356 20 10383 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/33c7252b6d9f74c4444ad058d903f478.pdf 14e55c829a428422cb2398e2c2212d5d Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. PUBLIC SERVICE UNIT COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 72 Mr. Walter M. Mitchell Division Chairman �~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - , Mrs . Pa--ne , Secy - 261-6700 PUBLIC SERVICE UNTI - 70 Mr. R. G. Murphy - Unit Chairman Vrr . E. William Bohn - Vice Cha i r:nan ~ex Broad casting Corp. 1601 W. Peachtree St. N~W . 'el. 892-3l.i 56 Sears, Roebuck & Co . 3060 Feacr,tr~ e Re' . N. ';J . At l anta, Ga . 30305 Te l. 261- 6700 Ext. 321 .I Division - 71 Ci t· Governme nt Mr. E. C. Walker Retired,. Sears 978 Winall Down Rd. , NE AtlRnta, Ga. 30319 Division - 72 County Government Mr . Walter M. Mitchell Cha i rman Board of Fulton County Commissioners 165 Central Ave. S. W. Division - 73 Federal Government Col. Dea n Van Lydergraf Commanding Officer Atlanta Army Depot Forest Park, Ga 30050 Tel. 363-5201 Divi si on - 7L Hospitals Mr. Robert W. Biccum General Attorney Retail Crenit P . 0, Box Lo81 6100 Peachtree St ., N.W. rPe l: 237-2943 Tel. MT . R. L. Lancast er Tel: 875-8321 ') i.vision Chairman Division Chai rman - - - - ---- 572-2791 Co-Div Chai rman- 363-5621 Division Chairman Division - 75 Schools & College s Mr. Albert Griffin, Jr. Second Vice Pre sident Tllst Co. of Ga. M3.in Office, P. 0, Box 441E Division - 76 Socia l Agenc i es Mr . W. K. Mat tison Retired, Sears 210 West Pace's Ferry Rd. N. W., Atlanta , Ga. 30305 Tel. 588-7129 Tel: 237-273 5 Di vis ion Chairman Division Chairman _____________ Division Chai rman .,_ l Di v ision - 77 State Government Lester G. Madcl ox Governor Sta te Capitol Atlanta , Ga . 30303 Tel · 721- 1776 Wm . H. Burson , Direc~or State Farnil~' &. C;-,ilr: ren Service 118 Capi tol Square, Tel: 522-87 10 Divi sion Chairma.n EYt . 73 �lJNITED APPEAL, COMMUNITY CHEST - RED CROSS PUBLIC SERVICE UNIT - 70 2 Year Comparison 'I, of RE C AP - 70 %of Increase or (Decreas r:> ) Amount Given AverPer Capita age Gift 90 . 5 73,980 10.09 11.14 28. 8 6,566 86.5 83,541 11.00 12.72 12.9 4,985 2, 360 47.3 19,369 3.88 8 .20 ( 13 .4) 1969 4,985 2,411 48.3 26,254 5.26 10 .88 35.5 1968 29,032 27,973 96.3 366,147 7.03 10 . 94 9.6 1969 28, 799 27, 313 94.8 338, 221 11.74 12·;38 10.4 1968 8,666 4,750 54. 8 26,020 3.00 5.47 h3 .7 1969 8,956 4, 96!r 55.4 30,474 3. 40 6 .13 17.1 1968 25 , 995 16,723 64.3 226, 566 8.71 13. 54 22 .6 1969 26,450 16,177 61.1 234,464 8.86 14.h9 3.4 1968 3,276 2,756 84.1 68,358 20.86 24.80 15.3 1969 3,898 2,749 70. 5 76,082 19.51 ':!7.67 11.2 1968 6,014 3,081 51.2 20, 879 3.47 6.77 8.1 1969 6,739 4,203 62.3 ':!7,329 4.05 6.74 30.8 1968 85,299 64,562 75.0 741,319 8.69 11.48 14.8 1969 87,715 64,383 73.4 816,365 9.30 12.67 10.1 Year No. of Prospects No. of Gifts 1968 7,331 6,639 1969 7,591 1968 Camp. Participation CITY GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 71 COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 72 FEDERAL GOVERNMENr DIVISION - 73 HOSPITAL DIVISION - 74 SCHOOLS & COLLEGES DIVISION - 75 SOCIAL AGENCIES DIVISION - 76 STATE GOVERNMENT DIVISION - TI TOI'AL �UNITED APPEAL, COMMUNITY CHEST - RED CROSS COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 72 2 Year Comparison COUNTY GOVERNMENT - 72 Department No. & Chai:nnan 7212111 Fulton Count y (All Depts) Fulton Co . Court House, 165 Central Ave . , S . W. Camp. Year 1968 1969 1 0 7232111 1968 DeKalb County (All Depts) DeKalb Co . Admn Bldg., Decatur, Ga. 1969 1 0 7242111 1968 Cobb Count y (All Dept s ) Cobb Co . Court House, Mari etta, Ga. 1969 1970 7252111 1968 Clayton County (All Dept s ) Court House J onesbor o, Georgia 1969 1970 7262111 1968 Gwinnett County (All Depts. ) Court House Lawrenceville, Georgia 1969 1970 1968 No. of Prospects 1, 600 No. of Gifts 996 1, of Participation 62.2 Amount Given Per Capita 13,556 8 . 47 Aver.age Gi ft 13 .61 1, of Increas e or {Decrease} 9.2 (!?, 'J '(J()) 1, 600 950 59.3 15, 054 9 .40 15.81 11.0 2,200 975 44 . 3 5, 000 2 . 27 5. 12 ( 16.6) 2, 200 1, 025 44 .3 10,000 4. 54 10 . 25 100 . 0 600 325 54 .1 . 53 . 98 600 316 52 .6 1.16 2. 21 119.4 325 36 11.0 1. 20 10 .83 82 .2 325 75 11. 0 390 (r-tj v) 420 1. 29 11. 05 7. 6 260 28 10 .7 104 .40 3.71 260 45 9. 6 80 .30 3 . 20 (23 .() ) (/~; {I-(/()) v3:k) 700 (~~) (71. 7) 4, 985 2, 3~ 47.3 19, 369 3. 88 8 .20 ( 13. 4) 4, 985 2,411 48 .3 26, 254 5.26 10.88 35 . 5 T<JrAL 1969 1970 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document PUBLIC SERVICE UNIT COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 72 Mr. Walter M. Mitchell Division Chairman tox Broadcasting Corp. 1601 We Peachtree St. NuW. el. 892-3456 PUBLIC SERVICE UNIT - 70 Mr. R. G. Murphy Mr. E. William Bohn - Vice Chairman - Unit Chairman Mrs. Payne, Secy. sroun sears, Roebuck & Co. 3060 Peachtree Re. N. W. Atlanta, Ga. 30305 Tel. 261-€700 Ext. Manager 221 Division - 71 City Government Retired, Sears 978 Winall Down Atlanta, Ga. Peal: 237-2943 Mr. BE. C. Walker 30319 Yivision Chairman Chairman Rd., NE Tel. Division - 72 County Government Mr. Walter M. Mitchell Board of Fulton County Commissioners 165 Central Ave. S. W. 572-2791 Division Chairman Division - 73 Federal Government Col. Dean Van Lydergraf Commanding Officer Atlanta Army Depot Forest Park, Ga 30050 Tel. 363-5201 Mr. R. L. Lancaster Co-Div Chairman- 363-5621 Division Chairman Division - 7! i Hospitals Mr. Robert W. Biccum General Attorney Retail Crecit P. 0. Box L081 6100 Peachtree St., N.W. Tel: 875-8321 Division Chairman nn | ee L Division - 75 Schools & Colleges Mr. Albert Griffin, Jr. Second Vice President Trust Co. of Ga. Main Office, P.O. Box 4414 Tel. 588-7129 Division Chairman Division - 76 Social Agencies Mr. W. K. Mattison Retired, Sears 210 West Pace's Ferry Rd. N. W., Atlanta, Ga. 30305 Tel: 237-2735 Division Chairman Governor State Capitol Atlanta, Ga. Tel: 721-1776 Division - 77 State Government Lester G. Maddox Wm. H. Burson, State Famil: & Crileren 118 Capitol. Square, Diviston Chairman 30303 Director Service Tet. - 261-6700 Tel: 522-8710 i3 UNITED APPEAL, COMMUNITY CHEST - RED CROSS PUBLIC SERVICE UNIT - 70 2 Year Comparison % of RECAP - 70 Camp. No. of No. of % of Amount Per Aver- Increase Year Pros- Gifts Partici- Given Capita age or pects pation Gift (Decrease) 1968 7,331 6,639 90.5 73, 980 10.09 11.14 28.8 CITY GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 71 1969 7,591 6,566 86.5 83, 541 11.00 12.72 12.9 1968 4,985 2, 360 47.3 19, 369 3.88 8.20 (13.4) COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 72 1969 = 4,985 2, 411 48.3 26,254 5.26 10.88 35.5 1968 29,032 27,973 96.3 306, 147 7.03 10.94 9.6 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 73 1969 28,799 27,313 9h .8 338,221 11.74 12.38 10.4 1968 8,666 4,750 54.8 26 , 020 3.00 5.47 13.7 HOSPITAL DIVISION - 74 1969 8,956 = 44, 96 55.4 30,474 3.40 6.13 17.1 1968 25,995 16,723 64.3 226,566 8.71 13.54 22.6 SCHOOLS & COLLEGES DIVISION - 75 1969 26,450 16,177 61.1 234,464 8.86 1h.lgo 3.4 1968 3,276 2,756 BL.1 68,358 20.86 25.80 15.3 SOCIAL AGENCIES DIVISION - 76 1969 3,898 2,749 70.5 76,082 19.51 27.67 11.2 1968 6,014 3,081 51.2 20,879 3.47 6.77 8.1 STATE GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 77 1969 6,739 4,203 62.3 27 , 329 4.05 6.74 30.8 1968 85,299 64,562 75.0 741, 319 8.69 11.48 14.8 TOTAL 1969 87,715 64,383 73-4 816, 365 9.30 12.67 10,2 UNITED APPEAL, COMMUNITY CHEST - RED CROSS COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 72 2 Year Comparison COUNTY GOVERNMENT - 72 % of Camp. No. of No. of % of Amount Per Aver- Increas- Department No. & Chairman Year Pros- Gifts Partici- Given Capita age or pects pation Gift (Decrease) 7212111 1968 1,600 996 62.2 13,556 8.47 13.61 9.2 Fulton County (All Depts) Fulton Co. VF 500) Court House, 165 Central Ave., S. W. 1969 1,600 950 59.3 15,054 9.40 15.81 11.0 1970 7232111 1968 2,200 975 Lh 3 5,000 2.27 5.12 (16.6) DeKalb County (All Depts) DeKalb Co. Admn (2; vet) Bldg., Decatur, Ga. 1969 2,200 1,025 Lh .3 10,000 45k 10.25 100.0 1970 72k2111 1968 600 325 Sk.1 319 53 .98 (71-7) Cobb County (All Depts) Cobb Co. Court (ov) House, Marietta, Ga. 1969 600 316 52.6 700 1.16 2.21 119.4 1970 7252111 1968 325 36 11.0 390 1.20 10.83 82.2 Clayton County (All Depts) Court House (730) Jonesboro, Georgia ets 325 75 11.0 420 1.29 11.05 7.6 7262111 1968 260 28 10.7 104 40 3.71 ~ Gwinnett County (All Depts.) Court House (3 0) Lawrenceville, Georgia 1969 260 hs 9.6 80 -30 3.20 (23.0) 1970 1968 4,985 2,360 47.3 19, 369 3.88 8.20 (13.4) TOTAL 1969 4,985 2,411 48.3 26,254 5.26 10.88 35.5 1970  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 8, Folder 19, Document 1 Box 8 Box 8 Folder 19 Folder topic: Model Cities | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/5919e9393c0f5a13ca34ca38f0551e4b.pdf c8228538144b9a905d6f3fc2f8eb9ab3 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. PUBLIC SERVICE UNIT COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 72 Mr. Walter M. Mitchell Division Chairman �~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - , Mrs . Pa--ne , Secy - 261-6700 PUBLIC SERVICE UNTI - 70 Mr. R. G. Murphy - Unit Chairman Vrr . E. William Bohn - Vice Cha i r:nan ~ex Broad casting Corp. 1601 W. Peachtree St. N~W . 'el. 892-3l.i 56 Sears, Roebuck & Co . 3060 Feacr,tr~ e Re' . N. ';J . At l anta, Ga . 30305 Te l. 261- 6700 Ext. 321 .I Division - 71 Ci t· Governme nt Mr. E. C. Walker Retired,. Sears 978 Winall Down Rd. , NE AtlRnta, Ga. 30319 Division - 72 County Government Mr . Walter M. Mitchell Cha i rman Board of Fulton County Commissioners 165 Central Ave. S. W. Division - 73 Federal Government Col. Dea n Van Lydergraf Commanding Officer Atlanta Army Depot Forest Park, Ga 30050 Tel. 363-5201 Divi si on - 7L Hospitals Mr. Robert W. Biccum General Attorney Retail Crenit P . 0, Box Lo81 6100 Peachtree St ., N.W. rPe l: 237-2943 Tel. MT . R. L. Lancast er Tel: 875-8321 ') i.vision Chairman Division Chai rman - - - - ---- 572-2791 Co-Div Chai rman- 363-5621 Division Chairman Division - 75 Schools & College s Mr. Albert Griffin, Jr. Second Vice Pre sident Tllst Co. of Ga. M3.in Office, P. 0, Box 441E Division - 76 Socia l Agenc i es Mr . W. K. Mat tison Retired, Sears 210 West Pace's Ferry Rd. N. W., Atlanta , Ga. 30305 Tel. 588-7129 Tel: 237-273 5 Di vis ion Chairman Division Chairman _____________ Division Chai rman .,_ l Di v ision - 77 State Government Lester G. Madcl ox Governor Sta te Capitol Atlanta , Ga . 30303 Tel · 721- 1776 Wm . H. Burson , Direc~or State Farnil~' &. C;-,ilr: ren Service 118 Capi tol Square, Tel: 522-87 10 Divi sion Chairma.n EYt . 73 �lJNITED APPEAL, COMMUNITY CHEST - RED CROSS PUBLIC SERVICE UNIT - 70 2 Year Comparison 'I, of RE C AP - 70 %of Increase or (Decreas r:> ) Amount Given AverPer Capita age Gift 90 . 5 73,980 10.09 11.14 28. 8 6,566 86.5 83,541 11.00 12.72 12.9 4,985 2, 360 47.3 19,369 3.88 8 .20 ( 13 .4) 1969 4,985 2,411 48.3 26,254 5.26 10 .88 35.5 1968 29,032 27,973 96.3 366,147 7.03 10 . 94 9.6 1969 28, 799 27, 313 94.8 338, 221 11.74 12·;38 10.4 1968 8,666 4,750 54. 8 26,020 3.00 5.47 h3 .7 1969 8,956 4, 96!r 55.4 30,474 3. 40 6 .13 17.1 1968 25 , 995 16,723 64.3 226, 566 8.71 13. 54 22 .6 1969 26,450 16,177 61.1 234,464 8.86 14.h9 3.4 1968 3,276 2,756 84.1 68,358 20.86 24.80 15.3 1969 3,898 2,749 70. 5 76,082 19.51 ':!7.67 11.2 1968 6,014 3,081 51.2 20, 879 3.47 6.77 8.1 1969 6,739 4,203 62.3 ':!7,329 4.05 6.74 30.8 1968 85,299 64,562 75.0 741,319 8.69 11.48 14.8 1969 87,715 64,383 73.4 816,365 9.30 12.67 10.1 Year No. of Prospects No. of Gifts 1968 7,331 6,639 1969 7,591 1968 Camp. Participation CITY GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 71 COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 72 FEDERAL GOVERNMENr DIVISION - 73 HOSPITAL DIVISION - 74 SCHOOLS & COLLEGES DIVISION - 75 SOCIAL AGENCIES DIVISION - 76 STATE GOVERNMENT DIVISION - TI TOI'AL �UNITED APPEAL, COMMUNITY CHEST - RED CROSS COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 72 2 Year Comparison COUNTY GOVERNMENT - 72 Department No. & Chai:nnan 7212111 Fulton Count y (All Depts) Fulton Co . Court House, 165 Central Ave . , S . W. Camp. Year 1968 1969 1 0 7232111 1968 DeKalb County (All Depts) DeKalb Co . Admn Bldg., Decatur, Ga. 1969 1 0 7242111 1968 Cobb Count y (All Dept s ) Cobb Co . Court House, Mari etta, Ga. 1969 1970 7252111 1968 Clayton County (All Dept s ) Court House J onesbor o, Georgia 1969 1970 7262111 1968 Gwinnett County (All Depts. ) Court House Lawrenceville, Georgia 1969 1970 1968 No. of Prospects 1, 600 No. of Gifts 996 1, of Participation 62.2 Amount Given Per Capita 13,556 8 . 47 Aver.age Gi ft 13 .61 1, of Increas e or {Decrease} 9.2 (!?, 'J '(J()) 1, 600 950 59.3 15, 054 9 .40 15.81 11.0 2,200 975 44 . 3 5, 000 2 . 27 5. 12 ( 16.6) 2, 200 1, 025 44 .3 10,000 4. 54 10 . 25 100 . 0 600 325 54 .1 . 53 . 98 600 316 52 .6 1.16 2. 21 119.4 325 36 11.0 1. 20 10 .83 82 .2 325 75 11. 0 390 (r-tj v) 420 1. 29 11. 05 7. 6 260 28 10 .7 104 .40 3.71 260 45 9. 6 80 .30 3 . 20 (23 .() ) (/~; {I-(/()) v3:k) 700 (~~) (71. 7) 4, 985 2, 3~ 47.3 19, 369 3. 88 8 .20 ( 13. 4) 4, 985 2,411 48 .3 26, 254 5.26 10.88 35 . 5 T<JrAL 1969 1970 �UNITED APPEAL , COMMUNITY CHEST - RED CROSS 6 Y.RZ\R COMPARI SON COUNTY GOVERNMENT - 72 Camp . Year No . o f Pro spects No . o f Gift s 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 , 1969 1 5 34 1 535 1800 1800 1600 1 600 1235 1535 1648 902 996 950 196 4 196 5 1966 196 7 1 968 1 96 9 1 75 0 1 750 1 000 1400 22 00 2 200 1964 1 965 1966 1 9 67 1968 1969 1 964 1965 1966 1967 1968 196 9 % of Participation Amoun t Given Per Capita 80 .5 99 . 9 91 . 6 50 .1 6 2. 2 59 . 3 9 ,402 1 1, 291 1 3 , 665 14, 94 2 1 3 , 556 15 , 05 4 6 . 13 7. 3 5 7 . 59 8 . 30 8 .47 9 .40 800 1025 1000 97 5 97 5 + 1025 45. 7 58 . 5 100 . 0 69.4 44. 3 44. 3 6,14 0 8 , 200 4, 200 6 , 0 00 5, 000 1 0 , 000 3 . 51 4. 68 4. 20 4.27 2. 2 7 4.54 230 230 391 3 91 600 6 00 67 11 216 325 325 + 31 6 29.1 4. 8 55 . 2 8 3. 0 54.1 52 .6 856 215 1,246 1 , 128 319 700 3 . 72 .71 3 . 18 2. 88 .53 1.16 162 162 232 232 325 325 37 21 11 30 36 75 22 . 8 13. 0 4.7 12.9 11. 0 11. O 291 164 121 214 390 4 20 1. 80 1. 0 1 .52 . 92 13 0 90 68 52 25 28 45 69.2 52.3 32 . 5 32.5 10.7 9. 6 F UL'IDN COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY COBB COUNTY CLAY'ION COUNTY 1.;w 1. 29 rui;l;NNETI . CO!,!t!l'X 1964 1965 1 966 1967 1 968 196 9 130 160 160 26 0 260 593 302 104 104 80 4. 56 3 . 18 1.88 . 65 .40 .3 0 17,281 20,234 19,484 22,389 19,369 26,254 4.44 5.31 5.,44 5.61 3 088 5 . 26 414 'IDTALS 1964 1965 1966 1 967 1 968 1969 3894 3806 3583 3987 4985 4985 2229 2659 2927 2 257 2360+ 236 6 57.2 69.9 81.6 56 .6 47o3 4 7.4 �UNITED APPtAL, COliMUNITY CHiST - RED CROSS COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION (Date) DIVISION CHAIRl1AN 1 S REPORT ON SECTION CHAIRMEN ENLISTED: The following have accepted appointment as Section Chairmen in this. Division in this year's Campaign. They have been personally interviewed and have agreed to follow through on the various steps necessary to complete the organization •. Section Chairmen B:us. Address Telephone Zip Code Name Section Number Name Section Number Name Section Number Name Section Number Name Section Number NarrB Section Number Nan@ Section Number Name Section Number This report is made by Chairman_________________lli.v.#_ _ _ _ _ __ PLEASE FILL I N AND RETURN TO P. O. BOX 1038, ATLANTA, GEORGIA KEEP DUPLICATE COPY FOR YOUR RECORDS 30301 �UNITED APPML, COMMUNITY CHiST - RED CROSS COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION (Date) DIVISION CHAIR11AN 1 S REPORT ON SECTION CHAIRMEN ENLISTED: The following have accepted appointment as Section Chairmen in this Division in this year's Campaign. They have been personally interviewed and have agreed to follow through on the various steps necessary to complete the organization •. Section Chairmen Bµs. Address Telephone Zip Code Name Section Number Name Section Number Name Section Number Name ~ Sect ion Number Name Section Number NaITB Section Number NaITB Section Number Name Sec ti on Number This report is made by Chairman_________________Div.#_ _ _ _ _ __ PLEASE FILL IN AND RETURN TOP. O. BOX 1038, ATLANTA, GEORGIA KEEP DUPLICATE COPY FOR YOUR RECORDS 30301 �S pt mb r 18. 1969 MEMOR NDUM r . Johnny J hn o To. Fro D S 1bj ct: A· mini ·tr tiv Pl'oo C'ty. E . S e t ,. Jr. u.r �• 'I �.1em..o t J ohnny Johnsca P gc 'l'\"o Sept m.b r 18. 1969 inclttd blbhin th.e :,.O 1 Cltie org nlzation unrl r the dmini trati upe ision of the Stall of the yor and B o :i- 0£ l rmon in p , ctic ~ 11 technic y . T ill occ rily inv lv me cho.n e in your d y to d y op r tio s f l' s your l'-el tion hip ith th s rvice p tme of the City. ln dditio~ it ill involv gl'e ter p rticip tion of the ayor•a Offic: in th pl n1n· .. operation of th od 1 Cities Progr • lll'e Pr to ~ t ,,you. I c: ve du.ti e r.ned v b d n op o:rtunlty to r o that c n proc d D Jr:j le oo _tact m for • �September 19, 1969 Mr. P . A. Wood 762 Boulevard,. S. E. Atlanta, Georgia 30312 Dear Mr. Wood: This ill cknowledge receipt of the copy of your letter addressed to the Honorable Lester G. M ddox, Governor of Georgia, in reg rd to the xit signs on 1-20. ~ I a:m sendin your 1 tter to the Model Cities Office, so th t your tat ment concerning code violations may receive consideration. Sine rely yours, Ivan Allen, Jr. M yor lAJr:lp CC: Mod 1 Citi s Director �September 3, 1969 r. att.h e S. Faerber La Office 112 Bell vue Avenue Ne ort,, Rhode 1 land 02840 Dear r. F erber : Thank you tor your letter of Au £ sibllity of a 10 cant huttle bu Atlanta. od l Citiea ar a. t 30, co cerning t- e ervice for the I am for rding a co y of your lett r to Mr. Johnny Johnaon,. Direc:tor of our Model Citie · program, o t your pl-an may b giv n co11 ider tion. Si Iv: U.Jr:lrd CC: r. Jo y .Johaaon . rely yours, All yor , Jr. �LAW OFFICES MATrHEW J. FAERBER /\ J 112 B ELLEVUE A VENUE NEWPORT, RHODE ISi-AND 02840 (P, O, BOX 175) 847- 0034 Mayor Ivan Allen Jr. City Hall Atlanta 0 Ga. 847- 1112 August 30 , 1969 RE: Model Cities Program Dear Mayor Allen: I am taking the liberty of writing to you at the suggestion of Gove rnor Bllis Arnall to whom I wrote recerltly in connection with an item appearing in "Fleet Owner , July , 1969" concerning the l0cent shuttle bus service for the model cities area . I am enclosing an e x tra copy of this letter for Mr. Johnny Johnson , whom I under stand is Director of Atlanta ' s Model Citie s progr am and I am also sendi ng a copy to Governor Ar nall . In my Washington office I have the good fortune to represent the City of San Juan, where last November they elected a very ener getic y oung l awye r, Car los Romer o Barcelo a s Mayor . He is 36 year s o f a g e, a g ra duate o f Yale Univer sit y i n 1953 , and o f the University of Puer to Ri c o Law School 1956 . He inherited a very difficult situation with r espect to his Model Cities pr ogr am which had been commenced under the precee ding administration wh ich had f a i l ed to take car e of many e ssen t i al i tems . The p r o gr am was in jepoar dy when Mayor Romer o t ook over but a s of several weeks ag o , h e was a s sur ed by f o r mer Mayor Hyde o f Fr esno , now a t HUD , t h a t the p r o gr am i s go i ng thr o ugh s atisfac tori ly . Coincidental ly , t h e Federal I mple men t a t i o n Gr a n t f o r Sa n Juan is $7 . 1 mil lion wh e r eas I n o tic e At l ant a's Mode l Ci t ies Progr a m is b udg e ted a t $7 . 2 mi l l i on . The principal reason for th is i nq uir y to you , a nd t hrough you t o Dir ector Johnny Johnson , i s that San Juan has a ver y difficult t ran spor t a tion pr oblem and the plan wor ked o ut i n your city with re s pect t o 1 0 c ent shuttle b us s ervic e thr oughout the 3, 000 a cre model cities area might well b e a Godsend. It is interesting to me to note that a mutual friend of Governor Arnall and mine, the late Wa l lace Ro Bu rke, fo rmer l y of the Interstate Commerce Commi s sion 6 sugge sted a n almost identical plan to Mayor Romero in my prese?ce in San Juan on 31 March,19690 �-2- Mayor Ivan Allan , Jr. August 30 r 1969 If it is not an imposition, and if Mr o Johnson 1 could send me data which would help me advise Mayor Romero along these lines 1 I would be indebted. Very truly yours , '>t~ Faertfr Hon. Ellis Arnall Fulton Federal Building Atlanta , Ga. 30303 CoC o _ �LAW OFFICES MATTHEW J. FAERBER 112 BELLEVUE AVENUE NEWPORT, RHODE ISLAND O2B4O (P. O . BOX 175) B47-OO34 B47-1112 September 9, 1969 Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr. Mayor , City of Atlanta Atlan t a , Georgia 30303 Dear Sir: May I acknowledge your letter of September 3 , 1969 for Judge Faerber who is in Puerto Rico on business until Thursday of this we e k. Your letter will have his attention and appreciation at that time. c~yrr:u:s~-w~ fw Secre t a ry to Matthew J. Fae rber �' I 123 Vanira Avenue, Southeast Atlanta, Georgia 30315 September 2, 1969 Dear Comrades: It is with deep regret that the program that was conceived for t he purpose of motivating more resident participation and training has taken on the pattern of not more, but a fewer number of residents taking part in the program. The possibilities of helping the cit i zens of the Model Cities connnunity grow in stature has been placed behind a painted wall by a few of the residents that were elected to serve without bias for the betterment of a total corrnnunity with funds funneled into the target area for that purpose. As of now the residents ha ve the chance to do for themselves a job that was long needed - to be able to think of expa ns ion areas and the correct way t o expand. It is within this structure I pray the Mode l Cities Mass Convention, Incorporated will operate in the future. The juvenile acts that are taking place in the operation of t he Board of Directors at this time can only l e ad to a state of dictatorship that .can impede the growth of any worthwhile organization. At t he t ime of t he e l ect ion f or offi cers of t he Mode l Cit i es Mass Convention , I ncorporat ed, I was e lected treasurer, but fi nd I cannot , nor ,·rill ~ot , a ssume the responsibility of t hat office U...'1der the conditions listed herein: 1. When advanced funds wer e received fr om EOA to t ake care of t he community workers payroll, t he Chairman of the Boar d , Deac on Pet ers , inst ructe d the secretary t o make the ba nk deposit, secure checks ~nd pa y off the workers. 2. The aforeme ntione d assi gnment was l ater delegated t o Mr . J ohn Hood ; a Board Member. 3. Mr. Hood st ate d that he was requeste d , but refused to pay from these monies the salary of a secretary that is not officially on t he payroll of Mode l Citi es Mass .Convention, Incorporated. �September 2, 1969 Page 2 All of these transactions took· place without the benefit of vouchers, drafts, etc., that would enable the treasurer to keep accurate records. Under the existing conditions the need for· a treasurer is nil. Therefore, before more valuable time is lost by the Board, certain guidelines should be studies and become a workable pattern. I recognize the fact that no individual or group can exist without making errors, and the experiences gained by such means should prove of value for future operations . I hold no animosity toward anyone in the organization and shall continue my support for the total program, but with the slovenly methods used to date, I have no alternative other than tender my resignation as treasurer effective innnediately. Respect lly, '--/ _,,. _ ) '£-eff/,..,,:?) CC: cu.@.,-;s Deacon Lewi s Peters , Chairman , Board of Directors Mr. Johnny Johnson, Direct or, Model Cities · Mr. William W. Allis on, Executive Administrator, EOA Mayor Ivan Allen �~--.:· . . -..>" - ,, ~ p ~ •• c ::..:;,?:i:CE O F MODEL CITIES PROGR .t\.M 67 2 c~. ::,:to: Av~r:ue, S.W. A tt:.,1 t a, G z . 30 3 15 (, j q 577 - 5200 v s.n Alle n J-..· ., M ayor J. c . Johnson, Direct o r .Mr s. Ma : : - t ha L . We ems 1039 Ridge Avenue , S . W. 3 031 5 At lant a , Ge o rgia Dear l.lr s . Weem s : Your l etter o f Sept embe~ 2 , 1 ~ 09 i n whicn y ou t e n dered y our res i g natio n as Tre a s u r e r of M:ode l Ci t i es ~a s s Co nvention , Inc., ha s cau sed s e rio u s con c ern o n o y p a:ct abo~t the future o f t h e o rgan i z a tion . The questions y ou r a ised i :-i your l e tte:c , o.s to proc edur e and autho ri ty , were v alid a nd sh ould c a use t he Bo a rd to c arefully r e - exami n e i ts existing method o ~ oper ation . My Pro g ram Management s t a f f ,,:i l l b e happy to a s s ist y o u a n d t he Ci t iz e n s ' Boar d i n est ablish i n g p ro per p ro c e dure s f or o per at i on wh ich will be i n f ul l corr.pli a.n c e with t he requ i rements o f the City o f At l a n t a a nd t h e De p art1 e n t o f Ho u sing a n d Urba n De ve l o p ment . I a m a s ki n g .Mr . Sam Ru s s e ll t o p rovide y ou a nd al l me mbers o f the Citizen s ' Bo a r d with copi e s o f "F i s cal and Administ r a t i ve Proc edur e s for Operati ng Agenc ie s o f Mode l Cities Pro j e cts ." These p roc edure s will be a par t of your co n t rac t v,i t h t he Ci ty when i t i s e xecuted in t h e n e ar fu tur e . Be c a use I f e e l that b-1is g-roup n eed3 the v a l u a ble e x perienc e y ou o ffe r it , I h o p e that y ou will re - consider y our t e nde r of r e signa tio n , and t hat the y wi ll n ot s ee fit to ac c ept your requ est. Sin c e r ely , / ~ J, J·ohnny c ·. Di rector· JCJ:vlc cc : / . ,y " . . , ·~~ ·. -;_; ~.i:.y Johnson ' "" Mayo r I v a n All en , J-r . .Mr . Wi lli a m Al lison, Exe cuti v e Adm i n i strator , EOA B:>a r d Members o f r,.,:ode l Ci ties Ma ss Co n v entio n , Inc. �MEMBERS NON - PROFIT DEVELOPERS TRUSTEES 940 McDANIEL STREET, S. W. CHAIRMAN OF BOARD ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30310 Joe Stallings VICE-CHAIRMAN TELEPHONE: 523-5166-7 Rev. J. L. Marshall SECRETARY CLARK MARTIN AVERY SHIELDS NATHANIEL PROTHRO SAMUEL COCHRAN REV. AUSTIN FORD PRINCE MARTIN. SR . HAROLD OWENS CLAUDE BARNES REV. JOEL W. MARSHALL TECHNICAL ADVISORS August 28,1969 TREASURER C. G . EZZARD C. BRON CLEVELAND PAUL MULDAWER ELIZA PASCHAL Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. City Hall Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Mayor Allen: As Chairman of the Board, I would like to express my appreciation for your vote of confidence in the Special Executive Committee Meeting for the contract with Model Neighborhood, Incorporated. I want to assure you that all of the Board members will work hard to make this project a success. we are seeking to have our project to be one of the things Atlanta can be proud of and one of the things that you can point to in the future with pride. we greatly appreciate working with the threeman committee that you appointed. The Board have e x pressed a desire to develop a continuing relationship with this committee. We would appreciate you using your influence to help us develop this relationship . Thank you very much for your concern and cooperation . Sincerely your..,s , J~/eab �EDWIN L. STERNE LE ST E R H. PERSELLS CHAIRMAN G E OR GE s. r:xccUT I V C 0 1RF.: CT O R I'd.::> S CCR E TARY CARL TON GARRETT CRAFT 0 1rn: c T OR er FtNANCC VICE CIIAIRMA~I C, IL 8E RT H. 80GC.S l' t11 r c:1· o n at,· II CIU~ INC HOWA R D O P E NSHAW J. B. S L AYTON DIR E C TOR OF R ED E VE L O PME N T FP.ANK G. ETHERIDGE GEORGE R. SANDER T E C HNI CAL D I RE C TOR JACK F . GLENN 82 4 HVRT DUILOINC ATLA NTA . GEORGIA 3 03 03 JA C KS ON 3 - 50 74 A gust 25., 1969 Mro ,Johnny Joh.nson Director of Model Cities Program. 673 Capitol Aven e So Wo A"i:.lant~., Georgia 30315 De ar Joh..nny: Th is is to confirm t he proced •res agreed. upon in :my office on August 29., 1969 wit,h respect, to exped:l"l;in.g hous ing c onstruction in the Model Cities NDP area s: l o Parcel C-4 ,_,. Mro Stan Ay r 1 s s ne plan prov iding f or for ty (40) townhouse n its approve do Meeting to be set up with Urban East and Mro Wri ght to r eview pla..n. submitt al of appli ca t i on to FHA s election of non.,,,profit s pons ors ., e t c,, YJro Openshaw to procee d with FHA on establishing pri ce of land~ pr eparing d is position doc uments applying to City for c ommunity unit plano 20 Temporary ho sing site T, 21 (G orgi a Aven ue and Cori_,_"lalJ..y Street) .,. Mr ., Joe S.m.ith., Archit ect r al Consulta.11.t to :,he Housing Author i ty., proposed 16 .mobile ho.mes on t his 2o5 a cre siteo ~ousing Authority to study possibility of .mor e reloc atable units., exped i te constr uct i on o Mro Collier Gl adi n to pr par a a r Gsol1::1tion per.m.itting use of reloca.,, table housing units in t he Model Ci t ies areao 3:, A revie~-.r of -t,he o~-~9r :::.:i:n..'3 -;-,(:_....,:pora:>'."".f hoL,sing sites in the 1969 NDP areas of Model c .:.ties i ::.dic2.-:~es :.O:ce. fcD _o'.·J::.::'.lg a ct i on : ao The :fousir.g A;::·0::.ori·':-:y ·t o :.)l"Ocee'.J. -,rit.h -;~~e a cqui s ition, relocai;,io::1. of f2..'l'.l.il ~. es R.na. e:;o1it ion of s tructures on T...5., T-12_, T...,~_6: T• '~-7 a..d c:(93c ::.te constructi on of relo ca·'"able hot·.s i :'.'.:?; ·-.:.~.:.-':,;; o:. . t::-:.ss e. s~:: esl) 2~," bo 0 The Housing Ac:tt:.-:.or:::'·.y -:·.o " ;:p:!..ore possfoi~.H-y o.f leas i ng '.i:'-10 for r eloc2:'"-2.Y_" :i.c·~s :>s w .c.1 pro~a 3~L i:::.·0h acqr:isiti on of s:t,e o �Mrs JolL'11...n.y JolLn.son Augus t 25., 1969 Page Noo 2 Co The rema1n:mg ten;porary hous i ng s1-c,es., T-18., T-9., T-11., and T.,.19 t o be t h.e l as t order of business as these involve sever e topogr aphi c or acqui s i t i on problems, the latter sit e .having been developed. by the Board of Education for a school pl aygr ound o 4o The Housing Authori ty to pr oceed Jith relocatable housing on the block north of Richar dson Street., betYeen Ira and Wi ndsor St reets in t he RawsonWashington Urban Redevel opment Areao 5o The block b ounded by Georgia Avenu e Capitol, Bass., ,a nd Crew Streets to be leased to Model Cities fo r housi ng cent er a...n.d par kingo The block bounded by Georgi a Aven ue., Cr ew., Bass , and Washington Streets t o be leas ed by the Hous ing Authority for stadium parkingo Land to be offered for s ale f or co.nun,ercial uses compatible wi t h stad i um as soon as documents have been prepar ed o _ ease advis e if you have a."1.y ques ti ons pertaini ng to t he above., Very tr' _y yours , Ho:-rc:.:'.' ~ Opens haw Director of Redevel opment HO:vw cc : Mr o J ames Wr ight Mr o Coll ier .Gladin Y.Lr o Thom.as Eskew �August 19, 1969 Mr. M yles G. Smith 25 Inman Circle, N. E. Attanta, Georgia 30309 . I Dear Mr. Smith: Since Mayor Allen i out of the city, I should like to acknowledge receipt of your lett r of Augu t 17th, expres ing your views about Model Neighborhood, Inc. and your endor ement of Mr . Edward Moody. M yor Allen h s already appointed a special committee to make recommendation about the structure of Model Neighborhood, Inc., and that l"Cport i due hortly. May I a sure you th t your letter will be brought to hi upon his return. attention Sincerely, Mrs. Ann Mos a Executive S er t.ary AM:lrd �2.r fa,.,,~;, C - ~/e- J ~4.~h / ac;7i'~ 47u.rr / 7/ //.,., <1 ,-q c ?' ~,1. c;7 ha-, ,4'&,'I 7 _.. .- /J/E' Jo 3 07 /?~? I ,.-,/' ~r' A'r/4,.. /4 ~tY /Ir/4 ~ /..c _, 0e-7 "; flu 47,,... ~ / ~ ~//e~ : ~ ~ ~ J ~r~ /4~ J ~ . ~~ /4~r' r ~ ~ / , r· ... f? ~ - d~ JI ~ z- ~ ,F ~ _,/4. 7 ~ - 143.215.248.55 /,,/,.,7 L ~ /~ ~ ·/ ~ ?ac " -~~ ~ /4 ---4 ~,~~ ~ ~~ ~ ___&~ / ~ ~r<- ~ - , , - < ' a r c - -., ~c< -<" -- . _.,ef ~~ �143.215.248.55 J ~ ~ r~~ .d47,,; / ~. r - f -; ? ; ~ __,- ~ J ~ ~// ~- ~~7ze ~ ~ ~ ~ y~ ~ ~/r~ ~ -~ ,,/4_. ~ - ~J _;_r ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ - ~ ~ ~ -I ~ - ~ / ~ ~ - ~ ~~-~ ......... ~ ~ z;,(';;j < F"'-<c.•:r/ ~ ~ ~~/ _ ~c-e . /4; 143.215.248.55 ~ ·?-r-r --? /4~ ~ ~ - I( -._ i ... y - ~ / L: /-r/_~ . =~ 7(- ~~ - • - 7? ~~/ ~ 7,/<-'••.t:e -C4t~ . �3 ~- ~ ~ -4 ~ ~< ~ ~ ~~ - 143.215.248.55 d. ~ ,_:_ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~J ,f°#Vl.L / ~ , ,.r~ ~ ~ ~ -9 / ~ -..cj- ~ / ~~ . .... rt - , _:._~ .£.-4:., ~ ' ~ ~ ~-~ ~ ~~ ~,~~ ~ 143.215.248.55 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ If' ~ 7 ~,,_,,- ~ /J ""'- A143.215.248.55 ~ ~~ ~ , .~ r--- ...c-.. ~ ~-~~ ­ ~,.7 _;;7%, . ~ - - / ~ ~- -r- - �143.215.248.55 /~ ~ ~ "" d' r - ~ ~ -d. ~ - , ~ ec),,,f- ,, ~~z-X--~ / ~ _, ~ /4 / d 143.215.248.55 ~ 143.215.248.55 15:39, 29 December 2017 (EST) ~ ~ . JD ,-Z /Ac . , , ~ ~ r/~ ~~.. - ~ ~ L... ~ z<- ~ - ~'7· 143.215.248.55%~~ ~ ~~ ~~r If _;tS"- ,r~ ~r ~ /. -wr- ~ /..' Crh~ /#7 d7 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A--ze _:._ ~ _L_H~ ~77 . ~/ J ~7 ��COST CONTROL STATEMENT AS OF : _ _.,...J~uwnw;ea.-3+10+c- l+--9~G~9----___;..---CITY OF :_-1-A-lrl.,.t""l+-iru-:1-Ft.;;ia,__,,,...G ...,e ...o ........ r"-lg....;.._.a.,___ _ _ _ __ MODEL CITIES. PROGRAM NUMBER: BUDG ET ESTlMATES Total Amt. Ptir Cum. Est :i.irk"l tc I. Lates t Approved Budget COST CATEGORY Program Administra tion Through Current Quarter COST INCURRED Total for Tota 1 Reported Cumulative ·Month Through Reorted Month $618,66 3 .00 2os,ooo.oo TR003N Intra-Neighbo11hood 'Bus System 14,009. 72 14, 009.72 ·14,009. 72 14,009.72 Subtotal ~GfR~AN~D~T~O~T~AJ~,--_j_-~d,i...ru:l~~L-+...J....!143.215.248.55 15:39, 29 December 2017 (EST)1~-~l~l~8Q.L..12~0~3~•.~5~4.!-.----i.1_1~8~,.2.0.3.54 • . Certified Correct Signatur e This cost includes those ex penses incurred ~uring the 90 day interim budget, _March-June 1969. Title F.UD-W-:,;h., O. C. ). Date �C I ,\ C {) ~ Farm <>pproverl 1',.di;;,• B.,, ,.a-., No . ~3 - Rl 16, N T ,~ ~ ,1 1; ~ 1 • \ ,, ,. •· ,\In ·. l. _ . :: •. \ Ci ty of l\ tlan ta , Geor,::; ia f FlNANClA.L C NPi YION ST Al' EMEH 'f MODEL CIT Y PLANl'ilMG GR.A.I~ r L68 Mitchell Stre et C . , S T .). T . 1 ' • 1£. C O C- E Jun e_ 3 0_,___ 1 96 9 , (H I ~ L_ At lanta, Georgi a 30 30 ,.... MF C 0t-JT l-1 A C: T 10 -- 001 P ROJECT OR P AOC ~ J\ M . ' 1.l MBE ~ NO . A$ EH Cash : $ 6, 6 79 . 62 Cash P etty C ash $ Total Cash 6 16 7 9 . 6 2 Accounts Rece ivable : -o- P l ann i ng Grant CDA Contribut ion - o- -0 -· Other T otal Accounts Receivable 306 , 90 8 . 00 3 1 3 ,5 87 . 62 C os t Co ntrol --- -- ---· -- -- -----~ TOTA!. ASli EH LIA.ll!I ILITI ES AHO CA PITAL ---·- -- C urrPn l L iabi liti f's - 0- Accounts Puyab!P Acc rue c! L iab ilities T otal C.:um·nt. Lia bilit ies 6, 6 79 . 6 2 Deferred Credits . -0 ·-0- unf,a tni•d Pla r111 in1; Grant u nearnr,d CD/l Contribution T ril<.1 l Oflie ff'd C r,'dirs -o- 6,679. 6 2 TOUL LIA BILI TIE :S Capital: 61 , 4 08 . 00 2 4 5 ,5 0 0 . 00 CDA C on tr i bu:ti on P !anrang Grant ~06,908. 00 Tota l Capi.tal 31 3, 587. 6 2 v ________,___________________ ~ - ' i EP Al~ TIJ! E t•• OF H 0 1,1S,l~! G A l~ :J !.>'HI "'- "'-' O E V F.: Ll1C>MEl'J "r il> MO OE I- S T A 1 EMEN T OF f' !NANC l .t L. C ON~H 101'1 n:naa.p Hm:>-~',1111h .. o,. C IT , t!-:$ c:. -- - -- PfH)c:;~.._M HU D-70 411 .. 6 ) �~ - -~~J.:.; - - ~ ~:-: ri _ .. : ~ : ~ -~-- --·.:__ -- - . · · ..•• .. · •. Y!i-;r ,,: r- uu 1 :. _ _ _ _ Prog~a.,,71 Di r ector ___ ____ . __ { "\ i.t!t>i Jul y 10.,___ 19§9 __ ·---·-··- ··---· ____ _ ( r:.:t t c ':-u tJtq 1. t: r t d) r i I .... _____ ______ ·----·- ···-~----- ---· ____... --- ---·-·--- ·-·· .... . , _ ..-... ... --..····--··- ------· ------ --- -- - ·---< �MIN UTE S - - ----- - MOD.EL NEIGHBORHOOD EXECU'rIVE BOARD Tuesday , J u ly 1 , 1969 10:00 a.m. The monthly mee ting o f the Mode l Neighborhood Executive Board w_as held on Tuesday , J u ly 1, 1 9 69 a t 10:00 a.m . in Committee Room #2, City Hall. 'rhe following membe r s wer e p r e sent: Mayor Ivan All e n, Jr . , Chairman Mrs. Mattie An s l ey · Mr. Claren ce Colema n Mr. Joh n Hood Alderman E. Gregory Gr i ggs Alderman G . Eve r ett Mil l ic an Mr. Walter Mi tche ll Deacon Lewi s Peters Mr . J. D. Newber ry Dr. c. Mi l e s Smith Mrs. Martha Weems Mr . Bill Wainwright Mr. Jo e Wh ite ly Absent : Mr . Sam Ca l dwell Other City o f fic i als, r epresentatives f rom n eighborho o d o r ganizat ionB, and tlle pr e ss were al s o present . The Chairman, .Mayor Ivan Allen, J.r . , called the meeting to order . He t hen e nt e rtained a motion for the ado p t ion of the June 10 Minutes. It was so moved a.nd unanimousl y appr o ved without correction. REPOR~r OF THE MASS CONVEN"rION STEERING COMMITTEE Deacon Peters distributed copies of the Minutes of the Model Cities Mass Convention which met on June 15 and he stated that he was very impressed with the participation of the residents since the program moved into imple:rnentation. Mr. Wainwright moved that the Minutes of the June 15 mef~tinq be a.ccepted by the Board. The motion was seconded and! unanimously approved . �2 REPORT FROM· S PECIAL :EMPLOYMENT COMMITTEE Iv.tr. Coleman read and distributed copie s o f t h e r e solut i on p r e pared by the Special Employment Committ e e. The re solut i on est ablish ed g u idelines fo r t h e Mode l Ci t i e s Progr am and contracting a gen c ies to fol l o w in the i r emp l oyme n t p r actices . The resolu tion s p e ll ed out a progr a m t h at · a ssur es Mod e l Cities jobs wi ll go to Mode l Neighborhood res i dent s. Mr. Mi ll ican sta ted t hat he f elt the req uirements l i sted i n the resol u tion wo uld tie t he hands of the c ont r ac ting agencies in fil·l in g posit i o ns. He specifically que stioned t he proposal that Model Ci tie s r e s ide nts b e give a base "re sid ent p r efe r ence" of 10 points or ten per cent and that all firms o r ag·e nc.ies contracting to d o proj e cts in t he Mo de l Cities area b e b ound by policies set by the Board. Mr . Millican s tated that he had prepared another resolution t hat was a l i ttle les s strict in its requirements and that he h a d confer r e d with the City Attorney on its Inerits. Mr . Coleman then moved that the Boar d adopt a nd appr o ve his resolution and r efer: i t to the City Attorney for lega l i n t erpretation . Mrs. Ansley seconde d t h e mot ion. Mr . Whitley brought out the fact that Mr. Millican had ·the righ t to read his resolution to the Board as a mi nor ity r e por t . Mr. Mi l l i can sa i d that h e preferred not to read his resolut i on a s a mino r ity r epo r t. Afte r further discussion o n whether t o a p prove the reso lut ion or t o j ust a c cept i t as i nforma tion, Mr. Coleman reword ed his moti on. He mo v ed t hat t he Board refer the reso l u tio n to the C ity Attorney f or a ruling ; i f i t is a legal document t hat it becomes a po licy o f t h e Boar d, if not , t hat i t be r eferr ed b ack to the Board. 'l'h e mot i on was s econded by Mr. Ho o d and approved by the Board. Mr. Cole man t h e n s ub mit t e d a r e s o l ut i on that called f or the c r e ation o f a new po s itio n on t he Mode l Ci t ie s Staf f of Resident Employment Opportunity Coord i nat or, whose r e spons i b i lity shall b e t o impleme n t the employment pol icies of the Board and assure compliance of the a genc i e s o r o r g anizatio ns contracted b y t h e program. Copies o f t h e reso l u t i on wer e distr i buted to al l Board members . Mr . Mill ican mo ved that t he resolutio n be refe rred to the Per son n el Comm i t tee for their revi ew . The motion was secon ded and approve d . Mr. Coleman a sked that the c omm i ttee report at the next meeting . REPORT FROM THE REVIEW COMMITTEE Co pies of the recommendations from the Review Committe-e.~ wer,e d istributed t o a l l Board members. Mrs~ Weems moved that the recommendations be a c cepted. ·r he motion wa s secon.de d . Mr. Hood a s k e d that a br i ef discription be given of a l l pl'.'ojects that were a p proved by the Committee. Mr. Johnson proce eded to give a discription of t he projects as they were l isted i:n the recomme 1ndation. A discussion was opene d by Mr. Whitl e y conce rning Project SS-049N ,, Project Expand, which gives Economic Opportunity Atlanta, Inc. $140,000 to set-up and staff a Neighborhood Service Center in G.rant Park and Adair Parle r.tr. Whitely stated that a majority of the �3 residents of Grant Park did not want an EOA Service Center in the area . Deacon Peters said that only a small segment of the r e sidents did not want the EOA Center and that the othe rs fel t that the re was a real need for the center . Mr.Newberr y , speak i ng for Ada ir Park., said that he feels that the p rojec t was needed by t he people and should not be deleted Mr. Whitley then moved that Project Expand be deleted from t he Program. The motion fa i l ed due to the lack of a second. Dr . Smit h then moved to a pprove the four projects listed to be carried out by EOA. The motion was seconded and approved by the Board. The four . projects are: SS-028N, Neighborhood Consumer Program ; SS-049N, Project Expand ; TR-OOlC , Specialized Passenger Van Service; EM-024N, Resident Emergency 1\s~'- istance Fund to Job Applicants. It was moved and seconded and unanimously approved that Proj e ct . SS-009C, Crisis Oriente d Counseling, be approved. Mr. Wairri:-rright moved that Project SS-033N, Multi-Day c a.re Services, be approved. Mr. Mitchell . seconded the motion. Mr. Coleman then asked for a report on the status of the Southside Day Ca re Association. Mr. Shimkus reported that the Model Cities Program was very much interested in relating to the Southside Day Care As sociation in a funding position, and that a proposal had been recei v e d from their staff which was being review for funding in next yea r' s program. Mr. Coleman asked if it were still possible to fund a part of the Southsid e fa cility this year. Mr. Shimkus answered y es . Mr. Coleman then asked that the Review Committee rev i e w the Southside proposal and report on it at the next meeting . A v o te was then taken on the mot ion t o appr ove the Multi-Day Care Services t o be implemented by the Senior Citizens Services of Metr opol itan Atlanta. It was unamiously approved . It was then moved and s econded and unanimously appr ove d that Pro ject SS-O llC , Homemaker Services; Project SS-026N ~ Legal Educat ion and Project SS- 27N Model Home Managemen:t, be app:x~oved . It was moved and seconded that the two projects t o be implemented by Model Neighborhood, Inc., be approved . Deacon Peters said that the Steering Committee met to discuss Model Neighborhood , Inc., and recommends that Mode l Neighborhood, Inc., not be appro ved t o r -e cei ve the $35,000 in Model Cities f unds. The Mayor then stated fo r the record that he does not think Mr. Moody is qua lified to car.ry out the projects. He said that he questioned the validity of Mr . Moody's ability to carry out the pro jects because of his past employment record with the cit y. For these reasons, the Mayor feels that he cannot endorse the pro j ect s' implementation by Model Neighborhood Inc. Dr. Smith sai.d that since Mr. Moody has obtained technical people to assist him, that he strongly endorses the projects. Alderman.Griggs said that he was reluctant to t rust the Board of Model Neighborhood, Inc. with that amount of money because of tht~ir in·abil ity to get together. M:': . Mitchel l said Ju~ was r.elllctant because of the Mayor 's statement and suggested that the Boai:.