418 20 10383 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/850441d1156dff80bc79ae03f13fab3e.pdf 412b716e98684e2f97a2c0ec9c11f0c9 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. ,~ 1 - . --' ~ - .., - ---- ·--. ·.. .. .. I I I MRS •. DOROTHY · JOHNSON SHELL, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Mrs. E. C. Johnson, Deceased . CASE NO. A-10557 . Plaintiff •• . . • vs. .• MRS. JULIA JOHNSON MEADOWS (now O'KELLEY) and ERNEST C. JOHNSON, JR., Individually and as Executors of the Estate of: Mrs. E. C. Johnson, Deceased FULTON SUPERIOR COURT .• Defend?,nts 0 RD ER It appearing to the Court that no immediate danger of damage will result, if ~he properties sought to be demolished by the City of Atlanta are left standing; IT IS CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND DECREED that the City of Atlanta is hereby temporarily enjoined and restrained from demolishing the houses set forth in its motion, and .• in the order passed by the City ordering demolition. This Order shall be of force and effect until the further order of this Court. This /l. J/J..day of May, 1968. ! !. 'I. \ ... · -- � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document MRS, DOROTHY JOHNSON SHELL, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of : CASE NO. A-10557 Mrs. E. C. Johnson, Deceased ee Plaintiff La eee . a oe VS. MRS. JULIA JOHNSON MEADOWS oa O'KELLEY) and ERNEST - JOHNSON, JR., Individually ; and as Executors of the Estate of : Mrs. E. C. Johnson, Deceased FULTON SUPERIOR COURT Defendants ORDER It appearing to the Court that no immediate danger of damage will result, if the properties sought Go: te demolished by the City of Atlanta are left standing; TT. IS CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND DECREED that the City 4 of Atlanta is hereby temporarily enjoined and restrained : from demolishing the houses set forth in its motion, and in the order passed by the City ordering demolition. This Order shall be of force and effect until the further order of this Court. This 23/4aay of May, 1968.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 6, Document 21 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 6 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1968 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/0198f8a3a2d67578c1e72ccc1587ecbd.pdf 091cc953cab104b686f7dac9fc40899e Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. June 3 , 1968 ME ORANDU FOR RECORD Several weeks go rs. Charles W. Heeden of Lithonia (telephone 482-6149) called me concerning her property at 512•14 Decatur St., S. E. This property was under Housing Code proceedings sever 1 y ars go , together itb other properties in the s me block on either side of tb Heeden prop rty. As efforts the top St ., S . cost of a result of th Housing Code procedures and y person 1 at that tie to enfo ce the Code, the Heeden ' s removed floor (residential) of the building at 512-14 Dec tur E. and re odeled the ground floor for business at a approximately 12,000 . I infor ed Mrs . Headen that I no long r directly involv din Code Enforce ent and referred her to r . J mes A. Smith, Chief of the Housing Code Division. This date, Mrs. He den call d e ag in and read to e rec nt Court Order (copy att ched) p rt ining to the properties adjacent to b rs ind informed e that her Insur nc Comp ny ha cancelled her insur nco on the prop rty at 512-14 Dec tur St . nd th t she cannot get insurance itb ny other oo p ny b caus of the fire haz rd caused by th adj e nt properti s. rs . R den pecifically requested that l brin this to th tt ntion of th M yor; that b c plied 1th th reque t to i prov the property at 512-14 Dec tur St. owner of th dj c nt prop rti (which r in wor than b r ) b v done nothin and th t she 1s now th victi of circu t nces by da ge being o used by tb djac nt prop rtie. This t.s a ca e of long standing. Housin Cod viol tions on the prop rti s w r r port d nd eorr ctiv otion initl led in 1961, '63 nd '64. The tt ched court Ord r p rt in to th �- Page 2 June 3. 1968 emorandum For Record follo ·ing properties : emorial Drive , 615 emorial Drive , 510 Decatur Street , 516 Decatur Street , 530 Decatur Street , 609 S . E. S . E. S. E. S. E. S. E. This case is making a mockery of the Housing Code_and "In Rem" Orelin nee of the City of Atlanta . I as personally involved in enforcement procedures against these properties, as Director of Urban Re ewal , during the period of 1961-64 . Subsequently, as Supervisor of Inspection Services in the Building Department, I discussed this case at length personally with Judge Whitman of the Fulton County Su ior Court and with r . Robert H. Cleveland, receiver for the executors of the Estate of rs . E. c. Johnson, deceased . I recommend that these properties be personally inspected by any one involved with this c se and that the best legal talent available be utilized in an 11 out effort to resolve this case in behalf of the City . Malcolm D. Jones Housing Coordinator Encl: Copy of Court Order dated ay 23, 1968. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document June 3, 1968 MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD Several weeks ago Mrs. Charles W. Heeden of Lithonia (telephone 482-6149) called me concerning her property at 512-14 Decatur St., S. E. This property was under Housing Code proceedings several years ago, together with other properties in the same block on either side of the Heeden property. As a result of the Housing Code procedures and my personal efforts at that time to enforce the Code, the Heeden's removed the top floor (residential) of the building at 512-14 Decatur St., S. E. and remodeled the ground floor for business at a cost of approximately $12,000, I informed Mrs. Heeden that I was no longer directly involved in Code Enforcement and referred her to Mr. James A. Smith, Chief of the Housing Code Division. This date, Mrs. Heeden called me again and read to me a recent Court Order (copy attached) pertaining to the properties adjacent to hers and informed me that her Insurance Company has cancelled her insurance on the property at 512-14 Decatur St. and that she cannot get insurance with any other company because of the fire hazard caused by the adjacent properties. Mrs. Heeden specifically requested that I bring this matter to the attention of the Mayor; that she complied with the City's request to improve the property at 512-14 Decatur St. and that the owners of the adjacent properties (which were in worse condition than hers) have done nothing and that she is now the victim of circumstances by damage being caused by these adjacent properties. This is a case of long standing. Housing Code violations on these properties were reported and corrective action initialed in 1961, ‘63 and ‘64. The attached Court Order pertains to the Page 2 June 3, 1968 Memorandum For Record following properties: 609 Memorial Drive, 8.E. 615 Memorial Drive, 8S. E. 510 Decatur Street, S. E. 516 Decatur Street, 8. E. 530 Decatur Street, S. E. This case is making a mockery of the Housing Code and "In Rem" Ordinance of the City of Atlanta. I was personally involved in enforcement procedures against these properties, as Director of Urban Rewewal, during the period of 1961-64. Subsequently, as Supervisor of Inspection Services in the Bullding Department, I discussed this case at length personally with Judge Whitman of the Fulton County Superior Court and with Mr. Robert H. Cleveland, receiver for the executors of the Estate of Mrs. E. C. Johnson, deceased. I recommend that these properties be personally inspected by any one involved with this case and that the best legal talent available be utilized in an all out effort to resolve this case in behalf of the City. Malcolm D. Jones Housing Coordinator Encl; Copy of Court Order dated May 23, 1968. i a a  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 6, Document 20 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 6 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1968 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/9fbf35232a987e893eea214daa14ae86.pdf 80d9868bea674ecb52aeb4328c05f65f Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. I HOUSING RESOURCES COMMITTEE I !' PROJECT INDEX To accompany Low-income Housing Inventory Report of May 15, 1968 Item No. No. Units New - Existing Designation Location Program· Allen Temple Single Family Duplexes & Smal~ Apts. Apts. Leased for · P.H. Rehab. H.C. Div. Rehab. by H.A. Rehab. by Pvt. Ent. Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. London Towne Houses Public Housing Gordon Rd. ~ear Harwell Scattered Scattered Scattered 8 Sites Throughout City West End U. R. Project Scattered 2661 Beeler Dr., S.W. 1930 Flat Shoals Rd., SW 1991 DeLowe Drive., SW 200 Alden Ave., NW 3242 Custrman Cir., SW McDaniel St., SW 221 d(3) Conv. & 221 d(2) Conv. Conv. Leasing. for P.H. H.C. Enf. U.R. Conv. Rehab. Conv. Conv. Conv. Conv. 221 d(3) co-op P ·.H. Pa omp leted C-1 C-2 C-3 C-4 C-5 C-6 C-7 C-8 C-9 C-10 C-11 C-12 C-13 C-14 Totals 373 380 100 534 658 10,487 218 30 28 32 96 400 6 82 2 ,TI3I' 11,393 Jnder Construction UC-1 UC-2 UC-3 UC-4 UC-5 UC-6 UC-7 UC-8 UC-9 UC-10 UC-11 UC-12 UC-13 UC-14 UC-15 UC-16 126 96 78 108 140 568 306 247 76 62 30 134 80 250 150 11 Park West No. 1&2 College Plaza London Towne Houses Gartrell Ct. Perry Homes Ext. McDaniel St. Single Family Duplexes & Small Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. Single Family 3751 Gordon at Bolton i017 Westview Dr. at . Jones Pl. 3242 Cushman Cir., SW . 38~88 Younge St., SE 1730 Kerry Dr. , ,NW R-W UR Project Scattered Scattered 1145 Constitution Rd., SE 140 Mt. Zion Rd., SE 419 Chamberlain St., SE 1101 Collier Rd., N.W. 1895 Plaza Lane, SW 1185 Collier Rd., NW 1991 Delowe Dr., SW Thomasville U.R. Project \ I 221 d(3)L.D . 221 d(3) 221 d(3) Co-op 221 d(3) LD P.H. P. H . Conv. & 22i d(2) Conv. Co nv . Conv. 221 d(3) LD Conv, Conv. Conv. Conv. 221 d :( 2) .i �i. HOUSING RESOURCES COMMITTEE PROJECT INDEX (Continued) Item No. -- No. Units New - Existing Designation Location Program - Jn der Construction (Continued) UC-17 UC-18 UC-19 UC-20 UC-21 UC-22 UC-23 UC-2 4 UC-25 UC-26 UC-27 UC-28 UC-29 UC-30 UC-31 UC-32 UC-33 UC-3 4 UC-35 UC-36 To ta l 58 76 76 192 138 108 80 92 48 192 . 45 64 400 92 72 202 208 20.8 2 41 54 5,10'8 Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. · Apts. Apts. Wheat St. Gardens 2 & 3 Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. Hollywood Rd. Project Friendship Center Allen Temple 3 Apts. Apts. 1910 Bixby St., SE 1501 Beauregard Ave., SE 1935 Allison Ct., SW 914 Collier .Rd., NW 2722 Gordon Rd. , NW 2950 Springdale Rd., ~W 2390 Palmour Dr., . NE 1090 Hollywood Rd., · NW 2113 Defore Ferry Rd., liW. Butler St. U.R. Project 3379 Stone Rd. SW 1073 Hollywood Rd., SW 3901 Campbellton Rd. SW . . 2400 Campbell t ,on Rd. SW 50 . Mt. Zion Rd. SW 1580 Hollywood Rd. NW 99 Northside Dr. SW 31·75 Gordon Rd . SW 475 East Paces Fy. Rd. NE 3136 Gordon Rd. SW Conv. ~or lease as PH Conv. Conv. Conv. Conv. Conv. Conv. Conv. Conv. 221 d(3) & RS , Conv. Conv. Conv • Conv. Conv. Turnkey 221 d(3) 221 d(3) ·conv. Conv. I n Plann i n g IP- 1 IP- 2 IP-3 IP-4 IP- 5 IP-6 IP-7 IP-8 IP-9 IP-10 IP-11 IP-12 IP-13 52 116 1,384 3 50 262 220 5 00 1 52 20 250 500 41 588 Park West 3 London Towne Houses Cerex Atlanta Corp. Apts & Elderly Russel Property Gilbert Rd. Bankhead Hwy Site Ebenezer Baptist Church Single Family Ashbury Hills Home Fairburn Rd. Site Single family lots . Central Methodist Church Gordon Rd. at Bolton 32 4 2 Cushman Cir~ SW Rockdale U.R. Project Thomasville U~R. Project Off Etheridge Dr. NW At Flynn Rd. SE Bankhead Hwy; ,. -at . Maynard Rd. Between Capitol Homes & I-20 Thomasville Gammon Theological Sem. Site Fairburn Rd. N. of Holy Family Thomasville U.R. area E. of Fairbur~, N. of Sewell 221 d(3) 221 d(3) Co-op 221 d(3) co~op,221 d(3),BMIR ,M I R P.H. 221 d(3) Turnkey Turnkey 221 d(3) .221 d (3) Hill-Burton Act , 232; 202 221 d(3) Co- op 221 d(2) 221 d(3) & Elderly �HOUSING RESOURCES COMMITTEE PROJECT INDEX (Continued) j· .i j It em No . No. Units New - Existing Designation Location Program Betmar Apts. Apts. Br,owntown Rd. Site Butler St. YMCA Site Leopold Project Apts & Elderly. Apts. Apts. Honor Farm 1 Apts. Apts. 1765 Pryor Rd. SE N. of Gordon, W. of Adamsville Dr. N. side Browntown Rd. NW W. side Hollywood Rd. W. of Jonesboro Rd.,S~ .of McWilliams Bedford-Pine U.R. Project 3750 Gordon Rd. SW . E. of Brownlee Rd., SW, N. of Scott Off McDonough Blvd~ West Lake Manor East Lake Golf Course 2 Leasipg for P.H. Conv . . Turnkey 221 d(3) Turnkey P.H. Conv. Conv. PH;Turnkey & 221d(3),(2) 221 d(3) L.D. Turnkey Single Family Lots Joe Anderson Project Joe Anderson Project S. side Westview Dr. SW Seminole Ct. Apts. Cenker & Kingloff Project Railroad Ave. Duvall tract Wellswood Apt. area Ga. Teacher's Develop. Inc. Lee P. Fore property Keith Project David Berry Proposal Multi-family Apts. Cath. Archdoicese Property Thomasville UR area 221 d(2) Glun Club Rd. NW 221 d(3) Alvin Dr: NW 221 d(3) West End UR area 221 d(3) LD Near N. Highland & N. Ave. Turnkey Rehab. Harwell Rd. at Oakcliff 221 d(3) Railroad Ave. NE 221 (h) or d(3) E. of Jonesboro Rd. SE Turnkey S. of Englewood Ave. SE Turnkey Harwell Rd., S. of Bankhead Hwy. 221 d(3) · E. of Empire Dr.,sw,s. of Oak Dr. 221 d(3) Co-op W. - side of Gilbert Rd. at Co. line Conv. W side of Fairburn Rd.near ··Bak~rs .:Fy ; Conv. East of Kimberly Rd.-Fulton Co. Turnkey L.L. 68 14th Dist.-F.C. Conv. Off DeKalb Ave. at Hampton Ter . Turnkey l I n Planning (Continued) 1 IP- 14 IP- 1 5 IP-16 IP-17 IP-18 IP-19 IP-20 IP-2 1 IP-22 IP-23 I P-2 4 Total 352 48 450 180 180 364 52 40 600 32 800 7 , 151 ~Being Considered BC- 1 26 100. BC-2 BC-3 150 BC- 4 50 BC-5 80 BC - 6 65 BC -7 500 BC-8 2 40 BC-9 225 BC- 10 2 50 BC-11 16 BC-12 20 BC- 13 600 BC -1 4 72 BC -15 200 BC -16 2,594 Total 36 l Did Not Materialize DNM DNM-2 8,056 150 175 DNM-3 50 DNM-1 Shown on p r evious report of January 15, 1968. W. side Jackson Pkwy; at Procter Cr . 2 21 d(3) Co- op A. L . Roberts Pr ope r ty H.A . early submit t al E . side Jonesboro Rd;N . of Circum. Tu r nke y or 221 d(3) Blyd. Dr . SE,Howard - Hallman- Saunder s El d e rl y Turne r Monumenta l Chu r ch • I .l �HOUSING RESOURCES COMMITTEE PROJECT INDEX (Continued) Item No. No. Units New Existing - Designation Locatioa Program )id Not Materialize (Continued) DNM-4 DNM-5 DNM-6 DNM-7 DNM-8 DNM-9 DNM-10 DNM-11 DNM-12 Total 260 200 364 280 100 175 360 500 352 11~022 221 d(3) Wm. L. Warnoker Proposal W. of S. Expressway; S. of AWI>RR Conv. Charlie Taylor Proposal W. of Bolton Rd; S. of Sandy clr. Luther Fraser Property Adj. to CC Esates;off Boulder Pk. Dr.221 d(3) Turnkey Ralpy Willis,J.R. Hall proposalCuster Ave. E. of Chosewood Pk. Carl ton Marlow Proposal W. of Jackson Pk\VY ;D .E. Glenrock Dr. · 221 d(3) Trailer Park Site Bankhead Hwy. at Osburn Rd. Turnkey Golfview Apts. Cleveland Ave. Ext. 221 d(3) LD Part of Golfview Project At Cleveland Ave. · Ext. Turnkey Wm. A. Mitchell tract Between Collier Dr., NW & I-20 221 d (3)" � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document Item No. ;ompleted 1 KFroOomONouhR WHE ree NH oO EUSA OOOO OOO c-13 c-14 Totals No. Units New - Existing 373 380 100 534 658 10,487 218 30 28 32 96 400 6 82 2,031 11,393" inder Construction UC=2 UC-2 UC-3 uCc-4 Uc-5 UC-6 UC~7 UC-8 uc-9 Uc-10 veil uc-12 uUC-13 uc-14 uC-15 uUCc-16 126 96 78 108 140 568 306 247 76 62 30 134 80 250 150 11 To accompany Low-income Housing Inventory Report of May 15, 1968 Designation Allen Temple Single Family Duplexes & Smal Apts. Apts. Leased for P.H. Rehab. H.C. Div. Rehab. by H.A. Rehab. by Pvt. Ent. Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. London Towne Houses Public Housing Park West No. 1&2 College Plaza London Towne Houses Gartrell Ct. Perry Homes Ext. McDaniel St. Single Family Duplexes & Small Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. Single Family HOUSING RESOURCES COMMITTEE PROJECT INDEX Location Gordon Rd. Near Harwell Scattered Scattered Scattered 8 Sites Throughout City West End U. R. A aa Scattered 2661 Beeler Dr., S.W. 1930 Flat Shoals Rd., SW ' 1991 DeLowe Drive., SW 200 Alden Ave., NW 3242 Cushman Cir., SW McDaniel St., SW 3751 Gordon at Bolton 1017 Westview Dr. at Jones Pl. 3242 Cushman Cir., SW . 38-88 Younge St., SE 1730 Kerry Dr., NW R-W UR Project Scattered Scattered 1145 Constitution Rd., SE 140 Mt. Zion Rd., SE 419 Chamberlain St., SE 1101 Collier Rd., N.W. 1895 Plaza Lane, SW 1185 Collier Rd., NW 1991 Delowe Dr., SW Thomasville U.R. Project Program’ Page 221 d(3) Conv. & 221 d(2) Conv. Conv. Leasing for P.H. H.C. Enf. U.R. Conv. Rehab. Conv. Conv. Conv. Conv. 221 d(3) co-op P.H. 221 d(3)L.D. 221 <d{3) 221 d(3) Co-op 221 d(3) LD P.H. P.H. Conv. & 221 d(2) Conv. Conv. Conv. 221 d(3) LD Conv, Conv. Conv. Conv. 221 d€2)  Item No. Units No. New - Existing Jnder Construction (Continued) UG=17 58 uc-18 76 uUC=-19 76 UCc-20 192 UC-21 138 uUC-22 108 UE=-23 80 UC-24 “92 UuC=-25 48 UC-26 192 UC-27 45 UCc-28 64 | UC-29 400 UC-30 92 Uc-31 72 UC-32 202 UC-33 208 UC-34 208 UC-35 241 UC-36 54 Total 5,108 In Planning IP-1 52 IP-2 116 IP-3 1,384 IP-4 350 IP-5 262 IP-6 220 IP-7 500 IP-8 152 1P-9 20 IP-10 250 IP-11 500 IP-12 41 IP-13 588 HOUSING RESOURCES COMMITTEE PROJECT INDEX (Continued) Designation Apts, Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. : Apts.- Apts. Apts. Wheat St. Gardens 2 & 3 Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. Apts. ' Hollywood Rd. Project Friendship Center Allen Temple 3 Apts. Apts. Park West 3 London Towne Houses Cerex Atlanta Corp. Apts & Elderly Russel Property Gilbert Rd. Bankhead Hwy Site Ebenezer Baptist Church Single Family Ashbury Hills Home Fairburn Rd. Site Single family lots : Central Methodist Church Location 1910 Bixby St., SE 1501 Beauregard Ave., SE 1935 Allison Ct., SW 914 Collier Rd., NW 2722 Gordon Rd., NW 2950 Springdale Rd., SW 2390 Palmour Dr.,- NE 1090 Hollywood Rd., NW 2113 Defore Ferry Rd., NW, Butler St. U.R. Project 3379 Stone Rd. SW ; 1073 Hollywood Rd., SW 3901 Campbellton Rd. SW ',2400 Campbellton Rd. SW 50 Mt. Zion Rd. SW 1580 Hollywood Rd. NW 99 Northside Dr. SW 3175 Gordon Rd. SW 475 East Paces Fy. Rd. NE 3136 Gordon Rd. SW Gordon Rd. at Bolton 3242 Cushman Cir. SW Rockdale U.R. Project Thomasville UR. Project Off Etheridge Dr. NW At Flynn Rd. SE Bankhead Hwy. ,-at. Maynard Rd. Between Capitol Homes & I-20 Thomasville Gammon Theological Sem. Site Fairburn Rd. N. of Holy Family Thomasville U.R. area E. of Fairburn, N. of Sewell | Program Page | Conv. for lease as PH Conv. Conv. Conv. Conv. Conv. Conv. Conv. Conv. 221 d(3) & RS: Conv. Conv. Conv. Conv. Conv. Turnkey 221 d(3) 221 d(3) ‘Conv. Conv. 221 d(3) 221 d(3) Co-op 221 d(3) Co-op,221 d(3),BMIR,MIR PH. 221 d(3) Turnkey Turnkey 221 d(3) 221 d(3) Hill-Burton Act,232; 202 221 d(3) Co-op 221 d(2) 221 d(3) & Elderly  Item No. Units No. New - Existing In Planning (Continued) IP-14 352 IP-15 48 iP-16 450 IP-17 180 IP-18 180 IP-19 364 IP-20 52 IP-21 40 IP-22 600 IP-23 32 IP-24 800 Total 7 C5 352 Being Considered Be-1I = 26 BC-2 100. BC-3 150 Bc-4 50 BC-5 36 BC-6 80 BC-7 65 BC-8 500 BC-9 240 BC-10 225 BC-11 250 BC-12 16 BC-13 20 BC-14 600 BC-15 72 BC-16 200 Total 2,094 36 Did Not Materialize DNM 8,056 DNM-1 150 DNM-2 175 DNM-3 50 HOUSING RESOURCES COMMITTEE PROJECT INDEX (Continued) Designation Betmar Apts. Apts. Browntown Rd. Site Butler St. YMCA Site Leopold Project Apts & Elderly . Apts. . Apts. Honor Farm 1 Apts. Apts. Single Family Lots Joe Anderson Project Joe Anderson Project S. side Westview Dr. SW Seminole Ct. Apts. Cenker & Kingloff Project Railroad Ave. Duvall tract Wellswood Apt. area Ga. Teacher's Develop. Inc. Lee P. Fore property Keith Project David Berry Proposal Multi-family Apts. Cath. Archdoicese Property Location 1765 Pryor Rd. SE N. of Gordon, W. of Adamsville Dr. N. side Browntown Rd. NW W. side Hollywood Rd. W. of Jonesboro Rd.,S..of McWilliams Bedford-Pine U.R. Project 3750 Gordon Rd. SW E. of Brownlee Rd., SW, N. of Scott Off McDonough Bivd. West Lake Manor East Lake Golf Course 2 Thomasville UR area Glun Club Rd. NW Alvin Dr. NW West End UR area Near N. Highland & N. Ave. Harwell Rd. at Oakcliff Railroad Ave. NE E. of Jonesboro Rd. SE S. of Englewood Ave. SE Harwell Rd., S. of Bankhead Hwy. E. of Empire Dr.,SW,S. of Oak Dr. ' W.-side of Gilbert Rd. at Co. line Program Leasing for P.H, Conv.. Turnkey 221 d(3) Turnkey P.H. Conv. Conv. PH;Turnkey & 221d(3),(2) 221 d(3) L.D. Turnkey 221 d(2) 221 d(3) 221 d(3) 221 4d(3) LD Turnkey Rehab. 221 d(3) 221 (h) or d(3) Turnkey Turnkey 221 d(3)° 221 d(3) Co-op Conv. W side of Fairburn Rd.near Bakers. Fy.Conv. East of Kimberly Rd.-Fulton Co. L.L. 68 14th Dist.