1
20
25
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/5ffaa33ee7a851c07b8f0ab5536fd577.pdf
0fc6f7021dc8bc4709bd170cc096b66e
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
·'" .]_4l.A_
Fjy.~~
r' -
.. ',..
THE ATLANT A CONSTITUTION, Tues., July 29, 1969
16,(;~'W"'~9:R·" ' ",~---~·w---:.r-TT"-"'··w~-:n~ "-'"?"t-··~-.,,~·.. ·.--· .........
'-·---~r'?'"'.·~- ~ ":'~.., . ~,
..· ·
.
.
'1
.1
~
1
~
.
,i
I
~
I
tc_:
Q~"\.\u
s.
I.
I
. ,,l'\j
i
.I
\
i
\
\
YOUNGSTERS ENGAGE 1N RELAY AT GRADY STADIUM:
Foot Race Is Depicted In 'Swinging Summer'
I
· -- - - - A § JI
11 1P)
2 PUD1ic
II
§~<e
JU,- - - -- .
{ _f "°
0
r ~II a]_Jr§
•P.rogram§ Tofillight
..
By PAUL JONES
. Two TV specials which have something pertinent to say
about t axes and r ecreation. will be .presented Tuesday by Channel 5.
·.. The first, "Swinging Summer ," a filmed story of what's
going on in the Atlanta Parks
· · Phyllis and cameraman Dan
.Keever and producer Michael
Fields spent several weeks
pu tting together the special
which depicts such areas. as a
basketball clinic conducted
!,,
,.i,~,,;.
9.30 p.m.
by stars of the Atlanta Hawks ,
golf lessons, track meets,
1::;f /::'":
ly
~: :
drama classes, guitar lessons,
r.::c:c:: 1.· .·.:¥.~r'/.·'.i.;'/·"'j·•· the. Channel 5
arts a nd crafts, bus trips into
·.-~(;?rt ,t;."-; • news departthe country, visits to Channel
\'<,
ment will of5, the Coca-Cola Co. , and othf ··.: !r:_ ,:Ji. ·, ~ fer a discus~r indus tries to say nothing
l'-'~i:L~'-' '"° sion program
Pa'.J ! Jor.cg
i n V O} V i n g
of the various activities on
playgrounds and in pools in
Clark Harrison, chairman of
_the Atlanta area.
the DeKalb Coun ty Commission , and Homer Cronin , chair• The "Swinging Summer"
will a fford Atlanta area viewm an of the Republican party
.ers a better picture of what is
in DeKalb County. They will
going on in and around the
discuss taxes.
.city. Thousands will see activ"Swinging Summer" is a
ity they never dreamed took
happy program. We can't say
place here.
the same for the di scussion
. In the fin ale the program
progra m at 10 p.m .
will offer a montage of the
,· P hyllis Muller, who wrote
many-sided progra m, high"Swinging Snmmer," said she
lighted by a "block party" in
was surprised to fi nd the great
which under privileged yol!ngvariety of activity that exists
sters are fed from mob ile
in the Atlanta Pa rks and Reciunch rooms.
reation Departmen t summ er
. ,I:
ll:
'"
program Rnd she said viewers
will be agreeably surprised
too. ·
t.tf.ii i;~~P\
!lt$f;'~tij I~~rl143.215.248.55f
/
F::
0
..
/
·?,(
~-
--=.-; ,.,,.
{
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
“TO: O fens Bus ERT
TReIc Devio S.
mm
" 14.A. THE ATLANTA CONSTITUTION, Tues, July 29, 1969 |
*
SAR pyimece pine mage rer ter eeunerinntine germane rants
YOUNGSTERS ENGAGE IN RELAY AT GRADY STADIUM
Foot Race Is Depicted In ‘Swinging Summer’
As Il See It
2 Public Affair
Prog rams Tonight
mre weennne trie raata'y Nee WMA 2 at
By PAUL JONES
= Two TV specials which have something pertinent to say
about taxes and recreation will be. presented Tuesday by Chan-
nel 5.
~ The first, “Swinging Sum-
mer,” a filmed story of what’s
gene on in the Atlanta Parks
. .. depariment’s
: 9:30 p.m.
i
ve 4 news depart-
E ment will of-
Eee 1 fer a discus-
Powis aA wd sion program
involving
Clark wares chairman of
the DeKalb County Commis-
sion, and Homer Cronin, chair-
man of the Republican party
in DeKalb County. They will
discuss taxes.
“Swinging Summer” is a
happy program. We can’t say
the same for the discussion
program at 10 p.m.
~ Phyllis Muller, who wrote
“Swinging Summer,” said she
was surprised to find the great
variety of activity that exists
in the Atlanta Parks and Ree-
reation Depariment summer
program and she said viewers
will be agreeably surprised
too.
* Phyllis and cameraman Dan
Keever and producer Michacl
Fieids spent several weeks
putting together the special
which depicts such areas.as a
basketball clinic conducted
by stars of the Atlanta Hawks,
golf lessons, track meets,
drama classes, guitar lessons,
arts and crafts, bus trips into
the country, visits to Channel
5, the Coca-Cola Co., and oth-
er industries to say nothing
of the various activities on
playgrounds and in pools in
the Atlanta area.
- The “Swinging Summer”
will afford Atlanta area view-
ers a better picture of what is
going on in and around the
city. Thousands will see activ-
ity they never dreamed took
place here,
. In the finale the program
will offer a montage of the
many-sided program, high-
lighted by a “block party” in
which underprivileged young-
sters are fed from mobile
lunch rooms.
aK * *
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 2, Folder 4, Document 24
Box 2
Box 2 Folder 4
Folder topic: Planning department | 1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/10724a4f2b0bf7b6326d5d91944eff43.pdf
ba4a992f477e7d449d822aba892c13d3
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
...
4
URB AN
RE N EWAL
MONTHLY STATUS
PROGRAM
REPORT
February 28, 1970
.ATLANT.A HOUSING
AUTHORITY
�-I
. -J.Ull2lu'J RENEWAL STJ1.'l'US REPORT
I
ATLlJITA EOUsnm AUT!-IOR.TIY
~
I
~
ACQUISITION
I
Parc els to
bz Acquired
PROJECT
I
Acquired to
Date
!
Total to b e
Yet to be · Relocated
Acquired
. Fami ly & Ind.
-
,.
'i'CY.!-..L
B:Jtl er Street
R-·9
l'
RELOCATION
Bus .
Rel ocated
To Date
Fa mily & Ind •
DP.·10LITION
Remaining to b e
~tructures
Relocated
to be
b'am1J.y & ma. ~us . e molished
Bus .
Demolis hed
To Date
5507
52o6
301
6668
657
6205
573
463
84
4857
4409
600
600
0
1261
103
1261
1 OJ
0
0
594
594
11 14
77
111 4
76
0
1
811
799
1253
79
1253
0
0
987
987
421
18
421
0
0
Yet to :JG
Demolis :ic
448
I
'
R:v...;:=:on- Wa.s!:1.i n 6 ton
R-10
. 820
81 4
Univa~sity Center
R-11
866
866
0
~
R·'.Jckdale
R- 21
941
879
62
~
6
~
79
18
R---22
463
6
457
315
19
315
19
0
0
305
305
.
-
Goo:rgi a State
R- 59
29
29
GE-oq;ia Tech
R- 85
335
335
v!cst E0.d
4
l
4. - 2- -1 lI
Gi~orgi a Tech II
A-2-2
lbdel Ci ties
A-2 -J
-
0
66.
4 30.-
l-1-1 4
16.
32
7
25
398
278
120
-+---
I
48
20
48
o·
0
261
58
261
58
0
0
359
359
480
104
465
87
15
17
476
365
1094
103
896
77
198
26
539
462
77
18
37
12
3
6
34
21
0
21
·1 1
187
5
244
6
278
51
227
52
52
111
'
I
I
i-i ·- 431
I
I
..
20
0
527·
593
I
-
!
!
R-90
Be::::.:crd- Pine
I
435
435
I
'Ih0T.asv ille
12
'
�Ul1JJAN II.ENE\ AL STATUS IlliPO.RT
Pai:;e 2
.
I
i
TITSFOST'T'T O~if
Prcject
. l
] Acres \:o
be Sold
I
'T Ol' /~
E·.1.lter Street
!i,.:3.1,:son- 1rlash
R- 9
R-10
Acres Sol d
to Dat e
Under
Contract
1127 ~o
62402
87.6
81o6
126 .. 0
105 .. 1
15 , h
1 Ol.i., J
93, 8
1
To t al t o be
Rehabi litated
Not Undsr
Contract
175 .. 8
REHABILITATION
I TEM- IlLPROVEI'-IBNT S
Complete
to date
'
I
Yet t o be
Rehab.
Budge t
.Amount
2221
3,558, 966
5782
2967
786
182
4°5
NA
NA
1..it~
80?
1804
1744
60
32700
I
NA
~ o d:c:.2..le
R- 21
242 .. 6
56. 3
·183 .5
2 .. 8
NA
NA
NA
m·
R- 22
2o/5 o;)
1BJ.5
69.6
12 o4
92
87
5
G2o r gi2.S t.a te
Ke st- End
662,000
1.762.9~h
653,1 80
1 .406 1864
I
R-59
807
8. 7
R-85
45. 0
39.4
,..
.
1..:c orgia.-
Te ch
-J
2, 786,798
4
R-11
• .., . ...
Completed
'
D>.ivers ity
Cs nter
.;,_ ~ C:-"'. C..S TI..!..J..e
I
R- 90
.
5.o
.6
98. 4
20.6
33.6
154.9
_34o2
22o 5
I
44. 2
NA
NA
NA
NA
I
~
653, 914
553, 773
.
2338
' 698
1640
168, 598
192
58
134
14, 000
168, 598
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
3c:d.ford-
Pine
A-2-1
98o2
42, 000
GeJ ~6 i a Tee~ II A-2-2
}:cdel Ci ties
A-2-3
It
I
~7G- ·
192
378
255,500
4,383
i
i
�Urban Renewal Status Report
I
--
t
r
,)
Amount Required
FR.OJ:;CT
~,
CASH
A:n.ount Received
from City
Amount to be Received
--
ITEN II
-
I!
Au:ount to
Cn:npl etion
~i
$
St:-c9t
? :. :tl.er
~-:}_".-:=ot~- ~·. a. s hi~gtcn
1
627,727
$
791,078
$
(163,351
'
-
~)
,,
,_,
t. I
,;.
~
37 ,046,089
L :i Ye :-.s::. ty
Cs::ter
186 , 567
$
196,468
$
(9,901 )
R-10
I ;~
$
$
·'
·.P
R-11
49,714
,,
C:ecrgi2.
State
~- 59
R- 85
G~>JrG ia Tec h
R- 9C·
\~:-=:st :-:::1d
-
3e~orC-Pi.r.e
GG J:--r5 ia
·1>
R- 22
T :10:::?..s•JiJ.le
.
Tech I I
Ci :.:'..8S
24,293,299
t~,;
J
67,202
,~
·:>
$
$
$
$
~:;
$
,.p
"'
$
,..,
67,202
13, 988
,; ,.
324,244
.$
$
189, 1 76
$
941,479 -
$
.
324,244
L
1$
d·
p
A-2-2
~
y
$
~µ
A-2-3
$
t
$
p
~>
995,283
fl~t ,:,,!)
$
4,571, 692
-~
5,466,679
$
5,370,008
·?
3,003,765
$
616,134
->'
2,.387 , 631
4,81 9~ 578
~~
733,879
$
4,085,699
11,222
$
11,222
$
I~
0
{'-s
t
(13,988 )
12, 752, 790
$
f
$
A- 2-1
$
(1°39,462 )
$
g $ 1,936 ,762
~
R- 21
P~ct·c.::._' 9
$"
I
i
$·
R-9
I
6, 046,68,2
~
• ~
_;
,ce
.1.
A.mount Completed to Date
Total Costs
i1
'
T:JT.U,
'f
NON-CASH I HPROVB-:E~·TTS
~1
!~
t '
E
i
$
l
$
i
$
i
~
!
.
..,
I
96,671
I
I
$
~ '. ~
~
'l
ii
$
5., 292 ., 344
$
4, 476,857
'
2,524,521
$
407.,616
)
I
5,699,960
~
"
3,060,063
I
~
)J
~
~µ
5,584,584
-~,,
1
p
3,696 ,478
$
l
I
·?
g
~
I
1,474, 9.90
L
$
I
780,379
lI
I
I
j
I
�Page 4
Urban Renewal Status Report
.
'
TOTAL VALUE OF It1PROVEMENTS
NJHBER DWELLING UNITS
-
-
Complet ed
PRCJJ~CT
..
autlc:c S-t:-eet
1095
650
L~n i v er-s i t ~l Ce;1ter
P.- 11
431
F~·: k_j3.le
R- 21
0
-- R- 22
1;
·
0
ia
+e
~~+
.., v2-.v
R- 59
~ -=- """~ ..:.r .!
\.,; _, -1 J. .::, -
!)
.__
R- 85
Teer.
·C" .;..
·,...; ...
... S:!d
1/1" ..-
-·
-
.
-
--
--
Complet ed
$
..
Unde~
Constru ction
. Total
Proposed -
I
I
d:-
95,370, 792
$ 30,739, 025
$ 89, 248, 41 2
4'
215, 358 ,229
I
R-90
I
I
.I
I
$
105
192
0
842
J 25,029,546
.$
1
3
435
$ 17 , 149,838
·s 2,249, 000
325
605
33,069,144
.J
1372
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
$
$
0
'•
3, 036, 800
~
i
I
38, 1 75, 944
8,235, 000
$
33, 264,546
$ 2, 783, 000
,p
,~
22, 181, 838
$
5, ooo ~b 3,534, 825
r
...-
2, 070, 000
$
I
-
'
p
1500
1175
351
0
$
1200
3,797, 964
3,500,000
.$
$
$ 14, 081 , 325
$
17, 621,150
~
. 8,700, 000
'J)
s
19 , 623,164
4, 250, 000
$29, 000, 000
,5
11 , 05 0, 000
.$ 1o, 16 2, 000
~
23, 71 2, 000
·'
8., 452 ,050
7,125,200
ii
I
1
., 36, 750, 000
{
0
1
I
!
I
I
I
A- 2- 1
0
.-,c. ~; i c. T
:~c l1 I I
A- 2- 2
0
0
0
> , Citie s
A-2 - 3
0
0
0
'I
0
"'
•:)
1
353
.,
2,500,000
$
$
2,013,300
$
460,000
$
5, 978, 750
•;)
353
~
8,306.000
$
0
•!)
.
7 . ?71 ~17
·2
0
$
0
$
0
s
0
.:J;
0
- $
0
$
0
$
0
.$
0
-
~
"3 c2 .: :'c~d- ? i ~e
i-r
........~,c;; _
. , _._
5703
2241
0
416
-Gt3:
Total
I
I
i
R- 9
R-10
Tr:, :,a:::·ville
I
I
E:-.. ·.~s VY!- \·,Tashi :1~:.on
1 ::::
I
!Proposed
869
2593
· OT.~
-
Under
Constructi on
'
0
I
,
.., 15 ,5.77 ,537
'
)
I
I
I
I
'
.
•}
--
!
�PRESENT ORGANIZATION
CITY GOVERNMENT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
,----------,
1969
I 12:53, 29 December 2017 (EST): ~i!l~oF :
L-----r---'
I
r--------,
I
I
I
METROPOLITAN ~ l
0E VEL0PME.HT COUHOL
L---
I
ATlANTACHILD lf! N
AHDT0UTH S!RYICU
COUNCIL
CITIZEIU ADYl!DR1'
COMMlTTfE FOlt
URBAN RENEWAL
COMMU Nl TT
RELATIONS
COMMIHID N
I
I
_ _ _ _ .J
0
CHIEF A0MINISTRATN(
Of"FIC[R ANO
I
U LAHTA STADIUM
.4.TT0IIH!T
AOMIHISTRATIVC ST.UT
I
I
I
COORDIH ATOR
7I
I
I
PU!DHHEL
DEPAIITM[HT
PUIILICHOUSING
DIVlSIOH
UIIU.N REHEW.U.
0IVl~OH
Z0MING COMMITT EE
PLAHHIHC AHO
0E VELOPMEHT
COMMI TTEE
:,I
AT LAJrfTA
MUN1O PAL COURT
auocn
COORDI NA TOR FOR
COMMUNITY RELATI0HS
II
I
I
I
L._
I ____ _
OFFICE OF TIU
COMPTROL LER
COMl,IJUI0H
r
AnAHTA
TRAFflC COURT
(
I
7I
FIH4HCE COMMITTEE
I
I
I
I
I
I
PURCHUIHC C'OMMITTEE
, - -- -+ - - - - , ,
I
.----- .l----,
_ _____ JI
OTT Ct.ERK
I
TU4UES!DII
I
L-----------1
IIUILOING COO! 4 0Vl!,011' IIOAR0
40"'-110.0N PLUMIIHCAH0SJ.MIT41
PRl!DN COMMJTTEI!
PLUMIIINC E.0.1,UNIHC IOUD
PLWillllHC40Vll,OIIYI0UD
fll!CTIIC4L UJ.M.ltllHC aouo
ELl!CTRICAL40Vl!DRYII0UD
Bl!TTU ttOU~ NG COMMIUI0N
Hl!J.T.4N 0 Vl!HT,AQVl!DRY COMM.
PUIICHUIHG
DEP4RTMEHT
7
,
-1
-!
1
1
rJHAHC( D[PARTM[H'T
1
~
IUILOIHG
COMM.I TTfE
IOARD OF PUIE
M4$TUS
I
I
I
PUIIL1CWOHS
COM.ll.l TTl!I!
I
I
FIR£ 0EPAIITMEMT
POLICE 0 EPARTMEMT
ADMIN ISTRATI VE
USISTJ.HT
IUILDIMCI MSPl!C TI OH
Dl!PAR TMEH T
_J
PUIILICWORICS
DEP ARTMEN T
WATER DEPARTMEH T
PARKS NID C El,lETfRY
DEPARTMEN T
0 IV1SIOH 0F
IHHRUCTIOH
RU UR CH AMO
0EYEL0PMEHT OIVls.t0H
SOlOOL PLANT PL.t.HHIHC
'-NO COHSTRUC TI 0H
SERVICES DIVISION
ADMIMISTRU IV£
SER'flCfSOl'flSIOH
�II
PRESENT ORGANIZATION
CITY GOVERNMENT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
1969
. --------,
r----------,
I ~~i~i::: ~ :;.,o, :
A~~t:TT:j_f~LH143.215.248.55 ~g~=~yf -,
1iA~~J12:53, 29 December 2017 (EST)i u;T~r
L-----r ___ J
I
J
r:;n~~fUL~O;-~;;;.,7
" '- - J
L - - -" '-" ""
-'-
,L __
'l~
_",'~.fo
-~(__ .J'
,
i -~T:"ufri:n~J~; 7
r,
-S~o;-,,,;00-E;IT-IO;M.,; ;T-7I
'1. .•_«_" _"'~"-'"'
-"-" .J'
" J
•
L ____ 1- ___
~==================;l=======================:=::=:==5?.':=.=.:;::===========*========iF===================;i:
I
I
ELECTO RATE
1
1
,----------,
I
MHROPO LITAH Sot00L
I
I OEVfl OPJ,rnn COIJH O L I
____ .J
L---
I
I
I
AT L.ulTA CHtLDR Di
,UI QTOU TH SUYICU
COUHCIL
I
CITll.EHS' AOVnORT
COMMI TTEE FOi
COMMUHITT
IEL A TI01n
COM.WlHIOH
I
I
U U AHR EHE WAL
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
7I
I
I
PEIUOtot f L
110.1, RO
I
I
I
I
I
I
PER SOKM EL
0EP.UTI.IEHT
I
COOROIIO,TOR FOi
CO...WMITY R! LA TI OHS
ADMI HISTU,TI VE
U SI STAMT
OFFICE Of TME
COlolP TROL Ll!R
PUSOMH EL DIVISIOH
I
I
I
I
f
::,
I
ATL.AH'TA
MUHI O PAL COURT
PU I LICHOUS/ HG
OI Vl~OH
IUOG ET C0MMlllJOH
OIVL SI OH
I
I
I
I
II
l
~
ZOHIHGCQl,IM,JTT U
I
I
I
I
IL.
r
r
I
ATL,lHTA
TUHICCOURT
UI U ,H REHEW AL
P L.IJ,IH IMG AH O
OfVE LOPkE HT
CDMMI TTU
I
I
.JI
____..._____ ,
FlHAH CE COMMI TTEE
I
I
__ _ _ _
I
I
_ _ ____ JI
PURCH .UIHG COMMLTT H
I
I
I
,------ J. ____,
I
T.UUSE U.011
I
L...----------1
I UILDI HG CODE ADVl!oORT IO • • D
•DV. 10.0H PLUMIIHG I.M D SAM I T AR
PLUMI IHC. U~H JHC
ao.u o
PLUMII IHG ADVl1,0RY80AIO
IE L l!C TRIC AL IE J Al1tlH1H C BO ARD
EL ECUICAL A0Vli0 11 YIOARD
BETTER HOU MH G awMIUIOH
HhT. .UIO Vf HT, AO'IUOIIT (01,U,1 .
PUROU ,SI HG
DEPA RTMEHT
,l
-1
-;
-f
1
,
"1
~
TRAFFIC AHO
IIU ILOI HC.
TRAH SPOIITAT IO H
COMM ITTEE
COM.MISSIOH
I
I
I
P UI LI C WOR ICS
COMMITTEI!
I
I
FIRE OEPARTMEHT
POLICE OEPA II TME HT
TRAFFI C OEPAR TMEH T
IU1 LOI HC OU P l! CTl OH
OEP AIITMEH T
_J
PU I LtC WOR KS
OEPAIITMEHT
WAHR OEPARTMfHT
PARKS A>ID CEMHUY
DEP U T.W.EMT
OLVlSIOH OF
ltUTR UC TIOH
RUURCHA.M D
DEVE L0 PMIEH T DIV I M0 H
SCHOOL PLAN T PL ,UOIIHC
AM O COJO TRUC TIOtt
SUYIC U OIV1 $10H
AOMIHISTR.t. TIV E
SERVIC ES OIVUIOH
�PRESENT ORGANIZATION
CITY GOVERNMENT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
1969
,
I s%f~~:
~ :; ToF
, -------- ,
L---- -r---'
I METROPOLITAN SCHOOL
I
I
I DfVfLOPMfHT COUHOL I
I
I
L- - - -
ATLAHT A CltlLDREH
AHO YOU TH SER VICES
COUHCIL
_ _ __ J
CITIZUI S' ADVU,OIY
COM.loWHITY
Rf LATIO!iS
COMMISSIOH
COMMITT U: FOi
URIAH IEHEWAL
CHICr AOMINISTRATTV[
OfrJC[R AKO
ADMINISTRATIVE STAJT
I
I
I
I
7I
PE U OHH EL
aouo
I
I
COORDIHATOR FOR
CO-UNITY IU:LATIOHS
E XECUTIVE DIRECTOR
OFF ICE Of TM£
COMP TROLLU
PU8LIC HOUSIHC
DIVISIOH
- - - ----- :,
I
I
I
ATLANTA
MUHICIPAL COURT
~
I
.J
lOHIHC COMMITT EE
I
I
I
I
I
I
PUIICHASIHG COMMITTEE
~-- - +---~ ,
I
I
L-----
FIHJ.NCE COMMITTEE
I
I
I
I
rI
r
I
I
ATLAHTA
TRAFFIC COURT
I
,--- -- ..L----,
_ _ __ __ JI
CITY CLERK
IUILOIHC COO£ 4DVU,ORY aouo
.i.O'(IOOHPLUMIIHGAIIOSIJ,IITU
,
PLUWBIHG UNillH IHG BOARD
""1
PLLIMIIHG .i. OYISORY aouo
fl! CT11CAL flAMIHIHG a.ouo
fl!CTRIC4 L ADVISORY BOARD
BUTU HOUSIHC COMMISSIOH
Hl!AT. al40 VfHT.Jr,OVIKlRT CQl,¥,II,
I
T U OSESSOII
L.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
I
J
PURCHASING
OEPARTMEHT
7
1
1
1
,,
~
IUILOIHG
C.0-ITTEE
FI RE DEP ARTMEHT
POLICED fP UTM!HT
TRAHIC Dl! PUTMEH T
BUILDI HG IHSPICTIOH
O!PARTM!HT
I
I
I
I
I
_J
PUILICWOHS
COMMJTTH
PU BLIC WORKS
OEPARTMl!HT
WATER OEP ARTW!HT
PARltS AHO C!METUT
DEPARTMENT
DIVIS/OH OF
IHSTROCTIOH
PUSOHHEL DIVIS/OH
RESEARCH AHO
O!VELOPNEHT OIY1SIOH
SCHOOL PL.t.HT PL.tJOIIHG
.t.HO COHSTRUCTIOH
SERVICUDIVISION
ADMI HISTRAT1VE
SUV1CU DI VI MOH
�----------,
r------ .:. -,L
L-----r---'
~
I si:~t~'::: ~:;,,oF :
J ATL.itlTA, FUL TOtl
COIJ)<ITY
~:T.:L~:tl:11::o -:
1•n~;1~:12:53, 29 December 2017 (EST)UHTY
I
I
I
IL _ _
PRESENT ORGANIZATION
CITY GOVERNMENT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
1969
i
rJ
.,,_,_un_• .._ T_ _ ...J
r,
ELECTORATE
1
1
l
4TL~~t/~~ : ~~wHn7
TA X ASSEUOU
1,_,_EC_RE_ATl~U-THO
_ RI_TTJI
r-:;:~~;::11:.;;-1
I
I
L- --~--- -J
.
~----.---~
i ...i~T:ui143.215.248.55J'r, 7
Of f otlOTIOH
,--------,
I
I
METIIOPOLITAH sotOOL
DEVt:LOPWEJ4T ctlUH O L
L---
I
I
____ J
r.*================i;:===================6E=HE==RA
L=
Mu==H1=ic,l~l=6=0v==ER=HM
==EH
==,==========i~=====*================= :
I
ATLAHT4CH ILOR EH
AHOTOUTH SER VICES
COUHCIL
O'.)MMUHITT
Rll 4 TIOHS
c_oMMJS110H
CHl[f AOMIN ISTRAT IV[
orrlC[R ANO
AOM IN15TR4TI V[ SlAff
I
I
I
I
j
PUioOl{H fl
IIOARO
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EU:CUTIVf. OIIIECTOII
UIIB 4H REHftt'4L
OIVISIOH
::,
COOROIH 4TO R FOR
COM,IUMITT ll:IELATIOH1
I
1
1
ATLANTA
TRAFFIC COURT
P L Atl NIHC AtlO
OEVELOPM[HT
COMMITTEE
\..
