1
20
43
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/9acc3c33649f3ea94ef04b1a4ccffd30.pdf
8383332ac9c7f797d823fb750db91708
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AUGUST
31, 1967
ASSETS
Cash in Banks:
C & S National Bank
First National Bank - Payroll
Trust Company of 9eorgia
Fulton National Bank - Section 9
$ 14,296.04
2,651.88
1,000.00
20,976.08
Inv es tmen ts:
U. S. Treasury Bills
114,812.00
Petty Cash
25.00
Accounts Receivable:
Gwinnett County - 1967
Gwinnett County - 1966
$9,105.00
4,552.50
13,657.50
TOTAL ASSETS
$167,418.50
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable
$ 12,648.37
Payroll Taxes Withheld and Accrued
Reserves:
ARMPC - Urban Design Study
Atlanta Transit Stu9y
Parsons-Brinkerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel:
Section 9 Matching
Retainer Agreement:
Transportation Study
Public Information
Surveying
TOTAL LIABILITIES
SURPLUS
1,492.14
7,293.00
1,563.00
82,411.00
$
139. 37
245.19
4,338.89
4,723.45
110,130.96
$ 57,287.54
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AUGUST 31, 1967
ASSETS
Cash in Banks;
Cc & § National Bank $ 14,296.04
First National Bank - Payroll 2,651.88
Trust Company of Georgia 1,000.00
Fulton National Bank - Section 9 20,976.08
Investments:
U. S. Treasury Bills 114,812.00
Petty Cash 25.00
Accounts Receivable;
Gwinnett County - 1967 $9,105.00
Gwinnett County - 1966 4,552.50 13,657.50
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable $ 12,648.37
Payroll Taxes Withheld and Accrued 1,492.14
Reserves:
ARMPC - Urban Design Study 7,293.00
Atlanta Transit Study 1,563.00
Parsons~Brinkerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel;:
Section 9 Matching 82,411.00
Retainer Agreement:
Transportation Study $ 139.37
Public Information 245.19
Surveying , 4, 338.89 4,723.45
TOTAL LIABILITIES
SURPLUS
$167,418.50
110,130.96
$57,287.54
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 21, Folder 5, Document 42
Box 21
Box 21 Folder 5
Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/e7c7b8547f1e8f5e4189a3a94a41ecbd.pdf
679c7b072e05eb06a1a231689307fec5
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
BUDGET REPORT
AUGUS? ' 31 ·~. 1967 ·.
Unappropriated Surplus
BUDGET
1967
ACTUAL
JANUARY 1, 196 7
TO
AUGUST 31, 196 7
$128,281.64
$128,281.64
$ 84,030.00
$ 63,022.50
23,190.00
82,770.00
91,800.00
18,210.00
$300,000.00
$ 5,520.00
17,392.50
41,385.00
68,850.00
9,105: 9.9
$199,755.00
$ 3,018.77
$ 95,000.00
$371,000.00
$676,520.00
$804,801.64
$ 60,000.00
67,686.12
597.46
$128,283.58
$331,057.35
$459,338.99
$ 68,950.00
10,500.00
$ 41,380.94
7,048.24
1,109.00
533.00
1,680.00
10,000.00
99.00
$ 92,871.00
$ 3,150.00
1,088.89
400.00
758.13
300.54
104.00
$ 51,080.74
$ 2,200.00
iNCOME
Appropriations:
City of Atlanta
Clayton County
DeKalb County
Fulton County
Gwinnett County
Sub-Totals
Interest Income
Federal Funds:
702 Loan
Section 9 Grant
Interest - Federal Funds
Sub-Totals
TOTAL INCOME
TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS
276,000.00
0
EXPENSES
Staff Cost:
Salaries
Expenses
Benefits:
Social Security
Guaranty Fund
Health and Accident Insurance
Retirement
Workmen's Compensation
Aub-Totals
Board Meetings
Administrative and Office Overhead:
Rent
Communications and Postage
Furniture and Equipment
Supplies
Printing
Auditor
Accountant
Public Information
Advisory
Insurance:
Public Liability
Depository and Forgery
Fidelity Bond
Sub-Totals
CARRIED FORWARD
$
3,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
3,600.00
1,000.00
250.00
1,000.00
33,000.00
5,000.00
72.00
56.00
199.00
$ 51,177.00
$147,198.00
$
2,000.00
1,254.16
117 .81
1,854.58
623.56
250.00
500.00
15,025.20
977. 35
55.00
56.27
198. 6 0
$ 22,912.53
$ 76,193.27
�METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
BUDGET REPORT
AUGUST 31, 1967
BUDGET
19'67
ACTUAL
JANUARY 1, 1967
TO
AUGUST 31, 1967
I
TOTAL INCOME AND UNA?PROPRIATED
SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD
$804,801.64
$459,338.99
$147,198.00
$ 20,000.00
$ 76,193.27
$ 8,758.61
$ 31,250.00
$ 29",939.00
32,667.00
16,333.00
16,000.00
15,293.00
3,333.00
1,667.00
0
0
1,563.00
4,742.09
EXPENSES
Brought Forward
Counsel
Consultants:
Atlanta Region Metropolitan
Planning Commis~ion
Urban Design Study:
Section 9
Matching
Atlanta Transit Stu9y;
Section 9
Matching
Hamm~r, Greene and Siler
Parsons-Brinckerhoff-Tudor ~Bechtel:
702 Loan
Section 9:
Federal
Matching
Retainer Agreement
Research and Technical Services
Sub-Totals
TOTAL EXPENSES
95,000.00
60,000.00
240,000.00
120,000.00
60,000.00
2,000.00
$602,250.00
$769,448.00
60,000.00
112,411.00
15,115.64
2,035.84
$317,099.57
$402 , 051. 45
SURPLUS
$ 35,353.6~
$ 5Z,28Z.5~
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
BUDGET REPORT
AUGUST 31, 1967.
Unappropriated Surplus
INCOME
Appropriations:
City of Atlanta
Clayton County
DeKalb County
Fulton County
Gwinnett County
Sub-Totals
Interest Income
Federal Funds:
702 Loan
Section 9 Grant
Interest - Federal Funds
Sub-Totals
TOTAL INCOME
TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS
EXPENSES
Staff Cost:
Salaries
Expenses
Benefits:
Social Security
Guaranty Fund
Health and Accident Insurance
Retirement
Workmen's Compensation
Aub-Totals
Board Meetings
Administrative and Office Overhead:
Rent
Communications and Postage
Furniture and Equipment
Supplies
Printing
Auditor
Accountant
Public Information
Advisory
Insurance:
Public Liability
Depository and Forgery
Fidelity Bond
Sub-Totals
CARRIED FORWARD
ACTUAL
JANUARY 1, 1967
BUDGET TO
1967 AUGUST 31, 1967
$128,281.64 $128,281.64
$ 84,030.00 $ 63,022.50
23,190.00 17,392.50
82,770.00 41,385.00
91,800.00 68,850, 00
18 ,210,00 9,105, 00
$300,000.00 $199,755.00
$§ 5,520.00 $ 3,018.77
$ 95,000.00 $ 60,000.00
276,000.00 67 ,686,12
) 597.46
$371,000.00 $128,283.58
$676,520.00 $331,057.35
$804,801.64 $459, 338,99
$ 68,950.00 $ 41,380.94
10,500.00 7,048.24
1,109.00 1,088.89
533.00 400.00
1,680.00 758.13
10,000.00 300,54
99.00 104.00
$ 92,871.00 $ 51,080.74
$ 3,150.00 $2,200.00
$ 3,000.00 $ 2,000.00
2,000.00 1,254.16
2,000.00 117.81
3,600.00 1,854.58
1,000.00 623.56
250.00 250.00
1,000.00 500.00
33,000.00 15,025.20
5,000.00 977.35
72.00 55.00
56.00 56.27
199.00 198.60
$ 51,177.00 § 22,912.53
$147,198.00 $ 76,193.27
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT
BUDGET REPORT
AUGUST 31, 1967
TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED
SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD
EXPENSES
Brought Forward
Counsel
Consultants:
Atlanta Region Metropolitan
Planning Commission
Urban Design Study:
Section 9
Matching
Atlanta Transit Study;
Section 9
Matching
Hammer, Greene and Siler
Parsons-Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel:
702 Loan
Section 9:
Federal
Matching
Retainer Agreement
Research and Technical Services
Sub-Totals
TOTAL EXPENSES
SURPLUS
AUTHORITY
ACTUAL
JANUARY 1, 1967
BUDGET TO
1967 AUGUST 31, 1967
$804,801.64 $459,338.99
$147,198.06 $ 76,193.27
$ 20,000.00 $8,758.61
$ 31,250.00 $ 29,939.00
32,667.00 16,000.00
16,333.00 15,293.00
3,333.00 0
1,667.00 1,563.00
8) 4,742.09
95,000.00 60,000.00
240,000.00 60,000.00
120,000.00 112,411.00
60,000.00 15,115.64
2,000.00 2,035.84
$602,250.00 $317,099.57
$769,448.00 $402,051.45
$35,353.64 $57,287.54
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 21, Folder 5, Document 41
Box 21
Box 21 Folder 5
Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/f8e8df1c8fda60f49b714940dde537aa.pdf
b8ff53e261ef349384dba3d3552b51cd
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
MINUTES OF THE NINETEENTH MEETING OF THE
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
SEPTEMBER 5, 1967
The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit
Authority held its regular meeting on September 5, 1967, at
3:30 P.M. in the Glenn Building Conference Room, Atlanta. Mr.
Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman, presided.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Robert F. Adamson (City of Atlanta)
Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County)
M. C. Bishop (Fulton County)
Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County)
Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta)
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Edgar Blalock (Clayton County)
K. A. McMillan (Gwinnett County)
L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta)
Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta)
OTHERS PRESENT:
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
H. L. Stuart, General Manager
Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary
King Elliott, Public Information Director
Earl Nelson, Chief Engineer
H. N. Johnson, Secretary to General Manager
MARTA Advisory Committee
H. Boyer Marx, American Society of Landscape Architects
Richard Forbes, American Institute of Planners
�Consultants
J. A. Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor,
Bechtel, Atlanta
Leon Eplan, Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta
W. Stell Huie, Huie & Harland, Atlanta
Others
Joseph Lay, Robinson-Humphrey Company, Inc., Atlanta
William Fletcher, White, Weld & Co., New York City
Thomas J. Pendergrast, Courts & Co.
P.A. Springer, Atlanta Traffic and Safety Council
George B. Pilkington, Bureau of Public Roads
John D. Prien, Jr., Executive Director, Georgia Society
of Professional Engineers
Donald G. Ingram, Central Atlanta Progress, Inc.
J. D. Wingfield, Jr., Mrs. Rachel Champagne, Miss Claudette
Parrish, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission
The meeting was called to order by the Vice Chairman.
Minutes
The minutes of the August meeting were unanimously approved by the
members present. Due to lack of a quorum, it was agreed that this
action would be ratified by the Board at the October meeting.
Financial Report
The General Manager presented the financial report as of August 31,
1967, which is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
Costs were running according to the budget. Third quarter appropriations had been received from participating governments with
the e x ception of DeKalb and Gwinnett Counties . The tentative
budget for fiscal 1968 would be submitted to the Board members
for consideration in October .
Progress Reports
General Manager
Mr. Stuart reported that Mr. Nelson had met with officials of the
City of Atlanta, Fulton and DeKalb Counties, and the City of
-
2 -
�Decatur, and furnished them with sets of the 701 report materials
for their study. He was scheduled to meet with East Point and ·
College Park officials to apprise them of transit plans relative
to their areas.
The General Manager stated that the final draft of the financial
report prepared by Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates had been
received and would be submitted to the Board members.
Public Information Director
Mr. Elliott reported that Mr. M. C. Bishop had made rapid transit
presentations during the past month before the South Fulton Chamber
of Commerce Board of Directors meeting, the College Park Kiwanis
Club and the Atlanta Airport Area Rotary Club. At these meetings
a film was shown entitled "The Alternate Route"; this was on
transportation problems in Los Angeles and its need for a rapid
transit system.
Mr. Elliott mentioned a special column that will appear in f uture
issues of Rapid Transit Progress.
It will answer various questions about rapid transit and plans; subject matter will consist
of "MARTAnswers" by the General Manager.
Chief Engineer
Mr. Nelson reported on his attendance at the Engineering Foundation Research Conference held at Proctor Academy , Andover, New
Hampshire, August 14-16, where discussions and presentations on
e conomic and social aspects of urban transportation were stressed.
The imple me nta tion of new transportation technology wa s pre s e nte d
b y promine nt res earche rs f rom the fe d e ral government a nd priv a t e
industry.
Mr . Nelson was instructed to meet with the State Highway Department
in connection with the construction of I - 485 in o rder to determine
e ff e cts this r oute might h a v e on the t r ansit pl a nni ng.
Consultants
Pars o n s , Bri n c kerho f f - Tudor, Be chtel
Mr. Co i l reported on recent s oil t est borings alo ng the n o rth-so u th
line and exhibited formations o f stone taken at various depths.
Contractual work f o r these borings had been completed and was
-
3 -
�being analyzed by Law Engineering Testing Company prior to a final
report.
Mr. Donald C. Hyde, retired General Manager of the Cleveland Transit
System and now an Associated Consultant with Parsons, Brinckerhoff,
Quade and Douglas, had visited the PBTB offices recently and rendered valuable guidance on patronage and operations studies under
way. Mr. Walter Quintin of BART, San Francisco, had also worked
in Atlanta recently and furnished information on train controls.
Mr. Coil said PBTB's text for the 701 report was completed and
was going to the printer very soon. Mr. Bennett mentioned that
additional copies, over and above the 250 copies called for under
the 701 contract, might be requested by the Authority. Mr. Bishop
suggested that the General Manager be authorized to secure an
appropriate number of additional copies at MARTA's expense. This
was agreed.
Mr. Coil reported on progress of Lord & Den Hartog, design consultant for PBTB, in the design work for Transit Center and other
stations and said a more detailed report would be made during
November. Design concepts of the stations had been presented to
those in attendance at the briefing session prior to the meeting.
Eric Hill Associates
Mr. Eplan briefly reported on progress of the impact study; discussions had been held with school authorities, fire department
officials, and housing authorities to consider rapid transit plans
and their relationship to these particular functions.
He said
work was continuing; studies were approximately two-thirds complete.
·
Proposed New Impact Study
Mr. Bennett stated that in view of the studies by Eric Hill
Ass ociates and the 701 reports, he had felt there might be duplication of work in the previously submitted work program for the
first Section 9 Amendment approved by the Authority at the July
meeting. This application had been held up until a revised
program was determined and clarified.
Mr. Wingfield said consideration was being given to retaining one
of the nation's outstanding transportation experts, Alan Voorhees
and Associates of Washington, D. c., to evaluate plans and pro grams. This could be a valuable addition to the final planning
of the transit system. Voorhees would be able to render the
-
4 -
�Authority excellent advice and evaluations which would be invaluable as input for the pre-referendum campaign next year.
Mr. Ingram of Central Atlanta Progress stated the transportation
consultant selected to advise MARTA would be retained by Central
Atlanta Progress in connection with its studies on transportation.
Other Business
Mr. Bennett informed the Board members of a meeting to be held on
September 12 in the Highway Board Room, co-sponsored by the -State
Highway Department and the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning
Commission. The purpose was to discuss important points relative
to overall transportation planning. At the meeting it was expected that a Policy Committee would be organized to render
decisions regarding the Atlanta Area Transportation Study. It
was hoped this would strengthen coordination of all agencies involved in the total transportation planning program for metropolitan Atlanta. To date AATS had operated without unified
policy direction.
Invitations had been sent to heads of local
governments, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Bureau
of Public Roads, MARTA, and the Atlanta Transit System.
Adjournment
The Vice Chairman adjourned the meeting at 4:30 P.M.
Next Meeting
October 3, 1967.
-
5 -
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
MINUTES OF THE NINETEENTH MEETING OF THE
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
SEPTEMBER 5, 1967
The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit
Authority held its regular meeting on September 5, 1967, at
3:30 P.M. in the Glenn Building Conference Room, Atlanta. Mr.
Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman, presided.
MEMBERS PRESENT;
Robert F. Adamson (City of Atlanta)
Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County)
M. C. Bishop (Fulton County)
Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County)
Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta)
MEMBERS ABSENT;
Edgar Blalock (Clayton County)
K. A. McMillon (Gwinnett County)
L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta)
Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta)
OTHERS PRESENT:
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
H. L. Stuart, General Manager
Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary
King Elliott, Public Information Director
Earl Nelson, Chief Engineer
H. N. Johnson, Secretary to General Manager
MARTA Advisory Committee
H. Boyer Marx, American Society of Landscape Architects
Richard Forbes, American Institute of Planners
Consultants
J. A. Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor,
Bechtel, Atlanta
Leon Eplan, Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta
W. Stell Huie, Huie & Harland, Atlanta
Others
Joseph Lay, Robinson-Humphrey Company, Inc., Atlanta
William Fletcher, White, Weld & Co., New York City
Thomas J. Pendergrast, Courts & Co.
P. A. Springer, Atlanta Traffic and Safety Council
George B. Pilkington, Bureau of Public Roads
John D. Prien, Jr., Executive Director, Georgia Society
of Professional Engineers
Donald G. Ingram, Central Atlanta Progress, Inc.
J. D. Wingfield, Jr., Mrs. Rachel Champagne, Miss Claudette
Parrish, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission
The meeting was called to order by the Vice Chairman.
Minutes
The minutes of the August meeting were unanimously approved by the
members present. Due to lack of a quorum, it was agreed that this
action would be ratified by the Board at the October meeting.
Financial Report
The General Manager presented the financial report as of August 31,
1967, which is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
Costs were running according to the budget. Third quarter appro-
priations had been received from participating governments with
the exception of DeKalb and Gwinnett Counties. The tentative
budget for fiscal 1968 would be submitted to the Board members
for consideration in October.
Progress Reports
General Manager
Mr. Stuart reported that Mr. Nelson had met with officials of the
City of Atlanta, Fulton and DeKalb Counties, and the City of
Decatur, and furnished them with sets of the 701 report materials
for their study. He was scheduled to meet with East Point and
College Park officials to apprise them of transit plans relative
to their areas.
The General Manager stated that the final draft of the financial
report prepared by Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates had been
received and would be submitted to the Board members.
Public Information Director
Mr. Elliott reported that Mr. M. C. Bishop had made rapid transit
presentations during the past month before the South Fulton Chamber
of Commerce Board of Directors meeting, the College Park Kiwanis
Club and the Atlanta Airport Area Rotary Club. At these meetings
a film was shown entitled "The Alternate Route"; this was on
transportation problems in Los Angeles and its need for a rapid
transit system.
Mr. Elliott mentioned a special column that will appear in future
issues of Rapid Transit Progress. It will answer various ques-
tions about rapid transit and plans; subject matter will consist
of "MARTAnswers" by the General Manager.
Chief Engineer
Mr. Nelson reported on his attendance at the Engineering Founda-
tion Research Conference held at Proctor Academy, Andover, New
Hampshire, August 14-16, where discussions and presentations on
economic and social aspects of urban transportation were stressed.
The implementation of new transportation technology was presented
by prominent researchers from the federal government and private
industry.
Mr. Nelson was instructed to meet with the State Highway Department
in connection with the construction of I-485 in order to determine
effects this route might have on the transit planning.
Consultants
Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel
Mr. Coil reported on recent soil test borings along the north-south
line and exhibited formations of stone taken at various depths.
Contractual work for these borings had been completed and was
being analyzed by Law Engineering Testing Company prior to a final
report.
Mr. Donald C. Hyde, retired General Manager of the Cleveland Transit
System and now an Associated Consultant with Parsons, Brinckerhoff,
Quade and Douglas, had visited the PBTB offices recently and ren-
dered valuable guidance on patronage and operations studies under
way. Mr. Walter Quintin of BART, San Francisco, had also worked
in Atlanta recently and furnished information on train controls.
Mr. Coil said PBTB's text for the 701 report was completed and
was going to the printer very soon. Mr. Bennett mentioned that
additional copies, over and above the 250 copies called for under
the 701 contract, might be requested by the Authority. Mr. Bishop
suggested that the General Manager be authorized to secure an
appropriate number of additional copies at MARTA's expense. This
was agreed.
Mr. Coil reported on progress of Lord & Den Hartog, design con-
sultant for PBTB, in the design work for Transit Center and other
stations and said a more detailed report would be made during
November. Design concepts of the stations had been presented to
those in attendance at the briefing session prior to the meeting.
Eric Hill Associates
Mr. Eplan briefly reported on progress of the impact study; dis-
cussions had been held with school authorities, fire department
officials, and housing authorities to consider rapid transit plans
and their relationship to these particular functions. He said
work was continuing; studies were approximately two-thirds com-
plete.
Proposed New Impact Study
Mr. Bennett stated that in view of the studies by Eric Hill
Associates and the 701 reports, he had felt there might be dupli-
cation of work in the previously submitted work program for the
first Section 9 Amendment approved by the Authority at the July
meeting. This application had been held up until a revised
program was determined and clarified.
Mr. Wingfield said consideration was being given to retaining one
of the nation's outstanding transportation experts, Alan Voorhees
and Associates of Washington, D. C., to evaluate plans and pro-
grams. This could be a valuable addition to the final planning
of the transit system. Voorhees would be able to render the
Authority excellent advice and evaluations which would be in-
valuable as input for the pre-referendum campaign next year.
Mr. Ingram of Central Atlanta Progress stated the transportation
consultant selected to advise MARTA would be retained by Central
Atlanta Progress in connection with its studies on transportation.
Other Business
Mr. Bennett informed the Board members of a meeting to be held on
September 12 in the Highway Board Room, co-sponsored by the State
Highway Department and the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning
Commission. The purpose was to discuss important points relative
to overall transportation planning. At the meeting it was ex-
pected that a Policy Committee would be organized to render
decisions regarding the Atlanta Area Transportation Study. It
was hoped this would strengthen coordination of all agencies in-
volved in the total transportation planning program for metro-
politan Atlanta. To date AATS had operated without unified
policy direction. Invitations had been sent to heads of local
governments, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Bureau
of Public Roads, MARTA, and the Atlanta Transit System.
