1 20 43 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/adc25e663baef53abe386cdd247f982f.pdf 1fa01d272ee273eefea611e36f012c0e Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORI TY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION NOVEMBER 30 , 1967 ASSETS Ca sh in Banks : C & S National Bank First National Bank Trust Compa ny of Georgia Fulton Nati.anal Bank ·- Sec tion 9 $ 37,873.95 2 , 972 . 78 1 , 000 . 00 115 , 000 . 00 Invest ments : U" S " Treas ury Bills 9 -, 497 . 06 25. 00 Petty Cash TOTAL ASSETS $253 , 368 . 79 LIABILITIES Accounts Payable $ Payroll Taxes Withh eld and Ac cr ued Reser ves : ARMPC - Ur ban Des ign St udy A lanta Transir St udy Parsons Brinckerho ff - Tuior -Be c hte l : Se ction 9 Ma tc hi ng Re tainer Agr eemen t: Tr a _s portati n Study Publi c Informac i on S rveying TOTAL LIABlU.TIES SUR PLUS 433.65 1 , 283 . 32 8 ,333 . 00 1 , 667 . 00 $1 , 500 . 00 1,92 5 . 48 2 ,984 . 78 6 , 410 .26 8~491. 23 $] 647877, 56 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATEMENT OF FINANCTAL CONDITION NOVEMBER 30, 1967 ASSETS Cash in Banks: C & S National Bank $ 37,873.95 First National Bank 2,972.78 Trust Company of Georgia 1,000.00 Fulton National Bank - Section 9 115,000.00 Investments: U. S, Treasury Bills 96,497, 06 Petty Cash -_ 25,00 TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES Accounts Payable $ 433.65 Payroll Taxes Withheld and Accrued 1,283.32 Reserves: ARMPC - Urban Design Study 8,333.00 Atlanta Transit Study 1,667,00 Parsons Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: Section 9 Matching 70, 364,00 Retainer Agreement: Transportation Study $1,500.00 Public Information 1,925.48 Surveying 2,984.78 _ 6,410.26 TOTAL LIABILITIES SURPLUS $253,368.79 88,491.23 $164,877.56  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 5, Document 9 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 5 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/1c17903d828b6d8bbc116e995284314c.pdf 96c2bbc0c4f31de068de4e42a7b27c5d Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY BUDGET NOVEMBER REPORT 30 s 1967 BUDGET 1967 ACTUAL JANUARY 1 , 196 7 TO NOVEMBER 30, 196 7 $128 ,2 81.64 §_128,281.64 $ 84 , 030.00 23 , 190.00 82 ,77 0.00 91 , 800.00 18,210 . 00 $300,000.00 $ 5 , 520.00 $ 84 , 030 . 00 . 17,3 92. 50 82,770 . 00 91 , 800 . 00 13 ,657.50 $289,650.00 $ 4 , 262.34 $ 95 , 000 . 00 276 , 000 . 00 $371 , 000.00 $ 90 , 000.00 212,069.54 597.46 $302, 667 . 00 TOTAL INCOME $676 , 520 . 00 $596 , 579 . 34 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS .§.804 , 801. 64 _$,72 4 , 860 . 98 $ 68 , 950 . 00 10 , 500 . 00 $ 59 , 083 .67 9 , 853.63 1 , 109.00 533. 00 1 , 680 . 00 10 , 000 . 00 99 . 00 _L92 , 871. 00 $ 3,150 . 00 1,188 . 09 533.34 1 , 11 0 .5 1 300.54 181. 72 LJ.2, 251.5 0 $ 2 , 950.00 Unappropriated Surplus INCOME Appropr ia tions : City of Atlant a Clay t on County DeKalb Count y Fulton County Gwinnett Count y Sub - Totals I nteres t Income Federal Funds : 702 Loan Section 9 Grant Inter es t - Federal Funds Sub -To tals 0 EXPENSES Staff Cost : Salaries Ex pense Bene fits : Social Security Guarant y Fund Health and Accid ent I nsurance Retir ement Workmen ' s Compensation Sub -To tals Board Mee tings Administra tive and Offi c e Overhead : Rent Communicati ons and Postage Furn iture and Eq ui pmen t Su pplies Pr i n ting Aud i tor Accountant Pub l i c Informa tion Ad v is ory I n sur ance : Pub l ic Li abi l i ty De posi tory a nd Forgery Fide l ity Bond Sub-Tot a l s CARRIED FORWARD $ 3 , 000 . 00 2,000.00 2 , 000.00 3 , 600 . 00 1 :, 000 . 00 250 . 00 1, 000 . 00 33 , 000 . 00 5 , 000.00 $ 2 , 750.00 1 , 890 . 69 577 .16 2, 646 . 55 62 3 . 56 250 . 00 750 . 00 28 , 345. 85 4, 213. 71 72. 00 56 . 00 19 9 . 00 $ 51 z177. 00 107. 00 56 . 2 ·; 198.60 $ 422409 . 39 $147,198. 00 ~117 , 6 10 . 89 �METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY BUDGET NOVEMBER TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD REPORT 30, 1967 BUDGET 1967 ACTUAL JANUARY 1 , 196 7 TO NOVEMBER 30, 1967 $804 , 801.64 $724 , 860.98 $147 , 198.00 $ 20 , 000.00 ,$,117 , 610 . 89 .,$_ 11,758 . 61 $ 31 , 250 . 00 $ 29,939 . 00 32,667 . 00 16 , 333 . 00 16 , 000 ,. 00 16,333.00 EXPENSES Brought Forward Counsel Consultant s: Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission Urban Design Study: Section 9 Matching Atlanta Transit Study: Section 9 Matching Hammer , Greene & Siler Parsons Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel : 702 Loan Se ction 9 : Federal Mat ching Re tainer Agreement Research and Te chnical Se rvic es Sub - Totals 95 , 000.00 90 , 000 . 00 240 , 000 . 00 120 , 000 . 00 60 , 000 . 00 2 , 000 . 00 .,$_6 02,250 . 00 120 , 000 . 00 130 ,364 . 00 19 , 09 2.99 2, 475 . 84 .,$_43 0 ,613 .92 TOTAL EXPENSES _V 69 , 448 . oo $559 , 98 3 . 42 SURPLUS $ 35 . 353,64 $164,877 ,56 3 ,333 . 00 1,667 .00 0 0 1 , 66 7 .00 4 ,742.09 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY BUDGET NOVEMBER Unappropriated Surplus INCOME Appropriations: City of Atlanta Clayton County DeKalb County Fulton County Gwinnett County Sub-Totals Interest Income Federal Funds: 702 Loan Section 9 Grant Interest - Federal Funds Sub-Totals TOTAL INCOME TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS EXPENSES Staff Cost: Salaries Expense Benefits: Social Security Guaranty Fund Health and Accident Insurance Retirement Workmen's Compensation Sub-Totals Board Meetings Administrative and Office Overhead: Rent Communications and Postage Furniture and Equipment Supplies Printing Auditor Accountant Public Information Advisory Insurance: Public Liability Depository and Forgery Fidelity Bond Sub-Totals CARRIED FORWARD REPORT 30, 1967 ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 BUDGET TO 1967 NOVEMBER 30, 1967 $128,281.64 $128,281.64 $ 84,030.00 $ 84,030.00 23,190.00 .17,392.50 82,770.00 82,770.00 91,800.00 91,800.00 18,210.00 13,657.50 $300,000.00 $289,650.00 $5520.00 $ 4,262.34 $ 95,000.00 $ 90,000.00 276,000.00 212,069.54 0 597.46 $371,000.00 $302,667.00 $676,520.00 $596,579, 34 $804,801.64 $724 860,98 $ 68,950.00 $ 59,083.67 10,500.00 9,853.63 1,109.00 1,188.09 533.00 533.34 1,680.00 v5, 110,51 10,000.00 300.54 99,00 181,72 $ 92,871.00 S 72.251 50 S. 3,150.00 $ 2,950.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 2,750.00 2,000.00 1,890.69 2,000.00 577.16 3,600.00 2,646.55 1,000.00 623.56 250.00 250.00 1,000.00 750.00 33,000.00 28,345.85 5,000.00 4,213.71 72.00 107.00 56.00 56.27 199.00 198.60 $51,177.00 $42,409.39 $147,198.00 $117,610.89 METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY BUDGET NOVEMBER TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD EXPENSES Brought Forward Counsel Consultants: Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission Urban Design Study: Section 9 Matching Atlanta Transit Study: Section 9 Matching Hammer, Greene & Siler Parsons Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: 702 Loan Section 9: Federal Matching Retainer Agreement Research and Technical Services Sub-Totals TOTAL EXPENSES SURPLUS REPORT 30, 1967 BUDGET 1967 $804,801.64 ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 TO NOVEMBER 30, 1967 $724,860.98 $147,198.00 $117,610.89 $ 20,000.00 $ 11,758.61 § 31,250.00 $ 29,939.00 32,667.00 16,000, 00 16,333.00 16,333.00 3,333.00 0 1,667.00 1,667.00 0 4,742.09 95,000.00 90,000.00 240,000.00 120,000, 00 120,000.00 130,364.00 60,000.00 19,092.99 2,000.00 2 475,84 $602,250.00 $430,613.92 $769,448 .00 $559,983.42 S 35 353.64 $164,877 56  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 5, Document 8 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 5 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/3bb7ce588e45edfb38d5b76ad97c0cdd.pdf 7ef1e881e8c3745f608817a0925f69ca Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY 1968 OPERATING BUDGET JANUARY 1 1 1968 - DECEMBER 31, 1968 Unappropriated Surplusa (1) • On hand, 12/31/67!a) $ 60,371.00 Receivables a ( 2) (Omitted) (3) State of Georgia(c) 12s,ooo.oo $185,371.00 (4) (S)· l . Appropriated Surplus (d) "45,324.00 $230,695.00 (6) INCOME (7) City of Atlanta(e) (8) Clayton County 23,190.00 (9) DeKalp .County 82,770.00 (10) Fulton County_ 91,800.00 (11) Gwinnett Count y 10,210.00 $ 84,030.00 $300,000.00 (12) (13) (14) s,000.00 . Intere st on Treasury Bills (f) State of Georgia 2so,ooo.oo U. S . DEPT. OF HUD _,. (15) 70 2 Loan (16) Section 9 (17) Section 9 - 2 ) 1968 work program ' (18) ) Compl etion of 1 ~ 1967 work program. $ . 35, 000.00 173,333.·oo 624, 333. 00 1, 000, od Interest Income (g) $839,666.00 (19) $1,394,666.00 (20) TOTAL INCCME (21) GRAND TOTAL INCQ.iE" SURPLUS .. $1,625,361.00 �- - -:· - J (22) ,j -- , $1t62s,.361.oo INCOME & SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD , .. . ·- - STAFF & AI:MINISTRATIVE EXPENSES (23) Salaries 93;600,.00 (24) Expenses 14,500.00 • Benefits, Social Security · (26) Guaranty Fund (27) Health & Accident ( 28) Reti rement (29)' Workmen's Cornpensatio·n - $1,904.,00 533 . 00 2,940.00 11,000.00 182.00 22,559.00 ' (3 0) . (31) BOARD MEETINGS (32) TOTAL STAFF EXPENSES 3,600.00 ·, $ 134,259.00 Administrative E25I2enses ' (33) Rent (34) Communications & postage 4,000.00 (35) Furniture & equipment 4,000.00 (36) Supplies 4,000.00 (311) Pri nti ng 2,000.00 (38) $ 4,200.00 ". Auditor 500.00 (39) Accountant (4.0) Pub lic I nformation a· '(h) 1,soo.00 (41) Local $50 , 667.00 (4 2) Federal - $35 , 033.00 . (43 ) - 86,000.00 Insurance 327 . 00 (44) TOTAL ArMl:NIS'l'RATIVE EXPENSES $ 1 0 6, 5 27.00 (45} TOTAL STAi'F &c AIMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES $ 24 0,786.00 . ~ I 1 ~~ ~-~-·---· -·-"-=-'---'-'_J Staff E?5Penses (25) ... �·. (4 6 ) $1, 625 , 361. 0 0 t lNCOME SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD (47) EXPENSES BROUGHT (48) COUNSEL FORWAiRD 24 0 , 786 . 0 0 so,000•.00 (i) CONSULTANTS 8 On . • Retainer!! (49) Research (50) Advisory Committee (k) (51) Hammer, Greene , Siler Associa tes' (1) - 1, 200. 00 (52) Eric Hill Associate$ (rn} 1,200 . 00 & Tecbnical Services (j) - $ s, 000 . 00 1 2 t OOO . OO 31,400.00 (53) .' Under ContractK 1967 Work Proqran,ll,_ 3s,ooo. oo (54) 702 Loan (n) (55) Section 9 - l Grant (o) (56) · (57) (58) Local - $ HUD 230; 000 .. 00 76 ~667a 00 - $ 153 r 333&00 Section 9 - l Gr ant (p) (59) Local - $1 ,667. 00 (60) HUD s,000.00 3,333.00 270,000.00 (61) , 1968 Work Programa ., (62) Section 9 - l Amendment (q) (63) Local - $ 10,000o OO (64) HUD , (65) 30,000.00 20q000.00 Section 9 - 2 Applic~tion (r) ·(66) Local - $ 297,000eOO (67) HUD 891,000 .. 00 .. 594,000. 00 92ltOOO.OO (68) (69) Retainer Agreerf,U!nt ( s ) (70) TOTAL EXPENSES (71) UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS 39,000.00 $1,552,186.00 - .... .$ - - -- - 73,175.00 .::.. - ~ . • . A-> �EXPLANATORY NOTES TO THE BUDGET D JANUARY 1 1 1968 - DECEMBER 31, 1 969 (a) ... .______ . - ,- (b) -- .. - · .. .""'"".:l -:-r (c) This is a fcre:::ast figure derived from expected r eceipts and expenses between August 31, 1967 and Decembe r 31 , 1967 • ~ • OMITTED - •·. The 1967 Ge ner a l As semb l y appropriate d $500 , 000 for the fiscal biennium J uly 1, 1967 throu gh June 30 1 1969. We are develo~ing a contra ct with the Dep a r tment of Industry and Trade (in which budget our item appears ) o We are seeking to arr ange to receive these fund s quarte rly in advance, which is, the same schedul e on whic h we receive funds from the local governments and the United States Departme nt of Housing and Urban Dev e l op ment& (d) This is a ~ as t figure based on a n ticipated expenditures and scheduled appropriations between August 31, 1 967 and December 31, 1 967. (e) I ncome fr om local governments shown is idlentlical requested and received in 1966 and 196 7e (£) This i s o ne year 1 s appro~ riati o n made by the 1 967 Georgia General Assemblyo Note (c) abovee (g) I nterest o n federal funds accrues t o the benef i t o f the Uni ted States Government and is deducted from the grand t otal . to that (h) Thi s is an expanded program (from 33,000 i n 1 966). The sta ff will double the circulation of " Rapid Transit Progress" ($18,000 for one year above pre sent costs), and we wi ll p r ovide one mailing of factual information t o every r egistered voter in the four-county area ($35 1 000 ) s ome time pri o r t o ,··-,- - ......; election time.. Publio Information Program Expansion -: $53, 000 . ·- .!1 . (1) Services of bond counsel, which will be added, a ntici pati ng a successful referendum in November 1968, which wi l l caus e . the issuance of bonds. Also, requirements for legal advice will increase as our work becomes more specific. (j) This item covers assistance as required in preparing and filing requests for federal grantso (k) This five- man committee, chaired by Professor Howard Menhinick; provides us with design advice and assures our communications with the local groups of design professionalso (l)' We will need a little work from economic consultants as it becomes necessary to update our financial plano �~m) The Corri dor Impact Study will go out of date if it doea nob receive some attention from time to time .. (n) This i s the bala nce to be expended on pr eliminary engineering on the North-South Line. (o) 1-· I i This is the bala n c e to b~ expended on the prel i minary engineering· on the Eas t-West Line and certain planning for extensions. • ! It also includes support by our consulting engineer s ·.during the period in which we seek public acceptance .. (p) This will be applied to t ransporta tion planning t o itemize future policy n eeds as to relations between MARTA and other transportation system. (q) This is for an evaluation and review of t1ARTA's plans wi th reference to total transportation planning in the Atlanta region. ·(r) The applicati on for our 1968 work program will cover the following projects s 1. Prelimi nary Ownership Study ----- ---------------------$ 50,000 This is t he beginning of ti tle search operations on the 30-mile system e Getting s t art ed on this in 1968 will · save one y e a r in the right of way acquisition programo 2o Accounting & Financial Control System Design Study -- $ 25,000 This work element sets up the system of accounts and financial contr ols for the Authority. Given a successful bond referendum, we will be i nto right of way acqui sition i mmediately and some construction within nine months . Final ·d esign con~::racts will be r eady soon after the referenda and our budget will tota l mil lions . The Comptroller 1 s office must go into operation .:with zero time lag . 3. Plans for the Prese rvation of Historical Sites-------$ 3,000 Our routes and station sites will be examined by a committee of the Atlanta Historical Society. It will recommend to us course of action to preserve our heritage where rapid transit operations affe ct sites or structures of historical significance. .4. Relocation Program Design----------------------------$ 13,000 This work will d efine the job ahead, in detail, so that we can make application under our future capital programs to achieve successful relocation as required by our const~ction progresse Sa. Preliminary Architectural and Engineering Design of J of Transit Center-------------------------------------$300,000 The purpose of this work is to further the technical development of Transit Center and the adjacent line structures. Items to be considered under this work are s followss 1 L----· �------ . --'--- ~ -~ -~-- '· 1·· 6. , ,I . /· . Sb. (a) Circulation and access of pedestrians, bu~es and automobiles to Transit Center. (b) Metho m of c onstruction. (c) Types of s t ructures. · (d) Utility and sub-surface investigations. (e) Establi sh electrical and mechanical spatial requirements., (f) Develop architectural preliminary plans. (g) Prepare preliminary specifications • . (h) Establish preliminary right-of-way plans. (i) Construct architectural study model. Development of Transit Center-----------------------$450,000 The purpose of t his work is to make surveys, borings and devel op pla ns to bring the · design of Transit Center and its a pproaches to a point just short· of architectural fi nishes and contract documents. By doing t his in 1968, we can start first construction on thi s 22½ million complex in the summer of 1969. This work is s ubject to final adoption of routes, station locations, and acceptance of uhe work items in Sa aboveo This work will includes ,. • ~- , (a) Make surveys. (b) Take soil borings. (c ) Establish hor izontal and vertical controls. (d ) Prepare utili ty plans. (e ) Prepare base maps. (£) Develop design c riter ia. ' 6. Architectural studi es------------ -------------------$ 50,000 This work includes the much di scus sed consulting Architect. There are many de sign e l e ments t hat should be constant or confined within prescribed limite system-wideo Consistency, good looks and economy demand these specifications set up by the Consulttng Architect., · (s) This agreements provides for engineering support not otq,r:¥iae covered in existing contracts. ' I·f • f. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document (1) (2) * (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) / (18) (19) (20) (21) METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY 1968 OPERATING BUDGET JANUARY 1, 1968 — DECEMBER 31, 1968 Unappropriated Surplus: On hand, 12/31/67! $ 60,371.00 Receivables: (Omitted) State of Georgia ‘®) 125,000.00 | $185,371.00 Appropriated surplus !@ 45,324.00 $230,695.00 INCOME City of atlanta ‘@) $ 84,030.00 Clayton County 23,190.00 DeKalb. County 82,770.00 Fulton County 91,800.00 Gwinnett County ; 18,210.00 $300,000.00 Interest on Treasury Bilis 5,000.00 State of ecorsia ® 250,000.00 U. S. DEPT. OF HUD 702 Loan ) Completion of “ $ 35,000.00 setdon Shek. ee re pe Las BSIOO Section 9 = 2 ) 1968 work program 624, 333.00: Interest Income ‘9) 7,000,00 . $839,666.00 TOTAL INCOME $1, 394,666.00 GRAND TOTAL INCOME & SURPLUS $1,625, 361.00  (22) rn INCOME & SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD ~ STAPF & ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES (23) (24) (25) (26) (27) (28) (29)° (30) (31) (32) (33) (34) (35) (36) (377) (38) (39) " (40) (41) (42) _ (43) (44) (45) Staff Expenses Salaries Expenses Benefits: Social Security Guaranty Fund Health & Aboi dant Retirement Workmen's Compensation BOARD MEETINGS TOTAL STAFF EXPENSES Administrative Expenses Rent ' Communications & postage Furniture & equipment Supplies Printing » Auditor Accountant Public Informations (h) Local - $50,667.00 Federal — $35,333.00 Insurance TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES $1,904.00 533.00 2,940.00 17,000.00 182.00 $ 4,200.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 2,000.00 500.00 1,500.00 86,000.00 327.00 TOTAL STAFF & ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES J owe Me .. — | $1,625,361.00 . pe eres ee 93,600.00 14,500.09 22,559.00 3,600.00 © $ 134,259.00 $ 106,527.00 $ 240,786.00  (46) INCOME SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD $1,625,361.00 (47) EXPENSES BROUGHT FORWARD - 240,786.00 (48) COUNSEL (1) 50,000.00 CONSULTANTS: | On Retainers (49) Research & Technical Services (j) - $ 5,000.00 (50) Advisory Committee (k) - 12,000.00 (51) Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates (1) - 7,200.00 (52) Eric Hill Associates (m) - 7,200.00 (53). 31,400.00 Under Contracts nt) 67 Work Program? (54) 702 Loan (n) 35,000.00 (55) Section 9 —~ 1 Grant (0) 230,000.00 (56) Local - $ 76,667.00 (57) | «HUD = $ 153,333.00 (58) ‘ Section 9 - 1 Grant (p) 5,000.00 (59) Local —- $ 1,667.00 (60) HUD - 3,333.00 (61) | 270,000.00 1968 Work Program: (62) Section 9 = 1 Amendment (q) 30,000.00 (63) Local = $ 10,000.00 | (64) HUD = 20,000.00 . (65) Section 9 = 2 Application (r) 891,000.00 (66) Local ~ $ 297,000.00 (67) HUD = 594,000.00 Sica (68) ~ 921,000.00 — (69) Retainer Agreement (s) 39,000.00 (70) TOTAL EXPENSES $ 1,552,186.00 _ (71) UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS § 73,175.00  \ EXPLANATORY NOTES TO THE BUDGET JANUARY 1, 1968 - DECEMBER 31, 1969 (a) This is a forecast figure derived from expected receipts and _ expenses between August 31, 1967 and December 31, 1967. (b) OMITTED . : - a — ih a * _— ie (c) The 1967 General Assembly appropriated $500,000 for the fiscal biennium July 1, 1967 through June 30, 1969. We are developing a contract with the Department of Industry and Trade (in which budget our item appears). We are seeking to arrange to receive these funds quarterly in advance, which is: the same schedule on which we receive funds from the local governments and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. (d) This is a forecast figure based on anticipated expenditures and scheduled appropriations between August 31, 1967 and December 31, 1967. (e) Income from local governments shown is identical to that requested and received in 1966 and 1967. (f£) This is one year's Sppropy ateoe made by the 1967 Georgia General Assembly. Note (c) above. (g) Interest on federal funds accrues to the benefit of the United States Government and is deducted from the grand total. (h) This is an expanded program (from 33,000 in 1966). The staff will double the circulation of "Rapid Transit Progress" ($18,000 for one year above present costs), and we will pro- vide one mailing of factual information to every registered voter in the four-—county area ($35,000) sometime prior to -« ,, @lection time. Public Information Program Expansion - $53,000 (1) Services of bond counsel, which will be added, anticipating a successful referendum in November 1968, which will cause . the issuance of bonds. Also, requirements for legal advice will increase as our work becomes more specific. (j) This item covers assistance as required in preparing and filing requests for federal grants. (k) This five-man committee, chaired by Professor Howard Menhinick, ; provides us with design advice and assures our communications with the local groups of design professionals. (1) We will need a little work from economic consultants as it becomes necessary to update our financial plan.  ee ee i = fn) The Corridor Impact Study will go out of date if it does not receive some attention from time to time. (n) This is the balance to be expended on preliminary engineering on the North-South Line. (o) This is the balance to be expended on the preliminary engineering _ of the East-West Line and certain planning for extensions. It also includes support by our consulting engineers’ during the period in which we seek public acceptance. be (p) This will be applied to transportation planning to itemize " future policy needs as to relations between MARTA and other transportation system. (q) This is for an evaluation and review of MARTA's plans with reference to total transportation planning in the Atlanta region. ‘(r) The application for our 1968 work program will cover the followin projects: ; le Preliminary Ownership Study --------~---~-~—-~----~~---.~. $ 50,000 This is the beginning of title search operations on the 30-mile system. Getting started on this in 1968 will save one year in the right of way acquisition program. 22 Accounting & Financial Control System Design Study -- $ 25,000 This work element sets up the system of accounts and finan- clal controls for the Authority. Given a successful bond referendum, we will be into right of way acquisition immediately and some construction within nine months. Finel design contracts will be ready soon after the referenda and our budget will total millions. The Comptroller's office must go into operation with zero time lag. 3. Plans for the Preservation of Historical Sites ~------ $ 3,000 Our routes and station sites will be examined by a committee of the Atlanta Historical Society. It will is t recommend to us course of action to preserve our heritage where rapid transit operations affect sites or structures of historical significance. 