1
20
51
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/30c1cb2bd26c575a1bb981fe1488326f.pdf
8303a552d68b19e7bdbbb68fc8949aff
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
CITY OF ATLANTA
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
501 CITY HALL
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
CHARLES L. DAVIS
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
EDGAR A . VAUGHN, JR.
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
GEORGE J. BERRY
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
January 16, 1969
Mr. William Wofford
Building Department
City of Atlanta
Dear Bill:
In reviewing the City's various funds in preparation of the 1969
budget, I have noted that we have not made significant expenditures
from the demolition grant fund. As you are aware, this fund was
established to handle the demolition grant project for which we
received a grant from the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
According to our records, we have only expended a total of $19,229
for the years 1967 and 1968. A total of $85,540 was authorized
for this project.
I have reviewed your Mr. Waddell's report on this project in which
he indicates that there were a total of 157 structures to be demolished
under the program and that only 42 have been demolished in
a two year period.
It is a considerable cost to us in both time and effort to carry
this fund. It is the smallest und and has the least activity of
any fund in our budget. I would appreciate your thoughts on how
we can move forward to complete this project and accomplish the
intent of this program.
Very truly yours,
Charles L. Davis
Director of Finance
CLD:cs
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
Co itrY OF AT LAN TA
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
501 CITY HALL
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
CHARLES L. DAVIS
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
EOGAR A. VAUGHN, JR.
DEPUTY DIRECTOR -OF FINANCE
GEORGE J. BERRY
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE January 16, 1969
Mr. William Wofford
Building Department
City of Atlanta
Dear Bill:
In reviewing the City's various funds in preparation of the 1969
budget, I have noted that we have not made significant expenditures
from the demolition grant fund. As you are aware, this fund was
established to handle the demolition grant project for which we
received a grant from the Department of Housing and Urban Develop-
ment.
According to our records, we have only expended a total of $19,229
for the years 1967 and 1968. A total of $85,540 was authorized
for this project.
I have reviewed your Mr. Waddell's report on this project in which
he indicates that there were a total of 157 structures to be demo-
lished under the program and that only 42 have been demolished in
a two year period.
It is a considerable cost to us in both time and effort to carry
this fund. It is the smallest fund and has the least activity of
any fund in our budget. I would appreciate your thoughts on how
we can move forward to complete this project and accomplish the
intent of this program,
Very truly yours,
Oh itz BS.
Charles L. Davis
Director of Finance
CLD:cs
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 2, Document 50
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 2
Folder topic: Building department | 1967-1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/54dfa56ddc40449b937e50d667c26337.pdf
1bbfd26d4ad5d3c7fa73f00556bcad9a
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
CITY OF ATLANTA
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
800 CITY HALL
TEL. JA. 2-4463 EXT. 321
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
1969
.
r
•. Johnson,
'
~l.l;JQ
Jan
ry 10, 19
f•~~ tot
y
,,..
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
be
CITY OF ATLANTA
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
800 CITY HALL
TEL. JA. 2-4463 EXT. 321
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
January 28, 1969
Mr. Carl G. Johnson, County Manager
Room 401
165 Central Ave., &. W.
Atlanta, Georgia
Dear Mr. Johnson:
A copy of your letter dated January 10, 1969, addressed to
_ R. Earl Landers has been ‘referred te the Building Department
fox study and reply.
The contents of your letter indicates that you are aware of the
hazardous building conditions which concern the White Alms
Building, as well as, subsequent litigation which has transpired
since an inspection revealed the building condition early in
July of 1968.
The request of time extension for occupation of condemned structure
to June 30, 1969 is beyond the perrogative of the Building
Inspector since without extensive repairs safety to the inhabitants
igs an ambiguity.
As the Building Official for the City of Atlanta I can understand
the of the Municipal Theatre Groups which the
Saisak, ‘wanaven, as my first obligation is téward preservation
of life, limb, and property through Code enforcement, I must
decline an extension of time and ask that the structure be repaired
or demolished.
Very truly yours,
Ww. R. Wofferd
Building Official
WEN sg@
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 2, Document 49
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 2
Folder topic: Building department | 1967-1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/f58fb9b41f61f5ac59d2ee2c8e5f1de3.pdf
2a8e6f3e0ee6f4e90d1cbc519ae4d521
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
CITY OF ATLANTA
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
ARCHITECTURAL DIVISION
901 CITY HALL
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
January 16 , 1969
WILLIAM R . WOFFORD, P.E . , R . A .
INSPECTO-R OF BUILDINGS
FREDERICK R. SHEPHERD
ADDY W. CHAN
ELMER H. MOON, E . E. , P.E .
ASST . INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
Mr . R. Earl Landers
Administrative Assistant
Mayor ' s Office
Atlanta , Georg i a
Dear Mr. Landers:
Re:
White Alms Building
In the absence of Mr . W. R. Wofford, Building Official , your
letter of January 14, 1969, with attached copy of letter from
Fulton County Manager concerning the future of the White Alms
Building has been referred to the City Architec t for study.
The hazardous conditions which existed and were first reported
on or about July 16, 1968, still exist and have not been
allievated to date.
In view of the potential hazard and possible
political implications, a departmental decision concerning the
matter is expected to be made upon return of Mr. Woffo rd to the
City of Atlanta on or about Tuesday, January 21, 1969.
A letter from this office concerning this matter shall be
forthcoming.
_:;:;;?~
Frederick R. Shepherd
Representative of the Architect
FRS:gs
ATLANTA
THE
DOGWOOD
CITY
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
f*itrtv coyce ATI AARITA
oe (OF ATLANTA
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
ARCHITECTURAL DIVISION
901 CITY HALL
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
eee January 16, 1969
WILLIAM R. WOFFORD, P.E., R.A.
INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS FREDERICK R. SHEPHERD
ELMER H. MOON, E.E., P.E. ADDY W. CHAN
ASST. INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
Mr. R. Earl Landers
Administrative Assistant
Mayor's Office
Atlanta, Georgia
Dear Mr. Landers:
Re: White Alms Building
In the absence of Mr. W. R. Wofford, Building Official, your
letter of January 14, 1969, with attached copy of letter from
Fulton County Manager concerning the future of the White Alms
Building has been referred to the City Architect for study.
The hazardous conditions which existed and were first reported
on or about July 16, 1968, still exist and have not been
allievated to date. In view of the potential hazard and possible
political implications, a departmental decision concerning the
matter is expected to be made upon return of Mr. Wofford to the
City of Atlanta on or about Tuesday, January 21, 1969.
A letter from this office concerning this matter shall he
forthcoming.
oe a ee ;
Frederick R. Shepherd
Representative of the Architect
FRS:gs
ATLANTA THE DOGWOOD CITY
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 2, Document 48
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 2
Folder topic: Building department | 1967-1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/109933605120ccb4dd665aa31352290c.pdf
b448ae74eeed5f34062f05492d865133
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
__________________ __________________________
.,
__,,..,
January 14, 1969
Mr . William R . Wofford
In pector of Buildings
City Hall
Atlanta , G orgia
Dear Bill :
Sometime 1
t fall, you gre d to allow the Municipal Theat. r to
occupy the Alme House loc ted in Cha tain Park Wltil J n
thi year.
ry of
Attached h reto is a letter of January 10, 1969 from Mr . Carl
Johnson. Fulton County M n ger, which ii self- xpla tory.
Would you pl a
dvi
r . Johnson r gardin thi r qu t, and
send m
copy of your letter.
Since,: ly your•.
R. Ear 1 Land r•
Adminietr tive A
REL:lp
A
chm nt
CC: Mr. Carl Johnson
i tant
._
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
Ee a, PG
January 14, 1969
Mr. William R. Wofford
Inspector of Buildings
City Hall
Atlanta, Georgia
Dear Bill:
Sometime last fall, you agreed to allow the Municipal Theater to
eccupy the Alms House located in Chastain Park until January of
this year.
Attached hereto is a letter of January 10, 1969 from Mr. Carl
Johnson, Fulton County Manager, which is self-explanatory.
Would you please advise Mr. Johnson regarding this request, and
send me a copy of your letter.
Sincerely yours,
R. Earl Landers
Administrative Assistant
R
REL:lp
Attachment
CC: Mr. Carl Johnson
es a as ee ee ee eee niente
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 2, Document 47
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 2
Folder topic: Building department | 1967-1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/d615a8150d16390e55afb66e8d53a9a8.pdf
5dff75c06a4fc3c7f2bf0101d11b7b81
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
CITY OF ATLANTA
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
Atlanta 3, Georgia
WILLIAM R . WOFFORD, P.E ., R.A.
INSPECTOR OF BU IL D I NGS
January 10, 1969
ELMER H. MOON, E.E., P.E.
ASST. I NSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
The Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr.
Mayor, City of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia
Dear Mayor Allen :
I will be out of the City the week of January 13 through
January 20, 1969, attending the Executive Board meeting and
the Code Changes Committee meeting of the Building Officials
Conference of America to be held in Miami, Florida.
During my absence Mr. C. M. Smith, Assistant Building
Official , will be in charge of the office.
Very truly yours,
W.R. Wofford
Building Official
WRW:at
ATLANTA
THE
DOGWOOD
CITY
•
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
===
re
eS FSS
WILLIAM R. WOFFORD, P.E., R.A.
INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
ELMER H, MOON, E.E., P.E.
ASST. INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
The Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr.
Mayor, City of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia
Dear Mayor Allen:
I will be out of the City the week of January 13 through
January 20, 1969, attending the Executive Board meeting and
the Code Changes Committee meeting of the Building Officials
CITY OF ATLANTA
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
Atlanta 3, Georgia
January 10, 1969
Conference of America to be held in Miami, Florida.
During my absence Mr. C. M. Smith, Assistant Building
Official, will be in charge of the office.
WRW:at
Very truly yours,
—2t 32 ave teeta.