I
I
I
I
l
r
I
I
.J
FIHAMC E COMMI TTEE
1
1
L------
I
PUIIO!UIHC COMMITTEE
I
I
,----+----,\
1
I
OFFICE Of Tl11;"
COl,IP TROL LER
I
I
BUDGET CXlMMI WOH
I
1
I
I
_ _____ JI
I
,----- .L----,
PLAtlH INCDE PAIITMEHT
OTTCLElll
I
T AI d S[ UO R
I
PURCHASING
DEPARTMEHT
L...-- --------'
I UIL01NC/.MD
4THLfTICCQl,U,UTTIEf
IUI LDING COPE AOVUOaT a o uo
A0V. IID.0 H P' LIJMBIHG AHOSAtll T AR
7
7
PLUMIIIHG UAMIHIHC BOARD
"1
PLUMll1HG A0Vli,ORTIOUO
-i
f LE CTRlC AL fX AMIH1HCIIOARD
1
1
fl[ CTIIIC AL AOVlioOIIT IIOUO
.WOITOII IUM
lllOCIYICCUITU
l[TTER HOU11NC C~UIOH
H(Af. AHOV[HT. AOVli,ORTCCIMM.
LAH D AGE HT
1
7
LAtt'DfPUTM[HT
rlNANC[ 0£f'AAT MEM'T
~
TIIAHICAHD
TRAHSl'ORT ATIOH
COMliUSSIOH
Flllf O[ PARTMEM T
POLICf DEPARTMENT
IUILOIHG
COMMIT TU
TRAFF IC O[f'ARTMEM T
Ao..lH ISTRATIV[
4 UIST.u! T
I
1
r
I
ATLAHTA
MUHIOP•L COUffT
PERioOKNfl
DfPAIITMEHT
IUl LOIH C IHSPl!CTIOH
OrP AIITMfHT
I
I
I
I
I
_J
PUBLICWOIIU
CGMMITTff
WAT U COMMITTEE
PAIIICSC'Ololl,UTHf
PUSL1C WORKS
DE PARTME NT
WATER O[f'AIITMfNT
PAIIUAMOCEJ,1£TUT
OEPAII TMEHT
OIVl SIDN OF
IHSUUCTIDN
RESEARCH AH O
OEVELOPMEHT OIVISIOH
SCHOOL PLA.HT PLAH)II NC
AHO COH ST RUCTI OH
SERVICES OIVlSIOH
ADMINISTRATl'I[
SERVlCESOIVlSIOH
�PRESENT ORGANIZATION
CITY GOVERNMENT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
1969
,--------,
,-----------,
I 143.215.248.55 12:53, 29 December 2017 (EST)ig: ggi::,,oF :
L-----r---'
Ai~t:TT:i.'~LH143.215.248.55 ig~=~T ~-,
I
[L(CJORATE
r ; ; : ~ci143.215.248.55 12:53, 29 December 2017 (EST)iu; TY1 . J
I
L-- ~J143.215.248.55r__ J
I
rTL~~r.:rF143.215.248.55;~uHnl
i ~~T:"ufr~n143.215.248.55; 1
L-~ 143.215.248.55R~-J
L~c~E~1~u2_H~1~rj
r -s~ ; ; ~ ; : :R~;;-7
__~~E~~T~~-J
,--------,
I fllETR0POLITAH SOIOOL I
I
DEVfL0 P'fllEtH C0UHOL
L.---
I
____ J
r.:;==================;~===============================t:========::::::::==========*==========?===================;i
',
GENERAL MUNICI l GOYERNMENT
I
ATL.ulTA CHILDREH
AHD YDUTH 1ElfYI CES
C0UHCl l
MAYOR
BOARD Of ALDER MEN
CITIZEH ~· ADVISORY
C0-ITTEEF0R
UR9AH REHEW.U.
COM.w.UHIT'f
RELATI0HS
COWMl~!.I0H
CH1cr A0M IHISTR AT ,V[
ornccR AHO
ADMINISlRATIV[ STA.ff
I
I
I
I
7I
I
I
I
I
I
P'fl !.OMM fL
DEP'ARTM(HT
COORDINATOR FOR
COM,1.UNITY RELATtOHS
AOMIMISTRATIVE
AS-SISTA.NT
0FF1Cf.0F tlif
COMPTROLL ER
PUSOKHEL DIVl!,IOH
I
I
I
I
:,
UReAH RfHEWAL
DIY l!o!0H
Z0 HIHGctlwoll TTEE
PLAHHIHG AHO
DEYEL0P MEMT
COl,y/,LfTEf
I
1
I
I
I
I
ATUH TA
MUHIOP'AL COURT
PU 9 L1CH 0USI HG
0JVISI0M
r
I
I
A.TlAKTA
TRAFFIC COURT
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
FIHAHC E COMMITT EE
I
I
'------
\
PURCH ASIMG COfllloU TTEE
I
I
I
~----+----~,
, - - - - .1 ____,
I
I
______ JI
an
PLAHNJMG 0EPARTMEHT
a.ERK
I
TU AUESSOR
I
L-- --------- J
8UIL0IHGAH0
ATHLL!"TI C COMMITTEE
BU1L0IHGCODE ADVISORY BOARD
AD'(80. 0 H PL UMBIHCAH0 SAHITA II
PLUMB IH G l!U.W.IHIHG BOARD
PLUMII IHC ADVISORY II0 ARD
EUCTRICAL l!U,MIHJHG IIOARD
ELECTR IC AL ADVISORY eouo
BETTER HOU!.IHG COMMISSIDH
Hf,H.AH0VEHT. ADVl!,OITC014N ,
AUDITORIUM
,_.0CIYICCCIHH
PURCHASJHG
0 !PAI TME HT
7
,
--1
-j
"1
"1
"1
rlHANC[ 0(PAATMCHT
,
~
8UILDI HG
~ I TTE ,
IOARD0f FIRE
MAHEIS
I
I
I
I
PU&LICWOR U
COMMITTU
I
flllf 0EPARTMEHT
POLICE 0EPAlfMEtlT
TR AFflC DEPARTMfMT
&UI LDIHGIH 1PECTIOH
Df.PAITMEHT
_j
PU&LIC WORU
0f.P.&ITMf.HT
W.t.Tf.R DEP.&ITMf.HT
PUUAH0COlETflY
0l!P.&RTMEHT
0IVl!.IOHOF
INST RUCTIOH
RESEARCH N'D
DEYEL0PMEHT DIVIY0H
SCHOOL PLANT PLAMHIHC
AHD COtUTRUCT10H
SERVICES DIVISIOH
Atw.lJHISTRA TT VE
SERVICES OIVIYOH
�PRESENT ORGANIZATION
CITY GOVERNMENT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
1969
~---------,
143.215.248.55 12:53, 29 December 2017 (EST)ig: ~i::.,oF :
I
L-----,---'
I
,--------,
I
I
L---
ATLI.MTACHILD lf EH
AHDYOUTHUIYICU
CDUHCIL
CITIZ[HS' ADYUOl1'
COMMJTTU:FOI
Ul&I.M REHEWAl.
COW.WHITT
IEL ATIOH S
C.OMMJ U IOH
I
METIOPOL1T.ut sotOOL
I
DEVEL0PMEl4T COUMO L I
I
____ J
CH l[ f AOMJN15 TRAT1V[
OfTJC[ R AHO
.t.OM LNISTRATIV[ SUIT
I
I
I
I
7I
PEISOtOIEL
I OAIO
I
I
I
I
I
P EISOHHEL
OEPAIT MEHT
COOIDIHA TO R FOi
COMMUHlTY RE LATIOH S
ADl,II HISTIATI YE
AUISTANT
BUDGET COMM.IUlOH
OfflC E OFTllE
COM.PTROL LEI
PERWH>IEL DI VlSIOH
I
I
I
I
I
PUBLICHOUSIHC
DIY ISIOH
Ull~Hy~J~!WAL
I
.t.Tl AHTA
TRAFFIC COU RT
I-
PLI.MHIH C AH O
DEYELOPMEHT
COM.l,IITTU
ZOH IHC COW,ll TTU
l'
I
I
J
FIHI.MCE C0MMITTEE
I
I
I
I
I
______ JI
I
I
I
I
I ____ _
L
I
I
I
~----+----~,
PLI.MHtHG OEPAITMEHT
OTTCLE U:
,----- .l-- --,
I
I
TAllASSE1S0R
"----·- -----'
BUI LOIHGAH O
ATllLET IC COMMI TTEE
PURCHA SIMC COMMITTEE
I UI LOI HG C.OOE AOYIS011' IDAIO
A0Y8D.0 HP LUMIIHGI.MOUJ'OTAI
PLUM BIHG ElA.M IHIHG IOARO
PLOM ll HG AO YtSOIY IOAIO
ELE CTRICAL UAMIHIHG IOAIO
ELECT RI CAL ADYISO RY BOARD
U TT ER HOU11HC COMMJU IOH
HUT.AHO YEHT.AOYIW IY COMM,
PURCH.t.SIHC
DE PAITM[ICT
7
,
-1
-i
~
-1
"1
j
~
IU ILOtHG
COMMITTl!f:
IO AIO Of FI RE
,un us
I
I
I
I
PUI LICWOIU
COMMITTEE
I
FIR E OE PART MEHT
POLI CE OV'AITMEHT
TRA Fl' IC DEPARTMVtT
I U1LD0 4CIH SPECTIOH
OEPARTM[HT
_J
PUB LIC WORKS
OEPARTMEMT
PARU AHO CEMETERY
DEl"ARTMEICT
OIV1SIDHO F
IHSTRUCTIOH
RESEARCH AHO
DEV[ LOPMEHT OIVL SI OIC
KHOOL PLAMT PLAHHIHG
.ulO COH STRUCTIOM
SERVICES OIVISIOH
AC*IHISTRATI VE
SERV1CESOI VUIOH
�~---------,
PRESENT ORGANIZATION
CITY GOVERNMENT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
1969
r--------,
12:53, 29 December 2017 (EST): tg~::TOF :
I ATLAHU..f ULTOH COUHTT L
L-----r---'
I
~~'.:.T~L~:H~l~A~ -.:
I ATLA~ci1143.215.248.55 12:53, 29 December 2017 (EST)-r:.~ ~UHTT
I
I
I __ •_OJ_UH_••_••__ J
L
i
,---------,
'r J
ELECTORATE
o
1
l
jATLAJ~r:t~~!143.215.248.55UHTY7
r -~TYufr~n~l~;1
I
IL_ TUASS EUOO _ _JI
0
I RECRt: ATIOH.4UTHORITT I
L-----,----.J
I
L-----,--.JI
STATE OEl"ARTMEHT
OFEOOC.4TION
I
, --------,
I
W.fTROPOLIT.4H SCMOOL
I
I OEVELOPW. EHT COUHOL I
L ---
_ _ _ _ .J
r,:;====================.~ =========================
cc=.HE:=:':R:':AL=:M=.:=U=.:=Hl=:=C,i.".;:l:;;
GO=v:::ER=.:=H=.:=M!; :;H::=T============.:=========r======================;i :
~
MAYO
R I
SOIRO or ILD!RMEH
CITIZ ENS' AOVtSORT
ATLAHUCHILOREM
C0ll.MUH1TY
.4140 TOUTH SERVICES
COUNCIL
COMMI TTEE FOR
URUHREHE•AL
RELATIOHS
CXlMMIUIOH
CHIEF AOMIHISTRATIV[
OHlC(R A.MO
ADMINISTRATIVE ST"1'F
I
ATL.4HU. STAOIUM
I
1
1
SIJPUIHTf:HDEHT
7I
COOROIHATOR
l" USOMH EL
80Alf0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t:lECU TIVE DIRECTOR
PUILICHOUSIHG
OIVUJOH
ATLANTA
TRAFF IC COURT
I
I
I
I-
ZOHIHGCOMNITTH
I
I
FINAHCE COMMJTTU
I
I
I
I
.---- + - -- --,,
I
,----- .!.----,
______ JI
CJTY CLERC
I
TU AUUSOR
L- _ _ _ _ _ __
IUILDIHG AHO
ATl1LETICCO,,U,UTTU.
AUOITOIIUM
lN OCl'flC C(NICI
l"U RCHASIH& COl,Ur,ILTTE!
I
I
I
IL ____ _
IUIL DIHG CODE ADVISOlfT IOUO
AOV llD.OH l"LUMlllHG AHO)AH ITAR
PLUMIIHG UAMJHJHG BOARD
l'LUMIIHG ADVISORY eouo
t:L ECTRICAL t:U.WJHl HG BOUD
EL !CTIICAL ADVISORY IOARO
ll!TTU HOUMHG COtitMJUIOH
HfAT.AH OVEHT.AOVISO R'fCOl,IM,
_
_
IJ
PUICHASIHG
OEl'ARht(HT
,,
l
-t
1
1
,
"1
~
flREDIPAATwE,lT
.4DlilHIST RATIVE
AUISTAHT
OFFICE Of TliE
COl,lf'TROLLEI
PEISOKHEL DIVISIOH
r
I
_J
I
I
I
IOAIO Of FIRE
W.ASTEIS
COOlfDIHATOR FOR
C'OMlilUHlTY RELATIONS
I
:,I
ATLAHTA
MUHIOP AL COORT
URIAH RENEWAL
OIVISIOH
P ERSOKHt:L
Ot:PUTM EHT
TRAFFI C AHO
TRAH,.,ORTATIOH
cow.w.m10K
IUILDIHG
Ct>MMI TT U.
IUILDIHGIHSl'(CT IOH
Dll"AIUMOH
I
I
I
I
I
_J
l'UILICWOIIU
COMMITTEE
PUILIC 110ltl:S
DEPUTW.!HT
PARU AHO CEMETUT
DEPARTMENT
DIVISIOtl Of
IHSTIUCTIOH
RESEARCH AHO
O(V(LOPWOIT OIVIMOH
KHOOL PL.4HT PLA.XH IHG
.lMO COMSTRUCTIOH
SERVICES DI VI SIOH
AtMIH1STR.4TIYE
SfRVfCUDI VI SIOtl
�PRESENT ORGANIZATION
CITY GOVERNMENT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
~---------,
,--------,
I
L
l ~~t~~ ~:lyOF :
L-----r---'
I
1969
ATL.UtTA fUlTOH COUHTT
0
~~:_r_:l~:"~e~•~-! i
ATL'1ci,~:12:53, 29 December 2017 (EST)UHTT
I
I
L - - 143.215.248.55 12:53, 29 December 2017 (EST)r_ _ J
rJ
ELECTORATE
f,.rL~~r.tr'143.215.248.55;g:u"n7
L-~ 143.215.248.55 12:53, 29 December 2017 (EST)·~
•
-J
11l
r-~TYu~~n143.215.248.55 12:53, 29 December 2017 (EST)7
r-s~;;;;;:.-;:.;.:T-7
L_~c~E~l~U2_tto_!~YJ
•
I ________
L
OfEDUCATIOH
..JI
,--------,
I
1111!:TIOl"OLITAM SOIDOL
I
I
0EVEL0l"MfMT COUHOL
I
L----
____ J
r,:;J===================;,i'========================c==EN=;E=RA=L==M==UN=,c;;,lt=L==Go=vE==R=NM
= =E==NT==============*=======~=====================;i:
I
~
ATLMITA CH ILOIEH
COMMUH I TT
ClT!ZflO' AOYIIOIIY
,U,10 l'OUTH SfA VI CU
lt ELATI 0 HS
COUHCI L
COMMI UIOH
COloUUTTl!E fOR
UIIBAH JIEHfl'.U.
SOARD DI ALDERMEN
CH l[f ADM IHISTRATI\1£
ATTORHl!T
OH IC CR .I.HO
ADM lNISTRATM STAIT
I
I
I
I
lI
PflUOIOIEL
1104110
I
I
I
EXECUTIVE DI RECTO R
COOIIDIHATDI FOi
COMMUKITT lll!L ATI OMS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:,
OFFICE OF TllE
COMP TROLLER
rI
I
I
ATLANTA
ATLANTA
MUMIOPAL COURT
TRAFFI C COURT
J
~
I
I
I
I
It_ _ _ _ _ _
FJHAH CE C0MMJTTfl!
I
I
I
I
I
I
.-----+------.,
I
,----- .L----,
______ JI
PLl.t! HIHGOEP.UTMEHT
CIT Y CURI(
I
TU U SUSOI
i._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
II UILOIH C AJlO
ATHLE TIC COMMI TTEE
BUI LOIHC CO OE ADYl l,O IY IIOARO
.t,0V.&D.0 N PLUMBJWC'i AMD SAMITAII
PL Ulol ll HC'i EU,MJHIHC'i 104110
PL UMI IHC'i A0VIS.O IIT I DAID
f LfC HIICAL UAMJH!HC'i 14AIID
f Ll!CTIICAL ADVIS(UY
A.l.l OIT ORIUM
.UDCl'IIC:CCJITU
PURCHASJHC'i COMMITTEE
I
ao uo
UTTER ttOUSI HC'i COlolMI WOH
HEA T.AH O Yl!HT. AD VUO IIY COt,U,11 ,
IJ
PUIICHASJHC'i
DEPARTMEHT
7
7
"1
-i
-1
-1
"1
rlHAHC E DE PARTMENT
~
TRAF FIC AHO
TI AM Sl'O ITATI0 H
COM,i,tJS SI0H
IU1LDIHC'i
COl,U,IITTff
IUILDIHC'i IHSPECTI0H
Dl!PAIITlolVCT
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
_J
PUILtCWOIIU
COMMIT TU
PUIUCWOHS
Dl!l"dTMtHT
WATUDEPUTMEHT
l".UU ~D CEM!TERY
01!1".UTMl!HT
DIVlSlc»I OF
IHSTRUCTIOH
PERSOHHl!L DIVISIOM
IIUUICHA.H0
0EVEL0PMEHT 0IVISI0H
SCHOOL PLA.HT PL.u(f41HC'i
AHO COHSTIIUCTI0H
SERYLCUDIVISI0H
ADMIHISTIIATIVE
Sl!IIVICUDIVISIOH
�,----------,
~~t~~:
I
,--------,L
J ATLAHTA- FULYOH COUMTY
-:
i
I
I ATLAMT.t.-FUL TOH CDUMTY I
I
I
I
1
'L __' 0,_
L-----r---'
~ ~:T~L~:H~l~A~
~.ATL~~r:-r'143.215.248.55; ~UHTY, ,1
~r_
u~~-~.._'~-· - _,r-:,l..
ELECTORATE
L_
TU AH, !UORS
_...J
r -~TYufr~n~l~~
I
,----- ---,
7
RECRUTIOH AUTHORITl'
I
STATE DEPAUMU4 T
I
1----- , ----'
I
I
L----,----.J
OF EOUCAT IOH
I
,--------,
I
METROPO LJTAH KMOOL
I
I DEVE LOPMEMT COUNCIL I
L - - - _ _ _ _ .J
r.:i==================:::::;;:::::=======================6==[N
: :[: : RA=l==M==UN==1c;;,l.1=
l ==6o==vc==R==NM:::::lNT::= =============*=======~=====================.i:
I
ATLANTA CH ILOREH
AHO YO UTH U RYIC U
COUHCIL
CITIZEHS ' AOYISORY
CO_.YTEE FOR
URIAM R[MEWAL
COMMUHt TT
RE L ATIOHS
COM,w.U ~ H
CH l[r A.OM INISTRATIV[
OfflC[ R A.MD
ADMINIST RATIVE STM r
I
I
I
I
SUPERIHTEHOUIT
7I
COOROI HATOR
PERSOHJIEL
IOUO
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COOIIOIH.t.TOR FOR
C'OMMUMITY RELATIOHS
AOMIHISTJ.ATIYE
AUIST.u4T
I
I
OFFICE Of TM[
COMP TROL L ER
I
I
I
:,
r
r
I
I
ATLANTA
W.UMJO PAL COURT
A.TL.A.HTA
TR AFF IC COURT
...J
~
I
I
I
I
I
______ JI
I
I
I
L---- -
r-----
QTY CLE Rl
I
.l----,
I
TU AUE U.OR
'------------1
IUI LOI HG AHO
ATHL ETIC COtil.MJ TT!E
PURotA SIHGCOl,WITTEE
~----+----~,
PLAMHIHG OE PARTW. EMT
AlJOIT ORtUW.
lNDCITICClNtll
I
I
I
I
f lMANCECOMM.ITTE E
I
I
IU ILOI HG CO D! ADYU.OIIT IOARO
ADY. ID. OH P' LU.WII MGAMD SAM ITAR
7
1
PLU.w l LM G EUMJHIHGIOAI D
P' LO.WI IHG ADYISO IY 10.1.10
ELE C TR IC AL l! l AMIM1MG I041f D
-1
PURCHASIHG
DEPAR TMEHT
-i
ELECTRIC AL .lOY ISO R1' IO AR D
"1
-t
IU TU HOU11HG COMMIUI~
HU T. AM DY EMT.AOYISOII YCOMiM.
J
r lNAHCC OCl'ARTMCN1'
~
IU ILOI HG
COMMITT U
I
I
I
PUIU C WOIJC.S
COMMITTEI!
I
I
IUIL OI HG IM SP ECTIOH
OEPA1Tt,1EHT
I
I
zg~::YoF
PRESENT ORGANIZATION
CITY GOVERNMENT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
1969
I
I
~I
_J
PUIL1C WORKS
OE PARTt,1EMT
WA.TU O[P.lJITt,ifMT
PARKS AHO CEMETERY
OEP.lR Tt,1EHT
OIVUION Of
IM ST IIUCTIOH
RESEARCH AHO
DEV ELOPMEMT OIYL110M
SCHOOL PLA.HT PLA.H>IIMG
AHO COHSTRUCTI OH
URYICESOI VlSIOH
.lO..U MISTR.lTIYE
SERVICES DIVISION
�PRESENT ORGANIZATION
CITY GOVERNMENT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
,
,--------,
J
L
L-----r---•
~ ~:T~ L~:H~l~A.:°
I
si:~[~~: tgi;~,oF :
,U U.HTA-F ULTOH COUHTT
I
~
I AT L ~ ;1!:12:53, 29 December 2017 (EST) ~UHTT I
L __~J143.215.248.55r__ J
I
I
1969
i
J
ELECTORATE
jArl~~rt/143.215.248.55;~fU HTTI
L-143.215.248.55s.~11~_j
11
l
r
r-s-;:;;;;:.: ;:;-7
-jrJu143.215.248.551~; 7
I
L ~c~ E~l~U2_H~i.:, J
.
OFEOUCAT IO H
I
,--------,
I NETIIOPOLITAH SOtOOL I
IL, OEVEL01'NU4T
COUMOL
_____
_ _ JI
~--~-.---~
~==================:::::;,;::::=======================G
=EN:E::RA:L::M:UN=IC
jl _)::LG=O
=VE=RN: M
[::NT=============:::;:========*=====================;i:
l
ATLANT A CHILDIIOI
AHO TOUTH SERVICES
COUHCI L
CITIZENS' AOVU,ORT
COIIU4J TTEE FOR
URIAH IIEN[WAL
COM,MUNITT
IIELAT10NS
COIIU4JUION
CH!tf" AOMIHISTRATIV[
ornCCR ANO
AOM IHISTRAT1VC ST>.rr
I
I
1
,
I
SIJP ERlHTEHOENT
PEIISOMH[L
104110
I
I
PUSOIOI EL
DEPAIITNEH T
PUBLIC HOUSING
OIVISIO H
URIAH RENCW.t.L
[)I VISIO H
:,
ATLAKTA
TIIAfFIC COURT
1'LAHHIHG AHO
OEVEL 01'N EHT
COMMITT EE
II
I
1
J
I
FIIO.HCE COI.IMI TTU
1
1
(
I
1
I
IL ____ _
I
I
__ ____ J1
,----- .1 ____,
PLAHMIMG DEPAII TMENT
OTT CL ERK
I
i._ _
9U ILD1HG J.HD
ATttLETIC COMMI TTEE
PURCHUI MC COl,l,NI TTU
I
I
I
9UILotHG C.ODE AD VUOIIT 90.UD
ADV. I Q OM PLUM91 MG.utDSAHIT AR
TA X AUEUOR
_
_
_______
l
J
PURCH,U l MC.
DEPARTMENT
7
,
PLUNIIMC. UAMIMIHC. IOARD
PLUM91 HG AOY ISOIIT90U O
ELECTRICAL EU.Nl~MC. ao uo
"1
ELECTl1CA L ADYISllllT &OARD
-1
-I
1
rncAHC[ OCPAAT M[NT
1-:-,:
,;c-:,:-~:..,:::-';'c:,c~~::c:-:::,c::-"
-::,cc:-=~«:..=.-I~
~
aou o oF Fru
lolA$Tf:U
IUILOIHC.
COM.Ml TT EE
I
I
I
PUI LI C WOIU
COM.NJTTEE
I
I
FI I EOEP..tJITNUU
AOMIHISTRAT1V E
AUIST .t.MT
OFFICl!OFTlll!
COlolPTROLLEII
PEUONHEL OIVISIOH
r
1
ATLANT.t.
MUH IO PAL COURT
COOROI HATOR FOR
CCJM,LUHlTT RELAT IOHS
IIJI LDIMC.IMiPECTIOM
Of:PAIITNU4 T
_J
PU 9LJC WORU
DEPAIITMEMT
PAII U NIO CUIETEIT
DE1'AITMEHT
OIVISIOMOF
IHURUCTIOH
RUURCHNIO
OE VELO PMU4T otV ISIOM
SCHOOL PLAHT PLt.MM1MC.
AHO COttSTRUCTIOH
SERV1CUOIVI SI OH
ADMIHl5TRAT1VE
~EIIV1CUOIVISl0t'I
�PRESENT ORGANIZATION
CITY GOVERNMENT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
1969
,----------,
I s%~~'g!
