384 20 10383 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/a2eb4d6cdaf5d04946fc0e162ffdcd90.pdf 62489a755a3ac46b0c370f29db5efeb2 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. \ -- ~ MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE New York, New York October 9, 1967 Co-Chairman Andrew Heiskell opened the meeting by welcoming Mr. John Johnson, President of Johnson Publications and Mr. J. H. Allen, President of McGraw-Hill P~blications to the meeting. They are Co-Chairmen of the Communications Task Force. By unanimous approval they were added to the Steering Committee. In addition to this, Mr. Heiskell said that the present limited religious representation warranted additions from that segment. REPORT ON BUDGET AND ADMINISTRATION Coalition costs are running slightly in excess of the approved budget. It was suggested that a finance committee made up of members from the Steering Committee be set up. Mr. Heiskell appointed Mr. Asa T. Spaulding, Mayor Jerome Cavanagh, and Mr. Theodore Schlesinger to that committee. They will oversee the budget and fund raising activities. To date, contributions have been received from the mayors and the business members. The labor contribution is expected shortly, and the contribution from religion is in the process of being worked out. PROPOSALS ON ORGANIZATION AND PROCEDURES The Report of the Special Working Sub-Committee on Organization was brought up for discussion. There was some disagreement as to whether the National Coalition· itself should take a public position on legislation pending before the Congress or whether this should be done on the local level. It was decided, however, that any statements released by the National Coalition would be seen by all members of the Steering Committee before being made public. Specific changes were made in Paragraphs 7 and 8 (see attached) and the public policy position was approved. PRESENTATION OF TASK PROGRAMS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Over fifty cities have indicated that they are interested in setting up their own local coalitions. To assist these communities, as well as others, a one-day planning session will be held on Tuesday, October 17, in Chicago. This session, hosted by Mayor Daley, will be attended by representatives from several hundred cities. The Co- Chairmen of the Task Force on Communications will be recruiting ten leaders in the various areas of communication . Contact has been made with both the Magazine Association and the Advertising Council. Both have expressed an �• -2- interest in working with the Coalition. It was suggested that Urban America might serve as liaison between the Advertising Council and the Coalition. The Co-Chairmen of the Task Force on Reconstruction Investment and Urban Development have met and have agreed on the expansion of the Task Force. They have assigned their working committee to develop r ecommended goals and a task force program. The full task force membership will meet on October 19. The Task Force on Educational Dispari t ies and the Task Force on Equal Housing Opportunity are in the process of holding working committee meetings to develop task force programs. The Task Force on Priva te Employment is scheduling meetings in three cities with local private employment task forces in preparation fo r a national private emp loyment conferenc e. REPORT ON LEGISLATION Mayor Lindsay reported on the Task Force's activities on behalf of the Cl ark-Javits Amendment . He noted that the Prouty compromise failed by five v otes . He a lso noted that a new effort would be made in the Senate and an additional effort in the House to pass an emergency public employment meas u re. He said that the l egislative committee fe lt that two other pending measures related directly to the employment problem. One was adoption of the poverty legislation; the other was defeat of the Welfare Amendments to the Social Security legi slati on. There was intense discus s ion relative to the position of the Steering Committee on this legislation. A consensus was reached that there shou ld be prepared a positi on paper on the Welfare Amendments to be distributed to the Steering Committee members to determine their reaction. URBAN ECONOMI~ COUNCIL A committee wil l be made up of members from the Steering Committee to work with Urban America on setting up the Urban Economic Council. Next meeting of the Steering Committee will be at 7:30 p.m. on December 18 , 1967, in Detroit, Michigan. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE New York, New York October 9, 1967 Co-Chairman Andrew Heiskell opened the meeting by welcoming Mr. John Johnson, President of Johnson Publications and Mr. J. H. Allen, President of McGraw-Hill Publications to the meeting. They are Co-Chairmen of the Communications Task Force, By unanimous approval they were added to the Steering Committee, In addition to this, Mr. Heiskell said that the present limited religious repre- sentation warranted additions from that segment, REPORT ON BUDGET AND ADMINISTRATION Coalition costs are running slightly in excess of the approved budget. It was suggested that a finance committee made up of members from the Steering Committee be set up. Mr. Heiskell appointed Mr. Asa T. Spaulding, Mayor Jerome Cavanagh, and Mr, Theodore Schlesinger to that committee, They will oversee the budget and fund raising activities. To date, contributions have been received from the mayors and the business members. The labor contribution is expected shortly, and the contribution from religion is in the process of being worked out, PROPOSALS ON ORGANIZATION AND PROCEDURES The Report of the Special Working Sub-Committee on Organization was brought up for discussion, There was some disagreement as to whether the National Coalition itself should take a public position on legislation pending before the Congress or whether this should be done on the local level. It was decided, however, that any statements released by the National Coalition would be seen by all members of the Steering Committee before being made public. Specific changes were made in Paragraphs 7 and 8 (see attached) and the public policy position was approved. PRESENTATION OF TASK PROGRAMS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Over fifty cities have indicated that they are interested in setting up their own local coalitions. To assist these communities, as well as others, a one-day planning session will be held on Tuesday, October 17, in Chicago. This session, hosted by Mayor Daley, will be attended by representatives from several hundred cities, The Co-Chairmen of the Task Force on Communications will be recruiting ten leaders in the various areas of communication, Contact has been made with both the Magazine Association and the Advertising Council. Both have expressed an a interest in working with the Coalition. It was suggested that Urban America might serve as liaison between the Advertising Council and the Coalition, The Co-Chairmen of the Task Force on Reconstruction Investment and Urban Develop- ment have met and have agreed on the expansion of the Task Force. They have assigned their working committee to develop recommended goals and a task force program, The full task force membership will meet on October 19. The Task Force on Educational Disparities and the Task Force on Equal Housing Opportunity are in the process of holding working committee meetings to develop task force programs, The Task Force on Private Employment is scheduling meetings in three cities with local private employment task forces in preparation for a national private employ- ment conference, REPORT ON LEGISLATION Mayor Lindsay reported on the Task Force's activities on behalf of the Clark-Javits Amendment. He noted that the Prouty compromise failed by five votes. He also noted that a new effort would be made in the Senate and an additional effort in the House to pass an emergency public employment measure, He said that the legis- lative committee felt that two other pending measures related directly to the employment problem. One was adoption of the poverty legislation; the other was defeat of the Welfare Amendments to the Social Security legislation, There was intense discussion relative to the position of the Steering Committee on this legislation. A consensus was reached that there should be prepared a position paper on the Welfare Amendments to be distributed to the Steering Committee members to determine their reaction, URBAN ECONOMIC COUNCIL A committee will be made up of members from the Steering Committee to work with Urban America on setting up the Urban Economic Council, Next meeting of the Steering Committee will be at 7:30 p.m. on December 18, 1967, in Detroit, Michigan,  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 7, Folder 9, Document 30 Box 7 Box 7 Folder 9 Folder topic: Urban Coalition | Miscellaneous | 1967-1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/e53a806604668471d35eb0361fcc5c83.pdf 69af87ab4511dfc8876ee7899fa47771 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. CLASS OF SERVICE This is a fas t message unless its d efe rred char• actcr is ind icated by t he proper symbol. WESTERN UNION W. P . MARSHALL CHA I RMAN O F THE BO A RD TELEGRAM ® SYMBOLS DL = Day Letter NL =N igh t Letter R . W . M c FALL PRESIDENT LT _ I ntern atio n a l - Letter Telegram The fi lin g time shown in the da te line o n domes tic telegrams is LOCAL T IME at point of origin . T ime of receipt is LOCAL T IME at poinc of destination 742P EST NOV 3 67 AH388 CTC 516 w ncvo;o rxz1 TXZ1 PD TX WASHINGTON DC 3 NFT DAN SWEAT OFF ICE 0:- THE MAOR CITY HALL A11.ANTA GA THE WORKING COMMITTEE WILL MEET AT 2100 PM ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 27 IN THE NEW YORK SUITE OF TH.E MAYFLOER HOTEL, WASMiflGTON DC TO CONS IDER THE AGEN:>A FOR THE DECEMBER 1 g STEER ING COMMITTEE MEE·ING JOHM FEILD RON M LINTON NATIONAL COORDINATORS THE URBAN COALITION • . SF1201(R2-65) � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document CLass oF SERVICE | | ; lt iQ SYMBOLS > —— \ This is a fast message a DL =Day Letter unless its deferred char- NL=Night Letter acter is indicated by the W. P. MARSHALL 4.8 E J E GR A M R. W. McFALL 7a a proper symbol. CHAIRMAN OF THE BoarD : PRESIDENT LT: insecnanicpel se The filing time shown in the date line on domestic telegrams is LOCAL TIME at point of origin, Time of receipt is LOCAL TIME at point of destination 7TuoP EST NOV 3 67 AH388 CTC516 W TXY030 TXZ!1 TX21 PD TX WASHINGTON DC 3 NFT DAN SWEAT OFF ICE OF THE MAOR CITY HALL ATLANTA GA THE WORKING COMMITTEE WILL MEET AT 2:00 PM ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 27 IN THE NEW YORK SUITE OF THE MAYFLOER HOTEL, WASHINGTON DC TO CONSIDER THE AGENDA FOR THE DECEMBER 18 STEERING COMMITTEE MEEING JOHN FEILD RON M LINTON NATIONAL COORDINATORS THE URBAN COALITION. SF1201(R2-65)  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 7, Folder 9, Document 29 Box 7 Box 7 Folder 9 Folder topic: Urban Coalition | Miscellaneous | 1967-1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/0e1089c30a0494975f0336ad03db9e57.pdf faaec753fc09279d6678a33d4278a2f4 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. SYMBOLS CLASS OF SERVICE This is a fast message unless its defe rr ed cha r# actcr is indicated by the p roper symbol. W . P. MARSH A LL CH A I RMAN O F T HE B OAR D TELEGRAM ® L T- l ntcr-natio n a l - Letter T clegram 1102A EST NOV 6 67 AC072 PC078 WMR023 WDO~O (WMR) PD 6 EXTRA DUPLICATE & CORRECTED COPY WASHil'GTON DC 6 NF"T DAM SWEAT OFFICE OF THE MAYOR CITY HALL ATLA Tt£ WORKING COMMITTEE WILL ~EET AT 2:00 PM ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER . 27 IN Tt-E .NEW YORK SUITE OF THE MAYFLOWER -HOTEL, WASHINGTON, · D. Ce TO CONSIDER THE AGENDA FOR THE DECEMBER 18 STEERING COMMITTEE MEETif\G JOHN FEILD RON M LINTON NATIONAL COORDINATORS THE URBAN COALITION 2:00 27 18. SF1201 (RZ-65) � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document Crass oF SERVICE V E TER N | | | N TO N | a SYMBOLS ‘ This is a fast message DL =Day Letter NL=Nighr Letrer unless its deferred char- er is indic seeaiby the WwW. P. MARSHALL TEI EGR A M. R. W. McFALL proper symbol. CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD International \. LT= ~ Letter Telegram J E appoint of destination The filing time shown in the date line on domestic telegrams is LOCAL TIME at point of origin. Time $f receipt is LOCAL 4902A EST NOV 6 67 ACO72 PCO78 WMRO24 wD030 (WMR) PD 6 EXTRA DUPLICATE & CORRECTED COPY WASHINGTON DC 6 NFT DAN SWEAT OFFICE OF THE MAYOR CITY HALL ATLA THE WORKING COMMITTEE WILL MEET AT 2200 PM ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 27 IN THE NEW YORK SUITE OF THE MAYFLOWER HOTEL, WASHINGTON, De Ce TO CONSIDER THE AGENDA FOR THE DECEMBER 18 STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING JOHN FEILD RON M LINTON NATIONAL COORDINATORS THE URBAN COALITION 2200 27 18. SF1201(R2-65)  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 7, Folder 9, Document 28 Box 7 Box 7 Folder 9 Folder topic: Urban Coalition | Miscellaneous | 1967-1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/659779712846278211b40e3304899949.pdf 75bbe2e35df9580f8d26c67683a2d984 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. November 7, 1967 Mr . John Feild Co - Coordinater The Urban Coalition 1819 H Street, N. W . Suite 220 Washington, D . C , 20006 Dear J ohn: I will be unable to attend the November 27 Working Committee me ting of the U:Tban Coalition . If any particular point com s up on which you n ed some specific word from Mayor Allen, plea e 1 t me know. Sine -r ly yours, Dan Sw DS:fy t � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document November 7, 1967 Mr. John Feild Co-Coordinater The Urban Coalition 1819 H Street, N. W. Suite 220 Washington, D. C. 20006 Dear John: I will be unable to attend the November 27 Working Committee meeting of the Urban Coalition. If any particular point comes up on which you need some specific word from Mayor Allen, please let me know, Sincerely yours, Dan Sweat DS:fy  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 7, Folder 9, Document 27 Box 7 Box 7 Folder 9 Folder topic: Urban Coalition | Miscellaneous | 1967-1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/76a3f4d0a322913523a4ea7abc471af6.pdf cd8dafbaa1fb2face74e3ad088ddc866 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. October 27, 1967 NATIONAL COORDINATORS WEEKLY REPORT LOCAL COALITIONS Six cities have now announced the formation of urban coalitions and intend to affiliate with The Urban Coalition--Detroit, New York City, Minneapolis, Gary, Indianapolis, and Atlanta. Sparked by the Chi~ago "Mobilizing Urban Coalitions" planning session dozens of other cities now have organizing committees. The California League of Cities, meeting in San Francisco, formally e ndorsed th e formation of coalitions in all its constituent cities on a motion by Mayor Floyd Hyde of Fresno supported by officials of San Diego. Both cities announced they are organizing coalitions. Regional meetings like the one in Chicago have been scheduled for San Francisco on November 30 and New York in early December. PRIVATE EMPLOYMENT On October 25, some 40 major Pittsburgh employers and labor leaders attended a meeting hosted by Mayor Joseph M. Barr on private industry pla ns for hiring hard-core unemployed. On October 27, at the invitation of Mayor Herman Katz of Gary and Mr. George Jedenoff, Superintendent of the U.S. Steel Gary Work s, The Urban Coalition Task Force on Private Employment joined with sev eral hundred leading Gary employe r s a nd unions in developing a progra m o f expanded e mployment opportunities. Mr. David Stahl, o f Mayor Daley' s o ffi c e r e p resenting t h e Task Fo r c e , s poke b rief ly a t the luncheon . Other local mee t i ngs on priva te employme nt have been scheduled f or Ba ltimore (Nove mber 14 ) and De troit (Nove mber 2 1) . Task Force c o chairman Gerald L. Phi llipp e wi ll s p eak a t both meet i ngs. In Balt imor e, Mayo r Theodore McKeldin and Counc i l President Thoma s D 'Al esandr o and fift een major i ndus tria l lea ders are convening a meeting of top manag e ment representatives o f Ba ltimore firms to launch a program of e x panding Negro entrepreneurship in the ghetto s timulated by sub- contract arrangements. with leading industries . • �(2) This is being viewed as a "breakthrough" type of program and is being carried out through the Baltimore Council on Equal Business Opportunity (CEBO). CEBO is a pr·o ject of The Potomac Institute. In Detroit, the New Detroit Committee's employment and education committee is convening a meeting of industrial and labor leaders to discuss expansion of private employment in the ghetto. The Ford Motor Company has announced that it will recruit 6500 new workers from the central city and the Michigan Bell Telephone Company has announced plans to concentrate its training efforts in an allNegro high school in the center of Detroit. LEGISLATION Coalition co-chairme n Andrew Heiskell and A. Philip Randolph urged members of the House/Senate Conference Committee on Independent Offices Appropriations to adopt the Senate's recommendations for funding model cities and rent supplements--$637 for model citi es arid $40 million for rent supplements. Rent supplements received $10 mi llion (th e House had earlie r appr oved no f unds) and model cities received $312 (the House had approved $237 million). The f a ct sheet and position paper on the Social Se curity amendments will be mailed to the Steering Committee the first part of nex t week. EDUCATI ONAL DISPARITIES The Task Force will meet on November 7 to map its program and round out its membe r sh i p . HOUSING , RECONSTRUCTI ON AND I NVESTMENT The Task Fo rce had t o r eschedu l e i ts October 19th meet ing f o r earl y November. EQUAL HOUS ING OPPORTUNITI ES Task Force working committee meets November 3 in Washington to consider a pilot three city pro ject invo lving development of new lower-income housing o n a n open o ccupancy b asis in suburban areas. Also scheduled for the meeting are plans to draw together some 30 0 Fair Housing Committees now operating in suburban communities for a national action session on open housing to be held in Chicago e arly in January. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document October 27, 1967 NATIONAL COORDINATORS WEEKLY REPORT LOCAL COALITIONS Six cities have now announced the formation of urban coalitions and intend to affiliate with The Urban Coalition--Detroit, New York City, Minneapolis, Gary, Indianapolis, and Atlanta. Sparked by the Chicago "Mobilizing Urban Coalitions" planning session dozens of other cities now have organizing committees. The California League of Cities, meeting in San Francisco, formally endorsed the formation of coalitions in all its constituent cities on a motion by Mayor Floyd Hyde of Fresno supported by officials of San Diego. Both cities announced they are organizing coalitions. Regional meetings like the one in Chicago have been scheduled for San Francisco on November 30 and New York in early December. PRIVATE EMPLOYMENT On October 25, some 40 major Pittsburgh employers and labor leaders attended a meeting hosted by Mayor Joseph M. Barr on private industry plans for hiring hard-core unemployed. On October 27, at the invitation of Mayor Herman Katz of Gary and Mr. George Jedenoff, Superintendent of the U.S. Steel Gary Works, The Urban Coalition Task Force on Private Employment joined with several hundred leading Gary employers and unions in developing a program of expanded employment opportunities. Mr. David Stahl, of Mayor Daley's office representing the Task Force, spoke briefly at the luncheon. Other local meetings on private employment have been scheduled for Baltimore (November 14) and Detwit (November 21). Task Force co- chairman Gerald L. Phillippe will speak at both meetings. In Baltimore, Mayor Theodore McKeldin and Council President Thomas D'Alesandro and fifteen major industrial leaders are convening a meeting of top management representatives of Baltimore firms to launch a program of expanding Negro entrepreneurship in the ghetto stimulated by sub-contract arrangements with leading industries. (2) This is being viewed as a "breakthrough" type of program and is being carried out through the Baltimore Council on Equal Business Opportunity (CEBO). CEBO is a project of The Potomac Institute. In Detroit, the New Detroit Committee's employment and education committee is convening a meeting of industrial and labor leaders to discuss expansion of private employment in the ghetto. The Ford Motor Company has announced that it will recruit 6500 new workers from the central city and the Michigan Bell Telephone Company has announced plans to concentrate its training efforts in an all- Negro high school in the center of Detroit. LEGISLATION Coalition co-chairmen Andrew Heiskell and A. Philip Randolph urged members of the House/Senate Conference Committee on Independent Offices Appropriations to adopt the Senate's recommendations for funding model cities and rent supplements--$637 for model cities and $40 million for rent supplements. Rent supplements received $10 million (the House had earlier approved no funds) and model cities received $312 (the House had approved $237 million). The fact sheet and position paper on the Social Security amendments will be mailed to the Steering Committee the first part of next week. EDUCATIONAL DISPARITIES The Task Force will meet on November 7 to map its program and round out its membership. HOUSING, RECONSTRUCTION AND INVESTMENT The Task Force had to reschedule its October 19th meeting for early November. EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES Task Force working committee meets November 3 in Washington to consider a pilot three city project involving development of new lower-income housing on an open occupancy basis in suburban areas. Also scheduled for the meeting are plans to draw together some 300 Fair Housing Committees now operating in suburban communities for a national action session on open housing to be held in Chicago early in January.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 7, Folder 9, Document 26 Box 7 Box 7 Folder 9 Folder topic: Urban Coalition | Miscellaneous | 1967-1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/72174bd24d113a431feb525deb0a6158.pdf f55a8cf6f7d310127cf0d14c53b1836c Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. October 27, 1967 MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Steering Committee FROM: Steering Committee Co-Chairmen The next meeting of the Steering Committee will be held on December 18 at 4:00 p.m. in the Van Antwerp Room on the 8th Floor of the Veterans Memorial Building, 151 West Jefferson Street, Detroit, Michigan. Mayor Jerome P. Cavanagh will host a dinner for the members of the Steering Committee or their representatives to be served in the penthouse at 6:30 p.m. Please advise the National Coordinating Office as to whether you and/or your designee will be present. The Urban Coalition 1819 H Street, N . W. Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 293-1530 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document October 27, 1967 MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Steering Committee FROM: Steering Committee Co-Chairmen The next meeting of the Steering Committee will be held on December 18 at 4:00 p.m. in the Van Antwerp Room on the 8th Floor of the Veterans Memorial Building, 151 West Jefferson Street, Detroit, Michigan. Mayor Jerome P. Cavanagh will host a dinner for the members of the Steering Committee or their representatives to be served in the penthouse at 6:30 p.m. Please advise the National Coordinating Office as to whether you and/or your designee will be present. The Urban Coalition 1819 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 293-1530  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 7, Folder 9, Document 25 Box 7 Box 7 Folder 9 Folder topic: Urban Coalition | Miscellaneous | 1967-1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/29551ba832cb092887c2025420bd054a.pdf ac6577f268a6cca523b1f11a34d4ad0a Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. FROM: Ivan Allen, Jr. D For your information D Please refer to the attached correspondence and make the necessary reply. 0 F ORM 25 - 4 Advise me the status of the attached. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document Office of the’ Mayor TO: ALA FROM: Ivan Allen, Jr. L] For your information {_] Please refer to the attached correspondence and make the necessary reply. (_] Advise me the status of the attached. FORM 25-4  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 7, Folder 9, Document 24 Box 7 Box 7 Folder 9 Folder topic: Urban Coalition | Miscellaneous | 1967-1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/40d70cfe329a8d0491aa48267ed20d06.pdf 267ae041756a89854825681b3ed08e8d Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. C y F.ATL CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 November 2, 1967 IVAN ALLEN, JR., MAY~R R. EARL LANDERS, Administrative Assistant MRS. ANN M. MOSES, Executive Secretary . DAN E. SWEAT, JR., Director of Governmental Liaison MEMORANDUM To: Mayor I van Allen, Jr. From: Dan Sweat -{]!53 Attached is a memorandum which you forwarded to me conc erning the D ecember 18 meeting of the Urban C o alition Steering C ommittee in Detroit. The Washington office has inquired as to whether or not you plan to attend this meeting. What shall I t ell them? DS:fy a /V{J,I � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 November 2, 1967 IVAN ALLEN, JR., MAYOR R. EARL LANDERS, Administrative Assistant MRS. ANN M, MOSES, Executive Secretary - DAN E. SWEAT, JR., Director of Governmental Liaison MEMORANDUM To: Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. From: Dan Sweat SS Attached is a memorandum which you forwarded to me concerning the December 18 meeting of the Urban Coalition Steering Committee in Detroit. The Washington office has inquired as to whether or not you plan to attend this meeting. What shall I tell them? DS: fy To Chu Sweul- Lp Kat foley fo atfeasl  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 7, Folder 9, Document 23 Box 7 Box 7 Folder 9 Folder topic: Urban Coalition | Miscellaneous | 1967-1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/886418918e0c959fe96895d417278b56.pdf 89e7b0cc6d03dc08c0a5d7b0d3883c25 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. November 20 , 1967 Mr . John Feild National Coordinator The Urban Coalition 1819 H Street, N . W . Suite 220 Washington, D. C . 20006 Dear John: Mayor Allen will not be able to attend the December 18 Detroit St ering Committee m.e ting. Unfortun tely , l will not be ble to be theJ"e either so please fe 1 f re to carry on without u • Sincerely yours ., Dan Sweat DS:fy � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document November 20, 1967 Mr. John Feild National Coordinator The Urban Coalition 1819 H Street, N. W. Suite 220 Washington, D. C, 20006 Dear John: Mayor Allen will not be able to attend the December 18 Detroit Steering Committee meeting. Unfortunately, I will not be able to be there either so please feel free to carry on without us, Sincerely yours, Dan Sweat DS :fy ee oS a ee ee ras OT a a aS a a a  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 7, Folder 9, Document 22 Box 7 Box 7 Folder 9 Folder topic: Urban Coalition | Miscellaneous | 1967-1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/d256515f3eb75c6aab5d56f615635732.pdf 1809ffc625f63fd7d9f9cde1fe4f3129 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document n* ! ss uae Fists sy} re  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 7, Folder 9, Document 21 Box 7 Box 7 Folder 9 Folder topic: Urban Coalition | Miscellaneous | 1967-1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/559dac2f1f800ee4746f336900a07527.pdf a3d150f90164f6362a311aab4e5cf2c5 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. REPORT OF THE LOCAL COAL ITION DIVISION TO THE EXE CUTIVE COM.MI TTEE December 16, 1968 I. Accomplishments of Coalitions The "older gene ration" of coalitions , with increas ing frequency, is showing tangible and substantial re s ults; the younger coalitions are, in many insta nces , cons ume d by o rganizationa l problems . Some illustrative accomplishme nts are listed: The Miami Coalition, in collaboration with the United Black Federa tion, a bl a ck organization formed with the encourage ment and cooperation of members of the coa l ition, h a s taken significant steps to ease police- community relations. It is currently f o rmulating programs in o ther fields identified as key to Mi a mi's needs. Ten (or more ) coalitions are aggressively c reating entrepreneurship o pportuni ties f o r minorities. The New York Coa lition's Venture Capital Corporation has just made its f i rs t loan, in cooperation with the Harlem Commonwea lth Council. The comp l ementary Coaliti on Development Corporation h as begun with a case load o f 203 entrepreneurs s eeking t echnica l as sistance . Plainfi e ld and Racine h a ve h e l ped establis h sma ll companies . REC Industries , a small manufacturing company estab li shed by the Ra ci ne Environment Committee now employs and is training 35 "hard core " youths. Both the Philade l phia and New York coaliti ons h ave active programs designe d t o enhance the capabilities and opportun iti es o f mino r ity con tractors. Most coalitions are striving to re lieve unemployment, consist ently i n collaboration with the loca l NAB effo rts. The New Detroit Committee has found 50,000 j obs; Minneapo lis ha s promote d coordination o f NAB efforts with other o rgani zations; Fresno h as estab l ished a Manageme nt Council f or Mer it Employmen t; Riverside h as formed a Job Opportunities Counci l ; and Tacoma has establ ished a ghetto area employment o ffice which has plaqed 300 h ard-core une mp loye d. The Winston- Sa l e m Coalition h as estab li s h e d a Housing Foundation {with a million d ol l ar budget ), and h as h e lped finance a hous ing proj ect f or the elderly. Other coalitions with strong hous ing activities include Detroit, Fre sno, Lima, Minneapolis, New York, Philade lphi a , and Tacoma. The New Detroit Committee i s pressi n g l egal action t o get more adequate reso u rces for core-city sch oo l s. Bridgeport, Minneapo li s, and Racine are conce ntrating on scholarships for des e rving minority college s tudents. Detroit a l so h as stimulated the formation of partnerships between schools and major companies, �Page Two L. C. Div. Report and Newark has proposed private sector construction and operation of schools. New York has helped find sponsors for 15 Street Academies, whos e contributions will amount to $600,000 annually. New York also has a ttempted to come to g~ips with the city's decentralization crisis through public education and offers of mediation. The Philadelphia Coalition is launching an employment training program by establishing "academies" in high schools which are sponsored and operated by major compan ies. Three academies are being o rgan i zed in Of fice Management, Banking and Finance, Aviation and Aerospace, and in Electronics. Coalitions in Detroit, Newark, New York, Baltimore, New Orleans, Philadelphi a , Plainfield, Racine, and Saginaw are promoting legislative activity either at the local, state or Federal level. II. Established Coalitions New Bedford, Massachusetts established a coalition in late November; this brings the total of established coalitions to 40. III. Hou.sing Con fere nce for Coalitions During 1969 the Urban Coalition, with the help of the National Institute of Public Affa irs, will provide a s e ries of conferences to help coalitions develop effective strategies in particul ar substantive areas. The first of the s eries , To Impr ove a City ' s Housing , will be held on Feb r u ary 6 and 7 in Washington. This conference i s specifica lly d es igne d to h e lp the staf f and hous ing ta s k forc e me mbers o f coa litions to ident ify the i r rol e and strategies in improving the loca l hous ing situ at ion. IV. Organizing Efforts Efforts are currently underway to establish coa litions in 33 cities. Thi s tota l includes Chic ago , Illinoi s and Durh am , North Caro lina. Coa li tions are e x p e cted to be a nnounc e d soon in San Francisco, Kansas City and Dayton. ·Mr. Walter Re uther h as scheduled a luncheon on January 9 to advance organi zing efforts in Michigan cities . . At the Novembe r mee ting , the Steeri ng Committee resolved to aid. in the formati on of loca l coa litions . All 38 members were contacted by letter as a cons equence , r equ es ting assistance in relation to spe ci f ic cities. Te n members h a v e responded to this r equ es t; s even me mbers h a v e p r ovide d the n ame s of individu a l s who can assist in a total o f t we lve of the target cities: Since the last meeting on Nove mber 1 3, the following Steering Committee members h ave made or wil l make speech e s: Mayor Nafta lin Cl e v e l and , November 21 Mr. Close Corpus Christi, January 28. ., � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document Lis REPORT OF THE LOCAL COALITION DIVISION TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE December 16, 1968 Accomplishments of Coalitions The "older generation" of coalitions, with increasing frequency, is - showing tangible and substantial results; the younger coalitions are, in many instances, consumed by organizational problems. Some illus- trative accomplishments are listed: — The Miami Coalition, in collaboration with the United Black Federation, a black organization formed with the encourage- ment and cooperation of members of the coalition, has taken significant steps to ease police-community relations. It is currently formulating programs in other fields identified as key to Miami's needs. Ten (or more) coalitions are aggressively creating entrepre- neurship opportunities for minorities. The New York Coalition's Venture Capital Corporation has just made its first loan, in cooperation with the Harlem Commonwealth Council. The comple- mentary Coalition Development Corporation has begun with a , case load of 203 entrepreneurs seeking technical assistance. Plainfield and Racine have helped establish small companies. REC Industries, a small manufacturing company established by the Racine Environment Committee now employs and is training 35 "hard core" youths. Both the Philadelphia and New York coalitions have active programs designed to enhance the capabilities and opportunities of minority contractors. Most coalitions are striving to relieve unemployment, consis- tently in collaboration with the local NAB efforts. The New Detroit Committee has found 50,000 jobs; Minneapolis has promoted coordination of NAB efforts with other organizations; Fresno has established a Management Council for Merit Employment; Riverside has formed a Job Opportunities Council; and Tacoma has established a ghetto area employment office which has placed 300 hard-core unemployed. J The Winston-Salem Coalition has established a Housing Foundation (with a million dollar budget), and has helped finance a housing project for the elderly. Other coalitions with strong housing activities include Detroit, Fresno, Lima, Minneapolis, New York, Philadelphia, and Tacoma. The New Detroit Committee is pressing legal action to get more adequate resources for core-city schools. Bridgeport, Minneapolis, and Racine are concentrating on scholarships for deserving minority college students. Detroit also has stimulated the formation of partnerships between schools and major companies, Le; Dine. Report Page Two and Newark has proposed private sector construction and oper- ation of schools. New York has helped find sponsors for 15 Street Academies, whose contributions will amount to $600,000 annually. New York also has attempted to come to grips with the city's decentralization crisis through public education and offers of mediation. The Philadelphia Coalition is launching an employment training program by establishing "academies" in high schools which are sponsored and operated by major companies. Three academies are being organized in Office Management, Banking and Finance, Aviation and Aerospace, and in Electronics. = Coalitions in Detroit, Newark, New York, Baltimore, New Orleans, Philadelphia, Plainfield, Racine, and Saginaw are promoting legis- lative activity either at the local, state or Federal level. II. Established Coalitions New Bedford, Massachusetts established a coalition in late November; this brings the total of established coalitions to 40. III. Housing Conference for Coalitions During 1969 the Urban Coalition, with the help of the National Institute of Public Affairs, will provide a series of conferences to help coalitions develop effective strategies in particular substantive areas. The first of the series, To Improve a City's Housing, will be held on February 6 and 7 in Washington. This conference is specifically designed to help the staff and housing task force members of coalitions to identify their role and strategies in improving the local housing situation. IV. Organizing Efforts Efforts are currently underway to establish coalitions in 33 cities. This total includes Chicago, Illinois and Durham, North Carolina. Coali- tions are expected to be announced soon in San Francisco, Kansas City and Dayton. -Mr. Walter Reuther has scheduled a luncheon on January 9 to advance organizing efforts in Michigan cities. At the November meeting, the Steering Committee resolved to aid in the formation of local coalitions. All 38 members were contacted by letter as a consequence, requesting assistance in relation to specific cities. Ten members have responded to this request; seven members have provided the names of individuals who can assist in a total of twelve of the target cities. Since the last meeting on November 13, the following Steering Committee members have made or will make speeches: Mayor Naftalin - Cleveland, November 21 Mr. Close - Corpus Christi, January 28.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 7, Folder 9, Document 20 Box 7 Box 7 Folder 9 Folder topic: Urban Coalition | Miscellaneous | 1967-1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/ffd7c0bf50a271674ec9f952a4aadc99.pdf 74c3d2196e732eafaa0fa35b0dfed115 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. I, December 1968 I Community The following statement is an excerpt fr.om a recent speech by John W. Gardner, cha(rman of the Urban Coalition: l Today one of the gravest handicaps to the local community, dne of the things that prevents it from pursuing any of its.purposes effectively, is the fragmentation of the community itselfand the fragmentation of community leadership. I saw_this at first ·h and when, as Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, I had to visit all of our major cities-and many not so major. I found that the typical American city was split up into a variety of different worlds that were often wholly out of touch with one another. The suburbs were out of touch with the central city. Business, labor and the universities were three wholly separate worlds-as far apart as worlds can be, City Hall was usually out of touch with the ghetto and often out of touch with the ablest and most influential people in the city. The most omin6us rifts, of course, were the rifts involving various minority communities, most commonly the black community, but in some parts of the country the American Indian or Mexican-American_community. As I traveled around, I observed that these fragmented worlds were often terribly ignorant of one another, and that the ignorance bred fear, and the fear bred hostility. These cities were not communities. They were encampments of strangers. Is it surprising that cities so fragmented have great difficulty in solving their problems, great difficulty in even formulating their problems? Long before the riots, it was apparent to everyone who studied these matters closely that communities so riven could not weather a ~to:rm without cracking wide open. , The stqrms came-and they cracked wide -open. One after another. Like all structures under stress they cracked along the lines of their internal weaknesses. The rift between black and white communities was usually the main issue but when the city tried to pull itself together to face that issue, it found its capacity to do so greatly c:Liminished by the other rifts within the community-between business and labor, between suburb and central city; between police and citizen, between young and old. Nothing is more clear than that no major city can or will solve its problems without first repairing some of those devastating gaps in communication. _ In some respects it is harder to accomplish that repair after the troubles that have occurred. In some respects, of course, it is easier. Some people respond to trouble affirmatively, redoubling their efforts to act constructively. But others, both black and white, respond to the interplay of violence and counter-violence with deepened anger, fear, hostility and a desire to strike back. We shall see a good deal more of those emotions before we're through. But they won't ,5olve a thing. Sooner or later we are going to have to sit down together and figure out how we can create communities that we can all live in, all believe in, all be proud of, all defend. �i The sooner we get on with it the better. There are issues so explosive that if we ignore The Urban Coalition was formed precisely them we shall be overtaken by events-and then with that task in mind. I would emphasize the every problem on the list will be infinitely importance oithe coalition principl\;!. Some harder to solve. people think of the Coalition as just another The goal that takes precedence over all organization tackling the tough urban problems others is to begin to heal those rifts that are now of the day. But it is unique. Our distinction is ,makin& many American cities quite incapable that we bring together segments of American of any kind of healthy problem solving. We can life that do not normally collaborate in the heal those 'rifts. We can heal them through the solution of public problems. ' process of coalition, if the PJOSt influential Becaus·e of the need for such collaboration at citizens in the community will lend their ~trength the local level, the national organization has and their presence, if all significant elements in helped to form local coalitions. There are now ' the community are fairly represented and if all local coalitions in 39 cities. As in the case of concerned are unsparingly honest in facing the national, each local organization includes the toughest issues. , representatives from a variety of leadership In a number of American cities today those segments in the community-the mayor, busicondifions are being met in local urban coalitions ness, labor, minority groups and religion. And -the most i.nfluential citizens hctve stepped we encourage .the participation of other relevant forward, all significant elements in the commuelements-the u~iversities, the schools, the nity are represented and the toughest issues are press, the professions. being faced. The coalition principle requires that minority Once the significant elements in the commugroups be represented in the effort to solve nity begin to work together, once they begi~ to community problems. And such representation think as a community and act as a community, is itself a step toward solving the toughest proball kinds of things are possible. Then they can lem of all-effective dialogue between minority give city government the kind of intelligent communities and the dominant elements in support it needs; they can make the needs of the city. their city felt at the state and Federal level; they Such communication is difficult. It requires can see how all the various Federal, state and bard work and patience and imagination on the local programs fit together; they can provide part of every person involved. But there is no strong citizen support for Federal programs alternative, unless we are willing to see our cities that are working and strong citizen criticism torn apart. The one encouraging thing I can say of those that are not working. to you is that communication is possible. We And most important of all, perhaps, they can have proven th at over and over again. look ahead. When a crisis strikes it is too late to begin the Ion~, arduous process of building effective ( ch annels of communication. If there is to be fruitful collaboration between black and white communities it must begin and be tested in a National Relations Office non-crisis atmosphere. Then when trouble strikes, if it does, men who have learned to work An Office of National Relations has been estabtogether and trust one another can go into lished within the Communications Division of action together. the Urban Coalition to "broaden support for the I have not dealt with many substantive probCoalition and its objectives," John W. Gardner, lems of the cities-fiscal and governmental chairman of the national Coalition, announced. problems, housing, jobs, education , health servThe new office is under the direction of ices, economic development and so on. The Christopher Mould, former executive assistant Urban Coalition is interested in all those probto Mr. Gardner. Before joining the Coalition last lems, but we are not free to choose the year, Mr. Mould was chief of the Federal particular problems to which we shall give our Programs Division of the Justice Department's attention . The priorities are thrust upon us. Community Relations Service. 2 The associate director of the new unit will be Fred Jordan, who is leaving the post of Deputy Assistant Director for Operations and Technical Assistance of the Model Cities Administration. Mr. Jordan is a former deputy director of the California Office of Economic Opportunity, a division of the governor's office. Brian Duff, vice president of the Communications Division, said the mission of the National Relations staff will be to establish liaison with other national organizations and with Federal agencies and to seek ways for the national Coalition to cooperate with others in so ving urban problems. Action in Newark The Newark, N.J. , Urban Coalition has a shorter history than many of the 3 8 other Coalitions launched since August, 1967. But its formal incorporation in April of this year has been followed by planning on a large scale and some substantial steps toward improvement of the city's economy. Newark has the second highest proportion of Negroes in its population of all American cities; it is more than half Negro, and another 10 per cent is Spanish-speaking. A report by the city's Office of Economic Development showed that generally this 60-plus per cent lives at a much lower economic level than the rest of the population: It is largely unskilled and untrained, and it has few resources except labor to offer to Newark's economy. Projections indicate the downward trend will continue as the gap widens between the character of the population and the types of jobs available. Growth is expected to 1 come in the non-production industries that require the greatest skills, not in trade employment which could absorb the unskilled workers. The Greater Newark Urban Coalition, in a broad "Plan of Action," has proposed the establishment of a Community Development Corp. that could be the key to the city's economic development. As the Coalition sees it, the objective is to "forge for Newark a communitywide organizational capability that will be able to deal effectively with the wide range of problems th at are rooted in the economic dependency and weakness of the indigenous popul ation of the ghetto." The Community Development Corp. would be owned, operated and managed hy ghetto residents. It would run all antipoverty _ services, but more importantly would also own and manage businesses, own and manage housing and represent the community in renewal planning and other phases of public policy. One of its goals will be to become involved in businesses which are job producing with a market for its products or services both inside and outside of the ghetto. The Coalition is now organizing this corporation so that it will qualify for 502 loans from the Small Business Administration as well as grants and loans from the Economic Development Administration and other sources. <' Solid impetus was given the Coalition's " Plan for Action" by tbe establishment in early October of a $1 million fund by four commercial banks to provide loans to ghetto buisnessmen who cannot qualify for financial help elsewhere. 1 Two staff members of the New Jersey Department of Community Affairs have been assigned to administe1' the loan program through the Coalition office. The Coalition and the private, nonprofit Interracial Council for Business Opportunity will help loan applicants di agnose the problems of their businesses and try to improve their operations. Coalition president Gustav Heningburg followed the loan fund announcement with word that the organization would move into sponsorship oflow-income housing within the next two months. To enter this field , it will establish a housing development corporation with a separate board of directors composed of Negroes and Puerto Ricans. The corporation will provide fin ancial and technical assistance to community groups which wish to sponsor low- and middleincome housing construction under various fed eral and state assistance programs. The "Plan for Action" outlined by the Coalition to the community includes effortsnow underway-to organize and charter a blackcontrolled bank in the city. "The benefits of a full-service commercial bank with a special concern for the fin ancial needs of the minority com munity are obvious," it said. It is working also to deepen the commitment of the private sector to a personal loan program for lowincome residents. The state has promised to 3 �commit $150_,000 to create a guarantee fund if a matching amount is commi~ted by private interests. Gerald L. Phillippe Gerald L. Phillippe, chairman of the board of the General Electric Co. and a merpber of the Urban Coalition's steering committee, died Oct. 17 at the age of 59. Mr. Phillippe had worked for General Electric since his graduation from col1ege. He became the company's seventh president in 1961 and was elected chairmar;i of the board in 1963. He was present at the Aug. 31, 1967; emergency: convocation at which the Urban Coalition was launched, and for many years lie had led efforts ~o join ~he private and public elements of society rn fightrng poverty and unemployment in the cities. Fresno Expands From an initial focus on improving 1ocal housing, the Urban Coalition of Fresno, Calif., has turned its energies to attacking a broad spectrum of community problems. Since Mayor F loyd H. Hyde called meetings of leaders of all segments of the community to set priorities last January, task forces have been organized in jobs, youth opportunities, housing, entrepreneurship and education. · The first task fo rce to get fully underway was ~n housing, and the city responded by trading its street beautification and tree planting program ~or an effort to set up a municipal mortgage msurance fund with an initial appropriation of S10,000. The experiment lets the city insure home loans which do not qu alify for conventional financing. To administer the mortgage program, a Housing F inance Board was established by city ordinance, and it ruled that loan applicants must participate in the HOME (Home Opportunities and Management E ducation) program. HOME was developed by Fresno State <?~lle~e, at the city's request, to assist people llvmg m substandard conditions to rehabilitate or replace their present housing. 4 The Fresno Ho.using Development Corp. was cr:eatep by members of the housing task force as a nonprofit corporation to assist the city's renewal efforts, and the task force is also assist. ing the civic redevelopment agency with its General Neighborhood Renewal Area Plan covering 1,900 acres in West Fresno with over 5,000 .q_wellings. The pilot project, San Joaquin Par~, cove~s 400 acres. Another part of the poverty-stnck~n West Fresno area, the Baison ~anor neighborhood, was helped by the Coalition_ task force in activating a FACE (Federally Assisted Conservation Effort) project to halt deterioration. , " W~ile housing activities were getting started last_wmter, _the mayor invited a Los Angeles bu~messman_who had headed that city's rehabilitation committee after the Watts riots to speak to Fresno business leaders. H . C. McClellan described the Management Council for Merit Em~loy_ment, Training and Research, which was findmg Job and ,training opportunities for minority grou~s. By M arch 6, t~ree me~tings had been held m Fresno, and 28 industrialists initiated a lik~ program for that city. The Management Council hired an executive director to serve through the summer months, called 200 !arge c~mpanies to a general meeting-and 1mme~iately g1ot to work distributing job applicant b1ograph1es and unemployment fact sheets along with its statement of purpose. A raft of personal interviews followed and a follow-up survey was made later to find ~ut how many disadvantaged Mexican-American and Negro workers had been hired. By midSeptember, 401 full-tim e and 114 part-tin1e workers had been signed on by 146 companies who responded. And by that time, a three-year budget for the Management Council was prepared, a full-time director recn:rited, a fulltime person assigned to work with the Council by the Model Cities Program, and a contract signed with the Concentrated E mployment Program to help secure jobs and training for 100 persons in the six months ahead. High p~i_o rity has been assigned also to youth opportunities and services. In April a chairman and the nucleus of a task force were selected and this body was subsequently charged with pr~viding a meaningfu1 summer program for ( Continued on page 9) Action The 90th Congress and the Urban Crisis A pamphlet briefly summarizing what steps the 90th Congress took in 1967 and 1968 to meet the crisis of the cities has been published by the Action Council. It is available upon request to the Urtian Coalition Action Council, 18.19 H St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006. Although the 90th Congress never agreed to "reorder national priorities," as the Urban Coalition Action Council urged, the pamphlet concludes that the Congress "nevertheless showed increasing interest in solutions to the urban crisis and tQok many positive actions to promote the welfarc of the cities." Legi lative subjects covered in the booklet are Hou ing, Employment, Antipoverty Programs, Food Programs, Education, Health, Law Enforcemlfnt and Transportation. Legislation in 1968 The 90thCoog;ress adjourned October 14 1968 with a record that w nt about halfwa}t in meet~ l ative goal of the Action Council. Tbij gr test achievements of th ear e,; in the housing fi Id-a landl,U housing act focused harply on the ne ds of low and mod teinco families and a fair bonsillg bill, b.n~na racial and religiou discrimination in n.e al an~ r ntal of homes. Tho N:tion Cou.o · orkcd bilrd f 'Con~ sioDal apprO\' of th measurea. The fair housing law had to weather a Senate filibuster before it came to a vote, but its enactment had the support of both parties in Congress. The Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 grew out of legislation submitted by the Democratic Administration, but it also encompassed many Republican proposals. Its enactment was a major bipartisan achievement. 