4. Relocation Program Desiqn ~-------~-<=-<--9-<------------ S$ 13,000 This work will define the job ahead, in detail, so that we can make application under our future capital programs to achieve successful relocation as required by our construction progress. Sae Preliminary Architectural and Engineering Design of of Transit Center—--—..—.~.2--— noe $300,000 The purpose of this work is to further the technical development of Transit Center and the adjacent line structures. Items to be considered under this work are as follows; — (s) (a) Circulation and access of pedestrians, buses and automobiles to Transit Center. (b) Methods ef construction. (c) Types of structures. (d) Utility and sub-surface investigations. (e) Establish electrical and mechanical spatial requirements. (£) Develop architectural preliminary plans. (g) Prepare preliminary specifications. (h) Establish preliminary right-of-way plans. (i) Construct architectural study model. 5be Development of Transit Center -- $450,000 The purpose of this work is to make surveys, borings and develop plans to bring the design of Transit Center and its approaches to a point just short of architectural finishes and contract documents. By doing this in 1968, we can start first construction on this 22% million complex in the summer of 1969. This work is subject to final adoption of routes, station locations, and acceptance of the work items in 5a above. This work will include: (a) Make surveys. (b) Take soil borings. (c) Establish horizontal and vertical controls. (d) Prepare utility plans. (e) Prepare base maps. (£) Develop design criteria. 6. Architectural Studies $ 50,000 This work includes the much discussed consulting Architect. There are many design elements that should be constant or confined within prescribed limits system-wide. Consistency, good looks and economy demand these specifications set up by the Consulting Architect. This agreements provides for engineering support not Suhenwses covered in existing contracts. ee, 6e  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 5, Document 7 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 5 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/67318893894a82e5f64e129614bd2e12.pdf 7a8db26b7439945a9a0f837e312659a6 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. MINUTES OF THE TWENTY-SECOND MEETING OF THE METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY DECEMBER 5, 1967 The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority held its regular meeting on December 5, 1967, at 3:30 P.M., in the Glenn Building Conference Room, Atlanta. Mr. Richard H. Rich, Chairman, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Robert F. Adamson (City of Atlanta) Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County) M. C. Bishop (Fulton County) Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County) Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta) K. A. McMillan (Gwinnett County) L. D. Milton (City of Atl a nta) Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta) MEMBERS ABSENT: Edgar Blalock (Clayton County) OTHERS PRESENT: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority H. L. Stuart, General Manager King Elliott, Public Information Director Earl Nelson, Chief Engineer H. N. Johnson, Secretary to General Manager Glenn E . Bennett, Secretary Consultants W. O. Salter, Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, San Francisco J . A. Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons, BrinckerhoffTudor-Bechtel, Atlanta R. W. Gustafson, Supervising Engineer, Parsons, Brincker hoff-Tudor-Bechtel, Atlanta Jacques Labourer , Eric Hill Associates Tom Watson Brown, Huie and Harland \ �Others Don Ingram, Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. P.A. Springer, Atlanta Traffic and Safety Council Mrs. Rachel Champagne, J. D. Wingfield, Jr., Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission The meeting was called to order by the Chairman. Minutes Upon motion by Mr. Bishop, seconded by Mr. McMi llon, the minutes of the November meeting were unanimously approveq . Financial Report Mr. Stuart presented the November 30th budget report and said most items were as projected. There were no questions and the report was accepted. Report of General Manager Mr. Stuart said the Georgia Society o f Professional Engineer s had pass e d a resolution e ndorsing the tran s it project, and expressing a desir e to e stablish a spe aker s bureau. Mr . Stuart reported on a recent trip to Louisville, to contact officials of the L. & N. Railroad and present deta ils of the transit plan. He said the new lease for the A. & W. P. Railroad contained spec if ic refer e nce as to how rapid transit should be rou ted thr ough t h e a r ea t o th e wes t o f Un i on Sta t ion. The General Manager said meetings had been held with railroads, planning groups, municipal officials, and with Fu l ton, DeKalb, and Gwinnett County Commissioners. The proposed legislative p r o gr am had been discuss e d wi th member s o f the Hou se a nd Sena t e f r om the fou r count ies . He planne d a tr ip t o Washington to d iscu ss the 1968 l egislativ e pro gram wi th Representatives Blackbur n and Thomps o n. Mr. Stuart me nt i oned a vis it on Nov e mber 28, f rom Mr. Carl Hi ll , a n assis tan t to Mr. Char l es Ha ar of HUD in Wash ington . Mr. Hill h ad been s hown the plans and reviewed progress in the design field. - 2 - �Mr. Stuart said he and Mr. Bennett would appear before the Fulton County Grand Jury on December 12. (Subsequently, Mr. Haverty was substituted for Mr. Stuart.) Mr. Rich had testified before the Rainey Sub-Committee of the Georgia House of Representatives on November 30, and requested Mr. Stuart to send a copy of his testimony to the Board members. Reports by Consultants Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel Mr. John Coil reported that the 701 report had been distributed, and the popular summary version would be r .eady for distribution within one week. He said the engineers were continuing to update the plan and resolve questions with governments. He had been encouraged by responses from the Seaboard Coast Line Railroad and by the L. & N. Railroad. Corridor Impact Study Mr. J. D. Wingfield, Jr . , Planning Director for ARMPC, commented on the corridor impact study. He said the study was designed to examine potentials. Examples had been looked at, such as outlying stations, but most of the work had been done on developed sections of the lines. Mr. Wingfield said many of the ideas would depend upon the initiative of the elected officials to do early work so MARTA could take advantage of opportunities . He stressed that this study was not totally a "MARTA study," but pointed up the opportunities for local governments to act . Contract between Georgia Department of Industry & Trade and MARTA Copies of a proposed contract between MARTA and the Georgia Department of Industry & Trade were distributed for considera tion. The State of Georgia had appropriated $500 , 000 per y ea r to MARTA, and the Department of Industry & Trade had been de s ig nated the agency who would disburse these funds . Th e cont r act p r o v ided for appropriations to be paid quarterly in adv ance , an d provided that such funds could be used fo r direct or indire c t costs , including debt service , administr ation , operating , plan n i ng, desig n i n g , finishing , r ight -of-wa y acq uisition , and r olli ng s t oc k. - 3 - �The contract provided further that the State could appropriate real estate, in lieu of cash. It also gave the State a reversionary interest in the property of the Authority, in the same proportion as the State 1 s appropriation to MARTA. The contract required an annual audit of the books of MARTA to be sent to the State. The contract was for 50 years, and would cover subsequent appropriations as - they were made. After discussion of the contract prov isions, the following resolution was presented: BE IT RESOLVED that Henry L. Stuar t, General Manager, and Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary, be and hereby are authorized and directed to execute on behalf of this Authority a contract substantially in the form as presented to this Board, subject to approval o f counsel, with the State of Georgia, by and through its Depa rtment of Industry & Trade, for the t ra nsfe r and p a yment to thi s Author i t y o f funds appropriated and to be appropriated by the Legislature and Governor of Georgia for the purposes of this Authority; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED t ha t said General Manager a nd Secr e tar y b e and h e r e by a r e a uthoriz ed a nd d i rected t o execu te any and a l l f u rth er d o cuments as may be reasonably necessary to the transfer and payment of said funds; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Citi zens Tru s t Company b e a nd h ere by is d esign a t e d as t he depo s i t ory f o r said f u nds a nd t h a t a l l withdrawals t h eref rom s h a ll b e only o ver t h e signatu res o f e i ther the Chairman or Vice Chairman o f the Board o f this Authority a n d either the Gen e ral Manage r o r t h e Chief Engineer o f th i s Authority. Up o n mo tio n by Mr. Mc Millan , seco nded by Dr. Atwood, the above resolution was u n animously ado pted. Appointmen t o f Audi t o r for 1 96 8 Mr. Stuart had received a proposal from Arthur Andersen Company to continue auditing services as n eeded for the year ending December 31, 1968, for a fee of $500. Mr. Bishop made a motion, - 4 - �seconded by Mr. McMillon, that this contract be renewed. motion was unanimously passed. The 1968 Budget The 1968 budget estimates were presented by the General Manager, who recommended the proposed budget for adoption. Mr. Stuart said the budget had been reviewed by the Board earlier. The Chairman asked for a breakdown and explanation of an item of $750,000 for preliminary design of the transit center. The General Manager agreed to provide an explanation of this item, and Mr. Bishop made a motion that the budget for 1968 be adopted, subject to a satisfactory review of the item questioned by the Chairman. The motion was seconded by Mr. Adamson and unanimously passed. A copy of the 1968 budget as adopted is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Authorization under Retainer Agreement The General Manager requested authorization for $500 to be expended under the retainer agreement, to pay for copies of the 100-scale plan and profile drawings which are being requested by the State Highway Department, the railroads, and others. Mr. Stuart showed samples of these prints, and said the engineers had been making them available at cost. Mr. Bishop made a motion, seconded by Mr. McMillan, that a sum of $500 be allocated for these prints, from the retainer agreement. The motion was unanimously passed. January Meeting It was agreed that the General Manager would poll the members as to a date in January for the regular meeting, which would not conflict with holiday plans. It was tentatively agreed that January 5 would be agreeable. Notice would be sent after the staff had checked with all members. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 4:45 P.M. - 5 - � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document MINUTES OF THE TWENTY-SECOND MEETING OF THE METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY DECEMBER 5, 1967 The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Trans- it Authority held its regular meeting on December 5, 1967, at 3:30 P.M., in the Glenn Building Conference Room, Atlanta. Mr. Richard H. Rich, Chairman, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Robert F. Adamson (City of Atlanta) Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County) M. C. Bishop (Fulton County) Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County) Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta) K. A. McMillon (Gwinnett County) L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta) Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta) MEMBERS ABSENT: Edgar Blalock (Clayton County) OTHERS PRESENT: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority H. L. Stuart, General Manager King Elliott, Public Information Director Earl Nelson, Chief Engineer H. N. Johnson, Secretary to General Manager Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary Consultants W. O. Salter, Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, San Francisco J. A. Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons, Brinckerhoff- Tudor-Bechtel, Atlanta R. W. Gustafson, Supervising Engineer, Parsons, Brincker- hoff-Tudor-Bechtel, Atlanta Jacques Labourer, Eric Hill Associates Tom Watson Brown, Huie and Harland Others Don Ingram, Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. P. A. Springer, Atlanta Traffic and Safety Council Mrs. Rachel Champagne, J. D. Wingfield, Jr., Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission The meeting was called to order by the Chairman. Minutes Upon motion by Mr. Bishop, seconded by Mr. McMillon, the minutes of the November meeting were unanimously approved. Financial Report Mr. Stuart presented the November 30th budget report and said most items were as projected. There were no questions and the report was accepted. Report of General Manager Mr. Stuart said the Georgia Society of Professional Engineers had passed a resolution endorsing the transit project, and expressing a desire to establish a speakers bureau. Mr. Stuart reported on a recent trip to Louisville, to contact officials of the L. & N. Railroad and present details of the transit plan. He said the new lease for the A. & W.P. Railroad contained specific reference as to how rapid transit should be routed through the area to the west of Union Station. The General Manager said meetings had been held with railroads, planning groups, municipal officials, and with Fulton, DeKalb, and Gwinnett County Commissioners. The proposed legislative program had been discussed with members of the House and Senate from the four counties. He planned a trip to Washington to discuss the 1968 legislative program with Representatives Blackburn and Thompson. Mr. Stuart mentioned a visit on November 28, from Mr. Carl Hill, an assistant to Mr. Charles Haar of HUD in Washington. Mr. Hill had been shown the plans and reviewed progress in the design field. Mr. Stuart said he and Mr. Bennett would appear before the Fulton County Grand Jury on December 12. (Subsequently, Mr. Haverty was substituted for Mr. Stuart.) Mr. Rich had testified before the Rainey Sub-Committee of the Georgia House of Representatives on November 30, and requested Mr. Stuart to send a copy of his testimony to the Board members. Reports by Consultants Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel Mr. John Coil reported that the 701 report had been dis- tributed, and the popular summary version would be ready for distribution within one week. He said the engineers were continuing to update the plan and resolve questions with governments. He had been encouraged by responses from the Seaboard Coast Line Railroad and by the L. & N. Railroad. Corridor Impact Study Mr. J. D. Wingfield, Jr., Planning Director for ARMPC, commented on the corridor impact study. He said the study was designed to examine potentials. Examples had been looked at, such as outlying stations, but most of the work had been done on developed sections of the lines. Mr. Wingfield said many of the ideas would depend upon the initiative of the elected officials to do early work so MARTA could take advantage of opportunities. He stressed that this study was not totally a "MARTA study," but pointed up the opportunities for local governments to act. Contract between Georgia Department of Industry & Trade and MARTA Copies of a proposed contract between MARTA and the Georgia Department of Industry & Trade were distributed for considera- tion. The State of Georgia had appropriated $500,000 per year to MARTA, and the Department of Industry & Trade had been desig- nated the agency who would disburse these funds. The contract provided for appropriations to be paid quarterly in advance, and provided that such funds could be used for direct or indirect costs, including debt service, administration, operating, plan- ning, designing, finishing, right-of-way acquisition, and rolling stock. The contract provided further that the State could appropriate real estate, in lieu of cash. It also gave the State a reversionary interest in the property of the Authority, in the same proportion as the State's appropriation to MARTA. The contract required an annual audit of the books of MARTA to be sent to the State. The contract was for 50 years, and would cover subsequent appropriations as: they were made. After discussion of the contract provisions, the following resolution was presented: BE IT RESOLVED that Henry L. Stuart, General Manager, and Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary, be and hereby are authorized and directed to execute on behalf of this Authority a contract substantially in the form as presented to this Board, subject to approval of counsel, with the State of Georgia, by and through its Department of Industry & Trade, for the transfer and payment to this Authority of funds appropriated and to be appropriated by the Legis- lature and Governor of Georgia for the purposes of this Authority; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said General Mana- ger and Secretary be and hereby are authorized and directed to execute any and all further documents as may be reasonably necessary to the transfer and payment of said funds; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Citizens Trust Company be and hereby is designated as the deposi- tory for said funds and that all withdrawals there- from shall be only over the signatures of either the Chairman or Vice Chairman of the Board of this Authority and either the General Manager or the Chief Engineer of this Authority. Upon motion by Mr. McMillon, seconded by Dr. Atwood, the above resolution was unanimously adopted. Appointment of Auditor for 1968 Mr. Stuart had received a proposal from Arthur Andersen Company to continue auditing services as needed for the year ending December 31, 1968, for a fee of $500. Mr. Bishop made a motion, seconded by Mr. McMillon, that this contract be renewed. The motion was unanimously passed. 1968 Budget The 1968 budget estimates were presented by the General Manager, who recommended the proposed budget for adoption. Mr. Stuart said the budget had been reviewed by the Board earlier. The Chairman asked for a breakdown and explanation of an item of $750,000 for preliminary design of the transit center. The General Manager agreed to provide an explanation of this item, and Mr. Bishop made a motion that the budget for 1968 be adopted, subject to a satisfactory review of the item questioned by the Chairman. The motion was seconded by Mr. Adamson and unanimously passed. A copy of the 1968 budget as adopted is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Authorization under Retainer Agreement The General Manager requested authorization for $500 to be expended under the retainer agreement, to pay for copies of the 100-scale plan and profile drawings which are being re- quested by the State Highway Department, the railroads, and others. Mr. Stuart showed samples of these prints, and said the engineers had been making them available at cost. Mr. Bishop made a motion, seconded by Mr. McMillon, that a sum of $500 be allocated for these prints, from the retainer agreement. The motion was unanimously passed. January Meeting It was agreed that the General Manager would poll the members as to a date in January for the regular meeting, which would not conflict with holiday plans. It was tentatively agreed that January 5 would be agreeable. Notice would be sent after the staff had checked with all members. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 4:45 P.M.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 5, Document 6 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 5 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/1a2bcf674a4a41c36290b146643097f6.pdf b3973c8b05c9c8779868880d09864acf Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. HUIE AN D HARLAN D ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW FULTON FEDERAL BUILDING ATLANTA. G EO RGIA 3 0 3 0 3 TELEPHONE W . STELL HUIE 522-1641 JAMES R . HARLAND, JR. HARRY L. CASHIN, JR. TOM WATSON BROWN RUFUS A . CHAMBERS TERRILL A . PARKER D ecember 1 9 , 1967 JAMEsH .MO RGAN , JR . The Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr. Mayor of Atlanta City Hall Atlanta, G eorgia 30303 D ear Mayor Allen: Enclosed please find a copy of the proposed Bill to implement the legislative program of MARTA. As we have previously indicated, we would like the concurrence of all of the particip ating governments in these suggested changes, and will, of course, not seek to have passed any of those on which the governments cannot agree. This is also true with respect to Senate Bill 1 1 1 which is presently in the House Local Affairs Committee. We have previously furnished copies of the proposed legis lation to Messrs. Earl Landers and Charles Dav is and have discussed the matter with Messrs. Charles Lokey and Jack Dougherty of the City Attorney's office. By a copy of this letter to e ach of the City Attorne ys we are furnishing them a c opy of same. W e are also furnishing a copy to Mr. Hugh Pierce and Mr. H en ry Bowden. Very truly yours, ,I )(<)-39; .:~/Jt/. . .~, HUIE AND,:tARLA~D /) W SH/ jlt Encl. cc : Mr . Mr. Mr . Mr . Hugh Pierce Henry Bow den Charles Lokey Jack Dougherty Stell Huie / ..... J �HUIE AND HARLAND The Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr. Page 2 December 19, 1967 P.S. For your information, also enclosed please find a copy of S.B. 111 as passed by the Senate with an additional sugg e stion added. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document HUIE AND HARLAND ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW FULTON FEDERAL BUILDING ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30303 W. STELL HUIE TELEPHONE JAMES R. HARLAND, JR. 522-1641 HARRY L. CASHIN, JR. TOM WATSON BROWN RUFUS A. CHAMBERS TERRILL A. PARKER JAMES H. MORGAN, JR. December 19, 1967 J The Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr. Bed Mayor of Atlanta City Hall Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Mayor Allen: Enclosed please find a copy of the proposed Bill to implement the legislative program of MARTA. As we have previously indicated, we would like the concurrence of all of the participating governments in these suggested changes, and will, of course, not seek to have passed any of those on which the governments cannot agree. This is also true with respect to Senate Bill 111 which is presently in the House Local Affairs Committee. We have previously furnished copies of the proposed legis- lation to Messrs. Earl Landers and Charles Davis and have discussed the matter with Messrs. Charles Lokey and Jack Dougherty of the City Attorney's office. By a copy of this letter to each of the City Attorneys we are furnish- ing them a copy of same. We are also furnishing a copy to Mr. Hugh Pierce and Mr. Henry Bowden. Very truly yours, HUIE AND HARLAND ? FF . Pf \ f | - — haf ial a ee y DPN \/ # — W. staal Huie WSH/jlt Encl. cc: Mr. Hugh Pierce Mr. Henry Bowden Mr. Charles Lokey Mr. Jack Dougherty HUIE AND HARLAND The Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr. Page 2 December 19, 1967 For your information, also enclosed please find a copy of S.B. 111 P.S. as passed by the Senate with an additional suggestion added.