-F.C. Off DeKalb Ave. at Hampton Ter. Shown on previous report of January 15, 1968. A.L. Roberts Property H.A. early submittal Turner Monumental Church W. side Jackson Pkwy; at Procter Cr. E. side Jonesboro Rd;N. of Circum, Turnkey Conv. Turnkey 221 d(3) Co-op Turnkey or 221 4d(3) Blvd. Dr. SE,Howard-Hallman-Saunders Elderly Item No. did Not Materialize (Continued) No. Units New - bxisting DNM-4 DNM-5 DNM-6 DNM-7 DNM-8 DNM-9 DNM-10 DNM-11 DNM-12 Total 260 200 364 280 100 175 360 500 352 11,022 HOUSING RESOURCES COMMITTEE PROJECT INDEX (Continued) Designation Location Wm. L. Warnoker Proposal W. of S. Expressway; S. of AWPRR Charlie Taylor Proposal Luther Fraser Property W. of Bolton Rd; S. of Sandy Cir. Adj. to CC Esates;off Boulder Pk. Dr. Ralpy Willis,J.R. Hall proposalCuster Ave. E. of Chosewood Pk. Carlton Marlow Proposal Trailer Park Site Golfview Apts. Part of Golfview Project At Cleveland Ave. Ext. Wm. A. Mitchell tract W. of Jackson Pkwy;D.E. Glenrock Dr. Bankhead Hwy. at Osburn Rd. Cleveland Ave. Ext. Between Collier Dr., NW & I-20 Program Page 221 d(3) Conv. 221 d(3) Turnkey 221 d(3) Turnkey 221 d(3) LD Turnkey 221 d(3)  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 6, Document 19 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 6 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1968 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/7e905d478cb932352984e54985cb8b04.pdf 8ffa0e4af24f4910e11b072491611d31 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. HOUSING RESOURCES COMMITTEE May 15, 1968 ' ·.I SUMMARY 'i STATUS OF ACCELERATED LOW-INOMCE HOUSING PROGRAM . . (Commenced Nov. 15, 1966) Total dwelling units ·permitted in Atlanta: 1963 - 9,129 1966 - 2,382 5 yr. Program, 1967-71 1964 - ~,829 1967 - 4,630 1965 - 2,656 1968 - 1,810 (thur Apr .) % estab. for f Goal (Same % first 2 yr. used for 5 yr. period) ' Sta tus 100% 16,800 No. Units May 15 Jan 15 1,312 2,031 · Completed (new Const.) (57%) (9,576) P.H. & TK. May· 15 Jan 15 (82) (13%) (2,184) FHA 221 May 15 Jan 15 (510) (400) (30%) (5,040) Pvt. Devlp. (Conv.) Ma y 15 Jan 15 (1,439) (912) ~ Elderly & N. H . May 15 Jan 15 ' 5,108 3,701 · (910) (790) (1,188) (565) In Planning 7 2 151 6 2 582 (2 2 91 4 ) (2 2 220) (3 2 651) (3 2 868) (140) ( 4 8) ( 44 6) {44 6) Total in Sight 14,290 11,595 O, 906) (3,010) (5,349) (4,833) (4,589) (3,306) (446) (446) Increase-Deficit -2,510 -5,205 (-5,670) (-6,566) (+ 3, 165) (2,649) (-451)(-1,734) (446) (446) 2,?94 4,481 Did Not Materia lize I (0) Und er Construction Be ing considered (all categories) I (3,010) (2,346) See Note A. Figures in this column are basic and represent the entire program. ( ) Indicates breakdown by programs, of figures included in basic column. In additi on, 658 units have been leased for P.Ho and leasing of 372 additional units for P.H. is being negotiated. Als o 13,983 units have been reported ~y the Housing Code Division as repaired (rehabilitated). However, those figures include un i ~ found in compliance on ori g ina l inspection. It is estimate d that 75% of this figure, or 10,487 sub-st andard units have been brought into compliance thr ough actual r eha bilitation. 218 units have been rehabilitated by the H.A. in the West End U.R. Project. These do not increase the number of housing units _ available, but do increase the supply of standard units. 1 Includes only units financed under Federal assisted low and med ium income housing programs; and units constructed under convent ional financing as follows: Multi-family units costing not more than $10 ,000, exclusive of land Respectfully submitted, ti Duples uni ts · " " " · " $12 ,000, " "ti ti Single family units " " " " $15,000 , " }k-k d-J-~-"i-~ Enc ls: 1 . Summary of Public Housing in Atlanta 2. Notes Malc olm D. Joo/5 . Housing Coord~nator 3. Inventory of Low and Medium Cost Housing in Atlanta (with office copies only) Note: �HOUSING RESOURCES COMMITTEE May 15, 1968 SUMMARY OF PUBLIC HOUSING IN ATLANTA 8 874 • Existing Units in operation - filled. • 1140 Units in Development stage, as follows: Units under construction off McDaniel St., in Rawson-Washington completion in '68) (248) Spring '68 (82 of these units completed 5-15-68) (402) Fall '68 (650) Units under construction in Perry Homes Extension - South of Procter Creek. (78) 3 Bedroom Bids opened March 7, 1967. Permit issued May '67. Const. (46) 4 Bedroom (16) 5 Bedroom on schedule for completion by Nov. '68; 48% completed 5-15-68. (350) Units planned for Thomasville U. R. Project (40) 1 Bedroom (16 elderly) Bids opened May 15, 1968. 12 months, at least, required for (120) 2 Bedroom construction. Will try to have part delivered before final. (80) 3 Bedroom (80) 4 Bedroom (30) 5 Bedroom 4200 (1372) Units reserved (Allocations made by HUD to date; Hollywood Rd., 202; Gilbert Rd., 220: Bankhead Hwy., 500; and Honor Farm #1, 450) (500 units of this reservation are approved for allocation to the leasing program, to be replaced later) I (500) i Units allocated for leasing program; can only be utilized for Public Housing as ~hey become vaca n t. Allocation requested for 230 additional units to the leasing program. 300 5640 14 , 514 • R. Project (scheduled for (140) 1i I. u. (8 locations) (658) Units under lease (372) Negotiations under way for leasing 372 additional units. • • Total Potential Figures in ( ) in this column are included in figure above; not in ( ). { i I Encl. 1 .I �HOUSING RESOURCES COMM ITTEE May 15, 1 968 NOTES A. ll, 022 units proposed did not materialize, of which 8,056 were shown in the previous report of Jan. 1 5, 1968 a nd 2,966 a d di tional units are listed in this report, as Lost. (The majority .of these losses were due to disapprovals of sites and propo~ed r ezoni n g. ) 0 f B. P roposed locations for low-cost housing .are coordinated through the Planning Dept., for adequacy of Community . Facili t ies, ex i s t i ng or pros p osed. Proposals are also reviewed periodically with the School Dept. for adequacy of school facili t ies. C. An engineering firm from Savannah, McNa mara & Associates, Consulting Engineers, has recently made present ations in Atl ant a o f a t' p atent applied for" low-cost housing method of construction with flexible design, whic h is claimed can be construc t ed qu ickl y o n sit e, employing mostly untrained labor and at a savings of 10%-15% under conventional construction. This fir m establ is hed connections with a reputable construction firm in Atlanta and a l ocal architect. This team is anxious to acqu ire a 1 0 ac r e tra c t in the Mo d el Cities area to construct an experimental Housing project. · D. The Travelers Insurance Company has agreed to finance 70 or more new single family low-cost houses in the Th omasvil l e Ur ba n Rene wal p roject a rea under the FHA 221 D (2) insured mortgage program. Equitable has made $1,000,000 available to Atl ant a Mor tgage Brok e r ~g Co. for financing low-cost homes at favorable rates. E. I n v i e w o f difficulties encountered in zoning and getting other approvals on sites proposed for large multi- fam ily d e velopme nts , it is app arent t h at the Low-income Housing Program will have to lean heavily on Developers and Builders prov i di ng a s ubs ta nti al p or ti on of the requirements on small scattered sites, with or without Federal assistance. 1 ! I I I ·I F. No pro p os a l had yet been made for construction of uni t s (even efficiency or 1 bedroom) to rent or sell for a s l ow as $ 50 per mo nth, althoug h the London Towne Houses, a 221 d (3) co-op development now under construction, is pushing t his close t with its o ne bed room u n it advertised to sell for· $59 per month. The City's greatest need is in the $30-$50 per month re nt a l -purc h ase r a nge . G. Ric hard L. Fullerton Associates has proposed a fibre glass "manufactured" patented process, 3 bed r oom and bath house . ( 900 s q . ft. & c ar p o rt ) with w-to-w carpeting and air conditioning, which he claims can sell for $9,000-$9,500, including l and es t i mat e d to cos t $ 1,500. H. National Homes Corp. of Lafayette, Inc. placed on the market Fab. 1, 1967 a 800--900 S. F. (O.S. dimensions) 3 b e dr ooms , p refabric ate preass e mbled p a nel, single family house plus a 96 S.F. (IoSo dimensions) stora ge building manufac t u r ed b y Arrow Me tal Products Corp. , t o sell under FHA 221 d (2). Price includes plumbing , electrical, heating units, stove & refrigerat or. Ho uses c an be comple t e ly a ssembled in 8 5 man h our s; 72 of t hese ( wit h conventiona l plumbing) are being erected (pr e-sold) i n t he Thomasville Urba n Renewal Area . Approx . 8 0 0 sq. f t. h ouse is priced at $ 11,200; 900 sq. ft. house is p riced at $ 1 1 ,600. Adrian Homes Cor. has prop osed a p refab to r e tail f or a bout $ 7,500 plus land, foundation , closing and possible tapping fees. Other p refa b d is tr i but o rs and c onve nt i o n al builders h ave int eresting potential houses to of f er but, because of fear of local Codes di ff icult i es, are not producing single i fam ily houses in Atlant a to sell in the $ 10,000-$ 12,500 range for which there is a strong demand and marke t . Pe rhaps the grea tes t 1 di f f iculty is a v ailab il i ty of suitably priced land within the City Limits. Economics for this p r ic e r a nge sales h ousing req uire land wh ich will no t c ost t h e developer mor e than $ 1500 . per unit. (A 5,000 sq. ft. lot is cons i dered a mple for this type house.) I. Ralph L. Dick ey o f Atlant a h a s proposed ~a non-prof i t revolvint fund enterprise to acq uire substandard hous ing ; renovate it and r e s el l prima rily t h rough .priv ate e n t e r pr ise. CACUR recent ly f ormed a 1 non- profit corporation to reha bil itate e xis int 1 units u n~er 221 (h) • . I Mo r r i s Brown College is a not her such sponsor . Nor th West Communi ty Forum ha s a lso fi led app lications for ~ 4 projects und er 2 2 1 (h) ~ J. Informa tion is welcomed as t o c orre ct ions, add itions or delet ions of ma ter ial conta ined i n this report. {Ca l l 522-4463 Ext . 4 3 0 . ) � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document HOUSING RESOURCES COMMITTEE May 15, 1968 SUMMARY STATUS OF ACCELERATED LOW-INOMCE HOUSING PROGRAM . . (Commenced Nov. 15, 1966) Total dwelling units permitted in Atlanta: 1963 - 9,129 1966 - 2,382 | 5 yr. Program, 1967-71 1964 - 3,829 - 1967 - 4,630 1965 - 2,656 1968 - 1,810 (thur Apr.) % estab. for first 2 yr. 100% (57%) (13%) (30%) Goal (Same % used for 5 yr. period) 16,800 (9,576) (2,184) (5,040) Status *No. Units P.H. & TK. FHA 221 Pvt. Devlp. (Conv.) Elderly & N.H. May 15 Jan 15 May 15 Jan 15 May 15 Jan 15 May 15 Jan 15 May 15 Jan 15 Completed (new Const.) 2,031 1,312 (82) ---- (510) (400) (1,439) (912) me ee | Under Construction 5,108 3,701 (910) (790) (1,188) (565) (3,010) (2,346) —— eee eee In Planning 7,151 6,582 (2,914) (2,220) (3,651) (3,868) (140) (48) (446) (446) Total in Sight 14,290 11,595 **3,906) (3,010) (5,349) (4,833) (4,589) (3,306) : (446) (446) Increase-Deficit -2,510 -5,205 (-5,670) (-6,566) (73,165) (2,649) (-451) (-1, 734) (446) (446) Being considered (all categories) 2,994 4,481 Did Not Materialize See Note A. *Figures in this column are basic and represent the entire program. ( ) Indicates breakdown by programs, of figures included in basic column. *kIn addition, 658 units have been leased for P.H. and leasing of 372 additional units for P.H. is being negotiated. Also 13 ,983 units have been reported by the Housing Code Division as repaired (rehabilitated). found in compliance on original inspection. brought into compliance through actual rehabilitation. These do not increase the number of housing units available, but do increase the supply of standard units. Note: Includes only units financed under Federal assisted low and medium income housing programs; and units constructed under conventional financing as follows: Multi-family units costing not more than $10,000, exclusive of land ° Respectfully submitted, Duples units mW wT Ww. mW $12 ,000, wv mW 7 Single family units " moon " $15,000 " " " isp swe es = Encls: 1. Summary of Public Housing in Atlanta : : tiple cluvaKX ie. 2. Notes ; : ; ‘ : Malcolm D. Jongs 3. Inventory of Low and Medium Cost Housing in Atlanta (with office copies only) Housing Coordinator However, those figures include unit It is estimated that 75% of this figure, or 10,487 sub-standard units have been 218 units have been rehabilitated by the H.A. in the West End U.R. Project.  S374 Encl. #1 1140 * (650) (140) (350) 4200 (1372) (500) 300 - SSeS Pee HOUSING RESOURCES COMMITTEE May 15, 1968 SUMMARY OF PUBLIC HOUSING IN ATLANTA Existing Units in operation - filled. Units in Development stage, as follows: Units under construction off McDaniel St., in Rawson-Washington U. R. Project (scheduled for completion in '68) (248) Spring '68 (402) Fall '68 (82 of these units completed 5-15-68) Units under construction in Perry Homes Extension - South of Procter Creek. (78) 3 Bedroom (46) 4 Bedroom (16) 5 Bedroom Bids opened March 7, 1967. Permit issued May '67. Const. on schedule for completion by Nov. '68; 48% completed 5-15-68. Units planned for Thomasville U. R. Project (40) 1 Bedroom (16 elderly) Bids opened May 15, 1968. 12 months, at least, required for (120) 2 Bedroom construction. Will try to have part delivered before final. (80) 3 Bedroom (80) 4 Bedroom (30) 5 Bedroom Units reserved (Allocations made by HUD to date; Hollywood Rd., 202; Gilbert Rd., 220: Bankhead Hwy., 500; and Honor Farm #1, 450) (500 units of this reservation are approved. for allocation to the leasing program, to be replaced later) Units allocated for leasing program; can only be utilized for Public Housing as they become vacant, Allocation requested for 230 additional units to the leasing program. Units under lease (8 locations) Negotiations under way for leasing 372 additional units. Total Potential *Figures in ( ) in this column are included in figure above; not in ( ). J Rael HOUSING RESOURCES COMMITTEE May 15, 1968 | NOTES L,022 units proposed did not materialize, of which 8,056 were shown in the previous report of Jan. 15, 1968 and 2,966 additional I units are listed in this report, as Lost. (The majority of these losses were due to disapprovals of sites and proposed rezoning.) I Proposed locations for low-cost housing are coordinated through the Planning Dept., for adequacy of Community Facilities, existing Hy or prosposed. Proposals are also reviewed periodically with the School Dept. for adequacy of school facilities. . An engineering firm from Savannah, McNamara & Associates, Consulting Engineers, has recently made presentations in Atlanta of a "patent applied for" low-cost housing method of construction with flexible design, which is claimed can be constructed quickly on site, employing mostly untrained labor and at a savings of 10%-15% under conventional construction. This firm established : connections with a reputable construction firm in Atlanta and a local architect. This team is anxious to acquire a 10 acre tract in the Model Cities area to construct an experimental Housing project. The Travelers Insurance Company has agreed to finance 70 or more new single family low-cost houses in the Thomasville Urban Renewal project area under the FHA 221 D (2) insured mortgage program. Equitable has made $1,000,000 available to Atlanta Mortgage Brokeragé« Co. for financing low-cost homes at favorable rates. In view of difficulties encountered in zoning and getting other approvals on sites proposed for large multi-family developments, it is apparent that the Low-income Housing Program will have to lean heavily on Developers and Builders providing a substantial portion of the requirements on small scattered sites, with or without Federal assistance. No proposal had yet been made for construction of units (even efficiency or 1 bedroom) to rent or sell for as low as $50 per month, although the London Towne Houses, a 221 d (3) co-op development now under construction, is pushing this close, with its one bedroom unit advertised to sell for $59 per month. The City's greatest need is in the $30-$50 per month rental-purchase range. Richard L. Fullerton Associates has proposed a fibre glass "manufactured" patented process, 3 bedroom and bath house. (900 sq. ft. & car port) with w-to-w carpeting and air conditioning, which he claims can sell for $9,000-$9,500, including land estimated to | cost $1,500. National Homes Corp. of Lafayette, Inc. placed on the market Fab. 1, 1967 a 800--900 S.F. (0.S. dimensions) 3 bedrooms, prefabricated preassembled panel, single family house plus a 96 S.F. (I.S. dimensions) storage building manufactured by Arrow Metal Products Corp. ,| to sell under FHA 221 d (2). Price includes plumbing, electrical, heating units, stove & refrigerator. Houses can be completely assembled in 85 man hours; 72 of these (with conventional plumbing) are being erected (pre-sold) in the Thomasville Urban Renewal Area. Approx. 800 sq. ft. house is priced at $11,200; 900 sq. ft. house is priced at $11,600. Adrian Homes Cor. has proposed a prefab to retail for about $7,500 plus land, foundation, closing and possible tapping fees. Other prefab distributors and convent- | ional builders have interesting potential houses to offer but, because of fear of local Codes difficulties, are not producing single family houses in Atlanta to sell in the $10,000-$12,500 range for which there is a strong demand and market. Perhaps the greatest difficulty is availability of suitably priced land within the City Limits. Economics for this price range sales housing require land which will not cost the developer more than $1500.per unit. (A 5,000 sq. ft. lot is considered ample for this type house.) Ralph L. Dickey of Atlanta has proposed a non-profit revolving fund enterprise to acquire substandard housing; renovate it and resell primarily through private enterprise. CACUR recently formed a non-profit corporation to rehabilitate exisint units under 221 (h).. Morris Brown College is another such sponsor. North West Community Forum has also filed applications for « 4 projects under 221 (h). Information is welcomed as to corrections, additions or deletions of material contained in this report. (Call 522-4463 Ext. 430.) oD  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 6, Document 18 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 6 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1968 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/d72e5b3bd51e17dfafeb0057373134da.pdf 00f6225d1e4c112bda4176844f0337a8 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. Jun 7, 1968 ~MORANDUM To: Mr . J. C . John on Director of Model Citi Pur u t to our di&cu. io:n y, st rd y , thi is to dvl e you that in r port which I. in now pr p ring to Mr D n E . Sw t, Jr ., Dir ctor o..t Gov rnm ntal Li i o , pert lnin . to Ex run ntal Hou in Surv y , I m p!l'opo ing (1 ) th t approxbnat ly a four block r (about 10 c.re.e) c nt r d en0 r ally on the int r ection of Conn lly Plaee d Crumley Str et, S . E. or (2 ) slmU ~ eiz r cent r d o.n the ill' reectiori of R - d Stre t d Love Str t, S. . b d ign t d for ex riment housing d t t r que t b tniti t d promptly to HUD for uthority to cquir tuch tr ct for thb pu.rpot · a oon · po ei'bl , und r pp opd t proc dur a. Both of thee tract• v b n di;scu• ed with Mr . Sw r . Jim right ot your offic . M lcolrn D. Jon Housin Coordln tor MDJ':(y t d � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document Jit Set eo” ’ June 7, 1968 MEMORANDUM To: Mr. J. C. Johnson Director of Model Cities Pursuant to our discussion yesterday, this is to advise you that in a report which I am now preparing to Mr. Dan E. Sweat, Jr., Director of Governmental Liaison, pertaining to Experimental Housing Survey, I am proposing (1) that approximately a four block area (about 10 acres) centered generally on the intersection of Connally Place and Crumley Street, S. E. or (2) a similar size area centered on the intersection of Reed Street and Love Street, S. E. be designated for experimental housing and that request be initiated promptly to HUD for authority to acquire such tract for this purpose as soon as possible, under appropriate procedures, Both of these tracts have been discussed with Mr. Sweat and Mr. Jim Wright of your office. Malcolm D. Jones Housing Coordinator MDJ:fy a  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 6, Document 17 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 6 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1968 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/3fbf4e64630f44d49a16c12e19102de9.pdf a4742a03a11f13f6c2581876053ea90d Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Reprinted from Federal Register-32 F .R. 9660-62 July 4, 1967 Title 24-HOUSING AND HOUSING CREDIT Subtitle A-Office of the Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development PART 15-PUBLIC INFORMATION In Subtitle A a new Part 15 is added as follows: Subpart A-Pi,rpose and Policy Sec. 15.1 15.2 15.3 Definitions. Purpose. Statement of Policy. Subpart S---Production and Disclosure of Records 15.11 Publication in the FEDERAL REGISTER. 15.12 Materials not published ln the FEDERAL REGISTER. 15.13 Identifia ble records produced upon request. 15.14 Sche dule of fees. 15.21 Subpart C-Exemplions E xemptions authorized by 5 U.S.C. 552. Subpart D-Where Records May Be Inspected and Information Obtained 15.31 Information centers. 15.32 Informa tion officers. 15.33 Material ln Department Central Information Center. Subpart E-Procedure for Requesting Access to Records 15.41 Requests for records. Subpart !