Scripto
Transcription
' J .
'· - / ::· ;-::'t
·.,.
O'
P t . . · -"
ZS
.L,.
OUTLINE
Neighborhood Programs:
A.
Some Questions
Social Framework
l.
r
E:::iergence of planning
·a. · In general, what conditions J.ed to the emergence of this
specific _neighborhood plan?
b.
Who wi-ote the proposal?
c. What is his (their) relation to the neighborhood?
I
d.
Were neighborhood people involved in th~ planning?
e. · I,f so, how were they involved?
f.
To what extent have planning concepts or methods been borroHed
from other proposa1sz ·
g.
What attempts have been made to adapt transplanted concepts
to the neighborhood?
I
h. What is the role of tbe outside advisor iri the neighborhood
planning?
-· .
i.
2.
What opposition has there been?
'·.
Social and political environment
a.
How is the nei ghborhood defined?
b.
Wnat criteria were used to determine the limits of the
neighborhood?
-- phys ical geography?
-- population to be served?
---
service pr oposed?
combination of above?
/
/
I
I
.··
c.
Has~ inventory been made?
Geographic
Historic.
• . . . . . .. . . -
• ... .
•
- ~ -
_••• • - .. ... , • • 1. , . . . . . ..
· -.- ·
\
�2
Demo~aphic (length of residence; population turnover;
cot:II;J.uting patterns for work, play, health; education; etc·. )
Ethnic
Health
?l..ental health
Economic · (individual fa.mizy income; places of employment:
Do dollars circulate in neighborhood or flow out, etc.)
Housing ·
Social (num.oers and tYJ;)es of organizations, churches,
neighborhood groups, etc.)
F.ducation (education of people, ntl!llber and tsJl)es of schools,
etc.)
Power structure (fon:al and informal)
. Values an.cl morale (e. g. suspicion; what ability does the ·
neighborhood have ,to cope with its proble:tS?)
..
Mobile ability
d.
_
To what e..~tent is the neiehborhood dependent upon outside resources for jobs; medical care, welfare, education, recreation,
inspiration?
3. What social services are now available to the neighborhood?
a.
What is the per capita ·dollar a.I:lount for social services?
b.
What is the ratio of social 'service · perso:r:i..."lel to the neighborhood population?
(
B.
Goal formation
.... i-
l.
Hierarchy of goals
a.
What are the overriding goals .and how are lesser goals subordinated to them?
b.
What criteria were used to establish priorities of goals?
c. · ·W'aa.t do the neighborhood people thi.Dk · their needs a.re?
.,
�~(J
..
I
·. f· .:
--::- - -·- -_,,
__--· ..,.,
I'
I
I
I
3
I-
I
d.
What are the n~~ds for:
Health
I .
F.ducation
Work, jobs, inco~e
.
.
"Skills-of-livi~"
Social cohesiveness
.Advocacy:
.I
2.
l .,
legal and constl!!ler
Have the neighborhood people been involved in establishing the
. goals?
3. Are the programs intended to ma.~e the people less dependent and
more able to cope, or are they merely hand-outs w~ich Will keep
the people dependent?
'
I-
4. Are long-range goals and purposes for the neighborhood specified?
5. How does this specific proposal fit into the long-rang objectives?
.. ,
6. Does it meet Federal criteria of desegregation?
C.
Decision-ma.~ing
l.
/
I
I
/
Institutional network
a.
Do neighborhood organizations already exist?
b.
Is there an identifiable central neighborhood authQrity ·
responsible f or this program?
c.
What is the relationship between this authority and the
existing service agencies -- Federal, state, local, public
and privete?
d.
Should this program be part of an already existing agency?
/
2.
Precess of decision-making
a.
What are the attitudes of the traditional agencies to this
progra:n?
b. ,Are. there ar.y institutional mechanisns for consulting other
___ .. _.... . .. age·n cies- and pressure groups ( traue unions, qhurches, business
·
organizations , poll ti cal pa.rties) ? What are the me·c hanisms?
·- .-
. ..
- -.
.: ···
·~--. -_.. -- ·- .. . . - - . - - .