·d post.ponia: action on the projects until the next meeting. Dr. Smith asked foJC �4 a r oll c al l vote s o that the peop le will know how the Boar d feels. Further discu ssion followed ·w ith other Board meroJ)ers expressing their views . Mr. Hood then offered a subst: i.tu.b~ motion to the original mo tion tha t Model Neighborho od , Inc ., projects be t abled until the next regular meeting in or der to aive them time to reorgan.i.ze and restructure their progra.n, . Mrs. Weems seco nded the motio n. The motion carried with 8 voting for approval and 3 o pposing . .Mr. Wai. n.w:c ight stated that some one should g ive MNI d irection as to what the Board expects. Mr . Millican s uggested that MNI prepare a written s t atement showing what. they are go:i..nq to do with the mo ne y. JvJr. Newber r y said that he would like to know who the expert s are on the MJ.'fI staff. The Mayor .said that the Reveiw Committee would meet to d iscuss the pro jects with the Board o f Directors of MNI. A discussion the n followed on the expansion of the Re vi e w Committe e to include the entire board. !V'ir. Mitchell moved t hat t he personnE-11 of the Review Committee be the same as the personnel o f: the Executive Board. The motion was seconded. Mr. Johnson cautione d the Board that the Rev i ew Committee should be prepared to meet weekly or bi-weekly. Dr . Smi th brought out the fact tha.t a quo rum wil l be necessary b efore any official action can b e taken . Mr. Hood then offered a. substitute motion that the Review Commi t tee be expan ded by two members and that they be community residents. Deacon Peters seconded the mot ion . After a discussion on the me ri t s of expanding the Reveiw Committee by two members or expanding it to i ncludrc. the entire board, Mr . Hood withdrew his motion and a vote was take n on the previous motion. The mot ion wa s carried with onP (l)op r.,os ing. Mr. Griggs moved that the balance of the proj e ct s recommended by the Review Committee b e approved. The motion was seconded and approved by the Board. The other projects are! EM-019N, Staffing Cent.rai Faci lity and Mechanism of Serv ice; EM- 0 2 3N , Direc t Me dical Maintenance; EM-015N, Re sident Work Attitude Chanqe ; EM-00lC, Mode l Cities Mass Convent.ion, Inc.; RC-003N, Purchase Vacant La n d for. Block Parks a nd Playlots, RC-005N, Mobile Re creatio n Cen ters. 01J) BUSINESS Mr. White ly said tha t because of the meeting be ing held a week early , he was not prepar ed to g ive hi.s report on relocation; but he would give in in the August me e t i n g . DIREC'.!'OR I S REPOR'I' Mr. James L . Wright, J.i:., Director of Physical Developmen t q ave a re~rt on the r eloca.t i on a ct ivity out s i de of th.e Urban Ren ·~wa l j!\n:ia. . The meet i ng was a d j o urned at 1 2 :20 p . m. A P PROVED :: APPR0\17::D: I ,. h ... '·~ ·-.u .. ,•dl ;"( - - - ~ ~ . J i ... . -, ~~- -' · r ~ • · ·-· _ _ _ _ _ , ..... ~- - - - -- · ,'Johnn.y-.... c. Sohn. son, Di r e ctor �NON • PROFIT DEVELOPERS TRUSTEES MEMBERS 940 McDANIEL STREET, S. W . '#.!~MAN OF BOARD rnll###~' AVERY SHIELDS NATHANIEL PROTHRO SAMUEL COCHRAN REV. AUSTIN FORD PRINCE MARTIN, SR. HAROLD OWENS CLAUDE BARNES REV. JOEL W . MARSHALL ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30310 /;f,.fficHAIRMAN JOE STALLING TELEPHONE: 523-5166-7 SECRETARY CLARK MARTIN TECHNICAL ADVISORS C . BRON CLEVELAND PAUL MULDAWER ELIZA PASCHAL TREASURER C. G . EZZARD J uly 9_,1969 Mayor I van Allen Jr . 56 Mi tche l l Stree t At lanta ., Ge orgia De a r Sir : The Board of Dire c tors of Model Neighb orhood Inc . request a meeting with you on Friday J uly 11., 1969 to dis cuss the circumstances around the funding of our o!l'.!gantzation . The purpose of this meeting is to c l ear up the position you have t aken and to answ e r any questions about thi s matter. Sincerel y yours Joseph Stallings Cha irman., Board of Di re ctors �' - CITY OF .ATLANT.A CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING C OLLIE R B. GLADIN , Directo r July 9, 1969 Mr. Johnny Johnson, DiNctor Model Cities Program 673 Caplt,ol Avenue, S. W. tlanto, Georgia Dear Johnny: to your verbal re st bock In the sprf rtlcl tlon by tt-. ~annl . 0.par t stoff in the phyaicol p lanning effort. However, to m"f our 1969 pr , hcav. .In writing octly hat i kt you with us to perform, whot mnn0t1WAt you think It wfll requl,.; nd whtn the work mutt be accom fished . Without such Information, It Ill b• y dlfflc lt for ua to ..scono ny furthe t This letter 11 In r• for more we already havtt. 1d l.fdt'9, • wtll •ffi Jn -1 Cftl• In the ntl... city. ve phyu for • nw.. ,., �Mr~ Johnny Johnson July 9, 1969 - 2- hav- xp,vaiM:JU b for • The d. partm nt wi 11 b unobl .. to accept tota I r sponsibillty in th or. a of citlz ns' involv ment . The respon.siblllty of w obtafning oltfzen review ond approval must contfnu to rest with you.r ·a g ncy which was stofh,d J .r this urf>O" during at least th 1969 planning y r. Oth•r t.hcin this singlt, limitation we ore wlllln to do ev rythlng w can to support th Model Cities Pr ram. Sincer, ly yours, ~W> Collier • GI. · in Planning DlfOctor C G/bls c:.e: Mayor Ivan Allen, J, •.....Mr. ney Cook Mr. G ry Grf J Mr. Everett MU II can �~ ~ITY OF ATLANTA CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COLLIER B. GLADIN, Dir ector July 9, 1969 Mr. Johnny Johnson, Director ~ I Cl tias Progrorn 673 Capitol Avenue, S. W. Atlanta, Gaorgia . Dear Johnny: This lotter Is In res;x:me to your verbol request bock In the &pting for mora po.rtici;>atbn by tha Plcnning Oop•.:utm&nt staff in tha A.'ooel Citios physical pfanntng effort. Ho-waver, to meet our 1969 prQgrcm , we must have in writing exactly what tasks you wish m t~ P3rt0rnl, whot mon»ower you think It will require,. ond whoo the work must be accom;:,Hshed . 'Nlth-:,ut such Information, it will be very difficult for us to respond any further than we a lready hove. As you kn'lW, tho !)hyslcol plcmnfng efforts should mesh closely within the proposed 1970 Nefohborhooc.l Davelopment Program activities ond your own 1970 action year program development. Since Neighborhood C.velopment Program deadline, ore a~oaching with bewildering a ~ , every day that paaes maket the time factor more critical. We wlah .to- do all we can to help but our other commitments must ~ met also. So It 11 ~ tiol .thot we n;ceive a concrete expression of your needs tight' away. At we have 10id before, we will do everything WO can to alJt the physical plannlng efforts In Model Cities in ochi ving the maximum benefit for that area ond the entire city. There Is, however, one limltatlon which �/1,,\r. Johnny Johnson July 9, 1969 - 2- we have e.mpressecl before . The deparhnent will bo unable to accept total resporuibility in the a rao of c;tizens• involvement. The respomibility of obtaining citize n review and C!pprovol mv:it coni-inua to rest with your agency which wos ~toffed for this purpose during at feoot the 1969 planning year. Other than this single li mita tion we am willin9 to do everything w con to wpport th$ WlodeJ Cities Pr-:igram . Sincerely yours, Co!lte r S. G l<X!in Planning Director ·caG/1,b ccr Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. Mr. Rodney Cook Mr. Gregory Griggs Mr. EVGrott l'v1iliicon --~ · -' ·~ �I . . I I I model APRI L 5 M Y W T ... l 2 6 7 R 9 !3 1-1 I~ 16 ZO 11 '11 23 lil'AV r i 3 4 lil ll G U T W T > z 11 18 19 Zl ZS 26 vnn n . .... p s .. .. .. . I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 il 14 !5 16 17 JS 19 20 21 Z2 7.l 2( "• n •N~ ~ Bl-MONTHLY REPORT . • . - · - - . . . ··· - · - -~- _ ____ ,. _ _ _ _..._J �APRIL-MAY MONTHLY MILESTONES: HUD and the City of Atlanta signed the official implementing contract for supplemental funds. The first delegate agency contract - the intra-neighborhood bus system - was being finalized and was expected to be effected the first part of June. A thorough review of all 1969 pro- jects was initiated and nearly completed. The majority of adm.Lnistrative staff positions was filled. MILESTONES NEXT PERIOD: to be promulgated. uation system Many delegate agency contracts are Finalization of the is to be effected. be completed .. Plans and Eval- ' ,. · Staffing is expected to �CONTRACT NO. MP.-10-001 City of Atlanta Model Neighborhood Program 673 Capitol Avenue, s .w. Atlanta, Georgia 30315 Johnny c. Johnson, Directok April-May Bi-Monthly Report June 10, 1"969 Report No. 7 Frepared By Alan Wexler Technical Write INDEX Page .MA.JOR DEVELOP1'1:E:NTS. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 General...................................... 1 Administration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Social Services Planning................. Physical Planning... . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Economic Development..................... State Participation...................... 1 2 9 12 Data Collection.............................. Problems. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 12 ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE ••••••••••••••••••••••••• . • 7 13 Policy 1and Advisory Groups.................. Staff .. .................... 13 13 RESIDENT INVOLVEMENT.. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 14 FEDERAL ASSISTANCE. • .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 15 0 .................. 0 �I • MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS A. General, Project Status, and Other Related Projects Under Coordination A.l. Administration A.l.a. The City of Atlanta and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development officially signed ·the $7.175 million supplemental funds contract May 20. Mayor Ivan Allen Jr. signed for Atlanta and Ed Baxter, Regional Administrator, signed for HUD. Present for the ceremony were Earl Metzger, Regional Model Cities Director, and Johnny c. Johnsor Atlanta Model Cities Director. A,l.B. On May 29, the City officially designated the Negro-owned Citizens Trust Company to be the officiaJ depository for supplemental funds. This represents the largest account ever e143.215.248.55:ished by the City of Atlanta in a Negro-owned Bank. A.l.c. Also on May 29, Model Cities signed its first delegate agency contract - with the Atlanta Transit System for a $205,000 intra-neighborhood ~us system. Mayor Allen, other political leaders, business leaders and news media representatives were given a tour of the bus route, which officially was to start June 4. A.l.d. Other priority contracts were scheduled to be signed during the coming reporting period. A.l.e. A comprehensive rev iew of a ll supplementallyfunded projects was completed by the Plans and Evaluation and Program Management Divisions. This review was designed and executed to assure that each project was pronP.,..1~ A.-:: :=:.:..... '1 and ad".\ressed itself r~ ~he ~pacific objective for which it was designed. In addition, pre- contract reviews were held with a specially- appointed review team from tha Model Cities Executive Board. A.lof. The Plans and Evaluation staff began formalizing a Resident Service Information System which would l �-2- permit Model Cities to serve more adequately each resident who comes into contact with any project in the program. The system would involve nonsupplemental-funded as well as supplemental-funded agencies. Contacts were made with p~ivate firms which might be capable of designing the system. A.2 . A.l.g. Also included in preparation for implementation was a comprehensive salary study regarding simil ar job classifications in the various components. The purpose of the study was to discover salary differences in positions which will require the same type of work. Wherever such disc:r.ep:mcic s were found, the appropriate agencies were asked to review their salary scales. A.l.h. In accordance with a HUD request, Model Cities submitted an overall survey regarding in-house and on-loan administrative personnel. The study includ ec salary scales, recruiting pract ices, and types of positions . HUD h ad requeste d such action to compare similarities and differences among the various Model Cities programs throughout the nation. A.l.i. Concentrated work continued on planning for the t e nagency multi- pur pose cente r scheduled to be c omplete < by July 15. Commodore Corporation of Omaha, Nebrask, was the low b i dder for the modular-constructed, 20,000 sq. ft. facility. The contract with Commod oi i s e x pected t o b e s i gned during t he c oming repor t ing period. The contract with the Atl anta Housing Authority for t h e l and is also expected to b , s igned dur ing t h e corning r epor tin g p eriod. Social Services A.2°a. HEW initiated a signoff system whereby any of its future projects affecting 5 00/4 of the Model Cit i es area residents would require a certificate of approval from the Model Cities Director. A.2obo Several meetings were held with the ten agencies wnich will be housed in the temporary multi-purpose facil~tyo · Among the major results were establishment of an operating committee to oversee the quality of services to residents and the resolving �-3- of various adminis trative matters (decentralizing phone service~ system f or paying utility bills,etc~ ), The Committee will include agency r e presentative s and re~Jdents. A.2.c. With the Work Incentive Program (WIN) scheduled to begin L"1 July, Model Citie s established a WIN program 'l'ask For c e for the Model Cities are a. This ·Task Force will include repre s e ntative s fr om the State Department of F~mily and Children Se rvice s (DFCS)° , Fulton County .DFCS , Georgia State Employment Service, Senior Citizens , and Model Cities . Its purpose will be to develop means of coordin ating whatever services ar~ needed to make WIN successful(day care, e t c.). A.2.d. Several meetings were held t o discuss the problem of hunger. The participants were convened by federal HEW officials and i n cluded representatives of federal and local agenc ies. Subsequently and as a result of the meetings, Model Cities convened a meeting of several community-based agencies at which a U.S. De partment o f Agriculture off ici al explained the new Food For C11i ldre n program. As a result of · that mee t ing, s ome c ornrnuni t:;;"- based agencies actually fi led applications f or t he p r ogr am. A.2 .e. Representative s from the Wa.,;1 ington and Regiona l office s of HEv1 's Social Rehabilitati0n Serv ice met in an all-day briefing s e ssion with Model Ci ties staff members. Thelr purpose s were to learn how the various Model Cities p roposals r e lated to their particular work and to study Model Cities needs. A.2.f. Severa.l meetings were held with the Fulton County DFCS, and Senior Citizens in developing a protec tive services project for senior citizens. A.2.g. Contacts were made with the Board of Education to develop a training program for senior citizen s . This program would train senior citizens who would be working in the Model Cities progr am and person s who would be· working with the senior citizens. �- 4- A.2.h. The proposal by the Fulton County DFCS for Housing Aid to the aged was submitted to and reviewed by Washington federal officials. The program would coordinate information flow on housing for senior citizens and would also emphasize social services . A.2.i . . The he a lth component project entitled Health, .--• Education and Services was not favorably considered by HEW's r egiona l Technical Review Commi ttee . This project, which was for $1.3 million of the total $2 . 9 million health component budget,is considered vital to the over all program. It would provide pre-pai d health care, family outreach workers and dental serv ices . A.2.j. At least partially because of the unfavorable review on the above project, three other projects will probably b e temporarily delayed• 1"hese projects are the Health Facility building, the Group Practice Project a nd the Multi-phasic Screening Center. The latter two projects would have been housed in the Health Facility. Model Cities officials felt tha t without the Health, Education and Ser vice s Pr oject, t he other three proj ects c ould n o t f ully achieve their objectives. A. 2.k. The Family P lannin g Clinic project was still being considered by HEW's Children's Bureau and was expected t o be funded when some r elatively minor matters were resolved . A.2.1. Favor able response was also expected from HEW's Social Rehabilitation Service regarding the pr o pos ed Me nta l Re t ardation Workshop project. A.2.m. The menta l He a lth Plann er pro ject wa s still under in-house review. A.2.n. The Preventive Dental Care Project was rewritten prior to first submission. being A.2.o. Georgia State College was funded by HEW to train the e i ghteen residents on the twenty- five-membe r �-5- Better Health Corpotation Board. The Board, incorporated in January, also has seven professionals. A.2.p . .·,,_ll,," .. . ,) · ' , ;; / ~:: -.;J. ime prevention, major emphasis was in : developing the best possible relationship with every known criminal justice agency working in the area and/or that will have an impact on the area. Contacts included the Atlanta Police Depar t ment, the Fulton county Juvenile Court, Fulton County Probation Department, Fulton County 2arole District Office, State Board of Pardons and Parole , State Division of Children and Youth, State Board ' of Corrections , National Council on Crime and Delinquency, etc. A .2.q. Meetings were held with members of the residents' c rime prevention committees and with members of the profess jn~ ~l-Tech r. ical AdviBory Committee. The 1969 crime prevention plan was introduced and discussed at the meetings, and t he committees were asked to make input for 1969 implementation and · 1970_ planning. A.2.r. The Cr i me Prevention Planner did detailed work in p r eparation for implementation of the crime data compi lation project. This project, the planner f elt, should be one of the fi r st to be implemented in his program be cause it is so interrelated with all aspects of his 1969 program and with future planning. Most of t he negot iations were arranged with the Atlanta Board of Education regarding the ~un~rous educational projects which will receive supple mental funds in 1969 (Total supp lemental funds: $ 2 ,.159,00). F i nal d~tails w !re expected to be worked out in t he coming report ing period. A planning committee was formed to work on key issues which will be involved in the proposed educational complex. Included on the committee are r~presentatives of the Board of Education, Model Cities , residents, consultants, the Housing Authority, and the City Planning Department . The need for more land or a cutback in the program we r e two issues which were fa c ing the committee. �-6- A.2.u. Three meetings were held with regional federal officials, Model Cities officials and Board of Education officials. Discussions centered on new or existing possible funding resources. From these meetings, the Board of Education and Model Cities proceeded on devel oping proposals for money available throught the 11 Talent Search" project. �-7A. 3. Physical Planning A cooperative agr eement was developed between Model Cities, the Atl a nta Housing Authority and the Ci ty Housing · Code Inspection Division regarding propert i es inside and outside 1969 clear ance and rehabil itation areas. Basically , in 1969 Rehabilitation Areas, the Housing Authority will obtain a list of structures which have met city code enforcement standards in recent years. Owners whose properties cur rently mee t the standards will have the option of either taking advantage of possible gr a n ts or loans under the Housing Authority's r ehabilitation program to meet project standards or continuing to maintain structures in compliance with the City Housing Code. A.3.c. In future-designated rehabi litat ion areas other than those o f 1969, t he Housing Code Divis i on will participate on a c omplaint basis only. A .3.d. The Housing Authority will be fully responsible for demo lition activities in 1969 clearance act i on areas. A.3.e. In future-clearance areas the Housing Code Division will become involved only on a complaint basis, Generally, no new equipment installation will be required unless the residents' health or safety would be a factor without such work. A.3.f. The Housing Authority, the City Building Department and Model Cities developed policies and procedures for i nspecting and approving new prefab housing. A.3.g. Model Cities worked with the Georgia State Employment Service {GSES) to plan a construction training program for residents. It would be administered through the Model Cities Housing Center. A.3.h. Meetings were held with representat ives of the Citizens and Southern National Bank regarding their possible assistance in ~taking money and technical assistance available for housing rehabilitation and construction (See Economic Development Section.). �-8- A.3.i. A cooperative agreement was arranged with the City Planning Department which will allow Model Cities to receive adv ance notice of all Model Cities area zoning requests. The advance notice will allow Model Ci ties to review and comment on these important matter s . A.3.j. Discussions were held with representatives of t he Greater Atlanta Housing Development Corporation. The purpose wa s to persuade the Corporation to provide seed monies and technical assistance in HUD'~ 2 35 and 236 h ousing construction p rograms and in 235 ~J rehabiliat i on p ro jects . The Corporation is a private-non-profit group sponsored by Atlanta Businessmen . A.3.k. The Housing Authority, -!:he Greater Atlanta Housing Development Corporation and Model Cities agreed to explore the feasibility of relocating existing house s wh i ch are in the path o f the present Atlanta Airport construction program. A.3.1. Model Cities began rev iewing an Urban Design Framework Pr opos al for the areas. The Proposal was developed by a team of professionals. A.3.m. Model Cities worked with the Hous ing Authority in developing a project management control system for the Authority ' s Neighborhood Development Program (NDP) • A.3 .n. Pittsburgh neighborhood businessmen discussed with Model Cities how they could become involved in building businesses in renewa l areas and in becoming active in other areas of the Model Cities Program. A . 3.o. It was agreed to submit design plans to the City's Civic Design Commission. ,A. 3 .p. The nation's first deleqate agency contract was signed with the Atlanta Transit System for initiation of the intra-neighborhood bus system. (See Administration Section.) A.3.q. As of the end of the reporting period, the Atlanta Housing Authority had completed approximately 85% of its rehabilitation area i n spection work. A total of 25 grants had been made , ranging from �-9- $2,800 to $3,000. The total figure for all the grants was $73,576 . Housing Authority Officials said numerous persons in · the area were not qualifying for the gra.nts because of the $3,000 yearly gross-income limitations Eight to ten grantees had completed their rehabilitation work as of the end of the reporting period. A.4. A . 3.r. Regarding loans, between 50 and 60 were being processed for possibl e activation after July 5. Loan applications in the region had been terminated for the 1%8-69 fiscal year, but HUD officials indicated that sufficient monies would be available in the approaching fiscal year. In all; some 150 loan applicat ions had been filed, althoughmany of the applicants were e xpe cted to have yearly gross incomes exceeding the maximum ($8,400 for a family of seven ). A. 3. s . Housing Authority o ffi cials initiated action designed to i n form members of the U .S. Congress that the gross income loan limitations were too low. A congressional act in 1968 had established the limits on any NOP pro ject begun after August 1968. The a ct did not, however , affect previouslyapproved Urban Renewal efforts . Therefore, in the n earby West End Urban Renewal area, there are no i ncome limitations. A.3.;t. In clearance activit ies , 4- parcels had been acquired of the 378 parcels sched uled for 1969 acquisitions. Appraisa ls of. approximately 800/4 of the 378 parcels had been made. Most parcels were e x p ect e d to be acquired within approximately 3 months . A.3.u. Four consultants were hired by the Housing Author ity to work with residents in preparing the land-use plan and a 1970 Neighborhood Development Plan. By the end of the reporting period, two communities had met with their consultants. Economic Development {Employment and Industrial-Commercial Development} A~4.a. Intensive recruiting was curtailed during most of the reporting period because of the delay in ·funding. �-10- .--- -- However, the May 20 Atlanta-Model Cities - HUD supplemental-fund contract signing was to result in much g re ater a ctivity during the coming reporting period a It was d e cided that the Economic Opportunity Atlanta Neighborhood Center Manpower Units would conduct the call-in and referral work for the program. A.4.b. Atlanta Model Cities fa iled to convince the U .S . Labor Department and HUD that federal training f u nds should b e used to train residents in power sewing machine operations. The significanc;e of HUD's inabi lity to fund this pro j ect was that it would almos t be impossible to assist several companies which h ad expressed previous intere_st in locat i ng o r expanding their operations in the are a. Hundre ds o f res ident-filled j obs would have been involved. A.4.c. Southland Engineers and Surveyors Corporation decided to apply f o r an MA-5 contract under the National Al liance of Businessmen's program. The appli c a tion would be for fi v e app licants to be trained as rodmen. If accepted, i t was expected to be signed in early June. A.4.d. Discussions were held with Army/Navy recruiters to respond to their questions relative to the Department of Defense's lowering enlistment standards for ghetto r esidents. A.4. e- 'P. meeting was h eld with Church's Golden Fried Chicken to d e termine the feasibility of its establishing t wo s tores in the Model Cities area. _Each store would e mploy as many as eight to ten residents . Fu ture meetin g s were to be held when plans were more definiteo A.4 .f. Model Neighborhood, Inc ., a resident, non-profit development corp oration, received a grant from the Economic Development Administration for approximately $87,000o The money would be u sed to provide technical assistance to new businesses, t? identify and develop businesses which would be owned and managed by .MNI, to help develop manufacturing facilities in the area, to provide technical assistance to neighborhood groups seeking to establish local deve~opment corporat i ons, etc. �-1 1- A.4.g. In add i tion, MNI req uested $35 , 000 in supplemental funds from Mod el Ci ties . The money requested would be used t o supple ment its programs listed above. A.4.h. MNI had previo u s ly been given an EDA g r ant of $6,000 through Mod el Cit i e s a nd the City of Atlanta. Most o f those f u nds had b e en used to b e gin initial developmen t o f a shoppin g center . MNI a lso had developed a s e wing ma chin e operation in the area. It employs appr oxima tely 13 women . A . 4 .i . The Mode l Cit i e s Economic Development staff studied t he p roblems of a r e s ident busine sswoman to gain an ins igh t i n to some common obstacles fac i ng many a r ea business pe ople . The woman's main problems c o n c erned relocation o f h er customers because of urban renewa l a n d unco o r d i n ated efforts b y public a g encies. A.4. j . Techn i c al assist ance was give n to the JohnsonFluker Candy Company on -var i ous employer p rograms offered by the Ge orgia Stat e Emp loyment Se rvice . A.4.k. An important meeting wa s held with a rep re s ent a tive of Stokes and Wood Consultant fir m of Washington, D . C.; and HUD representatives. The pr i mary purpose was to e~plain the firm ' s agreement with the U.S. ~ Department of -l.,p.bor to promo te union involvement in the Model Cities Program. It appeared that local unions in Atlanta do not desire to recruit individuals who have no experience in t he building trades. A.4.1. Attempts to receive b ids for the leasing o f two jobmobiles resulted only i.n the possibility that three companies might submi t bids. The main reasons for lack of definite bid submittals appeared to be the cancel l ation clause after one year, high insurance risk, and low resa le value. The jobmobile was still scheduled to be one of the first 1969 employment projects. �A.5. State Participation A.5.a. Model Cities continued to keep various State departments i n formed as to its plans . Especially active during thi s reporting period was the Georgia State Employment Service. GSES continued ·to supply one coordinator, one planner, and three other staff members. Mod el Cities was expected to reimburse GSES for pers onnel e x penses this year. B. Data Collection B.l.a. There was a delay in releasing preliminary reports on the important 10,000-interviewee surve y being conducted b y the U . S. Department of Labor ' s Bureau of Labor Statistics. Atlanta's survey is being conducted in the area served by the Concentrated Employment Program (CEP) and in more affluent sect i ons . B . l . b. Or iginally, a general r e por t was to have been released in Ma rch . By t h e end of the reporting period, BLS o ff icials sai d the earl i est a p r e liminary repor t would be released would be in or after August. The final rep or t , which wi ll contain more specific information, was not expected to b e released b efo re December o r the first part of 1 97 0. B.l . c. All interviews were expected to be completed by June 30. c. Proble ms c.1. The major p roblem concerned the many scheduling adjustments made necessary by the delay in funding prior to the May 20 contract signing. Delegate agencies were required in some instances to change significantly their scheduled milestones. In at least one instance, a consultant told Model Cities officials that he might not be able to begin his project because he had had to place his manpower and machines on another project. �-13- II. c.2. Another major problem resulted in the refusal by HUD and the U.S. Department of Labor to allocate monies for the training of sewing machine operators. (See industrial <'levelopment section.) C.3. Labor unions did little to ensure that they will significantly assist ghetto res~dents to obtain union membership . (See industrial-commercial section.) C.4. A third major problem was the prohibition against granting any rehabilitat ion l oan s to any · family uni t ear ning more than a maximum of $8,400 a y e ar. Many needy familie s were not mee t ing the min i mum income limitat ion s a s of the e nd o f t he r eporting period . (See Physical Services Section.) ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE A. Policy and . Advi s ory Gr oups A.l . a. B. No changes were made on the Executive Board, the highest p o licy-making g roup i n the program. Howeve r , negotiat i on s began with s ome potent i al new member s t o t h e Technical Ad visory Bo ard , a gr ou p comp o sed of pub lic a n d p rivate exp erts in variou s dis c i plines . The new me mber s would f unc tion as a dvisor s t o the Plans a nd Evaluation staff. Staff B. l .a. The Direc t or for Program Manageme n t was appointed and approximately ten other n ew staff members were e mployed. The two ma jor vacancies wer e in the Direc t orships of Plans and Evaluation, and Economic Development. Other v acancies still existed in Program Management and the cler ical staff. Bol.b. Staff turnover was almost n on- existent, as it had been in the past. �-14III. RESIDENT INVOLVEMENT A. Activities Incorporation procedures continued for Stadium Heights, Inc., t he new name for the resident involvement organization . The incorporation and structural matters were expected to become offici al durin g the coming reporting period~ Four consultant fi r ms wer e hired by the Atlanta H9using Authority to work with the six neighborhoods in developing land- use plan and the 1970 Ne ighborhood De velopment Pr ogr am (in cluding clearance and rehabi l itation) . By the end o f the reporting period , one firm had met with one of his two neighborhoods and the other firms had made p l ans to meet wi th t h e i r c ommun i ties durin g the coming reporti ng period. A.l.c. The Atla nta Community Relations Commission conduct e d t wo 11 t ownha ll 11 me etings , one in Gr ant Park (s eventy people ) . and on e i n Me chani c s ville (f i fty peo p le) . Mode l Citie s rep resentatives dis cussed t he p rogram and answered residen ts ' question s a t tho se meetings. A.l.d. The 7th Mass Convention was he l d, wit h o ver onehundred peo ple attending. Howev er , since .t he supplemental-fund contract had not been signed and since most subjects h a d previously been discussed , n o official business was conducted. A. l .e. Four of the six neighborhoods met to work out procedures for di s tributing the approximately 865000 gallons of paint recently reserved for the a rea by the General Services Administration . Only resident homeowners will be eligible to receive the paint . I t was e xpected to be d i stribute d s ometime in June. �-15- IV. A.l.f. Planners met with residents of the Sugar Hill community and patrons of the Fellowship Mission to discuss the possible clearance areas which would affect them. F urther discussions were expected to be held during - the coming reporting period. A. l. g . The Communit y Affairs Division sponsored a tour of the soon -to - be -initiated intra-neighborhood bus line. The Mayor, many other public officials and s ome key residents took the tour. A.l.h. A group of residents apµ-oved the designation of the Model Cities Steering Committee to be the recipient of some $72,000 in OEO training funds. The Steering Committee was s chedu led to incorporate under the name o f St adium Height s, Inc. sometime in June. FEDERAL ASSISTANCE A . l.a . Washington and regional officials continued to provid e technical assistance. Espe c ially helpful were discussions with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and HEW's Social Rehabilitation Service (See Social Services �~ J:-'1 /J1t /L'-J~ '· tf. , (..... I c.:c. J une 9 , 1969 Mr. T . D. Allisandratos General Manager Albeni Corporation P .. o. Box 606 Tarpon Springs, Florida Dear Mr . Allissandratos : Mayor Ivan Allen has referred your letter of June 3 to our office for respon e . I am enclosing a copy of the summary of the one- year and the five-year foreca t. This summary list the major objective and approaching to solving the problems of the Model Neighborhood Ar • If I can provide you with let m know. ny furtb . information, please Sincerely, Johnny C. John on Director vlc Enclosur cc: Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. (,,4' r,;1 ��DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT PEACHT_REE SEVENTH BUILDING, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323 Room 645 REGION Ill June 3, 1969 IN REPLY REFER TO: Code 3RF Mr. George L. Aldridge, Jr. Director Community Improvement Program City Hall 68 Mitchell Street, S. W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Mr . Aldridge : · Subject: Proj e ct No. Ga . R-97(CRP) Community Renewal Program Approval of Housing Cost s Study The Housing Costs Study for the Atlanta Community Improvement Program has been reviewed and found to be satisfactory. It is recommended that the Model Cities Agency be advised of the following : a. To consider the recommenda tions and conclusions contained in the Housing Cos ts Study in planning relocation resources, especially as they concern housing p r ef erences, timi ng of development of resources, treatment of particular neighborhoods or sub-areas, the style and cost of housing and full utilization of HUD-assisted housing programs. b. To coordinate the Study recommendat ions with proposed NDP activities within the Model Cities Area. c. To include in the Relocation Program for the Model Cities Area the matters included in paragraph a ab ove, in addition to reviewing estLuates of displacement found in the Study. d. Relative to housing resources proposed for relocation of residents in or from the Model Cities Area, displacement should not exceed the supply of new housing which can be assured of development within the same displacement period. In view of the experimental nature of t he Model Cities effort and the . recommendations in the Study to use all possible methods and programs to keep housing prices low, it may be necessary and desirable to show resources on a year-to-year basis with first year displacement limited to the resource supply for that �2 year, allowing the time for development of innovative housing programs and in attaining necessary sponsorship on an open-ended basis. This would require assurance that displa cement and resource supply will be reviewed annually wi t h ame nded Relocation Programs provided to HUD for concurrence before displa cement occurs. Sincerely yours, Q\) I' \ r· () I.- ( / ; · ,; \ 9A1 ~f'i \ )>\ John I'.' '.Ed!n'unds .... ..... cc: Mr. Fountain I \ ~ . ( ) J'I: ) / ,}1{.V / -· Assista nt Regiona l Acl~ini strator for Renewal Assistance �DEPARTMENT OF HOU S ING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT PEA C HTRE E SEVENTH BUILDING, ATL ANTA, GEORG I A 30 323 REGION I l l Offic e June 3, ]969 of Administration IN C i ty of Atl a nta Cit y !!all Atl a nta, Ge or g ia R E P L Y 30303 Ge ntlem e n: Att a ched is a cop y o f l e tt e r of credit numb e r 8 6 - 03-0009, a uthorizin g y ou to drawdown funds a g a inst the total am o unt a uth o ri z e d b y pr ese ntin g F o rm TUS 5401, P ay me nt Vo u c h e r s o n L e tt e r s o f Cr ed i t , to yo u r l oc a l c o mm e rc ia l ba nk . A ll fund s r e s u lt i n g from such vouch ers sh a l l imm e di a t e l y b e d epos it e d i n y o u r a cc ount w ith th e loc a l co mmerci a l b a n k , R S indi c at e d o n t h e l e tt e r of c r e dit. Si n c e r e l y . (7 1 y ou rs , , 1 , , - !-- _,,,,,, _ 7'/ ,/ ;, ,,, / >./fy,,-,-11·7' ~-> ' _., / ,, ' / ) , -) ~ Di re c to r , Fi a n ci a l Re vi e w a nd Ac coun tin g Di v i s io n R E FE R T O : �~---- ---...__.______.-· 10 0 0 h,ra l ~t'rv l <.:C" , Uuri·.,u of An:o urH!, LETTER OF ISSUING AGENCY t . S . Dept of Housing and Urhan DevclopQCnt 645 Peachtree 7th Bldg WE Atlanta . Ga. 30323 A<..,F.'.':CY ST AT I ON SYMI.\CJL LETTER OF CR ED IT NUMBER 86-03-00 09 CREDIT Au di: TR EASll l:Y DE P A RT MEN T C IH C l lLAll No. 10 7 ~. R t·v iscd 668/90133 (I f(Qirit 86 - 00 - 9703 Al\1ENO~-ff.1" T i'J (IMBFH. __·_ _ EF FECTIVE DATE ( FO R AGENCY U SE ) June 1 0: 30 1969 AT ~-! ! n :1ccord.1!"·<· wi:1, the ;;u:hori·, ,!,!\/,1 of the Fiscal As, ;,r.11H ~'l'<.TcLiry, Trca,ury Dt:j".1n 111 •: !! t , ciic re 1s hc:n· h y ,1 i.rli or i1 c J fo; d ,c ::c co un l anJ rcspo n , ihility of che is<. u ing a g(' ll C)' ;i l<:tCc1· of c·rc<l i, : ' 1 l :--.J ~FA VO~flf lO ~l' l ~ ! I' l I I t 0 t l ~·-nt·~~,-~-- -- ~ - - --·~··----,..-f(=) ~R~ L)=E•-POSrf"()Nl.Y Atlanta , Georgia ,\ M()l ':'JT AllTIIO l,i Z ED 30303 D D PRIOR AUTI!ORlZATION I ACII f\lONTH I'} 0 ".) (' () THIS EACil QUA RTER $ - f SEE NOTE s 7 , 1 7 5 > 0 0 0 O0 0- .J M~·r_· _ _= _ ACCOUNT C-1 ,'.:,c t: I ncr,·.» ,· E~.~~-··-· !~-~·:.=~:. s 7 , 1 7s - -.. Citi zcno Tru9t Co mpany Post Office Box 4485 Atlonta, Georgia 303 02 a y TO -~~=~~u C _ _ _...'., The un pa id b. d :inn: of chi ·: lt:1 te r of c r ~·d it will r e m a in avail a bi c: u11 £il D Treasury Depart:r;~·,,1· tft:,1. tl1i -. ktt" r l1;; :, l>L·(·n revol;crl . Dene», you arc adv ised ;n ,._ ri li ng b y the OR 0 The u11paiJ b.:lanu· ,,f chi ·. kc1,·r uf creJ it is revoke d at t he end of each pnio<l indicated ,wd the full n·(",l ,1hl i,l11·d :1: 1lw h, ·g i11111 111.: of ,: ... f.,11,,win~ period un t il yo u arc ,1d\'i,cd in wric ;ng bv t!.c Treasur y Dc·parcmuH that clt i~ k ite r l1.1 :, hec 11 revoked . a1110111H I T he amount of this lurer of credit is ht·reby certifu,:d to be dra w n again st, u pon presenta tion to you of Form TUS 5401, Po1 1 1JH.:11r Vo:1cber 011 Lcf.ter of Credit, by the o fti. cial ( s ) of the recipient orgar1i ;'.,1tio11 whose signac11~L·(s ) artH·.,r(s) o n t he Sc.1n ,lard h,r111 ll9f, Authorized Sis nature Card for P;iy!1\e nt Vo u l: :cr~ on Letter of Credit, act,1 d 1c:d t1<·rt·c,, or prC'viously or \ubse•-1 uently furni,hed you thro u gh the Treas u ry Dq,artment. The amo u nt of c:1cl1 payme1 t vou<.her paid by a Federal Reserve Ba n k or branch to a dc,i g na ted com mercial hank fur crc·dit to ,he account of the rec ip ien t organization shall consriatte p:iymcnt to che recipient organi?.1t1on by the I !11ircd St.Hes. I certify to the Tre:is ury Dep:irtrne nt that the payments authori1cd hen::in are correct and proi)er for payment from the apprnpriarions or funds lega lly committed and available for the purpose, when paid in accord ance with the terms and conditions cited above. t10TE: T~e naximum anount that roay b~ requested durin ~ n calendar month i8 limite<l to $1,435 9 000 000. nroject Contract DATE CERTIFll-.D . _ ,{1-;-1n-no1 1 F'- 10-()•11 .J.une,_.) ~ l <J 6 ') ~ ncdfc~n, Ccrtifyic~ ~fficrr TYPED NAME AND Tl I'LE 1193- 10 2 �---CITY OF .ATLAl'JT .A CITY HALL June 3, 1969 ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 IVAN ALLEN, JR., MAYOR R. EARL LANDERS, Admini strative Assistant MRS. ANN M. MOSES, Executive Secretary DAN E. SWEAT, JR., Director of Governmental Liaison MEMORANDUM To: Mr. R . Earl Landers From: Subject: Dan Sweat Review of Code Enforcement Policy in Model Cities Area Attache d is a copy of a m emor andum from Jim Wri ght to me spelling out the revised policy of the Atlanta Housing Authority and the City's H e-using Code Division in the Model Cities ar e a. This came about as a result of probl ems b eing called to our attention in the A d a ir Park Area w h e're the city had -compl e te d a hous e by house rehabilitation program within the last few years. You might r ecall at the time we were discussing the Model Cities Pro g r am with r es idents of that area, the y were very much concerned with hous ing code ac tivity which was going on at that time . We assured them we would not place them in double jeopardy when the Model Citi e s Program started. There were indications that we were doing this by requiring the same property owne rs to bring th e ir prop e rty in line with th e new code s t anda rds of th e Atlanta Housing Authority und er the Mod e l Citi e s Program. This r ev i sed polic y was adopted ,after a m ee tin g in my offic e with officials of the H o usin g Authority, the Buildin g Department and M o d e l Cities. DS:fy cc: Mayor I van Allen, Jr. Mr. Johnny R obinson �..I i::' . -· 0 'r, May 29, 1969 OFFICE OF MODEL CITIES PROGRAM 673 Capitol Avenue, S.W. Atlanta, Ga. 30315 404-524 -8876 Ivan Allen Jr., Mayor J. C. Johnson, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Dan Sweat Director of Governmental Liaison FROM: Jame~ L. Wright , Jr.i~w,tt. Director of Physical Develo~~ent SUBJECT: Atlanta Housing Authority and Housing Code Division Activities in the Model Neighborhood Area Attached hereto, is a revised copy of the policy regarding AHA and Atlanta Housing Code Division in the Model Neighborhood Area. The addendum to the original policy which was developed in February of 1969, refers to properties wh ich have, in rec e nt years, been brought up to City Housing Code standards. This policy is outlined in paragraph 2 under the heading Rehabilitation Policy - Model Ne ighb orhood Area . The Atlanta Housing Authority will obtain a list of structures ·which have met Code Enforcement standards o f the City of Atlanta Building Department in rec ent years. Owners whos e properties currently meet these standards will have the option of either taking advantage of possible grants or lo an s under the Atlanta Housing Authority rehabilitation program to meet project standards or continuing to maintain structures in compliance with the City Housing Code . . As you know, it was formulated by Messrs. Lester Persells, Executive Director of Atlanta Housing Authority; C. M. Smith, Architectural Engineer; James Smith, Chief Housing Code Inspector; Ma lcolm Jones, Chairman of Housing Resources Committ ee; and myself, representing the CDA. This agreement was reached during the meeting with you in your offic e on May 26. The purpose is to provide the most equitable arrangement to benefit property owners in the rehabilitation program. cc : Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. William Wofford Lester Persel ls C . M. Smith Malcolm Jones James Smith Johnny Johnson �I' • •• . .. •.