1968 was a year in which Congress was mor than ever conscious of the rising federal budget, and the action taken on appropriation bills reflected this concern. Passage of the tax surcharg and the failure to enact a Public Service Employment bill also were linked to the state of the budget and fear of growing inflation. The Action Council supported the tax surcharge as necessary to solving the problem facing the nation, but it urged that no n:ducti.ohs be made in essential pro~aIDS such as jobs housing, ducation and oonununity services. CMgre&s, howev r, exempted only the education l})propriations from the 6 billion spending cut tluf.t it decided must go hand in hand with the tax increase. The exemption. for education activities oam.e only after 11,ppropriations for c major urb education program-ti&J. I p( th J!l m tary and Secondary Education. Act, providing aid to schools in impoverished areu-.-were QQt sliah below 1 t year's figures. Apptop.r;i bou ing, antipoverty activities d o4 ,gram for the needy, how ver-1 ros abe year s totals. �I Here are some examples: • The Juvenile Delinquency Prevention and -Title I education funds. Last year, Sl.191 Control Act, which was changed from an experibillion. This year, Sl.123 billion. mental demonstration program to a more per-Grants for model cities. Last year, $312 manent program largely under state control. million. This year, S625 million. • The Mass Transportation Act, which fur-Office of Economic Opportunity, the basic nishes federal funds for improved local transit antipoverty agency. Last year, S l. 77 billion. This operations. year, Sl.95 billion. • The Federal-Aid Highway Act, which fi-Food stamp program for the needy. Last nances major urban highways. New provisions , year, $185 million. This year, $280 million. were added to the Act requiring that when hearAt the very end of its 1968 session Congress ings are held on proposed routes within a city considered the appropriations that were needed the effect of the location of the highway on the by the Housing and Urban Development Depart- community environment must be considered. ment to get a quick start on the new programs in the Housing Act and to administer the fair hous- Desegregation Amendment. A serious threat to ing law. The results were disappointing to the the drive for effective desegregation of schools Action Council. Of S 15 0 million in con tracts was barely beaten in Congress this year. The that HUD planned to sign under the new home- Action Council cooperated with other organizaownership and rent subsidy programs, Congress tions in working to defeat the proposal. approved only $50 million. And the appropriaThe provision was sponsored by Mississippi tion under the fair housing law was even slim- Rep. Jamie L. Whitten (D). a high-ranking mer-$2 million compared to the request for $8 member of the House Appropriations Commitmillion. tee, and was written into the Committee's approThe Secretary of HUD, Robert C. Weaver, priation bill for the Health, Education and 1 said October 29 that the cuts in requested approWelfare Department. After the House of Reprepriations might set back for as much as a year sentatives approved the Whitten amendment in the goal in the Housing Act of achieving 6 mil- June, the Action Council urged the Senate to l lion housing units for low-income families in remove it from the bill. The provision was not the next ten years. He expressed hope that the deleted by the Senate but it was made relatively next Administration and Congress would ap- harmless by the addition of qualifying language. prove supplemental appropriations for the homeThe key part of Whitten's amendment proownership and rental subsidy programs. hibited HEW from "forcing" children to altend By the time Congress adjourned it had ex- any particular school against their parents' I tended a number of laws that helped meet prob- wishes. The Senate language prohibited forced lems of the cities. Among these were: attendance at a particular schpol "in order to • The Manpower Development and Training overcome racial imbalance." This phrase, which Act. which provides money for training the un- referred to de facto as opposed to discriminatory employed and upgrading the skills of the under- segregation, was already part of civil rights law. employed. The Act was extended for four years, It allowed the Government and the courts to put but the Public Service Employment program an end to "freedom of choice" school plans that which the Action Council supports was not were perpetuating racial discrimination. added to it. When members of the House and Senate Ap• The Higher Education Act, which includes propriations Committees met in conference on the Teacher Corps, financial aid for needy stu- the HEW bill, Southerners had a majority of the 1 dents and funds for college construction, and the votes and they struck out the Senate's qua lit\ ing Vocational Education Act. New programs to language concerning rncial imbalance. In effect, 1 lidp disadvantaged students were added to the Whitten\; purpose was achieved. two Acts. Action Council Chairman John W. Gardner • The School Lunch Act, which wa<; amended wrote House Speaker John W. McCormack (D to make fede ral funds available to day-care cen- Mass.) and the Republican leader, Rep. Ciera Id ters, neighborhood houses and summer recrea- R. Ford (Mich.), October 2, a~king them to help tion programs. defeat the Whitten amendment on the House 6 floor. He said the amendment "raises the real threat of resegregation in many Southern school districts" and "implicitly sanctions racially dual school systems." On a close 167-175 vote October 3, the House rejected the Appropriations Committees' recommendation and adopted the Senate phrase nullifying Whitten's amendment. The result is that HEW can continue to withhold funds from school districts that arc not making real progress toward desegregation. } l Block Grants. Block grants to the states were a feature of two major bills passed by Congress in 1968. These were the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act, which provides $400 million in federal funds to help improve state and local law enforcement activities, and the law extending the Juvenile Delinquency program. Block grants have become a classic federal versus states' rigbts issue in the last two years. The principal debate has been on whether funds from the federal government for specific programs should go directly to the communities that apply for them, or whether they should go to the state governments for distribution under a state plan. A major argument against block grants to the states was raised by Sen. Edmund S. Muskie (D Maine) during the debate on the anti-crime bill. The block grant approach, Muskie said. will , foster "continuing political controversies and partisan rivalries between state and local governments, between Governors and Mayors, between urban and rural areas." Muskie pointed out that law enforcement is far more a local than a state problem, just as is education-another field in which block grants have been proposed. The chief opposing argument was made by Sen. Everett M. Dirksen (R 111.), whose block grant amendment prevailed on the crime bill. Dirksen warned that if Congress "bypassed 1 state governments by providing funds directly to municipal governments, the system would lead to "imposition of federal guidelin1.:s, restrictions and eventual domination" of the states. Southern Senators joined Dirksen in supporting block grants. Sen. Strom Thurmond (R S.C.), for example, declared that "the federal government !>hould not deal with local communities, cities, towns and other subdivisions" but only with the states. Sen. Sam J. Ervin (D N.C.) added that cities are only "creatures of the state." Administration officials contended that since law enforcement and juvenile delinquency are basically local issues, federal programs should be "community based," involving local people in the planning and operations. The U.S. Attorney General, Ramsey Clark, said it would be a mistake to "thrust the state into the pipeline" between Washington and the local area. Arrangements under which state officials could review and evaluate-but not veto-local plans for the use of federal funds were favored by the Administration. Action Council Chairman Gardner, commenting on the Juvenile delinquency bill in a July 8 telegram to Sen. Joseph S. Clark (D Pa.), noted that "most youth services and juvenile courts arc now operated at the local level. Precipitate requirements that all federal funds be channeled through state agencies," Gardner said, "would seriously impair the effectiveness of the juvenile delinquency legislation and in my view would be a grave mistake." Congress, however, wrote into the bill require1 ments that federal contributions to rehabilitation and prevention programs, the basic elements of the legislation, be allocated directly to the states. But, each state first has to draw up a comprehensive plan for distributing the money to its communities and get the approval of the Secretary of HEW. The state also has to pay part of its communities' costs in operating the program. The anti-crime bill allocated in block grants all of the money for planning ($25 million the first year) and 85 % of the money for law enforcement grants ($50 million). Each state was required to channel at least 75 % of its law enforcement grants to communities in the state. The planning money was for setting up and operating state agencies to draw up statewide law enforcement plans. Local Legislation Local coalitions have been active this year in urging legislative action by the state legislatures and by city government. They have also made recommendations on bond issues to be voted on by the public. In Racine, Wisconsin. the k1cal coalition- t hl' Racine Environment Committee- met with the 7 1 �:J / Mayor and 12 of the city's 18 aldermen to discuss the coalition's program. The Environment Committee urged swift action by the city in applying to HUD ~or planning funds under the model cities program. Another legislative goal was adoption by the City Council of a housing conservation code so that the city would be eligible for federal funds for low-income housing. This effort was led for the coalition by Paul Cody, the urban affairs manager of the Johnson Wax Company. The Louisiana legislature recently enacted a law for local option urban renewal, capping a two-year campaign by the Urban Coalition's New Orleans affiliate, the Metropolitan Area CQmmittee. Members of the committee endorsed a Community Improvement Act sponsored by the city administration, prepared and distributed a pamphlet explaining urban renewal, and testified at hearings by legislative committees in the capitol in Baton Rouge. The legislature did not act on the proposal last year, but when the New Orleans group and other supporters of urban renewal resumed the campaign in 1968, the bill passed and was signed by the Governor. The city is now actively working on its urban renewal plans. On the local level the Metropolitan Area Committee has been seeking reform of the tax structure and has endorsed bond proposals within the city of New Orleans and in an adjoining parish (county) . The Saginaw, Michigan, local coalition has been credited by the Mayor's office with gaining support within the city for passage of fair housing legislation and an unprecedented tax levy for education. The Committee of Concern, the Saginaw coalition, al o worked successfully for a county-wide mutual fire assistance pact. The New York City Urban Coalition's Housing Task Force has set up a legislative subcommittee of ten attorneys to examine what provisions in the housing law are being used or misused. The subcommittee will seek new approaches to housing legislation and regulations, as well as advising on community housing prob- lems. T tifying before the St. P.aul, Minn sota, City Council in October, representatives of the local litiou supporttd a budget increase sought by the ciiteot.or of the St. Pa1,1l municipal human and 0ml ri,iit, departmeat. Fresno Expands f rom page 4 disadvantaged youth, as weU as summer jobs. But this didn't seem enough to the task force members; they wanted a year-round role. In July, representatives from youth organizations throughout the Fresno area were convened, and a You th Council was born. It includes a voting representative from every youth group, and accepts as members all youth from 15 to 22 years old. The first official activity was a September panel discussion where a fiery exchange went on among 500 .adults and youths on "The Widening Gap Between Youth and AduHs." This gap between the generations was not the only one to be faced ; one of the specifit goals of the Youth Council is to promote interaction and communication among you,ng people from all parts of Fresno. The Council recognizes no barriers, whether city-county, school, church or racial. It has made plans to study such problems as recreation, high school curriculum and drug abuse-studies to be carried out by youth alone. And the gap between youth and the "establishment" is being tackled by having youths sit in on city commissions and take a role in the decision making- learning about community planning processes at first hand. Case Study: Minneapolis Minneapolis, one of the first cities to form an Urban Coalition, has had its first year 's experience described in a detailed case study. The report, available from the national Urban Coalition office, was prepared by Michael J. McMaous, correspondent for Time Magazine who had been on loan to the Urban Coalition. Sparked by Mayor Arthur Naftalin, 14 business leaders who had worked together after a 1966 riot in Minneapolis agreed that a longrange attack on the city's problems was needed. Each donated Sl ,000 for a citywide study on the possibility of creating a Coalition for com- ( 9 �munity focus on the problems. To conduct the study they hired Larry Harris, organizer of the Hennepin County poverty program, who was white and had the respect of most white leaders. Se,9sing distrust by the militant black leadership, H arris asked for a co-directon T. Williams, black staff director of a local community center. Their study found wide agreement on need for a coalition , but re al apprehension that business -would dominate it. The businessmen responded by minimizing their role, deciding that only seven of them would sit on a 63-man board. One-third would represent minority and poverty groups, one-third governm ent and agencies, one-third business, labor and religion. A statement of goals was drafted a nd circulated to 100 leaders by midNovember, and a temporary structure was designed with six-month terms for chair man, staff director and task1orce heads. Larry H arris became exec4tive director fo r the first six months. In early December, a single meeting of men from 60 corporations raised the $45 ,000 budget, and a six-man staff was planned. " In retrospect, this underestimation of staff needs was the largest single error in launching the Coalition," the report says. "Once the study was completed, things seemed to drag. It was not until Feb. 8 that the first Coalition meeting was held." Task forces were named on employment, housing and community information. T he latter followed up the Kerner Commission Report with . an "Anti-R acism Week" : Church-goers were given a "sensitivity survey," seminars were held on the shortcomings of the wh ite press, housing industry members were confronted with charges of discriminatory housing practices. In the week following the murder of Dr. M artin Luther King Jr., black members, venting their emotions with violent words, charged th at the Coalition was useless and formed a Black United Front to p resent fo rmal demands. T heir 14-point "Recommendations fro m the Black Community" impressed the white members with the thoughtfulness of the demands and the unity of the community. "The Coalition committed itself to a series of specific actions in direct response to the 14 points," it is reported, but "as p ainful as it was for the fledgling Urban Coalition to bow (some said 'capitulate' ) to the demands of the black community, producing action on the 10 promises was far more difficult. The white man had made new promises, but he did not provide the staff to do the hard work to produce results." The outcome : frustration on all parts, culminating in an explosive me~ting on the six-m,onth annivers ary. It was time for a new loo1c at purposes and methods . L arry H arris' temporary assignment as executive director eIJ.ded at this meeting, and he submitted a series of special recommend ations. One was carried out immediately, as Harry D avis, the man the blacks had chosen to negotiate their 14 points, became the new executive director. The appo intment had " profound symbolic value," McManus says in his report. "To have a Negro in that post underscored the city's long-term commitment to press the battle against racism and poverty." Finding th at the sh arpest cry was fo r blaok entrepreneurship, 17 fa mily and corporate found ation s form ed a consortium and pledged $225 ,000 for an equal opportunity fund. A predomin antly ql ack subcommittee of the business developm ent task force was fo rmed to decide which applicants fo r enterpri se are to be helped ; other committees give technical aid. By early October, Sl 7,000 made in "soft" loans had drawn another S64,000 from traditional lending sources to help Negroes open their own businesses. T he housing task fo rce also had produced results. By October the city had added 14 building inspec tors to fo rce landlords to maintain property stand ards; leg islati9n to protect tenants was in the works; the consortium had approved 51 applications and was reviewing 175 more fo r down-pay ment fu nds for needy fa milies. T he employment task force help ed fill 600 full-time jobs and fo und 1,470 summer jobs. Lessons learned in this year : T he Coalition cannot be "solely a behind-the-scenes catalytic agent . .. ," the case study concludes. It must actively strengthen the black leadership on a broad base, and there must be persistent communication among all parties. I t must be fu nded to afford enough fu ll-time staff to do the job; bor rowing personnel initially is only a stop-gap solution . Finally, says the report, the principals "must recognize that they are blazing new trails through perilous terrain. Like explorers, they must have goals, enthusiasm, strength and a vast capacity to be flexible when confronted by the unexp ected. " Communications Brian Du.ff, vice president of the national Urban Coalition in charge of communications, has announced the appointment of William A. M ercer as deputy director of communications. Mercer has served since April 1964 as executive director of the Business and Industrial Coordinating Council in Newark, N.J. , an organization of business, civil rights, industry, labor, education, the major religious faiths and social agencies that has developed more than 15,000 job and training opportunities for the disadvantaged in that city. Mercer is a graduate of the New York University School of Commerce, Accounts and Finance and has done graduate work at the NYU Graduate School of Arts and Sciences. 11 �I ,, \ ·/ " - ,,, I I 1 ,. The Urban Coalition ort~ Nonprofit Org. U.S. Postage PAID Washington, D.C. Permit No. 43234 1819 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 J1bird Class 100 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document | Re Urban Coalition December 1968 Community The following statement is an excerpt froma recent speech by John W. Gardner, chairman of the Urban Coalition: Today one of the gravest handicaps to the local community, one of the things that prevents it from pursuing any of its purposes effectively, is the fragmentation of the community itselfi— and the fragmentation of community leadership. I saw this at first hand when, as Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, I had to visit all of our major cities—and many not so major. I found that the typical American city was split up into a variety of different worlds that were often wholly out of touch with one another. The suburbs were out of touch with the central city. Business, labor and the universities were three wholly separate worlds—as far apart as worlds can be, City Hall was usually out of touch with the ghetto and often out of touch with the ablest and most influential people in the city. The most ominous rifts, of course, were the rifts involving various minority communities, most commonly the black community, but in some parts of the country the American Indian or Mexican-American community. As I traveled around, I observed that these fragmented worlds were often terribly ignorant of one another, and that the ignorance bred fear, and the fear bred hostility. These cities were not communities. They were encampments of strangers. Is it surprising that cities so fragmented have great difficulty in solving their problems, great difficulty in even formulating their problems? Long before the riots, it was apparent to every- one who studied these matters closely that communities so riven could not weather a storm without cracking wide open. , The storms came—and they cracked wide open. One after another. Like all structures under stress they cracked along the lines of their internal weaknesses. The rift between black and white communities was usually the main issue but when the city tried to pull itself together to face that issue, it found its capacity to do so greatly diminished by the other rifts within the community—between business and labor, between suburb and central city, between police and citizen, between young and old. Nothing is more clear than that no major city can or will solve its problems without first repairing some of those devastating gaps in communication. : In some respects it is harder to accomplish that repair after the troubles that have occurred. In some respects, of course, it is easier. Some people respond to trouble affirmatively, re- doubling their efforts to act constructively. But others, both black and white, respond to the interplay of violence and counter-violence with deepened anger, fear, hostility and a desire to strike back. We shall see a good deal more of those emotions before we’re through. But they won’t solve a thing. Sooner or later we are going to have to sit down together and figure out how we can create communities that we can all live in, all believe in, all be proud of, all defend. The sooner we get on with it the better. The Urban Coalition was formed precisely with that task in mind. I would emphasize the importance of the coalition principle. Some people think of the Coalition as just another organization tackling the tough urban problems of the day. But itis unique. Our distinction is that we bring together segments of American life that do not normally collaborate in the solution of public problems. Because of the need for such collaboration at the local level, the national organization has helped to form local coalitions. There are now local coalitions in 39 cities. As in the case of the national, each local organization includes representatives from a variety of leadership segments in the community—the mayor, busi- ness, labor, minority groups and religion. And we encourage the participation of other relevant elements—the universities, the schools, the press, the professions. The coalition principle requires that minority groups be represented in the effort to solve community problems. And such representation is itself a step toward solving the toughest prob- lem of all—effective dialogue between minority communities and the dominant elements in the city. Such communication is difficult. It requires hard work and patience and imagination on the part of every person involved. But there is no alternative, unless we are willing to see our cities torn apart. The one encouraging thing I can say to you is that communication /s possible. We have proven that over and over again. When a crisis strikes it is too late to begin the long, arduous process of building effective channels of communication. If there is to be fruitful collaboration between black and white communities it must begin and be tested ina non-crisis atmosphere. Then when trouble strikes, if it does, men who have learned to work together and trust one another can go into action together. I have not dealt with many substantive prob- lems of the cities—fiscal and governmental problems, housing, jobs, education, health serv- ices, economic development and so on. The Urban Coalition is interested in all those prob- lems, but we are not free to choose the particular problems to which we shall give our attention. The priorities are thrust upon us. There are issues so explosive that if we ignore them we shall be overtaken by events—and then every problem on the list will be infinitely harder to solve. The goal that takes precedence over all others is to begin to heal those rifts that are now making many American cities quite incapable of any kind of healthy problem solving. We can heal those rifts. We can heal them through the process of coalition, if the most influential citizens in the community will lend their strength and their presence, if all significant elements in the community are fairly represented and if all concerned are unsparingly honest in facing the toughest issues. Ina number of American cities today those conditions are being met in local urban coalitions —the most influential citizens have stepped forward, all significant elements in the commu- nity are represented and the toughest issues are being faced. Once the significant elements in the commu- nity begin to work together, once they begin to think as acommunity and act asa community, all kinds of things are possible. Then they can give city government the kind of intelligent support it needs; they can make the needs of their city felt at the state and Federal level; they can see how all the various Federal, state and local programs fit together; they can provide strong citizen support for Federal programs that are working and strong citizen criticism of those that are not working. And most important of all, perhaps, they can look ahead. National Relations Office An Office of National Relations has been estab- lished within the Communications Division of the Urban Coalition to “broaden support for the Coalition and its objectives,” John W. Gardner, chairman of the national Coalition, announced. The new office is under the direction of Christopher Mould, former executive assistant to Mr. Gardner. Before joining the Coalition last year, Mr. Mould was chief of the Federal Programs Division of the Justice Department’s Community Relations Service. The associate director of the new unit will be Fred Jordan, who is leaving the post of Deputy Assistant Director for Operations and Technical Assistance of the Model Cities Administration. Mr. Jordan is a former deputy director of the California Office of Economic Opportunity, a division of the governor’s office. Brian Duff, vice president of the Communica- tions Division, said the mission of the National Relations staff will be to establish liaison with other national organizations and with Federal agencies and to seek ways for the national Coalition to cooperate with others in solving urban problems. Action in Newark The Newark, N.J., Urban Coalition has a shorter history than many of the 38 other Coalitions launched since August, 1967. But its formal incorporation in April of this year has been followed by planning on a large scale and some substantial steps toward improvement of the city’s economy. Newark has the second highest proportion of Negroes in its population of all American cities; it is more than half Negro, and another 10 per cent is Spanish-speaking. A report by the city’s Office of Economic Development showed that generally this 60-plus per cent lives at a much lower economic level than the rest of the population: It is largely unskilled and untrained, and it has few resources except labor to offer to Newark’s econoniy. Projections indicate the downward trend will continue.as the gap widens between the character of the population and the types of jobs available. Growth is expected to come in the non-production industries that require the greatest skills, not in trade employment which could absorb the unskilled workers. The Greater Newark Urban Coalition, in a broad “Plan of Action,” has proposed the establishment of aCommunity Development Corp. that could be the key to the city’s economic development. As the Coalition sees it, the objective is to “forge for Newark a community- wide organizational capability that will be able to deal effectively with the wide range of problems that are rooted in the economic dependency and weakness of the indigenous population of the ghetto.” The Community Development Corp. would be owned, operated and managed by ghetto residents. It would run all antipoverty services, but more importantly would also own and manage businesses, own and manage housing and represent the community in renewal planning and other phases of public policy. One of its goals will be to become involved in businesses which are job producing with a market for its products or services both inside and outside of the ghetto. The Coalition is now organizing this corporation so that it will qualify for 502 loans from the Small Business Administration as well as grants and loans from the Economic Development Administration and other sources. Solid impetus was given the Coalition’s “Plan for Action” by the establishment in early October of a $1 million fund by four commercial banks to provide loans to ghetto buisnessmen who cannot qualify for financial help elsewhere. Two staff members of the New Jersey Department of Community Affairs have been assigned to administer the loan program through the Coalition office. The Coalition and the private, nonprofit Interracial Council for Business Opportunity will help loan applicants diagnose the problems of their businesses and try to improve their operations. Coalition president Gustav Heningburg followed the loan fund announcement with word that the organization would move into sponsor- ship of low-income housing within the next two months. To enter this field, it will establish a housing development corporation with a sepa- rate board of directors composed of Negroes and Puerto Ricans. The corporation will provide financial and technical assistance to community groups which wish to sponsor low- and middle- income housing construction under various federal and state assistance programs. The “Plan for Action” outlined by the Coalition to the community includes efforts— now underway—to organize and charter a black- controlled bank in the city. “The benefits of a full-service commercial bank with a special concern for the financial needs of the minority community are obvious,” it said. It is working also to deepen the commitment of the private sector to a personal loan program for low- income residents. The state has promised to commit $150,000 to create a guarantee fund if a matching amount is committed by private interests. Gerald L. Phillippe e Gerald L. Phillippe, chairman of the board of the General Electric Co. anda member of the Urban Coalition’s steering committee, died Oct. 17 at the age of 59. Mr. Phillippe had worked for General Electric since his graduation from college. He became. the company’s seventh president in 1961 and was elected chairman of the board in 1963. He was present at the Aug. 31, 1967; emergency _ convocation at which the Urban Coalition was launched, and for many years he had led efforts to join the private and public elements of society in fighting poverty and unemployment in the cities. Fresno Expands -Froman initial focus on improving local housing, the Urban Coalition of Fresno, Calif., has turned its energies to attacking a broad spectrum of community problems. Since Mayor Floyd H. Hyde called meetings of leaders of all segments of the community to set priorities last January, task forces have been organized in jobs, youth opportunities, housing, entrepreneurship and education. __ The first task force to get fully underway was in housing, and the city responded by trading its street beautification and tree planting program for an effort to set up a municipal mortgage insurance fund with an initial appropriation of $10,000, The experiment lets the city insure home loans which do not qualify for convention- al financing. To administer the mortgage pro- gram, a Housing Finance Board was established by city ordinance, and it ruled that loan appli- cants must participate in the HOME (Home Opportunities and Management Education) ' program. HOME was developed by Fresno State College, at the city’s request, to assist people living in substandard conditions to rehabilitate or neplaee their present housing. The Fresno Housing Development Corp. was created by members of the housing task force — as a nonprofit corporation to assist the city’s | renewal efforts, and the task force is also assist- ing the civic redevelopment agency with its General Neighborhood Renewal Area Plan covering 1,900 acres in West Fresno with over 5,000 dwellings. The pilot project, San Joaquin Park, covers 400 acres. Another part of the poverty-stricken West Fresno area, the Edison. Manor neighborhood, was helped by the Coali- tion task force in activating a FACE (Federally Assisted Conservation Effort) project gto halt deterioration. J While housing activities were getting started last winter, the mayor invited a Los Angeles businessman who had headed that city’s rehabili- tation committee after the Watts riots to speak to Fresno business leaders. H. C. McClellan 4 described the Management Council for Merit - Employment, Training and Research, which was finding job and training opportunities for _ minority groups. By March 6, three meetings had been held in Fresno, and 28 industrialists - initiated a like program for that city. The Management Council hired an executive director _to serve through the summer months, called 200 large companies toa general meeting—and immediately got to work distributing job appli- cant biographies and unemployment fact sheets ; along with its statement of purpose. Araft of personal interviews followed, and ao follow-up survey was made later to find out ~ how many disadvantaged MoxigantAnietican. and Negro workers had been hired. By mid- September, 401 full-time and 114 part-time workers had been signed on by 146 companies _ who responded, And by that time, a three-year budget for the Management Council was prepared, a full-time director recruited, a full- time person assigned to work withthe Council _ by the Model Cities Program, and a contract signed with the Concentrated Employment Program to help secure jobs and training for 100. persons in the six months ahead. High priority has been assigned also to seutht opportunities and services. In Aprila chairman and the nucleus of a task force were selected, and : this body was subsequently charged with pro- viding a meaningful summer program for hey ( Continued ou page 9) “sd  Here are some examples: —Title I education funds. Last year, $1.191 billion. This year, $1.123 billion. —Grants for model cities. Last year, $312 million. This year, $625 million. —Office of Economic Opportunity, the basic antipoverty agency. Last year, $1.77 billion. This year, $1.95 billion. —Food stamp program for the needy. Last year, $185 million. This year, $280 million. At the very end of its 1968 session Congress considered the appropriations that were needed by the Housing and Urban Development Depart- ment to get a quick start on the new programs in the Housing Act and to administer the fair hous- ing law. The results were disappointing to the Action Council. Of $150 million in contracts that HUD planned to sign under the new home- ownership and rent subsidy programs, Congress approved only $50 million, And the appropria- tion under the fair housing law was even slim- met—$2 million compared to the request for $8 million. The Secretary of HUD, Robert C. Weaver, said October 29 that the cuts in requested appro- priations might set back for as much as a year the goal in the Housing Act of achieving 6 mil- lion housing units for low-income families in the next ten years. He expressed hope that the next Administration and Congress would ap- prove supplemental appropriations for the home- ownership and rental subsidy programs. By the time Congress adjourned it had ex- tended a number of laws that helped meet prob- lems of the cities. Among these were: e The Manpower Development and Training Act, which provides money for training the un- employed and upgrading the skills of the under- employed. The Act was extended for four years, but the Public Service Employment program which the Action Council supports was not added to it. ® The Higher Education Act, which includes the Teacher Corps, financial aid for needy stu- dents and funds for college construction, and the Vocational Education Act. New programs to help disadvantaged students were added to the two Acts. ® The School Lunch Act, which was amended to make federal funds available to day-care cen- ters, neighborhood houses and summer recrea- tion programs. e The Juvenile Delinquency Prevention and Control Act, which was changed from an experi- mental demonstration program to a more per- manent program largely under state control. @ The Mass Transportation Act, which fur- nishes federal funds for improved local transit | Operations. e The Federal-Aid Highway Act, which fi- nances major urban highways. New provisions | were added to the Act requiring that when hear- | ings are held on proposed routes within a city | the effect of the location of the highway on the | | community environment must be considered. Desegregation Amendment. A serious threat to the drive for effective desegregation of schools was barely beaten in Congress this year. The Action Council cooperated with other organiza- tions in working to defeat the proposal. The provision was sponsored by Mississippi Rep. Jamie L. Whitten (D), a high-ranking member of the House Appropriations Commit- tee, and was written into the Committee’s appro- priation bill for the Health, Education and Welfare Department. After the House of Repre- sentatives approved the Whitten amendment in June, the Action Council urged the Senate to remove it from the bill. The provision was not deleted by the Senate but it was made relatively harmless by the addition of qualifying language. The key part of Whitten’s amendment pro- hibited HEW from “forcing” children to attend any particular school against their parents’ wishes, The Senate language prohibited forcéd attendance at a particular school “in order to overcome racial imbalance.” This phrase, which referred to de facto as opposed to discriminatory segregation, was already part of civil rights Jaw. It allowed the Government and the courts to put an end to “freedom of choice” school plans that were perpetuating racial discrimination. When members of the House and Senate Ap- propriations Committees met in conference on the HEW bill, Southerners had a majority of the votes and they struck out the Senate’s qualifying language concerning racial imbalance. In effect, Whitten’s purpose was achieved. Action Council Chairman John W. Gardner wrote House Speaker John W, McCormack (D Mass.) and the Republican leader, Rep. Gerald R. Ford (Mich. ), October 2, asking them to help defeat the Whitten amendment on the House floor. He said the amendment “raises the real threat of resegregation in many Southern school districts” and “implicitly sanctions racially dual school systems.” On aclose 167-175 vote October 3, the House rejected the Appropriations Committees’ recom- mendation and adopted the Senate phrase nulli- fying Whitten’s amendment. The result is that HEW can continue to with- hold funds from school districts that are not making real progress toward desegregation. Block Grants. Block grants to the states were a | feature of two major bills passed by Congress in 1968. These were the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act, which provides $400 million in federal funds to help improve state and local law enforcement activities, and the law extend- ing the Juvenile Delinquency program. Block grants have become a classic federal versus states’ rights issue in the last two years. The principal debate has been on whether funds from the federal government for specific pro- grams should go directly to the communities that apply for them, or whether they should go to the state governments for distribution under a state plan. A major argument against block grants to the states was raised by Sen. Edmund S. Muskie (D Maine) during the debate on the anti-crime bill. The block grant approach, Muskie said, will foster “continuing political controversies and partisan rivalries between state and local govern- ments, between Governors and Mayors, between urban and rural areas.” Muskie pointed out that law enforcement is far more a local than a state problem, just as is education—another field in which block grants have been proposed. The chief opposing argument was made by Sen, Everett M. Dirksen (R IIl.), whose block grant amendment prevailed on the crime bill. Dirksen warned that if Congress “bypassed” state governments by providing funds directly to municipal governments, the system would lead to “imposition of federal guidelines, restrictions and eventual domination” of the states. Southern Senators joined Dirksen in support- ing block grants. Sen. Strom Thurmond (R S.C.), for example, declared that “the federal government should not deal with local commu- nities, cities, towns and other subdivisions” but only with the states. Sen. Sam J. Ervin (D N.C.) added that citiés are only “creatures of the state.” Administration officials contended that since law enforcement and juvenile delinquency are basically local issues, federal programs should be “community based,” involving local people in the planning and operations. The U.S. Attor- ney General, Ramsey Clark, said it would be a mistake to “thrust the state into the pipeline” between Washington and the local area. Ar- rangements under which state officials could re- view and evaluate—but not veto—local plans | for the use of federal funds were favored by the Administration. Action Council Chairman Gardner, com- menting on the juvenile delinquency bill in a July 8 telegram to Sen. Joseph S. Clark (D Pa.), noted that “most youth services and juvenile courts are now operated at the local level. Pre- cipitate requirements that all federal funds be channeled through state agencies,” Gardner said, ‘would seriously impair the effectiveness of the juvenile delinquency legislation and in my view would be a grave mistake.” Congress, however, wrote into the bill require- ments that federal contributions to rehabilitation and prevention programs, the basic elements of the legislation, be allocated directly to the states. But, each state first has to draw up a compre- hensive plan for distributing the money to its communitics and get the approval of the Secre- tary of HEW. The state also has to pay part of its communities’ costs in operating the program. The anti-crime bill allocated in block grants all of the money for planning ($25 million the first year) and 85% of the money for law en- forcement grants ($50 million), Each state was required to channel at least 75% of its law en- forcement grants to communities in the state. The planning moncy was for setting up and op- erating state agencies to draw up statewide law enforcement plans. Local Legislation Local coalitions have been active this year in urging legislative action by the state legislatures and by city government. They have also made recommendations on bond issues to be voted on by the public. In Racine, Wisconsin, the local coalition—the Racine Environment Committee—met with the  Mayor and 12 of the city’s 18 aldermen to dis- cuss the coalition’s program. The Environment Committee urged swift action by the city in ap- plying to HUD for planning funds under the model cities program. Another legislative goal was adoption by the City Council of a housing conservation code so that the city would be eligible for federal funds for low-income housing. This effort was led for the coalition by Paul Cody, the urban affairs manager of the Johnson Wax Company. The Louisiana legislature recently enacted a law for local option urban renewal, capping a two-year campaign by the Urban Coalition’s New Orleans affiliate, the Metropolitan Area Committee. Members of the committee endorsed a Community Improvement Act sponsored by the city administration, prepared and distributed a pamphlet explaining urban renewal, and testi- fied at hearings by legislative committees in the capitol in Baton Rouge. The legislature did not act on the proposal last year, but when the New Orleans group and other supporters of urban renewal resumed the campaign in 1968, the bill passed and was signed by the Governor. The city is now actively working on its urban renewal plans. On the local level the Metropolitan Area Committee has been seeking reform of the tax structure and has endorsed bond proposals within the city of New Orleans and in an adjoin- ing parish (county). The Saginaw, Michigan, local coalition has been credited by the Mayor’s office with gaining support within the city for passage of fair hous- ing legislation and an unprecedented tax levy for education. The Committee of Concern, the Sagi- naw coalition, also worked successfully for a county-wide mutual fire assistance pact. The New York City Urban Coalition’s Hous- ing Task Force has set up a legislative subcom- mittee of ten attorneys to examine what provi- sions in the housing law are being used or misused. The subcommittee will seek new ap- proaches to housing legislation and regulations, as well as advising on community housing prob- lems. Testifying before the St. Paul, Minnesota, City Council in October, representatives of the local coalition supported a budget increase sought by the director of the St. Paul municipal human and civil rights department. Fresno Expands from page 4 disadvantaged youth, as well as summer jobs. But this didn’t seem enough to the task force members; they wanted a year-round role. In July, representatives from youth organizations throughout the Fresno area were convened, and a Youth Council was born. It includes a voting representative from every youth group, and accepts as members all youth from 15 to 22 years old. The first official activity was a September panel discussion where a fiery exchange went on among 500 adults and youths on “The Widening Gap Between Youth and Adults.” This gap between the generations was not the only one to be faced; one of the specific goals of the Youth Council is to promote interaction and commu- nication among young people from all parts of Fresno. The Council recognizes no barriers, whether city-county, school, church or racial. It has made plans to study such problems as recreation, high school curriculum and drug abuse—studies to be carried out by youth alone. And the gap between youth and the “establish- ment” is being tackled by having youths sit in on city commissions and take a role in the decision making—learning about community planning processes at first hand. Case Study: Minneapolis Minneapolis, one of the first cities to form an Urban Coalition, has had its first year’s experi- ence described in a detailed case study. The report, available from the national Urban Coalition office, was prepared by Michael J. McManus, correspondent for Time Magazine who had been on loan to the Urban Coalition. Sparked by Mayor Arthur Naftalin, 14 busi- ness leaders who had worked together after a 1966 riot in Minneapolis agreed that a long- range attack on the city’s problems was needed. Each donated $1,000 for a citywide study on the possibility of creating a Coalition for com- munity focus on the problems. To conduct the study they hired Larry Harris, organizer of the Hennepin County poverty program, who was white and had the respect of most white leaders. Sensing distrust by the militant black leadership, Harris asked for a co-director: T. Williams, black staff director of alocal community center. Their study found wide agreement on need for a coalition, but real apprehension that business would dominate it. The businessmen responded by minimizing their role, deciding that only seven of them would sit on a 63-man board. One-third would represent minority and poverty groups, one-third government and agencies, one-third business, labor and religion. A statement of goals was drafted and circulated to 100 leaders by mid- November, and a temporary structure was designed with six-month terms for chairman, staff director and task force heads. Larry Harris became executive director for the first six months. In early December, a single meeting of men from 60 corporations raised the $45,000 budget, and a six-man staff was planned. “In retrospect, this underestimation of staff needs was the largest single error in launching the Coalition,” the report says. “Once the study was completed, things seemed to drag. It was not until Feb. 8 that the first Coalition meeting was held.” Task forces were named on employment, housing and community information. The latter followed up the Kerner Commission Report with - an “Anti-Racism Week”: Church-goers were given a “sensitivity survey, ’ seminars were held on the shortcomings of the white press, housing industry members were confronted with charges of discriminatory housing practices: In the week following the murder of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., black members, venting their emotions with violent words, charged that the Coalition was useless and formed a Black United Front to present formal demands. Their 14-point “Rec- ommendations from the Black Community” impressed the white members with the thought- fulness of the demands and the unity of the community. “The Coalition committed itself to a series of specific actions in direct response to the 14 points,” it is reported, but “as painful as it was for the fledgling Urban Coalition to bow (some said ‘eapitulate’) to the demands of the black community, producing action on the 10 promises was far more difficult. The white man had made new promises, but he did not provide the staff to do the hard work to produce results.” The outcome: frustration on all parts, culmi- nating in an explosive meeting on the six-month anniversary. It was time for a new look at purposes and methods. Larry Harris’ temporary assignment as executive director ended at this meeting, and he submitted a series of special recommendations. One was carried out imme- diately, as Harry Davis, the man the blacks had chosen to negotiate their 14 points, became the new executive director. The appointment had “profound symbolic value,” McManus says in - his report. “To have a Negro in that post under- scored the city’s long-term commitment to press the battle against racism and poverty.” Finding that the sharpest cry was for black entrepreneurship, 17 family and corporate foundations formed a consortium and pledged $225,000 for an equal opportunity fund. A predominantly black subcommittee of the busi- ness development task force was formed to decide which applicants for enterprise are to be helped; other committees give technical aid. By early October, $17,000 made in “soft” loans had drawn another $64,000 from traditional lending sources to help Negroes open their own businesses. The housing task force also had produced results. By October the city had added 14 build- ing inspectors to force landlords to maintain property standards; legislation to protect tenants was in the works; the consortium had approved 41 applications and was reviewing 175 more for down-payment funds for needy families. The employment task force helped fill 600 full-time jobs and found 1,470 summer jobs. Lessons learned in this year: The Coalition cannot be “solely a behind-the-scenes catalytic agent ...,” the case study concludes. It must actively strengthen the black leadership on a broad base, and there must be persistent com- munication among all parties. It must be funded to afford enough full-time staff to do the job; borrowing personnel initially is only a stop-gap solution. Finally, says the report, the principals “must recognize that they are blazing new trails through perilous terrain. Like explorers, they must have goals, enthusiasm, strength and a vast capacity to be flexible when confronted by the unexpected.” Communications Brian Duff, vice president of the national Urban Coalition in charge of communications, has announced the appointment of William A. Mercer as deputy director of communications. Mercer has served since April 1964 as executive director of the Business and Industrial Coordi- nating Council in Newark, N.J., an organization of business, civil rights, industry, labor, educa- tion, the major religious faiths and social _ agencies that has developed more than 15,000 job and training opportunities for the disadvan- taged in that city. Mercer is a graduate of the New York University School of Commerce, Accounts and Finance and has done graduate work at the NY U Graduate School of Arts and Sciences. \  The Urban CT 1819 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 Nonprofit Org. U.S. Postage PAID Washington, D.C. Permit No, 43234 Third Class Sy offices 105  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 7, Folder 9, Document 19 Box 7 Box 7 Folder 9 Folder topic: Urban Coalition | Miscellaneous | 1967-1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/c5fa18fa35abc065370bbda73365dd9f.pdf dd7b7c87ba4c748a79e04cd5c5eeaa99 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. Prepared by ,.._m:llma The Housing Staff of The National Urban Coalition \ �An Agenda For Positive Action: State Programs in Housing & Community Development November 1, 1968 A Report Prepared by the Urban Coalition's Task Force on Housing, Reconstruction and Investment �Preface and Acknowledgements On July 9, 1968, the Urban Coalition Task Force on Housing, Reconstruction and Investment met in New York City. At that time the Task Force members discussed the potential role of the states in helping cities meet urban needs. The discussion soon revealed that a few -states had begun innovative programs, many of which show promise of bringing better living conditions to an increasingly urbanized population. The Task Force accordingly requested the staff of the Urban Coalition to draw together and analyze legislative actions that had been taken, and which cQuld feasibly be taken, so that states considering enacting housing and community devel~pment programs might have guidelines for action. This report is the result of that survey and analysis, and was prepared with the goals of the Urban Coalition in mind. The Task Force reviewed and commented on the paper in draft form and at its meeting on .September 23, 1968, approved its publication. The report is intended to enable those in each _state responsible for administering, recommendmg and drafting housing programs to ask relevant questions and to be aware of possible patterns for :state involvement. The paper describes an assortment of weapons in the armory of state action which can be combined to achieve overall objectives. The Task Force believes each of the tools described in this paper is worthy of serious consideration. It further believes that no · recommendations for state action in housing and community development can be deemed complete without their consideration. _Although responsibility for the judgments in this document remains with the Urban Coalition ~ousing staff, helpful suggestions were received rom many sources. Chief among them were Seylllour Baskin, Esquire, of Pittsburgh ; Ralph Brown and Michael Herbert, Department of Colllmunity Affairs, State of New Jersey ; Joel Cogen of Joel Cogen Associates, New Haven; Mrs. Glenda Sloane, National Committee Against Discrimination in Housing; and Stephen Ziegler, Esquire, of New York City. Each attended discussion meetings and critically reviewed the draft in detail. Helpful advice, assistance or critical comments also were advanced by: S. Leigh Curry and H. Ralph Taylor of HUD; Stanley Berman, Esquire, of New York City; Peter Paul · and William L. Slayton of Urban America; Professor Daniel Mandelker, Washington University Law School, St. Louis; Richard Blakley, Illinois State Housing Board; Eugene Rossland, National Bureau of Standards; James Martin of the National Governors' Conference; Stephen D. Moses of Boise-Cascade Corporation; and Warren Lindquist, Associate of David Rockefeller. In addition, representatives of the Task Force co-chairmen supplied support and guidance from the inception of the study: Thomas Hannigan for Joseph Keenan; David Cohen for Walter Reuther; and Richard Dowdy for David Rockefeller. Jack Davies of the Chase Manhattan Bank and John Kolesar of the New Jersey Department of Community Affairs provided valuable aid in redrafting some of the material. . Helpful advice on presentation of the matenal was received from Commissioner Paul N. Ylvisaker, Mayor Jerome Cavanagh and James Rouse, members of a special Housing Task Force Subcommittee which reviewed the fin al draft. . Citations were checked and expanded by Stuart Stiller. Two reports previously published : "The States and Urban Problems," a staff study of the National Governors' Conference, and a preliminary report ("Action for Our Cities-Part IlHousing" ) of the States Urban Action Ce~ter, Washington, D. C. , stimulated Task Force thmking at the outset. �Table of Contents and Summary of Recommendations Page v Page Introduction II. Increasing Housing Choice I. Increasingcthe Supply of Low- and Moderate-Income Housing 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 6 6 ii Program I: Seed money loans, technical assistance and grants. 