W. R. Wofford
Building Official
ATLANTA THE DOGWOOD CITY
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 2, Document 46
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 2
Folder topic: Building department | 1967-1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/16d751ce0c314d524eb4546dc77eeb57.pdf
70cc675f2c422fb7cb979e9098a97c49
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
January 9, 1969
Mr. W.R. Wofford
Building Official
Building Department
City of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, 30303
Dear Sir:
It is with some reluctance that I ask you to accept this,
my letter of resignation, as Building Inspector for the
City of Atlanta effective January 27, 1969.
I have an opportunity for employment with the Department
¢- f Housing and Urban Development as a Codes Specialist
~ o, ~ 0 '- - 11 with the grade of G. s. 11. After considerable consideration
- ~- - of this advancement, as to the welfare of me and my family,
¢
I feel that I must accept this position.
~s---1 1
P
2""J"V~4J'..
~·
u? / o/1-
fe:,.
(...,
?l<.A..~
..?'u
3u ~ ~
MU-
/4~<-<.A--
~ ,(/vP
--
I would like to take this opportunity to express my sincere
appreciation to you, Mr. Smith, Mr. Hewes and all of the
employees of the Building Department for their very kind
and generous cooperation they have given me as an employee
of this department.
~
_,,,~ Z.(1~
With best wishes and thanks to all ,
~~
~-ct II
tl/4~~
M. Fr ed Ha r dage
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
January 9, 1969
Mr. W. R. Wofford
Building Official
Building Department
City of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, 30303
Dear Sir:
It is with some reluctance that I ask you to accept this,
my letter of resignation, as Building Inspector for the
City of Atlanta effective January 27, 1969.
I have an opportunity for employment with the Department
73008t Housing and Urban Development as a Codes Specialist
, With the grade of G. S. 11. After considerable consideration
of this advancement, as to the welfare of me and my family,
I feel that I must accept this position.
I would like to take this opportunity to express my sincere
appreciation to you, Mr. Smith, Mr. Hewes and all of the
employees of the Building Department for their very kind
and generous cooperation they have given me as an employee
of this department.
4 bptinrt With best wishes and thanks to all,
MH, Fed Haroliig te
M. Fred Hardage
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 2, Document 45
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 2
Folder topic: Building department | 1967-1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/5395647ad1cc567444fa15f12e68a69c.pdf
a4b9373e45c57e9893d13eaeeaf4509e
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
\..:
-~·
> ....
r -., . ,
• I
~
,,
I -..
.
[
!,:
}'.
'
t -.
c -T~.- o :F
7
Ar1. -
. ·.
,I,
'I)
~
•
..
-: !·:!
•
\,
CITY I-IALL
ATLANTA, GA. 30303
Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
COLLIER B. GLADI N, Dircccor
January 6, 1969
Mr. W. R . Wofford
Building Official
Building Department
City Hall
Atlanta, Georgia
Dear Bi 11:
In assessing the status of the Housing Code Compliance Program for 1969,
the Planning Department has offered various solutions for design of a new program,
all of which have had the basic shortcoming of being based on outdated information.
In an attempt to alleviate this problem, the Planning Departm ent submits the
following proposal for activities of the Housing Code Compliance Program personnel
for the year I969:
Because of tremendous efforts on house-by-house inspections in th e most
pressing are as of the city during the last year, the Housing Code Compliance
Division has made original inspe ctions on a majority of the sub-standard dwelling
units within the highest priority areas of the city. However, because of conditions
beyond control of the inspe ctors (i.e. insufficient financial abilities, shortage of
contractors, legal tieups), many of these recently inspected units have not comp Iied
with the city's Housing Code. Therfore, since the program is running ah ead of
schedule in original inspect ions, but behind schedule in gaining compliances in th e
most deteriorated areas of th e city, th e Planning Department suggests that exJ-ensive
time and manpowe r be spent in those areas that have recently been inspected in
order to gain lasting comp Iiances and a general upgrade in housing conditions.
To accomplish this end, the Planning Department suggests that the ten
Concentration Area Inspectors be use d during the first quarter of 1969 to concentrate
on more complete efforts toward gaining more and lasting comp I iances "in those areas
that have recently been inspected. Sending these men into the areas they have
just covered will enable them to comp lete the work that was only begun with the
original inspections .
�Mr. W. R . Wofford
-2-
January 6, 1969
After this first three-month pe riod, it is expected that approx imately one-half
of the ten inspectors wi 11 be removed from thse recently inspe cted areas and joined
with other personnel of the Housing Code Compliance Division to make original
inspections in areas corre sponding with Community Improvement Program priorities
during the second quarter of 1969. The remaining five inspe ctors wil I spe nd the
second quarter on continued completion efforts in those a reas inspected in 1968.
Those areas designated by Community Improvement Program priorities, which
will be inspected on an original basis during the second quarter of 1969, were,
to a large extent, inspected during the first years of the Housing Code Comp Iiance
Program. However, the 1969 program will not send inspectors into any area that
has been inspected since 1966 for original inspections.
The third and fourth quarters for
inspections and reinspe ctions at a rate
efficiency from the inspectors. These
in priority areas determined during the
1969 will mark the beginning of original
determined to gain the greatest degree of
concentrated area inspections will take place
first three months of 1969.
Among the top - priority items of the data processing division of the city is
an update of the Community Improvement Program information. If th is update is
completed, it will include complete · housing condition information and a priority
Iisting for housing improvements. Th is new priority Iisting wi 11 determine th e
areas for original inspe ctions for the Housing Code Compliance Division. The
information compil e d during the first quarter of 1969 will show those areas of the
city that must be surveyed in order to realistically determine the top-priority areas
for Housing Code inspe ctions . Also during the first three months of the year, if
certain areas need to be surveyed, the city can make decisions on surve y techniques
and personnel to conduct the survey, including decisions on what type of information
must be accumulated by th e survey .
Sincerely yours,
QJQ~ ~ <¾cR:.~
Collier B. Glad in
Planning Director
C BG /b ls
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
a
CITY OF ATLANTA
CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA.30303 —
Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
COLLIER B. GLADIN, Director
January 6, 1969
Mr. W. R. Wofford
Building Official
Building Department
City Hall
Atlanta, Georgia
Dear Bill:
In assessing the status of the Housing Code Compliance Program for 1969,
the Planning Department has offered various solutions for design of a new program,
all of which have had the basic shortcoming of being based on outdated information.
In an attempt to alleviate this problem, the Planning Department submits the
following proposal for activities of the Housing Code Compliance Program personnel
for the year 1969:
Because of tremendous efforts on house=by-house inspections in the most
pressing areas of the city during the last year, the Housing Code Compliance
Division has made original inspections on a majority of the sub-standard dwelling
units within the highest priority areas of the city. However, because of conditions
beyond control of the inspectors (i.e. insufficient financial abilities, shortage of
contractors, legal tieups), many of these recently inspected units have not complied
with the city's Housing Code. Therfore, since the program is running ahead of
schedule in original inspections, but behind schedule in gaining compliances in the
most deteriorated areas of the city, the Planning Department suggests that extensive
time and manpower be spent in those areas that have recently been inspected in
order to gain lasting compliances and a general upgrade in housing conditions.
To accomplish this end, the Planning Department suggests that the ten
Concentration Area Inspectors be used during the first quarter of 1969 to concentrate
on more complete efforts toward gaining more and lasting compliances in those areas
that have recently been inspected. Sending these men into the areas they have
just covered will enable them to complete the work that was only begun with the
original inspections.
Mr. W. R. Wofford -2- January 6, 1969
After this first three-month period, it is expected that approximately one-half
of the ten inspectors will be removed from thse recently inspected areas and joined
with other personnel of the Housing Code Compliance Division to make original
inspections in areas corresponding with Community Improvement Program priorities
during the second quarter of 1969, The remaining five inspectors will spend the
second quarter on continued completion efforts in those areas inspected in 1968.
Those areas designated by Community Improvement Program priorities, which
will be inspected on an original basis during the second quarter of 1969, were,
to a large extent, inspected during the first years of the Housing Code Compliance
Program. However, the 1969 program will not send inspectors into any area that
has been inspected since 1966 for original inspections.
The third and fourth quarters for 1969 will mark the beginning of original
inspections and reinspections at a rate determined to gain the greatest degree of
efficiency from the inspectors. These concentrated area inspections will take place
in priority areas determined during the first three months of 1969.
Among the top-priority items of the data processing division of the city is
an update of the Community Improvement Program information. If this update is
completed, it will include complete housing condition information and a priority
listing for housing improvements. This new priority listing will determine the
areas for original inspections for the Housing Code Compliance Division. The
information compiled during the first quarter of 1969 will show those areas of the
city that must be surveyed in order to realistically determine the top-priority areas
for Housing Code inspections. Also during the first three months of the year, if
certain areas need to be surveyed, the city can make decisions on survey techniques
and personnel to conduct the survey, including decisions on what type of information
must be accumulated by the survey.
Sincerely yours,
CQ: BSE -
Collier B. Gladin
Planning Director
CBG/bls
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 2, Document 44
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 2
Folder topic: Building department | 1967-1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/42e2a592a1ece4137ce08ac943893200.pdf
42742b792b631d290072988fa10bf494
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
Department of Planning
MEMO
FROM: Collier
TO: _
Gladin®
DATE :
___,,,E=aC!...r'-1_,,L,,_,,a,_,_n=d=e:..:...r::c..s_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
[K]
For your information
O
Ple ase make neces s ary re ply
D
Advise status of the attached
1-6-69
TIME: _ __ _ __ _ _
I met with Bill this morning and I believe we are getting
close to a meeting with you.
contacting you soon.