• ! 01··~-~·-~\:-r ....._C '-" f... C"'J>•_......:,.-;·,_ , ___. . . ..:,-1 , 1 ~--. It_ ··-J"..,~ '. __ T_ ..•r-u. May 29, 1969 OFFICE OF MODEL CITIES PROGRAM 673 Capitol Avenue, S.W. Atlanta, Ga . 30315 404-524-8876 Ivan Allen Jr., Mayor J. C. Johnson , Director Policy Regarding Atlanta Housing Authority and Atlanta Housing Code Division Activity in the Model Neighborhood Area Rehabilitation Policy - Model Neighborhood Area The Atlanta Housing Authority will obtain a list of structures which have met Code Enforcement standards of the City of Atlanta Building Department in recent years. Owners whose properties currently meet these standards will have the option of either taking advantage of possible grants or loans under the Atlanta Housing Authority rehabilitation program to meet project standards or continuing to maintain structures in compliance with the City Housing Code. In rehabilitation areas other than those of current year action areas, the City Building Department will participate on a complaint investigation basis only. New enforcement cases will be undertaken in accordance with De partment personnel capability and on a full code compliance basis. Demolition Policy - Model Neighborhood Area The Atlanta Housing Authority is fully responsible for demolition activities in NDP current year clearance action areas. When emergency situations occur necessitating prompt action on particular structures in th e clearance areas, the City Building Department will become involved for enforcement efforts. In demolition are a s other than those of current year action areas ~ the Building Depa rtment will become involved only on a compliant basis to ef f e ct full code compliance with the e x c e ption that generally no inst a ll a tion of a ddition a l equipme nt will be r e quired . A possibl e excep tion will a rise if it is determin e d that the failure to install a d dition a l equipment may r e sult in j e opardy to the h e alth , safety on general wel f are of a structures inhab itants. �., l· CITY OF .ATLANT.A May 19, 1969 / OFFICE OF MODEL CITIES PROGRAM 673 Capitol Avenue , S.W. Atlanta, Ga. 30315 404 -524-8876 Ivan Allen Jr., Mayor J. C. Johnson, Director M E MO R A N D U M TO Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. FROM Johnny C. Johnson, Director SUBJECT: Technical Assistance Funds The attached spells out the requirements for training and technical assistance funds in Model Cities. been offered $70,000. JCJ : vlc At t achment Atlanta has �PROPO SAL FOR A Gi<M~'! TO - ··-- --·--FOR TRt.l NlMG AND n:c !INTCAL ASC STANCE I N MODE!. Cl.TI ES L BACKGROUND AND PU RPO SE: The purpose o f thi s program -L s t o build t h e ea.p acity of HrY.lel Cit i e s resid e nts i n ··---- -·---- --·--·--t;c, l:e £-> p nJ k nn 1_.tlc rJgcah ly n nJ t:: f f ecti. v d .y to th e r equi reme 1,t s of ti1 c f'hdc l CJ l:i·:!s P rogr2m 1:-y csto.bJ -~sh:fng responsi ble neighborho o d ·orgarr.i.?.at k,n s s o thll t t li,~y c:nn asses s thci r prob 1 em s a nd ca. n work e f fect ive l y wi th ci· .y gove n in1 e1:i and o th er l o<!al ins ti tu t:!. ons i n th e planning . execu tio n t1nJ e \ ·a l u ti ur~ of pr,..,gn1rn s . I t :i.s o ur und e r s tanding tha t the H,>dc.,t Ci.Lie s .l\dm i n is L'ra t:i. n n a n d 0E0 will j oi n in this p ro jec t a s part o f an ef f o rt t 0 bu -f.ld cffccti •,e a nd TE'. Gp ;i n s ibl(' commun ity p a rti c i p ation and to make avai. l a bl e ft ncl~ u id <i.t;s i s t nnce to .od ~l n ei ghbor.ho d gro u ps 'f. n both first nd scc _ n r oundcitie s . 'h,r. major obj e cU.v e s of th e prngni.. fl r c: 1. To p rov id e c it ze. ;; wj ·ha d ive sily of experie nce end c apabi.lity in lo c-n J :t nst:l tu t :ilH1c11 pl n ~r,jng , progt·n<n i ,nrteme ntat5. on an d prog ram e v lua.: i on. fun ct ion l y CAA t1t1d CD:\ (! i g ;1bnrh0,.)cl gn,ups a 1d to plan an d m,,ve t 0 wa r d the nvcntuc\ l C'O n~;r.,lid a tiur of r~sidr~n t partic ip at i o n lnhe1· rit. ;n rnaking t heir rraJ.ni ng, '. E:" l-mi.ca l assi st :illt::e , and p l anning fu11ds a vail a ble i s t h e ass11i.1ptj on by or:o and HU.G t h at citize 1s l-u ve �'· - l- major rol e t o pl a y :i.n bo th t he Communi ty Ac t i on Prog r am and the Model Citi es Program. Further ~ bot h OEO' s and HUD' s philoso phy ,- -acknowledges th~ r ight of peo pl e aff ec ted by publi c pr og r ams to h av e access t o and influ er.c e on t he proc e s s by whi ch dec ~s ions abou t t he i r live s ~re made ; -- a cce pts t h at ma ny of the be st i nte nt ioned of fi ci a ls a nd ~ echnici aris a r e o ften, bi the i r t rai ni ng, experi e nc e s , and l ife-styl es , unfamiliar w:t.th o r even insens it i ve to t h e prob lems a nd a s pi r at ions of mode l naigh borhood res ide nt s ; therefo re , resident ideas and prior:i.ti e s can resu l t i n mp r e re l evant , sensi t i~e , a nd eff ec tiv e plan and programs; -- r ecogni zes t hat the pr ocess o f participation makes it po si ble for tho s e citi~en~ forme r ly out s ide t h e sy s t em to learn how it functio ns a nd ho w to make it f unc t ion i n the ir i nt c r ~st - and t hat the process mak e s it po ssib l e fo r r e s i de nts t o s t rengthe n existing skil l s and to develop th e kind of new s kil ls needed for ef fe ctive d . ti zcnsh:ip b eyo nd as we l l a s wi thin the Mo de l Ci t i e s Progra m. In ligh t of the above a nd in o r de ·· to ove rcome t hese probl ems , OEO and HUD arc e ncou rag j ng CAAI s, CDA' s ond the ne i ghborhood g r oup s t o test thi s te chnica l a s s is t ance st ra t egy t hrough the us e o f the s e f unds . Funds alloca te d to ne i ghborhood groups under t he s e g r a nts may be u sed to prov :tde p l a nning , tra:f.ning and tecl n:f c al rws i<·tance se rvice s l o �,- J- rwio.hb o rhoo d r.r.: s id<~11t s in .J.udlng bl.,l t not: J·i.mi te d Lo th e fo ll ow i. ng : l. Vul.1 -J:}. mr:i s t a f f for n o ighbo r l.1ood g ro up s t o r l an and develop s erv i c c•s u ndo I'.." t h ec e p r ngn:.in e. · 2. Pon11a l tra ln 'I. g p r o g 1wn R .or n s.:ighbo 1:·;-1o o d r e sid e n t gr·-ciup s a nd Staff. 3 . ·. Coll e ct i o n a nd lis ~;emi. niLU ,- n ::.i f r •J l.cv nn t infon11~t:fo n a h.o u t Mo de l .-r. Ci t: -J e s and rci1nted p rog r :, rns t o nl': i g hb o hoo d rE!s j_d e ti:; . 4 ,1 · ReLHi nfrig c1:, 11sult m1ts . l lD ,1y (•r. ;:;, c ornmu nit. y 0 1.·g an i z ers , planners, a nd pb n ni ng. _5;. To d e\· e l op 6. Ai1d c ,H ry 1., u t •:i. ti:,,: ~ n c-va l.u a io n o f l h e r-fod e l Ci. ti. e s A por tio t1 of g n m t .:u n d~· rrm ' b r:- u s ;:. d by nd g h bo 1:h o . d grn1}ps t0 co n t r a. ct d:ir e c t i. y 1-,J t h o ·r._, a ni·-:.:at II , I' OCES 5 P..R IOR TO WOI,K J RO L Th e .')i1 1:'i e f t h e.it· o wn c h oos i ng whi c h i, 1 N AA a nd CDA ~r1.l l di.c; c u !; s 11t :; r:n:og 1·,<;r:1. (d c. t c i e n· ma i. ndc t· o E s cnt e n(; e .) 2 , Th ey r-,i l.l d i.s c.:us '., t_ ne i gh borhood grou µs . c:i · ccrnirn5. t nic fl i. fo: th8 n e xt- t we lv e mo;i ths o f �..,. -4·,. 3. Designa tion of neighborhood groups to pl!)-n t he program and receive funds ,l~ th e C£1_A .a nd CD/L 4. The neighbo rhood group with a. ~rnis t:a nce acceptable to ir from th e CAA and CD;\ will rle cid0 who. t training and te chnical assist a nc e they re qui re f or the devalopmen t of the propos~l for neighborhood -g roup s up port f unds. 5. If this assistanc e i s no t av a ilabl e in the c:i.ty , the CAA and CDA wil ). make every e ffo r t to ob t a in it. We. hope 0E0 and the other Fe de r F.1 1, s tnt e and local age nc ie s invo lv e d i n the Model Cities Progra m wi l l mak(? it ava.i lahle to the ne ighb orhoo d group -- assistan c e whi ch f s a ccep t a ble to the group. , 6. If th e nei ghbo rhood group or grou ps f e e l tha t p r omised t r aining . and tech~i c al a ~si st anc e i s not b e ing reGei ve d o r is inadequat e, we, the CAA and CDA will use 2£!:. good offic e s to remedy t he situation . III. Wo rk Program. l. The neighbo r hood group with the above t echn ica l - a ssi s ta nee wi 11 pr.e pare a form l wri t te n a pp icatio n . a s umma ry o f Th ey wi lJ a l so prepar LhaL a pp li ~at i 0n for ci r c ul a tio n to resident s of th~ m del neighbod1ood. 2, After the interim bonrd and/or membership o f the n e i.ghborhoocl group has appr:ovcd the appUcation it should l e submit ted through the CAA a nd CDA to om and a copy se n t to HUD. l f CDA funds are not included in the a pplica tio n , th ey must _be :integrated i,nto the a.pplicatfon . Pd.or to this submission, the CAA, CDA �•• , .' ..· ·,·· .~ \.. ~s·a nd reside n t groups sha 11 me et together t o dis c uss t he:t 1: re~ations h ip s 3. i., l Lh i n t he fr a;11cwork of the proposa l . Inc h ide d in th e: f inal o.ppliuLtion w J J. be a dc sc: r:i pt i ve h istory of t h e wa ys in which th e steps in tl, e wo1:k p roces s o u t l i n ed n bovo hAvc be e n me t. The a p p li c ation wi ll al.l;o indic a t e t he ways CD.I\ funds a n d L1. as si stanc e wi ll b e rna clc avai labl e to t h e neigh bo rh ood group . ., 'f h e ap p ].icn t ion J:!i-.!l. r:; how as speci.fica l l y a ~: pC1ssib l c wl, at ·t kinds of a c t-:l.vi Uc s wi 11 he _u nch! r lak c n, wh e n an d h ow . 5 , Th e . a ppl_:lcation will a l so dcscr:i.be wha.t , when and how o f t r aining dur i ng t h e program ye, ·r. 1 6. The applic.:ation will als o specify lo\·1 con s ult a nts hired by the nei ghb rl1ood group wi 11 b e account a ble to t he ne i.ghborhoocl group or groups. 7. 'I'h e Hppl:t ca t.icn w:i.ll. a l so desc:d b c how t h is trnini.ng nnd techni c a l assis t ance i s rc Ja t od l o Cl~ e nd CAA p l a ns end prcig r ams. 8. The: wo rk p rog r am wi.11 Gpc ll out h i~i.ng pro ce dures: pn rt:i cu l a rly the righ t~ end rec, po ns :i.Lil:U- i e s of th e nc:i.ghbo r ho o cJ g 1-ollp, the CAA and CDA. 9. The wor1• prog uu n ui.l l al r-o i ndiq:1. t c by nanie wh e n \Ve.t- poss:i. bl e specific C/\ /i-Cl)i\ s Loff. and sl aff of nc::iehhorhoo cl 01.;ganizations who wi.11 b e i nv o l ved in imp l emc nti11g thr..! progn1m . . �~6- 10. We a r .e committed t o ob s erv i ng the t e r ms o f th e HUD/0E0 Agre ement o n l ocal coordina ti o n i n t h e de.vclopment a nd of t h i s wo rk p r:ogta:n. ' , __ I,V·; :1'.ime Tag l e / >;-,)':;i:;,:!, ):'.~fJ ', . •. _.__'·:·_: . ' :. : ' .• ~, Z~.\·:,,~·:,,;-1if,·zd),.:,_.'.i..De si:gn?:lti'on r:,-·~-\ ~~:1 ~(~:/·· :!.;~!~,:-~ .--~~. :~-. -:_ ~· ·: t han 2·. o·f t h e n eighbo rhoo d g -roupc, wi l l o c cur no la t er 3d da y s a f t er the gra n t fu nds ha ve be en obliga ted. The ne i ghbo r hoo d g r o up will compl e te th e t rai ni ng p l a n no l ater tho~ 60 days a f t er .t he f unds have been obl iga t e d . 3. The fir s t draf t o f t h e prop0 Dc1.l and the summary f o r commur,j_caU.on t o ne1.gh bo rhoo ci r es i dents s hould b e c o111p l cted no l a t er t han 75 day s after the f unds have bee n obl iga t ed . 4. ·, V, The fina l wo rk p rogram wU l b e submitted no lat e r t h an 90 days aft er the gnrn t f unds have been obU ga t ed. Budget Sampl e CAP 2.5 . . 80% Staff 20% space, overhead �,.: , • • 'l .·_~. v· SPECIAL CONTHTTONS The Region ma.y wan t t:o sped.a l c ond:L t::l on· the g rant to insure p e d .od:lc progr.c s r. . ~po.r t s . Ot:he r de ,, j r a ' 1 (, s p ~c :iJd e:ondi t. i ,) ns ~1hlch Re g i c, ns 1 . may ,want to c r:i nw!.der a r e: -1. . No funds und~t' thi !> g ran t 01..gh ... to h1:· expended un t il OEO approved tlie 90 de.y propo s n l which 2. emerg e 11 f r o m the work p r ogram de s cribe d Incorpore.t ion :l.t, not ne c cssfn·y f or re l ease. o f .funds from 0 E0 provide d . t ha t. t he CAA i n conju nc t '. o n wi t h CDA llgree t o !=:Pend the fu nd s as reque sted b·y t h e ne -.l g hbo dv o d ;_,,ro u p ~ind . n d ·.~at e r, he mechanism with whi ch it wi ll ma ke fU:c al r:1c co·~intab:i. 1.i t v. to and f o i:_ t h e group. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document PUBLIC SERVICE UNIT COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 72 Mr. Walter M. Mitchell Division Chairman �~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - , Mrs . Pa--ne , Secy - 261-6700 PUBLIC SERVICE UNTI - 70 Mr. R. G. Murphy - Unit Chairman Vrr . E. William Bohn - Vice Cha i r:nan ~ex Broad casting Corp. 1601 W. Peachtree St. N~W . 'el. 892-3l.i 56 Sears, Roebuck & Co . 3060 Feacr,tr~ e Re' . N. ';J . At l anta, Ga . 30305 Te l. 261- 6700 Ext. 321 .I Division - 71 Ci t· Governme nt Mr. E. C. Walker Retired,. Sears 978 Winall Down Rd. , NE AtlRnta, Ga. 30319 Division - 72 County Government Mr . Walter M. Mitchell Cha i rman Board of Fulton County Commissioners 165 Central Ave. S. W. Division - 73 Federal Government Col. Dea n Van Lydergraf Commanding Officer Atlanta Army Depot Forest Park, Ga 30050 Tel. 363-5201 Divi si on - 7L Hospitals Mr. Robert W. Biccum General Attorney Retail Crenit P . 0, Box Lo81 6100 Peachtree St ., N.W. rPe l: 237-2943 Tel. MT . R. L. Lancast er Tel: 875-8321 ') i.vision Chairman Division Chai rman - - - - ---- 572-2791 Co-Div Chai rman- 363-5621 Division Chairman Division - 75 Schools & College s Mr. Albert Griffin, Jr. Second Vice Pre sident Tllst Co. of Ga. M3.in Office, P. 0, Box 441E Division - 76 Socia l Agenc i es Mr . W. K. Mat tison Retired, Sears 210 West Pace's Ferry Rd. N. W., Atlanta , Ga. 30305 Tel. 588-7129 Tel: 237-273 5 Di vis ion Chairman Division Chairman _____________ Division Chai rman .,_ l Di v ision - 77 State Government Lester G. Madcl ox Governor Sta te Capitol Atlanta , Ga . 30303 Tel · 721- 1776 Wm . H. Burson , Direc~or State Farnil~' &. C;-,ilr: ren Service 118 Capi tol Square, Tel: 522-87 10 Divi sion Chairma.n EYt . 73 �lJNITED APPEAL, COMMUNITY CHEST - RED CROSS PUBLIC SERVICE UNIT - 70 2 Year Comparison 'I, of RE C AP - 70 %of Increase or (Decreas r:> ) Amount Given AverPer Capita age Gift 90 . 5 73,980 10.09 11.14 28. 8 6,566 86.5 83,541 11.00 12.72 12.9 4,985 2, 360 47.3 19,369 3.88 8 .20 ( 13 .4) 1969 4,985 2,411 48.3 26,254 5.26 10 .88 35.5 1968 29,032 27,973 96.3 366,147 7.03 10 . 94 9.6 1969 28, 799 27, 313 94.8 338, 221 11.74 12·;38 10.4 1968 8,666 4,750 54. 8 26,020 3.00 5.47 h3 .7 1969 8,956 4, 96!r 55.4 30,474 3. 40 6 .13 17.1 1968 25 , 995 16,723 64.3 226, 566 8.71 13. 54 22 .6 1969 26,450 16,177 61.1 234,464 8.86 14.h9 3.4 1968 3,276 2,756 84.1 68,358 20.86 24.80 15.3 1969 3,898 2,749 70. 5 76,082 19.51 ':!7.67 11.2 1968 6,014 3,081 51.2 20, 879 3.47 6.77 8.1 1969 6,739 4,203 62.3 ':!7,329 4.05 6.74 30.8 1968 85,299 64,562 75.0 741,319 8.69 11.48 14.8 1969 87,715 64,383 73.4 816,365 9.30 12.67 10.1 Year No. of Prospects No. of Gifts 1968 7,331 6,639 1969 7,591 1968 Camp. Participation CITY GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 71 COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 72 FEDERAL GOVERNMENr DIVISION - 73 HOSPITAL DIVISION - 74 SCHOOLS & COLLEGES DIVISION - 75 SOCIAL AGENCIES DIVISION - 76 STATE GOVERNMENT DIVISION - TI TOI'AL �UNITED APPEAL, COMMUNITY CHEST - RED CROSS COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION - 72 2 Year Comparison COUNTY GOVERNMENT - 72 Department No. & Chai:nnan 7212111 Fulton Count y (All Depts) Fulton Co . Court House, 165 Central Ave . , S . W. Camp. Year 1968 1969 1 0 7232111 1968 DeKalb County (All Depts) DeKalb Co . Admn Bldg., Decatur, Ga. 1969 1 0 7242111 1968 Cobb Count y (All Dept s ) Cobb Co . Court House, Mari etta, Ga. 1969 1970 7252111 1968 Clayton County (All Dept s ) Court House J onesbor o, Georgia 1969 1970 7262111 1968 Gwinnett County (All Depts. ) Court House Lawrenceville, Georgia 1969 1970 1968 No. of Prospects 1, 600 No. of Gifts 996 1, of Participation 62.2 Amount Given Per Capita 13,556 8 . 47 Aver.age Gi ft 13 .61 1, of Increas e or {Decrease} 9.2 (!?, 'J '(J()) 1, 600 950 59.3 15, 054 9 .40 15.81 11.0 2,200 975 44 . 3 5, 000 2 . 27 5. 12 ( 16.6) 2, 200 1, 025 44 .3 10,000 4. 54 10 . 25 100 . 0 600 325 54 .1 . 53 . 98 600 316 52 .6 1.16 2. 21 119.4 325 36 11.0 1. 20 10 .83 82 .2 325 75 11. 0 390 (r-tj v) 420 1. 29 11. 05 7. 6 260 28 10 .7 104 .40 3.71 260 45 9. 6 80 .30 3 . 20 (23 .() ) (/~; {I-(/()) v3:k) 700 (~~) (71. 7) 4, 985 2, 3~ 47.3 19, 369 3. 88 8 .20 ( 13. 4) 4, 985 2,411 48 .3 26, 254 5.26 10.88 35 . 5 T<JrAL 1969 1970 �UNITED APPEAL , COMMUNITY CHEST - RED CROSS 6 Y.RZ\R COMPARI SON COUNTY GOVERNMENT - 72 Camp . Year No . o f Pro spects No . o f Gift s 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 , 1969 1 5 34 1 535 1800 1800 1600 1 600 1235 1535 1648 902 996 950 196 4 196 5 1966 196 7 1 968 1 96 9 1 75 0 1 750 1 000 1400 22 00 2 200 1964 1 965 1966 1 9 67 1968 1969 1 964 1965 1966 1967 1968 196 9 % of Participation Amoun t Given Per Capita 80 .5 99 . 9 91 . 6 50 .1 6 2. 2 59 . 3 9 ,402 1 1, 291 1 3 , 665 14, 94 2 1 3 , 556 15 , 05 4 6 . 13 7. 3 5 7 . 59 8 . 30 8 .47 9 .40 800 1025 1000 97 5 97 5 + 1025 45. 7 58 . 5 100 . 0 69.4 44. 3 44. 3 6,14 0 8 , 200 4, 200 6 , 0 00 5, 000 1 0 , 000 3 . 51 4. 68 4. 20 4.27 2. 2 7 4.54 230 230 391 3 91 600 6 00 67 11 216 325 325 + 31 6 29.1 4. 8 55 . 2 8 3. 0 54.1 52 .6 856 215 1,246 1 , 128 319 700 3 . 72 .71 3 . 18 2. 88 .53 1.16 162 162 232 232 325 325 37 21 11 30 36 75 22 . 8 13. 0 4.7 12.9 11. 0 11. O 291 164 121 214 390 4 20 1. 80 1. 0 1 .52 . 92 13 0 90 68 52 25 28 45 69.2 52.3 32 . 5 32.5 10.7 9. 6 F UL'IDN COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY COBB COUNTY CLAY'ION COUNTY 1.;w 1. 29 rui;l;NNETI . CO!,!t!l'X 1964 1965 1 966 1967 1 968 196 9 130 160 160 26 0 260 593 302 104 104 80 4. 56 3 . 18 1.88 . 65 .40 .3 0 17,281 20,234 19,484 22,389 19,369 26,254 4.44 5.31 5.,44 5.61 3 088 5 . 26 414 'IDTALS 1964 1965 1966 1 967 1 968 1969 3894 3806 3583 3987 4985 4985 2229 2659 2927 2 257 2360+ 236 6 57.2 69.9 81.6 56 .6 47o3 4 7.4 �UNITED APPtAL, COliMUNITY CHiST - RED CROSS COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION (Date) DIVISION CHAIRl1AN 1 S REPORT ON SECTION CHAIRMEN ENLISTED: The following have accepted appointment as Section Chairmen in this. Division in this year's Campaign. They have been personally interviewed and have agreed to follow through on the various steps necessary to complete the organization •. Section Chairmen B:us. Address Telephone Zip Code Name Section Number Name Section Number Name Section Number Name Section Number Name Section Number NarrB Section Number Nan@ Section Number Name Section Number This report is made by Chairman_________________lli.v.#_ _ _ _ _ __ PLEASE FILL I N AND RETURN TO P. O. BOX 1038, ATLANTA, GEORGIA KEEP DUPLICATE COPY FOR YOUR RECORDS 30301 �UNITED APPML, COMMUNITY CHiST - RED CROSS COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION (Date) DIVISION CHAIR11AN 1 S REPORT ON SECTION CHAIRMEN ENLISTED: The following have accepted appointment as Section Chairmen in this Division in this year's Campaign. They have been personally interviewed and have agreed to follow through on the various steps necessary to complete the organization •. Section Chairmen Bµs. Address Telephone Zip Code Name Section Number Name Section Number Name Section Number Name ~ Sect ion Number Name Section Number NaITB Section Number NaITB Section Number Name Sec ti on Number This report is made by Chairman_________________Div.#_ _ _ _ _ __ PLEASE FILL IN AND RETURN TOP. O. BOX 1038, ATLANTA, GEORGIA KEEP DUPLICATE COPY FOR YOUR RECORDS 30301 �S pt mb r 18. 1969 MEMOR NDUM r . Johnny J hn o To. Fro D S 1bj ct: A· mini ·tr tiv Pl'oo C'ty. E . S e t ,. Jr. u.r �• 'I �.1em..o t J ohnny Johnsca P gc 'l'\"o Sept m.b r 18. 1969 inclttd blbhin th.e :,.O 1 Cltie org nlzation unrl r the dmini trati upe ision of the Stall of the yor and B o :i- 0£ l rmon in p , ctic ~ 11 technic y . T ill occ rily inv lv me cho.n e in your d y to d y op r tio s f l' s your l'-el tion hip ith th s rvice p tme of the City. ln dditio~ it ill involv gl'e ter p rticip tion of the ayor•a Offic: in th pl n1n· .. operation of th od 1 Cities Progr • lll'e Pr to ~ t ,,you. I c: ve du.ti e r.ned v b d n op o:rtunlty to r o that c n proc d D Jr:j le oo _tact m for • �September 19, 1969 Mr. P . A. Wood 762 Boulevard,. S. E. Atlanta, Georgia 30312 Dear Mr. Wood: This ill cknowledge receipt of the copy of your letter addressed to the Honorable Lester G. M ddox, Governor of Georgia, in reg rd to the xit signs on 1-20. ~ I a:m sendin your 1 tter to the Model Cities Office, so th t your tat ment concerning code violations may receive consideration. Sine rely yours, Ivan Allen, Jr. M yor lAJr:lp CC: Mod 1 Citi s Director �September 3, 1969 r. att.h e S. Faerber La Office 112 Bell vue Avenue Ne ort,, Rhode 1 land 02840 Dear r. F erber : Thank you tor your letter of Au £ sibllity of a 10 cant huttle bu Atlanta. od l Citiea ar a. t 30, co cerning t- e ervice for the I am for rding a co y of your lett r to Mr. Johnny Johnaon,. Direc:tor of our Model Citie · program, o t your pl-an may b giv n co11 ider tion. Si Iv: U.Jr:lrd CC: r. Jo y .Johaaon . rely yours, All yor , Jr. �LAW OFFICES MATrHEW J. FAERBER /\ J 112 B ELLEVUE A VENUE NEWPORT, RHODE ISi-AND 02840 (P, O, BOX 175) 847- 0034 Mayor Ivan Allen Jr. City Hall Atlanta 0 Ga. 847- 1112 August 30 , 1969 RE: Model Cities Program Dear Mayor Allen: I am taking the liberty of writing to you at the suggestion of Gove rnor Bllis Arnall to whom I wrote recerltly in connection with an item appearing in "Fleet Owner , July , 1969" concerning the l0cent shuttle bus service for the model cities area . I am enclosing an e x tra copy of this letter for Mr. Johnny Johnson , whom I under stand is Director of Atlanta ' s Model Citie s progr am and I am also sendi ng a copy to Governor Ar nall . In my Washington office I have the good fortune to represent the City of San Juan, where last November they elected a very ener getic y oung l awye r, Car los Romer o Barcelo a s Mayor . He is 36 year s o f a g e, a g ra duate o f Yale Univer sit y i n 1953 , and o f the University of Puer to Ri c o Law School 1956 . He inherited a very difficult situation with r espect to his Model Cities pr ogr am which had been commenced under the precee ding administration wh ich had f a i l ed to take car e of many e ssen t i al i tems . The p r o gr am was in jepoar dy when Mayor Romer o t ook over but a s of several weeks ag o , h e was a s sur ed by f o r mer Mayor Hyde o f Fr esno , now a t HUD , t h a t the p r o gr am i s go i ng thr o ugh s atisfac tori ly . Coincidental ly , t h e Federal I mple men t a t i o n Gr a n t f o r Sa n Juan is $7 . 1 mil lion wh e r eas I n o tic e At l ant a's Mode l Ci t ies Progr a m is b udg e ted a t $7 . 2 mi l l i on . The principal reason for th is i nq uir y to you , a nd t hrough you t o Dir ector Johnny Johnson , i s that San Juan has a ver y difficult t ran spor t a tion pr oblem and the plan wor ked o ut i n your city with re s pect t o 1 0 c ent shuttle b us s ervic e thr oughout the 3, 000 a cre model cities area might well b e a Godsend. It is interesting to me to note that a mutual friend of Governor Arnall and mine, the late Wa l lace Ro Bu rke, fo rmer l y of the Interstate Commerce Commi s sion 6 sugge sted a n almost identical plan to Mayor Romero in my prese?ce in San Juan on 31 March,19690 �-2- Mayor Ivan Allan , Jr. August 30 r 1969 If it is not an imposition, and if Mr o Johnson 1 could send me data which would help me advise Mayor Romero along these lines 1 I would be indebted. Very truly yours , '>t~ Faertfr Hon. Ellis Arnall Fulton Federal Building Atlanta , Ga. 30303 CoC o _ �LAW OFFICES MATTHEW J. FAERBER 112 BELLEVUE AVENUE NEWPORT, RHODE ISLAND O2B4O (P. O . BOX 175) B47-OO34 B47-1112 September 9, 1969 Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr. Mayor , City of Atlanta Atlan t a , Georgia 30303 Dear Sir: May I acknowledge your letter of September 3 , 1969 for Judge Faerber who is in Puerto Rico on business until Thursday of this we e k. Your letter will have his attention and appreciation at that time. c~yrr:u:s~-w~ fw Secre t a ry to Matthew J. Fae rber �' I 123 Vanira Avenue, Southeast Atlanta, Georgia 30315 September 2, 1969 Dear Comrades: It is with deep regret that the program that was conceived for t he purpose of motivating more resident participation and training has taken on the pattern of not more, but a fewer number of residents taking part in the program. The possibilities of helping the cit i zens of the Model Cities connnunity grow in stature has been placed behind a painted wall by a few of the residents that were elected to serve without bias for the betterment of a total corrnnunity with funds funneled into the target area for that purpose. As of now the residents ha ve the chance to do for themselves a job that was long needed - to be able to think of expa ns ion areas and the correct way t o expand. It is within this structure I pray the Mode l Cities Mass Convention, Incorporated will operate in the future. The juvenile acts that are taking place in the operation of t he Board of Directors at this time can only l e ad to a state of dictatorship that .can impede the growth of any worthwhile organization. At t he t ime of t he e l ect ion f or offi cers of t he Mode l Cit i es Mass Convention , I ncorporat ed, I was e lected treasurer, but fi nd I cannot , nor ,·rill ~ot , a ssume the responsibility of t hat office U...'1der the conditions listed herein: 1. When advanced funds wer e received fr om EOA to t ake care of t he community workers payroll, t he Chairman of the Boar d , Deac on Pet ers , inst ructe d the secretary t o make the ba nk deposit, secure checks ~nd pa y off the workers. 2. The aforeme ntione d assi gnment was l ater delegated t o Mr . J ohn Hood ; a Board Member. 3. Mr. Hood st ate d that he was requeste d , but refused to pay from these monies the salary of a secretary that is not officially on t he payroll of Mode l Citi es Mass .Convention, Incorporated. �September 2, 1969 Page 2 All of these transactions took· place without the benefit of vouchers, drafts, etc., that would enable the treasurer to keep accurate records. Under the existing conditions the need for· a treasurer is nil. Therefore, before more valuable time is lost by the Board, certain guidelines should be studies and become a workable pattern. I recognize the fact that no individual or group can exist without making errors, and the experiences gained by such means should prove of value for future operations . I hold no animosity toward anyone in the organization and shall continue my support for the total program, but with the slovenly methods used to date, I have no alternative other than tender my resignation as treasurer effective innnediately. Respect lly, '--/ _,,. _ ) '£-eff/,..,,:?) CC: cu.@.,-;s Deacon Lewi s Peters , Chairman , Board of Directors Mr. Johnny Johnson, Direct or, Model Cities · Mr. William W. Allis on, Executive Administrator, EOA Mayor Ivan Allen �~--.:· . . -..>" - ,, ~ p ~ •• c ::..:;,?:i:CE O F MODEL CITIES PROGR .t\.M 67 2 c~. ::,:to: Av~r:ue, S.W. A tt:.,1 t a, G z . 30 3 15 (, j q 577 - 5200 v s.n Alle n J-..· ., M ayor J. c . Johnson, Direct o r .Mr s. Ma : : - t ha L . We ems 1039 Ridge Avenue , S . W. 3 031 5 At lant a , Ge o rgia Dear l.lr s . Weem s : Your l etter o f Sept embe~ 2 , 1 ~ 09 i n whicn y ou t e n dered y our res i g natio n as Tre a s u r e r of M:ode l Ci t i es ~a s s Co nvention , Inc., ha s cau sed s e rio u s con c ern o n o y p a:ct abo~t the future o f t h e o rgan i z a tion . The questions y ou r a ised i :-i your l e tte:c , o.s to proc edur e and autho ri ty , were v alid a nd sh ould c a use t he Bo a rd to c arefully r e - exami n e i ts existing method o ~ oper ation . My Pro g ram Management s t a f f ,,:i l l b e happy to a s s ist y o u a n d t he Ci t iz e n s ' Boar d i n est ablish i n g p ro per p ro c e dure s f or o per at i on wh ich will be i n f ul l corr.pli a.n c e with t he requ i rements o f the City o f At l a n t a a nd t h e De p art1 e n t o f Ho u sing a n d Urba n De ve l o p ment . I a m a s ki n g .Mr . Sam Ru s s e ll t o p rovide y ou a nd al l me mbers o f the Citizen s ' Bo a r d with copi e s o f "F i s cal and Administ r a t i ve Proc edur e s for Operati ng Agenc ie s o f Mode l Cities Pro j e cts ." These p roc edure s will be a par t of your co n t rac t v,i t h t he Ci ty when i t i s e xecuted in t h e n e ar fu tur e . Be c a use I f e e l that b-1is g-roup n eed3 the v a l u a ble e x perienc e y ou o ffe r it , I h o p e that y ou will re - consider y our t e nde r of r e signa tio n , and t hat the y wi ll n ot s ee fit to ac c ept your requ est. Sin c e r ely , / ~ J, J·ohnny c ·. Di rector· JCJ:vlc cc : / . ,y " . . , ·~~ ·. -;_; ~.i:.y Johnson ' "" Mayo r I v a n All en , J-r . .Mr . Wi lli a m Al lison, Exe cuti v e Adm i n i strator , EOA B:>a r d Members o f r,.,:ode l Ci ties Ma ss Co n v entio n , Inc. �MEMBERS NON - PROFIT DEVELOPERS TRUSTEES 940 McDANIEL STREET, S. W. CHAIRMAN OF BOARD ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30310 Joe Stallings VICE-CHAIRMAN TELEPHONE: 523-5166-7 Rev. J. L. Marshall SECRETARY CLARK MARTIN AVERY SHIELDS NATHANIEL PROTHRO SAMUEL COCHRAN REV. AUSTIN FORD PRINCE MARTIN. SR . HAROLD OWENS CLAUDE BARNES REV. JOEL W. MARSHALL TECHNICAL ADVISORS August 28,1969 TREASURER C. G . EZZARD C. BRON CLEVELAND PAUL MULDAWER ELIZA PASCHAL Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. City Hall Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Mayor Allen: As Chairman of the Board, I would like to express my appreciation for your vote of confidence in the Special Executive Committee Meeting for the contract with Model Neighborhood, Incorporated. I want to assure you that all of the Board members will work hard to make this project a success. we are seeking to have our project to be one of the things Atlanta can be proud of and one of the things that you can point to in the future with pride. we greatly appreciate working with the threeman committee that you appointed. The Board have e x pressed a desire to develop a continuing relationship with this committee. We would appreciate you using your influence to help us develop this relationship . Thank you very much for your concern and cooperation . Sincerely your..,s , J~/eab �EDWIN L. STERNE LE ST E R H. PERSELLS CHAIRMAN G E OR GE s. r:xccUT I V C 0 1RF.: CT O R I'd.::> S CCR E TARY CARL TON GARRETT CRAFT 0 1rn: c T OR er FtNANCC VICE CIIAIRMA~I C, IL 8E RT H. 80GC.S l' t11 r c:1· o n at,· II CIU~ INC HOWA R D O P E NSHAW J. B. S L AYTON DIR E C TOR OF R ED E VE L O PME N T FP.ANK G. ETHERIDGE GEORGE R. SANDER T E C HNI CAL D I RE C TOR JACK F . GLENN 82 4 HVRT DUILOINC ATLA NTA . GEORGIA 3 03 03 JA C KS ON 3 - 50 74 A gust 25., 1969 Mro ,Johnny Joh.nson Director of Model Cities Program. 673 Capitol Aven e So Wo A"i:.lant~., Georgia 30315 De ar Joh..nny: Th is is to confirm t he proced •res agreed. upon in :my office on August 29., 1969 wit,h respect, to exped:l"l;in.g hous ing c onstruction in the Model Cities NDP area s: l o Parcel C-4 ,_,. Mro Stan Ay r 1 s s ne plan prov iding f or for ty (40) townhouse n its approve do Meeting to be set up with Urban East and Mro Wri ght to r eview pla..n. submitt al of appli ca t i on to FHA s election of non.,,,profit s pons ors ., e t c,, YJro Openshaw to procee d with FHA on establishing pri ce of land~ pr eparing d is position doc uments applying to City for c ommunity unit plano 20 Temporary ho sing site T, 21 (G orgi a Aven ue and Cori_,_"lalJ..y Street) .,. Mr ., Joe S.m.ith., Archit ect r al Consulta.11.t to :,he Housing Author i ty., proposed 16 .mobile ho.mes on t his 2o5 a cre siteo ~ousing Authority to study possibility of .mor e reloc atable units., exped i te constr uct i on o Mro Collier Gl adi n to pr par a a r Gsol1::1tion per.m.itting use of reloca.,, table housing units in t he Model Ci t ies areao 3:, A revie~-.r of -t,he o~-~9r :::.:i:n..'3 -;-,(:_....,:pora:>'."".f hoL,sing sites in the 1969 NDP areas of Model c .:.ties i ::.dic2.-:~es :.O:ce. fcD _o'.·J::.::'.lg a ct i on : ao The :fousir.g A;::·0::.ori·':-:y ·t o :.)l"Ocee'.J. -,rit.h -;~~e a cqui s ition, relocai;,io::1. of f2..'l'.l.il ~. es R.na. e:;o1it ion of s tructures on T...5., T-12_, T...,~_6: T• '~-7 a..d c:(93c ::.te constructi on of relo ca·'"able hot·.s i :'.'.:?; ·-.:.~.:.-':,;; o:. . t::-:.ss e. s~:: esl) 2~," bo 0 The Housing Ac:tt:.-:.or:::'·.y -:·.o " ;:p:!..ore possfoi~.H-y o.f leas i ng '.i:'-10 for r eloc2:'"-2.Y_" :i.c·~s :>s w .c.1 pro~a 3~L i:::.·0h acqr:isiti on of s:t,e o �Mrs JolL'11...n.y JolLn.son Augus t 25., 1969 Page Noo 2 Co The rema1n:mg ten;porary hous i ng s1-c,es., T-18., T-9., T-11., and T.,.19 t o be t h.e l as t order of business as these involve sever e topogr aphi c or acqui s i t i on problems, the latter sit e .having been developed. by the Board of Education for a school pl aygr ound o 4o The Housing Authori ty to pr oceed Jith relocatable housing on the block north of Richar dson Street., betYeen Ira and Wi ndsor St reets in t he RawsonWashington Urban Redevel opment Areao 5o The block b ounded by Georgia Avenu e Capitol, Bass., ,a nd Crew Streets to be leased to Model Cities fo r housi ng cent er a...n.d par kingo The block bounded by Georgi a Aven ue., Cr ew., Bass , and Washington Streets t o be leas ed by the Hous ing Authority for stadium parkingo Land to be offered for s ale f or co.nun,ercial uses compatible wi t h stad i um as soon as documents have been prepar ed o _ ease advis e if you have a."1.y ques ti ons pertaini ng to t he above., Very tr' _y yours , Ho:-rc:.:'.' ~ Opens haw Director of Redevel opment HO:vw cc : Mr o J ames Wr ight Mr o Coll ier .Gladin Y.Lr o Thom.as Eskew �August 19, 1969 Mr. M yles G. Smith 25 Inman Circle, N. E. Attanta, Georgia 30309 . I Dear Mr. Smith: Since Mayor Allen i out of the city, I should like to acknowledge receipt of your lett r of Augu t 17th, expres ing your views about Model Neighborhood, Inc. and your endor ement of Mr . Edward Moody. M yor Allen h s already appointed a special committee to make recommendation about the structure of Model Neighborhood, Inc., and that l"Cport i due hortly. May I a sure you th t your letter will be brought to hi upon his return. attention Sincerely, Mrs. Ann Mos a Executive S er t.ary AM:lrd �2.r fa,.,,~;, C - ~/e- J ~4.~h / ac;7i'~ 47u.rr / 7/ //.,., <1 ,-q c ?' ~,1. c;7 ha-, ,4'&,'I 7 _.. .- /J/E' Jo 3 07 /?~? I ,.-,/' ~r' A'r/4,.. /4 ~tY /Ir/4 ~ /..c _, 0e-7 "; flu 47,,... ~ / ~ ~//e~ : ~ ~ ~ J ~r~ /4~ J ~ . ~~ /4~r' r ~ ~ / , r· ... f? ~ - d~ JI ~ z- ~ ,F ~ _,/4. 7 ~ - 143.215.248.55 /,,/,.,7 L ~ /~ ~ ·/ ~ ?ac " -~~ ~ /4 ---4 ~,~~ ~ ~~ ~ ___&~ / ~ ~r<- ~ - , , - < ' a r c - -., ~c< -<" -- . _.,ef ~~ �143.215.248.55 J ~ ~ r~~ .d47,,; / ~. r - f -; ? ; ~ __,- ~ J ~ ~// ~- ~~7ze ~ ~ ~ ~ y~ ~ ~/r~ ~ -~ ,,/4_. ~ - ~J _;_r ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ - ~ ~ ~ -I ~ - ~ / ~ ~ - ~ ~~-~ ......... ~ ~ z;,(';;j < F"'-<c.•:r/ ~ ~ ~~/ _ ~c-e . /4; 143.215.248.55 ~ ·?-r-r --? /4~ ~ ~ - I( -._ i ... y - ~ / L: /-r/_~ . =~ 7(- ~~ - • - 7? ~~/ ~ 7,/<-'••.t:e -C4t~ . �3 ~- ~ ~ -4 ~ ~< ~ ~ ~~ - 143.215.248.55 d. ~ ,_:_ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~J ,f°#Vl.L / ~ , ,.r~ ~ ~ ~ -9 / ~ -..cj- ~ / ~~ . .... rt - , _:._~ .£.-4:., ~ ' ~ ~ ~-~ ~ ~~ ~,~~ ~ 143.215.248.55 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ If' ~ 7 ~,,_,,- ~ /J ""'- A143.215.248.55 ~ ~~ ~ , .~ r--- ...c-.. ~ ~-~~ ­ ~,.7 _;;7%, . ~ - - / ~ ~- -r- - �143.215.248.55 /~ ~ ~ "" d' r - ~ ~ -d. ~ - , ~ ec),,,f- ,, ~~z-X--~ / ~ _, ~ /4 / d 143.215.248.55 ~ 143.215.248.55 15:39, 29 December 2017 (EST) ~ ~ . JD ,-Z /Ac . , , ~ ~ r/~ ~~.. - ~ ~ L... ~ z<- ~ - ~'7· 143.215.248.55%~~ ~ ~~ ~~r If _;tS"- ,r~ ~r ~ /. -wr- ~ /..' Crh~ /#7 d7 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A--ze _:._ ~ _L_H~ ~77 . ~/ J ~7 ��COST CONTROL STATEMENT AS OF : _ _.,...J~uwnw;ea.-3+10+c- l+--9~G~9----___;..---CITY OF :_-1-A-lrl.,.t""l+-iru-:1-Ft.;;ia,__,,,...G ...,e ...o ........ r"-lg....;.._.a.,___ _ _ _ __ MODEL CITIES. PROGRAM NUMBER: BUDG ET ESTlMATES Total Amt. Ptir Cum. Est :i.irk"l tc I. Lates t Approved Budget COST CATEGORY Program Administra tion Through Current Quarter COST INCURRED Total for Tota 1 Reported Cumulative ·Month Through Reorted Month $618,66 3 .00 2os,ooo.oo TR003N Intra-Neighbo11hood 'Bus System 14,009. 72 14, 009.72 ·14,009. 72 14,009.72 Subtotal ~GfR~AN~D~T~O~T~AJ~,--_j_-~d,i...ru:l~~L-+...J....!143.215.248.55 15:39, 29 December 2017 (EST)1~-~l~l~8Q.L..12~0~3~•.~5~4.!-.----i.1_1~8~,.2.0.3.54 • . Certified Correct Signatur e This cost includes those ex penses incurred ~uring the 90 day interim budget, _March-June 1969. Title F.UD-W-:,;h., O. C. ). Date �C I ,\ C {) ~ Farm <>pproverl 1',.di;;,• B.,, ,.a-., No . ~3 - Rl 16, N T ,~ ~ ,1 1; ~ 1 • \ ,, ,. •· ,\In ·. l. _ . :: •. \ Ci ty of l\ tlan ta , Geor,::; ia f FlNANClA.L C NPi YION ST Al' EMEH 'f MODEL CIT Y PLANl'ilMG GR.A.I~ r L68 Mitchell Stre et C . , S T .). T . 1 ' • 1£. C O C- E Jun e_ 3 0_,___ 1 96 9 , (H I ~ L_ At lanta, Georgi a 30 30 ,.... MF C 0t-JT l-1 A C: T 10 -- 001 P ROJECT OR P AOC ~ J\ M . ' 1.l MBE ~ NO . A$ EH Cash : $ 6, 6 79 . 62 Cash P etty C ash $ Total Cash 6 16 7 9 . 6 2 Accounts Rece ivable : -o- P l ann i ng Grant CDA Contribut ion - o- -0 -· Other T otal Accounts Receivable 306 , 90 8 . 00 3 1 3 ,5 87 . 62 C os t Co ntrol --- -- ---· -- -- -----~ TOTA!. ASli EH LIA.ll!I ILITI ES AHO CA PITAL ---·- -- C urrPn l L iabi liti f's - 0- Accounts Puyab!P Acc rue c! L iab ilities T otal C.:um·nt. Lia bilit ies 6, 6 79 . 6 2 Deferred Credits . -0 ·-0- unf,a tni•d Pla r111 in1; Grant u nearnr,d CD/l Contribution T ril<.1 l Oflie ff'd C r,'dirs -o- 6,679. 6 2 TOUL LIA BILI TIE :S Capital: 61 , 4 08 . 00 2 4 5 ,5 0 0 . 00 CDA C on tr i bu:ti on P !anrang Grant ~06,908. 00 Tota l Capi.tal 31 3, 587. 6 2 v ________,___________________ ~ - ' i EP Al~ TIJ! E t•• OF H 0 1,1S,l~! G A l~ :J !.>'HI "'- "'-' O E V F.: Ll1C>MEl'J "r il> MO OE I- S T A 1 EMEN T OF f' !NANC l .t L. C ON~H 101'1 n:naa.p Hm:>-~',1111h .. o,. C IT , t!-:$ c:. -- - -- PfH)c:;~.._M HU D-70 411 .. 6 ) �~ - -~~J.:.; - - ~ ~:-: ri _ .. : ~ : ~ -~-- --·.:__ -- - . · · ..•• .. · •. Y!i-;r ,,: r- uu 1 :. _ _ _ _ Prog~a.,,71 Di r ector ___ ____ . __ { "\ i.t!t>i Jul y 10.,___ 19§9 __ ·---·-··- ··---· ____ _ ( r:.:t t c ':-u tJtq 1. t: r t d) r i I .... _____ ______ ·----·- ···-~----- ---· ____... --- ---·-·--- ·-·· .... . , _ ..-... ... --..····--··- ------· ------ --- -- - ·---< �MIN UTE S - - ----- - MOD.EL NEIGHBORHOOD EXECU'rIVE BOARD Tuesday , J u ly 1 , 1969 10:00 a.m. The monthly mee ting o f the Mode l Neighborhood Executive Board w_as held on Tuesday , J u ly 1, 1 9 69 a t 10:00 a.m . in Committee Room #2, City Hall. 'rhe following membe r s wer e p r e sent: Mayor Ivan All e n, Jr . , Chairman Mrs. Mattie An s l ey · Mr. Claren ce Colema n Mr. Joh n Hood Alderman E. Gregory Gr i ggs Alderman G . Eve r ett Mil l ic an Mr. Walter Mi tche ll Deacon Lewi s Peters Mr . J. D. Newber ry Dr. c. Mi l e s Smith Mrs. Martha Weems Mr . Bill Wainwright Mr. Jo e Wh ite ly Absent : Mr . Sam Ca l dwell Other City o f fic i als, r epresentatives f rom n eighborho o d o r ganizat ionB, and tlle pr e ss were al s o present . The Chairman, .Mayor Ivan Allen, J.r . , called the meeting to order . He t hen e nt e rtained a motion for the ado p t ion of the June 10 Minutes. It was so moved a.nd unanimousl y appr o ved without correction. REPOR~r OF THE MASS CONVEN"rION STEERING COMMITTEE Deacon Peters distributed copies of the Minutes of the Model Cities Mass Convention which met on June 15 and he stated that he was very impressed with the participation of the residents since the program moved into imple:rnentation. Mr. Wainwright moved that the Minutes of the June 15 mef~tinq be a.ccepted by the Board. The motion was seconded and! unanimously approved . �2 REPORT FROM· S PECIAL :EMPLOYMENT COMMITTEE Iv.tr. Coleman read and distributed copie s o f t h e r e solut i on p r e pared by the Special Employment Committ e e. The re solut i on est ablish ed g u idelines fo r t h e Mode l Ci t i e s Progr am and contracting a gen c ies to fol l o w in the i r emp l oyme n t p r actices . The resolu tion s p e ll ed out a progr a m t h at · a ssur es Mod e l Cities jobs wi ll go to Mode l Neighborhood res i dent s. Mr. Mi ll ican sta ted t hat he f elt the req uirements l i sted i n the resol u tion wo uld tie t he hands of the c ont r ac ting agencies in fil·l in g posit i o ns. He specifically que stioned t he proposal that Model Ci tie s r e s ide nts b e give a base "re sid ent p r efe r ence" of 10 points or ten per cent and that all firms o r ag·e nc.ies contracting to d o proj e cts in t he Mo de l Cities area b e b ound by policies set by the Board. Mr . Millican s tated that he had prepared another resolution t hat was a l i ttle les s strict in its requirements and that he h a d confer r e d with the City Attorney on its Inerits. Mr . Coleman then moved that the Boar d adopt a nd appr o ve his resolution and r efer: i t to the City Attorney for lega l i n t erpretation . Mrs. Ansley seconde d t h e mot ion. Mr . Whitley brought out the fact that Mr. Millican had ·the righ t to read his resolution to the Board as a mi nor ity r e por t . Mr. Mi l l i can sa i d that h e preferred not to read his resolut i on a s a mino r ity r epo r t. Afte r further discussion o n whether t o a p prove the reso lut ion or t o j ust a c cept i t as i nforma tion, Mr. Coleman reword ed his moti on. He mo v ed t hat t he Board refer the reso l u tio n to the C ity Attorney f or a ruling ; i f i t is a legal document t hat it becomes a po licy o f t h e Boar d, if not , t hat i t be r eferr ed b ack to the Board. 