7 Interest-free seed money loans and technical assistance to limited-profit and nonprofit developers of low- and moderate-income housing; grants to nonprofit developers of loW· and moderate-income housing. Program 2: State-developed housing. State-developed low- and moderate-income housing. Program 3: Below-marketinterest-rate mortgage loans. Below-market-interest-rate mortgage loans to limited-profit and nonprofit developers of low- and moderate-incorne housing. Program 4: Interest-free loans to developers. Program 5: Construction loans. Program 6: Land acquis ition and write-down. Program 7: Rehabilitation housing acquisition and write-down . Program 8: Property tax abatement. Program 9: Administration. 8 9 Program I: Comprehensive fair housing law. A comprehensive fair housing law establishing a strong enforcement agency. Program 2: Metropolitan area housing information centers. Financial assistance to nonprofit metropolitan area housing information centers to aid families in finding decent housing. Program 3: Priority assistance for integrated housing. Priority assistance to developers . which have affirmative plans to locate, promote and manage their low- and moderate-income housing projects to achieve integrated housing. III. Improving Building Codes Interest-free loans to limited-profit and nonprofit developers to enable them to fall within federal cost limitations on JoW· and moderate-income housing. Construction loans to limited-profit and nonprofit develop· ers of low- and moderate-income hou sing. 10 Program: Model building code. A model building code embodying performance standards for permissive adoption by communities; a building codes appeal board ; aids for building inspection. IV. Improving Relocation Assistance 11 Financial assista nce for acquisition and sale or lease of hous. rket . mg sites for low- and moderate-income housing at ma value or less than market value. Program: Uniform relocation program. A uniform relocation program to assist communities to pay relocation expenses and to provide relocation services to families and businesses displ aced by state or local government action. V. Equalizing Landlord-Tenant Relations Financial assistance for acquisition of substandard housing and its sale or lease at market value or less th an market value for rehabilitation for low- and moderate-income housing. . Reimbursement to communities for abatement of normal ' or moderate-income b 0 us· ~roperty taxes on public housing mg; ~~yments to cover extra public service costs incurred b)' localities on account of this housing. Administration of low- and moderate-income hou sing as· sistance programs. 12 13 13 Program I: Means to secure code compliance. Permit a tenant to institute a housing c~de enforcem~nt ~roceeding, to obtain specific relief for inadequately mam~arned premises, and to withhold rent to secure code compliance. Program 2: Evictions. Prohibit "retaliatory" evictions. Program 3: Private obligation to repair. Require that every lease pledge that premises are fit_ to live in when the tenant moves in and that the landlord will keep them in good repair. iii �Page Introduction 13 Program 4: Public housing policies. ~equire local housing authorities to give reasons for evictmg tenants and establish a "Board of Tenants Affairs" for public housing. VI. Enhancing Community Development 15 Program 1: Financial assistance for community development programs. 16 Program 2: Urban Development Corporation. 17 Technical and financial assistance to communities to draft proposals for federal program grants. Eliminte ~onstitutional prohibitions, if any on the involvement o pnvate enterprise in urban affairs. ' Program 6: Zoning and planning reforms. 18 A Decent Home and Suitable Living Environment Program 5: Constitutional reform. 18 guarantees to owners of residential property and small Lo~n b usmesses. Program 4: Assistance to obtain federal grants. 18 ~n ~rban Development Corporation with state-wide aut onty to combine state and private resources for the improvement of metropolitan areas. Program 3: Loan guarantees. 17 Provide a substantial portion of the required non-federal share of federa~y aided community development programs a_nd a su~stantial portion of the cost of non-federally assisted projects. AC .. _omm1ss1on to review and assess modern techniques of zonmg an~ land use regulation and to recommend legislation to moderrnze the state's zoning enabling act. Program 7: Improving design quality. · o f structures mvolving . Excellence in the d es1gn the use of nd ta~e fu s or c_redi~ and the preservation of public buildings n areas of h1stoncal or architectural significance. VII. Developing New Communities 19 Program: Aiding the development of new communities. 21 VIII. Centralizing Administratio n of Housmg . and Community Development Programs P rogram: A centralized Department of Housing and Community Affairs. References iv New ~ommunity development corporations with eminent domam powers; deferral of property taxes during development ~eri?d; state approval of new community development plans m lieu of other land use regulation. ~C~binet lev~l Department of Housing and Community a'.r~ res~onsible to the Governor, with responsibility for adm1mstenng a broad range of community aid programs. At its Emergency Convocation in August 1967, the Urban Coalition called upon the nation to t~ke bold and immediate steps to fulfill the nat10nal goal to provide "a decent home and suitable living environment for every American family" with guarantees of equal access to all housing, new and existing. This goal requires a national effort vastly larger than anything done in the past. The Coalition set an objective of building or rehabilitating one million housing units a year for lower-income families. The National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders later recommended construction of an average of 1.2 million units a year for lowand moderate-income families over the next five years. The Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 set a goal of six million units in the next decade-an annual average of 600,000 units. These goals exceed by a wide margin the current annual rate of production of less than 100,000 housing units for low- and moderate-income families. Why State Action? State action must be part of any national program to provide the housing to meet the very real needs and expectations of millions of Americans. The states have abilities and legal authority unavailable to the other levels of government. If these resources are withheld from national programs, the federal government, the cities and the private sector will be seriously hampered in carrying out their roles. If the states apply their authority and abilities creatively, they can enhance the effectiveness of the other partners in programs aimed at providing a decent environment for the residents of our communities. States have authority to assist cities in modernizing governmental patterns and to amend laws that impede new programs for urban progress. States have great flexibility to experiment with a wide variety of instruments and incentives closely tailored to local conditions and requirements. States, moreover, have the capacity to respond directly to urban problems as they arise, and to work with cities in supplementing federal and local programs and to adapt them to the individual challenges each city faces. A few states have already enacted their own housing and community development programs covering a wide variety of problems. But these programs are not as well known as they should be at a time when many states are seeking new avenues through which -to enlarge their assistance to local communities to improve the quality of housing and community facilities. The Purpose of This Report. This report on possible state programs has been prepared by the Urban Coalition's Task Force on Housing, Reconstruction and Investment as a guide for those in the public and private sectors concerned with greater positive action by the states to assist cities in housing and community development. The programs for state action outlined here are designed to meet problems which fall into eight categories: V �I I I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. Increasing the Housing Supply Increasing Housing Choice Improving Building Codes Improving Relocation Assistance Equalizing Landlord-Tenant Relations Enhancing Community Development Developing New Communities VIII. Centralizing Administration of Housing and Community Development Programs Programs in each of these categories are prefaced by a brief statement of needs and potentials in the area. And federal programs are related to state programs where a relationship exists. The programs cited are designed to spur swift and effective action. This report does not envision establishing at the state level another set of complex administrative requirements alongside the existing federal regulations. To the greatest feasible ex tent, where states supplement or relate to federal programs, the federal appro val should be the principal criterion to obtain the additional state aid. Duplicating and possibly conff,icting state requirements may only delay or frustrate needed action. Cities have built up a body of experience dealing with federal aid procedures, however complicated these rules may be. States must master the same procedures before they can work effectively to improve them. A state administration truly intent on helping cities thro ugh these programs will develop its own experienced and capable staff. It will, consequently, -find its voice significantly strengthened in shaping -the course of federal action. Strong voices are indeed needed, because in the last analysis increasing the effectiveness of federal efforts, backed by the far larger potential financial resources of the federal government, will prove crucial. States should join with their cities in working to channel these resources into urban needs. Except for a suggested commission to revise complex laws for zoning and land use, no proposals are made that require extensive research. A suggestion is advanced for centralized state administration, but with one exception, no at~ tempt is made here to deal with long-range con~titutional or fiscal reforms. Though such organic and fiscal change is unquestionably vital, to maintain a sharp focus this report concentrates on specific measures which can be readily taken. Indeed, most of th e measures described are already being undertaken in some form in one or more states. In ~an_y states constitutional li mitations may make it difficult to enact some of the provisions vi described here. States with restrictive constitutions are, however, already undertaking many of these programs by the use of responsible and imaginative legal counsel, financing devices and careful draftsmanship. Before a sensible course of action is piscarded because of assumed constitutional difficulties, the statutes of other states should be carefully e?(amined for possible solutions to the constitutional problem. The primary objective of the majority of these programs is to attract greater federal aid-to bring in several federal assistance dollars for each state assistance dollar. A number of the programs also act to attract wider private sector involvement and to overcome legal and political impediments to swifter and more effective progress. In many cases, state assistance can be seen substantially to improve the scope and efficiency of federal and private programs. No model legislation for these programs is included since such legislation must necessarily be drafted to fit the circumstances in each state. However, citations to existing state programs and other relevant sources are given in the references at the end of this report. These citations are intended to be illustrative rather than exhaustive. The staff of the Urban Coalition is prepared to provide further information and assistance to those interested in carrying out any of these programs in their states. E ach state is urged to review these suggested programs carefully within th e fra mework of its own needs, priorities and resources. The programs outlined here could be combined or considerably altered to fit particular circumstances, and there is still certainly a great need for experimentation . Each housing and community development project, moreover, should be related to an ongoing local or metropolitan comprehensive planning effort. Ideally, each state should seek to combine new concepts and existing programs into a well-coordin ated and effective effort. It is a time to decide. It is a time to act. To justify the role of the state as an innovatora laboratory for imaginative approaches to urban problems-state leaders must dramatically increase state assistance to urban communities. Enactment and adequate funding of a com· prehensive state housing and community de• velopment program which in some measure includes the specific programs described in this report would dramatize an important commit• ment that states could make to their own people. I. Increasing the Supply of Low- and Moderate- Program I Income Housing Interest-Free Seed Mo ney Loans and T echnical Assistance to Limited-Profit and Nonprofit Developers of Low- and Moderate-Income Housing; Grants to Nonprofit Developers of Low- and Moderate-Income Housing. , Federal and state low- and moderate-income housing assistance programs rely heavily upon . nonprofit housing sponsors. * Nonprofit housing sponsors are e1the_r bro~dly-based housing development corpo_rat10ns _aiding or sponsoring a number of ho~smg proiects in the community or individual proiect sponsors, such as churches, charitable foundations , se~tlement houses, labor unions, fraternal orgaruza. tions and other civic-minded groups. As landlords or as organizers of cooperatives, these groups are likely to follow enlightened policies. As sellers, they are likely to help lowerincome buyers adjust to homeownership. Th_e social motivation of many nonprofit corporations, moreover, causes them to undertake t_he_bften risky, tedious and difficult task o~ bu1ld~g or rehabilitating housing in inner- city . or gray areas " where many private profit-motivated de' will not enter. velopers Experience has shown, however, t_hat to? many nonprofit groups are long on social dedication but short on money and skills. Thus, ~he difference between good intentions and hous'. ng in place is often assistance to nonprofit housmg corporations in the forms of: -seed money loam, (advances from a revolving loan fund needed to cover initial costs, such as preliminary architectural fees, engineering fees , site options, tenant surveys, market analyses, and legal an_d organizational expenses during the project development stage, which are recoverable from the proceeds of the FHA-insured mortgage ) ; . - grants for administrative costs, social services and other necessary expenses whic~ are important to the success o~ the organization and the project, but which may not be recoverable fro m the mortgage proceeds; -interim fina ncing ( construction loans needed when private construction loans are not available as described in program 5 below) , and - technical assistance (expert aid needed to train personnel, develop projects, se_cure project approval and oversee construct10n). • A used ;,, this paper references to 11011 profit deve lopers or n~npro{it sponsors include nonprofit cooperatives as well as ot er non profit entities. �/ The availability of grant money is particul arly important to housing development corporations. These broadly based nonprofits need start-up and operating money that will not be recaptured from the proceeds of housing project mortgages. Seed money loans interim loans and technical assistance might also be made available to limited-profit housing developers in need of this assistance. The federal Housing and Urban D evelopment Act of 1968 (hereafter the 1968 Housing Act) provides similar assistance to nonprofit developers of low- and moderate-income housing. It directs the Department of Housing and Urban Development (hereafter HUD) to provide information , advice and technical assistance. It also authorizes HUD to make 80 percent interestfree seed money loans to nonprofit corporations from a small, newly created revolving fund. It creates a government-chartered, nonprofit, private corporation known as the National Homeownership Foundation to encourage private and public organizations to provide increased homeownership and housing opportunities fo r lowand moderate-income fa milies. A state assistance program, however, would provide an additional and more flexible source of aid to developers of low- and moderate-income housing. A state program could be used to give encouragement to the form ation of limitedprofit and nonprofit housing groups within the state, when federal assistance is not available. A state program, moreover , might put more emphasis on making non-recoverable grants, rather than recoverable seed money loans-the thrust of federal aid. Grants, rather than loans, are needed to help finance housing development corporations and pay fo r the extra costs of housing low-income people, such as the provision of important social services. Program 2 State-Developed Low- and Moderate-Income Housing. Developing housing for low- and moderate-income families requires a great deal of expertness. The services qf a lawyer, real estate agent, builder, banker and administrator at a minimum are generally required. In many smaller communities it is difficult to find people who are both qualified and willing to render these services to a housing sponsor. Thus, as a logical alternative to state or federal technical assistance to help local groups become qualified to develop housing projects, the state may wish itself to develop either public housing 2 or moderate-income housing. It should only do so where there is no functioning local p ublic housing authority or moderate-income housing developer to build the housing. To produce public housing, the state would establish a public housing authority which could provide the necessary public housing anywhere in the state. R ecent changes have added great flexibility to the federally assisted public housing program. A public housing authority can now lease as well as bu ild or purch ase housing, and can sell the housing to its tenants. State-wide public housing authorities are eligible to receive federal public housing assistance. To build moderate-income housing, the state could create a nonp~ofit housing development corporation to develop this housing anywhere in the state. The corporation generally would serve as developer of the project. It would only serve as sponsor (i. e., the owner and maintainer of rented housing) in the absence of a local group which could serve as th e sponsor. In developing either public hou sing or moderate-income housing, the state would act in close cooperation with local public and private groups. And the state would not itself construct the housing; construction would be done by a private contractor under the " turnkey" system. Program 3 Below-Market-Interest-Rate Mortgage Loans to Limited-Profit and ·Nonprofit Developers of Low- and Moderate-Income Housing. States may use their power to borrow cheaply through the issuance of tax-exempt bonds to finance moderate-income housing projects at mortgage interest rates several percentage points below commercial rates. On long-term mortgages (usu ally forty years) , this lower interest rate can be of substantial assistance in reducing the cost of housing. New York pioneered this assistance with its highly successful "MitchellLama" program. F ederally assisted moderate-income housing programs also aid the production of housing by reducing interest rates. The FHA section 221(d) (3) program, for example, provides fin ancing at a three percent interest rate. Nevertheless, at least five states have enacted their own belowmarket-interest-rate programs to supplement the federal programs. There are many good reasons for states to establish their own below-market-interest-rate housing programs. Com prehensive Program. A state agency may find it difficult to undertake a comprehensive Substantial reasons still remain, however, fo r program fo r encou raging the development of moderate-income housing without itself being states to make supplemental loans to developers able to assist in the mortgage fin ancing of this to enable them to qu alify fo r federal assistance housing. Without its own below-market-inte_r<:st- when they otherwise would not. The FHA and the Housing Assistance Adrate mortgage program, the important decIS1on (HAA) continually have under conministration of whether to fin ance a proposed housing projproposals for housing projeots which sideration ect would be made exclusively by th e Federal or fo und infeasible because have been slowed Housing A dministration. proposed costs exceed maximum fe~er_al ~ost Flexibility . M any FHA programs can only be limits. In many cases federal cost hm1tat1ons used to assist housing developers in communisimply may not adequately re~ect lo~al cost facties which have enacted . a "workable program might, for. extors. Costs per unit for a proiect for community improvement"- an overall plan ample, exceed the federal maximum by as little of action for meeting problems of slums and blight, and for guiding community development. as five to ten percent; yet, as the ~evelo? er This "workable program requirement" greatly spends perh aps months redesigning ~1s ?roiect restricts the use of important FHA programs in to bring unit costs in line ( often sacr~cmg demany states where such a program has not been sirable design features in the process)'. m~reases in construction costs during the redes1gnmg_ peadopted by a locality. A state program would not riod might well consume wh atever other savmgs be subj ect to this restriction. The FHA allows a maximum six percent book were managed. This tedious proce~s causes many units of badly needed housing to die on the draftreturn to limited-profit housing developers. To . il encourage greater participation, a state program ing boards. State assistance can remedy this and s1m ar may allow a greater maximum return , such as the cost problems. To reduce th~ t~tal fed_eral morteight percent return allowed under the New Jergage assistance amount to w1thm m~x1mu~ fedsey program. . eral cost limits, the state could provide an mterL essComplexAdministration. FHA processmg est-free loan to the developer of up to t~n percent of moderate-income housing proposals is comof his cost to supplement his FHA-msured fiplex and generally time-consuming. An adenancing. R epayment of the state loan would ~e quately staffed state program may be able to deferred until after the fed eral mortgage loan is simplify its rules and regulations and thus spee~ . processing time. And based on its own expe~I- ·paid off or refinanced. The state loan is secured by a state lien on the ence, it may be able to suggest .improvements m project. T he loan is subordinated t~ the FHAFHA regulations. insured mortgage. It becomes a first hen af~er the Experim entation. States may wish ~o i_nnovate with their own programs, such as Ilhno1s, M as/" . M sac/111setts and N ew Jersey also sachu setts and New Jersey are doing with "rent • To lower rents, II m o,s, b -:;-' programs to pay the di ffe rence ~~"~\ ~om_e family can afford to pay skewing." Through rent skewing, rents in a 143.215.248.55,~e:~a~;:etd : :~:,,,~~n! state-assisted pro1ects. and the ren s o n ' may wish to delay initiating rent supmajority of apartments are raised slightly_ to Other states, howe'r~[· they see how two new sections of the plem ent programs un 1 •• low larger reductions in the rents of a mm~nty · A ct are adnumstered. b 68 H 19Secti;:s143.215.248.55(b) allows f';deral rent supplem ent payments to e of apartments. R ent skewing allows a wider . . t made t_o st~~6't/if~r,~::;0 ;,~;t~;ew fe deral interest reduc tion pa?;range of tenants' income~ in a hous'.ng f roi ec Sect,onb de for state-assisted housing. These payments_ w1 I m ents to e ma b t ee n normal rents on a state-assuted th an would be possible without skewmg. ma~e up the dlfferenc{ ,:h;; ,. tenants can afford to pay ii they u- pro1ect and the re nta_ s ·ncome for rent . Tir e paym ent cannot ex- P rogram 4 Interest-Free Loans to Limited-Profit and Nonprofit Developers to Enab le Them to Fall Within Federal Cost Limitations on Low- and Moderate-Income Housing. Federal programs have almost excl u_sively assisted housing by reducing fin ancmg costs through mortgage lo ans, mortgage in_surance and interest subsidies. T he 1968 H ousmg Act ex~ pands these programs. Due to th e ex istence of substantial federal ass istance some states ~ ay not wish to engage in the same form of assistance. ( As desc ribed in P rogram 3 above.) pay 25 percent of 1•.e~ 'vo11ld lower the effective interest rate on ceed an am ount w uc , 'd I om the rentals to less than one perthe project mortgage pa, r cent. . . f state m ortgage loan and federal rent Th ese comb1'.1at1ons :eduction payments give pro mise of lwussupplem ent or mtere~t in state-assisted housing. Ing families of low m co;"e ver that in many cases the state Jt does not appear, ,owe t ~ e loan and the federal in terest below-mark et-interest-ra!lel m ar bg ·,g,e to reduce rents below the . . tance w, com , . d reduction ass1s I the m ortgage were FHA-msure at amount _they would be di ti e fe deral program , and not statemarke t-mterest rates un er 1 1 1 arket-in terest rates. . 11 assisted at b e O H- m 0 m ent m ay not exceed the T he federal interest"i:e!~~f'~teJ' t~ pay under the mortgage" amount a m ortgago~, Id b! obligated to pay if the m ortgage and the am o unt he ,!vo~t ti e rate of one percent. To the ex tent we re to bear inte~es! ~ ' federal assistance com es into play . this one percent l1111k1tat1? 1t1 orenst-rate m ortgage loan wo uld simply .1 re below-m ar e t-Ill e I t ,e ., a f d I b itli• by lowering th e am ount the mortgagor 'i,, reduce the e era ·"'., the absence of the state below-market"is obligated to pay. 1 the federal government would make interest-rate mortgage ,oa,b,, . of FHA -insured market interest higher payments on t ,e rate morgage. as,s 3 �financing of federally insured housing for lowand moderate-income families. This action was instrumental in clearing the backlog in Illinois in 221 (d)(3) housing. As of October 1968, $288 million were allocated to qualifying banks in proportion to ,their outstanding loans. Additional sums for time deposits have been made available where needed by banks to meet special public needs. Those varied needs have included programs other than housing. The Illinois plan involves no sacrifice to the state of earnings on its investments, or greater risks of loss. Where this state stimulus is not possible and construction financing is difficult to secure, states might make or participate in providing interim construction loans at below-market-interest rates to developers of low- and moderate-income housing. A state could borrow its loan money through the sale of tax-exempt bonds and establish a revolving loan fund. Since construction financing is short-term, such a revolving fund would have a rapid turnover. Thus, a limited amount of money could finance a large number of projects. No net cost ,to the state would be incurred, and a state could in fact earn a sum on its Joans sufficient to pay borrowing costs and the costs of administering the program. FHA-insured mortgage is paid off. (FHA has indicated approval of this type of state assistance since_ t~chnically it does not constitute currentl; proh1b1ted secondary financing.) The state loan is well secured. Even were the improvements on the property to be depreciated completely by the end of the FHA-insured mortgage period, the land would still remain to secure it. The small state loan brings high returns. If the state w~re, for example, to finance ten percent of the proJect cost With its supplemental loan, the state loan would call forth ten times its amount in private and federal investment. Program 5 Construction Loans to Limited-Profit and Nonprofit Developers of Low- and Moderate-Income Housing. The recent tight money situation and the general shortage of long-term mortgage financing in some areas have hampered the development of low- ~nd moderate-income hom;,ing. Despite a commitment on the permanent financing by the federal government and in some cases FHA insura~ce of the interim construction loan, conventional loans have often been unavailable to finance the construction of housing in the interim period before the permanent financing takes place. When interim construction financing is available for lo:V- and moderate-income housing, the ~eveloper is often required to pay high rates thus mcreasing housing costs. ' The shortage and high cost of short-term construction financing can thus be a substantial bottleneck to the production of large amounts of low- and moderate-income housing. State authority to invest millions of dollars of cash resources not immediately required for expenditure provides leverage to encourage banks to meet public objectives. In January 196 7, the sta:te of Illinois announced a Sta~e Investment Program to forge a new partnership between the public and private sectors-between public treasuries and private ba~s._ The_ program was implemented through adm1mstrat1ve action by the state treasurer. Under this program deposits of state funds are made in banks agreeing to make interim financing available for construction of low- and moderate-income housing. Working with FHA and several banks in the Chicago area, the state agreed to deposit, at competitive interest rates about $90 million in those banks which in tur~ were willing to invest equivalent sums for interim 4 Progra1n 6 Financial Assistance for Acquisition and Sale or L ease of Housing Sites for Low- and ModerateIncome Housing at Market Value or L ess Than Market Value. .. A state program of assistance for land acquisition can: (1) increase the incentive of limitedprofit developers to construct low- and moderate-income housing; or (2) help assemble large housing sites and, where justified, lower the cost of housing by writing down the cost of the land through its sale or lease to a nonprofit housing developer at less than fair market value. (1) Increasing the incentive of limited-profit developers to construct low- and moderate-income housing. Nonprofit housing sponsors alone cannot build or rehabilitate six million houses in the next five years. The private developer can produce a large share, either by building "turnkey" public housing (public housing developed by a private developer rather than the local public housing authority) or by operating as a limitedprofit sponsor developing low- and moderateincome housing. Since 1961, when FHA assistance for moderate-income housing began, 42 percent of its projects have been built by limitedprofit sponsors and 58 percent by nonprofit sponsors. As a limited-profit sponsor the private developer is allowed a regulated return before taxes on its equity investment in a housing project. In FHA programs this is usually six percent. With the benefit of early writeoffs and other favorable investment factors to which a developer is entitled under the law, he can substantially increase his after-tax return above this amount. Yet even with the favorable rate of return presently allowed under the law, only a small number of units of low-r,isk, moderate-income housing projects have aotually been built by limited-profit developers, principally at times when other construction business has been slow. To increase the incentive for a limited-profit developer to build low- and moderate-income housing, states could leverage the federal program by financially assisting communities to purchase land and to lease it to a developer at favorable terms without loss to the states or the municipalities. Land purchase and lease frees the developer from investing substantial capital in land, which cannot b_e depreciated, and substitutes an annual rent on the lease which is a deductible expense, thus increasing his after-tax return. Such land purchase and lease would also lower the cost of housing by enabling lower sales prices or rents. States may be able to obtain the money needed to help municipalities purchase and lease land by floating state-guaranteed, tax-exempt bonds which are repaid from rent receipts under the lease. The financing is analagous to state financing of industrial parks. (2) Assembling land and ·reducing the cost of low- and moderate-income lwusing . The increasingly high cost of suitable land in metropolitan areas is a major factor in boosting housing costs beyond the reach of low- and moderate-income families. The federal government does not provide financial assistance in writing down land costs for housing except in urban renewal area , which, for the most par·t, have been in the central city. Section 506 of the 1968 Housing Act, however, now allows federal assistance for "write downs" of open land in declared urban renewal areas for low- and moderate-income housing. But designating urban renewal areas and receiving federal funds is a long and cumbersome process, involving more than writing down land costs for housing projects. Additional state assistance to communities 5 �j assembling and developing land for low- and moderate-income housing outside of urban renewal areas would give substantial aid to the large-scale production of low- and moderateincome housing. By use of the community's eminent domain powers, large tracts of land could be assembled. With state aid a municipality could sell or lease the land at less than market value to nonprofit developers where the write down was to be reflected in lower rentals or sales prices. Program 7 Financial Assistance for Acquisition of Substandard Housing and Its Sale or Lease at Market Value or Less Than Market Value for Rehabilitation for Low- and Moderate-Income Housing. Systematic rehabilitation of housing in the core or "gray areas" of cities is an important part of the nation's housing program. The federal assistance needed to clear these areas for the development of new housing is greater than is likely to be made available in the foreseeable future. Even if the money were available, •the dislocation and disruption involved in clearance and reconstruction would weigh heavily against total reliance on c;learance as a renewal instrument. Of the six ml'llion standard houses that the Department of Housing and Urban Development sets as a production goal, two million ( one third) are intended to be rehabilitated structures. Housing rehabilitation could be increased greatly if the states were to help municipalities purchase substandard houses and resell or lease them to nonprofit developers which would rehabilitate them for sale or rental as low- and moderate-income housing. With state aid a municipality could sell or lease the substandard houses at less than market value where the write down was to be reflected in lower rentals or sales prices. In addition, a judicious use by a locality of its power of eminent domain would enable a systematic rehabilitation of all declining properties in a neighborhood or on a block, rather than the rehabilitation of only those houses which are on the market, as is now generally the case. This systematic rehabilitation has a greater effect in upgrading entire neighborhoods. Program 8 Reimbursement to Communities for Abatement of Normal Property Taxes on Public Housing or Moderate-Income Housing; Payments to Cover 6 Extra Public Service Costs Incurred by Localities on Account of This Housing. Under the federally assisted public housing program,communities are required to abate real estate taxes on the project. They receive a payment in lieu of taxes of approximately ten percent of the rentals of the project. This reduction of tax income to communities has proven to be an important barrier to the production of public housing. State payments to make up the difference between what the public housing pays in taxes and the normal tax bill would help communities to provide needed public housing. On the other hand, local property taxes often account for between twenty arid thirty percent of the rents paid by occupants of FHA-assisted moderate-income housing. These projects are usually taxed as though they were conventional apartments even though the rental income they produce is limited by FHA. State payments to communities to reimburse abatements of normal local property taxes on federally and stateassisted housing would be a potent device to lower rents. An additional barrier, even if full taxes are paid by or on behalf of low- and moderateincome housing projects, is the higher cost of public services for occupants of higher density housing, e.g., schools, playgrounds, social services. State payments to communities in excess of local taxes to meet these extra costs would provide an inducement to communities to accept low- and moderate-.income housing. This inducement would assist in locating low- and moderate-income families outside central cities, closer to places of expanding employment. Gearing these payments to an industrial development program would help relieve labor shortages which increasingly inhibit economic growth of outlying areas. Program 9 Administration of Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Assistance Programs. States administer housing assistance Programs one through eight in varied ways. A pattern of clustering programs designed to encourage the construction of low- and moderate-income housing-seed money loans and grants, technical ass istance, construction loans, tax abatementaround the core program of making belowmarket-interest-rate loans to developers has, however, emerged in several states . These programs are then either administered directly by the state with the below-market- interest-rate loans being made from a housing II. Increasing Housing Choice development fund . Or they are administered by a separate public benefit corporation, sometimes called a Housing Development Authority or Housing Finance Agency. State constitutions may well dictate this choice. The important factor in administering these programs is to assure that one responsible agency has the authority to combine them imaginatively. For example, a state seeking to increase the production of low- and moderate-income housing and homeownership by low- and moderateincome families, might administer each of the first eight assistance programs described. The state could make seed money loans or grants and give technical assistance to help establish sponsors. . It could help finance projects by makmg construction loans and permanent mortgages to developers. And it could make additional loans to lower the costs of projects which exceeded FHA maximum cost limitations. Where sponsors did not exist it could develop projects itself. It could assist. communities in purchasing and leasing housing sites or houses for rehabilitation. The sales or leases could either recover fully the state's costs or, if needed, could assist the project by recovering less, i.e. , by writing down the land. ·. f It could help to reimburse commumties or abated taxes where needed. And in addition to the first eight programs, the stat~ might be given some unearmarked de_monstration funds to devise new ways of meetmg its housing problems. For example, using demonstration money, the state might: -make equity loans to developers of ~ooperative housing to enable moderate-mcome families to purchase their houses on a cooperative basis with a minimal down payment and liberal financing of the balance Program 1 A Comprehensive Fair Housing Law Establish. over a period of years, or - establish a rent assistance program to fill m ing a Strong Enforcement Agency. gaps in federal programs whereby houses The landmark June 17, 1968, Supreme Court would be purchased or leased by ,~ e state decision, Jones vs. Mayer Company (20 L.Ed. and then leased or sublet to low-mcome 2nd 1189), interprets an 1866 Civil Rights law families at reduced rentals. (guaraillteeing to all citizens the right "to inherit, To fin~nce loan-type programs, such as seed purchase, loan, sell, hold, and convey real _an? money loans, construction loans, below-m~ketpersonal property") to prohibit ra~ial discnnninterest-rate loans, and purchase and leasmg of . land, the state would issue tax-exempt bon~s nation in the sale or rental of bousmg. The Jones decision, however, is not a substi(guaranteed by the state where the state constItute for a comprehensive fair housing law . .It tution permitted). Grant programs and other ~scovers only racial discrimination and not_ dissistance would be financed by state appropnacrimination on the grounds of religion or national tions. 7 �origin. It does not deal with discrimination in the provis,ion of services or facilities in connection with the sale or rental of a dwelling. It does not prohibit advertising or other representations that indicate discriminatory preferences. lit does not cover discrimination in financial arrangements or in the provision of brokerage sources. Nor does it provide for administrative assistance to aggrieved parties or enforcement. And although courts can fashion effective remedies to enforce the 1866 statute, ,the statute contains no provision expressly authorizing a federal court to issue injunctions or to order payment of damages. The 1968 Civil Rights Act, on the other hand, covers these specific acts of discrimination omitted in the ·1866 s,tatute and fashions administrative and legal remedies as well. The remedies, however, are not strong enough to provide adequate relief in many cases for those who suffer discrimination. The Secretary of HUD may investigate complaints. His powers, however, are limited to conference, concilia-tion and persuasion. He may not issue an enforceable administrative remedy. For enforceable relief under federal law, the aggrieved party must himself generally go to court. (The Attorney General may bring suit based on a pattern or practice of discrimination or a denial of rights to a group of persons that raises an issue of general public importance.) The 1968 Civil Rights Act, however, invites strong state action to gu arantee fair housing. Section 81 0 ( c) provides that wherever a state (or local) fair housing law provides rights and remedies at least substantially equivalent to rights and remedies in the 1968 Act, the federal government will defer to the state in its enforcement activities. Thus, in enacting a comprehensive state fair housing law and in establishing a strong state fair housing agency to secure the constitutional rights of raci al and other minority groups, states would be filling the gap in federa l legislation and taking advantage of the priority extended to state legislation by section 810 ( c ) of the 1968 Act. A strong and comprehensive state fair housing law should : -establish an enforcement agency with adequate staff and appropriations to enforce the law; -empower the enforcement agency to receive complaints fro m citizens, from appropriate state officials, and to initiate complaints on its own motion; - ban all discrimination on the grounds of 8 race, religion, or national origin in the sale or rental of all property, including: -refusal to sell or rent, -discrimination in the terms or conditions of a sale or rental, -use of advertisements or applications which express or imply any such discr-imination, -discrimination by real estate salesmen or brokers, or -discrimination by lending institutions; -empower the enforcement agency to use temporary injunctions on sale or rental during its investigation of a complaint; -empower the enforcement agency to conciliate, issue cease and desist orders, require appropriate affirmative acts to cure the discrimination ; -provide penalties for a failure to comply with the enforcement agency's orders; -subject the enforcement agency's orders to judicial review, and -empower the enforcement agency to carry on appropriate research and education programs to eliminate hous.ing discrimination. ment, state and federal grants. There is presently no regular source of funds for the support of housing information centers. States might make grants to help establish and operate such centers. Progran1 3 Priority Assistance to Developers Which Have Affirmative Plans to Locate, Promote and Manage Their Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Projects to Achieve Integrated Housing. Racial integration of housing projects or neighborhoods rarely occurs without deliberate measures by developers. Low- and moderate-income housing must be located in areas where housing for these families does not exist in great numbers. The housing must be affirmatively marketed with minority communities not accustomed to considering housing so located. Rental projects, if they are to become and remain integrated, must be managed with ,this objective always in mind. A state can encourage developers to locate, market and manage projects with the objective of achieving integration by giving priority on its state assistance (Programs one through eight) to developers with affirmative and practical integration plans. Program 2 Financial A ssistance to Nonprofit Metropolitan Area Housing Information Centers to Aid Families in Finding Decent Housing. In most communities the existing supply of decent housing for low- and moderate-income families is not limited to the central city ghetto or to its gray areas. It is often found in other p arts of the metropolitan area as well. The lack o f information on available rental and sale housing throughout the metropolitan area, however, is a substantial barrier to the movement of families out of declining neighborhoods of the central city. F amilies in the housing market need help in finding housing they can afford, convenient to their jobs, and located in good school districts. A nonprofit metropolitan area housing information center would list available housing, i nteres t low- and moderate-income families in moving to areas with which they are initially unfa miliar, escort them on inspection of houses, ed ucate the community to the need for providing more housing fo r low- and moderate-income families and undertake other associated activities. The Metropolitan Denver F air Housing Center, Inc. is the principal example of a housing information center providing these kinds of services. It is supported by private, local govern- \ ,I 9 �Ill. Improving Building Codes P rogram IV. Improving Relocation Assistance A Model Building Code Embodying Pe,jormance Standards for Permissive Adoption by Communities; A Building Codes Appeal Board; A ids for Building Inspection. Program In most states, communities enforce differing and generally outdated building codes. This profusion of outdated codes has tended to raise building costs by perpetuating the outmoded and uneconomic use of building materials and building techniques and by restrieting the natural play of economies of scale in the construction industry. Higher building costs, in turn, unnecessarily restrict the availability of decent housing for low- and moderate-income families. States might assist communities to improve their building codes and building codes enforcement. Specifically they might: - authorize the development of a state model building code utilizing to the greatest extent possible performance standards for permissive adoption by communities. (To maintain uniformity the state should specify that the code would be automatically amended when state amendments were adopted, and that communities might only alter the model code upon specific approval of the administering agency) ; - establish an appeals board to hear appeals from decisions on the administration by communities of the state model code or other codes adopted by communities; - require that state and local government agencies utilize the state model code for public construction; - require that the state model code be used for federal or state-assisted nonpublic construction ; -establish professional qualifications for building inspectors, train and license them; - establish minimum staffing requirements for community building inspection departments; --offer building inspection services to communities which do not wish to maintain their own building inspection departments . 10 A Uniform R elocation Program to Assist Communities to Pay R elocation Expenses and to Provide R elocation Services to Families and Businesses Displaced by State or Local Government Action. Communities cannot be rebuilt for public objectives without uprooting families and businesses. The public has the obligation to compensate these dislocated families and businesses for the costs of dislocation, and to see that they are relocated in suitable accommodations. Unfortunately, famil ies displaced by public action are often those with the least freedom in the housing market- the poor, minorities, large families and elderly. Special government efforts therefore must be made to relocate these families successfully. States might establish a uniform relocation program for families and businesses displaced by state and local government programs. It would give financial assistance to communities in making relocation payments and providing relocation services where federal assistance is unavailable. To reduce inequities in the treatment between families displaced by federally assisted activities and families displaced by state or local activities, to the extent possible there should be uniformity in the relocation assistance offered to fa milies or businesses displaced by any public action- federal, state or local. Federal urban renewal relocation assistance includes : - relocation payments to families and individuals which may not exceed $200 for moving costs and property loss; -relocation adjustment payments totaling up to $1000 over a two-year period to fa milies and elderly individuals to assist them to relocate in standard accommodations; -an additional payment to owner-occupants of residential property acquired for an urban renewal project ( in lieu of a relocation adjustment payment) to enable them to purchase a replacement dwelling within one year. (This payment would be that amount not in excess of $5,000, which, ' when added to the acquisition price paid for the owner-occupant's borne, equals the average price for an adequate replacement home in the community, and - relocation payments for moving expenses and re.imbursement to business concerns or nonprofit organizations for property loss, up to $3,000, incurred in their move. (If no property loss is claimed, reimbursement for moving expenses can be made up to a maximum of $25 ,000.) Such payments are covered in full by a federal relocation grant made to the appropriate local agency. If the moving expenses of a business concern exceed $25,000, the locality may elect to reimburse the excess costs through a local cash payment which will be shared by the federal government through a relocation grant in the same percentage as other urban renewal project costs. State-assisted relocation agencies should be required to: -establish a single central relocation agency to offer services to all families needing relocation in a metropolitan area ; - formulate a single reloc-ation plan covering all foreseeable relocations by all government programs; - see that displaced families are relocated in . standard housing that is decent, safe and sanitary ; - relocate families to the greatest possible extent practicable outside of declining areas of the community; -provide for temporary relocation of displaced fa milies in decent housing where permanent housing is not immediately available; -pay the expenses of moving the displaced family or business and fix payments to cover other expenses, and - provide social services to relocated families with such needs. 