Adjournment
The Vice Chairman adjourned the meeting at 4:30 P.M.
Next Meeting
October 3, 1967.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 21, Folder 5, Document 40
Box 21
Box 21 Folder 5
Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/0a0cd80b3908ae21d0e3640c1e059426.pdf
d5ae2cb44df977c3d2e223d53144c8d6
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AUGUST
31, 1967
ASSETS
Cash in Banks:
C & S National Bank
First National Bank - Payroll
Trust Company of Georgia
Fulton National Bank - Section 9
$ 14,296 . 04
2,651.88
1,000.00
20,976.08
Investments:
U. S. Treasury Bills
114,812.00
25.00
Petty Cash
Accounts Receivable:
Gwinnett County - 19Q7
Gwinnett County - 1966
$9,105.00
4,552.50
13,657.50
$167,418.50
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES
$ 12,648.37
Accounts Payable
Payroll Taxes Withheld and Accrued
Reserves:
ARMPC - Urban Design Study
Atlanta Transit Study
Parsons-Brinkerhoff-Tudor-Bechtet:
Section 9 Matching
Retainer Agree~ent:
Transportation Study
Public Infor\llBtion
Surveying
TOTAL LIABILITIES
SURPLUS
1,492.14
7,293. 00
1 ,563 . 00
82,411.00
$
139.37
245.19
4,338.89
4,723.45
110,130.96
$ 57 , 287.54
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AUGUST 31, 1967
ASSETS
Cash in Banks:
C & S National Bank $ 14,296.04
First National Bank - Payroll 2,651.88
Trust Company of Georgia 1,000.00
Fulton National Bank - Section 9 20,976.08
Investments; 7
U. S. Treasury Bills 114,812.00
Petty Cash 25.00
Accounts Receivable:
Gwinnett County - 1967 $9,105.00
Gwinnett County - 1966 4,552.50 13,657.50
TOTAL ASSETS $167,418.50
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable $ 12,648, 37
Payroll Taxes Withheld and Accrued 1,492.14
Reserves:
ARMPC = Urban Design Study 73293.00
Atlanta Transit Study 1,563.00
Parsons~Brinkerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel;
Section 9 Matching 82,411.00
Retainer Agreement:
Transportation Study $ 139.37
Public Information 245.19
Surveying 4, 338.89 4,723.45
TOTAL LIABILITIES 110,130.96
SURPLUS 287.5
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 21, Folder 5, Document 39
Box 21
Box 21 Folder 5
Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/e13bc3d838fd2960dbc7499172e86d8c.pdf
be04ee8cbc75139d1657ccd6c90a6e9d
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
BUDGET REPORT
AUaus:r-. ' 3l ·~. 196 7·.
Unappropriated Surplus
BUDGET
1967
ACTUAL
JANUARY 1, 196 7
TO
AUGUST 31, 1967
$128,281.64
$128,281.64
$ 84., 030. 00
$ 63,022.50
17,392.50
41, 385.00
68,850.00
9,10.5:9~
$199,755.00
$ 3,018.77
lNCOME
Appropriations:
City of Atlanta
Clayton County
DeKalb County
Fulton County
Gwinnett County
St,1b-Totals
Interest Income
Federal Funds:
702 Loan
Section 9 Grant
Interest - Federal Funds
Sub-Totals
TOTAL INCOME
TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS
23,190.00
82,770.00
91,800.00
18,210.00
$3001000.00
$ 5,520.00 .
$ 95,000.00
276,000.00
$ 60,000.00
$371,000.00
$676,520.00
9804,801.64
67,686.12
597.46
$128,283.58
."$ 331 z 05 7 , 35 .
$459,338.99
$ 68,950.00
10,500.00
$ 41,380.94
7,048 . 24
1,109.00
533.00
1,680.00
10,000.00
99.00
$ 92 1871. 00
$ 3,150.00
1,088.89
400.00
758.13
300.54
104.00
$ 51 1 080.74
$ 2,2 00.00
0
EXPENSES
Staff Cost:
Salaries
Expenses
Benefits:
Social Security
Gua,ranty Fund
Health and Accident Insurance
Retirement
Workmen's Compensation
Aub-Totals
Board Meetings
Administrative and Office Overhead:
Rent
Communications and Post143.215.248.55
Furniture and Equipment
Supplies
Printing
Auditor
Accountant
Public Ipform,ation
Advisory
Insurance:
Pub l ic Liability
Depository and Forgery
Fidelity aon9
Sub-Totals
CARRIED FORWARD
$
3,000.00
2, 000.00
2,000 . 00
3 , 600.00
1,000.00
25 0 . 00
1,000 . 00
33,000.00
5 , 000.00
72 . 00
56.00
199.00
$ 51 ,177. 00
$147,198.00
$
2,000.00
1 ,2 54 .16
117.81
1, 854 .58
623.56
25 0 . 00
500.00
15,025.20
977. 35
55. 00
56.27
198.60
$ 22,9 12.53
$ 76,193~27
�METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
BUI;>GET REPORT
AUGUST 31 1 1967
BUDGET
lo/67
ACTUAL
JANUARY 1, 1967
TO
AUGUST 31, 1967
I
TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED
SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD
$804,801.64
$459,338.99
$147,198.00
$ 20,000.00
$ 76,193.27
$ 8,758.61
$ 31,250.00
$ 29,939.00
32,667.00
16,333.00
16,000.00
15,293.00
3,333.00
1,667.00
0
0
1,563.00
4,742.09
EXPENSES
Brought Forward
Counsel
Consultants:
Atlanta Region Metropolitan
Planµing Commission
Urban Design Study:
Section 9
Matching
Atlanta Transit Study:
Section 9
Matching
Hamm~r, Greene and Siler
P~rsons-Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel:
702 Loan
Section 9:
Federal
Matching
Retainer Agreement
Research and Technical Services
Sub-Totals
TOTAL EXPENSES
95,000.00
60,000.00
240,000.00
120,000.00
60,000.00
2,000.00
$602,250.00
$769,448.00
60,000.00
112,411.00
15,115 . 64
2,035.84
$317,099.57
$402 I 051. 45
SURPLUS
S 35,353,6f±
S 5Z, 28Z , 5f±
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
BUDGET REPORT
AUGUST’ 31,. 1967:
Unappropriated Surplus
INCOME
Appropriations:
City of Atlanta
Clayton County
DeKalb County
Fulton County
Gwinnett County
Sub-Totals
Interest Income
Federal Funds:
702 Loan
Section 9 Grant
Interest - Federal Funds
Sub-Totals
TOTAL INCOME
TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS
EXPENSES
Staff Cost:
Salaries
Expenses
Benefits:
Social Security
Guaranty Fund
Health and Accident Insurance
Retirement
Workmen's Compensation
Aub-Totals
Board Meetings
Administrative and Office Overhead:
Rent
Communications and Postage
Furniture and Equipment
Supplies
Printing
Auditor
Accountant
Public Information
Advisory
Insurance:
Public Liability
Depository and Forgery
Fidelity Bond
Sub-Totals
CARRIED FORWARD
ACTUAL
JANUARY 1, 1967
BUDGET TO
1967 AUGUST 31, 1967
$128,281.64 $128,281.64
$ 84,030.00 $ 63,022.50
23,190.00 17,392.50
82,770.00 41,385.00
91,800.00 68,850.00
18,210.00 9,105, 09
$300,000.00 $199,755.00
$ 5,520.00 $° 32018.77
$ 95,000.00 $ 60,000.00
276,000.00 67,686.12
0 597.46
$371,000.00 $128 , 283.58
$676,520.00 ($331,057.35
$804,801.64 $459,338.99
$ 68,950.00 $ 41,380.94
10,500.00 7,048.24
1,109.00 1,088.89
533.00 400.00
1,680.00 758.13
10,000.00 300.54
99.00 104.00
$ 92,871.00 $ 51,080.74
$ 3,150.00 § 2,200.00
$ 3,000.00 $ 2,000.00
2,000.00 1,254.16
2,000.00 117.81
3,600.00 1,854.58
1,000.00 623.56
250.00 250.00
1,000.00 500.00
33,000.00 15,025.20
5,000.00 977.35
72.00 55.00
56.00 56.27
199.00 198.60
$ 51,177.00 5 22.912. 53
$147,198.00 $ 76,193.27
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT
BUDGET REPORT
AUGUST 31, 1967
TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED
SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD
EXPENSES
Brought Forward
Counsel
Consultants:
Atlanta Region Metropolitan
Planning Commission
Urban Design Study:
Section 9
Matching
Atlanta Transit Study:
Section 9
Matching
Hammer, Greene and Siler
Parsons-Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel:
702 Loan
Section 9:
Federal
Matching
Retainer Agreement
Research and Technical Services
Sub-Totals
TOTAL EXPENSES
SURPLUS
AUTHORITY
ACTUAL
JANUARY 1, 1967
BUDGET TO
1967 AUGUST 31, 1967
$804,801.64 $459,338.99
$147,198.00 $ 76,193.27
$ 20,000.00 $ 8,758.61
$ 31,250.00 §$ 29,939.00
32,667.00 16,000.00
16,333.00 15,293.00
3,333.00 )
1,667.00 1,563.00
0 4,742.09
95,000.00 60,000.00
240,000.00 60,000.00
120,000.00 112,411.00
60,000.00 15,115.64
2,000.00 2,035.84
$602,250.00 $317,099.57
$769,448.00 $402,051.45
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 21, Folder 5, Document 38
Box 21
Box 21 Folder 5
Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/0ceabd1ae98f52472db0164351032dbd.pdf
dd21df0a7ee44da6bf3f452be36b8db9
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
MINUTES OF THE NINETEENTH MEETING OF THE
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
SEPTEMBER 5, 1967
The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit
Authority held its regular meeting on September 5, 1967, at
3:30 P.M. in the Glenn Building Conference Room, Atlanta. Mr.
Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman, presided.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Robert F. Adamson (City of Atlanta)
Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County)
M. C. Bishop (Fulton County)
Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County)
Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta)
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Edgar Blalock (Clayton County)
K. A. McMillon (Gwinnett County)
L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta)
Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta)
OTHERS PRESENT:
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
H. L. Stuart, General Manager
Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary
King Elliott, Public Information Director
Earl Nelson, Chief Engineer
H. N. Johnson, Secretary to General Manager
MARTA Advisory Committee
H. Boyer Marx, American Society of Landscape Architects
Richard Forbes, American Institute of Planners
�Consultants
J. A. Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor,
Bechtel, Atlanta
Leon Eplan, Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta
w. Stell Huie, Huie & Harland, Atlanta
Others
Joseph Lay, Robinson-Humphrey Company, Inc., Atlanta
William Fletcher, White, Weld & Co., New York City
Thomas J. Pendergrast, Courts & Co.
P.A. Springer, Atlanta Traffic and Safety Council
George B. Pilkington, Bureau of Public Roads
John D. Prien, Jr., Executive Director, Georgia Society
of Professional Engineers
Donald G. Ingram, Central Atlanta Progress, Inc.
J. D. Wingfield, Jr., Mrs. Rachel Champagne, Miss Claudette
'
Parrish, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission
The meeting was called to order by the Vice Chairman.
Minutes
The minutes of the August meeting were unanimously approved by the
members present. Due to lack of a quorum, it was agreed that this
action would be ratified by the Board at the October meeting.
Financial Report
The General Manager presented the financial report as of August 31,
1967, which is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes .
Costs were running according to the budget. Third quarter appropriations had been received from participating governments with
the e xception of DeKalb and Gwinnett Counties. The tentative
budget for fiscal 1968 would be submitted to the Board members
for consideration in October.
Progress Reports
General Manager
Mr. Stuart reported that Mr. Nelson had met with officials of the
City of Atlanta, Fulton and DeKalb Counties, and the City of
-
2 -
�Decatur, and furnished them with sets of the 701 report materials
for their study. He was scheduled to meet with East Point and
College Park officials to apprise them of transit plans relative
to their areas.
The General Manager stated that the final draft of the financial
report prepared by Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates had been
received and would be submitted to the Board members.
Public Information Director
Mr. Elliott reported that Mr. M. C. Bishop had made rapid transit
presentations during the past month before the South Fulton Chamber
of Commerce Board of Directors meeting, the College Park Kiwanis
Club and the Atlanta Airport Area Rotary Club. At these meetings
a film was shown entitled "The Alternate Route"; this was on
transportation problems in Los Angeles and its need for a rapid
transit system.
Mr. Elliott mentioned a special column that will appear i n future
issues of Rapid Transit Progress. It will answer various questions about rapid transit and plans; subject matter will consist
of "MARTAnswers" by the General Manager.
Chief Engineer
Mr. Nelson reported on his attendance at the Engineering Foundation Research Conference held at Proctor Academy, Andover, New
Hampshire, August 14-16, where discussions and presentations on
economic and social aspects of urban transportation were st r essed.
Th e implementation of new t r ansportat i on t e chnology was pres ent e d
b y promine nt r esea rchers f rom th e f ederal gove rnment and pr iva t e
i ndustry .
Mr . Nelson was instructed to meet with the State Highway Depa r tme nt
in connection with the construction of I-485 in order to determine
e ffects this route might have on the t ran s it pla n n ing .
Co nsultants
Pa r son s , Brincke rho f f - Tudor, Be chtel
Mr. Coil reported o n rece n t s oil t est borings a lo ng the north-so u t h
line and exhibite d formations o f s tone taken at var i ous depths.
Contractual work f o r these borings had been completed and was
-
3 -
�being analyzed by Law Engineering Testing Company prior to a final
report.
Mr. Donald C. Hyde, retired General Manager of the Cleveland Transit
System and now an Associated Consultant with Parsons, Brinckerhoff,
Quade and Douglas, had visited the PBTB offices recently and rendered valuable guidance on patronage and operations studies under
way. Mr. Walter Quintin of BART, San Francisco, "had also worked
in Atlanta recently and furnished information on train controls.
Mr. Coil said PBTB ' s text for the 701 report was completed and
was going to the printer very soon. Mr. Bennett mentioned that
additional copies, over and above the 250 copies called for under
th e 701 contract, might be requested by the Authority. Mr. Bishop
suggested that the General Manager be authorized to secure an
appropriate number of additional copies at MARTA's expense. This
was agreed.
Mr . Coil reported on progress of Lord & Den Hartog, design consultant for PBTB, in the design work for Transit Center and other
stations and said a more detailed report would be made during
Nove mber. Design concepts of the stations had been presented to
those in attendance at the briefing session prior to the meeting.
Eric Hill Associates
Mr . Eplan briefl y reported on progress of the impact study; d i scussions had been held with school authorities, fire department
officials, and housing authorities to consider rapid transit plans
and their r elationship to these particular functions . He said
wo r k was continuing ; studies were appro x imately two-thirds complete.
Pr o p os e d New Impact Study
Mr. Ben nett stated that in view of the studies b y Eric Hill
Associates a nd t h e 701 repo r ts, he had felt the r e might be dupl icat i o n o f wo rk in the p r eviously submitte d wo rk p r ogram fo r t h e
fi r s t Sec t i o n 9 Amen dmen t appro ved b y the Autho ri t y at t h e July
me e t i n g . Th i s applicatio n h ad been held up until a r e v i s ed
pro gram wa s d etermined and cla ri fied.
Mr. Wingfi e l d sai d cons ideratio n wa s b e i ng gi v e n t o r eta ining one
o f th e nati o n ' s out sta n d ing tra n spo r tati on e xperts , Alan Voorh e es
and Ass o ci a t e s of Wa shing t o n , D. C. , t o eval uate plans a nd p r o grams . This could be a valuable a dditio n t o the final planning
of the t ransit s y stem . Voorhee s wo uld b e abl e to r e nder the
- 4 -
�Authority excellent advice and evaluations which would be invaluable as input for the pre-referendum campaign next year.
Mr. Ingram of Central Atlanta Progress stated the transportation
consultant selected to advise MARTA would be retained by Central
Atlanta Progress in connection with its studies on transportation.
Other Business
Mr. Bennett informed the Board members of a meeting to be held on
September 12 in the Highway Board Room, co-sponsored by · the State
Highway Department and the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning
Commission. The purpose was to discuss important points relative
to overall transportation planning. At the meeting it was expected that a Policy Committee would be organized to render
decisions regarding the Atlanta Area Transportation Study.
It
was hoped this would strengthen coordination of all agencies involved in the total transportation planning program for metropolitan Atlanta. To date AATS had operated without unified
policy direction.
Invitations had been sent to heads of local
governments, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Bureau
of Public Roads, MARTA, and the Atlanta Transit System.
Adjournment
The Vice Chairman adjourned the meeting at 4:30 P.M.
Next Meeting
October 3, 1967.
-
5 -
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
LEC
MINUTES OF THE NINETEENTH MEETING OF THE
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
SEPTEMBER 5, 1967
The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit
Authority held its regular meeting on September 5, 1967, at
3:30 P.M. in the Glenn Building Conference Room, Atlanta. Mr.
Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman, presided.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Robert F. Adamson (City of Atlanta)
Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County)
M. C. Bishop (Fulton County)
Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County)
Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta)
MEMBERS ABSENT;
Edgar Blalock (Clayton County)
K. A. McMillon (Gwinnett County)
L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta)
Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta)
OTHERS PRESENT:
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
H. L. Stuart, General Manager
Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary
King Elliott, Public Information Director
Earl Nelson, Chief Engineer
H. N. Johnson, Secretary to General Manager
MARTA Advisory Committee
H. Boyer Marx, American Society of Landscape Architects
Richard Forbes, American Institute of Planners
Consultants
J. A. Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor,
Bechtel, Atlanta
Leon Eplan, Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta
W. Stell Huie, Huie & Harland, Atlanta
Others
Joseph Lay, Robinson-Humphrey Company, Inc., Atlanta
William Fletcher, White, Weld & Co., New York City
Thomas J. Pendergrast, Courts & Co.
P. A. Springer, Atlanta Traffic and Safety Council
George B. Pilkington, Bureau of Public Roads
John D. Prien, Jr., Executive Director, Georgia Society
of Professional Engineers
Donald G. Ingram, Central Atlanta Progress, Inc.
J. D. Wingfield, Jr., Mrs. Rachel Champagne, Miss Claudette
Parrish, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission
The meeting was called to order by the Vice Chairman.
Minutes
The minutes of the August meeting were unanimously approved by the
members present. Due to lack of a quorum, it was agreed that this
action would be ratified by the Board at the October meeting.
Financial Report
The General Manager presented the financial report as of August 31,
1967, which is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
Costs were running according to the budget. Third quarter appro-
priations had been received from participating governments with
the exception of DeKalb and Gwinnett Counties. The tentative
budget for fiscal 1968 would be submitted to the Board members
for consideration in October.
Progress Reports
General Manager
Mr. Stuart reported that Mr. Nelson had met with officials of the
City of Atlanta, Fulton and DeKalb Counties, and the City of
Decatur, and furnished them with sets of the 701 report materials
for their study. He was scheduled to meet with East Point and
College Park officials to apprise them of transit plans relative
to their areas.
The General Manager stated that the final draft of the financial
report prepared by Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates had been
received and would be submitted to the Board members.
Public Information Director
Mr. Elliott reported that Mr. M. C. Bishop had made rapid transit
presentations during the past month before the South Fulton Chamber
of Commerce Board of Directors meeting, the College Park Kiwanis
Club and the Atlanta Airport Area Rotary Club. At these meetings
a film was shown entitled "The Alternate Route"; this was on
transportation problems in Los Angeles and its need for a rapid
transit system.
Mr. Elliott mentioned a special column that will appear in future
issues of Rapid Transit Progress. It will answer various ques-
tions about rapid transit and plans; subject matter will consist
of "MARTAnswers" by the General Manager.
Chief Engineer
Mr. Nelson reported on his attendance at the Engineering Founda-
tion Research Conference held at Proctor Academy, Andover, New
Hampshire, August 14-16, where discussions and presentations on
economic and social aspects of urban transportation were stressed.
The implementation of new transportation technology was presented
by prominent researchers from the federal government and private
industry.
Mr. Nelson was instructed to meet with the State Highway Department
in connection with the construction of I-485 in order to determine
effects this route might have on the transit planning.
Consultants
Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel
Mr. Coil reported on recent soil test borings along the north-south
line and exhibited formations of stone taken at various depths.
Contractual work for these borings had been completed and was
being analyzed by Law Engineering Testing Company prior to a final
report.
Mr. Donald C. Hyde, retired General Manager of the Cleveland Transit
System and now an Associated Consultant with Parsons, Brinckerhoff,
Quade and Douglas, had visited the PBTB offices recently and ren-
dered valuable guidance on patronage and operations studies under
way. Mr. Walter Quintin of BART, San Francisco, had also worked
in Atlanta recently and furnished information on train controls.
Mr. Coil said PBTB's text for the 701 report was completed and
was going to the printer very soon. Mr. Bennett mentioned that
additional copies, over and above the 250 copies called for under
the 701 contract, might be requested by the Authority. Mr. Bishop
suggested that the General Manager be authorized to secure an
appropriate number of additional copies at MARTA's expense. This
was agreed.
Mr. Coil reported on progress of Lord & Den Hartog, design con-
sultant for PBTB, in the design work for Transit Center and other
stations and said a more detailed report would be made during
November. Design concepts of the stations had been presented to
those in attendance at the briefing session prior to the meeting.
Eric Hill Associates
Mr. Eplan briefly reported on progress of the impact study; dis-
cussions had been held with school authorities, fire department
officials, and housing authorities to consider rapid transit plans
and their relationship to these particular functions. He said
work was continuing; studies were approximately two-thirds com-
plete. ;
Proposed New Impact Study
Mr. Bennett stated that in view of the studies by Eric Hill
Associates and the 701 reports, he had felt there might be dupli-
cation of work in the previously submitted work program for the
first Section 9 Amendment approved by the Authority at the July
meeting. This application had been held up until a revised
program was determined and clarified.