'l'h e mot i on was s econded by Mr. Ho o d and approved by the Board. Mr. Cole man t h e n s ub mit t e d a r e s o l ut i on that called f or the c r e ation o f a new po s itio n on t he Mode l Ci t ie s Staf f of Resident Employment Opportunity Coord i nat or, whose r e spons i b i lity shall b e t o impleme n t the employment pol icies of the Board and assure compliance of the a genc i e s o r o r g anizatio ns contracted b y t h e program. Copies o f t h e reso l u t i on wer e distr i buted to al l Board members . Mr . Mill ican mo ved that t he resolutio n be refe rred to the Per son n el Comm i t tee for their revi ew . The motion was secon ded and approve d . Mr. Coleman a sked that the c omm i ttee report at the next meeting . REPORT FROM THE REVIEW COMMITTEE Co pies of the recommendations from the Review Committe-e.~ wer,e d istributed t o a l l Board members. Mrs~ Weems moved that the recommendations be a c cepted. ·r he motion wa s secon.de d . Mr. Hood a s k e d that a br i ef discription be given of a l l pl'.'ojects that were a p proved by the Committee. Mr. Johnson proce eded to give a discription of t he projects as they were l isted i:n the recomme 1ndation. A discussion was opene d by Mr. Whitl e y conce rning Project SS-049N ,, Project Expand, which gives Economic Opportunity Atlanta, Inc. $140,000 to set-up and staff a Neighborhood Service Center in G.rant Park and Adair Parle r.tr. Whitely stated that a majority of the �3 residents of Grant Park did not want an EOA Service Center in the area . Deacon Peters said that only a small segment of the r e sidents did not want the EOA Center and that the othe rs fel t that the re was a real need for the center . Mr.Newberr y , speak i ng for Ada ir Park., said that he feels that the p rojec t was needed by t he people and should not be deleted Mr. Whitley then moved that Project Expand be deleted from t he Program. The motion fa i l ed due to the lack of a second. Dr . Smit h then moved to a pprove the four projects listed to be carried out by EOA. The motion was seconded and approved by the Board. The four . projects are: SS-028N, Neighborhood Consumer Program ; SS-049N, Project Expand ; TR-OOlC , Specialized Passenger Van Service; EM-024N, Resident Emergency 1\s~'- istance Fund to Job Applicants. It was moved and seconded and unanimously approved that Proj e ct . SS-009C, Crisis Oriente d Counseling, be approved. Mr. Wairri:-rright moved that Project SS-033N, Multi-Day c a.re Services, be approved. Mr. Mitchell . seconded the motion. Mr. Coleman then asked for a report on the status of the Southside Day Ca re Association. Mr. Shimkus reported that the Model Cities Program was very much interested in relating to the Southside Day Care As sociation in a funding position, and that a proposal had been recei v e d from their staff which was being review for funding in next yea r' s program. Mr. Coleman asked if it were still possible to fund a part of the Southsid e fa cility this year. Mr. Shimkus answered y es . Mr. Coleman then asked that the Review Committee rev i e w the Southside proposal and report on it at the next meeting . A v o te was then taken on the mot ion t o appr ove the Multi-Day Care Services t o be implemented by the Senior Citizens Services of Metr opol itan Atlanta. It was unamiously approved . It was then moved and s econded and unanimously appr ove d that Pro ject SS-O llC , Homemaker Services; Project SS-026N ~ Legal Educat ion and Project SS- 27N Model Home Managemen:t, be app:x~oved . It was moved and seconded that the two projects t o be implemented by Model Neighborhood, Inc., be approved . Deacon Peters said that the Steering Committee met to discuss Model Neighborhood , Inc., and recommends that Mode l Neighborhood, Inc., not be appro ved t o r -e cei ve the $35,000 in Model Cities f unds. The Mayor then stated fo r the record that he does not think Mr. Moody is qua lified to car.ry out the projects. He said that he questioned the validity of Mr . Moody's ability to carry out the pro jects because of his past employment record with the cit y. For these reasons, the Mayor feels that he cannot endorse the pro j ect s' implementation by Model Neighborhood Inc. Dr. Smith sai.d that since Mr. Moody has obtained technical people to assist him, that he strongly endorses the projects. Alderman.Griggs said that he was reluctant to t rust the Board of Model Neighborhood, Inc. with that amount of money because of tht~ir in·abil ity to get together. M:': . Mitchel l said Ju~ was r.elllctant because of the Mayor 's statement and suggested that the Boai:.·d post.ponia: action on the projects until the next meeting. Dr. Smith asked foJC �4 a r oll c al l vote s o that the peop le will know how the Boar d feels. Further discu ssion followed ·w ith other Board meroJ)ers expressing their views . Mr. Hood then offered a subst: i.tu.b~ motion to the original mo tion tha t Model Neighborho od , Inc ., projects be t abled until the next regular meeting in or der to aive them time to reorgan.i.ze and restructure their progra.n, . Mrs. Weems seco nded the motio n. The motion carried with 8 voting for approval and 3 o pposing . .Mr. Wai. n.w:c ight stated that some one should g ive MNI d irection as to what the Board expects. Mr . Millican s uggested that MNI prepare a written s t atement showing what. they are go:i..nq to do with the mo ne y. JvJr. Newber r y said that he would like to know who the expert s are on the MJ.'fI staff. The Mayor .said that the Reveiw Committee would meet to d iscuss the pro jects with the Board o f Directors of MNI. A discussion the n followed on the expansion of the Re vi e w Committe e to include the entire board. !V'ir. Mitchell moved t hat t he personnE-11 of the Review Committee be the same as the personnel o f: the Executive Board. The motion was seconded. Mr. Johnson cautione d the Board that the Rev i ew Committee should be prepared to meet weekly or bi-weekly. Dr . Smi th brought out the fact tha.t a quo rum wil l be necessary b efore any official action can b e taken . Mr. Hood then offered a. substitute motion that the Review Commi t tee be expan ded by two members and that they be community residents. Deacon Peters seconded the mot ion . After a discussion on the me ri t s of expanding the Reveiw Committee by two members or expanding it to i ncludrc. the entire board, Mr . Hood withdrew his motion and a vote was take n on the previous motion. The mot ion wa s carried with onP (l)op r.,os ing. Mr. Griggs moved that the balance of the proj e ct s recommended by the Review Committee b e approved. The motion was seconded and approved by the Board. The other projects are! EM-019N, Staffing Cent.rai Faci lity and Mechanism of Serv ice; EM- 0 2 3N , Direc t Me dical Maintenance; EM-015N, Re sident Work Attitude Chanqe ; EM-00lC, Mode l Cities Mass Convent.ion, Inc.; RC-003N, Purchase Vacant La n d for. Block Parks a nd Playlots, RC-005N, Mobile Re creatio n Cen ters. 01J) BUSINESS Mr. White ly said tha t because of the meeting be ing held a week early , he was not prepar ed to g ive hi.s report on relocation; but he would give in in the August me e t i n g . DIREC'.!'OR I S REPOR'I' Mr. James L . Wright, J.i:., Director of Physical Developmen t q ave a re~rt on the r eloca.t i on a ct ivity out s i de of th.e Urban Ren ·~wa l j!\n:ia. . The meet i ng was a d j o urned at 1 2 :20 p . m. A P PROVED :: APPR0\17::D: I ,. h ... '·~ ·-.u .. ,•dl ;"( - - - ~ ~ . J i ... . -, ~~- -' · r ~ • · ·-· _ _ _ _ _ , ..... ~- - - - -- · ,'Johnn.y-.... c. Sohn. son, Di r e ctor �NON • PROFIT DEVELOPERS TRUSTEES MEMBERS 940 McDANIEL STREET, S. W . '#.!~MAN OF BOARD rnll###~' AVERY SHIELDS NATHANIEL PROTHRO SAMUEL COCHRAN REV. AUSTIN FORD PRINCE MARTIN, SR. HAROLD OWENS CLAUDE BARNES REV. JOEL W . MARSHALL ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30310 /;f,.fficHAIRMAN JOE STALLING TELEPHONE: 523-5166-7 SECRETARY CLARK MARTIN TECHNICAL ADVISORS C . BRON CLEVELAND PAUL MULDAWER ELIZA PASCHAL TREASURER C. G . EZZARD J uly 9_,1969 Mayor I van Allen Jr . 56 Mi tche l l Stree t At lanta ., Ge orgia De a r Sir : The Board of Dire c tors of Model Neighb orhood Inc . request a meeting with you on Friday J uly 11., 1969 to dis cuss the circumstances around the funding of our o!l'.!gantzation . The purpose of this meeting is to c l ear up the position you have t aken and to answ e r any questions about thi s matter. Sincerel y yours Joseph Stallings Cha irman., Board of Di re ctors �' - CITY OF .ATLANT.A CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING C OLLIE R B. GLADIN , Directo r July 9, 1969 Mr. Johnny Johnson, DiNctor Model Cities Program 673 Caplt,ol Avenue, S. W. tlanto, Georgia Dear Johnny: to your verbal re st bock In the sprf rtlcl tlon by tt-. ~annl . 0.par t stoff in the phyaicol p lanning effort. However, to m"f our 1969 pr , hcav. .In writing octly hat i kt you with us to perform, whot mnn0t1WAt you think It wfll requl,.; nd whtn the work mutt be accom fished . Without such Information, It Ill b• y dlfflc lt for ua to ..scono ny furthe t This letter 11 In r• for more we already havtt. 1d l.fdt'9, • wtll •ffi Jn -1 Cftl• In the ntl... city. ve phyu for • nw.. ,., �Mr~ Johnny Johnson July 9, 1969 - 2- hav- xp,vaiM:JU b for • The d. partm nt wi 11 b unobl .. to accept tota I r sponsibillty in th or. a of citlz ns' involv ment . The respon.siblllty of w obtafning oltfzen review ond approval must contfnu to rest with you.r ·a g ncy which was stofh,d J .r this urf>O" during at least th 1969 planning y r. Oth•r t.hcin this singlt, limitation we ore wlllln to do ev rythlng w can to support th Model Cities Pr ram. Sincer, ly yours, ~W> Collier • GI. · in Planning DlfOctor C G/bls c:.e: Mayor Ivan Allen, J, •.....Mr. ney Cook Mr. G ry Grf J Mr. Everett MU II can �~ ~ITY OF ATLANTA CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COLLIER B. GLADIN, Dir ector July 9, 1969 Mr. Johnny Johnson, Director ~ I Cl tias Progrorn 673 Capitol Avenue, S. W. Atlanta, Gaorgia . Dear Johnny: This lotter Is In res;x:me to your verbol request bock In the &pting for mora po.rtici;>atbn by tha Plcnning Oop•.:utm&nt staff in tha A.'ooel Citios physical pfanntng effort. Ho-waver, to meet our 1969 prQgrcm , we must have in writing exactly what tasks you wish m t~ P3rt0rnl, whot mon»ower you think It will require,. ond whoo the work must be accom;:,Hshed . 'Nlth-:,ut such Information, it will be very difficult for us to respond any further than we a lready hove. As you kn'lW, tho !)hyslcol plcmnfng efforts should mesh closely within the proposed 1970 Nefohborhooc.l Davelopment Program activities ond your own 1970 action year program development. Since Neighborhood C.velopment Program deadline, ore a~oaching with bewildering a ~ , every day that paaes maket the time factor more critical. We wlah .to- do all we can to help but our other commitments must ~ met also. So It 11 ~ tiol .thot we n;ceive a concrete expression of your needs tight' away. At we have 10id before, we will do everything WO can to alJt the physical plannlng efforts In Model Cities in ochi ving the maximum benefit for that area ond the entire city. There Is, however, one limltatlon which �/1,,\r. Johnny Johnson July 9, 1969 - 2- we have e.mpressecl before . The deparhnent will bo unable to accept total resporuibility in the a rao of c;tizens• involvement. The respomibility of obtaining citize n review and C!pprovol mv:it coni-inua to rest with your agency which wos ~toffed for this purpose during at feoot the 1969 planning year. Other than this single li mita tion we am willin9 to do everything w con to wpport th$ WlodeJ Cities Pr-:igram . Sincerely yours, Co!lte r S. G l<X!in Planning Director ·caG/1,b ccr Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. Mr. Rodney Cook Mr. Gregory Griggs Mr. EVGrott l'v1iliicon --~ · -' ·~ �I . . I I I model APRI L 5 M Y W T ... l 2 6 7 R 9 !3 1-1 I~ 16 ZO 11 '11 23 lil'AV r i 3 4 lil ll G U T W T > z 11 18 19 Zl ZS 26 vnn n . .... p s .. .. .. . I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 il 14 !5 16 17 JS 19 20 21 Z2 7.l 2( "• n •N~ ~ Bl-MONTHLY REPORT . • . - · - - . . . ··· - · - -~- _ ____ ,. _ _ _ _..._J �APRIL-MAY MONTHLY MILESTONES: HUD and the City of Atlanta signed the official implementing contract for supplemental funds. The first delegate agency contract - the intra-neighborhood bus system - was being finalized and was expected to be effected the first part of June. A thorough review of all 1969 pro- jects was initiated and nearly completed. The majority of adm.Lnistrative staff positions was filled. MILESTONES NEXT PERIOD: to be promulgated. uation system Many delegate agency contracts are Finalization of the is to be effected. be completed .. Plans and Eval- ' ,. · Staffing is expected to �CONTRACT NO. MP.-10-001 City of Atlanta Model Neighborhood Program 673 Capitol Avenue, s .w. Atlanta, Georgia 30315 Johnny c. Johnson, Directok April-May Bi-Monthly Report June 10, 1"969 Report No. 7 Frepared By Alan Wexler Technical Write INDEX Page .MA.JOR DEVELOP1'1:E:NTS. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 General...................................... 1 Administration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Social Services Planning................. Physical Planning... . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Economic Development..................... State Participation...................... 1 2 9 12 Data Collection.............................. Problems. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 12 ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE ••••••••••••••••••••••••• . • 7 13 Policy 1and Advisory Groups.................. Staff .. .................... 13 13 RESIDENT INVOLVEMENT.. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 14 FEDERAL ASSISTANCE. • .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 15 0 .................. 0 �I • MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS A. General, Project Status, and Other Related Projects Under Coordination A.l. Administration A.l.a. The City of Atlanta and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development officially signed ·the $7.175 million supplemental funds contract May 20. Mayor Ivan Allen Jr. signed for Atlanta and Ed Baxter, Regional Administrator, signed for HUD. Present for the ceremony were Earl Metzger, Regional Model Cities Director, and Johnny c. Johnsor Atlanta Model Cities Director. A,l.B. On May 29, the City officially designated the Negro-owned Citizens Trust Company to be the officiaJ depository for supplemental funds. This represents the largest account ever e143.215.248.55:ished by the City of Atlanta in a Negro-owned Bank. A.l.c. Also on May 29, Model Cities signed its first delegate agency contract - with the Atlanta Transit System for a $205,000 intra-neighborhood ~us system. Mayor Allen, other political leaders, business leaders and news media representatives were given a tour of the bus route, which officially was to start June 4. A.l.d. Other priority contracts were scheduled to be signed during the coming reporting period. A.l.e. A comprehensive rev iew of a ll supplementallyfunded projects was completed by the Plans and Evaluation and Program Management Divisions. This review was designed and executed to assure that each project was pronP.,..1~ A.-:: :=:.:..... '1 and ad".\ressed itself r~ ~he ~pacific objective for which it was designed. In addition, pre- contract reviews were held with a specially- appointed review team from tha Model Cities Executive Board. A.lof. The Plans and Evaluation staff began formalizing a Resident Service Information System which would l �-2- permit Model Cities to serve more adequately each resident who comes into contact with any project in the program. The system would involve nonsupplemental-funded as well as supplemental-funded agencies. Contacts were made with p~ivate firms which might be capable of designing the system. A.2 . A.l.g. Also included in preparation for implementation was a comprehensive salary study regarding simil ar job classifications in the various components. The purpose of the study was to discover salary differences in positions which will require the same type of work. Wherever such disc:r.ep:mcic s were found, the appropriate agencies were asked to review their salary scales. A.l.h. In accordance with a HUD request, Model Cities submitted an overall survey regarding in-house and on-loan administrative personnel. The study includ ec salary scales, recruiting pract ices, and types of positions . HUD h ad requeste d such action to compare similarities and differences among the various Model Cities programs throughout the nation. A.l.i. Concentrated work continued on planning for the t e nagency multi- pur pose cente r scheduled to be c omplete < by July 15. Commodore Corporation of Omaha, Nebrask, was the low b i dder for the modular-constructed, 20,000 sq. ft. facility. The contract with Commod oi i s e x pected t o b e s i gned during t he c oming repor t ing period. The contract with the Atl anta Housing Authority for t h e l and is also expected to b , s igned dur ing t h e corning r epor tin g p eriod. Social Services A.2°a. HEW initiated a signoff system whereby any of its future projects affecting 5 00/4 of the Model Cit i es area residents would require a certificate of approval from the Model Cities Director. A.2obo Several meetings were held with the ten agencies wnich will be housed in the temporary multi-purpose facil~tyo · Among the major results were establishment of an operating committee to oversee the quality of services to residents and the resolving �-3- of various adminis trative matters (decentralizing phone service~ system f or paying utility bills,etc~ ), The Committee will include agency r e presentative s and re~Jdents. A.2.c. With the Work Incentive Program (WIN) scheduled to begin L"1 July, Model Citie s established a WIN program 'l'ask For c e for the Model Cities are a. This ·Task Force will include repre s e ntative s fr om the State Department of F~mily and Children Se rvice s (DFCS)° , Fulton County .DFCS , Georgia State Employment Service, Senior Citizens , and Model Cities . Its purpose will be to develop means of coordin ating whatever services ar~ needed to make WIN successful(day care, e t c.). A.2.d. Several meetings were held t o discuss the problem of hunger. The participants were convened by federal HEW officials and i n cluded representatives of federal and local agenc ies. Subsequently and as a result of the meetings, Model Cities convened a meeting of several community-based agencies at which a U.S. De partment o f Agriculture off ici al explained the new Food For C11i ldre n program. As a result of · that mee t ing, s ome c ornrnuni t:;;"- based agencies actually fi led applications f or t he p r ogr am. A.2 .e. Representative s from the Wa.,;1 ington and Regiona l office s of HEv1 's Social Rehabilitati0n Serv ice met in an all-day briefing s e ssion with Model Ci ties staff members. Thelr purpose s were to learn how the various Model Cities p roposals r e lated to their particular work and to study Model Cities needs. A.2.f. Severa.l meetings were held with the Fulton County DFCS, and Senior Citizens in developing a protec tive services project for senior citizens. A.2.g. Contacts were made with the Board of Education to develop a training program for senior citizen s . This program would train senior citizens who would be working in the Model Cities progr am and person s who would be· working with the senior citizens. �- 4- A.2.h. The proposal by the Fulton County DFCS for Housing Aid to the aged was submitted to and reviewed by Washington federal officials. The program would coordinate information flow on housing for senior citizens and would also emphasize social services . A.2.i . . The he a lth component project entitled Health, .--• Education and Services was not favorably considered by HEW's r egiona l Technical Review Commi ttee . This project, which was for $1.3 million of the total $2 . 9 million health component budget,is considered vital to the over all program. It would provide pre-pai d health care, family outreach workers and dental serv ices . A.2.j. At least partially because of the unfavorable review on the above project, three other projects will probably b e temporarily delayed• 1"hese projects are the Health Facility building, the Group Practice Project a nd the Multi-phasic Screening Center. The latter two projects would have been housed in the Health Facility. Model Cities officials felt tha t without the Health, Education and Ser vice s Pr oject, t he other three proj ects c ould n o t f ully achieve their objectives. A. 2.k. The Family P lannin g Clinic project was still being considered by HEW's Children's Bureau and was expected t o be funded when some r elatively minor matters were resolved . A.2.1. Favor able response was also expected from HEW's Social Rehabilitation Service regarding the pr o pos ed Me nta l Re t ardation Workshop project. A.2.m. The menta l He a lth Plann er pro ject wa s still under in-house review. A.2.n. The Preventive Dental Care Project was rewritten prior to first submission. being A.2.o. Georgia State College was funded by HEW to train the e i ghteen residents on the twenty- five-membe r �-5- Better Health Corpotation Board. The Board, incorporated in January, also has seven professionals. A.2.p . .·,,_ll,," .. . ,) · ' , ;; / ~:: -.;J. ime prevention, major emphasis was in : developing the best possible relationship with every known criminal justice agency working in the area and/or that will have an impact on the area. Contacts included the Atlanta Police Depar t ment, the Fulton county Juvenile Court, Fulton County Probation Department, Fulton County 2arole District Office, State Board of Pardons and Parole , State Division of Children and Youth, State Board ' of Corrections , National Council on Crime and Delinquency, etc. A .2.q. Meetings were held with members of the residents' c rime prevention committees and with members of the profess jn~ ~l-Tech r. ical AdviBory Committee. The 1969 crime prevention plan was introduced and discussed at the meetings, and t he committees were asked to make input for 1969 implementation and · 1970_ planning. A.2.r. The Cr i me Prevention Planner did detailed work in p r eparation for implementation of the crime data compi lation project. This project, the planner f elt, should be one of the fi r st to be implemented in his program be cause it is so interrelated with all aspects of his 1969 program and with future planning. Most of t he negot iations were arranged with the Atlanta Board of Education regarding the ~un~rous educational projects which will receive supple mental funds in 1969 (Total supp lemental funds: $ 2 ,.159,00). F i nal d~tails w !re expected to be worked out in t he coming report ing period. A planning committee was formed to work on key issues which will be involved in the proposed educational complex. Included on the committee are r~presentatives of the Board of Education, Model Cities , residents, consultants, the Housing Authority, and the City Planning Department . The need for more land or a cutback in the program we r e two issues which were fa c ing the committee. �-6- A.2.u. Three meetings were held with regional federal officials, Model Cities officials and Board of Education officials. Discussions centered on new or existing possible funding resources. From these meetings, the Board of Education and Model Cities proceeded on devel oping proposals for money available throught the 11 Talent Search" project. �-7A. 3. Physical Planning A cooperative agr eement was developed between Model Cities, the Atl a nta Housing Authority and the Ci ty Housing · Code Inspection Division regarding propert i es inside and outside 1969 clear ance and rehabil itation areas. Basically , in 1969 Rehabilitation Areas, the Housing Authority will obtain a list of structures which have met city code enforcement standards in recent years. Owners whose properties cur rently mee t the standards will have the option of either taking advantage of possible gr a n ts or loans under the Housing Authority's r ehabilitation program to meet project standards or continuing to maintain structures in compliance with the City Housing Code. A.3.c. In future-designated rehabi litat ion areas other than those o f 1969, t he Housing Code Divis i on will participate on a c omplaint basis only. A .3.d. The Housing Authority will be fully responsible for demo lition activities in 1969 clearance act i on areas. A.3.e. In future-clearance areas the Housing Code Division will become involved only on a complaint basis, Generally, no new equipment installation will be required unless the residents' health or safety would be a factor without such work. A.3.f. The Housing Authority, the City Building Department and Model Cities developed policies and procedures for i nspecting and approving new prefab housing. A.3.g. Model Cities worked with the Georgia State Employment Service {GSES) to plan a construction training program for residents. It would be administered through the Model Cities Housing Center. A.3.h. Meetings were held with representat ives of the Citizens and Southern National Bank regarding their possible assistance in ~taking money and technical assistance available for housing rehabilitation and construction (See Economic Development Section.). �-8- A.3.i. A cooperative agreement was arranged with the City Planning Department which will allow Model Cities to receive adv ance notice of all Model Cities area zoning requests. The advance notice will allow Model Ci ties to review and comment on these important matter s . A.3.j. Discussions were held with representatives of t he Greater Atlanta Housing Development Corporation. The purpose wa s to persuade the Corporation to provide seed monies and technical assistance in HUD'~ 2 35 and 236 h ousing construction p rograms and in 235 ~J rehabiliat i on p ro jects . The Corporation is a private-non-profit group sponsored by Atlanta Businessmen . A.3.k. The Housing Authority, -!:he Greater Atlanta Housing Development Corporation and Model Cities agreed to explore the feasibility of relocating existing house s wh i ch are in the path o f the present Atlanta Airport construction program. A.3.1. Model Cities began rev iewing an Urban Design Framework Pr opos al for the areas. The Proposal was developed by a team of professionals. A.3.m. Model Cities worked with the Hous ing Authority in developing a project management control system for the Authority ' s Neighborhood Development Program (NDP) • A.3 .n. Pittsburgh neighborhood businessmen discussed with Model Cities how they could become involved in building businesses in renewa l areas and in becoming active in other areas of the Model Cities Program. A . 3.o. It was agreed to submit design plans to the City's Civic Design Commission. ,A. 3 .p. The nation's first deleqate agency contract was signed with the Atlanta Transit System for initiation of the intra-neighborhood bus system. (See Administration Section.) A.3.q. As of the end of the reporting period, the Atlanta Housing Authority had completed approximately 85% of its rehabilitation area i n spection work. A total of 25 grants had been made , ranging from �-9- $2,800 to $3,000. The total figure for all the grants was $73,576 . Housing Authority Officials said numerous persons in · the area were not qualifying for the gra.nts because of the $3,000 yearly gross-income limitations Eight to ten grantees had completed their rehabilitation work as of the end of the reporting period. A.4. A . 3.r. Regarding loans, between 50 and 60 were being processed for possibl e activation after July 5. Loan applications in the region had been terminated for the 1%8-69 fiscal year, but HUD officials indicated that sufficient monies would be available in the approaching fiscal year. In all; some 150 loan applicat ions had been filed, althoughmany of the applicants were e xpe cted to have yearly gross incomes exceeding the maximum ($8,400 for a family of seven ). A. 3. s . Housing Authority o ffi cials initiated action designed to i n form members of the U .S. Congress that the gross income loan limitations were too low. A congressional act in 1968 had established the limits on any NOP pro ject begun after August 1968. The a ct did not, however , affect previouslyapproved Urban Renewal efforts . Therefore, in the n earby West End Urban Renewal area, there are no i ncome limitations. A.3.;t. In clearance activit ies , 4- parcels had been acquired of the 378 parcels sched uled for 1969 acquisitions. Appraisa ls of. approximately 800/4 of the 378 parcels had been made. Most parcels were e x p ect e d to be acquired within approximately 3 months . A.3.u. Four consultants were hired by the Housing Author ity to work with residents in preparing the land-use plan and a 1970 Neighborhood Development Plan. By the end of the reporting period, two communities had met with their consultants. Economic Development {Employment and Industrial-Commercial Development} A~4.a. Intensive recruiting was curtailed during most of the reporting period because of the delay in ·funding. �-10- .--- -- However, the May 20 Atlanta-Model Cities - HUD supplemental-fund contract signing was to result in much g re ater a ctivity during the coming reporting period a It was d e cided that the Economic Opportunity Atlanta Neighborhood Center Manpower Units would conduct the call-in and referral work for the program. A.4.b. Atlanta Model Cities fa iled to convince the U .S . Labor Department and HUD that federal training f u nds should b e used to train residents in power sewing machine operations. The significanc;e of HUD's inabi lity to fund this pro j ect was that it would almos t be impossible to assist several companies which h ad expressed previous intere_st in locat i ng o r expanding their operations in the are a. Hundre ds o f res ident-filled j obs would have been involved. A.4.c. Southland Engineers and Surveyors Corporation decided to apply f o r an MA-5 contract under the National Al liance of Businessmen's program. The appli c a tion would be for fi v e app licants to be trained as rodmen. If accepted, i t was expected to be signed in early June. A.4.d. Discussions were held with Army/Navy recruiters to respond to their questions relative to the Department of Defense's lowering enlistment standards for ghetto r esidents. A.4. e- 'P. meeting was h eld with Church's Golden Fried Chicken to d e termine the feasibility of its establishing t wo s tores in the Model Cities area. _Each store would e mploy as many as eight to ten residents . Fu ture meetin g s were to be held when plans were more definiteo A.4 .f. Model Neighborhood, Inc ., a resident, non-profit development corp oration, received a grant from the Economic Development Administration for approximately $87,000o The money would be u sed to provide technical assistance to new businesses, t? identify and develop businesses which would be owned and managed by .MNI, to help develop manufacturing facilities in the area, to provide technical assistance to neighborhood groups seeking to establish local deve~opment corporat i ons, etc. �-1 1- A.4.g. In add i tion, MNI req uested $35 , 000 in supplemental funds from Mod el Ci ties . The money requested would be used t o supple ment its programs listed above. A.4.h. MNI had previo u s ly been given an EDA g r ant of $6,000 through Mod el Cit i e s a nd the City of Atlanta. Most o f those f u nds had b e en used to b e gin initial developmen t o f a shoppin g center . MNI a lso had developed a s e wing ma chin e operation in the area. It employs appr oxima tely 13 women . A . 4 .i . The Mode l Cit i e s Economic Development staff studied t he p roblems of a r e s ident busine sswoman to gain an ins igh t i n to some common obstacles fac i ng many a r ea business pe ople . The woman's main problems c o n c erned relocation o f h er customers because of urban renewa l a n d unco o r d i n ated efforts b y public a g encies. A.4. j . Techn i c al assist ance was give n to the JohnsonFluker Candy Company on -var i ous employer p rograms offered by the Ge orgia Stat e Emp loyment Se rvice . A.4.k. An important meeting wa s held with a rep re s ent a tive of Stokes and Wood Consultant fir m of Washington, D . C.; and HUD representatives. The pr i mary purpose was to e~plain the firm ' s agreement with the U.S. ~ Department of -l.,p.bor to promo te union involvement in the Model Cities Program. It appeared that local unions in Atlanta do not desire to recruit individuals who have no experience in t he building trades. A.4.1. Attempts to receive b ids for the leasing o f two jobmobiles resulted only i.n the possibility that three companies might submi t bids. The main reasons for lack of definite bid submittals appeared to be the cancel l ation clause after one year, high insurance risk, and low resa le value. The jobmobile was still scheduled to be one of the first 1969 employment projects. �A.5. State Participation A.5.a. Model Cities continued to keep various State departments i n formed as to its plans . Especially active during thi s reporting period was the Georgia State Employment Service. GSES continued ·to supply one coordinator, one planner, and three other staff members. Mod el Cities was expected to reimburse GSES for pers onnel e x penses this year. B. Data Collection B.l.a. There was a delay in releasing preliminary reports on the important 10,000-interviewee surve y being conducted b y the U . S. Department of Labor ' s Bureau of Labor Statistics. Atlanta's survey is being conducted in the area served by the Concentrated Employment Program (CEP) and in more affluent sect i ons . B . l . b. Or iginally, a general r e por t was to have been released in Ma rch . By t h e end of the reporting period, BLS o ff icials sai d the earl i est a p r e liminary repor t would be released would be in or after August. The final rep or t , which wi ll contain more specific information, was not expected to b e released b efo re December o r the first part of 1 97 0. B.l . c. All interviews were expected to be completed by June 30. c. Proble ms c.1. The major p roblem concerned the many scheduling adjustments made necessary by the delay in funding prior to the May 20 contract signing. Delegate agencies were required in some instances to change significantly their scheduled milestones. In at least one instance, a consultant told Model Cities officials that he might not be able to begin his project because he had had to place his manpower and machines on another project. �-13- II. c.2. Another major problem resulted in the refusal by HUD and the U.S. Department of Labor to allocate monies for the training of sewing machine operators. (See industrial <'levelopment section.) C.3. Labor unions did little to ensure that they will significantly assist ghetto res~dents to obtain union membership . (See industrial-commercial section.) C.4. A third major problem was the prohibition against granting any rehabilitat ion l oan s to any · family uni t ear ning more than a maximum of $8,400 a y e ar. Many needy familie s were not mee t ing the min i mum income limitat ion s a s of the e nd o f t he r eporting period . (See Physical Services Section.) ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE A. Policy and . Advi s ory Gr oups A.l . a. B. No changes were made on the Executive Board, the highest p o licy-making g roup i n the program. Howeve r , negotiat i on s began with s ome potent i al new member s t o t h e Technical Ad visory Bo ard , a gr ou p comp o sed of pub lic a n d p rivate exp erts in variou s dis c i plines . The new me mber s would f unc tion as a dvisor s t o the Plans a nd Evaluation staff. Staff B. l .a. The Direc t or for Program Manageme n t was appointed and approximately ten other n ew staff members were e mployed. The two ma jor vacancies wer e in the Direc t orships of Plans and Evaluation, and Economic Development. Other v acancies still existed in Program Management and the cler ical staff. Bol.b. Staff turnover was almost n on- existent, as it had been in the past. �-14III. RESIDENT INVOLVEMENT A. Activities Incorporation procedures continued for Stadium Heights, Inc., t he new name for the resident involvement organization . The incorporation and structural matters were expected to become offici al durin g the coming reporting period~ Four consultant fi r ms wer e hired by the Atlanta H9using Authority to work with the six neighborhoods in developing land- use plan and the 1970 Ne ighborhood De velopment Pr ogr am (in cluding clearance and rehabi l itation) . By the end o f the reporting period , one firm had met with one of his two neighborhoods and the other firms had made p l ans to meet wi th t h e i r c ommun i ties durin g the coming reporti ng period. A.l.c. The Atla nta Community Relations Commission conduct e d t wo 11 t ownha ll 11 me etings , one in Gr ant Park (s eventy people ) . and on e i n Me chani c s ville (f i fty peo p le) . Mode l Citie s rep resentatives dis cussed t he p rogram and answered residen ts ' question s a t tho se meetings. A.l.d. The 7th Mass Convention was he l d, wit h o ver onehundred peo ple attending. Howev er , since .t he supplemental-fund contract had not been signed and since most subjects h a d previously been discussed , n o official business was conducted. A. l .e. Four of the six neighborhoods met to work out procedures for di s tributing the approximately 865000 gallons of paint recently reserved for the a rea by the General Services Administration . Only resident homeowners will be eligible to receive the paint . I t was e xpected to be d i stribute d s ometime in June. �-15- IV. A.l.f. Planners met with residents of the Sugar Hill community and patrons of the Fellowship Mission to discuss the possible clearance areas which would affect them. F urther discussions were expected to be held during - the coming reporting period. A. l. g . The Communit y Affairs Division sponsored a tour of the soon -to - be -initiated intra-neighborhood bus line. The Mayor, many other public officials and s ome key residents took the tour. A.l.h. A group of residents apµ-oved the designation of the Model Cities Steering Committee to be the recipient of some $72,000 in OEO training funds. The Steering Committee was s chedu led to incorporate under the name o f St adium Height s, Inc. sometime in June. FEDERAL ASSISTANCE A . l.a . Washington and regional officials continued to provid e technical assistance. Espe c ially helpful were discussions with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and HEW's Social Rehabilitation Service (See Social Services �~ J:-'1 /J1t /L'-J~ '· tf. , (..... I c.:c. J une 9 , 1969 Mr. T . D. Allisandratos General Manager Albeni Corporation P .. o. Box 606 Tarpon Springs, Florida Dear Mr . Allissandratos : Mayor Ivan Allen has referred your letter of June 3 to our office for respon e . I am enclosing a copy of the summary of the one- year and the five-year foreca t. This summary list the major objective and approaching to solving the problems of the Model Neighborhood Ar • If I can provide you with let m know. ny furtb . information, please Sincerely, Johnny C. John on Director vlc Enclosur cc: Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. (,,4' r,;1 ��DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT PEACHT_REE SEVENTH BUILDING, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323 Room 645 REGION Ill June 3, 1969 IN REPLY REFER TO: Code 3RF Mr. George L. Aldridge, Jr. Director Community Improvement Program City Hall 68 Mitchell Street, S. W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Mr . Aldridge : · Subject: Proj e ct No. Ga . R-97(CRP) Community Renewal Program Approval of Housing Cost s Study The Housing Costs Study for the Atlanta Community Improvement Program has been reviewed and found to be satisfactory. It is recommended that the Model Cities Agency be advised of the following : a. To consider the recommenda tions and conclusions contained in the Housing Cos ts Study in planning relocation resources, especially as they concern housing p r ef erences, timi ng of development of resources, treatment of particular neighborhoods or sub-areas, the style and cost of housing and full utilization of HUD-assisted housing programs. b. To coordinate the Study recommendat ions with proposed NDP activities within the Model Cities Area. c. To include in the Relocation Program for the Model Cities Area the matters included in paragraph a ab ove, in addition to reviewing estLuates of displacement found in the Study. d. Relative to housing resources proposed for relocation of residents in or from the Model Cities Area, displacement should not exceed the supply of new housing which can be assured of development within the same displacement period. In view of the experimental nature of t he Model Cities effort and the . recommendations in the Study to use all possible methods and programs to keep housing prices low, it may be necessary and desirable to show resources on a year-to-year basis with first year displacement limited to the resource supply for that �2 year, allowing the time for development of innovative housing programs and in attaining necessary sponsorship on an open-ended basis. This would require assurance that displa cement and resource supply will be reviewed annually wi t h ame nded Relocation Programs provided to HUD for concurrence before displa cement occurs. Sincerely yours, Q\) I' \ r· () I.- ( / ; · ,; \ 9A1 ~f'i \ )>\ John I'.' '.Ed!n'unds .... ..... cc: Mr. Fountain I \ ~ . ( ) J'I: ) / ,}1{.V / -· Assista nt Regiona l Acl~ini strator for Renewal Assistance �DEPARTMENT OF HOU S ING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT PEA C HTRE E SEVENTH BUILDING, ATL ANTA, GEORG I A 30 323 REGION I l l Offic e June 3, ]969 of Administration IN C i ty of Atl a nta Cit y !!all Atl a nta, Ge or g ia R E P L Y 30303 Ge ntlem e n: Att a ched is a cop y o f l e tt e r of credit numb e r 8 6 - 03-0009, a uthorizin g y ou to drawdown funds a g a inst the total am o unt a uth o ri z e d b y pr ese ntin g F o rm TUS 5401, P ay me nt Vo u c h e r s o n L e tt e r s o f Cr ed i t , to yo u r l oc a l c o mm e rc ia l ba nk . A ll fund s r e s u lt i n g from such vouch ers sh a l l imm e di a t e l y b e d epos it e d i n y o u r a cc ount w ith th e loc a l co mmerci a l b a n k , R S indi c at e d o n t h e l e tt e r of c r e dit. Si n c e r e l y . (7 1 y ou rs , , 1 , , - !-- _,,,,,, _ 7'/ ,/ ;, ,,, / >./fy,,-,-11·7' ~-> ' _., / ,, ' / ) , -) ~ Di re c to r , Fi a n ci a l Re vi e w a nd Ac coun tin g Di v i s io n R E FE R T O : �~---- ---...__.______.-· 10 0 0 h,ra l ~t'rv l <.:C" , Uuri·.,u of An:o urH!, LETTER OF ISSUING AGENCY t . S . Dept of Housing and Urhan DevclopQCnt 645 Peachtree 7th Bldg WE Atlanta . Ga. 30323 A<..,F.'.':CY ST AT I ON SYMI.\CJL LETTER OF CR ED IT NUMBER 86-03-00 09 CREDIT Au di: TR EASll l:Y DE P A RT MEN T C IH C l lLAll No. 10 7 ~. R t·v iscd 668/90133 (I f(Qirit 86 - 00 - 9703 Al\1ENO~-ff.1" T i'J (IMBFH. __·_ _ EF FECTIVE DATE ( FO R AGENCY U SE ) June 1 0: 30 1969 AT ~-! ! n :1ccord.1!"·<· wi:1, the ;;u:hori·, ,!,!