FORM 30·13
Bill will probably be
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
Department of Planning
MEMO
C ty)
FROM: Collier ctoaic(
TO:
P|
O 0
Earl Landers
For your information
Please make necessary reply
Advise status of the attached
| met with Bill this
close to a meeting with you.
contacting you soon,
DATE:_l-6-69
TIME:
r
Bill will probably be
ettin
> . f
4 KY
FORM 30-13
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 2, Document 43
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 2
Folder topic: Building department | 1967-1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/f0d5ced98e2e1ce549defa35b6dad6dd.pdf
6048960aad758dbd0635fe0fc47579c1
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
CITY OF ATLANTA
REPORT OF THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS OFFICE
FOR
THE
MOH TH
NO . OF PERM IT S
.._,
»eaembar
0 F
1969
CLASS IFICATION
COST
, J _,,' ..;
NO. OF FAM ILI ES
HOUSED
$
Masonry Dwellings, 1 Family
$
Frame Dwellings, Duplex .
$
Masonry Dwellings, Duplex
$
Apartment Houses .
$
Churches & Religious Buildings.
$
Add-Alter-Repair Churches
$
Awu s~~.m~e~t & J},e<:rfi tion_ Buildings
$
9
sr143.215.248.55 12:42, 29 December 2017 (EST)-~-~~x.
$
278,000
1
Service Stations .
$
128,000
4
Residential Garages & Carports
$
900
Parking Garages .
$
Garages .
$
Hotel & Motel Buildings .
$
School & Educationa l Buildings .
$
Add-Alter-Repair Schools .
$
4,116 , 449
Offic e Buildings .
$
271,000
Office & Warehouse .
$
Utility Buil~ings .
$
Indus tria l Buildings .
$
Swimming Pools .
$
Fire Escapes E leva tors & Signs
$
Add -Alter-Repair, R esidentia l .
$
Add-Alter-Repair, Business Bldgs ..
$
Demolitions-Business Buildings .
$
De molitions -Residential Buildings .
$
'r
,._
1
>\.t ~, -- J ..,.J~
12
5
1
147
192
.\ •
.
~n_,
80
11
.H I
~0 '.;GJ
1,J (_ CQ
4,000
14.5 ?620
377 ,517
920,414
11,000
403
1
er
('? ~
Frame Dwellings, 1 Family .
Erect Mas. Office Drive-In Bank
886
Total Permits _ _ _ _ __
Tota l Cost
..
130 , 240
-531
80,000
$7,009,516
16
Total No. of Families Housed - - - - - - - - - - -
W. R. WOFFORD
FO<>M N O . 4- 2
Insp ec tor o f Buildings
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
CITY OF ATLANTA
REPORT OF THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS OFFICE
Baceaber 1969
FOR THE MONTH OF
NO. OF PERMITS CLASSIFICATION COST NO, OF FAMILIES
HOUSED
a0 : 3 ae.07 2 LG
Frame Dwellings, 1 Family. ......... $
Masonry Dwellings, 1 Family. ........ $
Frame Dwellings, Duplex. . . . .... 2.5. $
Masonry Dwellings, Duplex... ....... $
Apartment Houses: on. Wo cyt, heat asa en es $
Churches & Religious Buildings. . . . . ae fas 8
2 29. 4G
Add-Alter-Repair Churches...» ..-- $ 20 360
t “di 1. C90
Aahicment degen Bellings foxes n —
__? _stivei' 8 OARPRPRCRIAP BORER, toes
2 Setvice Stations:: 3.6 69 @ #96) ¢-40% Wow 8 $ 128,000
4 Residential Garages & Carports. ....... $ 900
Parking Gatages:.) 3.0. wc a ie oe eS we $
GALABES oa aS ae wi a a $
Hotel & Motel Buildings. . . .. 2... . $
School & Educational Buildings. . ...... $
12 Add-Alter-Repair Schools. . .. 2... 44% g 4,116,449
an ae Spt aS Biildings 5 ~ oid 315. S hae ae eS $ 271,000
Office & Warehouse. . . . 2. ......2.2.. $
Utility Buildings «3.4.56 64552824 o 8
Industrial Buildings. . ~~... 7 ee ee ee $
1 Swimming Pools. «5. 5.1 « 4 «> seen 4,000
147 Fire Escapes Elevators & Signs ....... $ 145 620
192 . : : 377,517
—________ Add-Alter-Repair, Residential. ........ §
80 920,414
Add-Alter-Repair, Business Bldgs... .. . . 28
E1 11,000 '
—_________—_ De molitions-Business Buildings. . ...... $
403 130,240 <“t wean
——____ De molitions-Residential Buildings . Ae sh eae:
1 Erect Mas. Office Drive-In Bank 80,000
886 7,009,51
Total Permits-—_—— -— ——_— Total Cost $7; xa
16
Total No. of Families Housed
W. R. WOFFORD
Inspector of Buildings
FOPM NO, 4-2
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 2, Document 42
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 2
Folder topic: Building department | 1967-1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/680736926767d91cab05ff7f36f8fe09.pdf
32ca837451e2276f9b78153a99ab34c6
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
CITY OF ATLANTA
REPORT OF THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS OFFICE
Yi AR - 1969
NO. OF PERM I T S
1
C.L A SSIF ICATION
COST
NO. OF FAMILIES
HOUSED
Condominium (Addition)
613,536
32
_ _.2..,8.,,4,___ _ _ Frame Dwellin gs , 1 Family .
$
5,888,853
284
- - - ' - - - - - - Masonry Dwellings, 1 Family
$
8,750
- -~ ----Frame Dwellings , Duplex.
$
432, J 75
62
- - - - - - - Masonry Dwellings , Duplex
$
_ ___,,,41-\.()J-----Apartment Houses . . . . .
$ 49,222,358
4,655
--=------ Churches
$
156,196
$
2,597,509
$
929,993
_
& Religious Buildings .
____..3....9'-.' -----Add-Alter-Repair Churches .
. .
- ~J-.. ,2_ _ _ _ Amusement & Recreation Buildings
Business Buildings
_...,l_....;J,...1---- St~::&:,Odt:es~'dce,oaa£:i:le.:iiw~ a;,.
.
$ U, 922 ,61..4
_ _21
_ _ _ _ _ Service Stations . . . . . . .
$
960,295
__1_3_6_ _ _ _ Residential Garages
$
144,756
___8_ _ _ _ parking Garages .
$
1,233,666
_ _..;..2_ _ _ _ Garages
$
4,433,593
$
4, ,~so , ooo
___3_ _ _ _ Hotel
& Carports
. . . . .
& Motel Buildings .
_ _l_l_ _ _ _ school &
$ 20,649,422
Educational Buildings .
9,097,138
_ _6_9_ _ _ _ Add-Alter-Repair Schools .
$
_ __;;3...;;2;..__ _ _ office
Buildings . . . . .
$ 19,698,019
_ _.:::3c.::8;___ _ _ Office
& Warehouse .
$
3,439,968
---"l,.__ _ _ Utility Buildings . .
$
1.144.000
- - - - - - - - - Industria l Buildings .
$
7,910,839
__5,_5,___ _ _ Swimming Pools . . .
$
284,225
__.J....,,...,6...8u.0,____ _ _ Fire Escapes Elevators & Signs
$
1, 43S, 974
_3._,,,....6,_)..._Q,.__ _ _ Add-Alter-Repair, Residential . . .
$
6,049,054
_...,;9""2...8,.__ _ _ Add-Alter-Repair, Business Bldgs ..
$
J8,J65,3'.l6
_ _.J._5...,,4.___ _ _ Demolitions-Business Buildings . .
$
174,110
_J'-,...,,Q~7u.O'---- Demolitions-Residential Buildings .
$
387,183
1
l
1
1
1
Erect
Erect
Erec t
Erect
Erect
'
194,290
18,000
3,327,000
100,000
25,000
Fire Station
Monument
Georgia Pl aza
Post Office
N/C Hanger
Total Permits _ _.8...,,,_3...6...Q..____
J 663 -
Total Cost
176,093.832
Total No. of Families Housed _ _ _ _.,,:.5:....,~0;.,.3c;,4'------
W. R. WOFFORD
F O R M N O. 4- 2
Inspector of Buildings
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
—
>
CITY OF ATLANTA XQ
REPORT OF THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS OFFICE
FOR THE J€0:¢e3-# OF __yzAR.j 1969 —
NO. OF PERMITS CLASSIFICATION COST NO. OF FAMILIES
HOUSED
1 Condeminium (Addition) 613,536 32
—284_______ Frame Dwellings, 1 Family. ......... $ —5,888 853 284
Mi stnty ‘Dwellings; UFamily . <<. 5 x 4 $ 8,750 1
—__3_______ Frame Dwellings, Duplex. ........-.. $ 432,175 62
Masonry Dwellings, Duplex... .....4.. $
=p —_—__— Apaitinéne'Housés:- 3-5) Scien Sah Son ees 4-469, 222: 358 = 65 5e
——__4________ Churches & Religious Buildings. . . . . “be tt 4 156,196
—_—12.________ Add-Alter-Repair Churches
arabe tee Subie o $ 2,597, 509
—_—12_________ Amusement & Recreation Buildings ...... $ 929,993
Business Buildings
—131__ Steres=& Other-Meroantile Buildings . 6... . $ 12,922 614
21 Service Stations... 1. 1 1 eee ew eee $ 960,295
136 Residential Garages & Carports ........ $ 144,756
g Parking Garages ck kkk i ee PERS $ 1,233, 666
2 GAPARES i) aaa A: oe eae ak 4,433,593
—____3__Hotel & Motel Buildings. . .. 0.5.5 ¢ 4,450,000
il School & Educational Buildings Sate SOBA ee ¢ 20,649, 422
__§9 Add Alter-Repair Schools: .s5. i603 see a. cde a aoa $ 9,097, 138
__32 office Buildings jose to se Gd oe aa ee $ 19,698,019
—__38 Office & Warehouse . . $ —3,439, 968
—_1 utility Buildings. . 2 2... ¢ 1,144,000
ge indicia Bailie cara la se ok ee 1S ake ws $ —2,910,839
253. Swing Poole: ind. 3-9 Kode Soe BB 2278 eS
1,680 Fire Escapes Elevators & Signs ....... $ 1,435,974
3,630 __ Add-Alter-Repair, Residential. ........ $—f,049,054
—928 —s Add-Alter-Repair, Business Bldgs... .. . . . $18,165,316
—_154_____sdDemoilitions-Business Buildings. . ...... $ 174,110
1070 ________ Demolitions-Residential Buildings. . ..... $ 387,183 1,663 =
1 Erect Fire Station 194,290
1 Erect Monument 18,000
i Erect Georgia Plaza 3,327,000
I Erect Post Office 100,000
1 Erect N/C Hanger 25,000
Total Permits __8,360
FORM NO, 4-2
Total: Cosé..——_ 176,095 352 _
Total No. of Families Housed 5,034
W. R. WOFFORD
Inspector of Buildings
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 2, Document 41
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 2
Folder topic: Building department | 1967-1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/ee48c67a61bf40e974353bb2689e6b80.pdf
616012d444928ec908972a8403eea5b6
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
.,.
