2 20 69 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/f360fb6620da73d2386cb89a37bb53ed.pdf 7a9f53aa0a5ea231862c3ebda4f7ab17 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. MINUTES OF THE SEVENTEENTH MEETING OF THE METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY JULY 7, 1967 The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority held its regular meeting on July 7, 1967, at 3:30 P.M., in the Glenn Building Conference Room, Atlanta. Mr. Richard H. Rich, Chairman, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Robert F. Adamson (City of Atlanta) M. C. Bishop (Fulton County) Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County) Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta) K. A. McMillan (Gwinnett County) Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta) MEMBERS ABSENT: Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County) Edgar Blalock (Clayton county) L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta) OTHERS PRESENT: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority H. L. Stuart, General Manager Glenn E . Bennett, Secretary King Elliott, Public Information Director Earl Nelson, Chief Engineer H. N. Johnson, Secretary to General Manager MARTA Advisory committee Howard K. Menhinick, Chairman, Georgia Institute of Technology H. Boyer Marx, H. Boyer Marx and Associates Richard L. Aeck, Aeck Associates , Inc. Richard M. Forbes, Georgia State College Roy J. Boston, Georgia Department of Public Health �Consultants Walter Douglas, Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, New York w. O. Salter, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, San Francisco J. A. Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta Raymond O'Neil, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta David McBrayer, Traffic Engineer, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta R. w. Gustafson, Supervising Engineer, Parsons, BrinckerhoffTudor, Bechtel, Atlanta Robert P. Barksdale, Project Estimator, Parsons, BrinckerhoffTudor, Bechtel, Atlanta Peter Vandersloot, Manager of Planning and Scheduling, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, San Francisco _ Leon Eplan, Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta Jacques L. Laboureur, Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta Lynn Howard, Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta Arden Brey, Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta W. Stell Huie, Huie & Harland, Atlanta Tom Watson Brown, Huie & Harland, Atlanta Others Hugh L. McDaniell, Cobb County Representative Robert w. Roseveare, Traffic Engineer, DeKalb County Joe Lay, Robinson-Humphrey company, Inc., Atlanta Maarten Den Hartog, Lord & Den Hartog, New York City Donald G. Ingram, Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. P.A. Springer, Atlanta Traffic & Safety Council Van Redmon, WAII-TV Remer Tyson, Atlanta Constitution J . D. Wingfield, Jr., Gayle L. Harder, Jerry A. Coursey, Mrs. Margaret c. Breland, Mrs. Rachel Champagne, Miss Claudette Parrish, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission - 2 - �,-The meeting was called to order by the Chairman. Minutes Upon motion by Mr. Bishop, seconded by Mr. McMillon, the reading of the minutes of the June meeting was dispensed with and they were unanimously approved. Financial Report The General Manager presented the financial report as of June 30, 1967, which is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DeKalb County had not sent payment for the second quarter; however it was understood this would be received soon. A bill in the amount of $4,742 .09 had been received from Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates for extra work in connection with a report suggested by Washington officials of HUD. The Chairman had authorized the work subject to Board ratification, because of the timing which was important. Upon motion by Mr. Bishop, seconded by Mr. McMillan, approval of this expenditure was unanimously given. Other Business The Chairman said a managerial seminar sponsored by HUD, would be conducted at Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, from July 10 - July 21. TWo-thirds of salary and tuition would be reimbursed by HUD, and Mr. Rich recommended approval of the General Manager's attendance at this seminar. Upon motion by Mr. Bishop, seconded by Mr. Blount, unanimous approval was given. Mr. Bishop reported on a recent trip to Montreal and Toronto, and his obs ervations of the two rapid transit systems. Progress Reports General Manager Mr . Stuart r e ported on the status of all MARTA consultant contracts. This report is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. There is an unused balance of $42,000 in the retainer agreement with Parsons, Brinckerhoff- Tudor Bechtel, which is expected to be adequate for whatever additional work might be r e quired. Th e General Manager h a d fil l e d seven speaking e ngageme n ts during the month of June . He reported briefly on a recent trip to - 3 - �Washington where he visited HUD officials , and Congressman Fletcher Thompson. Mr. Stuart said a presentation of MARTA's requirements would be made to the State Properties Control Commission on July 10. The General Manager introduced Professor Howard K. Menhinick of Georgia Tech , Chairman of the Advisory Committee to MARTA , who introduced the other members of this Committee to the Board. Consultants Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor , Bechtel In response to a r eque st o f the Board o f Dire ctors, Mr. Wa lter Douglas of Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, present~d a time and action calendar for construction of the 30-mile s y stem. This schedule assumed construction could begin in January , 196 8, and Mr. Douglas pointed •out that it was only a point of re f erence, based not upon financial capabilit i es , but upon length o f time requ i red from the po int o f pract i cal design and con structi on . Mr. Salter identified the 30-mile system, and Mr. Coil presented charts showing costs involved, based on a 1968 beginning date. He reminded the Board that additional costs would accrue e ach year construction had to be dela y ed. ' Mr. Rich s uggested r emoving ac tua l dates fr om th e time and a c tion calendar, s o tha t i t would show t h e construc tion p e r i od i n number of years. Mr. Douglas said the 4½ year period was feasible and possible, but ver y optimistic. Mr. Rich commended Mr. Douglas on the presentation. Hammer , Greene , Si ler Ass o ciates Mr . Bennett reported for Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates on the status of th e e conomic stud y. He said the fi na l r eport would be submitte d wi t h in thirty d ays. The Hammer fi r m ha d r e viewed method s o f fina n cing p ropo sed i n the 1 96 2 study, and ha d i nvest i gated al l permanent meth ods , pro grams, a nd sources which might realistically be a vailable to finance capital costs. They had examined all o ther systems in the c o untry and had exp l ored all poss ib l e s our ces of f i n ance - loc al , sta t e , and f edera l . A fo rmula belie v ed t o be feasib l e and equi t able f o r all o cating costs, using we i ghted indexes o f population, pro perty tax digests, and employment for 1965 and 1985 , had been developed , as f ollows : - 4 - �City of Atlanta Fulton County outside the City of Atlanta DeKalb County Clayton County Gwinnett County 56.6 % 12.0 % 22.1 % 5.9 % 3.4 % It had been recommended by the consultant and accepted by the MARTA Board that Clayton and Gwinnett Counties would not participate in the financing of the system until lines were constructed in those counties, at which time they would begin paying their appropriate share retroactively from the beginning of the construction period. Mr. Bennett said the consultants had worked with local governments to evaluate financial capabilities in light of long-range capital demands and forecasts of ad valorem ta x digests , plus other sources of income. The next step would be meetings with the major governments to explain the report and seek support of it. Proposed New Impact Study Mr. Bennett reported on several recent meetings with HUD officials in Washington, attended by the Chairman, himself, and others. The present policy of the federal government is to help build transit facilities; it also includes the study of the economic and social impact on entire areas affected. HUD hopes to use transit as a tool to guide future growth and reshape blighted areas of cities. Washington officials had recently e x pressed interest in having MARTA study the economic impact, potentials, and issues of the system on Metropolitan Atlanta. Indication had been given that HUD would favorabl y entertain an application for funds'to support such a stud y. Mr . Be n nett recommended that MARTA be authorized to conduct such a study, and to prepare an application for federal funds , with local matching funds not to e x ceed $40,000 . The study was e x pected to take approx imately six months. It was suggested that it be coordinated by ARMPC, with Central Atlanta Progress, Inc . , and the City of Atlanta Planning Department participating, as well as outside consultants as needed . A motion was made b y Mr . Haverty and seconded by Mr . Bishop that local funds of $40,000 for the study be approved , a n d that the Gen eral Manager be autho r ized to ma k e approp r iate application to HUD . - 5 - �Atlanta Transit System - Busways Proposal The Chairman reviewed briefly the recently proposed rapid busways concept of the Atlanta Transit System. He said Mayor Ivan Allen had asked the Authority to evaluate the proposal and make a recommendation concerning it. The Chairman had instructed the staff to make an objective evaluation of the rapid busways proposal and report back to the Board. After discussion, it was the consensus of the Board that this should be done as soon as possible. Mr. Bennett announced that Messrs. Rich, Stuart, and Coil had taped a program on transit for viewing Sunday, July 9, at 10:30 P.M. on WAGA-TV. Also, the Chairman would address the Atlanta Rotary Club on transit on Monday, July 10, and Board members were invited to attend as Mr. Bennett's guests. Adjournment Upon motion by Mr. Bishop, seconded by Mr. Adamson, the meeting was adjourned at 4:45 P.M. Next Meeting August 1, 1967. - 6 - � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document MINUTES OF THE SEVENTEENTH MEETING OF THE METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY JULY 7, 1967 The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority held its regular meeting on July 7, 1967, at 3:30 P.M., in the Glenn Building Conference Room, Atlanta. Mr. Richard H. Rich, Chairman, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Robert F. Adamson (City of Atlanta) M. C. Bishop (Fulton County) Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County) Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta) K. A. McMillon (Gwinnett County) Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta) MEMBERS ABSENT: id Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County) Edgar Blalock (Clayton County) L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta) OTHERS PRESENT: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority H. L. Stuart, General Manager Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary King Elliott, Public Information Director Earl Nelson, Chief Engineer H. N. Johnson, Secretary to General Manager MARTA Advisory Committee Howard K. Menhinick, Chairman, Georgia Institute of Technology H. Boyer Marx, H. Boyer Marx and Associates Richard L. Aeck, Aeck Associates, Inc. Richard M. Forbes, Georgia State College Roy J. Boston, Georgia Department of Public Health Consultants Walter Douglas, Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, New York W. O. Salter, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, San Francisco J. A. Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta Raymond O'Neil, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta David McBrayer, Traffic Engineer, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta R. W. Gustafson, Supervising Engineer, Parsons, Brinckerhoff- Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta Robert P. Barksdale, Project Estimator, Parsons, Brinckerhoff- Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta Peter Vandersloot, Manager of Planning and Scheduling, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, San Francisco Leon Eplan, Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta Jacques L. Laboureur, Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta Lynn Howard, Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta Arden Brey, Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta W. Stell Huie, Huie & Harland, Atlanta Tom Watson Brown, Huie & Harland, Atlanta Others Hugh L. McDaniell, Cobb County Representative Robert W. Roseveare, Traffic Engineer, DeKalb County Joe Lay, Robinson-Humphrey Company, Inc., Atlanta Maarten Den Hartog, Lord & Den Hartog, New York City Donald G. Ingram, Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. P. A. Springer, Atlanta Traffic & Safety Council Van Redmon, WALII-TV Remer Tyson, Atlanta Constitution J. D. Wingfield, Jr., Gayle L. Harder, Jerry A. Coursey, Mrs. Margaret C. Breland, Mrs. Rachel Champagne, Miss Claudette Parrish, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission The meeting was called to order by the Chairman. Minutes Upon motion by Mr. Bishop, seconded by Mr. McMillon, the reading of the minutes of the June meeting was dispensed with and they were unanimously approved. Financial Report The General Manager presented the financial report as of June 30, 1967, which is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DeKalb County had not sent payment for the second quarter; however it was understood this would be received soon. A bill in the amount of $4,742.09 had been received from Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates for extra work in connection with a report suggested by Washington officials of HUD. The Chairman had authorized the work subject to Board ratification, because of the timing which was important. Upon motion by Mr. Bishop, seconded by Mr. McMillon, approval of this expenditure was unanimously given. Other Business The Chairman said a managerial seminar sponsored by HUD, would be conducted at Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, from July 10 - July 21. ‘Two-thirds of salary and tuition would be reimbursed by HUD, and Mr. Rich recommended approval of the General Manager's attendance at this seminar. Upon motion by Mr. Bishop, seconded by Mr. Blount, unanimous approval was given. Mr. Bishop reported on a recent trip to Montreal and Toronto, and his observations of the two rapid transit systems. Progress Reports General Manager Mr. Stuart reported on the status of all MARTA consultant con- tracts. This report is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. There is an unused balance of $42,000 in the retainer agreement with Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor Bechtel, which is expected to be adequate for whatever additional work might be required. The General Manager had filled seven speaking engagements during the month of June. He reported briefly on a recent trip to Washington where he visited HUD officials, and Congressman Fletcher Thompson. Mr. Stuart said a presentation of MARTA's requirements would be made to the State Properties Control Commission on July 10. The General Manager introduced Professor Howard K. Menhinick of Georgia Tech, Chairman of the Advisory Committee to MARTA, who introduced the other members of this Committee to the Board. Consultants Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel In response to a request of the Board of Directors, Mr. Walter Douglas of Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, presented a time and action calendar for construction of the 30-mile system. This schedule assumed construction could begin in January, 1968, and Mr. Douglas pointed ‘out that it was only a point of reference, based not upon financial capabilities, but upon length of time required from the point of practical design and construction. Mr. Salter identified the 30-mile system, and Mr. Coil presented charts showing costs involved, based on a 1968 beginning date. He reminded the Board that additional costs would accrue each year construction had to be delayed. Mr. Rich suggested removing actual dates from the time and action calendar, so that it would show the construction period in number of years. Mr. Douglas said the 4% year period was feasible and possible, but very optimistic. Mr. Rich commended Mr. Douglas on the presentation. Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates Mr. Bennett reported for Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates on the status of the economic study. He said the final report would be submitted within thirty days. The Hammer firm had reviewed methods of financing proposed in the 1962 study, and had investi- gated all permanent methods, programs, and sources which might realistically be available to finance capital costs. They had examined all other systems in the country and had explored all possible sources of finance - local, state, and federal. A formula believed to be feasible and equitable for allocating costs, using weighted indexes of population, property tax digests, and employment for 1965 and 1985, had been developed, as follows: City of Atlanta 56.6 % Fulton County outside the City of Atlanta 2.0 &% DeKalb County Zeki % Clayton County 5.9% Gwinnett County 3.4 % It had been recommended by the consultant and accepted by the MARTA Board that Clayton and Gwinnett Counties would not participate in the financing of the system until lines were constructed in those counties, at which time they would begin paying their appropriate share retroactively from the beginning of the construction period. Mr. Bennett said the consultants had worked with local govern- ments to evaluate financial capabilities in light of long-range capital demands and forecasts of ad valorem tax digests, plus other sources of income. The next step would be meetings with the major governments to explain the report and seek support Gf Lt. Proposed New Impact Study Mr. Bennett reported on several recent meetings with HUD officials in Washington, attended by the Chairman, himself, and others. The present policy of the federal government is to help build transit facilities; it also includes the study of the economic and social impact on entire areas affected. HUD hopes to use transit as a tool to guide future growth and reshape blighted areas of cities. Washington officials had recently expressed interest in having MARTA study the economic impact, potentials, and issues of the system on Metropolitan Atlanta. Indication had been given that HUD would favorably entertain an application for funds*to support such a study. Mr, Bennett recommended that MARTA be authorized to conduct such a study, and to prepare an application for federal funds, with local matching funds not to exceed $40,000. The study was expected to take approximately six months. It was sug- gested that it be coordinated by ARMPC, with Central Atlanta Progress, Inc., and the City of Atlanta Planning Department participating, as well as outside consultants as needed. A motion was made by Mr. Haverty and seconded by Mr. Bishop that local funds of $40,000 for the study be approved, and that the General Manager be authorized to make appropriate application to HUD. Atlanta Transit System - Busways Proposal The Chairman reviewed briefly the recently proposed rapid bus- ways concept of the Atlanta Transit System. He said Mayor Ivan Allen had asked the Authority to evaluate the proposal and make a recommendation concerning it. The Chairman had instructed the staff to make an objective evaluation of the rapid busways proposal and report back to the Board. After discussion, it was the consensus of the Board that this should be done as soon as possible. Mr. Bennett announced that Messrs. Rich, Stuart, and Coil had taped a program on transit for viewing Sunday, July 9, at 10:30 P.M. on WAGA-TV. Also, the Chairman would address the Atlanta Rotary Club on transit on Monday, July 10, and Board members were invited to attend as Mr. Bennett's guests. Adjournment Upon motion by Mr. Bishop, seconded by Mr. Adamson, the meeting was adjourned at 4:45 P.M, Next Meeting August 1, 1967.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 6, Document 20 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 6 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/a4d2e259452994915ca638984afe7126.pdf 3e0f1d49f3c37bfbc96828b370f7b1c6 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. _, METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY BUDGET REPORT JUNE 30, 1967 BUDGET 1967 ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 JUNE 30, 1967 $128,281.64 $128,281.64 Appropriations: City of Atlanta Clayton County DeKalb County Fulton County Gwinnett County Sub-Totals $ 84,030.00 23,190.00 82,770.00 91,800.00 18,210.00 $300,000.00 $ 42,015.00 11,595 . 00 41,385.00 45,900.00 9,105.00 $150,000.00 Interest Income $ Federal Funds : 702 Section 9 Grant Interest on Federal Funds Sub-Totals $ 95,000.00 276,000.00 0 $371,000.00 $ 60,000.00 67,686.12 597.46 $128,283.58 TOTAL INCOME $676,520.00 $281,075.85 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS $804,801. 64 $409,357.49 Unappropriated Surplus INCOME 5,520.00 $ 2,792.27 EXPENSES Staff Cos ts: Salaries Expenses Benefits: Social Security (iuaran_t y ·Fu nd Health and Accident Insurance Retirement Workmen's Compensation Sub-Totals $ 68,950.00 10,500.00 $ 29,723. 75 5,615.09 1,109 . 00 533 . 00 1,680 . 00 10 , 000.00 99 . 00 $ 92,871.00 916 . 