Mr. Wingfield said consideration was being given to retaining one
of the nation's outstanding transportation experts, Alan Voorhees
and Associates of Washington, D. C., to evaluate plans and pro-
grams. This could be a valuable addition to the final planning
of the transit system. Voorhees would be able to render the
Authority excellent advice and evaluations which would be in-
valuable as input for the pre-referendum campaign next year.
Mr. Ingram of Central Atlanta Progress stated the transportation
consultant selected to advise MARTA would be retained by Central
Atlanta Progress in connection with its studies on transportation.
Other Business
Mr. Bennett informed the Board members of a meeting to be held on
September 12 in the Highway Board Room, co-sponsored by’ the State
Highway Department and the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning
Commission. The purpose was to discuss important points relative
to overall transportation planning. At the meeting it was ex-
pected that a Policy Committee would be organized to render
decisions regarding the Atlanta Area Transportation Study. It
was hoped this would strengthen coordination of all agencies in-
volved in the total transportation planning program for metro-
politan Atlanta. To date AATS had operated without unified
policy direction. Invitations had been sent to heads of local
governments, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Bureau
of Public Roads, MARTA, and the Atlanta Transit System.
Adjournment
The Vice Chairman adjourned the meeting at 4:30 P.M.
Next Meeting
October 3, 1967.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 21, Folder 5, Document 37
Box 21
Box 21 Folder 5
Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/45ac987593ca43bebb9a934b7a603c70.pdf
cae728471e9c5c9afb4d84a8e2da16fd
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
METROPOl 1
1l
TA RAP D TRANS i A UT HOR~T Y
GLENN BU ILDI G / ATLANTA , GEORGIA 30303 / AREA COD E 404 524-5711
O FFICERS:
Richard H. Rich, Chairman
Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman
Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary
October 3, 1967
Henry L Stuart, General Manager
Mr. Charles L. Davis
City Comptroller
City of Atlanta
City Hall
Atlanta, Georgia.
Dear Mr. Davis:
This will acknowledge receipt of and thank you for
check No. 18,559 dated October 2, 1967 from the City of
Atlanta in the amount of $21,007.50 covering the fourth
quarterly payment by the City to the operating budget of
the Transi t Aut hori t y.
Your promptness in exped iting this matter is indeed appreciated.
With b est regards .·
Sinc eraly y our s ,
H. L. Stuart ,
General Manager.
HLS:JJ
cc, ~
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
able Ivan Allen, Jr.
Milton G. Farris
Rawson Haverty
Robt. F. Adamson
L. D. Milton
-
---
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
GLENN BUILDING / ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 / AREA CODE 404 524-5711
OFFICERS:
Richard H. Rich, Chairman
Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman
October 3, 1967 Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary
Henry L. Stuart, General Manager
Mr. Charles L. Davis
City Comptroller
City of Atlanta
City Hall
Atlanta, Georgia.
Dear Mr. Davis:
This will acknowledge receipt of and thank you for
check No. 18,559 dated October 2, 1967 from the City of
Atlanta in the amount of $21,007.50 covering the fourth
quarterly payment by the City to the operating budget of
the Transit Authority.
Your promptness in expediting this matter is in-
deed appreciated.
With best regards.
Sincerely yours,
NA tel
H. L. Stuart,
General Manager.
HLS: JJ
cc: cit Ivan Allen, Jr.
Mr. Milton G. Farris
Mr. Rawson Haverty
Mr. Robt. F. Adamson
Mr. Ls. D. Milton
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 21, Folder 5, Document 36
Box 21
Box 21 Folder 5
Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/89a2538c0bee3772ee7700d9a08db2a5.pdf
988a9e64333c28f3b8b370b4bf05dacb
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
METROPOLITNA ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
SEPTEMBER 30, 1967
ASSETS
Cash in Banks:
C & S National Bank
First National Bank
Trust Company of Georgia
Fulton National Bank - Section 9
$25 .; 768.91
2,907.26
1,000 . 00
90,000 . 00
Investments:
U. S. Treasury Bills
99,229.40
Petty Cash
25.00
Accounts Receivable:
Gwinnett County - 1967
Gwinnett County - 1966
$13,657.50
4,552.50
18,210.00
TOTAL ASSETS
$237,140 . 57
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable
$
Payroll Tax es Withheld and Accrued
Reserves;
ARMPC - Urban Design Study
Atlanta Transit Study
Parsons-Beinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel:
Section 9 Matching
Retainage Agreement:
Transportation Stud y
Public Information
Surve yi ng
TOTAL LIABILITIES
SURPLUS
549 . 86
1,779.01
7, 293 . 00
1 , 563 . 00
82,411.00
$
139.37
207 . 76
4 , 260 . 82
4 ,607.95
98,2 03.82
$138,936, 75
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
METROPOLITNA ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
SEPTEMBER 30, 1967
ASSETS
Cash in Banks:
C & S National Bank $25,768.91
First National Bank 2,907.26
Trust Company of Georgia 1,000.00
Fulton National Bank - Section 9 90,000.00
Investments:
U. S, Treasury Bills 99,229.40
Petty Cash 25.00
Accounts Receivable:
Gwinnett County - 1967 $13,657.50
Gwinnett County - 1966 4,552.50 _18,210.00
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable $ 549,86
Payroll Taxes Withheld and Accrued 1,779.01
Reserves:
ARMPC - Urban Design Study 7,293.00
Atlanta Transit Study 1,563.00
Parsons-Beinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel:
Section 9 Matching 82,411.00
Retainage Agreement:
Transportation Study 2 439.37
Public Information 207.76
Surveying 4,260.82 4,607.95
TOTAL LIABILITIES
SURPLUS
$237,140.57
98,203.82
$138..936.75
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 21, Folder 5, Document 35
Box 21
Box 21 Folder 5
Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/33c14d8392003747ebf29abcd219ae29.pdf
431afeeddd020da36681eaf4934d799c
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT SUTHORITY
BUDGET REPORT
SEPTEMBER 30, 1967
BUDGET
1967
Unappro priated Surplus
ACTUAL
JANUARY 1 , 1967
TO
SEPTEMBER 30 1 1967
$128,281.64
$128,281.64
$ 84,030.00
23,19 0.00
82,770.00
91,800.00
18,2 10.00
$300,000.00
$ 5,5 20.00
$ 63,022. 50
17 , 392. 50
62,077.50
68,850.00
13,657.50
$2 25 ,000 . 00
$ 3,663.17
$ 95,000. 00
276 ,000 . 00
$371,000.00
$676,520. 00
$804,801.64
$ 60,000 .00
135,402 .54
597.46
$196,000. 00
$424 ,663.17
$552,944.81
$ 68,950.00
10 , 500 .00
$ 47 ,2 03.22
7,863.00
1 , 109.00
533.00
1,680.00
10,000.00
99.00
92
,871.00
$
$ 3 , 150 . 00
1 , 151.16
400 . 00
875 . 59
300.54
104 .00
5
7,8
97 . 51
$
2
,400.00
$
INCOME
Appropr iations :
City of Atlanta
Clayt on County
DeKalb County
Fulton County
Gwinnett County
Sub-Totals .
Interest Income
Federal Funds:
702 Loan
Section 9 Grant
Interest~ Federal Funds
Sub-Totals
TOTAL INCOME
TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS
0
EXPENSES
Staff Cost:
Salar ies
Expens e s
Benefits:
Social Secur i ty
Gua r anty Fund
Health and Accident Insurance
Retirement
Workmen is Compensation
Sub-Totals
Board Mee tings
Administra t ive and Office Overhe ad :
Rent
Communication and Postage
Fur niture and Equipment
Supplies
Prin t ing
Audi tor
Ac countant
Public I n forma t i on
Advi sory
Insurance :
Pub l ic Liability
De pos i tory and Forger y
.Fidel;i.ty Bond
Sub-Totals
CARRIED FORWARD
$
3, 00 0 .00
2 ,000. 00
2, 000 . 00
3 ,6 00 . 00
1 , 000 . 0025 0 . 00
1, 000 . 00
33, 000 . 00
5 ,000 . 00
72. 00
56. 00
199. 00
51,177.00
$
$147,198.00
$
2, 25 0 . 00
1 ,448.94
11 7 . 81
1 , 978 . 78
62 3.56
250. 00
500 . 00
17, 009. 03
1 , 077.35
55 .00
56.27
198. 60
25,565.34
$
$ 85,862.85
�METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
BUDGET REPORT
SEPTEMBER 30, 1967
TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED
SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD
BUDGET
1967
ACTUAL
JANUARY 1, 196 7
TO
SEPTEMBER 30, 1967
$804,801.64
$552,944.81
$147,198.00
$ 20,000.00
$ 85, 86'2,. 85
$ 9,7~8.61
$ 31,250 . 00
$ 29, 939. 00
32,667.00
16,333.00
16,000.00
15,293.00
3,333.00
1,667.00
0
0
1,563.00
4, 742.09
EXPENSES
Brought Forward
Counsel
Consultants:
Atlanta Region Metropolitan
P,anning Commission
Urban Design Study:
Section 9
Matching
Atlanta Transit Study:
Section 9
Matching
Hammer, Greene and Siler
Par sons-Brinkerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel:
702 Loan
Section 9:
Federal
Matching
Retainer Agreement
Research and Tec~ni cal Services
Sub-Totals
TOTAL EXPENSES
95,000.00
60,000.00
240,000. 00
12 0 , 000 . 00
60,000.00
2,000 .00
$602,2 50.00
$769,448. 00
60, 000.00
112,411.00
16,182.67
2,255.84
$318,386.60
$414,008.06
SURPLUS
s 35
Sl38, 236. Z5
0
353 6~
I
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT SUTHORITY
BUDGET REPORT
SEPTEMBER 30, 1967
ACTUAL
JANUARY 1, 1967
BUDGET TO
1967 SEPTEMBER 30, 1967
Unappropriated Surplus $128,281.64 $128,281.64
INCOME
Appropriations:
City of Atlanta $ 84,030.00 $ 63,022.50
Clayton County 23,190.00 17,392.50
DeKalb County 82,770.00 62,077.50
Fulton County 91,800.00 68,850.00
Gwinnett County 18,210.00 13,657.50
Sub-Totals $300,000.00 $225,000.00
Interest Income $ 5,520.00 § 3.663217
Federal Funds:
702 Loan $ 95,000.00 $ 60,000.00
Section 9 Grant 276,000.00 135,402.54
Interest - Federal Funds 0 597.46
Sub-Totals $371,000.00 $196,000.00
TOTAL INCOME $676,520.00 $424 663.17
TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS $804,801.64 $552,944.81
EXPENSES
Staff Cost:
Salaries $ 68,950.00 § 47,203.22
Expenses 10,500.00 7,863.00
Benefits:
Social Security 1,109.00 Ls LoL, L6
Guaranty Fund . 533.00 400.00
Health and Accident Insurance 1,680.00 875.59
Retirement 10,000.00 300.54
Workmen's Compensation 99.00 104.00
Sub-Totals $ 92,871.00 S$ 57.897 ,51
Board Meetings $3,150.00 $2,400.00
Administrative and Office Overhead:
Rent $ 3,000.00 $§ 2,250.00
Communication and Postage 2,000,00 1,448.94
Furniture and Equipment 2,000.00 L178
Supplies 3,600.00 1,978.78
Printing 1,000,006 623.56
Auditor 250.00 250.00
Accountant 1,000.00 500.00
Public Information 33,000.00 17,009.03
Advisory 5,000.00 L,.077..35
Insurance:
Public Liability 72,00 55.00
Depository and Forgery 56.00 56.27
Fidelity Bond 199.00 198.60
Sub-Totals $.51..177,,00 $ 25,565.34
CARRIED FORWARD $147,198.00 S$ 85,862.85
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
BUDGET REPORT
SEPTEMBER 30, 1967
TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED
SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD
EXPENSES
Brought Forward
Counsel
Consultants:
Atlanta Region Metropolitan
P,anning Commission
Urban Design Study:
Section 9
Matching
Atlanta Transit Study:
Section 9
Matching
Hammer , Greene and Siler
Parsons-Brinkerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel:
702 Loan
Section 9:
Federal
Matching
Retainer Agreement
Research and Technical Services
. Sub-Totals
TOTAL EXPENSES
SURPLUS
ACTUAL
JANUARY 1, 1967
BUDGET TO
1967 SEPTEMBER 30, 1967
$804,801.64 552,944.81
$147,198.00 $ 85,862.85
$ 20,000.00 $9,758.61
$ 31,250.00 $ 29,939.00
32,667.00 16,000.00
16,333.00 15,293.00
3,333.00 0
1,667.00 1,563.00
0 4,742.09
95,000.00 60,000.00
240,000.00 60,000.00
120,000.00 112,411.00
60,000.00 16 ,182.67
2,000, 00 2,255.84
$602,250.00 $318,386.60
769,448.00 414,008.06
$.35..353,.64 $138.936.75
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 21, Folder 5, Document 34
Box 21
Box 21 Folder 5
Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/0c3998852d06e19f2b2593d2b8e8d345.pdf
30388e8f353610c840039b50b7a539ae
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
MINUTES OF THE TWENTIETH MEETING OF THE
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
OCTOBER 3, 1967
The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit
Authority held its regular meeting on October 3, 1967, at 3:30 P.M.
in the Glenn Building Conference Room, Atlanta. Mr. Roy A. Blount,
Vice Chairman~ presided.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Robe1.t F. Adamson (City of Atlanta)
Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County)
M. C. Bishop (Fulton County)
Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County)
Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta)
K. A. McMillon .( Gwinnett County)
L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta)
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Edgar Blalock (Clayton County)
Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta)
OTHERS PRESENT:
Metropolita n Atl a nt a Rap id Tran s it Autho rity
H. L. Stuart, General Manager
Glenn E ._ Bennett, Secretary
King Elliott , Public I n f ormation Director
Earl Ne lson, Chie f Eng i neer
H. N . Johns on, Secretary to Ge n eral Ma n a g er
Consultants
Wal t er Doug las, Pars o ns, Br i nckerho ff, Qua de & Douglas,
Ne w Yo rk
Gerald M. Stu r man, Parsons, Brinckerho ff, Quade & Dougl as,
Ne w -York
W. O. S a lter, Parsons, Brincke rhoff- Tudor, Bechtel,
Sa n Franci s c o
�Consultants (Cont'd.)
J. A. Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor,
Bechtel, Atlanta
Leon Eplan, Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta
W. Stell Huie, Huie & Harland, Atlanta
Tom Watson Brown, Huie ·& Harland, Atlanta
Others
Paul Muldawer, Muldawer & Patterson, Atlanta
Maartin Den Hartog, Lord & Den Hartog, New York
Stan Lorch, Lord & Den Hartog, New York
H. Boyer Marx, American Society of Landscape Architects
and MARTA Adviso~y Committee
P.A. Springer, Atlanta Traffic and Safety Council
William Fletcher, White, Weld & Co., New York City
George B. Pilkington, Bureau of Public Roads
Roger D. Lewis, Bureau of Public Roads
John D. Prien, Jr., Ex ecutive Director, Georgia Society
of Professional Engineers
Bill Schemmel, Marietta Daily Journal
Dick Hebert, Atlanta Constitution
Dave Donaldson, Securities News
Leroy Powell, WAGA-TV
Don Bridges, WAGA-TV
Mrs. Margaret C. Breland, Jerry A. Coursey, Mrs. Rachel
Champagne, Miss Claudette Parrish, Atlanta Region
Metropolitan Planning Commission
The meeting was called to o r der by the Vice Chairman.
Minutes
Upon motion by Mr. Bishop , seconded by Mr. Adamson, the minutes
of the September meeting were unanimously approved and the actions
of th e August mee ting were ratifie d.
Financial Report
The General Manager presented the f inancial report as of September 30, 1967, which is attached h ereto and made a part of these
minutes. Gwinnett County was in arrears for one- half o f its 1967
commitment. Mr. McMillan reported on a meeting held with Gwinnett
- 2 -
�County Commissioners and stated payment would be forthcoming.
Cash balance would be in line once the recent bill from Parsons,
Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel was audited and paid.
Section -9 Amendment
The General Manager recommended approval of a resolution authorizing
an application to HUD for an amendment to the current Section 9
project and a contract between MARTA and the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission for a three-month study to meet statutory requirements for a coordinated transportation and transit
plan required by the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
This work would be performed by Alan M. Voorhees and Associates,
the cost of which would not . exceed $30,000--$10,000 local money
and $20,000 from HUD.
The following resolution was unanimously
passed:
WHEREAS, local funds in the amount of $10,000 are available
as matching funds for additional work necessary to expand
the scope of HUD Contract No. H-771 as set forth in the
Amendment request presented to this Board;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that this Authority request
$20,000 additional funds to expand the scope of the technical studies, Section 9 Grant (HUD Contract No. H-771) and
approve the Amendment request; and
FURTHER RESOLVED, that H. L. Stuart, General Manager of
this Authority, be and hereby is authorized and directed
to take any and all further actions and to execute for
this Authority any and all documents as may be reasonably
necessary to make and obtain such request.
Huie and Harland
Mr. Huie stated that the re was now a need for bond counsel to as sist in preparation of bond issues.
There were only two firms in
Atlanta specializing in this area and they both were interested
in doing this work.
He suggested the firm of King & Spalding be
retained as bond counsel , with Gambrell & Mobley as associate
bond counsel.
This would not involve any commitment of money this
year.
Upon motion by Mr. Bishop, seconded by Mr. Atwood , the
following resolution was passed :
RESOLVED, that the recommendations of General Counsel
with regard to Bond Counsel are approved and that King &
Spalding be named Bond Counsel and that Gambrell & Mobley
- 3 -
�be named Associate Bond Counsel to the Authority with
the understanding that Bond Counsel will report to the
Authority through General Counsel.
Report of Secretary
Mr. Bennett reported on recent meetings held with Mr. Robert
Sommerville, President of the Atlanta Transit System, ~nd stated
he thought any misunderstanding had now been removed. Mr. Sommerville had said he would study MARTA's 701 report before making
any further statements. He also expressed an interest in meeting
with MARTA's consultants for briefings. Mr. Haverty commended
this effort.
General Manager
Mr. Stuart recommended appointment of a committee made up of members of the Board to approve the procedures under which public
hearings and meetings were to be conducted as well as to conduct
such hearings and meetings. A design review committee should also
be formed and the Finance Committee reactivated. Mr. Bishop
suggested the formation of a public relations committee.
Upon
motion by Mr. Bishop and seconded by Mr. Adamson, it was agreed
that Messrs. Rich, Blount and Stuart should appoint these committees and that Mr. Huie prepare bylaws.
Mr. Stuart stated that in the past Mr. McBrayer of Parsons,
Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel had represented MARTA at meetings
of the Technical Coordinating Committee and the consultants were
reimbursed under the retainer agreement. He requested approval
of the Board to make adjustments under the retainer agreement
now that the Chief Engineer of MARTA would replace Mr. McBrayer.
He also requested authorization for $2,000 for graphics under
the retainer agreement. Upon motion by Mr. Bishop and seconded
by Mr. Adamson, those two requests were approved.
Consultants
Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel
Mr. Coil reported that the design firm of Lord and Den Hartog had
completed final drawings for the stations . He stated the 701
report was at the printer and copies should be available for the
nex t Board meeting . Mr. Haverty urged that steps be taken to
e x pedite completion of the report.
-
4 -
�At the briefing prior to the Board meeting, a table had been presented showing costs of the system for the metropolitan area as
it related to the 65-mile system.
The report from Law Engineering Company on soil samples would be
ready within the next month; however, PBTB had been using the
information developed by that firm on a daily basis. Liaison was
being continued with the State Highway Department, municipalities,
cities and counties. Meetings Lad been held with the railroads.
In response to a question from Mr. Haverty, Mr. Coil said that
his firm was getting excellent cooperation from the Highway Department and the railroads.
It was mentioned that the General Manager had had at least ten
conferences with the railroads, all of which were most satisfactory.
Eric Hill Associates
Mr. Eplan stated work was almost finished on the impact of the
system on certain facilities such as schools and fire stations.
The report on the impact on the poor and disadvantaged was being
written. The firm's current effort was giving line-by-line reviews to the General Manager and engineers on recommendations as
to possible changes, conflicts and opportunities for development.
Reviews had been submitted on the east and west lines. He commented that relationships with the engineers had been very good.
Mr. Muldawer, whose firm is assisting Eric Hill Associates in its
work, made a presentation showing potential development around
the Cultural Center as it related to rapid transit.
The firm
will prepare such information regarding ten or twelve key stations.
196 8 Proposed Budget
Mr. Stuart presented the proposed budget for · l968. This required
only Board review; approval of the budget would be requested at
the December .meeting. The proposed budget showed a carry-over
from 1967 of $230,000 with income for 1968 estimated to be about
$1.5 million.
Income was based on continuing participation of
local governments, money appropriated by the State, money authorized
by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, as well as
anticipated federal funds for applications to be submitted by the
first of the year.
Operating expenses amounted to approx imately
$1.6 million. Mr. Stuart was instructed to forward the proposed
budget to the governments after preparing a more detailed e xplanation for each item.
-
5, -
�Rail Equipment
Mr. Douglas discussed the various kinds of rail equipment and
pointed out the advantages and disadvantages of each. de recommended to the Board thdt it conside£ steel wheels on steel rails.
If any other system developed more potential, it should be considered only if it demonstrated substantial savings. Mr. Douglas
pointed out that 70-foot cars seating 72 passengers would cost
approximately $200,000 per car.
Adjournment
The Vice Chairman adjourned the meeting at 4:50 P.M.
Next Meeting
November 7, 1967.