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 5, Document 5 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 5 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/9acc3c33649f3ea94ef04b1a4ccffd30.pdf 8383332ac9c7f797d823fb750db91708 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AUGUST 31, 1967 ASSETS Cash in Banks: C & S National Bank First National Bank - Payroll Trust Company of 9eorgia Fulton National Bank - Section 9 $ 14,296.04 2,651.88 1,000.00 20,976.08 Inv es tmen ts: U. S. Treasury Bills 114,812.00 Petty Cash 25.00 Accounts Receivable: Gwinnett County - 1967 Gwinnett County - 1966 $9,105.00 4,552.50 13,657.50 TOTAL ASSETS $167,418.50 LIABILITIES Accounts Payable $ 12,648.37 Payroll Taxes Withheld and Accrued Reserves: ARMPC - Urban Design Study Atlanta Transit Stu9y Parsons-Brinkerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: Section 9 Matching Retainer Agreement: Transportation Study Public Information Surveying TOTAL LIABILITIES SURPLUS 1,492.14 7,293.00 1,563.00 82,411.00 $ 139. 37 245.19 4,338.89 4,723.45 110,130.96 $ 57,287.54 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AUGUST 31, 1967 ASSETS Cash in Banks; Cc & § National Bank $ 14,296.04 First National Bank - Payroll 2,651.88 Trust Company of Georgia 1,000.00 Fulton National Bank - Section 9 20,976.08 Investments: U. S. Treasury Bills 114,812.00 Petty Cash 25.00 Accounts Receivable; Gwinnett County - 1967 $9,105.00 Gwinnett County - 1966 4,552.50 13,657.50 TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES Accounts Payable $ 12,648.37 Payroll Taxes Withheld and Accrued 1,492.14 Reserves: ARMPC - Urban Design Study 7,293.00 Atlanta Transit Study 1,563.00 Parsons~Brinkerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel;: Section 9 Matching 82,411.00 Retainer Agreement: Transportation Study $ 139.37 Public Information 245.19 Surveying , 4, 338.89 4,723.45 TOTAL LIABILITIES SURPLUS $167,418.50 110,130.96 $57,287.54  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 5, Document 42 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 5 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/e7c7b8547f1e8f5e4189a3a94a41ecbd.pdf 679c7b072e05eb06a1a231689307fec5 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY BUDGET REPORT AUGUS? ' 31 ·~. 1967 ·. Unappropriated Surplus BUDGET 1967 ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 196 7 TO AUGUST 31, 196 7 $128,281.64 $128,281.64 $ 84,030.00 $ 63,022.50 23,190.00 82,770.00 91,800.00 18,210.00 $300,000.00 $ 5,520.00 17,392.50 41,385.00 68,850.00 9,105: 9.9 $199,755.00 $ 3,018.77 $ 95,000.00 $371,000.00 $676,520.00 $804,801.64 $ 60,000.00 67,686.12 597.46 $128,283.58 $331,057.35 $459,338.99 $ 68,950.00 10,500.00 $ 41,380.94 7,048.24 1,109.00 533.00 1,680.00 10,000.00 99.00 $ 92,871.00 $ 3,150.00 1,088.89 400.00 758.13 300.54 104.00 $ 51,080.74 $ 2,200.00 iNCOME Appropriations: City of Atlanta Clayton County DeKalb County Fulton County Gwinnett County Sub-Totals Interest Income Federal Funds: 702 Loan Section 9 Grant Interest - Federal Funds Sub-Totals TOTAL INCOME TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS 276,000.00 0 EXPENSES Staff Cost: Salaries Expenses Benefits: Social Security Guaranty Fund Health and Accident Insurance Retirement Workmen's Compensation Aub-Totals Board Meetings Administrative and Office Overhead: Rent Communications and Postage Furniture and Equipment Supplies Printing Auditor Accountant Public Information Advisory Insurance: Public Liability Depository and Forgery Fidelity Bond Sub-Totals CARRIED FORWARD $ 3,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 3,600.00 1,000.00 250.00 1,000.00 33,000.00 5,000.00 72.00 56.00 199.00 $ 51,177.00 $147,198.00 $ 2,000.00 1,254.16 117 .81 1,854.58 623.56 250.00 500.00 15,025.20 977. 35 55.00 56.27 198. 6 0 $ 22,912.53 $ 76,193.27 �METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY BUDGET REPORT AUGUST 31, 1967 BUDGET 19'67 ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 TO AUGUST 31, 1967 I TOTAL INCOME AND UNA?PROPRIATED SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD $804,801.64 $459,338.99 $147,198.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 76,193.27 $ 8,758.61 $ 31,250.00 $ 29",939.00 32,667.00 16,333.00 16,000.00 15,293.00 3,333.00 1,667.00 0 0 1,563.00 4,742.09 EXPENSES Brought Forward Counsel Consultants: Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commis~ion Urban Design Study: Section 9 Matching Atlanta Transit Stu9y; Section 9 Matching Hamm~r, Greene and Siler Parsons-Brinckerhoff-Tudor ~Bechtel: 702 Loan Section 9: Federal Matching Retainer Agreement Research and Technical Services Sub-Totals TOTAL EXPENSES 95,000.00 60,000.00 240,000.00 120,000.00 60,000.00 2,000.00 $602,250.00 $769,448.00 60,000.00 112,411.00 15,115.64 2,035.84 $317,099.57 $402 , 051. 45 SURPLUS $ 35,353.6~ $ 5Z,28Z.5~ � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY BUDGET REPORT AUGUST 31, 1967. Unappropriated Surplus INCOME Appropriations: City of Atlanta Clayton County DeKalb County Fulton County Gwinnett County Sub-Totals Interest Income Federal Funds: 702 Loan Section 9 Grant Interest - Federal Funds Sub-Totals TOTAL INCOME TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS EXPENSES Staff Cost: Salaries Expenses Benefits: Social Security Guaranty Fund Health and Accident Insurance Retirement Workmen's Compensation Aub-Totals Board Meetings Administrative and Office Overhead: Rent Communications and Postage Furniture and Equipment Supplies Printing Auditor Accountant Public Information Advisory Insurance: Public Liability Depository and Forgery Fidelity Bond Sub-Totals CARRIED FORWARD ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 BUDGET TO 1967 AUGUST 31, 1967 $128,281.64 $128,281.64 $ 84,030.00 $ 63,022.50 23,190.00 17,392.50 82,770.00 41,385.00 91,800.00 68,850, 00 18 ,210,00 9,105, 00 $300,000.00 $199,755.00 $§ 5,520.00 $ 3,018.77 $ 95,000.00 $ 60,000.00 276,000.00 67 ,686,12 ) 597.46 $371,000.00 $128,283.58 $676,520.00 $331,057.35 $804,801.64 $459, 338,99 $ 68,950.00 $ 41,380.94 10,500.00 7,048.24 1,109.00 1,088.89 533.00 400.00 1,680.00 758.13 10,000.00 300,54 99.00 104.00 $ 92,871.00 $ 51,080.74 $ 3,150.00 $2,200.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 2,000.00 2,000.00 1,254.16 2,000.00 117.81 3,600.00 1,854.58 1,000.00 623.56 250.00 250.00 1,000.00 500.00 33,000.00 15,025.20 5,000.00 977.35 72.00 55.00 56.00 56.27 199.00 198.60 $ 51,177.00 § 22,912.53 $147,198.00 $ 76,193.27 METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT BUDGET REPORT AUGUST 31, 1967 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD EXPENSES Brought Forward Counsel Consultants: Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission Urban Design Study: Section 9 Matching Atlanta Transit Study; Section 9 Matching Hammer, Greene and Siler Parsons-Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: 702 Loan Section 9: Federal Matching Retainer Agreement Research and Technical Services Sub-Totals TOTAL EXPENSES SURPLUS AUTHORITY ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 BUDGET TO 1967 AUGUST 31, 1967 $804,801.64 $459,338.99 $147,198.06 $ 76,193.27 $ 20,000.00 $8,758.61 $ 31,250.00 $ 29,939.00 32,667.00 16,000.00 16,333.00 15,293.00 3,333.00 0 1,667.00 1,563.00 8) 4,742.09 95,000.00 60,000.00 240,000.00 60,000.00 120,000.00 112,411.00 60,000.00 15,115.64 2,000.00 2,035.84 $602,250.00 $317,099.57 $769,448.00 $402,051.45 $35,353.64 $57,287.54  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 5, Document 41 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 5 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/f8e8df1c8fda60f49b714940dde537aa.pdf b8ff53e261ef349384dba3d3552b51cd Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. MINUTES OF THE NINETEENTH MEETING OF THE METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY SEPTEMBER 5, 1967 The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority held its regular meeting on September 5, 1967, at 3:30 P.M. in the Glenn Building Conference Room, Atlanta. Mr. Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Robert F. Adamson (City of Atlanta) Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County) M. C. Bishop (Fulton County) Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County) Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta) MEMBERS ABSENT: Edgar Blalock (Clayton County) K. A. McMillan (Gwinnett County) L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta) Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta) OTHERS PRESENT: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority H. L. Stuart, General Manager Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary King Elliott, Public Information Director Earl Nelson, Chief Engineer H. N. Johnson, Secretary to General Manager MARTA Advisory Committee H. Boyer Marx, American Society of Landscape Architects Richard Forbes, American Institute of Planners �Consultants J. A. Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta Leon Eplan, Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta W. Stell Huie, Huie & Harland, Atlanta Others Joseph Lay, Robinson-Humphrey Company, Inc., Atlanta William Fletcher, White, Weld & Co., New York City Thomas J. Pendergrast, Courts & Co. P.A. Springer, Atlanta Traffic and Safety Council George B. Pilkington, Bureau of Public Roads John D. Prien, Jr., Executive Director, Georgia Society of Professional Engineers Donald G. Ingram, Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. J. D. Wingfield, Jr., Mrs. Rachel Champagne, Miss Claudette Parrish, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission The meeting was called to order by the Vice Chairman. Minutes The minutes of the August meeting were unanimously approved by the members present. Due to lack of a quorum, it was agreed that this action would be ratified by the Board at the October meeting. Financial Report The General Manager presented the financial report as of August 31, 1967, which is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Costs were running according to the budget. Third quarter appropriations had been received from participating governments with the e x ception of DeKalb and Gwinnett Counties . The tentative budget for fiscal 1968 would be submitted to the Board members for consideration in October . Progress Reports General Manager Mr. Stuart reported that Mr. Nelson had met with officials of the City of Atlanta, Fulton and DeKalb Counties, and the City of - 2 - �Decatur, and furnished them with sets of the 701 report materials for their study. He was scheduled to meet with East Point and · College Park officials to apprise them of transit plans relative to their areas. The General Manager stated that the final draft of the financial report prepared by Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates had been received and would be submitted to the Board members. Public Information Director Mr. Elliott reported that Mr. M. C. Bishop had made rapid transit presentations during the past month before the South Fulton Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors meeting, the College Park Kiwanis Club and the Atlanta Airport Area Rotary Club. At these meetings a film was shown entitled "The Alternate Route"; this was on transportation problems in Los Angeles and its need for a rapid transit system. Mr. Elliott mentioned a special column that will appear in f uture issues of Rapid Transit Progress. It will answer various questions about rapid transit and plans; subject matter will consist of "MARTAnswers" by the General Manager. Chief Engineer Mr. Nelson reported on his attendance at the Engineering Foundation Research Conference held at Proctor Academy , Andover, New Hampshire, August 14-16, where discussions and presentations on e conomic and social aspects of urban transportation were stressed. The imple me nta tion of new transportation technology wa s pre s e nte d b y promine nt res earche rs f rom the fe d e ral government a nd priv a t e industry. Mr . Nelson was instructed to meet with the State Highway Department in connection with the construction of I - 485 in o rder to determine e ff e cts this r oute might h a v e on the t r ansit pl a nni ng. Consultants Pars o n s , Bri n c kerho f f - Tudor, Be chtel Mr. Co i l reported on recent s oil t est borings alo ng the n o rth-so u th line and exhibited formations o f stone taken at various depths. Contractual work f o r these borings had been completed and was - 3 - �being analyzed by Law Engineering Testing Company prior to a final report. Mr. Donald C. Hyde, retired General Manager of the Cleveland Transit System and now an Associated Consultant with Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas, had visited the PBTB offices recently and rendered valuable guidance on patronage and operations studies under way. Mr. Walter Quintin of BART, San Francisco, had also worked in Atlanta recently and furnished information on train controls. Mr. Coil said PBTB's text for the 701 report was completed and was going to the printer very soon. Mr. Bennett mentioned that additional copies, over and above the 250 copies called for under the 701 contract, might be requested by the Authority. Mr. Bishop suggested that the General Manager be authorized to secure an appropriate number of additional copies at MARTA's expense. This was agreed. Mr. Coil reported on progress of Lord & Den Hartog, design consultant for PBTB, in the design work for Transit Center and other stations and said a more detailed report would be made during November. Design concepts of the stations had been presented to those in attendance at the briefing session prior to the meeting. Eric Hill Associates Mr. Eplan briefly reported on progress of the impact study; discussions had been held with school authorities, fire department officials, and housing authorities to consider rapid transit plans and their relationship to these particular functions. He said work was continuing; studies were approximately two-thirds complete. · Proposed New Impact Study Mr. Bennett stated that in view of the studies by Eric Hill Ass ociates and the 701 reports, he had felt there might be duplication of work in the previously submitted work program for the first Section 9 Amendment approved by the Authority at the July meeting. This application had been held up until a revised program was determined and clarified. Mr. Wingfield said consideration was being given to retaining one of the nation's outstanding transportation experts, Alan Voorhees and Associates of Washington, D. c., to evaluate plans and pro grams. This could be a valuable addition to the final planning of the transit system. Voorhees would be able to render the - 4 - �Authority excellent advice and evaluations which would be invaluable as input for the pre-referendum campaign next year. Mr. Ingram of Central Atlanta Progress stated the transportation consultant selected to advise MARTA would be retained by Central Atlanta Progress in connection with its studies on transportation. Other Business Mr. Bennett informed the Board members of a meeting to be held on September 12 in the Highway Board Room, co-sponsored by the -State Highway Department and the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission. The purpose was to discuss important points relative to overall transportation planning. At the meeting it was expected that a Policy Committee would be organized to render decisions regarding the Atlanta Area Transportation Study. It was hoped this would strengthen coordination of all agencies involved in the total transportation planning program for metropolitan Atlanta. To date AATS had operated without unified policy direction. Invitations had been sent to heads of local governments, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Bureau of Public Roads, MARTA, and the Atlanta Transit System. Adjournment The Vice Chairman adjourned the meeting at 4:30 P.M. Next Meeting October 3, 1967. - 5 - � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document MINUTES OF THE NINETEENTH MEETING OF THE METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY SEPTEMBER 5, 1967 The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority held its regular meeting on September 5, 1967, at 3:30 P.M. in the Glenn Building Conference Room, Atlanta. Mr. Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT; Robert F. Adamson (City of Atlanta) Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County) M. C. Bishop (Fulton County) Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County) Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta) MEMBERS ABSENT; Edgar Blalock (Clayton County) K. A. McMillon (Gwinnett County) L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta) Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta) OTHERS PRESENT: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority H. L. Stuart, General Manager Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary King Elliott, Public Information Director Earl Nelson, Chief Engineer H. N. Johnson, Secretary to General Manager MARTA Advisory Committee H. Boyer Marx, American Society of Landscape Architects Richard Forbes, American Institute of Planners Consultants J. A. Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta Leon Eplan, Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta W. Stell Huie, Huie & Harland, Atlanta Others Joseph Lay, Robinson-Humphrey Company, Inc., Atlanta William Fletcher, White, Weld & Co., New York City Thomas J. Pendergrast, Courts & Co. P. A. Springer, Atlanta Traffic and Safety Council George B. Pilkington, Bureau of Public Roads John D. Prien, Jr., Executive Director, Georgia Society of Professional Engineers Donald G. Ingram, Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. J. D. Wingfield, Jr., Mrs. Rachel Champagne, Miss Claudette Parrish, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission The meeting was called to order by the Vice Chairman. Minutes The minutes of the August meeting were unanimously approved by the members present. Due to lack of a quorum, it was agreed that this action would be ratified by the Board at the October meeting. Financial Report The General Manager presented the financial report as of August 31, 1967, which is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Costs were running according to the budget. Third quarter appro- priations had been received from participating governments with the exception of DeKalb and Gwinnett Counties. The tentative budget for fiscal 1968 would be submitted to the Board members for consideration in October. Progress Reports General Manager Mr. Stuart reported that Mr. Nelson had met with officials of the City of Atlanta, Fulton and DeKalb Counties, and the City of Decatur, and furnished them with sets of the 701 report materials for their study. He was scheduled to meet with East Point and College Park officials to apprise them of transit plans relative to their areas. The General Manager stated that the final draft of the financial report prepared by Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates had been received and would be submitted to the Board members. Public Information Director Mr. Elliott reported that Mr. M. C. Bishop had made rapid transit presentations during the past month before the South Fulton Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors meeting, the College Park Kiwanis Club and the Atlanta Airport Area Rotary Club. At these meetings a film was shown entitled "The Alternate Route"; this was on transportation problems in Los Angeles and its need for a rapid transit system. Mr. Elliott mentioned a special column that will appear in future issues of Rapid Transit Progress. It will answer various ques- tions about rapid transit and plans; subject matter will consist of "MARTAnswers" by the General Manager. Chief Engineer Mr. Nelson reported on his attendance at the Engineering Founda- tion Research Conference held at Proctor Academy, Andover, New Hampshire, August 14-16, where discussions and presentations on economic and social aspects of urban transportation were stressed. The implementation of new transportation technology was presented by prominent researchers from the federal government and private industry. Mr. Nelson was instructed to meet with the State Highway Department in connection with the construction of I-485 in order to determine effects this route might have on the transit planning. Consultants Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel Mr. Coil reported on recent soil test borings along the north-south line and exhibited formations of stone taken at various depths. Contractual work for these borings had been completed and was being analyzed by Law Engineering Testing Company prior to a final report. Mr. Donald C. Hyde, retired General Manager of the Cleveland Transit System and now an Associated Consultant with Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas, had visited the PBTB offices recently and ren- dered valuable guidance on patronage and operations studies under way. Mr. Walter Quintin of BART, San Francisco, had also worked in Atlanta recently and furnished information on train controls. Mr. Coil said PBTB's text for the 701 report was completed and was going to the printer very soon. Mr. Bennett mentioned that additional copies, over and above the 250 copies called for under the 701 contract, might be requested by the Authority. Mr. Bishop suggested that the General Manager be authorized to secure an appropriate number of additional copies at MARTA's expense. This was agreed. Mr. Coil reported on progress of Lord & Den Hartog, design con- sultant for PBTB, in the design work for Transit Center and other stations and said a more detailed report would be made during November. Design concepts of the stations had been presented to those in attendance at the briefing session prior to the meeting. Eric Hill Associates Mr. Eplan briefly reported on progress of the impact study; dis- cussions had been held with school authorities, fire department officials, and housing authorities to consider rapid transit plans and their relationship to these particular functions. He said work was continuing; studies were approximately two-thirds com- plete. Proposed New Impact Study Mr. Bennett stated that in view of the studies by Eric Hill Associates and the 701 reports, he had felt there might be dupli- cation of work in the previously submitted work program for the first Section 9 Amendment approved by the Authority at the July meeting. This application had been held up until a revised program was determined and clarified. Mr. Wingfield said consideration was being given to retaining one of the nation's outstanding transportation experts, Alan Voorhees and Associates of Washington, D. C., to evaluate plans and pro- grams. This could be a valuable addition to the final planning of the transit system. Voorhees would be able to render the Authority excellent advice and evaluations which would be in- valuable as input for the pre-referendum campaign next year. Mr. Ingram of Central Atlanta Progress stated the transportation consultant selected to advise MARTA would be retained by Central Atlanta Progress in connection with its studies on transportation. Other Business Mr. Bennett informed the Board members of a meeting to be held on September 12 in the Highway Board Room, co-sponsored by the State Highway Department and the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission. The purpose was to discuss important points relative to overall transportation planning. At the meeting it was ex- pected that a Policy Committee would be organized to render decisions regarding the Atlanta Area Transportation Study. It was hoped this would strengthen coordination of all agencies in- volved in the total transportation planning program for metro- politan Atlanta. To date AATS had operated without unified policy direction. Invitations had been sent to heads of local governments, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Bureau of Public Roads, MARTA, and the Atlanta Transit System. Adjournment The Vice Chairman adjourned the meeting at 4:30 P.M. Next Meeting October 3, 1967.