11 �V. Equalizing Landlord-Tenant Relations The law governing the relationships between landlord and tenant in the Anglo-American system has not changed substantially since feudal times. Historically the law viewed a lease, not as a contract recording mutual obligations, but as a conveyance of an interest in land subject to conditions. Consequently, the law as formulated by the courts does not adequately, with some recent notable exceptions, reflect the new aspiratiions and economic realities of an urbanized society. An updating of these archaic laws" not only will tend to reduce tensions in our cities by responding to the just claims of tenants, but may instill greater respect for law -in general and provide greater incentives for the maintenance of property by ,those who occupy and own it. At the same time, responding to the valid claims of tenants while ignoring the legitimate interests of those who own and finance housing would not be productive. Landlord-tenant relations have attracted legislative attention recently in Illinois and Michigan. The Illinois Legislative Commission on Low-Income Housing, in a 1967 report entitled "For Better Housing in Illinois,"examined many of the inadequacies in the laws governing landlord-tenant relationships and the enforcement of housing codes in that state. Revisions of these laws were recommended in ways which may be applicable to other states. Five laws that significantly equalize the rights of tenants have recently been enacted in Michigan. These laws and similar provisions in other states are the basis for the following guidelines. Program 1 Permit a Tenant to Institute a Housing Code Enforcement Proceeding, to Obtain Specific R elief for Inadequately Maintained Premises, and to Withhold R ent to Secure Code Compliance. Anti-trust laws, securities laws and other modern regulatory measures have commonly provided for private as well as public enforcement. By contrast, although the tenant is a critically interested party, the enforcement of housing codes has been heretofore generally a two-party affair between the public enforcement agency and the landlord. Tenants have not been allowed to initiate or control enforcement proceedings. Yet their critical concern is justified in view of the fact that in many instances the proceedings can lead to the abandonment of the building, the eviction of the tenants, or a major increase in rent; and the failure to take action would result in the continuance of substandard and often intolerable conditions. 12 The Michigan law makes housing code enforcement a civil rather tha'Il a criminal matter, allowing a tenant to begin court action. The law also creates a variety of court actions that may be taken against landlords, including injunctions or orders permitting the tenant, a receiver or the city to make necessary repairs. The repairs can be paid for out of rents withheld in an escrow fund or by a lien on the property when the landlord is at fault, or by an assessment against the tenant when he is at fault. In Connecticut, state law authorizes municipalities ,to create repair receivershipt with the state advancing the cost of the repairs until rent receipts replenish the fund. These rent receivership or rent withholding measures are also a housing code enforcement technique. The state of New York, because of its dense patterns of urbanization, as long ago as 1930 allowed New York City residents to pay rent into court rather than to the landlord when a certified code violation exists. The court retains the rent, and evictions are stayed, until ,t he violation is corrected. To stimulate prompt remedial action by the landlord, the law was amended in 1965 to permit the tenant to arrange for heat, electricity, janitorial service or make repairs and apply to the court to have bills paid out of the rent on deposit. Another method of rent withholding, applicable to New York City tenants, permits onethird of the tenants in an apartment to bring action against landlords when conditions in the building are dangerous to "life, health or safety. " The court may appoint an administrator to collect rents and use them to remedy defects. Rhode Island, Pennsylvania (limited to Pittsburgh, Philadelphia and Scranton) , M assachusetts and M aryland (limited to Baltimore) have recently enacted similar measures. In a rela,ted problem area, some states (Illinois, New York and Michigan among them) have enacted legislation suspending the legal duty of a welfare recipient to pay, and the right of a landlord t? collect rent for housing in violation of applicable housing codes. Program 2 begin eviction proceedings without giving any reason. A few courts, however, have begun to rule that retaliatory evictions violate the tenant's constitutional right to petition for redress of grievances. The Michigan law enables a tenant to resist an eviction by contending that it is in retaliation for exercising lawful rights, such as complaining to public code enforcement authorities. In addition, the new law reverses the general common law rule that the breach by the landlord even of an explicit promise to make repairs does not excuse the tenant from payment of rent. Thus the tenant may withhold his rent until the landlord makes the repairs he has promised. Program 3 R equire that Every Lease Pledge that Premises Are Fit to Live in When the Tenant Moves in and that the Landlord Will Keep Them in Good R epair. The common law provides a tenant with little assurance that his dwelling will be comfortable or even habitable. No duty to repair is imposed on the landlord and he is under no duty, in the absence of express agreement to the contrary, to maintain or repair the premises. This rule is so firmly entrenched it is widely felt that specific legislation is required to override it. In o rder to correct some of the injustices of the basic rule, courts long ago adopted the fiction of a constructive eviction-which permitted the tenant to move out without payment of further rent if he lost the beneficial use and enjoyment of the premises through lack of beat -or light or some similar gross defect. The right to leave, however, is an empty one for the slum dweller. The Michigan statute, accordingly, specifically places upon the landlord the duty of repair during the term of the lease, and the duty to comply with applicable health and safety laws, except when the disrepair or violation has been caused by the tenant. Presumably, the courts will construe this to give the tenant the right to sue for damages, consisting of the difference in the rental value of the premises as they are and their value if in the condition warranted by the landlord. Prohibit "R etaliatory Evictions." The term "retaliatory eviction" refers to an eviction undertaken in retaliation for the tenant's complaint to municipal authorities of violations of housing and health regulations: W~ere landlords have resorted to this practice it has not been challenged. This may result from the law prevailing in most states, where a landlord may Program 4 R equire Local Housing Authorities to Give R easons for Evicting T enants and Establish. a "Board of Tenants Affairs" for Public Housing. Local housing authorities are instruments for local, state and federal housing policies. Such 13 �authorities are created by the state, subsidized by the federal government, and their members are appointed by the cities. Unlike the private landlord, the local housing authority is not motivated by profit. The admission and eviction of tenants is the source of most controversy in public housing practices. Because of the silence of most state enabling statutes and the special concern of the federal government with financial aspects of subsidized housing authority operations, the local authority typically sets its own admission and eviction policies. These standards may not be published, or if published may not be clear; they often relate to the "social desirability" of prospective or existing tenants as determined by the management. Nevertheless, tenants seeking to resist their eviction from public housing projects have found the courts frequently an alogizing public landlords with private landlords, or using other rationales to avoid reviewing the merits of such cases. Although there have been exceptions to this rule, the results of most cases leave local housing authorities with power legally to evict, or refuse admission to anyone, without cause. Corrective regulations aimed at " upgrading . . . outmoded management policies" addressed to procedural problems have been issued by HUD. Section 3.5 of the HUD Low-Rent Management Manual ("Procedures Prescribed for the Operation of Federally Aided Low-Rent H ousing" ) requires a local authority to adopt and publicize its admission policies, but does not prescribe policies beyond those imposed by law relative to income, age, disability, race, etc. Section 3.9 prohibits evictions witho ut giving the tenant notice of reasons and affording him "an opportunity to make such reply or explanation as he may wish." Although these rules are intended as mandatory by federal officials, it is not clear that local authorities view them in the same light. In the absence of an adequate supply of decent low-income housing, the refusal to confer, or the withdrawal of the benefits, of a dwelling in public housing constitutes substantial injury to a potential or existing tenant. It is within the pu rview of the state to prescribe the manner in which housing authorities deal with applicants and tenants. The ingredients of a policy reflecting commonly accepted standards of fairness might be: - applicants for admission to public housing should be apprised with in a specified period of a determination of ineligibility and given a right to appeal to a body other than the management; - the reasons for an unfavorable decision 14 should be clearly and concisely stated in relation to precise standards of admission; - leases should be written in simple language and effective on a self-renewing basis terminable (for a cause other than exceeding income limitations or nonpayment of rent) only for conduct injurious to other tenants or substantially injurious to the project; - evictions should be permitted only for good cause with the opportunity for a fair hearing; and - rights of privacy of tenants should be respected and harassment in the form . of fines , charges for repairs, threats of eviction, etc. , prohibited. The Michigan law adopts many of these principles. Another essential ingredient of a soundly administered public housing program is an increased effort to involve tenants in the management of projects. This may be done through the creation of representative tenant organizations or the representation of tenants on the local housing authority board. The Michigan law creates for public housing in the City of Detroit a " board of tenants affairs ," one-half of which is composed of elected tenant members and one-half by appointees of the mayor. The board may veto rules and regulations of the authority and acts as a binding board of review on decisions of project management or the authority with respect to matters such as denial of admission to or eviction from public housing and rent increases. A similar Rhode Island measure creates a board of tena~ts affairs for each city in the state with a public housing project. One-half the board is elected from among tenants occupying housing proj ects, the others to be appointed by th e mayor from residents of neighborhoods in which the projects are located. Thi s board advises the housing authority on tenant welfare, may veto authority rules on admission, occupa ncy, and eviction policies, and sits as a board of review for individual compl aints on these matters. VI. Enhancing Community Development Housing without stable neighborhoods served_by adequate community facilities will not provide long-term values to our cities and their people. States can take important steps to enhance the environment which supports new and rehabilitated housing. Just as an expanded supply of well-designed housing requires the stimulation of private initiative and assistance to local units of government, balanced community d~velopment cannot take place without a contmuous partnership between government on all levels and private groups. Program 1 Pro vide a Substantial Portion of the R equired Non-Federal Share of Federally A ided Community Development Programs and a Substa~tial Portion of the Cost of Non-Federally Assisted Projects. The federal programs to aid local comm~nity development require contributions to project cost from non-federal sources. These are often in the form of cash but usually in the form of non-cash items ·such as staff services, parks, schools or other facilities related to the project. Increasingly, the ability of many localities t_o utilize these programs is dependent upon their ability to finance the non-federal share of a . project. Connecticut has recently implemented comprehensive community development legislation which, among other programs, extends state financial assistance to localities in the form of contributions to the non-federal sh are of _fe~erally assisted projects. In some instances this kmd of help has spelled the difference between federal funding and no local program at all. Connecticut, for example, fund s one-half of the local share of fed erally assisted urban renewal projects, demolition of unsafe or uninhabitable buildings, construction of neighborhood facilities, and open-space land acquisition. The state contribution to the non-federal share of urban renewal projects actually began in 1955 and has contributed materially to the flow of federal urban renewal fu nds to cities in that state ever since. A Connecticut city need supply only one-sixth instead of one-third of net project cost. As a result, one dollar of city funds (supplemented by one state dollar) generates four federal dollars instead of only two. The form of state assistance was inaugurated in Pennsylvania as early as 1949, the year the federally assisted urban renewal program was enacted. Neighborhood facilities, in particular, embrace a wide range of horizon-expanding centers 15 �for persons of low- and moderate-income. These centers house health, recreational, social service, civic, educational, cultural and youth activities that can give residents a sense of identity, community pride and participation. In Connecticut, the state pays half the non-federal share of the cost of building these modern-day settlement houses, and there have been proposals to extend state aid to non-federally aided neighborhood facilities. In Connecticut, a special state program also assists the development of child day-care centers for disadvantaged children by funding two-thirds of the operating cost to the locality ( or an antipoverty agency) . The state normally relies on the application approval by the federal authorities in allocating its own contribution to the locality, thus avoiding unnecessary paperwork by municipal officials. In New Jersey, the state, in addition to providing one-half of the local share, allows a flexible formul a (up to 100 percent) for contributions to the local cost of federally assisted urban renewal projects to the extent they are devoted to public uses. As a prerequisite to aid for community development programs, Connecticut requires localities to prepare a Community Development Action Plan (CDAP). The CDAP is a community's survey and estimate of its problems and the physical, economic and human resources for dealing with them. T he state provides three-fourths of the cost of preparing the CDAP ; some of these costs to the state, with respect to CDAPs for communities under 50,000 are in ,t urn funded by HUD. It is vital, however, for a state to assure that these planning requirements do not become a substitute for or an inhibitor of program actions. The Connecticut Community Development Act, moreover, permits state aid to many projects that do not receive federal funding. In such cases the state provides two-thirds of the cost of the project. A state which participates in the funding of federally assisted projects should retain this flexibility. Some deserving applications will not receive federal funding fo r a variety of reasons. The state may wish ,to help localities that have sought federal fund ing but have not been able to obtain it for reasons unconnected with the merits of the project. Pennsylvania, for example, has launched an ambitious open-space land acquisition program financed by proceeds of a $500,000,000 bond issue. This pays for one-half of project cost to the locality. Although Connecticut only makes grants for specific programs set forth in its statute, states 16 might consider making a portion of their grant money available in block grants to cities for programs which do not fall within established categories of federal or state assistance. This will encourage ·1ocal initiative and will help meet individual locality needs. Program 2 An Urban Development Corporation with StateWide Authority to Combine State and Private R esources for the Improvement of Meiropolitan Areas. There are many factors inhibiting private, profitmotivated entrepreneurial participation in city renewal efforts on the scale demanded by current needs. Profit-motivat¼d entrepreneurs are used to assuming normal business risks. They are less accustomed to the political and public relations risks associated with publicly assisted programs. And they are disinclined to shoulder the additional commitment of personal and fin ancial resources occasioned by protracted negotiation and processing which often lengthens the development period. One way to bridge the gap between public control over land use and private entrepreneurial initiative has been indicated in New York. The state has recently created the New York State Urban Development Corporation (SUDS) . SUDS is empowered to draw upon the combined talents and resources of the state and private business to work with local governments to produce development and redevelopment projects throughout the state. These projects are intended to include balanced combinations of housing, light industri al, commerci al, recreational and cultural developments. As requested by agencies of the state or by cities, the corporation is to consider implementing projects within ex isting state and city programs. The corporation board of an urban development corporation similar to SUDS could be onehalf comprised of public officials and one-half chosen from the private sector. Initially, the corporation could be funded by the state through the issuance of tax-exempt revenue bonds. Conceivably, the corporation would eventu ally genera te sufficient earnings to cover operating expenses with o nly investment capital furni shed by the state in the form of loans at a rnte approximating that of the state's cost of borrowing. The corporation would plan projects and assemble the land, through eminent domain if necessary. In New York, SUDS has ultimate authority to override local building and zoning regulations. Although SUDS has extensive statu- tory authority in these respects, it is likely that it will oper-ate most effectively and perhaps exclusively in communities where local governmental and planning bodies are cooperating with the corporation. Rather than tie up its capital in the actu al development of a project, the corporation could encourage private developers to undertake this work. The corporation could also act as a developer itself where necessary. In such instances, after the project was completed, with long-term financing in effect and the project fully rented or functioning according to plan, the corporation would undertake to sell the project to a private investor or investors. The proceeds of the sale would be applied to the retirement of state loans to the corporation. Pursuant to conditions to be defined, some portion of the proceeds could be retained by the corporation. In some instances, the corporation might find it necessary to take back a lease in order to relieve the investor of the operating or supervisory burdens of ownership. Conceivably the corporation might eventu ally cause various real estate investment trusts to be organized. Projects would be sold to the trust with a lease-back by the corporation. If feas ible, this could be a method of mobilizing and channeling substanti al amounts of priva te capital into investments to which it would ordin arily not be attracted. Direct investment in real estate and development requires experience, sophistication, and fixed amounts of equity money, with the ·a dditional diffic ulty, especially in the case of residential real ~state, of responsibilities to tenants, legal, public relations and political hazards. However, purchasers of the real estate investment trust certificates could enj oy the benefits of real estate ownership and be substantially free of its hazards. Progra1n 3 Loan Guarantees to Owners of R esidential Property and Small Businesses. Private initiatives are necessary to reh abilitate the economic life and physical fac il ities of blighted communities. But often th ese are not forthcom ing unless th e addition al risk of inve tment in deteriorated areas is reduced. When needed capital, or bonding capacity, is not otherwise a~a ilable, states might provide an urban development guarantee fund to guarantee loans made by conventional lenders to owners of resi dential property and small businesses. A loan to an owner of residential property would have to be intended to provide housing for persons and families who could not obtain safe and sanitary accommodations provided by the unaided operations of private enterprise. A business would qualify for a guaranteed loan if it were unable to obtain adequate financing to maintain a stabilized work force or increase job opportunities by virtue of (a) its location ; (b ) its net assets ; or ( c) its doll ar volume. The New York Urban Development Guarantee Fund loans are to be used for the purposes of construction rehabilitation, or refinancing of properties a~d, in the case of small business pr_ojects, for equipment, stock in trade or wor~mg capital. The monies of the fund are den ved through the sale of debentures and from gifts. The fund is empowered to invest funds held by it and to charge a premium for its guarantees. In the event of default, the fund would pay to the lender the net amount of the loss. Program 4 Technical and Financial Assistance to Communities to Draft Proposals for Federal Program Grants. The increasing complexity of application requirements fo r some federal yrograms, eve~ those whose ultimate objective 1s frankly expen1:1-ental, has outrun the staff resources of many small er communities. The federal "Model Cities" progra m, for example, is intended to demonst rate how th~ ~nvironment and general welfa re of people hvmg in slu m and blighted neigh borhoods ca n be substanti ally improved through the orchestrati~n of federal, state and local governmental and pnvate efforts. Cities must submit proposals fo r planni ng grants. T hese proposals are to analyze the social, economic and physical problem~ of the model neighborhood area, what the city proposes to do about t~em, ~n? the strategy and adm inistrative machmery 1t mtends to employ. Under the program, cities with approved planning grants will become eligible fo r s~e~ial grants supplementing assistance under_ ex1stmg federal 1rrant-in-aid programs. T he reqwred nonfederal 0 contribution to every federally as isted project or activity carried ou t as part of an approved model cities program serves as the " base" fo r computing the special supplemental grant. The special grant may be up to 80 percent of the total non-federal contri bution. The development of a model cities or urban renewal proposal places a demand on the financial and techn ical capabilities of many localities. To help them obtain the e grants, the state might: 17 �--l I ( a) assist in drafting proposals for federal grants for communities which request technical assistance, and (b) make grants to enable those communities which wish to draft their own proposals to hire competent staff and consultants for this purpose. The stategic injection of assistance in this manner can help to enhance the flow of federal dollars to communities within the state. The purpose of this kind of assistance, however, should be the development of local competence to handle these administrative tasks in the future. It can be applied to a variety of federal grant-inaid programs. The New Jersey Department of Community Affairs has been particularly active in helping communities with Model Cities applications to HUD. Pennsylvania, through its Department of Community Affairs, provides similar help with applications for federal assistance for a broad range of programs. HUD is authorized to make grants to states to provide technical assistance to communities under 100,000 in population. A state program as described here, organized as a special technical assistance effort, might be eligible to receive a 50 percent grant from HUD to cover its cos ts. Program 5 Eliminate Constitutional Prohibitions, if Any, on the Involvement of Private Enterprise in Urban Affairs. A concerted attack on the problems of urban housing and community development requires a public-private partnership. New legal and financial tools and interrelationships must be devised to permit states, local units of government and private groups to marshal their resources in ways not foreseen years ago. Some state constitutions, however, specifically prohibit the use of the state's credit for private undertakings or contain provisions which have been interpreted as precluding tax abatement and other desirable public-private cooperative arrangements. The Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental R elations, a permanent, bi-partisan body esta blished by Congress to study relationships among local, state and national levels of government, has recommended the following constitutional language to facilitate general cooperative efforts between state and local public agencies and private enterprise : Notwithstanding any other provision of this constitution, the state, its political sub18 divisions, and any public corporation may, as provided by law, where a public purpose will be served, grant or lend its funds to any individual, association, or private corporation for purposes of participating or assisting in economic and community development. These basic constitutional changes are important. It is nonetheless vital to recognize, for example, that a program of state aid to localities for urban renewal under existing constitutional provisions can go far ,to bring about a constructive public-private partnership. Program 6 A Commission to Review and Assess Uodern Techniques of Zoning and Land Use Regulation and to Recommend Legislation to Modernize the State's Zoning Enabling Act. The period of rapid urbanization since the war has proven the inadequacy of present zoning statutes to control urban sprawl. The American Law Institute is presently drafting a Model Land Development Code to overhaul antiquated state zoning enabling statutes and provide much needed new tools to communities for shaping urban development. States should authorize the establishment of a commission to review and assess modern techniques of zoning and land use regulation and to recommend legislation for modernizing the state's zoning enabling act. A legislative committee of this nature is now at work in Connecticut having the benefit of a report on th at state's plan~ ning legislation . It is drafting specific measures that may have applicability in other jurisdictions. The prime objective of such a review would be to introduce greater flexibility into typically rigid requirements which inhibit imaginative and progressive land use for community development, and to eliminate the use of zoning powers to undergird economic segregation in residential development. Program 7 Excellence in the Design of Structures In volving the Use of State Funds or Credit and the Preservation of Public Building,r and Areas of Historical or Architectural Significance. Stimulation of massive increases in needed housing and community facilities will not achieve durable improvements in urban life unless conscious and unremitting attention is paid to the quality of the structures and public spaces and their sensitivity to the needs of people. Design quality is not a matter of style or pa- tina or the application of cosmetic effects. It goes, rather, to the heart of the process by which space is shaped. Delay, inadequate fee arrangements, resistance to innovation, imprudent concern with short-run savings at the expense of long-run viability-any of these will drive superior talent away from design responsibilities in subsidized projects. Great architecture, it has wisely been said, requires great clients. The state, in its manifold direct and indirect role as a potentially "great client," should impress all those who deal with it or serve it as functionaries with ,t he understanding that excellence in the end product is a keystone of .the state's housing and community development policies. The creation of a State Council on Architecture is one means of implementing these objectives. Such a Council has been created in New York to: -encourage excellence in design of all buildings constructed by the state or under supervision or with assistance of any state agency; -stimulate interest in architectural excellence in public and private construction throughout the state; -accept gifts to further its objectives; -obtain from other agencies of the state necessary cooperation and assistance; -make grants to municipalities to rehabilitate structures of historical or architectural significance for public purposes. Whether a council or some other instrument is created is secondary to assuring that what is designed, who is involved in the process, and how the process works is sensitive to user needs and community values as well as the normal economic structures. Even in purely economic terms , costs of managing, maintaining ( and protecting) a structure may be sharply reduced by appropriate design in the first instance. The responsibility for analyzing and changing the manner in which public funds are employed in designing community facilities from capital budgeting to maintaining the end result-must be centralized and highlighted. VII. Developing New Communities Program New Community Development Corporations with Eminent Domain Powers; Deferral of Property Taxes during Development Period; State Approval of New Community Development Plans in Lieu of Other Land Use R egulation. States can participate directly in solving urban problems by encouraging the development of new comunities on raw land outside of existing urban concentrations. New communities offer opportunities both for alleviating the problem of overcrowding in the central city and for overcoming the ugly patchwork sprawl on urban fringes . By providing a wide range of housing at varying prices, including low-income housing, new communities give promise of economically and socially integrated cities. Through comprehensive planning, new comi;nunities can provide for orderly urban growth using the most desirable locations, timing their development to correspond with area-wide or regional development plans or objectives. Internally, new communities can use land more efficiently, thereby cutting costs and providing better public services. They can br~ak away from conventional thinking, devel?p~ng new arrangements in such fields as bu~dmg codes, land use controls, zoning regulations, public services and governmental structures: . New communities offer unique opportumttes to enlist the talents and energies of the private sector in the inevitable expansion in the nation's metropolitan areas. They offer 'large-scale investment opportunities and new markets. Moreover, they offer a dramatic chall~~ge to ~e private sector to demonstrate its a~1hty to ~mld new urban environments in a settmg relatively free of the many constraints which hamper private initiative in existing cities. A first step in undertaking a state new community program could be to inventory land now owned by the state which may be deemed surplus to its needs. It may be found , fo r example, in many states that thousands of acres were purchased in the last century for penal or mental 19 �institutions and hospitals in then rural areas which are no longer required in the light of mod~ em medical or penal practice. Such land could be retained by the state, but leased to new community developmeat corporations. To help fin ance approved new communities Title X of the H ousing and Urban Developmen~ Act of 1965 provides FHA insurance of mortgages fin ancing land and improvements for new communities. T itle IV of the Housing and Urban D evelopment Act of 1968 provides a federal guarantee of debt obligations of private new community developers. These provisions should ease the financing difficulties of new community developers. S~ates, however, can remove three other major barners and thus stimulate the development of new communities within their borders. F irst, they might charter new community development corporations which would be authorized to use the power of eminent domain to assemble _large tracts of land necessary for the construction of new communities. S_econd, they might defer local property taxes dunng the development period of the new communjty by temporarily reim bursing developers for local property taxes paid, as an interest-free loan to be repaid when the property is sold, but not la~er than the end of a stated deferral period. Third, they might provide for state approval of new community development plans wpich would supersede local land use regulation that would otherwise apply to new com munity tracts. In many areas where new communities would be located, largely rural local government is unable t~ respond effectively to the needs of new commumty developers. Direct state action is ~eede~ to speed development or, indeed, to make it ~oss1ble. State authority would then be relinq~1shed to the government of the new commumty, once it was established. A state land should not be leased eminent domain powers granted , the deferral of local property .taxes made, nor state approval of new commumty development plans given unless a state finds that: - the development of a new community will make a substantial contribution to the economic and social development of the area in which it is situated ; - the site ~elected fo r the new community is sound with regard to projected population trends, the availability of land required , the absence of undesirable topographical or geological features, and the availability of transportation; - the proposed new community will have a 20 sound economic b ase and sound land-use patterns; -adequate provision has been made for local self-government; - adequate provision has been made for all necessary public utilities and facilities including those n eeded for education, he;lth, transportation, open sp ace, sites for industrial and residential uses, a central business center, and cultural and recreational facilities, and - adequate housing is available to meet the needs of families of a wide variety of income levels, including a substantial number of families of low- and moderateincome levels. VIII. Centralizing Administration of Housing and Community Development Programs Program A Cabinet L evel Department of Housing and Community Affairs R esponsible to the Governor, with R esponsibility for Administering a Broad Range of Community A id Programs. A state's ability to help communities tackle the tough urban problems of poor housing and inadequ ate community facilities could be greatly increased if responsibility for aid to urban communities were centralized in a single dep artment, agency or individual. Yet, today only a score of states have centralized a uthority for housing and community affair s programs. A centralized agency for community affairs , With adequate authority to administer a broad range of community aid programs like those described above, should be able to: - help communities attract private capital investment a nd business skills in ,solving community p roblems; - help communities attract and effectively utilize greater amounts of federal assistance; - help communities attract the financial assistance of private foundations ; - fill the gaps among existing federallyassisted community programs; - help local governments improve their planning and management of community programs, so that they can better assess community needs and decide the kinds of federal and st ate assistance that are required ; - help communities develop new approaches to commun ity problems through smallscale pilot programs which, if successful, could be widely repeated; -marshal state resources for more effective assistance to communities; - provide needed technical assistance to public and private groups, and - be a clearinghouse fo r information on a ssistance available to communities and a coordinator among communities, between state and communities, and between the federal government and communities. The form a centralized state authority for community affairs will take must fit into the administrative pattern of the state. At least three variations of centralized authority have been adopted : - a department of housing and community affairs with broad statutory authority ( e.g., Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island ) ; - a housing and community affairs administrator with narrower statutory authority (e.g., Alaska, Illinois, Vermont); - a special assistant to the Governor for housing and community affairs without statutory authority (e.g., Kentucky, Kansas, and North Carolina). . A department of housing and community affa irs responsible to the Governor and armed with a full range of community assistance programs is, generally speaking, the best administrative arrangement. It dramatically demonstrates the state's commitment to assist its communities on a continuing basis; it allows the Governor to assert executive leadership, and it may make possible a marshalling of state resources in other programs toward solving community problems. A principal task of the department would be to see that state assistance progra ms are more directly aimed at aiding communities to solve u rban problems. At the same time, the department as its principal task must direct its energies to helping communities to help themselves. This requires an able staff familiar with both local needs and the federal and state resources available to meet them. It also requires sufficient funding to create incentives to attract community support and capable personnel convinced of their value to the localities they are assisting. A special program of federal matching grants has been authorized to assist states in providing special training for professional, sub-professional and technical persons to be employed in housing and community development. Many states have already filed plans spelling out specific proposals, but these await federal funding, which is now anticipated. This program m ay thus provide the key resource for departmental staff development. 21 �References New Jersey : Other: I. Increasing the Supply of Low- and ModerateIncome Housing Program 1: Seed money loans, technical assistance and grants. Connecticut: Illinois: Michigan: New Jersey : New York : Other: 8 Connecticut General Statutes Annotated, secs. 218, 220 (P.A. 522, laws of 1967, sec. 20-21 ) . Chapter 67 1/2 Smith-Hurd Illinois Annotated Statutes, secs. 308-309. 12 Michigan Statutes Annotated secs. 16: 114 et seq. ' 52 New Jersey Statutes Annotated secs. 27D-59 et seq. (P.L. 1967 c'. 82). 41 McKinney's Consolidated Laws article 11. ' Urban America, Inc., Proposed Kentucky Housing D evelopment Fund; Proposed W est Virginia H ousing D evelopment Fund. Contact: James Twomey, Director Nonprofit Housing Center Ur ban America, Inc. I7i7 M assachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 202/265-2224 Program 2: State-developed housing. Alaska: Alaska Statutes, secs. 18.55.010 et seq. Hawaii : 8 Revised Laws of Hawaii, 1955, secs. 74-1 et seq. Vermont: Acts of 1961 , no. 21 2 ( as amended by H.B. 447, laws of 1968) . Program 3: Below-m arket-interest-rate mortgage loans. Illinois: 67 I /2 Smith-Hu rd Illinois Annotated Statutes, secs. 310 et seq. M assachusetts : 2A Massachusetts General Laws Annotated, Chapter 23 A. 12 M ichigan Statutes Annotated, Michigan : secs. 16.114 et seq. New Jersey: 55 N ew Jersey Statutes Annotated, sec. 141-5 (P.L. 1957 c. 8 1); 52 New Jersey Statutes Annotated, sec. 27D -66 (P.L. 1967 c. 82). New York : 41 McKinney's Consolidated Laws, article 2. Program 4: Interest-free loans to developers. New Jersey : Senate Bill 859, introduced June 13, 1968. Program 5: Construction loans. Illinois: 67 1/2 Smith-Hurd Illinois Annotated Statutes, sec. 3 IO. Massachusetts: 2A Massachusetts General Laws Annotated, Chapter 23A. RI 144 New Jersey Statutes Annotated, sec. 141-5 (P.L. 1967 c. 81). Urban America (see Program above). Program 6: Land acquisition and write-down. Connecticut : 8 Connecticut General Statutes Annotated, sec. 214 (P.A. 522, laws of 1967, secs. 16, 17). Program 7: Rehabilitation housing write-down. New Jersey: acquisition and Senate Bill 859, introduced June 13, 1968. Program 8: Property tax abatement. Connecticut: Michigan: New Jersey: New York : 8 Conn~cticut General Statutes Annotated, secs. 215, 216 (P.A. 522, Jaws of 1967, secs. 18-19) . P.A. 1968, No. 334. 52 New Jersey Statutes Annotated, sec. 27D-51 (P.L. 1967, c. 80). 41 McKinney's Consolidated Laws, article 11, sec. 57 5. Program 9: Administration. Illinois : 67 1/ 2 Smith-Hurd Illinois A nnotated Statutes, secs. 308 et seq. M assachusetts: 2A M assachusetts General Laws Annotated, Chapter 23A. Michigan: 12 Michigan Statutes Annotated sec. 16.114 et seq. ' New Jersey : 55 N ew Jersey Statutes Annotated secs. 14J-1 et seq. (P.L. 1967: C. 81 ) . 41 McKinney's Consolidated Laws New York: article 3. ' II. Increasing Housing Choice Program ]: Comprehensive fa ir housing Jaw. Alaska : Alaska Statutes, secs. 18.80-010. 160. Colorado: 69 Colorado Revised Statutes, article 7. New York: 18 McKinney's Consolidated Laws article 15. ' Program 2: Metropolitan area housing information centers. New York: Senate Bill 4099, Assembly Bill 6026. Contact: State Senator Whitney North Seymour, Jr. State Capitol Albany, New York Other: Paul D avidoff, Neil G old, Harry Schwartz, A H ousing Program for N ew Y ork State (1 968) . Contact : Paul D avidoff, Chairman Urban Planning Program Hunter College of the City U niversity of New York N ew York, New York Metro Denver F air Housing Center, Inc. Contact : Richard E. Young, Chairman 130 West Twelfth Avenue Denver, Colorado 80204 303 / 534-1263 Other : Program 3: Priority assistance for integrated housing. III. Improving Building Codes Program: Model building code. 18 McKinney's Consolidated L aws, New York : ar ticle 18. Advisory Commission on IntergovOther: ernmental Relations, 1968 State L egislative Program , pp. 287 et seq. IV. Improving Relocation Assistance Program: Uniform relocation program. Connecticut : 8 Connecticut General Statutes Annotated, sec. 219 (P.A. 522, laws of 1967, sec. 24) . Maryland : 33A Annotated Code of M aryland, sec. 6A. New Jersey: 52 N ew Jersey Statutes Annotated, secs. 31B-1 et seq. (P.L. 1967 c. 79). Other: Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, 1968 State Legislative Program, p. 264. V. Equalizing Landlord-Tenant Relations Program I: Means to secure code compliance. Connecticut: Community Development Act. Illinois: "For Better Housing in Illin ois," Report of the Legislative Commission on Low-Income H ousing ( April 10, 1967). Maryla nd : Code of Public Laws, Baltimore City, 1949 ed., sec. 459A. Massachusetts : M ass. Gen. Laws Anno., Ch. 111, sec. 127H (1967) . New York: Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, sec. 755 (McKinney Supp. 1966). Pennsylvania : Pa. Stat. Anno. Lit., 35 sec. 1700-1 (Supp. 1967 ) . Rhode Island: R. I. G en. Laws Anno., 45-24.2-11 (1956) . ( Rent withholding by welfa re agencies ) : Illinois: Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 23, secs. 11-23 ( 1967 ) . Michigan : M ich. Stat. Anno., sec. 16.414 (3) (Supp. 1968 ). New York: N.Y. Social Services Law, sec. 143-b (McKi nney 1966) . Program 2: Evictions. Michigan : Laws of 1968, P.A. 297. Program 3: Private obligation to repair. M ichigan : Laws of 1968, P.A. 295. Program 4: Publ ic housing policies. M ichigan: Laws of 1968, P.A. 267, 344. Rhode Island: R.I. Gen. Laws Anno., 45-25-18 (House BiJI No. 1605, Laws of 1968). VI. The American Bar F oundation, under contract to the U.S. Office of Economic Opportunity, is preparing a "Model Landlord-Tenant Code." The final report, expected to be available by January 1969," will consist of a statutory text together with relevant notes and comments. Its purposes include the codification of existing Landlord-Tenant Law, as well as the suggesting of useful changes. The Code is designed for eventual submission to the various state legislatures after initial submission to the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. Contact: Philip Hablutzel American Bar Foundation 1155 East 60th Street Chicago, Illinois 60637 Enhancing Community Development Program J: Financial assistance for community development programs. Community Development Act, P.A. Connecticut: 522, Laws of 1967. N ew Jersey: State Aid for Urban Renewal Projects, Laws of 1967, c. 80 (NJSA 52:27D-44 et seq. ). Program 2: Urban development corporation. New York : Chap. 174, Laws of 1968. Program 3: Loan guarantees. New York: Chap. 175, Laws of 1968. Program 4: Assistance to obtain federal grants. Laws of 1967, c.82 (NJSA 52:27DN ew Jersey: 59 et seq. ). Program 5: Constitutional reform . Advisory Commission on lnter~ovOther : ernmental Relations, State L eg1s/atio11 Program for 1969. Program 6: Zoning and plan ning reforms. Connecticut : New Directions in Planning Legislation, American Society of Planning Officials. 1313 East 60th Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 American Law Institute, Model Other: L and D evelopment Code. Contact: Allison D unham , C hief Reporter 101 N . 33rd Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104 Program 7: Improving design quality. Chap. 982, Art. 22, Laws of N.Y. New York : Contact: John P. Jansson, Executive Director New York State Council on Architecture 545 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10022 R2 �VII. Developing New Communities Program: Aiding the development of new communfries. New York : Laws of 1968, Chapters 173, 174. Other: Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Rel ations, 1969 State Legislative Program, pp. 507 et seq. VIII. Centralizing Administration of Housing and Community Development Programs Program: A centralized department of housing and community affairs. Connecticut : 8 Connecticut General Statutes Annotated, secs. 201 et seq. (P.A. 522, Laws of 1967. New Jersey : 52 New Jersey Statutes Annotated, secs. 27D-1 et seq. (P.L. 1967, c.293). Pennsylvania : Reorganization Plan 2, Act 582, 1965, Reg. Sess. Further information concerning the operation of the state programs referred to can be obtained from the follow ing officials : A laska Larry Montgomery, Director Local Affairs Agency Pouch AB Office of the Governor Juneau, Alaska 9980 l 907 /586-5 386 Connecticut LeRoy Jones Commissioner of Commun ity Affa irs 1179 Main Street P.O. Box 786 Hartford, Connecticut 06120 Ha waii Yoshio Yanagawa Executi ve D irector Hawaii Housing Authority 1002 North School Street Honolul u, Hawaii /1 /in ois Richard Blakley Managing D irector and Secretary Illinois State Housing Board 160 LaSalle Street Chicago, Illinois 60601 3 12/ 346-2000 Kansas John I va n Special Ass istant for Urban Land Community Affairs The Governor's Office State Capitol Building Topeka, Ka nsas 6661 2 913/ CE5-00l I , Ext. 261 K entucky John Vanderweir Director of Division of Land Development Assistance Kentucky Program Development Office of the Governor Frankfort, Kentucky 502/564-3840 Massachusetts Julian D. Steele Commissioner Department of Community Affairs State Office Building JOO Cambridge Street Boston, Massachusetts 02202 617 /727-3238 .. Michigan Robert McLain, Director State Housing Development Agency Department of Social Services Lewis Cass Building Lansing, Michigan 5)7/ 373-2000 N ew Y ork Edward Logue President and Chief Executive Officer New York State Urban Development Corporation 22 W. 55th Street New York, New York 10019 212/ JU 2-7030 N ew Jersey Paul Ylvisaker, Commissioner Department of Community Affairs State of New Jersey 363 W. State Street Trenton, New Jersey 08625 609 I 292-6420 North Carolina Luther C . Hodges Housing and Urban Affairs Land Specialist State Planning T as k Force 405 State Adminjstration Building P.O. Box 1351 R aleigh, North Carolin a 27602 919/829-4131 Pennsylvania Joseph W. Barr, Jr. Secretary of Communit y Affairs State of Pennsylvania 201 South Office Building Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 171 20 717/78 7-7160 Rhode Island Rev. Arthu r L. H ar dge Director Department of Community Affairs State House Providence, Rhode Island 401 / 52 1-7100 Ve rm ont J ames F in neran Executive Director State Housing Authority Mo ntpelier, Vermont 802 / 223-23 I l R3 " � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document Prepared by ,.._m:llma The Housing Staff of The National Urban Coalition \ �An Agenda For Positive Action: State Programs in Housing & Community Development November 1, 1968 A Report Prepared by the Urban Coalition's Task Force on Housing, Reconstruction and Investment �Preface and Acknowledgements On July 9, 1968, the Urban Coalition Task Force on Housing, Reconstruction and Investment met in New York City. At that time the Task Force members discussed the potential role of the states in helping cities meet urban needs. The discussion soon revealed that a few -states had begun innovative programs, many of which show promise of bringing better living conditions to an increasingly urbanized population. The Task Force accordingly requested the staff of the Urban Coalition to draw together and analyze legislative actions that had been taken, and which cQuld feasibly be taken, so that states considering enacting housing and community devel~pment programs might have guidelines for action. This report is the result of that survey and analysis, and was prepared with the goals of the Urban Coalition in mind. The Task Force reviewed and commented on the paper in draft form and at its meeting on .September 23, 1968, approved its publication. The report is intended to enable those in each _state responsible for administering, recommendmg and drafting housing programs to ask relevant questions and to be aware of possible patterns for :state involvement. The paper describes an assortment of weapons in the armory of state action which can be combined to achieve overall objectives. The Task Force believes each of the tools described in this paper is worthy of serious consideration. It further believes that no · recommendations for state action in housing and community development can be deemed complete without their consideration. _Although responsibility for the judgments in this document remains with the Urban Coalition ~ousing staff, helpful suggestions were received rom many sources. Chief among them were Seylllour Baskin, Esquire, of Pittsburgh ; Ralph Brown and Michael Herbert, Department of Colllmunity Affairs, State of New Jersey ; Joel Cogen of Joel Cogen Associates, New Haven; Mrs. Glenda Sloane, National Committee Against Discrimination in Housing; and Stephen Ziegler, Esquire, of New York City. Each attended discussion meetings and critically reviewed the draft in detail. Helpful advice, assistance or critical comments also were advanced by: S. Leigh Curry and H. Ralph Taylor of HUD; Stanley Berman, Esquire, of New York City; Peter Paul · and William L. Slayton of Urban America; Professor Daniel Mandelker, Washington University Law School, St. Louis; Richard Blakley, Illinois State Housing Board; Eugene Rossland, National Bureau of Standards; James Martin of the National Governors' Conference; Stephen D. Moses of Boise-Cascade Corporation; and Warren Lindquist, Associate of David Rockefeller. In addition, representatives of the Task Force co-chairmen supplied support and guidance from the inception of the study: Thomas Hannigan for Joseph Keenan; David Cohen for Walter Reuther; and Richard Dowdy for David Rockefeller. Jack Davies of the Chase Manhattan Bank and John Kolesar of the New Jersey Department of Community Affairs provided valuable aid in redrafting some of the material. . Helpful advice on presentation of the matenal was received from Commissioner Paul N. Ylvisaker, Mayor Jerome Cavanagh and James Rouse, members of a special Housing Task Force Subcommittee which reviewed the fin al draft. . Citations were checked and expanded by Stuart Stiller. Two reports previously published : "The States and Urban Problems," a staff study of the National Governors' Conference, and a preliminary report ("Action for Our Cities-Part IlHousing" ) of the States Urban Action Ce~ter, Washington, D. C. , stimulated Task Force thmking at the outset. �Table of Contents and Summary of Recommendations Page v Page Introduction II. Increasing Housing Choice I. Increasingcthe Supply of Low- and Moderate-Income Housing 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 6 6 ii Program I: Seed money loans, technical assistance and grants. 7 Interest-free seed money loans and technical assistance to limited-profit and nonprofit developers of low- and moderate-income housing; grants to nonprofit developers of loW· and moderate-income housing. Program 2: State-developed housing. State-developed low- and moderate-income housing. Program 3: Below-marketinterest-rate mortgage loans. Below-market-interest-rate mortgage loans to limited-profit and nonprofit developers of low- and moderate-incorne housing. Program 4: Interest-free loans to developers. Program 5: Construction loans. Program 6: Land acquis ition and write-down. Program 7: Rehabilitation housing acquisition and write-down . Program 8: Property tax abatement. Program 9: Administration. 