-
6 -
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
MINUTES OF THE TWENTIETH MEETING OF THE
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
OCTOBER 3, 1967
The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit
Authority held its regular meeting on October 3, 1967, at 3:30 P.M.
in the Glenn Building Conference Room, Atlanta. Mr. Roy A. Blount,
Vice Chairman, presided.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Robert F. Adamson (City of Atlanta)
Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County)
M. C. Bishop (Fulton County)
Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County)
Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta)
K. A. McMillon (Gwinnett County)
L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta)
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Edgar Blalock (Clayton County)
Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta)
OTHERS PRESENT:
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
H. L. Stuart, General Manager
Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary
King Elliott, Public Information Director
Earl Nelson, Chief Engineer
H. N. Johnson, Secretary to General Manager
Consultants
Walter Douglas, Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas,
New York
Gerald M. Sturman, Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas,
New -York
W. O. Salter, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel,
San Francisco
Consultants (Cont'd.)
J. A. Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor,
Bechtel, Atlanta
Leon Eplan, Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta
W. Stell Huie, Huie & Harland, Atlanta
Tom Watson Brown, Huie & Harland, Atlanta
Others
Paul Muldawer, Muldawer & Patterson, Atlanta
Maartin Den Hartog, Lord & Den Hartog, New York
Stan Lorch, Lord & Den Hartog, New York
H. Boyer Marx, American Society of Landscape Architects
and MARTA Advisory Committee
P. A. Springer, Atlanta Traffic and Safety Council
William Fletcher, White, Weld & Co., New York City
George B. Pilkington, Bureau of Public Roads
Roger D. Lewis, Bureau of Public Roads
John D. Prien, Jr., Executive Director, Georgia Society
of Professional Engineers
Bill Schemmel, Marietta Daily Journal
Dick Hebert, Atlanta Constitution
Dave Donaldson, Securities News
Leroy Powell, WAGA-TV
Don Bridges, WAGA-TV
Mrs. Margaret C. Breland, Jerry A. Coursey, Mrs. Rachel
Champagne, Miss Claudette Parrish, Atlanta Region
Metropolitan Planning Commission
The meeting was called to order by the Vice Chairman.
Minutes
Upon motion by Mr. Bishop, seconded by Mr. Adamson, the minutes
of the September meeting were unanimously approved and the actions
of the August meeting were ratified.
Financial Report
The General Manager presented the financial report as of Septem-
ber 30, 1967, which is attached hereto and made a part of these
minutes. Gwinnett County was in arrears for one-half of its 1967
commitment. Mr. McMillon reported on a meeting held with Gwinnett
County Commissioners and stated payment would be forthcoming.
Cash balance would be in line once the recent bill from Parsons,
Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel was audited and paid.
Section 9 Amendment
The General Manager recommended approval of a resolution authorizing
an application to HUD for an amendment to the current Section 9
project and a contract between MARTA and the Atlanta Region Metro-
politan Planning Commission for a three-month study to meet statu-
tory requirements for a coordinated transportation and transit
plan required by the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
This work would be performed by Alan M. Voorhees and Associates,
the cost of which would not exceed $30,000--$10,000 local money
and $20,000 from HUD. The following resolution was unanimously
passed:
WHEREAS, local funds in the amount of $10,000 are available
as matching funds for additional work necessary to expand
the scope of HUD Contract No. H-771 as set forth in the
Amendment request presented to this Board;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that this Authority request
$20,000 additional funds to expand the scope of the tech-
nical studies, Section 9 Grant (HUD Contract No. H-771) and
approve the Amendment request; and
FURTHER RESOLVED, that H. L. Stuart, General Manager of
this Authority, be and hereby is authorized and directed
to take any and all further actions and to execute for
this Authority any and all documents as may be reasonably
necessary to make and obtain such request.
Huie and Harland
Mr. Huie stated that there was now a need for bond counsel to as-
sist in preparation of bond issues. There were only two firms in
Atlanta specializing in this area and they both were interested
in doing this work. He suggested the firm of King & Spalding be
retained as bond counsel, with Gambrell & Mobley as associate
bond counsel. This would not involve any commitment of money this
year. Upon motion by Mr. Bishop, seconded by Mr. Atwood, the
following resolution was passed:
RESOLVED, that the recommendations of General Counsel
with regard to Bond Counsel are approved and that King &
Spalding be named Bond Counsel and that Gambrell & Mobley
be named Associate Bond Counsel to the Authority with
the understanding that Bond Counsel will report to the
Authority through General Counsel.
Report of Secretary
Mr. Bennett reported on recent meetings held with Mr. Robert
Sommerville, President of the Atlanta Transit System, and stated
he thought any misunderstanding had now been removed. Mr. Sommer-
ville had said he would study MARTA's 701 report before making
any further statements. He also expressed an interest in meeting
with MARTA's consultants for briefings. Mr. Haverty commended
this effort.
General Manager
Mr. Stuart recommended appointment of a committee made up of mem-
bers of the Board to approve the procedures under which public
hearings and meetings were to be conducted as well as to conduct
such hearings and meetings. A design review committee should also
be formed and the Finance Committee reactivated. Mr. Bishop
suggested the formation of a public relations committee. Upon
motion by Mr. Bishop and seconded by Mr. Adamson, it was agreed
that Messrs. Rich, Blount and Stuart should appoint these com-
mittees and that Mr. Huie prepare bylaws.
Mr. Stuart stated that in the past Mr. McBrayer of Parsons,
Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel had represented MARTA at meetings
of the Technical Coordinating Committee and the consultants were
reimbursed under the retainer agreement. He requested approval
of the Board to make adjustments under the retainer agreement
now that the Chief Engineer of MARTA would replace Mr. McBrayer.
He also requested authorization for $2,000 for graphics under
the retainer agreement. Upon motion by Mr. Bishop and seconded
by Mr. Adamson, those two requests were approved.
Consultants
Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel
Mr. Coil reported that the design firm of Lord and Den Hartog had
completed final drawings for the stations. He stated the 701
report was at the printer and copies should be available for the
next Board meeting. Mr. Haverty urged that steps be taken to
expedite completion of the report.
At the briefing prior to the Board meeting, a table had been pre-
sented showing costs of the system for the metropolitan area as
it related to the 65-mile system.
The report from Law Engineering Company on soil samples would be
ready within the next month; however, PBTB had been using the
information developed by that firm on a daily basis. Liaison was
being continued with the State Highway Department, municipalities,
cities and counties. Meetings had been held with the railroads.
In response to a question from Mr. Haverty, Mr. Coil said that
his firm was getting excellent cooperation from the Highway De-
partment and the railroads.
It was mentioned that the General Manager had had at least ten
conferences with the railroads, all of which were most satisfactory.
Eric Hill Associates
Mr. Eplan stated work was almost finished on the impact of the
system on certain facilities such as schools and fire stations.
The report on the impact on the poor and disadvantaged was being
written. The firm's current effort was giving line-by-line re-
views to the General Manager and engineers on recommendations as
to possible changes, conflicts and opportunities for development.
Reviews had been submitted on the east and west lines. He com-
mented that relationships with the engineers had been very good.
Mr. Muldawer, whose firm is assisting Eric Hill Associates in its
work, made a presentation showing potential development around
the Cultural Center as it related to rapid transit. The firm
will prepare such information regarding ten or twelve key stations.
1968 Proposed Budget
Mr. Stuart presented the proposed budget for 1968. This required
only Board review; approval of the budget would be requested at
the December meeting. The proposed budget showed a carry-over
from 1967 of $230,000 with income for 1968 estimated to be about
$1.5 million. Income was based on continuing participation of
local governments, money appropriated by the State, money authorized
by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, as well as
anticipated federal funds for applications to be submitted by the
first of the year. Operating expenses amounted to approximately
$1.6 million. Mr. Stuart was instructed to forward the proposed
budget to the governments after preparing a more detailed ex-
planation for each item.
Rail Equipment
Mr. Douglas discussed the various kinds of rail equipment and
pointed out the advantages and disadvantages of each. de recom-
mended to the Board that it consider steel wheels on steel rails.
If any other system developed more potential, it should be con-
sidered only if it demonstrated substantial savings. Mr. Douglas
pointed out that 70-foot cars seating 72 passengers would cost
approximately $200,000 per car.
Adjournment
The Vice Chairman adjourned the meeting at 4:50 P.M.
Next Meeting
November 7, 1967.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 21, Folder 5, Document 33
Box 21
Box 21 Folder 5
Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/65ec21a4f6e23c417f347e19a78ae884.pdf
75367733ed39968e93d6fbbb68ee84f3
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
METROPOLITNA ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
SEPTEMBER 30, 1967
ASSETS
Cash in Banks:
C & S National Bank
First National Bank
Trust Company of Georgia
Fulton National Bank - Section 9
$25,7 68.9 1
2,907.26
1,000.00
90,000 . 00
Investments:
U. S. Treasury Bills
99,229.40
Petty Cash
25.00
Accounts Receivable:
Gwinnett County - 1967
Gwinnett County - 1966
$13,657.50
4,552.50
18,210.00
TOTAL ASSETS
$237,140.57
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable
$
Payroll Taxes Wi thheld and Accrued
Reserves:
ARMPC - Urban Design Study
Atlanta Transit Study
Parsons-Beinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel:
Section 9 Matching
Retainage Agreement:
Transportation Study
Public Information
Surveying
TOTAL LIABILITIES
SURPLUS
549.86
1,779.01
7,293.00
1,563.00
82,411.00
$
139.37
207.76
4,260.82
4,607.95
98,203.82
$138,936 75
I
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
METROPOLITNA ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
SEPTEMBER 30, 1967
ASSETS
Cash in Banks:
C & S National Bank $25,768.91
First National Bank 2,907.26
Trust Company of Georgia 1,000.00
Fulton National Bank - Section 9 90,000.00
Investments:
U. S. Treasury Bills 99,229.40
Petty Cash 25.00
Accounts Receivable:
Gwinnett County - 1967 $13,657.50
Gwinnett County - 1966 4,952.00. 2185210200
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable $ 549,86
Payroll Taxes Withheld and Accrued L779 301
Reserves:
ARMPC - Urban Design Study 75293,00
Atlanta Transit Study ; 1,563.00
Parsons-Beinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel:
Section 9 Matching 82,411.00
Retainage Agreement:
Transportation Study S 139.37
Public Information 207.76
Surveying 4,260.82 4,607.95
TOTAL LIABILITIES
SURPLUS
$237,140.57
98,203.82
$138,936.75
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 21, Folder 5, Document 32
Box 21
Box 21 Folder 5
Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/9ca8fee343a5b8625777099300bacc85.pdf
5c44226b99a6cf42cf865f2699b324a2
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT /tUTHORITY
BUDGET REPORT
SEPTEMBER 30, 1967
BUDGET
1967
Unappropriated Surplus
ACTUAL
JANUARY 1, 196 7
TO
SEPTEMBER 30, 1967
$128,281.64
$128,281.64
$ 84,030.00
23,190.00
82,770.00
91,800.00
18,210.00
$300,000.00
$ 5,520.00
$ 63,022.50
17,392.50
62,077.50
68,850.00
13,657 . 50
$225,000 . 00
$ 3,663.17
$ 95,000.00
276,000.00
$371,000.00
$676,520.00
$804,801.64
$ 60,000.00
135,402.54
597.46
$196,000.00
$424,663.17
$552,944.81
$ 68,950.00
10,500.00
$ 4 7 ,2 03 .22
7,86 3.00
1 , 109.00
533.00
1 ,680 . 00
10,000.00
99.00
$ 92,871.00
$ 3,150.00
1 , 151.16
400.00
875 . 59
300 . 54
104. 00
$ 57,897 . 51
$ 2,4 00.00
INCOME
Appropriations:
City of Atlanta
Clayton County
DeKalb County
Fulton County
Gwinnett County
Sub-Tota ls .
Interest Income
Federal Funds:
702 Loan
Section 9 Grant
Interest~ Federal Funds
Sub-Totals
TOTAL INCOME
TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS
0
EXPENSES
Staff Cost:
Salaries
Ex penses
Benefits:
Social Security
Guaranty Fund
Health and Accident Insurance
Retirement .
Workmen's Compensation
Sub-Totals
Board Meetings
Administrative and Offic e Overhead:
Rent
Communica tion and Postage
Furniture and Equipment
Supplies
Printing
Auditor
Accountant
Public Information
Advisory
Insurance:
Public Liability
Depository and Forgery
Fide l ;i.t y Bond
Sub - Totals
CARRIED FORWARD
$
3,000.00
2, 000 . 00
2, 000 . 00
3,600.00
1 , 000 . 00250.00
1,000.00
33,000 . 00
5,000.00
72.00
56.00
199.00
51
I
177. 00
$
$147 , 198 . 00
$
2,25 0 .00
1,448.94
117 .8 1
1,978.78
623.56
250.00
500.00
17 ,009.03
1 ,077.35
55.00
56 . 27
198 . 60
$ 25 , 565.34
$ 85 , 86 2 .85
�METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
BUDGET REPORT
SEPTEMBER 30, 1967
TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED
SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD
BUDGET
1967
ACTUAL
JANUARY 1, 1967
TO
SEPTEMBER 30, 1967
$804 , 801.64
$552,944.81
$147,198. 00
$ 20,000.0-0
$ 85, 86'2.. 85
$ 31,250.00
$ 29, 939 . 00
32,667.00
16,333.00
16,000.00
15,293.00
3,333.00
1,667.00
0
0
1,563.00
4, 742.09
EXPENSES
Brought Forward
Counsel
Consultants:
Atlanta Region Metropolitan
P,anning Commission
Urban Design Study:
Section 9
Matching
Atlanta Transit Stuoy:
Section 9
Matching
Hammer, Greene and Siler
Parsons-Brinkerhoff-Tudor-B~ch tel :
702 Loan
Section 9:
Federal
Matching
Retainer Agreement
Research and Technical Services
Sub-Totals
TOTAL EXPENSE S
95,000. 00
60 , 000.00
240 , 000.00
120 , 000.00
60 , 000. 00
2, 000. 00
$6 02,2 50.00
$769 ,448.00
60 , 000.00
112,411.00
16 , 182.67
2, 255.84
$318,386.60
$414,008.06
SURPLUS
s
Sl.38, 2.36. ZS
35,35.3,6~
$
9,75.8.61
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
BUDGET REPORT
SEPTEMBER 30, 1967
ACTUAL
JANUARY 1, 1967
BUDGET TO
1967 SEPTEMBER 30, 1967
Unappropriated Surplus $128,281.64 $128,281.64
INCOME
Appropriations:
City of Atlanta S 84,030.00 $ 63,022.50
Clayton County 23,190.00 17,392.50
DeKalb County 82,770.00 62,077.50
Fulton County 91,800.00 68,850.00
Gwinnett County 18,210.00 13,657.50
Sub-Totals $300,000.00 $225,000.00
Interest Income $5,520.00 $ 3,663.17
Federal Funds:
702 Loan $ 95,000.00 $ 60,000.00
Section 9 Grant 276,000.00 135,402.54
Interest - Federal Funds 0 597.46
Sub-Totals $371,000.00 $196 ,000.00
TOTAL INCOME $676 ,520.00 $424 663.17
TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS $804,801.64 $552,944.81
EXPENSES
Staff Cost:
Salaries $ 68,950.00 $ 47,203.22
Expenses 10,500.00 7,863.00
Benefits:
Social Security 1,109.00 1,151.16
Guaranty Fund 533.00 400.00
Health and Accident Insurance 1,680.00 875.59
Retirement 10,000.00 300.54
Workmen's Compensation 99,00 104.00
Sub-Totals $ 92,871.00 $57,897.51
Board Meetings $3,150.00 $2,400.00
Administrative and Office Overhead:
Rent §$ 3,000.00 $ 2,250.00
Communication and Postage 2,000.00 1,448.94
Furniture and Equipment 2,000.00 117.81
Supplies 3,600.00 1,978.78
Printing 1,000.00 623.56
Auditor 250.00 250.00
Accountant 1,000.00 500.00
Public Information 33,000.00 17,009.03
Advisory 5 ,000.00 1,077.35
Insurance:
Public Liability 72,00 55,00
Depository and Forgery 56.00 56.27
Fidelity Bond 199.00 198.60
Sub-Totals § 51,177.00 $ 25,565.34
CARRIED FORWARD $147,198.00 $ 85,862.85
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
BUDGET REPORT
SEPTEMBER 30, 1967
ACTUAL
JANUARY 1, 1967
BUDGET TO
1967 SEPTEMBER 30, 1967
TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED
SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD $804,801.64 $552,944.81
EXPENSES
Brought Forward $147,198.00 $ 85,862.85
Counsel $_ 20,000.00 $9,758.61
Consultants:
Atlanta Region Metropolitan
P,anning Commission $ 31,250.00 $ 29,93°.00
Urban Design Study:
Section 9 32,667.00 16,000.00
Matching 16,333.00 15,293.00
Atlanta Transit Study:
Section 9 3,333.00 0
Matching 1,667.00 1,563.00
Hammer , Greene and Siler 0 4,742.09
Parsons-Brinkerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel:
702 Loan 95,000.00 60,000.00
Section 9:
Federal 240,000.00 60,000.00
Matching 120,000.00 112,411.00
Retainer Agreement 60,000.00 16,182.67
Research and Technical Services 2,000.00 2,255.84
Sub-Totals $602,250.00 $318 , 386.60
TOTAL EXPENSES $769,448.00 $414 ,008. 06
SURPLUS $_35..353,64 $138,936.75
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 21, Folder 5, Document 31
Box 21
Box 21 Folder 5
Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/b5d87cba8ef7e3415995440cf8a13d9f.pdf
85a954ee1739f2c0f8e6819470d7ed7b
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
Sc ,:::cion l.
_-\:.1 _.\c t known as th~ lvfci.:ro1)01itan
Adan ta I-C ni<l
.
i
Tr2. .. s i ;: -~'.:cl:o ·i:.y _-\.c · oi 1)65 , ;;;.pprovcd :\t~;:irch 10 , 1965 (Gz... L aws
196 5, p '.
? ' ·.=.)
~) '
-
ci.S
arnc r..d~d, p:1rticularly by an Act approve
.). ) U.l ::i, ·~: t:~011
.!_
l.ll it: .· Cll
,.i..l' c
v'j.
March -:'. ,
,nd i n .;cr t i"i ,
,
" i.· li e
-~o a cccpt,.:;ci -;:Hi::-.. ciplc s oi 2.cc01..:n;::.~-.. g , the total cost, paid
. 1cur:r(.;c,
'
o:.· :..1
to study,
· 111~n C(;,
a ra"'.)ic. tr2..nsit sy s ten.1. or rz..nici ·i::.· 2.ns::.t "._)1·ojecc to a nor-:.·:c.a.l
o:::
c-~:.~ :t cd,
to cla_ify wha~
co sts rnay be capi - i:-:. c...'.iY way fr.cs0 - E:X?E:nses w:. ich L'...ay be ca:c .:.·.:aLzccl &s
ta ized as costs of
a. rapid t ra. sit
syste m or project
w 1_,___ ac e~ ue on obligations 1 s sued 0y tn e Al:fr. . o:;: i.:y to
n:c.2.•:cc t::e con st... ;_:c.:io:i of
J.'.1.f
-an i d tra1c.si"i.: sys.:e:-.. --. o:;:-
?:.·oj<;C'C di.:;. rin g t i1c co ns .:::n:ct:.or:. Dc r-i od ane'.. :or s1:-:: ( 6)
.
.
costs :.ncurrea
.
. :..-1
.::,;·._,.);::,..._;C~:.G
'·.L' ) ' 21'
0 1-.r
S ,··c'.:ion
6
.....
1n l'cS
a ::-,c w ~-..;,~:,.3,:: ccion (i)(2) wnich s1cali rc.-:i.d as follow s:
1n
�f: ,)
~ ) T~1c purcl:.:i.sc or lc;:i.se of a n y privat e ly o w n ed
dcl c t ' tl ' r ~qu ir~ 1n ' n . oi .:i. showii:s
sys1:c1-:1 oi: ;;r;:i11spo ::.--t ati o n of -oa c;sen g cr s £or hire in i~s
h.::. t L1 <2 C l~ ui s i i o 1
.J
o.:.·
3.
.p. r::. v a · ly- o,vncd
. .~::t i :i.· (!ty,
rans?Ortat io:1 syst 1-1
. s e sse, . .:ial to t 1
i~" s..:ction 8( c) o .. S (d ). ri
cev dopm.ent oi _ a.pid
t r a.i: sit in the met::.· o S a i d A ct ::.s fur fr, c _ i:l.lYJ.encle d by s c:rikin g th e refrom
-:i 0lita. are::a
uo ;:..:; ci.io::-: ' c) of Sc::ction 3 1n it::; (;:1t i:.: ety &nd inserting in liE:u the::rcof
•
I
)
• 7 s •• a.!.1
""
r
•
a ::1 cw s ·...: •::i scc"10::1.