\/,1 of the Fiscal As, ;,r.11H ~'l'<.TcLiry, Trca,ury Dt:j".1n 111 •: !! t , ciic re 1s hc:n· h y ,1 i.rli or i1 c J fo; d ,c ::c co un l anJ rcspo n , ihility of che is<. u ing a g(' ll C)' ;i l<:tCc1· of c·rc<l i, : ' 1 l :--.J ~FA VO~flf lO ~l' l ~ ! I' l I I t 0 t l ~·-nt·~~,-~-- -- ~ - - --·~··----,..-f(=) ~R~ L)=E•-POSrf"()Nl.Y Atlanta , Georgia ,\ M()l ':'JT AllTIIO l,i Z ED 30303 D D PRIOR AUTI!ORlZATION I ACII f\lONTH I'} 0 ".) (' () THIS EACil QUA RTER $ - f SEE NOTE s 7 , 1 7 5 > 0 0 0 O0 0- .J M~·r_· _ _= _ ACCOUNT C-1 ,'.:,c t: I ncr,·.» ,· E~.~~-··-· !~-~·:.=~:. s 7 , 1 7s - -.. Citi zcno Tru9t Co mpany Post Office Box 4485 Atlonta, Georgia 303 02 a y TO -~~=~~u C _ _ _...'., The un pa id b. d :inn: of chi ·: lt:1 te r of c r ~·d it will r e m a in avail a bi c: u11 £il D Treasury Depart:r;~·,,1· tft:,1. tl1i -. ktt" r l1;; :, l>L·(·n revol;crl . Dene», you arc adv ised ;n ,._ ri li ng b y the OR 0 The u11paiJ b.:lanu· ,,f chi ·. kc1,·r uf creJ it is revoke d at t he end of each pnio<l indicated ,wd the full n·(",l ,1hl i,l11·d :1: 1lw h, ·g i11111 111.: of ,: ... f.,11,,win~ period un t il yo u arc ,1d\'i,cd in wric ;ng bv t!.c Treasur y Dc·parcmuH that clt i~ k ite r l1.1 :, hec 11 revoked . a1110111H I T he amount of this lurer of credit is ht·reby certifu,:d to be dra w n again st, u pon presenta tion to you of Form TUS 5401, Po1 1 1JH.:11r Vo:1cber 011 Lcf.ter of Credit, by the o fti. cial ( s ) of the recipient orgar1i ;'.,1tio11 whose signac11~L·(s ) artH·.,r(s) o n t he Sc.1n ,lard h,r111 ll9f, Authorized Sis nature Card for P;iy!1\e nt Vo u l: :cr~ on Letter of Credit, act,1 d 1c:d t1<·rt·c,, or prC'viously or \ubse•-1 uently furni,hed you thro u gh the Treas u ry Dq,artment. The amo u nt of c:1cl1 payme1 t vou<.her paid by a Federal Reserve Ba n k or branch to a dc,i g na ted com mercial hank fur crc·dit to ,he account of the rec ip ien t organization shall consriatte p:iymcnt to che recipient organi?.1t1on by the I !11ircd St.Hes. I certify to the Tre:is ury Dep:irtrne nt that the payments authori1cd hen::in are correct and proi)er for payment from the apprnpriarions or funds lega lly committed and available for the purpose, when paid in accord ance with the terms and conditions cited above. t10TE: T~e naximum anount that roay b~ requested durin ~ n calendar month i8 limite<l to $1,435 9 000 000. nroject Contract DATE CERTIFll-.D . _ ,{1-;-1n-no1 1 F'- 10-()•11 .J.une,_.) ~ l <J 6 ') ~ ncdfc~n, Ccrtifyic~ ~fficrr TYPED NAME AND Tl I'LE 1193- 10 2 �---CITY OF .ATLAl'JT .A CITY HALL June 3, 1969 ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 IVAN ALLEN, JR., MAYOR R. EARL LANDERS, Admini strative Assistant MRS. ANN M. MOSES, Executive Secretary DAN E. SWEAT, JR., Director of Governmental Liaison MEMORANDUM To: Mr. R . Earl Landers From: Subject: Dan Sweat Review of Code Enforcement Policy in Model Cities Area Attache d is a copy of a m emor andum from Jim Wri ght to me spelling out the revised policy of the Atlanta Housing Authority and the City's H e-using Code Division in the Model Cities ar e a. This came about as a result of probl ems b eing called to our attention in the A d a ir Park Area w h e're the city had -compl e te d a hous e by house rehabilitation program within the last few years. You might r ecall at the time we were discussing the Model Cities Pro g r am with r es idents of that area, the y were very much concerned with hous ing code ac tivity which was going on at that time . We assured them we would not place them in double jeopardy when the Model Citi e s Program started. There were indications that we were doing this by requiring the same property owne rs to bring th e ir prop e rty in line with th e new code s t anda rds of th e Atlanta Housing Authority und er the Mod e l Citi e s Program. This r ev i sed polic y was adopted ,after a m ee tin g in my offic e with officials of the H o usin g Authority, the Buildin g Department and M o d e l Cities. DS:fy cc: Mayor I van Allen, Jr. Mr. Johnny R obinson �..I i::' . -· 0 'r, May 29, 1969 OFFICE OF MODEL CITIES PROGRAM 673 Capitol Avenue, S.W. Atlanta, Ga. 30315 404-524 -8876 Ivan Allen Jr., Mayor J. C. Johnson, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Dan Sweat Director of Governmental Liaison FROM: Jame~ L. Wright , Jr.i~w,tt. Director of Physical Develo~~ent SUBJECT: Atlanta Housing Authority and Housing Code Division Activities in the Model Neighborhood Area Attached hereto, is a revised copy of the policy regarding AHA and Atlanta Housing Code Division in the Model Neighborhood Area. The addendum to the original policy which was developed in February of 1969, refers to properties wh ich have, in rec e nt years, been brought up to City Housing Code standards. This policy is outlined in paragraph 2 under the heading Rehabilitation Policy - Model Ne ighb orhood Area . The Atlanta Housing Authority will obtain a list of structures ·which have met Code Enforcement standards o f the City of Atlanta Building Department in rec ent years. Owners whos e properties currently meet these standards will have the option of either taking advantage of possible grants or lo an s under the Atlanta Housing Authority rehabilitation program to meet project standards or continuing to maintain structures in compliance with the City Housing Code . . As you know, it was formulated by Messrs. Lester Persells, Executive Director of Atlanta Housing Authority; C. M. Smith, Architectural Engineer; James Smith, Chief Housing Code Inspector; Ma lcolm Jones, Chairman of Housing Resources Committ ee; and myself, representing the CDA. This agreement was reached during the meeting with you in your offic e on May 26. The purpose is to provide the most equitable arrangement to benefit property owners in the rehabilitation program. cc : Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. William Wofford Lester Persel ls C . M. Smith Malcolm Jones James Smith Johnny Johnson �I' • •• . .. •.• ! 01··~-~·-~\:-r ....._C '-" f... C"'J>•_......:,.-;·,_ , ___. . . ..:,-1 , 1 ~--. It_ ··-J"..,~ '. __ T_ ..•r-u. May 29, 1969 OFFICE OF MODEL CITIES PROGRAM 673 Capitol Avenue, S.W. Atlanta, Ga . 30315 404-524-8876 Ivan Allen Jr., Mayor J. C. Johnson , Director Policy Regarding Atlanta Housing Authority and Atlanta Housing Code Division Activity in the Model Neighborhood Area Rehabilitation Policy - Model Neighborhood Area The Atlanta Housing Authority will obtain a list of structures which have met Code Enforcement standards of the City of Atlanta Building Department in recent years. Owners whose properties currently meet these standards will have the option of either taking advantage of possible grants or loans under the Atlanta Housing Authority rehabilitation program to meet project standards or continuing to maintain structures in compliance with the City Housing Code. In rehabilitation areas other than those of current year action areas, the City Building Department will participate on a complaint investigation basis only. New enforcement cases will be undertaken in accordance with De partment personnel capability and on a full code compliance basis. Demolition Policy - Model Neighborhood Area The Atlanta Housing Authority is fully responsible for demolition activities in NDP current year clearance action areas. When emergency situations occur necessitating prompt action on particular structures in th e clearance areas, the City Building Department will become involved for enforcement efforts. In demolition are a s other than those of current year action areas ~ the Building Depa rtment will become involved only on a compliant basis to ef f e ct full code compliance with the e x c e ption that generally no inst a ll a tion of a ddition a l equipme nt will be r e quired . A possibl e excep tion will a rise if it is determin e d that the failure to install a d dition a l equipment may r e sult in j e opardy to the h e alth , safety on general wel f are of a structures inhab itants. �., l· CITY OF .ATLANT.A May 19, 1969 / OFFICE OF MODEL CITIES PROGRAM 673 Capitol Avenue , S.W. Atlanta, Ga. 30315 404 -524-8876 Ivan Allen Jr., Mayor J. C. Johnson, Director M E MO R A N D U M TO Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. FROM Johnny C. Johnson, Director SUBJECT: Technical Assistance Funds The attached spells out the requirements for training and technical assistance funds in Model Cities. been offered $70,000. JCJ : vlc At t achment Atlanta has �PROPO SAL FOR A Gi<M~'! TO - ··-- --·--FOR TRt.l NlMG AND n:c !INTCAL ASC STANCE I N MODE!. Cl.TI ES L BACKGROUND AND PU RPO SE: The purpose o f thi s program -L s t o build t h e ea.p acity of HrY.lel Cit i e s resid e nts i n ··---- -·---- --·--·--t;c, l:e £-> p nJ k nn 1_.tlc rJgcah ly n nJ t:: f f ecti. v d .y to th e r equi reme 1,t s of ti1 c f'hdc l CJ l:i·:!s P rogr2m 1:-y csto.bJ -~sh:fng responsi ble neighborho o d ·orgarr.i.?.at k,n s s o thll t t li,~y c:nn asses s thci r prob 1 em s a nd ca. n work e f fect ive l y wi th ci· .y gove n in1 e1:i and o th er l o<!al ins ti tu t:!. ons i n th e planning . execu tio n t1nJ e \ ·a l u ti ur~ of pr,..,gn1rn s . I t :i.s o ur und e r s tanding tha t the H,>dc.,t Ci.Lie s .l\dm i n is L'ra t:i. n n a n d 0E0 will j oi n in this p ro jec t a s part o f an ef f o rt t 0 bu -f.ld cffccti •,e a nd TE'. Gp ;i n s ibl(' commun ity p a rti c i p ation and to make avai. l a bl e ft ncl~ u id <i.t;s i s t nnce to .od ~l n ei ghbor.ho d gro u ps 'f. n both first nd scc _ n r oundcitie s . 'h,r. major obj e cU.v e s of th e prngni.. fl r c: 1. To p rov id e c it ze. ;; wj ·ha d ive sily of experie nce end c apabi.lity in lo c-n J :t nst:l tu t :ilH1c11 pl n ~r,jng , progt·n<n i ,nrteme ntat5. on an d prog ram e v lua.: i on. fun ct ion l y CAA t1t1d CD:\ (! i g ;1bnrh0,.)cl gn,ups a 1d to plan an d m,,ve t 0 wa r d the nvcntuc\ l C'O n~;r.,lid a tiur of r~sidr~n t partic ip at i o n lnhe1· rit. ;n rnaking t heir rraJ.ni ng, '. E:" l-mi.ca l assi st :illt::e , and p l anning fu11ds a vail a ble i s t h e ass11i.1ptj on by or:o and HU.G t h at citize 1s l-u ve �'· - l- major rol e t o pl a y :i.n bo th t he Communi ty Ac t i on Prog r am and the Model Citi es Program. Further ~ bot h OEO' s and HUD' s philoso phy ,- -acknowledges th~ r ight of peo pl e aff ec ted by publi c pr og r ams to h av e access t o and influ er.c e on t he proc e s s by whi ch dec ~s ions abou t t he i r live s ~re made ; -- a cce pts t h at ma ny of the be st i nte nt ioned of fi ci a ls a nd ~ echnici aris a r e o ften, bi the i r t rai ni ng, experi e nc e s , and l ife-styl es , unfamiliar w:t.th o r even insens it i ve to t h e prob lems a nd a s pi r at ions of mode l naigh borhood res ide nt s ; therefo re , resident ideas and prior:i.ti e s can resu l t i n mp r e re l evant , sensi t i~e , a nd eff ec tiv e plan and programs; -- r ecogni zes t hat the pr ocess o f participation makes it po si ble for tho s e citi~en~ forme r ly out s ide t h e sy s t em to learn how it functio ns a nd ho w to make it f unc t ion i n the ir i nt c r ~st - and t hat the process mak e s it po ssib l e fo r r e s i de nts t o s t rengthe n existing skil l s and to develop th e kind of new s kil ls needed for ef fe ctive d . ti zcnsh:ip b eyo nd as we l l a s wi thin the Mo de l Ci t i e s Progra m. In ligh t of the above a nd in o r de ·· to ove rcome t hese probl ems , OEO and HUD arc e ncou rag j ng CAAI s, CDA' s ond the ne i ghborhood g r oup s t o test thi s te chnica l a s s is t ance st ra t egy t hrough the us e o f the s e f unds . Funds alloca te d to ne i ghborhood groups under t he s e g r a nts may be u sed to prov :tde p l a nning , tra:f.ning and tecl n:f c al rws i<·tance se rvice s l o �,- J- rwio.hb o rhoo d r.r.: s id<~11t s in .J.udlng bl.,l t not: J·i.mi te d Lo th e fo ll ow i. ng : l. Vul.1 -J:}. mr:i s t a f f for n o ighbo r l.1ood g ro up s t o r l an and develop s erv i c c•s u ndo I'.." t h ec e p r ngn:.in e. · 2. Pon11a l tra ln 'I. g p r o g 1wn R .or n s.:ighbo 1:·;-1o o d r e sid e n t gr·-ciup s a nd Staff. 3 . ·. Coll e ct i o n a nd lis ~;emi. niLU ,- n ::.i f r •J l.cv nn t infon11~t:fo n a h.o u t Mo de l .-r. Ci t: -J e s and rci1nted p rog r :, rns t o nl': i g hb o hoo d rE!s j_d e ti:; . 4 ,1 · ReLHi nfrig c1:, 11sult m1ts . l lD ,1y (•r. ;:;, c ornmu nit. y 0 1.·g an i z ers , planners, a nd pb n ni ng. _5;. To d e\· e l op 6. Ai1d c ,H ry 1., u t •:i. ti:,,: ~ n c-va l.u a io n o f l h e r-fod e l Ci. ti. e s A por tio t1 of g n m t .:u n d~· rrm ' b r:- u s ;:. d by nd g h bo 1:h o . d grn1}ps t0 co n t r a. ct d:ir e c t i. y 1-,J t h o ·r._, a ni·-:.:at II , I' OCES 5 P..R IOR TO WOI,K J RO L Th e .')i1 1:'i e f t h e.it· o wn c h oos i ng whi c h i, 1 N AA a nd CDA ~r1.l l di.c; c u !; s 11t :; r:n:og 1·,<;r:1. (d c. t c i e n· ma i. ndc t· o E s cnt e n(; e .) 2 , Th ey r-,i l.l d i.s c.:us '., t_ ne i gh borhood grou µs . c:i · ccrnirn5. t nic fl i. fo: th8 n e xt- t we lv e mo;i ths o f �..,. -4·,. 3. Designa tion of neighborhood groups to pl!)-n t he program and receive funds ,l~ th e C£1_A .a nd CD/L 4. The neighbo rhood group with a. ~rnis t:a nce acceptable to ir from th e CAA and CD;\ will rle cid0 who. t training and te chnical assist a nc e they re qui re f or the devalopmen t of the propos~l for neighborhood -g roup s up port f unds. 5. If this assistanc e i s no t av a ilabl e in the c:i.ty , the CAA and CDA wil ). make every e ffo r t to ob t a in it. We. hope 0E0 and the other Fe de r F.1 1, s tnt e and local age nc ie s invo lv e d i n the Model Cities Progra m wi l l mak(? it ava.i lahle to the ne ighb orhoo d group -- assistan c e whi ch f s a ccep t a ble to the group. , 6. If th e nei ghbo rhood group or grou ps f e e l tha t p r omised t r aining . and tech~i c al a ~si st anc e i s not b e ing reGei ve d o r is inadequat e, we, the CAA and CDA will use 2£!:. good offic e s to remedy t he situation . III. Wo rk Program. l. The neighbo r hood group with the above t echn ica l - a ssi s ta nee wi 11 pr.e pare a form l wri t te n a pp icatio n . a s umma ry o f Th ey wi lJ a l so prepar LhaL a pp li ~at i 0n for ci r c ul a tio n to resident s of th~ m del neighbod1ood. 2, After the interim bonrd and/or membership o f the n e i.ghborhoocl group has appr:ovcd the appUcation it should l e submit ted through the CAA a nd CDA to om and a copy se n t to HUD. l f CDA funds are not included in the a pplica tio n , th ey must _be :integrated i,nto the a.pplicatfon . Pd.or to this submission, the CAA, CDA �•• , .' ..· ·,·· .~ \.. ~s·a nd reside n t groups sha 11 me et together t o dis c uss t he:t 1: re~ations h ip s 3. i., l Lh i n t he fr a;11cwork of the proposa l . Inc h ide d in th e: f inal o.ppliuLtion w J J. be a dc sc: r:i pt i ve h istory of t h e wa ys in which th e steps in tl, e wo1:k p roces s o u t l i n ed n bovo hAvc be e n me t. The a p p li c ation wi ll al.l;o indic a t e t he ways CD.I\ funds a n d L1. as si stanc e wi ll b e rna clc avai labl e to t h e neigh bo rh ood group . ., 'f h e ap p ].icn t ion J:!i-.!l. r:; how as speci.fica l l y a ~: pC1ssib l c wl, at ·t kinds of a c t-:l.vi Uc s wi 11 he _u nch! r lak c n, wh e n an d h ow . 5 , Th e . a ppl_:lcation will a l so dcscr:i.be wha.t , when and how o f t r aining dur i ng t h e program ye, ·r. 1 6. The applic.:ation will als o specify lo\·1 con s ult a nts hired by the nei ghb rl1ood group wi 11 b e account a ble to t he ne i.ghborhoocl group or groups. 7. 'I'h e Hppl:t ca t.icn w:i.ll. a l so desc:d b c how t h is trnini.ng nnd techni c a l assis t ance i s rc Ja t od l o Cl~ e nd CAA p l a ns end prcig r ams. 8. The: wo rk p rog r am wi.11 Gpc ll out h i~i.ng pro ce dures: pn rt:i cu l a rly the righ t~ end rec, po ns :i.Lil:U- i e s of th e nc:i.ghbo r ho o cJ g 1-ollp, the CAA and CDA. 9. The wor1• prog uu n ui.l l al r-o i ndiq:1. t c by nanie wh e n \Ve.t- poss:i. bl e specific C/\ /i-Cl)i\ s Loff. and sl aff of nc::iehhorhoo cl 01.;ganizations who wi.11 b e i nv o l ved in imp l emc nti11g thr..! progn1m . . �~6- 10. We a r .e committed t o ob s erv i ng the t e r ms o f th e HUD/0E0 Agre ement o n l ocal coordina ti o n i n t h e de.vclopment a nd of t h i s wo rk p r:ogta:n. ' , __ I,V·; :1'.ime Tag l e / >;-,)':;i:;,:!, ):'.~fJ ', . •. _.__'·:·_: . ' :. : ' .• ~, Z~.\·:,,~·:,,;-1if,·zd),.:,_.'.i..De si:gn?:lti'on r:,-·~-\ ~~:1 ~(~:/·· :!.;~!~,:-~ .--~~. :~-. -:_ ~· ·: t han 2·. o·f t h e n eighbo rhoo d g -roupc, wi l l o c cur no la t er 3d da y s a f t er the gra n t fu nds ha ve be en obliga ted. The ne i ghbo r hoo d g r o up will compl e te th e t rai ni ng p l a n no l ater tho~ 60 days a f t er .t he f unds have been obl iga t e d . 3. The fir s t draf t o f t h e prop0 Dc1.l and the summary f o r commur,j_caU.on t o ne1.gh bo rhoo ci r es i dents s hould b e c o111p l cted no l a t er t han 75 day s after the f unds have bee n obl iga t ed . 4. ·, V, The fina l wo rk p rogram wU l b e submitted no lat e r t h an 90 days aft er the gnrn t f unds have been obU ga t ed. Budget Sampl e CAP 2.5 . . 80% Staff 20% space, overhead �,.: , • • 'l .·_~. v· SPECIAL CONTHTTONS The Region ma.y wan t t:o sped.a l c ond:L t::l on· the g rant to insure p e d .od:lc progr.c s r. . ~po.r t s . Ot:he r de ,, j r a ' 1 (, s p ~c :iJd e:ondi t. i ,) ns ~1hlch Re g i c, ns 1 . may ,want to c r:i nw!.der a r e: -1. . No funds und~t' thi !> g ran t 01..gh ... to h1:· expended un t il OEO approved tlie 90 de.y propo s n l which 2. emerg e 11 f r o m the work p r ogram de s cribe d Incorpore.t ion :l.t, not ne c cssfn·y f or re l ease. o f .funds from 0 E0 provide d . t ha t. t he CAA i n conju nc t '. o n wi t h CDA llgree t o !=:Pend the fu nd s as reque sted b·y t h e ne -.l g hbo dv o d ;_,,ro u p ~ind . n d ·.~at e r, he mechanism with whi ch it wi ll ma ke fU:c al r:1c co·~intab:i. 1.i t v. to and f o i:_ t h e group. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 8, Folder 19, Complete Folder Box 8 Box 8 Folder 19 Folder topic: Model Cities | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/e5e407010d61a0b88306fb123b4e8ffe.pdf 2b09bb9da9b94fbf26acf84ad37d057b Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. MODEL CITIE S EXECU.1-I'VE BOARD REVI EW COM.MJ:ni'I'BE Ju.L.y 1 5, 19 6 9 M I N U T E S ·rhe Model Citie s Exec ut i ve Bo a r d Rev i e•,1 Com_m i t. t ee met Tuesday~ ,Jul y 15 , at 1 0 : 00 a . m. i n City Hal l, Committee Ro o m #2 . The followinq me mbers \'7e r e p r esent: Mayo r I v a n All en , ,J r. , Chairman Mattie An sley Mr • Jo1 n Hood Alderman Ever ett Milli can 1.liX .. ~'7 al t er fvj,i t: c ·he l l Mr. J. D . Newberr7 Dr . C , Miles Smit,h Mr. Bi l l C . Wainwri9ht lfu: s . Mrs. Jllla r thci WP.ems 'I'he Chairman , Mayor Iva.n Al len, Jr . presided over the meeting. 'I'he f o l lowing proj ects wer e d i s.-:ussed a nd app·coved: Amou nt Pr 9..i_ect Numbers $11 9, 0 00 HR - 005N Urban East Housing Consul ta 1.ts HE-019N At l anta Assoc i a tion o f Mental Retardation 9,00 0 HE- 0.llN Planned P1.rer t 'l:10::x:!, 5,000 Inc . It '.tvas mo ved a.nd second ed that action on. the fo l o wing projects be withheld u ntil fuxi":1"l:... r investiga tion can be made. The Chairman appointed Dr . C . Mi les Smith to hi:.~ad a c ommit ~ee to look into t he Hea l t h Component a n d to r~port at the next me et ing. Mr. Hood a nd Mr . :t-Iewbe rry were appoint ed "-o the ,.,orrnnittee. The proje c ts invo l ved are: HE =0 02N HE-00 9N HE-014N HE-007N Better Health , Inc. 113,000 100,000 5 , 00 0 4,000 �2 Mr. Wainw.;· :iyht moved that t he two ( 2) deletions :ceconi.mended by the staff b-2. appr oved . ,lrs . We e n's :,::e condEd the motion. 'rhe deletions w~re : HE-008.N He a.:L th Scr. e ening HE-·018N Mm1tal Health Plann.e::: $ 45,000 20,000 A discussion. was open.ed concer ning Project E~rpand . After a brief di scussio, Mrs. Ansley moved to temporarily delete Project Expand so the balance of the EOA projects c a n be sent back to the Board of Aldermen . The mot.:i.on was secon ded and app roved. The meeting wa s adjourned. APPROVED: l ___,f/, r---, r-~ -c:,-=-"~:::;;_.c.-.-J-~ ~ c ~or - Cit ies Prog ro May· r Iva.n Allen, Jr . , Chairman Mode l Ci tie s Exec u tive Board � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document MODEL CITIES EXECUTIVE BOARD REVIEW COMMITTEE July 15, 1969 MINUTES The Model Cities Executive Board Review Committee met Tuesday, July 15, at 10:00 a.m. in City Hall, Committee Room #2. fhe following members were present: Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr., Chairman Mes. Mattie Ansley Mr. John Hood Algderinan Everett Millican Mr. Walter Mitchell Mr. J. BD. Newberry Rr. C. Miles Smith Mr. Bill C. Wainwright Mrs. Martha Weems The Chairman, Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. presided over the meeting. The following projects were discussed and approved: Project Numbers Agency Amount HR-OOSN Urban East Housing $ 119,000 Consultants HE~-O19N Atlante Association of 9,000 Mental Retardation HE~-OLILN Planned Parenthood, Inc. 5,000 It was moved and seconded that action on the following projects be withheld until further investigation can be made. The Chairman appointed Dr. ¢. Miles Smith to head a committee to look into the Health Component and te report at the next meeting. Mr. Hood and Mc. Newberry were appointed to the Committee. The projects involved are: HE-GO2N Better Health, Ine. LL3, 000 HE-009N 100,000 HE-O1LAIN 5,000 HE-OO7N 4,000 Mr. Wainwright moved that the two (2) deletions recommended by the staff be approved. Mis. Weems seconded the motion. The deletions were: HE-OO8N Health Screening $ 45,000 HE-O18SN Mental Health Planner 20,000 A discussion was opened concerning Project Expand. After a brief discussion, Mrs. Ansley moved to temporarily delete Project Expand so the balance of the ECA projects can be sent back to the Board of Aldermen. The motion was seconded and approved. The meeting was adjourned. APPROVED: Mayor ivan Allen, Jr., Chairman Model Cities Executive Board  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 8, Folder 18, Document 23 Box 8 Box 8 Folder 18 Folder topic: Model Cities | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/8bbe46e23c5deb1aead2bb98d76b80d8.pdf 431217a3cfffa974d16aabc56d45b978 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. I_,- .. 'J•1"_;, ' CITY ()1~ F· r\1-: ~- ,.,i.-·:;_.~ t . .. , . -, .. .:/· ~ ' • August 11, 1969 '~ I OFFICE OF MODEL CITIES PROGRAM 673 Copitol Avcnuo. S.W. Atlanta. Ga. 30315 404-524 -8876 Ivan Allen Jr., Mayor J. C. Johnson, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Model Cities Executive Board FROM: The Div ision of Plans and Evaluation SUBJECT: Approval of Evaluation Projects The Atlanta Model Cities staff recommends that the City of Atlanta enter into contract with Arthur Andersen and Co. for the design and implementation of the proposed Resident Serv ice Information System for a cost not to excee d $70,000. The staff furth e r r e comme nds t hat the City of Atlanta e nter into contract with the Urban Observatory of Ge orgia Sta t e College for the implementation of the proposed Research Analysis Sy stem for a c ost not to exceed $ 144 ,000. fa) 1/ ,::;ob:;--?(I) Jff.b / t0 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document 9 August 11, 1969 OFFICE OF MODEL CITIES PROGRAM 673 Capitol Avenue, S.W. Atlanta, Ga. 30315 404-524-8876 Ivan Allen Jr., Mayor J.C. Johnson, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Model Cities Executive Board FROM: The Division of Plans and Evaluation SUBJECT: Approval of Evaluation Projects The Atlanta Model Cities staff recommends that the City of Atlanta enter into contract with Arthur Andersen and Co. for the design and implementation of the proposed Resident Service Information System for a cost not to exceed $70,000. The staff further recommends that the City of Atlanta enter into contract with the Urban Observatory of Georgia State College for the implementation of the proposed Research Analysis System for a cost not to exceed $144,000. 1) i - ~ sp he f Lp pee © My te Tied  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 8, Folder 18, Document 22 Box 8 Box 8 Folder 18 Folder topic: Model Cities | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/9a08119e8afa84f3b71d762a82e2ce5f.pdf 8263781f316e5b125295be7c76c43c81 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. PROPOSA f'O R 'l 'HE EVALUATION OF THE ATLANTA MODEL CI 1'IE S P ROGRAi."1 �.ATLANTA MODEL CITIES EVALUATION PLAN The plan f or evaluation o f t h e Model Cities p rogram wa s ·d e v eloped by t he Mode l Citie s P lan s and Eva.lua t ion s ta ff . The ob jecti ve o f th e plan i s to p r o v ide q u a n i tat i v e a.n a qua l i tat ive analysi s o f t h e program bot h f o r fi~ t u r e Mode l Ci t ie~:1 p l a n n i ng and as a d emon s trat i o n 0 £ this typ - of urba n impr o v eme nt ;,rogr a.rn . It i s v i t a l tha t we be aware of e xactly wha t ou r e ffo r t s a r e accompli sh i ng .in o r der t o lay e f f ecti ve plan s ¥o r f ut u r e upgr ~d i ng o f o ur c i ty. Residents 1i l l p lay a ma jor ro l e · n d e t e rmin i ng 1-1hat the mea su:cE> fl of p r ogram s uc ces s should be , i n inte r v i ewing , in mo ni t or i ng p r o jec t s, a n d i ~ as se ss i n g the e ff e c tiveness of p r o jects and t he ov erall p rogr am. The evaluat i on p l an h as t wo ma jor i nter.relate d compon e nts: A Residen t Se rvi c e In forma tion System a nd a Re s e arch Ana ly s is System. The Re~' ident Serv ice Information Sys tem (RSIS ) i s a computerized net.hod of monitor ing services p r ovidE .!d t o r e sident p rogrr-1.m . b y the Model Ci t i e s The Resea rch Anal ysis System wi l l pr ,.r i de a q ua l ita t i v e an alysis of t he progran based on t h e opinio ns a nd at titudes o f r e s iden ts . The RS I S is desi~J ned t o accomplish t h e foll owing: (1) Maintain records 0f al l services re n d~red to re s i de nts fo r statistical analysi s. (2) Provide s ervice agencies with stat i stica.1. report s t o rel iev e them of menial cl e rical work. (3) Provide random samples of participants in various pro jects f or survey in the Research Analysis System. (4·) Prepare profi le reports on char.acte~cistics on residents served by age, geographic location, occupation, race, etc. �-2- (5) Provide agencies with lists of residents in need of their services. (6·) Provide benefit unit reports for costjbenefi t analysis. (7) Prepare correlation reports to show influence on residents or families involved in combina t ions of projects. (8) Provide interface wi th a geographic ma pping program which will show areas of progra.111 weakness. (9 ) Provide information to research framework analysts to aid in the prepar a tion of their reports. (10) Provide various reports on reque st to service agencies, city depar tments, or the federal government. (11 , Prov ide baseline data estimates (e . g. unemployment rates, crime rates, bir t h rates). (12) Provide projections of numbers of people who will be involved in projec ts in future y ea rs. (13) Encourage i n tera gency cooperation and sh a ring of common data . The Research Analysis System is d esigned to accomplish the following: (1) Ga t h e r and asse ss opinions of part icipants about the qual i ty of Model Cit i ~s projects. (2) Secure follow-up data on project participants. (3) Gather data concerning control groups within and outside the Model Neighborhood. �-3- (4) Conduct attitud~ surveys concerning basic outlooks toward life of a sample of Mode l Neighborhood Area re sidents. (5) Assess attitudes and perception s o f insti tutional personnel employed to serve the Model Neighborhood residents . (6) Collect base-line data and formulate appropriate standards for future program planning . (7) Sel e ct and tra i n interviewers. (8) Develop appropriate attitude and opinion questionnaires. (9) Supe r vi s e the activities of resident obse rve r s who will furnish chronlc l e s on sign ificant change s that take place in the Model Neighborhood . �r " Opinion Surveys ttitude Survey s p Re search Analysis System '"""l Institut ion al Studies Random Re sident Samples Service tllllli~-------_,....,..,,_....,.,__,_ _ _-IInformation System Statistical Report s Residen t ServiceOb!3ervers · Needed . Report!:' ServiceRe n dered Reports Reside nt Profi le Repo rt s Quanti tativ e AJ. alysi s Qualitative Analysis Model Cities Program Evaluation Special Request Re p o rt s A9 ency Statistical Reports � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document PROPOSAL FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE ATLANTA MODEL CITIES PROGRAM ATLANTA MODEL CITIES EVALUATION PLAN The plan for evaluation of the Model Cities program was developed by the Model Cities Plans and Fvaluation staff. The objective of the pian 22 to provide quantitative and qualitative analysis of the pro- gram both for future Model Cities planning and as a demonstration of this type of urban improvement program. It is vital that we be aware of exactly what our efforts are accomplishing in order to lay effect- ive plans for future upgrading of our city. Residents will play a major role in determining what the measures of program success should be,in interviewing, in monitoring projects, and in assessing the effect- iveness Of projects and the overall program. The evaluation plan has two major interrelated components: A Resident Service Information System and a Research Analysis System. The Resident Service Information System (RSIS) is a computerized method of monitorince services provided to residents by the Model Cities program. The Research Analysis System will provide a qualitative analysis of the program based on the opinions and attitudes of residents. The RSIS is designed to accomplish the following: (1) Maintain records of all services rendered to residents for statistical analysis. (2) Provide service agencies with statistical reports to relieve them of menial clerical work. {3) Provide candom samples of participants in various projects for survey in the Research Analysis System. (4) Prepare profile reports on characteristics on residents served by age, gecgraphic location, occupation, race, etc. oie (5) Provide agencies with lists of residents in need of their services, (6) Provide benefit unit reports for cost/benefit analysis. (7) Prepare correlation reports to show influence on residents or families involved in combinations of projects. (8) Provide interface with a geographic mapping program which will show areas of program weakness. (9) Provide information to research framework analysts to aid in the preparation of their reports. (10) Provide various reports on request to service agencies, city departments, or the federal government. (11) Provide baseline data estimates (e.g. unemployment rates, crime rates, birth rates). (12) Provide projections of numbers of people who will be involved in projects in future years. (13) Encourage interagency cooperation and sharing of common data. The Research Analysis System is designed to accomplish the following: (1) Gather and assess opinions of participants about the quality of Model Citics projects. (2) Secure follow-up data on project participants. (3) Gather data concerning control groups within and outside the Model Neighborhood.  (4) Conduct attitude surveys concerning basic outlooks toward life of a sample of Model Neighborhood Area residents. (5) Assess attitudes and perceptions of institutional personnel employed to serve the Model Neighborhood residents. (6) Collect base-line data and formulate appropriate standards for future program planning. (7) Select and train interviewers. (8) Develop appropriate attitude and opinion questionnaires. (9) Supervise the activities of resident observers who will furnish chronicles on significant changes that take place in the Model Neighborhood.  Research Analysis << System Random Sanpee? Service information Statistical System Reports Resident Opinion Attitude Institution-f Resident Service- Service- Resident Special Agency , Surveys Surveys al Studies Observers Needed Rendered Profile Request Statistical Reports Reports Reports Reports Reports Qualitative Quantitative Analysis Analysis Model Cities Program Evaluation  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 8, Folder 18, Document 21 Box 8 Box 8 Folder 18 Folder topic: Model Cities | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/493d88b66195c1e64ee732c713efec6c.pdf fdaab0374d820428fe6e8664d13c5c47 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. Model Cities Mass Convention Pryor Street School July 20, 1969 on ~e Model Cities Mass Convention met in its regul~r sess1on, the above date at the designated time and place. The meeting was . called to o~der by the Chairman, Deacon Lewis Peters; the invocation was given 1 by Mr. N. A. Scott III . Upon the adoption, of th~ proposed agenda, t 'he meeting was put in progress. The tm.inutes of the ,tirevious meeting were read by the Secretary, Mrs . "C. B. Wright. They Jlre accepted as read with one suggested change by the city attorney . , (~he suggestion ·is attached) . The secretary motioned that the sugg~~tion of name change be accepted as read, it was seconded by Dr. Cox, motion carried. Deacon Peters made a plea for greater community participation. Moael Cities Staff Report g Mrs. Xernona Clayton 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. A one stop serv.t ce building is being built. News letters will be sent every Wednesday. All committees need to be made stronger. Help from the communit±es is needed. See that· your community is represented in all meetings. Thanks for cooperation that has been given . A·-preliminar y report of Credent ials · Committee was given by the Chairman , Rev. Calv i n Hous ton . Grant Park Pittsbur gh Mechani c s v ille Adair Park Summerhill Peoples town 32 21 11 10 9 4 85 S~eering Committee D~. Charles McClain Reviewed the minutes of the Steering Committee. Cqnstitution and By-Laws g Willie Weems read the Constitution and By-Laws No Discussion or vote was taken. Ml:l. �PAGE (2 MASS CONVENTION At this point the city attorney, Ji~ Pilcher was asked to speak, he stat~d he would read a statement and Dr. McClain would put it in the form of a motion (Statement Attached). Motion: That the Chairman and secretary and the Steering Committee of Atlanta Model Cities Mass Convention I~c. be authorized to execute a contract with the Model Neighborhood Program of the City of Atlanta to receive the funds in the approximate sum of $135 ~nousand ($727 63 ) This motion was seconded by Dr. Cox motion carried. MODEL CITms Mr. Allison (William) Executive of EOA was asked to give a description of O.E.O. funds, after a lerigthy discussion the name EOA not ~o e deleated from the contract was carried 27 to 23. Mr. C. Craig motioned that the secretary of Model Cities give an attendance report of each Steering Committee member to the Mass . Convention, seconded by Mr. Whitley motioned carried. (motion attached) Mr. Howard Kline a candidate for the Board of Education was introduced by Mr. Craig. ~- Craig asked for law and order in our communities the percent of juvinile delinquency was too high and suggested that the citizens must want law and order in the community. Final report of the Credentials Committee -- Rev. C. Huston s Grant Park Pittsburgh Adair Park Mechanicsville Summerhill Peoples town 38 23 11 11 9 5 Total 97 The foliowing persons were requested by Deacon Peters to meet on Tuesday to work on a work proposal and would be paid $35.00 for each meeting. Mrs. Mattie Ansley Mrs. Rosa Burney Mrs. Martha Weems Mrs. Beatrice Garland Mr~ Calvin Craig Dr. Cox 0 Mrs. Lacey principal of Pryor Street School was introduced, she gave a very warm welcome and words of commendation. There being no more business the meeting adjourned. Deacon Lewis Peters Dr. Chas . McClain Mrs. C. B. Wright Sec. Mrs. Rosa Burney Asst . Sec . 0 -~ �MASS CONVENTION MINUTES PAGE 3 RESOLUTION SUBMITTED TO MASS CONVENTION BY CALVIN F. CRAIG 7-29-69 That the Model Cities Mass Convention Secretary at each Mass Convention give a report as to the attendance at Steering Committee meeting by the elected members of this body. MOTION ~ "That the chairman and secretary of Atlanta Model Cities Mass Convention Inco be authorized to execute a contract with the Model Neighborhood Program of the City of Atlanta to receive funds in the approximately sum of $83.000 for citizen participation in the Model Cities Program." That the corporation serve asagent of the Mass Convention until the completion of corporate formalities. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document Model Cities Mass Convention Pryor Street School July 20, 1969 The Model Cities Mass Convention met in its regular session, on the above date at the designated time and place. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, Deacon Lewis Peters; the invocation was given, by Mr. N. A. Scott III. Upon the adoption . of thé proposed agenda, the meeting was put in progress. The minutes of the previous meeting were read by the Secretary, Mrs. C. B. Wright. They wére accepted as read with one suggested change by the city attorney. (The suggestion is attached). The secretary motioned that the suggéStion of name change be accepted as read, it was seconded by Dr. Cox, thotion carried. Deacon Peters made a plea for greater community participation. Model Cities Staff Report: Mrs. Xernona Clayton 1. A one stop service building is being built. 2. News letters will be sent every Wednesday. 3. All committees need to be made stronger. Help from the communities is needed. 4. See that your community is represented in all meetings. 5. Thanks for cooperation that has been given. A-preliminary report of Credentials Committee was given by the Chairman, R,v- Calvin Houston. t Grant Park 32 Pittsburgh 21 Mechanicsville 11 Adair Park 10 Summerhill 9 Peoplestown _4 85 Steering Committee Dr. Charles McClain Reviewed the minutes of the Steering Committee. Constitution and By-Laws: My, Willis Weems read the Constitution and By-Laws No Discussion or vote was taken. PAGE @ MODEL CITIES MASS CONVENTION At this point the city attorney, Jim Pilcher was asked to speak, he stated he would read a statement and Dr. McClain would put it in the form of a motion (Statement Attached). Motion: That the Chairman and secretary and the Steering Committee of Atlanta Model Cities Mass Convention Inc. be authorized to execute a contract with the Model Neighborhood Program of the City of Atlanta to receive the funds in the approximate Sum of $135 fhousand ($727 63 ) This motion was seconded by Dr. Cox motion carried. Mr. Allison (William) Executive of EOA was asked to give a description of O.E.0. funds, after a lengthy discussion the name EOA not to e de- leated from the contract was carried 27 to 23. Mr. C. Craig motioned that the secretary of Model Cities give an attendance report of each Steering Committee member to the Mass . Convention, seconded by Mr. Whitley motioned carried. (motion attached) Mr. Howard Kline a candidate for the Board of Education was introduced by Mr. Craig. Mr. Craig asked for law and order in our communities the percent of 2,8 juvinile delinquency was too high and suggested that the citizens must want lew and order in the community. Final report of the Credentials Committee -- Rev. C. Huston Grant Park 38 Pittsburgh 23 Adair Park 11 Mechanicsville 11 s Summerhill 9 Peoplestown 5 Total 97 The following persons were requested by Deacon Peters to meet on Tuesday to work on a work proposal and would be paid $35.00 for each meeting. Mrs. Mattie Ansley Mrs. Rosa Burney Mrs. Martha Weems, Mrs. Beatrice Garland Mr. Calvin Craig Dr. Cox Mrs. Lacey principal of Pryor Street School was introduced, she gave a very warm welcome and words of commendation. There being no more business the meeting adjourned. Deacon Lewis Peters Dr. Chas. McClain Mrs. C. B. Wright, Sec. Mrs. Rosa Burney Asst. Sec. MASS CONVENTION MINUTES PAGE $ RESOLUTION SUBMITTED TO MASS CONVENTION BY CALVIN F. CRAIG 7-28-69 That the Model Cities Mass Convention Secretary at each Mass Convention give a report as to the attendance at Steering Committee meeting by the elected members of this body. MOTION : "That the chairman and secretary of Atlanta Model Cities Mass Convention Inc. be authorized to execute a contract with the Model Neighborhood Program of the City of Atlanta to receive funds in the approximately sum of $83,000 for citizen participation in the Model Cities Program." That the corporation serve asagent of the Mass Convention until the completion of corporate formalities.