8 9 Program I: Comprehensive fair housing law. A comprehensive fair housing law establishing a strong enforcement agency. Program 2: Metropolitan area housing information centers. Financial assistance to nonprofit metropolitan area housing information centers to aid families in finding decent housing. Program 3: Priority assistance for integrated housing. Priority assistance to developers . which have affirmative plans to locate, promote and manage their low- and moderate-income housing projects to achieve integrated housing. III. Improving Building Codes Interest-free loans to limited-profit and nonprofit developers to enable them to fall within federal cost limitations on JoW· and moderate-income housing. Construction loans to limited-profit and nonprofit develop· ers of low- and moderate-income hou sing. 10 Program: Model building code. A model building code embodying performance standards for permissive adoption by communities; a building codes appeal board ; aids for building inspection. IV. Improving Relocation Assistance 11 Financial assista nce for acquisition and sale or lease of hous. rket . mg sites for low- and moderate-income housing at ma value or less than market value. Program: Uniform relocation program. A uniform relocation program to assist communities to pay relocation expenses and to provide relocation services to families and businesses displ aced by state or local government action. V. Equalizing Landlord-Tenant Relations Financial assistance for acquisition of substandard housing and its sale or lease at market value or less th an market value for rehabilitation for low- and moderate-income housing. . Reimbursement to communities for abatement of normal ' or moderate-income b 0 us· ~roperty taxes on public housing mg; ~~yments to cover extra public service costs incurred b)' localities on account of this housing. Administration of low- and moderate-income hou sing as· sistance programs. 12 13 13 Program I: Means to secure code compliance. Permit a tenant to institute a housing c~de enforcem~nt ~roceeding, to obtain specific relief for inadequately mam~arned premises, and to withhold rent to secure code compliance. Program 2: Evictions. Prohibit "retaliatory" evictions. Program 3: Private obligation to repair. Require that every lease pledge that premises are fit_ to live in when the tenant moves in and that the landlord will keep them in good repair. iii �Page Introduction 13 Program 4: Public housing policies. ~equire local housing authorities to give reasons for evictmg tenants and establish a "Board of Tenants Affairs" for public housing. VI. Enhancing Community Development 15 Program 1: Financial assistance for community development programs. 16 Program 2: Urban Development Corporation. 17 Technical and financial assistance to communities to draft proposals for federal program grants. Eliminte ~onstitutional prohibitions, if any on the involvement o pnvate enterprise in urban affairs. ' Program 6: Zoning and planning reforms. 18 A Decent Home and Suitable Living Environment Program 5: Constitutional reform. 18 guarantees to owners of residential property and small Lo~n b usmesses. Program 4: Assistance to obtain federal grants. 18 ~n ~rban Development Corporation with state-wide aut onty to combine state and private resources for the improvement of metropolitan areas. Program 3: Loan guarantees. 17 Provide a substantial portion of the required non-federal share of federa~y aided community development programs a_nd a su~stantial portion of the cost of non-federally assisted projects. AC .. _omm1ss1on to review and assess modern techniques of zonmg an~ land use regulation and to recommend legislation to moderrnze the state's zoning enabling act. Program 7: Improving design quality. · o f structures mvolving . Excellence in the d es1gn the use of nd ta~e fu s or c_redi~ and the preservation of public buildings n areas of h1stoncal or architectural significance. VII. Developing New Communities 19 Program: Aiding the development of new communities. 21 VIII. Centralizing Administratio n of Housmg . and Community Development Programs P rogram: A centralized Department of Housing and Community Affairs. References iv New ~ommunity development corporations with eminent domam powers; deferral of property taxes during development ~eri?d; state approval of new community development plans m lieu of other land use regulation. ~C~binet lev~l Department of Housing and Community a'.r~ res~onsible to the Governor, with responsibility for adm1mstenng a broad range of community aid programs. At its Emergency Convocation in August 1967, the Urban Coalition called upon the nation to t~ke bold and immediate steps to fulfill the nat10nal goal to provide "a decent home and suitable living environment for every American family" with guarantees of equal access to all housing, new and existing. This goal requires a national effort vastly larger than anything done in the past. The Coalition set an objective of building or rehabilitating one million housing units a year for lower-income families. The National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders later recommended construction of an average of 1.2 million units a year for lowand moderate-income families over the next five years. The Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 set a goal of six million units in the next decade-an annual average of 600,000 units. These goals exceed by a wide margin the current annual rate of production of less than 100,000 housing units for low- and moderate-income families. Why State Action? State action must be part of any national program to provide the housing to meet the very real needs and expectations of millions of Americans. The states have abilities and legal authority unavailable to the other levels of government. If these resources are withheld from national programs, the federal government, the cities and the private sector will be seriously hampered in carrying out their roles. If the states apply their authority and abilities creatively, they can enhance the effectiveness of the other partners in programs aimed at providing a decent environment for the residents of our communities. States have authority to assist cities in modernizing governmental patterns and to amend laws that impede new programs for urban progress. States have great flexibility to experiment with a wide variety of instruments and incentives closely tailored to local conditions and requirements. States, moreover, have the capacity to respond directly to urban problems as they arise, and to work with cities in supplementing federal and local programs and to adapt them to the individual challenges each city faces. A few states have already enacted their own housing and community development programs covering a wide variety of problems. But these programs are not as well known as they should be at a time when many states are seeking new avenues through which -to enlarge their assistance to local communities to improve the quality of housing and community facilities. The Purpose of This Report. This report on possible state programs has been prepared by the Urban Coalition's Task Force on Housing, Reconstruction and Investment as a guide for those in the public and private sectors concerned with greater positive action by the states to assist cities in housing and community development. The programs for state action outlined here are designed to meet problems which fall into eight categories: V �I I I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. Increasing the Housing Supply Increasing Housing Choice Improving Building Codes Improving Relocation Assistance Equalizing Landlord-Tenant Relations Enhancing Community Development Developing New Communities VIII. Centralizing Administration of Housing and Community Development Programs Programs in each of these categories are prefaced by a brief statement of needs and potentials in the area. And federal programs are related to state programs where a relationship exists. The programs cited are designed to spur swift and effective action. This report does not envision establishing at the state level another set of complex administrative requirements alongside the existing federal regulations. To the greatest feasible ex tent, where states supplement or relate to federal programs, the federal appro val should be the principal criterion to obtain the additional state aid. Duplicating and possibly conff,icting state requirements may only delay or frustrate needed action. Cities have built up a body of experience dealing with federal aid procedures, however complicated these rules may be. States must master the same procedures before they can work effectively to improve them. A state administration truly intent on helping cities thro ugh these programs will develop its own experienced and capable staff. It will, consequently, -find its voice significantly strengthened in shaping -the course of federal action. Strong voices are indeed needed, because in the last analysis increasing the effectiveness of federal efforts, backed by the far larger potential financial resources of the federal government, will prove crucial. States should join with their cities in working to channel these resources into urban needs. Except for a suggested commission to revise complex laws for zoning and land use, no proposals are made that require extensive research. A suggestion is advanced for centralized state administration, but with one exception, no at~ tempt is made here to deal with long-range con~titutional or fiscal reforms. Though such organic and fiscal change is unquestionably vital, to maintain a sharp focus this report concentrates on specific measures which can be readily taken. Indeed, most of th e measures described are already being undertaken in some form in one or more states. In ~an_y states constitutional li mitations may make it difficult to enact some of the provisions vi described here. States with restrictive constitutions are, however, already undertaking many of these programs by the use of responsible and imaginative legal counsel, financing devices and careful draftsmanship. Before a sensible course of action is piscarded because of assumed constitutional difficulties, the statutes of other states should be carefully e?(amined for possible solutions to the constitutional problem. The primary objective of the majority of these programs is to attract greater federal aid-to bring in several federal assistance dollars for each state assistance dollar. A number of the programs also act to attract wider private sector involvement and to overcome legal and political impediments to swifter and more effective progress. In many cases, state assistance can be seen substantially to improve the scope and efficiency of federal and private programs. No model legislation for these programs is included since such legislation must necessarily be drafted to fit the circumstances in each state. However, citations to existing state programs and other relevant sources are given in the references at the end of this report. These citations are intended to be illustrative rather than exhaustive. The staff of the Urban Coalition is prepared to provide further information and assistance to those interested in carrying out any of these programs in their states. E ach state is urged to review these suggested programs carefully within th e fra mework of its own needs, priorities and resources. The programs outlined here could be combined or considerably altered to fit particular circumstances, and there is still certainly a great need for experimentation . Each housing and community development project, moreover, should be related to an ongoing local or metropolitan comprehensive planning effort. Ideally, each state should seek to combine new concepts and existing programs into a well-coordin ated and effective effort. It is a time to decide. It is a time to act. To justify the role of the state as an innovatora laboratory for imaginative approaches to urban problems-state leaders must dramatically increase state assistance to urban communities. Enactment and adequate funding of a com· prehensive state housing and community de• velopment program which in some measure includes the specific programs described in this report would dramatize an important commit• ment that states could make to their own people. I. Increasing the Supply of Low- and Moderate- Program I Income Housing Interest-Free Seed Mo ney Loans and T echnical Assistance to Limited-Profit and Nonprofit Developers of Low- and Moderate-Income Housing; Grants to Nonprofit Developers of Low- and Moderate-Income Housing. , Federal and state low- and moderate-income housing assistance programs rely heavily upon . nonprofit housing sponsors. * Nonprofit housing sponsors are e1the_r bro~dly-based housing development corpo_rat10ns _aiding or sponsoring a number of ho~smg proiects in the community or individual proiect sponsors, such as churches, charitable foundations , se~tlement houses, labor unions, fraternal orgaruza. tions and other civic-minded groups. As landlords or as organizers of cooperatives, these groups are likely to follow enlightened policies. As sellers, they are likely to help lowerincome buyers adjust to homeownership. Th_e social motivation of many nonprofit corporations, moreover, causes them to undertake t_he_bften risky, tedious and difficult task o~ bu1ld~g or rehabilitating housing in inner- city . or gray areas " where many private profit-motivated de' will not enter. velopers Experience has shown, however, t_hat to? many nonprofit groups are long on social dedication but short on money and skills. Thus, ~he difference between good intentions and hous'. ng in place is often assistance to nonprofit housmg corporations in the forms of: -seed money loam, (advances from a revolving loan fund needed to cover initial costs, such as preliminary architectural fees, engineering fees , site options, tenant surveys, market analyses, and legal an_d organizational expenses during the project development stage, which are recoverable from the proceeds of the FHA-insured mortgage ) ; . - grants for administrative costs, social services and other necessary expenses whic~ are important to the success o~ the organization and the project, but which may not be recoverable fro m the mortgage proceeds; -interim fina ncing ( construction loans needed when private construction loans are not available as described in program 5 below) , and - technical assistance (expert aid needed to train personnel, develop projects, se_cure project approval and oversee construct10n). • A used ;,, this paper references to 11011 profit deve lopers or n~npro{it sponsors include nonprofit cooperatives as well as ot er non profit entities. �/ The availability of grant money is particul arly important to housing development corporations. These broadly based nonprofits need start-up and operating money that will not be recaptured from the proceeds of housing project mortgages. Seed money loans interim loans and technical assistance might also be made available to limited-profit housing developers in need of this assistance. The federal Housing and Urban D evelopment Act of 1968 (hereafter the 1968 Housing Act) provides similar assistance to nonprofit developers of low- and moderate-income housing. It directs the Department of Housing and Urban Development (hereafter HUD) to provide information , advice and technical assistance. It also authorizes HUD to make 80 percent interestfree seed money loans to nonprofit corporations from a small, newly created revolving fund. It creates a government-chartered, nonprofit, private corporation known as the National Homeownership Foundation to encourage private and public organizations to provide increased homeownership and housing opportunities fo r lowand moderate-income fa milies. A state assistance program, however, would provide an additional and more flexible source of aid to developers of low- and moderate-income housing. A state program could be used to give encouragement to the form ation of limitedprofit and nonprofit housing groups within the state, when federal assistance is not available. A state program, moreover , might put more emphasis on making non-recoverable grants, rather than recoverable seed money loans-the thrust of federal aid. Grants, rather than loans, are needed to help finance housing development corporations and pay fo r the extra costs of housing low-income people, such as the provision of important social services. Program 2 State-Developed Low- and Moderate-Income Housing. Developing housing for low- and moderate-income families requires a great deal of expertness. The services qf a lawyer, real estate agent, builder, banker and administrator at a minimum are generally required. In many smaller communities it is difficult to find people who are both qualified and willing to render these services to a housing sponsor. Thus, as a logical alternative to state or federal technical assistance to help local groups become qualified to develop housing projects, the state may wish itself to develop either public housing 2 or moderate-income housing. It should only do so where there is no functioning local p ublic housing authority or moderate-income housing developer to build the housing. To produce public housing, the state would establish a public housing authority which could provide the necessary public housing anywhere in the state. R ecent changes have added great flexibility to the federally assisted public housing program. A public housing authority can now lease as well as bu ild or purch ase housing, and can sell the housing to its tenants. State-wide public housing authorities are eligible to receive federal public housing assistance. To build moderate-income housing, the state could create a nonp~ofit housing development corporation to develop this housing anywhere in the state. The corporation generally would serve as developer of the project. It would only serve as sponsor (i. e., the owner and maintainer of rented housing) in the absence of a local group which could serve as th e sponsor. In developing either public hou sing or moderate-income housing, the state would act in close cooperation with local public and private groups. And the state would not itself construct the housing; construction would be done by a private contractor under the " turnkey" system. Program 3 Below-Market-Interest-Rate Mortgage Loans to Limited-Profit and ·Nonprofit Developers of Low- and Moderate-Income Housing. States may use their power to borrow cheaply through the issuance of tax-exempt bonds to finance moderate-income housing projects at mortgage interest rates several percentage points below commercial rates. On long-term mortgages (usu ally forty years) , this lower interest rate can be of substantial assistance in reducing the cost of housing. New York pioneered this assistance with its highly successful "MitchellLama" program. F ederally assisted moderate-income housing programs also aid the production of housing by reducing interest rates. The FHA section 221(d) (3) program, for example, provides fin ancing at a three percent interest rate. Nevertheless, at least five states have enacted their own belowmarket-interest-rate programs to supplement the federal programs. There are many good reasons for states to establish their own below-market-interest-rate housing programs. Com prehensive Program. A state agency may find it difficult to undertake a comprehensive Substantial reasons still remain, however, fo r program fo r encou raging the development of moderate-income housing without itself being states to make supplemental loans to developers able to assist in the mortgage fin ancing of this to enable them to qu alify fo r federal assistance housing. Without its own below-market-inte_r<:st- when they otherwise would not. The FHA and the Housing Assistance Adrate mortgage program, the important decIS1on (HAA) continually have under conministration of whether to fin ance a proposed housing projproposals for housing projeots which sideration ect would be made exclusively by th e Federal or fo und infeasible because have been slowed Housing A dministration. proposed costs exceed maximum fe~er_al ~ost Flexibility . M any FHA programs can only be limits. In many cases federal cost hm1tat1ons used to assist housing developers in communisimply may not adequately re~ect lo~al cost facties which have enacted . a "workable program might, for. extors. Costs per unit for a proiect for community improvement"- an overall plan ample, exceed the federal maximum by as little of action for meeting problems of slums and blight, and for guiding community development. as five to ten percent; yet, as the ~evelo? er This "workable program requirement" greatly spends perh aps months redesigning ~1s ?roiect restricts the use of important FHA programs in to bring unit costs in line ( often sacr~cmg demany states where such a program has not been sirable design features in the process)'. m~reases in construction costs during the redes1gnmg_ peadopted by a locality. A state program would not riod might well consume wh atever other savmgs be subj ect to this restriction. The FHA allows a maximum six percent book were managed. This tedious proce~s causes many units of badly needed housing to die on the draftreturn to limited-profit housing developers. To . il encourage greater participation, a state program ing boards. State assistance can remedy this and s1m ar may allow a greater maximum return , such as the cost problems. To reduce th~ t~tal fed_eral morteight percent return allowed under the New Jergage assistance amount to w1thm m~x1mu~ fedsey program. . eral cost limits, the state could provide an mterL essComplexAdministration. FHA processmg est-free loan to the developer of up to t~n percent of moderate-income housing proposals is comof his cost to supplement his FHA-msured fiplex and generally time-consuming. An adenancing. R epayment of the state loan would ~e quately staffed state program may be able to deferred until after the fed eral mortgage loan is simplify its rules and regulations and thus spee~ . processing time. And based on its own expe~I- ·paid off or refinanced. The state loan is secured by a state lien on the ence, it may be able to suggest .improvements m project. T he loan is subordinated t~ the FHAFHA regulations. insured mortgage. It becomes a first hen af~er the Experim entation. States may wish ~o i_nnovate with their own programs, such as Ilhno1s, M as/" . M sac/111setts and N ew Jersey also sachu setts and New Jersey are doing with "rent • To lower rents, II m o,s, b -:;-' programs to pay the di ffe rence ~~"~\ ~om_e family can afford to pay skewing." Through rent skewing, rents in a 143.215.248.55,~e:~a~;:etd : :~:,,,~~n! state-assisted pro1ects. and the ren s o n ' may wish to delay initiating rent supmajority of apartments are raised slightly_ to Other states, howe'r~[· they see how two new sections of the plem ent programs un 1 •• low larger reductions in the rents of a mm~nty · A ct are adnumstered. b 68 H 19Secti;:s143.215.248.55(b) allows f';deral rent supplem ent payments to e of apartments. R ent skewing allows a wider . . t made t_o st~~6't/if~r,~::;0 ;,~;t~;ew fe deral interest reduc tion pa?;range of tenants' income~ in a hous'.ng f roi ec Sect,onb de for state-assisted housing. These payments_ w1 I m ents to e ma b t ee n normal rents on a state-assuted th an would be possible without skewmg. ma~e up the dlfferenc{ ,:h;; ,. tenants can afford to pay ii they u- pro1ect and the re nta_ s ·ncome for rent . Tir e paym ent cannot ex- P rogram 4 Interest-Free Loans to Limited-Profit and Nonprofit Developers to Enab le Them to Fall Within Federal Cost Limitations on Low- and Moderate-Income Housing. Federal programs have almost excl u_sively assisted housing by reducing fin ancmg costs through mortgage lo ans, mortgage in_surance and interest subsidies. T he 1968 H ousmg Act ex~ pands these programs. Due to th e ex istence of substantial federal ass istance some states ~ ay not wish to engage in the same form of assistance. ( As desc ribed in P rogram 3 above.) pay 25 percent of 1•.e~ 'vo11ld lower the effective interest rate on ceed an am ount w uc , 'd I om the rentals to less than one perthe project mortgage pa, r cent. . . f state m ortgage loan and federal rent Th ese comb1'.1at1ons :eduction payments give pro mise of lwussupplem ent or mtere~t in state-assisted housing. Ing families of low m co;"e ver that in many cases the state Jt does not appear, ,owe t ~ e loan and the federal in terest below-mark et-interest-ra!lel m ar bg ·,g,e to reduce rents below the . . tance w, com , . d reduction ass1s I the m ortgage were FHA-msure at amount _they would be di ti e fe deral program , and not statemarke t-mterest rates un er 1 1 1 arket-in terest rates. . 11 assisted at b e O H- m 0 m ent m ay not exceed the T he federal interest"i:e!~~f'~teJ' t~ pay under the mortgage" amount a m ortgago~, Id b! obligated to pay if the m ortgage and the am o unt he ,!vo~t ti e rate of one percent. To the ex tent we re to bear inte~es! ~ ' federal assistance com es into play . this one percent l1111k1tat1? 1t1 orenst-rate m ortgage loan wo uld simply .1 re below-m ar e t-Ill e I t ,e ., a f d I b itli• by lowering th e am ount the mortgagor 'i,, reduce the e era ·"'., the absence of the state below-market"is obligated to pay. 1 the federal government would make interest-rate mortgage ,oa,b,, . of FHA -insured market interest higher payments on t ,e rate morgage. as,s 3 �financing of federally insured housing for lowand moderate-income families. This action was instrumental in clearing the backlog in Illinois in 221 (d)(3) housing. As of October 1968, $288 million were allocated to qualifying banks in proportion to ,their outstanding loans. Additional sums for time deposits have been made available where needed by banks to meet special public needs. Those varied needs have included programs other than housing. The Illinois plan involves no sacrifice to the state of earnings on its investments, or greater risks of loss. Where this state stimulus is not possible and construction financing is difficult to secure, states might make or participate in providing interim construction loans at below-market-interest rates to developers of low- and moderate-income housing. A state could borrow its loan money through the sale of tax-exempt bonds and establish a revolving loan fund. Since construction financing is short-term, such a revolving fund would have a rapid turnover. Thus, a limited amount of money could finance a large number of projects. No net cost ,to the state would be incurred, and a state could in fact earn a sum on its Joans sufficient to pay borrowing costs and the costs of administering the program. FHA-insured mortgage is paid off. (FHA has indicated approval of this type of state assistance since_ t~chnically it does not constitute currentl; proh1b1ted secondary financing.) The state loan is well secured. Even were the improvements on the property to be depreciated completely by the end of the FHA-insured mortgage period, the land would still remain to secure it. The small state loan brings high returns. If the state w~re, for example, to finance ten percent of the proJect cost With its supplemental loan, the state loan would call forth ten times its amount in private and federal investment. Program 5 Construction Loans to Limited-Profit and Nonprofit Developers of Low- and Moderate-Income Housing. The recent tight money situation and the general shortage of long-term mortgage financing in some areas have hampered the development of low- ~nd moderate-income hom;,ing. Despite a commitment on the permanent financing by the federal government and in some cases FHA insura~ce of the interim construction loan, conventional loans have often been unavailable to finance the construction of housing in the interim period before the permanent financing takes place. When interim construction financing is available for lo:V- and moderate-income housing, the ~eveloper is often required to pay high rates thus mcreasing housing costs. ' The shortage and high cost of short-term construction financing can thus be a substantial bottleneck to the production of large amounts of low- and moderate-income housing. State authority to invest millions of dollars of cash resources not immediately required for expenditure provides leverage to encourage banks to meet public objectives. In January 196 7, the sta:te of Illinois announced a Sta~e Investment Program to forge a new partnership between the public and private sectors-between public treasuries and private ba~s._ The_ program was implemented through adm1mstrat1ve action by the state treasurer. Under this program deposits of state funds are made in banks agreeing to make interim financing available for construction of low- and moderate-income housing. Working with FHA and several banks in the Chicago area, the state agreed to deposit, at competitive interest rates about $90 million in those banks which in tur~ were willing to invest equivalent sums for interim 4 Progra1n 6 Financial Assistance for Acquisition and Sale or L ease of Housing Sites for Low- and ModerateIncome Housing at Market Value or L ess Than Market Value. .. A state program of assistance for land acquisition can: (1) increase the incentive of limitedprofit developers to construct low- and moderate-income housing; or (2) help assemble large housing sites and, where justified, lower the cost of housing by writing down the cost of the land through its sale or lease to a nonprofit housing developer at less than fair market value. (1) Increasing the incentive of limited-profit developers to construct low- and moderate-income housing. Nonprofit housing sponsors alone cannot build or rehabilitate six million houses in the next five years. The private developer can produce a large share, either by building "turnkey" public housing (public housing developed by a private developer rather than the local public housing authority) or by operating as a limitedprofit sponsor developing low- and moderateincome housing. Since 1961, when FHA assistance for moderate-income housing began, 42 percent of its projects have been built by limitedprofit sponsors and 58 percent by nonprofit sponsors. As a limited-profit sponsor the private developer is allowed a regulated return before taxes on its equity investment in a housing project. In FHA programs this is usually six percent. With the benefit of early writeoffs and other favorable investment factors to which a developer is entitled under the law, he can substantially increase his after-tax return above this amount. Yet even with the favorable rate of return presently allowed under the law, only a small number of units of low-r,isk, moderate-income housing projects have aotually been built by limited-profit developers, principally at times when other construction business has been slow. To increase the incentive for a limited-profit developer to build low- and moderate-income housing, states could leverage the federal program by financially assisting communities to purchase land and to lease it to a developer at favorable terms without loss to the states or the municipalities. Land purchase and lease frees the developer from investing substantial capital in land, which cannot b_e depreciated, and substitutes an annual rent on the lease which is a deductible expense, thus increasing his after-tax return. Such land purchase and lease would also lower the cost of housing by enabling lower sales prices or rents. States may be able to obtain the money needed to help municipalities purchase and lease land by floating state-guaranteed, tax-exempt bonds which are repaid from rent receipts under the lease. The financing is analagous to state financing of industrial parks. (2) Assembling land and ·reducing the cost of low- and moderate-income lwusing . The increasingly high cost of suitable land in metropolitan areas is a major factor in boosting housing costs beyond the reach of low- and moderate-income families. The federal government does not provide financial assistance in writing down land costs for housing except in urban renewal area , which, for the most par·t, have been in the central city. Section 506 of the 1968 Housing Act, however, now allows federal assistance for "write downs" of open land in declared urban renewal areas for low- and moderate-income housing. But designating urban renewal areas and receiving federal funds is a long and cumbersome process, involving more than writing down land costs for housing projects. Additional state assistance to communities 5 �j assembling and developing land for low- and moderate-income housing outside of urban renewal areas would give substantial aid to the large-scale production of low- and moderateincome housing. By use of the community's eminent domain powers, large tracts of land could be assembled. With state aid a municipality could sell or lease the land at less than market value to nonprofit developers where the write down was to be reflected in lower rentals or sales prices. Program 7 Financial Assistance for Acquisition of Substandard Housing and Its Sale or Lease at Market Value or Less Than Market Value for Rehabilitation for Low- and Moderate-Income Housing. Systematic rehabilitation of housing in the core or "gray areas" of cities is an important part of the nation's housing program. The federal assistance needed to clear these areas for the development of new housing is greater than is likely to be made available in the foreseeable future. Even if the money were available, •the dislocation and disruption involved in clearance and reconstruction would weigh heavily against total reliance on c;learance as a renewal instrument. Of the six ml'llion standard houses that the Department of Housing and Urban Development sets as a production goal, two million ( one third) are intended to be rehabilitated structures. Housing rehabilitation could be increased greatly if the states were to help municipalities purchase substandard houses and resell or lease them to nonprofit developers which would rehabilitate them for sale or rental as low- and moderate-income housing. With state aid a municipality could sell or lease the substandard houses at less than market value where the write down was to be reflected in lower rentals or sales prices. In addition, a judicious use by a locality of its power of eminent domain would enable a systematic rehabilitation of all declining properties in a neighborhood or on a block, rather than the rehabilitation of only those houses which are on the market, as is now generally the case. This systematic rehabilitation has a greater effect in upgrading entire neighborhoods. Program 8 Reimbursement to Communities for Abatement of Normal Property Taxes on Public Housing or Moderate-Income Housing; Payments to Cover 6 Extra Public Service Costs Incurred by Localities on Account of This Housing. Under the federally assisted public housing program,communities are required to abate real estate taxes on the project. They receive a payment in lieu of taxes of approximately ten percent of the rentals of the project. This reduction of tax income to communities has proven to be an important barrier to the production of public housing. State payments to make up the difference between what the public housing pays in taxes and the normal tax bill would help communities to provide needed public housing. On the other hand, local property taxes often account for between twenty arid thirty percent of the rents paid by occupants of FHA-assisted moderate-income housing. These projects are usually taxed as though they were conventional apartments even though the rental income they produce is limited by FHA. State payments to communities to reimburse abatements of normal local property taxes on federally and stateassisted housing would be a potent device to lower rents. An additional barrier, even if full taxes are paid by or on behalf of low- and moderateincome housing projects, is the higher cost of public services for occupants of higher density housing, e.g., schools, playgrounds, social services. State payments to communities in excess of local taxes to meet these extra costs would provide an inducement to communities to accept low- and moderate-.income housing. This inducement would assist in locating low- and moderate-income families outside central cities, closer to places of expanding employment. Gearing these payments to an industrial development program would help relieve labor shortages which increasingly inhibit economic growth of outlying areas. Program 9 Administration of Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Assistance Programs. States administer housing assistance Programs one through eight in varied ways. A pattern of clustering programs designed to encourage the construction of low- and moderate-income housing-seed money loans and grants, technical ass istance, construction loans, tax abatementaround the core program of making belowmarket-interest-rate loans to developers has, however, emerged in several states . These programs are then either administered directly by the state with the below-market- interest-rate loans being made from a housing II. Increasing Housing Choice development fund . Or they are administered by a separate public benefit corporation, sometimes called a Housing Development Authority or Housing Finance Agency. State constitutions may well dictate this choice. The important factor in administering these programs is to assure that one responsible agency has the authority to combine them imaginatively. For example, a state seeking to increase the production of low- and moderate-income housing and homeownership by low- and moderateincome families, might administer each of the first eight assistance programs described. The state could make seed money loans or grants and give technical assistance to help establish sponsors. . It could help finance projects by makmg construction loans and permanent mortgages to developers. And it could make additional loans to lower the costs of projects which exceeded FHA maximum cost limitations. Where sponsors did not exist it could develop projects itself. It could assist. communities in purchasing and leasing housing sites or houses for rehabilitation. The sales or leases could either recover fully the state's costs or, if needed, could assist the project by recovering less, i.e. , by writing down the land. ·. f It could help to reimburse commumties or abated taxes where needed. And in addition to the first eight programs, the stat~ might be given some unearmarked de_monstration funds to devise new ways of meetmg its housing problems. For example, using demonstration money, the state might: -make equity loans to developers of ~ooperative housing to enable moderate-mcome families to purchase their houses on a cooperative basis with a minimal down payment and liberal financing of the balance Program 1 A Comprehensive Fair Housing Law Establish. over a period of years, or - establish a rent assistance program to fill m ing a Strong Enforcement Agency. gaps in federal programs whereby houses The landmark June 17, 1968, Supreme Court would be purchased or leased by ,~ e state decision, Jones vs. Mayer Company (20 L.Ed. and then leased or sublet to low-mcome 2nd 1189), interprets an 1866 Civil Rights law families at reduced rentals. (guaraillteeing to all citizens the right "to inherit, To fin~nce loan-type programs, such as seed purchase, loan, sell, hold, and convey real _an? money loans, construction loans, below-m~ketpersonal property") to prohibit ra~ial discnnninterest-rate loans, and purchase and leasmg of . land, the state would issue tax-exempt bon~s nation in the sale or rental of bousmg. The Jones decision, however, is not a substi(guaranteed by the state where the state constItute for a comprehensive fair housing law . .It tution permitted). Grant programs and other ~scovers only racial discrimination and not_ dissistance would be financed by state appropnacrimination on the grounds of religion or national tions. 7 �origin. It does not deal with discrimination in the provis,ion of services or facilities in connection with the sale or rental of a dwelling. It does not prohibit advertising or other representations that indicate discriminatory preferences. lit does not cover discrimination in financial arrangements or in the provision of brokerage sources. Nor does it provide for administrative assistance to aggrieved parties or enforcement. And although courts can fashion effective remedies to enforce the 1866 statute, ,the statute contains no provision expressly authorizing a federal court to issue injunctions or to order payment of damages. The 1968 Civil Rights Act, on the other hand, covers these specific acts of discrimination omitted in the ·1866 s,tatute and fashions administrative and legal remedies as well. The remedies, however, are not strong enough to provide adequate relief in many cases for those who suffer discrimination. The Secretary of HUD may investigate complaints. His powers, however, are limited to conference, concilia-tion and persuasion. He may not issue an enforceable administrative remedy. For enforceable relief under federal law, the aggrieved party must himself generally go to court. (The Attorney General may bring suit based on a pattern or practice of discrimination or a denial of rights to a group of persons that raises an issue of general public importance.) The 1968 Civil Rights Act, however, invites strong state action to gu arantee fair housing. Section 81 0 ( c) provides that wherever a state (or local) fair housing law provides rights and remedies at least substantially equivalent to rights and remedies in the 1968 Act, the federal government will defer to the state in its enforcement activities. Thus, in enacting a comprehensive state fair housing law and in establishing a strong state fair housing agency to secure the constitutional rights of raci al and other minority groups, states would be filling the gap in federa l legislation and taking advantage of the priority extended to state legislation by section 810 ( c ) of the 1968 Act. A strong and comprehensive state fair housing law should : -establish an enforcement agency with adequate staff and appropriations to enforce the law; -empower the enforcement agency to receive complaints fro m citizens, from appropriate state officials, and to initiate complaints on its own motion; - ban all discrimination on the grounds of 8 race, religion, or national origin in the sale or rental of all property, including: -refusal to sell or rent, -discrimination in the terms or conditions of a sale or rental, -use of advertisements or applications which express or imply any such discr-imination, -discrimination by real estate salesmen or brokers, or -discrimination by lending institutions; -empower the enforcement agency to use temporary injunctions on sale or rental during its investigation of a complaint; -empower the enforcement agency to conciliate, issue cease and desist orders, require appropriate affirmative acts to cure the discrimination ; -provide penalties for a failure to comply with the enforcement agency's orders; -subject the enforcement agency's orders to judicial review, and -empower the enforcement agency to carry on appropriate research and education programs to eliminate hous.ing discrimination. ment, state and federal grants. There is presently no regular source of funds for the support of housing information centers. States might make grants to help establish and operate such centers. Progran1 3 Priority Assistance to Developers Which Have Affirmative Plans to Locate, Promote and Manage Their Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Projects to Achieve Integrated Housing. Racial integration of housing projects or neighborhoods rarely occurs without deliberate measures by developers. Low- and moderate-income housing must be located in areas where housing for these families does not exist in great numbers. The housing must be affirmatively marketed with minority communities not accustomed to considering housing so located. Rental projects, if they are to become and remain integrated, must be managed with ,this objective always in mind. A state can encourage developers to locate, market and manage projects with the objective of achieving integration by giving priority on its state assistance (Programs one through eight) to developers with affirmative and practical integration plans. Program 2 Financial A ssistance to Nonprofit Metropolitan Area Housing Information Centers to Aid Families in Finding Decent Housing. In most communities the existing supply of decent housing for low- and moderate-income families is not limited to the central city ghetto or to its gray areas. It is often found in other p arts of the metropolitan area as well. The lack o f information on available rental and sale housing throughout the metropolitan area, however, is a substantial barrier to the movement of families out of declining neighborhoods of the central city. F amilies in the housing market need help in finding housing they can afford, convenient to their jobs, and located in good school districts. A nonprofit metropolitan area housing information center would list available housing, i nteres t low- and moderate-income families in moving to areas with which they are initially unfa miliar, escort them on inspection of houses, ed ucate the community to the need for providing more housing fo r low- and moderate-income families and undertake other associated activities. The Metropolitan Denver F air Housing Center, Inc. is the principal example of a housing information center providing these kinds of services. It is supported by private, local govern- \ ,I 9 �Ill. Improving Building Codes P rogram IV. Improving Relocation Assistance A Model Building Code Embodying Pe,jormance Standards for Permissive Adoption by Communities; A Building Codes Appeal Board; A ids for Building Inspection. Program In most states, communities enforce differing and generally outdated building codes. This profusion of outdated codes has tended to raise building costs by perpetuating the outmoded and uneconomic use of building materials and building techniques and by restrieting the natural play of economies of scale in the construction industry. Higher building costs, in turn, unnecessarily restrict the availability of decent housing for low- and moderate-income families. States might assist communities to improve their building codes and building codes enforcement. Specifically they might: - authorize the development of a state model building code utilizing to the greatest extent possible performance standards for permissive adoption by communities. (To maintain uniformity the state should specify that the code would be automatically amended when state amendments were adopted, and that communities might only alter the model code upon specific approval of the administering agency) ; - establish an appeals board to hear appeals from decisions on the administration by communities of the state model code or other codes adopted by communities; - require that state and local government agencies utilize the state model code for public construction; - require that the state model code be used for federal or state-assisted nonpublic construction ; -establish professional qualifications for building inspectors, train and license them; - establish minimum staffing requirements for community building inspection departments; --offer building inspection services to communities which do not wish to maintain their own building inspection departments . 10 A Uniform R elocation Program to Assist Communities to Pay R elocation Expenses and to Provide R elocation Services to Families and Businesses Displaced by State or Local Government Action. Communities cannot be rebuilt for public objectives without uprooting families and businesses. The public has the obligation to compensate these dislocated families and businesses for the costs of dislocation, and to see that they are relocated in suitable accommodations. Unfortunately, famil ies displaced by public action are often those with the least freedom in the housing market- the poor, minorities, large families and elderly. Special government efforts therefore must be made to relocate these families successfully. States might establish a uniform relocation program for families and businesses displaced by state and local government programs. It would give financial assistance to communities in making relocation payments and providing relocation services where federal assistance is unavailable. To reduce inequities in the treatment between families displaced by federally assisted activities and families displaced by state or local activities, to the extent possible there should be uniformity in the relocation assistance offered to fa milies or businesses displaced by any public action- federal, state or local. Federal urban renewal relocation assistance includes : - relocation payments to families and individuals which may not exceed $200 for moving costs and property loss; -relocation adjustment payments totaling up to $1000 over a two-year period to fa milies and elderly individuals to assist them to relocate in standard accommodations; -an additional payment to owner-occupants of residential property acquired for an urban renewal project ( in lieu of a relocation adjustment payment) to enable them to purchase a replacement dwelling within one year. (This payment would be that amount not in excess of $5,000, which, ' when added to the acquisition price paid for the owner-occupant's borne, equals the average price for an adequate replacement home in the community, and - relocation payments for moving expenses and re.imbursement to business concerns or nonprofit organizations for property loss, up to $3,000, incurred in their move. (If no property loss is claimed, reimbursement for moving expenses can be made up to a maximum of $25 ,000.) Such payments are covered in full by a federal relocation grant made to the appropriate local agency. If the moving expenses of a business concern exceed $25,000, the locality may elect to reimburse the excess costs through a local cash payment which will be shared by the federal government through a relocation grant in the same percentage as other urban renewal project costs. State-assisted relocation agencies should be required to: -establish a single central relocation agency to offer services to all families needing relocation in a metropolitan area ; - formulate a single reloc-ation plan covering all foreseeable relocations by all government programs; - see that displaced families are relocated in . standard housing that is decent, safe and sanitary ; - relocate families to the greatest possible extent practicable outside of declining areas of the community; -provide for temporary relocation of displaced fa milies in decent housing where permanent housing is not immediately available; -pay the expenses of moving the displaced family or business and fix payments to cover other expenses, and - provide social services to relocated families with such needs. 11 �V. Equalizing Landlord-Tenant Relations The law governing the relationships between landlord and tenant in the Anglo-American system has not changed substantially since feudal times. Historically the law viewed a lease, not as a contract recording mutual obligations, but as a conveyance of an interest in land subject to conditions. Consequently, the law as formulated by the courts does not adequately, with some recent notable exceptions, reflect the new aspiratiions and economic realities of an urbanized society. An updating of these archaic laws" not only will tend to reduce tensions in our cities by responding to the just claims of tenants, but may instill greater respect for law -in general and provide greater incentives for the maintenance of property by ,those who occupy and own it. At the same time, responding to the valid claims of tenants while ignoring the legitimate interests of those who own and finance housing would not be productive. Landlord-tenant relations have attracted legislative attention recently in Illinois and Michigan. The Illinois Legislative Commission on Low-Income Housing, in a 1967 report entitled "For Better Housing in Illinois,"examined many of the inadequacies in the laws governing landlord-tenant relationships and the enforcement of housing codes in that state. Revisions of these laws were recommended in ways which may be applicable to other states. Five laws that significantly equalize the rights of tenants have recently been enacted in Michigan. These laws and similar provisions in other states are the basis for the following guidelines. Program 1 Permit a Tenant to Institute a Housing Code Enforcement Proceeding, to Obtain Specific R elief for Inadequately Maintained Premises, and to Withhold R ent to Secure Code Compliance. Anti-trust laws, securities laws and other modern regulatory measures have commonly provided for private as well as public enforcement. By contrast, although the tenant is a critically interested party, the enforcement of housing codes has been heretofore generally a two-party affair between the public enforcement agency and the landlord. Tenants have not been allowed to initiate or control enforcement proceedings. Yet their critical concern is justified in view of the fact that in many instances the proceedings can lead to the abandonment of the building, the eviction of the tenants, or a major increase in rent; and the failure to take action would result in the continuance of substandard and often intolerable conditions. 