~c
w 1Ecn
_ eac..1 a s :c0
_1ows
11 I
c
)
T h e power to develo p cia1:;:.., p~.a:;:-,.:; and inJ.orn1ation
d<:!ve:lo p and car::.· y
01..
t mass t r ansportatio n demo::;.stra -
tio~1 projects , including the deve:lop:rnent, testing a ~1d dem cns-:: _ ation of :iew f acilities, e qui pme:;:-,'~, techniques ancl
methods, and ·c he i mp :-- o · vement and u t il:.zation of tr ans?o :: ·ca-cion servi ce s ai1.d facilit::.es, anc. any other rr:.eans
ve lo ? in g, uti~izir: g
OT
01
de -
i r.:1p rov i 11 g :i.Tia s s t~a::..: s :) Or Latio r1 :i.r.:.
to e l e t e a p r o vi s io n
subje cting sa id
c~-:. ; i:1(;;:;ring , :::.l13. l1Ci:cl c:..r.cl e:c o :;:-. ol-:"1.1c s ·.:l:d i-.:s, ·.:o n : a,,;_c; ?l ct~: s ,
A u tho .. ity t o liability
io r c e rt a i n atto rn e ys dc.: si g:-1s a nd te s ~s rc : a:: c c. .:o r2. p ::.c. -;;ra:.isi·~·projects . I:-.:. c o::1 fee s of a dverse
parties
rc. a :.:1ner ·c.::ion 2::iy lands, wat e:i: s o r prei-:11s es fo r .:he purpose
-. (;\
, ·...._b .,; c;ctic:i.-.:. (i) wh: c: sha ll r cz.<l a::; iollow s :
' i)
e,{
r;:r.(;
po\vC
w e n te r i n t o c ontrac t s with t he St3.t c
G-.:o ::.- g i 2. &nd a ny ager.. cy, i r, s tr u :-n e: ntalit y , a u tho ri ty ,
- ~-
�rn.unicip::i.lity o:i: politic :;_ su!.:)division thereof or
·:n cr...:in, J.nd pa riicub.rly with the locJ.l govcrnn1.cnts
wit>.in u1c n:.c:t:i: opo:i.itJ.n
ca , ::or public trans :,ortation
services to be :ren · erea by the Au hority or its rapid
-~:::;:;.:1sit ::;yster,1, ;.;.nc ior any o·c'1.cr pu:rposc:s inciccntal
·:o i,1dica t e ,-:hich
puolic bociies s id
_~_uthority may con -
o :1.1-2 cs;;a.'.:llishrn.cnt a.. d 111.ain·c<.::nancc of its rapid tr2.ns i t
tract \Yith pertaining syst1::n1., or any par·c or project t·1ereo ~, including the
to its purposes nd
to cla:::-ify the power payr:.,...:::'t oi iunds to subsidize fr1e operations oi such
of loc3.l governinents
top Y opera ional
subs idi es
syste1n if ·t s}1ould ev ::: be nccc:ssa:;.:y to
the usual fa.ciliti""s related t::iereto .
Sec-'-icn
i .
o so, and
11
Said Act is fu _ ther a1nended by striking
t: ereiron.J.
subscc·.::.on c) of Section 9 :.n its entirety and inse1·ti~1.~ i:::i lieu t..1.ereof
a new subsection (c) which shall read as follows :
Boa ~ d shall
,
.
Q(!·i: ~ ::~11'1:i.~-- C
oy itseli c:):clusi vcly
by ·.:--ic Au:ho:city, the scr-~eduled se:::vice::; ;;o be made
available to the pi..1.biic and -~he an'lo·u.nt s to be charged
to eliminate the pro v ision for judicial
review of char ge s
or services fixed
by said Authority
'.:r..e::.:eio :: .
c:1eclulec.
Before 1na!c:.. ng a:n.y c.e·~erminations as to
ervices o_ an"lou::1.ts ·co be chz..rged there:o::.·,
the.; 302.::-c. shall :i.i:;.: st hold a·c lez..st one public hearing
·~:-,..:; largc:c.t circulatic.,n
J.
-~}1c
·11.d:ro )ol:i.tan :1:.: ...:
no ·
c:-_0~c ·" .::... ten u ays :.1.or lcs.3 tr.an five d:iys prior ..;o the
- 3--
�:n,lcs an,t rcg,1L.1.tio 1s tu g0vc1·n ::;uch hc:::i.ring::; not
Sc...: ion 6.
1
SJ.i ' _.\ct 1s fu:rthcr 'arnc:1.dcd by sL iking tbcrciror11.
cw ··d) sc ctio
1 (d) which shall ::cad ;.is :.:allows :
I, :
\
~
.l )
..)c~::.·
intc.:. est p::i.yablc 2.t s · c h tin1cs :tncl a· such rate
o:::- rc:.tcs
.nd sI'.all rnaturc 1n s,__...cn amounts and at
Si.:.c: :i:Y1es
_ot exc eeding :or ty (".::O) ye!2.rs fro:,n the
d2.-ce fne1· eof, as th
i3oard rr:.ay detenni ne .
The
to delew require n:.en-s t at rev nue
bonds 1nay be ir. coupo :1 or registered f r om, or both ,
bonds o: said A ui:1:o rity
be sold at pa 2.nd
bearing inte est at
as the Boa1·d 111.ay d ete r:nin e , a:id the Board may ·
a rate not exceedin;; ff.::.:,c provision for the rcgis-::rz.:~io::-, 0£ any co upon bond
s 1x per cent per
anr.um
.::::c:.: es -:: .
s;.1'.:,scctiora ( 6 )
01
1'
S ection 10 in its e:::1.ti r e ty a:1.c. i:..1.serting 1r.. lieu t:ne1·cc:.:
tcnY:::io:::-2.ry bonds, equi pn:1er..t trust c<c:rtificates 2.::::d oth e :::to p1·ovic.e that ail
ooligations issued by o0:i_;;atio:is issued "l.:r.de r ·cl1e provis ions 0£ this Act s::J.l~
said Authority sh.a 1
havE: t ' e q;__;_alities
a _d inciC:.ents o
, egotiable
"L:r..cler the la.ws of this state anc. a _ c !1. e r eoy decl2._ ccl to
instruments
a:1C: the: pro;?e 1··cy, obligi:i:cic,r.s an~ interest 0:1 1:.1.:: obli~2.tioj::s
oi the A-.....t::--iority shall be cx~rn.pt fro1n all taxaticn wit"1in
~- .. -
�1
i
'CliOl1 8 .
Said Act i::; further am.ended by strikin g therefr or.n
Sl:b s 'Ci..iOl1 (h) oi Sec ·ion 10 i _
-,. ... -2.w
.t::i
cmircty a . . cl in se r t in g m lic:u thereof
s1.:.0scctior. h) whi c:n sho..11 read a::; follows :
11
(:1)
Born:s oi the Authority r-:i.ay be ::;old by public
c :11.pctitive b::.dding o:· dnol·: gh negotiation with
).i.:
spc c ;;ive p cu-cha$c r o
p'l.:rch.:i..se rs.
If the
J..
o::i.rd
.::ictc ·n~::..-:2::; tl," t so..i '-' by public co m .petiti vc bidd in g is
t o ddcte the equire 111.cnt that bo 1.ds be
in 1:11c best interest of ·he A u 'i:ho rity with res )C Ct to
o ld a t public
c~lni p '.li. .i.vc b.i.cdin ~
1oti cc
al:al
o:
sale an
invita'ci o n to bid wit:-1 respec t thereto
be adve::: t ised ~s is custon:.arily d one in the ha-:.1.dlin g
of g ovcrnrnental bond issues and section 14(b) as to th.:;sc
. . atters shall not a p ply.
Se;ctio
~
9.
11
Sz..ici _t\ct 1 s :\.:1··.:t.2 r c1.rr. . e11dcc~ by st ri:( i ng tl:c::: ci r o:ci:-1
.
~~·. I....' :
II
?)
vz..l.icia.t:cci , :;.r1 s0::a :c as a::>plic:able:, i n a cco:rci anc c w i tl1.
tne proc c~u2: e of fr1e i\even:c:. e :2.ond Law (Ga . L . 19 37,
? • 7'.
. C 1, (;t . seq . ) as now c :: h e r e a:frer a1ner:d.:::ci . T11e
to clar ify the p : :.- 0 cedur e fo th e validar;ctition fo -:: valiC::.ation s},all c:..lso rn.a. ~ e pa rty de:ic:ad ant
tion of rcvenu(:; bonds ·
t 0 ::; u ch action a . . y n unicipal ' ty , county , aut 10· ity,
·<1
.J C
i vi s i0n , in:;.;tn.;.1n c nt:..t.lity o
dcpar1.1Y1cnt of th e
StC!.tc:
o · Ce 0r gia , i:Z subject to be sued , which has conn a ct e.::i
with t:he: Autncr i '~y £o r ·.:he
-;i :.: 0 · e:ct
i c
12 ~
vices and iacilitics
,
01
J.:8
ior wnich bo::-,ds arc to be is succ. a1;.d so g},.t .. o
validated and suc:1 n'lunicip~.lity , county , auth or ity,
i 'l.,b d:ivision , instnnncnta li ty or dcpJ.rt1nc1-~t ::;hall be
- S-
4
CO:
.
�:.-~ ~'--1::,:cci to show c ause, ii ar.. y, why ::;uch contract
or co:1-r2.cts and the tenns and cone itions ther eo f
s:-..o~ :d : 10t be i :1 1ui::: c
i .. to by the coun an d the
va:ici.i::y oi the -~ern1s thereo:.: to be dete r mined and
.or ·che: ·9ayr.1 ~.. t o:I: any !:;;UCh bonds of the Authority .
The judgn1ent o: valid atio n shall be final and con elusive with resuecc to such bonds, and ·che security
.:r1erefor, agains t the P_u h ority , and aga in st any
mm .. icipality , county , &u-ch ority , sub di visio n , instru-
.nentali::y o:::- depa r tment o:: the S '~ate of Georgia, i£ a
?2. :.-ty to the validati01,. p. oceedings, co ntrac -cing with
J·he . ,_11.. c:tho:::-ity .
11
-._. , l:. \..'. l:
~
J,,.j
... ..
1..
,._,. . : _:: L: V
·:.:.,_;:..r,s 1or anci :::.ssi.st in the reloc&tio::1 o:£ persons
-
... .
.:.aJ..:::l.;.lC S ,
.) sincss conccr;.1s,
no:-.·Hoii:: or 6 aniL'. atior'..s 2.;.1cl othc .. s) d i spla c ed by
to lin1.it the sou .. ces
£rom which rcloca tio payme .. ts .ay
be made
on-::r2..·cions oi
fr.8
Aut}:ori;;y
t::.· z.nsit projecc, a:c..
El
c::u: rying out a rapid
to rnake ::: clocz.. ·ion pay :-nen ·s to
or with rcsj_)ect to such pc::.· son::; .
Tr:e relocation p&..y -
--::.cnts rd<;rre:d to in t:l1is subsection b) s~1all not be
rr.acle fro~'Y'.. -~:-..e: P - occeC::.s cie:rive:ci :aor,:1 the sale of bonds
1:-:,'/ th<; Authority no r fro1n rcve:~1ue s or funds which abso.:::n"i:
-~}:e 1-r.2:.king 0£ such relocation payn1er-.t s there:...~ orn would
0r the interest the:re:on . 1 1
- 6-
_
�Sc-:.tion 11.
.'.::iaid Act is further an:1c:aclccl by striking thc:rc:from
sub::;ec:ion 1 c) oi Section. 15 in its entirety and inserting in lieu t:ier c of
-1
new subsc -:. io 1 c) which shall 1·cacl as iollowt: :
11
(c) Any contract or transac-;:ion of the Authority rn -
sectio. (a) he _ eof, o ~ a violation oft: e a c t of the General
As senc.bly approved Mar c h l O, 19 6 -= , (19 64 Ga . L . p . 261) ,
as an1
ded, o r a vio l z,:cion o:f any other p r o vision o f law
ap?licable w tl1e Author i ty, ii:s .c..ioard n1.crr1ber s, o ffi c ers ,
to ?rovicl..e t 1at con tracts and trans or er:::1.p: oyees regulating conflicts o::: i ::ite ::- est , shall ·oe
actions c onstitut·ng
security for the pay - voidable by the Boar d ; provided, howeve r, a judgrn ent a nci
111. nt of obiigations
shall not be voidable ore.er vali ating °!)ands of t:1.e Authorit y, as in Secti o n 10
afte r validation
prov1cea, shall c o _stitute a fir.. 1 and c onclu s i ve adjud ic a-ci on
th&t no such conflict of :.::1.terest exists w i th respect to s...:.c;1
~cc11rity ior r}1c·-:_:,2.;,n.-;.1.c ~1.t c: st1.cl".. bor:i.ds . 1 1
s~asectio. ('::>) 0£ Sectior.. 17 in its entirety and inse1·ting m lieu i:hcreoi a
new s"c1bscction (b) wr.icr. shall rcac. as i ollow s :
"(b)
During each :Ciscal year the.• Board shall propo s e
in
~:1:::.·...:;:.l operating b clg e.: io :2: the cns1. rn.g :iisc:::..l y...::a.1· · ncl
hold a public r.ea,.ing therco~1 .
Aiter such puolic hea.1·ing
·.:::-.e :Soa1-d s1-:all review its ? rO)OScd budget, and, on or
to expar.d rhe pcrioc:.
of time with in which
J....::.:o:-c the last U.d.Y o:f t: c fiscci.l ye::1.r , it shall dopt a11
budge::ts shall be propose d and review e d <,.::,.._,__.._d ope;rc:..ting b ·d~ e:c fo:: the: ensui1:g :fiscal year . In
-~:.e; an:r......:.al operating budget each O?erating fund shall be
set forth s epara-ceiy and
11
w an estimate of ·he £-..me.
~alancc to be a vailabl-:; a·c the bc ~innin g ox the yc;:i.r , an
- 7-
�cs tirnate o" anticipated crcdi ·s during the year a ccording
to sou ... c ~, an cs;;in1atc o · .:mti ci patecl c harges , inc l u ding
lr.:)ln antic1p;1t cd rcv.:m.uc s, and co1nparati ve data on t he
13.s;; two con1.plc·.:c' fiscal ye;2. rs
n
or csti1na-ccc, fo r t he current yea r.
Scc1:io:1. 13 .
si1nilar data , actual
11
S aid A c t is iu :nhc r a1nended by st:::iking th er efrom
S ection 18 whi c h reads as follows :
11
Scction 18.
Engineering Surve y .
At least e very tr-.1.ree
years, th e Board shall enc.ploy a iirm of qualified i n depenc.ent e ngin ee rs to survey the conc.iti on 0 1 t:he
to de l te the r equire ment o f an eng inee r - i,.uth orityis fa c iliti es and OJ?er at::.ons fro1n an en g inee r ing
ing survey eve r y
thr ee years
standpo i nt and make a repo r;; th ereof and any re c or.irncndc:.. t ::.ons :::o r i r .-.1.p rov en1.cnt i n i 'c s ~)hys ic al faciiities a nd
ov-..
::.·n:-.1.e;nt
l:l
ir..
the metro Dol::.ta ::1 area .
11
i t S s.:::.t::.r C :.:y.
Saici A c t is iu ... the r a:::-:-.. ended by sc.: ikir:.g ::here:r o:".:.1.
s c..:.sc ci:::. o;.1. (b) of Section 21 "in i::s entir ety and i nsc . t i ng
111
lieu the r eoi a
,·,,:vi :... ·u1,::.;cction (b) w ·1 ·ch s h-:ill re:~,d :,c.: Io . lows:
'(L) 'J.'lH; .i\1.cLliori.ly :.;h~LJ..L <.1.l ::,;v IJ(.; cxcn·,1JL f1:u:u1 ...,_ny 1·c:,;l.ll..l.ti.011
to clarify the re::lation
of the Autho rity to
·0y tnc Publi c S e :::vic e Co nnn::. ss ion oi this S tate. 11
the Public Service
S(;ctio::1. 15. Sa.id Act i s :Curfr1er arr:.enc.e;d by striki g the 1· 2i:i: o:::n
Commis s ion
Se;ctior. 22 in its cr.tirety and in serting 1n lieu ther~of a new S e ct i on 22
1
'Se::c-cion 22 .
To. t Liabili·.:y; Insurance.
The Au::hority
s~all not enjoy g ove _ mne:-i.tal i:mrnunity frorn tort liabili1:y,
-
'-:
i., .... -
�Dut shall be liable t hcrcfo ::..· a s any private.; cor poration
cxce;,pt t:1a t no exe cution sl12..ll be le vied on any property
o:.: t~1c A: ·hor ity p rior to :1inety (90 days from the; date
o:
i. ~:.,
al jucigmem again t the Authority .
The Authority
s.1a.:.l p roviC:.e ior adequate ins1.:r a i1cc or similar protection
against any loss, liability or other risk, hazard or
o pe rmit the
_,;uthori~y to act as
a self - insurer
_ espons ibility to whic h it 1-r..ay be exposed or which it
rr:Zi.y accept on acco'll:at
o:2erations .
0.1.
i-cs pro?e ::ty, personnel, or
Such i nsurar.ce rn.ay be p rovided through
self- insurance res e rves or by contracts or arrange ments w ith othe r parties 1n such manner a::id amounts
as the Boar d in i ts d iscr etion shaL. cietermine .
Section 16 .
11
Said A ct ::. s further arr.ended by s-cri
·::.r..g tne r cfro~
S c c·cion 24 in its en ir e ty and in scning in l ieu thcreoi a new S c ctio::-, 2-;,
.:. :::- ~;:,. :;. ::,
c:c:2.:;: e ci ior the ?u:::posc
01 this _-'>..ct to be an essential
o v c nr
::-:c:nt2.l iunctio n a:i.d a p t b2.ic purpose of t he City oi Atlanta
and fr.c counties of Fulto~1., DeKalb , Clayton and Gwin nett, ana
t o m o d ify the pro c edur es w he r eb y
o: fo e co·,nty of Cobb if it :hereafter de ·~ermines- to ?articipate
local g ov e rnments
and othe r p ubl ic
l 1 L.. .... ..1.-..; Au-cha r ity a s provicied 1n this Act .
b o d ie s may partici ,. The B oard and the local governing boci.y of the City of
pat e i n financing
', ';j }
and s upporting a
rapid tr a nsit
Lt:a:r:.ta and each of th e: counti es of Fulton, DeKalb , C L:l.y t on,
sys t e m
.I• .,,.,,...
\
c::.:-.<l G w i r,nett, and of t he c ount y oi Co bb if it hcrc<1itcr
.ines t o pa.,, tici-oate i. th e Aut hority as provided
•
L
i:..--, :his P-c t, subj ect t o s 1..;.ch limitations a s ar e he re i na.::'"e - ~n t :'ni s section s<.;t f or ·ch, rnay negotiate
- 9-
�;:-.nci cic t cr:1. inc th c extent of fin;:i,nci:::..l
.
1) :1 •
·ici )ation
..:.nd .:he -.::irn.2 or ti 1.1.cs ::;uch ii 1a 1cial participation n1.ay
be required wit1 rcspcct ty
C;).Ch
of the; local govcrnni.cnts
in .:nde::.- to fiY-1::mce provision for· a rapid transit system
, g:1 ·c·1 e joint in::;tru:rncntality o:Z the Amhority .
£ ::;uch
c.:er:rn.i:1 tion co!1ternplates a conn-actual obligation on ·he
ua::.··~ oi a local governn1ent to n1.ake pay1nents t o the Autho::.·ity
over a period of tin1e e xc eeding one: year or t o i · s u e an y
bor:..ds or other obliga;;ions evi dencij_1.g ir.debtedness , su ch
.
cieter1-:1ir.. - ;;io"' s'1ali take the iorm of a r anid trans i t
c ont ra c t to be entered i nto between the Autho r i ty and
t :-. c lo c al gove ::.· nment .
T he :final execution 0£ a r a pid
t:;: ansit c ontr a c t shall be c on1.nicted in e v ery i nstan c e
1n the :::-r:.anner hcrc::.naf.:cr ::;.:;t fo_ tb. in this Section 2 , .
o : ·J:c c ost oi financi:..'lg a r c:.p i c. trar;.s i t projcc·c or p::: ojcc-cs,
2..
iocal go ve:!:"nment rnay in 1:he r:--.anner pres c :;:- i b.:;d by law c1.nd
Sl.:bjec~ to the conditio:1s 2..~d l i :r-[litatio11s pres c ribc.;G. ·oy law,
i ssue its gene:;:-al oblig2.tion bor.c.'..s , pay ovei· the pro c eeds
·fr. creo:f to the Author i ty and fo.e :;:- cby co:-nplctc and mctk-::: ii::al
he execution of the proposed r a:)lG. transit c on;;ra c t antici?ated
'-::,y such ::ioncl au·c:.10rization and "s suance and the Aut:l:..o:.:it: y ::;ha:l
agree
t~'le:;
1n
s-uch cor.t::a c 'c to pcriorrn ior s·u.ch lo c al 6 overm11-2nt
afo:;:e said g overnmcr. tal iur.ction and to pro vi de the nccc s s ary
u · ::,_r.::; 1:,ort;:i.tion sc1·viccs and :facilities .
.::..)
P- s c::u1 altcrr1ativc 1Y1c.:thocl o{ p rovidin g the iinancial pc:..:;:c:ici:.)J. -
1..iu~'l cicte; ·m.irJ.e c by its local ,sov.:; rnm g body to be i;; s pro:)c::: s:.1:.cn.:
- 10-
�lo ·al govcrnm.cnt n.1 y em:cr in ·o a rapid transit contract or
c0nt : :~1ct::; c:1lli 1f; for the At,tho::.:ity to p<..:!rionn for it'thc.: .:i.forcsaid
,,. o vcr m nent::i.l .LUnction and c:.illing for it to n1a :-.::.
e riodic payments
to t l1e At,:::hority for the public transpo r tation services and
facilities c: 01:t r a ct ed f or, whic h payments ma y include an1ounts
required. to defray the pe r ::.odic p rin cip ct.l ar:.d i"1tc re st )ayn1c.: nts
on ::my obli g ations i ss u e-· by ·h..:: Autho rity io:.: the purpose oi
iin::i.ncing th..:: cost o:C any r::i.picl tr:::..nsit project or projec ts,
a::nounts necessary to establis:1 and maintain rea s ona b le
rese ... ves 1n co nne ction w::.th the paym ent o:f sai2. debt se rvice
a:1d amo-..:nts re qu i red. to defray any op erational defic it w:'1ich
the system or any part thereof may inc ur .
(c) A local gove:r:nir..g boc.y may p ::: o c eeci 0:::1 its ow:1 r.::: soh1tior-,
!:a-:: ::1:c ii:1.a:1c ial ?a~·ticipa:cion required 1:he:-eunder may
,_-"' as onaLJ.y be iinanced w i t1:out ·~he: i .::: vy o:c any new or
•,, 1
..1.l",
1' r · . 1 ; . , · ,
I
i
, 1 :.