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 8, Folder 18, Document 20 Box 8 Box 8 Folder 18 Folder topic: Model Cities | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/a8a73cdee52200f49b13e30c57c5db08.pdf 3158391167c9c23139509e4a5a041ab5 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. - I A Rr: SOLUTION WHEREAS, the Mod 1 Cities Program wa s insti tuted for the purpose of improving the educationa l, socia l , emp l oyment, ax1d hous i ng of citizens in low-income area s; and, WHEREAS, one of t he pri,1e purp oses of t hi s program is to improvi; e-mployment opportunities of c i t izens living wi,:h i n t he Model Ci ties area; and , WHEREAS~ the City of Atlanta has rec eived t h e firs t year's grant a.moanting to more than 7 mil l ion dol lars and t his money will be used for many an<l varied. projec t s ; and , WHEREAS ~ t hese prcje.c t s wil l be. put ou t under contrac t by the City of At1:inta upon r ec ommenda t ion of s evera l grou ps , .i.ncb.1ding individu'31S wi t hin the ,:1.rea, Model Ci ties Mas s Conven tion, Model Cities staff, the Mode l Ci t ies Review Board and t he Model Cities Sxecut i ve Commi.ttee. , with fina l app r ova l b y the Board of Aldermen; and , WHEREAS, it is ex t remely des i rable tha t as many jobs a s possi ble covered by s uch contrac ts should be given to res idents of the :Model Citi eB area in furtherance of t he purposes of the. Ac t creating Model Cit ies , consonant with the pr oper use of f unds to be expended under the Program by the Ci t y of Atlanta~ THEREFORE BE IT RE SOLVED t hat t he per s onne l po l i cies an d practices of the Model Ci t ies Progr am and its contracting agencies shall prov i de that in a l l work ma de pos sible by or r e.s ult i ng from the grant agreem _nt above refe·r red to, af fi r ma tive action be t aken t~_insure that res idents of the mode l n e i ghborhood area are given maximum opportunity fo-i;: training and employment ~ as hereina fter set �fo r t h , cons onant wi th t he prop er ts e of f unds t o be expended unde r t he Program by the Ci ty 1. f At lanta: The Mode l Cit ies Pr ogram a nd t t:s cont r ac t ing agenc i e s sha l l con j unctively or i n dividua l ly devi.s e s ys t ems using all r e :ognized mean s of c ommunlcations f or t hos e neighbor hoods t o adequa t e l y i nform the a .cca r es i dents of al l availa b le pos i t ions fa.md.ed by t h e Model Ci t i e s Program , th a t i nf orma t ion a s to qua.i:i.fic a. t i on s , rat e of pay , where t o app ly> and c los ing dates shal l be inc l uded, and that, if reas onably possib le , a.n a .r;1 plication offi ce be l oca ted within the Mode l Ci t i es area; A mini um of ren ( 10) da ys shal l be a l lowed fo r reeei ving 2o a pp licat i ons fr om Mode l Cities re sidents fo l l owing t he full i n i tia t i on of the a r ea~.vi.de information sys tern; 3. The Mode l Cit ies Program and i ts c ontrac t i ng agenc i es be. en- cour aged to develop c ompreh ens i ve sys t ems for progr es s ively t rain i ng and upgradi ng workers a t all leve l s through such p r oven met h ods at New Ca r a e r s, job l adde r s :, e t c i <=~n d tha t t hese sys tems should i.nclude s ubsidiz ed fo rmal educat ion at the gec ondary , techni cal , and / or col l ege lev e l s ; and , 4,, Th is Board sh.a l l give top consi.der:ition to prov idi ng a ddi tiona. l fund ing f o:;: agenc i es and pr ogr ams emphasizing t he deve l opment of Mod l Ci.ties a.rea res i dent s f or posit ions be i.ng c r eated by Mode l 0 Cities programming; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the propos ed pers onnel proc edur e s a nd pr act i ces of al l c on t r ac ting agenc i. e s sha ll be s ubmitted a s pa r t of the .ir program proposals .:fn d shal l become a part of the f inal contrac t , grant , or agreement ~ upon t he app r oval of t h is Board, and tha t agenc i es wi th pr ogr ams a l r eady under c on t.r a ct sha l l be �strong ly urge d to establish procedures and practices in line with t hese guidelines wi t hi n the ex:isttng programs , and tha t their w:i.llingness and/or a bility to do so ·w i 11 be a major criteria in determining the renewal of ex isting cont:ra.cts , grants, or agreements ~ under this program; BE IT FURTliER RESOLVED that a copy of this · Res o l.utio·ci be f urnished to all exis t ing contract i ng agencies~ and to all agenc ies or organizations which in.di.cate in terest in s e eki ng Model Cities contracts, grants, or agreements a � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document A RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Model Cities Program was instituted for the purpose of improving the educational, social, empicyment, and housing of citizens in low-income areas; and, WHEREAS, one of the prime purposes of this program is to improve employment opportunities of citizens living within the Model Cities area; and, WHEREAS, the City of Atlanta has received the first year's grant amounting to more than 7 million dollars and this money will be used for many and varied projects; and, WHEREAS, these prejects will be put out under contract by the City of Atlanta upon recommendation of several groups, including individuals within the area, Model Cities Mass Convention, Model Cities staff, the Model Cities Review Board and the Model Cities Executive Committee, with final approval by the Board of Aldermen; and, WHEREAS, it is extremely desirable that as many jobs as possible covered by such contracts should be given to residents of the Model Cities area in furtherance of the purposes of the Act creating Model Cities, consonant with the proper use of funds to be expended under the Program by the City of Atlanta; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the personnel policies and practices of the Model Cities Program and its contracting agencies shall provide that in all work wade possible by or resulting from the grant agreement above referred to, affirmative action be taken t® insure that residents of the model neighborhood area are given maximum opportunity for training and employment, as hereinafter set forth, consonant with the proper use of funds to be expended under the Program by the City of Atianta: 1. The Model Cities Program and its contracting agencies shall conjunctively or individually devise systems using all recegnized means of communications for those neighborhoods to adequately inform the area residents of all available positions funded by the Modei Cities Program, that information as to quaiifications, rate of pay, where to apply, and closing dates shall be included, and that, if reasonably possible, an application office be located within the Model Cities area; 2, A minimum of ten (10) days shall be allowed for receiving applications from Model Cities residents following the full initiation of the areawide information system; 3. The Model Cities Program and its contracting agencies be en- couraged to develop comprehensive systems for progressively training and upgrading workers at all levels through such proven methods at New Careers, job ladders, etc,, and that these systems sheuld include subsidized formal education at the secondary, technical, and/or college leveis; and, 4, This Board shall give top consideration to providing additional Funding for agencies and programs emphasizing the development of Model Cities area residents for positions being created by Model Cities programming; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proposed personnel pro- cedures and practices of ail contracting agencies shall be submitted as part of their program proposals and shall become a part of the final contract, grant, or agreement, upon the approval of this Board, and that agencies with programs already under contract shall be  strongly urged to establish procedures and practices in line with these guidelines within the existing programs, and that their willing- ness and/or ability to de so will be a major criteria in determining the renewal of existing contracts, grants, or agreements, under this program; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be furnished to all existing contracting agencies, end to all agencies or organizations which indicate interest in seeking Model Cities contracts, grants, or agreements,  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 8, Folder 18, Document 19 Box 8 Box 8 Folder 18 Folder topic: Model Cities | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/52f964a57641e7c74471910ba729bbd7.pdf 15c0fa043da16c56691b907f962bc984 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. Model Cities Mass Convention Pryor Street School July 20, 1969 The Model Cities Mass Convention met in its regular session, on the above date at the designated time and place. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, Deacon Lewis Peters; the invocation was given by Mr. N. Ao Scott III. Upon the adoption, of the proposed agenda, the meeting was put in progress o The tminutes of the previous meeting were read by the Secretary, Mrso C. B. Wright. They were accepted . as read w~th one suggested change by the city attorney. (The suggestion is attached) . The secretary motioned that the suggestion of name change be accepted as read, it -was seconded by Dr. Cox, motion carried. De~con Peters made a plea for greater community participation. Model Cities Staff Reporti Mrs. Xernona Clayton 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. A one stop serv.ice building is being built. News letters will be sent every Wednesday. All committees need to be made stronger. Help from the communit±es is needed . See that· your community is represented in all meetings. Thanks for cooperation that has been given . A- preliminary report of Credentials Committee was given by the Chairman, Revo Calvin Houston. Grant Park Pittsburgh Mechanicsville Adair Park Summerhill . Peoplestown 32 21 11 10 9 4 85 Steering Committee l Dro Charles McClain Reviewed the minutes of the Steering Committee. Constitution and By-Laws i Mr. Willis Weems read the Constitution and By-Laws No Discussion or vote was taken. �-· PAGE~ MODEL CITIES MASS CONVENTION At this point the city attorney, Jim Pilcher was asked to speak, he stated he would read a statement and Dr. McClain would put it in the form of a motion (Statement Attached). Motion: That the Chairman and secretary and the Steering Committee of Atlanta Model Cities Mass Convention Inc. be authorized to execute a contract with the Model Neighborhood Program of the City of Atlanta to receive the funds in the approximate sum of $135 ~aousand ($727 63 ) This motion was seconded by or. Cox motion carried. Mr. Allison {William) Executive of EOA was asked to give a description of O.E.O. funds, after a lengthy discussion the name EOA not to e deleated from the contract was carried 27 to 23. Mr. C. Craig motioned that the secretary of Model Cities give an attendance report of each Steering Committee member to the Mass Convention, seconded by Mr. Whitley motioned carried. {motion attached) Mr.• Howard Kline a candidate for the Board of Education was introduced by Mr. Craig. ~- Craig asked for law and order in our communities the percent of juvinile delinquency was too high and suggested that the citizens must want law and order in the community. Final report of the Credentials Committee -- Rev. C. Huston s Grant Park Pittsburgh Adair Park Mechanicsville Summerhill Pe6plestown 38 23 11 11 9 Total 5 97 The foliowing persons were requested by Deacon Peters to meet on Tuesday to work on a work proposal and would be paid $35.00 for each me~ting. Mrs. Mattie Ansley Mrs. Rosa Burney Mrs. Martha Weems Mrs. Beatrice Garland Mr. Calvin Craig Dr. Cox 0 Mr$. Lacey principal of Pryor Street School was introduced a very warm welcome and words of commendation. 0 Th~re being no more business the meeting adjourned. Deacon Lewis Peters Dr. Chas. McClain Mrs. C. B. Wright Sec. Mrs. Rosa Burney Asst. Sec . 0 she gave - ~ �MASS CONVENTION MINUTES PAGE 3 RESOLUTION SUBMITTED TO MASS CONVENTION BY CALVIN F. CRAIG 7-29-69 That the Model Cities Mass Convention Secretary at each Mass Convention give a report as to the attendance at Steering Committee meeting by the elected members of this body. MOTION : "That the chairman and secretary of Atlanta Model Cities Mass Convention Inc. be authorized to execute a contract with the Model Neighborhood Program of the City of Atlanta to receive funds in the approximately sum of $83,000 for citizen participation in the Model Cities Program." That the corporation serve asagent of the Mass Convention until the completion of corporate formalities. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document Model Cities Mass Convention Pryor Street School July 20, 1969 The Model Cities Mass Convention met in its regular session, on the above date at the designated time and place. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, Deacon Lewis Peters; the invocation was given by Mr. N. A. Scott III. Upon the adoption. of the proposed agenda, the meeting was put in progress. The minutes of the previous meeting were read by the Secretary, Mrs. C. B. Wright. They were accepted.as read with one suggested change by the city attorney. (The suggestion is attached). The secretary motioned that the suggestion of name change be accepted as read, it was seconded by Dr. Cox, motion carried. Deacon Peters made a plea for greater community participation. Model Cities Staff Report: Mrs. Xernona Clayton A one stop service building is being built. News letters will be sent every Wednesday. All committees need to be made stronger. Help from the communities is needed. See that your community is represented in all meetings. Thanks for cooperation that has been given. 2 ® 2 wud WNP A-preliminary report of Credentials Committee was given by the Chairman, Rev. Calvin Houston. Grant Park 32 Pittsburgh ai Mechanicsville at Adair Park 10 Summerhill 9 Peoplestown _4 5 Steering Committee Dr. Charles McClain Reviewed the minutes of the Steering Committee. Constitution and By-Laws: Mr. Willis Weems read the Constitution and By-Laws No Discussion or vote was taken. PAGE @ MODEL CITIES MASS CONVENTION At this point the city attorney, Jim Pilcher was asked to speak, he stated he would read a statement and Dr. McClain would put it in the form of a motion (Statement Attached). Motion: That the Chairman and secretary and the Steering Committee of Atlanta Model Cities Mass Convention Inc. be authorized to execute a contract with the Model Neighborhood Program of the City of Atlanta to receive the funds in the approximate Sum of $135 Thousand ($727 63 ) This motion was seconded by Dr. Cox motion carried. Mr. Allison (William) Executive of EOA was asked to give a description of O.E.0O. funds, after a lengthy discussion the name EOA not to e de- leated from the contract was carried 27 to 23. Mr. C. Craig motioned that the secretary of Model Cities give an attendance report of each Steering Committee member to the Mass Convention, seconded by Mr. Whitley motioned carried. (motion attached) Mr. Howard Kline a candidate for the Board of Education was introduced by Mr. Craig. Mx. Craig asked for law and order in our communities the percent of Lk juvinile delinquency was too high and suggested that the citizens must want lew and order in the community. Final report of the Credentials Committee -- Rev. C. Hustan Grant Park 38 Pittsburgh 23 Adair Park 11 Mechanicsville 11 S Summerhill 9 Peoplestown 5 Total 97 The following persons were requested by Deacon Peters to meet on Tuesday to work on a work proposal and would be paid $35.00 for each meeting. Mrs. Mattie Ansley Mrs. Rosa Burney Mrs. Martha Weems, Mrs. Beatrice Garland Mr. Calvin Craig Dr. Cox Mrs. Lacey principal of Pryor Street School was introduced, she gave a very warm welcome and words of commendation. There being no more business the meeting adjourned. Deacon Lewis Peters Dr. Chas. McClain Mrs. C. B. Wright, Sec. Mrs. Rosa Burney Asst. Sec. MASS CONVENTION MINUTES PAGE 8 RESOLUTION SUBMITTED TO MASS CONVENTION BY CALVIN F. CRAIG 7-28-69 That the Model Cities Mass Convention Secretary at each Mass Convention give a report as to the attendance at Steering Committee meeting by the elected members of this body. MOTTON : "That the chairman and secretary of Atlanta Model Cities Mass Convention Inc. be authorized to execute a contract with the Model Neighborhood Program of the City of Atlanta to receive funds in the approximately sum of $83,000 for citizen participation in the Model Cities Program." That the corporation serve asagent of the Mass Convention until the completion of corporate formalities.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 8, Folder 18, Document 18 Box 8 Box 8 Folder 18 Folder topic: Model Cities | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/b2c256c1fac00afb015122763fe21156.pdf 7bdf5f08add77e63a597c025d5e7eb22 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. Southside proposal - 20 IX. budget Nursery Program Budget. - Southside Day Care Association 1. PERSONNEL - Classroom In-Kind 3 teachers @ 5,200 3 teacher trainees @ 4,200 3 child care trainees, 33 hr. wk. @2,746 2 part-time child care assistants@ 1, 900 1 practical nurse, 25 hr. wk. @ 3,250 $J.5, bOO -f2,b00 8,238 J,800 3,250 $43,488 PERSONNEL - Administrative and Program Director (4/11 of 8,000) · 2,909 Program Coordinator (4/11 of 6,00U) 2,182 Social Worker, JO hr. wk . (4/11 of 4,500) 1,637 Secretary (4/11 of 4,400) 1,600 Cook (4/11 of 4 , 800 ) 1,746 Maintenance, incl. supplies (4/11 of 7,000) 2, 536 Kitchen Assistant, 25 hr. wk.(4/11 of2,0c!O) , 756 Assist ant Cook (4/11 of 4,000) 1,l156 •.' } 1 '- · ·! , . ~~- J . :·, ·' : _:_ , ! ··:; ·. 1 ...., .. _ _;... ,,; ·. i 14,822 58,310 2,799 Total salaries FICA (4. 8%) Workman's Compensation (.25%) Total Personnel 146 $61,255 2. Consultants and Contract Services 150 600 3. Travel 150 450 4e Space - o- 4,500 5. Consumables children' s program mat erials office suppl ies (4/11 of 400) medical supplies, f irst aid clothing, bedding, laundry staff literature food @ .45 per child, 38 child.' ·2.50 ·days infant care@ per JO child. per week Total Consumables 350 150 145 36 100 150 400 75 25 5-98 3,677 2,800 6,933 6. Rental, Lease, and Purchase of Equipment 750 100 7. Others utilities (4/ 11 of 4,000) telephone (4/11 of 660 ) insurance equipment r epairs recreati on data processing Total Others 1,455 240 JOO 350 200 425 75 75 1,071 3, 216 TOTALS = classroom volunteer s and. · other volunteers •;. $72., 454'. · $14., 713 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document Southside proposal = 20 Ix. budget Nursery Program Budget - Southside Day Care Association 1. PERSONNEL - Classroom « In-Kind 3 teachers @ 5,200 $15,600 3 teacher trainees @ 200 2,600 3 child care trainees, 33 hr. wk. @2,7))6 8,238 2 part-time child care assistants @ 1,900 3,800 1 practical nurse, 25 hr. wk. @ 3,250 3,250 ; $43,488 #62515 PERSONNEL - Administrative and Program Director (l/11 of 8,000) 2,909. “4; Program Coordinator (l/11 of 6,00U) 2,182 eo Social Worker, 30 hr. wk. (l/11 of ),500) 1,637 nef Secretary (l/11 of 4,400) 1,600 Lc Cook (/11 of 4,800) 1,746 sy Maintenance, incl. supplies (44/11 of 7,000) 2,536 = Kitchen Assistant, 25 hr. wk.(l/1l1 of2,080) ,756 E Assistant Cook (/11 of l,000) 1,156 1h, 822 Total salaries 58, 310 FICA (h.8%) 2,799 Workman's Compensation (.25%) 116 Total Personnel $61,255 2. Consultants and Contract Services 150 600 3. Travel . 150 450 he Space , -0- 4500 5. Consumables children's program materials 150 350 office supplies (l,/11 of 00) 15 medical supplies, first aid : 36 150 Glothing, bedding, laundry 100 4,00 staff literature 25° 75 food @ .l5 per child, 38 child., 250-days 3,677 598 infant care @ per 30 child. per week 2,800 Total Consumables 6,933 6. Rental, Lease, and Purchase of Equipment 750 100 7 e Others utilities (/11 of ),000) 1,455 telephone (l/11 of 660) 20 insurance 300 350 equipment repairs 75 200 recreation 75 hes data processing 1,071 Total Others ; 3,216 TOTALS $72,u5n; - $14,713 % = classroom volunteers and other volunteers ;  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 8, Folder 18, Document 17 Box 8 Box 8 Folder 18 Folder topic: Model Cities | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/dce479ba9c7f088c6e96ca8d51f81621.pdf 41ff8bec20c256633a988193d0f55c12 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. Southside pr oposal - 1 I. PrearnbJ.e .. Thi s proposal fo r a nursery program of day car e and child development activitiP.s is submitt ed to t he Model Cities Program for consideration of its merits for fun ding under 1969 appropriation s . Southside Day Care As sociation has found it necessary to request emergency funding for thi s phase of its progr am because of three recent developments: 1. Southside has recently acqui red the use of the school building previously occupi ed by Pryor Str eet Elementary School. This facility i s not only mor e substanti al and more adequat e for an eff ecti ve day program, ; it . als o increases the c apacity of the c ent er from ni nety- one (91) to over 135 chi l dr en. 2. Wi t hi n we eks of Souths i de's move into its new fac ilities , t he funding agency of its program ini tiated pol i cies which 1) phas ed out all s ervi ces to chi ldren under two years of age, and _2) pr oportlonate l y reduc ed enrollment quotas of all delegate agenci es operati ng day care centers; Sout hs ide ' s quot a was cut fr om ninety - one (91 ) to eighty (80) c hi ldren. Thus , ins tead of being able t o expand its s ervi c es to needy f amilies , Souths i de has had t o r educ e the number of chi ldren to mor e than fi fty bel ow i ts capac i t y. J. I n the two months Souths i de has occupied its new loc ation, i t has had to refus e chi l d c ar e to more t han sixty children f rom families that qual i f y for its servic e~ under t he E. admis sion policies. o. Ao ~over ty gui delines that govern I n mos t ins tances , t hese were chi ldren of mot hers who were s e_eki ng c hild care in order to be able to ac cept jobs and ra.i.se thei r living standards above we lf a:re subs i s t ance l evels. �Southside proposal ~ 2 < The proposal outlined in this document will maximize the use of Southside Is facilities. The center will be able t 'o care for fifty-two additional children of mothers needing its services in order to work and improve the economic and pP-rsonal wellbeing of family. Tte salaries these: mothers earn .- even at minimum wage levels , will return over $100,000.00 into the economy of the inner-city. The public schools will be open shortly. · Surveys have shown that 80% of the absenteeism in the schools results from older children having to stay , home and care for the little ones while mother works. and nursery programs are presently operational. Southside's preschool The new openings for day care services this proposal makes possible would be available in a matter of weeks. This . proposa.Lfor ·. the· nurser y pr ogram at Southside, if funded, will make it possible for Southside to continue to ser ve the ne eds of mothers wi t h an infant as well as an ol der preschool child needing care; t hes e mothers-- the ones wi t h the most chi ldren-- are_ usually the ones who need day care the most. There is no other major .center offering quality day care services, -oper a ting ' or proposed, withi n mile s of Southside t hat off ers day care services to mothers of children from infants t o· school age. Wit hout funding, the se mothers will have no day care s ervices available that wil l release them. for gainful employment. In addition to re cently acquiring more suitable and spacious facilities, Souths ide has entered upon a joint venture of cooperat i on with the School of Education at Georgia State College for the purpos e of developing the center into an experimental laborator y for the College's students in early childhood education. The coupling of t he professional'resourc e s of a major school of education with Southside 1 s four year s of cont inuous experienc e in educa- �Southside proposal - J tional day care has important implications: ma.,jor research findings indicate that educational stimulation during early childhood is the most promising antidote to educational deprivation brought on by the conditions of poverty. Research also indicates the importance of continuing the nursery program at Southside as a part of this project; it suggests that more than 50%of the intellectual potentials of the adult is determined by the kinds of learning experiences he had before he was two years old. In view of the foregoing facts, the spons ors of Southside Child Develop~ ment Center suggest that no public funds expended can benefit so many, so directly, so quickly, or so meaningfully, as funds invested in its plans . for the· .nurser y program outlined ~ this proposal. No money spent at thi s time has any greater promise of finding answers to the burden of poverty today, and to its alleviation tomorrow. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document Southside proposal - 1 I. Preamole This proposal for a nursery program of day care and child develop- ment satieiliee is submitted to the Model Cities Program for consideration of its merits for funding under 1969 appropriations. Southside Day Care Association has found it necessary to request emer- gency funding for this phase of its program because of three recent devel- opments: 1. Southside has recently acquired the use of the school building pre- viously occupied by Pryor Street Elementary School. This facility is not only more substantial and more adequate for an effective day program, it. also increases the capacity of the center from ninety-one (91) to over 135 children. 2. Within weeks of Southside's move into its new facilities, the fund- ing agency of its program initiated policies which 1) phased out all servi- ces to children under two years of age, and 2) proportionately reduced en= rollment quotas of all delegate agencies operating day care centers; South- side's quota was cut from ninety-one (91) to eighty (80) children. Thus, instead of being able to expand its services to needy families, Southside has had to reduce the number of children to more than fifty below its capacity. 3. In the two months Southside has occupied its new location, it has had to refuse child care to more than sixty children from families that qualify for its services under the E, 0. A. poverty guidelines that govern admission policies. In most instances, these were children of mothers who were seeking child care in order to be able to atcept jobs and raise their living stendards above welfare subsistance levels. Southside proposal - 2 The proposal outlined in this document will maximize the use of South- side's facilities. The center will be able to care for fifty-two additional children of mothers needing its services in order to work and improve the economic and personal wellbeing of family. The salaries these mothers earn. even at minimum wage levels, will return over $100,000.00 into the economy of the inner-city. The public schools will be open shortly. Surveys have shown that 80% of the absenteeism in the schools results Pro older children having to stay home and care for the little ones while mother works. Southside's preschool and nursery programs are presently operational. The new openings for day care services this proposal makes possible would be available in a matter of weeks. This proposal for the nursery program at Southside, if funded, will make it possible for Southside to continue to serve the needs of mothers with an infant as well as an older preschool child needing care; these mothers~-the ones with the most children--are usually the ones who need day care the most. There is no other major center offering quality day care services, operating or proposed, within miles of Southside that offers day care services to mothers of ehdidven from infants to school age. Without funding, these mothers will have no day care services available that will release them. for gainful employment. In addition to recently acquiring more suitable and spacious facilities, Southside has entered upon a joint venture of cooperation with the School of Education at Georgia State College for the purpose of developing the center into an experimental laboratory for the College's students in early child- hood education. The coupling of the professional’ resources of a major school of education with Southside's four years of continuous experience in educa- Southside proposal = 3 « tional day care has important implications: major research findings indicate that educational stimulation during early childhood is the most promising antidote to educational deprivation brought on by the conditions of poverty. Beane also indicates the importance of continuing the nursery program at Southside as a part of this project; it suggests that more than 50% of the intellectual potentials of the adult is determined by the kinds of learning experiences he had before he was two years old. In view of the foregoing facts, the eaneore of Southside Child Develop- ment Center suggest that no public funds expended can benefit so many, so directly, so quickly, or so meaningfully, as funds invested in its plans for the nursery program outlined in this proposal. No money spent at this time has any greater promise of finding answers to the burden of poverty to- day, and to its alleviation tomorrow.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 8, Folder 18, Document 16 Box 8 Box 8 Folder 18 Folder topic: Model Cities | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/f9e4bea94690f77b1ed4fba38858159e.pdf 17ef148c43501e04fdefb5d4170d5fc6 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. rJUL 1 8 REG"b DEPARTME NT OF LAW 2614 FI RST NATION AL BANK BU I LD I NG ATLAN TA , GEORGIA 30303 July 16 HEMRY L . BOW ! EN CITY ATTORN ,Y FERRIN Y. MA H · ,W S A SSIS':ANT CITY 1969 ROBERT S. WIGGIN S MA RT IN McFAR LAND EDW I N L . STERNE RA I_PH C. JENKINS JOHN E. DO U GHE RT Y CHAR L ES M . LOKEY T H O MAS F. CHOYC E J AME S EJ . · PILCHER ASSOC IA T E A T ' ORN !:.. Y CIT Y ATTORNEYS HORII.CE T . WA RD 01.cP UT Y CI T Y. A TTO RNEY ROBERT A . HA RRIS HENRY M . MURFF CLA IMS A TTORNEYS JAMES B . HEN D ERSO N Mr a J ohn 1y S. J0hns on, Dirsc to r Model ri:ies ?rog~t m 676 r-ap1· -.-, 1 '\ven""' S P!IV Atlanta , c ~orgia 30315 ,...., ... . .,.• • A. •-. \. ... ) .. SPECI Al. ASSOC I A 1"E C l TY AT "rO RNEY g Dear Mro Johnson: I have i~ hand your request fo r an opinion, dated July 14, 1969 9 In addi tion, I have in hand the minut es of the Model Neighborhood Executb e Board, dated July 1, 1969 . It contains, among other things, a request f or an opinion from t he Ci ty At torne y as to whe t her :) r not a proposed res olution prepa red by Mro Clarence Coleman is a "lega 1 document". Further, I have i n hand a copy of the proposed resolution, as well as a copy of Contr;,,ct No o ME-10-00 1 which, hereinafter, shall be ref erred to as the grant agreeme.nt o It is important to know what a grant is from a l egal standpoint o A grant has been judicially defined as the bestowing or conferring upon another of some thing, with or without compensation, particularly in answer to the request of the othero In this instance, that thing is money. One of the conditions of this grant is found in Section 502 of the grant agreement above referred too This section reads as follo~s: n~EC o 502 . Opportunities for Residents -- In all ,.;o -r i:< 11\1. de possible by or r esulting from t his / .grr~ 1;;1nen :.. :i the City and each employer wi 11 take • f f',' ~-·mE d v e ,qction to ensure that residents of �Mro Johnny C. Johnson, Director Model Cities Program Page 2 July 16, 1969 the mode l ne ighborhood are given maximum opportunities for training and employment and that bus iness concerns located in , or owned in substant:U1 l part by , residents of the model neigh-· borhocd are t o t h e gre atest extent fea sible awa. ·!Bd cont::ac ts. ' 1 This ~yr, .... r.f c c ~t:c: f.:ua:: ..,,..,.-.:-eement is authori zed under Section 42 USCA 3303 C:1 ):: 1 There.:-u :~...,, : · '1 8 r-i1y op1.n1.on that a gr ant, such a s we have here: may be c onditio· ed upon add i t i ona l performance by the donee , the recipien t of the grant . Th is type of add it i ona l performanc e is made manifes t by the s e ct i on of the grant a gr eement a bove r e fer red t o. The general requirements of law relat ing t o c ompetitive biddi ng are set forth in McQui l lan on Municipal Corporations, Vol 10, at PPs 321, wherein , i t states as f ol lows: "The provisions of statut es , charters and ordinances requiring competitive bidding in the letting of municipal contracts are for the purpose of invitin g competition, to guard against favoritism, improvidence, extravagance, fr aud and corruption, and to secure the best work or supplies at the lowest price practicable, and they are enacted for the benefit of property holders and taxpayers, and not for the benefit or enrichment of bidders, and should be so construed and administered as to accomplish such rrnrpose fai rly and reasonably with sole reference , .0 t· .c public interest o 11 (Emphasis added) The pr:- :,c :· ~ 1 .._ ._· c:;n ·.·~tion mu.s t now be compared with the verbage of the s ~ct.1, ~: u[ -.. .-~ "': ,...A.nt agreement above referred to and with the genera~ · ,., . _. -- - .~ . . . . .:it:::T.-Jing the resolution, I am of the opinion tha t :_, : . ·.::> , ..1.1-. J ,. OlJ ' · t.eJ resolution may be a "lega 1 document", none, i. · l · . · -' S -. i tl y wor.ded, it is more restrictive than the 1 �Mro Johnny C. Johnson, Director Model Cities Program Page 2 July 16, 1969 section of the grant agre ement above referred to in tha t it places more of a bur den on the donee than was origina lly envisaged in the grant a r:rE.ement o The n e x t qu,:-~r t i u t 1--a L ;:nu r t be answered is whether or not the l angua ge o f i.:.L;.:, :.~c'J;:,,~sr· ·, r~so lution is so restric t ive that it does not ful f i } 1 tb ,." ~ C!; L. ~-~: ·:. -.r e ri.1 f rements of law rela t ing to c ompetitive b i .::'ld · :.;_.'.,c °i:,' r• . , · ~,:. .. ,,. _, :. . is t oo r e stric t iveo The r e.:., s t r-"r. .. ,·. c ;· i.nl;;n i s that it is necessary f or t he donee , th e Ci t :~· r... , ~-- .. . . cc: OL·;:: ain the contra cts at t he lowe s t p ossible price c oP. s u r,;;: ,t: ·vLt.l; Lo t h the condi tion s o f the grant a g r e ement and the gene r a l. l -c:\v. Th i s obj ec t i ve, i n a l l p roba bilit y, c annot be ob ta ine d und er the l a n gua g e of the p r oposed r e s o lution und er con- s ideration. Therefore , we wou ld r e spec tful l y s uggest tha t the propos ed res olution be modified a lon g the l ine s of th,3 propos e d re s olution a t tach ed h ereto so that bo t h the pa.t i cular section o f the grant a greement ( SEC o 502) a nd the general l aw can be sat i sf i ed~ Shoul d you wish any addi tiona l pr oblem, please fee l f r ee to con tact me o HLB:cwh 1 with res pect to this � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document SUL 18 Reg DEPARTMENT OF LAW 2614 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 ROBERT S. WIGGINS July 16, 1969 MARTIN MCFARLAND EDWIN L. STERNE RALPH C. JENKINS JOHN E. DOUGHERTY HEHRY L. BOW! EN CHARLES M. LOKEY CcITy ATTORN t¥ THOMAS F.CHOYCE FERRIN Y. MATE tws JAMES 8. PILCHER ASSISTANT CITY AT ORNEY ASSOCIATE CITY ATTORNEYS HORACE T. WARD DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY ROBERT A. HARRIS HENRY M. MURFF CLAIMS ATTORNEYS JAMES B. HENDERSON Mr, John } G Johnson Director SPECIAL ASSOCIATE CITY ATTORNEY 3 Model Cicries Program 676 Capi:ocl Avenue, S.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30315 Dear Mr. Johnson: I have ia hand your request for an opinion, dated July 14, 1969, In addition, I have in hand the minutes of the Model Neighborhood Executiye Board, dated July 1, 1969, It contains, among other things, a request for an opinion from the City Attorney as to whether or not a proposed resolution prepared by Mr. Clarence Coleman is a "legal document", Further, I have in hand a copy of the proposed resolution, as well as a copy of Contract No. ME-10-001 which, hereinafter, shall be referred to as the grant agreement. It is important to know what a grant is from a legal standpoint. A grant has been judicially defined as the bestowing or conferring upon another of some thing, with or without compensation, particu- larly in answer to the request of the other, In this instance, that thing is money. One of the conditions of this grant is found in Section 502 of the grant agreement above referred to. This section reads as follows: "SEC. 562. Opportunities for Residents -- In all werk made possible by or resulting from this rerecnent, the City and each employer will take “firme sive action to ensure that residents of Mr. Johnny C, Johnson, Director Model Cities Program Page 2 July 16, 1969 the model neighborhood are given maximum oppor- tunities for training and employment and that business concerns located in, or owned in sub- stantial part by, residents of the model neigh- borhocd are to the greatest extent feasible awarded contvacts." This type of ccctroetua’ cereement is authorized under Section 42 USCA 3303 fap i™® : Therefor v2, {i ts ay opinion that a grant, such as we have here, may be conditioned upon additional performance by the donee, the recipient of the grant. This type of additional performance is made manifest by the section of the grant agreement above referred to, The general requirements of law relating to competitive bidding are set forth in McQuillan on Municipal Corporations, Vol 10, at pp. 321, wherein, it states as follows: "The provisions of statutes, charters and ordi- nances requiring competitive bidding in the letting of municipal contracts are for the purpose of inviting competition, to guard against favoritism, improvidence, extravagance, fraud and corruption, and to secure the best work or supplies at the lowest price practicable, and they are enacted for the benefit of property holders and taxpayers, and not for the benefit or enrichment of bidders, and should be so con- strued and administered as to accomplish such nurpose fairly and reasonably with sole reference uO tie public interest." (Emphasis added) The prooe: .! .cselction must now be compared with the verbage of the sectic. of * © teant agreement above referred to and with the genera. "9 ..e% cowlewing the resolution, I am of the opinion that 4/)).9 ui. D.Upesed resolution may be a “legal document", monei* ‘e's «? . esectiy worded, it is more restrictive than the Mr, Johnny C. Johnson, Director Model Cities Program Page 2 July 16, 1969 section of the grant agreement above referred to in that it places more of a burden on the donee than was originally envisaged in the grant acreenent, The next queskic. thal must be answered is whether or not the language of tic Vcopcse' resolution is so restrictive that it does not fvilfiit the geru-u1 renuirements of law relating to competitive bidd':3. Ten’ ~anws., in is too restrictive. The reese for “+ cpinien is that it is necessary for the donee, the City ©. %.. 5... «is obtain the contracts at the lowest possible price consosu1ut wii. both the conditions of the grant agreement and the general law. This objective, in all probability, cannot be obtained under the language of the proposed resolution under con- sideration, Therefore, we would respectfully suggest that the proposed resolution be modified along the lines of tha proposed resolution attached hereto so that both the particular section of the grant agreement (SEC. 502) and the general law can be satisfied, Should you wish any additional: informa problem, please feel free to contact with respect to this Cify Attorney HLB: cwh  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 8, Folder 18, Document 15 Box 8 Box 8 Folder 18 Folder topic: Model Cities | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/ffdbb665c6d8b84ee26fa6174e32c966.pdf 375b1953189b7a28d234eb21aca633eb Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. Small-Group Work for Sessi on I of Model Cities Training Program Elect group l e ader or spokesman Make list of names of participants Yt'\ t, ~-ff,~ l>~N Our work in groups of ten (10) has three purposes: 1) to help the participants to get better acquainted with each other; 2) to help them examine their own thoughts and feelings about the Model Cities program and their role as board members; 3) · to provide us as planners of the training program with information about the participants' knowledge, n e eds and attitudes regarding the Model Cities pr,ogram and the training program itself. The content of each group session will consist of consideration of three questions: 1) " S uppo se someone stopp e d you on the str e e t or conf ronted you i n a meeting with the question, "What m a kes you think you're qualified to be on the Model Cities board? 1 What would be your answer?" 2) "Suppa se w e gave each of you a $1, 000 gr ant, to be u s ed in any way you choo se , to b e tt e r p rep a r e your self for p arti cip ation in the M od e l C ities boa rd. H ow would you u se the m on e y ? 11 1 3) "Suppose that you people a re. the Mod e l Cities Bo ar d, and th at y o u were o ffere d the answe r s . to t hre e (and only three ) questions about the M ode l N e ighborhood A rea. What three q u es tion s w ould you as a B o ard ask? " T h e firs t t w o ques ti ons are to be answered b y e a c h .member of the group individually. (Group disc u ssion could fo llow the individual answers if that seems natural. ) The answer to the third question should be arrived at by consensus of the group. Total time available for the group discussion is 10 0 minutes, allowing about 30 minutes for consideration of each question. This is a flexible standard, however, and if a lively discussion develops around one question or another, the leader need not cut it off for the sake of covering all three questions. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document ——__——— Nome Tags - i ob end. trop 0 Small-Group Work for Session I of Model Cities Training Program Elect group leader or spokesman — Mf, Rothe. We ohn Make list of names of participants Sel cola Our work in groups of ten (10) has three purposes: 1) to help the participants to get better acquainted with each other; 2) to help them examine their own thoughts and feelings about the Model Cities program and their role as board members; 3) to provide us as planners of the training program with information about the participants' knowledge, needs and attitudes regarding the Model Cities program and the training program itself. The content of each group session will consist of consideration of three questions: 1) "Suppose someone stopped you on the street or confronted you ina meeting with the question, 'What makes you think you're qualified to be on the Model Cities board?' What would be your answer?'"! 2) "Suppose we gave each of you a $1,000 grant, to be used in any way you choose, to better prepare yourself for participation in the Model Cities board. How would you use the money?"! 3) "Suppose that you ibe seni, are the Model Cities Board, and that you were offered the answers. to three (and only three) questions about the Model Neighborhood Area. What three questions would you as a Board ask?"! The first two questions are to be answered by each member of the group individually. (Group discussion could follow the individual answers if that seers natural.) The answer to the third question should be arrived at by consensus of the group. Total time available for the group discussion is 100 minutes, allowing about 30 minutes for consideration of each question. This is a flexible standard, however, and if a lively discussion develops around one question or another, the leader need not cut it off for the sake of covering all three questions.