---Disclosure of Records and Refusal To Disclose 15.51 16.52 Authority to release records or copies. Authority to deny requests for records. Subpart G--Administrative Review of Denials of Requests for Records 15.61 Administrative review. AUTHORITY: The provisions of this Part 16 are issued under 5 U.S.C. 552 and sec. 7(d), 79 Stat. 670; 42 U.S.C. 3535(d). Subpart A-Purpose and Policy § 15.l Definitions. As used in this Part-- . (a) "Act" means section 552 of Title 5, United States Code, as amended by Public Law 90-23, 81 Stat. 54, June 5, 1967. Public Law 90-23 repealed and superseded "Pubttc- Law 89---487; 80 Stat. 250, July 4, 1966, sometimes referred to as the "Freedom of Information Act" or "Public Information Act." (b) Department" means the Department of Housing and Urban Development which consists of the Office of the Secretary and the several organizational units. (c) "Secretary" means the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. (d) "Organizational unit" means any one of the several offices, staffs, divisions, or administrations of the Department, including the F'-ederal Housing Adminis- tration (FHA) and the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) . Organizational unit also includes Department Regional Offices and local FHA and FNMA offices. (e) "Person" means "person" as defined in 5 U.S.C. 551(2) to include corpora,tions and organizations as well as individuals. (f) "Information center" means any place, reading room, desk, or other area or facility established and maintained by the Department where the public may request and obtain information and records concerning the Department's operations and business. § 15.2 § 15.12 Materials not. published in Fecleral Register. Purpose. This part contains the rules and regulations of the Department implementing 5 U.S.C. 552. It informs the public about where and how the Department's records and information may be obtained from its organizational units in Washington , D.C., and its regional and other local offices throughout the country. § 15.3 Except to the extent that a person has actual and timely notice of the terms thereof, no person shall in any manner be required to resort to or be adversely affected by any matter required to be published in the FEDER/IL REGISTER and not so published. For purposes of this § 15.11 , matter which is r easonably available to the class of persons affected thereby shall be deemed published in the FEDERAL REGISTER when incorporated by reference therein with the approval of the Director of the Office of the Federal Register, as provided in 32 F.R. 7899, June 1, 1967, 1 CFR Part 20. Statement of policy. The Department's policy is one of full and responsible disclosure of Its identifiable records and information consistent with such competing public interests concerning the national security, personal privacy, and obligations of confidentiality as are recognized by 5 U.S .C. 552. Every effort will be made to -furnish service with reasonable promptness to the public with respect to the obtaining of records and information. Subpart B-Production and Disclosure of Records § 15.11 Publication in the Federal Reg- ister. Subject to the exemptions in § 15.21, the Department shall separately state and currently publish in the FEDERAL REGISTER for the guidance of the public: (a) Descriptions of its central and field organization and the established places at which, the employees from whom, and the methods whereby, the public may obtain information, make submittals or requests, or obtain decisions;(b) Statements of the general course and method by which its functions are channeled and determined, including the nature and requirements of all formal and infonnal procedures available; <c) Rules of procedure, descriptions of forms available or the places at which forms may be obtained, and i.Jl.structions as to the scope and contents of all papers, reports, or examinations; (d) Substantive rules of general applicability adopted as authorized by law, and statements of general policy or interpretations of general applicability formulated and adopted by the Department; and (e) Each amendment. revision, or repeal of the foregoing . (a) Subject to § the exemptions in 15 .21, the Department, in accordance with this part, shall make available for public inspection and copying: ( 1) Final opinions, including concurring a,nd dissenting opinions, as well as orders, made in the adjudication of cases; (2) Statements of policy and interpretations which have been adopted by the Department and are not published in the FEDERAL REGISTER; and (3) Administrative staff manuals and instructions to staff that affect a member of the public. Cb) To prevent a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, the Department may delete identifying details ~hen it makes available or publishes any material. Whenever such deletions are required, the record or copy will be made available with the space formerly occupied by such identifying details left blank, and the justification for the deletion shall be explained fully in writing. Cc) The Department shall maintain and make available for public inspection and copying a current index providing identifying information for the public as to any matter issued, adopted, or promulgated after July 4, 1967, and which is required by this § 15.12 to be made available or published. § 15.13 Identifiable upon request records produced Requests for records and copies may be m a de in person during normal business hours at information centers listed below in § 15.31 of this part. Requests may also be made by mail addressed to such centers. (a) Each request fo r a record or copy thereof should identify the record specifically with respect to names, dates, subject matter, and location, 1f known. The Department will hotify any person making a request if further identifying information 1s needed before his request can l>e J:wllQfed. (bJ Charges will be made in accordance with the schedule of fees set forth in § 15.14 for any records search which involves more than one man-hour of work, and for duplicating, reproducing, certifying, or authenticating~opies �of documents furni~ed. (c) When a request is made for an identifiable record of the Department which has been stored in the Na tiona l Archives or other record centers of the General Services Administration, such record will be requested by the Department if it otherwise would be a vaila ble under this part. (d) Every effort will be made to make a record in use by the staff of the Department available when requested, and such availability will be deferred only to the extent necessary to avoid serious interference wit h the business of the Department. (e) Copies of a requested record need not be furnished if the record is published in the FEDERAL REGISTER or is availa ble for purchase from the Superintendent of Documents of the Government Printing Office. Such records may, however, be examined in one of the Department's information centers. § 15.14 Schedule of fees. For the services listed below performed in the location and disclosure or furnishing of copies of records under 5 U.S.C. 552, and pursuant to the policy established by Congress in 5 U.S.C. <1964 Ed.) 140, Act of August 31, 1951, the following charges will apply : (a) Records search: ( 1) First m a n-hour on any single request : no fee. (2) E ach additional man-hour or fraction ther eof: $5. (b ) Copies of documents: (1) X erox or equiva lent, page s ize up to 8 ½ inches by 14 inches, per p a ge : $0.25. (2) Photostat, page size up to 8 ½ inches by 14 inches, per page : $1. (c ) If charge is less than $1.00 per order : no fee. (d ) Maximum number of copies furnished of any record : 10. (e) Certifica tion of true copies, each : $ 1. (f ) Attestation under the seal of the Department or of FNMA, as the case may be, each : $2. (g) P ayment of fees under this § 15.20 shall be made in cash, or by U.S. money order , or by certified bank check payable to the Treasurer of the United States except that, in case of the F ederal Housing Administ ration and the Federal National Mortgage Associa tion , drafra should be ma de payable to those organizational units. Postaire stamps will not be accepted. Subpart C-Exe mptions § 15.21 Exemptions u.s.c. 552. authorized by 5 A requested record shall not be withheld from inspection or copying unless it bot h (1) comes within one of the classes of records exempted by 5 U.S.C. 552, and (2) there Is need in the public interest to withhold It. In determining the scope of the classes of records described in paragraph (a) of this section, the Attorney General's Memorandum on the Public Information Act, June 1967, will be used as a guide. (a) The classes of records authorized to be exempt ed from disclosure by 5 U.S.C. 552 are those which concern matters that are : 0 ) Specifically required by Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of the national defense or foreign policy; (2) Related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of the Department; (3) Specifically exempted from disclosure by statute; (4) Trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential; (5) Interagency or intra-agency memorandums or letters which would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the Department; (6) Personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy; (7) Investigatory files .compiled for law enforcement purposes except to the extent available by law to a party other than an agency ; (8) Contained in or related to examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of the Department in connection with its responsibility for the, regulation or supervision of financial institutions; or (9) Geological and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells. Subpart D-Where Records May Be Inspected and Obtained § 15.31 Information centers. (a) The Depar tment maintains a Centra l Information Center in Washington, D.C., at the following location: D ep artment of Housing and Urban Development, 1626 K Street NW. (Room 102 ) , Washington, D .C. 20410. (b) The Department also maintains an informa tion center(1) In each of its Regional Offices as follows : R egion 1- 346 Br oa d way, New York. N.Y . 10013. R egion II- Widener Building, 1339 Chestnut Street , Philadelphia, Pa. 19107. Region III-Peachtr ee-Seventh Building , At l a nta, G a. 30323. R egion IV--360 Nor th Michigan Avenue, Chicago, DI. 60601. R egion V-Fed e ra l Office Bu!lding. _819 T aylor S t reet, Fort Wor t h, Tex. 76102. Region VI--450 G olden G a t e Avenu e, P ost Office Box 36003, San Francisco, C al!f . 94 102; Northwest Operations Office, First Avenue, Seattle, Wash. 98104. R egion VII- Ponce De Leon a nd Bol!va, Post Office Box 3869, GPO, San Juan, P .R. 00936. (2) In each FNMA Agency Office as follows : 2 11 South Broad Street, Ph!ladelph!a, Pa. 19107. 34 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Ga. 30303. 1112 Commonwealth Edison B uilding, 72 West Ad ams S treet, Chicago, Ill. 60603 . 411 North Akard S treet, Dallas, T ex. 76201. 3840 Wilshire Boul evard, Los Angeles. Calif. 90005. (3) In each FHA Local Insuring Office at its respective local address as listed in local telephone directories. § 15.32 Information officers. There shall be a.n information officer in each of the information centers described in§ 15.31 who.sha.11 be responsible for m aking information and records available to the public in accordance with this part. The information officer in the Department Central Information Center shall be designated by the Director, Division of Public Affairs. The information officer in each Regional Office and field office shall be designated by the Regional Administrator or the Director of the office, as the case may be, with the concurrence of the Director, Division of Public Affairs. § 15.33 Material in Department Central Information Center. (a) The Central Information Center shall contain or have ready access to the following as a minimum: (1) FEDERAL REGISTER, Code of Federal Regulations, and regu_Iations of the Department contained therein; <2) Precedent final opinions and orders in the adjudication of cases; (3) Administrative staff manuals which affect the public; (4) Program manuals which affect the public and forms; (5) Interpretations relied upon as precedents; (6) A current index of the foregoing materials issued, adopted, promulgated after July 4, 1967. Cb) Each Regional Office information center, each FHA Local Insuring Office, and each FNMA Agency ·Office shall contain or shall have ready access to such of the above records as pertain to the activities of that office. (c) Fa<:ilities shall be available to each information center for the copying of properly requested and available records. Subpart E-Procedures for Requesting Access to Records § 15.41 Requests for records. (a) Requests for identifiable records should be made at the established information centers. (b) A request should specify the requested record by brief description, containing the name, number or date as applicable, in enough detail that the record ca n be identified and located. A reasonable time should be allowed for records to be loca ted, copied, and m ailed or otherwise delivered. (c) Th e request should be accompanied by the fee or an offer to pay the fee when determined. (d) Copies of ava ilable records shall be produced as promptly as possible. Copying service shall be llmlted to not more than 10 copies, of any single .p age. Records wh ich are published or availa ble f or sale n eed not be supplied. Subpart F-Disclosure of Records and Refusal To Disclose § IS.SI Authority to release records or copies. The head of each organizational unit or the designee of each of t hese officers, wit h respect to records pertaining to programs or activities for which each has primary responsibilit y, is authorized to release any Department record or copy t hereof when disclosure ls clearly appropriate under this part. Such authorized persons may release records for which another officer has_primary respoiisibWty �only with the consent of the other officer or his designee. § 15.52 Authority to deny requests for records. thereafter may not be made available except with the express authorization of the Secretary or his designee. Subpart G-Administrative Review of Denials of Requests for Records The officers and their designees described in the preceding § 15.51 may deny § 15.61 Administrative review. a request for a record. Any denial shall be promptly made in writing and con(a) Review shall be available only tain .a simple statement of reasons for from a written denial of a request for the denial. Prior to a denial, the officer a record issued under § 15.52, and only or designee shall clear the matter with if a written request for review is filed the Office of General Counsel or the office within 30 days after issuance of the writof the appropriate Regional Counsel or, ten denial. The filing of a request for rein the case of an officer or designee in view may be accomplished by mailing to any FNMA office, with the Office of the the Secretary of Housing and Urban DeGeneral Counsel, FNMA, or the app_ro- velopment, 1626 K Street NW. (Room priate FNMA Agency Counsel. Denial 600), Washington, D.C. 20410, a copy of shall terminate the authority of the par- the request if in writing, a copy of the ticular officer or designee to release or written denial issued under § 15.52, and disclose the requested record, which a statement of the circumstances, reasons, or arguments advanced in support of disclosure of the original request for the record. Review will be made promptly by the Secretary or his designee on the basis of the written record described in this § 15.61. (b) The decision after review will be in writing, will be promptly communicated to the person requesting review, and will constitute final action of the Department on the request, subject to judicial review as provided in 5 U.S.C. 552(a) (3). Effective date. This regulation is effective as of July 4, 1967. ROBERT C. WEAVER, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document MENT 9 Le fr il q 4, ¥ o a* e % "0 ys? ony July 4, 1967 73430 Title 24—HOUSING AND HOUSING CREDIT Subtitle A—Office of the Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development PART 15—PUBLIC INFORMATION In Subtitle A a new Part 15 is added as follows: Subpart A—Purpose and Policy Sec. 15.1 Definitions. 15.2 Purpose. 15.3 Statement of Policy. Subpart B—Production and Disclosure of Records 15.11 Publication in the FepErAL REGISTER. 15.12 Materials not published in the Feperat REGISTER. Identifiable records produced upon request. Schedule of fees. 15,13 15.14 Subpart C—Exemptions Exemptions authorized by 5 U.S.C. 552. Subpart D—Where Records May Be Inspected and Information Obtained 15.31 Information centers. 15.32 Information officers. 15.33 Material in Department Central In- formation Center. 15.21 Subpart E—Procedure for Requesting Access to Records 15.41 Bequests for records. Subpart F—Disclosure of Records ond Refusal To Disclose Authority to release records or copies. Authority to deny requesta for rec- ords. 15.51 16.52 Subpart G—Administrative Review of Denials of Requests for Records 15.61 Administrative review. AuTHoriry: The provisions of this Part 15 are issued under 5 U.S.C. 552 and sec. T(d), 79 Stat. 670; 42 U.S.C, 3535(d). Subpart A—Purpose and Policy § 15.1 Definitions. As used in this Part— . (a) “Act” means section 552 of Title 5, United States Code, as amended by Public Law 90-23, 81 Stat. 54, June 5, 1967. Public Law 90-23 repealed and superseded Public Law 89-487, 80 Stat. 250, July 4, 1966, sometimes referred to as the “Freedom of Information Act” or “Public Information Act.” (b) “Department” means the Depart- ment of Housing and Urban Develop- ment which consists of the Office of the Secretary and the several organizational units. (ec) “Secretary” means the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. (d) “Organizational unit’ means any one of the several offices, staffs, divisions, or administrations of the Department, including the Federal Housing Adminis- tration (FHA) and the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA). Organi- zational unit also includes Department Regional Offices and local FHA and FNMA offices. (e) “Person” means “person” as de- fined in 5 U.S.C. 551(2) to include cor- porations and organizations as well as individuals. (f) “Information center’ means any place, reading room, desk, or other area or facility established and maintained by the Department where the public may request and obtain information and rec- ords concerning the Department’s op- erations and business. § 15.2 Purpose. This part contains the rules and regu- lations of the Department implementing 5 U.S.C. 552. It informs the public about where and how the Department's records and information may be obtained from its organizational units in Washington, D.C., and its regional and other local offices throughout the country. § 15.3 Statement of policy. The Department's policy is one of full and responsible disclosure of its identi- flable records and information consistent with such competing public interests concerning the national security, per- sonal privacy, and obligations of confi- dentiality as are recognized by 5 U.S.C. 552. Every effort will be made to fur- nish service with reasonable promptness to the public with respect to the obtain- ing of records and information. Subpart B—Production and Disclosure of Records § 15.11 Publication in the Federal Reg- ister. Subject to the exemptions in § 15.21, the Department shall separately state and currently publish in the FreprraL Recister for the guidance of the public: (a) Descriptions of its central and field organization and the established places at which, the employees from whom, and the methods whereby, the public may obtain information, make submittals or requests, or obtain de- cisions;- (b) Statements of the general course and method by which its functions are channeled and determined, including the nature and requirements of all formal and informal procedures available; (¢) Rules of procedure, descriptions of forms available or the places at which forms may be obtained, and instructions as to the scope and contents of all papers, reports, or examinations; (d) Substantive rules of general ap- plicability adopted as authorized by law, and statements of general policy or inter- pretations of general applicability formulated and adopted by the Depart- ment; and (e) Each amendment, repeal of the foregoing. revision, or DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Reprinted from Federal Register-32 F.R. 9660-62 Except to the extent that a person has actual and timely notice of the terms thereof, no person shall in any manner be required to resort to or be adversely affected by any matter required to be published in the FepErRAL RecIsTer and not so published. For purposes of this § 15.11, matter which is reasonably avail- able to the class of persons affected there- by shall be deemed published in the FEDERAL REGISTER when incorporated by reference therein