1 , 11
IJ
J
f"
l ' 1' i ' i '
1 •
J
I/
i. I
l
t
I .l
I 1·
f /
'/ /
j i -, ) l
I I
I
i. i:
{'·
1 1·
j l.1'
1'
y.
tl is event , the r es o l utio:r-1 o:f the lo c al govern1;:,g body
tha -.: the partic ipati on r equi::.: ed there "l.:nder may reasonably
be i::.nan c ed witho ut the l e vy of any new or increased tax
0~1.
the ?rope::: ty situated w i thi n its -er ritory shall be con -
c :usive oi that :fact.
(i:
Oth e rwi.3c, befo r e a r ap i d transit contra ct such as is
ci e: :;cribeci. in subsection (d) is exe cuted bc ·cwee:1 the Authority
a nci a local g overnm.ent, the loc.:.i go verning body shall c all
a n ·e~e ction and s h all sub n 1it tc the qualifi ed voters of s :ch
- LL -
�l o c.::11 :;ovc::: nn1.cnt in a rci(;ren<lu::n as hereinafter proviclccl ,
c:hc; .._uc ,3tion whet 1er or not the local g over nn1.cnt should enter
.:::.o a r :Jid t:,: a;.1sit c ontra.ct o · contracts calling io-:.: it to make
perio d ic pay1nen-cs to the Authority within the parti cular r.noneta ry
lirnitatior: or iimitations p ... oposc
The
HOC
by such lo cal govcr:::1.ing b c.dy .
,du.r e io,: holdi:1g .:he rdcrendum c allccl fo · rn
sub scctio1 (i) shall be as io lows :
Tl:c local governing body
s:nll cause to be published 1n a nc;wspa J c r having gcn<::rd
c::. ... cula-cion throughout the te rrito r y of the local gave ... nrrle::1t
involve d , once ea c h , week for three wee ks immediately preceding
-::: Wc;ci, during which the rc:.. -:::rcndu1n is to be held, a 101.:icc to
1e electors thereof that on the day na1nec. therein an ele c tion
w il be h elc. to dete i-r11.ine fne ouestion wheth e r or not the loc2.l
g ove r:11-:1ent shall enter i;1;;0 a rapic. transit co:1tract or co -. c: ro.cts
c:.:l the ele ctio:'1 cii s t:::ic t s wi;;}_i:;:-. th e ·.:c r ::: itorial lirnits o:t t h e
~o c al g overr.i-r1ent involv e d e xc e pt that an ei e ction call e d b y
t>.e l ocal g overning boc.y o : any county within the :::11.etrop0Et2.:1
a r ea sha· 1 not be heic.
1:::1.
a:_y p a rt o f such coun ty which
i.S
\V::.t::in
t ;-..c te rr::.torial lim its o f t h e City of Atlanta i i , with rc s? cct t o
'.:he :) a rtic u lar rapid tran sit proje c t or projects -~o b e sup9or"Ci.::C.
cy the p r opo sed r apid tr a n s it co::.1t a ct of s uch county, s::i.i' C i::y
.s al · ca y a pa1·ty to a rap id n-a n s it contr a ct or t he gov...:: :::1::.ng
IJGc.y
of ;:;aid C ity p::.·opo::;e;::; t o c 1tcr into
r ap.-d t r,:i-:.1 sit c or:::::: c.c"'
·ubj(;ct -
;o the ap-;_)roval t 1crc o f ::i.t a rc ie r c n dun1 .
1..o be :::irescr.t s.: <l to t he elc cto
· ::t t 1;
The qucs
·1011
o f a loc a l g ovc n11n s.: nt ;.:.:1-:::. s s.::t
�iorth on the b:illot shall be detenn.ined by· the local
govcrn::.:1g bo -' y ;:i,nd i t slull set out t he monetary limitation
or lim.itations, ii any, proposed by the local governing
b0dy w id resp ' Ct to the :: nnou1 ts oi the periodic pay11cnts
to b' rn;:i,dc
nJ er :1ny suc ~1 r.:1.pi c'. t ransit c ont ·act or co tracts.
T~1c bJ..llot subrnitting the question shall be in a fonn dc::t<.:!rmined
by the local go verning body, and th12: form. of the. ballot shall
b e published as a pa ~ t oi the aioresaid notice.
Each such
election called by the governing body or c:. county within the
met ropolitan area under th.2 provisio~1.s of this subse c tion
is hereby declared to be a co·c1nty ele c tion and shall be
gove rned by and c ondu c teci. in a cc ordanc e with the provisions
oi the Georgia Ele c tion C ode.
The board 0£ reg i strars 0£
ea ch county snall provide tbe n e ce s sa:cy lists ior c onducti . . g
delega te, w ho shall 0£:fici2.lly de cla::.·e t}1c re suit .
EZi.c h
de c tion c ailed by ·c~. e g ov e :::-n::.:1 g ::iody of th e City o :. _.:i~tla:::tz,,
1.1::-. der t he ;novisions oi this sue se ction shail be gove :..- :::ecl by
1D.c udin:::, spccific;:i.lly the chc:..rt.:.:r cf :::aid City, ct.t tl <.: ti . c
6 ove rnin g the:: ho ~d in g of e lectio:is by sa~cl Ci-c y .
T'.:-.e ex _)ense
o : any such e l e ction caile d by the gove::.·ning body of th e Cit y
oi Atb.. nta shall be paid by the City of Atlanta.
(b)
If a r.1ajority oi thos e vo-cin g in such an ele ction vo te
in fa vo::: of the proposition sub::nitted, then tl-1.e local
- 13-
�g 0v~::: ni.1g b o d y ::;hali b"' al:::c~1orizcd to agree upon and
execution of a r apid transit
c0 n trac ·c o::: con trac;:s subj ect '.:o ::;uch moneta r y lirnitation
or Ln:;.i·c3.tions as were proposed w the ele c torate and in
...:: co rci::i.l1ce with the te r r:."ls of this Act.
(:. ) _-\ _ocal gove:rn:nem: :c:.1.&y elec:: any n1.ethod provided 1~1.
L"l::. s
se c-.:io:-i to finance ::he p2.rticipation requi red. of it 1::--.
wnole or in pa:::t , and the el.::: c tic:, ::--. of o ne rnethod shall not
? reclucie tne election oi anothe _ n1.cthod w i th r espect thereto
or w i th r es p e ct t o any a d ditional or supplementary participatioa
dete::.·r.:1.ined to be ne c essar y .
(j) W h e n the Authority and a l o cal government have co:npleted
and iully exec--1.:ed a ra-pid transit c ontract in c ompliance wi::h
t l"'.e re qui _ ements of this _-\ct, such cont::: a c t shall cons:initc
w a y car.:. -- e
er 00 ,_'
C,
a r.C:. cr e cit o f a r.y local
·;,le2 6 ed w it}. re s p e ct to a :::ap ::.c tr an sit co:ntracc.
(:'-
A n y local govermnent :nay us e p ub lic fu~-.cis ·co ? r ovic.c 1or
a ra? i d L a n sit syste1n within the :netropolitar. a:c e a anG. ::-:.-1&y
evy and colle ct any t a x es a u tho : :ized t o it by law t o ·che e xi.:e:r.t
necessar y to fulf ill t he o b li g atio::-i. s incurrcc. in a :::apic. t: ::: aas :::c
co:it::: z.. c t o r co n tr a c t s wit};_ the A1..:thor i ty ; p:::ovicie d , t::at no
.0 co.l county g ove:r:rnnent s h all lav e t h e p ow.:; r t o l .:::vy ar"y ;:ax
0 ::.
c, {
2.~·,y .; uojc ct o i -..: ax a ;:ion s :.t 1.. ;:;,;: ~ cl w i tl i n the t..-:;rri rnri::i.l E r:... its
the C ity o f AtlZ:.nta in i u l.ii lln1.c11:c oi fina nc i a l obli:;::t ··i o :1s set
{0::: C'l
i~'l
a rapid tran~;it c o n t ::: act w h en t he C i ·cy of _t.~ tb.1".t J.
- 1-..: -
~1z.i.s .J.
�:::a·.Jid t:.:2.:1.sit c ontr2. c t with the ~e1~l '. :hority c alling for said
C:.-.:y
to 1ss1.:e its general obligation bonds_ for rapid t:l: an::;it
pl::;::xlscs
CH to
pay rnonics pcr i o ically with respect to the
o.cbt sc:: vicc on obiig;:nions issu-c:d by the Authority , and is itsc .. : us :.ng its public funds or levyi1:g a tax for eithZ::r oi such
?Urpo ses .
( l) Any ::.nunicipality o::.· c ounty witnin the rr.ctropolitan area
1.:;ly transie r to the Autho::.· ity any p rop e rty or fa cilities , or
r-,::.::.y be useful to -d:e establish 11..er.-.:, op e r c1tion or administration
oi the r apid trans it s ystem contemplated hereunde r, a ~'ld may
contract with the Authorit y for &.:'ly of e r purpo se inc idental
·.:o th1::: e stablis:n..111..cnt, opc::::.'~ior_ or adrninistra.tion o·i such
s~:a:l !Jc ,-;:.::'.'l0\,Vl1 as Scc::ions 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 , 23, 2-± and 2.S , :-cs?cctivciy ,
, to renumber
1 certain
saici Act a?proved
ar.cl ci.ny :r e:::e::.· ences i:ci said Act, as h e::.· etofore
se ctions of
the A ct
\{arc:-_.;,, :966 and by ·che preced::.ng lc:.:::'..guage oi ·.:his amer.c.a·.:o:-y A ct, to
24, 2:5 anci. 26 as tl:ey we c ·- own
s.:r:_y ci said Sec-cions 19 , 20, 21, 22,
p:.:-:.c ~ to ·.:he ac.optio:1 of this arnenda:cory A ct, are hereby char:geci so that
5l.:.c::. :;: e:Eerences h.:::rea£'.:er shall be to said Sections as re:::i"wY. . ber.:::d .
- b-
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF
"Wry CLT A}
Wl WIN ia
]
Section l. An Act known as the Me tropolitan Atlanta Ra
ra
vic
'
TPransit Authority Act of 1965, approved March 10, 1965 (Ga. Laws
i965, p. 2425), as amended, particularly by an Act approved March 4
£ i *3
=A tem = » 7 7 ath > fs. Sr hari as 7 4 geist 2 i . —_
aYou (ud, Laws Noo, De J2o-1), is furiner amended bY SLPiaiils therefrom
hae be eke eit the ah et 5 Steps $e by ae aman tt ot ' aden Sen TH te ee fa
BUM awe ron (i) ol Section 2 1n its entis vey ehh Laser bia iil licu thercol
” 44
+ , ghey 8 ieee eae LY Walt aaarl ae TAT a
oo GOW subsection (jy ¥ vVhich snail rcad as iollows:
'(j) Cost of Rapid Transit System or Project, According
GCsish, linance, acquire,
*
oImMmponent parts of
Sit 7 project tO & Normal
5 +45 A SAE TA e Pos Saas meme 64:8 eves ay Ta esi SA
DELTATING OF TEVENUG=HrGcucing COMaALLLON, Inmcsucing The
apitalivation or CMPERSECS, Cltecu OF LCLTeet, Baia oF in}
= te sy Yaa WAT = 4b ose as t =
i
= or
bPaeLTeEwiia, VW deed intending TO a2TTie
wd, = 7 *
ses Watch lay be capitalized as
vill accrue on obligations issued by the Authority to
hts =. wien th & apo RARE pase dP tekeet een ae
2 tne Constr wction 2 any 2epic transit system £
project d wring the construction period and for six (3)
-, . 2
racnths thereafter anc all start-up costs incurred in
a as de ne weanwmatsas if
L FO}. rarey Oysee e&tion,.
. *
macing such system or
Canela 2? Saic i. ee er 1d a b SUT Lcd Hhay arom
WwEeCwOln 4, Q1Q £.CU 25 UT ener aimcnueca VY stPiniwy teacre.lormn
* > m
7 - psye c ef ac f= rae, Spt te ee A ted oo tea a eee sre
subscetion (i)(2) of Section 6 in its entirety and inserting in iicu thereot
anew subsecztion (i)(Z) waich shall read as follows:
3 71. antum ine Bet was Toewak at oe eS cds
(«) The purchase or lease of any privately owned
Bs
ment of a showing pacha ky Reker atk Ek ae an | pe ee oe
eR BhOw is system Ol transportation of passengers for hire in its
13 2 rrVvaTtely med
of a privately owned or as contemplated
Transporration system
Son Dn 1 -
is essential to the ee ee eT t
: mao in section S(c) or S(d). et
~ rTRAoane = J] 4 _ aaa = an aed asec ls wats -
metnoas, and the improvement and utlilzation of
tation services and facilities, and any other means of de-
Ve.onlng, Lillizing = imp POVINE mess Uransportacion aaa
ss“Hac Aras AG * bbe, ain
ia Wels odletat, wee, 244 ULs
“ i + = ya a
to delete a provision
subjecting said type en ew Toned a] ana
jJeciing sai Gasenecring, -2neancias ane
Taanher upon any lands, Warers OF Premises ior The purpose
ae 4a Seth BAe emma ha Sire a aaa Nt x aa ttitewe oc ana "
of Taking Peasonac.e surveys, souncings, al WLIngs ana ex-
: . - . . cA tu j .
BMUGATIONS and such GNtrics sNail Nar oe deemed a trespass
+
ang’ Kaw Bansal Rai ig eps pe keer eh Pee eye axes be
7 seaquc a. Galages resulting Irom such enirics.
4 . - 4,
=a ast
mint at ode . sae Tas “| Jaap Stes ]e 5 = ~
Said Act is further amended by striking thereirom
ioe ae, yeni es 9 Fan te arate a etek celina
& in its entircty and inserting in lieu thereor a
subsection
= eee ete TA) ate a+ bey =] easel ae “allows
Mew SubsccCtion (1) whicn snail Teac as .0L.0WS?
ies a4 i oe oa iba ie py PPA yeaa eR S25. ws a Ret
i) The power to enter imio contracts with the otate
ry ~ eee ee Aree laa = ey? naa oe
aqany agency, imstt umentalty, auenoriry;
tn the local governments
10r public transportatiorz
L
by the Authority or
fT
ePaidsie system, ane ior any Oiler PALPOSes incidental
@ @sta..uLsmnent az
“nat of funds to sul
Fr oe
po
1)
K
fs
be
1‘
ck
He)
oO
'O
2
3
@
H
,
as
pP
wf
w
ry
i
sonst = i»)
& new subsection (c) which shall read as follows:
Giver BWuUbsiic nearincs
c =
ang le scope anc stancaarcs Ol service to be operated
Dy tne Authority, the scheduled se
5 2 eae Be es Hg: Gy che 9 gt atin og :
Hines, Gogh aberss’ as bre Pree WALA a ee ee Ee oe
wie sew Slais 41D Se 10LC al sGast One Duslic nearing
E
- = = ws ee) . 7 * + 7
m ‘ rt ipl sa Teas chin ON Alcan, Shae ow SE a bs
CuLation in whe Metropolitan arta nor
‘
naearing, As to all othe
Sg tien | AA Soe ep ote as ae FS ASE ed
biel Taare d a, 1c DOarl a may ality
as it may deem appro}
“
wW Ull public hearings, it muy prescribe reasonable
rules and yvegulations to govern such hearings not
inconsistent with this Act."
Section 6. Said Act is further amended by striking therciror
subsection (4) of Section 10 in its entirety and inserting in licu thercof
oe GOW Subse ce.
wi
G
be
5
oo
c
~—
a
<x
be
5
eo
G
Hr)
tw
b
0
re
i
ri
G
3
oC
2
b
Len
ey
oO
Ee
KS
Oo
=
u
me
Mid) The bonds of each issue shall be dated, shall
ates, and snall mature in such amounts and at
such times not exceedi
ts
I
oO
iH
c:
=
—
it
Q
ia
GQ
p
H
its)
By
at
©
5
hr
a
a
t
@
a
et
w
ct
D
fo
ct
fe
revenue bonds may be in coupon or registered from, or both,
as the Board may determine, and the Board may
vu oe
q@
th
a
bal
ph.
fu
nterest at
:
a rate not exceeding yoske provision ior the registration of any coupon bond
six per cent per
&5 lo principas alone anc a.s0 Gs TO SOM principal ana
4 5 t tr «+ eae me tee ee At Raw
rary poncs, equipimeche trust certilicates and otne
to provide that all
112 t, dpe mien Te an ta 1? ape ed alls 5 as Nap ee EE ele Wel, sat ats Pas
Goligat1ions issuce oy Oo.l gations 1ssuec Vnhcer te Pr OVIs1lONS oz this Act ghalt
ai +h 3 tet
said Authority shal
= +h --5 1974, Gc ‘la ~ 2) fo pean 14a ne On ae a +o - tree VD ln Fes "un
nave the qualities Save all the aquailties ana incidents of ne gotiavie iNstruments
moral nm ee
ana incicents or
aimee GI Si A eae, Gay! A fe Shee 3 aaa r 1.45 5 ee ee
negotiable undex the laws ot this state anc are neresy aeciared 16
nstruments
j 1 < . RIA ane a A gs
OG issued ior an ¢SsSenvlal public ana govern mental purposes,
5 Ay aaa oy ee ay ht Ue aa et aaa at Wits 4a AHS
aac the property, obligations and interest on the obligations
E =
eh Ae A ig Ep eit ae shall hae awranrnsst 4 rom a 1 taxation Within
OL LAG AULIOPriLy sila. C Crepe Iz to NATLOT LalLt
inserting in licu thercoz
&@ new sudsection (h) which shall read as follows:
Hy Rance 4] 5 A xn dda oy gag 4 = 1, . -] }- maaled
(h) Bonds of the Authority may be sold by pub
+
oO
a
cr
r
or
H
Cc
=
Gz,
ta
me
eo
We
=
G
fi
C
c
be
ts
£
ct
BH
Oo.
_
—
~
re
ct
Ke
Ey
aeltermiues
+ oe | Sei bey he aw Balan et! a ie ee ie Tee Oa dee To
ay Sale WY DUbLIC COL iE evlilive Hbiadin’ is
te the require-
sa ent thar hye Wc + s " 1 tnt i oo ak, A a ay 4
ment that bonds be in the best interest of the Authority with respect
competitive bidding any purticulay issue of bunds, the advertising of the
a de wig, tel OS Aa Re a eis Oy =a,
MmOUuce OL S416 and INViItation to bla wita
shall be advertised as is customarily done in the handling
Osa ced.
a l4(b) as to these
ids
OL vovernmenta. bond issues ana seca
+
jwiecr efr orm
SUBSECLON (3) OL Section oe v¥Y 2hc insect 7 ame 22 Leo!
@ Mew subsection (Pp) Wich snes. Yeac 45 1OLLOoOWs:
or ity snall be contirmed and
A
we “ “a9
(DB) Oras of we Auth
to Clariiy the pro-
eaure for the val ida-. aed’ 54 aa) Hey D2 et aaa tt = T sr ey Le es pe oe a ee ee
. . setition fox valication shall also maxe Darty GeLicnaant &
tion of revenue bonds
VO suc action any munici [res lity, Country, GULNGLILY,
Mae yuidighs aarws _pteretiey Td ae. Bip nk ee a eR ge eS pp ett
LNSerumentlasiry OP GQeparincne Oo. The ocate
suuvdivisicn,
ot Georgi
A
Will bE Authority for
an tie ty oe bs le avy “A Ha teenead and eauadh? fn
g2Gj)ect Tor wWAicA ponds ale .O ue Lssuecd and SOUS tO
such municipality, county, 2
Ww valia ated and SUC ifitiis
1. 17 Fo .
mmt shail be
SUDULVISION, Inslrumenvalicy or ¢
a huw
to limit the sources
from which reloca-
tion payments may
be made
required to show cause, if any, why such contract
or contracts and the terms and conditions thereof
shovld not be inquired into by the court and the
Validity of the terms thereof to be determined and
the contract or contracts adjudicated as security
for the payment of any such bonds of the Authority.
The judgment of validation shall be final and con-
clusive with respect to such bonds, and the security
therefor, against the Authority, and against any
= ental ir od <5 ue : eS c 2 in Cee
mentality or department of the State of Georgia, iia
wer Neda Waee
oa fw , 4 a % mi
eit 20K alerews
SUBSECCTGN (Oy WHICH SHods. Teac as ib..0Ws
i7is) The Sar ya pw ah] a ee
.~) ne Auth Paby Ss... have ine POWer LO Sresasc
re
or with re ct to such persons. The relocation pzy-
ments referred to in this subsection (b) shail not be
by the Authority nor from revenues or funds which absent
stand as a pledye for the payment of bonds of the Authority
or the interest thercon.!
aid Act is farther amended by strikinv thercfrom
subsecotion (c) of Section 15 in its entircty and inserting in lieu thereof
anew subsection (c) which shall read as follows:
ment of obligations
hall not be voidable
after validation
"(c) Any contract or transaction of the Authority in-
VolViT de Guide of tabeaenak aol disclaged dade atte
section (a) hereof, or a violation of the act of the General
he
wm
Ww
©
1p
uy
a
p
G
'd
H
oO
<
pu
te
<
po
tl
Qa
yr
he
Q
he
sO
on
ye
_
kK
so
o~
i>
{,
.
c*
*.
mo
*
™N
o~
e
—
7
applicable to the Authority, its Board members, officers,
ble by the Board; provided, however, a judgment and
order validating bonds of the Authority, as in Section 10
provided, shall constitute a final anc conclusive adjudication
that no such conflict of interest exists with respect to such
voncs or any contra OF transaction which constizutces
ee es Gay A abode, Sea ees tee eee! Tac od eee re ol og a a,
Section 12. Said. Actis further amended by striking thereirom
subsection (b) of Section 17 in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereoi a
new sub tion (b) which shall reac as follows:
expand the period
time within which
idgets shall be pro-
ed and reviewed
— ae ar ty on a4 s 5 sam =a es 1
annval operating budget for the ensuing fiscal year and
+S
hold a public hearing thercon. Aiter such public heaving
the Board shall review its proposed budget, and, on or
i watts Larlhna* Re th Boer eta ee SE ess ee '| slo ye ro.
annual operating budeet sor the ensuing tiscal Year. in
- oa = ao
the annual operating budget each operating funda snails be
ih
C
ct
th
balance to be available at the beginning of the year, an
estimate of anticipated credits during the year according
ct
o
uw
©
Go
Lar]
O
G
ph
i
e
ct
nr
et
a
pe
et
o
o
By
§3
a
En.