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 8, Folder 18, Document 14 Box 8 Box 8 Folder 18 Folder topic: Model Cities | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/1b98337f19c4e88d38d5f593c7319076.pdf af8428da8f447e4012dcaa5f412bc9f7 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. Re sident Involvement During Planni nq Proce ~s In December 1967 the residents of the Mod~ l Ne ighborhood Area selected the s tructure tha t they_ felt would be the most workable and repre sentat i ve o f the s i ~ ne ighborhoods that make up the Atlanta Model Cities Program. ( see figure on community structure) . l•Iass Convent:!.0.1 The Mass Convention is open t o a ll Mode l Neighborhood Area residents. Here the cit:i.zen·s .have an op portunity to hear the progress made to improve their coromunity and to voice their views on the Model Cities Pro gram. The Mass Convention also guarantees to every Mode l Neighbcrhood Area res ident that all elections that relate_ to the organizatio n o f the Mode l Neighborhood Area will be conducted in an orderly and democrati c manner. The Mass Conventio n also symbolizes the idea that the Model Neighborhood Area is a unified c ommunity with many similar · as·s ets and liabilities in each of the six concerned neighborhoods. Executive Board The 14 me mbe r Executive Board i s the policy making body in the Model cities organization. It is c omposed o f six neighborhood residents . (One elected representative fr om each of s ix · · neighborhoods _within the Model Neighborhood Area). In addition to the six citizens , it includes the f ollowing: Mayor of the City o f At l anta , one citi zen repr esenting the Atlanta Negro community, one citizen from the genera l Atlanta Community, one repr esentative from the Atlanta Board o f Education , one repres e ntat i'.,e from the Stai.:e of G~orgia , two Aldermen from the City of Atlanta , and ~he Fulto n County Commissi on chairma n. Steering Committee The 16 merri::)er citizen ' s Steering Committee serves as the Mass Co nvention when i t is not in session . It ac c epts recommendation s a nd proposa ls from each o f the six n eighborhoods. It wi ll bring th~s~ recommenda~ions and propo sals to the Mas s Conventio r:. and t h e Executive Board. The Steering Committee is also responsible for deve loping a n effective citizen organization in each of the s i x neighborhoods. It is compo sed of the f our Mass Convention officers, six neighborhood vice chairmen (one elect e d fr om each of the s ix neighborhoods) ·a nd six residents who serve on the Executive Board. Neighborhood Advisor y Councils The Neighborhood Advisory council structure is designed to organize citizens at the neighborhood level •. The residents decided to use thr ee basic structures of organization. Adair Park elected it s repr,2sentatives on an area-wide basis. Grant Park and Peoplestown elected their representatives on a district basis. Mecr.anicsville, Pitt sbm·gh, and Summerhill elected its representatives through the block structure. �The basic function of the councils is to coordinat e all activity in the neighborho0d and to be sure that all operating and standing committees are functioning at maximum efficiency. Operating committees Each of the six neighborhoods has 11 operating commj tt ees for the following program areas: Health, Ed1_tcation, Welfare and Social Services, Hou sing, Relocation, De s i .gn and Preservation Physical Improve ments, Public Facilities, Ernplcyment, Crime Prevention and Re creation. These commit.tees played a valuable role in the planning phase of Model Cities Programs through working with pl a nners in identifying problems ti.nd s uggesting solutions to solve these problems. The Operating Committee s work closely with thE: .:leighborhood Advisory Council so that all proposals from the community will be coordinated through the council. Membership on th-J Operating Committees is open to any resident of the-neighborhood. Standing Commi ttees 'J~he St anding Comm.i.t.tees serve a s th e o rga nizational arm for the Mass Con ve ntion and the s i x nei ghborhoods within Atlar.ta's Model Ne ighbo rhood Area . There are seven committe e s (Boundary, credenti als, Nor.ti n.at ions, Pr ogram, Org3 ni zation, Resolutions, and Con sti tution and By-Laws ) . Each neighborhood has three representatives on each committee. Techni8 a l Adviscry Bo ar d The purpose of the Technical Advisory Boa rd is to 1:eview the pl ans of the re s idents and planners, and to offer technical advice. Members ar e r.epr e se ntatives of various community organiz a tion s . Total membership is open - ended, allowing the Model Cities Prog r am Director to appoint anyone who might aid the program. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document Resident Involvement During Planning Process In December 1967 the residents of the Model Neighborhood Area selected the structure that they. felt would be the most work- able and representative of the six neighborhoods that make up the Atlanta Model Cities Program. (see figure on community, structure). Mass Convention The Mass Convention is open to all Model Neighborhood Area resi- dents. Here the citizens have an opportunity to hear the pro- gress made to improve their community and to voice their views on the Model Cities Program. The Mass Convention also guaran- tees to every Model Neighborhood Area resident that all elec- tions that relate to the organization of the Model Neighborhood Area will be conducted in an orderly and democratic manner. The Mass Convention also symbolizes the idea that the Model Neighborhood Area is a unified community with many similar “assets and liabilities in each of the six concerned neighbor- hoods, Executive Board The 14 member Executive Board is the policy making body in the Model Cities organization. It is composed of six neighborhood residents. (One elected representative from each of six - © neighborhoods within the Model Neighborhood Area). In addition to the six citizens, it includes the following: Mayor of the City of Atlanta, one citizen representing the Atlanta Negro community, one citizen from the general Atlanta Community, one representative from the Atlanta Board of Education, one repre- sentative from the State of Georgia, two Aldermen from the City of Atlanta, and the Fulton County Commission Chairman. Steering Committee The 16 member citizen's Steering Committee serves as the Mass Convention when it is not in session. It accepts recommenda- tions and proposals from each of the six neighborhoods. It Will bring thesc recommendations and proposals to the Mass Convention and the Executive Board. The Steering Committee is also responsible for developing an effective citizen organi- zation in each of the six neighborhoods. It is composed of the four Mass Convention officers, six neighborhood vice chairmen (one elected from each of the six neighborhoods) and six residents who serve on the Executive Board. Neighborhood Advisory Councils The Neighborhood Advisory Council structure is designed to organize citizens at the neighborhood level..The residents decided to use three basic structures of organization. Adair Park elected its representatives on an area-wide basis. Grant Park and Peoplestown elected their representatives on a district basis. Mechanicsville, Pittsburgh, and Summerhill elected its representatives through the block structure. The basic function of the councils is to coordinate all acti- vity in the neighborhood and to be sure that all operating and standing committees are functioning at maximum efficiency. Operating Committees Each of the six neighborhoods has 11 operating committees for the following program areas: Health, Education, Welfare and Social Services, Housing, Relocation, Design and Preservation Physical Improvements, Public Facilities, Emplcyment, Crime Prevention and Recreation. These committees played a valuable role in the planning phase of Model Cities Programs through working with planners in identifying problems and suggesting solutions to solve these problems. The Operating Committees work closely with the Neighborhood Advisory Council so that all proposals from the community. will be coordinated through the council. Membership on the Opera- ting Committees is open to any resident of the neighborhood. Standing Committees ‘The Standing Committees serve as the organizational arm for the Mass Convention and the six neighborhoods within Atlanta’s fodel Neighborhood Area. There are seven committees (Boundary, Credentials, Nominations, Program, Or@nization, Resolutions, and Constitution and By-Laws). Each neighborhood has three representatives on each committee. Technical Adviscry Board The purpose of the Technical Advisory Board is to review the plans of the residents and planners, and to offer technical advice. Members are representatives of various community organizations. Total membership is open-ended, allowing the Model Cities Program Director to appoint anyone who might aid the program.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 8, Folder 18, Document 13 Box 8 Box 8 Folder 18 Folder topic: Model Cities | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/d253ae70d8e185fc2ae6d3f254fd0159.pdf 926a5dc938267e7801e7b2ec9dce1555 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. MODEL CITIES TRAINING PROGRAM University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Chattanooga, Tennessee .·.- . .... . ..... The Model Cities Training Program, one of the first of it."s kind in the country, i~. a ten session course to be conducted in seminar form under the direction of the University of Tennes·s ee at Chattanooga. Th e ma jor objective o f the Model Citie s Training Program is the enablement of the fifty members of the CoDoA. Board of Directors to function as a cohesive policy-making body while simult an e ously encoura ging the a t t ainme nt or ret e ntion of individual identity with those various sponsoring groups whom it is the board me mbe rs' r es p o n s ibility _to 're p resent. This obj e ctive c a n b es t b e a chie v e d by e n ab l ing t h e p articipa n ts t o: (1) acq uir e knowledge of the . actu~l structure of the Model Cities o r g a nizat~on and the obj ectives of the p r ogr a m; (2 ) d e v e lop an awaren ess of the d e cision- mak ing process in t e rms of se l e cting a cce ptabl e al tern a tives to r e cognize d problems confronting the CDA Board; and, (3) est a bli s hing and ma int ain i ng an o rga n i z a tiona l es p r it' d e cor ps' which on one h and will e n a ble each CDA Bo ard p art icipa nt to ma intain hi s i d entity a nd ties within h is own sphere o f the commu nity , and y e t p e r mit him to ma k e d e cis ions b ased o n a tota l c o mmit tme nt to an ove ra ll achieve me nt o f the o rgani z ation a l g oa l s o �l I (2) This series of seminars utilizing consultants, applying dynamic and innovative educational techniques, and involving expertise from as many pertinent sources as are available is, like the Model Cities--Program itself, a demonstration project •.. Because there is iittle national experience in training programs such as the one .described, the emphasis in the Chattanooga program will -be on experimentation and innovation. As might be e x pected of an experimental undertaking, it will be subject to regular observation, monitoring, and evaluation of its effectiveness in terms of the goals it seeks to fulfill. It should be understood that this continuous evaluative process is a testing process of the training program and its staff, as ~elL ~s of the participants. The first session of the program will meet Saturday, August 9, 1969, at th~ campus of UoToCo as will the following nine sessions on the following nine consecutive Saturd ay s. A suggested structure and content of each session is found in Appendic es I thru Xo Each consultant, however, may modify or restructure the seminar to achieve the objectives as outlinedo Funding for this training program has been secured under the provi sion s of Title 1 of the Higher Education Act from the Department of Health, Education and Welfare; Institution al monies of U T0C o; and funds from the Model Cities Planning Grant o 0 �l (3) The expectation is that the experience and information derived from the program will contribute signific~ntly to the effectiveness of the CDA Board as a decisive administrative bodyo It is hoped, also, _thi;lt from this Model Cities Training Program_ there will emerge a body of knowledge and exp~rience which will be of . value not only in Chattanooga, but in other cities as wello �(4) OBJECTIVES The succe-ss of the Model Cities Program to a large degree depend~ upon the~a~i~!ty and willingness of the CDA Board to discharge effectively its responsibility as chief policy-makirig . body of the Chattanoog·u. Model Cities Programo As administrators who are responsible for the planning and implementation of the total Model Cities Program, CDA Board members must be sufficiently equipped (1) with the necessary skills, tools, and information related to all aspects of the Model Cities Program; · (2) with an understanding of the Model cities Program and its relationship to city government and other agencies in the urban are--both private and public; and (3) with me thodology and dyna~i cs of d e cis ionmaking. To this end, t~e Mode l citie s Training· and Orientation Se minar Pr o gram i s d es i g n e d: . 1. To. insure that . the CDA Boa rd me mbers will be aware of the ir role s · in the Mode l Cities Program 2o To p r ovide CDA Bo ard me mbe rs with s u f fi cie nt and re l e vant informa tion c o nc erning the Mode l cities concept a nd me t h od . 3o To ins u r e th a t CDA Board me mb ers are familiar wi th the Mode l Cities st r u ctu re, both n a t ion a lly and l oca l ly. �(5) 4o To provide CDA Board members with pertinent data concerning the HUD guidelines as related to the Model Cities Programu So To provide CDA Board members with relevant information concerning speciti6 problems and program areas to be dealt wi.th in the Model Neighborhood area o Further, this program is designed to foster competency and sound judgment on the part of the Board members by providing them with training exercises and experiences in problem-solving and decision - makingo No Board with a ·membership so varied as that of the CDA Board can effectively discharge its duties and responsibilities unless its members develop a oneness of mind and purpose. It is the intent of this program to provid·e s~ructured experiences for the fifty participating CDA Board members--members with varied backgrounds, wide ranges of e x periences, diffeient levels 6f educational attainment, and diverse interests--which will enable ·the Board to .function as a cohesive unit ·w ith mutual interests and common goals; one dedicated to solving the problems of the Model Neighborhood and its people. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document MODEL CITIES TRAINING PROGRAM University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Chattanooga, Tennessee The Model Cities Training Program, one of the first of its kind in the country, is a ten session course to be conducted in seminar form under the direction of the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. The major objective of the Model Cities Training Program is the enablement of the fifty members of the C.D.A. Board of Directors to function as a Bohesive policy-making body while simultaneously encouraging the attainment or retention of individual identity with those various sponsoring groups whom it is the board members' responsibility to’‘représent. This objective can best be achieved by enabling the participants to: (1) acquire knowledge of the. actual structure of the Model Cities opganizatson and the objectives of the program; (2) develop an awareness of the decision~making process in terms of selecting acceptable alterna- tives ia recognized problems confronting the CDA Board; and, (3) establishing and maintaining an seuaaibacaonss esprit' de corps' which ah one hand will enable each CDA Board participant to Aenea his identity and ties within his own sphere of the community, and yet permit him to make decisions based on a total committment to an overall achievement of the organizational goals. (2) This series of seminars utilizing consultants, applying dynamic and innovative educational techniques, and involving expertise from as many pertinent sources as are available is, like the Model. Cities..Program itsel£, a demonstration project. . Because there is little national experience in training programs such as the one described, the emphasis in the Chattanooga program will be on experimentation and innovation. As might be expected of an experimental undertaking, it will be subject to regular observation, monitoring, and evaluation of its effectiveness in terms of the goals it seeks to fulfill. It should be understood that this continuous evaluative process is a testing process of the training program and its staff, as well as of the participants. The first session of the spogeeh will meet Saturday, August 9, 1969, at the campus of U.T.C. as will the following nine sessions on the following nine consecutive Saturdays. A suggested structure and content of each session is found in Appendices I thru X. Each consultant, however, may modify or restructure the seminar to achieve the objectives as outlined. Funding for eis training program has been secured under the provisions of Title 1 of the Higher Education Act from the Department of Health, Education and Welfare; Institutional monies of U.T.C.; and funds from the Model Cities Planning Grant. (3) The expectation is that the experience and information derived from the program will contribute significantly to the effectiveness of the CDA Board as a decisive administrative body « It is hoped, alzo,. that from thie Model eis Training pena) there will emerge a body of knowledge and experience which will be of. value not only in Chattanooga, but in other cities as well. (4) OBJECTIVES The success of the Model Cities Program to a large degree depends upon the ability and willingness of the CDA alo. Bi acts Seccctiveiy its responsibility as chief policy-making body of the Chattanooga Model Cities Program. As administrators who. are responsible for the planning and implementation of the total Model Cities Program, CDA Board members must be sufficiently equipped (1) with the necessary skills, tools, and information related ne a aspects of the Model Cities Program; : (2) with an understanding of the Model Cities Program and its relationship to city government and Sune agencies in the urban are--both private and public; and (3) with methodology and dynamics of decision- making. TG this ae the Model Cities Training and Orientation Seminar Program is designed: 1. To. insure that. the CDA Board members will be aware of their roles in the Model Cities Program 2s!) “TO provide CDA Board members with sufficient and rele- vant information concerning the Model Cities concept and method. 3, To insure that CDA Board members are familiar with the. Model Cities structure, both nationally and locally. (5) 4, To provide CDA Board members with pertinent data concerning the HUD guidelines as related to the Model Cities Program. : 5. To provide CDA Board members with relevant information concerning epuckete problems and program areas to be dealt with in the Model Neighborhood area. Further, this program is designed to foster competency and sound judgment on the part of the Board members by providing them with training exercises and experiences in problem-solving and meta tiar ine No Board with a membership so varied as that of the CDA Board can effectively discharge its duties and responsi- bilities unless its members develop a oneness SE mind and purpose, It is the intent of this program to provide structured experiences for the fifty participating CDA Board members-—-members with varied backgrounds, wide ranges of experiences, different Levels GE educational attainment, and diverse i keke siolomicion will enable the Board to function as a cohesive unit with mutual interests and common goals; one dedicated to solving the problems of the Model Neighborhood and its people.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 8, Folder 18, Document 12 Box 8 Box 8 Folder 18 Folder topic: Model Cities | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/b1d49fa368661838d103ebdf16933166.pdf 81ae9f4a84ed0c0f99168edc571094a2 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. (l) Al '1 -~~ ~1DIX I 8: JO-S1: .15 CD/1 ;Jo1r:.l me -•l:,s Special Are a ConsuHant. 9:L15-ll) : J0 Vil'JA ::irid Cnnsultc1nt. 9: L5-10: JO Non-t·:IJA rnembers · and ConsuJ.tanto Sach e: roup u:i.11 0.lect le.:ide:r to act as chair;nan and member to ;:crve as r e cor i:kr and/or fcp,YrLcro Sessions will be !:,aped , both HW\ ,1.nri Non-rZ·:A _:1·oups ·d ll he rli.scus sion seminar s 1. th t1-1 0-f0ld purpose: To enablr. part tcipants to partic:i.pa te in some: dee Lsi0n 1::ak:i.n; or proc?f>s in terms 2. wj orcanizati on- ·:>.10.cti,)n o: chairman and recnr rter. To discuss t.he implica ti.on of the consultant I s morn:~n~ present:itinn ·in terms of the 11 50 11 and what eff8ct the croup could have on the Grea ter C}ic1U a noo:;a- 11 Thi.nk Tank" for what conld take place t.hrou;h 1975. · 10:J0-10:~5 Coffee Dreak. l0: L.::-11:15 .Simul:.il:,i :m ".:;;.;:crcisc basect on weekly format-Leo, a pic:torici.l . rep rese:nt,:d;i-)n of a philiso phy expressing opposition to th-3 need for a ~'.od:; l Cities Pro:·;ro.m i.ri Chattanooca o This will alss, be structl1red to s erve as a catal;;st for a sensitivity exercise. 1::.:15-12 :30 F'ive s ma ll discussion broups will be formed-leaders and recorders will be elP.cted by each group. Tapes provided fo r some --Vi deo Tapes of othe rs. Discussion will proceed on the basis of attcmptin::; to formu l ate 3.n acc e;:-ta~le decis t0n C'Jncernin;; the nature of the pictorial pres e ntation. .1 :ember shi;;-, wi ll rc r.1ain the same for first five session-then r ar. d0r:1 s e l e ction o: :ive n e ,v croups o Iloarr:l m~r.ibcrn will re :orm as- CDA Board duri;--i,; last 20 mi:,ut c~ of t h~ proJram o Brief report fro m each group chairman or record er. ' .e:r.a-5:icer �(2 ) I. L)f rc1·j :)Ll srcnt i11 olrl:,.:t:in:int; the co11scn0u s o.f the .'.lC'. l~cpt,tbl,~ t.o the :_;roup. 11 )0" in tcn.1::; of.' d cc isi:m(s) �(J) APl ';.i;NDI X JI CD!\ Doard and Cc111sultan~,. 8:JL)-9:.':; 9:)1S:-l'.J:J0 tJi ;A i3 oarcl ancl ConsuJ.ta nt. 9: 1_:~-' -10 :J0 Non-NtL\ Doani .cind Consultant. T1-10 _;rou~)S me e L independent-~,, ele ct chairmcm a nd recorder s , disc uss H:C'ir un:iq11e role as individuals in the total ctedision-makint_; structuri: ,v of th i::- CDA Bna1·d. cr i tique or Hep-'Jrts of chairmen of the tuo ~rou ps, Discussion and the reports in terms of total interaction of the participants. 10:J0-10 :L5 Coffee Dreak. 10:L5-ll:15 Sj_intilatbn Exercise. Role l'l;:iyjn 1_; --~rnrc1se designed to enhance the authoritorive structlcre of an or~anizatinn in terms of decision-making. ll:;15-12:J0 Five Reports--CDA. Boa rd structures a model for interactbn based on principles acceptable to the total Boardo · �8: J0-9: /15 CD/\ Doard meets Special Consult.:tnt. 9: !,5-l'.1: JO i'iJ.JA and Consult.ant. 9:LiS-l·J:J0 ~:on-l'-,NI\ me mbers. ElFcti•m of cliairm:in .:incl recorckr. Discussion seminar·s for Loth 2roups~ . . Two-fold purpose: 1. To participate in decision making process by clcctin.; .chair:nan. 2. To disc11ss an issue as unique to the 1;roups,ioe.; the l•l}JA mer.ibe rs and the effort of non-participation in decision-:n.aking in the Chattnnoo 0a City Goverrunent--the Non-MNA membGrs anr:1 the d (: sirability of bcin:.:; in a position to effect a decisi0n with the city goverruni:; nt. l0:JO-lO:)i5 Cof.fco Brea ko 10: L5-ll: 15 S:i.mulation Exercise. Role playin[; by selectccl r;r ciup. "i iilit::?.nt Citiz ens"--a confrontation between a' group of citiz e ns ;ind ' . i n~trl r->qua t P. police protection or n.n inadequa t") schoQl cur :-- .i.c 11lu..'n. Problem based on -Zcono:, ics--I-fow to cope wi"t.h sec11rine enployment. 11:15-12:JO Five discussion groups--ele ct leader and r e corder. Disc uss acceptable solution to the problPm pres e nted. ques tion pe r i od. wi ll b e mad e Simula tors ava ilable for Report of the r e c ord ers to the full CDA Board . An at tempt to obtain a cons e nsus of opinion as to the be tter solut ion. Vi deo Ta pe Re c orde r to r ecord the de ci s i on- making proce ss. mi nu t e s for self-eva l ua t ion of problemo Use l a s t 15 Use �('.:S ) /1YPENDIX IV Au:_;us L J() 8:J0-9:L ~ CDA GoarJ.mects Spec ial Area Consulta nt. ?: L5-:i.0:30 n~J.\. .:i.nd Consult:int. 9: L5-10: JO }\111-l\en:bcrs NHA. Each r,i~0up 0lP.cts chairrna n and record12r co:.c e r:1in G e:ich groups I o Sessions ta pedo Serni_nar discussi -Jn uni.queness in terms of the consultant 's presenta:.iono Two-fold purpose: 1. To strcn ghtcn total participation of all memb8rs of the group. 2. To disc 1-<s s t:1e decision-making process as related to Nl":A and Non-Nl'"IJ\ o l0:J0-10:L5 Coffee Break. 10:L5-11:15 Sbu l atLon Sxerci se . 35 r.m pictorial presenta tion of a ,_ "Cit-izr=m 1 s Participation S t,ructure" wh ich does not reflect the r;oals of the 1-lodel Cj t-,y Program. Problem of making acc~ptah l8 decision by the sroup is prcs~nted to the CDA Board. 11: 15-12: JO . Sma 11 grjup discussi :m of sinula tion exercise--5 l eaders and recorde rs are ele cted. 1. Discussion will proceed on the ba sis of: How could the structure of the board be c hanged to make the board more effective? 2. What alternatives are available to th e group in t eTiils of maktr.e an acceptable decision as posed by the problem. Brief repor t fr om Chair~an--Remainder of time spent by CDA Board ma.kL~g a dec ision based on da ta presented in problem. �(6) APJ 'ENDIX V Scptc:;ll.iPl' 6 S:J0-9:)_Jr. CD;\ !Jo:wd m0cLs Spcci:,l Consultant. ~) :!1)-10: JO }lNJ\ and Consultant. 9: l,S'-10: JO Non-MJ'li\ and Consultant. - Each group · electr·leader and recorder. Each group will decide the·most seriol1s problem confront:Ln~ the CDA Board in terms of the consultant's cU ~cussion. 10: J0-10: )15 Coffee Drcak. 10: 16-11: 15 Simubtion ·Exercise 11 Con.D ictir1e Priorities" a pictorial representa tion of priorjties beinG established with adequate participation of thP. area ciUzenry. ll:15-12:JO Small group seminars. group establish priorities. Elect chairmen and record8rs. CD/\ group meets. Zach Chairmen report briefly. CDA attempts to estahlish priorities acceptable to total Board. �('I) i\Fl'~ NDIX VI Sept.crnb cr 13 8:J0-9://; C:DA J10.1rcl meet::; S;;8c :i'11 Area Consultant. 9: ){;-Jo: JO MNA :rnr:l c,~nsult-1 .nt. 9: L~-1 1"' :JO l'fon-MN1\ and Con:rnltant. Two-fold pnrrosc: 1. D:lch grou p elect chairma n and recorder. 2., Each group discus3 the role of the total CDA Board and 11 Subtantive I:npost" with specific reference to (a) physical problerns; (b) ec -:momic problems; (c) social problems. (Use Video if available) 10:JJ-10:L5 Coffe e Dreak. 10: !.;5-11: 15 Simulation F.xercise--Hypothet ical Problem prrnented to CCA parti::i.p:1nts. Short skit developed for purposes of drama tizinz a spe cific -r'-1bl,,r;i arisinc within tb i=  !fodel Area. 11 :15-12:JO Small 3roup disc ussion of pr obl em ~ nd. solutions. rr.cets as unit. 3rief reports fro~ r ecord~rs. CDA Board An Analysis of the proble ~ by to t~ l group and an .acceptanc~ or reject~on of the five solutions --a c onsensus of the group is formed in terms of articulating a decision 'oy the tot3l group. (taped) �(fl ) AP l "~ImIX: VII ,S:J(l- 0 CD,\ Doard rr.i--ets Special Area Consu ltant. // 9:l,S-JJ:JO Nt-"·/\ and Consult::i.nt. 9: lt-JO: JO Nim,..}17',1.f\. anrl Consult-1.nt. Two- :·o·Jd !' ;1rpose; 1. Elccti.on of chairm=rn and record er. - 2. Group disc11s sinn jmplcmcnt the discuss:ion of the CDA to the '.:.hr"'e s;-,ccific ar eas as seen by the two groups- -city Government, nei;;hborhood, nnd Model City Staff. l0:J0-10:L5 Coffee Dreak. 10:IJ5-ll :15 Simulation Bxercisc~ <~erci se-pi dorial will present .a problem (5 ) which will involve .a high de~rcc of rolarizntion of three aroas of interest groups--goverru, ental officials, nej.-:;hborhooct organization, and Hod el · City Sta ff. 11:15-12: J O Sma ll group (5) discus s ion with lea der a nd r ecord er. An analysis of th'? problem(s) ancl altr,rmitives available to the to tal CDA group as seen by the s ma ll gr 0up. Report of five chairme n: An ana lysis by the CD!\ group as a comm i tt ee of the whole:--What is acceptable i..n terms of a decision to the pictorial problem. �(9) S0.;.:,tenl.'c r 27 8: JCl-9: )( CD!\ l30.:1 rd mecl,s Special /1.rca Consultanto 9 : 1:5-10: 30 JWa\ anc1 . Cons u 1t.:1nt. 9: /J.5-10:30 n:in:..t!Ef\. and Cons nli;,anto ~:-ic~ ;roup meets: 1. To elect chnirnmn and recorde r. 2. To discusf specific ques tions arising out o.f th~ co nsultant .ts present,,. t i on with an emphasis on th~ uniqueness of int er actions as ar~i'l ic.::ihle to each croup. 10:J0-10:L5 Coffee Break. 10:)15-11:15 Simulation Exercise~ · i'ictor:i ~l presentation of problems which set the sta ge for prob l0.m- solvin.::; in th~ are a of tech nical assistanceo 11:15-1?.:JO Fiv e e roups rltscuss ann formnlate ·action pro~ram based on t ecbnic.;il assis tance . t o CDA Boarrl. CDA Board ll)eets as a group. Five chairmen re port Discussion of concl1Jsio n by tota l Board . �(10 ) 1\ PP !~NDIX IX Oct.0b0.r Ii n:3(1- S' : // CD,\ Bciard meets Spccia l Arca Consu1 Lant. 9: lt-10 : JO tiNf\ Boarrl niemb Prs and Cons11 1 t :rn t.. 9:/.5 -10 :JO Non - MN.~ Bo.J.ril m0.rnbe rs and Consultant. -1. 2. Slec-t Je3.r:l 0r.~a nd r ecord er. lrnplC'mcnt.ntion of clisc us si0n by consulta nt, with emphas is on r0le1tinnsh ip nicl c oord in 3. tion. 10 :J0-10:~5 Coffee Dreak. 10: L5-ll: 15 S i.1n111.:t t i on Acti.vity o Pictor i.al presen t G.t ion of a hy potr;etica l case of thr in-• bili t y of a boarJ to make a decj_sion bec.J. use of an inadeqt.:a te c ,11-rd; r.,1tin:1 anrl informa tion structure within the total organization. ( a nother a~;ency (i.P.s) within the Model Neighb orhood Area ) 11:15-12:JO Sma ll discuss_ion groups. di scussion :;roups. Ele ct chair ma n and r ecor der. Tape Purpose _of group is to :~naJ..;ysts the problem pre sented in the sir-iul3.terl experience an d attempt, to select a lt ernate soJ.1;.tions in tN; 1.s o.f a value d eterminent . Comparison of solutions by group presentation. A sohition or" a ·b etter -solution by the CDA. Board. · �(11) APPENDIX X 8:JC>-9 :li~: CDf\ 9:l15-10 :Ji1 2. Bl):ll'd (tnd Cn11s11ll,ant. J·!on-!'r~•lp r::, ,111°1 Cnnsult.ani.. Contj1111.·.lt:i.on of Consul tan l,'s theme in terms of: (1) Sensitivity to ncedG of all membrrs of the CDA Boarrl . (2) i\n ex1111:in.1t·Lon o f the group 's responsibility in s e ttin3 cr o.;p fi01ls anrl makini progress. 10:J0-10:L5 Cnffc e Br~~k. 10:l:5-11 :l;'. Sjmul"ltinn :T.xercis c . Selected croup portrayine; a 6 roup of r epr8- sen bt-~ve youn;: peop1€' of the Model Neighborhood Area Thmne of sir.rul::i.tion ~:-: r_, rcise is a rlir~ct confron t d ,i0n b2t1-reen one se;:;ment o~ the r-ItrA anr:l the C'..)A B,,ar <~. Impli.cati,..,:i.s for authorH'lri rm decision-riakin.; .1r.d p.1rticipa tory deci.si•Jn-m,:1. Jci.n:;; are pictoriA-lly portrayed tb the group. 11: 15-12 :30 Small 6 rciup disc 1tssion. Slection of 6 roup l eaner and r ecorde ro ." n J.n:ilysis of th8 ty I') cs or ctecision-ma ki.ng as portr3.yed witi1 an atte::i,,:Jt to $tri1ct.ure a mnre ae c eptab l0 procc2:=, . for arrivlnG at a dccisiono f_;rot:p rP~ort, to the cnA. group by chairmen. T.'lpe o CD.t.. The CDA, · q.ctin6 as a unit, is prF?ssured to. for mulate de finitivP. .:;oals for the c;roup with ne eative stirru l a t ion bdnc c011st," lntly p!'ovided by '::'Xtcrnal force --Consultant 0r member of the ?·:nd e l CiLies Teqm. body. RPaction of group in terms of cohesiveness as a decisi0n-rna k i n; Video t ape. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document (1) ADT™NDIX I 8:30-9:15 CDA Borrd mests Special Area Consultant, 2:5-10:30 MNA and Consultant, sO 9:)5-10:30 Non-MNA members’ and Gongoteanit. Sach group will elect leader to act as chairman and momber to cerve as recorder and/or reporter, Sessions will be taped, both MITA and Non-?itA eroups til] be discussion seminars with two-fold purpose: 1. To enable participants to participate in some decision making process in terns of organizabion-election of chairman and recorder, 2. To discuss the implication of the consultant's morning presentation ‘in terms of the "50" and what effect the group could have on the Greater Chattanooga~"Think Tank" for what could take place throvzh 1975. 10:30-20:!; Wa Coffee Break, i 10:),0411:15 Simulation Exercise based on weekly format-i.es, a pictorial representation of a philisophy expressing opposition to the need for a Nodel Cities Pro;ram in Chattanooga. This will also be structured to serve as a catalyst for a sensitivity exercise, 13:15-12:30 Five small discussion groups will be formed-leaders and recorders will be elected by each group, Tapes provided for some--Video Tapes of others. Discussion will proceed on the basis of attempting to formulate an accestable decision concerning the nature of the pictorial presentation, Membership will remain the same for first five session-then random selection 0° five new groups, Board members will reform as- CDA Board during last 20 minutes of the program, Brief report from each group chairman or recorder, Remainder Awmst 9 of period spent i taini sONSUS . : Be of perio vent in obtaining the consensus of the "SO" in terms of decision(s) aceeptable Lo the ;roupe (3) APPENDIX TI August 1¢ 8330-93): CDA Board and Consultant, 9:),5-10:30 NA Board and Consultant, 93!):6-10:30 Non-NMA Board aha Consultant, Two groups meel. independently, clect chairmen and pecordeses discuss their unique role as individuals in the total dedision-making structure of the CDA Board. Reports of chairmen of the two groups, Discussion and critiqve of the reports in terms of total interaction of the participants, 10:30-10:l15 Coffee Break, 10:45-11:15 Simulation Exercise. Role llaying--Sxercise designed to enhance the authoritorive structure of an orsanization in terms of decision-making. 11:15+12:30 Five Reports--CDA Board structures a model for interaction based on principles acceptable to the total Board. - (1) APPMADIX IIL . 8330-9:)5 CDA Board meets Special Consultant. 19:30 BNA and Consultant, 9:45-10:30 Non-HNA members, Election of chairman and vacordene Discussion seminars for toth groups. _Two-fold purpose: 1. To participate in decision making process by electiny .chairman, 2. To discuss an issue as unique to the sroups,i.e.; the MNA members and the effort of non-participation in decision-making in the Chattanooga City Government--the Non-MNA members and the desirability of beins in a position to effect a decision with the city governnens. 10:30-10:15 Coffee Break. 10:l5-11:15 Simulation Exercise. Role playing by selected group. "}iilitant Citizens"--a confrontation between a group of citizens and inadequate police protection or an inadequate schodl curriculum, eeheh: based on Sconomics--How to cope with securing employment, ~11:15-12:30 Five discussion groups--elect leader and recorder, Discuss Recentabie solution to the problem presented, Sjnulavers available for question period. Report of the recorders to the full CDA Board. dn atbempt will be made to obtain a consensus of opinion as to the better solution, Use Video Tape Recorder to record the decision-making process. Use last 15 “minutes for self-evaluation of problem, APPENDIX IV August 30 8:30-9:)5 CDA Board.meets Special Area Consultant, 9:)5-10:30 MNA and Consultant. 9:15-10:30 Non-Members NMA, Ray Sebub dieots enatonen and recorder, Gasniona tepede Senne discussion concerning each groups! uniqueness in terms of the consultant's presentation. Two-fold purpose: 1. To strenghten total participation of all members of the group, 2. To discuss the decision-making process as related to NMA and Non-NMA. 10:30-10:45 Coffee Break, 10:5-11:15 Simulation Exercise. 35 mm pictorial presentation of a "Citizen's Participation Structure" which does not reflect the goals of the Nodel City Program, Problem of making acceptable decision by the group is presented to the CDA Board, 11:15-12:30 .Small group discussion of simulation exercise=s5 leaders and recorders are elected, Diadicaten will proceed a the basis of: 1. How could the structure of the board be changed to make the board more effective? 2. what alternatives are available to the group in terms of making an acceptable decision as posed by the problem, Brief report from Chairman--Remainder of time spent by CDA Board making a decision based on data presented in problem. (6) APPENDIX V September 6 8:30-9:45 CDA Board mects Special Consultant, 0:);5-10:30 MNA and Gonsuleaites 9:h5~10:30 Non-MNA and Consultant. - Each group-elect leader and recorder, Each group will decide the ‘most serious problem confronting the CDA Board in terms of the consultant's discussion. 10:30-10:):5 Coffee Break. 10:))5-11:15 Simulation Exercise "Conflicting Priorities" a pictorial representation of priorities being established with adequate participation . of the area citizenry. 11:15-12:30 Small group seminars, Elect chairmen and recorders, Zach group establish priorities, CDA group meets, Chairmen report briefly. CDA attempts to establish priorities acceptable to total Board, * (7) APPENDIX VI September 13 8:30-9:45 CDA Reoard neets Special Area Consvitant,. 9:))5-10:30 MA and Consultant, 9:1:5-19:30 Non-MNA and Consultant, Two-Lold purpose: 7 1. Each group elect chairman and recorder. 26 Bach group discuss the role of the total CDA Board and "Subtantive Impost" with specific reference to (a) physical problems; (0) economic problems; (c) social problems, (Use Video if available) 10:30-10:h5 Coffee Break, 10:;5-12 :18 Simulation Exercise--Hypothetical Problem presented to CDA participants, Short skit developed for purposes of dramatizing a specific rroblem arising within the Model Area, 11:15-12:30 Small group discussion of problem ‘and solutions. CDA Board meets as unit. Brief reports from recorders, An Anaya of the problem by total group and an.acceptance or rejection of the five solutions--a consensus of the group is formed in terms of articulating a decision by the total group. (taped) (6) APUWNDIA VIL Septeniber 20 8:30-0:25 CDA Board anaie Special kee Consulbant, 9 sha 230 NMA and Consultant, 2 9:],0-10:30 Non-MNA and Consultant. Two-fold purpose; 1. Election of shit cme and recorder. oe Group discussion implement the discussion of the CDA to the three specific areas as seen by the two groups~-city government, nei:shbor- hood, and Model City Staff. 10:30-10:):5 Coffee Break. | 10:)5-11:15 Simlation Exercise, Mxercise-pictorial will present .a problem (5) which will involve a high decree of polarization of three areas of interest groups~~governnental officials, neithborhood organization, and Model: City Staff, 11:15-12:30 Small group (5) discussion with leader and recorder, An analysis of the problem(s) ana alternatives available to the total CDA group as seen by the small group. Report of five chairmen: An analysis by the CDA group as a committee of the whole--What is acceptable in terms of a decision to the pictorial problem, Our os : | APPENDIX VIII Sepiember 27 8: 30-9 hf CDA Board meets Special Area Consultant, 9;);5419:30 NMA and Consultant. - 93):5-10:30 Non-NMA and Consultant. Wach group mects: a 1. To elect chairman and recorder, 2s To discuss specific questions arising out of the consultant's presentation with an emphasis on the uniqueness of interactions as applicable to each group. 10:30-10:L5 Coffee Break, 10:hS-11:15 Siimilation Exercise. - Pictorial eresentation of problems which set the stage for problem-solving in the area of technical assistance, 11:16-12:30 Five groups discuss and formulate ‘action program based on technical assistance. CDA Board meets as a group. Five chairmen report to CDA Board, Discussion of conclusion by total Board, (10) APPENDIX IX October |): 8:30-0:))— CDA Board meets Special Area Consultant, 2).6210:30 NA Board members and Consultant. te) ‘9 ::5-10:30 Non-MNA Roard members and Consultant. “de Riect leader..and raceenen, 2. Implementation of discussion by consultant with emphasis on relationship and coordination. | 10:30-10:);5 Coffee Break, 10:45~-11:15 Simlation Activity. Pictorial presentation of a hypothetical case of the inability of a board to make a decision because of an inadequate corrdination and information structure within Bhs total organization, (another Meaney es) within the Model Neighborhood Area) 11:15-12:30 Small digestion groups, Elect chairman and recorder, Tape discussion groups. Purpose of group is to analysis the problem presented in the eimitated experience and attempt to select alternate solutions in terms of a value determinent, Comparison of solutions by group presentation, A solution of a better solution by the CDA Board, (11) APPENDIX | x October 11 8:30-9:15 CDA Board and Consultant, 9:'6.70:30 NMA and Consultant. 9:1)5-10:30 Non-Members and Consultant, 1. election of Leader, 2. Gokesmation of Consultant's theme in terms ot: (1) Sensitivity to needs of all members of the CNA Board, (2) An examination of the group's responsibility in setting group foils and making progress. 10:30-10:45 Coffee Break, 10:15-11:1© Simvlation Exercise, Selected group portraying a group of repre- sentative young people of the Model Neighborhood Area Theme of sirmlation exercise is a direct confrontation between one segment of the MNA and the CDA Board, Implications for authoritari.on decision-makin; and participatory decision-makinz are pictorially portrayed tb the group, 11:15-12:30 Small group discussion, Election of sroup leader and recorder, ‘rn analysis of the types of decision-making as portrayed with an attempt to stricture a more seceptabé process for arriving at a decision, Tape. CDA eroup report to the CNA group by chairmen, The CDA, acting as a unit, is pressured to, formulate definitive goals for the group with negative stirulation “being constantly provided by external force--Consultant or member of the Model Cities Team, Reaction of group in terms of cohesiveness as a decision-makinz body. Video tape,  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 8, Folder 18, Document 11 Box 8 Box 8 Folder 18 Folder topic: Model Cities | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/0163093d168afb05d5413788bed3ecde.pdf c04c37d73da66b3ef1905057a9d3b071 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. V(' l) '~L GJ.'P[ 1~3 T fi 'i IJ,,lJ 1·c l'l"lOGl·{Af: Tile 1-J, ,d.P.l CH,j0s 'I'r.cJ.inin _: Progr am - Thr-: fir st of :its kind in the country is , Lf"n ( l Cl) scs:d. l,r i )Jl c n1 1:·si" to be conduct e d in sc ,n:i.n:ir fo_rm undP. r th() dircc tion l:r llnb1c1·si Ly o f Ten nessee at Cb.:iLto.noo L:.:i . Th e m:.1jor objc,cl.ivP. of the Mode l Ci.ties Tr;)fn::n ~~ l'rc1:_1;r:1in is the en:1b l em8nt of the fifty mr:imb r~ rs of t :1 c C.D.A. i.~0:1~'G or- 11:;__r ect1"rs b-0 -f -L111,Jtion c1s a cohes ive arlminlstrat ive body ,1h:i.l~ s imnlt=meous ly · c1:c , 11r·1,::;i: :.:; t h e dtt.ci.i.n.,1.ent'. nr r':)t ~ntion of indiviciu.1.l .i.dentity w~th t ho se va rious spo rw0rin r,; :~rL;u r--c Fh0m :i.t is the board mc;1'.1bers I r e sponsi.hlity to repr1:;scnt. This objed:ive can best be ach i.. eved by en.J.b line :,h e participants to: 1. acquire knowJ.erl Ge of the actual structur e of thA Model Cities organization and the objectives of the progr am . 2. ·deve lop an aw3.reness of the decision-makini::; proces s in tr:-rms of s e l e ct i r.G acc eptable alternativ ~s to recogni zed problems confronti~c the CDA Board. 3. Establish.i.ng and . maint,ainin g an orga nizationc1l esprit I de corps' which on one hand wil l enable each CDA H.oard. par t i cipant t o mafot3.in his id entity and . t ies wit9i.n _his own spher e of the community , and yet permit hj~'ll to Inr'.lke decisi:ms b ased on a tot-3. l committ me nt to an Jv erall achievement of the organizatiana l goals o · Th i.s s eries of s eminars uti liz in_, c onsult::i.nts , applyin1:; dynamic a;1d inno 1i:1.ti.v~ ed ctcati on'l l techniqu~s , and jnvolving expertise from as many perti :-1':=nt s nJ rc r.:; 3.s a r e availab l e is, like th e Mode l Cj_ t,ies Program i t se l f , a de;--:onstr 3.ti0n rroj ect. !lec.1.use thP. re i s l ittl,~ nat ·l on;:i. l experie nce in train iri;:; prograns Sllch as the onr:; d esc!"ibed, the emphasis in th e Chattanooca progr,:11,1 wi l l be on experi.r:,ent ati:rn anrl i:'1.:10vati,, n. As mie ht be expected of an expe rimenta l undert.1kin~ , it :vill be subjcc ~ to reiular ob servati on, monitorine, and evaluation of its effectiveness in terr.;s of the goals it seeks to fulfill. It should be understood that this �{2) co:1 ti :n:nu[, ev:tlu-:itivc p' oces" is o. tcsLin;; proc:<'ss or thP. tr;i:i.,dn _~ pr0:.:;r·1m and it.s shfr, a~ 1,e ll i .c; of th0 p:1rti.r.ip,1. n~s . 