28~:;YoF
,---------,
L-----r ___ ,
I
I
Ml!TR0,.OLlTAH SOWOL
I
I 0fVEL0,.MEHT COUHO L I
I
I
L---
ATL.ulTA CHILDRf:H
AHO YDU TH SERVICES
COUNCIL
CITIZl!MS'ADV ISOIIY
CO-a TTEE FOR
UIIIIAM IIEMEWAL
CDMM.IJMITY
RELATIDMS
C0M.l(JHID M
____ J
CH IEF A0MIH ISTAATIV[
OHICER ANO
I
ADM IHISTRATIV[ STArr
I
I
I
WP ERtHTfHDEHT
7I
C:OORDIHAT'OR
PU!oOHHEl
110.UD
I
I
I
I
E JCECUTIYI! DIRECTOR
COORDIHA TOR fOR
I
I
I
I
I
COMM UH\ TT UL ATIOHS
I
0FFICE0I' TliE
COMPTROLL ER
I
I
I
- :,I
r
(
I
ATLAHTo\
MUHlOP AL COURT
ATLANTA
TRAFFIC COURT
I
I
I
I
L-----
flHAHCE C01,11,11TTU:
I
I
I
PUR CHASI HG COMWI TTEE
0lVUIOHOf
IHSTR LICTIOH
I
~----+----~,
.----- J. ____ ,
I
I
I
I
J
II
I
______ JI
I
TA.XUSESSOR
I
L---------·- -J
1--------~7
AD'(aD.DH "LUMIIIHGAH0SAHITAR
,
PLUMlll HG U"-"'lH tHG 110.U0
PLUMII IHG ADVISORY 104110
EL"TRICAL U.U.UHIHG IOARD
-j
ELEC TRICAL ADYIIORY IOAR0
Hl!AT,AHDYtHT.AD VISORTCOMlit.
PUROtA!.IHG
DEPARTMENT
LAW 0EPARTM(HT
-i
1
1
>--"-"-'-' _,._.,_.._._,....
_ ,_,.,_••_. .,
rlHAHC[ 0 CPAltTM[Nl
,
~
IULLOIHG
COMtitlT TU
I
I
I
I
PUIILICWORU
CONiM.ITTfE
PARUCOMMITTU
PUB LIC WORU
DEPARTMf:HT
PAU:5 AHO COU! TERT
OtPAIITMl!HT
I
FIRE D!PAR TMEHT
AOlr,UHl$TRATIVE
ASl!STAHT
POLICf. OEPARTMl!HT
TRAFF IC 0EPARTM~T
IIUI LOIHGIHSPECTIOH
DEPARTMEHT
_J
_____ JI
Rf:Sl!ARCH AH O
Ol!Vfl0PMOIT DIV IS.OH
SOIOOL PL Al(T PLAlfHIMG
AHO COMSTRUC TI 0H
SERVICES DIVIS.OH
ADMINI ST RATIVE
SERVICES DIVISIOH
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
URBAN RENEWAL PROGRAM
MONTHLY STATUS REPORT
February 23, 1970
ATLANTA HOUSING AUTHORITY
ATLANTA HOUSING AUTHORITY
~L-
UREAN RENEWAL STATUS REPORT
'
i
ACQUISITION RELOCATION DEMOLITION
Total to be Relocated Remaining to be Structures
Parcels to Acquired to | Yet to be: | Relocated To Date Relocated to be Demolished |jYet to
PROJECT be Acquired Dave Acquired Family & Ind. | Bus Family & Ind. Bus. Family & Ind. | Bus.|)Demolished | To Date Demolis
Rubles G&resy R-9 600 600 0 1261 103 1261 103 0 0 29 ook
Raxson-Washington R-10| goo 81), 6. 11h 77 11h 76 | 0 ry ? =
Rockdale R-21 9,1 879 62 1,21 18 121 18 0 0 435 435
Thomasville R22 163 457 6 315 19 318 19 0 0 305 305 |
Georgia State R-59 29 29 0 20 8 20 8 0 0 52 52
Georcia Tech R-85 °
seorgia Tec R= 335 335 261 58 261 58 Oo. Oo || 359 359
t Ead R-90'| B93 527: 66 1,80 104 65 87 15 17 |} 476 365 111
~~ ‘Becford-Pine Aa2=1 } 39 Wik 16. 109), 103 896 77 198 26 539 62 77
Georgia Tech II A-2-2 30 7 25 18 37 12 3 6 3h 21 0 21
| Model Cities A-2-3 | 398 278 120 43 11 187 s 2h) 6 |i 278 51 297
| |
I
URBAN TUENEWAL STATUS IusPoRr
Page 2
DISEOSTTION REHABTLTTATTION , ITEM-— IMPROVEMENTS
Pee jiart 4 4
ast Acres ‘fo ° Acres Sold {Under | Not Under Total to be Complete Yet to be Budget
be Sold to Date Contract | Contract Rehabilitated to date Rehab. Amount Completed
TOTAT, 112730 62h 62 327.0 175.8 5182 2961 2221 _ 3,558,966 2,786,798
Bolter Street. -R-9 | 81.6 81.6 186 182 h
Reveon-Wash R-LO 126.0 10501 150ht eS NA NA NA
“Center R-11
10h,3 93.8 1,46 Boi 180), 17h 60
Rockdele R21 , 22.6 56.3 183.5 2.8 NA NA NA 662,000 653,180
Thomasville _R-22 25505 183.5 6946 120) 92 87 5 | 1,762.95) 1,06 86)
Georgia-
s tate R-59 8. 7 7 8. 7 NA NA
Georgia- ;
Tech R-85 45 20 39h 06 300 NA NA 653,91 5535773
West-End R-GO : ;
98h 20.6 33.6 bhe2 2338 698 160 168.598 168,598
Pine £-2-1 1509 yo? 22.5 98.02 192 r «58 13h 1),000
Georgia Tech II A+2~2 2,000
Model Cities 4-2-3 —570- _ 192 378 255,500 h, 383
Payre 3
Urban Renewal Status Report
een i ITEM IT NON-CASH IMPROVEMENTS
é :
Amount Received Amount to be Received Total Costs umount Completed to Date Amount to
PROJZCT Amount Required from City i Conpletion
a
% :
d
TOTAL | 3 627,727 ° 791,078 $ (163,351 Bs 37,046,089 §° 24,293,299 $ 12,752,790
Butler Street R-9 186,567 > 196,168 3 (9,901) Ee 1,936,762 $ 91 579 $ 995,283
. ‘ 8
SeysonVashington -R-10] . , 5 i
ad eee $ 9 ° i 6,046,682 $ 4,571,692 a 15,474,99
University Center R+1l{ ? 9,71 3 189,176 $ (139,162) Ps 5,166,679 $ 5,370,008 3. 96,671
Bockdale R-21| > 67,202 * 67,202 ¥ tg 3,003,765 g 616,134 $ 2,287,631
Taomasvill p22] § 5 13,988 > (13,988) E” 4,819,578 % 733,879 $ 085,699
Georgia State nso} ” . $ _* 11,222 $ 11,222 $
Georgia Tech R-85 ° ? ° . > 5
i: i
vst End 1 $50 ohh > 32h, 2h) $ [ $°~ 5,58h,58h | % 3,060,063 g_ Bsb eke
EFedforc-Pine A=-2-1 s $ $ 5 $
ae a * " 8699,960 5,292, ahh $ 407,616
Georgia Tech IT A-2-2) $ $ ? p $ 5
sésl. Cities A-2-3| 4 ‘ 6 bs 76,857 | 3 3,696,478 $ 780, 379
§ %
i
Ki
Urban Renewal Status Report
NUMBER DWELLING UNITS TOTAL VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS
Under Under
PROJECT - Completed Construction Proposed Total Completed Construction Proposed Total
$ $ $ $
TOTAL 2593 869 22h1 5703 9553705792 30, 739,025 89,2)8,112 215,358,229
Butler Street 3
1095 0 105 1200 33,069,1l, | 2,070,000 > 3.036,800 |* 38,175,9bh
Rauson-Wasnington 650 192 0 8),2 s 25,029,5)6 | 4 0 $ 8,235,000 |$ 33,26h,5h6
University Center 31 1 3 435 17,149,838 | 3 2249,000 $ 2,783,000 & 22,181,838
Rockdale és 326 1178 1500 5,000 ]% 3,534,825 $ 1),,081 , 325 $ 17,621,150
Thenasvill
SEO HEV ALS 16 351 605 1372 3,797,961 | $ 7,125,200 $ 8,700,000 |% 19,623,16h |
Georgia State $
0 0 0 0 3,500,000 4,250,000 $ 29,000,000 $ 36,750,000 |
4
Georgia Tech 0 $ $ 3 |
0 0 0 2,500,000 11,050,000 10,162,000 > 23,712,000
Tes 1 0 0 1 2,013,300 |$ 460,000 | $ 5,978,750 13 8.452.050 |
Redferd-Pine 0 0 353 353 8,306,000 | $ 0 37,271,537 § 1555775537
Geergia Tech IT 0 0 0 O 0 $ 0 y 0 t O
Model Cities 0 0 0 0 0 $ oO $ O +” Oo
ee
PRESENT ORGANIZATION
CITY GOVERNMENT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
a ne 1969
1 sup end courTor | | ATLANTA-FULTON COUNTY L_
1 FULTON COUNTY 1 | JOINT PLawwinG BOARD pT
ar eee ge was aoe ew d ee
Tr r Tt an eee cee ef eS Fe ee eel
pATLANTA.FULTON COUNTY i ATLANTA FULTON couNTT? I | CITY OF ATLANTA ! J Stateorrartam | 1 wETROFOLITAN SoHDOL |
wIDIUSTHENY cr ' wit IT ASSESORS ' I arceention tne | 1 OF EDUCATION 1 1 DEVELOPMENT CouNcIL
eer cca Lecioued: (Le 3 bane eees Lo
— ——- i
GENERAL MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT r 1
' ' t 4 MAYOR SCHOOL BOARD =------+
4. 4 ! BOARO OF ALDERMEN
ATLANTs CHILDREN COMMIT Y 1
and pL ee 1
‘CHILF ADMINIS TRA’
: OPREER AND ATLANTA STADIUM
i ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF
!
| suPeRtiTENoENT }-+ cooromaroe |
COORDINATOR FOR ADMIMISTRATH
METY RELATIONS ASSISTANT
PUBLIC HOUUHE URBAN REWEWAL
OnvnioM ovinioN BUDGET COseu sion
See aa ee ee a ee ee ee a a =
PERSOMMEL DIVIION
| I I
ATLANTA 2 SCHOOL PLANT PLANNING caine ¥
MUNICIPAL COURT ERMAHCE. COMMITTEE (roroume court) | IMSTRUE TION | peveLoruent prion | Gate von | sthvices orion
‘eer. | poniccoscceereeeenccennd
AHKIMG DEPARTMENT J-——————4 | CTY LER | FuscsG
BUILINNG CODE ADVISORY BOARD 7
PLUMBING EXauING BOARD |<]
PLUMBING ADVISORY BOARD <4
ELECTRICAL EAAMIMING BOARD ~—{
|
|
See ee oa epee ee ee a
r
|
|
|
|
!
| TAX ASTERIOR
ELECTRICAL ADVISORY BOARD poy
AUDITOR ELE COT Hab BETTER MOUUMG COMMISION [-
PEHOM AND FAB AVIATION cern | ‘soar eee eaecal DaPanTaent? rm FINANCE DEPARTMENT SeNOOLS SCHOOLS SOWOOLS SCHOOLS SEWOOLS
HEATAND VENT ADVISORY COs. fy
| | |
TRAFFIC AND TRAFFIC ae
BOARD OF FIRE POLICE Commit TRAMIPOR TATION ae
COMME SION ‘COMMITTEE
a
TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT
L-------=]-
bLic
PARTUENT EPARTHERT
FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT
I
} |
mae | --- sath _J
WATER DEPARTMENT
LOG IMSPECTION:
DEPARTMENT
PS e
SUPEMOR COURT OF
FULTON COUNTT
—<--------!
pooo------5
J ATLANTA.FULTON COUNTY L
1 JOINT PLAHWING BOARD |
ens
{ATLANTALFULTON COUNTY |
404 }.AR r
ADJUSTMENT 3
PRESENT ORGANIZATION
CITY GOVERNMENT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
1969
patiay TA FUL TOM COUNTY
JOINT BOARD OF
TAX ASSESSORS
———— =
r CITY OF ATLANTA
[| pAN® FULTON COUNTY |
RECREATION AUTHORITY.
—_< =o ool
poco --4
| STaTe DerarTwent I
EoUCA 1
GENERAL MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT
eee ees ee ee ee ee = a
ATLANTA,
MUNICIPAL COURT
ATLANTA CHILDREN
AND YOUTH SERVICES
COUNCIL
COMMUNITY
RELATIONS
Comers OM
ee
picasa eed eo eerri ea pe eo oe cee ne ener et ae ah ane Sec j---L--4
‘coma
UnBAN
PUBLIC HOULHS URBAN RENEWAL
orniwow DivinOW
CITIZENS aDvORT
TTEE FOR
RENEWAL
BOARD OF ALDERMEN
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
FICER AND
ADMOUSTRATIVE STAFF
TLANT A ST abe
I
PLANMING AMD
DEVELOPMENT
COMMITTED
Ctr Like
FINANCE COMMITTEE
ool ----- --- ~~ -
al
TAX AMSEStOR
ATTORNE
COORDINATOR FOR
COMMUNITY RELATIONS
t----4---4
SCHOOL BOARD
PERINTENDEMT }-
poco
1 weTROPOLiTaN scHooL |
1 DEVELOPMENT CONG |
a
fa a
ADMINISTRATIVE
ASUSTANT
OFFICE OF THE
COMPTROLLER
I
PRISON AND Fama
AVIATION DEPARTMENT |
nD CUTE CCT
GUILOING CODE ADVISORT fOakD
4
PLUMBING EXaMiNiNG BOARD -—{
FLUMENG ADVISORY BOARD
ELECTRICAL EXAMINING BOARD [~~
ELECTRICAL ADVISORY B04R0 b-=4
BETTER HOUMNG COMMISLION pany
HEAT.AND WENTADVISORY Cola, oy
Land aGenT
FINANCE DCPARTMENT
DIVESIOH OF RESEARCH AND RGHOOL, EAM PL LANES: ADMINISTRATIVE
PURCHAMNG COMMITTEE AMD CONSTRUCTION
( ) | PMS TRUC TION | | DEVELOPMENT DIVIZON | SERVICES DIVISION SERVICES OOION
PURCHASING
OLPARTwENT
| AREAL AREA WH AREAL AREA IY | AREA Y
[
ASS &
BOARD OF Fine
MASTER:
|
| FIRE DEPARTMENT ‘|
( POLICE COMMITTEE )
TRAFFIC AND
TRANIPOR TATION
ECan
SOM
TRAFFIC, PARKING
AND Thay
COMMITTEE
-----------+----------
| POLICE DEPARTMENT |
PUBLIC WORKS
COMMITTEE
WATER COMMITTEE
PARES COMMITTEE
ADVISORY COMMISION
OM PARKS
DOARO OF LinRaRY
TRUSTEES
t-------],-
PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTHENT
|
q
!
| | ATER DEPARTMENT | mesenansrer f- ciel
| |
wu
FUL TOM COUNTY
ae ed
'
1
1
poss e---4
( ATLABTA-FULTON COUNTY L.
| JOT PLANNING BOARD pV
|
p ATLANTA-FUL TOM COUN TT
POINT ROARDOF p=
ADJUSTMENT
rr eal
PRESENT ORGANIZATION
CITY GOVERNMENT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
1969
PATCanTA. FULTON COUNTY r CITT OF ATLANTA, 4 I
JOINT BOARD OF 1 AND FUL TOM COUM 1 i
t TAX ASSESSORS | RECREATION UTHORITY
ca ci ae pe a a a
——-—— = =
ATLANTA
MUNICIPAL COURT
mca Peele eerie |
4
Commune Tr
RELATIONS
Coens cet
L
ATLANTA CHILDREN
AMD YOUTH SERVICES
COUNCIL
PUBLIC MOUS
OIvEOM
BOARD OF ALDERMEN
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER AND
er |
ser] Lee
peor 4
STATE DEPARTMENT = |
‘OF EDUCATION
be---------!
SCHOOL BOARD
Pee TS a eh ee
I METROPOLITAN ScHOOL I
i | DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL I
ea ee ere
iV!
ATLANTA,
TRAFFIC COURT
[Poon n perenne nnn ee een ne eee --b-
BUILGENG AND
ATHLETIC COmmiT TEE
AVIATION COMMITTEE
| AVIATION ODP 4m TMENT
AUDITORIUM
80 CIE CENTER
} |
CITY HALL
DEP AR THENT
TUILOING CODE ADVISORY BOARD - |
GY BD GM PLUMBING AND LAMITARTE
PLUMBING EXAMINING BOARD =]
PLUMBING ADVILORT BOARD =
Land AGENT
ELECTRICAL EXAMINING BOARD [==]
ELECTRICAL ADVISORY BOARD fo
ETTER WOUUNG COMMISIGH feng
WEATAND VENT ADWIIORT Comm
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
CJ
Eq] EJ
AREA GD |
|
AREAIY
AREA Y
-
( BOARD OF FIRE
UASTERS
| FIRE DEPARTMENT
| | |
TRAFFIC, PARKING
ano TRaMUT
Coma TT Ee
-----------'+----------
PRISON AND Fame |
FFIC AND
POLICE COMMITTEE TRAMLPOR Ta TION
Coal SoM
POLICE DEPARTMENT |
( PUBLIC WORKS
Cou TT EE
|
| PUBLIC WORKS
A
\
| i |
I
|
1
i
!
a
DEPARTMENT
)
5
| | | |
( WATER COMMITTEE ) ( PARKS COMMITTEE ) | om | | orga |
|
L !
pH
PARES AND CEMETE
DEPARTMENT
WATER OEPARTMEMT |
= oT (Tea
See el &
X
T
'
'
1
'
!
1
!
v ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF |
: \
! ' SUPERINTENDENT a COORDINATOR
-4 '
|
I
1 1
' 1 COORDEHATOR FoR ADMEKISTRATIVE
! | COMMU TY RELATIONS ASUSTANT
t
' |
! |
1 |
!
WOGET COMMISSION 1 PERSONNEL DevisiON
1
kL A
*
f | | f= |
SCHOOL PLANT PLANMING
7 FINANCE COMMITTEE 1 PURCHAMING COMMITTEE Sotazne DEKEL Coane eter AMD CONSTRUCTION eae
i SERVICES DIVISION
!
eed
1
main) | =e | [ Lae | | btrenthenr
PRESENT ORGANIZATION
CITY GOVERNMENT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
Sao eS ee ‘ 1969
| suremor courtor 1 | ATLANTA FUL TOW cpenry L.
1 “FuLTos county i ) JOINT PLANNING BOARD
ee a ed eer eoee eee de
r — = 0 pete ---4 Katee ey paseo
aT eounore it ir LANA. FULTON COUNTY 11 solutes county | state perarTwent | 1 weTROPOLITAN sooo. |
' ADJUSTMENT r ' Taxassessons = | RecReaTION AUTHORIT I OF EDUCATION = 1 DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL 1
ie ete aC misao ae a ri Bee ee es een a
L. 4 Lt eee a 4 — Z| ia i 4
4 4 _ i
GENERAL MUNICI r f 1
1 ' ' \ SCHOOL no,
. BOARD —————
4 . ! BOARO OF ALDERMEN |
ATLANTA CHILDREM COMMUNITY 1
AMD YOUTH SERVICES RELATIONS It
aia IC
nia a, I CHIEF ADMINESTRATIVE
I OFFICER AND
I ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF
|
SUPERINTENDENT }- 4 COORDINATOR |
Cts
wee ee a wa a = - = - +
!
1
!
!
t
1
!
'
I
'
t
!
!
I
!
!
!
I
I
!
I
|
!
!
t
L
r
t
I
!
!
t
L
(oer ke re rege nbee ee ee are TE ee ee ee i
r
| | | I |
ATLANTA Cen oreent J DIVINON OF RESEARCH AND SCHBOL, Pe ANT PL AMHES ADMINISTRATIVE
wuwerPaL couNT DEVELOPMENT 1 FINANCE COMMITTEE PURCHASING COMMITTEE Teucrbe DEVELGRMENT bevitiow AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES Gevigion
1
' i
so as mae PURCHASING
PLANHING DEPARTMENT CTY CLERE ] | TAT ASSESSOR j | DEPARTHENT
L J
BUILDING CODE ADVISORY BAND [- |
ADV BD OM PLUMBING AND LAMIT AR "a AREAL AREA TL meat aARGAIY AREA Y
PLUMBING EXAMINING BOARD]
PLUMBING ADVIIORT BOARD [<4
KLECTRICAL EXAMINING BOARD fy
ELECTRICAL ADYISORT BOARD b-
PRIGOM AND FARM AVIATION DEPARTMENT ee BETTER HOUMNG COMMISSION bang FINANCE DEPARTMENT SCHOOLS SCHOOLS SCHOOLS scHOOL Ss SCHOOLS
HEATAND VENT ADYILORT Coma, b-
I
( PUBLIC MORES ) ( WATER COMMITTEE ) ( PARES COMMITTEE ) ee SOuND OF LinkanY
aes | | ER r- — 3 | mesa |
BUILDING
Comal TTEE
-----------'+----------
POLICE DEPARTMENT | TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT
t------=|,-
DEPARTMENT
|
( vonanoy mt =) (maneon ) vinta
| |
FIRE DEPARTMENT
BULL OING INSPECTION
DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC WORKS
PRESENT ORGANIZATION
CITY GOVERNMENT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
teense 1969
=e eee
| supemorcourror | TD ATLANTA-FULTON COUNTY L_
1 “FuLTom COUNTY =| j JOINT PLawvinG BOARD pT
pine a ae nh teeter ae cs
T Fr = rocco crocs -4 eco 4 pocce----a
ATLAHTA-FULTON COUNTY 7 Tike iW inTY
' Se ahaa OF or Et TOF ATTA 4 1 stave perartuent | 1 METROPOLITAN scHooL |
' ADJUSTMENT ! TAR ASHELORS 1 1 ptcaeation autwonity | | OF EDUCATION I | DEVELOPMENT CoUNcHL I
Li Eg bed EERE ANON : eee es Ye ee
& L : |
r 1
I
1 ' ' ! SeHDO
iL BOARD ——S—— -
1 BOARD OF ALDERMEN f
txs abvisoRt
=
L
ATLANTA CHIL OREM COMMUNITY
AND YOUTH SERVICES: RELATIONS
COUNCIL ‘COMME Le
CHIEF ADMINESTHATIVE
OFFICLR AND
ADM@ESTRATIVE STAPF
[saan “
SUPERINTENDENT l- 4 COORDINATOR |
COORDINATOR FOR
COMMUNITY RELATIONS
ADMEKISTRATIVE
ASUSTANT
t
!
t
I
; (ecoutree |
1 (Cie be renst beeen)
I ‘Duna
!
!
'
!
!
t
1
1
ees | eee
r
|
'
1
!
!
1
1
1
'
|
'
1
1
1
!
|
!
!
!
|
!
!
'
1
|
L
T
!
|
|
|
1
1.
a an a aa Lae ee l--- Lb
Punic nouNG URDAM BEWEWAL
civInOn DIVION
A
r
| I I l
ATLANTA = pIVIZON OF RESEARCH AND SCHOOL PLANT PLANHIMG ACMEMISTRATIVE
MuNicPAL COURT FORRES COTE (retousne courte) INSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT DLVIDON ne ce SERVICES DIVIDON
1
eel OTT CLeme The Aeon | bersetuent
i
banheie aah BUILDING CODE ADVISORY HOARD }-—
PRION COMMITTEE AVIATION COMMITTEE ATHLETIC COMMITTEE GY Atl ON PLUMBING AND SANITARY ~] AREAL AREA ti AREA th AREA IY anea ¥
PLUMBING EXAMINING BOARD ra
Fiuuine asviony poamo 4
TLECTRICAL CXAMIRING BOARD [-—4
ELECTRICAL ADVISORT BOARD ra
AUDITORIUM CITY Hall TTER HOUSING COuua): nf
PRILON AMD Fan AVIATION DEPARTMENT aeons SEPARA BE an asics 4 FINANCE DEPARTMENT SCHOOLS SCHOOLS SCWOOLS SCHOOLS SCHOOLS
HEAT AMD VENT ADVISORY COMM. 7
E | | | | t | | | |
TRAFFIC AWD TRAFFIC, PamEinc
2OARD OF FIRE ( ( sun.ows OVITORY ComMisSOM BOARD OF LinkaRT
POLICE COMMITTEE TRANSFOR Ta ThOw and TRaMDT ! WATER COMMITTEE PARES COMM TTEE a
( MASTERS ) ) | ‘Coal iDo" ‘COMMITTEE ) ( COMMITTEE ) I OM PARES TRUSTEES
I
T == ; T I T
t
| FIRE DEPARTMENT | | POLICE DEPARTMENT | | mare cerarae | 4 WATER DEPARTMENT eam wo ceurreay: F____= 1
ite
I
1
ATLANTA
MUNICIPAL COURT
wrEROR COURTOF |
FULTON COUNTY 1
wore po
eo ee oe
' ATLANTA FUL TOM COUNTY |
JOINT PLANNING BOARD I 7a
' ATLANTA: FULTON county 1
JOT BOARDOF = =
be nd
PRESENT ORGANIZATION
CITY GOVERNMENT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
1969
ATLANTs CHILDREN
AMD YOUTH SERVICES
COUNCIL
!
!
Lo
F
\
'
1
'
1
|
'
1
!
|
1
!
!
|
!
'
!
t
'
t
!