61 400.00 483.42 300.54 0 $ 37,439 . 41 Board Meetings $ 3,150.00 $ 1 ,7 00 . 00 $ 3 , 000 . 00 2,000 . 00 2,000.00 3 ,6 00 . 00 1,000.00 250 . 00 1,000.00 33,000 . 00 5,000. 00 $ 1,500 . 00 85 7. 64 411.97 1 , 185.34 623 . 56 250 . 00 25 0. 00 11 ,4 79 . 92 705. 7 5 Administrative and Office Overhead: Rent Communications and Posta ge Furniture and Equipment Supplies Printing Auditor Accountant Public Information Special Projects Insurance : Public Liability Depository and Forgery Fidelity Bond Sub-Totals CARRIED FORWARD 72. 00 56 . 00 199 . 00 $ 51 ,177. 00 $147,198 .00 0 0 0 $ 17,264 . 18 $ 56,403 . 59 �METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY BUDGET REPORT JUNE 30, 1967 ACWAL BUDGET 1967 JANUARY 1, 1967 TO JUNE 30, . 1967 $804,BOi. 64 $409 ~ 357 .49 Brought Forward $147,198.00 $ 56,403.59 Counsel Consul tan ts: Atlanta Region Me tropolitan Planning Commission Urban Design Study: Section 9 Matching Atlanta Transit Study: Section 9 Matching Parsons-Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Becktel: 702 Loan Section 9: Federal Matching Re tainer Agreement Research and Technical Servic es Sub-Totals $ 20,000.00 $ 6,625.54 $ 31,250.00 $ 29,939.00 32,667.00 16,333.00 8,000 •. 00 9,800.00 3,333.00 1,667.00 0 1,000.00 95,000.00 60,000.00 240,000.00 120,000.00 60,000.00 2,000.00 $602,250.00 100,000.00 16,182.67 1,595.84 $226,517.51 TOTAL EXPENSES $769,448 . 00 $289,546.64 SURPLUS ~ ~119 ,810. 85 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD EXPENSES 35 , 35 3. 64 0 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY BUDGET REPORT JUNE 30, 1967 ACTUAL BUDGET JANUARY 1, 1967 1967 JUNE 30, 1967 Unappropriated Surplus $128,281.64 $128,281.64 INCOME Appropriations: City of Atlanta $ 84,030.00 $ 42,015.00 Clayton County 23,190.00 11,595.00 DeKalb County 82,770.00 41,385.00 Fulton County 91,800.00 45,900.00 Gwinnett County 18,210.00 9,105.00 Sub-Totals $300,000. 00 $150,000. 00 Interest Income $ 5,520.00 $ 2,792.27 Federal Funds: 702 $ 95,000.00 $ 60,000.00 Section 9 Grant 276,000.00 67,686.12 Interest on Federal Funds 0 597.46 Sub-Totals $371,000.00 $128,283.58 TOTAL INCOME $676,520.00 $281,075.85 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS $804,801.64 $409,357.49 EXPENSES Staff Costs: Salaries $ 68,950.00 § 29,723.75 Expenses 10,500.00 5,615.09 Benefits: Social Security 1,109.00 916.61 Guaranty Fund 533.00 400.00 Health and Accident Insurance 1,680.00 483.42 Retirement 10,000.00 300.54 Workmen's Compensation 99.00 0 Sub-Totals $ 92,871.00 $ 37,439.41 Board Meetings $ 3,150.00 $ 1,700.00 Administrative and Office Overhead: Rent § 3,000.00 § 1,500.00 Communications and Postage 2,000.00 857.64 Furniture and Equipment 2,000. 00 411.97 Supplies 3,600.00 1,185.34 Printing 1,000. 00 623.56 Auditor 250.00 250.00 Accountant 1,000. 00 250.00 Public Information 33,000.00 11,479.92 Special Projects 5,000. 00 705.75 Insurance: Public Liability 72.00 0 Depository and Forgery 56,00 0 Fidelity Bond 199.00 0 Sub-Totals $ 51,177.00 $ 17,264.18 CARRIED FORWARD $147,198.00 $ 56,403.59 METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY BUDGET REPORT JUNE 30, 1967 ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 BUDGET TO 1967 JUNE 30, 1967 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD $804,801.64 -$409, 357.49 EXPENSES Brought Forward $147,198.00 $ 56,403.59 Counsel $ 20,000.00 S$ 6,625.54 Consultants: Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission $ 31,250.00 § 29,939.00 Urban Design Study: Section 9 32,667.00 8,000.00 Matching 16,333.00 9,800. 00 Atlanta Transit Study: Section 9 3,333.00 0 Matching 1,667.00 1,000.00 Parsons-Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Becktel: 702 Loan 95,000.00 60,000.00 Section 9: Federal 240,000.00 0 Matching 120,000. 00 100,000. 00 Retainer Agreement 60,000, 00 16,182.67 Research and Technical Services 2,000. 00 1,595.84 Sub-Totals $602,250.00 $226,517.51 TOTAL EXPENSES SURPLUS $769,448.00 35.3. $289,546. 64 $119,810.85  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 6, Document 21 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 6 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/6e43194d770de3cb93a985ce98b6818e.pdf 4b36de311966a8b42daedf27e64112b5 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION JUNE 30, 1967 ASSETS Cash in Banks: C & S National Bank First National Bank - Payroll Trust Company of Georgia Fulton National Bank - Section 9 $ 38,921.04 443.53 1,000.00 90,283.58 Investments: U. S. Treasury Bills U. S. Treasury Bills - Section 9 69,603.14 0 Petty Cash 25. 00 Accounts Receivable: DeKalb County - 1967 Gwinnett County - 1967 Gwinnett County - 1966 $20,692.50 9,105.00 4,552.50 34,350.00 TOTAL ASSETS $234,626.29 LIABILITIES Accounts Payable $ Payroll Taxes Withheld and Accrued Reserves : ARMPC : Urban Design Study Atlanta Transit Study Parsons , Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: Section 9 Matching Retainer Agreement: Transportation Study Public Information Survey ing TOTAL LIABILITIES SURPLUS 1,290.67 0 5,800.00 1,000.00 100,000.00 $ 2 07. 7 0 696. 30 5,820.77 6,724. 77 114,815.44 $119. 810. 85 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION JUNE 30, 1967 ASSETS Cash in Banks: C & S National Bank § 38,921.04 First National Bank - Payroll 443.53 Trust Company of Georgia 1,000.00 Fulton National Bank - Section 9 90,283.58 Investments: U. S. Treasury Bills 69,603.14 U. S&S. Treasury Bills - Section 9 0 Petty Cash 25.00 Accounts Receivable: DeKalb County - 1967 $20,692.50 Gwinnett County - 1967 9,105.00 Gwinnett County - 1966 4,552.50 34,350.00 TOTAL ASSETS $234,626.29 LIABILITIES Accounts Payable $ 1,290.67 Payroll Taxes Withheld and Accrued 0 Reserves: ARMPC:; Urban Design Study 5,800.00 Atlanta Transit Study 1,000.00 Parsons, Brinckerhoff£-Tudor-Bechtel: Section 9 Matching 100,000. 00 Retainer Agreement: Transportation Study $ 207.70 Public Information 696.30 Surveying 5,820.77 6,724.77 TOTAL LIABILITIES 114,815.44 SURPLUS $119,810.85  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 6, Document 22 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 6 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/fd0f0a1aa9a6276792252ea55c35186f.pdf 729e5d6bdbf2dfa3f3025cb3261001dc Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY GLENN BUILDING/ ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 / AREA CODE 404 52 4 -57 11 June 30, 1967 OFFICERS: Richard H. Rich, Chairman Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman Glenn E. Be nnett, Secretary Henry L. Stuart, General Manager GENERAL MANAGER'S QUARTERLY REPORT OF CONTRACT STATUS, JUNE 30 , 1967 Considerable progress has been made under our several contracts and a detailed review is timely. Our contractural obligations total $962,566 of which $616,709 (64%) represents the federal portion and $345,857 represents the local matching funds. The status of work shown is as of May 31, 1967: I. The 11 701 11 Contracts signed June 28, 1966 total $183,566 of which the federal portion is $122,376. The local portion of Transit Authority funds is $61,189, all of which has been paid to the ARMPC who is administering the work for us. update the 1962 report in its entirety. These projects are to The updated revisions will appear as a technical version and a popular version of a bound report similar in format to the 1962 reports. The work is in three parts. A. Hammer , Greene, Siler Associates has a $48 , 000 contract to update the financing aspects which is 90¾ complete. It covers : 1. Methods of financing. 2. Sources of financing ~ 3. Derivation of formula for sharing the financial load between the several political jurisdictions. 4. Assistance t o local governments t o eva luate thei r financial ability. 5. P r eparation of a financial plan in line with the above . �B. PBTB has a $100 , 000 contract to update the other parts of the 1962 report which is about 85¾ complete . It covers: 1. Route and station locations (100¾ complete) a 2. Patronage, revenues and operating cost predictions (90¾ complete). 3. c. Report preparation (50¾ complete). ARM.PC will use the remaining $35 , 566 for administration and supervision of the HGS and PB-T-B contracts , its own staff 's work and auditing and overhead chargeable to the entire updating project. Each of these units of work provides inputs to the others so they will continue to move ahead on a common front and should be wrapped up this summer. The contractural completion date was May 2 , 1967 . The work was considerably delayed by the late development of travel statistics by the Highway Department and the completion date will not be met . The necessary statistics are now in hand and the work is moving ahead at a good pace. Our total project will not be damaged by the delay. II. The 11 702 11 Contract signed June 28 , 1966 is for $125,000 with PB- T-B to carry out preliminary engineering work on the system from Oglethorpe to the Airport. This is an interes t-free federal loan that must be repaid when construction begins . volved . No local funds are in- The preliminary engineering work will be in sufficient detail to enable us to initiate ri ght of way acquisition , to provide us with highly refined estimates of cons truction costs, and to provide us with a solid point of departure fo r the development of final , detailed design and the p r eparation of c ontract plans and specifications. Funds are r equisiti o ned from HUD in the exact amount required whe n we are invoiced . and payments have been made . - Two $30 , 000 requisitions The contract is 62¾ complete o 2 - It �i ' covers: A. Establishment of a design basis by developing information on: B. (74% complete) 1. Utilities. 2. Existing building foundations. 3. Subsurface structures. 4. Street and highway facilities. 5. Railroad structures. 6. Geology. Preliminary design of typical and of selected special items (65% complete) i c. D. 1. Structures. 2. Stations . 3. Functional layout of Transit Center. 4. Functional layout of shops and yards. 5. Equipment requirements. Preliminary engineering plans (53% complete): 1. Base maps. 2. Alignment of tracks. 3. Station sites . Co st es t imates ( 16% comple t e ) 1. Construction . 2. Right o f way. The contract carries a comple t ion date o f J u ne 30 , 1967 , b u t we have d ecided t o integrate this work wi th the wo rk being d one under the techni cal studies g rant (bel ow) . As a result, all o f the pre liminary engineering for the 44-mile system - Doraville - Forest Park and west from Hi ghtower Road to I-285 and east from Avondale Estates to I - 285 - is being d o ne simultaneously, aimed at a completion date of April 30 , 1968 . - 3 - �III . The Technical Studies Grant (Section 9) Contra cts are for a total of $554 , 000 of which the federal portion is $369 , 333 , and the local portion is $184 , 667 0 Federal funds are requisitioned quarterly in advance at a rate indicated by progress of the work and the terms of the contracts . ed and received . the Impact Study. $67 , 686 . 12 has been requisition- One $12 , 000 payment has been made to ARMPC for I expect a bill from PBTB this month o The work is divided into three parts: A. PB-T-B has a contract signed February 2, 1967 for $500 , 000 which is 18% complete and covers: 1. 2. System Extension Planning (35% complete): (a) East Line - Avondale Estates to I-285 . (b) West Line - Hightower Road to I-285. Preliminary Design of t¥:pical and of selected special structures (20% complete) : 3. 4. 5. B. (a) Structures . (b) Stations . (c) Equipment . Preliminary Engineering Plans (30% complete) : (a) Base maps . (b) Al i gnment of t r acks . (c) S tation site so Cost Estimate s (1 4% comp l ete ): (a) Co nstruc t i o n . (b ) Righ t o f way. Public He aring s a nd Re p o ~ts (no t started ) e ARMPC has a contract si g ned March 10 , 1967 for $49 , 0 0 0 to make a Cocc.idor Impact Study. $9 , 000 covers the supervision and overhead they will provide to the subcontracts , Eri c Hill Assoc iates , who will do most of the work of assess ing the im- 4 - �pact of our proposed rapid transit system on the community. We will receive recommendations for changes in community plans or rapid transit plans in the event that adverse impact or missed opportunities are discovered. The job is 35¾ com- plete. The work will check on our relationships to: C. 1. Land use and related controls. 2. Public improvements planning. 3. Urban design. 4. Local development plans. 5. Urban renewal projects. 6. Private development plans. 7. Benefit to disadvantaged groups. 8. Other public programs. Our impact on the Atlanta Transit will be substantial and $5,000 has been reserved to start studies in thi s fie ld . More money will be sought in future applications . I am in touch with ATS officials to determine the character of necessary study and plans. IV. The Retainer Agreement is a contract with PB-T-B for planni ng , consultant , o r engineering services not covered by existing contracts . Each item of work is authorized and budgeted by the Board . PB-T-B canno t initiate any work under thi s con- tract that will cause total charges under the contract to e xceed $100 , 000 . Its condition as of June 30 , 1967 is as f ollows: - 5 - �Billing 4/1/676/30/67 Previously reported as complete pre-contract work; support before State Properties Control Commission; Soils Library study Mobilization (6 out of 8 authorized moves have been made) Reported thru 3/31/67 Total thru 6/30/67 $30,943 ~10 $30 , 943.10 $ 2,192.70 12,697 . 84 14 , 890.54 93.37 1,198 . 93 1 , 292.30 497.33 806 . 37 1 , 303.70 4.00 1,443.12 1 , 447.12 868.59 310 . 64 1 , 179 . 23 $ 3,655.99 $47,400.00 $ 51 , 055.99 Participation in Atlanta Area Transportation Study ($1,500 authorized) Public Information Support ($2 , 000 authorized) Real Estate Consultation ($1,250 authorized; billing is complete.) Detailed Engineering ($7 , 000 authorized) 6 ,724. 77 Unexpended Authorizations Balance 42, 219.24 $100 , 000 . 00 - 6 - � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY GLENN BUILDING / ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 / AREA CODE 404 524-5711 Oo, l TOBE BU. LAaE OFFICERS: Richard H. Rich, Chairman Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary Henry L. Stuart, General Manager GENERAL MANAGER'S QUARTERLY REPORT OF CONTRACT STATUS, JUNE 30, 1967 Considerable progress has been made under our several contracts and a detailed review is timely. Our contractural obligations total $962,566 of which $616,709 (64%) represents the federal portion and $345,857 represents the local matching funds. The status of work shown is as of May 31, 1967: Ie The "701" Contracts signed June 28, 1966 total $183,566 of which the federal portion is $122,376. The local portion of Transit Authority funds is $61,189, all of which has been paid to the ARMPC who is administering the work for us. These projects are to update the 1962 report in its entirety. The updated revisions will appear as a technical version and a popular version of a bound report similar in format to the 1962 reports. The work is in three parts. A. Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates has a $48,000 contract to up- date the financing aspects which is 90% complete. It covers: 1. Methods of financing. 2. Sources of financing. 3. Derivation of formula for sharing the financial load between the several political jurisdictions. 4. Assistance to local governments to evaluate their financial ability. 5. Preparation of a financial plan in line with the above. II. B. PBTB has a $100,000 contract to update the other parts of the 1962 report which is about 85% complete. It covers: 1. Route and station locations (100% complete). 2. Patronage, revenues and operating cost predictions (90% complete). 3. Report preparation (50% complete). C. ARMPC will use the remaining $35,566 for administration and supervision of the HGS and PB-T-B contracts, its own staff's work and auditing and overhead chargeable to the entire updating project. Each of these units of work provides inputs to the others so they will continue to move ahead on a common front and should be wrapped up this summer. The contractural completion date was May 2, 1967. The work was considerably delayed by the late development of travel statistics by the Highway Department and the completion date will not be met. The necessary statistics are now in hand and the work is moving ahead at a good pace. Our total project will not be damaged by the delay. The "702" Contract signed June 28, 1966 is for $125,000 with PB-T-B to carry out preliminary engineering work on the system from Ogle- thorpe to the Airport. This is an interest-free federal loan that must be repaid when construction begins. No local funds are in- volved. The preliminary engineering work will be in sufficient detail to enable us to initiate right of way acquisition, to pro- vide us with highly refined estimates of construction costs, and to provide us with a solid point of departure for the development of final, detailed design and the preparation of contract plans and specifications. Funds are requisitioned from HUD in the exact amount required when we are invoiced. Two $30,000 requisitions and payments have been made. The contract is 62% complete. It aS =. covers: As The contract carries a completion date of June 30, 1967, but Establishment of a design basis by developing information on: (74% complete) l. Utilities. 2. Existing building foundations. 3. Subsurface structures. 4, Street and highway facilities. 5. Railroad structures. 6. Geology. Preliminary design of typical and of selected special items (65% complete) 1. Structures. 2. Stations. 3. Functional layout of Transit Center. 4. Functional layout of shops and yards. 5. Equipment requirements. Preliminary engineering plans (53% complete): 1. Base maps. 2. Alignment of tracks. 3. Station sites. Cost estimates (16% complete) l. Construction. 2. Right of way. we have decided to integrate this work with the work being done under the technical studies grant (below). As a result, all of the preliminary engineering for the 44-mile system - Doraville-Forest Park and west from Hightower Road to I-285 and east from Avondale Estates to I-285 - is being done simultaneously, aimed at a com- pletion date of April 30, 1968. a TIT. The Technical Studies Grant (Section 9) Contracts are for a total of $554,000 of which the federal portion is $369,333, and the local portion is $184,667. Federal funds are requisitioned quarterly in advance at a rate indicated by progress of the work and the terms of the contracts. $67,686.12 has been requisition— ed and received. One $12,000 payment has been made to ARMPC for the Impact Study. I expect a bill from PBTB this month. The work is divided into three parts: A. PB-T-B has a contract signed February 2, 1967 for $500,000 which is 18% complete and covers: 1. System Extension Planning (35% complete): (a) East Line — Avondale Estates to I-285. (b) West Line - Hightower Road to I-285. 2. Preliminary Design of typical and of selected special structures (20% complete): (a) Structures. (b) Stations. (c) Equipment. 3. Preliminary Engineering Plans (30% complete): (a) Base maps. (b) Alignment of tracks, (c) Station sites. 4. Cost Estimates (14% complete): (a) Construction, (b) Right of way. 5. Public Hearings and Reports (not started). B. ARMPC has a contract signed March 10, 1967 for $49,000 to make a Caxrridor Impact Study. $9,000 covers the supervision and overhead they will provide to the subcontracts, Eric Hill Associates, who will do most of the work of assessing the im-— — IVs pact of our proposed rapid transit system on the community. We will receive recommendations for changes in community plans or rapid transit plans in the event that adverse impact or missed opportunities are discovered. The job is 35% com-— plete. The work will check on our relationships to: 1. and use and related controls. 2. Public improvements planning. 3. Urban design. 4, Local development plans. 5. Urban renewal projects. 6. Private development plans. 7. Benefit to disadvantaged groups. 8. Other public programs. Our impact on the Atlanta Transit will be substantial and $5,000 has been reserved to start studies in this field. More money will be sought in future applications. I am in touch with ATS officials to determine the character of necessary study and plans. The Retainer Agreement is a contract with PB-T-B for planning, consultant, or engineering services not covered by existing contracts. Each item of work is authorized and budgeted by the Board. PB-T-~B cannot initiate any work under this con- tract that will cause total charges under the contract to ex- ceed $100,000. Its condition as of June 30, 1967 is as follows: xy Bee Previously reported as complete pre-—contract work; support before State Properties Con- trol Commission; Soils Library Study Mobilization (6 out of 8 authorized moves have been made) Participation in Atlanta Area Transportation Study ($1,500 authorized) Public Information Support ($2,000 authorized) Real Estate Consultation ($1,250 authorized; bill- ing is complete.) Detailed Engineering ($7,000 authorized) Unexpended Authorizations Balance Billing 4/1/67- 6/30/67 $ 2,192.70 93.37 497.33 4.00 868.59 $ 3,655.99 Reported thru 3/31/67 $30,943.10 12,697.84 1,198.93 806.37 1,443.12 310.64 $47,400.00 Total thru 6/30/67 $30,943.10 14,890.54 1,292.30 1,303.70 1,447.12 1,179.23 S 51,055.99 6,724.77 42,219.24 $100,000.00  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 6, Document 23 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 6 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/16f4758f12399a1abe0dab1696fd93b0.pdf 6c52889e00479274f87062e1619b2f12 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. ........./ l J I" > ~o Fair Oaks z· =>I 0 . ul r, I \ \ I • ' , __ '1 ' , ,__ ____ __f - z J: o: ATL ANTA I-' ...J: =>'I LL. I EAST BR NCH Nor i ru i d Hills I d I , \ \ I I I CL ARKSTON ' 1 \ --- ' \ \_ \ 20 \ ., Eas t \ I I \ . .