with the approval of the Director of the Office of the Federal Register, as provided in 32 F.R. 7899, June 1, 1967, 1 CFR Part 20. § 15.12 Materials not published in Fed- eral Register. (a) Subject to the exemptions in § 15.21, the Department, in accordance with this part, shall make available for public inspection and copying: (1) Final opinions, including concur- ring and dissenting opinions, as well as orders, made in the adjudication of cases; (2) Statements of policy and inter- pretations which have been adopted by the Department and are not published in the FEDERAL REGISTER; and (3) Administrative staff manuals and instructions to staff that affect a member of the public. (b) To prevent a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, the Depart- ment may delete identifying details when it makes available or publishes any material. Whenever such deletions are required, the record or copy will be made available with the space formerly oc- cupied by such identifying details left blank, and the justification for the dele- tion shall be explained fully in writing. (ec) The Department shall maintain and make available for public inspection and copying a current index providing identifying information for the public as to any matter issued, adopted, or promulgated after July 4, 1967, and which is required by this § 15.12 to be made available or published. § 15.13 Identifiable upon request. Requests for records and copies may be made in person during normal business hours at information centers listed below in § 15.31 of this part. Requests may also be made by mail addressed to such centers. (a) Each request for a record or copy thereof should identify the record specif- ically with respect to names, dates, sub- ject matter, and location, if known. The Department will hotify any person mak- ing a request if further identifying in- formation is needed before his request can be honored. (b) Charges will be made in ac- cordance with the schedule of fees set forth in § 15.14 for any records search which involves more than one man-hour of work, and for duplicating, reproduc- ing, certifying, or authenticating copies records produced of documents furnished. (c) When a request is made for an identifiable record of the Department which has been stored in the National Archives or other record centers of the General Services Administration, such record will be requested by the Depart- ment if it otherwise would be available under this part. (d) Every effort will be made to make a record in use by the staff of the Depart- ment available when requested, and such availability will be deferred only to the extent necessary to avoid serious inter- ference with the business of the Depart- ment. (e) Copies of a requested record need not be furnished if the record is pub- lished in the FeEepERAL RecIsTerR or is available for purchase from the Super- intendent of Documents of the Govern- ment Printing Office. Such records may, however, be examined in one of the Department's information centers. § 15.14 Schedule of fees. For the services listed below performed in the location and disclosure or furnish- ing of copies of records under 5 U.S.C. 552, and pursuant to the policy estab- lished by Congress in 5 U.S.C. (1964 Ed.) 140, Act of August 31, 1951, the following charges will apply: (a) Records search: (1) First man-hour on any single request: no fee, (2) Each additional man-hour or fraction thereof: $5. (b) Copies of documents: (1) Xerox or equivalent, page size up to 84 inches by 14 inches, per page: $0.25. (2) Photostat, page size up to 814 inches by 14 inches, per page: $1. (c) If charge is less than $1.00 per order: no fee. (d) Maximum number of copies fur- nished of any record: 10. ; (e) Certification of true copies, each: i (f) Attestation under the seal of the Department or of FNMA, as the case may be, each: $2. (g) Payment of fees under this § 15.20 shall be made in cash, or by U.S. money order, or by certified bank check payable to the Treasurer of the United States except that, in case of the Federal Hous- ing Administration and the Federal Na- tional Mortgage Association, drafts should be made payable to those organi- zational units. Postage stamps will not be accepted. Subpart C—Exemptions § 15.21 Exemptions authorized by 5 U.S.C. 55 = A requested record shall not be with- held from inspection or copying unless it both (1) comes within one of the classes of records exempted by 5 U.S.C. 552, and (2) there is need in the public interest to withhold it. In determining the scope of the classes of records de- scribed in paragraph (a) of this section, the Attorney General’s Memorandum on the Public Information Act, June 1967, will be used as a guide. (a) The classes of records authorized to be exempted from disclosure by 5 U.S.C. 552 are those which concern mat- ters that are: (1) Specifically required by Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of the national defense or foreign policy; (2) Related solely to the internal per- sonnel rules and practices of the De- partment; (3) Specifically exempted from disclo- sure by statute; (4) Trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential; (5) Interagency or intra-agency mem- orandumis or letters which would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the Depart- ment; (6) Personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy; (7) Investigatory files .compiled for law enforcement purposes except to the extent available by law to a party other than an agency; (8) Contained in or related to exam- ination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of the Department in connection with its responsibility for the regulation or supervision of financial institutions; or (9) Geological and geophysical infor- mation and data, including maps, con- cerning wells. Subpart D—Where Records May Be Inspected and Obtained Information centers. § 15.31 (a) The Department maintains a Central Information Center in Washing- ton, D.C., at the following location: Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment, 1626 K Street NW. (Room 102), Washington, D.C. 20410, (b) The Department also maintains an information center— (1) In each of its Regional Offices as follows: Region I—346 Broadway, New York, N.Y. 10013. Region Il—Widener Building, 1339 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, Pa. 19107. Region IlI—Peachtree-Seventh Building, At- lanta, Ga. 30323. Region IV—360 North Michigan Avenue, Chicago, Ill. 60601. Region V—Federal Office Building, 819 Taylor Street, Fort Worth, Tex. 76102. Region VI—450 Golden Gate Avenue, Post Office Box 36003, San Francisco, Calif. 94102; Northwest Operations Office, First Avenue, Seattle, Wash. 98104. Region VII—Ponce De Leon and Boliva, Post Office Box 3869, GPO, San Juan, P.R. 00936. (2) In each FNMA Agency Office as follows: 211 South Broad Street, Philadelphia, Pa. 19107. 34 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Ga. 30303. 1112 Commonwealth Edison Building, 72 West Adams Street, Chicago, Ill, 60603. 411 North Akard Street, Dallas, Tex. 75201. 3540 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, Calif, 90005. (3) In each FHA Local Insuring Office at its respective local address as listed in local telephone directories. § 15.32 Information officers. There shall be an information officer in each of the information centers de- scribed in § 15.31 who.shall be responsible for making information and records available to the public in accordance with this part. The information officer in the Department Central Information Center shall be designated by the Direc- tor, Division of Public Affairs. The in- formation officer in each Regional Office and field office shall be designated by the Regional Administrator or the Director of the office, as the case may be, with the concurrence of the Director, Division of Public Affairs. § 15.33 Material in Department Central Information Center. (a) The Central Information Center shall contain or have ready access to the following as a minimum: (1) Fepera. Recister, Code of Federal Regulations, and regulations of the De- partment contained therein; (2) Precedent final opinions and or- ders in the adjudication of cases; (3) Administrative staff manuals which affect the public; (4) Program manuals which affect the public and forms; (5) Interpretations relied upon as precedents; (6) A current index of the foregoing materials issued, adopted, promulgated after July 4, 1967. (b) Each Regional Office information center, each FHA Local Insuring Office, and each FNMA Agency Office shall con- tain or shall have ready access to such of the above records as pertain to the activities of that office. (c) Facilities shall be available to each information center for the copying of properly requested and available records. Subpart E—Procedures for Requesting Access to Records § 15.41 Requests for records, (a) Requests for identifiable records should be made at the established in- formation centers. (b) A request should specify the re- quested record by brief description, con- taining the name, number or date as applicable, in enough detail that the record can be fdentified and located. A reasonable time should be allowed for records to be located, copied, and mailed or otherwise delivered. (c) The request should be accompa- nied by the fee or an offer to pay the fee when determined. (d) Copies of available records shall be produced as promptly as possible. Copying service shall be limited to not more than 10 copies of any single page. Records which are published or available for sale need not be supplied. Subpart F—Disclosure of Records and Refusal To Disclose § 15.51 Authority to release records or copies. The head of each organizational unit or the designee of each of these officers, with respect to records pertaining to pro- grams or activities for which each has primary responsibility, is authorized to release any Department record or copy thereof when disclosure is clearly appro- priate under this part. Such authorized persons may release records for which another officer has primary responsibillty only with the consent of the other officer or his designee. § 15.52 Authority to deny requests for records, The officers and their designees de- scribed in the preceding § 15.51 may deny a request for a record. Any denial shall be promptly made in writing and con- tain a simple statement of reasons for the denial. Prior to a denial, the officer or designee shall clear the matter with the Office of General Counsel or the office of the appropriate Regional Counsel or, in the case of an officer or designee in any FNMA office, with the Office of the General Counsel, FNMA, or the appro- priate FNMA Agency Counsel. Denial shall terminate the authority of the par- ticular officer or designee to release or disclose the requested record, which thereafter may not be made available ex- cept with the express authorization of the Secretary or his designee. Subpart G—Administrative Review of Denials of Requests for Records § 15.61 Administrative review. (a) Review shall be available only from a written denial of a request for a record issued under § 15.52, and only if a written request for review is filed within 30 days after issuance of the writ- ten denial. The filing of a request for re- view may be accomplished by mailing to the Secretary of Housing and Urban De- velopment, 1626 EK Street NW. (Room 600), Washington, D.C. 20410, a copy of the request if in writing, a copy of the written denial issued under § 15.52, and a statement of the circumstances, rea- sons, or arguments advanced in support of disclosure of the original request for the record. Review will be made promptly by the Secretary or his designee on the basis of the written record described in this § 15.61. (b) The decision after review will be in writing, will be promptly communi- cated to the person requesting review, and will constitute final action of the Department on the request, subject to judicial review as provided in 5 U.S.C. 552(a) (3). Effective date. This regulation is effec- tive as of July 4, 1967. ROBERT C. WEAVER, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 6, Document 16 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 6 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1968 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/4374c832e77f99047b89e1f22877827b.pdf 5bd961642580bf70cdde963563ead387 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT NOTICE RENEWAL AND HOUSING ASSISTANCE 5/22/68 JQ: ALL RENEWAL AND HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS SUBJECT: HUD Policy for Provision of Information to the Public We are transmitting for your information a reprint from the Federal Register 32 FR 9660-62, dated July 4, 1967, presenting HUD's public information policy pertaining to those documents, records, regulations, manuals, etc. contained in the HUD Central and Regional Offices. The policy of the Department of Housing and Urban Development is to make full and responsible disclosure of its identifiable records and information consistent with such competing public interests as national security, personal privacy, and obligations of confidentiality as are recognized by the Public Infonnation Act. The "Public Information Act, 11 also lmown as "Freedom of Information Act, 11 5 U.S. 522, as amended by P.L. 90-23, upon which this policy is based, became effective July 4, 1967. Attachment NOTE: This "NOTICE" i s part of the new HUD Unified Issuances Sys tem. It will be u sed on occasion t o advise y ou on matters o.f general interest conceYning HUD assi sted programo HUD-Wash., D. C. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT NOTICE RENEWAL AND HOUSING ASSISTANCE 5/22/68 TO: ALL RENEWAL AND HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS SUBJECT: up Policy for Provision of Information to the Public We are transmitting for your information a reprint from the Federal Register 32 FR 9660-62, dated July ), 1967, presenting HUD's public information policy pertaining to those documents, records, regulations, manuals, etc. contained in the HUD Central and Regional Offices. The policy of the Department of Housing and Urban Development is to make full and responsible disclosure of its identifiable records and information consistent with such competing public interests as national security, personal privacy, and obligations of confidentiality as are recognized by the Public Information Act. The "Public Information Act," also known as "Freedom of Information Act," 5 U.S. 522, as amended by P.L. 90-23, upon which this policy is based, became effective July h, 1967. Attachment NOTE: This "NOTICE" is part of the new HUD Unified Issuances System. It will be used on occasion to advise you on matters of general interest concerning HUD assisted program. HUD-Wash., D. C.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 6, Document 15 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 6 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1968 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/4e35bd139d4cfd5d3d32db1ae6f25a6b.pdf 168eaf709ac9328e85893a3903288a6c Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. CEREX ATLANTA CORPORATION June 10, 1968 I I I I l !I ! Mr. Howard Openshaw Director of Redevelopment Atlanta Housing Authority 824 Hurt Building Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Mr. Openshaw: This is with reference to your letter of June 4, 1968 outlining several objections to our plans for the development of Parcels E-la and B-2. As I understand it, these objections represent the position both of your office and that of the City Planning Commission. I should like to take exception, first, to the second paragraph of your letter, which states in part that, "While certain elements of the original plan have been retained .... other features on which the development competition award was made have been eliminated, reducing the original extraordinary site plan proposal to the average run-of-the-mill development." That statement is unjustified as to the facts, and, if it is an expression of aesthetic judgement, not one with which we agree or respect. I I I Second, I should like to point out that your action in advising the Federal Housing Administration that our plans were not acceptable has resulted in their refusal t6 issue ready-to-go commitments. This may mean the loss, to . us and . to the City of Atlanta, of the 22l(d)(3) reservations for this project and, if 22l(d)(3) money is, as we are advised, exhausted, it may be some time before new reservations are obtained if we lose these. A far more advisable course for you to have followed (in terms of safeguarding the 22l(d)(3) reservations for this project) would have been to permit FHA to issue their commitments and in the period preceeding initial mortgage closing, work with us to achieve that which you feel is necessary. Your control of our going and our coming is so complete in every respect that with or without the commitment we cannot proceed into construction until you SUITE 2352 • NATIONAL BANK OF GEORGIA BUILDING • ATLANTA GEORGIA 30303 • TEL: 404/688-1415 -. ,'··. ~ i �• ! CEREX ATLANTA CORPORATION Mr. Howard Openshaw June 10, 1968 I .I .i ,I Page - 2 - .I I ·I I are completely satisfied with our work. You chose, however, to pursue a course which places the project's development in . jeopardy .... a needless and disheartening risk and delay. i J Third, I should like to point out that we are no less interested than are you or any other City Agency concerned with this project, · in producing as superior a development as possible.· Our competition submission was not a pipe dream nor did we approach it on the basis of winning a beauty contest thinking to make it work later, as is often the case. I would imagine that we will be with this project long after most of the City officials concerned with it now have left the scene and its success, both as an investment and in the achievement of our social objectives, depends entirely upon its desirability to potential tenants. It was recognized publicly, by you and by us during the course of the competition, that detailed planning, architecture and fiscal analysis would require certain changes, but that the major concepts presented would be preserved. We have ! acted in . good faith in pursuing our work and those changes which I have been made, in practically every single, instance of concern to you, have related to four major factors: ' A. The severe cost restrictions governing the 22l(d)(3) program which have become even more severe over this past year by virtue of the money market and tremendous increases in construction costs. B. Detailed cost analysis of certain of our original development proposals (such as rental town housing in Parcel E-la and elements of site development) have proved to be economically infeasible in terms of their effect upon rentals. C. The need to provide the full number of units originally proposed when certain areas, upon detailed site planning, proved to be economically infeasible for development or, proved to contain conditions of which we were not advised (such as County ownership of certain lands within the proje c t area) • I I ' ' i .. ..... --- ....... . __ .... . -· - ~-::--: �CEREX ATLANTA CORPORATION Mr. Howard Openshaw June 10, 1968 I .i Page - 3 - I D. The rentals and carrying charges which the housing market with which we are concerned can absorb. Lastly, _ I should like to point out that most of those elements of our work which you now question ·; have been known to your office and to the City Planning Commission for several months. It is baffling, to say the least, that at this late and critical date you choose to present your comments. Now, as to the substance of your letter, I shouH like to make the following brief observations which will be enforced by oral argument and graphic material presented at our meeting on June 11, 1968. I • I · J I As to your item (a), we do not agree that the geometric arrangement of buildings does not provide interesting and varied pedestrian spaces. The changes we have made in Parcel E-la with regard to buildings placement are not major. If you are making an aesthetic judgement, we agree that the original concept is better, but not that our revision does it great violence. Additionally, some study of our building placement would have indicated the extreme topographic conditions which account for many of our shifts in building _.location, conditions we originally felt able to resolve, but in the face of economics, could not. In this regard, I sh9uld point out that retaining walls were the first to go when the dollar situation became extreme and this fact mandated a shift in building, parking and driveway location . .I I! f I !I !: • I I J !I I As to your item (b), rental townhouses in Parcel E-la were ' eliminated solely for reasons of economy and FHA guidance here _: was quite convincing. They proved too costly to build and could not be absorbed by the rental market with which we are concerned . Eliminating townhouses eliminated the structured and disciplined flow of