~
CITY OF ATLANTA
REPORT OF THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS OFFICE
F OR
T H E
~8=N::T:=H:
NO. O F P E RM ITS
0 F
Yi A a - 1969
CLASSIFICATION
COST
NO. OF FAMILIES
HOUSED
1
Condami n i um (Addition)
_ _.2..,.8=4,.___ _ _ frame Dwellings, 1 Family.
$
613,536
S,BB8,8S3
- - - - - - - M a s o n r y Dwellings, 1 Family
$
8,250
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ frame Dwellings, Duplex.
$
432,175
62
- - - - - - - M a s o n r y Dwellings, Duplex
$
_ ___.4..,Q,.._____ Apartment Houses . . . . .
$
49,222,358
4,655
--~----Churches & Religious Buildings .
$
156,196
_ _ 3~2~-- ---Add-Alter-Repair Churches . . .
$
2,597,509
_ __.1,..-2._____ Amusement & Recreation Buildings
Busines s Buildings
$
929,993
__]..,.3,..1----Se=cs:Bc::et==Mor-·anit:ile:Bui:ldizrs,a .
$
12,922,814
_ _21
_ _ _ _ _ Service Stations . . . . . . .
$
960,295
__l_J_6_ _ _ _ Residential Garages
$
144,756
___8_ _ _ _ Parking Garages .
$
1,233,666
_ _ _2_ _ _ _ Garages . . . . .
$
4,433,593
___J_ _ _ _ Hotel & Motel Buildings .
$
4, t~so, ooo
__l_l_ _ _ _ School &
$
20,649,422
Schools .
$
9,097,138
Buildings . . . . ·
$
19,698,019
__3_8_ _ _ _ Office & Warehouse .
$
3,439,968
___l_ _ _ _ Utility Buil~ings . .
$
1,144,000
$
7,910,839
$
284,225
Escapes Elevators & Signs
$
1,435,974
Add-Alte r-Repair, Res identia l . . .
$
6,049,054
__9_2_a_ _ _ _ Add-Alter-Repa ir, Busine s s Bldgs ..
$
18,165,316
__J_5_4_ _ _ _ Demolitions-Business Buildings . .
$
114! 11 a
_J~,0_7...Q,.____ _ _ De molitions-Re s ide ntial Buildings .
$
Educational Buildings .
_ _6_9_ _ _ _ Add-Alter-Repair
_ _3_2_ _ _ _ office
-
-
- - Indus tria l Buildings .
__5~5_ _ _ _ swimming
_l_,...,6_8_0_ _ _ _ fire
_J_,,...6_3_0_ _ __
1
l
1
1
1
& Carports
Pools . . .
J 663 -
387,183
194,290
18,000
3,327,000
100,000
25,000
Ere ct Fire Station
Erec t Monumen t
Er ec t Georgia Pl aza
Erect Post Office
Erect N/C Hanger
Tota l P e rmits _ _.8.._,,,..3...,6...,0...___ _
32
284
Tota l Cost
176,093,832
Tota l No. of F a milie s Housed _ _ _ __.5cc..,..,0"-'3"-4 -'---
-
W. R. WOFF ORD
F O P'-' NO . 4-2
Insp ector o f Buildings
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
CITY OF ATLANTA
REPORT OF THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS OFFICE
FOR THE wWeGsN=t+t OF __y EAR =-/§ 1960
NO. OF PERMITS CLASSIFICATION COST NO. OF FAMILIES
HOUSED
1 Condominium (Addition) 613,536 32
—284____mm_§_ Frame Dwellings, 1 Family. ......... $2 8 8AG ASS PR
= l__ Masonry Dwellings, 1 Family’... . 00.0. » + $ 8,750 ]
— Frame: Dwellings, Duplet i. i. a s6a-8 ae 4, $ 432,175 62
Masonry Dwellings, Duplex. ......4... $
aa Apartment Houses s.6 a. ce, ese ueore, ey ee 2 } 83 222,000 = i GS
pe SO hicohes & Religious Buildings. . . . . a, ag 156,196
—__39._______Add-Alter-Repair Churches... ....... $ —2,597, 509
—_12. Ss Amusement & Recreation Buildings ...... $ 929,993
Business Buildings
—13]__ Stores::8: Other-Mereantile:-Buildings. . . . . . $ 12,922,614
21 Service Stations. © aos. ls-12, 3." aR we ee a ed $ 960,295
136 Residential Garages & Carports ........ $ 144,756
8 Parking Garages. . 2 1 1s eee ew ee $ 1,233, 666
- Garages, 253 ae Bl nate a a Se SS . $ 4,433,593
a es & Motel Buildings. ......... $ 4,450 ,000
il School & Educational Buildings. .... ... g¢ 20,649,422
—__§9 A dd-Alter-Repair Schools. ic-s-ace sees. eaerca $ 9,097, 138
__ 32, __softice Buildings. 3) 3. oi 5 8 fm oS Ss eu $ 19,698,019
__38 office & Warehouse . . $3,439, 968
sd ieiity- Braildings eo aa Gs . $ —1.144,000
a Faisal Binildinge ss. 6a era Gide Saw $ —7,910,839
__55 Swimming POOLS, 4:45.07 Ge Ser eS) nee 4 $ 284.225
1,680 Fire Escapes Elevators & Signs ....... $ 1,435,974
3,630 ss Add-Alter-Repair, Residential. . . ...... $—6,049,054
—__928 ss Add-Alter-Repair, Business Bldgs... ... . $18,165,236
—154 _______Demolitions-Business Buildings. . ...... $ 174,310
1,070 sd dDemolitions-Residential Buildings. . . . ... $ 387,183 1,663 =
1 Erect Fire Station 194,290
t Erect Monument 18 ,000
1 Erect Georgia Plaza 3,327,000
1 Erect Post Office 100, 000
1 Erect N/C Hanger 25,000
Total Permits __8,360 __ Total Cost 176,093 ,832
Total No. of Families Housed 5,034
W. R. WOFFORD
Inspector of Buildings
FOPM NO, 4-2
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 2, Document 40
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 2
Folder topic: Building department | 1967-1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/03efac9632d64ee7824ac67870384084.pdf
315465557c828f1c3bf9e6a8a8c7e8cc
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
-~. . ..:..:~
...
.
'
~~
. ;. . .;-............ .. , ~-· . . . . . . . . . ,, ,. _..143.215.248.55.;.;t.~-.,. . ,. ~,.
~
~
-~~\o~·~............... ~-··--··
'1
.,
f
, l
,._
l
'•
.,.,
J
s:. -·
ff
' 'lt'i=":
c..1? J,;;' l
. . ;
\
••• ,;.. . '
. !fJk
J$¢
\•
J .....
··
-r,
,.. -..,:~
~ z143.215.248.55 , -- '
t; -
C:.;.;::.•. ! . }P'
•
Jti
, ; •.ti,
.1,c
-,-
~
.. " " . 2ih!, .
~•
t
- .ivA• >.ot·, : >t "
Cd,.~ ·
~,,,.!!
I
_ .,,.;;-=",.-'-;,'li'o'"'·a,.,y;!;'a.
. .,...,.....,...,...•,. , ,.-.:i;_..,•_~
._.
-~
'¥ '. ' :t, ·•',::·~--Cl~':.>'t,'I; .;·'·· · ,
- ..... --- J.-J- .___...._ ... ...__...t. ......\iidbtflfbek::,e
d
'l .' I
. ,, ..,., 2
clltKLt&f!rrtte:t\tNrt
·Is";,~,, ;,~JI" ,f·!¼ ~
·w· ···~· ~
i
A
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 2, Document 39
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 2
Folder topic: Building department | 1967-1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/6e518b2dced4b0000b8ea75a9a87e401.pdf
144df0dd4dc12b09c60c310f508d9963
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
CITY OF ATLANTA
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
800 CITY HALL
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
June 12, 1967
WILLI AM R. WOFFORD, P,E., R , A.
I NSPECTOR OF BUI L D INGS
ELMER H. MOON, E.E., P,E.
ASST. I NSPECTOR OF B UILDINGS
•
Mr , Dan, E. Sweat, Jr .
Director of Governmental Liaison
Mayor's Office
Atlanta, Gedrgia
RE:
561 ~ 573 West Peachtree Street
Life of Georgia Building
Dear Mr. Sweat:
An inspection of the above building made June 9, 1967,
reve~led that the following items will hav~ to be corrected
before a State Ceitificate of Occupancy can be issued.
1.
An alarm s y stem will have to be installed.
2.
An additional stand pipe must be installed ,
3.
.Additional hose cabinets must be installed w.tth this
stand pipe.
4.
Additional e xi t lights and directional signs are tieeded .
5.
The rail on the fire escape will have to be four feet in
hei,ght ,
l hope that thi s will provide y ou with ~11 the
info rma t i on which might be needed to dete rmine if the
Community Chest Agencies would desire to use t h e ;building .
Very truly y ou r~,
J!t/,~~
w.A.
Hewes
Chief Building Jnspector
WAH:rsl
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
800 CITY HALL
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
June 12, 1967
WILLIAM R. WOFFORD, P.E., R.A
INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
ELMER H. MOON, E.E., P.E.