1
t
!
| |
COMME TY
RELATIONS
COM oM
Poorer enn ene ee === ye
GROINARCE CEGICATIVE
aco Be FENSE
Soweinwondbeece,
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
or an
ADMINISTRATIVE STAPT
[ATUITA FULTON cou COUNTY} Pa
Lccid te
ARO OF
er ASIESSORS
sgiTn of an aT A
UT
| nec ECREATION AUTHORITY
———
poor e == 45
| sTaTeDerarTuent |
1 OF EDUCATION I
Sa
aye
SCHOOL BOARD
r METROPOLITAN SCHOOL
1 DEVELOPMENT Counc |
Moa ee il
JUPERIMTENDENT }- 4 COORDINATOR |
comma ECATIONS
PERSONNI ViION
fe a ee =
4
POOH ANG Fan
ae OF FIRE
MASTERS
| FIRE DEPARTMENT
: L
i | [ | I |
aaa J ) Divide OF RESEARCH AND SEO FEST: Pe ADMINISTRATIVE
FINANCE COsmITTEE (rotons COMMITTEE IMpTEUC TION DEVELOPMENT DIVILON era erica SERVICES DIVIDON
a d PURCHAUNG.
| arr cers | | Taxassenon = | OEPARTUENT |
i
BUILDING AND BUILDING CODE ADVISORY BO4kD 7
AVIATION COUMITTEE ATHLETIC COMMITTEE aby nO OM PLUWDING AND SANITARY.“ LAND AGN AREAL AREA I aREa AREA IW AREA ¥
PLUMBING EXAMoWwING BOARD ro
PLUMBING ADVISORT BOARD 4
CCTRICAL EXAMIFING BOARD =f
CLECTMICAL ADVISORT fO4RD ra
AVIATION DEPARTMENT AUDITORIUM CIty HALL BETTER HOUSIHG COMMISHON pang FINANCE DEPARTMENT SCHOOLS SCHOOLS SCHOOLS ACHOOLS SCHOOLS
| AND CIVIC CENTER DEPARTMENT WEATAND VENTADVISONT Coun }+—4
TRAFFIC AND Te, Partin '
BUILDENG PUBLIC WORKS ADVISORY COMMISSION BOARD OF LINRARY
) ( POLICE COMMITTEE ) | Trasiron TaTiow ( an = ») ( Pa ) { a THe ) ( WATER COMMITTEE ) ( PARES COMMITTEE ) OM PARKS | | TRUSTEES, |
a ee ee : T
1
1
| | POLICE DEPARTMENT ] SurLiMs ase a | == | | WATER OEPARTMENT | | Paes Je coma ren. }--- ial
<<<. 2=
1
1
PRESENT ORGANIZATION
CITY GOVERNMENT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
1969
| ELECTORATE
So vance
‘LANT A-FUL TOM COUN"
I TONY PUaaWiG BARD yea
Soe aa '
j ATLANTA FULTON COUNTY
1 JOWNT BOARD OF
eel
wrenor couRTOF Tf
FULTON COUNTY 1
scree fe -—-/
i
aa
——— ee
faTtantaructon COUNTY |
JOINT BOARD OF
TAD ASSEMORS
Parrot amianta |
eooo- 4
GENERAL coe iL GOVERNMENT
[waren]
BOARD OF ALDERMEN
ATLANTA anna
and Toure SERVICES Recanond
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER AND
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF
ORDINANCE LEGILATIVE
ct
wae ee = -- -
b——-————-—--+
PERSONNEL
OEPARTHENT
ATLANTA ATLANTA
PAL COURT TRAFFIC COURT
Fe
-—
FINANCE COmmITTCE
ba — =) — — - = ll
|
poco -4
aia aaa ae ae ee ee a. ak, aa
ooo
Ory cere |
Tan AttEsOR
OUILOING CODE ADVISORY BOARD
ADW OD ON PLUMBING AND Last Tam
AVIATION COnulTTEE
AVIATION DEPARTMENT
PLUMENG ADVRORT BOARD =
ELECTRICAL ERAMIMIHG BOARD ;=-—4
ELECTRICAL ADVISORY BOARD fey
i
DETTER ROUMNG Coss LION bmmy
HEAT AND VENT AGYISORT COMM, oy
PRION nD Fate
AUDITORVL COT aL
and CIVIC COMTER DEPARTMENT
4
4
PLUMBING EXaMiNinG BOARD |
1 statecerartwent I I weteoroutanscuoo. |
AND FULTON COUNTY
1 EF gatwenicar ute | 1 OF EDUCATION 4] | SEES COUNCIL 4
----7+--- atta ta bgt cea
a 1
t '
I
I
1 SCHDOL BOAED -----
1
[snus | =
SUPERINTENDENT -
FoR ADMINISTRATIVE
COMMUIETY RELATIONS ASUSTANT
pivot OF RESEARCH AND SCHOOL PLANT PLANNING —_ =
( ECHR courte) | INSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION eae Brien SERVICES DIVIDON
| PURCHASING
DEPARTMENT
aReal | Apa tt | | AREA MH aRnaty AREA Y
[asonen |
| SCHOOLS | SCHOOLS | SCHOOLS | | sores | SCHOOLS |
I I |
TRAFFIC AND
BOARD OF FIRE
amnoee ) ( POLICE Committee ) |
_ PameInG MeL OG
‘Couult tte Tt tt t FIRE
BUILDING INSPECTION
DEPARTMENT
TRANSPORTATION
COMMON
-----------'+----------
TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT
t-------—],-
FIRE OFF ARTMEMT
| 4s
PUBLIC BOERS
COMMITTEE
PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
WATER DEPARTMENT
PARES AND CEMETERY
DEPARTMENT
ADVISORT COuMiszoM
On PARKS
OOARO OF LIBRARY
TRUSTEES
eon - --
| supemo cover oF
! FULTON COUNTY
L-~---,---! beat a eee
poco ----4
1 | ATLANTs. FULTON COUNTT L.
! | JOINT PLaMMInG OO4RD Y
P ATLANTA FULTON COUNTY |
1 JOINT BOARD OF r
ADJUSTMENT
PRESENT ORGANIZATION
CITY GOVERNMENT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
1969
7 4 rc rc
pA ee: ft On AT ! 1 statecerantueny | I weTROPOLITAN
1 “Tiasesons | L pteneaTow AUTHORITY 1 OF EDUCATION = | rece
L a bem L----+---4
——————————— es |
ATLANTA
WUMOCIPAL COURT
ATLANTA CHIL OREM COmmatie Tr
AMD TOUTH SERVICES: RELATIONS
COUNCIL nt
MOUSNG AUTHORITY
pi ERNMENT
[_waror_]
4 4 I
BOARD OF ALDERMEN
SCHOOL BOaRD
CHIL ADM@USTRATIVE
‘OFFICER AB
7
|
|
!
!
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF
PERE
‘BOARD
BUDGET CoweussiOM
a eee Se ene ee ine ge eae ee roe b--J
| [ it i |
(rovcu UNG COMMITTEE )
PURCHAUNG
DEPARTMENT
DIVISION OF RESEARCH AND SCE PLAT EE ees ADMINISTRATIVE
FIANCE COMMITTEE INSTRUC TrOat Kk: pIvinoH een Seo SERVICES DIVISION
I
'
I
t
!
'
1
!
!
1
!
!
!
!
!
|
|
1
!
!
1
1
|
|
L
r
|
!
!
!
1
J
| cITy CLERK | | TAR ASSESOR
AUDITORIUM CTT MALL
PRION AND Fan AVIATION DEPARTMENT | attr coer ote |
in
=
BUILOING CODE ADVISORY BoARo 4 [tao scomr | | | | |
ab BD GM PLUMBING AND SAxI TAR YE “| AREAL AREA tt AREA ttl AMER IY area ¥
PLUMBING CramininG BOARD
PLUMBING ADVILORY BOARD <4
FLECTMICAL EXaMiNENG BOARD
ELECTRICAL ADVISORY BOARD
BETTER HOULING COMMIIiIGN FMUANCE DEPARTMENT senD0LS SCHOOLS SOHOOLS SCHOOLS, SCHOOLS.
HEAT AND VENT ADVISORY COMM.
TRAFFIC AMD TRAFFIC, PARKING
( bat ) ( POLICE COmmITTER ) | TRANSPORTATION | ( AMD TRANSIT )
Cnt Si COmaiT TEE
[a
-----------l----------+
sneer | | marec otro |
|
( Tia ) ( WATER COMMITTEE ) ( =) | ASNLEORY Ceased | BOARD OF LIBRARY |
T
1
saa | | = = ears [mma |
BUILDING
Coan TTEE
BUILOING INSPECTION
DEPARTMENT
TTTT
ps ne a ed
PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
!
L
! PRESENT ORGANIZATION
CITY GOVERNMENT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
See beeecmercses 1969
1 supemor courtor | | ATLANTA. FULTON COUNTY LL
1 “FULTON COUNTY ) SOINT PLaMWNG BOARD 7 a
pas Sie ciarenl ares ses eee gee aay sega ean mien aR nal ait ts vesgcacon iterate
r F i G a oro “4 1 F 7
1 jaTcanTaruLTON couNTY | | [ ATLANTA FULTON COUNTY | a OF ATLANTA Sareccisrnc | uETeoroLiTan schoo, E
1 r 1 1 i I 1 OF EDUCATION t ' DEVELOPMENT COUCH 1
' ADAUSTMENT 1 TAR ASSESSORS nbeneaTian SoTeonTY
1 ———-=-— 1 Lee ed bee eee ead bo--->---4 Liew enenamil
Lb L a 1
r F T
' t ! i
l 4M !
! ' ' fr : : ! SCHOOL BOARD
! 2 s ! BOARD OF ALDERMEN I
1 ATLANTA CHILDREN COMMUNITY 1 ' 1
I AND YOUTH SERVICES | REL ATions | t I i
COUNCIL Cuan ic =
I ! I CHIEF ADMINS TRATIVE !
Fi ATLANTA STADCUM
1 ‘ \ ' ADMONISTRATIVE STAFF i
!
| i 1 ' :
! i ! 1 SUPERINTERDERT
1 ! 7 \
1 1 | !
I | | '
I 1 I
!
t ! 1 ' ADMAMISTRATIVE
1 1 ! : communi TY RELATION ASHSTANT
! !
'
! \
t : OFFICE OF THE
i
t | RETROLLER PERSONNEL DIVIEEOH
! !
=-—-~—~—--4 | l L
c r
ATLANTA ee i ! pivision OF SEARCH 42D Sag a ae ADMINIATRATIVE
MUNICIPAL COURT i eer erere FMANCE CMMUT TES I PURCHASING COMMUTTEE INSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION een ete SERVICES DIVISION
fi I
| i
| 1 TY 1
l
1 r
| Lu | CITY CLERK, | | TaN assessor | PURCHASING. |
sci BUILDING CODE ADVISORY BOARD
SUALOING nD [abv 80 OW PLUWBING AND SANITARY “J L PARTMENT AREA! AREA UI AREA I AREA i AREA Y
PLUMBING EXAMINING BOARD -—{
PLUMBING ADVISORY BOAR [-—f
ELECTRICAL EXamininG BOARD [~~
| ELECTRICAL ADVISORY BOARD [oj
AUDITOR rrr MALL BETTER HOWLING COMM : | [ | | |
PRION AND Fame AVIATION DEPARTHENT | PP ogee | Gees | ES cs FINANCE OURART MENT SCHOOLS scHOOLS,
I |
PUBLIC a AOVILORT COmmri Om BOARD OF LIBRARY
( oe ) ( ATER COMMITTEE ) ( PARES COMMITTEE ) | On PARES | TRULTEES |
TRAFFIC AND TRAFFIC, PARKING
ee ? BUIL OinG
POLICE COMMITTEE TRANSrG ATA TIO axD TRaNUT com
) ( ) | ( ree ) i )
CHG INSPECTION
DEPARTMENT
( eoann oF
MAST
‘WATER DEPARTMENT | Pane ee eee eer I. ees 5 uBLIC LipnanY
Le----- A)
POLICE OCF ARTMENT
PARTMENT
ae WORKS
— -_-—
PRESENT ORGANIZATION
CITY GOVERNMENT OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
paca n= p--~-----4 1969
| supemon couator I } ATLANTA-FULTON COUNTY L_
1“ FuLToOH COUNTY 1 j JOT PLANNING BoaRD yp
aaa ge ed ———<—— poo----- anaes ee eiieloe eee i inf Semen ra ins pee gras a er eam a
r 1 ATLANTA FUL on eT 1 ! On urea re jeDuNTYy 1 r ‘CITY OF ATLANTA 7} STATE DEPARTMENT 1 O peraapans et
i “oun | |OT el earl 7 1 OF EDUCATION = | DEVELOPuENT coUNerL i
a ah ae mein ll L--=s ae a ll Perio it a rl Le pe el bose ee
I
GENERAL MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT 1
' ' SCHOOL BOARD —--—----+
ATLANT& CHILDREN
asd YOUTH SERVICES
COUNCIL
-----
BOARD OF ALDERMEN
if
CHIDF ADMINESTRATIVE
‘OFFICER
ADMOGSTRATIVE STAFF
eg a | sromer |
| ‘MIPERINTENDENT }-+ COORDINATOR |
COORDINATOR FOR
COMMUNITY RELATIONS ASOSTANT
‘OFFICE OF TH
a
| | | | l
SCHOOL PLANT PLAHING
(rorousne courte) CONSTRUCTION | ADMINISTRA’
TIVE
SERVICES DIVisteat
r
PURCHADHG
Cty CLene | | TA AMEDOR | [ DEPARTMENT |
i 1
| mpacemr | nea nea area aneaiy arta
PLUMBING EXAMINING BOARD = >|
PLUMEING ADVISORY BOARD 4
ELECTRICAL EXAMINING BOARD F<
PUBLIC HOUENG URBAN RENEWAL
OrvivioN DIvEION
BUDGET COmmiiuoN
FINANCE COMMITTEE
SS | Se
ae
RESEARCH AND
AND
CEVELGPMENT Divrirnt SERVICES DIVISION
ATLANTA
onvigioN OF
(HS TRUC TION
MUNICIPAL COURT
T
'
t
t
I
I
'
!
!
!
I
It
I
!
!
I
!
|
!
I
!
I
I
!
!
!
L
r
|
!
!
!
!
|
ee me a cee ae ae mee ee ae ae a I---b
BUT ote AND
ATHLE Tie Coma T The
ELECTRICAL ADVISORY BOARD bey
AUDITOR crt Habe BETTER HOUSING Communion —f..
PRION AND Fame AVIATION DEPARTMENT AND CIVIC CENTER DEPARTMENT “| FDOANCE OLPARTMENT SCHOOLS SCHOOLS Poros SCHOOLS SCHOOLS
WEATAND VENTADVISoRT coum [>=
4
TRAPRIC anit aa Fain !
ROARD OF FIRE rovice COMMITTEE Throne hoe ie pup I PUBLIC WORKS ekvun cuaeitran vi eT Ie ADVISORY COwursirom BOARD OF LIBRARY
( MASTERS ) ( ST mee, COMMITTEE i COMMITTEE ON PARKS TRUSTEES
Soe ea ; T
i !
FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT | sean trae | Mates eT Bad | = | WATER DEPARTHI ‘| === }---- aed
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 2, Folder 4, Document 23
Box 2
Box 2 Folder 4
Folder topic: Planning department | 1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/5fa6b91102ff517eb42b1a2db7161297.pdf
2501049ab3c1e962ad7c9fe874f33d5a
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
ATLANTA,GEOROIA
FROM:
d.
Dan E . Sweat,
Jr.
For your information
D
Please refer to the attached correspondence and make the
necessary reply.
D
Advise me the status of the attached.
FORM 25- 4- S
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
Office of the’ Mayor
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
OUTE SLIP
FROM: Dan E. Sweat, Jr.
/
(Z] For your information
{_] Please refer to the attached correspondence and make the
necessary reply.
[_] Advise me the status of the attached.
| Z 7
aa
FORM 25-4-S
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 2, Folder 4, Document 22
Box 2
Box 2 Folder 4
Folder topic: Planning department | 1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/ce797264da3ac7a362b6049841f8cf92.pdf
0d0f2f5326a33865b6a75372b9376a55
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
- -.-.- -~--.::-::--.,:-.'.".""'..•.::::--- .-_ - -.~-~ --143.215.248.55 12:53, 29 December 2017 (EST)II"
'
I·
AN ORDINANCE
BY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
I
, WHEREAS, by ordinance of December 21, 1964, the Mayor and Board
of Aldermen of the City of Atlanta, Georgia, caused to be created a standing
committee of the Board of Aldermen entitled Urbar:i Renewal Policy Committee,
as.set forth in Section 2-40. 2 of the Code of Ordi nonces, City of Atlanta,
Georgia effective July I, 1965, as amended, and
WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable and in the public interest that the number
of standing committees of the Board of Aldermen of the City of Atlanta, Georgia
be reduced in number and that such action would be in keeping with the precedent
established by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen in 1967, and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the functions and responsibilities
of the Urban Ren ewal Policy Committee can readily and expeditiously be transferred
to another standing committee of the Board of Aldermen of the City of Atlanta,
Georgia, namely, the Planning and Development Committee, and
WHEREAS, such action should increase and improve communications between
and coordination of activities of both the City of Atlanta, Georgia and its urban
renewal agent, the Atlanta Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta, Georgia.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Board of
Aldermen of the City of Atlanta as follows:
I. That Section 2-40.2 of the Code of the City of Atlanta is here by
repealed and the Urban Renewal Policy Committee is abolished.
2. That Section 2-40. I (b) of the Code of the City of Atlanta is hereby
amended by striking said paragraph in its entirety and inserting in
lieu thereof the follow ing:
(b) Membership. The Planning and Development Committee sh al I be
composed of eight (8) members of the Board of Aldermen appointed
by the Moyor a nd ·two (2) c1clvisory members from th e Housing
�r
..
II
-2Authority of the City of Atlanta appoinl·ecl by the Chairman
of the Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta. The Housing
Authority members of this committee shal I have the power
to vote only on those items of housing and urban renewal
whic~ are going before the Housing Authority's Board of
Commissioners for further action. The Mayor shall appoint
from the Board of Ald ermen the chairman of said committee
and the other seven (7) members. The Mayor shall appoint
the Planning and Development Committee so that a
representation is obtained of aldermanic committees concerned
with community development, redevelopment, and
improvement.
3.
That Section 2-40.1 (c) of the Code of the City of Atlanta is hereby
amended by striking said paragraph in its entirety and inserting
in lieu th ereof the following:
(c) Functions, responsibilities. This Planning and Development
Committee shall have the primary responsibility to review and
coordinate the short and long range plans and programs of
oll city efforts in the fields of community development,
redevelopm ent, housing, facilities and improvements, and
to
make suggestions to other appropriate a lde rma nic committees
ond to recommend actions and policies for adoption by the
Board of Alderm en to insure max imum coordination and the
highest qua! ity of urban community deve lopme nt through ou t
the City. This responsibility shall include but is not limited to
the review and evaluation of th e e lements of th e compre he nsive
(general) plan deve lopment by th e Pl ann ing De par tme nt
with guidance From th e Atlanta - Fulton County Joint Planning
Board; th is comprehensive plan to be composed of at lea st a
�,,
II
II
-3land use plan, transpor tati on plan and a comm unily
foci! ities plan with pub Iic improv ements program. The
comm ii-tee shall further be responsible for developing
p91 icy recommendations on al I other matters concerning
the planning and coordination of future ; city developments
including, specifically, the Community Improvement
Program (CIPL
Open Space, Urban
.
. Beautification, the
1962 Federal Highway Act, the Workable Progr"am for
Community Improvement, Urban Renewal and Neighborhood
Development Program, preliminary and project or
execution plans, and other related urban renewal matters
formerly under the responsibi Iity of the Urban Renewal
Committee or the Urban Renewal Policy Committee.
The Committee shall further review all applications for
federal grants that are referred from the Grants Review Board
for planning considerations to determine their conformity
with adopted overall plans and policies for the development
of the City.
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that all ordinances and parts of Ordinances
in conflict_with this Ordinance be and the same are hereby repealed.
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
AN ORDINANCE
BY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
- WHEREAS, by ordinance of December 21, 1964, the Mayor and Board
of Aldermen of the City of Atlanta, Georgia, caused to be created a standing
committee of the Board of Aldermen entitled Urban Renewal Policy Committee,
as set forth in Section 2-40.2 of the Code of Ordinances, City of Atlanta,
Georgia effective July |, 1965, as amended, and
WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable and in the public interest that the number
of sfonding committees of the Board of Aldermen of the City of Atlanta, Georgia
be reduced in number and that euch action would be in keeping with the precedent
established by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen in 1967, and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the functions and responsibilities
of the Urban Renewal Policy Committee can readily and expeditiously be transferred
to another standing committee of the Board of Aldermen of the City of Atlanta,
Georgia, namely, the Planning and Development Committee, and
WHEREAS, such action should increase and improve communications between
and coordination of activities of both the City of Atlanta, Georgia and its urban
renewal agent, the Atlanta Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta, Georgia.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by he Mayor and Board of
Aldermen of the City of Atlanta as follows: |
I. That Section 2-40.2 of the Code of the City of Atlanta is hereby
repealed and the Urban Renewal Policy Committee is abolished.
2. That Section 2-40.1 (b) of the Code of the City of Atlanta is hereby
amended by striking said paragraph in its entirety and inserting in
lieu thereof the following:
(b) Membership, The Planning and Development Committee shall be
composed of eight (8) members of the Board of Aldermen appointed
by the Mayor and two (2) advisory members from the Housing
3.
un
Authority of the City of Atlanta appointed by the Chairman
of the Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta. The Housing
Authority members of this committee shall have the power
to vote only on those items of housing and urban renewal
which are going before the Housing Authority's Board of
Commissioners for further action. The Mayor shall appoint
from the Board of Aldermen the chairman of said committee
and the other seven (7) members. The Mayor shall appoint
the Planning and Development Committee so that a
representation is obtained of aldermanic committees concerned
with community development, redevelopment, and
improvement.
That Section 2~40.1 (c) of the Code of the City of Atlanta is hereby
amended by striking said paragraph in its entirety and inserting
in lisu thereof the following:
3) Functions, respansibilivies. This Planning and Development
Committee shall have the primary responsibility to review and
coordinate the short and long range plans and programs of
all city efforts in the fields of community development,
redevelopment, housing, facilities and improvements, and
to make suggestions to other appropriate aldermanic committees
and to recommend actions and policies for adoption by the
Board of Aldermen to insure maximum coordination and the
highest quality of urban community development throughout
the City. This responsibility shall include but is not limited to
the review and evaluation of the elements of the comprehensive
(general) plan development by the Planning Department
with guidance from the Atlanta - Fulton County Joint Planning
Board; this comprehensive plan to be composed of at least a
zy
land use plan, transportation plan and a community
facilities plan with public improvements program. The
committee shall further be responsible for developing
policy recommendations on all other matters concerning
the planning and coordination of future city developments
including, specifically, the Community Improvement
Program (CIP), Open Space, Urban Beautification, the
1962 Federal Highway Act, the Workable Program for
Community Improvement, Urban Renewal and Neighborhood
Development Program, preliminary and project or
execution plans, and other related urban renewal matters
formerly under the responsibility of the Urban Renewal
Committee or the Urban Renewal Policy Committee.
The Committee shall further review all applications for
federal grants that are referred from the Grants Review Board
for planning considerations to determine their conformity
with adopted overall plans and policies for the development
of the City. |
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that all ordinances and parts of Ordinances
in conflict with this Ordinance be and the same are hereby repealed.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 2, Folder 4, Document 21
Box 2
Box 2 Folder 4
Folder topic: Planning department | 1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/7e8d4a48cd38bf74bb334846e3a28244.pdf
410c1335128d5e1a610375c86c1945aa
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
OFFICE OF CITY CLF,RK
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
_.,
A RESOLUTION
BY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, the City Planning Tupartment is presently studying the
Plunkettown neighborhood for inclusion in the Atlanta 1970 Neighborhood
Development Program and
WHEREAS, the Plunkettown neighborhood extends south of the Atlanta
City limit s into the City of Mountainview and Clayton County and
WHEREAS, Clayton Caunty, Mountainview, and the City of Atlanta face
common problems in this area
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Board of AJ.dermen
of the City of Atlanta that Mayor I van Allen, Jr. reque st the Board of
Commissioners of Clayton County and the Mayor and Council of the City
of Mountainview to participate i.rt a joint study de signed to solve the
problems of the PlunkettoW!l neighborhood.
ADOPTED by Board of Aldermen July 21 , 1 969
APPROVED July 23, 1969
A true copy,
-
.~
erk
. . .- - .i¢JU___....,. .
~~-
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
| OFFICE OF CITY CLERK
is ATLANTA, GEORGIA
A RESOLUTION
BY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, the City Planning Department is presently studying the
Plunkettown neighborhood for inclusion in the Atlanta 1970 Neighborhood
Development Program and
WHEREAS, the Plunkettown neighborhood extends south of the Atlanta
City limits into the City of Mountainview and Clayton County and
WHEREAS, Clayton County, Mountainview, and the City of Atlanta face
common problems in this area
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen
of the City of Atlanta that Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. request the Board of
Commissioners of Clayton County and the Mayor and Council of the City
of Mountainview to participate in a joint bud designed to solve the
problems of the Plunkettown neighborhood.
ADOPTED by Board of Aldermen July 21, 1969
APPROVED July 23, 1969
A true copy,
ca
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 2, Folder 4, Document 20
Box 2
Box 2 Folder 4
Folder topic: Planning department | 1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/fa44eece42ddf05e7665d6e60ef78438.pdf
c92c59514167e594ddeb996e985d4532
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
OFFICE OF CITY CLERK
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
A RESOLUTION
BY PLANNING .AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, the City Planning Department is presently studying the
Plu.nkettown neighborhood for inclusion in the Atlanta 1970 Neighborhood
Development Program and
WHEREAS, the Plu.nkettown neighborhood extends south of the Atlanta
City limits into the City of Mountainview and Clayton County and
WHEREAS, Clayton County, Mountainview, and the City of Atlanta face
common problems in this area
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen
of the City of Atlanta that Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. request the Board of
Commissioners of Clayton County and the Mayor and Council of the City
of Mountainview to participate ma joint study designed to solve the
problems of the Plu.nkettown neighborhood.
AOOPTED by Board of .Aldermen July 21, 1 96 9
APPROVED July 23, 196 9
A true copy,
-
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
OFFICE OF CITY CLERK
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
A RESOLUTION
BY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, the City Planning Department is presently studying the
Plunkettown neighborhood for inclusion in the Atlanta 1970 Neighborhood
Development Program and
WHEREAS, the Plunkettown neighborhood extends south of the Atlanta
City limits into the City of Mountainview and Clayton County and
WHEREAS, Clayton County, Mountainview, and the City of Atlanta face
common problems in this area
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen
of the City of Atlanta that Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. request the Board of
Commissioners of Clayton County and the Mayor and Council of the City
of Mountainview to participate in a joint study designed to solve the
problems of the Plunkettown neighborhood.
ADOPTED by Board of Aldermen July 21, 1969
APPROVED July 23, 1969
A true copy,
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 2, Folder 4, Document 19
Box 2
Box 2 Folder 4
Folder topic: Planning department | 1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/f8c61bf9b71c6d95b8da9fb7f8adfa66.pdf
2a6c8d421cc52e80944fb52621b20dc3
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
..
~
.....
.,_
....
---
.