12 The Michigan law makes housing code enforcement a civil rather tha'Il a criminal matter, allowing a tenant to begin court action. The law also creates a variety of court actions that may be taken against landlords, including injunctions or orders permitting the tenant, a receiver or the city to make necessary repairs. The repairs can be paid for out of rents withheld in an escrow fund or by a lien on the property when the landlord is at fault, or by an assessment against the tenant when he is at fault. In Connecticut, state law authorizes municipalities ,to create repair receivershipt with the state advancing the cost of the repairs until rent receipts replenish the fund. These rent receivership or rent withholding measures are also a housing code enforcement technique. The state of New York, because of its dense patterns of urbanization, as long ago as 1930 allowed New York City residents to pay rent into court rather than to the landlord when a certified code violation exists. The court retains the rent, and evictions are stayed, until ,t he violation is corrected. To stimulate prompt remedial action by the landlord, the law was amended in 1965 to permit the tenant to arrange for heat, electricity, janitorial service or make repairs and apply to the court to have bills paid out of the rent on deposit. Another method of rent withholding, applicable to New York City tenants, permits onethird of the tenants in an apartment to bring action against landlords when conditions in the building are dangerous to "life, health or safety. " The court may appoint an administrator to collect rents and use them to remedy defects. Rhode Island, Pennsylvania (limited to Pittsburgh, Philadelphia and Scranton) , M assachusetts and M aryland (limited to Baltimore) have recently enacted similar measures. In a rela,ted problem area, some states (Illinois, New York and Michigan among them) have enacted legislation suspending the legal duty of a welfare recipient to pay, and the right of a landlord t? collect rent for housing in violation of applicable housing codes. Program 2 begin eviction proceedings without giving any reason. A few courts, however, have begun to rule that retaliatory evictions violate the tenant's constitutional right to petition for redress of grievances. The Michigan law enables a tenant to resist an eviction by contending that it is in retaliation for exercising lawful rights, such as complaining to public code enforcement authorities. In addition, the new law reverses the general common law rule that the breach by the landlord even of an explicit promise to make repairs does not excuse the tenant from payment of rent. Thus the tenant may withhold his rent until the landlord makes the repairs he has promised. Program 3 R equire that Every Lease Pledge that Premises Are Fit to Live in When the Tenant Moves in and that the Landlord Will Keep Them in Good R epair. The common law provides a tenant with little assurance that his dwelling will be comfortable or even habitable. No duty to repair is imposed on the landlord and he is under no duty, in the absence of express agreement to the contrary, to maintain or repair the premises. This rule is so firmly entrenched it is widely felt that specific legislation is required to override it. In o rder to correct some of the injustices of the basic rule, courts long ago adopted the fiction of a constructive eviction-which permitted the tenant to move out without payment of further rent if he lost the beneficial use and enjoyment of the premises through lack of beat -or light or some similar gross defect. The right to leave, however, is an empty one for the slum dweller. The Michigan statute, accordingly, specifically places upon the landlord the duty of repair during the term of the lease, and the duty to comply with applicable health and safety laws, except when the disrepair or violation has been caused by the tenant. Presumably, the courts will construe this to give the tenant the right to sue for damages, consisting of the difference in the rental value of the premises as they are and their value if in the condition warranted by the landlord. Prohibit "R etaliatory Evictions." The term "retaliatory eviction" refers to an eviction undertaken in retaliation for the tenant's complaint to municipal authorities of violations of housing and health regulations: W~ere landlords have resorted to this practice it has not been challenged. This may result from the law prevailing in most states, where a landlord may Program 4 R equire Local Housing Authorities to Give R easons for Evicting T enants and Establish. a "Board of Tenants Affairs" for Public Housing. Local housing authorities are instruments for local, state and federal housing policies. Such 13 �authorities are created by the state, subsidized by the federal government, and their members are appointed by the cities. Unlike the private landlord, the local housing authority is not motivated by profit. The admission and eviction of tenants is the source of most controversy in public housing practices. Because of the silence of most state enabling statutes and the special concern of the federal government with financial aspects of subsidized housing authority operations, the local authority typically sets its own admission and eviction policies. These standards may not be published, or if published may not be clear; they often relate to the "social desirability" of prospective or existing tenants as determined by the management. Nevertheless, tenants seeking to resist their eviction from public housing projects have found the courts frequently an alogizing public landlords with private landlords, or using other rationales to avoid reviewing the merits of such cases. Although there have been exceptions to this rule, the results of most cases leave local housing authorities with power legally to evict, or refuse admission to anyone, without cause. Corrective regulations aimed at " upgrading . . . outmoded management policies" addressed to procedural problems have been issued by HUD. Section 3.5 of the HUD Low-Rent Management Manual ("Procedures Prescribed for the Operation of Federally Aided Low-Rent H ousing" ) requires a local authority to adopt and publicize its admission policies, but does not prescribe policies beyond those imposed by law relative to income, age, disability, race, etc. Section 3.9 prohibits evictions witho ut giving the tenant notice of reasons and affording him "an opportunity to make such reply or explanation as he may wish." Although these rules are intended as mandatory by federal officials, it is not clear that local authorities view them in the same light. In the absence of an adequate supply of decent low-income housing, the refusal to confer, or the withdrawal of the benefits, of a dwelling in public housing constitutes substantial injury to a potential or existing tenant. It is within the pu rview of the state to prescribe the manner in which housing authorities deal with applicants and tenants. The ingredients of a policy reflecting commonly accepted standards of fairness might be: - applicants for admission to public housing should be apprised with in a specified period of a determination of ineligibility and given a right to appeal to a body other than the management; - the reasons for an unfavorable decision 14 should be clearly and concisely stated in relation to precise standards of admission; - leases should be written in simple language and effective on a self-renewing basis terminable (for a cause other than exceeding income limitations or nonpayment of rent) only for conduct injurious to other tenants or substantially injurious to the project; - evictions should be permitted only for good cause with the opportunity for a fair hearing; and - rights of privacy of tenants should be respected and harassment in the form . of fines , charges for repairs, threats of eviction, etc. , prohibited. The Michigan law adopts many of these principles. Another essential ingredient of a soundly administered public housing program is an increased effort to involve tenants in the management of projects. This may be done through the creation of representative tenant organizations or the representation of tenants on the local housing authority board. The Michigan law creates for public housing in the City of Detroit a " board of tenants affairs ," one-half of which is composed of elected tenant members and one-half by appointees of the mayor. The board may veto rules and regulations of the authority and acts as a binding board of review on decisions of project management or the authority with respect to matters such as denial of admission to or eviction from public housing and rent increases. A similar Rhode Island measure creates a board of tena~ts affairs for each city in the state with a public housing project. One-half the board is elected from among tenants occupying housing proj ects, the others to be appointed by th e mayor from residents of neighborhoods in which the projects are located. Thi s board advises the housing authority on tenant welfare, may veto authority rules on admission, occupa ncy, and eviction policies, and sits as a board of review for individual compl aints on these matters. VI. Enhancing Community Development Housing without stable neighborhoods served_by adequate community facilities will not provide long-term values to our cities and their people. States can take important steps to enhance the environment which supports new and rehabilitated housing. Just as an expanded supply of well-designed housing requires the stimulation of private initiative and assistance to local units of government, balanced community d~velopment cannot take place without a contmuous partnership between government on all levels and private groups. Program 1 Pro vide a Substantial Portion of the R equired Non-Federal Share of Federally A ided Community Development Programs and a Substa~tial Portion of the Cost of Non-Federally Assisted Projects. The federal programs to aid local comm~nity development require contributions to project cost from non-federal sources. These are often in the form of cash but usually in the form of non-cash items ·such as staff services, parks, schools or other facilities related to the project. Increasingly, the ability of many localities t_o utilize these programs is dependent upon their ability to finance the non-federal share of a . project. Connecticut has recently implemented comprehensive community development legislation which, among other programs, extends state financial assistance to localities in the form of contributions to the non-federal sh are of _fe~erally assisted projects. In some instances this kmd of help has spelled the difference between federal funding and no local program at all. Connecticut, for example, fund s one-half of the local share of fed erally assisted urban renewal projects, demolition of unsafe or uninhabitable buildings, construction of neighborhood facilities, and open-space land acquisition. The state contribution to the non-federal share of urban renewal projects actually began in 1955 and has contributed materially to the flow of federal urban renewal fu nds to cities in that state ever since. A Connecticut city need supply only one-sixth instead of one-third of net project cost. As a result, one dollar of city funds (supplemented by one state dollar) generates four federal dollars instead of only two. The form of state assistance was inaugurated in Pennsylvania as early as 1949, the year the federally assisted urban renewal program was enacted. Neighborhood facilities, in particular, embrace a wide range of horizon-expanding centers 15 �for persons of low- and moderate-income. These centers house health, recreational, social service, civic, educational, cultural and youth activities that can give residents a sense of identity, community pride and participation. In Connecticut, the state pays half the non-federal share of the cost of building these modern-day settlement houses, and there have been proposals to extend state aid to non-federally aided neighborhood facilities. In Connecticut, a special state program also assists the development of child day-care centers for disadvantaged children by funding two-thirds of the operating cost to the locality ( or an antipoverty agency) . The state normally relies on the application approval by the federal authorities in allocating its own contribution to the locality, thus avoiding unnecessary paperwork by municipal officials. In New Jersey, the state, in addition to providing one-half of the local share, allows a flexible formul a (up to 100 percent) for contributions to the local cost of federally assisted urban renewal projects to the extent they are devoted to public uses. As a prerequisite to aid for community development programs, Connecticut requires localities to prepare a Community Development Action Plan (CDAP). The CDAP is a community's survey and estimate of its problems and the physical, economic and human resources for dealing with them. T he state provides three-fourths of the cost of preparing the CDAP ; some of these costs to the state, with respect to CDAPs for communities under 50,000 are in ,t urn funded by HUD. It is vital, however, for a state to assure that these planning requirements do not become a substitute for or an inhibitor of program actions. The Connecticut Community Development Act, moreover, permits state aid to many projects that do not receive federal funding. In such cases the state provides two-thirds of the cost of the project. A state which participates in the funding of federally assisted projects should retain this flexibility. Some deserving applications will not receive federal funding fo r a variety of reasons. The state may wish ,to help localities that have sought federal fund ing but have not been able to obtain it for reasons unconnected with the merits of the project. Pennsylvania, for example, has launched an ambitious open-space land acquisition program financed by proceeds of a $500,000,000 bond issue. This pays for one-half of project cost to the locality. Although Connecticut only makes grants for specific programs set forth in its statute, states 16 might consider making a portion of their grant money available in block grants to cities for programs which do not fall within established categories of federal or state assistance. This will encourage ·1ocal initiative and will help meet individual locality needs. Program 2 An Urban Development Corporation with StateWide Authority to Combine State and Private R esources for the Improvement of Meiropolitan Areas. There are many factors inhibiting private, profitmotivated entrepreneurial participation in city renewal efforts on the scale demanded by current needs. Profit-motivat¼d entrepreneurs are used to assuming normal business risks. They are less accustomed to the political and public relations risks associated with publicly assisted programs. And they are disinclined to shoulder the additional commitment of personal and fin ancial resources occasioned by protracted negotiation and processing which often lengthens the development period. One way to bridge the gap between public control over land use and private entrepreneurial initiative has been indicated in New York. The state has recently created the New York State Urban Development Corporation (SUDS) . SUDS is empowered to draw upon the combined talents and resources of the state and private business to work with local governments to produce development and redevelopment projects throughout the state. These projects are intended to include balanced combinations of housing, light industri al, commerci al, recreational and cultural developments. As requested by agencies of the state or by cities, the corporation is to consider implementing projects within ex isting state and city programs. The corporation board of an urban development corporation similar to SUDS could be onehalf comprised of public officials and one-half chosen from the private sector. Initially, the corporation could be funded by the state through the issuance of tax-exempt revenue bonds. Conceivably, the corporation would eventu ally genera te sufficient earnings to cover operating expenses with o nly investment capital furni shed by the state in the form of loans at a rnte approximating that of the state's cost of borrowing. The corporation would plan projects and assemble the land, through eminent domain if necessary. In New York, SUDS has ultimate authority to override local building and zoning regulations. Although SUDS has extensive statu- tory authority in these respects, it is likely that it will oper-ate most effectively and perhaps exclusively in communities where local governmental and planning bodies are cooperating with the corporation. Rather than tie up its capital in the actu al development of a project, the corporation could encourage private developers to undertake this work. The corporation could also act as a developer itself where necessary. In such instances, after the project was completed, with long-term financing in effect and the project fully rented or functioning according to plan, the corporation would undertake to sell the project to a private investor or investors. The proceeds of the sale would be applied to the retirement of state loans to the corporation. Pursuant to conditions to be defined, some portion of the proceeds could be retained by the corporation. In some instances, the corporation might find it necessary to take back a lease in order to relieve the investor of the operating or supervisory burdens of ownership. Conceivably the corporation might eventu ally cause various real estate investment trusts to be organized. Projects would be sold to the trust with a lease-back by the corporation. If feas ible, this could be a method of mobilizing and channeling substanti al amounts of priva te capital into investments to which it would ordin arily not be attracted. Direct investment in real estate and development requires experience, sophistication, and fixed amounts of equity money, with the ·a dditional diffic ulty, especially in the case of residential real ~state, of responsibilities to tenants, legal, public relations and political hazards. However, purchasers of the real estate investment trust certificates could enj oy the benefits of real estate ownership and be substantially free of its hazards. Progra1n 3 Loan Guarantees to Owners of R esidential Property and Small Businesses. Private initiatives are necessary to reh abilitate the economic life and physical fac il ities of blighted communities. But often th ese are not forthcom ing unless th e addition al risk of inve tment in deteriorated areas is reduced. When needed capital, or bonding capacity, is not otherwise a~a ilable, states might provide an urban development guarantee fund to guarantee loans made by conventional lenders to owners of resi dential property and small businesses. A loan to an owner of residential property would have to be intended to provide housing for persons and families who could not obtain safe and sanitary accommodations provided by the unaided operations of private enterprise. A business would qualify for a guaranteed loan if it were unable to obtain adequate financing to maintain a stabilized work force or increase job opportunities by virtue of (a) its location ; (b ) its net assets ; or ( c) its doll ar volume. The New York Urban Development Guarantee Fund loans are to be used for the purposes of construction rehabilitation, or refinancing of properties a~d, in the case of small business pr_ojects, for equipment, stock in trade or wor~mg capital. The monies of the fund are den ved through the sale of debentures and from gifts. The fund is empowered to invest funds held by it and to charge a premium for its guarantees. In the event of default, the fund would pay to the lender the net amount of the loss. Program 4 Technical and Financial Assistance to Communities to Draft Proposals for Federal Program Grants. The increasing complexity of application requirements fo r some federal yrograms, eve~ those whose ultimate objective 1s frankly expen1:1-ental, has outrun the staff resources of many small er communities. The federal "Model Cities" progra m, for example, is intended to demonst rate how th~ ~nvironment and general welfa re of people hvmg in slu m and blighted neigh borhoods ca n be substanti ally improved through the orchestrati~n of federal, state and local governmental and pnvate efforts. Cities must submit proposals fo r planni ng grants. T hese proposals are to analyze the social, economic and physical problem~ of the model neighborhood area, what the city proposes to do about t~em, ~n? the strategy and adm inistrative machmery 1t mtends to employ. Under the program, cities with approved planning grants will become eligible fo r s~e~ial grants supplementing assistance under_ ex1stmg federal 1rrant-in-aid programs. T he reqwred nonfederal 0 contribution to every federally as isted project or activity carried ou t as part of an approved model cities program serves as the " base" fo r computing the special supplemental grant. The special grant may be up to 80 percent of the total non-federal contri bution. The development of a model cities or urban renewal proposal places a demand on the financial and techn ical capabilities of many localities. To help them obtain the e grants, the state might: 17 �--l I ( a) assist in drafting proposals for federal grants for communities which request technical assistance, and (b) make grants to enable those communities which wish to draft their own proposals to hire competent staff and consultants for this purpose. The stategic injection of assistance in this manner can help to enhance the flow of federal dollars to communities within the state. The purpose of this kind of assistance, however, should be the development of local competence to handle these administrative tasks in the future. It can be applied to a variety of federal grant-inaid programs. The New Jersey Department of Community Affairs has been particularly active in helping communities with Model Cities applications to HUD. Pennsylvania, through its Department of Community Affairs, provides similar help with applications for federal assistance for a broad range of programs. HUD is authorized to make grants to states to provide technical assistance to communities under 100,000 in population. A state program as described here, organized as a special technical assistance effort, might be eligible to receive a 50 percent grant from HUD to cover its cos ts. Program 5 Eliminate Constitutional Prohibitions, if Any, on the Involvement of Private Enterprise in Urban Affairs. A concerted attack on the problems of urban housing and community development requires a public-private partnership. New legal and financial tools and interrelationships must be devised to permit states, local units of government and private groups to marshal their resources in ways not foreseen years ago. Some state constitutions, however, specifically prohibit the use of the state's credit for private undertakings or contain provisions which have been interpreted as precluding tax abatement and other desirable public-private cooperative arrangements. The Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental R elations, a permanent, bi-partisan body esta blished by Congress to study relationships among local, state and national levels of government, has recommended the following constitutional language to facilitate general cooperative efforts between state and local public agencies and private enterprise : Notwithstanding any other provision of this constitution, the state, its political sub18 divisions, and any public corporation may, as provided by law, where a public purpose will be served, grant or lend its funds to any individual, association, or private corporation for purposes of participating or assisting in economic and community development. These basic constitutional changes are important. It is nonetheless vital to recognize, for example, that a program of state aid to localities for urban renewal under existing constitutional provisions can go far ,to bring about a constructive public-private partnership. Program 6 A Commission to Review and Assess Uodern Techniques of Zoning and Land Use Regulation and to Recommend Legislation to Modernize the State's Zoning Enabling Act. The period of rapid urbanization since the war has proven the inadequacy of present zoning statutes to control urban sprawl. The American Law Institute is presently drafting a Model Land Development Code to overhaul antiquated state zoning enabling statutes and provide much needed new tools to communities for shaping urban development. States should authorize the establishment of a commission to review and assess modern techniques of zoning and land use regulation and to recommend legislation for modernizing the state's zoning enabling act. A legislative committee of this nature is now at work in Connecticut having the benefit of a report on th at state's plan~ ning legislation . It is drafting specific measures that may have applicability in other jurisdictions. The prime objective of such a review would be to introduce greater flexibility into typically rigid requirements which inhibit imaginative and progressive land use for community development, and to eliminate the use of zoning powers to undergird economic segregation in residential development. Program 7 Excellence in the Design of Structures In volving the Use of State Funds or Credit and the Preservation of Public Building,r and Areas of Historical or Architectural Significance. Stimulation of massive increases in needed housing and community facilities will not achieve durable improvements in urban life unless conscious and unremitting attention is paid to the quality of the structures and public spaces and their sensitivity to the needs of people. Design quality is not a matter of style or pa- tina or the application of cosmetic effects. It goes, rather, to the heart of the process by which space is shaped. Delay, inadequate fee arrangements, resistance to innovation, imprudent concern with short-run savings at the expense of long-run viability-any of these will drive superior talent away from design responsibilities in subsidized projects. Great architecture, it has wisely been said, requires great clients. The state, in its manifold direct and indirect role as a potentially "great client," should impress all those who deal with it or serve it as functionaries with ,t he understanding that excellence in the end product is a keystone of .the state's housing and community development policies. The creation of a State Council on Architecture is one means of implementing these objectives. Such a Council has been created in New York to: -encourage excellence in design of all buildings constructed by the state or under supervision or with assistance of any state agency; -stimulate interest in architectural excellence in public and private construction throughout the state; -accept gifts to further its objectives; -obtain from other agencies of the state necessary cooperation and assistance; -make grants to municipalities to rehabilitate structures of historical or architectural significance for public purposes. Whether a council or some other instrument is created is secondary to assuring that what is designed, who is involved in the process, and how the process works is sensitive to user needs and community values as well as the normal economic structures. Even in purely economic terms , costs of managing, maintaining ( and protecting) a structure may be sharply reduced by appropriate design in the first instance. The responsibility for analyzing and changing the manner in which public funds are employed in designing community facilities from capital budgeting to maintaining the end result-must be centralized and highlighted. VII. Developing New Communities Program New Community Development Corporations with Eminent Domain Powers; Deferral of Property Taxes during Development Period; State Approval of New Community Development Plans in Lieu of Other Land Use R egulation. States can participate directly in solving urban problems by encouraging the development of new comunities on raw land outside of existing urban concentrations. New communities offer opportunities both for alleviating the problem of overcrowding in the central city and for overcoming the ugly patchwork sprawl on urban fringes . By providing a wide range of housing at varying prices, including low-income housing, new communities give promise of economically and socially integrated cities. Through comprehensive planning, new comi;nunities can provide for orderly urban growth using the most desirable locations, timing their development to correspond with area-wide or regional development plans or objectives. Internally, new communities can use land more efficiently, thereby cutting costs and providing better public services. They can br~ak away from conventional thinking, devel?p~ng new arrangements in such fields as bu~dmg codes, land use controls, zoning regulations, public services and governmental structures: . New communities offer unique opportumttes to enlist the talents and energies of the private sector in the inevitable expansion in the nation's metropolitan areas. They offer 'large-scale investment opportunities and new markets. Moreover, they offer a dramatic chall~~ge to ~e private sector to demonstrate its a~1hty to ~mld new urban environments in a settmg relatively free of the many constraints which hamper private initiative in existing cities. A first step in undertaking a state new community program could be to inventory land now owned by the state which may be deemed surplus to its needs. It may be found , fo r example, in many states that thousands of acres were purchased in the last century for penal or mental 19 �institutions and hospitals in then rural areas which are no longer required in the light of mod~ em medical or penal practice. Such land could be retained by the state, but leased to new community developmeat corporations. To help fin ance approved new communities Title X of the H ousing and Urban Developmen~ Act of 1965 provides FHA insurance of mortgages fin ancing land and improvements for new communities. T itle IV of the Housing and Urban D evelopment Act of 1968 provides a federal guarantee of debt obligations of private new community developers. These provisions should ease the financing difficulties of new community developers. S~ates, however, can remove three other major barners and thus stimulate the development of new communities within their borders. F irst, they might charter new community development corporations which would be authorized to use the power of eminent domain to assemble _large tracts of land necessary for the construction of new communities. S_econd, they might defer local property taxes dunng the development period of the new communjty by temporarily reim bursing developers for local property taxes paid, as an interest-free loan to be repaid when the property is sold, but not la~er than the end of a stated deferral period. Third, they might provide for state approval of new community development plans wpich would supersede local land use regulation that would otherwise apply to new com munity tracts. In many areas where new communities would be located, largely rural local government is unable t~ respond effectively to the needs of new commumty developers. Direct state action is ~eede~ to speed development or, indeed, to make it ~oss1ble. State authority would then be relinq~1shed to the government of the new commumty, once it was established. A state land should not be leased eminent domain powers granted , the deferral of local property .taxes made, nor state approval of new commumty development plans given unless a state finds that: - the development of a new community will make a substantial contribution to the economic and social development of the area in which it is situated ; - the site ~elected fo r the new community is sound with regard to projected population trends, the availability of land required , the absence of undesirable topographical or geological features, and the availability of transportation; - the proposed new community will have a 20 sound economic b ase and sound land-use patterns; -adequate provision has been made for local self-government; - adequate provision has been made for all necessary public utilities and facilities including those n eeded for education, he;lth, transportation, open sp ace, sites for industrial and residential uses, a central business center, and cultural and recreational facilities, and - adequate housing is available to meet the needs of families of a wide variety of income levels, including a substantial number of families of low- and moderateincome levels. VIII. Centralizing Administration of Housing and Community Development Programs Program A Cabinet L evel Department of Housing and Community Affairs R esponsible to the Governor, with R esponsibility for Administering a Broad Range of Community A id Programs. A state's ability to help communities tackle the tough urban problems of poor housing and inadequ ate community facilities could be greatly increased if responsibility for aid to urban communities were centralized in a single dep artment, agency or individual. Yet, today only a score of states have centralized a uthority for housing and community affair s programs. A centralized agency for community affairs , With adequate authority to administer a broad range of community aid programs like those described above, should be able to: - help communities attract private capital investment a nd business skills in ,solving community p roblems; - help communities attract and effectively utilize greater amounts of federal assistance; - help communities attract the financial assistance of private foundations ; - fill the gaps among existing federallyassisted community programs; - help local governments improve their planning and management of community programs, so that they can better assess community needs and decide the kinds of federal and st ate assistance that are required ; - help communities develop new approaches to commun ity problems through smallscale pilot programs which, if successful, could be widely repeated; -marshal state resources for more effective assistance to communities; - provide needed technical assistance to public and private groups, and - be a clearinghouse fo r information on a ssistance available to communities and a coordinator among communities, between state and communities, and between the federal government and communities. The form a centralized state authority for community affairs will take must fit into the administrative pattern of the state. At least three variations of centralized authority have been adopted : - a department of housing and community affairs with broad statutory authority ( e.g., Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island ) ; - a housing and community affairs administrator with narrower statutory authority (e.g., Alaska, Illinois, Vermont); - a special assistant to the Governor for housing and community affairs without statutory authority (e.g., Kentucky, Kansas, and North Carolina). . A department of housing and community affa irs responsible to the Governor and armed with a full range of community assistance programs is, generally speaking, the best administrative arrangement. It dramatically demonstrates the state's commitment to assist its communities on a continuing basis; it allows the Governor to assert executive leadership, and it may make possible a marshalling of state resources in other programs toward solving community problems. A principal task of the department would be to see that state assistance progra ms are more directly aimed at aiding communities to solve u rban problems. At the same time, the department as its principal task must direct its energies to helping communities to help themselves. This requires an able staff familiar with both local needs and the federal and state resources available to meet them. It also requires sufficient funding to create incentives to attract community support and capable personnel convinced of their value to the localities they are assisting. A special program of federal matching grants has been authorized to assist states in providing special training for professional, sub-professional and technical persons to be employed in housing and community development. Many states have already filed plans spelling out specific proposals, but these await federal funding, which is now anticipated. This program m ay thus provide the key resource for departmental staff development. 21 �References New Jersey : Other: I. Increasing the Supply of Low- and ModerateIncome Housing Program 1: Seed money loans, technical assistance and grants. Connecticut: Illinois: Michigan: New Jersey : New York : Other: 8 Connecticut General Statutes Annotated, secs. 218, 220 (P.A. 522, laws of 1967, sec. 20-21 ) . Chapter 67 1/2 Smith-Hurd Illinois Annotated Statutes, secs. 308-309. 12 Michigan Statutes Annotated secs. 16: 114 et seq. ' 52 New Jersey Statutes Annotated secs. 27D-59 et seq. (P.L. 1967 c'. 82). 41 McKinney's Consolidated Laws article 11. ' Urban America, Inc., Proposed Kentucky Housing D evelopment Fund; Proposed W est Virginia H ousing D evelopment Fund. Contact: James Twomey, Director Nonprofit Housing Center Ur ban America, Inc. I7i7 M assachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 202/265-2224 Program 2: State-developed housing. Alaska: Alaska Statutes, secs. 18.55.010 et seq. Hawaii : 8 Revised Laws of Hawaii, 1955, secs. 74-1 et seq. Vermont: Acts of 1961 , no. 21 2 ( as amended by H.B. 447, laws of 1968) . Program 3: Below-m arket-interest-rate mortgage loans. Illinois: 67 I /2 Smith-Hu rd Illinois Annotated Statutes, secs. 310 et seq. M assachusetts : 2A Massachusetts General Laws Annotated, Chapter 23 A. 12 M ichigan Statutes Annotated, Michigan : secs. 16.114 et seq. New Jersey: 55 N ew Jersey Statutes Annotated, sec. 141-5 (P.L. 1957 c. 8 1); 52 New Jersey Statutes Annotated, sec. 27D -66 (P.L. 1967 c. 82). New York : 41 McKinney's Consolidated Laws, article 2. Program 4: Interest-free loans to developers. New Jersey : Senate Bill 859, introduced June 13, 1968. Program 5: Construction loans. Illinois: 67 1/2 Smith-Hurd Illinois Annotated Statutes, sec. 3 IO. Massachusetts: 2A Massachusetts General Laws Annotated, Chapter 23A. RI 144 New Jersey Statutes Annotated, sec. 141-5 (P.L. 1967 c. 81). Urban America (see Program above). Program 6: Land acquisition and write-down. Connecticut : 8 Connecticut General Statutes Annotated, sec. 214 (P.A. 522, laws of 1967, secs. 16, 17). Program 7: Rehabilitation housing write-down. New Jersey: acquisition and Senate Bill 859, introduced June 13, 1968. Program 8: Property tax abatement. Connecticut: Michigan: New Jersey: New York : 8 Conn~cticut General Statutes Annotated, secs. 215, 216 (P.A. 522, Jaws of 1967, secs. 18-19) . P.A. 1968, No. 334. 52 New Jersey Statutes Annotated, sec. 27D-51 (P.L. 1967, c. 80). 41 McKinney's Consolidated Laws, article 11, sec. 57 5. Program 9: Administration. Illinois : 67 1/ 2 Smith-Hurd Illinois A nnotated Statutes, secs. 308 et seq. M assachusetts: 2A M assachusetts General Laws Annotated, Chapter 23A. Michigan: 12 Michigan Statutes Annotated sec. 16.114 et seq. ' New Jersey : 55 N ew Jersey Statutes Annotated secs. 14J-1 et seq. (P.L. 1967: C. 81 ) . 41 McKinney's Consolidated Laws New York: article 3. ' II. Increasing Housing Choice Program ]: Comprehensive fa ir housing Jaw. Alaska : Alaska Statutes, secs. 18.80-010. 160. Colorado: 69 Colorado Revised Statutes, article 7. New York: 18 McKinney's Consolidated Laws article 15. ' Program 2: Metropolitan area housing information centers. New York: Senate Bill 4099, Assembly Bill 6026. Contact: State Senator Whitney North Seymour, Jr. State Capitol Albany, New York Other: Paul D avidoff, Neil G old, Harry Schwartz, A H ousing Program for N ew Y ork State (1 968) . Contact : Paul D avidoff, Chairman Urban Planning Program Hunter College of the City U niversity of New York N ew York, New York Metro Denver F air Housing Center, Inc. Contact : Richard E. Young, Chairman 130 West Twelfth Avenue Denver, Colorado 80204 303 / 534-1263 Other : Program 3: Priority assistance for integrated housing. III. Improving Building Codes Program: Model building code. 18 McKinney's Consolidated L aws, New York : ar ticle 18. Advisory Commission on IntergovOther: ernmental Relations, 1968 State L egislative Program , pp. 287 et seq. IV. Improving Relocation Assistance Program: Uniform relocation program. Connecticut : 8 Connecticut General Statutes Annotated, sec. 219 (P.A. 522, laws of 1967, sec. 24) . Maryland : 33A Annotated Code of M aryland, sec. 6A. New Jersey: 52 N ew Jersey Statutes Annotated, secs. 31B-1 et seq. (P.L. 1967 c. 79). Other: Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, 1968 State Legislative Program, p. 264. V. Equalizing Landlord-Tenant Relations Program I: Means to secure code compliance. Connecticut: Community Development Act. Illinois: "For Better Housing in Illin ois," Report of the Legislative Commission on Low-Income H ousing ( April 10, 1967). Maryla nd : Code of Public Laws, Baltimore City, 1949 ed., sec. 459A. Massachusetts : M ass. Gen. Laws Anno., Ch. 111, sec. 127H (1967) . New York: Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, sec. 755 (McKinney Supp. 1966). Pennsylvania : Pa. Stat. Anno. Lit., 35 sec. 1700-1 (Supp. 1967 ) . Rhode Island: R. I. G en. Laws Anno., 45-24.2-11 (1956) . ( Rent withholding by welfa re agencies ) : Illinois: Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 23, secs. 11-23 ( 1967 ) . Michigan : M ich. Stat. Anno., sec. 16.414 (3) (Supp. 1968 ). New York: N.Y. Social Services Law, sec. 143-b (McKi nney 1966) . Program 2: Evictions. Michigan : Laws of 1968, P.A. 297. Program 3: Private obligation to repair. M ichigan : Laws of 1968, P.A. 295. Program 4: Publ ic housing policies. M ichigan: Laws of 1968, P.A. 267, 344. Rhode Island: R.I. Gen. Laws Anno., 45-25-18 (House BiJI No. 1605, Laws of 1968). VI. The American Bar F oundation, under contract to the U.S. Office of Economic Opportunity, is preparing a "Model Landlord-Tenant Code." The final report, expected to be available by January 1969," will consist of a statutory text together with relevant notes and comments. Its purposes include the codification of existing Landlord-Tenant Law, as well as the suggesting of useful changes. The Code is designed for eventual submission to the various state legislatures after initial submission to the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. Contact: Philip Hablutzel American Bar Foundation 1155 East 60th Street Chicago, Illinois 60637 Enhancing Community Development Program J: Financial assistance for community development programs. Community Development Act, P.A. Connecticut: 522, Laws of 1967. N ew Jersey: State Aid for Urban Renewal Projects, Laws of 1967, c. 80 (NJSA 52:27D-44 et seq. ). Program 2: Urban development corporation. New York : Chap. 174, Laws of 1968. Program 3: Loan guarantees. New York: Chap. 175, Laws of 1968. Program 4: Assistance to obtain federal grants. Laws of 1967, c.82 (NJSA 52:27DN ew Jersey: 59 et seq. ). Program 5: Constitutional reform . Advisory Commission on lnter~ovOther : ernmental Relations, State L eg1s/atio11 Program for 1969. Program 6: Zoning and plan ning reforms. Connecticut : New Directions in Planning Legislation, American Society of Planning Officials. 1313 East 60th Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 American Law Institute, Model Other: L and D evelopment Code. Contact: Allison D unham , C hief Reporter 101 N . 33rd Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104 Program 7: Improving design quality. Chap. 982, Art. 22, Laws of N.Y. New York : Contact: John P. Jansson, Executive Director New York State Council on Architecture 545 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10022 R2 �VII. Developing New Communities Program: Aiding the development of new communfries. New York : Laws of 1968, Chapters 173, 174. Other: Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Rel ations, 1969 State Legislative Program, pp. 507 et seq. VIII. Centralizing Administration of Housing and Community Development Programs Program: A centralized department of housing and community affairs. Connecticut : 8 Connecticut General Statutes Annotated, secs. 201 et seq. (P.A. 522, Laws of 1967. New Jersey : 52 New Jersey Statutes Annotated, secs. 27D-1 et seq. (P.L. 1967, c.293). Pennsylvania : Reorganization Plan 2, Act 582, 1965, Reg. Sess. Further information concerning the operation of the state programs referred to can be obtained from the follow ing officials : A laska Larry Montgomery, Director Local Affairs Agency Pouch AB Office of the Governor Juneau, Alaska 9980 l 907 /586-5 386 Connecticut LeRoy Jones Commissioner of Commun ity Affa irs 1179 Main Street P.O. Box 786 Hartford, Connecticut 06120 Ha waii Yoshio Yanagawa Executi ve D irector Hawaii Housing Authority 1002 North School Street Honolul u, Hawaii /1 /in ois Richard Blakley Managing D irector and Secretary Illinois State Housing Board 160 LaSalle Street Chicago, Illinois 60601 3 12/ 346-2000 Kansas John I va n Special Ass istant for Urban Land Community Affairs The Governor's Office State Capitol Building Topeka, Ka nsas 6661 2 913/ CE5-00l I , Ext. 261 K entucky John Vanderweir Director of Division of Land Development Assistance Kentucky Program Development Office of the Governor Frankfort, Kentucky 502/564-3840 Massachusetts Julian D. Steele Commissioner Department of Community Affairs State Office Building JOO Cambridge Street Boston, Massachusetts 02202 617 /727-3238 .. Michigan Robert McLain, Director State Housing Development Agency Department of Social Services Lewis Cass Building Lansing, Michigan 5)7/ 373-2000 N ew Y ork Edward Logue President and Chief Executive Officer New York State Urban Development Corporation 22 W. 55th Street New York, New York 10019 212/ JU 2-7030 N ew Jersey Paul Ylvisaker, Commissioner Department of Community Affairs State of New Jersey 363 W. State Street Trenton, New Jersey 08625 609 I 292-6420 North Carolina Luther C . Hodges Housing and Urban Affairs Land Specialist State Planning T as k Force 405 State Adminjstration Building P.O. Box 1351 R aleigh, North Carolin a 27602 919/829-4131 Pennsylvania Joseph W. Barr, Jr. Secretary of Communit y Affairs State of Pennsylvania 201 South Office Building Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 171 20 717/78 7-7160 Rhode Island Rev. Arthu r L. H ar dge Director Department of Community Affairs State House Providence, Rhode Island 401 / 52 1-7100 Ve rm ont J ames F in neran Executive Director State Housing Authority Mo ntpelier, Vermont 802 / 223-23 I l R3 " � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 7, Folder 9, Document 18 Box 7 Box 7 Folder 9 Folder topic: Urban Coalition | Miscellaneous | 1967-1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/2ce707717609e4373ce325cd93a9f9c3.pdf d4452b98e5779505f1afc15e1e11e996 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. REPRINTED FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES, THURSDAY, DECEMBERS, 1968 'Exiles' From Government Heading National Urban Coalition By JOHN HERBERS Special to Th< New York Tlme5 WASHIN~TON, Dec. 4 Some of the ablest innovators and mechanics of the New Frontier and Great Society are to be found two blocks from the White House in the offices of the National Urban Coalition. This private agency has become the vehicle for the special talents and persuasion of John W. Gardner, the former Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare. The kind of ferment. and excitement that pervaded the Government in the Kennedy Administration and early part of the Johnson Administration is present to a degree within the coalition, which occupies two floors df an office building at 1819 H Street. Many on Mr. Gardner's staff of professionals are, in effect, exiles from the Government and have transferred their hope for a better society from the public to the private sector. A Commitment Sought They show less optimism about the possibility of quick change and less self . assurance than was evident in Washington in the days before the big city riots. But they are finding America to be a little wiser about its urban predicament and are moving to achieve a national commitment in that area. The force that Mr. Gardner has assembled in the last seven months has two main objectives: To organize a massive lobbying effort to obtain the The New York Times John W. Gardner legislation that the coalition considers essential for the cities and to activate local leader.ship, especially the business community, through local affiliates. Mr. Gardner said in an interview that the coalition's annual b\ldget at .the national level was $3.5-million but that the overall cost, including that of 39 local coalitions, would be ,a bout $20-million. The money is provided \)y ccntributions from individuals, businesses and foundations. Three years ago President Johnson described the adverse forces faced by Negroes in the slums as a "seamless web" that would yield only to a total attack The coalition itself is moving in several areas, if only in small ways. School Aid Disputed ·For example, its education qivi'sion, headed by Dr. James Kelly, an associate professor at Columbia University, is supporting with funds and research a lawsuit that ·could radically change the method by which most states allocate school funds, so as to give inner-city schools a larger share. The suit, brought by the Detroit Board of Education against the State -of Michigan, charges that the system of appropriating the , same amount per child in both rich and poor districts is inherently unfair to the slum child. The case, now in a state court in Detroit, is expected eventually to be decided by the United States Supreme Court. Other "problem solving" projects are under way in the fields of employment, education, housing, economic development of the slums, legal services and health-all under the general heading of program development. The coalition was founded by a group of private citizens in August, 1967, after the nation had been raked by riots. It brought together business, religious, labor and civil rights leaders in an effort to reorder national priorities in the urban crisis. Its stated objectives was to bring about expanded Federal �THE NEW YORK TIMES, THURSDAY, DECEMBERS, 1968 efforts to provide jobs, an adequate income, decent and nondiscriminatory housing and improved education for the poor. There was considerable skepticism about what it_ coul_d accomplish, and for a time 1t appeared that the coalition would disappear for lack· of leadership, staffing and coordination. Mr. Gardner became its chairman the following spring and has been steadily building his staff. "The staff was assembled from two sources: persons who had worked with Mr. Gardner in government and those who beat on the doors to get in ," according to a coalition spokesman. · The latest high-level official to arrive is George A. -Silver, who had been deputy assistant secretary for health and scientific affairs in the Department of Health, Education and Welfare and who will head up a health program for the coalition. Dr. Silver was an idea man for the Government ("it would take several trucks to haul away my unused memos," he says) and hopes to be the same at the coalition. Health Crisis Seen In an interview amid packing boxes in his new office, Dr. Silver said there was a crisis building in most communities regarding health services, -due in part to ,a lack of understanding among the classes of people and professional groups involved. He hopes to build "communications bridges" between them. Following is a sample of others who have joined the staff: M. Carl Holman, formerly deputy staff director of the United States Coro.mission on Civil Rights, and now the coalition's vice president for program development. Bryiµi Dliff, who was on the public affairs staff of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and is now vice president for communications. Lo~ll Beck, who was on the staff of the American Bar Association antl is executive director of the Urban Coalition Action Council, the coalition's lobbying arm. A visitor gets the feeling that if Mr. Gardner were to leave, the coalition might fall apart. This is due in part to the fact that he has the respect of liberals because of his commitment to Federal action, and of conservatives because he is a Republican with a wide following in the business community. The emphasis is on getting business leaders and others with "clout" in their communities involved. John Dean, a Negro who had been southeastern director for community action programs under the Office of Economic Opportunity, is overseeing the formation of local coalitions in the same area. It is a slow, difficult task, he acknowledged, but the first step is to interest business and other community leaders in establishing a coalition. The blacks, he said, are no longer interested in meeting just with the white liberals who mean well but have little power. "They want to meet with the people who can get something done," he said. Mr. Gardner believes the greatest failure has been at the community level, As Secretary of Health, , Education and Welfare, he was assured by his own staff and other leaders in some communities that there would be no riots just before the riots broke out. In some cities white leaders still do ·not know who the real Negro leaders are. Performance Varies "We have talked a great game of community leadership, but we haven't lived up to it," he said. "The Federal Government can only give the communities the pieces [in grants 1and program s], and it is up to them to put the pieces together." The performance of the local coalitions has varied widely. Many are still in the formative stage. Th e Minneapolis Coalition is cited as the good example. It' has sponsored such things as "Anti-Racism Weck" for the education of suburban whites. White leaders ventured into the slums and were exposed to such remarks as: "Did you see wliat the honkies did? They raised $5-million for the Minneapolis Symphony." Stephen Keating, president of Honeyw~ll. Inc., and chairman of the coalition, withstood outrage and in sults· in "confrontations between the powerless and the powerful." But cities like Minneapolis, New York and Detroit are exceptions. Some cities whose Mayors are members of the national steering committeeChicago, P:ttshu,·gh and Phoenix-did not even have coalitions as of last month. Mayor Richard J. Daley of Chicago has said his Democratic organization provides the same service, and in cities like Atlanta progressive leaders who have traditionally met in private and decided what is best for the community are reluctant to give up that preroi;:ative. Because of the coalition's emphasis on private initiative, Mr. Gardner is hopeful of having the cooperation of the incoming Nixon Administration. Members of the steering committee are to meet soon with the President-elect, and Mr. Gardner already has held meetings with several of Mr. Nixon's advisers. He is pleased with the list of persons he has been told Mr. Nixon is considering for the Secretaties of Health, Education and Welfare and Housing and Urban Development. But there is skepticism within the coalition about the use of tax credits, which Mr. Nixon has proposed in an effort to enlist private enterprisr in rebuilding the slums and providing employment. Mr. Gardner says the proposals must be made more specific and studied carefully before his organization will decide on their merit. NEW SYMBOL of Urban Coalition makes "U" and "C" the links of a chain. Sandgren & Murtha, Inc., designed it. �THE NEW YORK TIMES, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 5, 1968 N ew York Coalition Scoring Its First Dramatic Gains in Slums By SYLVAN FOX A grimy foundry in Harlem changed ownership recently, and with the transaction, all the 'talk about giving Negroes a " piece of the action" took a small but profound step toward reality. The foundry, at 402 West 126th Street, was sold by its two white owners, Frieda