pedestrian traffic, but that function can be provided by strong and adequately designed pedestr i an pathways . - .. ., ·r : . ~ ·! �CEREX ATLANTA CORPORATION Mr. Howard Openshaw June 10, 1968 Page - 4 i I II The original competition drawing did in fact show townhouses step up or down the grades. It was later recommended by your office and concurred in by us, that the B-2 site be converted to all co-op townhouses which more fully and economically served the market for townhouse occupancy. In addition, FHA requirements regarding percentage of grade around the E-la townhouses parking ·lots which served these steep townhouse had severe cost implications. Also, the cost of producing such a steep townhouse proved to be so high as to approach or exceed the maximum rentals under the 22l(d)(3) program as follows: • I i ·. i I I I i ,. I I I i: Tr:ee of Unit 2BR 3BR 2BR basement 3BR basement 4BR basement I Monthly Rent On E-1 Site $ 98 112 105 119 126 Monthly Charge On B-2 (co-o:e site) $ 81 98 96 109 119 • Note: Includes all ~tilities As to your item (c), we agree that the community plaza . was a major and highly desirable element of our original proposal. We eliminated it and distributed the functions elsewhere throughout the project in that a part of Parcel E-lb and all of E-lc cannot now be developed for housing due to certain facts not brought to our attention during the competition. We, therefore, sought to recapture some of the lost units by placing them on the community plaza site. However, we are quite willing to eliminate that housing and to reinstate the original community plaza proposal, but you must recognize that this will mean a net loss of approximately 40 dwelling units. I' !I I  ! Additionally, it should be noted here that the new centrally located community recreation area was not only approved by the Planning Commission and the full Board of Aldermen in our Community Unit Plan submission, but was also approved by the Atlanta Housing Authority. Similarily, the \ . ~r\ --- , �CEREX ATLANTA CORPORATION Mr. Howard Openshaw June 10, 1968 I I . J Page - 5 I ! i l new church site location plan was forwarded to both the Housing Authority and Collier Gladdin's office on April 22, 1968 and no objection was raised at that time. As to your item (d), changes in relationship of peripheral drives and parking areas to the housing units they serve, were made necessary by detailed studies which could not have been performed during the competition and by other changes such as building location and elimination of retaining walls. However, not by any stretch of the imagination can we understand the charge that the basic concept and relationship of driveways and parking to housing units served, has been violated. As to the statement that a massive "sea of asphalt" parking area, remote from housing units is created, we point out that this is not the fact except perhaps in one instance. Even though the number of parking spaces has been increased to serve a larger number of housing units the parking solution in our proposal is superior to the original in many instances and in fact results in eliminating seas-of-parking. The statment that ,· parking areas are remote from housing units is absolutely unfounded. Except in two instances they are all in the same relationship as originally proposed and improved in many instances -- at FHA insistence. I ' As to your item (e), the concept of uninterrupted pedestrian streets is maintained. As a matter of fact, it is improved in both -Parcels E-la and B-2. Site plans showing the use of this particular street has been in jour possession since March. As a matter of fact, its utilization resulted as much from your suggestion that it be used and dedicated to the City so that approximately $30,000 in site improvement credits would accrue to the City, as it did from our desire to eliminate the cost of constructing additional roadway. 'I 'l , · ' '. ', As to your item (f), the pedestrian and vehicular traffic between Parcels B-2 and E- la will provide for controlled street crossing as originally proposed. I \ ... .. . . -·--.----\ ..... .,. .! . I ! ·- . • . •" .. ,.-. I ' . �~ . CEREX ATLANTA CORPORATION Mr. Howard Openshaw June 10, 1968 Page - 6 I, I As to your i _tem (g) , we have rethought the placement of church sites within building clusters in view of our meetings with church groups which established that the churches will attract members both from within and without the project area. · ·To place churches within the clustered areas would be to introduce large amounts of parking which we consider undesirable. As to your item (h), ·the geometric arrangement of Parcel B-2 not only does relate to topography, it is governed by topography. We do propose a cluster arrangement of buildings with much of the site open and existing ttees preserved. The statement that the entire site is covered with buildings and parking areas is completely unsupported by the facts and rather contentious. Coverage is approximately 20% for all buildings, roads and parking areas. The original plan proposed 331 dwelling units and 450 parking spaces. The present one proposes 250 dwelling units and 375 parking spaces -on the same acreage. I Very truly yours l.,;11~,A.,Nt}l,I143.215.248.55 I I DLR/sbs I ' cc : Mr . Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr . ~ Mr. Mr . \ Lester H. Persells Ralph johnston Collier Gladdin Rodney Cook Hamilton Douglas, Jr . Cecil Alexander Larry Chkoreff Stanley Berman � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document CEREX ATLANTA CORPORATION June 10, 1968 Mr. Howard Openshaw Director of Redevelopment Atlanta Housing Authority 824 Hurt Building Atlanta, Georgia 30303 ’ Dear Mr. Openshaw: This is with reference to your letter of June 4, 1968 outlining several objections to our plans for the develop- ment of Parcels E-la and B-2. As I understand it, these objections represent the position both of your office and that of the City Planning Commission. I should like to take exception, first, to the second Paragraph of your letter, which states in part that, "While certain elements of the original plan have been retained.... other features on which the development competition award was made have been eliminated, reducing the original extra- ordinary site plan proposal to the average run-of-the-mill development." That statement is unjustified as to the facts, and, if it is an expression of aesthetic judgement, not one with which we agree or respect. Second, I should like to point out that your action in advising the Federal Housing Administration that our plans were not acceptable has resulted in their refusal to issue ready-to-go commitments. This may mean the loss, to us and to the City of Atlanta, of the 221(d)(3) reservations for this project and, if 221(d)(3) money is, as we are advised, exhausted, it may be some time before new reservations are obtained if we lose these. A far more advisable course for you to have followed (in terms of safeguarding the 221(d)(3) reservations for this project) would have been to permit FHA to issue their commitments and in the period preceeding initial mortgage closing, work with us to achieve that which you feel is necessary. Your control of our going and our coming is so complete in every respect that with or without the commitment we cannot proceed into construction until you SUITE 2352 * NATIONAL BANK OF GEORGIA BUILDING + ATLANTA GEORGIA 30303 * TEL: 404/688-1415 . as  CEREX ATLANTA CORPORATION Mr. Howard Openshaw June 10, 1968 Page - 2 - ‘ are completely satisfied with our work. You chose, however, to pursue a course which places the project's development in jeopardy....a needless and disheartening risk and delay. Third, I should like to point out that we are no less interested than are you or any other City Agency concerned with this project, in producing as superior a development as possible. Our competition submission was not a pipe dream nor did we approach it on the basis of winning a beauty contest thinking to make it work later, as is often the case. I would imagine that we will be with this project long after most of the City officials concerned with it now have left the scene and its success, both as an investment and in the achievement of our social objectives, depends entirely upon its desirability to potential tenants. It was recognized publicly, by you and by us during the course of the competition, that detailed planning, architecture and fiscal analysis would require certain changes, but that the major concepts presented would be preserved. We have acted in good faith in pursuing our work and those changes which have been made, in practically every singles instance of concern | to you, have related to four major factors: A. The severe cost restrictions governing the 221(d) (3) program which have become even more severe over this past year by virtue of the money market and tremendous increases in construction costs. development proposals (such as rental town housing in Parcel E-la and elements of site development) ; ; have proved to be economically infeasible in terms of their effect upon rentals. | B. Detailed cost analysis of certain of our original : | | | | Cc. The need to provide the full number of units originally proposed when certain areas, upon t. ae detailed site planning, proved to be economically infeasible for development or, proved to contain conditions of which we were not advised (such as County ownership of certain lands within the project area). CEREX ATLANTA CORPORATION Mr. Howard Openshaw June 10, 1968 Page - 3 = D. The rentals and carrying charges which the housing market with which we are concerned can absorb. _Lastly, I should like to point out that most of those elements of our work which you now question: have been known to your office and to the City Planning Commission for several months. It is baffling, to say the least, that at this late and critical date you choose to present your comments. Now, as to the substance of your letter, I should like to make the following brief observations which will be enforced by oral argument and graphic material presented at our meeting on June 11, 1968. As to your item (a), we do not agree that the geometric arrangement of buildings does not provide interesting and varied pedestrian spaces. The changes we have made in Parcel E-la with regard to buildings placement are not major. If you are making an aesthetic judgement, we agree that the original concept is better, but not that our revision does it great violence. Additionally, some study of our building placement would have indicated the extreme topographic con- | ditions which account for many of our shifts in building location, conditions we originally felt able to resolve, but in the face of economics, could not. In this regard, I should point out that retaining walls were the first to go when the dollar situation became extreme and this fact mandated a shift in building, parking and driveway location. : As to your item (b), rental townhouses in Parcel E-la were: eliminated solely for reasons of economy and FHA guidance here - was quite convincing. They proved too costly to build and could not be absorbed by the rental market with which we are concerned. Eliminating townhouses eliminated the structured and disciplined flow of pedestrian traffic, but that function can be provided by strong and adequately designed pedestrian pathways. CEREX ATLANTA CORPORATION Mr. Howard Openshaw June 10, 1968 Page - 4 = The original competition drawing did in fact show townhouses step up or down the grades. It was later recommended by your office and concurred in by us, that the B-2 site be converted to all co-op townhouses which more fully and economically served the market for townhouse occupancy. In addition, FHA requirements regarding per- centage of grade around the E-la townhouses parking lots which served these steep townhouse had severe cost impli- cations. Also, the cost of producing such a steep townhouse proved to be so high as to approach or exceed the maximum rentals under the 221(d)(3) program as follows: Monthly Rent Monthly Charge On Type of Unit On E-1 Site B-2 (co-op site) 2BR $ 98 $ 81 3BR 112 98 2BR basement 105 96 3BR basement 119 109 4BR basement 126 119 Note: -Includes all utilities As to your item (c), we agree that the community plaza .was a major and highly desirable element of our original proposal. We eliminated it and distributed the functions elsewhere throughout the project in that a part of Parcel E-1lb and all of E-lce cannot now be developed for housing due to certain facts not brought to our attention during the competition. We, therefore, sought to recapture some of the lost units by placing them on the community plaza site. However, we are quite willing to eliminate that housing and to reinstate the original community plaza proposal, but you must recognize that this will mean a net loss of approximately 40 dwelling units. Additionally, it should be noted here that the new centrally located community recreation area was not only approved by the Planning Commission and the full Board of Aldermen in our Community Unit Plan submission, but was also approved by the Atlanta Housing Authority. Similarily, the instances -- at FHA insistence. CEREX ATLANTA CORPORATION Mr. Howard Openshaw June 10, 1968 Page - 5 = new church site location plan was forwarded to both the Housing Authority and Collier Gladdin's office on April 22, 1968 and no objection was raised at that time. : As to your item (d), changes in relationship of peripheral drives and parking areas to the housing units they serve, were made necessary by detailed studies which could not have been performed during the competition and by other changes such as building location and elimination of retaining walls. However, not by any stretch of the imagination can we under- stand the charge that the basic concept and relationship of driveways and parking to housing units served, has been violated. As to the statement that a massive "sea of asphalt" parking area, remote from housing units is created, we point out that this is not the fact except perhaps in one instance. Even though the number of parking spaces has been increased to serve a larger number of housing units the parking solution in our proposal is superior to the original in many instances and in fact results in eliminating seas-of-parking. The statment that parking areas are remote from housing units is absolutely unfounded. Except in two instances they are all in the same relationship as originally proposed and improved in many As to your item (e), the concept of uninterrupted pedes- trian streets is maintained. As a matter of fact, it is improved in both Parcels E-la and B-2. Site plans showing the use of this particular street has been in your possession Since March. As a matter of fact, its utilization resulted as much from your suggestion that it be used and dedicated to the City so that approximately $30,000 in site improvement | credits would accrue to the City, as it did from our desire to © eliminate the cost of constructing additional roadway. As to your item (f), the pedestrian and vehicular traffic. between Parcels B-2 and E-la will provide for controlled : street crossing as originally proposed. DLR/sbs CEREX ATLANTA CORPORATION Mr. Howard Openshaw June 10, 1968 Page - 6 - As to your item (g), we have rethought the placement of church sites within building clusters in view of our meetings with church groups which established that the churches will attract members both from within and without the project area. ‘To place churches within the clustered areas would be to intro- duce large amounts of parking which we consider undesirable. As to your item (h), the geometric arrangement of Parcel B-2 not only does relate to topography, it is governed by topography. We do propose a cluster arrangement of buildings with much of the site open and existing trees preserved. The statement that "the entire site is covered with buildings and parking areas" is completely unsupported by the facts and rather contentious. Coverage is approximately 20% for all buildings, roads and parking areas. The original plan proposed 331 dwelling units and 450 parking spaces. The present one proposes 250 dwelling units and 375 parking spaces -- on the same acreage. Very truly yours, | avid L. Rosen ce: Mr. Lester H. Persells Mr. Ralph Johnston Mr. Collier Gladdin Mr. Rodney Cook Mr. Hamilton Douglas, Jr. he wir. Cecil Alexander Mr. Larry Chkoreff Mr. Stanley Berman  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 6, Document 14 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 6 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1968 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/5ab27d0058a4fb8d15ed0527e0d98ad8.pdf b8b3a53766ff8f3f63d7f67b6d0cc65d Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. June 7, 1968 Housing Resources Committee City of A tlanta Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Attelltion: Mr . Malcolm D . Jones Gentlemen : Re : G~lbert Gardens Turnkey:- Mayor Allen ' s Letter We are in rec~pt of the Mayor ' s letter of May 31 , 1968 'U rging us to proceed as quickly as pos sible with the Gilbert Garden Turnkey Project. He requested t hat we keep you advised 0£ our progress and any problems which tend to delay this development . To the best of our knowledge, the estimates have been received and approved, and they confirm our revised contract price of $4,028,775 .00. We would be ready to sign 'the contract on Monday , June 17, 1968 and proceed with the project immediately thereafter. If in checking the statu of thi project you should find that any inf'<:>rmation is required , plea e advise the writer. dditional We are most aru.tious to take advantage of the balance of the desirable oununer con truction season, and look forward to an award this month . V erry truly your , mer cc: Ralph P. Pase, Jr. D n E . Sweat, Jr. , Director of Governmental Liai on M. B. Satterfield, E x ecutive Dir ctor, Atlanta. Hou ing Authority � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document June 7, 1968 Housing Resources Committee City of Atlanta Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Attention: Mr. Malcolm D. Jones Gentlemen: Re: Gilbert Gardens Turnkey- Mayor Allen's Letter : We are in receipt of the Mayor's letter of May 31, 1968 urging us to proceed as quickly as possible with the Gilbert Garden Turnkey Project. He requested that we keep you advised of our progress and any problems which tend to delay this development. To the best of our knowledge, the estimates have been received and approved, and they confirm our revised contract price of $4,028,775, 00. We would be ready to sign the contract on Monday, June 17, 1968 and proceed with the project immediately thereafter, If in checking the status of this project you should find that any additional information is required, please advise the writer. We are most anxious to take advantage of the balance of the desirable summer construction season, and look forward to an award this month. Very truly yours, mer Ralph P, Pass, Jr, ec; Dan E. Sweat, Jr., Director of Governmental Liaison M. B. Satterfield, Executive Director, Atlanta Housing Authority %  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 6, Document 13 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 6 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1968 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/06d074d0056885f077177134eef9390e.pdf 647b433c87c2fe5a3a962d9f0584cfc1 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. ·"· HOUSING RESOURCES CO ITTEE ROOM 1204 , CITY HALL June 11 , 1968 Mr . Cecil A. Al exander, Chairman Housing Resources Committee E ORANDUM TO: Pursuant to your suggestion ~ several days ago I talked to Jim Parham about E. O. A. providing administrative support to Lee Burges' newly organized Housing Development Corporation nd informed him of our previous contact with Bi ll Allison regarding this matter . At that time 1 . Parham did not ppear to be f miliar ith it, bµt said he would talk with Bill Allison and look at the file on the subject which as pro ided to Bill Allison by H 11 are . Following the Housing Resources Committee Meeting June 6 , Hr . Parham discussed the atter with me and provided me with the att ched copy of "A Proposal to Form the Atlanta Housing Development Corporation . r . P rh m stated thnt be is very spmpathotic ith the idea of E . O. A. prov iding ad inistrative support for the Housing Development Corporation; th the ill need, ho ever , the folioing indicated materi l in ord r to present nd justify this atter to his Board , •hich he feels will be inclined to act favorably upon it : copy of the Logal document of Incorporation of the Housing Development Corporation . (A) A (B) A statement of the Corporations functions , scope of operation , and principal activities, a ctually established (not the "proposal" for for tion of the Corpor tion, as cont ined in th att ch d.) (C) A list of th Corporation's Bo rd of Directors ( r. Parha stated that it ould bee 1 r for E. O. A¥ to support the Housing D velop ent Corpor tion dministratively. if tho Bo rd of Directors contains r pres nt tion from th poor). �Memorandum Page 2 June 11 , 1968 (D) A statement as to how the Housing Development Corporation will benefit the poor . (E) Budget (including breakdo n by principal items) . NOTE : At the time of our conversation r . Parh m insisted that I give him some concept as to what the total amount of the budget would probably be , I told him that I did not know , as I felt this would have to be orked out with the Director, selection of hicb I understand is now being considered , but that I anticipate that it would be in the neighborhood of $25 , 000 per year , principal items of hich would be the salaries of the Director and Secretary, office supplies and postage . r . Parham said thnt as soon as the above information is presented to him, he will submit a formal proposal to his Board for inclusion of this item in E . O. A.' s further activities. I feel that e should provide him as quickly as possible with information he has requested . Malcolm D. Jones Housing Coordinator J,fl)J/mac Encl : Copy "A Proposal to Form The Atlanta Housing Development Corporation . CC:V'Mr. Dan E. Sweat , Jr. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document HOUSING RESOURCES COMMITTEE ROOM 1204, CITY HALL June 11, 1968 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Cecil A. Alexander, Chairman Housing Resources Committee Pursuant to your suggestion, several days ago I talked to Jim Parham about E.0.A,. providing administrative support to Lee Burges‘ newly organized Housing Development Corporation and informed him of our previous contact with Bill Allison regarding this matter, At that time Mr. Parham did not appear to be familiar with it, but said he would talk with Bill Allison and look at the file on the subject which was provided to Bill Allison by Hall Ware. Following the Housing Resources Committee Meeting June 6, Mr. Parham discussed the matter with me and provided me with the attached copy of "A Proposal to Form the Atlanta Housing Development Corporation", Mr. Parham stated that he is very spmpathetic with the idea of E,0.A. providing administrative support for the Housing Development Corporation; that he will need, however, the following indicated material in order to present and justify this matter to his Board, which he feels will be inclined to act favorably upon it: (A) A copy of the Legal document of Incorporation of the Housing Development Corporation, (B) A statement of the Corporations functions, scope of operation, and principal activities, as actually established (not the “proposal” for formation of the Corporation, as contained in the attached.) (C) A list of the Corporation's Board of Directors (Mr. Parham stated that it would be easier for E.0.A, to support the Housing Development Corporation administratively, if the Board of Directors contains representation from the poor). a a ee) Memorandum Page 2 dune 11, 1968 (D) A statement as to how the Housing Development Corporation will benefit the poor. (E) Budget (including breakdown by principal items). NOTE: At the time of our conversation Mr. Parham insisted that I give him some concept as to what the total amount of the budget would probably be, I told him that I did not know, as I felt this would have to be worked out with the Director, selection of which I understand is now being considered, but that I anticipate that it ‘would be in the neighborhood of $25,000 per year, principal items of which would be the salaries of the Director and Secretary, office supplies and postage. Mr. Parham said that as soon as the above information is presented to him, he will submit a formal proposal to his Board for inclusion of this item in E.0.A.'s further activities. I feel that we should provide him as quickly as possible with information he has requested. Malcolm D. Jones Housing Coordinator MDJ/mac Encl: Copy "A Proposal to Form The Atlanta Housing Development Corporation, CC:Mr. Dan E. Sweat, Jr.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 6, Document 12 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 6 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1968 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/e0465914ae74787d83dba43ba1af238d.pdf a5b1f3a099232eb1a55c42dfb129de1a Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. URBAN EAST Housin g Consult an ts James S. Robinson, president 900 Peachtree Stree t Atlant a. Georgia 30309 Phone 404 875-0781 June 3, 1968 Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr. Mayor of the City of Atlanta Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Re: Rawson-Washington Urban Renewal Project Martin Luther King, Jr. , Village Atlanta, Georgia i I Dear Mayor Allen: I am writing at the requ e st of Dr. Martin Luther King, Sr., in reply to your letter of May 31, 1968, regarding the progress of the above captioned project. Please be advised that the Application-Project Mortgage Insurance (FHA Form 2013) with preliminary plans and sp e cifications were submitted to the Atla nta Insuring Offi c e of the Fed era l Housing Ad ministration this morning, June 3, 19 68. The Federal Housing Administration has e x pressed its eagernes s and willingness to e x p e dite th e processing of this case in order to provide th is ne e ded housing at the earliest possible date . A considera ble amount of time and effort has been e x p e nded by the Ebe ne zer Ba ptist Church and its repres e ntative s to insure the deve lopm e nt of a resid e ntia l community which e mbodies the most ad vance d thinking in multifa mily liv i n g. Our deve lopment plan provides for a high ris e buildin g con s isting of twe l v e stories, pre s enting a pa norama vi e w of downtow n Atl a n ta , th e expre ss ways and the spaciou s spl e ndor of the City . This i s the fir s t atte mpt to de velop a high ri se cons tru c tion under Sectio n 2 2l(d) (3) of the Na tiona l Housing Ac t i n th e City of Atlan ta . With the i ncreas ing a waren e s s of th e ne e d for hi gh r:ise residenti a l faciliti es , it is i mpera t i ve tha t low to modera te i ncome fam ilies , especia lly fa milies with out children , are pro vid ed for i n h i gh ri se constructio n in C entra l City. Larg er fam ili e s will fi nd spacio us accommodation s in 2 , 3 or 4- bedroom s i ze u nits with the 3 and 4 bedroom units designed with 1 1/2 baths . All low rise units are town houses and garden type, two -s tory wa l k-up apartments, w i th amp l e �1- • Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr. - 2 - play areas and enclosed patios. A pedestrian walkway, free of vehicle traffic, allows for safe access throughout the development. A community shopping center consisting of approximately 7,000 square feet form an integral part of this development concept which will provide the daily essentials for residents and the general community. In addition, an office building complex of approximately 3200 square feet, is incorporated in this community center, providing space for professional offices and convenient type stores and shops. A day nursery designed to accommodate preschool-age children of working mothers has been given special study and the result of this intensive investigation regarding the special needs of these children are reflected in our day-care center. A coin-operated laundry facility is also provided. Our development plan utilizes open spaces and green belts in order to provide a character of individuality and sense of pride and appreciation. The total 19 3 unit complex will be served by central air conditioning and heating. We feel that Martin Luther King, Jr. , Village will be an exciting and important addition to the City of Atlanta and a major step forward in the development of residential communities in urban areas. ,.,~~ .,< Your continued interest and coopera tion is greatly apprecialed. l /ery truG ~ 1 )'r 2 ( . cc: Martin Luth e r King, Sr. Mr. Cary S. Hooks Mr. Cecil Al exa nder Mr. Albert Thompson - '{ ) ':-, ~ I / '_.I. 1/-,: urs, - \'~ ,· ·/ /; ,,, ~c _ , .,. v- es S. Robinson I - - � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document a k of of C Ce. Pp _ ¥e. a. { | BAN Housing Consultants James S. Robinson, president 900 Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Phone 404 875-0781 June 3, 1968 —“_ . ~ . mane ee Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr. Mayor of the City of Atlanta Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Re: Rawson-Washington Urban Renewal Project Martin Luther King, Jr., Village Atlanta, Georgia Dear Mayor Allen: I am writing at the request of Dr, Martin Luther King, Sr., in reply to your letter of May 31, 1968, regarding the progress of the above captioned project. Please be advised that the Application-Project Mortgage Insurance (FHA Form 2013) with preliminary plans and specifications were submitted to the Atlanta Insuring Office of the Federal Housing Administration this morning, June 3, 1968. The Federal Housing Administration has expressed its eagerness and willingness to expedite the processing of this case in order to provide this needed housing at the earliest possible date. A considerable amount of time and effort has been expended by the Ebenezer Baptist Church and its representatives to insure the development of a residential community which embodies the most advanced thinking in multifamily living. Our development plan provides for a high rise building consisting of twelve stories, presenting a panorama view of downtown Atlanta, the express ways and the spacious splendor of the City. This is the first attempt to develop a high rise construction under Section 221(d)(3) of the National Housing Act in the City of Atlanta. With the increasing awareness of the need for high risé residential facilities, it is imperative that low to moderate income families, especially families without children, are pro- vided for in high rise construction in Central City. Larger families will find spacious accommodations in 2, 3 or 4-bedroom size units with the 3 and 4 bedroom units designed with 11/2 baths. All low rise units are town houses and garden type, two-story walk-up apartments, with ample v ss X Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr. -2- play areas and enclosed patios. A pedestrian walkway, free of vehicle traffic, allows for safe access throughout the development. A community shopping center consisting of approximately 7,000 square feet form an integral part of this development concept which will provide the daily essentials for residents and the general community. In addition, an office building complex of approximately 3200 square feet, is incor- porated in this community center, providing space for professional offices and convenient type stores and shops. A day nursery designed to accommodate preschool-age children of working mothers has been given special study and the result of this intensive investigation regarding the special needs of these children are reflected in our day-care center. A coin-operated laundry facility is also provided. Our development plan utilizes open spaces and green belts in order to provide a character of individuality and sense of pride and appreciation. The total 193 unit complex will be served by central air conditioning and heating. We feel that Martin Luther King, Jr., Village will be an exciting and important addition to the City of Atlanta and a major step forward in the development of residential communities | in urban areas, Your continued interest and cooperation - is greatly appreciated, Very trul ioe 1) Lp S. ‘Robinser cc: Martin Luther King, Sr. Mr. Cary S. Hooks Mr. Cecil Alexander Mr. Albert Thompson vy  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 6, Document 11 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 6 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1968 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/57b0aaf357d01de77653ab333ef837ac.pdf 3a3ae877c185f5b3ae29bb8323c54f30 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. June 11, 1968 Mr. J ames S. R ~bins on, President Urban East H o using Consultants 900 Peachtree Stl"eet Atlanta, Geo rgia 30309 Dear Mr . Robinson : I am v ery ple ased to l earn that you are making pr og res s on the Martin Luther Kin g . J r .• Village to provide housing for 193 Atl anta families. Your plans are i maginative and e xemplify the best th i nking in n10dern housing developn:ient for low and mo J erate income families . Since re ly yo urs . Ivan A ll en, Jr. lviayo r lAJr:fy � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document June ll, 1968 Mr. James S. Rebinson, President Urban Bast Housing Consultants 900 Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Dear Mr. Robinson; Iam very pleased to learn that you are making progress on the Martin Luther King, Jr., Village to provide housing for 193 Atlanta families. Your plans are imaginative and exemplify the best thinking in raodern housing development for low and moderate income families, Sincerely yours, Ivan Allen, Jr. Mayor lAdr:fy v 5  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 6, Document 10 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 6 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1968 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/53bf62716c03b45c1a53b952af0a7f78.pdf 67a6c5c9f7b94ce86744a839bb158d6b Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. IV AN A LLEN, .JR . MA YOR ATL AN T A , GEORGIA Mr. Edw in L . Sterne, Chairman Atlanta Housing Authority 824 Hurt Building Atlanta, Georgia � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document IVAN ALLEN, JR. MAYOR ATLANTA, GEORGIA Mr. Edwin L. Sterne, Chairman Atlanta Housing Authority 824 Hurt Building Atlanta, Georgia  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 6, Document 9 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 6 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1968 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/ff110dc073b3391b00e226b59b520f69.pdf d0686928d68ed13cbe059be38e3d635d Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. IVAN ALLEN, JR, MAYOR ATLANTA, GEORGIA Mr . M. B. Satter f ield, Executive Director Housing Authority of the City of Atlant a 824 Hurt Building At l anta, Georgia 30303 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document IVAN ALLEN, JR. MAYOR ATLANTA, GEORGIA Mr. M. B. Satterfield, Executive Director Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta 824 Hurt Building Atlanta, Georgia 30303  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 6, Document 8 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 6 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1968 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/3e1829b761bbe51dbebeeadf946aa6bb.pdf 9ced18e818d938c36c9695f8ac720070 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. \ I r r, r, E U, C · , COl OU I I' April 16, 196 I le -• H Jo o. l (, or r3l Pen ite ) g sted th t I tr1 to e;at private o Colli r Gladin eitej and d in th1 1 c ntl/ D S oat a ed oo to ork with Colli r Gladin and l 1y ard Oppe h w in trying to expedite ut lo or the hou n portion of th1e site . c April 10 l t r thi e1 • • li.ck Ca r ., Ho dul d con£ renc with a pro pcctivc d lopor d Oppen aw of the Housing Authority and rtieip ted in the conto of HUD ~ ne • Subsequently ! have tter 1th Collier Gl din and others int rested ill th"s di cu t. P-ro :rty is now in Ganer l ~rvice Titl Topogr phic ha turni d t Public been pr p red nd is in center•lln for the i.:xpres ay nnd 13 working on slo boundary .......,._..,. fin ni tration. he St to iighway D per ent h s 1ng uthorlty. of ban >. Ho e r , tho ... d eonr· s te Highw y D por ent cannot ccur tely y bound r s until after it l olds a nc . ar uou cl tract, acquisition o.f trian -le h t ich is 1r ble tor inclu ion in th o rill proj~ct. 1 own d by pr1v d 1 tere t • It could b _ e u1 ition .................. should not · l y dev, lo 1 lo rtic Thi t nt o.r the l··nd to be dedicated ti htly tiuled d 0 or ately by- the !ousing Authority aoqnired ~lo n chedul ' d.1 cent to the xi ting hould continu and thi portion � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document own Srpeo? HOUSING RESOURCES COMMITTEE April 18, 1968 Memorandum t Fromg Malcolm Jones Re Honor Farm No. 1 (Federal Pen Site) BACKGROUND Several days ago Collier Gladin suggested that I try to get private developers interested in this sites; and recently Dan Sweat asked me to work with Collier Gladin and Howard Oppenshaw in trying to expedite development of the housing portion of this site, On April 10 I had a scheduled conference with a prospective developer for this site, Mr, Howard Oppenshaw of the Housing Authority and Mr, Dick Case of HUD participated in the conference. Subsequently [ have discussed the matter with Collier Gladin and others interested in this development. CURRENT STATUS Title to the property is now in General Services Administration, Topographic map (2! interval) of the area has been prepared and is in hands of the Housing Authority. The State Highway Department has furnished the center~line for the Expressway and is working on slepe boundary lines, However, the State Highway Depertment cannot accurately define and confirm the Expressway boundaries until after it holds a Public Hearing several weeks hence. A small contiguous triangle shaped tract, acquisition of which is considered desireble for inclusion in the overall project, is owned by private interests. It could be acquired seperately by the Housing Authority and ite acquisition should not delay developnent of the lend to be dedicated by the Federal Goverment. Mr. Oppenshaw is now working on a tightly timed development schedule for 15 single~fanily lots in a portion of the area adjacent to the existing Thomasville Urban Renewal Project. This should continue and this portion should be handled separately from the remainder of the housing portion of the Federal Pen site, |  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 6, Document 7 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 6 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1968 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/8de81fd88c19f0cd38591313d9957c0c.pdf 15f5033602798dbf5bae1d8c00c0e964 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. t 1t r:fy s e r lyy l D 11 yoi, ~ • •• r. mar � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document ee Ea RT PI eK Pe a em ET BR i a a a LT ee ee eer LS ere ee ee ee ee ee Mr. Fullerton Page Two May 3, 1968 therein and alse with our Housing Resources Committee for any locel coordination needed. We will endeavor to work cooperatively with you and your associates in any way we can on a fair competitive basis, as required by Georgia law. We wish you success in your new undertaking and hope that it roay be mutually beneficlal. Sincerely yours, Ivan Allen, Jr. Mayor tASrily  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 6, Document 6 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 6 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1968 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/4093035ae2fd6d1bc24f2b95e159af4a.pdf f92200cf0d3244fd2965ea4c66971e66 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. W E L C O ME t;o t;he. SITE ATLANTA'S LARGEST LARGEST IN. THE SOUTHEAST SECONO IN THE NATION TURNKEY LOW REWT HOUSING PROJECT �SHEETZ ANV BRAVFIE LV/ARCHITECTS/INCORPORATEV/A.I.A. H.L.C. AND ASSOCIATES, INC. COBLE-WEAVER (JOINT VENTURE) DEVELOPER CONTRACTOR �BANKHEAV PROJECT GEORGIA 6-28. S.ae.: Un,Uf.,: 45. 40 AcJu¼ :to :the. Nolt..:th and Sou.:th ofi Bank.he.ad Highway a.:t Mayna1td Road, jU-6:t EM:t 06 :the. Cha-tta.hooehe.e. RivVL. 500 - eon.oi-6ting 06 1 J:.o 5 be.dltoorn6 i n two and :th!c..e.e. -1.doJL y bu.,u'.d,i,ng • No f.i e.pa!ULte. 6ac_ili_;U_u 6Oil. :the. Eide.Jzl.y. Community &u1.cl.,i_.ng. To.:ta..l Cof.,;t: $9,356,094.00 To be. eompie.te.d in 6oUJt inMe.me.nu. F~t PhMe. to i nefude. 132 Un,Uf., Se.eond PhM e. 10 8 Un,Uf., TM!Ld PhMe. 148 Un,Uf., FoUJL:th PhM e. 112 Un,Uf., , Cof.,;t 06 Sae.: AppJLox.,una,te_iy $350,000.0 0 She.e.:tz and Btta.d6ie.id/Alz.eh.ae.w/Ineo1Lpo1La:te.d/A.I.A. A:tia.n:ta, Ge.oJLgia Ve.ve.iopVt: H. L.C . and Mf.ioeia:te.f.i, Ine . GJLe.e.n.t,boJLo , NoJL:th Ca.JLolina Co n:t!Lae:toJL: Coble.-We.avVt (Joint Ve.ntUJte.) GJLe.e.nf.i boJLo, No!L:th Ca.JLolina. �ATLANTA'S LARGEST TURNKEY LOW RENT HOUSING PROJECT GROUND 3475-76 BREAKING CEREMONIES Monday, May Twenty-Seven, Nineteen Hundlted & Six:ty-Eight Bankhead High.way,NoJvthwe.,ot Ate.a.vit:a., Geottg ia. Ho.o.:U: Mtt. F1tanw B. Sheetz, J1t., A. I. A. Mtt. Ric.ha1td H. Btiad6iehl, A. I. A. Gue.ot Spea.keM: Mtz.. Edwin L. Stettne, ChlUll.man Hou..oing Autholtity 06 the City 06 Ati.a.nta Vil.. Benjami..n E. May.o, Co-Chtultman Hou/2ing Re.,o outtc.e.o Committee Mtz.. Edwa1td H. Ba.x:tett, Reg,W na.£. Admini.otll.atott, Vepa!l.tment 06 Hou..oing and Uttban Veve.lopment Hono1table Ivan Allen, Jtt., Ma.yo.It, City o6 Ate.a.nta �WE HOLV THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF EVIVENT. "CHILVREN OF POVERTY TOVAY WILL BE THE PARENTS OF POVERTY TOMORROW." So 1.iai..d Mll/2. Mcvue Mc.Qu.,ilie, 60'1.meJt Un-U.ed Sta;tu Comrru,Mion.eJt 06 Pu.bUc. HoMing. TheJte ,i,,6 a. need - ,i,n. A.ti.an.ta. - 6ott oveJt 16,000 de.c.en.t, 1.