{ LoU I I , '__ ,r-.. . -,r-\.-• I Co vington . / YA... -~ ' J ·=--- -,..,-- J' ' I ::::, / EAST LINE ' ', \ 0,': -...1~0 ( I ,-- - , I I ..  : (J-r--· ~---' I <r! ...J~ I _1 ,-. l __ Lj'(l~e_w_opd•A;(e_ r _ __ I I I I I I I I ,_ ,-1 '\ CONSTITUTION I I EAST POINT I -7 1.I . --, , I I ....I \ , >-~ --- , ' s:l I L__ l I \~ .. ,.. J \ I ' ,- .... " ou.:, I I I • / ~ ~z,;;;1/' ,,,' -, f---/ __JI I I I - ---! I I I I L __ ATLANTA REG ION METROPOLITAN P L ANNING COMMISS ION PROPOSED RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM i~ i~ Bas ic System Reg ional System ju I~ . II>. <t -·-- ~ I...J .u > ·- ·, Ii \ ~ \ . ---~,-. I .· r-: i   \. ~ JO~ESBORO ! 1...11 \ t Parsons Br incker hoff -Tudor - Bechte l • J une 1967 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document ‘ : on, —_ : i Al - eon ait } ( L\ BERKELEY LAKE iw : , , C Sa J 5 bs ‘ — ELIZABETH > y _ ) N e yise Age ¢ pe a oy MEI oa ES ads . ori 0 1 « NQRTHWEST LIN® oS | Pe atte ES | si" MARIETTA VA > \ MILES 7" ‘wy ey et “ i! Gr h. é sae ae \ Mariettay he | C : \ foie San oe oye | NORTHEAST LIVE /norcross a | Loos “nO ‘ ™ ‘i Ye OX \ — ty A » cS 7 * Ne aye r% H 1 B fr Norcross Fair Oaks Re Ps ees) In oe E, si ( z: 1 a’ | “‘p. ce) . >| 1 MKT Dordiitle Ay prong, le en Py / 2. ! 4 q \ aos o 1 i | ay c Suet * THT ) is | \ I ty o3 } ¢ Sets 1 4 Chanmplee! ; Smyrna “\ asl ‘ ek hy I ¥S pe t. / 1 ae ye fo Nest eel) Lb ese A CHAMBLEE 5 sae e CIT? “OF ATLANTA a fa Xe L SMYRNA hee? a ff Ss, 5 Se, 3 si ~. aatel bed R > Ry ™ ©Gilmore - Vinings utfL’ Brookhaven ba f > neh Lenox Rd. > * if Pied t Rd = réamon . o LO EAST BRANCH 4a aft > / NorthBruid HillsAd —__ = | A SWE Briarcliff - FN ‘ Z Py \_ / CLARKSTON ( \ - = 1 te i North Decatur ase Na \ ff = ed \ wor Pershing Poihf morys fra PINE LAKE : FI "\ * \ oy 15 Tenth St. a pecatun’'9"4/s/Estate (20) PSN : I Oecatur At \ / ig North\ive. at | BS avoNDALE ; 2 i Kirkweos, | me S Yestares™ | EAST LINE \ 4 fs Sa t Eastlake ~~" Sah = 07 : Moreland : 4 ovington % § WESTIZ INE, 3 bteoees \ 4 ie Bop letard r Va \--76j : “ ‘ x ar’ emir we f> 4 pee /- ry eo | ' i Lay ss < (as) Sie eee eass=—--1 oe a coutece ! ] PARK i + be --- a | | a ATLANTA REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION PROPOSED RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM Basic System —g— Regional System ——j—— Parsons Brinckerhoff - Tudor - Bechtel June 1967 a sohesaidha u ' \ ual  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 6, Document 24 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 6 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/7875ad814e72c9d006d8220bd3379a2a.pdf ad3b0e13542d130f871ea264e063e9d4 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. V I MINUTES OF THE SIXTEENTH MEETING OF THE METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY JUNE 9, 1967 The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority held its regular meeting on June 9, 1967, at 3:30 P.M. in the Conference Room of the Glenn Building~ Atlanta. Mr. Richard H. Rich, Chairman, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Robert F. Adamson (City of Atlanta) M. C. Bishop (Fulton County) Edgar Blalock (Clayton County) Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County) Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta) K. A. McMillan (Gwinnett County) L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta) Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta) MEMBERS ABSENT: Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County) OTHERS PRESENT: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority H. L. Stuart, General Manager King Elliott, Public Information Director Earl W. Nelson, Chief Engineer H. N. Johnson, Secretary to General Manager Consultants Walter Douglas, Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, New York W. 0. Salter, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, San Francisco J. A. Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta Raymond O'Neil, Parsons, Brinckerhoff- Tudor , Bechtel , Atlanta �Consultants (Cont'd.) R. W. Gustafson, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta David McBrayer, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta Bob Barksdale, Parsons, Brinckerhof f -Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta M. D. Den Hartog, Lord & Den Hartog/Parsons, BrinckerhoffTudor, Bechtel, New York Philip Hammer, Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates, Washington Lawrence Greene, Hammer, Greene , Siler Associates, Atlanta Leon Eplan , Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta W. Stell Huie, Huie & Harland, Atlanta Others Lorraine Bennett, Atlant~ Journal Dick Hebert, Atlanta Constitution Joseph E. Lay-;Robinson-Humphrey Jere A. Burruss, State Highway Department of Georgia Joel F. Stone, Jr., State Highway Departmen t of Georgia Robert W. Rosevear e , Traffic Engineer, DeKalb County Donald G. Ingram, Associate Director, Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. Andy Springer, Atlanta Traffic & Safety Council J. D. Wingfield, Jr., Jerry A. Coursey, A. Y. Brown, Gayle Harder, Mrs. Rachel Champagne, Miss Claudette Parrish, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission The meeting was called to order by the Chairman. Minutes The minutes of the meeting of May 2nd had been mailed to members prior to the meeting . Mr. Bishop made a motion, seconded by Mr. Haverty, that the reading of the minutes be dispensed with and that they be unanimously approved. Mr. Huie called a tt ention to the fact that minutes of March 2, 1966, June 28, 1966, January 3 , 1967, and April 4, 1967, meetings had been approved at meetings which did not have a quorum present, and suggested that the Board ratify approval of those documents. Mr . Bishop made a motion that approval of these minutes be ratified , Mr. McMillan seconded the motion, and it was unanimously passed. - 2 - �Financial Report The General Manager presented the financial report as of May 31, 1967, which is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Mr. Stuart commented that Gwinnett County was the only government in arrears on its commitments to the Authority. Income from interest had been slightly less than anticipated because less money had been invested, due to consultant payments having been made. There were no q'u estions, and the financial report was accepted. Progress Reports General Manager A meeting was held at 2:00 o'clock immediately prior to the regular Board meeting, for the purpose of hearing progress reports from the consultants. Engineers from Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Mr. Philip Hammer of Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates, and Mr. Leon Eplan of Eric Hill Associates gave detailed reports on rapid transit consultant contracts in force. This was well attended by some 50 individuals, including local consultants, planners, architects, etc. Mr. Stuart said this would be a regular meeting each month, and it was hoped it would serve as a tool for information and coordination of efforts among the various governments and agencies concerned. Mr. Stuart said Cousins Properties, Inc., in development of the air rights in the gulch, had allowed SO-foot corridors between columns as well as a Y track, to accommodate requirements of the transit system. Liaison continued with Mr. Portman in the development of Peachtree Center. Mr. Stuart had met with airport developers and with principals in the Nasher project, and reported cooperation from both groups. 11 11 The General Manager had made nine public addresses during the month. Mr. Stuart reported on a conference in Washington, D. C., on May 22nd. The meeting was called by HUD, and was on design of urban transportation. An exhibit had been prepared by MARTA with the help of the engineers, and Mr. Stuart showed slides of the e x hibit, and taped excerpts of addresses by Mr. Charles Haar and others were presented . A brief report of the recent national meeting of the Institute for Rapid Transit held in Atlanta was made by the General Manager . - 3 - �Mr. Stuart said Aldermen Cook and Griggs, Representative Winkles, and others had recently toured the proposed transit lines. The General Manager announced that the Advisory Committee, discussed at the May meeting, had been formed, and was composed of the following professionals from the principal design disciplines in Atlanta: Chairman - Professor Howard K. Menhinick Richard L. Aeck, representing American Institute · of Architects Richard M. Forbes, representing American Institute of Planners H. Boyer Marx, representing American Society of Landscape Architects Roy J. Boston, representing American Society of Professional Engineers The purpose of this committee would be twofold: (1) to provide professional review of design work and (2) to discuss proper relationships between the several consultants. Mr. Stuart asked for approval of an amendment to the 1967 budget, adding an expenditure item of $5,000 for fees to this committee. Mr. Haverty made a motion that this amendment to the budget be approved, Mr. Bishop seconded the motion, and it was unanimously passed. Mr. Stuart and Mr. Huie had visited the State Department of Industry and Trade. Mr. Huie felt contractual arrangements could probably be made with the State for funds on a quarterly basis during the first two years. The State had appropriated $250,000 for the next two years, limited by the Constitutional provision restricting the State's contribution to ten percent of the cost of any one project. Consultants Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel Mr. John Coil gave examples of photogrammetry and aerial photography and the methods used to show projected plans and profiles of the system. The engineers had examined the gulch area further to determine the best rights-of-way for the transit system . In formation was being transmitted to the State Properties Control Commission . Preliminary work had begun on a contract for taking soil samples in the central and east- west lines . Mr . Coil said one company in the joint venture would do preliminary des_ign of special structures in the system. Liaison wor k on coor dinating plans for the airport and transit system continued. Effor ts t o - 4 - �coordinate the Highway Department's plans for the Brookwood interchange had been made. Mr. Coil said the firm had reviewed architectural definitives and had four which showed concepts for a transit center. The Chairman recognized the importance of coordinating plans for the transit lines to the airport, but cautioned the engineers against too detailed plans at this time in view of the realistic time lag on this line. Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates Mr. Philip Hammer reported that final figures for financing the system would be completed within a few days. He said there had been some changes in annual requirements which would more advantageously fit into a financial plan and the receipt of federal funds. He mentioned a plan staging the development of the system so that participation on the part of the outlying counties would begin simultaneously with construction in those areas. Other Business The Board accepted the resignation of Mr. Robert W. Adamson as Treasurer of MARTA. Mr. Adamson had been appointed as a member to replace Mr. Mills B. Lane, Jr. At Mr. Adamson's suggestion, the Board agreed to ask Mr. Herbert Dickson, Executive Vice President of the C. & S. Bank, to serve as Treasurer of MARTA. The Chairman reported that Fulton County Commission would soon appoint a replacement for Mr. Pulver. July Meeting Because of the July 4th holiday, the nex t regular meeting was scheduled for Friday, July 7th, at 3 : 30 P.M . Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 4 : 45 P.M. - 5 - � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document MINUTES OF THE SIXTEENTH MEETING OF THE METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY JUNE 9, 1967 The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority held its regular meeting on June 9, 1967, at 3:30 P.M. in the Conference Room of the Glenn Building, Atlanta. Mr. Richard H. Rich, Chairman, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Robert F. Adamson (City of Atlanta) M. C. Bishop (Fulton County) Edgar Blalock (Clayton County) Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County) Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta) K. A. McMillon (Gwinnett County) L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta) Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta) MEMBERS ABSENT: Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County) OTHERS PRESENT: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority H. L. Stuart, General Manager King Elliott, Public Information Director Earl W. Nelson, Chief Engineer H. N. Johnson, Secretary to General Manager Consultants Walter Douglas, Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, New York W. O. Salter, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, San Francisco J. A. Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta Raymond O'Neil, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta Consultants (Cont'd.) R. W. Gustafson, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta David McBrayer, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta Bob Barksdale, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Atlanta M. D. Den Hartog, Lord & Den Hartog/Parsons, Brinckerhoff- Tudor, Bechtel, New York Philip Hammer, Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates, Washington Lawrence Greene, Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates, Atlanta Leon Eplan, Eric Hill Associates, Atlanta W. Stell Huie, Huie & Harland, Atlanta Others Lorraine Bennett, Atlanta Journal Dick Hebert, Atlanta Constitution Joseph E. Lay, Robinson-Humphrey Jere A. Burruss, State Highway Department of Georgia Joel F. Stone, Jr., State Highway Department of Georgia Robert W. Roseveare, Traffic Engineer, DeKalb County Donald G. Ingram, Associate Director, Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. Andy Springer, Atlanta Traffic & Safety Council J. D. Wingfield, Jr., Jerry A. Coursey, A. Y. Brown, Gayle Harder, Mrs. Rachel Champagne, Miss Claudette Parrish, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission The meeting was called to order by the Chairman. Minutes The minutes of the meeting of May 2nd had been mailed to members prior to the meeting. Mr. Bishop made a motion, seconded by Mr. Haverty, that the reading of the minutes be dispensed with and that they be unanimously approved. Mr. Huie called attention to the fact that minutes of March 2, 1966, June 28, 1966, January 3, 1967, and April 4, 1967, meet- ings had been approved at meetings which did not have a quorum present, and suggested that the Board ratify approval of those documents. Mr. Bishop made a motion that approval of these minutes be ratified, Mr. McMillon seconded the motion, and it was unanimously passed. Financial Report The General Manager presented the financial report as of May 31, 1967, which is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Mr. Stuart commented that Gwinnett County was the only govern- ment in arrears on its commitments to the Authority. Income from interest had been slightly less than anticipated because less money had been invested, due to consultant payments having been made. There were no questions, and the financial report was accepted. Progress Reports General Manager A meeting was held at 2:00 o'clock immediately prior to the regular Board meeting, for the purpose of hearing progress re- ports from the consultants. Engineers from Parsons, Brincker- hoff-Tudor, Bechtel, Mr. Philip Hammer of Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates, and Mr. Leon Eplan of Eric Hill Associates gave detailed reports on rapid transit consultant contracts in force. This was well attended by some 50 individuals, including local consultants, planners, architects, etc. Mr. Stuart said this would be a regular meeting each month, and it was hoped it would serve as a tool for information and coordination of efforts among the various governments and agencies concerned. Mr. Stuart said Cousins Properties, Inc., in development of the air rights in the gulch, had allowed 50-foot corridors between columns as well as a "Y" track, to accommodate requirements of the transit system. Liaison continued with Mr. Portman in the development of Peachtree Center. Mr. Stuart had met with air- port developers and with principals in the Nasher project, and reported cooperation from both groups. The General Manager had made nine public addresses during the month. Mr. Stuart reported on a conference in Washington, D. C., on May 22nd. The meeting was called by HUD, and was on design of urban transportation. An exhibit had been prepared by MARTA with the help of the engineers, and Mr. Stuart showed slides of the exhibit, and taped excerpts of addresses by Mr. Charles Haar and others were presented. A brief report of the recent national meeting of the Institute for Rapid Transit held in Atlanta was made by the General Manager. Mr. Stuart said Aldermen Cook and Griggs, Representative Winkles, and others had recently toured the proposed transit lines. The General Manager announced that the Advisory Committee, dis- cussed at the May meeting, had been formed, and was composed of the following professionals from the principal design disciplines in Atlanta: Chairman - Professor Howard K. Menhinick Richard L. Aeck, representing American Institute of Architects Richard M. Forbes, representing American Institute of Planners H. Boyer Marx, representing American Society of Landscape Architects Roy J. Boston, representing American Society of Professional Engineers The purpose of this committee would be twofold: (1) to provide professional review of design work and (2) to discuss proper re- lationships between the several consultants. Mr. Stuart asked for approval of an amendment to the 1967 budget, adding an ex- penditure item of $5,000 for fees to this committee. Mr. Haverty made a motion that this amendment to the budget be approved, Mr. Bishop seconded the motion, and it was unanimously passed. Mr. Stuart and Mr. Huie had visited the State Department of Industry and Trade. Mr. Huie felt contractual arrangements could probably be made with the State for funds on a quarterly basis during the first two years. The State had appropriated $250,000 for the next two years, limited by the Constitutional provision restricting the State's contribution to ten percent of the cost of any one project. Consultants Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor, Bechtel Mr. John Coil gave examples of photogrammetry and aerial photog- raphy and the methods used to show projected plans and profiles of the system. The engineers had examined the gulch area further to determine the best rights-of-way for the transit system. In- formation was being transmitted to the State Properties Control Commission. Preliminary work had begun on a contract for taking soil samples in the central and east-west lines. Mr. Coil said one company in the joint venture would do preliminary design of special structures in the system. Liaison work on coordinating plans for the airport and transit system continued. Efforts to coordinate the Highway Department's plans for the Brookwood interchange had been made. Mr. Coil said the firm had reviewed architectural definitives and had four which showed concepts for a transit center. The Chairman recognized the importance of coordinating plans for the transit lines to the airport, but cautioned the engineers against too detailed plans at this time in view of the realistic time lag on this line. Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates Mr. Philip Hammer reported that final figures for financing the system would be completed within a few days. He said there had been some changes in annual requirements which would more advan- tageously fit into a financial plan and the receipt of federal funds. He mentioned a plan staging the development of the system so that participation on the part of the outlying counties would begin simultaneously with construction in those areas. Other Business The Board accepted the resignation of Mr. Robert W. Adamson as Treasurer of MARTA. Mr. Adamson had been appointed as a member to replace Mr. Mills B. Lane, Jr. At Mr. Adamson's suggestion, the Board agreed to ask Mr. Herbert Dickson, Executive Vice President of the C. & S. Bank, to serve as Treasurer of MARTA. The Chairman reported that Fulton County Commission would soon appoint a replacement for Mr. Pulver. July Meeting Because of the July 4th holiday, the next regular meeting was scheduled for Friday, July 7th, at 3:30 P.M. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 4:45 P.M.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 6, Document 25 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 6 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/6224bf91ec15c2137746ed1dd3a5e874.pdf 74343afa4014e93f8e05a2093a59b952 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANS IT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA BUDGET REPORT MAY 31, 1967 BUDGET 1967 Unappropriat ed Surplus ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 TO MAY 31, 1967 $128,281.64 $1 28, 281.64 $ 84,030 . 00 23,190 , 00 82,770 . 00 91,800 . 00 18,210 . 00 $ 42 , 015 . 00 11,595 . 00 20 , 692 . 50 45 , 900 . 00 4 , 552 . 50 $300 , 000 . 00 $1 24 , 755 . 00 INCOME Appropriations : City of Atlanta Clayton Count y DeKalb Count y Fulton County Gwinnett Count y Sub - Totals Inter est Income Feder al Funds : 702 Loan Se c t ion 9 Grant Inter e s t on Fede r al Funds Sub -To tal s $ 5 , 520.00 $ 95 , 000 . 00 276, 000 . 00 0 $ 1,780 . 40 $ 60,000 . 00 67 ,6 86 , 12 25 2, 05 $371 , 000 . 