ASST. INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
Mr, Dan, E. Sweat, Jr,
Director of Governmental Liaison
Mayor's Office >
Atlanta, Georgia
RE: 561 - 573 West Peachtree Street
Life of Georgia Building
Dear Mr, Sweat:
An inspection of the above building made June 9, 1967,
revealed that the following items will have to be corrected
before a State Certificate of Occupancy can be issued,
1, An alarm system will have to be installed.
2. An additional stand pipe must be installed,
3. Additional hose cabinets must be installed with this
stand pipe.
4, Additional exit lights and directional signs are needed.
5. The rail on the fire escape will have to be four feet in
height,
I hope that this will provide you with all the
information which might be needed to determine if the
Community Chest Agencies would desire to use the building,
Very truly yours,
Wid. ober -—
W.A. Hewes
Chief Building Inspector
WAH: rsl
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 2, Document 38
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 2
Folder topic: Building department | 1967-1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/dd63904c7338adb7014154b3023b7770.pdf
a521f36bc9624462581b57e2bac611cf
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
c~
0
LA
OFFICE O F INS PECTO R
A
OF BUILDINGS
A t lan t a 3, G e orgia
WI LLI AM R . WOFFORD, P. E. , R. A.
I NSP E CTOR OF BUILD I NGS
Marc h 9, 1967
E L MER H. MOON , E.E., P.E.
ASST. INSPECTOR OF BUI L D I NG S
MEMORANDUM TO
FROM
R. Ea r l Landers
•
/
W.R. Wo f f ~ ~
Our Housing Code Complianc e Map, t oge th e~ wi th the Policy a nd
Procedure Guide , was de livered perso nally t o HUD on Marc h 7 , 196 7 .
The map and p ol ic i e s were briefl y d i scussed wit~ Mr. Papageorge,
Mr. Taylor a n d Mr . Lackey who spoke highl y o f our program and
accomplishments in Atlanta.
I p u rpo sel y t ook a r e presentative from the Plumbi ng Division
(Mr. Mitchell ) with me t o deliver the map as I had been told that
our Plumbing Code may be questioned. During our discussion Mr .
Papageorge stated that he felt we had no problems with recertification and, in fact, made the statement that Atlanta h ad the be st
codes program in the region. Th e other ge n tlemen present agreed
but had some reservatio n s about our p lumbing code. We discussed
the matter agreeably and were furnished with a review of the code.
Mr. Mitchell and I have an appointment with the Codes staf f on
Tuesday , March 14, to discuss the code review a nd firm u p plans
for impleme ntation of our conclu sion s.
As our Housing go a l s are stepped up considerably consistent
with the expanded staff, I have adv ise d the Chief Housing Inspector
to pl ace particular emphasis on field inspections and supervision.
This may cause him to be out of the o ff i ce more than heretofore.
~
If there are any questions or matters concerning our Housing
Improvement Program o r policies, I will be ava ilable to assist you
or the members of your staff in any way possible.
/I
AT L A N TA
TH E
DOGWOO D
CI TY
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
CITY OF ATLANTA
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
Atlanta 3, Georgia
WILLIAM R, WOFFORD, P.E., R.A
INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
ELMER H. MOON, E.E., P.E,
ASST. INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
March 9, 1967
R. Earl Landers
W. R. WOFEOZE | 1 24,/
MEMORANDUM TO
FROM
Our Housing Code Compliance Map, together with the Policy and
Procedure Guide, was delivered personally to HUD on March 7, 1967.
The map and policies were briefly discussed with Mr. Papageorge,
Mr. Taylor and Mr. Lackey who spoke highly of our program and
accomplishments in Atlanta.
I purposely took a representative from the Plumbing Division
(Mr. Mitchell) with me to deliver the map as I had been told that
our Plumbing Code may be questioned. During our discussion Mr.
Papageorge stated that he felt we had no problems with recertifi-
cation and, in fact, made the statement that Atlanta had the best
codes program in the region. The other gentlemen present agreed
but had some reservations about our plumbing code. We discussed
the matter agreeably and were furnished with a review of the code.
Mr. Mitchell and I have an appointment with the Codes staff on
Tuesday, March 14, to discuss the code review and firm up plans
for implementation of our conclusions.
As our Housing goals are stepped up considerably consistent
with the expanded staff, I have advised the Chief Housing Inspector
to place particular emphasis on field inspections and supervision.
This may cause him to be out of the office more than heretofore.
If there are any questions or matters concerning our Housing
Improvement Program or policies, I will be available to assist you
or the members of your staff in any way possible.
BT
SE i
ATLANTA ‘i DOGWOOD CiTy
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 2, Document 37
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 2
Folder topic: Building department | 1967-1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/3b6d3568a226698c258c606a5b49e03b.pdf
b8fc76f8d5cbe0f69bbff330b108b78d
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
March 10, 1967
To:
Mr. Bill Wofford
~rom:
• Earl Land r
fa/
Thanks for your
randum of March 9th advisiag ua of your
conferenc with the HUD p pl • It would ppear that
usual
you h v Chings
11 und r control. If we can
st tin uy
way, let us know.
t:lp
CC:
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
1 «oS ee
ae ee
a ST
ee ee
Pe ee
— eS ee
March 10, 1967
MEMORANDUM
To: Mr. Bill Wofford
From: R. Earl Landers fe
Thanks for your memorandum of March 9th advising us of your
conference with the HUD people. It would appear that as usual
you have things well under control. If we can assist in any
way, let us know.
REL: lp
CC: Mr. Dan Sweat x
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 2, Document 36
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 2
Folder topic: Building department | 1967-1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/866b6fa8a3b76e2f7a5192c6c4576469.pdf
2399748837d7a0a332bf74d405813682
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
~
-.. ;::-,
- "
........ .
...
~
..
,
D~\/ ~: · O!1 .\ '1;~;-!T
,\DV Ai\'Ct: NOTI CE OF , t.V l S ED CODE RiQU IR EMENTS FO R A
\.JOR ABLE P ROG RAM fO COMMU NITY I 1 ' ROVEMENT
Sec t i o n 3 O1 ( a ) o f the Housing Ac t of 1 964 a me nd e d S e c tion l Ol(c ) of
th e Housi n g .-\ct of 194 9 t o r equ ir e tha t , eff e ctive S e pt e mbe r 2 , 1 96 7, " . • ..
no ,,,o r '·sbl e ~ ro g r am sh a l l b e c e r t i fi e d or r e c e r t ified u n l es s ( A) t h e l o c a lity
c:s h,, ci in e :fe c t, for a t l ea s t s i x I o n th s prior to such c e r t i fi c a t ion or
r ece~tif ication , a mini mum st a n d a r s housing cod e , r e l a t e d bu t no t l i mi t e d t o
he2.lt'1 , s ~ n ita ti on , a nd o cc up a ncy r equir eme n ts, \-hich is deem e d a d equa te by
c he S e c r e ta ry , a nd (B ) th e Sec r etary is s t i s fi e d t ha t the loc a lit y i s c a r r y ing o u t a n ef f e c t ive pro g r a m o f enfo rceme n t t o a c h i e v e comp l i a nc e wi th su c h
h ou s in g c ode ."
Th i s Gu i de line s p rov i de s ad v an c e no tic e of rev i se d r e quirements f or
loc al co d e adopti on a nd enfo r c e me nt under S e ct i on l Ol ( c) a s am e nded .
In
ad~ itio n , i t se ts forth a n int e r im set o f st a n da r d s e ff e ctive Ma rc h 2, 1967 .
T1ese in te r i 1 s t a n d a r ds a r e bei n g estab li s h ed t o p r ovide a n ord e rly a nd
equi t ab l e t r ans ition f rom t he pre s e nt co de r e u ireme nts o f t h e Work ab l e
~rogram to t hose effe ctive o n S e pt e mb e r 2 , 1 96 7 .
An y community which do es not no w mee t the r e vis ed r e quire me nts shou ld
und e r s t a nd th e mi nimum standa rd s for ap pro v a l a n d thei r effe ct ive d a t e s, un d ~ r
bo th t he int e rim standard s a n d t hos e r eq u i r e d un de r th e a me n ded S e ction lO l ( c) .
Wh i l e S e ction 3O l ( a ) of th e 19 6 4 Ac t cite s only a r e qu i r e me nt fo r th e
adoption a n d e n fo rc e me n t o f a hou si n g cod e ; b ui ld ing , p l umb i n g , e l e ct rica l a n d
f ire pre v e ntion c ode s a r e e qu a l l y pertin e nt t o t h e int e nde d pu rpos es o f t h is
S e ct i o n .
Und e r th e l ang uage o f S e cti o n l Ol ( a ) o f the Hou si n g Ac t o f 1949 , a s
amen ded , which cit e s ".. .
th e adoption, mo de rni za tion, admin i stra tion a nd
enf o r c eme nt o f hou s in g , zo n in g , bu i l d i ng a n d othe r lo c a l laws , c odes and
rogulntions, . , .. ' ' as a ma j or e l ement in the development of " .... positive
programs . . . f or p re ventin g the spread o r re cu rrenc e in th e commun ity of slums
and blighted areas , .• . e ncou r ag in g h ou si n g c o s t reduction s ... a nd t he e l imi nat io n of r es tri c tive p r a ctice s whi ch unn e c e ss a rily in c rease hou s i n g co s ts;
an d un der th e ge n e r a l a ut h orit y o f S e ction l Ol(c), th e adoption a nd en f orc eme nt ,
i n c o nc er t, of a ll fiv e b a s ic c o d e s h as h e r et o fore b ee n a part of Wo rkab l e
Pro gram po li cy .
Th e r ef ore , th e re qu iremen t s with r espet t to . the adoption and
enforceme n t o f the ho usin g co de will a p ply also to the ado pt ion a n d enforc ement
of building , plumbi n g , e l e ctri ca l, an d fi r e pre v en tion co d es .