~
-
II
II
II
A RESOLUTION
BY Fl NANCE COMMITTEE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, the City has just completed a Community Facilities Plan which
indicates the need and desirable location for many capital projects throughout the
City, and
WHEREAS, the City expects to complete a transportation plan in the near
future in conjunction with the five county region and the State Highway Department
of Georgia, and
WHEREAS, this transportation plan will indicate the need and desirable
location for new and improved transportation facilities throughout the City and the
region, and
WHEREAS, the City has engaged
in
a capital improvement programming
effort for a number of years and has become increasingly effective in th is activity,
and
WHEREAS, for the first time a means of financing a limited amount of
capital improvements on a continuing basis has become available, and
WHEREAS, the implementation of plans and projects to reach the City's goals
and objectives requires adequate financing and continuing scheduling according to
realistic priorities as well as close coordination.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that those departments and agencies
of the City of Atlanta aiding in preparation of the 1969-1973 Capital Improvement
Program make every possible ~Hort to ensure that their projects .and proposals for
the coming five-year program reflect accurately and realistically their goals,
objectives and plans as expressed in the Community Facilities Plan and the soon
to be completed Transportation Plan.
BE IT .FURTHER RESOLVED
coordinated and cooperative basis.
that this effort be on a comprehensive, continuing,
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
A RESOLUTION
BY FINANCE COMMITTEE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, the City has just completed a Community Facilities Plan which
indicates the need and desirable location for many capital projects throughout the
City, and
WHEREAS, the City expects to complete a transportation plan in the near
future in conjunction with the five county region and the State Highway Department
of Georgia, and
WHEREAS, this transportation plan will indicate the need and desirable
location for new and improved transportation facilities throughout the City and the
region, and
WHEREAS, the City has engaged in a capital improvement programming
effort for a number of years and has become increasingly effective in this activity,
and
WHEREAS, for the first time a means of financing a limited amount of
capital improvements on a continuing basis has become available, and
WHEREAS, the implementation of plans and projects to reach the City's goals
and objectives requires adequate financing and continuing scheduling according to
realistic priorities as well as close coordination.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that those departments and agencies
of the City of Atlanta aiding in preparation of the 1969-1973 Capital Improvement
Program make every possible effort to ensure that their projects and proposals for
the coming five-year program reflect accurately and realistically their goals,
objectives and plans as expressed in the Community Facilities Plan and the soon
to be completed Transportation Plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this effort be on a comprehensive, continuing,
coordinated and cooperative basis.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 2, Folder 4, Document 18
Box 2
Box 2 Folder 4
Folder topic: Planning department | 1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/3cc4c928e9ac897903c4beb94d19ca9d.pdf
597e2b2ea152abf6a8fcc0b35c287272
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
ATTITUDE SURVEY OF THE
RE SIDENTS OF PLUNKETTOWN
City of At l anta
Dep artment of Pl anning
Augus t 11 , 1969
�-
This report presents the results of an attitude survey conducted
among the people of the Atlanta section of Plunkettown by the City of
Atlanta Department of Planning at the request of the Mayor and Board
of Aldermen . The purpose of this survey was to explore, on a broad
base, the atti tudes of the people toward living in Plunke ttown versus
living elsewhere, and to discover which aspects of life in Plunkettown
the people consider to be major problems . The ultimate purpose of this
report is to provide information concerning the people ' s desires toward
r emai ning in Plunket town to help the Board of Aldermen in making the
dec ision as to whether or not an urban renewal project in Plunkettown
will be a residential rehabilitation and rebuilding project.
Interviews were conducted during the daytime hours on Friday,
August 1 , and Monday , August 4, and during the evening hours on Tuesda y, August 5. The group of interviewers who conducted the survey
included t wo members of the Planning Department staff and five summer
i nterns from the Mayor ' s office . All interviewers were white . (A list
of int erviewers appears in Appendix A.)
Methodology
The survey was c onducted through use of a door -to-door ora l interview . An attempt was made t o conduct at le as t one interview in each
household. Contact was attempted at each household at leas t three
times : morning , afternoon , and evening. In all, interviews were conducted in eighty-two hous eholds , or 85% of all households.
The interview questionnaire contained two basic types of questions .
The first type asked f or factu al information such as place of work,
travel time to work, number of persons in the household, and ownership
of property . The second asked atti tud inal questions about the desirability of Plunket town as a place to live as compared to other places.
General Reoults
The factual resul ts of the survey show that:
1.
The workers who live in Plunkettown have an average reported
t ravel time to work of twenty minutes by car; and that over
half ( 26 of 41) work within two miles of Plunkettown.
2.
Thirty-eight per cent (38%) of the present housing is overcrowded, having one or more persons per room.
3.
Of the eighty-two households surveyed, thirty-two (39%)
owned their houses while the remaining fifty (61%) are
renters.
�- 2 -
4.
Ten of the interviewed f ami lies own property other than th at
upon whi.ch they are living . Six ow-n other property in
Plunkettown . four others own property in Cl ayt on County,
lorthwest Fulton County, East Point, a nd Eas t Atlanta . These
four owners reported plans to build new homes on this property .
5.
Forty-two of the eighty-two interviews were conducted during
aircra ft peak tra ffic periods . These forty-a~o interviews
l asted an average of seventeen minutes and were interrupted
an average of seven times for an average of eighty-one seconds
per interview, e.g 8% of the interview time was lost due to
aircraft noise.
0
The attitudinal results of the survey show the following ma j or
results:
1.
A majority of interviewees woul d prefer l iving e l sewher e to
living in Plunket town as it is presently constituted . (See
Question 11.)
2.
A ma jority of the interviewees consider aircraft noise, a
problem which canno t be fully solved, to be a ma jor probl em
to living in Plunke ttown . (See Questions 10a, 15 , and 17b.)
3.
There appears to be a desire among some o f the interviewees
to move together to a " New Plunkettown". At this point in
time , fully reli able attitudes on this issue c annot be expected
as the people do not now h ave a real opportunity to consider
this choice . (See Questions 12 and the "Many of my friends
live here" response in 17 a .)
4.
If they were to move, there is a definite desir e among the
interviewees to remain in an outlying area, as opposed to
downtown , where they c an occupy single family type houses.
( See Questions 12a and 13.)
Det ailed Results
This section presents the complete interview form and the tabul ated results for each question asked. Interview instructions are presented in Appendix B.
uestions and Responses
1.
How long have you lived in Plunkettown?
Average l ength of res idence among interviewees . - 24.5 years
�- 3 -
2.
How old are you?
Average age of interviewees - 50 .5 year s
Range - 13 years to 90 years
3.
Where do you work ?
Within two miles - 26
Fur t her than two miles - 15
4.
How l ong does i t t ake you to get to work?
Av erage - 19 minutes
Range - 2 minutes to 1 hour
5.
How do you ge t t o work ?
Car - 35
Wal k - 4
Bus ~·- 2
6.
How many people live in this house ?
Average - 3.4
7.
How many rooms in this house ?
Average - 4 . 0
( 31 houses with one or more persons per room)
8.
Do you own this house or rent it ?
Own - 32
Rent - 50
9.
IF OWN :
Do you own any other property?
Yes - 10
No - 2 2
I F SO: Where?
Plunkettown - 6
Elsewhere - 4
10.
Do you like l iving here ?
Yes - 50
No - 31
�.- 4 -
a.
What do you like about living here?
,':It's home - 14
I've been here a long t ime - 11
I l i ke the peopl e - 11
It's ctose to work - 9
Nothing - 9
Low Rent - 8
It's be tt er than where I lived before - 4
The pl ay area - 2
I own my house - 2
It is a convenient loc ation - 2
I like single-family houses - 1
I t' s clos e to church - 1
b.
What don't you like about living here ?
No sewers - t.,O
Unpaved streets - 22
Houses - 20
Planes - 19
No mail service - 8
Poor bus service - 6
No inside water - 6
Poor police protection - 5
No hea lth service - 4
Nothing - 4
Unc ertainty about future - 2
Traffic problems - 2
Inconvenient location - 2
The people who live here - l
Poor street lights - l
Taxes - l
The railroad nearby - 1
Everything - 1
c.
Why have you chosen to live here ?
Came to live with relatives - 20
Low rent - 11
No other place availab l e - 10
Close to work - 8
Opportunity to buy a house - 7
It used to be a nice area - 7
I like the country - 7
I like the people - 7
Born in the area - 3
It's a better house than before - 3
This is the best I could do - 1
�.. 5 -
11.
How would you feel a bw t living somewhere else?
-
Like to ver y much
33
Like to - 14
No t mind
18
Not want to - 11
No t want to at a ll - 6
-
a.
IF NO :
Why not?
I ' m too o ld to move - 2
I ' ve been here a long time - 1
My relative s are here - 1
I don't know o f a ny other place - 1
b.
If this were overcome , would you like to l i ve s omewhere e l se?
Yes - 3
No - 2
12 .
In the past few years , severa l groups have come to Plunkettown and sugges t ed to the peop l e tha t they a ll move out
together to a new loca t ion. Wha t do you think of this idea?
It ' s a good idea - 20
The idea is 11 0 . k. 11 - 33
The idea is "o.k." i f the people can buy a new hous e - 1
The idea is 11 0 .k. 11 if the people c an move to single-family houses - 1
No opinion - 17
It's a bad idea - 10
The people should be able to move where they want - 1
12a .
IF TIIB INTERVIEWEE RESPONDS THAT HE WANTS TO MOVE :
Wha t l ocations do you think would be good if e veryone moved out
together?
No idea - 26
Poole Creek - 14
Atlanta fringe - 17
Eas t Point - 5
West Side - 2
Southwest - 1
Downtown - l
Harper Town - 1
Thomasville - 1
Carver Homes - 1
Perry Homes - 1
12b.
IF INTERVIEWEE WANTS TO STAY IN PLUNKETTOWN :
I
�- 6 -
Wha t problems need to be so lved f i rst to improve the neighborhood?
Sewers - 11
Houses - 9
Pave the stree t s - 6
Be tt er po li ce pr otection - 3
Ins i de water - 3
Stop the p lanes - 2
Railro ad noise - l
Better s tre et l ights - 1
13.
If you co uld l i ve e l sewher e, wh at gener a l area would you like
t he mos t ?
Don I t know - 13
Poo le Creek - 9
Atl anta fringe - 7
Downtown - 7
Same general area - 4
Eas t Point - 4
A pro j ec t - 4
Gil bert Road - 2
Wes t Side - 2
Hapevi lle - 1
St adium - l
Wil son Road - 1
Cl ay ton Count y - l
N• . w. Fu l ton County - 1
Forres t Park - 1
Alpharet t a - l
De c atur - l
Gordon Road - l
Was hington , D.C . - 1
14.
Can you a ff or d t o buy a house s omewhere e ls e ?
Yes - 16
No - 50
Don ' t know - 16
How much could you p ay ?
Nothing $16 / month
$30/month
$40/month
$SO/ month
$60/month
$70/month
$80/month
7
-
1
1
4
5
5
3
2
�- 7 -
Re ceipts from sal e of present house - 11
Don't know - 8
15.
Does living here with the airplanes flying over bother you ?
Very much - 57
Some - 10
Hardly at al l - 5
Not at a Ll - 10
16.
What: kind of place do you think Plunkettown is for children
to grow up in?
Very good - 2
Be tter than most other places - 5
Same as other places - 24
No t as good as most other pl. ac es - 21
·1cvery bad - 25
No opinion - 5
17a .
Now, I would like to find out exactly what: you like and dis like about living in Plunkettown . Here is a card which lists
some thi ngs we thought you might like about living here.
Would you please pick the two you like most . If t here is
anything you like, but is not on the card, go ahead and pick
it . (Read card aloud before showing.)
a.
b .
c .
d.
e.
f.
b.
I am close to work - 26
The rent is low - 38
l.fany of my friends live here - 39
I have lived here a long time - 27
I own my home - 27
Anything else - I like none of them - 3
Away from downtown
2
Good bus service - 2
I have a good home - 1
Here is a card which lists some problems we thought you might
have in Plunkettown. Would you please pick the five you think
are the biggest problems? If there is any problem you would
like to pick but do not find on the list, go ahead and pick it.
(Read aloud before showing,)
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
Not close to shopping - 23
Not close to work - 3
No recreation - 12
No mail service - 61
No sewers - 63
Too much noise - 56
No health service - 28
�- 8 -
h.
i.
j.
k.
1.
m.
n.
Poor water servic e - 30
No street paving - 66
Unemployment - 7
Housing - 34
Educ a tion - 8
Poli c e protec tion ~ 41
Anythi ng else - Bus service - 3
Street l ights - 2
Speeding - 2
Too f ar from church - 2
Not a good place f or children - 1
Old we lls are caving in - 1
Yard s are not kept up - 1
There ar e no probl enIB - 1
�7
APPENDIX A
List o f Interviewers
James 1'1 . Bruce, Offi c e of the Mayor
Danie l K. Christenbury , Office of the Mayor
Thomas Isaac , Offi c e of the Mayor
Joseph Menez , Office of the Mayor
Meg So~ell, Office of t he Mayor
Mostafa Howeedy , Department of Planning
John Ma tthews, Dep artment of Pl anning
�,._
APPENDIX B
Interview Guide - Plunkettot·m
A.
General Instruc tions .
1. This is a general guide for conducting a house-to~house s urvey
in the Plunkettm,m neighborhood. Make sure t hat al l questions
included are answered; however , if a respondant refuses to ans~er
any questions, go on to the ne,ct item on your questionnaire . Re cord
reas on for no response if possible. You may inc l ude other questions;
record them as wel l as the interviewee's answer.
2. Ple ase record all answers as accurately and c arefu lly as possible.
3. Let the interview continue if t he interviewee wishes to t a lk .
However , one hour shou l d, in most c ases , be the maximum time r equired for the interview .
4. Record the date o f the interview, the time at which the interview
begins and is completed, and t he total amount of time the interview
lasts . Record the number of times the interview is interrupted by
aircraft noise, and the approximate l ength of such interruptions.
B.
I ntroduction .
The following general introduction should be used in the interview
situation: "Hello, my name is________
I represent the City
of Atlanta {show your identification c ard) . The Mayor and Board of
Aldermen are concerned about the people living in Plunkettown . Many
different suggestions have been made about what the people of Plunkettown want from the City. However, we feel that it is necessary to
t alk directly to the people o f Plunkettown. For the next few days
we will be talking with all Plunkettown residents and asking them
questions to help us find out exactly what the people want . Could
you please take a few minutes to answer these questions?
If subject refuses to participate in the interview, t ry to find out
why. If he indicates he is too busy, try to make an appointment to interview him at another date. If he has another reason , try again to get the
i nterview . However, if he absolute ly refuses, do not persist. Record
a response and, if possible, the reason. If more than one member of a
hous ehold wants to participate in the interview session, record.their
responses separately. Each interview record should contain the responses
.
�of one person only . However, if this is not possible, indi c ate that
responses c ame from two or more people .
Remember that the main purpose is t o get answers to the basic
questi ons contained in our questionnaire. If the int erviewee has
questions to ask of you, try to delay this discussion until the end
of t he fo rmal interview. DO NOT , under any circumstances, attemp t t o
answer questions of whi ch you are unsure. The purpose of thi s interv iew is to find out what the peop le in Plunkettown thin and want .
If peop l e ask questions you cannot answer, r efer them to Mr . Johnny
Robinson or George Aldridge . (You will have a supp ly of their personal
c ards to pass ou t to everyone .)
C.
Close
Close the interview by answering any questions you can, and by
thanking the interviewee for his cooperation. State again that if he
has any additional questi ons he should c all Mr. Johnny Robinson or
Mr. George Aldri dge . Also , if he has any additional c onnnents , a ttempt
to record them on the answer sheet. (Give Mr. Aldridge's and Mr . Robi ns on's c ards .)
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
ATTITUDE SURVEY OF THE
RESIDENTS OF PLUNKETTOWN
City of Atlanta
Department of Planning
August 11, 1969
This report presents the results of an attitude survey conducted
among the people of the Atlanta section of Plunkettown by the City of
Atlanta Department of Planning at the request of the Mayor and Board
of Aldermen. The purpose of this survey was to explore, on a broad
base, the attitudes of the people toward living in Plunkettown versus
living elsewhere, and to discover which aspects of life in Plunkettown
the people consider to be major problems. The ultimate purpose of this
report is to provide information concerning the people's desires toward
remaining in Plunkettown to help the Board of Aldermen in making the
decision as to whether or not an urban renewal project in Plunkettown
will be a residential rehabilitation and rebuilding project.
Interviews were conducted during the daytime hours on Friday,
August 1, and Monday, August 4, and during the evening hours on Tues-
day, August 5. The group of interviewers who conducted the survey
included two members of the Planning Department staff and five summer
interns from the Mayor's office. All interviewers were white. (A list
of interviewers appears in Appendix A.)
Methodology
The survey was conducted through use of a door-to-door oral inter-
view. An attempt was made to conduct at least one interview in each
household. Contact was attempted at each household at least three
times: morning, afternoon, and evening. In all, interviews were con-
ducted in eighty-two households, or 85% of all households.
The interview questionnaire contained two basic types cf questions,
The first type asked for factual information such as place of work,
travel time to work, number of persons in the household, and ownership
of property. The second asked attitudinal questions about the desira-
bility of Plunkettown as a place to live as compared to other places.
General Results
The factual results of the survey show that:
1. The workers who live in Plunkettown have an average reported
travel time to work of twenty minutes by car; and that over
half (26 of 41) work within two miles of Plunkettown,
2. Thirty-eight per cent (38%) of the present housing is over-
crowded, having one or more persons per room,
3. Of the eighty-two households surveyed, thirty-two (39%)
owned their houses while the remaining fifty (61%) are
renters.
The
results:
1.
as
3.
Ten of the interviewed families own property other than that
upon which they are living. Six own other property in
Plunkettown. Four others own property in Clayton County,
Northwest Fulton County, East Point, and East Atlanta. These
four owners reported plans to build new homes on this property.
Forty-two of the eighty~two interviews were conducted during
aircraft peak traffic periods. These forty-two interviews
lasted an average of seventeen minutes and were interrupted
an average of seven times for an average of eighty-one seconds
per interview, e.g, 84 of the interview time was lost due to
aircraft noise.
attitudinal results of the survey show the following major
A majority of interviewees would prefer living elsewhere to
living in Plunkettown as it is presently constituted. (See
Question 11.)
A majority of the interviewees consider aircraft noise, a
problem which cannot be fully solved, to be a major problem
to living in Plunkettown. (See Questions 10a, 15, and 17b.)
There appears to be a desire among some of the interviewees
to move together to a "New Plunkettown". At this point in
time, fully reliable attitudes on this issue cannot be expected
as the people do not now have a real opportunity to consider
this choice. (See Questions 12 and the "Many of my friends
live here" response in 17a.)
If they were to move, there is a definite desire among the
interviewees to remain in an outlying area, as opposed to
downtown, where they can occupy single family type houses.
(See Questions 12a and 13.)
Detailed Results
This section presents the complete interview form and the tabu-
lated results for each question asked. Interview instructions are pre-
sented in Appendix B.
1.
Questions and Responses
How long have you Lived in Plunkettown?
Average length of residence among interviewees. - 24.5 years
9.
10.
How old are you?
Average age of interviewees - 50.5 years
Range ~ 13 years to 90 years
Where do you work?
Within two miles - 26
Further than two miles - 15
How long does it take you to get to work?
Average - 19 minutes
Range - 2 minutes to 1 hour
How do you get to work?
*Car - 35
Walk - 4
Bus =-2
How many people live in this house?
Average - 3.4
How many rooms in this house?
Average - 4.0
(31 houses with one or more persons per room)
Do you own this house or rent it?
Own = 32
*Rent - 50
IF OWN: Do you own any other property?
Yes - 10
No = 22
IF 80: Where?
Plunkettown - 6
Elsewhere =- 4
Do you like Living here?
*Yes - 50
No - 31
a. What do you like about living here?
*{it's home - 14
*I've been here a long time - 11
*I like the people - 11
*It's close to work - 9
*Nothing - 9
*Low Rent - 8
It's better than where I lived before - 4
The play area - 2
I own my house = 2
It is a convenient location - 2
I like single-family houses - 1
It's close to church - 1
b. What don't you like about living here?
*No sewers - 40
*Unpaved streets - 22
*Houses - 20
*Planes - 19
No mail service - 8
Poor bus service ~ 6
No inside water - 6
Poor police protection < 5
No health service - 4
Nothing - 4
Uncertainty about future - 2
Traffic problems - 2
Inconvenient Location = 2
The people who live here - 1
Poor street lights - 1
Taxes - 1
The railroad nearby = 1
Everything - 1
c. Why have you chosen to live here?
*Came to live with relatives - 20
Low rent - 11
No other place available - 10
Close to work - 8
Opportunity to buy a house = 7
It used to be a nice area - 7
I like the country - 7
I like the people - 7
Born in the area - 3
It's a better house than before - 3
This is the best I could do - 1
LL. How would you feel abort living somewhere else?
*Like to very much = 33
Like to - 14
Not mind - 18
Not want to - 1]
Not want to at all - 6
a. IF NO: Why not?
I'm too old to move - 2
I've been here a long time - 1
My relatives are here - 1
I don't know of any other place - 1
b. If this were overcome, would you like to live somewhere else?
Yes - 3
No = 2
12. In the past few years, several groups have come to Plunket-
town and suggested to the people that they all move out
together to a new location. What do you think of this idea?
*It's a good idea - 20
*The idea is "o.k.'' = 33
The idea is "o.k."' 1£ the people can buy a new house - 1
The idea is "o.k.'"' 1f the people can move to single-family houses - 1
No opinion - 17
It's a bad idea - 10
The people should be able to move where they want - 1
12a. IF THE INTERVIEWEE RESPONDS THAT HE WANTS TO MOVE:
What locations do you think would be good if everyone moved out
together?
*No idea - 26
*Poole Creek - 14
*Atlanta fringe - 17
East Point = 5
West Side - 2
Southwest - 1
Downtown - 1
Harper Town - 1
Thomasville - 1
Carver Homes - 1
' Perry Homes - 1
12b. IF INTERVIEWEE WANTS TO STAY IN PLUNKETTOWN:
What problems need to be solved first to improve the neighbor-
hood?
*Sewers - L1
“Houses - 9
*Pave the streets - 6
Better police protection - 3
Inside water = 3
Stop the planes - 2
Railroad noise - 1
Better street lights - 1
13. If you could live elsewhere, what general area would you like
the most?
Don't know - 13
Poole Creek - 9
Atlanta fringe - 7
Downtown - 7
Same general area - 4
East Point - 4
A project - 4
Gilbert Road - 2
West Side - 2
Hapeville - 1
Stadium - 1
Wilson Road - 1
Clayton County - 1
N. W. Fulton County - 1
Forrest Park = 1
Alpharetta - 1
Decatur - 1
Gordon Road - 1
Washington, D.C. - 1
14. Can you afford to buy a house somewhere else?
Yes - 16
*No - 50
Don't know - 16
How much could you pay?
Nothing - 7
$16/month -
$30/month -
$40/month -
$50/month -
$60/month =
$70/month -
$80/month -
NWR ree
Receipts from sale of present house - 11
Don't know - &
15. Does living here with the airplanes flying over bother you?
*Very much ~ 57
Some - 10
Hardly at ali = 5
Not at all - 10
16. What kind of place do you think Plunkettown is for children
to grow up in?
Very good = 2
Better than most other places - 5
*Same as other places - 24
*Not as good as most other places - 21
#Very bad - 25
No opinion - 5
17a. Wow, I would Like to find out exactiy what you like and dis-
like about living in Plunkettown. Here is a card which lists
some things we thought you might like about living here.
Would you please pick the two you like most. If there is
anything you like, but is not on the card, go ahead and pick
it. (Read card aloud before showing, }
a. I am close to work - 26
*b. The rent is low - 38
*c. Many of my friends live here =- 39
d. I have lived here a long time - 27
e. I own my home - 27
f£. Anything else - I like none of them = 3
Away from downtown = 2
Good bus service = 2
I have a good home = Ll
b. Here is a card which lists some problems we thought you might
have in Plunkettown. Would you please pick the five you think
are the biggest problems? If there is any problem you would
like to pick but do not find on the list, go ahead and pick it.
(Read aloud before showing }
a. Not close to shopping = 23
b. Not close to work = 3
c. No recreation - 12
*d. No mail service - 61
*e,. No sewers - 63
*f£. Too much noise - 56
g- No health service - 28
h. Poor water service ~ 30
*i. No street paving - 66
j- Unemployment - 7
k. Housing - 34
1. Education - 8
m. Police protection - 41
n. Anything else - Bus service - 3
Street lights - 2
Speeding = 2
Too far from church - 2
Not a good place for children - 1
Old wells are caving in - 1
Yards are not kept up - 1
There are no problems - 1
APPENDIX A
List of Interviewers
James M. Bruce, Office of the Mayor
Daniel K. Christenbury, Office of the Mayor
Thomas Isaac, Office of the Mayor
Joseph Menez, Office of the Mayor
Meg Sowell, Office of the Mayor
Mostafa Howeedy, Department of Planning
John Matthews, Department of Planning
APPENDIX B
Interview Guide = Plunkettown
A. General Instructions,
1. This is a general guide for conducting a house-to-house survey
in the Plunkettown neighborhood. Make sure that all questions
included are answered; however, if a respondant refuses to answer
any questions, go on to the next item on your questionnaire. Record
reason for no response if possible. You may include other questions;
record them as well as the interviewee's answer.
2. Please record all answers as accurately and carefully as pos-
sible.
3. Let the interview continue if the interviewee wishes to talk.
However, one hour should, in most cases, be the maximum time re-
guired for the interview.
4. Record the date of the interview, the time at which the interview
begins and is completed, and the total amount of time the interview
lasts, Record the number of times the interview is interrupted by
aireraft noise, and the approximate length of such interruptions,
B. Introduction.
The following general introduction should be used in the interview
situation: "Hello, my name is - IL represent the City
of Atlanta (show your identification card). The Mayor and Board of
Aldermen are concerned about the people living in Plunkettown. Many
different suggestions have been made about what the people of Plunket-
town want from the City. However, we feel that it is necessary to
talk directly to the people of Plunkettown. For the next few days
we will be talking with all Plunkettown residents and asking them
questions to help us find out exactly what the people want. Could
you please take a few minutes to answer these questions?