00 $1 27, 938 , 17 TOTAL I NCOME $676 , 520 , 00 $254 ,47 3 . 57 TOTAL I NCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS $804 , 801 , 64 $382,7 55 .21 $ 68 , 950 , 00 $ 22 , 270 . 30 10 , 500 , 00 4,826 . 87 1 , 109 . 00 533. 00 1 , 680 , 00 10 , 000 , 00 99 . 00 75 0 . 10 266 , 67 402, 85 0 0 $ 92 2 871. 00 $ 28 , 516 , 79 EXPENSES St a ff Costs : Sa l a ries Ex penses Benefits : Social Se curit y Guarant y Fund Health and Ac cident I nsura nce Re tir ement Wor kme n ' s Compensation Sub- Totals Board Meetings $ CARRIED FORWARD $ 96 , 021.00 3 , 150 , 00 $ 1, 400 . 00 $ 29 , 916 . 79 �METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA BUDGET REPORT MAY 31, 1967 BUDGET 1967 TOTAL I NCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD ACTUAL JANUARY 1 , 1967 TO MAY 31, 1967 $804 , 801.64 $382, 755 .2 1 $ 96,021.00 $ 29 ,916 . 79 EXPENSES Brought For ward Administ r ative and Of fice Overhead : Rent Communi cations and Postage Furn i tur e and Equipment Suppli e s Printing Auditor Accountant Public In f ormation Spe c ia l Projects $ Ins urance: Public Liability Depository and Forgery Fid elity Bond Sub - Tot a ls Couns e l Consu ltants : Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission : 701 Matching Urban Design Study : Section 9 Matching Atlanta Transit Study : Section 9 Matching Parsons , Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel : 702 Loan Section 9 : Federal Matching Retainer Agreement Research and Te chnical Services 3,000 . 00 2 , 000 . 00 2 ,000 . 00 3 ,6 00 . 00 1 ,000 . 00 25 0 . 00 1,000 . 00 33 , 000 . 00 0 $ 1,250 . 00 743 . 09 411 . 97 1, 008 . 23 623.56 25 0 . 00 250 . 00 9 , 436. 90 34 . 00 0 0 0 72 . 00 56 . 00 199 . 00 $ 46, 177 . 00 $ 14, 00 7 . 75 $ 20,000 . 00 $ $ 31,2 50 . 00 $ 29,939 . 00 32,66 7 . 00 16,333 . 00 12, 000 . 00 0 3,333 . 00 1 ,66 7 . 00 5,451.30 0 0 95,000 . 00 60, 000 . 00 240,000 . 00 120,000 . 00 60,000 . 00 2, 000 . 00 0 110,800 . 00 14,220 . 55 1,490 . 84 $602,250 . 00 $228,45 0 .3 9 TOTAL EXPENSES $764,448 . 00 f}.277 ,826223 SURPLUS ~ nof! ,228, 2a Sub-Totals f±0,3.23,6f± �METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION MAY 31, 1967 ASSETS Cash in Banks : C & S National Bank First National Bank - Payroll Trust Company of Georgia Fulton National Bank - Section 9 $ 26,536.42 3,941.57 1,000.00 64,144.08 Investments: U. S. Treasury Bills U. S. Treasury Bills - Section 9 95,979.98 25,794.09 Petty Cash 25.00 Accounts Receivable: Federal Funds - 702 Loan Gwinnett County - 1967 Gwinnett County - 1966 $30,000.00 4,552.50 4,552.50 39,105.00 TOTAL ASSETS $256,526 . 14 LIABIL!T!ES Accounts Payable $ 32,708 . 12 Payroll Taxes Withheld and Accrued Res erves : Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: Section 9 Matching Retainer Agreement: Transportation Study Public Information Surveying TOTAL LIABILITIES SURPLUS 1,545.76 110,800 . 00 $ 25.23 928 . 16 5,589 . 89 6,543.28 151,597.16 $104,928.98 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA BUDGET REPORT MAY 31, 1967 ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 BUDGET TO 1967 MAY 31, 1967 Unappropriated Surplus $128,281.64 $128,281.64 INCOME Appropriations: City of Atlanta $ 84,030.00 $ 42,015.00 Clayton County 23,190.00 11,595.00 DeKalb County 82,770.00 20,692.50 Fulton County 91,800.00 45,900.00 Gwinnett County 18,210.00 4,552.50 Sub-Totals $300,000.00 $124,755.00 Interest Income $ 5,520.00 $1,780.40 Federal Funds: 702 Loan $ 95,000.00 $ 60,000.00 Section 9 Grant 276,000.00 67,686,12 Interest on Federal Funds 0 252.05 Sub-Totals $371,000.00 $127,938.17 TOTAL INCOME $676,520.00 $254,473.57 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS $804,801.64 $382,755.21 EXPENSES Staff Costs: Salaries $ 68,950.00 $ 22,270.30 Expenses 10,500, 00 4,826.87 Benefits: Social Security 1,109,00 750.10 Guaranty Fund 533.00 266.67 Health and Accident Insurance 1,680.00 402,85 Retirement 10,000,00 0 Workmen's Compensation 99.00 0 Sub-Totals $_ 92,871.00 $ 28,516.79 Board Meetings $ 3,150.00 $ 1,400.00 CARRIED FORWARD $_ 96,021.00 $ 29,916.79 METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT ATLANTA, GEORGIA BUDGET REPORT MAY 31, 1967 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD EXPENSES Brought Forward Administrative and Office Overhead: Rent Communications and Postage Furniture and Equipment Supplies Printing Auditor Accountant Public Information Special Projects Insurance: Public Liability Depository and Forgery Fidelity Bond Sub-Totals Counsel Consultants: Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission: 701 Matching Urban Design Study: Section 9 Matching Atlanta Transit Study: Section 9 Matching Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: 702 Loan Section 9: Federal Matching Retainer Agreement Research and Technical Services Sub-Totals TOTAL EXPENSES SURPLUS AUTHORITY ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 BUDGET TO 1967 MAY 31, 1967 $804,801.64 $382,755.21 $ 96,021.00 § 29,916.79 $ 3,000.00 $ 1,250.00 2,000.00 743.09 2,000.00 411.97 3,600.00 1,008.23 1,000, 00 623.56 250.00 250.00 1,000.00 250.00 33,000.00 9,436.90 0 34.00 72.00 0 56.00 ) 199.00 0 $ 46,177.00 § 14,007.75 $ 20,000.00 § 5,451,30 § 31,250.00 $ 29,939.00 32,667.00 12,000.00 16 5333.00 0 3,333.00 0 1,667.00 0 95,000.00 60,000, 00 240,000,00 0 120,000.00 110,800.00 60,000.00 14,220.55 2,000.00 1,490.84 $602,250.00 $228 450,39 $764,448.00 $277,826.23 S_ 40,353.64 $104 928.98 METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION MAY 31, 1967 ASSETS Cash in Banks: C & S National Bank $ 26,536.42 First National Bank - Payroll 3,941.57 Trust Company of Georgia 1,000.00 Fulton National Bank - Section 9 64,144.08 Investments: U. S. Treasury Bills 95,979.98 U. S. Treasury Bills - Section 9 25,794,09 Petty Cash 25.00 Accounts Receivable: Federal Funds ~ 702 Loan $30,000.00 Gwinnett County - 1967 4,552.50 Gwinnett County - 1966 4,552.50 39,105.00 TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES Accounts Payable $ 32,708.12 Payroll Taxes Withheld and Accrued 1,545.76 Reserves: Parsons, Brinckerhoff£-Tudor-Bechtel: Section 9 Matching 110,800.00 Retainer Agreement: Transportation Study $ 25.23 Public Information 928.16 Surveying 5,589.89 6,543.28 TOTAL LIABILITIES SURPLUS $256,526.14 151,597.16 $104 928.98  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 6, Document 26 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 6 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/3b406505fddad8365de1b8c97a8baa18.pdf bea7349e02d559452e8d1fc010178109 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. July 3, 1967 Mr. Charles C . Ford Bank Building Corporation 132 6 Fulton National Bank Building Atlanta , -G eorgi a 30303 Dear Check: Thank you very much for your kind l e t ter . We were all pre ent at Mr . Sommerville ' s fine presentation la t week. This matter will be referred to the Rapid Transit A uthority for full consideration. Sincerely, Ivan Allen, Jr. M ayor IAJr: o � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document July 3, 1967 Mr. Charles C. Ford Bank Building Corporation 1326 Fulton National Bank Building Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Check: Thank you very much for your kind letter. We were all present at Mr. Sommerville's fine presentation last week. This matter will be referred to the Rapid Transit Authority for full consideration. Sincerely, Ivan Allen, Jr. Mayor IAJr:eo  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 6, Document 27 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 6 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/1bde526b4236280c4ca6595755137721.pdf 9d00aa8a1b1b93ed9daddc43ae75a938 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. BANK BUILDING CORPORATION 132(3 FULTON NATIONAL BANK BUILDING ATLANTA , GEORGIA 303 03 5 23 - 6052 June 30, 196 7 The Honorable Mayor Ivan Allen Jr. City Hall Atlanta, Georgia Dear Mayor Allen: Mr. Bob Sommerville, President of the Atlanta Transit Company, talked to t he Nor th side Kiwanis Club th is noon. He presented to t he membership an i nterim p rogra m for the moving of mass transportation. I am certain that you are familiar with this program so I will not go into the details, but I believe it has a great deal of merit . It' s a dvantages are cos ts, time to place in operation, and it' s flexibility. The bus as a complete unit gives this method quick mob ility on or off the rapid expr ess rou t e . I believe that if we could give this a good trial that it might result in something revolutionary in the rapid transit program. I wou ld like to go on record as endorsing this program to you and offering any assistance to ini ti ate it. CCF :hs cc: Mr. Robert L. Sommerville � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document BANK BUILDING CORPORATION 1326 FULTON NATIONAL BANK BUILDING ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 523 - 6052 June 30, 1967 The Honorable Mayor Ivan Allen Jr. City Hall Atlanta, Georgia Dear Mayor Allen: Mr. Bob Sommerville, President of the Atlanta Transit Company, talked to the North side Kiwanis Club this noon. He presented to the member- ship an interim program for the moving of mass transportation. I am certain that you are familiar with this program so I will not go into the details, but I believe it has a great deal of merit. It's advantages are costs, time to place in operation, and it's flex- ibility. The bus as a complete unit gives this method quick mobility on or off the rapid express route. T believe that if we could give this a good trial that it might result in something revolutionary in the rapid transit program. I would like to go on record as endorsing this program to you and offering any assistance to initiate it. Sinéérely, 2 Charles C. Ford CCF:hs ec: Mr. Robert L. Sommerville  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 6, Document 28 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 6 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/f81d42bf54a02d017522450422db918a.pdf 211c8af6b2f97d6c76ba6cd40a433606 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. rP METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHOR ITY GLENN BUILD ING / ATLANTA , GEORGI A 30303 / A REA CODE 404 524 -5711 OFFICERS: Rich a rd H. Ri ch, Chairman Roy A. Blount, V ice Cha irman G lenn E. Bennett , Se cretary Hen ry L. Stuart, Gene ra l M anager June 29, 1967 NOTICE TO: Board of Directors Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority FROM: Glenn E . Bennett, Secretary The next regular meeting will be held on July 7, 1967, at 3:30 P.M., in the Conference Room of the Glenn Buildi ng , Atlanta. The tentative agenda is as follows: 1. Minutes of last meeting . 2. Financial report . 3. Report of : 4. a) General Manager b) Engineering consultants c) Economic consulta n t s Othe r business . � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document rj) 7 METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY GLENN BUILDING / ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 / AREA CODE 404 524-5711 OFFICERS: Richard H. Rich, Chairman Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary Henry L. Stuart, General Manager June 29, 1967 NOTICE TO: Board of Directors Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority FROM: Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary j The next regular meeting will be held on July 7, 1967, at 3:30 P.M., in the Conference Room of the Glenn Building, Atlanta. The tentative agenda is as follows: 1. Minutes of last meeting. 2. Financial report. 3. Report of: a) General Manager b) Engineering Consultants c) Economic Consultants 4, Other business.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 6, Document 29 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 6 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/817afbd8743b50a31e3a2d84112957cb.pdf fdaa9e269b9d709340ed508af96fe14e Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. 7 f METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY GLENN BUILDING/ ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 / AREA CODE 404 524 -5711 OFFICERS: Richard H. Rich, Chairman June 2, 1967 Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman Glenn E. Bennett , Secretary Henry L. Stuart, General Manager NOTICE TO: Board of Directors Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority FROM: Glenn E. Bennett, S e c r e t a ~ The next regular meeting will be held on June 9, 1967, at 3:30 P.M., in the Conference Room of the Glenn Building, Atlanta. The tentative agenda is as follows: 1. Minutes of last meeting. 2. Financial report. 3. Report of: 4. a) General Manager b) Engineering Consultants c) Economic consultants Other business. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY GLENN BUILDING / ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 / AREA CODE 404 524-5711 OFFICERS: Richard H. Rich, Chairman June 2, 1967 Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary Henry L. Stuart, General Manager NOTICE TO: Board of Directors Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority FROM: Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary, The next regular meeting will be held on June 9, 1967, at 3:30 P.M., in the Conference Room of the Glenn Building, Atlanta. The tentative agenda is as follows: l. Minutes of last meeting. 2. Financial report. 3. Report of: a) General Manager b) Engineering Consultants c) Economic Consultants 4. Other business.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 6, Document 30 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 6 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/8db76b0edda8fa2319006def81d9cd51.pdf 14c385b19e6ef90509b16be9dd807c1b Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY GLENN BUILDING/ ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 / AREA CODE 404 524-5711 OFFICERS: Richard H. Rich , Chairman May 18 , 1967 Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary Henry L. Stuart, General Manager Mr . William A. Cunningham 262 East 78 t h St reet New York, N. Y. Dear Mr. Cunninghanu Yours of May 8th t o Mayor Allen has been referred to me for consi derati on. We have under way now rapid tran it development in Atlanta that i s closi ng out t he p l anning s t age and starting the preliminary engineering . Ahead of us is the heavy- duty polit ical job of selli ng th project to the public so that public financing can be made available to us in sufficient measure to permit us to get into detail final design. For the immediate future I can offer you little encouragement becau ewe are keeping our t f f very small and putting mot of our resourc s into the hands of our consultants . After public fin ncing is received, we will be in a po ition to consider eriou ly people of your background becau e it will be neces ary to enlarge the administr tive, ngineering and public information t ffs . I do not foresee public financing t this l v l during the current y ar, and only with srna bing succe can I v n predict it for next year . In th m nwhile, I am very glad to have your resum and will ke pit at th top of my file which has b en set up to how us the resources that may be avail ble when it is necess ry to nlarge our t ff. I a ur you that wh n the time comes w will giv serious consideration to your pplication. With bet wish s. Sincer ely yours, l LS:J/ BC: Mayot l l ] )llen, Jr . H. L. Stuart, General Manager . � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY GLENN BUILDING / ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 / AREA CODE 404 524-5711 OFFICERS: Richard H. Rich, Chairman May 18, 1967 Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary Henry L. Stuart, General Manager Mr. William A, Cunningham 262 East 78th Street New York, N. Y. Dear Mr. Cunningham: Yours of May Sth to Mayor Allen has been referred to me for consideration. We have under way now rapid trangit development in Atlanta that is closing out the planning stage and starting the preliminary engineering. Ahead of us is the heavy-duty political job of selling the project to the public so that public financing can be made available to us in sufficient measure to permit us to get into detail final design. For the immediate future I can offer you little encouragement because we are keeping our staff very small and putting most of our resources into the hands of our consultants. After public financing is received, we will be in a position to consider seriously people of your background because it will be necessary to enlarge the administrative, engineering and public information staffs. I do not foresee public financing at this level during the current year, and only with a smash- ing success can I even predict it for next year. In the mean- while, I am very glad to have your resume and will keep it at the top of my file which has been set up to show us the resources that may be available when it is necessary to enlarge our staff. I assure you that when the time comes we will give serious consideration to your application. With best wishes. Sincerely yours, H. L. Stuart, General Manager. HLS:JJ BCs Mayor Ivan Allen, Jr.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 6, Document 31 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 6 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/2c149317a94086f78b7758c0629fa2e9.pdf 5e2a8a883ab69bf6c564dc6b7cb0b399 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. May 15, 1967 MEMORANDUM TO: Richard H. Rich, Chairman Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority FROM: Glenn E. Bennett, Executive Director, Atl~nta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission, Secretary, Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Tr Authority SUBJECT: t · Some Planning Principles and Non-Engineering Aspects of Rapid Transit I would like to set down here some of the basic philosophy which has guided us in transit planning, and also to mention possibilities for the future. Transit in Atlanta will be a tremendous influence; it will be the biggest single factor in guiding growth in many parts of the Metropolitan Area. The Planning Commission concluded in 1960 that a balanced transportation system with transit would (1) help shape the pattern of development of the region in a desirable and efficient way, and (2) provide the necessary access to central Atlanta so that the orderly growth of employment and business activity could take place there. The Planning Commission is concerned with serving the economic need and shaping the metropolitan area. MARTA has been created primarily to "build a railroad" in accordance with the generalized plan which has been tested against planning factors. We have come to the engineering stage now. This is a time when cost estimates need to be based on specifics. If the Planning Commission could have built a railroad, we would not have needed MARTA. As we make decisions on precise locations we are continuing to test and re-test basic assumptions made earlier with respect to population growth , density, economic change , and many social factors. Serving the disadvantaged people , the educational institutions , the new centers of interest , such as the stadium , auditorium , and cul tural center , are of great concern to us at this stage . We are �r~ - aware of the opportunity we have for relating harmoniously all of the exciting activities in the developmental stages in central Atlanta, and upgrading the City's aesthetics and urban design. These are non-engineering factors which are currently receiving attention from planners. The present work program of the staff of the ARMPC includes an updating of earlier regional land use plans. In connection with this we have developed statements of region a l goals related to transportation. These are polic y statements. Th ey set up criteria against which transportation improvements can be measured . For example, one section deals with aesthetic standards as follows : "New or improved transportation facilities should be located and designed so as to enhance the appearance of the region, with appropriate regard to topography , soils, wooded areas and water bodies , as well as the character of e x isting and projected man-made development." Th e objective of a regional plan is to guide new growth into sensible patterns, and discourage extensively scatte red urban de v elopment which is wasteful of land a nd other resourc e s. Transportation s y stems are the greatest single influence on deve lopm e nt. Consequently, planners study the effects of any proposed transportation improv ements, such as roads and highways of all categories and transit, on future land uses. Here are a couple of paragraphs from our polic y statement on the pr e servation of neighborhoods a nd community v alu e s, a lso on pres e r v ing freedom of choice : "Neighborhoods are considered the basic unit of resid ential community de ve lopment. They may be defined in one or mor e of se ve ral way s : b y tr a di t ion, th rough identification b y th e r e sid e nts , from obser ved patt e rns of common a lity in ag e a nd ch a racter of d eve lopme nt , by natur a l o r ma n-m a de ba rr i e r s, a s th e limits of local trade or s er vice areas , a nd so forth Whe re t hey c a n be d e fine d, th e integrit y of sound or r e n e wable neighborhoods s hould be protect e d : ma jor tr a nspor t ation art e ri e s sh ould be lo cated a nd design e d so a s to bou nd , not penetrate , such a re a s . " "Re sidentia l de v elopmen t a nd renewa l s h ould be pl a n ned a n d c o nd ucted s o a s to make av ail abl e in e v ery sector of the reg ion h ousing of a wid e r an ge o f t ype s and c o s t , thus a llowi ng t he indi v i du al max i mum freed om to choo s e where he wi shes to l ive . To enhance t h is fr ee d om of choice , all resident i a l area s s hould hav e comp a rab le acce ssib ility to a r ea s of emp l oyment , re c reati onal and c omme r cial acti v ity . Pub li c t r ansportation - 2 - �facilities should provide this comparable accessibility for residents least able to depend on private transportation." All of this ARMPC planning policy relative to transportation is consistent with the objectives of the H oU oD o programs. Federal money has improved and expanded planning all over the country; there's no doubt about it. Atlanta can boast a little over having the oldest publicly supported metropolitan planning agency in the United States. Because of local initiative back in 1947 we ,have had metropolitan planning long before the feds got into the business. Now , many cities have agencies something like ours, but because we had a foundation of area-wide planning we could do a comprehensive transit plan in 1961, a nature preserve plan in 1962, an airport plan last year, code studies two years ago, and carry on many other activities in the field of economic and social research. HUD knows this. It has a bearing on present transit work; the transit routes are a part of the overall metropolitan plan and not independent and separate. We are now working on area-wide water and sewer problems , capital improvement programming, preparation for the 1970 census, and other items in addition to MARTA non-engineering work. HUD knows this. Sidelines include metropolitan training schools for police officers and improved communications and records systems for law enforcement agencies, to mention a few. Let's look at Central Atlanta. This is a concern of ARMPC because it's the h e art of the region. It is the subject of much study by the City of Atlanta in the community improvement plan (CIP } which is aimed toward the establishment of priorities for redevelopment of land all over the City. Now that Central Atlanta Progress , I nc. is organized and well staffed, we have the opportunity to better serve the original purpose of rapid transit with respect to downtown interests, both private and public. Growth and development occurs in Atlanta with or without public planning. Portman's Peachtree Center is far along; cousins' air rights project is starting with an 8,000-car park ing facilit y ; the Nasher Park Place 18-acre air rights project is under study by architects, planners, and economists , and Georgia State College has a big and significant expansion program . La ter this year contracts are e x pected to be let for Georgia Plaza Park , a landscaped open space with underground parking garage. The State, Fulton County , and the City of Atlanta are cooperating on this venture which will result in an attractive government - centered public park which will upgrade the area near the Capitol . Now we have the opportunity to coordinate all of these activities and others , and create before long a central At lanta plan with both short-range and long -range goals. Transit is an integral part of any downtown plan , and our present alignments of routes wi ll tie together all the major developments mentioned above . - 3 - �A corridor impact planning study is now in progress, as you know. It will show the relation of transit to low-income groups and their economic and social needs. Other considerations are the relation of transit to educational institutions, vocational schools, community centers, and renewal projects. The transit corridors, the lines of the system, will be pulsing and throbbing with growth and our efforts to properly direct and control these dynamics must never cease. Planners are now working with both private and public agencies in an attempt to identify the many possibilities which the transit corridors offer us for enhancing community values, serving the largest number of citizens, and guiding development toward most sensible and efficient patterns. In our discussions with H.U.D. officials and when we talk to. our transit visitors who will be in town next week, I think we ought to keep some of these points in mind. I want to take this opportunity, Dick, to e x press our gratitude to y ou for the time and energy you are putting into this task, which is at times extremely difficult and complex. Without your leaders h ip it would be much more so! - 4 - � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document May 15, 1967 MEMORANDUM TO: Richard H. Rich, Chairman Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority FROM: Glenn E. Bennett, Executive Director, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission, Secretary, Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Tr Authority SUBJECT: Some Planning Principles and Non-Engineering Aspects of Rapid Transit I would like to set down here some of the basic philosophy which has guided us in transit planning, and also to mention possibilities for the future. Transit in Atlanta will be a tremendous influence; it will be the biggest single factor in guiding growth in many parts of the Metropolitan Area. The Planning Commission concluded in 1960 that a balanced transpor- tation system with transit would (1) help shape the pattern of development of the region in a desirable and efficient way, and (2) provide the necessary access to central Atlanta so that the orderly growth of employment and business activity could take place there. The Planning Commission is concerned with serving the economic need and shaping the metropolitan area. MARTA has been created primarily to "build a railroad" in accordance with the generalized plan which has been tested against planning factors. We have come to the en- gineering stage now. This is a time when cost estimates need to be based on specifics. If the Planning Commission could have built a railroad, we would not have needed MARTA. As we make decisions on precise locations we are continuing to test and re-test basic assumptions made earlier with respect to popula- tion growth, density, economic change, and many social factors. Serving the disadvantaged people, the educational institutions, the new centers of interest, such as the stadium, auditorium, and cul- tural center, are of great concern to us at this stage. We are aware of the opportunity we have for relating harmoniously all of the exciting activities in the developmental stages in central Atlanta, and upgrading the City's aesthetics and urban design. These are non-engineering factors which are currently receiving attention from planners. The present work program of the staff of the ARMPC includes an up- dating of earlier regional land use plans. In connection with this we have developed statements of regional goals related to transportation. These are policy statements. They set up cri- teria against which transportation improvements can be measured. For example, one section deals with aesthetic standards as follows: "New or improved transportation facilities should be located and designed so as to enhance the appearance of the region, with appropriate regard to topography, soils, wooded areas and water bodies, as well as the character of existing and projected man-made develop- ment." The objective of a regional plan is to guide new growth into sen- sible patterns, and discourage extensively scattered urban develop- ment which is wasteful of land and other resources. Transportation systems are the greatest single influence on development. Conse- quently, planners study the effects of any proposed transportation improvements, such as roads and highways of all categories and transit, on future land uses. Here are a couple of paragraphs from our policy statement on the preservation of neighborhoods and community values, also on pre- serving freedom of choice: “Neighborhoods are considered the basic unit of resi- dential community development. They may be defined in one or more of several ways: by tradition, through identification by the residents, from observed patterns of commonality in age and character of development, by natural or man-made barriers, as the limits of local trade or service areas, and so forth Where they can be defined, the integrity of sound or renewable neigh- borhoods should be protected: major transportation arteries should be located and designed so as to bound, not penetrate, such areas." "Residential development and renewal should be planned and conducted so as to make available in every sector of the region housing of a wide range of types and cost, thus allowing the individual maximum freedom to choose where he wishes to live. To enhance this free- dom of choice, all residential areas should have com- parable accessibility to areas of employment, recrea- tional and commercial activity. Public transportation facilities should provide this comparable accessibility for residents least able to depend on private transpor- tation." All of this ARMPC planning policy relative to transportation is con- sistent with the objectives of the H.U.D. programs. Federal money has improved and expanded planning all over the country; there's no doubt about it. Atlanta can boast a little over having the oldest publicly supported metropolitan planning agency in the United States. Because of local initiative back in 1947 we have had metro- politan planning long before the feds got into the business. Now, many cities have agencies something like ours, but because we had a foundation of area-wide planning we could do a comprehensive transit plan in 1961, a nature preserve plan in 1962, an airport plan last year, code studies two years ago, and carry on many other activities in the field of economic and social research. HUD knows this. It has a bearing on present transit work; the transit routes are a part of the overall metropolitan plan and not independent and separate. We are now working on area-wide water and sewer problems, capital improvement programming, preparation for the 1970 census, and other items in addition to MARTA non-engineering work. HUD knows this. Sidelines include metropolitan training schools for police officers and improved communications and records systems for law enforcement agencies, to mention a few. Let's look at Central Atlanta. This is a concern of ARMPC because it's the heart of the region. It is the subject of much study by the City of Atlanta in the community improvement plan (CIP) which is aimed toward the establishment of priorities for redevelopment of land all over the City. Now that Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. is organized and well staffed, we have the opportunity to better serve the original purpose of rapid transit with respect to downtown interests, both private and public. Growth and development occurs in Atlanta with or without public planning. Portman's Peachtree Center is far along; Cousins' air rights project is starting with an 8,000-car parking facility; the Nasher Park Place 18-acre air rights project is under study by architects, planners, and economists, and Georgia State College has a big and significant expansion program. Later this year contracts are expected to be let for Georgia Plaza Park, a landscaped open space with underground parking garage. The State, Fulton County, and the City of Atlanta are cooperating on this venture which will result in an attractive government-centered public park which will upgrade the area near the Capitol. Now we have the opportunity to coordinate all of these activities and others, and create before long a central Atlanta plan with both short-range and long-range goals. Transit is an integral part of any downtown plan, and our present alignments of routes will tie together all the major developments mentioned above. A corridor impact planning study is now in progress, as you know. Tt will show the relation of transit to low-income groups and their economic and social needs. Other considerations are the relation of transit to educational institutions, vocational schools, com- munity centers, and renewal projects. The transit corridors, the lines of the system, will be pulsing and throbbing with growth and our efforts to properly direct and control these dynamics must never cease. Planners are now working with both private and public agencies in an attempt to identify the many possibilities which the transit corridors offer us for enhancing community values, serving the largest number of citizens, and guiding development toward most sensible and efficient patterns. In our discussions with H.U.D. officials and when we talk to. our transit visitors who will be in town next week, I think we ought to keep some of these points in mind. I want to take this opportunity, Dick, to express our gratitude to you for the time and energy you are putting into this task, which is at times extremely difficult and complex. Without your leader- ship it would be much more so!  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 6, Document 32 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 6 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/e687e17e2ece1ce4438cd79d5208b4f9.pdf fd948985966c167f575f3b7fe7e8fc6d Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. MINUTES OF THE FIFTEENTH MEETING OF THE METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY MAY 2, 1967 The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority held its regular meeting on May 2, 1967, at 3:30 P.M. in the Conference Room of the Glenn Building, Atlanta. Mr. Richard H. Rich, Chairman, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: M. C. Bishop {Fulton County) Rawson Haverty {City of Atlanta) K. A. McMillon {Gwinnett County) W. A. Pulver (Fulton County) Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta) MEMBERS ABSENT: Robert F. Adamson (City of Atlanta) Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County) Edgar Blalock (Clayton County) Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County) L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta) OTHERS PRESENT: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority H. L . Stuart, General Manager Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary King Elliott, Public Information Director Earl W. Nelson, Chief Engineer H. N. Johnson, Secretary to General Manager Consultants J. A. Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-TudorBechtel, Atlanta Lawrence Greene and Raul Garcia, Hammer , Greene, Siler Ass ociat es, Atlanta W. Stell Huie, Huie and Harland, Legal Counsel for the Authority �Others J. D. Wingfield, Jr., Planning Director, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission Mrs. Rachel Champagne, Assistant to the Executive Director, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission Margaret Hurst, Atlanta Constitution, Reporter Thomas Nooner, General Railway Signal Company, Rochester, New York Frank Scott, Resident Representative, General Railway Signal Company, Atlanta Otto Hikade, General Railway Signal Company The meeting was called to order by the Chairman. Minutes The minutes of the April meeting were unanimously approved by the members present. Due to lack of a quorum it was agreed that this action would be ratified by the Board at the June meeting. Financial Report The General Manager reported that payments from the local governments, with the exception of Gwinnett County, were on schedule. Gwinnett County remains in arrears for the fourth quarter of 1966 and the first quarter of 1967. Staff costs were running according to budget, and a payment of $29,939.00 had been made to the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission in 1967, completing a commitment of $61,188.00 for 1966 and 1967, as matching funds for 701 Project Ga. P- 49. The statement is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes . Progress Reports General Manager Mr . Stuart said studies were continuing on the feasibility of an e x tension of the West Line to ser v e Si x Flags Over Georgia in Cobb County . It was belie ved th a t r ight - of-wa y into this area would not be difficult to secure . It had not been determi n ed whether or not the patr on a ge would mak e this e x te n sion economic ally feasible , in v iew of the s eason al natur e of the r ec r eation f acility. - 2 - �The General Manager said he .was selecting a group of five professionals from the fields of architecture, landscape architecture, city planning, and engineering, who would comprise an advisory committee to the Authority for the purpose of reviewing plans as the work moves from preliminary engineering into urban design. Mr. Stuart said the organizational meeting of this committee would be held soon, and he would ask for approval of an amendment to the budget at the next meeting, to cover retainer fees for this committee. It was announced that Mr. Robert L. Adamson, Treasurer of the Authority, had been appointed a Director to fill the unexpired term of Mr. Mills B. Lane, Jr., a City of Atlanta appointee, who had recently resigned. The General Manager asked for approval of an expenditure of $2,000.00 for annual membership dues in the Institute for Rapid Transit. He said the annual workshop was helpful and provided an exchange of information with the eleven member operating or emerging transit authorities in the country. After discussion of the program of the Institute and the benefits of such a membership, it was decided that the $2,000.00 annual dues could not be justified at this time. The annual meeting of the Institute for Rapid Transit, to be held in Atlanta May 24-26, will provide an opportunity for members of the Board to observe its work. Mr. Stuart showed slides of operating transit systems in Montreal, Toronto and Philadelphia, having recently returned from a trip to observe these systems. He said each system had gotten started without federal aid. A comparison of the systems pointed out continuing improvements in materials, decor, maintenance, and technology. The General Manager announced that the Department of Housing and Urban Development was sponsoring a one-day meeting in Washington on May 22, on design in urban transportation. At the request of HUD, the Authority would provide an exhibit at that meeting, showing plans and progress of the Atlanta system, and Messrs. Stuart, Elliott and Nelson would attend. Mr. Rich said this would be an important meeting, and requested all members who could go to do so. Mr. Stuart had also asked the newly formed Advisory Committee to attend. Public Information Director Mr. Elliott reported on his recent trip to San Francisco. He had gathered information from the Bay Area Rapid Transit Dis trict to assist in the development of the Authority's public - 3 - �information program. A tentative outline of his findings would be used in the Authority's planning for a bond referendum. He showed slides of the BARTD rapid transit system now under construction in San Francisco. Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel Mr. Coil reported on a recent meeting with the Rapid Transit Committee of the Atlanta Chamber of Commerce at whi'ch time this Committee was brought up to date on planning and engineering progress. Enlargements of recently acquired aerial photographs were being assembled to support the Authority's display at the Urban Design Conference in Washington on May 22. Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates Mr. Greene reported briefly for Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates and stated they were now receiving final cost estimates from Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel covering the entire rapid transit system, broken down into five stages of development. A complete draft copy of HGS's report would soon be presented to the Authority and the Planning Commission for review. Mr. Bennett stated he had received approval from the Department of Housing and Urban Development to extend the completion date of 701 Project Ga. P-49 to August 2, 1967. The extension of time had been necessitated because of a delay in receipt of information from the State Highway Department. The approval of the extension would permit all work to be completed according to contracts. The Chairman introduced Mr. Earl W. Nelson, newly employed Chief Engineer for the Transit Authority, and welcomed him on behalf of the Board. Mr . Rich reminded the Board of the luncheon meeting on Tuesday, May 9, at the Commerce Club, at which time representati v es from the supporting governments would be brought up to date on rapid transit progress in the metropolitan area . At this time certain legislation would be discussed which the Authority would seek to hav e appr oved in the ne x t session of the Gene r al Assembly . Inquiry was made regarding the r ecov ery of Mr. L. D . Milto n f r om a recent oper atio n, and it was the e xpressed sentiment of the Boar d that he would soon be completely r eco v e r ed a n d back at his o f fice . - 4 - �Mr. Rich requested that maps of all areas under discussion be displayed at future meetings of the Board. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 4:30 P.M. June Meeting Date Due to the absence of the Chairman from the City on the next regular meeting date of the Board, June 6, it was suggested that it be postponed until 3:30 P.M., Friday, June 9. Members will be contacted in the interim in order to determine if this date is satisfactory. - 5 - � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document MINUTES OF THE FIFTEENTH MEETING OF THE METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY MAY 2, 1967 The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority held its regular meeting on May 2, 1967, at 3:30 P.M. in the Conference Room of the Glenn Building, Atlanta. Mr. Richard H. Rich, Chairman, presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: M. C. Bishop (Fulton County) Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta) K. A. McMillon (Gwinnett County) W. A. Pulver (Fulton County) Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta) MEMBERS ABSENT: Robert F. Adamson (City of Atlanta) Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County) Edgar Blalock (Clayton County) Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County) L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta) OTHERS PRESENT: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority H. L. Stuart, General Manager Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary King Elliott, Public Information Director Earl W. Nelson, Chief Engineer H. N. Johnson, Secretary to General Manager Consultants J. A. Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor- Bechtel, Atlanta Lawrence Greene and Raul Garcia, Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates, Atlanta W. Stell Huie, Huie and Harland, Legal Counsel for the Authority Others J. D. Wingfield, Jr., Planning Director, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission Mrs. Rachel Champagne, Assistant to the Executive Director, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission Margaret Hurst, Atlanta Constitution, Reporter Thomas Nooner, General Railway Signal Company, Rochester, New York Frank Scott, Resident Representative, General Railway Signal Company, Atlanta Otto Hikade, General Railway Signal Company The meeting was called to order by the Chairman. Minutes The minutes of the April meeting were unanimously approved by the members present. Due to lack of a quorum it was agreed that this action would be ratified by the Board at the June meeting. Financial Report The General Manager reported that payments from the local governments, with the exception of Gwinnett County, were on schedule. Gwinnett County remains in arrears for the fourth quarter of 1966 and the first quarter of 1967. Staff costs were running according to budget, and a payment of $29,939.00 had been made to the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission in 1967, completing a commitment of $61,188.00 for 1966 and 1967, as matching funds for 701 Project Ga. P-49, The statement is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Progress Reports General Manager Mr. Stuart said studies were continuing on the feasibility of an extension of the West Line to serve Six Flags Over Georgia in Cobb County. It was believed that right-of-way into this area would not be difficult to secure. It had not been determined whether or not the patronage would make this extension economically feasible, in view of the seasonal nature of the recreation facility. The General Manager said he.was selecting a group of five professionals from the fields of architecture, landscape architecture, city planning, and engineering, who would com- prise an advisory committee to the Authority for the purpose of reviewing plans as the work moves from preliminary engi- neering into urban design. Mr. Stuart said the organizational meeting of this committee would be held soon, and he would ask for approval of an amendment to the budget at the next meeting, to cover retainer fees for this committee. It was announced that Mr. Robert L. Adamson, Treasurer of the Authority, had been appointed a Director to fill the unexpired term of Mr. Mills B. Lane, Jr., a City of Atlanta appointee, who had recently resigned. : The General Manager asked for approval of an expenditure of $2,000.00 for annual membership dues in the Institute for Rapid Transit. He said the annual workshop was helpful and provided an exchange of information with the eleven member operating or emerging transit authorities in the country. After discussion of the program of the Institute and the benefits of such a membership, it was decided that the $2,000.00 annual dues could not be justified at this time. The annual meeting of the Institute for Rapid Transit, to be held in Atlanta May 24-26, will provide an opportunity for members of the Board to observe its work. Mr. Stuart showed slides of operating transit systems in Montreal, Toronto and Philadelphia, having recently returned from a trip to observe these systems. He said each system had gotten started without federal aid. A comparison of the systems pointed out continuing improvements in materials, decor, maintenance, and technology. The General Manager announced that the Department of Housing and Urban Development was sponsoring a one-day meeting in Washington on May 22, on design in urban transportation. At the request of HUD, the Authority would provide an exhibit at that meeting, showing plans and progress of the Atlanta system, and Messrs. Stuart, Elliott and Nelson would attend. Mr. Rich said this would be an important meeting, and requested all members who could go to do so. Mr. Stuart had also asked the newly formed Advisory Committee to attend. Public Information Director Mr. Elliott reported on his recent trip to San Francisco. He had gathered information from the Bay Area Rapid Transit Dis- trict to assist in the development of the Authority's public information program. A tentative outline of his findings would be used in the Authority's planning for a bond referen- dum. He showed slides of the BARTD rapid transit system now under construction in San Francisco. Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel Mr. Coil reported on a recent meeting with the Rapid Transit Committee of the Atlanta Chamber of Commerce at which time this Committee was brought up to date on planning and engi- neering progress. Enlargements of recently acquired aerial photographs were being assembled to support the Authority's display at the Urban Design Conference in Washington on May 22. Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates Mr. Greene reported briefly for Hammer, Greene, Siler Asso- Cliates and stated they were now receiving final cost esti- mates from Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel covering the entire rapid transit system, broken down into five stages of development. A complete draft copy of HGS's report would soon be presented to the Authority and the Planning Commission for review. Mr. Bennett stated he had received approval from the Depart- ment of Housing and Urban Development to extend the comple- tion date of 701 Project Ga. P-49 to August 2, 1967. The extension of time had been necessitated because of a delay in receipt of information from the State Highway Department. The approval of the extension would permit all work to be completed according to contracts. The Chairman introduced Mr. Earl W. Nelson, newly employed Chief Engineer for the Transit Authority, and welcomed him on behalf of the Board. Mr. Rich reminded the Board of the luncheon meeting on Tuesday, May 9, at the Commerce Club, at which time representatives from the supporting governments would be brought up to date on rapid transit progress in the metropolitan area. At this time certain legislation would be discussed which the Authority would seek to have approved in the next session of the General Assembly. Inquiry was made regarding the recovery of Mr. L. D. Milton from a recent operation, and it was the expressed sentiment of the Board that he would soon be completely recovered and back at his office. Mr. Rich requested that maps of all areas under discussion be displayed at future meetings of the Board. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 4:30 P.M. June Meeting Date Due to the absence of the Chairman from the City on the next regular meeting date of the Board, June 6, it was suggested that it be postponed until 3:30 P.M., Friday, June 9. Mem- bers will be contacted in the interim in order to determine if this date is satisfactory.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 6, Document 33 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 6 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/991499c682ebab5799b41df924d8844c.pdf 22daa9dc67c1c5f60e08bb55b030d294 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. ME TROPOL ITAN TLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUT"tlORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION APRIL 30 , 1967 BUDGET 19 67 ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 TO APRIL 30 , 1967 $128,281.64 $128 , 281.64 $ 84,030 . 00 23 , 19'0. 00 82,770 . 00 91,800 . 00 18,210 . 00 $300 , 000 . 00 $ 5,520 . 00 $ 42 , 015 . 00 11 , 595 . 00 20,692 .5 0 4-5,900 . 00 4,552.50 $124,755 . 00 $ 1,780. 40 $ 95, 000 . 00 276 , 000 . 00 $ 30 , 000 . 00 40 , 000 . 00 TOTAL INCOME $371 , 000 . 00 $676,52 0. 00 $ 70, 000 . 00 $196 , 5 35 . 4 0 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATE D SURPLUS $804,801. 64 $324, 817 . 04 $ 68 , 950 . 00 10,500 . 00 $ 16 , 583 .15 3 , 172 . 44 1 , 109 . 00 5 33 . 00 1 , 680 . 00 10 , 000 . 00 99 . 00 $ 92 , 87 1. 00 $ 3 , 150 . 00 613 .2 0 266 . 67 322 . 28 0 0 $ 20 , 957 . 74 $ 1 , 200 . 00 Unappr op riat e d Surplus INCOME App ropriations : Ci t y of At lanta Clay ton County DeKa l b County Fu lto n County Gwi nnett County Sub-Totals Interest Income Federal Funds: 702 Loan Section 9 Grant Sub ~Tota l s EXPENSES Sta ff Cos ts : Salaries Expenses Benefits: Social Security Guar anty Fund Health and Accident I nsur anc e Retirement Workme n's Comp ensat ion Sub-Totals Boar d Mee tings Administrative and Office Overhea d: Re nt Communications and Post age Furniture and Equipmen t Supplies Printing Au di tor Accountan t Public Information Insurance : Public Liabi lity Depository and Forgery Fidelity Bond Su b - Totals CARRIED FORWARD $ 3, 000 . 00 2 , 000 . 00 2 , 000 . 00 3 , 600 . 00 1 , 000 . 00 25 0. 00 1 , 000 . 00 33 , 000 . 00 72.00 56 . 00 199.00 $ 46,177 . 00 $142 , 198 . 00 $ 1, 000 . 00 5 36 . 83 117 . 81 904 . 02 623 . 56 25 0. 00 25 0. 00 6,742. 05 0 0 0 $ 10 , 424 . 27 $ 32,582 . 01 �METROPOLITA~ ATLANTA RAPID TP.ANSIT AUTHORITY A"'L.A..1.l'TA, GEGRGIA STATENE n F Fl~ANCIAL Cl t~ DITION APRI L 30 , i96 7 oUDGET 1 967 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD ACWAL JAYtJA&Y 1 , 1967 T APRIL 30 , 1967 $804,801. 64 $324,8 17.04 Brought Forward $142 ,19 8 .00 $ 32 , 582 . 01 Counsel Consult ants: Atlanta Region Metropolitan Plann i ng Commission: 7 01 Matching Urban Design Study: Section 9 Match i ng Atlanta Transit S tudy : Section 9 Matching Parsons, Brinckerhoff -Tudor -Bechte l: 702 Loan Sect ion 9 : Federal Matchi ng Retainer Agreement Research and Technical Serv i ces $ 2 , 000.00 $ $ 31 ,25 0 .0 $ 29 , 939.00 EXPENSES 4,299.74 32,667 . 00 16 , 333 . 00 0 0 3,333 . 00 1 , 667 . 00 0 0 95 , 00 .00 30 , 000 . 00 24 0 , 000 .0 120 , 000.00 60 , 000 . 00 2,000.00 0 110 , 800.00 15 ,048.70 817.58 2602 , 250 00 $186, 605 .2 8 TOTAL EXPENSES $764 , 448.00 $223 , 487. 03 SURPLUS ~ .n o1, 330 . Ol Sub-Totals 400~~3 . 6~ �METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATE~IBNT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION APRIL 30 , 1967 ASSETS Ca sh in Banks : C & S Nat ional Bank Fi r s t Na t ional Bank - Pay roll Tr ust Company o f Georgia Fu l t on Nat i onal Bank - Section 9 $ 48, 456 . 47 15 ,342 . 04 1 , 000 . 00 4, 457 .96 Investmen t s: U. S . Tr ea sury Bills U. S . Treasury Bills - Section 9 $ 90 , 003 . 56 55 , 542 . 04 25 . 00 Pet t y Ca s h Acco unt s Receivable : Gwinne t t County - 1967 Gwinnet t Count y - 196 6 $4 , 552 . 50 4 ,552.5 0 9 , 105. 00 $2 23, 932 . 07 TOTAL ASSETS LI ABILITIE S $ Accounts Pa yable 910 .67 Payro ll Taxe s Wi t hh e ld a nd Accr ued Reserves: Varsons, Brin c kerho ff- Tudor - Be ch t e l: Section 9 Ma t chi ng Retainer Agre ement : Tran s por ta tion Study Pu bl ic Informa t i on Surveying TOTAL LIABILITIES SURPLUS 3, 519 . 96 110 , 800. 00 $ 118 . 60 1 ,11 2.61 6, 140 .22 7 , 371. 43 12 2,602. 06 $1 01, 330. 01 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION Unappropriated Surplus INCOME Appropriations: City of Atlanta Clayton County DeKalb County Fulton County Gwinnett County Sub-Totals Interest income Federal Funds: 702 Loan Section 9 Grant Sub=Totals TOTAL INCOME TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS EXPENSES Staff Costs: Salaries Expenses Benefits: Social Security Guaranty Fund Health and Accident Insurance Retirement Workmen's Compensation Sub-Totals Board Meetings Administrative and Office Overhead: Rent Communications and Postage Furniture and Equipment Supplies Printing Auditor Accountant Public Information Insurance: Public Liability Depository and Forgery Fidelity Bond Sub-Totals CARRIED FORWARD APRIL 30, 1967 ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 BUDGET TO 1967 APRIL 30, 1967 $128,281.64 $128,281.64 $ 84,030.00 §$ 42,015.00 23,190.00 11,595.00 82,770.00 20,692.50 91,800.00 45,900. 00 18,210.00 4,552.50 $300,000.00 $124,755.00 § 5,520.00 $§ 1,780.40 $ 95,000.00 $ 30,000.00 276,000.00 40,000. 00 $371,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $676,520.00 $196,535.40 $804,801.64 $324,817.04 $ 68,950.00 §$ 16,583.15 10,500. 00 3,172.44 1,109.00 613.20 533.00 266.67 1,680.00 322.28 10,000. 00 0 99.00 0 $ 92,871.00 §$ 20,957.74 $ 3,150.00 § 1,200.00 $ 3,000.00 §$ 1,000.00 2,000. 00 536.83 2,000. 00 117.81 3,600. 00 904.02 1,000, 00 623.56 250. 00 250.00 1,000.00 250.00 33,000. 00 6,742.05 72.00 0 56.00 0 199.00 0 $46,177.00 § 10,424.27 $142,198.00 %$ 32,582.01 METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATEMENT OF FINANCTAL CONDITION APRIL 30, 1967 ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 BUDGET TO 1967 APRIL 30, 1967 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD $804,801. 64 $324,817.04 EXPENSES Brought Forward $142,198.00 $ 32,582.01 Counsel $ 20,000.00 § 4,299.74 Consultants: Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission: 701 Matching § 31.250. 00 $ 29,939.00 Urban Design Study: Section 9 32,667.00 0 Matching 16,333.00 0 Atlanta Transit Study: Section 9 3,333.00 0 Matching 1,667.90 0 Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: 702 Loan 95,000. 00 30,000. 00 Section 9: Federal 240,000. 00 0 Matching 120,000. 00 110,800. 00 Retainer Agreement 60, 0G0, 00 15,048.70 Research and Technical Services 2,000.00 817.58 Sub-Totals $602,250, 00 $186,605.28 TOTAL EXPENSES $764,448, 00 $223,487.03 SURPLUS $_ 40.353. 64 0 0.0 Cash in Banks: C & & National Bank First National Bank ~ Payroll Trust Company of Georgia Fulton National Bank - Section 9 Investments: U. S. Treasury Bills U, S. Treasury Bills - Section 9 Petty Cash Accounts Receivable: Gwinnett County - 1967 Gwinnett County - 1966 TOTAL ASSETS Accounts Payable Payroll Taxes Withheld and Accrued Reserves: ATLANTA. GEORGIA APRIL 30, 1967 ASSETS LLABILITIES Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: Section 9 Matching Retainer Agreement: Transportation Study Public Information Surveying TOTAL LIABILITIES SURPLUS METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY STATEMENT OF FINANCTAL CONDITION $ 48,456. 15,342, 1,000, 4,457. $ 90,003. 55,542, 25 $4,552.50 4,552.50 9,105. 910, 110,800, $ 118,60 1,112.61 6,140.22 7,371 47 04 06 96 56 04 00 00 , 96 67 00 43 $223,932.07 $101,330.01  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 6, Document 34 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 6 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/8bd44c7e5b096b3d5baa78c9614b4b4d.pdf cef7f0bdd513d5310638cae5d9c6f422 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. MINUTES OF THE FOURTEENTH MEETING OF THE METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY APRIL 4, 1967 The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority held its regular meeting on April 4, 1967" at 3:30 P.M. in the Conference Room of the Glenn Building, Atlanta. Mr. Roy A. Blount, Vice-Chairman, presided in the absence of Mr. Bennett, Mr. Huie acted as Secretary. MEMBERS PRESENT: Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County) M. C. Bishop (Fulton County) Edgar Blalock (Clayton County) Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County) Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta) K. A. McMillon (Gwinnett County) W. A. Pulver (Fulton County) Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta) MEMBERS ABSENT: L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta) Mills B. Lane, Jr. (City of Atlanta) OTHERS PRESENT: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority King Elliott, Public Information Director H. N. Johnson, Secretary to Ge n e r a l Manager Cons ul tan ts J. A . Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons Brinckerhoff-Tudor Bechtel, Atlanta W. 0 . Salter , Vice President, Parsons Brinckerho ff, Quade & Douglas, Inc. , San Francisco Raul Garcia, Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates, Atlanta W. Stell Huie and Harry Morg an, Huie a nd Harland, Legal Counsel for the Authority �Others J. D. Wingfield, Jr., Planning Director, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission Leon Eplan, Eric Hill Associates, Inc., Atlanta The meeting was called to order by the Vice-Chairman . . In the absence of Mr. Bennett, Mr. Huie acted as Secretary. Minutes Upon motion by Mr. Blalock, seconded by Mr. McMillan, reading of the minutes of the March 7 meeting was dispensed with and they were unanimously approved. Mr. Huie noted that a correction had been made in the March minutes regarding cost estimates as reflected in the last sentence under the Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates report. A corrigendum had been forwarded to all concerned by the Secretary and was included in the unanimous approval of the March minutes. Financial Report The financial report was presented by the Vice-Chairman in the absence of the General Manager who was in Montreal attending the Rail Transit Group Conference of the American Transit Association. The statement reflected that Gwinnett County was in arrears for the 4th quarter of 1966 and 1st quarter of 1967 and Clayton County for the 1st quarter of 1967. Appropriations for the 1st quarter had been recei v ed from the City of Atlanta and DeKalb County. DeKalb County 1 s payment was received after preparation of the Financial Statement where it was entered as an accounts receivable item. Second quarterly payment for 1967 from Fulton County had also been received . The financial statement was accepted by the Board and is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Progress Reports Vice - Chairman Mr. Blount presented the members with a copy of the General Manager's "Quarterly Report of Contract Status , March 31, 1967" to bring them up to date on the present status of the various contracts with MARTA. After some discussion the report was accepted by the Board and is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. - 2- �Parsons Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel Mr. Coil stated the contractor for aerial photography was continuing his work in connection with field measurements in order to provide back-up information for photogrammetry. This work is proceeding on schedule and PBTB expects to receive the first completed work in about 3 or 4 weeks. Patronage studies are being processed in New York utilizing a computer. This data is being incorporated into the patronage study here. Several alternate means for transferring rapid transit cars on the EastWest to the North-South Lines has been considered. More study is being given to this before making a recommendation in this area. Mr. Coil said the Technical Coordinating Committee had been briefed concerning the proposed rapid transit system and that Planning Directors of the governments supporting MARTA had been supplied with maps of the proposed system. Initial discussions with the various local governments is scheduled to begin next week. Preparation of text and supporting drawings in connection with the report on the 701 Contract was proceeding and should be completed in approximately 6 weeks. Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates are in the process of preparing certain aspects of this work which will be incorporated in the total plan. He stated that they had met with the City Consultant on plans for construction at the airport and would continue to consult with airport officials from time to time to keep abreast of developments. Mr. Rich inquired as to the possibility of running a spur of the transit line to the airport if the new air terminal is not constructed within a reasonable period of time. Mr. Coil said all possibilities for serving both the airport and the surrounding community would be considered. Mr. Haverty asked that consideration be given to the extension of the West Line from I-285 across the Chattahoochee River into Cobb County to serve the new amusement area, Six Flags Over Georgia, if income derived from such a move would justify it. Mr. Rich asked PBTB to give consideration to such a plan in order to protect future right-of-way through the industrial section in that area. He instructed Mr. Coil to meet with the General Manager and report at the next meeting on the feasibility of a study to extend the West Line to Six Flags Over Georgia. Mr. Blount said the Stone Mountain Authority had asked about the possibility of extending the East Line to Stone Mountain and this should also be considered. Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates Mr. Garcia said they were currently assembling two final reports , the first being a segment of the joint 701 report pre pared by PBTB and HGS which will summarize their analysis, consider potential sources of financing, and contain a formula - 3- �for distributing the local share of MARTA's costs to the five counties and the City of Atlanta, allowing for the inclusion or exclusion of local areas such as Cobb County. The second report is a comprehensive compilation of HGS work materials produced primarily for the benefit of MARTA and ARMPC staffs. HGS's study of possible new sources of funds reveals that a sales tax would produce the required volume of revenue, is easily implemented and is efficient. He stated there had been some discussion of a statewide sales ta~- distributed back to local governments on a per capita basis. HGS is currently analyzing the potential revenues from such a tax for the metropolitan area and will include these findings in the final report in addition to their estimates of the revenue from a local option sales tax and other possible sources. Further investigations are being made of the availability of potential federal funds. Mr. Garcia stated their representatives would like to meet with members of MARTA prior to putting together their final analysis and report. MARTA Award Messrs. Rich and Elliott had returned during the meeting from Jekyll Island where the Chairman had accepted the distinguished meritorious award presented to the Transit Authority by the Association County Commissioners of Georgia at their Annual Convention April 2-4 at the Buccaneer Motel, Jekyll Island, Georgia. Mr. Rich read the text on the Certificate of Appreciation to the Board. It is quoted below: "Association County Commissioners of Georgia presents to, Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, Certificate of Appreciation: For its intergovernmental leadership and for the progress it has made to provide the counties of Clayton, DeKalb, Fulton and Gwinnett, and the City of Atlanta, a fast, economical and comfortable transportation system. As befitting an intergovernmental agency, its leadership is composed of representatives of the involved governments dedicated to the promotion of a common advantage . It is under this kind of leadership, the ultimate goal will be achieved . Presented April 3, 1967 at 53rd Annual Convention at Jekyll Island. Signed Bruce Schaefer, President; Hill R. Healan , Execu tive Director." -4- �Transit Line Tours Mr. Blount said all members of the Board had not yet toured the various transit lines and urged that they arrange to do so at their earliest convenience. Mr. Rich said it was important to begin planning now for any legislation MARTA may require at the next session of the General Assembly. Mr. Blount stressed the importance of effective liaison between MARTA, county and city officials, and the legislative delegations. He urged all MARTA Directors to be in close and frequent contact with their respective governmental and legislative leaders, discussing the plans and needs of MARTA. A meeting with county and city officials is planned for May 9, 1967. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 4:15 P.M. W. Stell Huie Counsel and Acting Secretary NOTE: The next meeting of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority is scheduled for Tuesday, May 2, at 3:30 P.M. - 5- � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document MINUTES OF THE FOURTEENTH MEETING OF THE METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY APRIL 4, 1967 The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority held its regular meeting on April 4, 1967 at 3:30 P.M. in the Conference Room of the Glenn Building, Atlanta. Mr. Roy A. Blount, Vice-Chairman, presided in the absence of Mr. Bennett, Mr. Huie acted as Secretary. MEMBERS PRESENT: Sanford Atwood (DeKalb County) M. C. Bishop (Fulton County) Edgar Blalock (Clayton County) Roy A. Blount (DeKalb County) Rawson Haverty (City of Atlanta) K. A. McMillon (Gwinnett County) W. A. Pulver (Fulton County) Richard H. Rich (City of Atlanta) MEMBERS ABSENT: L. D. Milton (City of Atlanta) Mills B. Lane, Jr. (City of Atlanta) OTHERS PRESENT: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority King Elliott, Public Information Director H. N. Johnson, Secretary to General Manager Consultants J. A. Coil, Resident Manager, Parsons Brinckerhoff-Tudor- Bechtel, Atlanta W. O. Salter, Vice President, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc., San Francisco Raul Garcia, Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates, Atlanta W. Stell Huie and Harry Morgan, Huie and Harland, Legal Counsel for the Authority Others J. D. Wingfield, Jr., Planning Director, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission Leon Eplan, Eric Hill Associates, Inc., Atlanta The meeting was called to order by the Vice-Chairman. - « « » « . In the absence of Mr. Bennett, Mr. Huie acted as Secretary. Minutes Upon motion by Mr. Blalock, seconded by Mr. McMillon, reading of the minutes of the March 7 meeting was dispensed with and they were unanimously approved. Mr. Huie noted that a correc- tion had been made in the March minutes regarding cost esti- mates as reflected in the last sentence under the Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates report. A corrigendum had been for- warded to all concerned by the Secretary and was included in the unanimous approval of the March minutes. Financial Report The financial report was presented by the Vice-Chairman in the absence of the General Manager who was in Montreal attend- ing the Rail Transit Group Conference of the American Transit Association. The statement reflected that Gwinnett County was in arrears for the 4th quarter of 1966 and lst quarter of 1967 and Clayton County for the lst quarter of 1967. Appropriations for the lst quarter had been received from the City of Atlanta and DeKalb County. DeKalb County's payment was received after preparation of the Financial Statement where it was entered as an accounts receivable item. Second quarterly payment for 1967 from Fulton County had also been received. The financial state- ment was accepted by the Board and is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Progress Reports Vice-Chairman Mr. Blount presented the members with a copy of the General Manager's "Quarterly Report of Contract Status, March 31, 1967" to bring them up to date on the present status of the various contracts with MARTA. After some discussion the report was accepted by the Board and is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Parsons Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel Mr. Coil stated the contractor for aerial photography was con- tinuing his work in connection with field measurements in order to provide back-up information for photogrammetry. This work is proceeding on schedule and PBTB expects to receive the first completed work in about 3 or 4 weeks. Patronage studies are being processed in New York utilizing a computer. This data is being incorporated into the patronage study here. Several alternate means for transferring rapid transit cars on the East- West to the North-South Lines has been considered. More study is being given to this before making a recommendation in this area. Mr. Coil said the Technical Coordinating Committee had been briefed concerning the proposed rapid transit system and that Planning Directors of the governments supporting MARTA: had been supplied with maps of the proposed system. Initial discussions with the various local governments is scheduled to begin next week. Preparation of text and supporting drawings in connection with the report on the 701 Contract was proceed- ing and should be completed in approximately 6 weeks. Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates are in the process of preparing cer- tain aspects of this work which will be incorporated in the to- tal plan. He stated that they had met with the City Consultant on plans for construction at the airport and would continue to consult with airport officials from time to time to keep abreast of developments. Mr. Rich inquired as to the possibility of running a spur of the transit line to the airport if the new air terminal is not constructed within a reasonable period of time. Mr. Coil said all possibilities for serving both the airport and the surrounding community would be considered. Mr. Haverty asked that consideration be given to the extension of the West Line from I-285 across the Chattahoochee River into Cobb County to serve the new amusement area, Six Flags Over Georgia, if income derived from such a move would justify it. Mr. Rich asked PBTB to give consideration to such a plan in order to protect future right-of-way through the industrial section in that area. He instructed Mr. Coil to meet with the General Manager and report at the next meeting on the feasi- bility of a study to extend the West Line to Six Flags Over Georgia. Mr. Blount said the Stone Mountain Authority had asked about the possibility of extending the East Line to Stone Moun- tain and this should also be considered. Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates Mr. Garcia said they were currently assembling two final re- ports, the first being a segment of the joint 701 report pre- pared by PBTB and HGS which will summarize their analysis, consider potential sources of financing, and contain a formula for distributing the local share of MARTA's costs to the five counties and the City of Atlanta, allowing for the inclusion or exclusion of local areas such as Cobb County. The second report is a comprehensive compilation of HGS work materials produced primarily for the benefit of MARTA and ARMPC staffs. HGS's study of possible new sources of funds reveals that a sales tax would produce the required volume of revenue, is easily implemented and is efficient. He stated there had been some discussion of a statewide sales tax distributed back to local governments on a per capita basis. HGS is currently analyzing the potential revenues from such a tax for the metro- politan area and will include these findings in the final re- port in addition to their estimates of the revenue from a local option sales tax and other possible sources. Further investigations are being made of the availability of potential federal funds. Mr. Garcia stated their representatives would like to meet with members of MARTA prior to putting together their final analysis and report. MARTA Award Messrs. Rich and Elliott had returned during the meeting from Jekyll Island where the Chairman had accepted the distinguished meritorious award presented to the Transit Authority by the Association County Commissioners of Georgia at their Annual Convention April 2-4 at the Buccaneer Motel, Jekyll Island, Georgia. Mr. Rich read the text on the Certificate of Appreci- ation to the Board. It is quoted below: "Association County Commissioners of Georgia presents to, Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, Certi- ficate of Appreciation: For its intergovernmental leadership and for the progress it has made to provide the counties of Clayton, DeKalb, Fulton and Gwinnett, and the City of Atlanta, a fast, economical and comfort- able transportation system. As befitting an inter- governmental agency, its leadership is composed of representatives of the involved governments dedi- cated to the promotion of a common advantage. It is under this kind of leadership, the ultimate goal will be achieved. Presented April 3, 1967 at 53rd Annual Convention at Jekyll Island. Signed Bruce Schaefer, President; Hill R. Healan, Execu- tive Director." Transit Line Tours Mr. Blount said all members of the Board had not yet toured the various transit lines and urged that they arrange to do so at their earliest convenience. Mr. Rich said it was important to begin planning now for any legislation MARTA may require at the next session of the General Assembly. Mr. Blount stressed the importance of effective liaison between MARTA, county and city officials, and the legislative delegations. He urged all MARTA Directors to be in close and frequent contact with their respective governmental and legislative leaders, discussing the plans and needs of MARTA. A meeting with county and city officials is planned for May 9, 1967. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 4:15 P.M. W. Stell Huie Counsel and Acting Secretary NOTE: The next meeting of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority is scheduled for Tuesday, May 2, at 3:30 P.M.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 6, Document 35 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 6 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/3a84a2cd1866586daf369e07c9c736b8.pdf a932b8883a6b384c6bbb6ad0d6573122 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. -- METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPI D TRANSITY AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA BUDGET REPORT MARCH 31, 1967 BUDGET Una ppropri a ted Surplus ACTUAL JANUARY 1 , 196 7 TO MARCH 31 , 196 7 $128,281.64 $128,281.64 $ 84,030 . 00 $ 21,007 . 50 23,190 . 00 82,770 . 00 91,800 . 00 18,210.00 5,797.50 20,692.50 22,950.00 4,552.50 $300,000.00 $ 5,520 . 00 $ 75,000 . 00 $ L520.90 $ 95,000 . 00 $ 30,000.00 276,000.00 40 2 000 _.00 $371,000.00 $ 70,000.00 TOTAL I NCOME $676,520.00 $146,520.90 TOTAL I NCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS S8Qfl:.8Ql 6~ $274,802.54 $ 68,950 . 00 $ 12, 487 . 65 10 , 500 . 00 1 , 792 . 79 1,109 . 00 533 . 00 1 , 680.00 10,000 . 00 99.00 53 2. 71 133 . 34 241. 71 0 0 $ 92,871.00 $ 3 , 150 . 00 $ 15 , 188 . 20 900 . 00 $ I NCOME Appropriations: Cit y of Atlanta Clay ton County DeKalb Count y Fulton County Gwinnett County Sub-Totals Interest Income Federal Funds: 702 Loan Section 9 Grant Sub - Totals EXPENSES St af f Cos ts: Sa l ar i e s Ex pen ses Benefits : Soc ial Securit y Gua r an ty Fund Hea lth and Ac cid en t I n suranc e Retir ement Wo~kmen ' s Compansation Sub - Totals Board Meet ings Admi nis tra t i ve and Off ic e Over head : Rent Commun ic a ti ons and Post a ge Furni t ure and Equ i pment Suppl i e s Printing Audit or Accountant Public Informa tion I n s urance : Public Liabilit y Deposit or y and Forgery Fi de lit y Bond Sub - Totals CARRIED FORWARD $ 3,000 . 00 2, 000 . 00 2, 000 . 00 3 , 600 . 00 1 , 000 . 00 250 . 00 1 , 000 . 00 33, 000 . 00 $ 72 . 00 56 . 00 199 . 00 750 . 00 36 3 . 03 0 628. 15 623 . 56 250 . 00 0 5 , 058 . 91 0 0 0 ~ 46 2 177 . 00 $ $142 , 198 . 00 $ 23 , 761.85 7,673 . 65 �METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA BUDGET REPORT MARCH 31, 1967 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD 1967 ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 196 7 TO MARCH 31, 196 7 $804,801.64 $274,802.54 $142,198.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 23,761.85 $ 3,092.74 $ 31,250.00 $ 29,939.00 EXPENSES Brought Forward Counsel Consultants: Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission: 701 ~atching Urban Design Study: Section 9 Matching Atlanta Transit Study: Section 9 Matching Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: 702 Loan Section 9 : Federal Matching Retainer Agreement Research and Technical Services 32,667.00 16,333.00 0 0 3,333.00 1,667.00 0 0 95,000.00 0 240,000.00 120,000.00 60,000.00 2,000.00 0 92,333.00 13,985.97 597.58 $602,250.00 $136,855 . 55 TOTAL EXPENSES $764,448 . 00 $163,710.14 SURPLUS ~ Hll,Q22 .~Q Sub - Totals ~Q.J.SJ.6~ �METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION MARCH 31 , 196 7 ASSETS Cash in Banks: C & S National Bank First National Bank - Payroll Trust Company of Georgia Fulton National Bank - Sec tion 9 $30,354.81 6,543.55 1,000.00 5,313.88 Investments: U. S. Treasury Bills U. S. Treasury Bills - Section 9 70,261.29 34,686.12 25.00 Petty Cash Accounts Receivable: Clayton Count y DeKalb County Gwinnett County - 1967 Gwinnett County - 1966 $ 5,797.50 20,692.50 4,552.50 4,552.50 35,595.00 $183,779.65 TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES Accounts Payable $ 2,046.01 Payroll Taxes Withheld and Accrued Reserves: Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: Section 9 Matching Retained Agreement: Transportation Study Public Information Right-of-Way Procedure Study Surveying TOTAL LIABILITIES SURPLUS 124.18 62,333.00 $ 301.07 1,193.63 0 6,689.36 8,184.06 72,687.25 $111, 092 • 40 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSITY AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA BUDGET REPORT MARCH 31, 1967 Unappropriated Surplus INCOME Appropriations: City of Atlanta Clayton County DeKalb County Fulton County Gwinnett County Sub-Totals Interest Income Federal Funds: 702 Loan Section 9 Grant Sub-Totals TOTAL INCOME TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS EXPENSES Staff Costs: Salaries Expenses Benefits: Social Security Guaranty Fund Health and Accident Insurance Retirement Workmen's Compansation Sub-Totals Board Meetings Administrative and Office Overhead: Rent Communications and Postage Furniture and Equipment Supplies Printing Auditor Accountant Public Information Insurance: Public Liability Depository and Forgery Fidelity Bond Sub-Totals CARRIED FORWARD ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 TO BUDGET MARCH 31, 1967 $128 281.64 $128,281.64 $ 84,030.00 $ 21,007.50 23,190.00 5,797.50 82,770.00 20,692.50 91,800.00 22,950.00 18,210.00 4,552.50 $300,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 5,520.00 $1,520.90 $ 95,000.00 $ 30,000.00 276,000.00 40,000.00 $371,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $676,520.00 $146 ,520.90 $804,801.64 $274,802.54 $ 68,950.00 § 12,487.65 10,500.00 1,792.79 1,109.00 532.71 533.00 133.34 1,680.00 241.71 10,000.00 0 99.00 0 $ 92,871.00 $ 15,188.20 $ 3,150.00 $ 900.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 750.00 2,000.00 363.03 2,000.00 0 3,600.00 628,15 1,000.00 623.56 250.00 250.00 1,000.00 0 33,000.00 5,058.91 72.00 0 56.00 a) 199.00 0 $ 46,177.00 $ 7,673.65 $142,198.00 $ 23,761.85 METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA BUDGET REPORT MARCH 31, 1967 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD EXPENSES Brought Forward Counsel Consultants: Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission: 7O1 Matching Urban Design Study: Section 9 Matching Atlanta Transit Study: Section 9 Matching Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: 702 Loan Section 9: Federal Matching Retainer Agreement Research and Technical Services Sub-Totals TOTAL EXPENSES SURPLUS ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 TO 1967 MARCH 31, 1967 $804,801.64 $274,802.54 $142,198.00 $ 23,761.85 $ 20,000.00 $ 3,092.74 $ 31,250.00 $ 29,939.00 32,667.00 ) 16,333.00 0 3,333.00 0 1,667.00 0 95,000.00 0 240,000.00 0 120,000.00 92,333.00 60,000.00 13,985.97 2,000.00 597.58 $602,250.00 $136,855.55 $764,448.00 $163,710.14 $40,353.64 $111,092.40 Cash in Banks: METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION MARCH 31, 1967 ASSETS C & S National Bank First National Bank - Payroll Trust Company of Georgia Fulton National Bank - Section 9 Investments: U. S. Treasury Bills U. S&S. Treasury Bills - Section 9 Petty Cash Accounts Receivable: Clayton County DeKalb County Gwinnett County - Gwinnett County - TOTAL ASSETS Accounts Payable Payroll Taxes Withhe Reserves: 1967 1966 LIABILITIES ld and Accrued Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: Section 9 Matching Retained Agreement Transportation S tudy Public Information Right-of-Way Pro Surveying TOTAL LIABILITIES SURPLUS cedure Study $30,354.81 6,543.55 1,000.00 5,313.88 70,261.29 34,686.12 25.00 $ 5,797.50 20,692.50 4,552.50 4,552.50 _35,595.00 $ 124.18 2,046.01 62,333.00 $ 301.07 1,193.63 0 6,689. 36 8,184.06 $183,779.65 72,687.25 $111,092, 40  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 6, Document 36 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 6 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/0ed76e47aaa95e0dec957c8ef1353996.pdf 27b515217f29e00231739426f60cfee3 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY GLE NN BU ILD ING / ATLANTA , GEORG IA 30303 / AREA CODE 404 524 -5711 OFFICERS: Richa r d H. Ri ch , Cha irm an Roy A. Blou nt, Vice Chair man Gl e nn E. Bennett , Se cretary March 29, 1967 Henry L. Stu a rt , General Ma n ager GENERAL MANAGER'S QUARTERLY REPORT OF CONTRACT STATUS, MARCH 31, 1967. Cons i derable progress has been made under our several contracts and a detailed review is timely. Our contractural obli- gat i ons total $962,566 of which $616,709 (64¾) represents the federal porti on and $345,857 represents the local matching funds. The status of work shown is as of February 28, 1967: I .. The 11 701 11 Contracts signed June 28, 1966 tot(';ll $183,566 of which the federal portion is $122,376. The local portion of Trans i t Authority funds is $61,189, all of which has been paid to the ARMPC who is administering the work for us. These p r o j ects are to update the 1962 report in its entirety. The updated revisions will appear as a technical version and a popular v ersion of a bound report similar in format to the 1 962 r epor ts ~ Ao The wo r k is in three par tso Ha mmer o Gr een e r Siler Associates has a $48 , 000 contr a c t t o upd a te t he f inancing aspects whi c h is a b o ut 70¾ c omplete o I t c o v e rs: lo Methods o f financing . 2o Source s o f fina ncing . 3o Derivation o f f ormula for sharing the financial - 1 - �load between the several political jurisdictions. 4. Assistance to local governments to eva~uate their financial ability. 5. Preparation of a financial plan in line with the above. B. PBTB has a $100,000 contract to update the other parts of the 1962 report which is about 70¾ complete. It covers: 1. Route and station locations (90¾ complete). 2. Patronage, revenues and operating cost predictions (75¾ complete). 3. c. Report preparation (20¾ complete). ARMPC will use the remaining $35,566 for administration and supervision of the HGS and PB-T-B contracts, its own staff's work and auditing and overhead char9eable to the entire updating project. Each of these units of work provides inputs to the others so they will continue to move ahead on a common front and should be wrapped up this summer. is May 2, 1967. The contractural completion date The work was considerably delayed by the late development of travel statistic~ by the Highway Department and the completion date will not be met. The necessary statistics are now in hand and the work is moving ahead at a good pace. Our total project will not be damaged by the delay. II. The 11 702 11 Contract signed June 28, 1966 is for $125,00 0 with PB- T-B to carry out preliminary engineering work on the - 2 - �system from Oglethorpe to the Airport. This is an interest- free federal loan that must be repaid when construction begins. No local funds are involved. The preliminary engineering work will be ·in suffic;ient detail to Gnable us to initiate right of way acquisition, to provide us with highly refined estimates of construction costs, and to provide us with a solid point of departure for the development of final, detailed design and the preparation of contract >· plans and specifications. Funds are requisitioned from HUD in the exact amount required when we are invoiced. $30,000 requisition and payment has been made. One The contract is 44% complete. It covers: A. B. Establishment of design basis by developing information on: (65% complete) 1. Utilities. 