>a.6e, a.n.d 1.ianJ..:ta!r..y dwelling u.n.li-6, a. detell.m,[no..ti.on. made. by ou.tt Ma.yott when. he. en.Ul.ite.d the. ai..d 06 ma.n.y 1.iu.b1.ita.n;t,i,ai. uilzen.-6 06 the. Ciltj to be.gin. h,i,,6 c.a.mpa.,i_gn. a.n.d e.66oltt.6 to tteUe.ve. the de.p.lotta.ble c.on.cUtion.-6 06 ma.n.y 06 Atia.n.ta. '-6 cU,i,ze.Yl.-6. H.-ui tte.c.ogMtion. o,& .the. de.gtta.ded c.on.d,i_;t,i_on. 06 ma.n.y Mea.-6 06 the. Wy a.n.d the. gttoW-i..ng de;te.tt,i_oJr..a;t.,i.on. 06 e.wting dwe..U,ln.g-6 began. wha;t Wa.-6 a.lm0.6t a. "One. Ma.n. WM" a.galn.-6.t .thue u.n.,6otttu.n.a.te c.on.d,i_.t,i_on.-6 06 .the poott . The. ,6a.c.t.6 Welte. ga..theJted a.n.d tteve.a.le.d. The. Ma.yott a.ppe.a.led to in.du.-6:IJttJ to mee..t ;th,i,,6 n.e.ed. Su.6 6-<-uen.t in.c.en.tive. motiva..ted gtte.a:t in.teJte.1.it. HoweveJt, M pJt,i,va..te i n.teJtMt-6 be.ga.n. .to wottk., 1.iu.ttp!U-6.-i..n.gly e.veJttj en ooJt.t Wa.-6 1.i.tym.-i..ed by one ob1.ita.c.le - - pft,{,va..te vu.ted .-i..n.teJtut-6. Se.veJtal. 1.i ma..U pall.C.W We.Jte .6U.C.C.e..6.6ou.il.tj zon.e.d to tte.c.uve. hou.-6.-i..n.g a.n.d we.tte. u.-6 e.d. Su.b-6 e.qu.e.n.t tte.-zo n..-i..ng e.6 6oltt-6 ,i_tto n..-i..c.a..Uy bttou.g h.t oppo1ition. 6ttom e.ve.Jttj qu.all.te.tt 06 the. Wy -- no Jta.c.e. oft tteUgion. exc.lu.ded. Th,i,,6 Wa.-6 .the v o.-i..c.e. o6 t he. pe.o p.le. ! To .th,i,,6 da;te., .th,i,,6 voic.e ha.-6 be.en. he.Md on. ptr.a.c.tic.a..Uy eveJty pe.,ti;ti.on.. Fotttu.n.a..te.ly, .th,i,,6 1.iUe. Wa.-6 a.n. e.xc.eption.. Vo.-i..c.e.d obj ec.tio Yl.-6 a.n.d Jte.-6 e.r1.-tme.n.t.6 pu;t .the. BoaJUi o6 Alde.ttme.n. .-i..n. a. po1.iilion. 06 ttefuc..ta.n.c.e to ac.t on. an.y pe..tilion. 6ott Hou.-6-<-ng pu.ttpo-6 e-6 • T hW Jte-6 po Yl.-6.-i.. b-i.,,U,ty ,i_,6 to -6 ell.Ve the. WW hu o6 the ma.jail.Uy o0 .the people.. 16 th,i,,6 be. il -- the. pe.ople. 06 Afta.n..ta have. -t.wz.n.e.d .thw ba.c.k.-6 on. tho1.ie le1.i1.i 6otttu.n.a.te, and th,i,,6, ,i,n. me.lo, btte.e.d-6 :tJtou.ble. . �The. m and pU!tpo.t.e. 06 the. Fe.dVl.al. How.,ing Ao.t.,v.,:ta.nc.e. Admin,v.,.tJLation have. no:t be.e.n undV1..t,:tood by :the. pe.ople. 06 Atta.n.ta.. HV!.e. ,v., a. p!1.og11.am 06 a.t,.t,,v.,:tanc.e. and be.ne./)U - and we. tUJtn oUJt bac.k.-6 . The. /)iM:t 11.e..t.ult and ac.c.ompwhme.nt 06 .tiu.6 p11.og11.am put.t. a .t.ub.t.:tan;t,i.a...t 11.006 OVV!. :the. he.ad.t. 06 pe.ople. . That the.y Me. wa11.m, dll.y , and po.t..t.ibly c.omfJoll.:ta.ble. ,v., .t.e.c.ondMy. The. 6ill:t 11.e..t.uli and ac.c.ompwhme.n:t ,,u., u/)ting the.m out an e.nv,<_11.onme.nt that hM b11.e.d c.Jume. and moll.al. de.g e.nVtatio n. Ye.;t - we. tUJtn ouJz. bac.12.t. . We. complain 06 a :ta.x bUJtde.n ! on I.t. ;th,v., a :ta.x buJz.de.n - ;to move. pe.ople. out 06 .t..fu.m Me.M - :to e.n/)011.c.e. ;the. How.,ing Code. - ;to i ~ e . a Woll.Mble. P11.og11.am ;to b11.,<_n.g :the..t.e. Me.a.t. up ;to .t.:ta.nda.Jc.d 011. de.mofuh :the.m - ;to 11.e.Ue.ve. OU!t Pouc.e. o{J ;the. e.xpo.t.Wte. :to :the..t.e. Me.M -- ,<_.t, ;th,v., a bUJtde.n? Many have. 1.,;tate.d - M .t.oon. M :the..t.e. .t.lum Me.a.t. Me. vac.ate.d be./)011.e. an.y;thin.g c.an. be. done. - othe.11.f., move. in. oil.om out 06 ;the. Cay be.c.au.t.e. ofJ de.c.Jz.e.a.t.e.d job oppoJz.:tun.Uie..t. in. :the. ll.Ull.al. Me.M and o:theJr. c.iue..t.. Jo ble..t..t. pe.ople. mu.t.;t .t. e.e.12 . NatUJtaUy ;the.y tull.n. ;to A:tla.n:ta. - a Me.c.c.a - a Cay on. fi,<_11.e. - on.e. 06 the. mo.t,;t t~ving me..t!Lo pou ta.n. Me.M in :the. Coun.t!Ly. Ne.v eJr. wil..e. :the.y .t.:top c.om,i,n.g . Th,i,f., m,i_g11.ation. w.lU. c.on:t,i,nue. whe.:theJr. addd,i,on.al. hou.t.in.g ,i_.t, p11.ovide.d oil. no:t - - and i6 no:t p!tovide.d, :the. .t.fum Me.M uiu'..l J.>ptte.ad uf2e. c.an.c.e/l.. What a.Ue.11.n.ative. do we. have.? Shall we. le,:t :th,i,f., in.6fux c.11.e.ate. c.Jz.d,i_c_al. a11.e.M whe.11.e. on.e. ,v., af;11.a.,ul. .t.o wa.£12 - - Me.a.t. whic.h e.ve.n. Pouc.e. c.a.n.no:t c.on:tll.ol? All.e. we. inte.n:t,i,on.aUy c.11.e.ating .t.c.hool.t. 06 c.Jume. and c.011.Mp;U.on.? What ,i_gn.de..t. .t.he. 6u.t.e.? We. have. .t.e.e.n. e.xplo.t,ion..t. in. othVl. c.aie..t.. fa ;th,v., ;the. Amwc.an. way? - 2 - �It ,u., the. 6011..tana,te. and the. able. c,,itize.Vl-6 who mMt he.lp , we. the.y dM;tJioy ;the.m.oe.lve/2 . Ati.a.n.ta c.anno;t and mMt not .twc_n m baQQ ;to ne.Qeive. ;the. pov~y- 6onQe,d .omb 06 ve.nge.anQe. 06 ;tho.oe. who aJz.e. ,UY!pal.e.d upon the. 6;.,.uh and ha;te. on ;the. .ofu.m.6 ! Who among lL6 ha.o ne.v~ had the. na~e/2 06 a ;toile.;t, QOOQe.d on a de.Qe.n.t .o;tov e. , on, a.o in ;the. pcv.d, lAXl6 he.d fu he/2 in a pan and tMown the. wa.t~ out a W,tndow? Ye.;t thi-6 ,u., ;the. line. 06 many to day . Thi-6 .o;tall..t 06 Aftan;ta'.o lMgMt PubuQ HoMing de.ve.lopme.n.t und~ th~ TMnQe.y Sy.ote.m i.o a .oub.o;tan,u,a.,f_ ne.auza;tion and a milM;tone. i n oM Ma yon' .o wall. . Five. Hun~e.d ne.w home/2 ;to hoMe. Twe.n;ty- Five. Hu n~e.d u.tize.Vl-6 06 Aftan.ta . Ra.th~ ;than a Gnound Btl.e.aung , we. .ohould .oay ;thi-6 to ;the. Be.ginning . ,u., a Ve.diQatio n Pnoviding hoMing and moving pe.ople. nnom ;the. .olum all.e.M in;to de.Qe.n.t, .oa6e. and .oa~y .o~ounding.o doe/2 not e.nd - it be.gin.o the. job. So, e.duQa.;:Uo n ha.o be.Qome. an ,UY!pO~n.t paJz..t on ;the, HoMing Pnog~. I n.o;te,ad 06 e.duQWO n, we. c.an be.ti~ ;t~m a ;the. n e.vdauza;tion on inh~e.n.t qu~e/2 06 man.. To ne.v~ ze. ;the. ne.e.d and M ge. ;to live. pnope.nly in a we,ll -bu;.,.u, a,t;t!r_active. home.; ;to ne.vdauze. the. ne.auzwJ.on 06 a Qon;tinual.ly impno ving e.nvinonme.n;t; ;to ne.vimliz e. ;the. dMine. ;to main;tain and uplint ;the. .o;tandand 06 .ouQh e.nvinonme.n;t - to ;thi.o we. ple.dge. oun.oe.lve/2 .o o ;tha;t he. , ;too, Qan go W,t;th dignity and pnide. among ill me.n. - - and hM Qhildne.n a6t~ ~ . In .oome. i vit,;tanQe/2 we. may nail - but we. ~ put thMe. nailune/2 be.hind lL6 M t he. pniQe. We. pay to in.o M e. OM .ooue.;ty non pa.ot~y. - 3 - �� Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document WELCOME to the SITE of ATLANTA'S. LARGEST LARGEST IN. THE SOUTHEAST SECOND IN THE NATION TURNKEY LOW RENT HOUSING PROJECT tL a APY = ahs & idle ou we* = = a iE SHEETZ AND BRADFIELD/ARCHITECTS/INCORPORATED/A.1.A. H.L.C. AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DEVELOPER COBLE-WEAVER (JOINT VENTURE) CONTRACTOR Totak Cost: Cost of Site: Architects: Developer: Contractor: BANKHEAD PROJECT GEORGIA 6-28. 45,40 Acres to the North and South of Bankhead Highway at Maynard Road, just East of the Chattahoochee River. 500 - consisting of 1 to 5 bedrooms in two and three-story building. No separate facilities for the Ekderky. Community Burlding. $9,356, 094.00 To be compketed in four increments. First Phase to include 132 Units Second Phase 108 Units Third Phase 148 Units Fourth Phase 112 Units. Approximately $350,000.00 Sheetz and Bradfield/Architects /Inconporated/A.1T.A, Atlanta, Georgia H.L.C. and Associates, Inc. Greensboro, North Carolina Cobke-Weaver (Joint Venture) Greensboro, North Carolina ATLANTA'S LARGEST TURNKEY LOW RENT HOUSING PROJECT GROUND BREAKING CEREMONIES 3475-76 Bankhead Highway, Northwest Monday, May Twenty-Seven, Atkanta, Georgia Nineteen Hundred & Sixty-Eight Hosts: Mr. Faancts B. Sheetz, Jn., A.1.A. Mu. Richard H. Bradfield, A.1.A. Guest Speakers: Mt. Edwin L. Sterne, Chavunan Housing Authority of the City of Atkanta Dx. Benjamin E. Mays, Co-Chaiuman Housing Resources Committee Mt. Edward H. Baxter, Regional Administrator, Department of Housing and Urban Development Honorable Ivan Abken, Jn., Mayon, City of Atkanta  WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF EVIDENT. "CHILDREN OF POVERTY TODAY WILL BE THE PARENTS OF POVERTY TOMORROW." So said Mrs. Marie McQuine, former United States Commissioner of Pubkic Housing. There is a need - in Atkanta - for over 16,000 decent, safe, and sanitary dwekLing units, a determination made by our Mayor when he enkisted the aid of many substantial citizens of the City to begin his campaign and efforts to relieve the deplorable con- ditions of many of Atkanta's citizens. Hts recognition of the degraded condition of many areas of the City and the growing deterionation of existing dwellings began what was almost a "One Man War" against these unfortunate conditions of the poor. The facts were gathered and reveaked. The Mayor appealed to industry to meet this need. Sufficient dineentive motivated great interest. However, as private interests began to work, surprisingly every effort was stymied by one obstacke - - private vested interests. Several smakl parcels were successfully zoned to receive housing and were used. Subsequent re-zoning efforts inonically brought opposition srom every quarter of the City -- no race or religion exckuded. This was the voice of the people! To this date, this voice has been heard on practically every petition. Fortunately, this site was an exception. Voiced objections and resentments put the Board of Aldeunen in a position of reluctance to act on any petition for Housing purposes. Their responsibility 4s to serve the wishes of the majority of the people. 1% this be it -- the people of Atlanta have turned their backs on those Less fortunate, and this, in AtAekh, breeds trouble. The aim and purpose of the Federal Housing Assistance Admin- sstnation have not been understood by the people of Atkanta. Here 45 a program of assistance and benefit - and we tuin our backs. The first result and accomplishment of this program puts a substantiak roof over the heads of people. That they are waun, dry, and possibly comfortable is secondary. The first nesukt and accomplishment 1s Lifting them out of an environment that has bred crime and moral degeneration. Yet - we tuzn our backs. We complain of a tax burden? Is this a tax burden - to move people out of slum areas - to enforce the Housing Code - to tnitiate a Workable Program to bring these areas up to standard or demokish them - to relieve our Police of the exposure to these areas -- 4s this a burden? Many have stated - as soon ads these slum areas are vacated - before anything can be done - others move in from out of the City because of decreased job opportunities in the rural areas and other cities. Jobkess people must seek. Naturally they turn to Atkanta - a Mecca - a City on fine - one of the most thriving metropolitan areas in the Country. Never will they stop coming. This migration wtke continue whether additional housing is provided on not - - and 4§ not provided, the slum areas uikl Spread Like cancer. What alternative do we have? Shall we ket this influx create onritical areas where one 44 afraid to wakk -- areas which even Police cannot control? Ane we intentionally creating schools of crime and conuption? What ignites the fuse? We have seen explosions tn other ertres. 1s this what Atkanta wants? 1s this the American way? Is this the Christian way?  1t & the fortunate and the able citizens who must help, else they destroy themselves. Atlanta cannot and must not turn 14s back to receive the poverty-forced stab of vengeance of those who are impaled upon the filth and hate of the skums? Who among us has never had the facrkities of a totket, cooked on a decent stove, on, as in the past, washed dishes in a pan and thrown the water out a window? Yet this 4s the Life of many today. This start of Atkanta's Largest Public Housing development under the Twmkey System is a substantial realization and a mlestone in our Mayor's wart. Five Hundred new homes to house Twenty-Five Hundred citizens of Atlanta. Rather than a Ground Breaking, we should say this 44 a Dedication to the Beginning. Providing housing and moving people from the slum areas into decent, safe and sanitary surroundings does not end - it begins the job. So, education has become an Amportant part of the Housing Program. Instead of education, we can better term it the revitalization of inherent qualities of man. To revitalize the need and urge to Live property in a welk-butlt, attractive home; to revitalize the neakization of a continually tmproving environment; to nevitalize the desine to maintain and upki{t the standard of such envinonment - to this we pledge ourselves so that he, too, can go with dignity and pride among all men - - and his children after hun. In some instances we may fail - but we will put these failures behind us as the price we pay to insure our society for posterity. Thank you s0 much for participating.  7 4 ee - aor 4h %  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 6, Document 5 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 6 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1968 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/d54a64c2f0285d884897a17bbe9d2219.pdf 63055f0500e4fee5277cae5503718572 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. C TY OF A.n LPu T-"-L\. HOUSING RESOURCES COMMITTEE Room 1204, City Hall CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 IVAN ALLEN, JR., MAYOR May 29, , 1968 CECIL A. ALEXANDER, Chairman Housing Resources Committee MALCOLM D. JONES Housing Coordinator Dear Ho.u sing Resources Committee Member: The regular monthly meeting of the Executive Group of· the Housing Resources Committee for June 1968 will be held on regular scheduled date, Thursday, June 6, at 10:00 a.m., in Committee Room 2, City Hall . This will be a joint meeting with the Housing Coordinating Group composed of Heads of Departments and Agencies who activities relate to the Low-income Housing program. Please consider the functions and activities of your panel and be prepared to offer some specific proposals for making conrete c ontributions to the program. We hope that you will be able to attend this meeting. r eserve the date on your calendar. Please A return addressed postal card is enclosed for your convenience i n advising us whether you will be able to attend t he June 6 meet i ng . Sincerely, Ma l colm D. J ones Housing coordinator Enc l : Postal Ca rd � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document > = —— ° rs" ~ PR rT CITY OF ATLANTA HOUSING RESOURCES COMMITTEE . CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303 Room 1204, City Hail Tel, 522-4463 Area Code 404 May 29 1968 IVAN ALLEN, JR., MAYOR Pa CECIL A. ALEXANDER, Chairman Housing Resources Committee MALCOLM D. JONES Housing Coordinator Dear Housing Resources Committee Member: The regular monthly meeting of the Executive Group of the Housing Resources Committee for June 1968 will be held on regular scheduied date, Thursday, June 6, at 10:00 a.m., in Committee Room 2, City Hall. This will be a joint meeting with the Housing Coordinating Group composed of Heads of Departments and Agencies who activities relate to the Low-income Housing program, Please consider the functions and activities of your panel and be prepared to offer some specific proposals for making conrete contributions to the program. We hope that you will be able to attend this meeting. Please reserve the date on your calendar. : A return addressed postal card is enclosed for your convenience in advising us whether you will be able to attend the June 6 meeting. Sincerely, Malcolm D. Jones Housing Coordinator Encl: Postal Card  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 6, Document 4 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 6 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1968 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/9a27e1d9a8b2cd187eb45dacc82fcfec.pdf 87c98175e289cbd3b9de9b125066ab04 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. 'J C TYOF-A:. U.OUSING RESOURCES COMMITTEE Roo~ 1204, City H~ll May 29, _1968 Alde-r ma n G-. Everett Milli.can .P..ld-e rma n Rodney M. Cook Mr. Dan E . Sweat, Jr. Mr~ Jim Cr a wfor d Mr . Collier B. Gladin Mr . Lester A. Pe r sells Mr. Edwin L. Sterne Mr. Ca ry S. Hooks Dr~ J ohn W. Letson Mr o A. B. Pad ge t t Mi-o J im Parham Mi· " Johnn y C . J ohnson Ur . George W. Kennedy M1 o James B. Pi l c he r D io Sid ney L. Da vis 0.ITY. H ~ LI,, ,\TI,,Al'ffl\, G .-\, ~~0;3 T, 1. 52i·446~ Aru Co~e 49.4 IVAN Al.LEN, JR., MAYOR CECIL A, AHXANOER, C,ha irm~n Housin11 Resource ~ ComJ11ittee MALCOLM D. JONES Housine Coordinator Ge ntleme n : Th e nex t mee t ing of this Coordinating Group, for the purpose of ge t t i ng t oge ther , comparing notes and exchanging ideas in int e rest of e x edit ing t he Low-income Housing Program through effective coordination, il l b e held Thrusday, June 6, at 10:00 a.m., in Committee Room 2, Cit y Hal l. Th i s wi l l be a joint meeting with the Executive Group of the Housing Res ourc es Committ e e. The several previous meetings of this group have bee n stimulating and helpful to the Low-income Housing Progr a m. Jlr., Ceci l A. Ale x a nder, Cha irman, Housing Resources Committee 9 and I hope tha t you wi ll be able .to att e nd t h is meet ing , as your active pa r t i cipa ti on is v e~ y he lpfu l in furthering the progress of the Low incom Hous i ng· Pr·ogram. A r eturn addres sed posta l card is enc los e for your c onven ienc e in informing us whet he r y ou pl a n to at tend t he J une 6 mee ti nga Sincerely, • \ •1 • , - M  :~ Housing Coordinator •J Encl: Postal Card I ! ~ \ . I. \ � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document CITY OM AIT T. Al wT AL HOUSING RESOURCES COMMITTEE © Ging gra, anLANTA.ca,soa0e Room 1204, City Hall | Tel, 522-4463 Area Code 404 May 29. 1968 IVAN ALLEN, JR., MAYOR , ee ‘ busing Se penal H Liderman G. Everett Millican DEDEDE Alderman Rodney M. Cook Housing Coordinator Mr. Dan E. Sweat, Jr. Mr. Jim Crawford Mr. Coilier B. Gladin Mr.. Lester A. Persells Mr. Edwin L. Sterne Mr. Cary 5. Hooks Br. John W. Letson Mr. A. B. Padgett Mr. Jim Parham Mr. Johnny C. Johnson Mr. George W. Kennedy Mr. James B. Pilcher Dr. Sidney L. Davis Gentlemen: the next meeting of this Coordinating Group, for the purpose of getting together, comparing notes and exchanging ideas in interest of expediting the Low-income Housing Program through effective coordination, will be held Thrusday, June 6, at 10:00 a.m., in Committee Room 2, City Hall. This will be a joint meeting with the Executive Group of the Housing Resources Committee. The several previous meetings of this group have been stimulating and helpful to the Low-income Housing Program, Mr. Cecil A. Alexander, Chairman, Housing Resources Committee, and ¥ hope that you will be able to attend this meeting, as your active participation is very helpful in furthering the progress of the Low- income Housing Program. A return addressed postal card is enclosed for your convenience in informing us whether you plan to attend the June 6 meeting, Sincerely, Maigolm D, i ones Housing Coordinator Encl: Postal Card  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 6, Document 3 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 6 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1968 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/984c2153b00766718771a90e615565e4.pdf 0e3b1b18506f91bf2a53b65a217da0b5 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. NEW= TOWN =~N=TOWN .. .... �This document sets forth the basi c problems to be considered i n preparati on for the development of the New-Town-In-Town program i n the Federal Surplu s l and from the Federal Pen . The Schedules c ontained herein are opti mum and probably are too ti ght to be met by the agencies involved . However , this optimum s cheduling gives · the soundest bas i s for the consideration of differences between t he var iou s means of carrying out t he project. �_;; 1. Decisi ons Ne ces s ary to Develop Ne w- Town-In-Tmm Projects Who will a dmini ster the project ? a. Direct sale by HUD to Developer. b. HUD to City of Atlanta to Developer. ~ c. . HUD to Atlanta Housing Autho rity to Developer. ~ 2. Will di s position be for 221 (D) (3)) 202 only? 3, Who builds prima ry str eets and utilities? L . 4, a, Dev eloper. b. City. c. Atlanta Housing Authority. When are street locations to be pinned down? fl ... �Persons to be invol ved in these decisions? ,. ~~ ~ a. Members of the Planning i,Development Commi tte8 and Board of Aldermen. b. Mayor Ivan Allen c. Mr. John Edmunds d. Mr. M. B. Satterfi eld e. Mr. Edwi n Stern f. Mr. Frank Ethridge g. Mr. Colli er Gladdin h. Mr. Richard Case i. Atl anta Housing Authority Board of Commissioners j. Mr . Cecil Alexand er k. Col. Malcolm Jone s 1. Mr o Dan Sweat m. Mr. Edo Baxt er • , I �l.a. Direct Sale By HUD To Developers , 1. HU!ID states tha t they would expect the City to provide the land use plan) assurances as to public facilitie s, review the_developer s proposals. 2. HUD would need Bureau of Budget apprqval of the method of sale and would present the proposal to sell to the Bureau prior to making the award. Each of these steps would consume a minimum of approximately 30 days or a tota l of 60 days on this stage . 3. Under this method t he :Developer would put in the streets and utilities and this cos t would be r eflected in rent s or s ales prices. ' I 4. No non- cash credits i nvolved. 