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 5, Document 40 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 5 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/22712c4a2aa3b53c497087cb5c6edb32.pdf eddcb32398ac3d09697fb2c705d49215 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. HUIE AND HARLAND ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW FULTON FEDERAL BUILDING ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 W . STELL HUIE TELEPHONE 522-1641 JAMES R . HARLAND, JR. HARRY L . CASHIN , JR . TOM WATSON BROWN RUFUS A . CHAMBERS TERRILL A . PARKER JAMES H . MORGAN , JR . December 20, 1967 Chairman, Clayton County Commission Chairman, DeKalb County Commission Chairman, Fulton County Commission Chairman, Gwinnett County Commission Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. Gentlemen: Mr. Aldredge, Chairman of the Fulton County Commission, has indicated a desire, in which I believe all of you concur, that representatives of the governments participating in MARTA meet to discuss the proposed legislative changes. Of course, we with MARTA heartily welcome such a meeting as the communications problem seems to become more increasingly difficult. Mr. Aldredge has indicated that he will be in touch with you shortly after Christmas with regard to such a meeting. We look forward to seeing you or your representatives at that time. Wishing for each of you, your families, and your associates, a Merry Christmas, we are Very truly yours, ) WSH/jlt � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document je {- ‘ HUIE AND HARLAND ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW FULTON FEDERAL BUILDING a ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 W. STELL HUIE TELEPHONE JAMES R. HARLAND, JR. 522-1641 HARRY L. CASHIN, JR. TOM WATSON BROWN RUFUS A. CHAMBERS TERRILL A. PARKER i JAMES H. MORGAN, JR. December 20, 1967 Chairman, Clayton County Commission Chairman, DeKalb County Commission Chairman, Fulton County Commission Chairman, Gwinnett County Commission Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr. Gentlemen: Mr. Aldredge, Chairman of the Fulton County Commission, has indicated a desire, in which I believe all of you concur, that representa- tives of the governments participating in MARTA meet to discuss the pro- posed legislative changes. Of course, we with MARTA heartily welcome such a meeting as the communications problem seems to become more in- creasingly difficult. Mr. Aldredge has indicated that he will be in touch with you shortly after Christmas with regard to such a meeting. We look forward to seeing you or your representatives at that time. Wishing for each of you, your families, and your associates, a Merry Christmas, we are ; Very truly yours, HUIE AND HARLAND pe -) ~: ta ee aN \ es WSH/ jit  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 5, Document 4 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 5 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/0a0cd80b3908ae21d0e3640c1e059426.pdf d5ae2cb44df977c3d2e223d53144c8d6 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AUGUST 31, 1967 ASSETS Cash in Banks: C & S National Bank First National Bank - Payroll Trust Company of Georgia Fulton National Bank - Section 9 $ 14,296 . 04 2,651.88 1,000.00 20,976.08 Investments: U. S. Treasury Bills 114,812.00 25.00 Petty Cash Accounts Receivable: Gwinnett County - 19Q7 Gwinnett County - 1966 $9,105.00 4,552.50 13,657.50 $167,418.50 TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES $ 12,648.37 Accounts Payable Payroll Taxes Withheld and Accrued Reserves: ARMPC - Urban Design Study Atlanta Transit Study Parsons-Brinkerhoff-Tudor-Bechtet: Section 9 Matching Retainer Agree~ent: Transportation Study Public Infor\llBtion Surveying TOTAL LIABILITIES SURPLUS 1,492.14 7,293. 00 1 ,563 . 00 82,411.00 $ 139.37 245.19 4,338.89 4,723.45 110,130.96 $ 57 , 287.54 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AUGUST 31, 1967 ASSETS Cash in Banks: C & S National Bank $ 14,296.04 First National Bank - Payroll 2,651.88 Trust Company of Georgia 1,000.00 Fulton National Bank - Section 9 20,976.08 Investments; 7 U. S. Treasury Bills 114,812.00 Petty Cash 25.00 Accounts Receivable: Gwinnett County - 1967 $9,105.00 Gwinnett County - 1966 4,552.50 13,657.50 TOTAL ASSETS $167,418.50 LIABILITIES Accounts Payable $ 12,648, 37 Payroll Taxes Withheld and Accrued 1,492.14 Reserves: ARMPC = Urban Design Study 73293.00 Atlanta Transit Study 1,563.00 Parsons~Brinkerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel; Section 9 Matching 82,411.00 Retainer Agreement: Transportation Study $ 139.37 Public Information 245.19 Surveying 4, 338.89 4,723.45 TOTAL LIABILITIES 110,130.96 SURPLUS 287.5  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 5, Document 39 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 5 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/e13bc3d838fd2960dbc7499172e86d8c.pdf be04ee8cbc75139d1657ccd6c90a6e9d Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY BUDGET REPORT AUaus:r-. ' 3l ·~. 196 7·. Unappropriated Surplus BUDGET 1967 ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 196 7 TO AUGUST 31, 1967 $128,281.64 $128,281.64 $ 84., 030. 00 $ 63,022.50 17,392.50 41, 385.00 68,850.00 9,10.5:9~ $199,755.00 $ 3,018.77 lNCOME Appropriations: City of Atlanta Clayton County DeKalb County Fulton County Gwinnett County St,1b-Totals Interest Income Federal Funds: 702 Loan Section 9 Grant Interest - Federal Funds Sub-Totals TOTAL INCOME TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS 23,190.00 82,770.00 91,800.00 18,210.00 $3001000.00 $ 5,520.00 . $ 95,000.00 276,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $371,000.00 $676,520.00 9804,801.64 67,686.12 597.46 $128,283.58 ."$ 331 z 05 7 , 35 . $459,338.99 $ 68,950.00 10,500.00 $ 41,380.94 7,048 . 24 1,109.00 533.00 1,680.00 10,000.00 99.00 $ 92 1871. 00 $ 3,150.00 1,088.89 400.00 758.13 300.54 104.00 $ 51 1 080.74 $ 2,2 00.00 0 EXPENSES Staff Cost: Salaries Expenses Benefits: Social Security Gua,ranty Fund Health and Accident Insurance Retirement Workmen's Compensation Aub-Totals Board Meetings Administrative and Office Overhead: Rent Communications and Post143.215.248.55 Furniture and Equipment Supplies Printing Auditor Accountant Public Ipform,ation Advisory Insurance: Pub l ic Liability Depository and Forgery Fidelity aon9 Sub-Totals CARRIED FORWARD $ 3,000.00 2, 000.00 2,000 . 00 3 , 600.00 1,000.00 25 0 . 00 1,000 . 00 33,000.00 5 , 000.00 72 . 00 56.00 199.00 $ 51 ,177. 00 $147,198.00 $ 2,000.00 1 ,2 54 .16 117.81 1, 854 .58 623.56 25 0 . 00 500.00 15,025.20 977. 35 55. 00 56.27 198.60 $ 22,9 12.53 $ 76,193~27 �METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY BUI;>GET REPORT AUGUST 31 1 1967 BUDGET lo/67 ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 TO AUGUST 31, 1967 I TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD $804,801.64 $459,338.99 $147,198.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 76,193.27 $ 8,758.61 $ 31,250.00 $ 29,939.00 32,667.00 16,333.00 16,000.00 15,293.00 3,333.00 1,667.00 0 0 1,563.00 4,742.09 EXPENSES Brought Forward Counsel Consultants: Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planµing Commission Urban Design Study: Section 9 Matching Atlanta Transit Study: Section 9 Matching Hamm~r, Greene and Siler P~rsons-Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: 702 Loan Section 9: Federal Matching Retainer Agreement Research and Technical Services Sub-Totals TOTAL EXPENSES 95,000.00 60,000.00 240,000.00 120,000.00 60,000.00 2,000.00 $602,250.00 $769,448.00 60,000.00 112,411.00 15,115 . 64 2,035.84 $317,099.57 $402 I 051. 45 SURPLUS S 35,353,6f± S 5Z, 28Z , 5f± � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY BUDGET REPORT AUGUST’ 31,. 1967: Unappropriated Surplus INCOME Appropriations: City of Atlanta Clayton County DeKalb County Fulton County Gwinnett County Sub-Totals Interest Income Federal Funds: 702 Loan Section 9 Grant Interest - Federal Funds Sub-Totals TOTAL INCOME TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS EXPENSES Staff Cost: Salaries Expenses Benefits: Social Security Guaranty Fund Health and Accident Insurance Retirement Workmen's Compensation Aub-Totals Board Meetings Administrative and Office Overhead: Rent Communications and Postage Furniture and Equipment Supplies Printing Auditor Accountant Public Information Advisory Insurance: Public Liability Depository and Forgery Fidelity Bond Sub-Totals CARRIED FORWARD ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 BUDGET TO 1967 AUGUST 31, 1967 $128,281.64 $128,281.64 $ 84,030.00 $ 63,022.50 23,190.00 17,392.50 82,770.00 41,385.00 91,800.00 68,850.00 18,210.00 9,105, 09 $300,000.00 $199,755.00 $ 5,520.00 $° 32018.77 $ 95,000.00 $ 60,000.00 276,000.00 67,686.12 0 597.46 $371,000.00 $128 , 283.58 $676,520.00 ($331,057.35 $804,801.64 $459,338.99 $ 68,950.00 $ 41,380.94 10,500.00 7,048.24 1,109.00 1,088.89 533.00 400.00 1,680.00 758.13 10,000.00 300.54 99.00 104.00 $ 92,871.00 $ 51,080.74 $ 3,150.00 § 2,200.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 2,000.00 2,000.00 1,254.16 2,000.00 117.81 3,600.00 1,854.58 1,000.00 623.56 250.00 250.00 1,000.00 500.00 33,000.00 15,025.20 5,000.00 977.35 72.00 55.00 56.00 56.27 199.00 198.60 $ 51,177.00 5 22.912. 53 $147,198.00 $ 76,193.27 METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT BUDGET REPORT AUGUST 31, 1967 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD EXPENSES Brought Forward Counsel Consultants: Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission Urban Design Study: Section 9 Matching Atlanta Transit Study: Section 9 Matching Hammer, Greene and Siler Parsons-Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: 702 Loan Section 9: Federal Matching Retainer Agreement Research and Technical Services Sub-Totals TOTAL EXPENSES SURPLUS AUTHORITY ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 BUDGET TO 1967 AUGUST 31, 1967 $804,801.64 $459,338.99 $147,198.00 $ 76,193.27 $ 20,000.00 $ 8,758.61 $ 31,250.00 §$ 29,939.00 32,667.00 16,000.00 16,333.00 15,293.00 3,333.00 ) 1,667.00 1,563.00 0 4,742.09 95,000.00 60,000.00 240,000.00 60,000.00 120,000.00 112,411.00 60,000.00 15,115.64 2,000.00 2,035.84 $602,250.00 $317,099.57 $769,448.00 $402,051.45  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 5, Document 38 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 5 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/0ceabd1ae98f52472db0164351032dbd.pdf dd21df0a7ee44da6bf3f452be36b8db9 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. MINUTES OF THE NINETEENTH MEETING OF THE METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY SEPTEMBER 5, 1967 The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority held its regular meeting on September 5, 1967, at 3:30 P.M. in the Glenn Building Conference Room, Atlanta. Mr. Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Robert F. Adamson (City of Atlanta) Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County) M. C. Bishop (Fulton County) Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County) Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta) MEMBERS ABSENT: Edgar Blalock (Clayton County) K. A. McMillon (Gwinnett County) L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta) Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta) OTHERS PRESENT: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority H. L. Stuart, General Manager Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary King Elliott, Public Information Director Earl Nelson, Chief Engineer H. N. Johnson, Secretary to General Manager MARTA Advisory Committee H. Boyer Marx, American Society of Landscape Architects Richard Forbes, American Institute of Planners �Consultants J. A. Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta Leon Eplan, Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta w. Stell Huie, Huie & Harland, Atlanta Others Joseph Lay, Robinson-Humphrey Company, Inc., Atlanta William Fletcher, White, Weld & Co., New York City Thomas J. Pendergrast, Courts & Co. P.A. Springer, Atlanta Traffic and Safety Council George B. Pilkington, Bureau of Public Roads John D. Prien, Jr., Executive Director, Georgia Society of Professional Engineers Donald G. Ingram, Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. J. D. Wingfield, Jr., Mrs. Rachel Champagne, Miss Claudette ' Parrish, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission The meeting was called to order by the Vice Chairman. Minutes The minutes of the August meeting were unanimously approved by the members present. Due to lack of a quorum, it was agreed that this action would be ratified by the Board at the October meeting. Financial Report The General Manager presented the financial report as of August 31, 1967, which is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes . Costs were running according to the budget. Third quarter appropriations had been received from participating governments with the e xception of DeKalb and Gwinnett Counties. The tentative budget for fiscal 1968 would be submitted to the Board members for consideration in October. Progress Reports General Manager Mr. Stuart reported that Mr. Nelson had met with officials of the City of Atlanta, Fulton and DeKalb Counties, and the City of - 2 - �Decatur, and furnished them with sets of the 701 report materials for their study. He was scheduled to meet with East Point and College Park officials to apprise them of transit plans relative to their areas. The General Manager stated that the final draft of the financial report prepared by Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates had been received and would be submitted to the Board members. Public Information Director Mr. Elliott reported that Mr. M. C. Bishop had made rapid transit presentations during the past month before the South Fulton Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors meeting, the College Park Kiwanis Club and the Atlanta Airport Area Rotary Club. At these meetings a film was shown entitled "The Alternate Route"; this was on transportation problems in Los Angeles and its need for a rapid transit system. Mr. Elliott mentioned a special column that will appear i n future issues of Rapid Transit Progress. It will answer various questions about rapid transit and plans; subject matter will consist of "MARTAnswers" by the General Manager. Chief Engineer Mr. Nelson reported on his attendance at the Engineering Foundation Research Conference held at Proctor Academy, Andover, New Hampshire, August 14-16, where discussions and presentations on economic and social aspects of urban transportation were st r essed. Th e implementation of new t r ansportat i on t e chnology was pres ent e d b y promine nt r esea rchers f rom th e f ederal gove rnment and pr iva t e i ndustry . Mr . Nelson was instructed to meet with the State Highway Depa r tme nt in connection with the construction of I-485 in order to determine e ffects this route might have on the t ran s it pla n n ing . Co nsultants Pa r son s , Brincke rho f f - Tudor, Be chtel Mr. Coil reported o n rece n t s oil t est borings a lo ng the north-so u t h line and exhibite d formations o f s tone taken at var i ous depths. Contractual work f o r these borings had been completed and was - 3 - �being analyzed by Law Engineering Testing Company prior to a final report. Mr. Donald C. Hyde, retired General Manager of the Cleveland Transit System and now an Associated Consultant with Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas, had visited the PBTB offices recently and rendered valuable guidance on patronage and operations studies under way. Mr. Walter Quintin of BART, San Francisco, "had also worked in Atlanta recently and furnished information on train controls. Mr. Coil said PBTB ' s text for the 701 report was completed and was going to the printer very soon. Mr. Bennett mentioned that additional copies, over and above the 250 copies called for under th e 701 contract, might be requested by the Authority. Mr. Bishop suggested that the General Manager be authorized to secure an appropriate number of additional copies at MARTA's expense. This was agreed. Mr . Coil reported on progress of Lord & Den Hartog, design consultant for PBTB, in the design work for Transit Center and other stations and said a more detailed report would be made during Nove mber. Design concepts of the stations had been presented to those in attendance at the briefing session prior to the meeting. Eric Hill Associates Mr . Eplan briefl y reported on progress of the impact study; d i scussions had been held with school authorities, fire department officials, and housing authorities to consider rapid transit plans and their r elationship to these particular functions . He said wo r k was continuing ; studies were appro x imately two-thirds complete. Pr o p os e d New Impact Study Mr. Ben nett stated that in view of the studies b y Eric Hill Associates a nd t h e 701 repo r ts, he had felt the r e might be dupl icat i o n o f wo rk in the p r eviously submitte d wo rk p r ogram fo r t h e fi r s t Sec t i o n 9 Amen dmen t appro ved b y the Autho ri t y at t h e July me e t i n g . Th i s applicatio n h ad been held up until a r e v i s ed pro gram wa s d etermined and cla ri fied. Mr. Wingfi e l d sai d cons ideratio n wa s b e i ng gi v e n t o r eta ining one o f th e nati o n ' s out sta n d ing tra n spo r tati on e xperts , Alan Voorh e es and Ass o ci a t e s of Wa shing t o n , D. C. , t o eval uate plans a nd p r o grams . This could be a valuable a dditio n t o the final planning of the t ransit s y stem . Voorhee s wo uld b e abl e to r e nder the - 4 - �Authority excellent advice and evaluations which would be invaluable as input for the pre-referendum campaign next year. Mr. Ingram of Central Atlanta Progress stated the transportation consultant selected to advise MARTA would be retained by Central Atlanta Progress in connection with its studies on transportation. Other Business Mr. Bennett informed the Board members of a meeting to be held on September 12 in the Highway Board Room, co-sponsored by · the State Highway Department and the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission. The purpose was to discuss important points relative to overall transportation planning. At the meeting it was expected that a Policy Committee would be organized to render decisions regarding the Atlanta Area Transportation Study. It was hoped this would strengthen coordination of all agencies involved in the total transportation planning program for metropolitan Atlanta. To date AATS had operated without unified policy direction. Invitations had been sent to heads of local governments, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Bureau of Public Roads, MARTA, and the Atlanta Transit System. Adjournment The Vice Chairman adjourned the meeting at 4:30 P.M. Next Meeting October 3, 1967. - 5 - � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document LEC MINUTES OF THE NINETEENTH MEETING OF THE METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY SEPTEMBER 5, 1967 The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority held its regular meeting on September 5, 1967, at 3:30 P.M. in the Glenn Building Conference Room, Atlanta. Mr. Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Robert F. Adamson (City of Atlanta) Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County) M. C. Bishop (Fulton County) Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County) Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta) MEMBERS ABSENT; Edgar Blalock (Clayton County) K. A. McMillon (Gwinnett County) L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta) Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta) OTHERS PRESENT: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority H. L. Stuart, General Manager Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary King Elliott, Public Information Director Earl Nelson, Chief Engineer H. N. Johnson, Secretary to General Manager MARTA Advisory Committee H. Boyer Marx, American Society of Landscape Architects Richard Forbes, American Institute of Planners Consultants J. A. Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta Leon Eplan, Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta W. Stell Huie, Huie & Harland, Atlanta Others Joseph Lay, Robinson-Humphrey Company, Inc., Atlanta William Fletcher, White, Weld & Co., New York City Thomas J. Pendergrast, Courts & Co. P. A. Springer, Atlanta Traffic and Safety Council George B. Pilkington, Bureau of Public Roads John D. Prien, Jr., Executive Director, Georgia Society of Professional Engineers Donald G. Ingram, Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. J. D. Wingfield, Jr., Mrs. Rachel Champagne, Miss Claudette Parrish, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission The meeting was called to order by the Vice Chairman. Minutes The minutes of the August meeting were unanimously approved by the members present. Due to lack of a quorum, it was agreed that this action would be ratified by the Board at the October meeting. Financial Report The General Manager presented the financial report as of August 31, 1967, which is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Costs were running according to the budget. Third quarter appro- priations had been received from participating governments with the exception of DeKalb and Gwinnett Counties. The tentative budget for fiscal 1968 would be submitted to the Board members for consideration in October. Progress Reports General Manager Mr. Stuart reported that Mr. Nelson had met with officials of the City of Atlanta, Fulton and DeKalb Counties, and the City of Decatur, and furnished them with sets of the 701 report materials for their study. He was scheduled to meet with East Point and College Park officials to apprise them of transit plans relative to their areas. The General Manager stated that the final draft of the financial report prepared by Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates had been received and would be submitted to the Board members. Public Information Director Mr. Elliott reported that Mr. M. C. Bishop had made rapid transit presentations during the past month before the South Fulton Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors meeting, the College Park Kiwanis Club and the Atlanta Airport Area Rotary Club. At these meetings a film was shown entitled "The Alternate Route"; this was on transportation problems in Los Angeles and its need for a rapid transit system. Mr. Elliott mentioned a special column that will appear in future issues of Rapid Transit Progress. It will answer various ques- tions about rapid transit and plans; subject matter will consist of "MARTAnswers" by the General Manager. Chief Engineer Mr. Nelson reported on his attendance at the Engineering Founda- tion Research Conference held at Proctor Academy, Andover, New Hampshire, August 14-16, where discussions and presentations on economic and social aspects of urban transportation were stressed. The implementation of new transportation technology was presented by prominent researchers from the federal government and private industry. Mr. Nelson was instructed to meet with the State Highway Department in connection with the construction of I-485 in order to determine effects this route might have on the transit planning. Consultants Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel Mr. Coil reported on recent soil test borings along the north-south line and exhibited formations of stone taken at various depths. Contractual work for these borings had been completed and was being analyzed by Law Engineering Testing Company prior to a final report. Mr. Donald C. Hyde, retired General Manager of the Cleveland Transit System and now an Associated Consultant with Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas, had visited the PBTB offices recently and ren- dered valuable guidance on patronage and operations studies under way. Mr. Walter Quintin of BART, San Francisco, had also worked in Atlanta recently and furnished information on train controls. Mr. Coil said PBTB's text for the 701 report was completed and was going to the printer very soon. Mr. Bennett mentioned that additional copies, over and above the 250 copies called for under the 701 contract, might be requested by the Authority. Mr. Bishop suggested that the General Manager be authorized to secure an appropriate number of additional copies at MARTA's expense. This was agreed. Mr. Coil reported on progress of Lord & Den Hartog, design con- sultant for PBTB, in the design work for Transit Center and other stations and said a more detailed report would be made during November. Design concepts of the stations had been presented to those in attendance at the briefing session prior to the meeting. Eric Hill Associates Mr. Eplan briefly reported on progress of the impact study; dis- cussions had been held with school authorities, fire department officials, and housing authorities to consider rapid transit plans and their relationship to these particular functions. He said work was continuing; studies were approximately two-thirds com- plete. ; Proposed New Impact Study Mr. Bennett stated that in view of the studies by Eric Hill Associates and the 701 reports, he had felt there might be dupli- cation of work in the previously submitted work program for the first Section 9 Amendment approved by the Authority at the July meeting. This application had been held up until a revised program was determined and clarified. Mr. Wingfield said consideration was being given to retaining one of the nation's outstanding transportation experts, Alan Voorhees and Associates of Washington, D. C., to evaluate plans and pro- grams. This could be a valuable addition to the final planning of the transit system. Voorhees would be able to render the Authority excellent advice and evaluations which would be in- valuable as input for the pre-referendum campaign next year. Mr. Ingram of Central Atlanta Progress stated the transportation consultant selected to advise MARTA would be retained by Central Atlanta Progress in connection with its studies on transportation. Other Business Mr. Bennett informed the Board members of a meeting to be held on September 12 in the Highway Board Room, co-sponsored by’ the State Highway Department and the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission. The purpose was to discuss important points relative to overall transportation planning. At the meeting it was ex- pected that a Policy Committee would be organized to render decisions regarding the Atlanta Area Transportation Study. It was hoped this would strengthen coordination of all agencies in- volved in the total transportation planning program for metro- politan Atlanta. To date AATS had operated without unified policy direction. Invitations had been sent to heads of local governments, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Bureau of Public Roads, MARTA, and the Atlanta Transit System. Adjournment The Vice Chairman adjourned the meeting at 4:30 P.M. Next Meeting October 3, 1967.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 5, Document 37 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 5 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/45ac987593ca43bebb9a934b7a603c70.pdf cae728471e9c5c9afb4d84a8e2da16fd Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. METROPOl 1 1l TA RAP D TRANS i A UT HOR~T Y GLENN BU ILDI G / ATLANTA , GEORGIA 30303 / AREA COD E 404 524-5711 O FFICERS: Richard H. Rich, Chairman Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary October 3, 1967 Henry L Stuart, General Manager Mr. Charles L. Davis City Comptroller City of Atlanta City Hall Atlanta, Georgia. Dear Mr. Davis: This will acknowledge receipt of and thank you for check No. 18,559 dated October 2, 1967 from the City of Atlanta in the amount of $21,007.50 covering the fourth quarterly payment by the City to the operating budget of the Transi t Aut hori t y. Your promptness in exped iting this matter is indeed appreciated. With b est regards .· Sinc eraly y our s , H. L. Stuart , General Manager. HLS:JJ cc, ~ Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. able Ivan Allen, Jr. Milton G. Farris Rawson Haverty Robt. F. Adamson L. D. Milton - --- � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY GLENN BUILDING / ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 / AREA CODE 404 524-5711 OFFICERS: Richard H. Rich, Chairman Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman October 3, 1967 Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary Henry L. Stuart, General Manager Mr. Charles L. Davis City Comptroller City of Atlanta City Hall Atlanta, Georgia. Dear Mr. Davis: This will acknowledge receipt of and thank you for check No. 18,559 dated October 2, 1967 from the City of Atlanta in the amount of $21,007.50 covering the fourth quarterly payment by the City to the operating budget of the Transit Authority. Your promptness in expediting this matter is in- deed appreciated. With best regards. Sincerely yours, NA tel H. L. Stuart, General Manager. HLS: JJ cc: cit Ivan Allen, Jr. Mr. Milton G. Farris Mr. Rawson Haverty Mr. Robt. F. Adamson Mr. Ls. D. Milton  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 5, Document 36 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 5 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/89a2538c0bee3772ee7700d9a08db2a5.pdf 988a9e64333c28f3b8b370b4bf05dacb Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. METROPOLITNA ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION SEPTEMBER 30, 1967 ASSETS Cash in Banks: C & S National Bank First National Bank Trust Company of Georgia Fulton National Bank - Section 9 $25 .; 768.91 2,907.26 1,000 . 00 90,000 . 00 Investments: U. S. Treasury Bills 99,229.40 Petty Cash 25.00 Accounts Receivable: Gwinnett County - 1967 Gwinnett County - 1966 $13,657.50 4,552.50 18,210.00 TOTAL ASSETS $237,140 . 57 LIABILITIES Accounts Payable $ Payroll Tax es Withheld and Accrued Reserves; ARMPC - Urban Design Study Atlanta Transit Study Parsons-Beinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: Section 9 Matching Retainage Agreement: Transportation Stud y Public Information Surve yi ng TOTAL LIABILITIES SURPLUS 549 . 86 1,779.01 7, 293 . 00 1 , 563 . 00 82,411.00 $ 139.37 207 . 76 4 , 260 . 82 4 ,607.95 98,2 03.82 $138,936, 75 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITNA ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION SEPTEMBER 30, 1967 ASSETS Cash in Banks: C & S National Bank $25,768.91 First National Bank 2,907.26 Trust Company of Georgia 1,000.00 Fulton National Bank - Section 9 90,000.00 Investments: U. S, Treasury Bills 99,229.40 Petty Cash 25.00 Accounts Receivable: Gwinnett County - 1967 $13,657.50 Gwinnett County - 1966 4,552.50 _18,210.00 TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES Accounts Payable $ 549,86 Payroll Taxes Withheld and Accrued 1,779.01 Reserves: ARMPC - Urban Design Study 7,293.00 Atlanta Transit Study 1,563.00 Parsons-Beinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: Section 9 Matching 82,411.00 Retainage Agreement: Transportation Study 2 439.37 Public Information 207.76 Surveying 4,260.82 4,607.95 TOTAL LIABILITIES SURPLUS $237,140.57 98,203.82 $138..936.75  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 5, Document 35 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 5 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/33c14d8392003747ebf29abcd219ae29.pdf 431afeeddd020da36681eaf4934d799c Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT SUTHORITY BUDGET REPORT SEPTEMBER 30, 1967 BUDGET 1967 Unappro priated Surplus ACTUAL JANUARY 1 , 1967 TO SEPTEMBER 30 1 1967 $128,281.64 $128,281.64 $ 84,030.00 23,19 0.00 82,770.00 91,800.00 18,2 10.00 $300,000.00 $ 5,5 20.00 $ 63,022. 50 17 , 392. 50 62,077.50 68,850.00 13,657.50 $2 25 ,000 . 00 $ 3,663.17 $ 95,000. 00 276 ,000 . 00 $371,000.00 $676,520. 00 $804,801.64 $ 60,000 .00 135,402 .54 597.46 $196,000. 00 $424 ,663.17 $552,944.81 $ 68,950.00 10 , 500 .00 $ 47 ,2 03.22 7,863.00 1 , 109.00 533.00 1,680.00 10,000.00 99.00 92 ,871.00 $ $ 3 , 150 . 00 1 , 151.16 400 . 00 875 . 59 300.54 104 .00 5 7,8 97 . 51 $ 2 ,400.00 $ INCOME Appropr iations : City of Atlanta Clayt on County DeKalb County Fulton County Gwinnett County Sub-Totals . Interest Income Federal Funds: 702 Loan Section 9 Grant Interest~ Federal Funds Sub-Totals TOTAL INCOME TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS 0 EXPENSES Staff Cost: Salar ies Expens e s Benefits: Social Secur i ty Gua r anty Fund Health and Accident Insurance Retirement Workmen is Compensation Sub-Totals Board Mee tings Administra t ive and Office Overhe ad : Rent Communication and Postage Fur niture and Equipment Supplies Prin t ing Audi tor Ac countant Public I n forma t i on Advi sory Insurance : Pub l ic Liability De pos i tory and Forger y .Fidel;i.ty Bond Sub-Totals CARRIED FORWARD $ 3, 00 0 .00 2 ,000. 00 2, 000 . 00 3 ,6 00 . 00 1 , 000 . 0025 0 . 00 1, 000 . 00 33, 000 . 00 5 ,000 . 00 72. 00 56. 00 199. 00 51,177.00 $ $147,198.00 $ 2, 25 0 . 00 1 ,448.94 11 7 . 81 1 , 978 . 78 62 3.56 250. 00 500 . 00 17, 009. 03 1 , 077.35 55 .00 56.27 198. 60 25,565.34 $ $ 85,862.85 �METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY BUDGET REPORT SEPTEMBER 30, 1967 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD BUDGET 1967 ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 196 7 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1967 $804,801.64 $552,944.81 $147,198.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 85, 86'2,. 85 $ 9,7~8.61 $ 31,250 . 00 $ 29, 939. 00 32,667.00 16,333.00 16,000.00 15,293.00 3,333.00 1,667.00 0 0 1,563.00 4, 742.09 EXPENSES Brought Forward Counsel Consultants: Atlanta Region Metropolitan P,anning Commission Urban Design Study: Section 9 Matching Atlanta Transit Study: Section 9 Matching Hammer, Greene and Siler Par sons-Brinkerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: 702 Loan Section 9: Federal Matching Retainer Agreement Research and Tec~ni cal Services Sub-Totals TOTAL EXPENSES 95,000.00 60,000.00 240,000. 00 12 0 , 000 . 00 60,000.00 2,000 .00 $602,2 50.00 $769,448. 00 60, 000.00 112,411.00 16,182.67 2,255.84 $318,386.60 $414,008.06 SURPLUS s 35 Sl38, 236. Z5 0 353 6~ I � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT SUTHORITY BUDGET REPORT SEPTEMBER 30, 1967 ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 BUDGET TO 1967 SEPTEMBER 30, 1967 Unappropriated Surplus $128,281.64 $128,281.64 INCOME Appropriations: City of Atlanta $ 84,030.00 $ 63,022.50 Clayton County 23,190.00 17,392.50 DeKalb County 82,770.00 62,077.50 Fulton County 91,800.00 68,850.00 Gwinnett County 18,210.00 13,657.50 Sub-Totals $300,000.00 $225,000.00 Interest Income $ 5,520.00 § 3.663217 Federal Funds: 702 Loan $ 95,000.00 $ 60,000.00 Section 9 Grant 276,000.00 135,402.54 Interest - Federal Funds 0 597.46 Sub-Totals $371,000.00 $196,000.00 TOTAL INCOME $676,520.00 $424 663.17 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS $804,801.64 $552,944.81 EXPENSES Staff Cost: Salaries $ 68,950.00 § 47,203.22 Expenses 10,500.00 7,863.00 Benefits: Social Security 1,109.00 Ls LoL, L6 Guaranty Fund . 533.00 400.00 Health and Accident Insurance 1,680.00 875.59 Retirement 10,000.00 300.54 Workmen's Compensation 99.00 104.00 Sub-Totals $ 92,871.00 S$ 57.897 ,51 Board Meetings $3,150.00 $2,400.00 Administrative and Office Overhead: Rent $ 3,000.00 $§ 2,250.00 Communication and Postage 2,000,00 1,448.94 Furniture and Equipment 2,000.00 L178 Supplies 3,600.00 1,978.78 Printing 1,000,006 623.56 Auditor 250.00 250.00 Accountant 1,000.00 500.00 Public Information 33,000.00 17,009.03 Advisory 5,000.00 L,.077..35 Insurance: Public Liability 72,00 55.00 Depository and Forgery 56.00 56.27 Fidelity Bond 199.00 198.60 Sub-Totals $.51..177,,00 $ 25,565.34 CARRIED FORWARD $147,198.00 S$ 85,862.85 METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY BUDGET REPORT SEPTEMBER 30, 1967 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD EXPENSES Brought Forward Counsel Consultants: Atlanta Region Metropolitan P,anning Commission Urban Design Study: Section 9 Matching Atlanta Transit Study: Section 9 Matching Hammer , Greene and Siler Parsons-Brinkerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: 702 Loan Section 9: Federal Matching Retainer Agreement Research and Technical Services . Sub-Totals TOTAL EXPENSES SURPLUS ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 BUDGET TO 1967 SEPTEMBER 30, 1967 $804,801.64 552,944.81 $147,198.00 $ 85,862.85 $ 20,000.00 $9,758.61 $ 31,250.00 $ 29,939.00 32,667.00 16,000.00 16,333.00 15,293.00 3,333.00 0 1,667.00 1,563.00 0 4,742.09 95,000.00 60,000.00 240,000.00 60,000.00 120,000.00 112,411.00 60,000.00 16 ,182.67 2,000, 00 2,255.84 $602,250.00 $318,386.60 769,448.00 414,008.06 $.35..353,.64 $138.936.75  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 5, Document 34 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 5 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/0c3998852d06e19f2b2593d2b8e8d345.pdf 30388e8f353610c840039b50b7a539ae Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. MINUTES OF THE TWENTIETH MEETING OF THE METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY OCTOBER 3, 1967 The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority held its regular meeting on October 3, 1967, at 3:30 P.M. in the Glenn Building Conference Room, Atlanta. Mr. Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman~ presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Robe1.t F. Adamson (City of Atlanta) Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County) M. C. Bishop (Fulton County) Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County) Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta) K. A. McMillon .( Gwinnett County) L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta) MEMBERS ABSENT: Edgar Blalock (Clayton County) Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta) OTHERS PRESENT: Metropolita n Atl a nt a Rap id Tran s it Autho rity H. L. Stuart, General Manager Glenn E ._ Bennett, Secretary King Elliott , Public I n f ormation Director Earl Ne lson, Chie f Eng i neer H. N . Johns on, Secretary to Ge n eral Ma n a g er Consultants Wal t er Doug las, Pars o ns, Br i nckerho ff, Qua de & Douglas, Ne w Yo rk Gerald M. Stu r man, Parsons, Brinckerho ff, Quade & Dougl as, Ne w -York W. O. S a lter, Parsons, Brincke rhoff- Tudor, Bechtel, Sa n Franci s c o �Consultants (Cont'd.) J. A. Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta Leon Eplan, Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta W. Stell Huie, Huie & Harland, Atlanta Tom Watson Brown, Huie ·& Harland, Atlanta Others Paul Muldawer, Muldawer & Patterson, Atlanta Maartin Den Hartog, Lord & Den Hartog, New York Stan Lorch, Lord & Den Hartog, New York H. Boyer Marx, American Society of Landscape Architects and MARTA Adviso~y Committee P.A. Springer, Atlanta Traffic and Safety Council William Fletcher, White, Weld & Co., New York City George B. Pilkington, Bureau of Public Roads Roger D. Lewis, Bureau of Public Roads John D. Prien, Jr., Ex ecutive Director, Georgia Society of Professional Engineers Bill Schemmel, Marietta Daily Journal Dick Hebert, Atlanta Constitution Dave Donaldson, Securities News Leroy Powell, WAGA-TV Don Bridges, WAGA-TV Mrs. Margaret C. Breland, Jerry A. Coursey, Mrs. Rachel Champagne, Miss Claudette Parrish, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission The meeting was called to o r der by the Vice Chairman. Minutes Upon motion by Mr. Bishop , seconded by Mr. Adamson, the minutes of the September meeting were unanimously approved and the actions of th e August mee ting were ratifie d. Financial Report The General Manager presented the f inancial report as of September 30, 1967, which is attached h ereto and made a part of these minutes. Gwinnett County was in arrears for one- half o f its 1967 commitment. Mr. McMillan reported on a meeting held with Gwinnett - 2 - �County Commissioners and stated payment would be forthcoming. Cash balance would be in line once the recent bill from Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel was audited and paid. Section -9 Amendment The General Manager recommended approval of a resolution authorizing an application to HUD for an amendment to the current Section 9 project and a contract between MARTA and the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission for a three-month study to meet statutory requirements for a coordinated transportation and transit plan required by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. This work would be performed by Alan M. Voorhees and Associates, the cost of which would not . exceed $30,000--$10,000 local money and $20,000 from HUD. The following resolution was unanimously passed: WHEREAS, local funds in the amount of $10,000 are available as matching funds for additional work necessary to expand the scope of HUD Contract No. H-771 as set forth in the Amendment request presented to this Board; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that this Authority request $20,000 additional funds to expand the scope of the technical studies, Section 9 Grant (HUD Contract No. H-771) and approve the Amendment request; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that H. L. Stuart, General Manager of this Authority, be and hereby is authorized and directed to take any and all further actions and to execute for this Authority any and all documents as may be reasonably necessary to make and obtain such request. Huie and Harland Mr. Huie stated that the re was now a need for bond counsel to as sist in preparation of bond issues. There were only two firms in Atlanta specializing in this area and they both were interested in doing this work. He suggested the firm of King & Spalding be retained as bond counsel , with Gambrell & Mobley as associate bond counsel. This would not involve any commitment of money this year. Upon motion by Mr. Bishop, seconded by Mr. Atwood , the following resolution was passed : RESOLVED, that the recommendations of General Counsel with regard to Bond Counsel are approved and that King & Spalding be named Bond Counsel and that Gambrell & Mobley - 3 - �be named Associate Bond Counsel to the Authority with the understanding that Bond Counsel will report to the Authority through General Counsel. Report of Secretary Mr. Bennett reported on recent meetings held with Mr. Robert Sommerville, President of the Atlanta Transit System, ~nd stated he thought any misunderstanding had now been removed. Mr. Sommerville had said he would study MARTA's 701 report before making any further statements. He also expressed an interest in meeting with MARTA's consultants for briefings. Mr. Haverty commended this effort. General Manager Mr. Stuart recommended appointment of a committee made up of members of the Board to approve the procedures under which public hearings and meetings were to be conducted as well as to conduct such hearings and meetings. A design review committee should also be formed and the Finance Committee reactivated. Mr. Bishop suggested the formation of a public relations committee. Upon motion by Mr. Bishop and seconded by Mr. Adamson, it was agreed that Messrs. Rich, Blount and Stuart should appoint these committees and that Mr. Huie prepare bylaws. Mr. Stuart stated that in the past Mr. McBrayer of Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel had represented MARTA at meetings of the Technical Coordinating Committee and the consultants were reimbursed under the retainer agreement. He requested approval of the Board to make adjustments under the retainer agreement now that the Chief Engineer of MARTA would replace Mr. McBrayer. He also requested authorization for $2,000 for graphics under the retainer agreement. Upon motion by Mr. Bishop and seconded by Mr. Adamson, those two requests were approved. Consultants Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel Mr. Coil reported that the design firm of Lord and Den Hartog had completed final drawings for the stations . He stated the 701 report was at the printer and copies should be available for the nex t Board meeting . Mr. Haverty urged that steps be taken to e x pedite completion of the report. - 4 - �At the briefing prior to the Board meeting, a table had been presented showing costs of the system for the metropolitan area as it related to the 65-mile system. The report from Law Engineering Company on soil samples would be ready within the next month; however, PBTB had been using the information developed by that firm on a daily basis. Liaison was being continued with the State Highway Department, municipalities, cities and counties. Meetings Lad been held with the railroads. In response to a question from Mr. Haverty, Mr. Coil said that his firm was getting excellent cooperation from the Highway Department and the railroads. It was mentioned that the General Manager had had at least ten conferences with the railroads, all of which were most satisfactory. Eric Hill Associates Mr. Eplan stated work was almost finished on the impact of the system on certain facilities such as schools and fire stations. The report on the impact on the poor and disadvantaged was being written. The firm's current effort was giving line-by-line reviews to the General Manager and engineers on recommendations as to possible changes, conflicts and opportunities for development. Reviews had been submitted on the east and west lines. He commented that relationships with the engineers had been very good. Mr. Muldawer, whose firm is assisting Eric Hill Associates in its work, made a presentation showing potential development around the Cultural Center as it related to rapid transit. The firm will prepare such information regarding ten or twelve key stations. 196 8 Proposed Budget Mr. Stuart presented the proposed budget for · l968. This required only Board review; approval of the budget would be requested at the December .meeting. The proposed budget showed a carry-over from 1967 of $230,000 with income for 1968 estimated to be about $1.5 million. Income was based on continuing participation of local governments, money appropriated by the State, money authorized by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, as well as anticipated federal funds for applications to be submitted by the first of the year. Operating expenses amounted to approx imately $1.6 million. Mr. Stuart was instructed to forward the proposed budget to the governments after preparing a more detailed e xplanation for each item. - 5, - �Rail Equipment Mr. Douglas discussed the various kinds of rail equipment and pointed out the advantages and disadvantages of each. de recommended to the Board thdt it conside£ steel wheels on steel rails. If any other system developed more potential, it should be considered only if it demonstrated substantial savings. Mr. Douglas pointed out that 70-foot cars seating 72 passengers would cost approximately $200,000 per car. Adjournment The Vice Chairman adjourned the meeting at 4:50 P.M. Next Meeting November 7, 1967. - 6 - � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document MINUTES OF THE TWENTIETH MEETING OF THE METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY OCTOBER 3, 1967 The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority held its regular meeting on October 3, 1967, at 3:30 P.M. in the Glenn Building Conference Room, Atlanta. Mr. Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Robert F. Adamson (City of Atlanta) Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County) M. C. Bishop (Fulton County) Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County) Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta) K. A. McMillon (Gwinnett County) L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta) MEMBERS ABSENT: Edgar Blalock (Clayton County) Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta) OTHERS PRESENT: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority H. L. Stuart, General Manager Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary King Elliott, Public Information Director Earl Nelson, Chief Engineer H. N. Johnson, Secretary to General Manager Consultants Walter Douglas, Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, New York Gerald M. Sturman, Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, New -York W. O. Salter, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, San Francisco Consultants (Cont'd.) J. A. Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta Leon Eplan, Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta W. Stell Huie, Huie & Harland, Atlanta Tom Watson Brown, Huie & Harland, Atlanta Others Paul Muldawer, Muldawer & Patterson, Atlanta Maartin Den Hartog, Lord & Den Hartog, New York Stan Lorch, Lord & Den Hartog, New York H. Boyer Marx, American Society of Landscape Architects and MARTA Advisory Committee P. A. Springer, Atlanta Traffic and Safety Council William Fletcher, White, Weld & Co., New York City George B. Pilkington, Bureau of Public Roads Roger D. Lewis, Bureau of Public Roads John D. Prien, Jr., Executive Director, Georgia Society of Professional Engineers Bill Schemmel, Marietta Daily Journal Dick Hebert, Atlanta Constitution Dave Donaldson, Securities News Leroy Powell, WAGA-TV Don Bridges, WAGA-TV Mrs. Margaret C. Breland, Jerry A. Coursey, Mrs. Rachel Champagne, Miss Claudette Parrish, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission The meeting was called to order by the Vice Chairman. Minutes Upon motion by Mr. Bishop, seconded by Mr. Adamson, the minutes of the September meeting were unanimously approved and the actions of the August meeting were ratified. Financial Report The General Manager presented the financial report as of Septem- ber 30, 1967, which is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Gwinnett County was in arrears for one-half of its 1967 commitment. Mr. McMillon reported on a meeting held with Gwinnett County Commissioners and stated payment would be forthcoming. Cash balance would be in line once the recent bill from Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel was audited and paid. Section 9 Amendment The General Manager recommended approval of a resolution authorizing an application to HUD for an amendment to the current Section 9 project and a contract between MARTA and the Atlanta Region Metro- politan Planning Commission for a three-month study to meet statu- tory requirements for a coordinated transportation and transit plan required by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. This work would be performed by Alan M. Voorhees and Associates, the cost of which would not exceed $30,000--$10,000 local money and $20,000 from HUD. The following resolution was unanimously passed: WHEREAS, local funds in the amount of $10,000 are available as matching funds for additional work necessary to expand the scope of HUD Contract No. H-771 as set forth in the Amendment request presented to this Board; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that this Authority request $20,000 additional funds to expand the scope of the tech- nical studies, Section 9 Grant (HUD Contract No. H-771) and approve the Amendment request; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that H. L. Stuart, General Manager of this Authority, be and hereby is authorized and directed to take any and all further actions and to execute for this Authority any and all documents as may be reasonably necessary to make and obtain such request. Huie and Harland Mr. Huie stated that there was now a need for bond counsel to as- sist in preparation of bond issues. There were only two firms in Atlanta specializing in this area and they both were interested in doing this work. He suggested the firm of King & Spalding be retained as bond counsel, with Gambrell & Mobley as associate bond counsel. This would not involve any commitment of money this year. Upon motion by Mr. Bishop, seconded by Mr. Atwood, the following resolution was passed: RESOLVED, that the recommendations of General Counsel with regard to Bond Counsel are approved and that King & Spalding be named Bond Counsel and that Gambrell & Mobley be named Associate Bond Counsel to the Authority with the understanding that Bond Counsel will report to the Authority through General Counsel. Report of Secretary Mr. Bennett reported on recent meetings held with Mr. Robert Sommerville, President of the Atlanta Transit System, and stated he thought any misunderstanding had now been removed. Mr. Sommer- ville had said he would study MARTA's 701 report before making any further statements. He also expressed an interest in meeting with MARTA's consultants for briefings. Mr. Haverty commended this effort. General Manager Mr. Stuart recommended appointment of a committee made up of mem- bers of the Board to approve the procedures under which public hearings and meetings were to be conducted as well as to conduct such hearings and meetings. A design review committee should also be formed and the Finance Committee reactivated. Mr. Bishop suggested the formation of a public relations committee. Upon motion by Mr. Bishop and seconded by Mr. Adamson, it was agreed that Messrs. Rich, Blount and Stuart should appoint these com- mittees and that Mr. Huie prepare bylaws. Mr. Stuart stated that in the past Mr. McBrayer of Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel had represented MARTA at meetings of the Technical Coordinating Committee and the consultants were reimbursed under the retainer agreement. He requested approval of the Board to make adjustments under the retainer agreement now that the Chief Engineer of MARTA would replace Mr. McBrayer. He also requested authorization for $2,000 for graphics under the retainer agreement. Upon motion by Mr. Bishop and seconded by Mr. Adamson, those two requests were approved. Consultants Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel Mr. Coil reported that the design firm of Lord and Den Hartog had completed final drawings for the stations. He stated the 701 report was at the printer and copies should be available for the next Board meeting. Mr. Haverty urged that steps be taken to expedite completion of the report. At the briefing prior to the Board meeting, a table had been pre- sented showing costs of the system for the metropolitan area as it related to the 65-mile system. The report from Law Engineering Company on soil samples would be ready within the next month; however, PBTB had been using the information developed by that firm on a daily basis. Liaison was being continued with the State Highway Department, municipalities, cities and counties. Meetings had been held with the railroads. In response to a question from Mr. Haverty, Mr. Coil said that his firm was getting excellent cooperation from the Highway De- partment and the railroads. It was mentioned that the General Manager had had at least ten conferences with the railroads, all of which were most satisfactory. Eric Hill Associates Mr. Eplan stated work was almost finished on the impact of the system on certain facilities such as schools and fire stations. The report on the impact on the poor and disadvantaged was being written. The firm's current effort was giving line-by-line re- views to the General Manager and engineers on recommendations as to possible changes, conflicts and opportunities for development. Reviews had been submitted on the east and west lines. He com- mented that relationships with the engineers had been very good. Mr. Muldawer, whose firm is assisting Eric Hill Associates in its work, made a presentation showing potential development around the Cultural Center as it related to rapid transit. The firm will prepare such information regarding ten or twelve key stations. 1968 Proposed Budget Mr. Stuart presented the proposed budget for 1968. This required only Board review; approval of the budget would be requested at the December meeting. The proposed budget showed a carry-over from 1967 of $230,000 with income for 1968 estimated to be about $1.5 million. Income was based on continuing participation of local governments, money appropriated by the State, money authorized by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, as well as anticipated federal funds for applications to be submitted by the first of the year. Operating expenses amounted to approximately $1.6 million. Mr. Stuart was instructed to forward the proposed budget to the governments after preparing a more detailed ex- planation for each item. Rail Equipment Mr. Douglas discussed the various kinds of rail equipment and pointed out the advantages and disadvantages of each. de recom- mended to the Board that it consider steel wheels on steel rails. If any other system developed more potential, it should be con- sidered only if it demonstrated substantial savings. Mr. Douglas pointed out that 70-foot cars seating 72 passengers would cost approximately $200,000 per car. Adjournment The Vice Chairman adjourned the meeting at 4:50 P.M. Next Meeting November 7, 1967.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 5, Document 33 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 5 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/65ec21a4f6e23c417f347e19a78ae884.pdf 75367733ed39968e93d6fbbb68ee84f3 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. METROPOLITNA ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION SEPTEMBER 30, 1967 ASSETS Cash in Banks: C & S National Bank First National Bank Trust Company of Georgia Fulton National Bank - Section 9 $25,7 68.9 1 2,907.26 1,000.00 90,000 . 00 Investments: U. S. Treasury Bills 99,229.40 Petty Cash 25.00 Accounts Receivable: Gwinnett County - 1967 Gwinnett County - 1966 $13,657.50 4,552.50 18,210.00 TOTAL ASSETS $237,140.57 LIABILITIES Accounts Payable $ Payroll Taxes Wi thheld and Accrued Reserves: ARMPC - Urban Design Study Atlanta Transit Study Parsons-Beinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: Section 9 Matching Retainage Agreement: Transportation Study Public Information Surveying TOTAL LIABILITIES SURPLUS 549.86 1,779.01 7,293.00 1,563.00 82,411.00 $ 139.37 207.76 4,260.82 4,607.95 98,203.82 $138,936 75 I � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITNA ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION SEPTEMBER 30, 1967 ASSETS Cash in Banks: C & S National Bank $25,768.91 First National Bank 2,907.26 Trust Company of Georgia 1,000.00 Fulton National Bank - Section 9 90,000.00 Investments: U. S. Treasury Bills 99,229.40 Petty Cash 25.00 Accounts Receivable: Gwinnett County - 1967 $13,657.50 Gwinnett County - 1966 4,952.00. 2185210200 TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES Accounts Payable $ 549,86 Payroll Taxes Withheld and Accrued L779 301 Reserves: ARMPC - Urban Design Study 75293,00 Atlanta Transit Study ; 1,563.00 Parsons-Beinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: Section 9 Matching 82,411.00 Retainage Agreement: Transportation Study S 139.37 Public Information 207.76 Surveying 4,260.82 4,607.95 TOTAL LIABILITIES SURPLUS $237,140.57 98,203.82 $138,936.75  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 5, Document 32 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 5 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/9ca8fee343a5b8625777099300bacc85.pdf 5c44226b99a6cf42cf865f2699b324a2 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT /tUTHORITY BUDGET REPORT SEPTEMBER 30, 1967 BUDGET 1967 Unappropriated Surplus ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 196 7 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1967 $128,281.64 $128,281.64 $ 84,030.00 23,190.00 82,770.00 91,800.00 18,210.00 $300,000.00 $ 5,520.00 $ 63,022.50 17,392.50 62,077.50 68,850.00 13,657 . 50 $225,000 . 00 $ 3,663.17 $ 95,000.00 276,000.00 $371,000.00 $676,520.00 $804,801.64 $ 60,000.00 135,402.54 597.46 $196,000.00 $424,663.17 $552,944.81 $ 68,950.00 10,500.00 $ 4 7 ,2 03 .22 7,86 3.00 1 , 109.00 533.00 1 ,680 . 00 10,000.00 99.00 $ 92,871.00 $ 3,150.00 1 , 151.16 400.00 875 . 59 300 . 54 104. 00 $ 57,897 . 51 $ 2,4 00.00 INCOME Appropriations: City of Atlanta Clayton County DeKalb County Fulton County Gwinnett County Sub-Tota ls . Interest Income Federal Funds: 702 Loan Section 9 Grant Interest~ Federal Funds Sub-Totals TOTAL INCOME TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS 0 EXPENSES Staff Cost: Salaries Ex penses Benefits: Social Security Guaranty Fund Health and Accident Insurance Retirement . Workmen's Compensation Sub-Totals Board Meetings Administrative and Offic e Overhead: Rent Communica tion and Postage Furniture and Equipment Supplies Printing Auditor Accountant Public Information Advisory Insurance: Public Liability Depository and Forgery Fide l ;i.t y Bond Sub - Totals CARRIED FORWARD $ 3,000.00 2, 000 . 00 2, 000 . 00 3,600.00 1 , 000 . 00250.00 1,000.00 33,000 . 00 5,000.00 72.00 56.00 199.00 51 I 177. 00 $ $147 , 198 . 00 $ 2,25 0 .00 1,448.94 117 .8 1 1,978.78 623.56 250.00 500.00 17 ,009.03 1 ,077.35 55.00 56 . 27 198 . 60 $ 25 , 565.34 $ 85 , 86 2 .85 �METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY BUDGET REPORT SEPTEMBER 30, 1967 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD BUDGET 1967 ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1967 $804 , 801.64 $552,944.81 $147,198. 00 $ 20,000.0-0 $ 85, 86'2.. 85 $ 31,250.00 $ 29, 939 . 00 32,667.00 16,333.00 16,000.00 15,293.00 3,333.00 1,667.00 0 0 1,563.00 4, 742.09 EXPENSES Brought Forward Counsel Consultants: Atlanta Region Metropolitan P,anning Commission Urban Design Study: Section 9 Matching Atlanta Transit Stuoy: Section 9 Matching Hammer, Greene and Siler Parsons-Brinkerhoff-Tudor-B~ch tel : 702 Loan Section 9: Federal Matching Retainer Agreement Research and Technical Services Sub-Totals TOTAL EXPENSE S 95,000. 00 60 , 000.00 240 , 000.00 120 , 000.00 60 , 000. 00 2, 000. 00 $6 02,2 50.00 $769 ,448.00 60 , 000.00 112,411.00 16 , 182.67 2, 255.84 $318,386.60 $414,008.06 SURPLUS s Sl.38, 2.36. ZS 35,35.3,6~ $ 9,75.8.61 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY BUDGET REPORT SEPTEMBER 30, 1967 ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 BUDGET TO 1967 SEPTEMBER 30, 1967 Unappropriated Surplus $128,281.64 $128,281.64 INCOME Appropriations: City of Atlanta S 84,030.00 $ 63,022.50 Clayton County 23,190.00 17,392.50 DeKalb County 82,770.00 62,077.50 Fulton County 91,800.00 68,850.00 Gwinnett County 18,210.00 13,657.50 Sub-Totals $300,000.00 $225,000.00 Interest Income $5,520.00 $ 3,663.17 Federal Funds: 702 Loan $ 95,000.00 $ 60,000.00 Section 9 Grant 276,000.00 135,402.54 Interest - Federal Funds 0 597.46 Sub-Totals $371,000.00 $196 ,000.00 TOTAL INCOME $676 ,520.00 $424 663.17 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS $804,801.64 $552,944.81 EXPENSES Staff Cost: Salaries $ 68,950.00 $ 47,203.22 Expenses 10,500.00 7,863.00 Benefits: Social Security 1,109.00 1,151.16 Guaranty Fund 533.00 400.00 Health and Accident Insurance 1,680.00 875.59 Retirement 10,000.00 300.54 Workmen's Compensation 99,00 104.00 Sub-Totals $ 92,871.00 $57,897.51 Board Meetings $3,150.00 $2,400.00 Administrative and Office Overhead: Rent §$ 3,000.00 $ 2,250.00 Communication and Postage 2,000.00 1,448.94 Furniture and Equipment 2,000.00 117.81 Supplies 3,600.00 1,978.78 Printing 1,000.00 623.56 Auditor 250.00 250.00 Accountant 1,000.00 500.00 Public Information 33,000.00 17,009.03 Advisory 5 ,000.00 1,077.35 Insurance: Public Liability 72,00 55,00 Depository and Forgery 56.00 56.27 Fidelity Bond 199.00 198.60 Sub-Totals § 51,177.00 $ 25,565.34 CARRIED FORWARD $147,198.00 $ 85,862.85 METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY BUDGET REPORT SEPTEMBER 30, 1967 ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 BUDGET TO 1967 SEPTEMBER 30, 1967 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD $804,801.64 $552,944.81 EXPENSES Brought Forward $147,198.00 $ 85,862.85 Counsel $_ 20,000.00 $9,758.61 Consultants: Atlanta Region Metropolitan P,anning Commission $ 31,250.00 $ 29,93°.00 Urban Design Study: Section 9 32,667.00 16,000.00 Matching 16,333.00 15,293.00 Atlanta Transit Study: Section 9 3,333.00 0 Matching 1,667.00 1,563.00 Hammer , Greene and Siler 0 4,742.09 Parsons-Brinkerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: 702 Loan 95,000.00 60,000.00 Section 9: Federal 240,000.00 60,000.00 Matching 120,000.00 112,411.00 Retainer Agreement 60,000.00 16,182.67 Research and Technical Services 2,000.00 2,255.84 Sub-Totals $602,250.00 $318 , 386.60 TOTAL EXPENSES $769,448.00 $414 ,008. 06 SURPLUS $_35..353,64 $138,936.75  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 5, Document 31 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 5 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/b5d87cba8ef7e3415995440cf8a13d9f.pdf 85a954ee1739f2c0f8e6819470d7ed7b Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. Sc ,:::cion l. _-\:.1 _.\c t known as th~ lvfci.:ro1)01itan Adan ta I-C ni<l . i Tr2. .. s i ;: -~'.:cl:o ·i:.y _-\.c · oi 1)65 , ;;;.pprovcd :\t~;:irch 10 , 1965 (Gz... L aws 196 5, p '. ? ' ·.=.) ~) ' - ci.S arnc r..d~d, p:1rticularly by an Act approve .). ) U.l ::i, ·~: t:~011 .!_ l.ll it: .· Cll ,.i..l' c v'j. March -:'. , ,nd i n .;cr t i"i , , " i.· li e -~o a cccpt,.:;ci -;:Hi::-.. ciplc s oi 2.cc01..:n;::.~-.. g , the total cost, paid . 1cur:r(.;c, ' o:.· :..1 to study, · 111~n C(;, a ra"'.)ic. tr2..nsit sy s ten.1. or rz..nici ·i::.· 2.ns::.t "._)1·ojecc to a nor-:.·:c.a.l o::: c-~:.~ :t cd, to cla_ify wha~ co sts rnay be capi - i:-:. c...'.iY way fr.cs0 - E:X?E:nses w:. ich L'...ay be ca:c .:.·.:aLzccl &s ta ized as costs of a. rapid t ra. sit syste m or project w 1_,___ ac e~ ue on obligations 1 s sued 0y tn e Al:fr. . o:;: i.:y to n:c.2.•:cc t::e con st... ;_:c.:io:i of J.'.1.f -an i d tra1c.si"i.: sys.:e:-.. --. o:;:- ?:.·oj<;C'C di.:;. rin g t i1c co ns .:::n:ct:.or:. Dc r-i od ane'.. :or s1:-:: ( 6) . . costs :.ncurrea . . :..-1 .::,;·._,.);::,..._;C~:.G '·.L' ) ' 21' 0 1-.r S ,··c'.:ion 6 ..... 1n l'cS a ::-,c w ~-..;,~:,.3,:: ccion (i)(2) wnich s1cali rc.-:i.d as follow s: 1n �f: ,) ~ ) T~1c purcl:.:i.sc or lc;:i.se of a n y privat e ly o w n ed dcl c t ' tl ' r ~qu ir~ 1n ' n . oi .:i. showii:s sys1:c1-:1 oi: ;;r;:i11spo ::.--t ati o n of -oa c;sen g cr s £or hire in i~s h.::. t L1 <2 C l~ ui s i i o 1 .J o.:.· 3. .p. r::. v a · ly- o,vncd . .~::t i :i.· (!ty, rans?Ortat io:1 syst 1-1 . s e sse, . .:ial to t 1 i~" s..:ction 8( c) o .. S (d ). ri cev dopm.ent oi _ a.pid t r a.i: sit in the met::.· o S a i d A ct ::.s fur fr, c _ i:l.lYJ.encle d by s c:rikin g th e refrom -:i 0lita. are::a uo ;:..:; ci.io::-: ' c) of Sc::ction 3 1n it::; (;:1t i:.: ety &nd inserting in liE:u the::rcof • I ) • 7 s •• a.!.1 "" r • a ::1 cw s ·...: •::i scc"10::1. ~c w 1Ecn _ eac..1 a s :c0 _1ows 11 I c ) T h e power to develo p cia1:;:.., p~.a:;:-,.:; and inJ.orn1ation d<:!ve:lo p and car::.· y 01.. t mass t r ansportatio n demo::;.stra - tio~1 projects , including the deve:lop:rnent, testing a ~1d dem cns-:: _ ation of :iew f acilities, e qui pme:;:-,'~, techniques ancl methods, and ·c he i mp :-- o · vement and u t il:.zation of tr ans?o :: ·ca-cion servi ce s ai1.d facilit::.es, anc. any other rr:.eans ve lo ? in g, uti~izir: g OT 01 de - i r.:1p rov i 11 g :i.Tia s s t~a::..: s :) Or Latio r1 :i.r.:. to e l e t e a p r o vi s io n subje cting sa id c~-:. ; i:1(;;:;ring , :::.l13. l1Ci:cl c:..r.cl e:c o :;:-. ol-:"1.1c s ·.:l:d i-.:s, ·.:o n : a,,;_c; ?l ct~: s , A u tho .. ity t o liability io r c e rt a i n atto rn e ys dc.: si g:-1s a nd te s ~s rc : a:: c c. .:o r2. p ::.c. -;;ra:.isi·~·projects . I:-.:. c o::1 fee s of a dverse parties rc. a :.:1ner ·c.::ion 2::iy lands, wat e:i: s o r prei-:11s es fo r .:he purpose -. (;\ , ·...._b .,; c;ctic:i.-.:. (i) wh: c: sha ll r cz.<l a::; iollow s : ' i) e,{ r;:r.(; po\vC w e n te r i n t o c ontrac t s with t he St3.t c G-.:o ::.- g i 2. &nd a ny ager.. cy, i r, s tr u :-n e: ntalit y , a u tho ri ty , - ~- �rn.unicip::i.lity o:i: politic :;_ su!.:)division thereof or ·:n cr...:in, J.nd pa riicub.rly with the locJ.l govcrnn1.cnts wit>.in u1c n:.c:t:i: opo:i.itJ.n ca , ::or public trans :,ortation services to be :ren · erea by the Au hority or its rapid -~:::;:;.:1sit ::;yster,1, ;.;.nc ior any o·c'1.cr pu:rposc:s inciccntal ·:o i,1dica t e ,-:hich puolic bociies s id _~_uthority may con - o :1.1-2 cs;;a.'.:llishrn.cnt a.. d 111.ain·c<.::nancc of its rapid tr2.ns i t tract \Yith pertaining syst1::n1., or any par·c or project t·1ereo ~, including the to its purposes nd to cla:::-ify the power payr:.,...:::'t oi iunds to subsidize fr1e operations oi such of loc3.l governinents top Y opera ional subs idi es syste1n if ·t s}1ould ev ::: be nccc:ssa:;.:y to the usual fa.ciliti""s related t::iereto . Sec-'-icn i . o so, and 11 Said Act is fu _ ther a1nended by striking t: ereiron.J. subscc·.::.on c) of Section 9 :.n its entirety and inse1·ti~1.~ i:::i lieu t..1.ereof a new subsection (c) which shall read as follows : Boa ~ d shall , . Q(!·i: ~ ::~11'1:i.~-- C oy itseli c:):clusi vcly by ·.:--ic Au:ho:city, the scr-~eduled se:::vice::; ;;o be made available to the pi..1.biic and -~he an'lo·u.nt s to be charged to eliminate the pro v ision for judicial review of char ge s or services fixed by said Authority '.:r..e::.:eio :: . c:1eclulec. Before 1na!c:.. ng a:n.y c.e·~erminations as to ervices o_ an"lou::1.ts ·co be chz..rged there:o::.·, the.; 302.::-c. shall :i.i:;.: st hold a·c lez..st one public hearing ·~:-,..:; largc:c.t circulatic.,n J. -~}1c ·11.d:ro )ol:i.tan :1:.: ...: no · c:-_0~c ·" .::... ten u ays :.1.or lcs.3 tr.an five d:iys prior ..;o the - 3-- �:n,lcs an,t rcg,1L.1.tio 1s tu g0vc1·n ::;uch hc:::i.ring::; not Sc...: ion 6. 1 SJ.i ' _.\ct 1s fu:rthcr 'arnc:1.dcd by sL iking tbcrciror11. cw ··d) sc ctio 1 (d) which shall ::cad ;.is :.:allows : I, : \ ~ .l ) ..)c~::.· intc.:. est p::i.yablc 2.t s · c h tin1cs :tncl a· such rate o:::- rc:.tcs .nd sI'.all rnaturc 1n s,__...cn amounts and at Si.:.c: :i:Y1es _ot exc eeding :or ty (".::O) ye!2.rs fro:,n the d2.-ce fne1· eof, as th i3oard rr:.ay detenni ne . The to delew require n:.en-s t at rev nue bonds 1nay be ir. coupo :1 or registered f r om, or both , bonds o: said A ui:1:o rity be sold at pa 2.nd bearing inte est at as the Boa1·d 111.ay d ete r:nin e , a:id the Board may · a rate not exceedin;; ff.::.:,c provision for the rcgis-::rz.:~io::-, 0£ any co upon bond s 1x per cent per anr.um .::::c:.: es -:: . s;.1'.:,scctiora ( 6 ) 01 1' S ection 10 in its e:::1.ti r e ty a:1.c. i:..1.serting 1r.. lieu t:ne1·cc:.: tcnY:::io:::-2.ry bonds, equi pn:1er..t trust c<c:rtificates 2.::::d oth e :::to p1·ovic.e that ail ooligations issued by o0:i_;;atio:is issued "l.:r.de r ·cl1e provis ions 0£ this Act s::J.l~ said Authority sh.a 1 havE: t ' e q;__;_alities a _d inciC:.ents o , egotiable "L:r..cler the la.ws of this state anc. a _ c !1. e r eoy decl2._ ccl to instruments a:1C: the: pro;?e 1··cy, obligi:i:cic,r.s an~ interest 0:1 1:.1.:: obli~2.tioj::s oi the A-.....t::--iority shall be cx~rn.pt fro1n all taxaticn wit"1in ~- .. - �1 i 'CliOl1 8 . Said Act i::; further am.ended by strikin g therefr or.n Sl:b s 'Ci..iOl1 (h) oi Sec ·ion 10 i _ -,. ... -2.w .t::i cmircty a . . cl in se r t in g m lic:u thereof s1.:.0scctior. h) whi c:n sho..11 read a::; follows : 11 (:1) Born:s oi the Authority r-:i.ay be ::;old by public c :11.pctitive b::.dding o:· dnol·: gh negotiation with ).i.: spc c ;;ive p cu-cha$c r o p'l.:rch.:i..se rs. If the J.. o::i.rd .::ictc ·n~::..