Boga-rod and Ernest Kruezer, to the Harlem Commonwealth Council, a Negro economic development corporation. Behind the sale lies an important part of the story of what the New York Urban Coalition is all about; fo r it was with t he help of the coalition-a group of some 160 business, labor and community leaders who believe life in New York's slums can be improved by private e,ffortthat the deal was accomplished. The story of the coalition also 11ies in the help it gave to a Negro man who wanted to open a shoe store in Harlem. And it lies in the dedicated activities of the city's street academies, which seek to salva•g e high school dropouts from lives of ignorance and degradation. Not An 'Illusion' It even lies in a little vacant lot on 118th Street and Park Avwue, which in a few months will become the fi rst of dozens of miniparks created with coalition aid. "We're not under the illusion that the private sector can turn the city around," said Saul Wallen, the president of t he New York Urban Coalition, as he reviewed its first-year accomplishments. "But we can have an impact." Except for the trumpeting of its slogan - "Give a damn" -the coalition has operated quietly during the year, possibly because it did not seek publicity for its first tentative steps and avoided controversial areas until this week. But on Monday the coalition purchased newspaper advertisements strongly backing school decentralization under the headline: "If it works in Scarsdale, it can work in Ocean Hill." The text of the advertisement included a decentralization resolution approved by the group's board of directors after some vigorous private debate. Officials of the United Federation of Teachers said yesterday that the union was preparing a statement "rebutting some distortions" in the advertisement. A Dramatic Step The sale of the Acme Foundry to the Hal'lem Commonwealth Council is, perhaps, the most dramatic tangible step the coalition has yet made toward changing things in the depressed black and Puerto Rican communities. The Harlem Commonwealth CouncH was organized 18 months ago' by Roy Innis, now the national director of ~he Congress of Racial Equality and a fil'm believer in black economic development. Mr. Innis is also •a member of -t he New York Urban Coalition, w hich is the local arm of t he National Urban Coali,tion. His simultaneous role in both groups made it natural fo r the Urban Coalition and the Harlem Commonwealth co·uncil to cooperate, and when Miss Bogorod and Mr. Kruezer informed the coalition they wanted to sell their fo und·ry, the w heels were quickly set in motion. The ,price the foundry owners !tad set was $45,000 .p lus about $70.000 ·in cash on hand, accounts receivable and inventory. The coalition marshaled the needed assistance to complete the deal. Allen Herzig of Kidder, Peab9dy & Co., the investment banking firm, did a financial analysis of the foundry. Stuart Goldman, a WaH Street lawyer, handled the legal work involved in the purchase. The Abex Corporation, a manufacturer of control i:quipment and the owner of several foundries, agreed to provide technical aid and ar.ran-ged for the new president of the foun-dl:y, Rozendo Beasley, to attend a training course given by the American Foundrymen's Society. Loans Are Granted Through the efforts of the coalition, the Morgan Guaranty T,rust Company lent the Harlem Commonwealuh Council $50,000. The coalition's Venture Corporation-one of two economic development corpora~ tions it has established to help black and Puer.to Rican ·business enterprises -put up $20,000, and the Episcopa'i Diocese of New York provided a loan of another $20,000. Under its new ownership, the foundry employs 27 persons and does a gross business of $500,000 a year. But Negro ownership of the plant, while an important step, is just the fi rst, according to Mr. Beasley, a dynamic, mustached 33-year-old business administration graduate of Michigan State University. When the foun dry has paid off its $95,000 debt, he explained, 'the Ha~lem Commonwealth Council plans to sell shares to Harlem residents at a price they can afford to pay. "Our aim is economic development," he said, "spreading the equity within the community. That's what we're shooting for." THE N EW YORK TIMES, T HURSDAY, DECEMBERS, 1968 As a corollary objective, he ing number of high school munity Association, which has been working on a neighborsaid, the Harlem Common- dropouts. wealt,h Council hopes to prove Recently the New York Urban hood rehabilitation program. that Negro businessmen can run Coalition moved in, convinced The community association an en teiiprise so successfully ·businesses to invest in the edu- bought the lot and commisthat investment will be at- cation of high school dropouts, sioned plans for the minipark. tracted to other black-operated and won pledges from 15 com- It is expected to be completed businesses. panies of $50,000 a year each in early spring. These are a few of the coa"A lot of fi nancial institu- to support a street academy. tions say the re are no busi- Twenty-three are now in opera- lition's activities. There are others. In the South Bronx, the nesses in ghettos worth invest- tion or soon to be opened. New York Urban Coalition has ing in," Mr. Beasley said. "We 'Beautiful Communication' given the United Bronx Parents, wan t to prove that is wrong. A lot of financial institutions say Among the companies re- Inc., $50,000 1:o conduct a there isn't enough black mana- cruited by the coalition t o sup- training program, now in gerial talent available in the port street academies are Mc- progress, on school decentralighetto. We want to prove this Graw-HiH, American Ak lines, zation. After serious internal wrong, too. Pan Am, International Business debate, the coalition strongly "Our main function is to get Machines, Time Inc., Celanese endorsed the ,program. Col'poration, Sinclair Oil ComNews Jobs Filled in there and make dough." Cooperation between the Har- pany, Union Carbide, First NaLast summer, with coalition lem Commonwealth Council and tiona.J City Bank, Chase Man- financial help, 20 Negro and hattan Bank, Burlington Mills the New York Urban Coalition Puerto Rican young people athas also led to the establish- and American Express. tendetl a course in radio and At the McGraw Hill Street ment of a shoe store under television journalism at the CoAcademy on West 64th Street, Negro ownership at Lenox Avlumbia University Graduate enue and 134th Street. The five teachers work with 30 School o-f Journalism. All have 'rru-Fit Stride Rite store, which youngsters. McGraw-Hill found been ,placed in news jobs. ls owned by Al Jackson, opened the site for t:he academy, proThe coalition has committed vides teaohing mater-ial, puts up $150,000 in September. for four h ousing ,projthe money that is needed to Mr. Jackson, who had 'been run the school and conducts ects that needed money to go the manager of a Miles shoe regular conferences with mem- ahead with their construction store in Harlem, was chosen bers of the academy staff to plans. It has provided $20,000 from among eight possilble discuss the work ibeing done to the East Harlem Ski•lls owners whose names were sub- there and to sound out the Training Center, whioh is conmitted to the Green Shoe Com- teachers on how educational ducting a training program in pany by ' the Harlem Common- materials and textbooks can be vhe printing t rades for at least 200 Negroes and Puerto Ricans. wealth Council. The Green improved. The coalition has obtained, in Shoe Company put up about 90 "We've become, in a sense, conjunction with the National per cent of the needed investa laboratory for them," David Alliance of Businessmen, ment, Mr. Jackson the rest. Rathbun, a 26-year-old teacher The New York Urban Coa- at the academy, said of Mc- pledges of 19,000 jobs for hardlition helped Mr. Jackson refur- Graw-Hill. "There's a very core unemployed, and already bish the store, provided Jegal healuhy, beautiful kind of com- has filled 9,000 jobs. The National Urban Coalition assistance in the p reparation of munication." was formed in August, 1967, by his tax and insurance papers At 118th Street and Park a .group of private citizens who and is providing managerial 1 and technical assistance through Avenue, a sma:ll lot lies vacant. were convinced that private Next to it stands an a1bandoned business, laibor and community its Development Corporation. five-story building slated for· leaders could make a significant Companies Back Academies demolition. In a few month:;, it contribU'tion to improving life Another aspect of t he New is hoped, the site will be trans- in the nation's slums. John Gardner, the formr r York Ul'ban Coalition's wol'k is formed into a minipark. Again, the New York · Urben Secretary of Heal~h. Education evident at a street ·academy at 259 West 64rh Street, where 30 Coalition has been the catalyz- and Welfare, heads the national youngsters who have dropped ing agent behind the project. organization, and Mayor Lindout of high school are getting Last summer the Ama:lgamated say and Andrew Heiskell, an education. Clothing Workers of America ohairman of Time Inc., are coThe first street academies gave the coalition $40,000 for chairmen of its steering committee. were established by the New the construction of miniparks. York Urban League several The coalition turned about years ago to dea1 with the $27,000 of this money over to problem created by the grow- the Upper Pal'k Avenue Com- (cont. back page) �THE NEW YORK TIMES, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 5, 1968 (continued) Slow, Substantial Gains The New York Urban Coalition was or,g anized last October with Christian A. Herter Jr., vice president of the Mobil Oil Corporation, as its chairman, and Mr. WaHen, a labor mediator, as its president. At first, progress was slow , It still does not come at breakneck speed, but Mr. Wallen attribut.es this to the organization's "democratic character" and to the complexity of the problems i-t conf.ronts. Yet there have been some substantial gains in this first year-both of a tangible and an intangible nature, Mr. Wallen says. "One of the major accom- plishments," he said as he sat the other day •in his 35th-floor• office at coalition headquarters, 60 East 42d Street, "is maintaining a continuing dialogue between blacks and Puerto Ricans, business and labor. We don't have anything like that anywhere else in the city. "_And we've built an organizat10n and conducted a publicrelations campaign that articulated the concern of the white estaib'lishment about ghetto problems. "A year ago, when the coalitfon was founded, it was an idea. Now we're starting to emerge." The coalition, which has 48 full-time clerical and professional ernployes and about 100 volunteer workers, r.aised $4- million in a fund drive this year. It hopes to raise between $6-rnil'lion and $IO-million next year, Mr. Wallen said. A third of its income has been earmarl;{ed for Mayor Lindsay's sumn1er program. But short-term racial peace is not the main objective of the New York Urban Coalition. "I can't say we can take any credit for keeping the summer cool," Mr. Wallen said. "As a matter of fact, that isn't even our purpose. "We hope to involve the private sector in some of the basic problems of preventing urba·n blight, and that's going to transcend the summer. It's a long-term, long-pull proposition." Businessmen Are Urged to Join 'Frontal Assault' on Cities' Ills Special lo The New York Timcs PHILADELPHIA, Dec. 4 - chairman of the Urban CoaliThe nation's urban problems tion, an organization of busiare too great to yield to "hap- n_ess, labor, civic and civil hazard and limited solutions"; r!ghts lea?ers formed to help they require a "frontal assault find sol_u~1ons to the problems _ of the c1 ties. that will not work without busi- Mr. Heiskell was the speaker ness participation," Andrew at an alumni dinner of the UniHeiskell, chairman of Time versity of Pennsylvania's WharInc., said in a speech tonight. ton School of Finance and Businessmen, Mr. Heiskell Commerce, held at the Bellevuesaid, must find ways to intensify stratford Hotel. He was fy their interest, broaden their awaTded the Wharton ~old perspectives and enlarge their Medal, pres~.nted annually s1_nce commitment to the nation and 1_950, for personal contnb~its people. t10n to _the progress of Amen. . can business." Businessmen, he said, ca~ no Mr. Heiskell told the group lo?~er affo1:d to be _spe:1ahsts. ~hat perhaps the single most Our society, which 1s now 11:npormnt thing corporations largely urban," he declared, could do was to encourage the '.'will not continue to function young men who work for them 1f those of us in the priva~e "to find out about the problems sector do not become pubhc of the community and to bemen as well." come as expert at some aspect" Mr. Heisk~ll Is chairman of o_f them as they are at producUrban America, Inc., and co- t1on or marketing processes. The Urban Coalition 1819 H Street, N.W. • Washington, D. C. 20006 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document REPRINTED FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 5, 1968 ~ Heading Exiles’ From Government National Urban Coalition By JOHN HERBERS Special lo The New York Times WASHINGTON, Dec. 4 — Some of the ablest innovators and mechanics of the New Frontier and Great Society are to be found two blocks from the White House in the offices of the National Urban Coali- tion. This private agency has become the vehicle for the special talents and persuasion of John W. Gardner, the former Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare. The kind of ferment. and ex- citement that pervaded the Government in the Kennedy Ad- ministration and early part of the Johnson Administration is present to a degree within the coalition, which occupies two floors df an office building at 1819 H Street. Many on Mr. Gardner's staff of professionals are, in effect, exiles from the Government and have transferred their hope for a better society from the public to the private sector. A Commitment Sought They show less optimism about the possibility of quick change and less self. assurance than was evident in Washing- ton in the days before the big city riots, But they are finding America to be a little wiser about its urban predicament and are moving to achieve a national commitment in that area. The force that Mr. Gardner has assembled in the last seven months has two main ob- jectives: To organize a massive lobbying effort to obtain the The New York Times John W. Gardner legislation that the coalition considers essential for the cities and to activate local leader- ship, especially the business community, through local affili- ates. Mr. Gardner said in an inter- view that the coalition's annual budget at the national level was $3.5-million but that the over- all cost, including that of 39 lo- cal coalitions, would be about $20-million. The money is pro- vided by centributions from in- dividuals, businesses and foun- dations. Three years ago President Johnson described the adverse forces faced by Negroes in the slums as a “seamless web” that would yield only to a total attack. The coalition itself is moving in several areas, if only in small ways. School Aid Disputed For example, its education division, headed by Dr. James Kelly, an associate professor at Columbia University, is sup- porting with funds and re- search a lawsuit that could radically change the method by which most states allocate school funds, so as to give inner-city schools a_ larger share. The suit, brought by the Detroit Board of Education against the State of Michigan, charges that the system of ap- propriating the. same amount per child in both rich and poor districts is inherently unfair to the slum child. The case, now in a state court in Detroit, is expected eventually to be decided by the United States Supreme Court. Other “problem solving” proj- ects are under way in the fields of employment, education, hous- ing, economic development of the slums, legal services and health—all under the general heading of program develop- ment. The coalition was founded by a group of private citizens in August, 1967, after the nation had been raked by riots, It brought together busi- ness, religious, labor and civil rights leaders in an effort to reorder national priorities in the urban crisis. Its stated objectives was to bring about expanded Federal THE NEW YORK TIMES, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 5, 1968 efforts to provide jobs, an adequate income, decent and nondiscriminatory housing and improved education for the poor. There was _ considerable skepticism about what it could accomplish, and for a time it appeared that the coalition would disappear for lack of leadership, staffing and co- ordination. Mr. Gardner be- came its chairman the follow- ing spring and has_ been steadily building his staff. “The staff was assembled from two sources: persons who had worked with Mr. Gardner in government and those who beat on the doors to get in,” according to a coalition spokes- man. The latest high-level official to arrive is George A. Silver, who had been deputy assistant secretary for health and scien- tific affairs in the Department of Health, Education and Wel- fare and who will head up a health program for the coali- tion. Dr. Silver was an idea man for the Government (“it would take several trucks to haul away my unused memos,” he says) and hopes to be the same at the coalition. Health Crisis Seen In an interview amid packing boxes in his new office, Dr. Silver said there was a crisis building in most communities regarding health services, due in part to a lack of understand- ing among the classes of people and professional groups in- volved. He hopes to build “communications bridges” be- tween them. Following is a sample of oth- ers who have joined the staff: M. Carl Holman, formerly depu- ty staff director of the Unit- ed States Commission on Civil Rights, and now the co- alition’s vice president for program development. Bryan Duff, who was on the public affairs staff of the Na- tional Aeronautics and Space Administration and is now vice president for communi- cations. Lowell Beck, who was on the staff of the American Bar Association and is executive director of the Urban Coali- tion Action Council, the co- alition’s lobbying arm. A visitor gets the feeling that if Mr. Gardner were to leave, the coalition might fall apart. This is due in part to the fact that he has the respect of lib- erals because of his commit- ment to Federal action, and of conservatives because he is a Republican with a wide follow- ing in the business community. The emphasis is on getting business leaders and others with “clout” in their communi- ties involved. John Dean, a Ne- gro who had been southeastern director for community action programs under the Office of Economic Opportunity, is over- seeing the formation of local coalitions in the same area. It is a slow, difficult task, he acknowledged, but the first step is to interest business and other community leaders in establishing a coalition. The blacks, he said, are no longer interested in meeting just with the white liberals who mean well but have little power. “They want to meet with the people who can get something done,” he said. Mr. Gardner believes the greatest failure has been at the community level, As Secretary of Health,-Education and Wel- fare, he was assured by his own staff and other leaders in some communities that there would be no riots just before the riots broke out. In some cities white leaders still do not know who the real Negro leaders are. Performance Varies “We have talked a great game of community leadership, but we haven't lived up to it,” he said. “The Federal Govern- ment can only give the com- munities the pieces [in grants \and programs], and it is up to them to put the pieces to- gether.” The performance of the local coalitions has varied widely. Many are still in the formative stage. The Minneapolis Coali- tion is cited as the good ex- ample. It has sponsored such things as “Anti-Racism Weck” for the education of suburban whites. White leaders ventured into the slums and were ex- posed to such remarks as: “Did you see what the honkies did? They raised $5-million for the Minneapolis Symphony.” Stephen Keating, president of Honeywell, Inc., and chairman of the coalition, withstood out- rage and insults in “confron- tations between the powerless and the powerful.” But cities like Minneapolis, New York and Detroit are ex- ceptions. Some cities whose Mayors are members of the national steering committee— Chicago, Pittsburgh and Phoe- nix—did not even have coali- tions as of last month. Mayor Richard J. Daley of Chicago has said his Demo- cratic organization provides the same service, and in cities like Atlanta progressive leaders who have traditionally met in private and decided what is best for the community are reluctant to give up that pre- rogative. Because of the coalition’s emphasis on private initiative, Mr. Gardner is hopeful of hav- ing the cooperation of the in- coming Nixon Administration. Members of the steering com- mittee are to meet soon with the President-elect, and Mr. Gardner already has held meet- ings with several of Mr. Nixon’s advisers. He is pleased with the list of persons he has been told Mr. Nixon is considering for the Secretafies of Health, Edu- cation and Welfare and Hous- ing and Urban Development. But there is skepticism within the coalition about the use of tax credits, which Mr. Nixon has proposed in an effort to enlist private enterprise in re- building the slums and provid- ing employment. Mr, Gardner says the proposals must be made more specific and studied carefully before his organiza- tion will decide on their merit, NEW SYMBOL of Urban Coalition makes “U” and “C” the links of a chain. Sandgren & Murtha, Inc., designed it. THE NEW YORK TIMES, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 5, 1968 New York Coalition Scoring Its First Dramatic Gains in Slums By SYLVAN FOX A grimy foundry in Harlem changed ownership recently, and with the transaction, all the talk about giving Negroes a “piece of the action” took a small but profound step toward reality. The foundry, at 402 West 126th Street, was sold by its two white owners, Frieda Bogo- tod and Ernest Kruezer, to the Harlem Commonwealth Coun- cil, a Negro economic develop- ment corporation. Behind the sale lies an impor- tant part of the story of what the New York Urban Coalition is all about; for it was with the help of the coalition—a group of some 160 business, labor and community leaders who believe life in New York's slums can be improved by private effort— that the deal was accomplished. The story of the coalition also lies in the help it gave to a Negro man who wanted to open a shoe store in Harlem. And it lies in the dedicated activities of the city’s street academies, which seek to sal- vage high school dropouts from lives of ignorance and degrada- tion, Not An ‘Illusion’ It even lies in a little vacant lot on 118th Street and Park Avenue, which in a few months will become the first of dozens of miniparks created with coa- lition aid. “We're not under the illusion that the private sector can turn the city around,” said Saul Wallen, the president of the New York Urban Coalition, as he reviewed its first-year ac- complishments. “But we can have an impact.” Except for the trumpeting of its slogan — “Give a damn” —the coalition has operated quietly during the year, possi- bly because it did not seek publicity for its first tentative steps and avoided controversial areas until this week. But on Monday the coalition purchased newspaper adver- tisements strongly backing school decentralization under the headline: “If it works in Scarsdale, it can work in Ocean Hill.” The text of the advertisement included a de- centralization resolution ap- proved by the group’s board of directors after some vigorous private debate. Officials of the United Feder- ation of Teachers said yester- day that the union was pre- paring a statement “rebutting some distortions’ in the ad- vertisement. A Dramatic Step The sale of the Acme Foun- dry to the Harlem Common- wealth Council is, perhaps, the most dramatic tangible step the coalition has yet made toward changing things in the depressed black and Puerto Rican communities. The Harlem Commonwealth Council was organized 18 months ago by Roy Innis, now the national director of the Congress of Racial Equality and a firm believer in black eco- nomic development. Mr, Innis is also a member of the New York Urban Coalition, which is the local arm of the National Urban Coalition. His simultaneous role in both groups made it natural for the Urban Coalition and the Harlem Commonwealth Council to co- operate, and when Miss Bogo- rod and Mr. Kruezer informed the coalition they wanted to sell their foundry, the wheels were quickly set in motion. The price the foundry owners had set was $45,000 pius about $70.000 in cash on hand, ac- counts receivable and inven- tory. The coalition marshaled the needed assistance to complete the deal. Allen Herzig of Kid- der, Peabody & Co., the invest- ment banking firm, did a finan- cial analysis of the foundry. Stuart Goldman, a Wall Street lawyer, handled the legal work involved in the purchase. The Abex Corporation, a manufacturer of control equip- ment and the owner of several foundries, agreed to provide technical aid and arranged for the new president of the foundry, Rozendo Beasley, to attend a training course given by the American Foundrymen’s Society. Loans Are Granted Through the efforts of the coalition, the Morgan Guaranty Trust Company lent the Har- lem Commonwealth Council $50,000. The coalition’s Venture Corporation—one of two eco- nomic development corpora- tions it has established to help black and Puerto Rican business enterprises—put up $20,000, and the Episcopal Diocese of New York provided a loan of another $20,000. Under its new ownership, the foundry employs 27 persons and does a gross business of $500,000 a year. But Negro ownership of the plant, while an important step, is just the first, according to Mr. Beasley, a dynamic, mus- tached 33-year-old business ad- ministration graduate of Michi- gan State University. When the foundry has paid off its $95,000 debt, he ex- plained, the Harlem Common- wealth Council plans to sell shares to Harlem residents at a price they can afford to pay. “Our aim is economic devel- opment,” he said, “spreading the equity within the com- munity. That’s what we're shooting for.” THE NEW YORK TIMES, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 5, 1968 As a corollary objective, he said, the Harlem Common- wealth Council hopes to prove that Negro businessmen can run an enterprise so successfully that investment will be at- tracted to other black-operated businesses. _"A lot of financial institu- tions say there are no busi- nesses in ghettos worth invest- ing in,” Mr. Beasley said. “We want to prove that is wrong. A lot of financial institutions say there isn’t enough black mana- gerial talent available in the ghetto. We want to prove this wrong, too, “Our main function is to get in there and make dough.” Cooperation between the Har- lem Commonwealth Council and the New York Urban Coalition has also led to the establish- ment of a shoe store under Negro ownership at Lenox Av- enue and 134th Street. The Tru-Fit Stride Rite store, which is owned by Al Jackson, opened in September. Mr. Jackson, who had been the manager of a Miles shoe store in Harlem, was chosen from among eight possible owners whose names were sub- mitted to the Green Shoe Com- pany by the Harlem Common- wealth Council. The Green Shoe Company put up about 90 per cent of the needed invest- ment, Mr. Jackson the rest. The New York Urban Coa- lition helped Mr. Jackson refur- bish the store, provided legal assistance in the preparation of his tax and insurance papers and is providing managerial and technical assistance through its Development Corporation. Companies Back Academies Another aspect of the New York Urban Coalition’s work is evident at a street academy at 259 West 64th Street, where 30 youngsters who have dropped out of high school are getting an education. The first street academies were established by the New York Urban League several years ago to deal with the problem created by the grow- ing number of high school dropouts. Recently the New York Urban Coalition moved in, convinced businesses to invest in the edu- cation of high school dropouts, and won pledges from 15 com- panies of $50,000 a year each to support a street academy. Twenty-three are now in opera- tion or soon to be opened. ‘Beautiful Communication’ Among the companies re- cruited by the coalition to sup- port street academies are Mc- Graw-Hill, American Airlines, Pan Am, Internationa] Business Machines, Time Inc., Celanese Corporation, Sinclair Oil Com- pany, Union Carbide, First Na- tional City Bank, Chase Man- hattan Bank, Burlington Mills and American Express. At the McGraw Hill Street Academy on West 64th Street, five teachers work with 30 youngsters. McGraw-Hill found the site for the academy, pro- vides teaching material, puts up the money that is needed to trun the school and conducts regular conferences with mem- bers of the academy staff to discuss the work being done there and to sound out the teachers on how educational materials and textbooks can be improved. “We've become, in a sense, a laboratory for them,” David Rathbun, a 26-year-old teacher at the academy, said of Mc- Graw-Hill. “There’s a very healthy, beautiful kind of com- munication.” At 118th Street and Park Avenue, a small lot lies vacant. Next to it stands an abandoned five-story building slated for demolition. In a few months, it is hoped, the site will be trans- formed into a minipark. Again, the New York Urben Coalition has been the catalyz- ing agent behind the project. Last summer the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America gave the coalition $40,000 for the construction of miniparks. The coalition turned about $27,000 of ihis money over to the Upper Park Avenue Com- munity Association, which has been working on a neighbor- hood rehabilitation program. The community association bought the lot and commis- sioned plans for the minipark. It is expected to be completed in early spring. These are a few of the coa- lition’s activities. There are others. In the South Bronx, the New York Urban Coalition has given the United Bronx Parents, Inc., $50,000 to conduct a training program, now in progress, on school decentrali- zation. After serious internal debate, the coalition strongly endorsed the program. News Jobs Filled Last summer, with coalition financial help, 20 Negro and Puerto Rican young people at- tended a course in radio and television journalism at the Co- lumbia University Graduate School of Journalism. All have been placed in news jobs. The coalition has committed $150,000 for four housing proj- ects that needed money to go ahead with their construction plans. It has provided $20,000 to the East Harlem Skills Training Center, which is con- ducting a training program in the printing trades for at least 200 Negroes and Puerto Ricans. The coalition has obtained, in conjunction with the National Alliance of Businessmen, pledges of 19,000 jobs for hard- core unemployed, and already has filled 9,000 jobs. The National Urban Coalition was formed in August, 1967, by a group of private citizens who were convinced that private business, labor and community leaders could make a significant contribution to improving life in the nation’s slums. John Gardner, the former Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, heads the national organization, and Mayor Lind- say and Andrew Heiskell, chairman of Time Inc., are co- chairmen of its steering com- mittee. (cont. back page) THE NEW YORK TIMES, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 5, 1568 (continued) Slow, Substantial Gains The New York Urban Coa- lition was organized last Oc- tober with Christian A. Herter Jr., vice president of the Mobil Oil Corporation, as its chair- man, and Mr. Wallen, a labor mediator, as its president. At first, progress was slow. It still does not come at break- neck speed, but Mr. Wallen attributes this to the organiza- tion’s “democratic character” and to the complexity of the problems it confronts. Yet there have been some substantial gains in this first year—both of a tangible and an intangible nature, Mr. Wallen says. “One of the major accom- plishments,” he said as he sat the other day in his 35th-floor: office at coalition headquarters, 60 East 42d Street, “is main- taining a continuing dialogue between blacks and Puerto Ricans, business and labor. We don’t have anything like that anywhere else in the city. “And we've built an organi- zation and conducted a public- relations campaign that articu- lated the concern of the white establishment about ghetto problems. “A year ago, when the coa- lition was founded, it was an idea. Now we're starting to emerge.” The coalition, which has 48 full-time clerical and profes- sional employes and about 100 volunteer workers, raised $4- million in a fund drive this year. It hopes to raise between $6-million and $10-million next year, Mr. Wallen said. A third of its income has been earmarked for Mayor Lindsay’s summer program. But short-term racial peace is not the main objective of the New York Urban Coalition. “T can’t say we can take any credit for keeping the summer cool,” Mr. Wallen said. “As a matter of fact, that isn’t even our purpose. “We hope to involve the pri- vate sector in some of the basic problems of preventing urban blight, and that’s going to transcend the summer. It’s a long-term, long-pull propo- sition,” Businessmen Are Urged to Join ‘Frontal Assault’ on Cities’ Ills Special to The New York Times PHILADELPHIA, Dec. 4 — The nation’s urban problems are too great to yield to “hap- hazard and limited solutions”; they require a “frontal assault that will not work without busi- ness participation,” Andrew Heiskell, chairman of Time Inc., said in a speech tonight. Businessmen, Mr. Heiskell said, must find ways to intensify fy their interest, broaden their perspectives and enlarge their commitment to the nation and its people. Businessmen, he said, can no longer afford to be specialists. “Our society, which is now largely urban,” he declared, “will not continue to function if those of us in the private sector do not become public men as well.” Mr. Heiskell is chairman of Urban America, Inc., and co- The Urban chairman of the Urban Coali- tion, an organization of busi- ness, labor, civic and civil rights leaders formed to help find solutions to the problems of the cities. Mr. Heiskell was the speaker at an alumni dinner of the Uni- versity of Pennsylvania’s Whar- ton School of Finance and Commerce, held at the Bellevue- Stratford Hotel. He was awarded the Wharton Gold Medal, presented annually since 1950, for “personal contribu- tion to the progress of Ameri- can business.” Mr. Heiskell told the group that perhaps the single most important thing corporations could do was to encourage the young men who work for them “to find out about the problems of the community and to be- come as expert at some aspect” of them as they are at produc- tion or marketing processes. Coalition 1819 H Street, N.W. © Washington, D. C. 20006  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 7, Folder 9, Document 17 Box 7 Box 7 Folder 9 Folder topic: Urban Coalition | Miscellaneous | 1967-1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/d4637d0d5cccd14310ea92d23b54960d.pdf 971d9c0a55aee473fd0fc535e4a0afaf Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. ------======-==d;/==;:__==__143.215.248.55-=-J r The Urban Coalition I. ing ment Ac o The " 0 - s h owinq in man_ December 1968 I , t:atij F Community '] J The fallo wing statement is an excerpt from a recent speech by John W. Gardner, chairman of the Urban Coalition: difficulty in even formulating their probl~ms? Long before the riots, it was apparent to everyone who studied these-matters closely that communities so riven could not weather a storm without cracking wide open. Today one of the gravest handicaps to the The storms came-and they cracked wide local community, one of the things that prevents open. One after another. Like aU structures it from pursuing any of its purposes effectively, under stress they cracked along the lines of is the fragmentation of the community itselftheir internal weaknesses. The rift between and the fragmen tation of community leadership. black an d white communities was usually the I saw_ this at firsthand when, as Secretary of main issue but when the city tried to pull itself Health, Education and Welfare, I had to visit all together to face that issue, it found its capacity of our major cities-and many not so major. to do so greatly diminished by the other rifts I found that the typical American city was split within tbe community-between business and up into a variety of different worlds that were labor, between suburb and central city, between ,1 police and c iti?Pn h ~•---_ l:,1. __ • ~- -- ition . Id only to a tot~! that would y1e lition itself is attack. rhe coal areas, if only moving m severa in small ways. · ted School Aid ~::p:du<;ation For example, Dr. James division, headed _bre professor . an assoc1a . SUP" Kelly, b" University, is funds and re·a t Colum t~ porting with ·t that ·could search a Jawsu~he method by radically....-.n change t"tes allocate c_t L ! - \.. ~ �The Urban Coalition 1819 H Street N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 �Steering Committee of The Urban Coalition John W. Gardner Chairman Andrew Heiskell Co-Chairman A. PhiLip Randolph Co-Chairman I. W. Abel President United Steelworkers of America Pittsburgh, Pa. Honorable Ivan Allen Jr. Mayor {\.tlanta, Ga. Joseph H . Allen President McGraw-H:ill Publications New York, N.Y. Arnold Aronson Leadership Conference on Civil Rights · National Community Relations Advisory _Council NewYo.rk; N.Y. Roy Ash President Litton Industries Beverly Hills, Calif. Jordan Band Chairman National Community Relations Advisory Council Cleveland, Ohio Honorable Joseph M. Barr Mayor Pittsburgh, Pa. Honorable Jerome P. Cavanagh Mayor Detroit, Mich. Frederick J. Close Chairman of the Board Aluminum Company of America Pittsburgh, Pa. H.oiiorable John F. Collins Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Mass. Honorable Richard J. Daley Mayor Chicago, Ill. T he Most Reverend Joh n F. Dearden Archbishop of Detroit Detroit, Mich. �Dr. Arthur Flemming President, N ational Council of Churches . President, Macalaster Co!Jege St. Paul, Minn. Henry Ford 11 Chairman Ford Motor Company Dearbor,n, Mich. Honorable Milton Graham Mayor Phoenix, Ariz. The Most Reverend George H . Guilfoyle · Bishop, Diocese of Camden Camden, N .J. Dr._Edler G. Hawkins Pastor St. Augustine Presbyterian Church New York, N.Y. · Andrew Heiskell Chairman of the Board Time Inc. New York, N.Y: Jphn: H . Johnson President Johnson Publishing · Cpmpany Chicago, Ill. Joseph D . Keenan Secretary International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Washington, D .C . A. Philip Randolph President Emeritus . International Brot herhood of Sleeping Car Porters New York, N.Y. Walter Reuther President United Auto Workers Detroit, Mich. David. Rockefeller President Chase Manhattan Bank New Y ork, N.Y. James Rouse President The Ro.use Company Baltimore, Md. Rabbi Jacob P. Rudin President Synagogue Council of America New York, N.Y. TheodoFe Schlesinger President Allied Stores Corporation N ew York, N .Y. A~a T. Spaulding D irector North -Carolina Mutu.al Insurance Company Durham, N .C. David Sullivan President Service Employees International Union Washington, D.C. Honorable John V . Lindsay Mayor New York, N.Y. Honorable James H . J. Tate Mayor Philadelphia, Pa. George Meany President AFL-CIO Washington, D.C. John Wheeler President, Mechanics and .. Farmers Bank President, Southern Regional Council Durham, N .C. J. Irwin Miller President Cummins Engine Company Columbus, Ind. Honorable Arthur Naftalin Mayor Minneapolis, Minn. James F. Oates Chairman of the Board Equitable Life Assurance Society New Yo.i:k, N .Y. Roy Wilkins Executive Director National Association for the Advancement of Colored People New York, N .Y. Whitney M. Young Jr. Executive Director National Urban-League New York, N.Y. ..,. �On August 24, 1967, at an emergency convocation in Washington, D .C., a prestigious group of 1,200 persons issued an urgent appeal on the urban crisis to all concerned Americans. They were men and women of diverse, even divergent interests, and yet they joined together in a national effort to mold a new political, social, economic, and moral climate that would help to break the vicious cycle of the ghetto. This effort-heavily dependent on local as well as national actionwas the beginning of the Urban Coalition. The immediate impetus was concern over the mounting violence in American cities, and a realization tha-t the problems confronting the cities were too large and too complex to be solved by a single segment of society acting alone. At the conclusion of the convocation, the participants, who included mayors and leaders in business, religion, labor, and civil rights, agreed on the urgent need for action on a broad statement of principles that became the charter of the Urban Coalition movement. This is what the statement adopted at the convocation said, in part : " We believe the American people and the Congress must reorder national priorities, with a commitment of resources equal to the magnitude of the problems we face. The crisis requires a new dimension of effo rt in both the public and private sectors, working together to provide jobs, housing, education, and the other needs of our cities. '·We believe the Congress must mo ve without delay on urban programs. The country can wait no longer fo r measures that have too lo ng been denied the people of the cities and the nation as a wholeadditional civil rights legislation, adequately funded model cities, anti-poverty, housing, education , and job-training programs, and a host of others. "We believe the private sector of America must directly and vigoro usly involve itself in the crisis of the cities by a commitment to investment, job-training and hiring, and all that is necessary to the full enjoyment of the free enterprise system- and also to its survival. ... 'This convocation calls upon local government, business, labor, religions, and civil rights grou ps to r Joseph H. Allen Arnold Aronson �create counterpart local coalitions where the y do not exist to ·support and supplement this decl aration of principles." The work of mobiliza tion began immedi atel y after the convocation ended , under the leadership of two co-chairmen: Andrew Heiskell, chairman of the board of Time Inc. , and A. Philip R andolph , president of the Intern ational Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters. By yea r's end, communities across the country had responded by forming local Urban Coalitions , each structured to fit the particul ar needs of its city. In the spring of 1968, the national Urb an Coalition became a nonprofit, ta x-exempt corporation with John W . Gardner as its chairman and chief executive officer. The Coalition is governed by a steering committee of 38 national leaders represe ntative of the participants in the convocation. The Urban Coalition Action Counci l was se t up nationally as a separate non-profit organization to engage in direct advocacy of legislation a imed at meeting the problems of the cities. It is responsib le for a ll legislative activities. are needed . They have served as catalysts, marshaling broad community support and stimulating new ac tion programs while not operating them directly. The Coalition movement also provides a channel by which Coalition members and local groups may speak out on legisl ative issues at the national and state level affecting urban problems. Thus an Urb an Coalition is not a new organization , but a process , a means for joint action by the significant and diverse elements of the community. While the programs and structures of Urban Coalitions may vary to meet loc al priorities, the Coalitions share four essential characteristics: 1. Urban Coalitions have adopted a statement of principles which parallels that adopted by the organizers of the national Urban Coalition, tailored to the particular local situation. The national statement is broad enough to have received the endorsement of leaders from all major segments of urban society, from businessmen to civil rights ~rctivists , yet specific enough to give the Urban Coalition movement its essential form and direction . (For full text of statement, see appendix. ) 2. Urban Coalitions, as indicated by the statement of principles, are committed to a comprehensive at tack on all of the interrelated problems of their communitiespo verty, poor housing, in adequ ate ed ucation , racial tensions. A singlepurpose group such as a fairhousing council, even if it has wide community support, must expand its goals to other issues to become an Urban Coalition. 3. ln their m akeup, Urb an Coalitions are bro adl y representative of the leadership and li fe of th eir communities. As with the national Urb an Coalition, local Urban Coa litions include represe ntatives of business, labor, local government, re ligion , and civil rights o rgan iza tions . Most local Urb an Coalitions also include representati ves of ed ucation , the communications med ia, and estab li shed community organizations. It is essential that all include spokesmen for disadva ntaged and mi nority neighborhoods. 4. F in all y, Urban Coa litions must have th e resources to do an effective job. T hese reso urces include an adeq uate budget and an able (a lthough not necessa ril y large) staff. What is an Urban Coalition? The key word is " coalition": an alli ance of indi vi du als and orga niza ti ons drawn toge ther for specific purposes. An Urb an Coalition is a mechanism throu gh which individu al leaders and community groups can collaborate in dea ling with th e urban crisis. Jt is to meet all the complex and interwoven problems of our urban areas that Urban Coalitions are born. The elements of mod ern inJustri al soc iety have beco me so specia li zed and fr ag mented, and ye t so interdepe ndent, th at a new force is needed to pull the pieces together. No single element can solve the problems alone. The solution lies in joining the creativity, reso urces, a nd leadership of the private sector with those of the public sector. Ex ist ing Urban Coa liti ons have already demons trated their utilit y as forums for communication among the varied elements of comm unities and as instruments for comm unity ed ucation and action. T hey ha ve helped to assess community problems, establish goa ls and priorities, and coord inate program _ efforts. T hey have uncovered duplication of community efforts and identified gaps where new services ,. Joseph M. Barr Frederick J. Close �rate Coalitions. The Washington, D.C., Coalition has a metropolitan base, extending into the suburban counties in Virginia and Maryland. Since most of the problems confronted by a Coalition extend into the metropolitan areas-finding work for the unemployed, for example, requires a look at the job market both in the city and in its suburbs-these tasks are made easier if the Coalition is organized on a metropolitan basis. -The only criterion for the size of the steering committee is that it be large enough to do the job in the particular community. New York, With the national headquarters of many corporations, banks, and insurance Gompanies and its thousands of small employers, has 150 members, including spokesmen for community-action groups. Detroit, with one dominant industry, has 39. The first order of business before the steering committee is the drafting of a statement of principles. Once this is done and public announcement of the Urban Coalition's formation has been made, action should follow quickly. The community should know that it has The task of an Urban Coalition is a serious and complex one, and it dem ands a serious commitment of all involved. How an Urban Coalition Begins An Urban Coalition can start with one concerned and determined person-the mayor, a businessman, a labor leader-or out of discussions among several individuals or community organizations. As quickly as possible, however, the makeup of the organizing committee for an Urban Coalition should be spread across the entire spectrum of community leadership. The task of this initial group is to create the Coalition's steering committee, its policy- and programmaking body. These are some guidelines, drawn out of the experiences of Urban Coalitions to date, for selection of the steering committee members: - They need not have been previously identified with civic causes. One task of the Coalition, in fact, is to identify and enlist talent which may not previously have been at the service of the community. -They should include the community's most influential leadership. The most zealous efforts of churches, community-service organizations, and neighborhood groups will be wasted unless those who hold power in local government, business, labor, and communications are convinced of the need for action. - It also works the o ther way aro und. T he best efforts of the holders of power will be frustrated unless decisions are made with, rather than for, the disadvantaged in the community. The increasing drive for self-determination among the minorities and the poor is producing new and often militant neighborhood and youth organizations. If truly representative, the Coalition can provide the essential link between emerging neighborhood spokesmen and the established communitywide leadership. It can thus be a vehicle for both communication and common action, joining reso urces to needs. - The Coalition may represent a city, a metropolitan area, even a county. Kansas City, Mo., and Kansas C ity, Kan. , have found it advantageous to fo rm a joint U rban Coalition; the twin cities of St. Paul and Minneapolis have formed sepa- George H.Guilfoyle -- Andrew Heiskell �acquired not just a forum for discussion of its problems, but a potentially powerful force for constructive change. In joining an Urban Coalition, the steering committee members may be working together for the first time, putting their special interests aside for the sake of the community. The better they get to know each other, the more productive their association will be. When the New York Urban Coalition was organizing, some 100 men went off to Tarrytown together on a weekend retre at. On neutral ground, the big insurance executive and the ghetto militant met, listened, and learned from each other. To get a program underway, the Co alition needs both money and staff. Initial funds may come most readil y from business and labor members , or the city government m ay make an interim contribution. In Minneapolis, the 14 business executives who had attended the August convocation each contributed $ 1,000 to get their program organized. The fund was used to hire two part-time professionals to help analyze objectives, organization structure, and fe asibility of Coalition action. Perm anent funding should come , however, from all segments of the Coalition. If one segn1ent is unable to contribute money, it might provide se rvices inste ad: staff members ca n be lo aned to the Coalition , office space contributed, stationery and supplies furnished. In developing their programs, Coalitions have found th at it is impo rt ant to mee t where the problems are. Visiting slums in H arl em helped se t priorities for action by the New York Urb an Coalition. Phil adelphia leaders saw things " they would not be lieve" when the m ayor too k 200 of them to visit the city's pockets o f poverty. The Urban Coalition in Action G ive n the va ri ations in needs from city to city, the ra nge of program possi bilities fo r Urban Coalitions ca n best be desc ribed by specific exam ples . In most cases, programs are p lan ned by task forces in the a reas of most p ressing concern. Most U rban Coa litions have started with task forces on employment, ho usin g, and ed ucation ; others have been added on econom ic develop- �ment (with the focus on encouraging entrepreneurship among ghetto residents), youth, problems of the aging, and communications. These are some of the progra ms th at Urban Coalitions have launched aro und the country: Concentrating its strongest efforts on helping the ghetto's small businessmen, the Baltimore Urban Coa lition has formed a business task force to help establish a Small Business Investment Corp.