Oo
B
&
ig
G
oo
0
by
4
H
ges, including
= fs
irom anticipated revenues, and comparative data on the
last two completed fiscal years and similar data, actual
=
x estimated, for the current year."
Section 13, Said Act is further amended by striking therefrom
Section 15 which reads as follows:
WSection 18, Engineering Survey. Atleast every three
. ; ;
years, the Board s hall employ a firm of qualified in-
dependent engineers to survey the condition of the
to delete the require-
ment of an engineer-Authority's facilities and operations from an engineering
ing survey every
three
years
stanapoint ane make a report trereor 4 nd any Tecor mime»naa
=r = 2a ate de ia a, Bay a SARS nest Gh
tions tor iraprovement i in 1s P ayelceas Tacllities ana
operating procedures. Copies of such report sha-l be
LUTEisnece TO cath iocal geverning youy Oo. @acn Local
- 45 Shea a ee ay asa be
fOVE@TIEnt in the Mervropvoultan area.
Min) erwa, i sfae Mi :
im ils caeiresy,.
Ae a's antes: | Liat Ont Anat ta game ar Semended BU striking thereiron
SCcCtion -«. DSalGd Hot 1s luriner Gmenadea oy sirising eheresro.
pes yo ge jee Hh atten! I = = en ? -_ seo dy ye = eae an ep ay = Te ass FSG =
subsection (b) of Section 21 in its entirety and inserting Im dieu thereor
9 - ee he * tls
New sulbacctien fis) which shall L
OL) he Authority shall also be cxerapt frum any regulation
to clarify the relation
of the Authority to py the Public Service Commission of this State."
the Public Bact
Commission Section 15. Said Act is furtner amended by striking therefrom
which shail read as Zollows:
Scevion 22 in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof a new Section 2¢
me
mk
shall not enjoy governmental immunity from tort Nability,
but shall be Mable therefor as any private corporation
except that no execution shall be levied on any property
of the Authority prior to ninety (90) days from the date
against the Authority. The Authority
ky,
i
F
f
f
+
to
o
pn
ga
i
=]
oO
5
cr
©
o
shall provide for adequate insurance or similar protection
against any loss, liability or other risk, hazard or
tO permit the s
Authority to act as responsibility to which it may be exposed or which it
a self-insurer
may accept on account of its property, personnel, or
Se ee san Ts aed ‘ an = : a a a4] #15. +
Operations. Such insurance may be provided through
- r 4,
ments with other parties in such manner and amounts
as the Board in its discretion shall determine, '
=
Section 24 in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof anew Section 24
"AP stan toy oo Z 1 ow
WICK sla. Teac as zol LOWS
Tinsa | inte Aros Baads Kteneen fa) Saas
+ Lowal rOVeE Dre ene raw wiCiparion, \eJ ro-
eM ete Mate see A peoeten pe oe Me tte Pte, he eee ae ate MS ts
VWisi0n lor @ rapic translit SYStCIN WiILhIn tne Mc rroepo.ivan
=
area is declared ior the purposes oi this Act
governmental function and a public purpose of the City of Atlanta
and the counties of Fulton, DeKalb, Clayton and Gwinnett, and
to modify the pro-
cedures whereby of the county of Cobb if it hereafter determines to participate
local governments
4 th & 32 . 7 = 7 7 ad re 3 iy t
and other public in the Authority as provided in this Act,
bodies may partici-
pate in financing (5) The Board and the local governing body of the City of
and supporting a
rapid transit Atlanta and each of the counties of Fulton, DeKalb, Ciayton,
system
aad Gwinnett, and of the county of Cobb if it hereafter
determines to participate in the Authority as provided
in this Act, subject to such limitations as are herein-
4.
aiter in this section set forth, may negotiate
* 1
and determine the extent of financial participation
and the time or times such Linancial participation may
be required with respect to each of the local governments
tality of the Authority. If such
determination contemplates a contractual obligation on the
part of a local government to make payments to the Authority
ll take the form ofa bapac transit
fn
+
etermination sh
contract to be en
the local government. The final execution of a rapid
transit contract shall be completed .in every instance
in the manner hercinafier sct forth in this Section 24.
A i
<
ao
ut
Cy
*
©
0
H
,
1 at etnntthn id & Ba ade dearent = pag tes pth ete ias, bata fate ce: items ete eden
GCetverminegda SY its 16Ca. GOVErning JOGY lO ve tbs PYrOpecr sate
# oe ‘ a 20 . i
OL The Coste oi financing a apie transie projece or projeces,
ta
+ ; x
&@ .OCal povernmens: may i the manner prescr ibed by law and
aay Se ee «| Js de = a= 1, = sy -
sub ECT LO The conditions and limitations prescricca by -aw,
= cea ate = 1 Ins aes + = as el = a = = sa =a c
issue its ceneral obligation ooncs, pay over the proceccs
=} af ¢5. +1 etl $ ty el may] ae 5 toy San a
vhereor to the Authority anc tneresy complete anu Mmaxe tinal
the execution of the proposed rapic transit convract anticipated
b anThorigati J tt 2a) irs nd the sapeq 2]
by such bond authorization and issuance and the Authority shail
fen al aot Sar ata ern Tae eek ol a ty:
agree in sucA contract to periorm ior sucn local government
Te Hey Ae ee 5 per] 2 nant A wi es ate at oe ee = Fhe 2 al 42}5 _ eee
Ae aroresaia governmental function ana to provide the necessary
transportation services and facilities.
45 a ax wa Tides og 7
) As aa alternative method of . providi ne the financial par ticipa
by its local governing body to be its proper snare
- 10-
ol the cost of financing a ray
vid transit project or projects, a
local government may enter into a rapid transit contract or
contracts calling for the Authovity to perform for it the aforesaid
overnmental function and calling for it to mak: ‘criodic payments
Gt
to the Authority for the public transportation services and
the cost of any rapid transit project or projects,
reserves in connection with the
a
ro
fy
»
+
Oo
Gg
ct
a
Ft,
n
©
ww
fu
ar
a
ow
ct
yy
oO
HY
<
Hs
oO
aw
end amounts required to defray any operational deficit which
caf =1 ee | 2 oe the wae anh a asa a He is a ASA
{ec} = local governing pocy m1ey proceca on1 ics OWN Tesolution
poy 0 eet pe Ta ye wae) ees SF een irs oy 0 5 evenid transit
LG COW osGes anc Maw fina. eee CeCe ON GO. a Sele ew aloat
. : Pte an 1, ERAS Ws GS Ea Be detest an oo ca
CONITaACt such 25 15 CA@scrivea in suoscction (c) at 2b CELCTITINES
a =e
that the financial pa
reasonably be financed without the levy of any new or
cour Pete Tan re Phe pte tiy sibiahed waiddinte ahee bea tates Ya
in this event, the resolution of the local governing body
. = ten
be financed without the levy of any new or increased tax
(i) Otherwise, before a rapid transit contract such as is
described in subsection (d) is executed between the Authority
‘ gh? oo Fu Lh a ee ant, newt’
and a local government, the locel governing body sail call
an ‘election and shall submit to the qualified voters oi such
local government in a referendum as hereinafter provided,
the question whether or not the local government should enter
snio & rapid transit contract or contracts calling for it to make
limitation or limitations proposed by such local governiny body.
subsection (2) shall be as follows: The local governing body
e published in a newspaper having general
wh
sf
ws
gp
7
+
oO
ey
GC
uw
QO
ct
o
ov
Til
local government
Fh
circulation throughout the territory o
rc
ih 5 = =
involved, once each,week for three weeks immediately precedin
che week during which the referendum is to be held, a notice to
the electors thereof that on the day named therein an election
will be held to determine the question whether or not the local
eovernment shall enter into a rapic transit contract or contracts
Pie, Bay what aS Ae’ on cs Dats. eats ete ee. ge Shea abeteeetteie Staak
CG.s1y .Or lt es AK BELLOuLe eV TMCMes Mo Leo SeULGLley Weicliin
tac PATCoCuUsar Monetary limitation or. liniitations PEGIVscG vy
Sitters ie my Ar Suc! ma A ot ea] eT is ssanll We Kale .
euci. LOVerning eocy. ucn special aiecction Snall be Hela at
ad Sein +h a: a ye ges 4 asa 7 a5 5 ‘* =. -
tS Within tie Territorial 13 TLitS OF Tae
a
such county which is witain
"9
©
gp
Ub
a
i
a
rf,
oO
ot
oD
te
iS
t
ic]
r-F
n
i
f
¢
<<
x
fu
Kh
ct
oO
By
tne territorial limits of the City of Atlanta iz, with respect to
project or projects to be supported
ct
5
Oo
nm
fu
a
ct
Et
2
c
—
~
in
H
33]
rm
a]
oO.
ct
K
fy
4
wm
pe
cr
by the proposed rapid transit contract of such county, said City
. AAG
is already a party to a rapid transit contract or the governing
subject to the approval thereof ata referendum. The question
to be presented to the electorate of a local government and set
forth on the ballot shall be determined by the local
governing body and it shall set out the monetary limitation
y limitations, if any, proposed by the local governing
Yo4il Sy 2 Ys pror GC yu a1 Governing
body with respect to the amounts of the periodic payments
to be made under any such rapid transit contract or contracts.
The ballot subniitting the question shall be in a form determined
by the local governing body, and the form of the ballot shail
+1.
the aloresaid notice. Hach such
Fi
be published as a parto
election called by the governing body of a county within the
metropolitan area under the provisions of this subsection
is hereby declared to be a county election and shall be
governed by anc conducted in accordance with the provisions
Hy,
or the Georgia Election Code. The board of re
=
each county shall provide the necessary lists for conductin
a Te ps] The a = Te age ee a be ep aes —n
2 GL WLI 1s count Af er COnso.icartion,
‘ oy a SG ‘ - = 42, ane wh etch in
wee OPGIMEGTY sileil 2aTiSIMIE Ene TeUNPEsS Gf, 518 an electivun
an
GUtLhOTILY Caliumnag the election, Gr its
7 = 3
4 i See tig Te “| lan Gat = +5 [4 = 7+
who shall Orliciawy deciare the Tesule, Bach
G
election called by the governing body of the City of Atlanta
under the provisions of this subsection shall be governed by
and conducted in accordance with the provisions of law,
including specifically the charter of said City, at the time
1olding of elections by said City. The expense
of any such election called by the governing body of the City
4 om an 1 = 7
<2 ee 7
OL AtleaTita Sail OS
paid by the City of Atlanta,
ioe
+
nody shall be autnorized to agrec upon and
compiete anc make final the execution of a rapid transit
contract or contracts subject to such monetary limitation
: limitations as were proposed to the electorate and in
atl a . Cea he A om ae
i the terms of this Act,
7
(2) A local government may elect any method provided in
al
t
vo
=
o
r
aq
oO
H
r 1
DD
u
f
F
a
i
td
fu
ct
Po)
QO
G
b
oO
oO
ct
lad
Oo
ry
o
By
Oo
rt
o
»
BS
o
o
un
ai
m
-
-
i
oO
or
preclude the election of another mcthod with respect thereto
C
hi
<
pas
ay
ue
espect to any additional or supplementary participation
en
ace i tq kh / cag
Letermliined to be necessarx Ye
’
(3) When the Authority ana a local government have completed
“Ln sana a a ve 4h ge Aap ~a5 mS te. oie 17 Sy te
wae TEQUITEIMEents OL this Act, such contract snail constitute
a ébiteatiineg av eke at nt wh ae ee ee eee ht eat yest
GN OODLE aelOon on the pare of the local sovernment tor tre weyiteae
L =
hs ee aA aS) aha 5 ot a a a ee ee
OL WALCAD ivs GOOd iailn anc es fGdit are WAcGUCa, War lin ne Gece
sledved With resvect
ret * 5 ti 5 a ates ee <hr a alae Bs aE ee ote
(x) Any local government may use public funds to provice tor
ff] cea ="7 3 == 4 > Veen = a o+ Team,
4 rapid transit system within the metropolitan area and may
ta aclSie
ry to Zultiil the oblig
ts
fn
contract ox contracts with the Authority; provided, that no
lucal county government shall have the power to levy any tan
ect ol taxation situated within the terr
= “- eae * bs yates 47
of the City of Atlanta in fulfillment of financial obligations set
3 “ -— = 4 . Ste ft Pa ag ee
svta in a rapid transit contract when the City of Atiania nas a
7
oO renumber
th the Authority calling for said
City to issue its general obligation bonds for rapid transit
purposes or to pay monics periodically with respect to the
aebt service on obligations issued by the Authority, and is it-
Hi
QO
Py
|
Q
+
rE
Sesr Using its puslic iuncs or levying a tax Ior eithe
(i) Any municipality or county within the metropolitan Larea
may transier to the Authority any property or facilities, or
verde any services, wilh or without consideration, which
contract with t
the establistunent, operation or administration of sucn
+ : eis erent Fa Sey Ss ~
eYoavuelh, GY any pare OF DProjee. moereos OY ene Usud- iacililles
oe Hyit @20, i
ee ~ 7 Sate ae wont ys sess aed bye
wee baee te ee
an 45 98 Ye. Fa ea OH 4} : he rte HS gh a ES ons aire, Sth
a4, “=U, Sa, S45 G9, O45, S65 GNC 20 thc reol 50 elas mcreaive sr sala eOCrlons
‘i Be ate ne eT ig 3n 2 35 tte “Sls, San pe. ek fos made :
shail be kmown as Sections 15, 19, 20, <1, £4; 43, 22 ana £5, respectively,
and any teiere: ;
1 [eek = 4 ast, 4 ae aa a "340 Eide. ce ty eae AA
March +, i960 and by the preceding -anguage of this amencatory “ct, to
; Ph Oe eer awHrAAaAT A saris 5 Ne os ee _ sn ice .
PRLCr to tne aco plion of this amen atory act, are Nerebsy chahgec so tler
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 21, Folder 5, Document 30
Box 21
Box 21 Folder 5
Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/70e3b01ebec5e9a42deff525fe264354.pdf
686beab7b981dad442a952753b46664c
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
S·c
.S1..' ',..1t0'.·~
""1: Ct.1-:t z.:..:1d
..;oh>:1son oi the -±2r.d , \Vesu -::r.-y oi the 37 th, Ma c :.tyre o" the
ot}1c:.A
s
T.) be ·ntitlc . a.~ Act ·:·o · rn nd an Act kr,,ow::1 a - ti':c "Me tro -
par::c\.."iL.1. · :i.y by a.
w ·,th : 7.o c.ha:--.ge ih~ provisions reL,t.~.g
p. 326 4; , :cs fo.-Y·t::e:-:·
A
app1 ovc
r .e ,.YJ~a·-.::i.:.:::: g of i:, e::- so:r.a1. se::T.co.s
me::r..de::d ·ty : :--.:3e :~r.in.g in Seer.: ,:)!: 8 of sa~c'. Act
.t,ereor,
'
a:--i.d •vh~.c h s 1:--.c:.ll -::-ca.cl a· £0110·.v
S. 3 . l
L
fol~ 0 "1.vin.g
�11 •
•'
.. 1,
--,]
_,1c
•
1
ewe.:: to invest anc. rein ves t any or all idle fund::; or
110:11es, :.:.1culuing but no t limi · d to , funds held in r eserve or
ebt
2:etire::1.ent , or r- ce1vecl t h ough the issuance of reve nue ce rtificates
or fr::>:.:1 co:.nr ' bur ons, gi ·
~
o . gr ants, wh ' ch cannot be imrnediately
i.:sc · J:o;_· the pc:rpose io · wh· ch :::eceived ,
.n
any security or
securiti- s \vh:ch ace 1 gal inve strnen ts £or Executors or Trust ees ,
_J:,:ovided, however, tha-c such investr.c1.ents in such securities will,
at aL -cin:es, be held for arJ.c: ,vhe . sold used for "the purposes for
whicn the money was orig i, ally received .
Se c;.. io, 2 .
Said
11
ct is furt1er an nde d by striking therefr o m
Section · 2 thereoi n i'"s entirety and insertir g i:.1 lieu thereof a ne w Section
wh ich snall read as follows:
11
l2
The Au ho i ty shall have t 1 . e power of emi ent domc:.in
or tl"
e purpose oi acquiring pr op erty needed fo_ the purp os es oi t 11e
Al...thority .
Condenu1ation proceedings for ·the ac _uisition of su c h
prop rt.y shall be in accordance -,; ~th t he provisio. s contained 1n
C'1aptcr:::: 36-1 th · ough 36-6, of the Cod =- of Geo ;:(a of 1 933 , as
&:c:-.ended, C hapte1· 36 - 11 of the Code of Geo'rgia of 1933, as an1ended,
or any and all other procedures now or herea ter granted by ti1e
· c:.ws and Constitution of Georgia, including but not limi-ced to the
?:COcedu::e set for;;h nan Act approved M2. rch 13, 1957 (Ga . Laws
1 93 7, p. 387 1, as amended , to pers o ns or corporations ·.a vin.g 1:h
p n v i c ge of ex ercising the ·ight o · eminent do1nai
In addition to
sc:..ch 1:,owc::: oI emine:. t do nain, the City of Atlanta a 1d ·he Countic s
o i Fulton, De K c1.lb, Claywn ancl Gwinnett (and the County of Cobb
~n t he e::ve nt that i t sha li p ar tic ip a t e ) may for the purposes o th e
S . B . 111
- 2-
.
/,..---....,.,,,
\
\
'
~
�..,
A·..:..::ority ex rcise the b:i.•00.dcst. power o_ eminent doma i:1. av3.i lable
to : •. "'rn or any agency o:;: j o int a:::;2.1cy· thereo ·, unde:r any Stabxi:e ,
..r:.d. convey to the Authority any :_:>:.:-oper y so acquired U:'._:)On payment
o ::.· c:cdit for tl e total cos·.: 0£ any acqt:is ition he re DC'.. r .
r.0
local gov er 1ing bo 'y sl1.all exc r ci se any- power
'1.e ::.· ei..,nd e:c \: ith ·esp ct to propert
limi:~s .
emin ent don1ain
loca . . ccl beyond i s ter1:i·torial
11
S -· c ion 3 .
Said Ac 1s f, rtl1c _.. a::-r1en c
sec'.:ion C) of Section 8 t er of, i:1. it
a new subsection \Vhich shall rea
an
o:i:
However ,
e. ti l·ety , an
by striking he re fro 1., sub serting in lieu thereof
L
as fo low :
em:)loyees , includ ing e.,2:ineeri:1:;; , a~:c '1.itcct
al .:..n
const1·uctio.
experts , fiscal agents an c. 2.'.:to :.: .. eys , ·co contr2.c io:· the se vices of
individuals or organizati.ons not er11.p loyed full tirne by ·.:he Authority ,
0 t who ar- engaged prii·:-.,_:i::- ::. ly in. 'c:-.Le re . . d ' tion
&::G.
not the sale o
goods o:.: n:e:::c: an 1se, such
ers o::-.Lc:.l services
0
s but not li r:1itcd
to ·cne services o_ attorn ys, 2..c co u.2Y'::ant s, engi :. ee ~ s, 2.::- c ite c ts ,
consult;::i.nts and adviso _ , . 2l i.owi:-.::, suitable compcnsatio .. and to
m2.ke p1~ovisions fo:c groll,;::_, 1_1:.suyar~ce , i· - ti1·2r.:1ent o · othe
be:.1.eiit arrangements .
Sc c:ion
Lt
e1ni)loycc
11
All laws o r
p .... ::: " o f laws in conflict
wil 'l t . . i s Act 2.re
r. e:c e;oy rep ec1 l e d .
\;0':2~:
\Ve z..~::::o request that the
ast se tcn ce in Section 1-± ( · )
b~ dclet ' c.: 2.1c.
i:.1. .L:..et: thereof the followin g s b s ituted :
.'oc.:-..:'.:."..-5 i:"\. t:-.is .Se.ctio~1 s hall .&f->> y to co·.:1.'c acts for ., ofe.~sion2.l sc ~v:.. c r::.J c :c ·c ne p~ rso n.21 se:..~vic~s o::.· e:nploye.es, or ·::o conc.:··2cts f
o:c
s2-~-
vie.:.:.; o-Z. ::..·.1d.ividuals or o rgc:..niz.:. tio. s not employed full tir:1e. oy ':l.e.
143.215.248.55hc~ity bat who are engaged primari ly in the re.nditio2 ~f J~~son2~
s~rv~c=s ~~d not the sale of goods and m~rchandise., such
services of a~tcrneys, accountants, e.ngir:.c'-'rs,
':::ect.J. co;.--:.sultants and advi sors
o
,
.
i.::.::'"'c i.\l--
�.,::__..,_
..
-
A BILL
} .. :: Act ·co .:..n:..~r:d
E1
Act known as ·.:he:
~~;:) ic. T:·:..ns::.t _.;.x.ti.10::: ity A-:t or 1965,
,~
\.....i~••
11
11
?v:::etropolitan Atla:.:.:a
,,:_)p:cov,;d Maren lC, 1965 (C:••
Laws 1966, p.
priv:..ttdy
t::::-z.r:.si·.:
Ll
u ·. . c rn.ctropol i tan are2; ·co ~c::ic:te c:. provision subjecting sa::.
...\.utl-:..ority :o liaoili...:y fo ... c rt air... ::::cco :.r. ey s :ees of adverse parties ; -~o
.:J. ....1Ql~'-"-v'-"
. ,. . . . . ·- -:. \ ·V ,•. .•. lC
. -.. pu.
., ., b1· ;.. C b OQlC::,
- . , . . ::,2.H
. . .: ...:J...
,\ -
__ ,...,
.
.I.
.h.Ul,l.O .. J..y
~
[nay .... or...l,,.
•
,....
....... -
.... .I.-.