If subject refuses to participate in the interview, try to find out
why. If he indicates he is too busy, try to make an appointment to inter-
view him at another date. If he has another reason, try again to get the
interview. However, if he absolutely refuses, do not persist. Record
a response and, if possible, the reason. If more than one member of a
household wants to participate in the interview session, record their
responses separately. Each interview record should contain the responses
of one person only. However, if this is not possible, indicate that
responses came from two or more people.
Remember that the main purpose is to get answers to the basic
questions contained in our questionnaire. Lf the interviewee has
questions to ask of you, try to delay this discussion until the end
of the formal interview. DO NOT, under any circumstances, attempt to
answer questions of which you are unsure. The purpose of this inter-
view is to find out what che people in Plunkettown think and want.
If people ask questions you cannet answer, refer them to Mr. Johnny
Robinson or George Aldridge. (You will have a supply of their personal
cards to pass out to everyone.)
Cc. Close
Close the interview by answering any questions you can, and by
thanking the interviewee for his cooperation. State again that if he
has any additional questions he should call Mr. Johnny Robinson or
Mr. George Aldridge. Also, if he has any additional comments, attempt
to record them on the answer sheet. (Give Mr. Aldridge's and Mr. Rob-
inson's cards.)
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 2, Folder 4, Document 17
Box 2
Box 2 Folder 4
Folder topic: Planning department | 1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/9ade731656f4f211a38e4ccb8070a35b.pdf
37ab06103fc13a7af33a6a39c82d45a9
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
00
0
3
.M.AP
4
II
12
A
OF
CITY OF ATLANTA
IOARD Of AlDERMEN
- - --
GRAPHIC SCAL~
'
_,..,
-~~ ,.....- - ,;
ATLANTA-FULTON COUNTY
lGOl.,.,.YGOIGG.
. , , .. .,
I
JAN .
• . 0 (.... , .
• W:••OD C . - N
(ltlllUONtO
JOINT PLANNING BOARD
ATLANTA - GEORGIA
J9e7
C
n - w..•
"°"""-COO.
-.........
.. ,........u
I
·c
I
ATLANTA - FULTON COUNTY
JOI N T PLANNING BOARD
"'" i,~'7';,:.-J,c:!:.. <>•
.. ,.,,o~ ..,toPYR•0hT .,. ...
••v,,,o•-C,:,P,R>6 nT-O,S9
o.t,_,.,._c"°"o.'""' ,,..;,
oov,,,o.. ..,.,.co,-,.,a.,,.,,.,
,,,.,,,o~ ••o=•••••• ·
D
HOUSING COOE COMPLIACE PROGRAM
1970 -1971
1·
E
H ISTINGNEIGH60RHOOO
OCYELOPMENTPROGRU IS
~
UR8ANIIENEWAL J.llf AS
COOEtNrORCE:MENT
Afl1!:AOIYISIONS
.,.,,. . . .. , ~ ,.......
.-C;)
__ .,.,..- .... ,L'_,
F
G
K
---1
L
I
M
... I
00
10
1_1_
12
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
ae — =
0"—@=—_-—-—— eee —_
oo Oo 1 Z i 3 4
i 12 13 ny
A
MAP OF 4
; CITY OF ATLANTA
4 WA VIZ ‘| | _
Z | / Z Z z
4 i x al BOARD OF ALDTREMEN
B ; Ne Ef AY : tals dia
BS r . ~ rey ant pa y
GRAPHIC SCaLt f . ty Fer Ward
i ee ane F_.-“NORTHEAST-= BUCKHEAD * a tgmangr srect—_axatey gta
f ‘ Tete ‘ re i ea oy a a see Sena eee
ATLANTA- FULTON COUNTY foe, a q Ce auae penuayfenaue
JOINT PLANNING BOARD . = Se oeerae
ATLANTA~ GEORGIA 5 4 Tree erase
Jae Goey , j i Nein aaa
c r ( 4 rors seo n Soot F
i FT en Pre reas Cc
ed ATLANTA - FULTON COUNTY
A - JOINT PLANNING SOuurD e
Ae pinning a
La) fein
D q - = Smt
ne Le rome D
HOUSING CODE COMPLIACE PROGRAM ar Coe
1970 197! ENT & eteoute
sy Ledeve aula aon
[ER] ra ccsince nea " ae 4
% seals
EE] rawr commune deca "ml Silkee ilen
E E Existie atanbotcon ‘id : amen gine
SeveLEnuteT Second | es E
Gand separ sevtna cotas 7
£ ~ COOL CAPOREE ET =!
MAL Oeviieory
F
G
‘Kam
‘a
WEST
4
?.
1h
jf
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 2, Folder 4, Document 16
Box 2
Box 2 Folder 4
Folder topic: Planning department | 1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/cb13fee4f88d71aa6dc2a7c3ab556203.pdf
9dbd9bec1c7d686c752d769680583cc4
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
l
--
@id :E;7· ~ld:i?
,.
Wb@l'l'I
4,
~
ll.~q
!,
lbai
c.1{6)
o,
&.Nu~
...
~
~---~------ ---
)',o,w.!
.ll. ?
d1')\t)·
,. t
-
--
c;:.-:re:
,-. ,,
~ll
'.u
t:r~ 1..r..,,.{
L
8,.
&,
'
XI'
10.
11
~
\!.>.!!111
?
Do yot ilk
1 ~n.n!J
a
What do 'lo
b
Wh.at do yau l ii
C
.
l'J be
Kow would
l
E )'0-
o
r
l
i
0
I
I
't'_..:,
...
- ~ ~ . ~ - - - - ...
- · ~ .....:::..-..=.... - ..::::.. -
�. l
b
It tht . W4!re
ould ynu U
v rco
r0ople th~c thy sll
o-, her
11
t
r~l gT u uh v
8e
l2
~uggeat~ to th
.
dCIV.
- __ -
··-~-~=
1._
---~- --~- . -
~
~
out together t~
.
new locstion
.--- ~- - - .. --
~---·---
..
,.,.
?
coae tor unk .tto.m ~nd
Whdlt d,:, y "' think ebou~ th1" id 1e?_ _ _____ . ~~
out togE-th
el
--
..
___
_,__,_
·---
--··-- ------------ - - ~-----'
?)
If you could\ v
~lft
w t g nerel ar a vould you lik
het
Why?
14
~
~
Vt> y
1'U
&rdly ~t wll
'
u
i
1f ,d o f s ,>
f n7
V'°r~
a• f1yfng o'ftir 'bc,,tb r you?
the st
CMICb
Wh t
---
Jl.31 · -· _ _ _
llvtng h r ~ ~it
T
?6
Can you
kou mu h cirn
1.
a>•t?
1'1"'
IXIUCh
~
X
, ~ Joy
n •~
&e-t t: r uu,-t'I
tl t.h~t p IIC
---
~-
-~
-
u th n• P urk ttl'flffl l
Not
8\l
t
-=I
_J
I
t
~
t\d .-n t
gtow
...
fll\)8 t
8
Jio r:
s
o thtt.t
.,9
" t
oc,d
---~r-
"
l8 C
V ry
t,. d
�"
Y'
..
·
., u
• .h
J
r •
.a
t
I
i .,.,. h ... ,'
. [ t.
tn
n
..
,
'l ..
..
ti
..,
t
~
,..
,.
!',l
I
'II"•'
I
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
Bow lomg hewe you lived in Plunzed town, - -
How old are you? as _ —_
Where do you work? —_ Se eevaie
Bow lowg dows it cee yer to geal te work?
Gow da you gat to wos? (automwtile, bee, Wait, ere )
Bow weny people Tins in thas lowse? _
How geny roeme in thie bowen? 7 a al
Be you coum this howee or reat ii) Gea Ramt (Circle One)
WP OMB: De you cw ony other wenporty? Tex fe
20, where?
—— > STS. Sea La ee ee St ee
Ms you like living heve? Yes Yo «= (Girele one)
9 What do you like about livicg bern”
——
b Whet do you like stows living here?
¢ Why heve you shioaen te live bere?
— — ee ea oe
How would you feel about living somewhere «iaet (Plece A om scewle)
Like to very wach, Like to Mot ind | Not want to Not weut to #t #1,
j
cael ane |
| | | | | |
so IF 8, Why avt? .
a SS eg ee a zi =m. — ae ee
ee ieee aie a i i ice meee cece enna mene a a ee i aa es en i tle i i et
12
14
LS
16
If thig were overcome, would you like to Live somewhere else?
In the past few years, several groups hwve come to Plunkettown and
auggeated to the people ther they sll @eve out together to « new locetion
What do you think ebowt this fdee?
» YF INTERVIEWEE RESPONDS THAT HE WOLLD LAKE TO MOVE OUT WITH HIS
WEIGPBORS: What lacation do you think would be geod {f everyone moved
out together?
b IF INTERVIEWEE WANTS TO STAY IN PLUMKETTOWN; What problems need to
be solved First to improve the neighborhood?
i a a aa —
Tf you could live elaewhere whet geners! ares would you like moet?
4 Why? °
Can you stford to buy @ house somewhere else?
How much can you psy?
Does living here with the airplanes Flying over bother you? (Plece X
on acale),
Very much Herdly at wll Rot ot ali
++} —
Whet «ind of s place do you thins P'unkettoewn te for children to grow
up in? ¢{Plece X on acele)
Better then eoet Hot as good «sa Very
Yery auch other pleces Same ae other pleces anet other places bad
SF + - a. = Ea
ll Tae ae or 1
i . =
i
!
il ode
f
12. e =Now. I would lite co find out erertiy whet vow iike and dial tke suet
‘iving in Plunkertawn Bere ie @ cse¢ witich Leite ascre thing se cyl”
you might Ite bert Itving here How'd you please otek phe feo
you tike moet Tf there ie anything you [fls, but de pot on the
cord ope sheet end rick ft eed gerd sToud before ghowtrig! "
2 lo aw cioee to work
b The rent te jew
e Many of wy Frieads tive here
d ft have lived here aw long time
2 Tf own ay swn home
f Anything rise
b Were te we card which [fete anew prebieme we Chought vou wight
have in Flankettown Would you plesee pick the Fler you shiok
| ere the biggest gprobiewa? if thece fa eny prokiew vou would | [ke
to pick bat do met find on the lier, aq aheed om pink i+ (Bea *
tlegd hefore ehowttig )
® Not clore to shopping
b Net close ta work
| c No tecrestion
| do We wet! eervice
e Noe geveta
ft Teo wach ontee)
es Bo heelth eoarvice
| hb Poor water sarvire
L No street paving
J Unie lovin at
* Hoveing
| ‘Edweatton
a Folfce Protection
nm «6 aapthing «lee
CUOSE TRE THTERVIEW SY ANSWERING ANY GUESTIONS TOT Ca, AWD AY TeANEIMG The
TNTRAVIEVEE FOR BIS CO OPERATION, STATE AGAIN THAT (¥ SB HAS ANY ADDTTANAL
COVESTIONS RE SROVLD CALL WR, JORAWY ROBINSOY OR HR GECRGF ALDAIINNN. Alan,
IF WE BAS ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, ATTEMPT TH fiecoRo THM On TWh ANSH ES
SHES (GIVE MR ALDRTOOE'S AND MR, ROBINSON S Lakls —
ea i x = -. ee
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 2, Folder 4, Document 15
Box 2
Box 2 Folder 4
Folder topic: Planning department | 1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/7be219002b237ef02104d356ad0b4a9c.pdf
1c8f67f59880af7d393196cb57594ddb
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
l
INTERVIEW GUIDE -- PLUN KETTOWN
A.
Genera l Instructions.
1.
This is a gen~ral guide for conducting a house-to- house survey in the Plunkettown
neighborhood.
Make sure thal· al I qu es tions included a re .answered; however, if a
respondent refuses to answer any questions, go on J-o the nex l· item on your questionaire.
Record reason for no res ponse if possible.
You may include other questions; record them
as well as the intervi ewee 's answer.
2.
Plea se record all answers as accura te ly and carefully as possible.
3.
Let the interview continue if the interviewee wishes to talk,
Howeve r, one hour
should, in most cases, be the maximum time required for the in terview.
4.
Reco rd the date of the intervi ew , the time at which the interview beg ins a nd 1s com-
pleted, and the total amount of time the interview lasted.
Reco rd the number of times the
interview is interrupted by air craft noise, and the approx imate length of such interrupJ-ions.
B.
Introduction.
The following general introduction should be used in the interview situation:
name 1s
identification card).
living in Plunkettown.
11
Hello, my
I represent the <;ity of Atlanta (show your
The Mayor and Board of Aldermen are concerned about the people
Many different suggestions have been made about #wo t the people
of Plunkettown want from the City.
to the people in Plunkettown.
However, we feer that it is necessary to talk di rectly
For the next few days we will be talking with all Plunkettow n
re sidents and ~sking them questions to help us find out exactly what the people · want. . Could
· you please take a few minute s to answer these questions?
�i
If subject refuses to participate in the interview, try to find out why.
If he indicates
he is too busy, try to make an appointment 1-o interview him at another date.
anol"her reason, try again to get the interv ie w.
not persist.
If he has
Howe ver , if he absolutely refuses, do
Record a response and, if possib le, the reason.
If more than one member
of a household wants to participate in the inte rv iew session, record their answers separa te ly.
E.ach interview record should contain the responses of one person only.
However, if this
is not possible, indicate that responses come from two or more people.
Remember that the main purpose is to get answers to the basic que$tions contained
§1:IOJ:llquestionaire.
in
If the interv iewee has questions to a sk of you, try to delay this discussion
until the end of the formal interview.
DO NOT, under any circumstances, attempt to
answer questions of which you are unsure.
the peopl e in Plunkettown th ink and wa nL
The purpose of this interview is to find out what
If people ask questions you cannot answe r, refer
them to Mr. Johnny Robinson or George Aldridge.
cards to pass out to everyone).
(You wi 11 have a supply of their personal
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
asa hail Meine: shia Sash
Morr’ C she
=A = = A PEK Wow?
INTERVIEW GUIDE~~PLUNKETTOWN xX 325-
General Instructions.
1. This is a general guide for conducting a house-to~house survey in the Plunkettown
neighborhood, Make sure that all questions included are answered; however, if a
respondent refuses to answer any questions, go on to the next item on your questionaire.
Record reason for no response if possible. You may include other questions; record them
as well as the interviewee!'s answer. |
2. Please record all answers as accurately and carefully as possible.
3. Let the interview continue if the interviewee wishes to talk. However, one hour
should, in most cases, be the maximum time required for the interview.
4. Record the date of the interview, the time at which the interview begins and is com=
pleted, and the total amount of time the interview lasted. Record the number of times the
interview is interrupted by air craft noise, and the approximate length of such interruptions.
Introduction,
The following general introduction should be used in the interview situation: "Hello, my
name is . | represent the City of Atlanta (show your
=
identification eard), The Mayor and Board of Aldermen are éoncerned about the people
living in Plunkettown. Many different suggestions have been made about deat the people
of Plunkettown want from the City. However, we feel that it is necessary to talk directly
to the people in Plunkettown, For the next few days we will be talking with all Plunkettown
residents and asking them questions to help us find out exactly what the people want.. Could
‘you please take a few minutes to answer these questions?
act iat tel eg aw
a sh Ath i i a le Rid
ee eee
iia tne
If subject refuses to participate in the interview, try to find out why. If he indicates
he is too busy, try to make an appointment fo interview him at another date. If he has
another reason, try again to get the interview. However, if he absolutely refuses, do
not persist, Record a response and, if possible, the reason. If more than one member
of a household wants to participate in the interview session, record their answers separately.
Each interview record should contain the responses of one person only. However, if this
is not possible, indicate that responses come from two or more people.
Remember that the main purpose is to get answers to the basic questions contained in
popuestionaire. If the interviewee has questions to ask of you, try to delay this discussion
until the end of the formal interview. DO NOT, under any circumstances, attempt to
answer questions of which you are unsure. The purpose of this interview is to find out what
the people in Plunkettown think and want. If people ask questions you cannot answer, refer
them to Mr. Johnny Robinson or George Aldridge. (You will have a supply of their personal
cards to pass out to everyone),
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 2, Folder 4, Document 14
Box 2
Box 2 Folder 4
Folder topic: Planning department | 1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/983074d6484069f5f4133940b80999e5.pdf
0e4b4d4a5474c51e8c615f1b218affe2
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
ATTITUDE SURVEY OF THE
P-ESIDENTS OF LIGHTNING
City of Atlanta
Dep artment of Planning
November 13, 1969
�This report deals with the results of an attitude survey conducted
in Lightning. The section of Atlanta known as Lightning is bounded by
Northside Drive, Hunter Street, and Simpson Street. Lightning is zoned
for industrial use.
This survey was conducted by the City of Atlanta Planning Department
upon the request of the citizens of Lightning. The citizens voiced their
support for this survey or a community meeting held Tuesday, October 14,
1969.
The Lightning attitude survey was conducted for several reasons.
First of all, the questionnaire is aimed at securing two basic types of
information. The first group of questions, one through nine, deal with
the attainment of factual information, such as the number of persons in
each household. The second group of questions, ten through seventeen,
explore the attitudes of the people toward living in Lightning and the
problems involved .
In addition to securing information, a second purpose of this survey
is to let the citizens of Lightn ing know that the City of Atlanta is concerned and interested in their problems. A third purpose of the Lightning
survey is to get both the citizens of Lightning and the City of Atlanta to
start thinking about the short and long range problems of this area. This
includes the exposure of short range problems that can perhaps be solved
in the near future, with the people of Lightning and the city working
together.
The survey was conducted Tuesday, October 28, 1969 through Thursday,
October 30, on a door-to-door verbal interview basis. Twelve interviewers,
bl a ci: end wh it e , ~e r e us e t o cond uc t t .c su . cy : One City Pla nning
Department employee, two City Planning Department int erns, one Model
Cities employee, and eight HUD interns. (A list of interviewers appears
in appendix A). They interviewed a total of 105 households, which is
77% of the total number of households in Lightning. Contact at each
household was attempted at least three times: Morning, afternoon, and
evening.
General Re sult s
The factual results of the survey show that:
1.
Forty-four per cent (44%) of the respondents live in housing
which is overcrowded, having one or more persons per room.
2.
Of the 105 households surveyed, eighty-one per cent (81%)
rented their residences and the remaining nineteen per cent
(19%) were home-owners. Seventy-five per cent (75%) of the
renters and eighty per certt (80%) of the homeowners stated
that they could not afford to pay more for housing.
�- 2 -
3.
Seventy-four of the interviewers, or seventy per cent (70%)
were unemployed, due to disability, retirement, household
responsibility or simple lack of ability to find work.
4.
The average length of residence in Lightning of the respondents
was nineteen years, with a range of 1.5 months to sixty-six years.
5.
The average age of the respondents was 52.4 years, with a range
of twelve to eighty-two7 years.
The attitudinal results of the survey show the following major
findings:
1.
The majority of interviewees (85%) like living in Lightning.
However, of the ninety-eight respondents saying whether they
would like c o live elsewhere (See question 12), fifty-three
per cent (53%) answered affirmatively, with the remaining fortyseven per cent (47%) preferring to remain in Lightning.
2.
Ninety-one out of the 105 interviewees feel like they are members
of the Lightning community and belong with the people there.
3.
Housing was the most frequently-mentioned problem in Lightning,
with fifty-two per cent (52%) of the respondents listing it.
(See question 13).
Detailed Results
The complete interview schedule and t abulated results for e a ch of the
questions in the interview are presented in this section.
Questions and Responses
l.
How long have you lived in Lightning?
Average length of residence - 19 years
Range - 1.5 month to 66 years
2.
Where do you work?
Number of respondents unemployed, due to dis ability, re tirement,
household responsibility, etc. - 74 number of respondents employed - 29
3.
How long does it take y~u to get to work?
Average t rave l time t o work - 30 mi nute s
Range - 5 mi nutes to 1~ h0ur
�- 3 -
4.
How do you get to work?
Car - 8
·I.Bus - 15
Walk - 8
Taxi - 1
5.
How old are you?
Average age of resporident - 52.4 years old
Range - 12 - 82 years old
6.
How many people live in this house?
Average - 3.5
7.
How many rooms are in this house?
Average - 3.7
(46 houses with one or more persons per room)
8.
Do you own this house or rent it?
Own - 20 *Rent - 85
9.
I f you ar e a rent er, could you aff or d to pay mor e rent fo r a
better house?
Yes - 20
No - 64
DOU' t know - 1
If you are a home owner, could you afford to buy a different house?
Yes - 3
No -16
Don't know - 1
10.
Do you like living here?
Yes - 89
No - 46
a.
Why do you like living h~re?
Ni ce neighbors - 14
Li ke the neighborhood - 13
�- 4 -
It is convenient - 13
All my friends live here - 10
Raised here or lived here
a long time - 9
Economic reasons - 8
No trouble or no one bothers me - 7
Nice landlord - 2
b.
Why do you dislike living here?
Dislike the people - 4
Dislike the neighborhood - 4
Sub-standard housing - 3
Not a good neighborhood for
children - 2
Don't like living alone - 1
11.
Do you feel like you are a member of this community and belong
with these people?
Yes - 91
No - 9
Guess so - 1
No answer - 4
12.
Wou l d you like to live
.,011
·-1 ,,er e el se?
Yes - 52
No - 46
Don 1 t know - 4
No answer - 3
a.
Why would you like to live somewhere else?
Would like a bette r neighborhood - 13
Would like better housing - 12
Dislike people here - 3
Want a garden - 3
Not quiet here - 2
See a change as good - 2
Wants a bath or hot water - 2
Want to move for health purposes - 2
Don't like living alone - 1
b.
Why would you not like to live somewhere else?
This is '·'my home" - 6
Would be hard to get used to new people and church - 4
�- 5 -
Friends or relatives are here - 3
Close to church - 2
Close to work - 1
Like it here - 2
Couldn't afford to move - 1
13.
What problems need to be solved first to improve the neighborhood?
Housing
Inadequate water service - 11
Traffic problems - 8
Street repairs - 8
Poor sanitation - 8
Inadequate facilities for children - 5
Crime and poor police protection - 4
Bad pe ople in neighborhood - 3
Poor bus service - 1
Lack of job opportunities - 1
We have no problems I can think of - 15
No answer - 14
14.
If you were to live elsewhere, what general area would you like most?
Nowhere else - 21
s.w. -
2
N.W. - 10
ALHA project - 1
Griffin St. - 1
Dix ie Hills - 2
Any nice place - 10
Hunte r Homes - 2
Kirkwood - 2
Bowen Homes - 1
West side - 12
Out of s t ate - 1
N.E. A & 1 - 1
Hunter & Mit chell - 2
Sout h side - 1
Unive rsit y Home s - 1
Dec at ur - 1
Hi gh Rise f or e lder ly - 1
Casc ade Ht s. a r e a - 1
Howell Dr. - 1
Bankhead & Hightower - 2
Scott cros sing - 1
Simpson Rd. - 1
In woods - 1
Adamsville area - 1
Around here - 3
McDaniel project - 1
Vine St. - 1
�- 6 =-
15.
What kind of place do you think Lightning is to grow up in?
Very good- 3
Better than most - 8
Same as others - 42
Not as good - 24
Very bad - 16
No answer - 12
16.
What do you like and dislike about living in Lightning?
Here is a card which lists some th ing s you might like about
living here. Pleas e pick the two you lilce most. If there
is anything you l i ke but it is not on the card, go ahead and
pick it.
A. I am close to work - 15
B. The rent i s low - 34
C. Many of my fri e nds live here - 55
D. I have lived here a long time - 43
E. I own my own home - 10
F. My rel atives live in Lightning - 13 ·
G. Other reasons
Conv enience - 6
Like the people
People t ake c are of me when I 1 m sick•> bett e r than
l a s t pl a ce I lived i n
There is nothi ng I like - 5
No answer - 5
17.
This c ard lists s ome pr ob l ems or things you might dislike about
Light ning . Pleas e p i ck the fi ve you think a r e t he b i gges t pr ob l ems.
If t he r e is any probl em you would like to pick but do not find on the
list, go ahead a nd pick i t .
A. Not clos e t o shopp ing - 27
B. No t clo se to wor k - 7
C. Lack of fa cilitie s and programs - 35
D. I nadequate bu s s erv i ce - 17
E. No healt h serv ice - 24
F. Inadequate water service - 18
G. Unemployment - 18
H. Hous ing - 65
I. Education a 3
J. Police pro te ction - 34
K. Rat control - 42
L. Traffic and parking prob lems - 44
�- 7 -
M.
-
Other reasons 1. Trash collection and yard maintenance - 5
2. Not close to any shopping centers - 4
l. Crime and juvenile delinquency - 2
4. Absentee landlords - 1
5. Need a laundromat - 1
6. Outside help is hurting us - 1
7. Cab fare is too high - 1
�List of Interviewers
Frank Biggins, HUD Intern
Gary Brown, HUD Intern
Bill Hanuner, HUD Intern
John Hiscox, HUD Intern
Louise Klaffner, HUD Intern
John Matthews, Department of Planning
Dot Metcal f, Department of Planning Intern
Nancy McKnight, Department of Pla nning Intern
Sonja Pevey, HUD Intern
Steve Steinart, Model Cities
Patricia Williams, HUD Intern
�APPENDIX B
Interview Guide - Lightning
A.
General Instructions
1. Make sure that all questions included are answered; however,
if a responde nt refuses to answe r a ny questions, go on to the
next item on your questionna ire. Re cord reason f or no r e sponse,
if possible. You may include other questions; record them as
well as the interviewee's a nswer.
B.
2.
Please record all answers as accurately and ca refully as possible.
3.
Let the i nterview continue if the i nterviewee wi shes to t a lk.
Howeve r , one hour should be the max i mum time required fo r the
interview.
4.
Record the date of t he interview, the time at which the interview
begins and i s comple t ed , a nd the t ot a l amount of time the interview
l a sts.
Introduction.
The followi ng gener a l introduct i on shoul d be us ed in t he interview
situation : " Hello , my name i s _ ______
I represent t he Ci t y
of Atlanta
(show your identi f icat ion card ) . The Mayor and Boa rd
of Aldermen a r e concerned about t he problems of the people living in
Lightning . Ma~y diff erent s ugge stions have bee n made about wha t the
pe ople of Lightning want and need fr om the city. However, we f eel i t
is neces sary t o talk di r e ctly t o the people of Lightni ng , so f or the
next few day s we will be t a lking with a l l Lightning residents to he lp
us find out exactly wha t the pe ople want. Cou l d you p lease t ake a
f ew minutes t o answer these que stions?"