-a high-risk ven ture capital program with a projected $ 1 million operating fund . The task force has pulled together the talents of the Greater Baltimore Committee ( a 102-member business organization) to advise on the creatio n of business cooperatives, and local associations of acco untants, law yers, and retail merch ants to give tech nica l assistance to inexperienced ghetto entrepreneurs. In the middle of its organizing process , the Washington, D.C., Urban Coalition came into instant, full-grown existence in response to the April disorders which rocked the capital fo llowing the shooting of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. T he Coalition appointed emerge ncy committees on food, housin g, John V. Lindsay George Meany employme nt , and fin ancial assis tance; they made available 1,400,000 free meals, developed 1,000 job offers , fo und 800 dwellings for riotdisplaced persons and collected $ 146,000 in emergency aid funds. This emergency effort was followed by a call to provide logistical support to the Poor People's Campaign: delivering food to Resurrection City three times a day and providing med ical care, a recreation al progra m, and community se rvice volunteers. Jobs have been the chief focus of the Minneapolis Urban Coalition , workin g with the N ation al Alliance of Businessmen and the Chamber of Commerce. The results have included pledges to the NAB for I , I 00 summer jobs and the waiving of education-level requirements for line work by one of the area's major em ployers, Honeywell Inc. The Riverside (Calif.) Urban Coalition developed a Job Opportunities Council and persuaded eight of the city's largest employers to participate. With funding from the eight firm s, the Council was to find and ge t in touch with hard-core unemployed persons. It wou ld provid e or obtai n necessary training to qualify these applicants to meet lowered minimum hiring standards, then refer them to the firms. The eight co mp an ies planned to hire a num ber equivalent to 4 per ce nt of their present work force. A. housin g se minar sponsored by the Gary (Ind.) Urban Coa lition led to the decision by two ch urches to sponsor the construction of lowe rincome housing under federa l mortgage guarantees . Along with these efforts by the non-p rofit spo nsors, the area's major employer, U .S. Steel, announced its intention to build about 300 moderate-i nco me housin g units in the city. The Bridge port (Conn.) Urban Coa /irion's ac tin g T ask Force on Ed ucation formed an educational consort ium to ensure a co llege educa tion for all qu alifi ed students in the Brid ge port area. The consortium includ es the three pres id ents of pri vate universities who make up the Task Force and the presidents of four o ther institutions of higher learning in the region. A com mittee of admissions officers fro m the seve n parti cipat ing schools screens each appli cant a nd arra nges fo r his admiss ion to one of the co lleges. J. Irwin Miller �pressing their views on nation al and state legislative issues. Because most Urba n Coalitions seek taxdedu ctible contributions from such sources as community found ations, some have chosen to establish a separate organization, as the nation al group has, to carry out legislative progra ms on the scale needed. The Urban Coalition Action Council will provide assistance to others choosin g this course. The tasks of an Urban Coalition will not be easy, for they reflect the scale and complexity of the crisis situation facing the country. The search for solutions involves major commitments at every level- national, state, and local-and by all segments of society, public and private alike. Substantial public resources must be forthcoming if solutions are to be found, but so must significant private leadership. "Out of past emergencies, we have drawn strength and progress," said the founders of the U rban Coalition movement. "Out of the present urban crisis we can build cities that are places, not of disorder and despair, but of hope and opportunity." Appendix 1 Principles Goals Commitments ' Statem ent adopted at the f:mergency Con vocation, August 24, 1967, Washingt'on; D.C. ,:, We are experiene~g our third summer of widespread civil disorder. In 1965, it was H arlem, and the disas ter of Watts. In 1966, it was the H ough area of Cleveland, _Omaha, ~ tlanta, D ayton, San Francisco, and 24 other cities. This summer, Newark and Detroit were only the most tragic of 80 explosions of violence in the streets. Confronted by these catastrophic events, we, as representatives of business, labor, religion, civil rights, and local government have joined in this convocation to create a sense of national urgency on the need for positive action for all the people of our cities. We are united in the followin g convictions: We believe the tangible effects of the urban riots in terms of death , injury, and property damage, horrifying though they are, are less to be feared than the intangible damage to men's minds. We believe it is the government's duty to m ai ntain law and order. · We believe that our thoughts and actions should be dir ected to the deep-rooted and historic problems of the cities. We believe that we, as a nation , must clearly and positively demonstrate our belief that justice, -social Progress, and equality of opportunity are rights of every citizen. We believe the American people and the Congress m ust reorder national priorities, with a com mitment of resources equal to the m agnitude of the problems we face. The crisis requires a new dimension of effor t in both the public and private sectors, Working together to provide jobs, housing, education , and the other needs of our cities. We believe the Congress must move without delay on urban program . T he country can wait no - • A t the national le1·el, t wo separate o rgani:::.atio11s ha,·e been created: the U rba11 Co a/itio11 and the U rban Coalition Action Cou11ci/. Th e Actio n Council is responsible fo r th e impleme111ation of legislative goals and ob jectfres ex pressed in this s tatement. . �longer for measures that have too long beet). denied the peop)e of the cities and the nation as a wholeadditional civil rights legislation, adequately funded model cities, anti-poverty, housing, education, and job-training_ programs, and a host of others. We believe the private sector oi America must directly and vigorously involve itself in the crisis of the cities by a commitment to investment, jo~:>-training, and hiring, and all that is necessary .to the full enjoyment of the free enterprise system-and also to its survival. We . believe the sickness of the cities, including civic disorder within them, is the responsibility of the whole of America. Therefore, it is the responsibility of every American to join in the creation of a new· political, social, economic, and ·moral climate that will make possible the breaking of the vicious cycle of the ghetto. Efforts must be made to insure 1he broadest possible opportunity for all citizens and groups, including those in the ghetto, to participate fully in shaping and directing the society of which they a're a part. This convocation calls upon the nation ·to end once and for all the shame of poverty amid general affl uence. Government and business must accept responsibility to provide all Americans with opportunity to earn an adequate income. Private industry must greatly accelerate its efforts to recruit, train, and hire the hard-core unemployed. When the private sector is unable to provide employment to those who are both able and willing to work, then in a free society the government must of necessity assume the respo.nsibility and act as the employer of last resort or must ass ure adequate income levels for those who are unable to work. Emergency Work Program This convocation calls upon the federal government to develop an emergency work program to provide jobs and new training opportunities for the unemployed and underemployed consistent with the following principles : - The federal government must enlist the cooperation of government at all levels and of private industry to assure that meaningful, productiv7 work is available to everyone willing and able to work. - To create socially useful jobs, the emergency work program should concentrate on the huge backlog of employment needi:; in parks, streets, slums, countryside, _schools, colleges, libraries, and hospitals. To this end an emergency work program should be initiated and should have as its first goal putting at least one million of the presently unemployed into productive work-at the earliest possible moment. - The program must provide meaningful jobs-not dead-end, make-work projects-so that the employment experience gained adds to the. capabilities and -broadens the opportunities of the employees to become productive members of tfie permanent work force of our nation . -Basic education, training, and counseling must be an integral part of the program t-0 assure extended 0 ~~ortunities for upw,!rd job mobility and to improve employee productivity. Funds for training, edncation, and counseling should be ma_de availal:ile to private industry as Well as to public and private nonprofit agencies. -Funds for employment should be made available to local and state governments, non-profit institutions, and federal agencies able to demonstrate their ability to use labor productively without reducing existing l~vels of employment or undercuttin& existing labor standards or wages which prevail for comparable Work or services in the area but are not less than the federal minimum wage. - Such a program should seek to qualify new employees to become Part of Jhe regular work force and tbat normal performance standards are met. -The operation of the program should be keyed to specific, localized unemployment problems and focu ed initially on those areas where tl)e need is most apparent. Private -Employment, Assistance, and Investment All representatives of the private sector in this Urban Coalition decisively commit themselves to assi t th.e deprived among us to achieve _ful.l participatiQn in the economy as self-supporting citizens. We pledge full-scale private endeavor through creative job-training and employment, managerial assi tance, and - �basic investment in all phases of urban development. The alternatives to a massive and concerted drive by the private sector are clear. They include the burden of wasted human and physical potential, the deterioration of the healthy environment basic to the successful operation of any business, and the dangers of permanent alienation from our society of millions of citizens. We propose to ini,tiate an all-out attack on the unemployment problem through the following steps : - In cooperation .with government, to· move . systematically and directly into the ghettos and barrios to seek out the unemployed arid underemployed and enlist them in basic and · positive private training and employment program s. We will re-evaluate ou,r current testing proceclures and employment stand ards so as to modify or eliminate those practices and requirements· that unnecessarily bar many persons from gainful employment by business or access to union membership. - To create a closer relationship between private employers and public training and emergency employment pTograms to widen career op-_ portunities for our disadvantaged citizens. To this end, we will proceed immedi ately to promote "Earn and Learn Centers" in clepressed urban areas that might well be the joint venture of business, labor, and local government. - To develop new training and related programs to facilitate the earl y entry of under-qualified persons into industrial and commerci al employment. - To develop large-scale programs to motivate the young to continue their education. Working close ly with educators, we will redouble our efforts to provide parttime employment, training, and other incentives for young men and women. We also pledge ou r active support to making quality education really accessible to deprived as well as advantaged young people. - To ·expand on-the-job train ing programs to enhance the career adva ncement prospects of all employees, with particula r emphasis on those who now must work at the lowest level of job· cl assifications becau e of educational and ski ll deficiencies. We pledge to mobilize the man- agerial resources and experience of the private sector in every way possible. We will expand p art-time and full-time assistance to small business development. We will strive to help residents of these areas b'ath to raise their level of managerial know-how and to obtain private and public investment funds for development. We will work more closely with publi<.:: agencies to assist in the management of p·ublic projects. We will encourage more leaders in the private sector to get directly and personally involved in urban problems so that they may gain a deeper understanding of these problems and be -of greater assistance. We pledge our best efforts to de~elop means by which m ajor private investment m ay be attracted to the renovation of deteriorating neighborhoods in our cities. We will explore and en~ourage governmental incentive.s to ·expedite private investment. We will develop new methods of combining investment and managerial assistance so that the residents · m ay achieve a leadership position in the development of their areas. llousing, Reconstruction, and Education This convocation calls upon the nation to take bold and immediate action to fulfill the national need to provide "a decent borne and a suitable. living environment for every American family" with guarantees of equal access to all housing, new and existing. The Urban Coalition shall, as its next order of business, address itself to the development of a broad program of urban reconstruction and advocacy of appropriate public and private action to move toward these objectives, including the goal of rehabilitation and construction of at least a million housing units for lower-income families annually. T his convocation calls upon the nation to create educational progran;is that will equip all young Americans for full and productive ~articipation in our society to the full potential of their abilities. This Will require concentrated compensatory programs to equalize opportunities for achievement. Early chi ldhood education must be made Universal. Work and study progra ms must be greatly expanded to enlist those young people who now �drop out of school. Financial barriers that now deny to youngsters from low-income fa milies the opportunity for higher edu_cation must be eliminated. Current programs. must be increased suffi ciently to wipe out adult illiteracy within five years. This convocation ·calls upon local government, business, labor, religions, and civil rights · groups to create counterpar t· local coalit_ions where they do not exist to support and supplement this declaration of - principles. · This convocation call~ upon all Americans to apply the same determination to these programs that they have to past emergencies. We are con:!ident that, given this commitment,. our society has the ingenuity to allocate its resources arid devise the techniques necessary to rebuild cities and still meet our other na-_ tional obligations without impairing our fin ancial integri~y. Out of past emergencies, we have drawn strength and progress. Out of the present urban crisis we can build cities that are places, not of disorder and des-pa ir, but of hope and opportunity. The task we set for ourselves will not be easy, but the needs are massive and urgent, and the hour is late. We pledge ourselves to this goal for · as long as it takes to accomplish it. We ask the help of the Congress and the nation. .,. �1 - � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document iT. Aca The "oj showing in many Erativ F m s C a = fy I 1 The Urban Coalition December 1968 Community ] ‘he fo e r jro TL OWIn y d &sS ement is an eC€XCé ‘pt F LLOy tf; tal ad recent speech by y John W f ; of the UrbanC Oalition: See ee ey Todayo local ining ke est handicaps to the ; , One of the thi it from pursui ? ings that prev is the a Poe yy of its Purposes effect en @smentation of the community it ar Y3 itself— and the fragment 1 io ‘0 V ade p 5 ati nofe mmunit le i ce rshi . Isaw this: tig 3 ee hand when, as Secretary of Ee 10n and Welf visi gee cities—and ee a a z eM EL major. aan af the typical American city aie li ne variety of different worlds that hd f at were Le difficulty in even for Long before the rio ah one Who studied th i ae their problems? "i Was apparent to every- ce matters closely that nh Could not weather astorm ati eo the community—pety, abor, between Suburb and i D0lice and citi i Police and citizen 1,.... htral city, between ent An Urban ition only to a total Coalition that would yield 5 attack, The coalition itself is in Your moving in several areas, if only @ - in small ways. mmunity School Aid Disputed For example, its education division, headed by Dr. James Kelly, an associate professor at Columbia University, is Sup- porting with funds and re- search a lawsuit that could radically change the method by tah “wmact ctates allocate Urban Coalition 1815 H STREET N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 AREA CODE 202 347-9630  Steering Committee of The Urban Coalition John W. Gardner Chairman Andrew Heiskell Co-Chairman A. Philip Randolph Co-Chairman I. W. Abel President United Steelworkers of America Pittsburgh, Pa. Honorable Ivan Allen Jr. Mayor Atlanta, Ga. Joseph H. Allen President McGraw-Hill New York, N-Y. Arnold Aronson Leadership Conference on Civil Rights National Community Relations Advisory Council New York, N.Y. Roy Ash President Litton Industries Beverly Hills, Calif. Jordan Band Chairman National Community Relations Advisory — Council Cleveland, Ohio Honorable Joseph M. Barr Mayor Pittsburgh, Pa. Honorable Jerome P. Cavanagh Mayor Detroit, Mich. Frederick J. Close Chairman of the Board Aluminum Company of America Pittsburgh, Pa. Honorable John F. Collins Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Mass. Honorable Richard J. Daley Mayor Chicago, IIl. The Most Reverend John F, Dearden Archbishop of Detroit Detroit, Mich.  President, Macalaster College ; St. Paul, Minn. Henry Ford II Chairman Ford Moior commen Dearborn, Mich. Milton Graham Mayor Phoenix, Ariz. The Most Reverend ~ George H. Guilfoyle ‘Camden: Nae Dr. Edler G. Haw kins | Pastor St. Augustine Presbyterian Church Andrew Heiskell Chairman of the Board Time Inc. New York, N.Y. John H. Johnson President - Johnson Publishing Company — Chicago, Ill. Joseph D. Keenan Secretary International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Washington, D.C, Honorable John VY. Lindsay Mayor New York, N.Y. George Meany President AFL-CIO Woshraston, Gr aif inwvin Miller - President — Gia eee Company Columbus, Ind. Honorable Arthur Naftalin Mayor Minneapolis, Minn. James F. Oates Chairman of the Board Equitable Life Assurance Society New York, N.Y. A. Philip Randolph President Emeritus of Sleeping Car Porters New York, N.Y. Walter Reuther a United Auto Workers Detroit, Mich. David Rockefeller President New York, N.Y. James Rouse President The Rouse Company ~ Baltimore, Md. Rabbi Jacob P. Rudin President - Synagogue Council of America — New York, N.Y. Theodore Schlesinger President — Allied Stores Corporation New York, N.Y. Asa T. Spaulding — Director North Carolina Mutual Insurance Company Durham, N.C. David Sullivan President Service Employees International Union Washington, D.C. Honorable James H. J. Tate Mayor Philadelphia, Pa. “John Wheeler President, Mechanics and . Farmers Bank President, Southern Regional Council Durham, N.C. Roy Wilkins Executive Director National Association for the Advancement of Colored People New York, N.Y. Whitney M. Young Jr. Executive Director National Urban League New York, N.Y. On August 24, 1967, at an emer- gency convocation in Washington, D.C., a prestigious group of 1,200 persons issued an urgent appeal on the urban crisis to all concerned Americans. They were men and women of diverse, even divergent interests, and yet they joined to- gether in a national effort to mold a | new political, social, economic, and | moral climate that would help to ; break the vicious cycle of the ghetto. This effort—heavily dependent on [ local as well as national action— | was the beginning of the Urban Coalition. The immediate impetus was con- cern over the mounting violence in ' American cities, and a realization that the problems confronting the b Cities were too large and too com- i plex to be solved by a single segment of society acting alone. At the con- | clusion of the convocation, the participants, who included mayors and Jeaders in business, religion, labor, and civil rights, agreed on the urgent need for action on a broad h statement of principles that became the charter of the Urban Coalition movement. | This is what the statement adopted at the convocation said, in part: “We believe the American people and the Congress must reorder national priorities, with a commit- ment of resources equal to the mag- | nitude of the problems we face. The i Crisis requires a new dimension of effort in both the public and private Sectors, working together to provide jobs, housing, education, and the other needs of our cities. “We believe the Congress must ‘ move without delay on urban pro- grams. The country can wait no Arnold Aronson il longer for measures that have too , long been denied the people of the cities and the nation as a whole— ty additional civil rights legislation, \ adequately funded model cities, anti-poverty, housing, education, | and job-training programs, and a host of others. \ “We believe the private sector of America must directly and vigor- ously involve itself in the crisis of the cities by a commitment to in- vestment, job-training and hiring, and all that is necessary to the full enjoyment of the free enterprise system—and also to its survival. ... “This convocation calls upon local government, business, labor, religions, and civil rights groups to ee Joseph H. Allen  create counterpart local coalitions where they do not exist to’support and supplement this declaration of principles.” The work of mobilization began immediately after the convocation ended, under the leadership of two co-chairmen: Andrew Heiskell, chairman of the board of Time Inc., and A. Philip Randolph, president of the International Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters. By year’s end, communities across the country had responded by forming local Urban Coalitions, each structured to fit the particular needs of its city. In the spring of 1968, the national Urban Coalition became a non- profit, tax-exempt corporation with John W. Gardner as its chairman and chief executive officer. The Coalition is governed by a steering committee of 38 national leaders representative of the participants in the convocation. The Urban Coalition Action Council was set up nationally as a separate non-profit organization to engage in direct advocacy of legis- lation aimed at meeting the prob- lems of the cities. It is responsible for all legislative activities. What is an Urban Coalition? The key word is “coalition”: an alliance of individuals and organizations drawn together for specific purposes, An Urban Coalition is a mechanism through which individual leaders and community groups can collabo- rate in dealing with the urban crisis. It is to meet all the complex and interwoven problems of our urban areas that Urban Coalitions are born. The elements of modern in- dustrial society have become so specialized and fragmented, and yet so interdependent, that a new force is needed to pull the pieces together. No single element can solve the problems alone. The solution lies in joining the creativity, resources, and leadership of the private sector with those of the public sector. Existing Urban Coalitions have already demonstrated their utility as forums for communication among the varied elements of com- munities and as instruments for community education and action. They have helped to assess commu- nity problems, establish goals and priorities, and coordinate program efforts. They have uncovered dupli- cation of community efforts and identified gaps where new services are needed. They have served as catalysts, marshaling broad com- munity support and stimulating new action programs while not operating them directly. The Coalition move- ment also provides a channel by which Coalition members and local groups may speak out on legislative issues at the national and state level affecting urban problems. Thus an Urban Coalition is not a new orga- nization, but a process, a means for joint action by the significant and diverse elements of the community. While the programs and structures of Urban Coalitions may vary to meet local priorities, the Coalitions share four essential characteristics: 1. Urban Coalitions have adopted # statement of principles which parallels that adopted by the orga- nizers of the national Urban Coali- tion, tailored to the particular local Situation. The national statement is broad enough to have received the endorsement of leaders from all major segments of urban society, from businessmen to civil rights activists, yet specific enough to give the Urban Coalition movement its essential form and direction. (For full text of statement, see appendix. ) 2. Urban Coalitions, as indicated by the statement of principles, are committed to a comprehensive attack on all of the interrelated problems of their communities— poverty, poor housing, inadequate education, racial tensions. A single- Purpose group such as a fair- housing council, even if it has wide community support, must expand its goals to other issues to become un Urban Coalition. 3. In their makeup, Urban Coalitions are broadly representa- tive of the leadership and life of their communities, As with the national Urban Coalition, local Urban Coalitions include repre- sentatives of business, labor, local government, religion, and civil rights organizations. Most local Urban Coalitions also include representa- tives of education, the communica- lions media, and established com- munity organizations, [1 is essential that all include spokesmen for dis- advantaged and minority neighborhoods, 4, Finally, Urban Coalitions must have the resources to do an effective job. These resources include an adequate budget and an able (al- though not necessarily large) staff. Joseph M. Barr Frederick J. Close  The task of an Urban Coalition is a rate Coalitions. The Washington, serious and complex one, and it D.C., Coalition has a metropolitan demands a serious commitment of base, extending into the suburban all involved. counties in Virginia and Maryland. Since most of the problems con- fronted by a Coalition extend into the metropolitan areas—finding work for the unemployed, for ex- ample, requires a look at the job market both in the city and in its suburbs—these tasks are made easier if the Coalition is organized On a metropolitan basis. —The only criterion for the size of the steering committee is that it be large enough to do the job in the Particular community. New York, With the national headquarters of Andrew Heiskell many corporations, banks, and in- surance companies and its thousands Of small employers, has 150 mem- bers, including spokesmen for community-action groups. Detroit, With one dominant industry, has 39. The first order of business before the steering committee is the draft- ing of a statement of principles. Once this is done and public an- nouncement of the Urban Coali- tion’s formation has been made, action should follow quickly. The community should know that it has How an Urban Coalition Begins An Urban Coalition can start with one concerned and determined person—the mayor, a businessman, a labor leader—or out of discussions among several individuals or com- munity organizations. As quickly as possible, however, the makeup of the organizing committee for an Urban Coalition should be spread across the entire spectrum of community leadership. The task of this initial group is to create the Coalition’s steering committee, its policy- and program- making body. These are some guide- lines, drawn out of the experiences of Urban Coalitions to date, for selection of the steering committee members: —They need not have been pre- viously identified with civic causes. One task of the Coalition, in fact, is to identify and enlist talent which may not previously have been at the service of the community. —They should include the com- munity’s most influential leadership. The most zealous efforts of churches, community-service organizations, and neighborhood groups will be wasted unless those who hold power in local govern- ment, business, labor, and commu- nications are convinced of the need for action. —lIt also works the other way around, The best efforts of the holders of power will be frustrated unless decisions are made with, rather than for, the disadvantaged 7 in the community. The increasing George H.Guilfoyl® drive for self-determination among the minorities and the poor is pro- ducing new and often militant neighborhood and youth organiza- tions, If truly representative, the Coalition can provide the essential link between emerging neighbor- hood spokesmen and the established communitywide leadership. It can thus be a vehicle for both communi- cation and common action, joining resources to needs. —The Coalition may represent a city, a metropolitan area, even a county. Kansas City, Mo., and Kansas City, Kan., have found it advantageous to form a joint Urban Coalition; the twin cities of St. Paul and Minneapolis have formed sepa- Arthur Flemming pee ¥  acquired not just a forum for dis- cussion of its problems, but a potentially powerful force for constructive change. In joining an Urban Coalition, the steering committee members may be working together for the first time, putting their special in- terests aside for the sake of the community. The better they get to know each other, the more pro- ductive their association will be. When the New York Urban Coali- tion was organizing, some 100 men went off to Tarrytown together on a weekend retreat. On neutral ground, the big insurance executive and the ghetto militant met, listened, and learned from each other. To get a program underway, the Coalition needs both money and staff. Initial funds may come most readily from business and labor members, or the city government may make an interim contribution. In Minneapolis, the 14 business executives who had attended the August convocation each contrib- uted $1,000 to get their program organized. The fund was used to hire two part-time professionals to help analyze objectives, organization structure, and feasibility of Coali- tion action. Permanent funding should come, however, from all segments of the Coalition. If one segment is unable to contribute money, it might pro- vide services instead: staff members can be loaned to the Coalition, office space contributed, stationery and supplies furnished. In developing their programs, Coalitions have found that it is im- portant to meet where the problems are. Visiting slums in Harlem helped set priorities for action by the New York Urban Coalition, Philadelphia leaders saw things “they would not believe” when the mayor took 200 of them to visit the city’s pockets of poverty. The Urban Coalition in Action Given the variations in needs from city to city, the range of program possibilities for Urban Coalitions can best be described by specific examples. In most cases, programs are planned by task forces in the areas of most pressing concern. Most Urban Coalitions have started with task forces on employment, housing, and education; others have been added on economic develop-  ment (with the focus on encourag- ing entrepreneurship among ghetto residents), youth, problems of the aging, and communications. These are some of the programs that Urban Coalitions have launched around the country: Concentrating its strongest efforts on helping the ghetto’s small busi- nessmen, the Baltimore Urban Coalition has formed a business task force to help establish a Small Busi- ness Investment Corp.—a high-risk venture capital program with a projected $1 million operating fund. The task force has pulled together the talents of the Greater Baltimore Committee (a 102-member business organization) to advise on the cre- ation of business cooperatives, and local associations of accountants, lawyers, and retail merchants to give technical assistance to inexperienced ghetto entrepreneurs. In the middle of its organizing process, the Washington, D.C., Urban Coalition came into instant, full-grown existence in response to the April disorders which rocked the capital following the shooting of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. The Coalition appointed emer- gency committees on food, housing, John V. Lindsay employment, and financial assist- ance; they made available 1,400,000 free meals, developed 1,000 job offers, found 800 dwellings for riot- displaced persons and collected $146,000 in emergency aid funds. This emergency effort was followed by a call to provide logistical support to the Poor People’s Campaign: delivering food to Resurrection City three times a day and providing medical care, a recreational pro- gram, and community service volunteers. Jobs have been the chief focus of the Minneapolis Urban Coalition, working with the National Alliance of Businessmen and the Chamber of Commerce. The results have in- cluded pledges to the NAB for 1,100 summer jobs and the waiving of education-level requirements for line work by one of the area's major employers, Honeywell Inc. The Riverside (Calif.) Urban Coalition developed a Job Opportu- nities Council and persuaded eight of the city’s largest employers to Participate. With funding from the eight firms, the Council was to find and get in touch with hard-core unemployed persons. It would pro- Vide or obtain necessary training to qualify these applicants to meet lowered minimum hiring standards, then refer them to the firms, The eight companies planned to hire a Number equivalent to 4 per cent of their present work force. A-housing seminar sponsored by the Gary (Ind.) Urban Coalition led to the decision by two churches to Sponsor the construction of lower- income housing under federal mort- gage guarantees. Along with these efforts by the non-profit sponsors, the area’s major employer, U.S. Steel, announced its intention to build about 300 moderate-income housing units in the city. The Bridgeport (Conn.) Urban Coalition's acting Task Force on Education formed an educational consortium to ensure a college edu- cation for all qualified students in the Bridgeport area. The consortium includes the three presidents of Private universities who make up the Task Force and the presidents of four other institutions of higher learning in the region. A committee of admissions officers from the seven Participating schools screens each applicant and arranges for his admission to one of the colleges. J. Irwin Miller A. Philip Randolph  ———eEOEEeeEe———e—e—eE—E—EeEeee pressing their views on national and state legislative issues. Because most Urban Coalitions seek tax- deductible contributions from such sources as community foundations, some have chosen to establish a separate organization, as the na- tional group has, to carry out legis- lative programs on the scale needed. The Urban Coalition Action Coun- cil will provide assistance to others choosing this course. The tasks of an Urban Coalition will not be easy, for they reflect the scale and complexity of the crisis situa- tion facing the country. The search for solutions involves major commit- ments at every level—national, state, and local—and by all segments of society, public and private alike. Substantial public resources must be forthcoming if solutions are to be found, but so must significant private leadership. “Out of past emergencies, we have drawn strength and progress,” said the founders of the Urban Coalition movement. “Out of the present urban crisis we can build cities that are places, not of disorder and despair, but of hope and opportunity.” Appendix Principles Goals Commitments Statement adopted at the Emergency Convocation, August 24, 1967, Washington, D.C.* We are experiencing our third summer of widespread civil disorder. In 1965, it was Harlem, and the dis- aster of Watts. In 1966, it was the Hough area of Cleveland, Omaha, Atlanta, Dayton, San Francisco, and 24 other cities. This summer, New- ark and Detroit were only the most tragic of 80 explosions of violence In the streets. Confronted by these catastrophic events, we, as representatives of business, labor, religion, civil rights, and local government have joined in this convocation to create a sense of national urgency on the need for Positive action for all the people of Our Cities, We are united in the following Convictions: We believe the tangible effects of the urban riots in terms of death, Injury, and property damage, horri- fying though they are, are less to be feared than the intangible damage tO men’s minds. We believe it is the government’s duty to maintain law and order. We believe that our thoughts and actions should be directed to the deep-rooted and historic problems Of the cities. We believe that we, as a nation, Must clearly and positively demon- Strate our belief that justice, social Progress, and equality of opportu- Nity are rights of every citizen. We believe the American people and the Congress must reorder na- tional priorities, with a commitment Of resources equal to the magnitude of the problems we face. The crisis requires a new dimension of effort in both the public and private sectors, Working together to provide jobs, housing, education, and the other heeds of our cities. We believe the Congress must Move without delay on urban pro- gtams. The country can wait no “At the national level, two separate orga- nizations have been created: the Urban Coalition and the Urban Coalition Action Council, The Action Council is responsible for the implementation of legislative goals and objectives expressed in this statement. longer for measures that have too long been denied the people of the cities and the nation as a whole— additional civil rights legislation, adequately funded model cities, anti-poverty, housing, education, and job-training programs, and a host of others. We believe the private sector of America must directly and vigor- ously involve. itself in the crisis of - the cities by a commitment to in- _Yestment, job-training, and hiring, and all that is necessary to the full ~ enjoyment of the free enterprise sys- tem—and also to its survival. We believe the sickness of the cities, including civic disorder with- in them, is the responsibility of the ~ whole of America. Therefore, it -is the responsibility of every American to join in the creation of a new political, social, economic, ~ and ‘moral climate that will make possi- ble the breaking of the vicious cycle of the ghetto. Efforts must be made to insure the broadest possible op- portunity for all citizens and groups, including those in the ghetto, to par- ticipate fully in shaping and direct- ing the society of which they are a part. This convocation calls upon the nation to end once and for all the shame of poverty amid general afflu- ence. Government’ and business must accept responsibility to provide all Americans with opportunity to earn an adequate income. Private industry must greatly accelerate its efforts to recruit, train, and hire the hard-core unemployed. When the private sector is unable to provide employment to those who are both able and willing to work, then in a free society the government must of necessity assume the responsibility and act as the employer of last resort or must assure adequate income levels for those who are unable to work. Emergency Work Program This convocation calls upon the federal government to develop an emergency work program to pro- vide jobs and new training oppor- tunities for the unemployed and underemployed consistent with the following principles: —The federal government must enlist the cooperation of govern- ment at all levels and of private in- dustry to assure that meaningful, productive work is available to everyone willing and able to work. —To create socially useful jobs, the emergency work program should concentrate on the huge backlog of ‘¢mployment needs in parks, streets, slums, countryside, schools, col- __leges, libraries, and hospitals. To this end an emergency work program should be initiated and should have as its first goal putting at least one million of the presently unemployed into productive work-at the earliest possible moment. ba Se —The program must~ provide meaningful jobs—not dead-end, ~ make-work projects—so that the employment experience gained adds to the capabilities and broadens the - Opportunities of the employees to become productive members of the Permanent work force of our nation. —Basic education, training, and Counseling must be an integral part of the program to assure extended °pportunities for upward job: mo- bility and to improve employee Productivity, Funds for training, education, and counseling should be Made available to private industry aS well as to public and private non- Profit agencies. —Funds for employment should be made available to local and state 8°vernments, non-profit institutions, and federal agencies able to demon- Strate their ability to use labor pro- ductively without reducing existing levels of employment or undercut- Ung existing labor. standards or Wages which prevail for comparable Work or services in the area but are Not less than the federal minimum Wage. —Such a program should seek to qualify new employees to become Part of the regular work force and that normal performance standards are met, —The operation of the program Should be keyed to specific, localized “nemployment problems and fo- Cused initially on those areas where the need is most apparent. Private Employment, Assistance, and Investment All representatives of the private Sector in this Urban Coalition de- Cisively commit themselves to assist the deprived among us to achieve full Participation in the economy as ’ Self-supporting citizens. We pledge full-scale private endeavor through Creative job-training and employ- ment, managerial assistance, and basic investment in all phases of urban development. The alternatives to a massive and concerted drive by the private sector are clear. They include the burden of wasted human and physical po- tential, the deterioration of the healthy environment basic to the successful operation of any business, and the dangers of permanent alien- ation from our society of millions of — citizens. We propose to initiate an all-out attack on the unemployment prob- lem through the following steps: —In cooperation with govern- ment, to move. systematically and directly into the ghettos and barrios to seek out the unemployed and un- deremployed and enlist them in basic and: positive private training and employment programs. We will re-evaluate our current testing pro- — cedures and employment standards so as to modify or eliminate those practices and requirements’ that un- necessarily bar many persons from gainful employment by business or access to union membership. —To create a closer relationship between private employers and pub- lic training and emergency employ- ment programs to widen career op- portunities for our disadvantaged citizens. To this end, we will pro- ceed immediately to promote “Earn and Learn Centers” in depressed ur- ban areas that might well be the joint venture of business, labor, and local government. —To develop new training and related programs to facilitate the early entry of under-qualified per- sons into industrial and commercial employment. —To develop large-scale pro- grams to motivate the young to continue their education. Working closely with educators, we will re- double our efforts to provide part- time employment, training, and other incentives for young men and women. We also pledge our active support to making quality educa- tion really accessible to deprived as well as advantaged young people. —To expand on-the-job training programs to enhance the career ad- vancement prospects of all em- ployees, with particular emphasis on those who now must work at the lowest level of job’ classifications because of educational and skill deficiencies. ’ We pledge to mobilize the man- agerial resources and experience of the private sector in every way pos- sible. We will expand part-time and full-time assistance to small busi- ness development. We will strive to help residents of these areas both to raise their level of managerial know-how and to obtain private and public investment funds for develop- ment. We will work more closely with public agencies to assist in the Management of public projects. We will encourage more leaders in the private sector to get directly and personally involved in urban prob- lems so that they may gain a deeper understanding of these problems and be of greater assistance. We pledge our best efforts to de- velop means by which major private investment may be attracted to the renovation of deteriorating neigh- borhoods in our cities. We will ex- Plore and encourage governmental Icentives to expedite private in- vestment. We will develop new methods of combining investment and managerial assistance so that the residents may achieve a leader- Ship position in the development of their areas, Housing, Reconstruction, and Education This convocation calls upon the Nation to take bold and immediate action to fulfill the national need to _ Provide “a decent home and a suit- able. living environment for every American family” with guarantees of equal access to all housing, new and existing, The Urban Coalition Shall, as its next order of business, address itself to the development of a broad program of urban recon- Struction and advocacy of appro- Priate public and private action to move toward these objectives, in- cluding the goal of rehabilitation and construction of at least a mil- lion housing units for lower-income families annually. This convocation calls upon the Nation to create educational pro- grams that will equip all young Americans for full and productive Participation in our society to the full potential of their abilities. This Will require concentrated compen- Satory programs to equalize oppor- tunities for achievement. Early childhood education must be made Universal. Work and study pro- Stams must be greatly expanded to Enlist those young people who now  The Urban Coalition 1819 H Street N.W. Washington, DiC. 20006   Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 7, Folder 9, Document 16 Box 7 Box 7 Folder 9 Folder topic: Urban Coalition | Miscellaneous | 1967-1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/123200ce8416da734f01142f1e2f793b.pdf 9a3274f7bb15c036923251c0f49a9050 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. The Urban Coalition � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 7, Folder 9, Document 15 Box 7 Box 7 Folder 9 Folder topic: Urban Coalition | Miscellaneous | 1967-1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/49756ab9a80f0485b30989337c091710.pdf 4e4f02498b409f0ef523eb3391dfe82c Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. . 1969 Schedule Steeri ng Committee, The Urban Coalition (also for the Urban Coalition Acti on Council ) Time Place Wednesday, February 26 6:00 p.m. Washington, D.C. Wednesday, June 18 6:00 p.m. New York City Date I Wednesday, September 2 4 6:00 P. m. To be determined Wednesday, December 10 6:00 p.m. Washington, D.C. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document 1969 Schedule Steering Committee, The Urban Coalition ‘(also for the Urban Coalition Action Council) Date Wednesday, Wednesday, Wednesday, Wednesday, February 26 June 18 September 24 December 10 Time 6:00 p.m. 6:00 p.m. 6:00 p.m. 6:00 p.m. Place Washington, D.C. New York City To be determined Washington, D.C.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 7, Folder 9, Document 14 Box 7 Box 7 Folder 9 Folder topic: Urban Coalition | Miscellaneous | 1967-1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/89d9924fdce1edf48c90e0d9c5c8e034.pdf 52efcba71e953da70fa1797219d52b8a Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. 7 \ .\ 1s19 H s:r~c t, !! \'/ . \ '/3~h ingto11 , D. C. 2CC'J:, Tel ephone : (~O,) 223-SGC0 CHA I !IM,t:\N : Joh n W. Garclne; CO-CH A I RMH ~: An drew Hc:ske l! / I . Philip P. andolph Decembe r 2 4 , 1 968 The Honorabl e I van Al le n, Jr . Mayo r of the City of At l an ta City.H a ll At l a n ta , Ge o rg i a 30 3 0 2 De a r I van: Enc l o sed i s th e s c h e d ul e f o r 1 96 9 me etings o f t h e St e e ring Commi ttee o f t h e Urb an Co a l it ion . P l e ase note t h a t the n e x t St ee r i ng Comm ittee mee ting will b e We dn e sday , Fe bruary 26th, in Wa s h i n g ton. I am a l so enclosing se ver a l i tems t ha t may b e o f i nterest to you . We can s end y o u a n y add ition a l c o p i es y o u may wa n t. P l eas e l et me k now i f fu r the r i n f ormation wi ll b e h e l pf ul . Sinc e r e l y , J ohn w~ Ga rd ner Cha i rma n . i � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document 1 Z } 1819 H Street, H.W. j Washington, D. GC. 20995 Telephone: (202) 223-S500 CHAIRMAN: John W. Gardner CO-CHAIRMEN: Andrew Heiskell / A. Philip Randolph December 24, 1968 The Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr. Mayor of the City of Atlanta City Hall Atlanta, Georgia 30302 Dear Ivan: Enclosed is the schedule for 1969 meetings of the Steering Committee of the Urban Coalition. Please note that the next Steering Committee meeting will be Wednesday, February 26th, in Washington. I am also enclosing several items that may be of interest to you. We can send you any additional copies you may want. Please let me know if further information will be helpful. Sincerely, John W: Gardner Chairman  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 7, Folder 9, Document 13 Box 7 Box 7 Folder 9 Folder topic: Urban Coalition | Miscellaneous | 1967-1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/2cd2d001e95f8cde948988386548b3f3.pdf 6077a829f93fbb166824f9c29af20780 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. The Urban Coalition 2100 M Street, N .W . Washingto n, D .C. 20037 (202) 293-7625 · Chairman Jo hn W . Gardner Co-cha irmen Andrew Heiskell A. Philip Ran dolph November 13, 1 969 Honorable I van Al len, Jr. Mayor of the City of Atlanta City Hall Atl anta, Georgia 30303 Dear Ivan: I want to urge that you make a special effort to attend the meeting of the Steering Committee on December 10 . The agenda will include discussion of the very critical fiscal problems facing our cities and consideration of the role of the Urban Coalition in helping the cities cope with these problems. I believe the meeting will be an interestinq one. I believe also that it will be an important one. The meeting will start at 3:30 p.m., on Wednesday, December 10 in Washington. We will have dinner and a brief eveninq session which should adjourn at approximately 9:30 p.m. I do hope that you will be able to be present. Further details will follow. Sincerely, Chairman � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document The Urban Coalition 2100 M Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037 (202) 293-7625 Chairman John W. Gardner Co-chairmen Andrew Heiskell A. Philip Randolph November 13, 1969 Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr. Mayor of the City of Atlanta City Hall Atlanta, Georgia 39303 Dear Ivan: I want to urge that you make a special effort to attend the meeting of the Steering Committee on December 10. The agenda will include discussion of the very critical fiscal problems facing our cities and consideration of the role of the Urban Coalition in helping the cities cope with these problems. I believe the meeting will be an interesting one. I believe also that it will be an important one. The meeting will start at 3:30 p.m., on Wednesday, December 10 in Washington. We will have dinner and a brief evening session which should adjourn at approximately 9:30 p.m. I do hope that you will be able to be present. Further details will follow. Sincerely, Chairman  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 7, Folder 9, Document 12 Box 7 Box 7 Folder 9 Folder topic: Urban Coalition | Miscellaneous | 1967-1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/8d309d189e28107d0725a8269410080f.pdf 66d217adc9918d5ad3a4f3032e29c159 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. N E WS from ··The Urban Coalition 2100 M Street, N. W. Washington, D. C. 20037 202/293-7625 ( Tom Ma thews) FOR RELEASE MONDAY, A.M., NOVEMBER 10, 1969 URBAN COALITION NAMES TOP LEADERS TO STEERING COMMITTEE Three businessmen, two mayors, a Texas state senator and a physician were named today as additions to the national Urban Coalition's policy-making Steering Committee. The new members announced by Urban Coalition Chairman John W. Gardner are: Ben W. Heineman of Chicago, Chairman of the Board and President of the Chicago and North Western Railway Company . Heineman is also Chairman of the President's Commission on Income Maintenance. Donald M. Kendall, President of Pepsico , Inc ., and Chairman of the National Alliance of Businessmen . H. I. Romnes, Cha irman of the Board of AT&T. Romnes is also Vice-Chairman of the National Industrial Conference Board and is a me mber of the Urban Coalition's Task Forc e o n Education. Mayor Erik Jonsson of Dallas. Mayor Richard Lugar of Indianapolis. State Senator Joe J. Bernal of San Antonio , Texas. Senator Bernal , an educator and social worker as well as legislator, is (MORE) �-2Executive Director of the Guadalupe Community Center in San Antonio. Hector P. Garcia, M. D., a Corpus Christi, Texas physician and Commissioner of the u. S. Civil ~ights Commission. Dr. Garcia was organizer of the American GI Forum, a national group of veterans of Mexican origin. The appointments bring the total membership on the national Steering Committee to 65. Mr. Gardner said the Urban Coalition adds to the Steering Committee periodically to assure broad and dynamic representation from the Coalition's constituent elements -- local government, business, labor, minority groups and religion. He said he was de- lighted that men of the stature of the seven new members had agreed to actively participate in Urban Coalition policy. The Urban Coalition is a national organization with 48 local coalition affiliates. It brings together diverse groups to work toward the solution of urban problems. Co-Chairmen of the national Urban Coalition Steering Committee are Andrew Heiskell, Chairman of the Board of Time , Inc . , and A. Philip Rand olph , International President - Emeritus of the Br otherh ood of Sleepin g Car Porters . � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document NEWS 7 ~Af from _ The Urban Coalition 2100 M Street, N. W. Washington, D. C. 20037 202/293-7625 (Tom Mathews) FOR RELEASE MONDAY, A.M., NOVEMBER 10, 1969 URBAN COALITION NAMES TOP LEADERS TO STEERING COMMITTEE Three businessmen, two mayors, a Texas state senator and a physician were named today as additions to the national Urban Coalition's policy-making Steering Committee. The new members announced by Urban Coalition Chairman John W. Gardner are: Ben W. Heineman of Chicago, Chairman of the Board and Presi- dent of the Chicago and North Western Railway Company. Heineman is also Chairman of the President's Commission on Income Mainten- ance. Donald M. Kendall, President of Pepsico, Inc., and Chairman of the National Alliance of Businessmen. H. I. Romnes, Chairman of the Board of AT&T. Romnes is also Vice-Chairman of the National Industrial Conference Board and is a member of the Urban Coalition's Task Force on Education. Mayor Erik Jonsson of Dallas. Mayor Richard Lugar of Indianapolis. State Senator Joe J. Bernal of San Antonio, Texas. Senator Bernal, an educator and social worker as well as legislator, is (MORE) =e Executive Director of the Guadalupe Community Center in San Antonio. Hector P. Garcia, M. D., a Corpus Christi, Texas physician and Commissioner of the U. S. Civil Rights Commission. Dr. Garcia was organizer of the American GI Forum, a national group of veterans of Mexican origin. The appointments bring the total membership on the national Steering Committee to 65. Mr. Gardner said the Urban Coalition adds to the Steering Committee periodically to assure broad and dynamic representation from the Coalition's constituent elements -- local government, business, labor, minority groups and religion. He said he was de- lighted that men of the stature of the seven new members had agreed to actively participate in Urban Coalition policy. The Urban Coalition is a national organization with 48 local coalition affiliates. It brings together diverse groups to work toward the solution of urban problems. Co-Chairmen of the national Urban Coalition Steering Committee are Andrew Heiskell, Chairman of the Board of Time, Inc., and A. Philip Randolph, International President-Emeritus of the Brother- hood of Sleeping Car Porters.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 7, Folder 9, Document 11 Box 7 Box 7 Folder 9 Folder topic: Urban Coalition | Miscellaneous | 1967-1969