• • •• ,
- ·
.... .....
•
.:
ct l.-c Wl cl1 ?CJ. l,alLJ..
g
..:o its p ·r:)oscs ; Io authorize loc.::.i gove:;:::.·.mcnts to pay opcr2tional s"Gb -
... even-..:e bo:-.1.C:.s ; ::o
'
Ir..e
rn&y ~(; ::::-.c.z..<le; to prov::.de
s e c 1...::::-i:y
.01·
t:
2.t con..::: a.cts
2..:-... ct
tra::::-.sactio:is co:.1s 's itt::-.:i. g
t::-i.e ?a 1 1-:..--icnt of obligations sl:a: l not be voidc:.blc a:t12r v2..hdatio:-:,.;
".ib
iod of '.:i::.-r. . c withir, wbich budgc·cs shz.ll be pro::ioscc.
st:rvcy cvi:..;ry ..... ., . .
')
L, .... .1.. I,,..;\.,;
w :.:e: : c .) 1 :cc::il 6 ove::.:r.:m-::nts and oC:..cr pubL.c bodies n1::i.y partici:J::.tc ~--
0 _ ::.-. <;
P... ...: t ; an<... 1:o :r r.Jthe: r p u :c )Os c s.
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
C
ica
ENATE BibhL 111
By: Senators Johnson of the 42nd, Wesberry of the 37th, Macintyre of the
the
+O0th and oa = >
A BILL
To be entitled an Act To amend an Act known as the ''Metro-
politan Atianta Rap‘'d Transit Autherity Act of 1965,"! approved March 10,
1965 Ga. Laws 1965, p. 2243), as amended, particularily by an Act approved
Cra. Laws 1966, p. 3254), so as to authorize the Mei ropoiitan
transit Authority to publicize its activities and functions; to
authorize sa.d Authozity to invest and :einvest anv and all idle funds or
Monies a4 certain specified investments, lo authorize said Authuvity te
exercise the power of eminent domain and the procedure in connection there-
with; to change the provisions relating tc the optaining of personai services
by the Authority: to repeal conflicting saws; and for other puzposes
UINACTED 3% THE CENERAL ASSEMBLY OF GEORG
Section 1. An Act known as the Metropolitar, Arlania Rap:d T»ansit
Authority Act of 19605, approved March 10, 19¢5 Gra. Laws 1905, p. 2245;
as amended, particulariy by an Act approved March 4, 19¢r ("G2 Laws i9co,
p. 3264), is further amended hy -nsezting in Section 8 of said Act following
subsection ‘pi thereof, two {2} new subsections which shell be known as
subsections (gq) and (r', and which shall read as follows:
Pt
ay +t
. oad
he power to puol.icizge in any way it may deem prope:
any and all activities and functions ci the Authority. including but
ant to
r limited to, the resvits of any activities conducted pursuat
subsection fe, of this Section,
laf as —
, she power to invest and reinvest any or all idle funds or
monies, inculding but not limited to, funds held in reserve or debt
tirement, or received through the issuance of revenue certificates
or irom contributions, giits or grants, which cannot be immediately
used for the purpose for which received, in any security or
securities which ave legal investments for Executors ox Trustees,
provided, however, that such investments in such securities will,
at all times, be held for and when sold used for the purposes for
which the money was originally received.'!
Section 2. Said Act is further amended by striking therefrom
Section 12 thereof in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof a new Section
which shall read as follows:
']2. The Authority shall have the power of eminent domain
zor the purpose of acquiring property needed for the purposes oi the
Authority. Condemnation proceedings for the acquisition of such
roperty shall be in accordance with the provisions contained in
rc}
(5
Chapters 36-1 through 36-6, of the Code of Georgia of 193
, as
amended, Chapter 36-11 of the Code of Georgia of 1933, as amended,
or any and all other procedures now or hereaiter granted by the
oS
laws and Constitution of Georgia, including but not limited to the
e =
procedure set forth in an Act approved March 13, 1957 (Ga. Laws
7, 37), as amended, to persons or corporations having the
—
wo
i
nm
eS)
1
privilege of exercising the right of eminent domain. In addition to
such power of eminent domain, the City of Atlanta and the Counties
oi Fulton, DeKalb, Clayton and Gwinnett (and the County of Cobb
in the event that it shali participate) may for the purposes of the
Authority exercise the broadest power of eminent domain available
to them or any agency or joint agency. thereof, under any Statute,
and convey to the Authority any property so acquired uvon payment
r credit for the total cost of any acquisition hereunder, However,
no local governing body shall exercise any power of eminent domain
hereunder with respect to property located beyond its territorial
limits.
Section 3. Said Act is further amended by striking therefrom, sub-
section (b) of Section 8 thereof, in its entirety, and inserting in lieu thereof
@ new subsection which shall read as follows:
"tb) The power to appoint, select aad employ officers, agents
and employees, including engineering, architectural and construction
J “SS
experts, fiscal agents and attorneys, to contract for the services of
individuals or organizations not employed full time by the Authority,
but who are engaged primarily in the rendition of personal services
f£ goods or merchandise, such as but not limited
a}
bie
c
g
Oo
ct
es
iy
o
Q
p
—
o
o
to the services of attorneys, accountants, engineers, architects
consultants and advisors, aliowing suitable compensation and to
make provisions for group insurance, retirement or other employee
benefit arrangements. "'
Section 4. All laws or parts of laws in conflict with this Act are
NOTE: We algo request that the last sentence in Section 14 (a) be deleted and
in lieu thereof the following substituted:
Nothing in this Section shall .apply to contracts for professional ser~
vices or the personal services of employees, or to contracts for ser-
vices of individuals or organizations not employed full time by the
Authority but who are @asaeae primarily in the pendittonx of personal
services and not the sale of goods and merchandise, such as but not
limited to the services of attorneys, accountants, engineers, archi
tects, consultants and advisors.
be
ti
Hi
c
an
te We ER Benn ek do a re ae ak = Ha
4 sict to amend an Act known as the "Metropolitan Atlanta
Rapid Transit Authority Act of 1965," approved March 106, 1965 (Ga.
243), as amended, ¢
Pp
riticularly by an Act approve
gh
Kg aie tA aa! 1a hh foe = 5 ee ao
March, i900 (Ga, Laws 1966, p. 3264)
may be cuniialived as costs of @ rapid transit system or project; io
: . 7 + aay ak mat om bh 7a 4 Ty =p 4 Oe Fecal ead aed = -
vedere wale Tequilement Ol a snowing lial the Gequisition of a j
rivately
OWHeG transportation system is essential to the development of rapid
se os wes oo ee Fic eat = oe Sad see ey aes © =r]
transit in the metropolitan area; to delete a provision subjecting said
A ag 4s « ee re a ee £ * Se ee ee
suthority to liability for certain attorneys fees of adverse parties; to
indicate which public bodies said Authority may contract with pertainin
+ ato ——= 9a = oe _ + a} ay = 5 =~ 1 — ~ =35— - = 7 ~
tO 1tS purposes; to authorize toca. fovernments to pay ot
esficae «= sae -» a7) =e Aa = aac die ae = pe. ates fae = tee
sidies anc to contract with said Authnorit bY Telative twnereto; to eliminate
tt Sonny, Lm sar Saye may ] Ln] eer eo aap oT eee
fleion ror jucicial review o2 Charces OF SETVices lixcac Gb
ae |e pt ta abet 7k eae Pee * me as VP La ey el a ee ert. ese
StUeOTaeY, 4O Ceierve Teculrermicnis tra. TeVenve YOoncs Gi stiu shee Orley
ee ee = Wa” ye em at (ele Be cide ne ieee eee
ye sola upon competitive bidding, Ge wed eet SCarliny itlecrest: oe a Pau
Fit tape een mate Ines Seat egy elec! a “ oe a Cee ees
POL ChccuGilne 51> eo . Cerne wer Ginuimi; to provide that all Oosloavuons
4 = +-lq oy aye =~ ae Ve tom 45
me oo tl able instrument 5; TO Clarily tne pYrocewure lol
2 d
1 7 4 ahs aa (ie nah de al A eed
TEyvyenue ooncs) TO 2imiit The sources 1r3om which Pe.OCcation paylments
Aaya S eae ote aa ae -F nate ote as teanea rts = anneiienes
may 5e¢ made; to provide that contracts and transactions constituti 1G
ae eee ee —- +. & i 14 =
security for the payment of obligati
E
’ eee - “bh ee oe! esa aay ce ae Apeate oie tt a5 Se pers Sead api
to uxbandc the period of time within which budgets shall be proposed and
z :
rev-cwed;'to delete the recuirement of an engineering survey every three
7 . 4 j 4 oe 40] = 4. ~ 1 5 a qaccagt se ~t57t
Years, tO C-arliy ine Foiation Go. tne Authority to the Publi Service WOlilis silGa,
=!
“, + : "A net se = - =, 1 + 2455 _ + dae - ee aces
ta permic the Authority to act as a seli-insurer; to modify the procecures
es may parti
to renumber certain se
je Aa x } was Tsay 4
OD. UNG #4Crt, and 20Fr other p
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 21, Folder 5, Document 29
Box 21
Box 21 Folder 5
Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/0db695ea0a88e369966e914b43d6769a.pdf
0e28a3ae51b0b7f9e59f5cfaee7831b2
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
BUDGET REPORT
AUOUSX· ' 31 -~. 196 7'.
BUDGET
1967
Unappropriated Surplus
ACTUAL
JANUARY 1, 196 7
TO
AUGUST 31, 1967
$128,281.64
$128,281.64
$ 84,030.00
23, 19o'. 00
82,770.00
91,800.00
18,210.00
$300,000.00
$ 5,520.00
$ 63,022.50
17,392 . 50
41,385.00
68,850.00
9,10_5_.9~
$199,755 . 00
~
3,018.77
$ 95,000.00
276,000.00
$371,000.00
$676,520.00
$804,801.64
$ 60,000.00
67,686.12
597.46
$1 28,283.58
~"$331, 057. 35
$459,338.99
$ 68,950.00
10,500.00
$ 41 , 380.94
7,048. 24
1 ,109.00
533.00
1 , 680.00
10,000.00
99.00
$ 92 ,871.00
$ 3,150.00
1, 088.89
400 . 00
758.13
300.54
104.00
$ 51 I 080. 74
$ 2 , 200.00
iNCOM)<';
Appropriations:
City of Atlanta
Clayton County
DeKalb County
Fulton County
Gwinnett County
Sub-Totals
Interest Income
Federal Funds:
702 Loan
Section 9 Grant
Interest - Federal Funds
Sub-Totals
TOTAL INCOME
TOTAL INC0?1E AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS
0
EXPENSES
Staff Cost:
Salaries
Expenses
Benefits:
Social Security
Guaranty Fund
Health and Accident Insur~nce
Retirement
Workmen's Compensation
Aub - Totals
Board Mee t i ngs
Administrative and Office Overhead:
Rent
Communications and Postage
Furniture and Equipment
Suppli e s
Print ing
Auditor
Ac countant
Publi c Informat ion
Advi sor y
Ins urance:
Pub l ic Liabi.lity
Depository and forgery
Fidelity Bond
Sub-Tot;als
CARRIED FORWARD
$
3,000.00
2, 000.00
2, 000 . 00
3,6 00 . 00
1, 000 . 00
25 0 . 00
1 , 000 . 00
33, 000 . 00
5, 000 . 00
72. 00
56.00
199.00
$ 51 , 177.00
$147,198.00
$
2 , 000.00
1,254 . 16
117 . 81
1 , 854 . .58
623.56
25 0 . 00
500 . 00
15, 025 .20
977. 35
55. 00
56.27
198 .60
$ 22,9 12.53
$ 76, 193.27
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
BUDGET REPORT
AUGUST’ 31,. 1967.
Unappropriated Surplus
INCOME
Appropriations:
City of Atlanta
Clayton County
DeKalb County
Fulton County
Gwinnett County
Sub-Totals
Interest Income
Federal Funds:
702 Loan
Section 9 Grant
Interest - Federal Funds
Sub-Totals
TOTAL INCOME
TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS
EXPENSES
Staff Cost:
Salaries
Expenses
Benefits:
Social Security
Guaranty Fund
Health and Accident Insurance
Retirement
Workmen's Compensation
Aub-Totals
Board Meetings
Administrative and Office Overhead:
Rent
Communications and Postage
Furniture and Equipment
Supplies
Printing
Auditor
Accountant
Public Information
Advisory
Insurance:
Public Liability
Depository and Forgery
Fidelity Bond
Sub-Totals
CARRIED FORWARD
ACTUAL
JANUARY 1, 1967
BUDGET TO
1967 AUGUST 31, 1967
$128,281.64 $128,281.64
$ 84,030.00 $ 63,022.50
23,190.00 17,392.50
82,770.00 41,385.00
91,800.00 68,850.00
18,210.00 9,105, 00
$300,000.00 $199,755.00
§ 5,520.00 $F B7008 77
$ 95,000.00 $ 60,000.00
276,000.00 67,686.12
0 597.46
$371,000.00 $128,283.58
$676,520.00 $331,057.35
$804,801.64 $459 338.99
$ 68,950.00 $ 41,380.94
10,500.00 7,048.24
1,109.00 1,088.89
533.00 400.00
1,680.00 758.13
10,000.00 300.54
99.00 104.00
$ 92,871.00 $ 51,080.74
$ 3,150.00 $ 2,200.00
$ 3,000.00 $ 2,000.00
2,000.00 1,254.16
2,000.00 117.81
3,600.00 1,854.58
1,000.00 623.56
250.00 250.00
1,000.00 500.00
33,000.00 15,025.20
5,000.00 977.35
72.00 55.00
56.00 56.27
199.00 198.60
$ 51,177.00 $ 22.912,53
$147,198.00 $ 76,193.27
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 21, Folder 5, Document 28
Box 21
Box 21 Folder 5
Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/f38889346de996867a9858eda3892b39.pdf
5107496c1c9c32453f673c502ce07fe0
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
GLENN BU ILD ING / A TL AN TA , GEORG IA 3 0 3 0 3 / AREA CODE 40 4 52 4 -5711
O FFICE RS:
Richard H. Rich, Ch a irm a n
Roy A. Blount, Vic e Chair man
October 16, 1967
Glenn E. Be nn ett, Secreta ry
Henry L. Stuart, Ge nera l Ma nager
Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr., Mayor
City of Atlanta
City Hall
Atlanta~ Georgia.
Dear Mayor Allen:
I am enclosing financial statement of the Metropolitan
Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority as of September 30 , 1967 .
Sincerely yours,
/i-~a4H. L. Stuart,
General Manager .•
HLS:JJ
Enclosur e
cc :
Mr. Mi l ton G. Fa rris
Mr. Cha rles L. Davis
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
ne
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
GLENN BUILDING / ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 / AREA CODE 404 524-5711
OFFICERS:
Richard H. Rich, Chairman
Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman
October 16, 1967 Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary
Henry L. Stuart, General Manager
Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr., Mayor
City of Atlanta
City Hall
Atlanta, Georgia.
Dear Mayor Allen:
I am enclosing financial statement of the Metropolitan
Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority as of September 30, 1967.
Sincerely yours,
4 L-
Vy * H. Le Stuart,
General Manager.
HLS:JT
Enclosure
ccs Mr. Milton G. Farris
Mr. Charles L. Davis
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 21, Folder 5, Document 27
Box 21
Box 21 Folder 5
Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/4acd1e8f5515985a734017252ddfd87d.pdf
3c20ea9e903b42872d4c098e0bb0e1cb
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
1rl
Octbber 24, 1967
MEMORANDUM
To: Mr . Cha:rle
L . Davis
From: R . Earl Land rs
We are attaching hereto the propo ed budget of the Metropolitan
Atlanta Rapid Tran it Authority.
If we do not already have the information, I think it would be
well for us to
cure a complete ro ter of the director and
employees of all of the agencie to which we contribute showing al ries proposed . Thi will n ble ua to at lea t, make
some compari•on a to the
laries b ing paid by the various
genci • with tho e we are able to p y to our offici la .
REL :lp
Atta.chm nt
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
eee
————————
— ee EEO eEG7v™
Octbber 24, 1967
MEMORANDUM
To: Mr. Charles L. Davis
From: R. Earl Landers
We are attaching hereto the proposed budget of the Metropolitan
Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority.
If we do not already have the information, I think it would be
well for us to secure a complete roster of the directors and
employees of all of the agencies to which we contribute show-
ing salaries proposed. This will enable us to at lease make
some comparisons as to the salaries being paid by the various
agencies with those we are able to pay to our officials.
REL:lp
Attachment
——
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 21, Folder 5, Document 26
Box 21
Box 21 Folder 5
Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/6c6538235c6d641c53d1f0ca182852da.pdf
a82e9728a052ac11cc91983e9e49de76
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
November 1, 1967
Mr. Richard H. Rich, Chairman
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
45 Broad Street, S. W.
Atl nta, Georgia 30303
De r Dick:
In view of the f ct that a determination will soon be made on
the federal level as to whether the Urban Mass Transportation
Act should be left in th Department of Hou ing and Urban
Development or trans{ rred to the Department of Tr n portation,
the N tion 1 League of Citie i considering th po ition it
bould t k on thi matter.
The Tran portation nd Communications Committee of NLC
baa scheduled me ting for the la t we k of this month, at
which tlme I will b asked - - s vie: chairman of the committee
to m ke recommendation; and I am writing you to
k for the
benefit of your feeling
nd reason for s m •
Sine rely,
s
SMJr:nd
cc: The Hon. Ivan Allen, Jr. V
~
Jr.
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
November 1, 1967
Mr. Richard H. Rich, Chairman
Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
45 Broad Street, S. W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Dear Dick:
In view of the fact that a determination will soon be made on
the federal level as to whether the Urban Mass Transportation
Act should be left in the Department of Housing and Urban
Development or transferred to the Department of Transportation,
the National League of Cities is considering the position it
should take on this matter.
The Transportation and Communications Committee of NLC
has scheduled a meeting for the last week of this month, at
which time I will be asked - - as vice chairman of the committee - -
to make a recommendation; and I am writing you to ask for the
benefit of your feelings and reasons for same.
Sincerely,
Sa assell, Jr.
SMJr:nd a
ce: The Hon. Ivan Allen, eae
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 21, Folder 5, Document 25
Box 21
Box 21 Folder 5
Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/3cd13dd6ff69eb2d8ab3fe43ee8aba85.pdf
aa43c08f45451943df1a2e3206f831e4
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
l
I
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
808 GLENN BUILDING/ ATLANTA , GEORGIA 30303 / TELEPHONE AREA 404 524- 5711
Ki ng Elliott, Public Information Director
Oct. 26, 1966
EDITORS, NEWS DIRECTORS:
(For your information.)
The next meeting of the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan
will be held
Atlanta
966, at 3:30 P.M.
Conference Room
Glenn Building
1 20 Marietta s t ., N. W.
One item which is expected to come up is the a p poi ntment of a
fiscal age nt for the Authority.
The Authority has h e ard presen-
tations from several firms seeking appointment as fiscal agent.
The " Fiscal Agent " would advise MARTA on a l l aspe cts of financ i ng
the r api d t ransit sys tem .
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
from MARTA
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
808 GLENN BUILDING / ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 / TELEPHONE AREA 404 524-5711
King Elliott, Public Information Director
8
Oct. 26, 1966
EDITORS, NEWS DIRECTORS: (For your information.)
The next meeting of the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan
Atlanta Rapid Tr, Authority will be held
/;
966, at 3:30 P.M.
6th Floor Conference Room
Glenn Building
120 Marietta St., N. W.
One item which is expected to come up is the appointment of a
fiscal agent for the Authority. The Authority has heard presen-
tations from several firms seeking appointment as fiscal agent.
The "Fiscal Agent" would advise MARTA on all aspects of financing
the rapid transit system.
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 21, Folder 5, Document 24
Box 21
Box 21 Folder 5
Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967
-
https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/578e0752cc20deb7ebf612082c50c29c.pdf
8cf3db6a956c15d40bebff9e83602770
Scripto
Transcription
A written representation of a document.
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
OCTOBER 31, 1967
ASSETS
Cash in Banks:
C & S National Bank
First National Bank
Trust Company of Georgia
Fulton National Bank - Section 9
$ 52,164.36
3,119.80
1 , 000 . 00
38,333.00
Investmen ts:
U. S. Treasury Bills
102,350.85
Pett y Cash
25.00
TOTAL ASSETS
$196 , 993 . 01
LIABILITIES
Ac counts Payable
$
Payr oll Taxes Withhe ld and Accrued
Reserve s :
ARMPC - Urban Design Study
Atlanta Transit Stud y
Parsons Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel :
Sect ion 9 Matching
Retainer Agreement:
Tr ans portation Study
Public Information
Surveying
TOTAL LIABILITIES
SURPLUS
2, 592.36
1,037.13
8,33 3.00
1, 667. 00
70 ,364. 00
$1 , 500 . 00
2,000.00
4,26 0.82
7, 760 .82
91,754.3 1
$105,238.7 0
�
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Text
Any textual data included in the document
METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
OCTOBER 31, 1967
Cash in Banks:
C & S National Bank
First National Bank
Trust Company of Georgia
Fulton National Bank - Section 9
Investments:
U. S. Treasury Bills
Petty Cash
TOTAL ASSETS
Accounts Payable
Payroll Taxes Withheld and Accrued
Reserves:
ARMPC - Urban Design Study
Atlanta Transit Study
Parsons Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel:
Section 9 Matching
Retainer Agreement:
Transportation Study
Public Information
Surveying
TOTAL LIABILITIES
SURPLUS
ASSETS
LIABILITIES
$ 52,164.
3,119.
1,000.
38,333.
102,350.
25
$ 2,592.
1,037.
$:5333%
1,667.
70,364.
$1,500.00
2,000.00
4,260.82 7,760,
36
80
00
00
85
00
36
13
00
00
00
82
$196,993.01
91,754.31
$105 ..238 70
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Box 21, Folder 5, Document 23
Box 21
Box 21 Folder 5
Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967