-:2::; tl," t so..i '-' by public co m .petiti vc bidd in g is t o ddcte the equire 111.cnt that bo 1.ds be in 1:11c best interest of ·he A u 'i:ho rity with res )C Ct to o ld a t public c~lni p '.li. .i.vc b.i.cdin ~ 1oti cc al:al o: sale an invita'ci o n to bid wit:-1 respec t thereto be adve::: t ised ~s is custon:.arily d one in the ha-:.1.dlin g of g ovcrnrnental bond issues and section 14(b) as to th.:;sc . . atters shall not a p ply. Se;ctio ~ 9. 11 Sz..ici _t\ct 1 s :\.:1··.:t.2 r c1.rr. . e11dcc~ by st ri:( i ng tl:c::: ci r o:ci:-1 . ~~·. I....' : II ?) vz..l.icia.t:cci , :;.r1 s0::a :c as a::>plic:able:, i n a cco:rci anc c w i tl1. tne proc c~u2: e of fr1e i\even:c:. e :2.ond Law (Ga . L . 19 37, ? • 7'. . C 1, (;t . seq . ) as now c :: h e r e a:frer a1ner:d.:::ci . T11e to clar ify the p : :.- 0 cedur e fo th e validar;ctition fo -:: valiC::.ation s},all c:..lso rn.a. ~ e pa rty de:ic:ad ant tion of rcvenu(:; bonds · t 0 ::; u ch action a . . y n unicipal ' ty , county , aut 10· ity, ·<1 .J C i vi s i0n , in:;.;tn.;.1n c nt:..t.lity o dcpar1.1Y1cnt of th e StC!.tc: o · Ce 0r gia , i:Z subject to be sued , which has conn a ct e.::i with t:he: Autncr i '~y £o r ·.:he -;i :.: 0 · e:ct i c 12 ~ vices and iacilitics , 01 J.:8 ior wnich bo::-,ds arc to be is succ. a1;.d so g},.t .. o validated and suc:1 n'lunicip~.lity , county , auth or ity, i 'l.,b d:ivision , instnnncnta li ty or dcpJ.rt1nc1-~t ::;hall be - S- 4 CO: . �:.-~ ~'--1::,:cci to show c ause, ii ar.. y, why ::;uch contract or co:1-r2.cts and the tenns and cone itions ther eo f s:-..o~ :d : 10t be i :1 1ui::: c i .. to by the coun an d the va:ici.i::y oi the -~ern1s thereo:.: to be dete r mined and .or ·che: ·9ayr.1 ~.. t o:I: any !:;;UCh bonds of the Authority . The judgn1ent o: valid atio n shall be final and con elusive with resuecc to such bonds, and ·che security .:r1erefor, agains t the P_u h ority , and aga in st any mm .. icipality , county , &u-ch ority , sub di visio n , instru- .nentali::y o:::- depa r tment o:: the S '~ate of Georgia, i£ a ?2. :.-ty to the validati01,. p. oceedings, co ntrac -cing with J·he . ,_11.. c:tho:::-ity . 11 -._. , l:. \..'. l: ~ J,,.j ... .. 1.. ,._,. . : _:: L: V ·:.:.,_;:..r,s 1or anci :::.ssi.st in the reloc&tio::1 o:£ persons - ... . .:.aJ..:::l.;.lC S , .) sincss conccr;.1s, no:-.·Hoii:: or 6 aniL'. atior'..s 2.;.1cl othc .. s) d i spla c ed by to lin1.it the sou .. ces £rom which rcloca tio payme .. ts .ay be made on-::r2..·cions oi fr.8 Aut}:ori;;y t::.· z.nsit projecc, a:c.. El c::u: rying out a rapid to rnake ::: clocz.. ·ion pay :-nen ·s to or with rcsj_)ect to such pc::.· son::; . Tr:e relocation p&..y - --::.cnts rd<;rre:d to in t:l1is subsection b) s~1all not be rr.acle fro~'Y'.. -~:-..e: P - occeC::.s cie:rive:ci :aor,:1 the sale of bonds 1:-:,'/ th<; Authority no r fro1n rcve:~1ue s or funds which abso.:::n"i: -~}:e 1-r.2:.king 0£ such relocation payn1er-.t s there:...~ orn would 0r the interest the:re:on . 1 1 - 6- _ �Sc-:.tion 11. .'.::iaid Act is further an:1c:aclccl by striking thc:rc:from sub::;ec:ion 1 c) oi Section. 15 in its entirety and inserting in lieu t:ier c of -1 new subsc -:. io 1 c) which shall 1·cacl as iollowt: : 11 (c) Any contract or transac-;:ion of the Authority rn - sectio. (a) he _ eof, o ~ a violation oft: e a c t of the General As senc.bly approved Mar c h l O, 19 6 -= , (19 64 Ga . L . p . 261) , as an1 ded, o r a vio l z,:cion o:f any other p r o vision o f law ap?licable w tl1e Author i ty, ii:s .c..ioard n1.crr1ber s, o ffi c ers , to ?rovicl..e t 1at con tracts and trans or er:::1.p: oyees regulating conflicts o::: i ::ite ::- est , shall ·oe actions c onstitut·ng security for the pay - voidable by the Boar d ; provided, howeve r, a judgrn ent a nci 111. nt of obiigations shall not be voidable ore.er vali ating °!)ands of t:1.e Authorit y, as in Secti o n 10 afte r validation prov1cea, shall c o _stitute a fir.. 1 and c onclu s i ve adjud ic a-ci on th&t no such conflict of :.::1.terest exists w i th respect to s...:.c;1 ~cc11rity ior r}1c·-:_:,2.;,n.-;.1.c ~1.t c: st1.cl".. bor:i.ds . 1 1 s~asectio. ('::>) 0£ Sectior.. 17 in its entirety and inse1·ting m lieu i:hcreoi a new s"c1bscction (b) wr.icr. shall rcac. as i ollow s : "(b) During each :Ciscal year the.• Board shall propo s e in ~:1:::.·...:;:.l operating b clg e.: io :2: the cns1. rn.g :iisc:::..l y...::a.1· · ncl hold a public r.ea,.ing therco~1 . Aiter such puolic hea.1·ing ·.:::-.e :Soa1-d s1-:all review its ? rO)OScd budget, and, on or to expar.d rhe pcrioc:. of time with in which J....::.:o:-c the last U.d.Y o:f t: c fiscci.l ye::1.r , it shall dopt a11 budge::ts shall be propose d and review e d <,.::,.._,__.._d ope;rc:..ting b ·d~ e:c fo:: the: ensui1:g :fiscal year . In -~:.e; an:r......:.al operating budget each O?erating fund shall be set forth s epara-ceiy and 11 w an estimate of ·he £-..me. ~alancc to be a vailabl-:; a·c the bc ~innin g ox the yc;:i.r , an - 7- �cs tirnate o" anticipated crcdi ·s during the year a ccording to sou ... c ~, an cs;;in1atc o · .:mti ci patecl c harges , inc l u ding lr.:)ln antic1p;1t cd rcv.:m.uc s, and co1nparati ve data on t he 13.s;; two con1.plc·.:c' fiscal ye;2. rs n or csti1na-ccc, fo r t he current yea r. Scc1:io:1. 13 . si1nilar data , actual 11 S aid A c t is iu :nhc r a1nended by st:::iking th er efrom S ection 18 whi c h reads as follows : 11 Scction 18. Engineering Surve y . At least e very tr-.1.ree years, th e Board shall enc.ploy a iirm of qualified i n depenc.ent e ngin ee rs to survey the conc.iti on 0 1 t:he to de l te the r equire ment o f an eng inee r - i,.uth orityis fa c iliti es and OJ?er at::.ons fro1n an en g inee r ing ing survey eve r y thr ee years standpo i nt and make a repo r;; th ereof and any re c or.irncndc:.. t ::.ons :::o r i r .-.1.p rov en1.cnt i n i 'c s ~)hys ic al faciiities a nd ov-.. ::.·n:-.1.e;nt l:l ir.. the metro Dol::.ta ::1 area . 11 i t S s.:::.t::.r C :.:y. Saici A c t is iu ... the r a:::-:-.. ended by sc.: ikir:.g ::here:r o:".:.1. s c..:.sc ci:::. o;.1. (b) of Section 21 "in i::s entir ety and i nsc . t i ng 111 lieu the r eoi a ,·,,:vi :... ·u1,::.;cction (b) w ·1 ·ch s h-:ill re:~,d :,c.: Io . lows: '(L) 'J.'lH; .i\1.cLliori.ly :.;h~LJ..L <.1.l ::,;v IJ(.; cxcn·,1JL f1:u:u1 ...,_ny 1·c:,;l.ll..l.ti.011 to clarify the re::lation of the Autho rity to ·0y tnc Publi c S e :::vic e Co nnn::. ss ion oi this S tate. 11 the Public Service S(;ctio::1. 15. Sa.id Act i s :Curfr1er arr:.enc.e;d by striki g the 1· 2i:i: o:::n Commis s ion Se;ctior. 22 in its cr.tirety and in serting 1n lieu ther~of a new S e ct i on 22 1 'Se::c-cion 22 . To. t Liabili·.:y; Insurance. The Au::hority s~all not enjoy g ove _ mne:-i.tal i:mrnunity frorn tort liabili1:y, - '-: i., .... - �Dut shall be liable t hcrcfo ::..· a s any private.; cor poration cxce;,pt t:1a t no exe cution sl12..ll be le vied on any property o:.: t~1c A: ·hor ity p rior to :1inety (90 days from the; date o: i. ~:., al jucigmem again t the Authority . The Authority s.1a.:.l p roviC:.e ior adequate ins1.:r a i1cc or similar protection against any loss, liability or other risk, hazard or o pe rmit the _,;uthori~y to act as a self - insurer _ espons ibility to whic h it 1-r..ay be exposed or which it rr:Zi.y accept on acco'll:at o:2erations . 0.1. i-cs pro?e ::ty, personnel, or Such i nsurar.ce rn.ay be p rovided through self- insurance res e rves or by contracts or arrange ments w ith othe r parties 1n such manner a::id amounts as the Boar d in i ts d iscr etion shaL. cietermine . Section 16 . 11 Said A ct ::. s further arr.ended by s-cri ·::.r..g tne r cfro~ S c c·cion 24 in its en ir e ty and in scning in l ieu thcreoi a new S c ctio::-, 2-;, .:. :::- ~;:,. :;. ::, c:c:2.:;: e ci ior the ?u:::posc 01 this _-'>..ct to be an essential o v c nr ::-:c:nt2.l iunctio n a:i.d a p t b2.ic purpose of t he City oi Atlanta and fr.c counties of Fulto~1., DeKalb , Clayton and Gwin nett, ana t o m o d ify the pro c edur es w he r eb y o: fo e co·,nty of Cobb if it :hereafter de ·~ermines- to ?articipate local g ov e rnments and othe r p ubl ic l 1 L.. .... ..1.-..; Au-cha r ity a s provicied 1n this Act . b o d ie s may partici ,. The B oard and the local governing boci.y of the City of pat e i n financing ', ';j } and s upporting a rapid tr a nsit Lt:a:r:.ta and each of th e: counti es of Fulton, DeKalb , C L:l.y t on, sys t e m .I• .,,.,,... \ c::.:-.<l G w i r,nett, and of t he c ount y oi Co bb if it hcrc<1itcr .ines t o pa.,, tici-oate i. th e Aut hority as provided • L i:..--, :his P-c t, subj ect t o s 1..;.ch limitations a s ar e he re i na.::'"e - ~n t :'ni s section s<.;t f or ·ch, rnay negotiate - 9- �;:-.nci cic t cr:1. inc th c extent of fin;:i,nci:::..l . 1) :1 • ·ici )ation ..:.nd .:he -.::irn.2 or ti 1.1.cs ::;uch ii 1a 1cial participation n1.ay be required wit1 rcspcct ty C;).Ch of the; local govcrnni.cnts in .:nde::.- to fiY-1::mce provision for· a rapid transit system , g:1 ·c·1 e joint in::;tru:rncntality o:Z the Amhority . £ ::;uch c.:er:rn.i:1 tion co!1ternplates a conn-actual obligation on ·he ua::.··~ oi a local governn1ent to n1.ake pay1nents t o the Autho::.·ity over a period of tin1e e xc eeding one: year or t o i · s u e an y bor:..ds or other obliga;;ions evi dencij_1.g ir.debtedness , su ch . cieter1-:1ir.. - ;;io"' s'1ali take the iorm of a r anid trans i t c ont ra c t to be entered i nto between the Autho r i ty and t :-. c lo c al gove ::.· nment . T he :final execution 0£ a r a pid t:;: ansit c ontr a c t shall be c on1.nicted in e v ery i nstan c e 1n the :::-r:.anner hcrc::.naf.:cr ::;.:;t fo_ tb. in this Section 2 , . o : ·J:c c ost oi financi:..'lg a r c:.p i c. trar;.s i t projcc·c or p::: ojcc-cs, 2.. iocal go ve:!:"nment rnay in 1:he r:--.anner pres c :;:- i b.:;d by law c1.nd Sl.:bjec~ to the conditio:1s 2..~d l i :r-[litatio11s pres c ribc.;G. ·oy law, i ssue its gene:;:-al oblig2.tion bor.c.'..s , pay ovei· the pro c eeds ·fr. creo:f to the Author i ty and fo.e :;:- cby co:-nplctc and mctk-::: ii::al he execution of the proposed r a:)lG. transit c on;;ra c t antici?ated '-::,y such ::ioncl au·c:.10rization and "s suance and the Aut:l:..o:.:it: y ::;ha:l agree t~'le:; 1n s-uch cor.t::a c 'c to pcriorrn ior s·u.ch lo c al 6 overm11-2nt afo:;:e said g overnmcr. tal iur.ction and to pro vi de the nccc s s ary u · ::,_r.::; 1:,ort;:i.tion sc1·viccs and :facilities . .::..) P- s c::u1 altcrr1ativc 1Y1c.:thocl o{ p rovidin g the iinancial pc:..:;:c:ici:.)J. - 1..iu~'l cicte; ·m.irJ.e c by its local ,sov.:; rnm g body to be i;; s pro:)c::: s:.1:.cn.: - 10- �lo ·al govcrnm.cnt n.1 y em:cr in ·o a rapid transit contract or c0nt : :~1ct::; c:1lli 1f; for the At,tho::.:ity to p<..:!rionn for it'thc.: .:i.forcsaid ,,. o vcr m nent::i.l .LUnction and c:.illing for it to n1a :-.::. e riodic payments to t l1e At,:::hority for the public transpo r tation services and facilities c: 01:t r a ct ed f or, whic h payments ma y include an1ounts required. to defray the pe r ::.odic p rin cip ct.l ar:.d i"1tc re st )ayn1c.: nts on ::my obli g ations i ss u e-· by ·h..:: Autho rity io:.: the purpose oi iin::i.ncing th..:: cost o:C any r::i.picl tr:::..nsit project or projec ts, a::nounts necessary to establis:1 and maintain rea s ona b le rese ... ves 1n co nne ction w::.th the paym ent o:f sai2. debt se rvice a:1d amo-..:nts re qu i red. to defray any op erational defic it w:'1ich the system or any part thereof may inc ur . (c) A local gove:r:nir..g boc.y may p ::: o c eeci 0:::1 its ow:1 r.::: soh1tior-,  !:a-:: ::1:c ii:1.a:1c ial ?a~·ticipa:cion required 1:he:-eunder may ,_-"' as onaLJ.y be iinanced w i t1:out ·~he: i .::: vy o:c any new or •,, 1 ..1.l", 1' r · . 1 ; . , · , I i , 1 :. 1 , 11 IJ J f" l ' 1' i ' i ' 1 • J I/ i. I l t I .l I 1· f / '/ / j i -, ) l I I I i. i: {'· 1 1· j l.1' 1' y. tl is event , the r es o l utio:r-1 o:f the lo c al govern1;:,g body tha -.: the partic ipati on r equi::.: ed there "l.:nder may reasonably be i::.nan c ed witho ut the l e vy of any new or increased tax 0~1. the ?rope::: ty situated w i thi n its -er ritory shall be con - c :usive oi that :fact. (i: Oth e rwi.3c, befo r e a r ap i d transit contra ct such as is ci e: :;cribeci. in subsection (d) is exe cuted bc ·cwee:1 the Authority a nci a local g overnm.ent, the loc.:.i go verning body shall c all a n ·e~e ction and s h all sub n 1it tc the qualifi ed voters of s :ch - LL - �l o c.::11 :;ovc::: nn1.cnt in a rci(;ren<lu::n as hereinafter proviclccl , c:hc; .._uc ,3tion whet 1er or not the local g over nn1.cnt should enter .:::.o a r :Jid t:,: a;.1sit c ontra.ct o · contracts calling io-:.: it to make perio d ic pay1nen-cs to the Authority within the parti cular r.noneta ry lirnitatior: or iimitations p ... oposc The HOC by such lo cal govcr:::1.ing b c.dy . ,du.r e io,: holdi:1g .:he rdcrendum c allccl fo · rn sub scctio1 (i) shall be as io lows : Tl:c local governing body s:nll cause to be published 1n a nc;wspa J c r having gcn<::rd c::. ... cula-cion throughout the te rrito r y of the local gave ... nrrle::1t involve d , once ea c h , week for three wee ks immediately preceding -::: Wc;ci, during which the rc:.. -:::rcndu1n is to be held, a 101.:icc to 1e electors thereof that on the day na1nec. therein an ele c tion w il be h elc. to dete i-r11.ine fne ouestion wheth e r or not the loc2.l g ove r:11-:1ent shall enter i;1;;0 a rapic. transit co:1tract or co -. c: ro.cts c:.:l the ele ctio:'1 cii s t:::ic t s wi;;}_i:;:-. th e ·.:c r ::: itorial lirnits o:t t h e ~o c al g overr.i-r1ent involv e d e xc e pt that an ei e ction call e d b y t>.e l ocal g overning boc.y o : any county within the :::11.etrop0Et2.:1 a r ea sha· 1 not be heic. 1:::1. a:_y p a rt o f such coun ty which i.S \V::.t::in t ;-..c te rr::.torial lim its o f t h e City of Atlanta i i , with rc s? cct t o '.:he :) a rtic u lar rapid tran sit proje c t or projects -~o b e sup9or"Ci.::C. cy the p r opo sed r apid tr a n s it co::.1t a ct of s uch county, s::i.i' C i::y .s al · ca y a pa1·ty to a rap id n-a n s it contr a ct or t he gov...:: :::1::.ng IJGc.y of ;:;aid C ity p::.·opo::;e;::; t o c 1tcr into r ap.-d t r,:i-:.1 sit c or:::::: c.c"' ·ubj(;ct - ;o the ap-;_)roval t 1crc o f ::i.t a rc ie r c n dun1 . 1..o be :::irescr.t s.: <l to t he elc cto · ::t t 1; The qucs ·1011 o f a loc a l g ovc n11n s.: nt ;.:.:1-:::. s s.::t �iorth on the b:illot shall be detenn.ined by· the local govcrn::.:1g bo -' y ;:i,nd i t slull set out t he monetary limitation or lim.itations, ii any, proposed by the local governing b0dy w id resp ' Ct to the :: nnou1 ts oi the periodic pay11cnts to b' rn;:i,dc nJ er :1ny suc ~1 r.:1.pi c'. t ransit c ont ·act or co tracts. T~1c bJ..llot subrnitting the question shall be in a fonn dc::t<.:!rmined by the local go verning body, and th12: form. of the. ballot shall b e published as a pa ~ t oi the aioresaid notice. Each such election called by the governing body or c:. county within the met ropolitan area under th.2 provisio~1.s of this subse c tion is hereby declared to be a co·c1nty ele c tion and shall be gove rned by and c ondu c teci. in a cc ordanc e with the provisions oi the Georgia Ele c tion C ode. The board 0£ reg i strars 0£ ea ch county snall provide tbe n e ce s sa:cy lists ior c onducti . . g delega te, w ho shall 0£:fici2.lly de cla::.·e t}1c re suit . EZi.c h de c tion c ailed by ·c~. e g ov e :::-n::.:1 g ::iody of th e City o :. _.:i~tla:::tz,, 1.1::-. der t he ;novisions oi this sue se ction shail be gove :..- :::ecl by 1D.c udin:::, spccific;:i.lly the chc:..rt.:.:r cf :::aid City, ct.t tl <.: ti . c 6 ove rnin g the:: ho ~d in g of e lectio:is by sa~cl Ci-c y . T'.:-.e ex _)ense o : any such e l e ction caile d by the gove::.·ning body of th e Cit y oi Atb.. nta shall be paid by the City of Atlanta. (b) If a r.1ajority oi thos e vo-cin g in such an ele ction vo te in fa vo::: of the proposition sub::nitted, then tl-1.e local - 13- �g 0v~::: ni.1g b o d y ::;hali b"' al:::c~1orizcd to agree upon and execution of a r apid transit c0 n trac ·c o::: con trac;:s subj ect '.:o ::;uch moneta r y lirnitation or Ln:;.i·c3.tions as were proposed w the ele c torate and in ...:: co rci::i.l1ce with the te r r:."ls of this Act. (:. ) _-\ _ocal gove:rn:nem: :c:.1.&y elec:: any n1.ethod provided 1~1. L"l::. s se c-.:io:-i to finance ::he p2.rticipation requi red. of it 1::--. wnole or in pa:::t , and the el.::: c tic:, ::--. of o ne rnethod shall not ? reclucie tne election oi anothe _ n1.cthod w i th r espect thereto or w i th r es p e ct t o any a d ditional or supplementary participatioa dete::.·r.:1.ined to be ne c essar y . (j) W h e n the Authority and a l o cal government have co:npleted and iully exec--1.:ed a ra-pid transit c ontract in c ompliance wi::h t l"'.e re qui _ ements of this _-\ct, such cont::: a c t shall cons:initc w a y car.:. -- e er 00 ,_' C, a r.C:. cr e cit o f a r.y local ·;,le2 6 ed w it}. re s p e ct to a :::ap ::.c tr an sit co:ntracc. (:'- A n y local govermnent :nay us e p ub lic fu~-.cis ·co ? r ovic.c 1or a ra? i d L a n sit syste1n within the :netropolitar. a:c e a anG. ::-:.-1&y evy and colle ct any t a x es a u tho : :ized t o it by law t o ·che e xi.:e:r.t necessar y to fulf ill t he o b li g atio::-i. s incurrcc. in a :::apic. t: ::: aas :::c co:it::: z.. c t o r co n tr a c t s wit};_ the A1..:thor i ty ; p:::ovicie d , t::at no .0 co.l county g ove:r:rnnent s h all lav e t h e p ow.:; r t o l .:::vy ar"y ;:ax 0 ::. c, { 2.~·,y .; uojc ct o i -..: ax a ;:ion s :.t 1.. ;:;,;: ~ cl w i tl i n the t..-:;rri rnri::i.l E r:... its the C ity o f AtlZ:.nta in i u l.ii lln1.c11:c oi fina nc i a l obli:;::t ··i o :1s set {0::: C'l i~'l a rapid tran~;it c o n t ::: act w h en t he C i ·cy of _t.~ tb.1".t J. - 1-..: - ~1z.i.s .J. �:::a·.Jid t:.:2.:1.sit c ontr2. c t with the ~e1~l '. :hority c alling for said C:.-.:y to 1ss1.:e its general obligation bonds_ for rapid t:l: an::;it pl::;::xlscs CH to pay rnonics pcr i o ically with respect to the o.cbt sc:: vicc on obiig;:nions issu-c:d by the Authority , and is itsc .. : us :.ng its public funds or levyi1:g a tax for eithZ::r oi such ?Urpo ses . ( l) Any ::.nunicipality o::.· c ounty witnin the rr.ctropolitan area 1.:;ly transie r to the Autho::.· ity any p rop e rty or fa cilities , or r-,::.::.y be useful to -d:e establish 11..er.-.:, op e r c1tion or administration oi the r apid trans it s ystem contemplated hereunde r, a ~'ld may contract with the Authorit y for &.:'ly of e r purpo se inc idental ·.:o th1::: e stablis:n..111..cnt, opc::::.'~ior_ or adrninistra.tion o·i such s~:a:l !Jc ,-;:.::'.'l0\,Vl1 as Scc::ions 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 , 23, 2-± and 2.S , :-cs?cctivciy , , to renumber 1 certain saici Act a?proved ar.cl ci.ny :r e:::e::.· ences i:ci said Act, as h e::.· etofore se ctions of the A ct \{arc:-_.;,, :966 and by ·che preced::.ng lc:.:::'..guage oi ·.:his amer.c.a·.:o:-y A ct, to 24, 2:5 anci. 26 as tl:ey we c ·- own s.:r:_y ci said Sec-cions 19 , 20, 21, 22, p:.:-:.c ~ to ·.:he ac.optio:1 of this arnenda:cory A ct, are hereby char:geci so that 5l.:.c::. :;: e:Eerences h.:::rea£'.:er shall be to said Sections as re:::i"wY. . ber.:::d . - b- � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF "Wry CLT A} Wl WIN ia ] Section l. An Act known as the Me tropolitan Atlanta Ra ra vic ' TPransit Authority Act of 1965, approved March 10, 1965 (Ga. Laws i965, p. 2425), as amended, particularly by an Act approved March 4 £ i *3 =A tem = » 7 7 ath > fs. Sr hari as 7 4 geist 2 i . —_ aYou (ud, Laws Noo, De J2o-1), is furiner amended bY SLPiaiils therefrom hae be eke eit the ah et 5 Steps $e by ae aman tt ot ' aden Sen TH te ee fa BUM awe ron (i) ol Section 2 1n its entis vey ehh Laser bia iil licu thercol ” 44 + , ghey 8 ieee eae LY Walt aaarl ae TAT a oo GOW subsection (jy ¥ vVhich snail rcad as iollows: '(j) Cost of Rapid Transit System or Project, According GCsish, linance, acquire, * oImMmponent parts of Sit 7 project tO & Normal 5 +45 A SAE TA e Pos Saas meme 64:8 eves ay Ta esi SA DELTATING OF TEVENUG=HrGcucing COMaALLLON, Inmcsucing The apitalivation or CMPERSECS, Cltecu OF LCLTeet, Baia oF in} = te sy Yaa WAT = 4b ose as t = i = or bPaeLTeEwiia, VW deed intending TO a2TTie wd, = 7 * ses Watch lay be capitalized as vill accrue on obligations issued by the Authority to hts =. wien th & apo RARE pase dP tekeet een ae 2 tne Constr wction 2 any 2epic transit system £ project d wring the construction period and for six (3) -, . 2 racnths thereafter anc all start-up costs incurred in a as de ne weanwmatsas if L FO}. rarey Oysee e&tion,. . * macing such system or Canela 2? Saic i. ee er 1d a b SUT Lcd Hhay arom WwEeCwOln 4, Q1Q £.CU 25 UT ener aimcnueca VY stPiniwy teacre.lormn * > m 7 - psye c ef ac f= rae, Spt te ee A ted oo tea a eee sre subscetion (i)(2) of Section 6 in its entirety and inserting in iicu thereot anew subsecztion (i)(Z) waich shall read as follows:  3 71. antum ine Bet was Toewak at oe eS cds («) The purchase or lease of any privately owned Bs ment of a showing pacha ky Reker atk Ek ae an | pe ee oe eR BhOw is system Ol transportation of passengers for hire in its 13 2 rrVvaTtely med of a privately owned or as contemplated Transporration system Son Dn 1 - is essential to the ee ee eT t : mao in section S(c) or S(d). et ~ rTRAoane = J] 4 _ aaa = an aed asec ls wats - metnoas, and the improvement and utlilzation of tation services and facilities, and any other means of de- Ve.onlng, Lillizing = imp POVINE mess Uransportacion aaa ss“Hac Aras AG * bbe, ain ia Wels odletat, wee, 244 ULs “ i + = ya a to delete a provision subjecting said type en ew Toned a] ana jJeciing sai Gasenecring, -2neancias ane Taanher upon any lands, Warers OF Premises ior The purpose ae 4a Seth BAe emma ha Sire a aaa Nt x aa ttitewe oc ana " of Taking Peasonac.e surveys, souncings, al WLIngs ana ex- : . - . . cA tu j . BMUGATIONS and such GNtrics sNail Nar oe deemed a trespass + ang’ Kaw Bansal Rai ig eps pe keer eh Pee eye axes be 7 seaquc a. Galages resulting Irom such enirics. 4 . - 4, =a ast mint at ode . sae Tas “| Jaap Stes ]e 5 = ~ Said Act is further amended by striking thereirom ioe ae, yeni es 9 Fan te arate a etek celina & in its entircty and inserting in lieu thereor a subsection = eee ete TA) ate a+ bey =] easel ae “allows Mew SubsccCtion (1) whicn snail Teac as .0L.0WS? ies a4 i oe oa iba ie py PPA yeaa eR S25. ws a Ret i) The power to enter imio contracts with the otate ry ~ eee ee Aree laa = ey? naa oe aqany agency, imstt umentalty, auenoriry;  tn the local governments 10r public transportatiorz L by the Authority or fT ePaidsie system, ane ior any Oiler PALPOSes incidental @ @sta..uLsmnent az “nat of funds to sul Fr oe po 1) K fs be 1‘ ck He) oO 'O 2 3 @ H , as pP wf w ry i sonst = i») & new subsection (c) which shall read as follows: Giver BWuUbsiic nearincs c = ang le scope anc stancaarcs Ol service to be operated Dy tne Authority, the scheduled se 5 2 eae Be es Hg: Gy che 9 gt atin og : Hines, Gogh aberss’ as bre Pree WALA a ee ee Ee oe wie sew Slais 41D Se 10LC al sGast One Duslic nearing E - = = ws ee) . 