5. Fed. Pen • .to GSA to HUD i s based on certai n improvements (fen ces , etc.) which onl y HUD can finance . 6. Can HUD a cquir e the 4 non-gov 1 t owned parcel s ? Leave t hem out ? �l.a. Schedule Direct Sale IIDD to Developer Decisions Land Use Map Disposition Plan Relocation Plan 4cqui si tion Plan Project Improvements Plan Financing Plan Submit to the Bureau of the Budget for prior approval ~ Approval Select developer (advertise if necessary) Submit to the Bureau of the Budget for concurrence Concurrence Execute Contract Approval of FHA or Mortgagor of redevelopment Start Engineering Start Cons t r ucti on of Site impr ovements Complete Site Impr ovements sufficient to begin construction of Housing May May May May May May May 1, 1968 J, 1968 21, 1968 21, 1968 21, 1968 21, 1968 21_, 1968 May 21, 1968 June 21, 1968 July 21, 1968 July 21, 1968 Au gust 21, 1968 September 1, 1968 January 1, 1969 January 1, 1969 February 1 , 1969 June 15, 1969 Dur ing the interi m from July 21 to J anu ary 1, it will be necessary to acqui re the 4 pr ivately owne d parcels, r eloc at e the one fa mily and demolish the str ucture . �l.b. Sale from Goverrunent to Cit y to Developer 1. HUD clear with Bureau of Budget for sale direct to City - approximately 30 days. 2. City proceeds with l and use plan, decis ions as to provision for street s a.n.d utilo, determine method of s ale. 3. / of Method sal e as outlined by Asst . City Atty - Tom Choyce : 1. A res olution mus t be pa s s ed by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen s tating that the r eal estat e is no longer usef ul and n ecess ary to the Cit y and ordering the real es tate t o be sol d. Formality but must be done at a r egul ar Ald . meeting after a mee t i ng of P & D Com. 2. The Land Agent mus t cause a pl at of the pr operty to be made by a register ed l and surveyor. ~This mus t be done by any agent . AHA woµl d n eed about 20 days prior to cl os ing ). 3. The Land Agent must cause an appra isa l of t he property to be ma de by t he Atlant a Real Es t at e Board or a r eal estate appraiser who i s a member of t he American I ns t i tute of Re al Est ate Appr ai ser s . The apprai s a l must be pla ced in a s eal ed envel ope and turned over to t he t he Land Agent . L,.. The plat of the property al ong with the l egal de scription must be submi t t e d to t h e Purchasi ng Agent, who mus t a dvert ise for bids t o be submi tted for t he purchase of t he pr operty . 5. All bids mus t be opened and r ead a t t he desi gnated time by the Pur chasing Committ ee . The Purcha sing Commit t ee must t abul ate t he bids and ref er them to an. Al dermanic Committee . 6. The Committee must open the sealed appraisal and take t he appraisal into consideration in determining whether or not any of the bids shall �-2- be recommended for acceptance. This Committee must submit its final recommendation to the Mayor and Board of Aldermen for :f.nra:i determination. 4. City must find a way to purcha se the them out. 4 non-gov 1 t owned parcels or l eave �. 1. b. Schedule HUD to City of Atlanta to Developer Decisions Land Use Map Dispos ition Plan Acquisition Plan (4 pri vately owned par cel s as well as Federal Land ) Reloc ation Plan Project Improvements Plan Financing Plan Planni ng and Development Committee to make reco mmendations t o the Board of Aldermen in joint session with the Finance Committee Aldermani c Approval Order Survey and Des cription Appraisal s Ordered Advertise Recei ve Bids Board of Aldermen Approve Contract • Begin Construction of hous ing ·'k May 1, 1968 May 3, 1968 May 21, 1968 May May May May 21, 21, 21, 21, 1968 1968 1968 1968 May 27, 1968 June 3, 1968 June 3, 196e June 24, 1968 June 24, 1968 Au gus t 24, 1968 September 16, 1968 September 26, 1968 J anuary 26, 1969 ENGINEER ING AND SITE IMPROVIl'IENTS Engineering Let Site Improve ments Contract Complete S.I. suffici ent to begin Cons truction of hous ing Ju ne 3, 1968 1~~--lEJuly 21, 1968 December 6, 1968 September 16, 1968-:B~ Nove mber 1, 1968 · March 15, 19691*' This date would delay the start of cons truction from J anuary 26, 1969, to March 15, 1969. ~--lE- -:BH*' Engineeri ng start after selec tion of Toveloper. Engineering start before s election of .Tuveloper. �l.c. HUD to AHA to Developer l. Atlanta Housing Authority would use the normal urban renewal procedure through on and 'expe dited " basis. The schedule i s estimated on optimum time intervals as are the other schedules. 2. If the project puts in the basic streets and utilities, they would be constructed at project cost which could be more than offset by Noncash Grant-in-Aid Credits. J. -The t wo major credits are for two schools: one at $1,000,000 - 100% eligible and one at $2,000,000 - 10 to 50%eligible. 4. Some comparatively small credits would be eligible from park, bridge, ramp and other items probably in the range of $50-100,000. �1. c • Sc;ne dule Thomasville Amendr~ent R-- 22 HUD To AHA To Devel oper Thi s schedule i s prepar ed ba s ed on the fo llouing as sumptions : L All deci sio ns nec essary for th e submission of t he appl ication ( particul arl y the ones appli.ed to the method of disposition and sequence installation of site i mprovements) are made prior to May 1, 1968 . 2. That the submission is to be macl e to the June 3, 1968 Aldermanic · Commit tee . 3. That HUD holds good on their commitment t o r eview and approve the applic ation in 30 days . I. Part I - Part I I Aopl ica tion - -· - ~ -.... l. - Decj_sions Land Use Map Proj ect Area Dat a Report Disposition PJ.an Relocati on Report Acquisj_tion Plan Urban Renewal Plan Proj ect I mprovements Plan All other s ections of t he application Financing Pl an Submit to Alderciicm:i.c Financ e Commit tee Pub1.ic Hearing Aldennanic Approval Compl ete Submi sc:i on II. May 1, 1968 May 3, May 20, May 20, May 21, May 21, May 21 , May 21, May 21, May 2)-1, May 27, May 31, J une 3, June 7, ' j i Execution Activi t i es Approval Executed Lo an and Gra nt Cont r act a. Disoos~ti on Acti viti e s _..,._,-=· n.i'-7-..=I , .._._ •MCW:.-....- Adverti s e Receive Bids Identi fy Developer Sign Contract Begin Const ructj_o'r1 of hous ing·:H*" b. July 8, 1968-~July 15, ~*" .. July 29 ., 1968 Sept . 23, Oct. 21 , Oc t. 31; Januar y 27, 1969 April 2b, 1969 }fay 27, Acsiuis:itio r:~RelQ c at :i.on-Dsmolitiori Begin l\.cqui s ition Begin Relocation Complet e Ac~uis ition Complete R2lo c 2tion Complete D~n0 J_j_tion July 29, 1968 Aug . 26, Sept. ~Cl, Scp -L . 1966 July 27, Aug. 27, Sept . 27, Feb . 27, 1969 30, I Oct. 11 , ~:-T~me cont ingent on HUD acq9-9.. i-r-~f-Time contingent on Develop<in.ehi:. FHA action and completion of access streets o Col. 1 contingent on pre-advertis ing. �c. Enf)-neer:i.i~~ and Site Ifilprovements Engirieering Let Site I mproveme nts Contract Complete Site Improveme nts Sui'ficient for Co nstructfon Complete Site Improvements May 27, 1968 July ·12, 1968 Oct . 21, 1968 Aug. 27 , 1968 ilec. . 11, 1968 Oct. 15, 1968 26, 1969 Nov . 27 , Apro Apr. 27, 1969 Aug. 19, 1969 1·~ Site Improveme nts Designated in.Planning 2·~- Adve rtise after Loan and Gra r1t - Site Improvements on b asis of bid Pre--Adver tise - Site I mpro veme nt s on b a sis of bid f· Febo ·;rf, 1969 June 27 ., 1969 �2. Will Dlsposition be 221 (d) (3), 202 , only? a. 221 ( d) ( 3) development would prevent any private development being fin anced by other FHA or conventional finance. This would prev~,nt an extensive eco nomic mix in this new area. However , higl{ income families now occupy the Single Family Portion of the Thomasville Project. b. To split the area between two programs will require definite boundaries fo r each , so that ea ch can be appra i sed separately. c. 221 ( d ) ( 3) would insure l ow and moderate income occupants·. d. 221 (d) (3) would require special appra isal techniques (write down of l and price ). e. Commercial areas must be designated regardless of other consideration for appra i sal purposes. f. I f public housing is involved ( this is at the present ruled out ), this boundary would have to b e delineated. ( Turn key or conventional). g. Can the developer be non-profit , limited dividend , Co -op, or other, or will it be limited to one . �3. Who builds primary streets and utilities? a. For the developer to bui ld streets and utilities would increase the cost per dwelling unit. b. 221 ( d) (3) might affect the decisio ns . c. Approximat ely months would be required for the City or Authority to build the primary street system sufficiently to provide access . However , construction can begin prior to advertising sale of land. d. A developer could build the streets at his rate of need but probably 6½ no more r apidly than the City or the Authori ty . It would however, force scheduling of construction to be tied to street construction schedule ( acc e ss ). This may not be pertinent. ,. e. Authority constr uction of the streets would co st the City approximat ely 1/3. f. Bridge credits would be affected. g. Cost of streets and utilities estimated at$ ;-- �4. When should street loc ati ons be pinned down ( invol ves savi ng s of approximat ely 1- 3½ months )? a. I f str eet is pinned cJown befo re ad ver t ising propert y : I \ b. ' (1 ) Would restric t t he de sign of th~ devel opment plan. ( 2) Would defin e school and park s ite s so that costs and credits could be fi rm . (3 ) Would s ave approxi ma t el y 1-3½ mont hs. After st reets are pinned down after advertising and decis ion on devel oper : (1 ) Would gi ve f re edom to t he develo pment plan. ( 2) Cost and credit s wo uld no t be quite as fi rm . (3) Would del ay fro m 1-3½ month s befo r e co nst ruction could be started (woul d thi s be actual or would the architects u se up the t i me anyway )? / � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document — NEW-TOWN-IN-TOWN =hbed Bee a E df i a This document sets forth the basic problems to be considered in preparation for the development of the New-Town-In-Town program in the Federal Surplus land from the Federal Pen. The Schedules contained herein are optimum and probably are too tight to be met by the agencies involved. However, this optimum scheduling gives the soundest basis for the consideration of differences between the various means of carrying out the project. a Decisions Necessary to Develop New-Town-In-Town Projects 1. Who will administer the project? ae Direct sale by HUD to Developer. b. HUD to City of Atlanta to Developer. “~¢,. HUD to Atlanta Housing Authority to Developer. “2. Will disposition be for 221 (D) (3), 202 only? 3. Who builds primary streets and utilities? a. Developer. b. City. <--c. Atlanta Housing Authority. l. When are street locations to be pinned down? Persons to be involved in these decisions? > ae of r a. Members of the Planning,Development Committee and Board of Aldermen. b. Mayor Ivan Allen ec. Mr. John Edmunds qd. Mr. M. B. Satterfield e. Mr. Edwin Stern f. Mr. Frank Ethridge g. Mr. Collier Gladdin h. Mr. Richard Case i. Atlanta Housing Authority Board of Commissioners j. Mr. Cecil Alexander k. Col. Malcolm Jones | 1. Mr. Dan Sweat Me Mr. Ed. Baxter Me Charles L. Davis il. l.a. Direct Sale By HUD To Developers HUD states that they would expect the City to provide the land use plan, assurances as to public facilities, review the developers proposals. HUD would need Bureau of Budget approval of the method of sale and would present the proposal to sell to the Bureau prior to making the award. Each of these steps would consume a minimum of approximately 30 days or a total of 60 days on this stage. Under this method the Developer would put in the streets and utilities and this cost would be reflected in rents or sales prices. No non-cash credits involved. Fed. Pen. to GSA to HUD is based on certain improvements (fences, etc.) which only HUD can finance. Can HUD acquire the ); non-gov't owned parcels? Leave them out? lea. Schedule Direct Sale HUD to Developer Decisions Land Use Map Disposition Plan Relocation Plan Acquisition Plan Project Improvements Plan Financing Plan y Submit to the Bureau of the Budget for prior approval Approval y Select developer (advertise if necessary) Submit to the Bureau of the Budget for concurrence Concurrence , Execute Contract Approval of FHA or Mortgagor of redevelopment Start Engineering Start Construction of Site improvements Complete Site Improvements sufficient to begin construction of Housing May 1, 1968 May 3, 1968 May 21, 1968 May 21, 1968 May 21, 1968 May 21, 1968 May 21, 1968 May 21, 1968 June 21, 1968 July 21, 1968 July 21, 1968 August 21, 1968 September 1, 1968 January 1, 1969 January 1, 1969 February 1, 1969 June 15, 1969 During the interim from July 21 to January 1, it will be necessary to acquire the | privately owned parcels, relocate the one family and demolish the structure. 1. 2," 36 1.b. Sale from Government to City to Developer HUD clear with Bureau of Budget for sale direct to City - approximately 30 days. City proceeds with land use plan, decisions as to provision for streets and util., determine method of sale. / of Method sale as outlined by Asst. City Atty - Tom Choyce: 1. A resolution must be passed by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen stating that the real estate is no longer useful and necessary to the City and ordering the real estate to be sold. Formality but must be done at a regular Ald. meeting after a meeting of P & D Com. 2. The Land Agent must cause a plat of the property to be made by a registered land surveyor. {This sia Be done by any agent. AHA would need about 20 days prior to closing). . 3. The Land Agent must cause an appraisal of the property to be made by the Atlanta Real Estate Board or a real estate appraiser who is a member of the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers. The appraisal must be placed in a sealed envelope and turned over to the the Land Agent. lh. The plat of the property along with the legal description must be submitted to the Purchasing Agent, who must advertise for bids to be submitted for the purchase of the property. 5. All bids must be opened and read at the designated time by the Purchasing Committee. The Purchasing Committee must tabulate the bids and refer them to an Aldermanic Committee. | 6. The Committee must open the sealed appraisal and take the soorabeal: into consideration in determining whether or not any of the bids shall be recommended for acceptance. This Committee must submit its final recommendation to the Mayor and Board of Aldermen for ffwak determination. City must find a way to purchase the ); non-gov't owned parcels or leave them out. — _1.b. Schedule HUD to City of Atlanta to Developer Decisions ‘ May 1, 1968 Land Use Map ; May 3, 1968 Disposition Plan May 21, 1968 " Acquisition Plan (lh privately owned parcels as well as Federal Land ; May 21, 1968 Relocation Plan May 21, 1968 Project Improvements Plan May 21, 1968 Financing Plan May 21, 1968 Planning and Development Committee to make recommendations to the Board of Aldermen in joint session with the Finance Committee May 27, 1968 Aldermanic Approval June 3, 1968 Order Survey and Description June 3, 1968 Appraisals Ordered June 2h, 1968 Advertise June 2), 1968 Receive Bids August 2), 1968 Board of Aldermen Approve ; September 16, 1968 — Contract ; September 26, 1968 Begin Construction of housing January 26, 1969 ENGINEERING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS Engineering June 3, 1968 *** September 16, 1968"" Let Site Improvements Contract July 21, 1968 November 1, 1968 Complete S.I. sufficient to begin Construction of housing December 6, 1968 “March 15, 1969* *This date would delay the start of construction from January 26, 1969, to March 15, 1969. ** Engineering start after selection of Developer. “x* Engineering start before selection of Developer. 1.c. HUD to AHA to Developer Atlanta Housing Authority would use the normal urban renewal procedure through on and 'éxpedited" basis. The schedule is estimated on optimum time intervals as are the other schedules. If the project puts in the basic streets and utilities, they would be constructed at project cost which could be more than offset by Non- cash Grant-in-Aid Credits. ; The two major credits are for two schools: one at $1,000,000 - 100% eligible and one at $2,000,000 - 10 to 50% eligible. Some comparatively small credits would be eligible from park, bridge, ramp and other items probably in the range of $50-100,000. re 1.c¢. Schedule Thomasville Amendment R-22 HUD To AHA To Developer This schedule is prepared based on the following assumptions: 1. All decisions necessary for the submission of the application (particu-~ rad % larly the ones applied to the method of disposition and sequence installation of site improvements) are made prior to May 1, 1968. 2. ‘That the submis sion is to be made to the June 3, 1968 Aldermanic ~ Committee. 35 That HUD holds good on their commitment to review and approve the appli- cation in 30 days. :. a i I. Part I - Part IJ Application eg o* a Decisions May 1, 1968 Land Use Map May 3, Project Area Data Report May 20, Disposition Plan May 20, Relocation Report May 21, Acquisition Plan : May 21, Urban Renewal Plan May 21, Project Improvements Plan May 21, » All other sections of the application May 21, | , Financing Plan May 2h, Subunit to Aldermanic Finance Committee / May 27, Public Hearing May 31, Aldermanic Approval June 3, Complete Submission June 7, JI. Execution Activit ties MG ee a Approval July 8, 1968* Executed Loan and Grant Contract July 15, % a. Disposition Activities Advertise _ duly 29, 1968 May 27, 1968 Receive Bids . " Sepbs 255 July 27; Identify Developer Ost. 21, Aug. oe Sign Contract : Oct. 31, Sept. Begin Construction of housing** January 27, 1969 April 26, ae Feb. 542 1969 be Acquisition-Rel loeation~ Demolition Begin Acquisition July 29, 1968 Begin Relocation Aug. 26, Complete Acquisition Sept. 30, Complete Relocstion Sept. 30, Complete Denolition Oct. 1h, | *Time contingent on HUD action. “x#Time contingent on Development FHA action. and completion of access streetse Col. 1 contingent on pre~advertising.  c. Engineering and Site Improvements Engineering May 27, 1968 Oct. 21, 1968 Aug. 27, 1968 Let Site Improvements Contract July 12,1968 Dec..11, 1968 Oct. 15, 1968 Complete Site Improvements Sufficient for Construction Nov. 27, Apr. 26, 1969 Feb. 27, 1969 Complete Site Improvements Apr. 27, 1969 Aug. 19, 1969 June 27, 1969 1* Site Improvenents Designated in,Planning as ‘< . . . 2° Advertise after Loan and Grant - Site Improvements on basis of bid 3° Pre-Advertise - Site Improvements on basis of bid Will Disposition be 221 (d) (3), 202, only? ade 221 (da) (3) development would prevent any private development being financed by other FHA or conventional finance. This would prevent an extensive economic mix in this new area. However, high income families now occupy the eangte Family Portion of the Thomasville Project. To split the area between two programs will require definite boundaries for each, so that each can be appraised separately. eel (da) (3) would insure low and moderate income occupants. 221 (d) (3) would require special appraisal techniques (write- down of land price). Commercial areas must be designated regardless of other consideration for appraisal purposes. If public housing is involved (this is at the present ruled out), this boundary would have to be delineated. (Turn key or conven- tional). Can the developer be non-profit, limited dividend, Co-op, or other; or will it be limited to one. Who builds primary streets and utilities? For the developer to build streets and utilities would increase the cost per dwelling unit. 221 (d) (3) might affect the decisions. Approximately 64 months would be required for the City or Authority to build the primary street system sufficiently to provide access. However, construction can begin prior to advertising sale of land. A developer could build the streets at his rate of need but probably no more rapidly than the City or the Authority. It would however, force scheduling of construction to be tied to street construction schedule (access). This may not be pertinent. Authority construction of the streets would cost the City ~ approximately 1/3. Bridge credits would be affected. Cost of streets and utilities estimated at $ | . lh. When should street locations be pinned down (involves savings of approximately 1-33 months)? ae If street is pinned down before advertising property: OF (1) Would restrict the design of the development plan. (2) Would define school and park sites so that costs and credits could be firm. (3) Would save approximately 1-33 months. b. After streets are pinned down after advertising and decision on developer: ; (1) Would give freedom to the development plan. ©) Cost and credits would not be quite as firm. (3) Would delay from 1-33 months before construction could be started (would this be actual or would the architects use up the time anyway)? i  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 6, Document 2 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 6 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1968