INTERIM STANDARDS FO R CODES AND ORDINANCES EL EJ1ENT
In an ticipatio n o f th e September 2, 1967, effective date of th e amen d men t, at which time ade q uate codes must have bne n in effect for at l east 6
mon ths , an d in order to prov ide for an order
.:J equitable transition f rom
�2
t\ e p1· ~sen~ co e adoption a nd code enforcem~nt r~quirements unde r the Workab l e
re r ev ised as follows, effective
e prese nt requirements
l' rogr.::1:;, , a ?l ie
l'a-::c .1 2, _9n 7 :
pplicat ion for initial c ertifi c a F0r i~itial ccrtificRtion .
t · on of H \forkRble J?rog r am wi 11 not be accepted fo r process ing
by HUD eg iona l Off ices unless tie locality (1) has in effect,
building, plumbing, e lectric al, housiig, .'.lad fire pre v ention
co de s deemed adec uate by tie S ecr2Lnry, and ( 2 ) is enf orcing
or c o:-:11:iits itself to enforce wit 1out del y) the bui ldin g ,
plumbing, elect ric a l and fire prevention codes, and has initiated (o r commits its e lf to initiate without delay) an
iiterim housing code comp li a nce program, i .c luding the devel o~mcnt of a planne d, systematic, comprehe nsive c o1 mun ity - wide
housing c ode comp liance program.
Fr first rece r tification.
Applications for first recertific at ion
of a Wo rkab le Pro g ram will not be acc e pted for process i ng by HUD
Rebi onal Offices unless the lo c ality (1) has in effe ct building ,
p umbing , ele ctric a l, and fire prevention codes deemed a cceptable
by the Se cretary, and submits acceptable evidence tha t it has
retained s u ffi c ien t trained staff to effectively administer these
codes, and (2) has in effe c t a housin g co de deemed adequa t e by
the S e c retary , an d submits a cceptable eviderrce that it has been
conducting a n effective int erim housing code complian c e pro g r am ,
incl u ding th e development of a planned, systemati c, comp r ehensive ,
long- range housing cod e compliance prog-::am.
For second and subsequent recertifications.
No change in applicable present requirements.
REQUIREME~'TS TO BECO½E EFFECTIVE SEPT&\.fBER 2, 1967
For initial certification . Applications for initial certification
will not be accepted for processing by HUD Regional Offices unl ess
the locality (1) has had in effect for at least 6 months (or will
have had by the expected c ertification date) building, plumbing,
ele ctrical, ho using, a nd fire prevention codes deemed adequate by
the Secretary, (2) submits acceptable evidence that it has initiated an interim housing code compli ance progrp.m;- an .(3) submits
acceptable evidence that it has established an appr6priate administrative organization, which c an effectively carry out code enforce ment activities .
For first recertification .
Applications for first recertification
will not be accepted for processing by HUD Regional Offic1s unless
the locality (1) has had in effect, for at least six months (or
If
�3
h"i ll h ..w e h ad by the exJ e ct ed r ec 2 rtificc,t ion date ) bui ld ing,
p iu1nbi ng, electric,:11 , housi ng, nn: i:ire pn, v c ntio n codes d eemed
a de quate by t h e S ec r eta ry, ( 2 ) submits wi t
it s app licat ion
a cc ep t ab l e e vid c n e that it h:is i n c xist f,nce a n effe cti ve p r o i::; ra m for e nforceme nt of it s buildin1_; , plumbin g , ele c trical , and
fi r e p r eve ntion codes , includi ng an ndequnt e budge t, s uf fici e nt
t r aine st · ff, a nd an a pp ropriate syste, of forms , records , a d
eporting so as to make t he pro g ram operati v e , (3) s u b mits wi th
its ppli c a tion ac c eptabl e eviden c e t a t it h as been conducti n g
a succe ssful interi m hou sing cod e comp li a nce prog ram, i n cl uding
the es t a blishmen t of an appropri a t e system of forms , r e cords ,
and r ep orting a nd the employme nt of an adequate sta ff for in spections , record - keeping, a nd compliance a ctions to make the
p r o g r am o pe r ative , a n d (4) has prepa red , adopte d, a nd sub itte d
a pl anne d, sys temat ic, area- by - a r ea , commun ity-wide , c omprehensive, long - r nge housin g co de comp lian c e prog r a m de signed to
se cure compliance with th e provi si on s o f the adop t e d housin g
code within a r eason a ble numbe r of years and to ma int ai n al l
r esident ial properties u p t o t e mi nimu m housi n g standards
es t abl ish e d in the c ommun i t y , to ge ther with an est imated budget
to c a rry out the program as planned and s chedule d .
Subs eq uent r e c ert ifica tion s will depend largely on (1) the a ctio n s
taken by the communi ty to keep its co des u p to date , ( 2 ) th e mc.in tena nce of an effe ctive en f orce,ent organiza tion and pro g ram for
adminis tration of a ll co des, and (3 ) the suc c es s of the community
in making r easona ble progress in meeting the schedules established
in its long-range housing c ode compli anc~ pro gram .
( Not e :
Revisions a nd a djustmen t s may be ~ade in the lon g -range hou sing
cod e compliance pro g r a m as circumstan c es may r equ ire, so long as
they do not limit e n f orcement or extend the comp li a nc e s c h e d ul es
a nd staff ing commi tme nts.
Such adj u s t ments shou ld be based up on
an a nnual eva l uation of p rogress as rel ated t o t he estab lishe d
l ong -range g oals, t aki n g into a ccount all proposals affec ti n g
local housing conditions a nd the availability o f standard hou s ing
in the communi t y .)
The materia l unde r t h e f ol lowing h eadings f u rth e r d ef ines and exp lains
the cr ite ria for acceptable adoption and e nforc emen t of codes under the Wo r kab le
Prog r am :
.,.
HOUSING CODE--CRITERIA FOR ADOPTION
To be d eemed adequate by th P Secretary, a h ousi ng code must (1) be the
latest published edition of on e of th e nationally reco g nized ~ode l housing
codes or (2) be a State or locally d eveloped housin g code which cont ains t e chnical
�4
i.1d :1J::1i : istr:,tiv ._, provisions t h a t a r c n':1soi 1,bly cornp:Jr:11l e to thos e in th e
'!..1tc;st '..)Gr.> lisi1e,i cditior s of th e mo de l cod es , .'1nd (3 ) co t . in the fol lowin g
~)rovisions , whet he r or not th ese arc provid , cl for in tlw mode l code ad opt e d
er u sed :Js a 6 uide :
(~)
Be fully appl icabl e , from th e da t e of its adoption , to all
1ous · ng in the commun it y , r egar l ess o wh e r or und e r ~~at
co de su ch ho usin g was ori g inally con s tructed .
(b)
Re t:ire a fully equi pp ed ba th a,d toi l e t facil ity for e ve r y
dwe 11 ing unit.
Cc)
P r ovide for an adequate means of eg r es s .
(d)
Provide f or a n effective adminis trati ve and appea ls
procedure .
OTHiR COD i S-- CRITER IA FOR ADOPTION
A~option of the lates t pub li shed ed ition of the nationa lly r ecogn iz e d
~odel buildin£ , p lumbing , elect ric a l, and fire prevention co des , without
~evision or mo di f ication excep t for minor adm inistrat ive adj ustments, will be
deemed adeq ua te by the Secre tar y .
Adoption of a Sta t e or locall y developed build in g, plumbing , elec t ri cal, or fire - preve ntion code whi ch cont a in s t e chnica l a nd adm inistrative
provisions r ea sonably comparab l e to thos e containe d in the l a tes t publish ed
ed itio ns of the nationa lly r e cognized mo del codes may a lso, upon r eview and
ana lysis, be de eme d adequate by t he Secre t a r y , ex c e pt that no such code will
be deeme d acceptab le wh ich cont a ins deviations, or r e visions wh ich are
unr eas on ab l y incompat ible with th e s t andards establ ishe d by the model co de s,
o r w;-,ic'1 conta in s de viations or r es tric tiv e practic es so numerous or of such
magnitude as to materia l l y and unre as ona bly incr ease the cost o f constructi on
or r ehab ilit u tion . The provisions of thes e codes shall a l so become effe cti ve
from the dnt@ g f 4p9pti n,
INTERI M HOUSING CODE COMPLIANCE ~ROGRAM
The details of a n ac c e ptable i nt erim housing co de comp li ance program ,
a s referred to above , a re set forth in Guidel ines G- 9, "Hol\_Sing Co de Complian c e
During the First Year Following Adopti on of the Housing Code, 11 ·
A PLA~:NED AND SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM OF HOUSING CODE COMl'LIANCE
The details of a planned and systematic p ro gram of housing co de co~piiance, as referred to above , are s et forth in P-c-ogram Guide No. 1, "Answers
on Codes and Ordinances 11 , and Guidelines G-8, "S ystematic Hous ing Code Co:np·liance. 11
�s
l:OD i7 C:, "FO'.' C U-;t::i\T IN ~ELAT ION TO l:'LAt N •:o Frnt:RAL - /1.lD PROGl{AMS
Iri e stc·,blishi n g its long- r angr· compliance pro g ram , each c ommunity
s wuld si ve considcr.:it i on t o i ts l ong- r:11 gc plons for uti l izing t he Fed (:ral
h0u~ing ~nd urba n r ene wa l aids in t h e nff,ctcd a r eas . Howeve r , th e se a i ds
~re to be us ~ in comb in at ion wi th , r at h e r t ha n AS s u bs titu t es for , an
~ff~ct ive loc , 1 e nf o r c cme t p ro gram . The use of th e ~Je ra l a id s ay r e ~ :ir~ 1n i nt e n s ifica tion of th e loca l enfor -~munt program i n order t o
assur e a suff i cient s upply of s t andard repl acement ho using fo r pe r sons
te .. por..i rily disp l c ed f r o. pro je c t areas . -tis i, ~.()ort a nt t1at the local
en ~orc eme n t p r ogram i n cl ud e survei l lanc e over areas sch~d ul ed f or future
urb~n r e newal tre t nen t in o rde r t o corre ct condi ti o s tha t a r e hazardous
or inju rious to health and welfa r e and to pre ve n t furthe r de t e riorat i on
?enciing t. e a ctua l st a rt o f p roj e c t cxe cut i o, .