7 * + 7 m ‘ rt ipl sa Teas chin ON Alcan, Shae ow SE a bs CuLation in whe Metropolitan arta nor ‘ naearing, As to all othe Sg tien | AA Soe ep ote as ae FS ASE ed biel Taare d a, 1c DOarl a may ality as it may deem appro} “  wW Ull public hearings, it muy prescribe reasonable rules and yvegulations to govern such hearings not inconsistent with this Act." Section 6. Said Act is further amended by striking therciror subsection (4) of Section 10 in its entirety and inserting in licu thercof oe GOW Subse ce. wi G be 5 oo c ~— a <x be 5 eo G Hr) tw b 0 re i ri G 3 oC 2 b Len ey oO Ee KS Oo = u me Mid) The bonds of each issue shall be dated, shall ates, and snall mature in such amounts and at such times not exceedi ts I oO iH c: = — it Q ia GQ p H its) By at © 5 hr a a t @ a et w ct D fo ct fe revenue bonds may be in coupon or registered from, or both, as the Board may determine, and the Board may vu oe q@ th a bal ph. fu nterest at : a rate not exceeding yoske provision ior the registration of any coupon bond six per cent per &5 lo principas alone anc a.s0 Gs TO SOM principal ana 4 5 t tr «+ eae me tee ee At Raw rary poncs, equipimeche trust certilicates and otne to provide that all 112 t, dpe mien Te an ta 1? ape ed alls 5 as Nap ee EE ele Wel, sat ats Pas Goligat1ions issuce oy Oo.l gations 1ssuec Vnhcer te Pr OVIs1lONS oz this Act ghalt ai +h 3 tet said Authority shal = +h --5 1974, Gc ‘la ~ 2) fo pean 14a ne On ae a +o - tree VD ln Fes "un nave the qualities Save all the aquailties ana incidents of ne gotiavie iNstruments moral nm ee ana incicents or aimee GI Si A eae, Gay! A fe Shee 3 aaa r 1.45 5 ee ee negotiable undex the laws ot this state anc are neresy aeciared 16 nstruments j 1 < . RIA ane a A gs OG issued ior an ¢SsSenvlal public ana govern mental purposes, 5 Ay aaa oy ee ay ht Ue aa et aaa at Wits 4a AHS aac the property, obligations and interest on the obligations E = eh Ae A ig Ep eit ae shall hae awranrnsst 4 rom a 1 taxation Within OL LAG AULIOPriLy sila. C Crepe Iz to NATLOT LalLt  inserting in licu thercoz &@ new sudsection (h) which shall read as follows: Hy Rance 4] 5 A xn dda oy gag 4 = 1, . -] }- maaled (h) Bonds of the Authority may be sold by pub + oO a cr r or H Cc = Gz, ta me eo We = G fi C c be ts £ ct BH Oo. _ — ~ re ct Ke Ey aeltermiues + oe | Sei bey he aw Balan et! a ie ee ie Tee Oa dee To ay Sale WY DUbLIC COL iE evlilive Hbiadin’ is te the require- sa ent thar hye Wc + s " 1 tnt i oo ak, A a ay 4 ment that bonds be in the best interest of the Authority with respect competitive bidding any purticulay issue of bunds, the advertising of the a de wig, tel OS Aa Re a eis Oy =a, MmOUuce OL S416 and INViItation to bla wita shall be advertised as is customarily done in the handling Osa ced. a l4(b) as to these ids OL vovernmenta. bond issues ana seca + jwiecr efr orm SUBSECLON (3) OL Section oe v¥Y 2hc insect 7 ame 22 Leo! @ Mew subsection (Pp) Wich snes. Yeac 45 1OLLOoOWs: or ity snall be contirmed and A we “ “a9 (DB) Oras of we Auth to Clariiy the pro- eaure for the val ida-. aed’ 54 aa) Hey D2 et aaa tt = T sr ey Le es pe oe a ee ee . . setition fox valication shall also maxe Darty GeLicnaant & tion of revenue bonds VO suc action any munici [res lity, Country, GULNGLILY, Mae yuidighs aarws _pteretiey Td ae. Bip nk ee a eR ge eS pp ett LNSerumentlasiry OP GQeparincne Oo. The ocate suuvdivisicn, ot Georgi A Will bE Authority for an tie ty oe bs le avy “A Ha teenead and eauadh? fn g2Gj)ect Tor wWAicA ponds ale .O ue Lssuecd and SOUS tO such municipality, county, 2 Ww valia ated and SUC ifitiis 1. 17 Fo . mmt shail be SUDULVISION, Inslrumenvalicy or ¢ a huw to limit the sources from which reloca- tion payments may be made required to show cause, if any, why such contract or contracts and the terms and conditions thereof shovld not be inquired into by the court and the Validity of the terms thereof to be determined and the contract or contracts adjudicated as security for the payment of any such bonds of the Authority. The judgment of validation shall be final and con- clusive with respect to such bonds, and the security therefor, against the Authority, and against any = ental ir od <5 ue : eS c 2 in Cee mentality or department of the State of Georgia, iia wer Neda Waee oa fw , 4 a % mi eit 20K alerews SUBSECCTGN (Oy WHICH SHods. Teac as ib..0Ws i7is) The Sar ya pw ah] a ee .~) ne Auth Paby Ss... have ine POWer LO Sresasc re or with re ct to such persons. The relocation pzy- ments referred to in this subsection (b) shail not be by the Authority nor from revenues or funds which absent stand as a pledye for the payment of bonds of the Authority or the interest thercon.!  aid Act is farther amended by strikinv thercfrom subsecotion (c) of Section 15 in its entircty and inserting in lieu thereof anew subsection (c) which shall read as follows: ment of obligations hall not be voidable after validation "(c) Any contract or transaction of the Authority in- VolViT de Guide of tabeaenak aol disclaged dade atte section (a) hereof, or a violation of the act of the General he wm Ww © 1p uy a p G 'd H oO < pu te < po tl Qa yr he Q he sO on ye _ kK so o~ i> {, . c* *. mo * ™N o~ e — 7 applicable to the Authority, its Board members, officers, ble by the Board; provided, however, a judgment and order validating bonds of the Authority, as in Section 10 provided, shall constitute a final anc conclusive adjudication that no such conflict of interest exists with respect to such voncs or any contra OF transaction which constizutces ee es Gay A abode, Sea ees tee eee! Tac od eee re ol og a a, Section 12. Said. Actis further amended by striking thereirom subsection (b) of Section 17 in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereoi a new sub tion (b) which shall reac as follows: expand the period time within which idgets shall be pro- ed and reviewed — ae ar ty on a4 s 5 sam =a es 1 annval operating budget for the ensuing fiscal year and +S hold a public hearing thercon. Aiter such public heaving the Board shall review its proposed budget, and, on or i watts Larlhna* Re th Boer eta ee SE ess ee '| slo ye ro. annual operating budeet sor the ensuing tiscal Year. in - oa = ao the annual operating budget each operating funda snails be ih C ct th balance to be available at the beginning of the year, an estimate of anticipated credits during the year according ct o uw © Go Lar] O G ph i e ct nr et a pe et o o By §3 a En. Oo B & ig G oo 0 by 4 H ges, including = fs irom anticipated revenues, and comparative data on the last two completed fiscal years and similar data, actual = x estimated, for the current year." Section 13, Said Act is further amended by striking therefrom Section 15 which reads as follows: WSection 18, Engineering Survey. Atleast every three . ; ; years, the Board s hall employ a firm of qualified in- dependent engineers to survey the condition of the to delete the require- ment of an engineer-Authority's facilities and operations from an engineering ing survey every three years stanapoint ane make a report trereor 4 nd any Tecor mime»naa =r = 2a ate de ia a, Bay a SARS nest Gh tions tor iraprovement i in 1s P ayelceas Tacllities ana operating procedures. Copies of such report sha-l be LUTEisnece TO cath iocal geverning youy Oo. @acn Local - 45 Shea a ee ay asa be fOVE@TIEnt in the Mervropvoultan area. Min) erwa, i sfae Mi : im ils caeiresy,. Ae a's antes: | Liat Ont Anat ta game ar Semended BU striking thereiron SCcCtion -«. DSalGd Hot 1s luriner Gmenadea oy sirising eheresro. pes yo ge jee Hh atten! I = = en ? -_ seo dy ye = eae an ep ay = Te ass FSG = subsection (b) of Section 21 in its entirety and inserting Im dieu thereor 9 - ee he * tls New sulbacctien fis) which shall L OL) he Authority shall also be cxerapt frum any regulation to clarify the relation of the Authority to py the Public Service Commission of this State." the Public Bact Commission Section 15. Said Act is furtner amended by striking therefrom which shail read as Zollows: Scevion 22 in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof a new Section 2¢ me mk shall not enjoy governmental immunity from tort Nability,  but shall be Mable therefor as any private corporation except that no execution shall be levied on any property of the Authority prior to ninety (90) days from the date against the Authority. The Authority ky, i F f f + to o pn ga i =] oO 5 cr © o shall provide for adequate insurance or similar protection against any loss, liability or other risk, hazard or tO permit the s Authority to act as responsibility to which it may be exposed or which it a self-insurer may accept on account of its property, personnel, or Se ee san Ts aed ‘ an = : a a a4] #15. + Operations. Such insurance may be provided through - r 4, ments with other parties in such manner and amounts as the Board in its discretion shall determine, ' = Section 24 in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof anew Section 24 "AP stan toy oo Z 1 ow WICK sla. Teac as zol LOWS Tinsa | inte Aros Baads Kteneen fa) Saas + Lowal rOVeE Dre ene raw wiCiparion, \eJ ro- eM ete Mate see A peoeten pe oe Me tte Pte, he eee ae ate MS ts VWisi0n lor @ rapic translit SYStCIN WiILhIn tne Mc rroepo.ivan = area is declared ior the purposes oi this Act governmental function and a public purpose of the City of Atlanta and the counties of Fulton, DeKalb, Clayton and Gwinnett, and to modify the pro- cedures whereby of the county of Cobb if it hereafter determines to participate local governments 4 th & 32 . 7 = 7 7 ad re 3 iy t and other public in the Authority as provided in this Act, bodies may partici- pate in financing (5) The Board and the local governing body of the City of and supporting a rapid transit Atlanta and each of the counties of Fulton, DeKalb, Ciayton, system aad Gwinnett, and of the county of Cobb if it hereafter determines to participate in the Authority as provided in this Act, subject to such limitations as are herein- 4. aiter in this section set forth, may negotiate  * 1 and determine the extent of financial participation and the time or times such Linancial participation may be required with respect to each of the local governments tality of the Authority. If such determination contemplates a contractual obligation on the part of a local government to make payments to the Authority ll take the form ofa bapac transit fn + etermination sh contract to be en the local government. The final execution of a rapid transit contract shall be completed .in every instance in the manner hercinafier sct forth in this Section 24. A i < ao ut Cy * © 0 H , 1 at etnntthn id & Ba ade dearent = pag tes pth ete ias, bata fate ce: items ete eden GCetverminegda SY its 16Ca. GOVErning JOGY lO ve tbs PYrOpecr sate # oe ‘ a 20 . i OL The Coste oi financing a apie transie projece or projeces, ta + ; x &@ .OCal povernmens: may i the manner prescr ibed by law and aay Se ee «| Js de = a= 1, = sy - sub ECT LO The conditions and limitations prescricca by -aw, = cea ate = 1 Ins aes + = as el = a = = sa =a c issue its ceneral obligation ooncs, pay over the proceccs =} af ¢5. +1 etl $ ty el may] ae 5 toy San a vhereor to the Authority anc tneresy complete anu Mmaxe tinal the execution of the proposed rapic transit convract anticipated b anThorigati J tt 2a) irs nd the sapeq 2] by such bond authorization and issuance and the Authority shail fen al aot Sar ata ern Tae eek ol a ty: agree in sucA contract to periorm ior sucn local government Te Hey Ae ee 5 per] 2 nant A wi es ate at oe ee = Fhe 2 al 42}5 _ eee Ae aroresaia governmental function ana to provide the necessary transportation services and facilities. 45 a ax wa Tides og 7 ) As aa alternative method of . providi ne the financial par ticipa by its local governing body to be its proper snare - 10-  ol the cost of financing a ray vid transit project or projects, a local government may enter into a rapid transit contract or contracts calling for the Authovity to perform for it the aforesaid overnmental function and calling for it to mak: ‘criodic payments Gt to the Authority for the public transportation services and the cost of any rapid transit project or projects, reserves in connection with the a ro fy » + Oo Gg ct a Ft, n © ww fu ar a ow ct yy oO HY < Hs oO aw end amounts required to defray any operational deficit which caf =1 ee | 2 oe the wae anh a asa a He is a ASA {ec} = local governing pocy m1ey proceca on1 ics OWN Tesolution poy 0 eet pe Ta ye wae) ees SF een irs oy 0 5 evenid transit LG COW osGes anc Maw fina. eee CeCe ON GO. a Sele ew aloat . : Pte an 1, ERAS Ws GS Ea Be detest an oo ca CONITaACt such 25 15 CA@scrivea in suoscction (c) at 2b CELCTITINES a =e that the financial pa reasonably be financed without the levy of any new or cour Pete Tan re Phe pte tiy sibiahed waiddinte ahee bea tates Ya in this event, the resolution of the local governing body . = ten be financed without the levy of any new or increased tax (i) Otherwise, before a rapid transit contract such as is described in subsection (d) is executed between the Authority ‘ gh? oo Fu Lh a ee ant, newt’ and a local government, the locel governing body sail call an ‘election and shall submit to the qualified voters oi such  local government in a referendum as hereinafter provided, the question whether or not the local government should enter snio & rapid transit contract or contracts calling for it to make limitation or limitations proposed by such local governiny body. subsection (2) shall be as follows: The local governing body e published in a newspaper having general wh sf ws gp 7 + oO ey GC uw QO ct o ov Til local government Fh circulation throughout the territory o rc ih 5 = = involved, once each,week for three weeks immediately precedin che week during which the referendum is to be held, a notice to the electors thereof that on the day named therein an election will be held to determine the question whether or not the local eovernment shall enter into a rapic transit contract or contracts Pie, Bay what aS Ae’ on cs Dats. eats ete ee. ge Shea abeteeetteie Staak CG.s1y .Or lt es AK BELLOuLe eV TMCMes Mo Leo SeULGLley Weicliin tac PATCoCuUsar Monetary limitation or. liniitations PEGIVscG vy Sitters ie my Ar Suc! ma A ot ea] eT is ssanll We Kale . euci. LOVerning eocy. ucn special aiecction Snall be Hela at ad Sein +h a: a ye ges 4 asa 7 a5 5 ‘* =. - tS Within tie Territorial 13 TLitS OF Tae a such county which is witain "9 © gp Ub a i a rf, oO ot oD te iS t ic] r-F n i f ¢ << x fu Kh ct oO By tne territorial limits of the City of Atlanta iz, with respect to project or projects to be supported ct 5 Oo nm fu a ct Et 2 c — ~ in H 33] rm a] oO. ct K fy 4 wm pe cr by the proposed rapid transit contract of such county, said City . AAG is already a party to a rapid transit contract or the governing subject to the approval thereof ata referendum. The question to be presented to the electorate of a local government and set  forth on the ballot shall be determined by the local governing body and it shall set out the monetary limitation y limitations, if any, proposed by the local governing Yo4il Sy 2 Ys pror GC yu a1 Governing body with respect to the amounts of the periodic payments to be made under any such rapid transit contract or contracts. The ballot subniitting the question shall be in a form determined by the local governing body, and the form of the ballot shail +1. the aloresaid notice. Hach such Fi be published as a parto election called by the governing body of a county within the metropolitan area under the provisions of this subsection is hereby declared to be a county election and shall be governed by anc conducted in accordance with the provisions Hy, or the Georgia Election Code. The board of re = each county shall provide the necessary lists for conductin a Te ps] The a = Te age ee a be ep aes —n 2 GL WLI 1s count Af er COnso.icartion, ‘ oy a SG ‘ - = 42, ane wh etch in wee OPGIMEGTY sileil 2aTiSIMIE Ene TeUNPEsS Gf, 518 an electivun an GUtLhOTILY Caliumnag the election, Gr its 7 = 3 4 i See tig Te “| lan Gat = +5 [4 = 7+ who shall Orliciawy deciare the Tesule, Bach G election called by the governing body of the City of Atlanta under the provisions of this subsection shall be governed by and conducted in accordance with the provisions of law, including specifically the charter of said City, at the time 1olding of elections by said City. The expense of any such election called by the governing body of the City 4 om an 1 = 7 <2 ee 7 OL AtleaTita Sail OS paid by the City of Atlanta, ioe + nody shall be autnorized to agrec upon and compiete anc make final the execution of a rapid transit contract or contracts subject to such monetary limitation : limitations as were proposed to the electorate and in atl a . Cea he A om ae i the terms of this Act, 7 (2) A local government may elect any method provided in al t vo = o r aq oO H r 1 DD u f F a i td fu ct Po) QO G b oO oO ct lad Oo ry o By Oo rt o » BS o o un ai m - - i oO or preclude the election of another mcthod with respect thereto C hi < pas ay ue espect to any additional or supplementary participation en ace i tq kh / cag Letermliined to be necessarx Ye ’ (3) When the Authority ana a local government have completed “Ln sana a a ve 4h ge Aap ~a5 mS te. oie 17 Sy te wae TEQUITEIMEents OL this Act, such contract snail constitute a ébiteatiineg av eke at nt wh ae ee ee eee ht eat yest GN OODLE aelOon on the pare of the local sovernment tor tre weyiteae L = hs ee aA aS) aha 5 ot a a a ee ee OL WALCAD ivs GOOd iailn anc es fGdit are WAcGUCa, War lin ne Gece sledved With resvect ret * 5 ti 5 a ates ee <hr a alae Bs aE ee ote (x) Any local government may use public funds to provice tor ff] cea ="7 3 == 4 > Veen = a o+ Team, 4 rapid transit system within the metropolitan area and may ta aclSie ry to Zultiil the oblig ts fn contract ox contracts with the Authority; provided, that no lucal county government shall have the power to levy any tan ect ol taxation situated within the terr = “- eae * bs yates 47 of the City of Atlanta in fulfillment of financial obligations set 3 “ -— = 4 . Ste ft Pa ag ee svta in a rapid transit contract when the City of Atiania nas a 7 oO renumber th the Authority calling for said City to issue its general obligation bonds for rapid transit purposes or to pay monics periodically with respect to the aebt service on obligations issued by the Authority, and is it- Hi QO Py | Q + rE Sesr Using its puslic iuncs or levying a tax Ior eithe (i) Any municipality or county within the metropolitan Larea may transier to the Authority any property or facilities, or verde any services, wilh or without consideration, which contract with t the establistunent, operation or administration of sucn + : eis erent Fa Sey Ss ~ eYoavuelh, GY any pare OF DProjee. moereos OY ene Usud- iacililles oe Hyit @20, i ee ~ 7 Sate ae wont ys sess aed bye wee baee te ee an 45 98 Ye. Fa ea OH 4} : he rte HS gh a ES ons aire, Sth a4, “=U, Sa, S45 G9, O45, S65 GNC 20 thc reol 50 elas mcreaive sr sala eOCrlons ‘i Be ate ne eT ig 3n 2 35 tte “Sls, San pe. ek fos made : shail be kmown as Sections 15, 19, 20, <1, £4; 43, 22 ana £5, respectively, and any teiere: ; 1 [eek = 4 ast, 4 ae aa a "340 Eide. ce ty eae AA March +, i960 and by the preceding -anguage of this amencatory “ct, to ; Ph Oe eer awHrAAaAT A saris 5 Ne os ee _ sn ice . PRLCr to tne aco plion of this amen atory act, are Nerebsy chahgec so tler  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 5, Document 30 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 5 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/2a085350f913807a091f273a61c19e0e.pdf c9755da340494ada74c82d498173b910 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. WILLIAM A . SUTHERLAND MAC ASB ILL .JOSEPH B . BRENNAN LAURENS WILLIAMS HERBERT R . ELS AS R A NDOLPH W. THROWER EDWARD .J . SCHMUCK JAMES H . WILSON. JR . MAC ASBILL , JR . KENNETH H. LILES WILLIAM R . PATTERSON WILLIS B . SNELL :t J A MES V . HEFFERNAN :t 0 . ROBERT CUMMING, JR . JAMES P . GROTON MICHAEL .J. EGAN , JR . GEORGE L. COHEN JEROME B . LIBIN :t ROBERT M. ROY ALTY N . JEROLD COHEN WILLIAM M . HAMES LOR A N A . JOHNSON CL.AV C . LONG THOMAS A. LAMAR . JR. JAMES R . PAULK , JR. JERRY D . W ILLIAMS 'f B A RRETT K . HAWKS WALTER H . WINGF I ELD ROBERT L. BROWN ROBERT E . .JENSEN * <:;. RONALD ELLINGTON LAW O FF' I CE S O F' SUTHERLAND, ASBILL & BRENNAN f"ARRAGUT BLOG.,9 00- 17 !?' ST. , N .W• WASHINGTON, O . C . 20006 ( 202 ) 296 -4 800 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BLDG . ATLAN T A,GEORG1A 30303 ( 404) 522-1600 MADISON RICHARDSON WILLIAM T . PLU~MB,JR .* SPECIAL COUNSEL ATLANTA MEMBER 0 . C . BAR, NOT GA. BAR December 26, 1967 Mr. G. Everett Millican City H ll Atiant, Georgia 30303 Dear Mr. Millican: I have rece1¥ d a copy ot resolution intr~uced by you and approved by the Board of Aldermen regarding the Metropolit n Atiant Rap-id Transit Authority. The re olution states that the passoge ot Senate Bill lll "may be at variru,.ce with the d sire and i bee ot the City o't Atlanta as expressed by the Board of Aldermen. 0 'lhe resolution asks th t all bills regarding MARTA be hmish d to the Mrqor and Board ot Aldermen ror an expression ot opinion. Since th re olution indicat only that th Alderm n '1mq be 11 opposed to Senat Bill 111; I voUld appreciate it it you would let e know as aoon as poseibl, pre:terably betore th l gialature b gins, wheth r or not the Board ot Aldermen is in opposition to the passage ot &mat _ Bill 111 and; it ao, your reasona tor such oppo 1t1on. With beat wishe -ror the HolidO¥ Sea on, SJ.Dcerely your, (Sgd.) MJE/HSM CC= Me.yor Iv Allen V--Mr. JU.chard. Rieb Stell Huie, la<;uire Michael J. Egan, Jr. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document WILLIAM A. SUTHERLAND MAC ASBILL LAW OFFICES OF FARRAGUT BLDG.,900-I7™ ST.,N.W. CAURENS nee WASHINGTON, D. C.20006 HERBERT RELSAS SUTHERLAND, ASBILL & BRENNAN (202) 296-4800 AN Hw. EDWARD achmUen a” FIRST NATIONAL BANK BLDG. JAMES H. WILSON, JR. ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 MAC ASBILL, JR. (aon) Beetieac KENNETH H. LILES WILLIAM R. PATTERSON —— WILLIS B. SNELL # JAMES V. HEFFERNAN # MADISON RICHARDSON 0. ROBERT CUMMING, JR. WILLIAM T. PLUMB, JR. # JAMES P. GROTON SPECIAL COUNSEL MICHAEL J. EGAN, UR. GEORGE L. COHEN ATLANTA JEROME B. LIBIN * ROBERT M. ROYALTY N.JEROLD COHEN WILLIAM M. HAMES LORAN A. JOHNSON CLAY C. LONG THOMAS A, LAMAR, JR. JAMES R. PAULK, JR. JERRY D. WILLLAMS + BARRETT K. HAWKS WALTER H. WINGFIELD ROBERT L. BROWN ROBERT E. JENSEN # . RONALD ELLINGTON * MEMBER D.C. BAR, NOT GA. BAR December 26, 1967 Mr. G. Everett Miliican City Hall Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Mr. Millican: I have received a copy of a resolution introduced by you and approved by the Board of Aldermen regarding the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority. The resolution states that the passage of Senate Bill 111 “may be at variance with the desires end wishes of the City of Atlanta as expressed by the Board of Aldermen.” The resolution asks that all bills regarding MARTA be furnished to the Mayor and Board of Aldermen for en expression of opinion. Since the resolution indicates only that the Aldermen “may be" opposed to Senate Bill 111, I would appreciate it if you would let me know as soon as possible, preferably before the legislature begins, whether or not the Board of Aldermen is in opposition to the passage of Senate Bill 111 and, if so, your reasons for such opposition. With best wishes for the Holidey Season, Sincerely yours, (Sgd.) Michael J. Egan, Jr. CC: Meyor Ivan Allen ~~ Mr. Richard Rich Stell Huie, Esquire  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 5, Document 3 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 5 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967