If sub j e ct refuse s t o participate i n the int erview , try to find out
why . If he indica tes he i s too busy, try t o make an appoi ntme nt t o int erv iew him at a nother dat e. I f he has another reason , try again t o get the
interview. However , if he abs olutely re f uses, do not per sist. Re cord a
response , a nd i f possible, t he r e a son. I f no one i s a t home , t r y to contact
the hou:::ehold t h ree different t i me s. I f some i nt e r vieuee s a r e not av ai l able
at certain times , a conve nient t ime will be worked out in t he i ntervi ew i ng
schedule so t hese people can be co nt a cted. If more than one member of a
hous eho ld want t o participate in the interview session, rec or d the i r responses
s eparat ely . Ea ch inte rview record should contai n t he r esponse s of one pers on
only . However, if this is not possible , i nd icate that responses came from
two or more people.
�,.
Remember that the main purpose is to get answers to the basic questions
contained in our questionnaire. If the interviewee has questions to ask of
you, try to delay this discussion until the end of the fo rmal interview.
DO NOT, under any circumstances, attempt to answer questions of which you
are unsure. The purpose of this int erview is to find out what the people
in Lightning think and want. If people ask questions you cannot answer,
refer theM to Mr . Johnny Robinson (you will have a supply of his personal
cards to pass out to everyone).
C. Close
Close the interview by answering any questions you can, and by thanking
the interviewee for his cooperation. State agai n that if he has any additional
questions, he should call Mr . Johnny Robinson. Also, if he has any addit ional
comments, attempt to record them on the answer sheet.
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
ATTITUDE SURVEY OF THE
RESIDENTS OF LIGHTNING
City of Atlanta
Department of Planning
November 13, 1969
This report deals with the results of an attitude survey conducted
in Lightning. The section of Atlanta known as Lightning is bounded by
Northside Drive, Hunter Street, and Simpson Street. Lightning is zoned
for industrial use,
This survey was conducted by the City of Atlanta Planning Department
upon the request of the citizens of Lightning. The citizens voiced their
support for this survey or a community meeting held Tuesday, October 14,
1969,
The Lightning attitude survey was conducted for several reasons.
First of all, the questionnaire is aimed at securing two basic types of
information. The first group of questions, one through nine, deal with
the attainment of factual information, such as the number of persons in
each household, The second group of questions, ten through seventeen,
explore the attitudes of the people toward living in Lightning and the
problems involved.
In addition to securing information, a second purpose of this survey
is to let the citizens of Lightning know that the City of Atlanta is con-
cerned and interested in their problems. A third purpose of the Lightning
survey is to get both the citizens of Lightning and the City of Atlanta to
start thinking about the short and long range problems of this area, This
includes the exposure of short range problems that can perhaps be solved
in the near future, with the people of Lightning and the city working
together.
The survey was conducted Tuesday, October 28, 1969 through Thursday,
October 30, on a door-to-door verbal interview basis. Twelve interviewers,
black and white, were used to conduct the survey: One City Planning
Department employee, two City Planning Department interns, one Model
Cities employee, and eight HUD interns. (A list of interviewers appears
in appendix A). They interviewed a total of 105 households, which is
77% of the total number of households in Lightning. Contact at each
household was attempted at least three times: Morning, afternoon, and
evening.
General Results
The factual results of the survey show that:
1. Forty-four per cent (44%) of the respondents live in housing
which is overcrowded, having one or more persons per room,
2. Of the 105 households surveyed, eighty-one per cent (81%)
rented their residences and the remaining nineteen per cent
(19%) were home-owners, Seventy-five per cent (75%) of the
renters and eighty per cent (80%) of the homeowners stated
that they could not afford to pay more for housing.
3. Seventy-four of the interviewers, or seventy per cent (70%)
were unemployed, due to disability, retirement, household
responsibility or simple lack of ability to find work,
4, The average length of residence in Lightning of the respondents
was nineteen years, with a range of 1,5 months to sixty-six years,
5. The average age of the respondents was 52.4 years, with a range
of twelve to eighty-two years.
The attitudinal results of the survey show the following major
findings:
1, The majority of interviewees (85%) like living in Lightning.
However, of the ninety-eight respondents saying whether they
would Like to live elsewhere (See question 12), fifty-three
per cent (53%) answered affirmatively, with the remaining forty-
seven per cent (47%) preferring to remain in Lightning.
2. Ninety-one out of the 105 interviewees feel like they are members
of the Lightning community and belong with the people there.
3. Housing was the most frequently-mentioned problem in Lightning,
with fifty-two per cent (52%) of the respondents Listing it.
(See question 13).
Detailed Results
The complete interview schedule and tabulated results for each of the
questions in the interview are presented in this section.
Questions and Responses
1. How long have you lived in Lightning?
Average length of residence - 19 years
Range - 1.5 month to 66 years
2. Where do you work?
Number of respondents unemployed, due to disability, retirement,
household responsibility, etc. - 74 number of respondents employed - 29
3. How long does it take you to get to work?
Average travel time to work - 30 minutes
Range - 5 minutes to 14 hour
fis 3
10,
ae
How do you get to work?
Car - 8
*Bus - 15
Walk - 8
Taxi - 1
How old are you?
Average age of respondent - 52.4 years old
Range - 12 - 82 years old
How many people live in this house?
Average - 3.5
How many rooms are in this house?
Average - 3.7
(46 houses with one or more persons per room)
Do you own this house or rent it?
Own - 20 *Rent - 85
If you are a renter, could you afford to pay more rent for a
better house?
Yes - 20
No - 64
Den't know - 1
you are a home owner, could you afford to buy a different house?
Yes - 3
No -16
Don't know - l
Do you like living here?
*Yes = 89
No = 46
Why do you like living here?
Nice neighbors - 14
Like the neighborhood - 13
ll.
ae
It is convenient - 13
All my friends live here - 10
Raised here or lived here
a long time - 9 .
Economic reasons = 8
No trouble or no one bothers me = 7
Nice landlord - 2
Why do you dislike living here?
Dislike the people - 4
Dislike the neighborhood - 4
Sub-standard housing - 3
Not a good neighborhood for
children - 2
Don't like living alone - 1
Do you feel like you are a member of this community and belong
with these people?
Yes - 91
No = 9
Guess so - l
No answer - 4
Would you Like to Live somewhere else?
Yes - 52
No - 46
Don't know - 4
No answer - 3
Why would you like to live somewhere else?
Would like a better neighborhood - 13
Would like better housing - 12
Dislike people here - 3
Want a garden - 3
Not quiet here - 2
See a change as good = 2
Wants a bath or hot water - 2
Want to move for health purposes - 2
Don't like living alone - 1
Why would you not like to live somewhere else?
This is “my home!" = 6
Would be hard to get used to new people and church - 4
Friends or relatives are here - 3
Close to church = 2
Close to work = 1
Like it here - 2
Couldn't afford to move - 1
13, What problems need to be solved first to improve the neighborhood?
Housing
Inadequate water service - 11
Traffic problems - 8
Street repairs - 8
Poor sanitation - 8
Inadequate facilities for children = 5
Crime and poor police protection - 4
Bad people in neighborhood - 3
Poor bus service = 1
Lack of job opportunities - 1
We have no problems I can think of - 15
No answer - 14
14. If you were to live elsewhere, what general area would you like most?
Nowhere else - 21
S.W. - 2
N.W. - 10
ALHA project - 1
Griffin St. - l
Dixie Hills - 2
Any nice place - 10
Hunter Homes - 2
Kirkwood = 2
Bowen Homes - L
West side - 12
Out of state - 1
N.E. A&1l-1
Hunter & Mitchell - 2
South side - 1
University Homes - 1
Decatur - 1
High Rise for elderly - 1
Cascade Hts. area - 1
Howell Dr, - 1
Bankhead & Hightower =- 2
Scott crossing - 1
Simpson Rd. = 1
In woods - 1
Adamsville area - 1
Around here = 3
McDaniel project - 1
Vine St. = 1
15;
16,
17,
What kind of place do you think Lightning is to grow up in?
Very good- 3
Better than most - 8
Same as others - 42
Not as good - 24
Very bad - 16
No answer - 12
What do you like and dislike about living in Lightning?
Here is a card which lists some things you might like about
living here. Please pick the two you like most. If there
is anything you like but it is not on the card, go ahead and
pick it,
A. I am close to work - 15
B. The rent is low - 34
C. Many of my friends live here - 55
D. I have lived here a long time - 43
E. I own my own home - 10
F. My relatives live in Lightning - 13°
G. Other reasons
Convenience - 6
Like the people
People take care of me when I'm sick, better than
last place I lived in
There is nothing I like = 5
No answer = 5
This card lists some problems or things you might dislike about
Lightning, Please pick the five you think are the biggest problems,
If there is any problem you would like to pick but do not find on the
list, go ahead and pick it.
A. Not close to shopping = 27
B. Not close to work - 7
C. Lack of facilities and programs - 35
D. Inadequate bus service - 17
E. No health service - 24
F, Inadequate water service - 18
G. Unemployment - 18
H. Housing - 65
I. Education =- 3
J. Police protection - 34
K. Rat control = 42
L. Traffic and parking problems - 44
M.
Other reasons -
L.
“WAL wr
» «6
Trash collection and yard maintenance =- 5
Not close to any shopping centers = 4
Crime and juvenile delinquency - 2
Absentee landlords - 1
Need a laundromat - 1
Outside help is hurting us - 1
Cab fare is too high - 1
APPENDIX A
List of Interviewers
Frank Biggins, HUD Intern
Gary Brown, HUD Intern
Bill Hammer, HUD Intern
John Hiscox, HUD Intern
Louise Klaffner, HUD Intern
John Matthews, Department of Planning
Dot Metcalf, Department of Planning Intern
Nancy McKnight, Department of Planning Intern
Sonja Pevey, HUD Intern
Steve Steinart, Model Cities
Patricia Williams, HUD Intern
APPENDIX B
Interview Guide - Lightning
A. General Instructions
1. Make sure that all questions included are answered; however,
if a respondent refuses to answer any questions, go on to the
next item on your questionnaire. Record reason for no response,
if possible. You may include other questions; record them as
well as the interviewee's answer.
2. Please record all answers as accurately and carefully as possible.
3. Let the interview continue if the interviewee wishes to talk.
However, one hour should be the maximum time required for the
interview.
4. Record the date of the interview, the time at which the interview
begins and is completed, and the total amount of time the interview
lasts,
B. Introduction,
The following general introduction should be used in the interview
situation: “Hello, my name is + I represent the City
of Atlanta (show your identification card). The Mayor and Board
of Aldermen are concerned about the problems of the people living in
Lightning, Mary different suggestions have been made about what the
people of Lightning want and need from the city. However, we feel it
is necessary to talk directly to the people of Lightning, so for the
next few days we will be talking with all Lightning residents to help
us find out exactly what the people want. Could you please take a
few minutes to answer these questions?"
If subject refuses to participate in the interview, try to find out
why. If he indicates he is too busy, try to make an appointment to inter-
view him at another date, If he has another reason, try again to get the
interview. However, if he absolutely refuses, do not persist, Record a
response, and if possible, the reason. If no one is at home, try to contact
the household three different times. If some interviewees are not available
at certain times, a convenient time will be worked out in the interviewing
schedule so these people can be contacted, If more than one member of a
household want to participate in the interview session, record their responses
separately. Each interview record should contain the responses of one person
only. However, if this is not possible, indicate that responses came from
two or more people,
Remember that the main purpose is to get answers to the basic questions
contained in our questionnaire. If the interviewee has questions to ask of
you, try to delay this discussion until the end of the formal interview.
DO NOT, under any circumstances, attempt to answer questions of which you
are unsure, The purpose of this interview is to find out what the people
in Lightning think and want. If people ask questions you cannot answer,
refer tnem to Mr. Johnny Robinson (you will have a supply of his personal
cards to pass out to everyone).
C. Close
Close the interview by answering any questions you can, and by thanking
the interviewee for his cooperation. State again that if he has any additional
questions, he should call Mr. Johnny Robinson, Also, if he has any additional
comments, attempt to record them on the answer sheet,
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 2, Folder 4, Document 13
Box 2
Box 2 Folder 4
Folder topic: Planning department | 1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/cdb32ea5a01f5fea981c9b90597d97df.pdf
034e667ec53a8c8ef02b020178b6bed3
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
May 12, 1969
MEMORANDUM
TO :
Henry L. Bowden, City Attorney
James B. Henderson, Special Associate City Attorney
IN RE:
Mrs. E. S. Hope, Mrs. Millie Walker,
Mrs. Vernie J. Jacobs, Complainants
-- Department of Planning
Reference is made to a mimeograph-type letter dated April 16, 1969
from complainants, a copy of which was directed to the Mayor and to
Alderman Griggs.
In accordance with the Mayor's referral of this
matter to Mr. Gladin and the request of Alderman Griggs, an investigation of the matter was conducted with the following results.
I conferred with Mr. Collier B. Gladin, Director, and Mr. Thompson
H. Shuttleworth, Zoning Administrator, both of the Planning Department, relative to this matter and they furnished the following information.
A zoning petition was filed April 25, 1968 by Lewis Cenker for rezoning of property on Brownlee Road.
The first public hearing in the
matter was set for June 6, 1968 before the Zoning Committee, at which
time the matter was deferred for revised site plans by the petitioner.
The deferment was until November 7, 1968.
Subsequently the petition
was denied by the Board of Aldermen on November 18, 1968, as the plans
were not available.
The matter was again initiated by the Zoning Com-
mittee on December 31, 1968, after the petitioner's attorney indicated
he would have the plans ready and a public hearing was scheduled for
February 6 , 1969 .
�The c ase , more specifically described as Zoning Case No. Z-68-225-C,
was postponed on February 6, 1969 by the Alderrnanic Zoning Committee
at the request of the connnunity and the developer to _provide an opportunity for discussion of the issue.
The petition was to be deferred
f or a period of 60 days and it was announced that the public hearing
would be held on April 10, 1969.
A meeting between community residents and the developer was scheduled
to be held in the Planning Department office on Monday, March 31, 1969,
however, this meeting was cancelled as the City Hall was closed in
tribute to the late President Eisenhower.
The Planning Department staff did not bring the case before the Zoning
Cornmittee on April 10th, since the March 31st meeting had been cancelled.
However, when area residents appeared at the hearing on
April 10th, Mr. Shuttleworth had the case file brought from the
Planning Department to the Alderrnanic Chamber.
Mr. Shuttleworth
advised that through an error on his part, the ·case was not actually
scheduled for hearing on April 10th.
In the course of the meeting on April 10th, area residents were offered
several options in considering the case.
The Committee offered to hear
from the residents at that time and the developer at a later time, or,
second , to hear from residents and the developer _at a later mutually
agreeable time.
dents.
Neither option appeared agreeable to connnunity resi-
They were, however, permitted to speak in opposition to the
petition and were assured another opportunity to speak when 'the
developer came to present his case.
Page Two
�Mr. Gladin and Mr. Shuttleworth expressed regret for any inconvenience
they may have caused community residents in this misunderstanding over
the hearing date for the zoning petition.
They are strongly of the
opinion , however, that members of the planning staff have made every
possible effort to work with the community in discussing the issues
in this case and will continue to do so.
As a matter of information, the Atlanta-Fulton County Joint Planning
Board has recommended approval of this zoning petition.
The Planning
Department staff also recommends approval in that the proposed use
conforms with the Atlanta Land Use Plan, which has been adopted by
the Mayor and Board of Aldermen.
Also of possible interest, it was reported that Mr. Cenker, the petitioner in this matter, has agreed to hold in abeyance any further action
in this matter pending a Georgia Tech Land Use Study.
As a result of prior telephonic arrangements with Mrs. Jacobs, she and
Mr s. Walker appeared at my office to discuss this matter on the morning
of May 8, 1969.
They explained that Mrs. Hope had planned to be present
but was unable to keep the appointment.
It was their opinion that Mrs.
Hope would have no information of value in addition to that information
in their possession.
At my request, Mr. Henry M. Murff, of the Law
Department, attended this conference.
After lengthy discussion of the case at hand, the law as applied to
zoning and the administrative handling of zoning matters were explained in detail to Mrs. Jacobs and Mrs. Walker.
Page Three
�The handling of the case at hand by the Planning Department and
cormnittees involved also was explained in detail to these ladies.
The contents of referenced letter of April 16, 1969 were reviewed with
the ladies, at which time they stated they had no information whatsoever which would indicate any wrongdoing on the part of any employee,
official or elected representative of the City of Atlanta.
Mrs. Jacobs and Mrs. Walker were more specifically questioned in
regard to Paragraph 16 of referenced letter
"16.
Are persons desiring favorable rulings on rezoning
petitions required to pay a fee under the table
and off the record to elected officials or paid
City Hall staffers?"
Mrs. Jacobs and Mrs. Walker advise they have no information to substantiate any possible inference of wrongdoing in the above quoted
paragraph.
In view of the above information, it would appear that no further
action is warranted at this time.
Page Four
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
May 12, 1969
MEMORANDUM
TO: Henry L. Bowden, City Attorney
James B. Henderson, Special Associate City Attorney
IN RE: Mrs. E. S. Hope, Mrs. Millie Walker,
Mrs. Vernie J. Jacobs, Complainants
-- Department of Planning
Reference is made to a mimeograph-type letter dated April 16, 1969
from complainants, a copy of which was directed to the Mayor and to
Alderman Griggs. In accordance with the Mayor's referral of this
matter to Mr. Gladin and the request of Alderman Griggs, an investi-
gation of the matter was conducted with the following results.
I conferred with Mr. Collier B. Gladin, Director, and Mr. Thompson
H. Shuttleworth, Zoning Administrator, both of the Planning Depart-
ment, relative to this matter and they furnished the following in-
formation.
A zoning petition was filed April 25, 1968 by Lewis Cenker for re-
zoning of property on Brownlee Road. The first public hearing in the
matter was set for June 6, 1968 before the Zoning Committee, at which
time the matter was deferred for revised site plans by the petitioner.
The deferment was until November 7, 1968. Subsequently the petition
was denied by the Board of Aldermen on November 18, 1968, as the plans
were not available. The matter was again initiated by the Zoning Com-
mittee on December 31, 1968, after the petitioner's attorney indicated
he would have the plans ready and a public hearing was scheduled for
February 6, 1969.
The case, more specifically described as Zoning Case No. Z-68-225-C,
was postponed on February 6, 1969 by the Aldermanic Zoning Committee
at the request of the community and the developer to provide an oppor-
tunity for discussion of the issue. The petition was to be deferred
for a period of 60 days and it was announced that the public hearing
would be held on April 10, 1969.
A meeting between community residents and the developer was scheduled
to be held in the Planning Department office on Monday, March 31, 1969,
however, this meeting was cancelled as the City Hall was closed in
tribute to the late President Eisenhower.
The Planning Department staff did not bring the case before the Zoning
Committee on April 10th, since the March 3lst meeting had been can-
celled. However, when area residents appeared at the hearing on
April 10th, Mr. Shuttleworth had the case file brought from the
Planning Department to the Aldermanic Chamber. Mr. Shuttleworth
advised that through an error on his part, the case was not actually
scheduled for hearing on April 10th.
In the course of the meeting on April 10th, area residents were offered
several options in considering the case. The Committee offered to hear
from the residents at that time and the developer at a later time, or,
second, to hear from residents and the developer at a later mutually
agreeable time. Neither option appeared agreeable to community resi-
dents. They were, however, permitted to speak in opposition to the
petition and were assured another opportunity to speak when the
developer came to present his case.
Page Two
Mr. Gladin and Mr. Shuttleworth expressed regret for any inconvenience
they may have caused community residents in this misunderstanding over
the hearing date for the zoning petition. They are strongly of the
opinion, however, that members of the planning staff have made every
possible effort to work with the community in discussing the issues
in this case and will continue to do so.
As a matter of information, the Atlanta-Fulton County Joint Planning
Board has recommended approval of this zoning petition. The Planning
Department staff also recommends approval in that the proposed use
conforms with the Atlanta Land Use Plan, which has been adopted by
the Mayor and Board of Aldermen.
Also of possible interest, it was reported that Mr. Cenker, the peti-
tioner in this matter, has agreed to hold in abeyance any further action
in this matter pending a Georgia Tech Land Use Study.
As a result of prior telephonic arrangements with Mrs. Jacobs, she and
Mrs. Walker appeared at my office to discuss this matter on the morning
of May 8, 1969. They explained that Mrs. Hope had planned to be present
but was unable to keep the appointment. It was their opinion that Mrs.
Hope would have no information of value in addition to that information
in their possession. At my request, Mr. Henry M. Murff, of the Law
Department, attended this conference.
After lengthy discussion of the case at hand, the law as applied to
zoning and the administrative handling of zoning matters were ex-
plained in detail to Mrs. Jacobs and Mrs. Walker.
Page Three
The handling of the case at hand by the Planning Department and
committees involved also was explained in detail to these ladies.
The contents of referenced letter of April 16, 1969 were reviewed with
the ladies, at which time they stated they had no information whatso-
ever which would indicate any wrongdoing on the part of any employee,
official or elected representative of the City of Atlanta.
Mrs. Jacobs and Mrs. Walker were more specifically questioned in
regard to Paragraph 16 of referenced letter
"16. Are persons desiring favorable rulings on rezoning
petitions required to pay a fee under the table
and off the record to elected officials or paid
City Hall staffers?"
Mrs. Jacobs and Mrs. Walker advise they have no information to sub-
stantiate any possible inference of wrongdoing in the above quoted
paragraph.
In view of the above information, it would appear that no further
action is warranted at this time.
Page Four
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 2, Folder 4, Document 12
Box 2
Box 2 Folder 4
Folder topic: Planning department | 1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/828fac8ee3f0b0e97f8a722197d77820.pdf
3eefd73798ad1b3259ff5d7fda5a65e7
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
DEPARTMENT OF LAW
2614 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
ROBERT S. WIGGINS
MARTIN McFARLAND
EDWIN L . STERNE
RALPH C . JENKINS
JOHN E. DOUGHERTY
CHARLES M . LOKEY
THOMAS F . CHOYCE
JAMES B. PILCHER
May 12, 1969
HENRY L . BOWDEN
CIT Y
ATTORNE Y
FERRIN Y . MATHEWS
ASSOCIATE CIT Y
A S SIST AN T CITY ATTOl', NEY
ATTORNEYS
HORACE T . WARD
DEPUT Y
CIT Y ATTORNE Y
ROBERT A . HARRIS
HENRY M . MURFF
CLAIMS ATTORNE Y S .
JAMES B . HENDERSON
SPECIAL ASSOCIATE CITY ATTORNEY
Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr.
City Hall
Atlanta, Georgia
In re:
Mrs. E. S. Hope, Mrs. Millie Walker,
Mrs. Vernie J. Jacobs, Complainants
Department of Planning
Dear Mayor Allen:
Reference is made to mimeograph-type letter dated April 16,
1969 from complai nants, a copy of which was directed to you
and to Alderman Griggs. In accordance with your referral
of th i s matter to Mr. Gladin and the request of Alderman
Gri ggs, an investigation of the matter was conducted by
J i m Henderson.
Attached hereto is a copy of Jim's memorandtnn to me .
I n the event further i nqui ry i s
no t he s ita t e to call upon me .
do
(Bow en
y Attorney
HLB/jk
Enc.
cc: Mr . John M. Flanigen (with encl . )
Mr. E. Gregory Griggs (with encl . )
Mr . Collier B. Gladin (with encl . )
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
DEPARTMENT OF LAW
2614 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
May 12, 1969 ROBERT S. WIGGINS
3
MARTIN MCFARLAND
EDWIN L. STERNE
RALPH C. JENKINS
JOHN E. DOUGHERTY
HENRY L. BOWDEN CHARLES M. LOKEY
cITY ATTORNEY THOMAS F.CHOYCE
JAMES B. PILCHER
ASSOCIATE CITY ATTORNEYS
FERRIN Y. MATHEWS
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
HORACE T. WARD
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY
ROBERT A. HARRIS
HENRY M.MURFF
CLAIMS ATTORNEYS
JAMES B. HENDERSON
SPECIAL ASSOCIATE CITY ATTORNEY
Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr.
City Hall
Atlanta, Georgia
In re: Mrs. E. S. Hope, Mrs. Millie Walker,
Mrs. Vernie J. Jacobs, Complainants
-- Department of Planning
Dear Mayor Allen:
Reference is made to mimeograph-type letter dated April 16,
1969 from complainants, a copy of which was directed to you
and to Alderman Griggs. In accordance with your referral
of this matter to Mr. Gladin and the request of Alderman
Griggs, an investigation of the matter was conducted by
Jim Henderson.
Attached hereto is a copy of Jim's memorandum to me.
/_)
In the event further inquiry is desired in this matter, do
not hesitate to call upon me.
/Youks very tr ly,
City Attorney
HLB/jk
Enc.
ce: Mr. John M. Flanigen (with encl.)
Mr. E. Gregory Griggs (with encl.)
Mr. Collier B. Gladin (with encl.)
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 2, Folder 4, Document 11
Box 2
Box 2 Folder 4
Folder topic: Planning department | 1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/7c4e3241ebe6e397bedcd262bab60e3b.pdf
bcba27d93caf86041a6ba7032778c65f
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
2!6, 19 9
~
r Coll1 r:
T.
ty
Mr . E arl Landers
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
February 26, 1969
Mr. Collier Gladin
Director of Planning
City of Atiante
700 City Hall
Atlents, Georgia
Dear Collier:
Re: Your letter to Jebn T. Edmunds of February 25, 1969
This is te request thet you transfer the $8,615 remaining in Amendatory
Application §- ef the Community Improvement Program to the Atlanta
Ghiidren and Youth Services Council.
It was the intent of the President's Council on Youth Opportunity that
the CRP in HUD be used simply as a conduit to provide funde to city
youth agencies for summer planning and programming. There wae aco
intent to require local CRP (CIP) agencies to justify the wee of these
funds as a pert of the normel CRP program activities. This is also
the understanding of John Edmunds.
I see no reason why we should not transfer the remaining funds from the
1968 approval to the Youth Council immediately so they will be able to
continue their present activities without interruption.
Mr. Edmunds has informed me that the $30,900 for 1969 YOP sctivities
hes been set aside by HUD In Washington for Atlanta's use. He wili let
as know shortly if your letter can serve as the 1969 application.
Sincerely yours,
Den Sweat
ec: Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr.