WORL\BL.C: PRO G A:-Vl t.LEMENTS RELAT ED TO COD E ENFORCEMENT
Al thou gh spe c if i c r eq ui r eme n ts a re not being chang ed a t th i s time
for othe r elements of a Wor kab l e P r ogram, l oc a lities (p a rt ic u l a r ly t hose i n
t he ea . ly stages of cod e e nforc eme nt pro g r ams) s hould bea r i n min d t hat the
effective ness of any loc a l hou s i ng code e nforc eme nt prog ram will r equire
solid comm unity sup port ; coord in ated social , fa il y , a nd we l fare servic es
to f mil ies in need o f such se rvic es, and a well - orga niz e d re location service ,
· n cludin g a p r og r am f or see ing t hat adequate relocati on hous in g i s availabl~ .
Therefore , in o rde r to mee t t he n ew code requirem e nts , a commun i ty ,.ay h a v e
to ste p up i ts ti min g o f oth e r a ct i viti es unde r th~ Wo r ka b l e P r o g r am .
DOCUME/\TATIO N
The above eleme n ts o f an effective pro g r am of c odes adopt i on and
enfo rc eme nt should be c a r eful l y a n d f u lly doc ume nted i n appropriate sect i on s
of the ap plica tio n for Wor ka bl e Pro gram cer t ific a t i on or r e c e rt if ic ation
(HUD Form H- 1081 , H- 1082 , H- 108 3, or H- 1084 a s app ro p ri ate ) a n d in t he ne c es sary exhi bi ts to a ccomp a ny the Fo rm.
,..
G-11, 11 / 66
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
ENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT WASHINGTON, D.C, 20410
ADVANCE NOTICE OF ReVISED CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR A
NORKABLE PROGRAM FOR COMMUNITY [IMPROVEMENT
Section 301(a) of the Housing Act of 1964 amended Section 101(c) of
the Housing Act of 1949 to require that, effective September 2, 1967, "....
no workable program shall be certified or recertified unless (A) the locality
hes had in ed for at least six months prior to such certification or
ertifi ation, a minimum standards housing code, related but not limited to
ith, sanitation, and occupancy requirements, thich is deemed adequate by
the Secretary, and (B) the Secretary is satisfied that the locality is carry-
ing out an effective program of enforcement to achieve compliance with such
housing code,"
This Guidelines providesadvance notice of revised requirements for
local code adoption and enforcement under Section 101(c) as amended. In
addition, it sets forth an interim set of standards effective March 2, 1967.
These interim standards are being established to provide an orderly and
equitable transition from the present code requirements of the Workable
Frogram to those effective on September 2, 1967,
Any community which does not now meet the revised requirements should
understand the minimum standards for approval and their effective dates, under
both the interim standards and those required under the amended Section 101(c),
While Section 30l(a) of the 1964 Act cites only a requirement for the
adoption and enforcement of a housing code; building, plumbing, electrical and
fire prevention codes are equally pertinent to the intended purposes of this
Section, Under the language of Section 101(a) of the Housing Act of 1949, as
amended, which cites ",,.. the adoption, modernization, administration and
enforcement of housing, zoning, building and other local laws, codes and
regulations,...." as a major element in the development of "....positive
programs ,.. for preventing the spread or recurrence in the community of slums
and blighted areas, ... encouraging housing cost reductions ... and the elimi-
nation of restrictive practices which unnecessarily increase housing costs";
and under the general authority of Section 101l(c), the adoption and enforcement,
in concert, of all five ‘basic codes has heretofore been a part of Workable
Program policy. Therefore, the requirements with respect to_the adoption and
enforcement of the housing code will apply also to the adoption and enforcement
of building, plumbing, electrical, and fire prevention codes. ;
INTERIM STANDARDS FOR CODES AND ORDINANCES ELEMENT .®
In anticipation of the September 2, 1967, effective date of the amend-
ment, at which time adequate codes must have been in effect for at least 6
months, and in order to provide for an order nd equitable transition from
the present code adoption and code enforcement requirements under the Workable
Yrogram, applicable present requirements are revised as follows, effective
March. 2, 1967:
For initial certification. Application for initial certifica-
tion of a Workable Program will not be accepted for processing
by HUD Regional Offices unless the locality (1) has in effect,
building, plumbing, electrical, housing, and fire prevention
codes deemed adequate by the Secretary, and (2) is enforcing
(or commits itself to enforce without delay) the building,
plumbing, electrical and fire prevention codes, and has in-
itiated (or commits itself to initiate without delay) an
interim housing code compliance program, including the devel-
opment of a planned, systematic, comprehensive community-wide
housing code compliance program,
For first recertification. Applications for first recertification
ot a Workable Program will not be accepted for processing by HUD
Regional Offices unless the locality (1) has in effect building,
plumbing, electrical, and fire prevention codes deemed acceptable
by the Secretary, and submits acceptable evidence that it has
retained sufficient trained staff to effectively administer these
codes, and (2) has in effect a housing code deemed adequate by
the Secretary, and submits acceptable evidence that it has been
conducting an effective interim housing code compliance program,
including the development of a planned, systematic, comprehensive,
long-range housing code compliance program,
For second and subsequent recertifications,
No change in applicable present requirements,
REQUIREMENTS TO BECOME EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 2, 1967
For initial certification. Applications for initial certification
will not be accepted for processing by HUD Regional Offices unless
the locality (1) has had in effect for at least 6 months (or will
have had by the expected certification date} building, plumbing,
electrical, housing, and fire prevention codes deemed adequate by
the Secretary, (2) submits acceptable evidence that it has init-
iated an interim housing code compliance program}; and (3) submits
acceptable evidence that it has established an appropriate adminis-
trative organization, which can effectively carry out code enforce-
ment activities.
For first recertification. Applications for_first recertification
will not be accepted for processing by HUD Regional Officgs unless
the locality (1) has had in effect, for at least six months (or
will have had by the expected recertification date) building,
plumbing, electrical, housing, and fire prevention codes deemed
adequate by the Secretary, (2) submits with its application
acceptable evidence that it has in existence an effective pro-
gram for enforcement of its building, plumbing, electrical, and
fire prevention codes, including an adequate budget, sufficient
trained staff, and an appropriate system of forms, records, and
reporting so as to make the program operative, (3) submits with
its application acceptable evidence that it has been conducting
a successful interim housing code compliance program, including
the establishment of an appropriate system of forms, records,
and reporting and the employment of an adequate staff for in-
spections, record-keeping, and compliance actions to make the
program operative, and (4) has prepared, adopted, and submitted
a planned, systematic, area-by-area, community-wide, compre-
hensive, long-range housing code compliance program designed to
secure compliance with the provisions of the adopted housing
code within a reasonable number of years and to maintain all
residential properties up to the minimum housing standards
established in the community, together with an estimated budget
to carry out the program as planned and scheduled.
Subsequent recertifications will depend largely on (1) the actions
taken by the community to keep its codes up to date, (2) the main-
tenance of an effective enforcement organization and program for
administration of all codes, and (3) the success of the community
in making reasonable progress in meeting the schedules established
in its long-range housing code compliance program. (Note:
Revisions and adjustments may be made in the long-range housing
code compliance program as circumstances may require, so long as
they do not limit enforcement or extend the compliance schedules
and staffing commitments. Such adjustments should be based upon
an annual evaluation of progress as related to the established
long-range goals, taking into account all proposals affecting
local housing conditions and the availability of standard housing
in the community.)
The material under the following headings further defines and explains
the criteria for acceptable adoption and enforcement of codes under the Workable
Program:
HOUSING CODE~-CRITERIA FOR ADOPTION :
To be deemed adequate by the Secretary, a housing code must (1) be the
latest published edition of one of the nationally recognized fliodel housing
codes or (2) be a State or locally developed housing code which contains technical
and administrative provisions that are reasonably comparable to those in the
latest published editions of the model codes, and (3) contain the following
provisions, whether or not these are provided for in the model code adopted
or used as a guide:
(2) Be fully applicable, from the date of its adoption, to all
y 8p} > i >
housing in the community, regardless of when or under what
code such housing was originally constructed,
(b) Require a fully equipped bath and toilet facility for every
dwelling unit.
(c) Provide for an adequate means of egress,
(d) Provide for an effective administrative and appeals
procedure.
OTHER CODES--CRITERIA FOR ADOPTION
Adoption of the latest published edition of the nationally recognized
model buiiding, plumbing, electrical, and fire prevention codes, without
revision or modification except for minor administrative adjustments, will be
deemed adequate by the Secretary.
Adoption of a State or locally developed building, plumbing, elec-
trical, or fire-prevention code which contains technical and administrative
provisions reasonably comparable to those contained in the latest published
editions of the nationally recognized model ‘codes may also, upon review and
analysis, be deemed adequate by the Secretary, except that no such code will
be deemed acceptable which contains deviations, or revisions which are
unreasonably incompatible with the standards established by the model codes,
or which contains deviations or restrictive practices so numerous or of such
magnitude as to materially and unreasonably increase the cost of construction
or rehabilitation. The provisions of these codes shall also become effective
from the date of adoption,
INTERIM HOUSING CODE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM
The details of an acceptable interim housing code compliance progran,
as referred to above, are set forth in Guidelines G-9, "Housing Code Compliance
During the First Year Following Adoption of the Housing Code." ~
A PLANNED AND SYSTEMATIC PROGRAM OF HOUSING CODE COMPLIANCE *
The details of a planned and systematic program of housing code com-
pliance, as referred to above, are set forth in Program Guide No. 1, "Answers
on Codes and Ordinances", and Guidelines G-8, "Systematic Housing Code Compliance,"
CODE ENFORCEMENT IN RELATION TO PLANNED FEDERAL-ALD PROGRAMS
In establishing its long-range compliance program, each community
should give consideration to its long-range plans for utilizing the Federal
housing and urban renewal aids in the affected areas, However, these aids
to be used in combination with, rather than as substitutes for, an
local enforcement program, The use of the Federal aids may re-
re an intensification of the local enforcement program in order to
assure a sufficient supply of standard replacement housing for persons °
temporarily displaced from project areas. It is important that the local
enforcement program include surveillance over areas scheduled for future
urban renewal treatment in order to correct conditions that are hazardous
or injurious to health and welfare and to prevent further deterioration
L i]
pending the actual start of project execution.