'fl1c: l':i.rsL :.;cs s i on or. the program will lllf':'ct Saturchy, J\uc11st 9, 19(.9, ~t the camp1s- 0r ll.T.C. rts • • ~ n.1.ne c onsccut,1.v c ,;;,. , tur,:.1.i ;_ws. w:i.11 the followin 1~ n:he sessi,Jn:::\ 'm the follo','l' i nG A suJ~estnd strucLure and cont e nt of e~ch se ss i on is found :in Appendices I thru X. s t,1·t1c t\ire the E·.J.ch consult:i.nt, however, may modiry or re- seminar to achieve the objectives as outlined. F11nd:Ln 6 .f0r th i.s t.rainini proi;ram has been secured under thP. · provisions of Ti.t.lP. 1 of the B:i_::her Education Act from the Department of He;iltn, Eduea tion .inrl '.·!9 1f,1 r? ; Ins t.i. Lu l;ional monies of U. T .c.; and funds from the 1fodel Cities Phnnir![; '}rant. The cxpectat.i.on is th at t.he e ~~pe rience and inf.'ormation derived fro;,1 the pro ~ram will c 0nt.ribute siz;nific.:i.ntly to the effectiveness of the C.D. A. B02 ::--d as a de cis i ve administrative body. It is hoped, · also , that from this .ModP.l Citi e s Training Pro ~ram th e re will emer;:;e a ,body of knowledge and experi ence which will be of value not only in Chatta nooga, but. in other cities ·, as v:e ll. �(J) t.lic- .:it,n:t.." .:ind HiJli.n:~ness of the C.D.A. Doard to disc har;;c e ffccL:i.v ely its res ~,0n s:i.bil i ty as chi.8 f ar.lriiin:i.Rt.ra t. i.ve body of th<: Ch-1t k rno 0,;a Model Citie s Progran. As adrninistrator:s who are. responsibJ.e for the pl;:i.nnin;:; and jm;_;l~rirmt:i.tion of th e L;it1l Model Ci. ti.es Pro,:;ram, CDA Board · rneinbe:rs must be sufficientl:-{ eci1J:i.pped · ( 1) ~d.th the necess,'.lr,Y ski lls, tools, and informati.on r c J..citP.d to all aspects of the l~d~l Cities Program; ( 2) with 3n understanding of the Mod el CitieR Pro~r a m and its rebt. ions li:i.p to city i;overnment ;ind other agencies in the urban are --both privc1te and pubhc; and (3 ) with methodoke;y anr.l dynamics of decision-mak inr:;. To this enrl, thP. Mod e l Cities Tra inj_n~ and Orienta ti:m Seminar Proc;ra.~ is d8si_:;ned.: 1. To insure th a t the C.D.A. Board members will be a1-1are of - their roles in the Model CiL:i.es Proir a m. 2. To provide C.D. A. Board mPmbe r s wi t-,h si.1fficient and relevant information c oncerni nc th~ Mod el Ci.ties conc ept a nd m~thort . 3. To insure tha t C.D.A. Board members a re fami liar with the ~:odcl Citi,;,s structure , bo t h na tiona lly and loca l ly o L. To provide C.D.A. Board members witA pertinent data concerning the Hud ~ui?eli ne s as related to the Model Cities Program. 5. To provide G.D.~. Board mP.~bers with r e l evant informaL ion concernine s peci fi c problAms rind program areas t o b e dealt with in the :fod el Neighborhood area. Furtr1P.r, this · proc;ram is de sir;ned to foster competency and sound judgement on the part. of the Board member.s by provirHng them with training cxcercises ar.d experiences i n problem-solv ing _and d ec ision-makin~. No Board wi th a members hip so v~ried as that of the C.D.Ao Board ~an effectively discharge its duties and �t.he inLcnt of t hi s pr o 1;ram Lo provide structured experiences for the fifty partici- r'.::l.t:in,; CDA Boal'd mE'n:be rs- - memhe rs with va r:i. P-d backcrounds, w5.de r a ng e s · of e xperiences, di.ff erent lev e ls or· edllcational attainme nt, anri diverse interc sts --wh ich ·t1ill P 1nble the iJo.Jrcl to function as a colwsive nnit with mutual interests and c or.,r:i.o n t~rnls; on P dedicated. to . salving the problems of the Model Nei~hborhood and its r0. op l e e �'.vlii lr t.he1'f' is 11,:i st.:ip('tir-l or othr-r Corm of' comr, 0 nsaLion for ~ tt, cnd jn~ thc:.;e l r :1in; i\~ ~rn tl •:iric-rnt:i.t,i ., n sctnin:1rs , U1r.rc i : =, ovailablc -for all members [':inon ci':11 as :..ds k1nr.c jn \.11 0. f' orm wlri 18 ,U.cnd itt :'; L} 1e0 r or r :1y 1~cnts or r .e iinb1ir seme nLs for all f'Xpcnses iw~1 1rrPd ·- c, 10 sessi.,1rn:i. , If you spencJ · or ne0 d any m.-rni..es for ci1ilr:l-c-:1.r t.r:111s rort.-1 t.i,, n, f :1od , or los e money Cor be.ing. off your j o b, you n.1ay qua lify for fjn =i.nc:i al assj_st-,nr.0 . As a memb er of the C.D.A. Board y ou are r e nde rir. 3 to the ci tizcns or Lllis comnnmi ty a V;) lu.:i. hle s e rv i ce; thus you should not be pena lize d f:ir..1.ncially in connP.c tion with your services on the C.D .A. Board. A simple voucher will be provid ed at each s ession. Simply list the expenses ir.c urr~d by Y·"ll. a nd bring, send, or mail to the Mode l Cities· Office at ll.il8 Mccallie Avenue . �If (0 Cl'f'J :3·;- t.! i '/\l/'l' 1 C 1 1'f\Tf 1)t! •\N D T~CIWJCJ\L /\SSTS'i'llf.JGii.: 1nrl thC:' as:~11 r t, inn which c,ntrihuLcG rnosL Lo jJ,s · uniciue chri.r::1ct0r is th0 uc1i.cf l.!~:..t ;11.1 .xi 1:w,11 hrr10ril·, c.1n be rlr.rived nn1;y ,,lien thrr P. :ls m;:i_;d.rnum p1.rticipaU.0n in pl·rnnin,~, rolicy fn.rnnVinn, :.nrl i.mplemental.ion by those v1l1ose li.vcs a:vj fut1iros ,d 11 b e 1 r· r Pctr.d I,~, t.lJP· pro;;ro.m. One of t.hc b-,sic el8m0ntc.; ot' an honest invit:ition for citizen particip-1.ti.::>n is th0. orfer 0·f t0.ch1Yic:1l astdRtance to the citiz e ns; the failure to provide s uch ~:.3s :l s L:t:-:c c ,-101,l i r~nrler th r: concept or genu1ne nei 2:hborhood involvement mea n i n;; l-=ss, since ther0. c~n he no partner~l1ir, ~r inv olvement, wh~n one of the parties l ack s the t? chn ic1l ~xpertis e to make informed judgements. In City Dein:-ins t,ration Asency Letter No. 3, October JO, 1967, the :!:lep3.rtment of :{ousi n_; an ci Urban D~velopme nt established performance standards for citiz en p~rt ic i pat i0n in the Mod~l Cities Program . Amon~ the major points contained in these standard s is that of technical assistance: ••••• The structure must ha ve the technical capacity for n,3.kin 0 kno1,,ledGeahle decisions~ ••• Some form of professional tech nical asEistnnc·e in a m;:inner agre e d to by neiehborhood resid e nts shall be provided." ) .... - �I (7) ,",1) ~) ~'.L CJT1 r,:.s C:lf'lr :U.'l .l 'l'Y Dl~l/l~Lij l'Nfi:N T ADIUi·JIS'l'iL'\'T'JON 130!\itD UflJ". NThTJ UN S,•~['JJNI\R. 1. An Ovrrview of Mode l Citi0s A. · Ilistory of Hodel Cities Proera m, ~J:iti.nnal and Local B. Phil6sopl)y of Moclcl Cities !'roGram C. llud guidelines ,1 ncl pcrfor 11:.:ince st0ndards D. The D~r1 ·nstr;1 t,ion CiLies .cind i"lctropolitan Develo pment Act of Aur,ust 16 1. Bo3.rd Decision Ha kine - Theory and Pr,ictice A~ Value a nd fact in decision making B H.esprinsibility, Res ponsivene s s, and Autl;ority 0 C. Au gust 23 1. A. Role . of loc~l Go vern ment B. Role of CDA Board D. 1. "The Hidden Agenda" Organiz a tion of the Nodel City' Program in Chatt;} r.ooga ·c. August JO 1966, as amended Role of nthPr agenctes Role of citi ze ns The Model Cities Planning Year A. Plan submission r equ ir ement.a B. Role of Model Citi8s sta ff Co 1/.ole of CD/\ Board Do Role of Citiz ~n part i eiration structure ~- Problem ana l ysis Fo Goals ci.nd obj ectives G. Priorities Ho Bud get in~ �( H) J.. i:,,1Jc l City 1'l:u111j n~ G0nccyt.s ,md Approaches B. Proc0.rl11r.:i.l l.'lann:in:_'; C. Fxe cu tory l'l .1 nni"ri[: 11. P lnn n:i.n s .'mr.l rPv:i. ew in the pr ') r,ess of c )n: posite d0c:i.sion-ma kin e 3c-;:itcmber 13 1. T!Je I'-'!i:H:lcl Citfos Five Year fimrncinl Plan A. The "Uem'. mstr;:i Li ·,n 11 concr-pt B. What is rneri.nt ~JY the s t nt ement: "The pro[:;r&rn f,h01Jld 1r.ake a substantial imp1 ct on L he _:h~rsical, P.conornic, and s ocial problems in the Viodel Nei~h bo.rhood /\rea." C ThP role of D. The role .•f the CDA Bo:,rd ~. Technic a l assist~nce arr~r.ir~ents F. Pos: ible st:r;-uct 1:rir.g ar:ranger.cn ts 0 Se ~t ember 20 1. the Model Cititts staff R')le nf Boa rd, St;:iPf, Citizens ~articipaLion Street ·re, and Te chnic-31 '\ssi.stance in Model CHies Se t·tei nber 27 I • 1. .q,. 1'\ r ..- as in which ::i Esist.:Jnce riay be called B. K; nds ':->.f a['SistP.nce av;:i ih ble c. Mechanics of r e:L nburs ement of te~hn ic:a l assis t2nt s D. R.c>as m f o r r rovision of assist'Jnce 0 Tr1e Firc- t YPar Acti ..,n Pro,::;ram A. l·'roe;ram De velo_p]llenL B. Prrigr-'.lm rfa n::t ~€' ment c. Progn.01 fvionitorinG D. i'ro 1:ra m 'Sva l1iaU. .- :i n �(?) C. It(-'] a t-,i 'llship r,f each ;_ ,rogram to Morl e l Ci tj_es .0.., .~.Tlie me r. h.'.:l ni cs of f8r:l rc: ra 1 ,::irograms - plo nnin 'i, progri1rnmin~, fundinc, iniplcrnent.:iti·m 1. l'robJ.em .Solvin:; and Group Interaction A. Hr.spect for the or;inion of others D. Se>nsitivi ty t,o the needs anr:l lim:i.tati0ns o.f otters c. S<?Lting eroup 6 oals c1nd making orderly progre ::.-s D. Democratic participation '!;' ~r.e,liency arid Compromise '• �(:ICl) The CD,\ ~i0aril, cornpri~,::,cl of 50 people of varied ba cl:r;r0uncls, abil·j tiPS anci :ii~t C' ··c,~~t.n, n•nst. t,c brou.:;tit. L,o funct:ion e rfcct.jvely after a scdc-s of tr.n \·1e 0.kly ori0nt.ation mr.etings. as a 1:nH, durinc; and This trainine r,:::·o;;ram wi).l . be ch.:ir:i.c_tcrhcd , in tern;.s of format, by strict ad}1erence to time schedules and by fJexibility in tr.e (in or,:l cr to :1.::i.kP. the best use of limited ti1ne ) f ) r :'it:°lati on and :implerncntG.tion of the format. The board will b e divided during ~art of the traininG sr.ssion to permit model neighborhood are representatives-half the b oard -- to rPceive special orientation dea ling with the broad area o°f citiz e n p2.r:i tc:i.rati on; thP. othe t 1:;roup, non-MNA repre sentatives, will also receivR 3rnup tra ining d11rin~ thls pe rjod. cct. i.n~;s will be hP ld each Sa tt:rc1:iy, August 9 throu 6 h October 11, on The tentative pr ograrn da y for t he. ten meetin[S will proc eed th=: c w-,,,·us o.f UTC. accord jn: t 0 t h~ followin~ sche dule . 8:J0-9:L5 Bo.J.rd mf"!el ,s togGther'with Spe cial Area Consultant. 9:L5-lO:JO i'-i 11L'\ representaU ve mr.et toge t her with Consulta nt rota tin;; . 9: L5-lO: JO Non-E:{A me;:ibers mee t together . 10:30-10 :LS Coffee Break . 10: L5-ll: 15/ °803.rd meets tot;ether Simulation exercis e presented. 11:15-12: JO Sma D. group discus s ion. The fo rma t may be f.;ooiffod after the first two n;eetin .::;s to permi t a gre.:::. ter ·dezree of flexibility in the utilization of the consultant s a nd ::>tr.er technic;:,.l o.s::: istanceo For each S.J.tt:rday ' s seminars a special are cor.sult=1.nt ~;ill h e r e ta ine cl and he ui 11 be at l ·Jb er Ly to aria.pt the format t o J-;j s r.E'cis s i.n~~ !'-11:' ~·rill be in char::;e of tha t day I s pro Gram. �(J J.) pro,~rarn, a bta:i.kci ., ct.iv.tty Gche dulc 1vi 11 br: wrjttr:-n f or tr:c rlJ.y c:.ncl s1.11-J'ri:i.tted to bo.'.l.rd !:;01111':~rs .'.l. t. lo,::i.s t. a week in arlvancc for their c oncurrci:c:e o �(12) EV/\LU/\.TION An es, ent.bl clc11:ent of the or:i.0ntation pro 0 rarn i.s the process by · 1-:l:frh :i.t. j_[.; cv:tlt1~ted 0 Apart from the obvious 1.Jener.its •J I: such an evJ.luative i-=rt)c~ss t o tl:8 .r-rog r :un itself and to. its participo.nts, is th~it Gu.ch a i='l' )cess will driubt,l.0ss be a dck·rn-inin 0 factor in th0 .fc.J.sibility of thA 11s"' of sur.!i 3 prot;1'<1lll cls 0.•-1!-iPre. Arsas tn bo cvciluatPd :i.re: (1 ) attitnclinal change s amone ' the rar ticip~~ts ; (2) r0tention and scope of factual materials presented ; and (J ) procress in the arc~s of d~cision-making and problem- solvinG• It, is f8lt that cv.il113.tions .sh-,uld tc1.ke place at_ the beginning of the pro~ra!1, a t, the t~rmina tion of the pro::;rn.m and as often durinc the pro~ram as is felt necessary. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document FONTL CIPTWS TRAINITEG PROGRAM The Hodel Cities Trainin: Program - The first of its kind in the country - is a ten (10) session course to be conducted in seminar form under the direction of the University of tT enneSREE at Chattanooya. The major objective of the Model Cities Trainins Prozram is the enablement of the fifty members of the C.D.A. Roard of Directors to funetion as a cohesive administrative body while similtaneously — encourizing z the attainment or retention of individual identity with those various sponsoring vrours whom it is the board members ! pespousimlity to represent. This objective can best be achieved by enabling the participants to: 1. acquire knowledse of the actual structure of the Model Cities organiza- tion and the objectives of the program, 2. ‘develop an awareness of the decision-making process in terms of selecting acceptable alternatives to recognized problems confronting the CDA Board. 36 Establishing and maintaining an organizational esprit! de corps! which on one hand will enable each CDA Board participant to maintain his identity and ties within his Sia sphere of the community, and yet permit him to make decisions based on a total committment to an overall achievement of the organizational goals, This series of seminars utilizing consultants, applying dynamic and innovative educational techniques, and involving sebork ies from as many pertinent sources as are svat isbie is, Like the Model Cities Program itself, a demonstration project, Because there is little national experience in training programs such as the one deseribed, the emohasis in the Chattanooga program will be on experimentation 2 f ga prog : Lt. will be bs and innovation, As might be expected of an experimental undertaking, subject to regular observation, monitoring, and evaluation of its effectiveness in . . terms of the goals it seeks to fulfill. It should be understood that this (2) continuous evaluative process is a testinz process of the trainin: program and its staff, as well as of the participants, The Cirst session of the program will meet Saturday, August 0, 1969, at the campns-of U.T.C. as will the followin nine sessiong on the following nine consecutive Saturdays. A suggested structure and content of each session is found in Appendices I thru X, Each consultant, however, may modi ry or re-— structure the seminar to achieve the objectives as outlined. ‘Funding for this training program has been secured under the: provisions of Title 1 of the Higher Education Act from the Department of Health, Education and Welfare; Tnstitubional monies of U.T.C.; and funds from the Model Cities Planning rant, The expectation as Hae the experience and information derived from the program will contribute significantly to the effectiveness of the C.D.A. Board as a decisive administrative body. It is hoped, also, that from this Model Cities Training Program there will emerge a body of knowledge and experience which will be of value not only in Chattanooga, but. in-other cities as well. (3) OBIECTIVGS The success of the Model Cities Program to a large degree depends upon the ability and willingness of the C.D.A. Board to discharge effectively its responsibility as chief aduinistrative body of the Chatbanooza Model Cities Program. As administrators who are responsible for the planning and implementation of the total Model Cities Program, CDA Board’ members must be sufficiently equipped - (1) with the necessary skills, tools, and information related to all aspects of the Model Cities Program; (2) with an understanding of the Model Cities Prosram and its relationship to city government and other agencies in the urban are--both private and To desizned: 36 he public; and (3) with methodolezy and dynamics of decision-making. this end, the Model Cities Training and Orientation Seminar Program is To insure that the C.D.A. Board members will be aware of- their roles in the Model Cities Prozram, To provide C,D.A. Board members with sifficient and relevant information concerning the Model Cities concept and acthoas To insure that C,D,A, Board members are familiar with the Model Cities structure, both nationally and location: : To provide C.D.A. Board members with pertinent data concerning the Hud guidelines as related to the Model Cities Program. To provide C.D.A4, Board members with relevant information concerning specific problems and program areas to be dealt with in the Model Neighborhood area, Further, this program is designed to foster competency and sound judzement on the part experiences of the Board members by providing them with training excercises and in problem-solving and decision-making. No Board with a membership so varied as that of the C.D.A. Board can effectively discharge its duties and (i) responsibilities wiless its members develop a oneness of mind and purpose. It is the intent of this pro,:ram to provide structured efpenicncag ion the fifty partici- Patin. CDA Board members--members with varied backgrounds, wide ranges of experiences, different levels of educational attainment, and diverse interests--which will enable the Roard to function as a cohesive unit with mutual interests and common goals; one dedicated. to.salving the problems of the Model Neighborhood and its people. (5) MINANCTAL ASSTSPA'C™ While there is no stipend or other form of compensation for attending these training and orientation seminars, ere is nvaqiebienioe all members financial assistance in the form of payments or reimbursements for all expenses incurred while atbendin: these 10 sessions. -If you apendton heed any monies for child-care, transportation, food, or lose money for being off your job, you may qualify for financial assistance. As a member of the C.D.A. Board you are rendering to the citizens of this community a valuable service; thus you should not be penalized financially in connection with your services on the C.D.A. Board. 4 Spl voucher will be provided at each session, Simply list the expenses incurred by you and bring, Bend: or mail to the Model Cities: Office at 118 McCallie Avenue, (é) CIPS 8S CARP ICEDATPTON AND TECHNICAL ASSTSTANCE Perhaps the essential premise upon which the Model Cities Program rests and the assuption which contributes most Lo its unique character is the belief that maximum benefit can be derived only when there is maximum participation in Planning, rolicy formtion, and implementation by those whose lives and futures will be affected by the- program, * One of the basic elements of an honest invitation for citizen participation is the offer of technical assistance to the citizens; the failure to provide such assisbtinee would render the concept of zemaine His chborhood involvement meaningless, since there can be no partnership, or involvement, when one of the parties lacks the technical expertise to make informed judgements. In City Demonstration Agency Letter No. 3, October 30, 1967, the Department of Housing and Urban Development established perfomianes standards for citizen participation in the Model Cities Program, Among the major points éontained in these standards is that of technical assistance: ) caese LUG structure must have the technical capacity for makinz knowledgeable decisions... .Some form of professional technical assistance in a manner agreed to by neighborhood residents shall be provided," (7) MODEL CITIES COMMUNELY DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION BOARD ORIENTATION Seu TNAR Aveust 9 1. An Overview of Model Cities Ae ‘History of Model Cities Program, National and Local B, Philosophy of Model Cities Program Gy ilud soqdeineseand performance standards — D, The Den nstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966, as amended August 16 1. Board Decision Making - Theory and Practice A, Value and fact in decision making Be Responsibility, Raspotisivencses and Authority C. "The Hidden Agenda" August 23 1. Organization of the Model City’ Program in Chattanooga A, Role of local government B. Role of COA Board ‘GC. Role of obliar agencies D. Role of citizens August 30 2 The Model Cities Planning Year A, Plan submission requirements B, Role of Model Cities staff ©, tole of CDA Board - D. Role of Citizen participation structure Re icpies analysis F. Goals and objectives &, Prierities He Budgeting September @ 1, september 13 1. September 20 1, Se:tember 27 1, fodel City Vlanning Concepts and Approaches (8) Sil She ntaae Manning Procedural Vlannin: Mxecutory ILanning Planning and review in the process of composite decision-mking i @ x Model Cities Five Year Financial Plan The "Demonstration" concept What is meant by the statement: "The progrem should make a substantial impact onthe chvsical, economic, and social problems in the Model Neighborhood Area," The role of the Model Citiés staff The role -f the CDA Board Technical assistance arranzements Possible structuring arrangenents Role of Board, Staff, Citizens varticipation Struct re, and Als Tne Ae B, C. Technical Assistance in Model Cities Arsas in which assistance may be called Kinds of assistance available Mechanics of reinbursement of technical assistants Reason for provision of assistance First Year Action Program Frogram Development Program Management Program Monitoring Vroyram Svaluation Vebober |; Yetober lL 1. D, ..The mechanics of federal zrograms ~ plannins, ‘ SGehin’ Chon, Information Systens, and “valuation of Ceders] prosrans in Chaitanoara A, Concent >of Coordination and infsrmation system Be CRP, CAP, NSi', and coordination CG, Relationship of cach program to Model Cities programming, funding, implementation bectiten Solving and Group Interaction A, Respect for the opinion of others Be. Sensitivity to tne needs and limitations of others C, Setting group goals and making orderly progress D. Yemocratic participation &. %Expediency and Compromise (10) OPSRATTOUAT, FORMAT HOD"L CITINS TRATNING PROGRAM The CDA Soard, comprised of SO people of varied backgrounds, abilities and interests, must be brought Lo function effectively as a unit during and after a serics of ten weekly arrehbetton meetings, This training program will be characterized, in terms of format, by strict adherence to time schedules (in order to make the best use of limited time) and by flexibility in the formulation and implensatation of the format. The board will be divided during part of the training session to ete oder neighborhood are representatives--~ half the board -~ to receive special orientation dealing with the broad area of citizen paritcipation; the other group, non-MNA representatives, will also receive zroup training during this period, Neetinss will be held each dabunday, Rasust 9 through October 11, on the car,us of UTC. The tentative program day for the ten meetings will proceed according to the following schedule, | 8:30-0:h© Board meel.s together ‘with Special Area Consultant. 9:l5-10:30 MNA representative meet together with Consultant rotating. 9:hi610:30 Non-MNA members meet together, 10:30-10:15 Coffee Break, 10:15-11:18 Board meets together Simulation exercise presented. 11:15-12:30 Small group discussion. | The format may be modified after the first two neetinzs to permit a greater desree of flexibility in the utilization of the consultants and other technical assistance, For each Saturday's seminars a special are consultant will. be retained and he will be at liberty to adapt the format to his needs Since he will be in charce of that day's program, (11.) abt After consultation with the consultant for each week's program, a detailed activity schedule will be written for the day and subnitted to board members at least a week in advance [for their concurrence, (12) EVALUATION An es;:ential element of the orientation program is the process by which it is evaluated, Apart from the obvious benefits of such an evaluative preeess to the program itself and to its participants, is that such a process will doubtless be a determining factor in the feasibility of the use of such a program elsevhere, Areas to be evaluated are: (1) attitndinal changes among’ the participants; (2) retention and scope of factual materials presented; and (3) progress in the areas of decision-making and problem-solving, > it. is felt that evaluations should take place at the beginning of the progran, at the termination of the program and as often during the program ~ as is felt necessary, : 3  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 8, Folder 18, Document 10 Box 8 Box 8 Folder 18 Folder topic: Model Cities | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/d3d0af0feb3bc579d7824a3a7061560a.pdf 58dd95e31982c8ea06f38a134b0fac78 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. ----o-r-J Ile~.J,., U}p.JI riJrvl J,u ,-1<. (!) ~(e 0 -f L 7i ~,.JS. L , /.'i., · vC 5 c- t y- .,, v-J,i! ke i,,.r/o~ i)e 5 ev,. Z.,__ I - -r-re> /;---11143.215.248.55,,J.J..,;., .,. /t + t c.,A-c/ s Q I jJ ,-ye .A~ ~ fl<..143.215.248.55 15:39, 29 December 2017 (EST) _; - Q._,, eCo J,.,.J-- -Ct_1 7 - /J t '-~) Jhw u.f .. ·w'-<--f1cf.'Y I~ _:.,-,-~ p.rr- I 5 r IV v o rv<'_r CvJ tv' ( _ ~ ~~<7 . ,,,,/ - cl~~ 41, ks<# n:._Q,--s\ /',,_,-'7 ~ - "·r/> 0 ~ - ) ~~ ( - Jy0 / ov-4' ~ ?-- Ct s -- /iv w L~ 5 Jv cd c/--.T_ ~ ~cJ;) + ~ o _,,Ju c1 ; 1 ( (; ,, __[~ (er-- < r-- h,.,-* ~ / - J1-e r-- J,u s S/o,Al ~ rJ ( '/- 0 ,-J Ii- cJ ~ . 1-- Je,tl Bctrc1: 5/--ec-lr- ~ ____ .--,/ /Yv fr-1 )-) ' � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document HI a Cong Fl ohens on S/ech#o~ @ p./e blog espous L, Ah 3 ra wht be pv fomet awe foot pe sea terre i \ 4 U ge fotwewd Peek ft VA sho— Grif Nee lysi's | , i ‘ Desc be pttartels tuotert -plemey - pol 73 haste £44 1_/¢ on QC, p proactel hs Cee a pore 19 oe o= The pad ote genteel: (Cee as oe 3- Oesels pnt <Z bes dink Peete exp Pron — sex [-prpeee Cle# pact Ch? chev / io [Aus hes it wworleed ' G- Loy litter pe {> The bes S#“y Zhe leon Ala . po few Bada shaterK © a  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 8, Folder 18, Document 9 Box 8 Box 8 Folder 18 Folder topic: Model Cities | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/4da6df97b2097861c11969c46eb8e906.pdf 1cc281a6512f18559416e9d16a93f8ba Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. STATEMENT OF ·MAYOR BENDER ON MODEL CITIES PROGRAM August 1, 1969 The Model cities Program is a cooperative effort among the Federal Government, State Government, the City Government and the residents who live in the Model Neighborhood Area. As such, the specific program designed to correct the problems in the Model Neighborhood Area will be a product of the cooperative effort of all those involved. On August 2nd, the 25 members of the CDA Board who will represent the citizens of the Model Neighborhood Area will be· elected. Every resident of the Area should plan to vote in his district at one of the polling places listed below. ( Never has ' an election been held in this Area which affe~ted the liv~s of its residents more directly and significantly than will this one. In order to vote in the election, residents must be registered with the Model Cities Program. Registration has been conducted (1) house-to - house in the Model Neighborhood, · (2) at the centers listed below during Ju_ly and, (3) at the Moclel Cities Office, 1418 Mccallie Avenue between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5 : 00 p . m. for the past month. As of July 30, 1969, the following numbers of people had registered. �., PAGE TWO DISTRICT I 655 DISTRICT II 592 DISTRICT III 1302 DISTRICT IV 380 DISTRICT V 564 ...... .·.• ·--· DISTRICT VI 537 I DISTRICT VII 1066 TOTAL REGISTERED VOTERS 5096 It is estimated t h a t is registered to vot e ~ 70% o f the MNA population o ver 18 In other Model Citie s around the country the leve l of r es i dent p articipa tion h as ave r a ged 10% to 15%. ( Votin g will b e on Augu st 2, 196 9 f r om 9 :00 a .m . u nt il 9:00 p.m. at the following place s which a re shown on the a tt a che d ma p .0 District District District ·Dist ri c t Distr i ct District District 1 11 111 lV V Vl Vll East Area Neighborhood Service Center Bo one-Hysinge r Community Center Avonda le Community Center Carv er Commun i ty Ce n ter Carv er Commun ity Center Orch ard Knob El ementary School Orch ard Knob Jr. High School One key to the success of the Model cities Program is the direct participation of the citi zen s of the Mode l Ne ighborhood Ar e a. The f a ct is that the Mode l Citie s Program c a nnot succeed without the p articipa tion of a significant numbe r of the r e sidents o f the MNA. I wa n t t o u rge e a c h a nd e v e ry v oter reg i s t ered to p artic i pate i n �PAGE THREE the Modelcities Program to vote on August 2, 1969 at the appropriat~ voting place. ( -- �' ell5T // R1:/f X ~ ,1,"E;Ht.3Vf-i'/{C> 01J APh:.. 1NG. Sr. sc1-;/1'1CC CENTt:k C-f<VTCHF/£Ll) .5T I l l>!STl?ICT I I~ , IC) .l>!5T/?ICT' :i:, ~ . ~ ~ JI. ~ !~ I · I I(w1Lcox r!NKER St. /'11/L,VE . IV clli'<: J'-f/lli'L> k,vc tj /IV'": sr ___ 2_ ~!STRICT 1 /II. ,,- ti / Oit. 4NJ) P1~1?1< A 1·'£ . ];);STRICT yr . L ~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _A_1_=...;C __ /?_'-_L_1_£_-___ A_V._=L-- - - - - - - - - -_j � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document SAUNT OF -MAYOR BENDER ON MODEL CITIES PROGRAM August 1, 1969 The Model Cities Program is a cooperative effort among the Federal Government, Shave <coveshient, the ‘City Government and the residents who live in the Model Neighborhood Area. As such, vie soccteic program designed to correct the problems in the Model Neighborhood Area will be a product of the cooperative ecenae of all those involved. On August 2nd, the 25 members of the CDA Board who will eoreuant the citizens of the Model Netehbor hood Area will be’ elected. Every resident of the Area should plan to vote in his district at one of the polling suaeed listed below. Never has an election been held in this Area which affected the lives of its residents more directly and significantly than will this one. In order to vote in the election, residents must be registered with the Model Cities Program. Registration has been conducted (1) house-to-house in the Model Neighborhood, (2) at the centers listed below during July and, . F _ (3) at the Model cities Office, 1418 McCallie Avenue between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. for the past month. As of July 30, 1969, the following numbers of people had registered. DISTRICT I DISTRICT II DISTRICT ELE DISTRICT IV DISTRICT V DISTRICT VI DISTRICT. VIL PAGE TWO 655 592 1302 380 564 537 1066 TOTAL REGISTERED VOTERS 5096 It is estimated that 70% of the MNA population over 18 ‘is registered to vote; In other Model Cities around the country the level of resident participation has averaged 10% to 15%. Voting will be on August 2, 1969 from 9:00 a.m. until 9:00 p.m. at the following places which are shown on the attached MAP « District District District District District DLSELLCE District oat aL lV V1 vll East Area Neighborhood Service Center Boone-Hysinger Community Center Avondale Community Center Carver Community Center Carver Community Center Orchard Knob Elementary School Orchard Knob Jr. High School One key to the success of the Model Cities Program is the direct participation of the citizens of the Model Neighborhood Area. The fact is that the Model Cities Program cannot succeed without the participation of a significant number of the residents of the MNA. I want to urge each and every voter registered to participate in PAGE THREE the ModelCities Program to vote on August 2, 1969 at the appro- priate voting place.  APPLING. ST: x S CRUTCHFIELD ST. SY és S Gy x BOONE: H¥SINGER Ky eee CFR: hy < / DISTRICT I | Pa ae DISTRICT |> a w ZR S { hd nN (WILCOX _gLvd)_—— T(NKER ST. AVONDALE CoMMeNiTyY LEN TER OISTRIGT og MILNE - wr MM. OC HAIZO a YONCE IKE, DISTRIC ae ‘ I CSFICO ALE, VY 2 s STRICT W. HIGHLAND 3 D “ PARK AVE. x 7 CARVER a CommuniTY » CENTER ® ny CLEVELAND ST ORCHARD ANOG = * UUATOR AIGA lex DISTRICT — sctoor I Tt ORCHARD KNB Vil BX ELEMENTARY S =u ' & DISTRICT Ss VI oS 1s ch "A Ss s BE CALLIE AVE) LAST ffREA NEIH BOR HOOD SERVICE CENTER  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 8, Folder 18, Document 8 Box 8 Box 8 Folder 18 Folder topic: Model Cities | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/10fb1e8d0af2e69069474aca5c0d972c.pdf 6bda8c2903c559bacf7d4b92d198903a Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. I !/ .,-,ii,. ! ,, MODEL CITIES BOARD TRAINING PROGRAM University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Guerry Center August 9, 1969 Welcome Dr. William H. Masterson, Chancellor University of Tennessee at Chattanoog a Introduction of Guests Mr. Roy Batchelor, Dir e ctor Urban Affairs University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Overview-Model Cities Training Program Dr. Charles Hyder, Dir ector Model Citie s Training Program Dr. Rob e rt W e lch Model Cities Training Prog ram Int roduction of Consultant Dr. John Dye r Fed er al Pro g r am C o ordinator and Acting Dire c tor Chattan o o ga Model Cities Addre ss M r . Dan S weatt Chief A d minis t rative Officer City o f Atlanta AGENDA 9:45. . Model Neighborhood Area Representatives ... Betty Blocker Lounge 9 : 45 .. Non - Mode l N e ighborhood Area R e presenta tives .. Conference Room 10: 30 . ...•• . . . . . . . . . .. Coffee Break ... . ..•. . . . ...•.... Snack Bar 10:45 ..•......•.... Simulation Exercise ......•.... Conference Room #1 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document WA Lf MODEL CITIES BOARD TRAINING PROGRAM University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Guerry Center August 9, 1969 Welcome Dr. William H. Masterson, Chancellor University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Introduction of Guests Mr. Roy Batchelor, Director Urban Affairs University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Overview-Model Cities Training Program Dr, Charles Hyder, Director Model Cities Training Program Dr. Robert Welch Model Cities Training Program Introduction of Consultant Dr. John Dyer Federal Program Coordinator and Acting Director Chattanooga Model Cities Address Mr. Dan Sweatt Chief Administrative Officer City of Atlanta AGENDA 9:45, . Model Neighborhood Area Representatives...Betty Blocker Lounge 9:45. .Non-Model Neighborhood Area Representatives. , Conference Room 10:30... -eeesrisecavees Coffee Break, ...cisecrseseesess Onack Bar 10:45....... eseeees Simulation Exercise.,......+.. Conference Room #1  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 8, Folder 18, Document 7 Box 8 Box 8 Folder 18 Folder topic: Model Cities | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/97ab1d106a4d9617725465cc03b9745f.pdf ecac03384a07c08fafbb3f13e226cbc4 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. c T _T o_~ /{· .- October 7, 1969 OFFICE OF MODEL CITIES PROGRAM 673 Capitol Avenue, S.W. Atlanta, Ga . 30315 (404) 577 -5200 Ivan Allen Jr., Mayor J. C. Johnson, Director Dr. John W. Letson Superintendent Atlanta Public Schools 224 Central Avenue, S. W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 RE: Requested Contract Revisions and Disposition Dear Dr. Letson: The contract betwe e n the Atlanta Board of Education (Agency) and the City of Atlanta (CDA) state s that the Agency must have prior approval by the CDA on any shift of funds that significantly changes the approved program and/or exceeds 10% of the line item total from which the funds are being removed or to which added. The following state ments _indic ~te the action taken by the CDA with regards to the revisions requested by the Atlanta Board of Education. The CDA does not ~pprove the proposed changes in projects ED-005N and ED-041C. It was proposed that $30,000 be shifted from ED-005N to ED-041C. The approved original budgets are attached herein. We are happy to know that only t wo temporary units will be required thereby reflecting a savings of $30,000. The CDA approves the proposed changes on project ED-020C, but with some modification. Th e shi ft of funds proposed b y the Agency involved $4;ooo being shifted from personnel, with $3,000 added to consumable supplies and $1,000 added to equipment. Inasmuch as this proposed change could not be adequate to meet present equipment expenditures (as indicated by Age ncy's August Project Report), CDA proposes that $1,374 be shifted to equipment with $2,626 going to consumable supplies. This change does not effect the total cost of the project. This approved budget is included herein. �Dr. John W. Letson Page Two October 7, 1969 The CDA approves the proposed c hanges in project ED-021C. This involves removing $5,978 fro m personn el and adding $4,738 for instructional equipment costs, $40 0 for office equipment, and $840 for mileage. Also, the number of lead teachers is reduced from eight to seven in order to create the position of Model Cities Coordinator. These changes do not affect the total cost of the project. The approved budget is included herein. With rega.rds to the proposed changes in project ED-022C, the CDA app:c oves the additi·on of three · teacher aides. However, the CDA does not approve the adding of $1,620 to travel. The funds are to :remain in personnel. The CDA appr9ves the adding of $396 for tel ,=phone service. Telephone service is included in the space cost line item. These changes do not affect the overall total the total cost of the project. The approved budget is included her1=in. The CDA approves the changes in project ED-024N. The number of Extended Day Programs is reduced from five to four, and consultants and contract services will be covered by In-Service Training funds. These changes allows $49,287 to be removed and to be allocated as follows: $16,500 added to food; $12,543 added for labor; $6,649 added for custodial services; $2,000 added for consumable s upplies; $4,000 added for equipment; $6,768 added for three additional teachers aid e s; $584 for telephone services; and $243 added to trave l. The approved budget with costs in the appropriate line items is includ ed here in. The CDA approves the changes in pr oj ect ED-025N. It was proposed to r educe the number of pre-school progr ams from nine to eight. This allows additional fund s to be used for food, labor for food preparation, equipment, custodi a l serv ices, field trips, and substitute teacher aides. These changes only involve the shifting of funds and does not a l ter the total cost of the project. The approved budget with costs i n the appropriate line items is included herein. The CDA approves the proposed changes in project ED-039N. These changes include removing $14,813 from personnel, and distributed as follows: Consultants and Contract Services, $3,000; Travel, $2,000; Consumable Supplies, $3,500; Rental, Lease, Purchase of Equipment, $6,000; Custodia l Services, $813. The approved budget with costs in the appropriate line items is included herein. �Dr. John w. Letson Page Three October 7, 1969 The attached budgets control al l future authorized revisions. expenditures specified as We a.re encouraged to k now t hat m-ny staff p ositions were overbudgeted and will reflect considerable savings. ~'--:,:°'-v'<::d'-""= Jo __,i{t ,. C. Exe cutive vlc cc: / Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. Model Cities Executive Board Members ( � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document CNT RTS Ska ok RL October 7, 1969 OFFICE OF MODEL CITIES PROGRAM 673 Capitol Avenue, S.W. Atlanta, Ga. 30315 (404) 577-5200 Ivan Allen Jr., Mayor J. C, Johnson, Director ies 6 Lay Sweat Superintendent — Atlanta Public Schools 224 Central Avenue, S. W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 RE: Requested Contract Revisions and Disposi- tion Dear Dr. Letson: The contract between the Atlanta Board of Education (Agency) and the City of Atlanta (CDA) states that the Agency must have prior approval by the CDA on any shift of funds that significantly changes the approved program and/or exceeds 10% of the line item total from which the funds are being removed or to which added. The following statements indicate the action taken by the CDA with regards to the revisions requested by the Atlanta Board of Education. The CDA does not approve the proposed changes in projects ED-OO5N and ED-041C. It was proposed that $30,000 be shifted from ED-OO5N to ED-041C. The approved original budgets are attached herein. We are happy to know that only two temporary units will be required thereby reflecting a savings of $30,000. The CDA approves the proposed changes on project ED-020C, but with some modification. The shift of funds proposed by the Agency involved $4,000 being shifted from personnel, with $3,000 added to consumable supplies and $1,000 added to equipment. Inasmuch as this proposed change could not be adequate to meet present equipment expenditures (as indicated by Agency's August Project Report), CDA proposes that $1,374 be shifted to equipment with $2,626 going to consumable supplies. This change does not effect the total cost of the project. This approved budget is included herein. Dr. John W. Letson Page Two October 7, 1969 The CDA approves the vroposed changes in project ED-0O21c. This involves removing $5,978 from personnel and adding $4,738 for instructional equipment costs, $400 for office equipment, and $840 for mileage. Also, the number of lead teachers is reduced from eight to seven in order to create the position of Model Cities Coordinator. These changes do not affect the total cost of the project. The approved budget is included herein. With regards to the proposed changes in project ED-O022C, the CDA approves the addition of three teacher aides. However, the CDA does not approve the adding of $1,620 to travel. The funds are to remain in personnel. The CDA approves the adding of $396 for telephone service. Telephone service is included in the space cost line item. These changes do not affect the overall total the total cost of the project. The approved budget is included herein. The CDA approves the changes in project ED-O24N. The number of Extended Day Programs is reduced from five to four, and consul- tants and contract services will be covered by In-Service Training funds. These changes allows $49,287 to be removed and to be allocated as follows: $16,500 added to food; $12,543 added for labor; $6,649 added for custodial services; $2,000 added for con- sumable supplies; $4,000 added for equipment; $6,768 added for three additional teachers aides; $584 for telephone services; and $243 added to travel. The approved budget with costs in the appropriate line items is included herein. The CDA approves the changes in project ED-O25N. It was proposed to reduce the number of pre-school programs from nine to eight. This allows additional funds to be used for food, labor for food preparation, equipment, custodial services, field trips, and substitute teacher aides. These changes only involve the shif- ting of funds and does not alter the total cost of the project. The approved budget with costs in the appropriate line items is included herein. The CDA approves the proposed changes in project ED-O39N. These changes include removing $14,813 from personnel, and distributed as follows: Consultants and Contract Services, $3,000; Travel, $2,000; Consumable Supplies, $3,500; Rental, Lease, Purchase of Equipment, $6,000; Custodial Services, $813. The approved bud- get with costs in the appropriate line items is included herein. Dr. John W. Letson Page Three October 7, 1969 The attached budgets control all future expenditures specified as authorized revisions. We are encouraged to know that many staff positions were over- budgeted and will reflect vic cc: Mayor Ivan Allen, Jz considerable savings. ey io Vas Se G, 2 ate sips q ue Kasay hh é er SS jOunny Gs Shen Executive Director 4 Model Cities Executive Board Members  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 8, Folder 18, Document 6 Box 8 Box 8 Folder 18 Folder topic: Model Cities | 1969