Alderman Redney Cook
Mr. John Cox
Mr. Charles Davis
Mr. Earl Landers
, oe F
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 2, Folder 4, Document 10
Box 2
Box 2 Folder 4
Folder topic: Planning department | 1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/b4507aa8b9a1941d8cbe16ecb5d010ec.pdf
bb9043882d1d10fab4ae941181c4964d
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
IIII
AN ORDINANCE
BY PLAN NI NG AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, by ordinance of December 21, 1964, the Mayor and Board
of Aldermen of the City of Atlanta, Georgia, caused to be ,created a standing
committee of th e Board of Aldermen entitled Urban Renewal Policy Committee ,
as set forth in Section 2-40.2 of the Code of Ordinances, City of Al·lanta,
Georgia effective July I, 1965, as amended, and
WHEREAS, it is deemed desirabl e and in the public interest that the number
of standing committees of the Board of Aldermen of the City of Atlanta, Georgia
be reduced in number and that such action wou Id be in keeping with the precedent
established by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen in 1967, and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the fundions and responsibilities
of the Urban Renewal Policy Committee can readily and exped itiously be transferred
to another standing committe e of !"he Board of Alderme n of the City of Atlanta,
Georgia, name ly, the Planning and Developmen t Committee, and
WHEREAS, such action should increase and improve communications betwee n
and coordination of activities of both the City of Atlanl·a, Georgia and its urban
renewa l agent, the Atlanta Housing Authority of th e City of Atlanta, Georgia.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by th e Mayor and Board of
Aldermen of the City of Atlanta as fol lows:
I. That Section 2-40. 2 of the Code of the City of A!-lanta is hereby
repealed and th e Urban Re newa l Policy Committee is abo li shed.
2. Tha t Section 2-40. 1 (b) of the Code of the City of Atlanta is he reby
ame nded by s!T iking said paragraph in its e ntire ty and inse rting in
Iieu the reof th e fo l low ing:
(b)Membersh ip. Th e Planning and Deve lopment Committee shall be
composed of e ight (8) members of the Board of Alde rme n a ppo in!·ed
by th e Mayor and two (2) ad visory membe rs fr om th e Housing
�IIII
-2Authority of the Cit-y of Atlanta appointed by the Chairman
of the Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta. The Housing Authority me ber!
of th is committee sh al I have the power f-o vote only on those
items of housing and urban renewal which are going before
the Housing Authority's Board of Commissioners for further action.
<
The Chairman of said committee shall be appointed by the Mayor
and the other seven (7) members from the Board of Aldermen.
The Mayor shall appoint the Plcinning and Development Committee
so that a representation is obtained of aldermanic commit-tees
concerned with community development, redevelopment, and
improvemenl· .
3. That Section 2-40. I (c) of the Code of the City of Atlanta is hereby
amended by striking said paragraph· in its entirety and inserting
in li e u thereof 1·he following:
(c) Funtions, responsibilities. This Planning and Development
Commif-tee shall have the primary responsibilit-y to review and
coordinate the long range plans and programs of all city efforts
in the fie Ids of community development, red evelopment, housing,
facilities and improvements, and to make suggestions f-o other
appropriate aldermanic committees or recommend actions and
policies for adoption by the Board of Alderm en to insure maximum
coordination and the highest quality of urban community development
throughout the City. This responsibility shall include but is notI im ited to the review and evaluation of the elements of the
comprehensive (general) plan development by the Planning Departme nt
with guidance from the Atlanf-a - Fult-on County Joint Planning Board;
th is comprehensive plan to be composed of at- least a land use plan,
transportal'ion plan and a community facilities plan with public
improv ements program and Capi ta l Improvements Program. Th e
�II
I
-3committee sh al I further be responsible for developing pol icy
recommendations on all oth er matters concerning J-h e planning
and coordination of future city developments including,
specifically, the Community Improvement Program (Cl P),
Open Space, Urban Beautification, the 1962 .Federal Highway
Act, the Workable Program for Community Improvement,
Urban Renewal and Neighborhood Development Program
preliminary and project or execution plans, and oth er re lated
urban renewal matters formerly under the responsibi Ii J-y of the
Urban Renewal Committee or J-he Urban Renewal Policy Comm ittee.
The Commitl-ee shal I further review all applications for federa l
grants to determ ine their conformity with adopted overall plans
and policies for the developme 1it of the Ci ty.
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED thal· all ordinances and parts of ordi nances in
conflict with th is ordinance be and the same are hereby repealed.
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
AN ORDINANCE
BY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, by ordinance of December 21, 1964, the Mayor and Board
of Aldermen of the City of Atlanta, Georgia, caused to be created a standing
committee of the Board of Aldermen entitled Urban Renewal Policy Committee,
as set forth in Section 2-40.2 of the Code of Ordinances, City of Atlanta,
Georgia effective July |, 1965, as amended, and
WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable and in the public interest that the number
of standing committees of the Board of Aldermen of the City of Atlanta, Georgia
be reduced in number and that such action would be in keeping with the precedent
established by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen in 1967, and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the functions and responsibilities
of the Urban Renewal Policy Committee can readily and expeditiously be transferred
to another standing committee of the Board of Aldermen of the City of Atlanta,
Georgia, namely, the Planning and Development Committee, and
WHEREAS, such action should increase and improve communications between
and coordination of activities of both the City of Atlanta, Georgia and its urban
renewal agent, the Atlanta Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta, Georgia.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Board of
Aldermen of the City of Atlanta as follows:
|. That Section 2-40.2 of the Code of the City of Atlanta is hereby
repealed and the Urban Renewal Policy Committee is abolished.
2. That Section 2-40.1 (b) of the Code of the City of Atlanta is hereby
amended by striking said paragraph in its entirety aed inserting in
lieu thereof the following:
(b) Membership. The Planning and Development Committee shall be
composed of eight (8) members of the Board of Aldermen appointed
by the Mayor and two (2) advisory members from the Housing
Din
Authority of the City of Atlanta appointed by the Chairman
of the Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta.The Housing Authority men
of this committee shall have the power to vote only on those
items of housing and urban renewal which are going before
the Housing Authority's Board of Commissioners for further action.
The Chairman of said committee shall be appointed by the Mayor
and the other seven (7) members from the Board of Aldermen.
The Mayor shall appoint the Planning and Development Committee
so that a representation is obtained of aldermanic committees
concerned with community development, redevelopment, and
improvement.
3. That Section 2-40. (c) of the Code of the City of Atlanta is hereby
amended by striking said paragraph’ in its entirety and inserting
in lieu thereof the following:
(c) Funtions, responsibilities. This Planning and Development
Committee shall have the primary responsibility to review and
coordinate the long range plans and programs of all city efforts
in the fields of community development, redevelopment, housing,
facilities and improvements, and to make suggestions to other
appropriate aldermanic committees or recommend actions and
policies for adoption by the Board of Aldermen to insure maximum
coordination and the highest quality of urban community development
throughout the City. This responsibility sali include but is not
limited to the review and evaluation of the elements of the
comprehensive (general) plan development by the Planning Department
with guidance from the Atlanta ~ Fulton County Joint Planning Board;
this comprehensive plan to be composed of at least a land use plan,
transportation plan and a community facilities plan with public
improvements program and Capital Improvements Program. The
ber
re
committee shall further be responsible for developing policy
recommendations on all other matters concerning the planning
and coordination of future city developments including,
specifically, the Community Improvement Program (CIP),
Open Space, Urban Beautification, the 1962 Federal Highway
Act, the Workable Program for Community Improvement,
Urban Renewal and Neighborhood Development Program
preliminary and project or execution plans, and other related
urban renewal matters formerly under the responsibility of the
Urban Renewal Committee or the Urban Renewal Policy Committee.
The Committee shall further review all applications for federal
grants to determine their conformity with adopted overall plans
and policies for the developmerit of the City.
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that all ordinances and parts of ordinances in
conflict with this ordinance be and the same are hereby repealed.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 2, Folder 4, Document 9
Box 2
Box 2 Folder 4
Folder topic: Planning department | 1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/5f79fc9033f0940c22fd77e53adb9c85.pdf
ffeaa6a6e5b52ffb39ef4d22a491e12e
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
·yoy~ A.TLA
CI
CITY H ~ LL
ATLANT A, GA. 30303
Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404 .
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
COLLI E R B . GLADIN , Dir e ctor
January 29, 1969
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Members of Board of Aldermen
FROM:
Collier B. Gladin
(~ /)JS_
SUBJECT: Consolidation of Urban Renewal Policy Committee into
Planning and Development Committee
At the request of Alderman G. Everett Mi 11 ican,the attached proposed
Ordinance is being sent to you for rev·iew. The Ordinance calls for
doing away with the Urban Renew·a l Policy Committee and transferring
its duties and responsibi I ities to the Planning and Development Committee.
The matter was brought up at the last Board meeting by Alderman Rodney
Cook.
With the exception of Alderman Hugh Pierce,the four other aldermanic
members of the Urban Renewal Policy Committee are also members of
the Planning and Development Committee. In order to facilitate the
change, the proposal is made to increase the Planning and Development
Committee by one aldermanic member in order to add Alderman Pierce
for the remainder of 1969 . For 1970 and beyond, a reduction back to
se ve r. al de rma nic me mbers is suggested for consideration at a later date .
Since much of the area of concern of the Urban Renewal Policy Committee
is a lso shared by the Planning and Development Committee and their
membe rsh ips a re prac tica lly the same , little change will actually result
in th is a ct ion e x cept to reduce the number of sta nding comm i ttees .
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
LA MI | PSEC Sc
“S/S COITy OF ATLANTA “227
—— eo tle
Ie
CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303
Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404.
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
COLLIER B. GLADIN, Director
January 29, 1969
MEMORANDUM
TO: Members of Board of Aldermen
FROM: Collier B. Gladin UA
SUBJECT: Consolidation of Urban Renewal Policy Committee into
Planning and Development Committee
At the request of Alderman G. Everett Millican,the attached proposed
Ordinance is being sent to you for review. The Ordinance calls for
doing away with the Urban Renewal Policy Committee and transferring
its duties and responsibilities to the Planning and Development Committee.
The matter was brought up at the last Board meeting by Alderman Rodney
Cook.
With the exception of Alderman Hugh Pierce,the four other aldermanic
members of the Urban Renewal Policy Committee are also members of
the Planning and Development Committee. In order to facilitate the
change, the proposal is made to increase the Planning and Deve lopment
Committee by one aldermanic member in order to add Alderman Pierce
for the remainder of 1969. For 1970 and beyond, a reduction back to
seven aldermanic members is suggested for consideration at a later date.
Since much of the area of concern of the Urban Renewal Policy Committee
is also shared by the Planning and Development Committee and their
memberships are practically the same, little change will actually result
in this action except to reduce the number of standing committees.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 2, Folder 4, Document 8
Box 2
Box 2 Folder 4
Folder topic: Planning department | 1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/5a3eab0ed2825b453fe3ecc22964a03e.pdf
730a99ebdf6ffb3af204b671c497c82f
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
II
.
I
I
I
AN ORD IN ANCE
BY PLAN NI NG AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, by ordinance of December 21, 1964, the Mayor and Board
of Aldermen of th e City of Atlanta, Georgia, caused to be created a standing
committee of the Board of Alderm en entitl ed Urban Renewal Policy Committee,
as set forth in Section 2- 40. 2 of the Code of Ordi nonces, City of Atlanta,
Georgia effective July I, 1965, as amend ed, and
WHEREAS, it is de emed desirabl e and in the pub Iic interest that the numbe r
of standin.g committees of the Board of Alde rmen of the City of Atlanta, Georgia
be reduced in number and that such action wou Id be in keeping with th e precede nt
establishe d by the Mayor and Board of Alderm e n in 1967, and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the functions and responsibi Iiti es
of th e Urba n Renewal Policy CommiHee can readily and expeditiously be transferr ed
to anothe r standing committee of the Board of Alderme n of th e City of Atlanta,
Georgia, name ly, the Planning and Development Committee, and
WHEREAS, such action shou Id increase and improve communications betwee n
and coordinati on of a ctiviti es of both th e City of Atlanta, G eorgia and its urban
renewal agent, the Atlanta Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta, Georg ia.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Board of
Alde rme n of th e City of Atl a nta as foll ows:
I. That Se ction 2- 40.2 of the Cod e of the City of Atlanta is he re by
re peal ed and th e Urban Re newal Policy Commhtee is abo li shed.
2. That Secti on 2-40. I (6) of th e Code of the City of Atl a nta is he re by
ame nded by strikin g scdd paragraph in its entire ty and inse rting in
Iie u the reof th e fo ll ow ing:
(b)Membe rship. Th e Planning and De ve lopme nt Committee shall be
composed of e ight (8) members of the Board of Alde rme n a ppo inted
by th e Mayor and two (2) adv isory membe rs from the Hous ing
�II
II
-2Authority of the City of Atlanta appointed by the Chairman
of the Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta. The Housing AuthoriJ-y me ber!
of this committee shall have the power to vote only on those
items of housing and urban renewal which are going be fore
the Housing Authority's Board of CQmmissioners for further aclion.
The Chairman of said committ-ee shall be appointed by the Mayor
and the oJ-her seven (7) members from the Board of Aldermen.
The Mayor shall appoint J-he Planning and Development CommiHee
so that a representation is obtained of aldermanic committees
concerned with community development, redevelopmen1·, and
improvement.
3. That Section 2-40. I (c) of 1·he Code of the City of A1·lanta is hereby
amended by striking said paragraph in its entirely and inserJ-ing
in lieu thereof the following:
(c)Funtions, responsibilities. This Planning and Development
Committee shall have the primary responsibility to review and
coordinate the long range plans and programs of all city efforts
in the fields of community development, redevelopment, housing,
foci Iities and improvements, and to make suggestions to other
appropriate alderrnanic committees or recommend actions and
policies for adopl-ion by !he Board of Aldermen to insure maximum
coordination and the highest quality of urban community development
throughout the City. This responsibility shall include but is not
limited to the review and evaluation of the elements of the
comprehensive (general) plan development by the Planning Departm e nt
with guidance from the Atlanta - Fulton County Joint Planning Board;
th is comprehensive plan to Le composed of at least a land use plan,
transportation plan and a community facilities plan with public
improvem e nts program and Capital Improve me nts Program. The
�II
II
-3committe e shall further be responsible for developing policy
recommendations on all oth e r matl-ers concerning the planning
arid coo rdination of future city dev e lopme nl-s including,
spe cifically, th e Community Improvement Program (CIP),
Open Space , Urba n Be autification, the 1962 Fede ral Highway
Act, th e Workable Pmgram for Communil-y Improvement,
ewal and Neighborhood Developme
pre
1
-
'nary and proje ct or execution plans, and other e loted
rban renewal matters formerly under the responsibility of
e
Urban Renewal CommiJ-tee or the Urban Renewal Policy Com iHee.
The Commit·te e shall fu rth e r re vie w all applications for fede ra
grants to determine their conformity with adopted overall
and polici e s for the d evelopme nt of the City.
HER O RDAINED that all ordinances and parts of or
e be and the same are hereby re peale .
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
AN ORDINANCE
BY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, by ordinance of December 21, 1964, the Mayor and Board
of Aldermen of the City of Atlanta, Georgia, caused to be created a standing
committee of the Board of Aldermen entitled Urban Renewal Policy Committee,
as set forth in Section 2~40.2 of the Code of Ordinances, City of Atlanta,
Georgia effective July 1, 1965, as amended, and
WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable and in the public interest that the number
of standing committees of the Board of Aldermen of the City of Atlanta, Georgia
be reduced in number and that such action would be in keeping with the precedent
established by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen in 1967, and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the functions and responsibilities
of the Urban Renewal Policy Committee can readily and expeditiously be transferred
to another standing committee of the Board of Aldermen of the City of Atlanta,
Georgia, namely, the Planning and Development Committee, and
WHEREAS, such action should increase and improve communications between
and coordination of activities of both the City of Atlanta, Georgia and ifs urban
renewal agent, the Atlanta Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta, Georgia.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Board of
Aldermen of the City of Atlanta as follows:
|. That Section 2-40.2 of the Code of the City of Atlanta is hereby
repealed and the Urban Renewal Policy Committee is abolished.
2. That Section 2-40.1 (b) of the Code of the City of Atlanta is hereby
amended by striking said paragraph in its entirety and inserting in
lieu thereof the following:
(b) Membership. The Planning and Development Committee shall be
composed of eight (8) members of the Board of Aldermen appointed
by the Mayor and two (2) advisory members from the Housing
lis
Authority of the City of Atlanta appointed by the Chairman
of the Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta.The Housing Authority men
of this committee shall have the power to vote only on those
items of housing and urban renewal which are going before
the Housing Authority's Board of Commissioners for further action,
The Chairman of said committee shall be appointed by the Mayor
and the other seven (7) members from the Board of Aldermen.
The Mayor shall appoint the Planning and Development Committee
so that a representation is obtained of aldermanic committees
concerned with community development, redevelopment, and
improvement.
3. That Section 2-40.1 (c) of the Code of the City of Atlanta is hereby
amended by striking said paragraph in its entirety and inserting
in
lieu thereof the following:
(c) Funtions, responsibilities. This Planning and Development
Committee shall have the primary responsibility to review and
coordinate the long range plans and programs of all city efforts
in the fields of community development, redevelopment, housing,
facilities and improvements, and to make suggestions to other
appropriate aldermanic committees or recommend actions and
policies for adoption by the Board of Aldermen to insure maximum
coordination and the highest quality of urban community development
throughout the City. This responsibility shall include but is not
limited to the review and evaluation of the elements of the
comprehensive (general) plan development by the Planning Department
with guidance from the Atlanta - Fulton County Joint Planning Board;
this comprehensive plan to be composed of at least a land use plan,
transportation plan and a community facilities plan with public
improvements program and Capital Improvements Program. The
ber
conflict with this ordin
=9-
committee shall further be responsible for developing policy
recommendations on all other matters concerning the planning
and coordination of future city developments including,
specifically, the Community Improvement Program (CIP),
Open Space, Urban Beautification, the 1962 Federal Highway
Act, the Workable Program for Community Improvement,
Urban Reréwal and Neighborhood Developme
inary and project or execution plans, and otherxelated
rban renewal matters formerly under the responsibility of the
Urban Renewal Committee or the Urban Renewal Policy Committee.
The Committee shall further review all applications for federa
grants to determine their conformity with adopted overall pl
and policies for the development of the City.
BE IT FORTHER ORDAINED that all ordinances and parts of ordinances in
e be and the same are hereby repealed?
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 2, Folder 4, Document 7
Box 2
Box 2 Folder 4
Folder topic: Planning department | 1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/6693d8e21e51de12f4552ab4eca32e5c.pdf
e18bf8be8fbbe187e2a27a2f751ee50f
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
TA.
C ITY OF A.nnL
CITY HALL
ATLANTA, GA. 30303
Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
COLLIER B. GLADIN, Dir e ctor
February 3, 1969
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Members of Board of Aldermen
FROM:
Collier B. Gladin
C,(\t .\--
SUBJECT: Consolidation of Urban Renewal Pol icy Committee into
Planning and Development Committee
The attached Ordinance, concerning the consolidation of the two
committees, has been subjected to some revision. Other than some
minor editing the major changes are:
I. the phrase "and Capital Improvements Program" has
been struck from the last line on Page 2 of the draft
forwarded to you on January 29, 1969.
2. The sentence on Page 3, referring to federal grants,
now reads: 11 The committee shal I further review
al I applications for federal grants that are referred
from the Grants Review Board for planning considerations
to determine their conformity with adopted overall
plans and policies for the development of the City."
CBG/jp
Attachment
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
CITY OF ATLANTA.
CITY HALL ATLANTA, GA. 30303
Tel. 522-4463 Area Code 404
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
COLLIER B. GLADIN, Director
February 3, 1969
MEMORANDUM
TO: Members of Board of Aldermen
FROM: Collier B. Gladin C(Mt-
SUBJECT: Consolidation of Urban Renewal Policy Committee into
Planning and Development Committee
The attached Ordinance, concerning the consolidation of the two
committees, has been subjected to some revision. Other than some
minor editing the major changes are:
|. the phrase "and Capital Improvements Program" has
been struck from the last line on Page 2 of the draft
forwarded to you on January 29, 1969.
2. The sentence on Page 3, referring to federal grants,
now reads: "The committee shall further review
all applications for federal grants that are referred
from the Grants Review Board for planning considerations
to determine their conformity with adopted overall
plans and policies for the development of the City."
CBG/jp
Attachment
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 2, Folder 4, Document 6
Box 2
Box 2 Folder 4
Folder topic: Planning department | 1969
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/a9e21b4c81acf1c3785d56a2f3fb034b.pdf
32a8dc5a09555b5a485a99e0e638e762
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
I N TRAOFFICE
MJEMO
AN
UM
DISPOSITION
To:
Collier Gladin and George Aldridge
Distribute
From:
Hold
Jack, Helen
Subject:
Schedule for Completion of Housing Conditions Survey
DATE
February 18, 1969
February 19:
File
D
lrifo. Only
0
As first step in beginning housing conditions survey, approval for use of data
processing time, personnel, and equipment must come from Mr. Milton Farris.
This approval must be gained prior to o!·dering cards and other tools for the
housing inspectors to use in the field.
I
-
Since it will take three to four weeks
after the order is placed to receive this equipment, it is imperative that
I
I
approval from Mr. Farris be gained at the earliest possible date.
February 19:
Order cards and other data processing equipment. The actual date for this
assignment will correspond to the date final approval for computer use is gained.
February 21:
Rough draft of procedural manual for field inspections will be submitted to
George, John Watson, Collier, Jim Smith, and Bill Wofford for approval of
form and information.
February 28:
Procedural manual wi 11 be completed, printed and distributed to housing inspectors
and other _interested persons, such as training personnel and non-inspecting
members of the Housing Code Division and Planning Department. --
February 21 :
Definitions pertaining to housing conditions that are now in use by various agencies
involved in the city's housing problems will be collected and assembled.
February 26: From the assembled information, the -Planning Department will prepare a list of
definitions resulting from a consensus of opinion and mail these definitions to the
interested agenc ie s by this date.
0
0
�MEMORANDUM
February 18, 1969
Page Two
February 28: Representatives of the agencies involved will meet to discuss the standardized
definitions and reach final agreement.
March 3:
Final listing of standardized definitions will be submitted to the Housing Code
Division to be used in the training program and actual survey.
March 3:
Intensive two-week training program for Housing Code Inspectors will begln.
During these two weeks, the use of punch cards and check Iists will be
explained to the inspectors, cost estimation procedures will be standardized
through field observation, and the standardized definitions will be explained
in the field to the inspectors.
March 17:
The inspectors, after completing the two-week intensive training program, ·
will enter the field to begin the actual survey.
March 17:
Data Processing Division will have cards pdnted and read:,- to take into the
field by the inspectors. Mr. Steve Carlson of Data Processing will supervise the
printing of original cards and programming of collected information back into
computer.
June 20:
Completion of field survey for entire city will take place on this ~ate, allowing
the inspectors 14 weeks in the field.
June 23:
By this date, collected, standardized information on every housing structure
in the city will have been submitted to the Data .Processing Division by the
Housing Code. Running of computer program to give information necessary for
developing Housing Code Comp Iiance Program wi II begin at th is time.
�MEMORANDUM
February 18, 1969
Page Three
July 14:
Computer printouts of necessary housing data will be presented to the Housing
Code Division.
That is, complete original information on conditions of
structures within the city will be in the hands of the Housing Code Division
at this time.
August I:
Housing Code Compliance Program for next five years will be prepared
jointly by Planning Department and Housing Code Division by this date.
September I:
Housing Code Compliance Program will be incorporated into application for
Workable Program Recertification by the Planning Department.
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
INTRAOFFICE MEMORANDUM
DISPOSITION
To: i din and Idrid
° Collier Gladin and George Aldridge cn =
From: Jack, Helen Hold a.
File ml
Info. Only CJ
Subject: Schedule for Completion of Housing Conditions Survey
DATE February 18, 1969
February 19:
February 19;
February 21:
February 28;
As first step in beginning housing conditions survey, approval for use of data
processing time, personnel, and equipment must come from Mr. Milton Farris.
This approval must be gained prior to ordering cards and other tools for the
housing inspectors to use in the field. Since it will take three to four weeks
after the order is placed to receive this equipment, it is imperative that
approval from Mr. Farris be gained at the earliest possible date.
Order cards and other data processing equipment. The actual date for this
assignment will correspond to the date final approval for computer use is gained.
Rough draft of procedural manual for field inspections will be submitted to
George, John Watson, Collier, Jim Smith, and Bill Wofford for approval of
form and information.
Procedural manual will be completed, printed and distributed to housing inspectors
and other interested persons, such as training personnel and non-inspecting
~ members of the Housing Code Division and Planning Department. -
February 2I;
February 26:
Definitions pertaining to housing conditions that are now in use by various agencies
involved in the city's housing problems will be collected and assembled.
From the assembled information, the Planning Department will prepare a list of
definitions resulting from a consensus of opinion ad mail these definitions to the
interested agencies by this date.
MEMORAND UM
February 18, 1969
Page Two
February 28; Representatives of the agencies involved will meet to discuss the standardized
March 3:
March 3:
March I7:
March |7:
June 20:
June 23:
definitions and reach final agreement.
Final listing of standardized definitions will be submitted to the Housing Code
Division to be used in the training program and actual survey.
Intensive two-week training program for Housing Code Inspectors will begin.
During these two weeks, the use of punch cards and check lists will be
explained to the inspectors, cost estimation procedures will be standardized
through field observation, and the standardized definitions will be explained
in the field to the inspectors.
The inspectors, after completing the two-week intensive training program,
will enter the field to begin the actual survey.
Data Processing Division will have cards printed and read; to take into the
field by the inspectors. Mr. Steve Carlson of Data Processing will supervise the
printing of original cards and programming of collected information back into
computer.
Completion of field survey for entire city will take place on this date, allowing
the inspectors 14 weeks in the field.
By this date, collected, standardized information on every housing structure
in the city will have been submitted to the Data Processing Division by the
Housing Code. Running of computer program to give information necessary for
developing Housing Code Compliance Program will begin at this time.
MEMORANDUM
February 18, 1969
Page Three
July 14:
August I:
September |:
Computer printouts of necessary housing data will be presented to the Housing
Code Division. That is, complete original information on conditions of
structures within the city will be in the hands of the Housing Code Division
at this time.
Housing Code Compliance Program for next five years will be prepared
jointly by Planning Department and Housing Code Division by this date.
Housing Code Compliance Program will be incorporated into application for
Workable Program Recertification by the Planning Department.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 2, Folder 4, Document 5
Box 2
Box 2 Folder 4
Folder topic: Planning department | 1969