WORKABLE PROGRAM ELEMENTS RELATED TO CODE ENFORCEMENT
Although specific requirements are not being changed at this time
or other elements of a Workable Program, localities (particularly those in
early stages of code enforcement programs) should bear in mind that the
effectiveness of any local housing code enforcement program will require .
olid community support; coordinated social, family, and welfare services
to families in need of such services, and a well-organized relocation service,
including a program for seeing that adequate relocation housing is available,
Therefore, in order to meet the new code requirements, a community may have
to step up its timing of other activities under the Workable Program.
e
i
+ WH © et rh
DOCUMENTATION
The above elements of an effective program of codes adoption and
enforcement should be carefully and fully documented in appropriate sections
oi the application for Workable Program certification or recertification
(HUD Form H-1081, H-1082, H-1083, or H-1084 as appropriate) and in the neces-
sary exhibits to accompany the Form,
tt # #
G-11, 11/66
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 2, Document 35
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 2
Folder topic: Building department | 1967-1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/fcf6628f85abb51f9c5a38c24d4b9626.pdf
b556dc785f6f72f7ebcbdfe2b4478047
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
DEPARTM ENT OF HOUSI NG AND URBAN DEVELOPMEN T
ru.cHTREE-SEVrNTII DUI LDI NO. ATLA NTA, G[OR(; l,0.
30) 1.J
Room 611.5
0 f :f'i_ce o:f the :Re~ional
J
February 21 , 196r(
dminis tr 3.t or
REGI ON Ill
In re ply refe~ t o:
Code 3 ADW
Ho.::1orable I vo...11 Allen, J 1· .
-:::~-or o .i' the City o f Atlant a
Ci_ t :t · i .:-. 11
, t lant~ , Georgia - 30303
De x c ;.1:.:yor _· llen :
Enclosed herewith 2.s an 11Advance Notice of Rev _s .d Code Requirements
for a Workabie Progrem for Community Im;)rovc,.1ent . u Because thes e new
standards considerabl y tighten the requ irements £or c odes and code
enforcement we wanted you t o have a c opy a,::, eaid.y as possib le . Please
note t hat the effec tive date of then w pr ovisions
the l aw is
September 2, 1967, but that the enclos ed public6tion al so contains
interim standards for t he six-month period N.arch 2, 195 7, to
September 2, 1967.
or
We urge you and your staff to c arefully study the re v ised standards
and take any nec essary a c tions immediately .
These revisions relate to only one of t h e s~ven ele~ents of the Workable
Program . Continuing progress must be a chieved in all elements before
recertification c an be granted.
Please let us know if you have any question3 conce ..·ning the revised
standards for c odes adoption and enforceme nt or on any of the other
phases of your Workable Program for Communit y Impr ovement . This office
stands ready to be of assistance L~ t his regard .
S incerely yo/rs,
£v1
~
rtv·t·t-1/
1 .l-10<~~
Edward H. Raxter/ ·
Regio
Enclosure
1 Adm_inistrator
•
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
PEACHTREE-SEVENTH GUILDING, ATLANTA, GCORGIA 30373
Room 6/15
Office of the Regional Administrator February 21, 1967
REGION Lil
In reply refer to:
Code 3 ADW
Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr
Mayor of the City of At
wo TOLL
Atlante, Geo orgia = 30303
i *
lanta
Dear Mayor Allen:
Enclosed herewith is an “Advance Notice of Revised Code Requirements
for a Workable Program for Community Improvement." Because these new
standards considerably tighten the requirements for codes and code
enforcement we wanted you to have a copy as early as possible, Please
note that the effective date of the new proyisions of the law is
September 2, 1967, but that the enclosed publication also contains
interim standards for the six-month period March 2, 1957, to
September 2, 1967.
We urge you and your staff to carefully study the revised standards
and take any necessary actions immediately.
These revisions relate to only one of the seven elements of the Workable
Program. Continuing progress must be achieved in ail elements before
recertification can be granted,
Please let us know if you have any questions concerning the revised
standards for codes adoption and enforcement or on any of the other
phases of your Workable Program for Community Improvement. This office
Stands ready to be of assistance in this regard.
incerely yours »
Enclosure
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 2, Document 34
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 2
Folder topic: Building department | 1967-1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/30f376524a4cd960bef6b076fb667d58.pdf
47571a066ad918697c224aae9afca01e
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
~- ,-· -,,... .
•
-
I
t,i_., '
- -
_,.. \, '
....
~
- . --· -· - ....J.L .
'
..
! -· ../. ~. -
February 24 , 1967
C ITY I-IALL
ATLANTA, GA. 30303
Tel. 522-446 3 Ar ea Code ~04
IVAN ALLE N, J R., MAYOR
R. EAR L LA NDER S, Admin is tr at ive Assi stan t
MRS. ANN M. MOS ES, Ex ec ut ive Secretary
DAN E. SWEAT, JR. , Direc tor of Governm ent al Li aison
Mr. E d ward H. Baxter
R e g ional A d ministrator
D epa r h n e nt of Housing and
Urban Development
R eg ion III
P ea chtr e e -Seventh Building
Room 6 4 5
Atlanta, Georgia 30323
Dear M r. Bax t e r:
W e hav e r e c e iv e d your. l e tt e r of F eb rua r y 21 e nclosing the
"Ad v a nce Notice of R e vis e d Code R e quireme nts for a
W o rkabl e Program for Community Improvement. 11
W e ar e takin g the ste ps nec e ssary t o complete action on
th e revised requirements.
Sinc ere ly yours,
I van All e n, Jr .....
Mayor
IAJ r :f y
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303
Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404
February 24, 1967
IVAN ALLEN, JR., MAYOR
R. EARL LANDERS, Administrative Assistant
MRS, ANN M. MOSES, Executive Secretary
DAN E. SWEAT, JR., Director of Governmental Liaison
Mr. Edward H. Baxter
Regional Administrator
Department of Housing and
Urban Development
Region III
Peachtree-Seventh Building
Room 645
Atlanta, Georgia 30323
Dear Mr. Baxter:
We have received your. letter of February 21 enclosing the
"Advance Notice of Revised Code Requirements for a
Workable Program for Community Improvement, "'
We are taking the steps necessary to complete action on
the revised requirements.
Sincerely yours,
Ivan Allen, Jr.
Mayor :
lAJr:fy
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 2, Document 33
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 2
Folder topic: Building department | 1967-1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/665cf73406caab4dac8a84018d48ae93.pdf
154846ca3fb8a2efdc310726ece2b5fe
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
CITY of ATLANTA
CITY HALL
ATLANTA, GA. 30303
Tel. 522-4163 Area Code 404
IVAN ALLEN, JR., MAYOR
R. EARL LANDERS, Administrative Assistant
MRS. ANN M . MOSES, Executive Secretary
DAN E. SWEAT, JR., Director of Governmental Liaison
February 24 , 1967
MEMORANDUM
To: Mr . Bill Wofford
From: Dan Sweat
Attached is a letter to Mayor Allen with a copy of the
"Advance Notice of Revised Code Requirements for a
Workable Program for Community Improvement."
It is my understanding that you have taken the initial
steps to meet the revised standards . You will notice that
the guidelines contain interim standards for a six months
period beginning March 2, 1967, so it will be necessary
for us to take some action immediately if we have not
already done so.
If there is anything this office can do to help you
expedite this action, please feel free to call upon us.
DS: fy
cc: Mr. Collier Gladin
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303
February 24, 1967 Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404
IVAN ALLEN, JR., MAYOR
R. EARL LANDERS, Administrative Assistant
MRS. ANN MM, MOSES, Executive Secretary
DAN E. SWEAT, JR., Director of Governmental Liaison
MEMORANDUM
To: Mr. Bill Wofford
From: Dan Sweat
Attached is a letter to Mayor Allen with a copy of the
"Advance Notice of Revised Code Requirements for a
Workable Program for Community Improvement,"
It is my understanding that you have taken the initial
steps to meet the revised standards. You will notice that
the guidelines contain interim standards for a six months
period beginning March 2, 1967, so it will be necessary
for us to take some action immediately if we have not
already done so.
If there is anything this office can do to help you
expedite this action, please feel free to call upon us.
DS :fy
ec: Mr. Collier Gladin
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 2, Document 32
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 2
Folder topic: Building department | 1967-1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/a703001e2235c43fea8d13e1283fd2bc.pdf
77ed38285ce20f11c15ed247b1e2185e
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
ATLANTA, GE:ORGIA
ROUTE SLIP
TO:
_.._O\cw._,_____.,,..~(ll....._.- - - ' " " - ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - -
\
M:
Dan E. Sweat,
Jr.
For your information
0
Please refer to the attached correspondence and -make the
necessary reply.
D
Advise me the status of the attached.
FORM 25·4-S
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
Office of the Mayor
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
ROUTE SLIP
FROM: Dan E. Sweat, Jr.
(7 For your information
{_] Please refer to the attached correspondence and make the
necessary reply.
[| Advise me the status of the attached.
Tb Liu. bridcl
Mahl.
LP
FORM 25-4-S
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 1, Folder 2, Document 31
Box 1
Box 1 Folder 2
Folder topic: Building department | 1967-1969