·:. _ . ---
-·- - -
�
'· - / ::· ;-::'t
·.,.
O'
P t . . · -"
ZS
.L,.
OUTLINE
Neighborhood Programs:
A.
Some Questions
Social Framework
l.
r
E:::iergence of planning
·a. · In general, what conditions J.ed to the emergence of this
specific _neighborhood plan?
b.
Who wi-ote the proposal?
c. What is his (their) relation to the neighborhood?
I
d.
Were neighborhood people involved in th~ planning?
e. · I,f so, how were they involved?
f.
To what extent have planning concepts or methods been borroHed
from other proposa1sz ·
g.
What attempts have been made to adapt transplanted concepts
to the neighborhood?
I
h. What is the role of tbe outside advisor iri the neighborhood
planning?
-· .
i.
2.
What opposition has there been?
'·.
Social and political environment
a.
How is the nei ghborhood defined?
b.
Wnat criteria were used to determine the limits of the
neighborhood?
-- phys ical geography?
-- population to be served?
---
service pr oposed?
combination of above?
/
/
I
I
.··
c.
Has~ inventory been made?
Geographic
Historic.
• . . . . . .. . . -
• ... .
•
- ~ -
_••• • - .. ... , • • 1. , . . . . . ..
· -.- ·
\
�2
Demo~aphic (length of residence; population turnover;
cot:II;J.uting patterns for work, play, health; education; etc·. )
Ethnic
Health
?l..ental health
Economic · (individual fa.mizy income; places of employment:
Do dollars circulate in neighborhood or flow out, etc.)
Housing ·
Social (num.oers and tYJ;)es of organizations, churches,
neighborhood groups, etc.)
F.ducation (education of people, ntl!llber and tsJl)es of schools,
etc.)
Power structure (fon:al and informal)
. Values an.cl morale (e. g. suspicion; what ability does the ·
neighborhood have ,to cope with its proble:tS?)
..
Mobile ability
d.
_
To what e..~tent is the neiehborhood dependent upon outside resources for jobs; medical care, welfare, education, recreation,
inspiration?
3. What social services are now available to the neighborhood?
a.
What is the per capita ·dollar a.I:lount for social services?
b.
What is the ratio of social 'service · perso:r:i..."lel to the neighborhood population?
(
B.
Goal formation
.... i-
l.
Hierarchy of goals
a.
What are the overriding goals .and how are lesser goals subordinated to them?
b.
What criteria were used to establish priorities of goals?
c. · ·W'aa.t do the neighborhood people thi.Dk · their needs a.re?
.,
�~(J
..
I
·. f· .:
--::- - -·- -_,,
__--· ..,.,
I'
I
I
I
3
I-
I
d.
What are the n~~ds for:
Health
I .
F.ducation
Work, jobs, inco~e
.
.
"Skills-of-livi~"
Social cohesiveness
.Advocacy:
.I
2.
l .,
legal and constl!!ler
Have the neighborhood people been involved in establishing the
. goals?
3. Are the programs intended to ma.~e the people less dependent and
more able to cope, or are they merely hand-outs w~ich Will keep
the people dependent?
'
I-
4. Are long-range goals and purposes for the neighborhood specified?
5. How does this specific proposal fit into the long-rang objectives?
.. ,
6. Does it meet Federal criteria of desegregation?
C.
Decision-ma.~ing
l.
/
I
I
/
Institutional network
a.
Do neighborhood organizations already exist?
b.
Is there an identifiable central neighborhood authQrity ·
responsible f or this program?
c.
What is the relationship between this authority and the
existing service agencies -- Federal, state, local, public
and privete?
d.
Should this program be part of an already existing agency?
/
2.
Precess of decision-making
a.
What are the attitudes of the traditional agencies to this
progra:n?
b. ,Are. there ar.y institutional mechanisns for consulting other
___ .. _.... . .. age·n cies- and pressure groups ( traue unions, qhurches, business
·
organizations , poll ti cal pa.rties) ? What are the me·c hanisms?
·- .-
. ..
- -.
.: ···
·~--. -_.. -- ·- .. . . - - . - - .
·:. _ . ---
-·- - -