2. Existing building foundations. 3. Subsurface structures. 4. Street and highway facilities. 5. Railroad structures. 6. Geology. Preliminary design of typical and of selected special items (49% complete): 1. Structures. 2. Stations. 3. Functional layout of Transit Center. 4. F~nctional layout of shops an<:\ yards. = 3 - .., ·, �5. c. n. Equipment requirements. Preliminary engineering plans 1. Base maps. 2. Alignment of tracks. 3. Station sites. (45% 1complete): Cost estimates (not started): 1. Construction. 2. Right of way. The cont,ract carries a completion date of June 30, 1~67, but we have decided to integrate this work with the work being don~ under the technical studies grant (below). As a result, all of the preliminary engineering for the 44-mile system . Doraville-Forest Park and west from Hightower Road to I-285 and east frqm ~vondale Estates to I-285 - is being done simultaneously, aimed at a completion date of O,ecem'ber 31, 1968. III. The Technical studies Grant (Section 9) Contracts are for a total of $ 554,000 of which the federal portion is $369,333, and the local portion is $184,667. Federal funds are re- quisitioned quarterly in advance at a raie ipdicated by prog~ess of the work and the terms of the contracts. has been requisitioned and received. $40,000 $20,000 of local funds must be deposited to this account out of our next receipts. I anticipate that we will be invoiced for parts of this work in May, 1967 . The wo;k is divided into three parts and contracts have just been signed and work is just getting und,r way. A. PB-T-B has a contract signed February 2, 1967 for $500,000 - 4 - �covering: 1. Preliminary Engineering: (a) East Line to I-285. (b) West Line to I-285. (c) Northeast Line - Oglethorpe to Doraville. (d) South Line Airport to Forest Park. 2. Support at public hearings on whole system. 3. Formal Technical Report on all preliminary en9ineering (702 and Section 9). B. ARMPC has a contract signed March 10, 1967 for $49,000 to make a Corridor Impact Study. $9,000 covers the supervision and overhead they will provide to the subcontracts, Eric Hill Associates, who will do most of the work of assessing the impact of our proposed rapid transit system on the community. We will receive recommendations for changes in community plans or rapid transit plans in the event that adverse impact or missed opportunities are discovered. The sub-contracts will check up on our relationship to: 1. Land use and related controls. 2. Public improvements planning. 3. Urban design. 4. Lo cal deve lopme nt pla n s. S. Urban ren ewal pro jects. 6. Private d e v el o pment plans. 7. Benefit to disadvantaged groups. 8. Other public programs. - 5 - �c. Our impact on the Atlanta Transit will be substantial and $5,000 has been reserved to start studies in this field . More money will be sought in future applications. I am in touch with ATS officials to dete~mine the character of necessary study and plans . IV. The Retainer Agreement is a contract with PB-T-B for planning, Consultant, or engineering services not covered by existing contracts . Each item of work is authorized and budgeted by the Board. PB-T-B cannot initiate any work under this con- tract that will cause total charges under the contract to exceed $100,000. Its condition as of March 31, 1967 is as follows: Billing 1/1/673/31/67 Pre-contract work (Billing is complete) $ Total Reported 12/31/66 Thru 3/31/67 964.61 $27,436.00 $28,400.61 2,249.45 10,448.39 12,697.84 387.38 811.55 1,198.93 Support before State Properties Control Commission ($1,000 authorized) Complete 1,073.99 1 , 073 .99 Soi l s Library Study ($1400 author i zed) Complete 1 ,468 . 50 1,468.50 P ublic Relati o ns Su ppor t ( $2, 000 autho rized) 446.71 359.66 806.37 Real Estate Co nsultati o n ($1250 autho r i zed) (Billing is c omplete ) 1,443.12 1,443.12 310.64 310.64 Mobilization & Relocation (6 out of 8 authorized moves have been made.) Participa t ion in Atlanta Area Transportation Study ($1500 authorized) Detailed Engineering ($2,000 authorized 1/3/67) ($5,000 authorized 3/7/67) Total Expenditures $5,801.91 Unexpended Authorizations $41,598.09 $47,400.00 $ 8 , 184 . 06 Balance $44 ,4'15 e 94, - 6 - �The road ahead: We have had one round of discussions with the Uo s. Depart- ment of Housing and Urban Development about the next application we should file o Matching funds for this grant will be those appro- priated by the 1967 General Assemblyo The applicati'on will cover: lo Title searches of selected right-of-way parcels. 2o Early acquisition of critical right-of-way parcelso 3o A plan for relocation of uprooted personso 4o Employment of Urban Planning (architectural) consultants. So Continued work on Atlanta Transit System impact and coordination plan e 60 First steps in detailed design of Transit Center. 7o Financial operations plan and organization. 8. Preservation of historical sites and structures. Target date for this application is July 1 , 1967. Further conferences with HUD people will ca1 ,~fully refine the particulars of the above o Item 2 has top priori ty o - 7 - � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY GLENN BUILDING / ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 / AREA CODE 404 524-5711 OFFICERS: Richard H. Rich, Chairman Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary March 29, 1967 Henry L. Stuart, General Manager GENERAL MANAGER'S QUARTERLY REPORT OF CONTRACT STATUS, MARCH 31, 1967. Considerable progress has been made under our several con- tracts and a detailed review is timely. Our contractural obli- gations total $962,566 of which $616,709 (64%) represents the federal portion and $345,857 represents the local matching funds. The status of work shown is as of February 28, 1967: Le The "701" Contracts signed June 28, 1966 total $183,566 of which the federal portion is $122,376. The local portion of Transit Authority funds is $61,189, all of which has been paid to the ARMPC who is administering the work for us. These projects are to update the 1962 report in its entirety. The updated revisions will appear as a technical version and a popular version of a bound report similar in format to the 1962 reports. The work is in three parts. A. Hammer, Greene, Siler Associates has a $48,000 contract to update the financing aspects which is about 70% com- plete. It covers: 1, Methods of financing. 2. Sources of financing. 3- Derivation of formula for sharing the financial Lis load between the several political jurisdictions. 4. Assistance to local governments to evaluate their financial ability. 5. Preparation of a financial plan in line with the above. B. PBTB has a $100,000 contract to update the other parts of the 1962 report which is about 70% complete. It covers: l. Route and station locations (90% complete). 2. Patronage, revenues and Operating cost predictions (75% complete). 3, Report preparation (20% complete). C. ARMPC will use the remaining $35,566 for administration and supervision of the HGS and PB-T-B contracts, its own staff's work and auditing and overhead chargeable to the entire updating project. Each of these units of work provides inputs to the others so they will continue to move ahead on a common front and should be wrapped up this summer. ‘The contractural completion date is May 2, 1967. The work was considerably delayed by the late development of travel statistics by the Highway Depart- ment and the completion date will not be met. The necessary statistics are now in hand and the work is moving ahead at a good pace. Our total project will not be damaged by the delay. The "702" Contract signed June 28, 1966 is for $125,000 with PB-T-B to carry out preliminary engineering work on the =2-* system from Oglethorpe to the Airport. This is an interest- free federal loan that must be repaid when construction begins. No local funds are involved. The preliminary engineering work will be in sufficient detail to enable us to initiate right of way acquisition, to provide us with highly refined estimates of construction costs, and to pro- vide us with a solid point of departure for the development of final, detailed design and the preparation of contract plans and specifications. Funds are requisitioned from WUD in the exact amount required when we are invoiced. One $30,000 requisition and payment has been made. The contract is 44% complete. It covers: A. Establishment of design basis by developing information on: (65% complete) 1. Utilities. 2. Existing building foundations. 3. Subsurface structures. 4, Street and highway facilities. 5. Railroad structures, 6. Geology. B. Preliminary design of typical and of selected special items (49% complete) : 1. Structures. 2. Stations. 3. Functional layout of Transit Center. 4. Functional layout of shops and yards. a See IIt. 5. Equipment requirements. Cc. Preliminary engitdertig plans (45%' complete) : 1. Base maps. 2. Alignment of tracks. 3. Station sites. D. Cost estimates (not started): 1. Construction. 2. Right of way. The contract carries a completion date of June 30, 1967, but we have decided to integrate this work with the work being done under the technical studies grant (below). As a result, all of the preliminary engineering for the 44-mile system - Doraville-Forest Park and west from Hightower Road to I-285 and east from Avondale Estates to I-285 - is being done simul- taneously, aimed at a completion date of December 31, 1968. The Technical Studies Grant (Section 9) Contracts are for a total of $554,000 of which the federal portion is $369,333, and the local portion is $184,667. Federal funds are re- quisitioned quarterly in advance at a rate indicated by progress of the work and the terms of the contracts. $40,000 has been requisitioned and received. $20,000 of local funds must be deposited to this account out of our next receipts. I anticipate that we will be invoiced for parts of this work in May, 1967. The work is divided into three parts and contracts have just been signed and work is just getting under way. A. PB-T=-B has a contract signed February 2, 1967 for $500,000 = 4 = Be covering: 1. Preliminary Engineering: (a) East Line to I-285. (b) West Line to I-285. (c) Northeast Line - Oglethorpe to Doraville. (ad) South Line Airport to Forest Park. 2. Support at public hearings on whole system. 3. Formal Technical Report on all preliminary engineer- ing (702 and Section 9). ARMPC has a contract signed March 10, 1967 for $49,000 to make a Corridor Impact Study. $9,000 covers the supervision and overhead they will provide to the sub- contracts, Eric Hill Associates, who will do most of the work of assessing the impact of our proposed rapid transit system on the community. We will receive recommendations for changes in community plans or rapid transit plans in the event that adverse impact or missed opportunities are discovered. The sub-contracts will check up on our relationship to: 1. Land use and related controls. 2- Public improvements planning. 3. Urban design. 4, Local development plans. 5. Urban renewal projects. 6. Private development plans. 7. Benefit to disadvantaged groups. 8. Other public programs. Cc. Our impact on the Atlanta Transit will be substantial and $5,000 has been reserved to start studies in this field. More money will be sought in future applications. I am in touch with ATS officials to determine the charac- ter of necessary study and plans. IV. The Retainer Agreement is a contract with PB-T-B for planning, Consultant, or engineering services not covered by existing contracts. Each item of work is authorized and budgeted by the Board. PB-T-B cannot initiate any work under this con- tract that will cause total charges under the contract to ex- ceed $100,000. Its condition as of March 31, 1967 is as follows: Billing Total 1/1/67- Reported Thru 3/31/67 12/31/66 3/31/67 Pre-contract work (Billing is complete) $ 964.61 $27,436.00 $28,400.61 Mobilization & Reloca- tion (6 out of 8 authorized moves have been made.) 2,249.45 10,448.39 12,697.84 Participation in Atlanta Area Transportation Study ($1500 authorized) 387.38 811.55 1,198.93 Support before State Pro- perties Control Commission ($1,000 authorized) Complete 1,073.99 1,073.99 Soils Library Study ($1400 authorized) Complete 1,468.50 1,468.50 Public Relations Support ($2,000 authorized) 446.71 359.66 806.37 Real Estate Consultation ($1250 authorized) (Billing is complete) 1,443.12 ~ 1,443.12 Detailed Engineering ($2,000 authorized 1/3/67) ($5,000 authorized 3/7/67) 310.64 = 310.64 Total Expenditures $5,801.91 $41,598.09 $47,400.00 Unexpended Authorizations $ 8,184.06 Balance $44,415.94 58 = The road ahead: We have had one round of discussions with the U. S. Depart- ment of Housing and Urban Development about the next application we should file. Matching funds for this grant will be those appro- priated by the 1967 General Assembly. The application will cover: 1. 26 6. Te 8. Title searches of selected right-of-way parcels. Early acquisition of critical right-of-way parcels. A plan for relocation of uprooted persons. Employment of Urban Planning (architectural) consultants. Continued work on Atlanta Transit System impact and coordination plan. First steps in detailed design of Transit Center, Financial operations plan and organization. Preservation of historical sites and structures. Target date for this application is July 1, 1967. Further conferences with HUD people will caivefully refine the particulars of the above. Item 2 has top priority.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 6, Document 37 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 6 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/e5bf1a80ed10968a8f3081c8c8de3c30.pdf f1f603e7922c342ab3643ba10f90d907 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY GLENN BU ILDIN G / ATLANTA , GEORGIA 30303 / AREA CODE 404 524 - 5711 OFFICERS: Richard H. Ric h , Chairman Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman Glenn E. Bennett , Secretary April 5, 1967 Henry L. Stuart , Genera l Manage r Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr., Mayor City of Atlanta City Hall Atlanta, Ga. 30303. Dear Mayor Allen: I am enclosing financial statements of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority as of March 31, 1967, as required under Section 16(b) of the 1965 MARTA Act No. 78. With kindest regards. Sincerely, HLS:JJ Enclosure. cc: Mr. Charles L. Davis, City Comptroller City of Atlanta 501 City Hall Atlanta, Ga. 30303. Copy of financial statement attached . H.L.S . � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY GLENN BUILDING / ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 / AREA CODE 404 524-5711 ~ OFFICERS: IY Richard H. Rich, Chairman Roy A, Blount, Vice Chairman J ‘ Glenn E. Bennett, Secretary pf 7 ( ABELL 24 128 Henry L. Stuart, General Manager Honorable Ivan Allen, Jr., Mayor City of Atlanta City Hall Atlanta, Ga. 30303. Dear Mayor Allen: I am enclosing financial statements of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority as of March 31, 1967, as re- quired under Section 16(b) of the 1965 MARTA Act No. 78. With kindest regards. Sincerely, General Manager. HLS:JJ Enclosure. cc: Mr. Charles L. Davis, City Comptroller City of Atlanta 501 City Hall Atlanta, Ga. 30303. Copy of financial statement attached.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 6, Document 38 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 6 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/4ee0da80b113f41f050367828aba4ff2.pdf eddfdcb878582f05b5d3f0d40c982262 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. METROPOLI TAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSITY AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA BUDGET RE PORT MARCH 31, 1967 Unappropriated Sur plus BUDGET ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 196 7 TO MARCH 31, 196 7 $128 , 281.64 $128,281.64 $ 84,030 . 00 23,190.00 82,770.00 91,800.00 18, 210.00 $ 21,007 . 50 5,7 97.50 20 ,6 92 .50 22.,950 . 00 4 ,552.50 INCOME Appropriations: Cit y of Atlanta Clay ton Count y DeKa l b County Fulton Count y Gwi nne t t Count y Sub - Tota l s Int e rest Income Federal Funds: 702 Loan Sec tion 9 Grant $300 ,000 . 00 $ 5,5 20.00 $ 1,520 . 90 $ 95 , 000.00 276,000.00 $ 30 ,000.00 40,000.00 Sub-Tot a ls $371,000.00 $ 70,000.00 TOTAL INCOME $6 76,520.00 $146,5 20.90 TOTAL I NCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS S8Qfi. 8Ql 6~ $274 ,802 .54 $ 68,950.00 10 , 500.00 $ 12,487.6 5 1 ,792 .7 9 1 , 109. 00 533 .00 1,680. 00 10 , 000.00 99 . 00 53 2 . 71 133.34 241. 71 0 0 $ 92,871. 00 $ 3,150.00 $ 15,188 . 20 900.00 $ $ 75,000 . 00 EXPENSES Sta ff Co sts: Salaries Ex pens e s Benef it s: Social Security Guaranty Fund Health and Accid ent Insurance Re t irement Wor kme n 's Compansa tion Sub-Totals Board Meeting s Administrative and Office Overhead: Rent Communica t i ons a nd Po s tage Furniture and Equipment Supp l ies Printing Auditor Accoun tant Public In formation Insurance: Public Liability Depository and Forgery Fidelity Bond Sub-Totals CARRIED FORWARD $ 3,000.00 2, 000 . 00 2, 000 . 00 3,600.00 1 ,000.00 25 0.00 1 , 000.00 33, 000 . 00 $ 72 . 00 56. 00 199.00 ~ 46 I 177. 00 $142,198.00 75 0.00 36 3. 03 0 628.15 623.56 250.00 0 5, 058.91 0 0 0 $ 7,673. 65 $ 23,761.85 �METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA BUDGET REPORT MARCH 31, 1967 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD 1967 ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 196 7 TO MARCH 3L 196 7 $804.801.64 $274.802.54 $142.198.00 $ 20.000.00 $ 23.761.85 $ 3.092.74 $ 31,250.00 $ 29,939.00 EXPENSES Brought Forward Counsel Consultants: Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission: 701 ~tching Urban Design Study: Section 9 Matching Atlanta Transit Study: Section 9 Matching Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: 702 Loan Section 9: Federal Matching Retainer Agreement Research and Technical Services 32,667.00 16,333.00 0 0 3,333.00 1,667.00 0 0 95,000.00 0 240,000.00 120,000.00 60,000.00 2.000.00 0 92,333.00 13,985.97 597.58 $602.250.00 $136.855.55 TOTAL EXPENSES $764.448.00 $163.710.14 SURPLUS ~ nu.Q22.~Q Sub-Totals ~Q.J5J,6~ �r METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION MARCH 31, 1967 ASSETS Cash in Banks: C & S National Bank First National Bank - Payroll Trust Company of Georgia Ful t on National Bank - Section 9 $30,354.81 6,543.55 1,000.00 5,313.88 Investments: U. S. Treasury Bills U. S. Treasury Bills - Section 9 70,261.29 34,686.12 25.00 Petty Cash Accounts Receivable: Clayton County DeKalb Count y Gwinnett County - 1967 Gwinnett County - 1966 $ 5,797.50 20,692.50 4,552.50 4,552.50 35,595.00 TOTAL ASSETS $183,779.65 LIABILITIES Accounts Payable $ Payroll Taxes Withhe ld and Ac crued Re serves: Parsons , Br inc kerho f f-Tudor-Bechtel: Sect i on 9 Ma t chi ng Retained Agreemen t: Transportation Study Public Information Right - of-Way Proc edure Study Surveying TOTAL LIABILITIES SURPLUS 124. 18 2,046.01 62 ,333.00 $ 301. 07 1,193.63 0 6,689.36 8,184.06 72, 687. 25 $111,092. 40 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSITY AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA BUDGET REPORT MARCH 31, 1967 ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 TO BUDGET MARCH 31, 1967 Unappropriated Surplus $128,281.64 $128,281.64 INCOME Appropriations: City of Atlanta $ 84,030.00 $ 21,007.50 Clayton County 23,190.00 5,797.50 DeKalb County 82,770.00 20,692.50 Fulton County 91,800.00 22.,950.00 Gwinnett County 18,210.00 4,552.50 Sub-Totals $300,000.00 $ 75,000.00 Interest Income $5,520.00 $1,520.90 Federal Funds: 702 Loan $ 95,000.00 $ 30,000,00 Section 9 Grant 276,000.00 40,000,00 Sub-Totals $371,000.00 § 70,000.00 TOTAL INCOME $676,520.00 $146,520.90 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS $804,801.64 $274,802.54 EXPENSES Staff Costs: Salaries $ 68,950.00 $ 12,487.65 Expenses 10,500.00 1,792.79 Benefits: Social Security 1,109,00 Sap h Guaranty Fund 533.00 133.34 Health and Accident Insurance 1,680,00 241,71 Retirement 10,000.00 0 Workmen's Compansation 99.00 0 Sub-Totals $_ 92,871.00 $ 15,188.20 Board Meetings $3,150.00 $ 900,00 Administrative and Office Overhead: Rent $ 3,000.00 $ 750.00 Communications and Postage 2,000.00 363.03 Furniture and Equipment 2,000.00 0 Supplies 3,600, 00 628.15 Printing 1,000, 00 623.56 Auditor 250,00 250.00 Accountant 1,000.00 0 Public Information 33,000.00 5,058,91 Insurance: Public Liability 72.00 0 Depository and Forgery 56.00 0 Fidelity Bond 199.00 0 Sub-Totals $ 46,177.00 $ 7,673.65 CARRIED FORWARD $142 ,198,00 $ 23,761.85 METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT ATLANTA, GEORGIA BUDGET REPORT MARCH 31, 1967 TOTAL INCOME AND UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS BROUGHT FORWARD EXPENSES Brought Forward Counsel Consultants: Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission: 701 Matching Urban Design Study: Section 9 Matching Atlanta Transit Study: Section 9 Matching Parsons, Brinckerhoff£-Tudor-BechtelL: 702 Loan Section 9: Federal Matching Retainer Agreement Research and Technical Services Sub-Totals TOTAL EXPENSES SURPLUS AUTHORITY ACTUAL JANUARY 1, 1967 TO 1967 MARCH 31, 1967 $804,801.64 $274,802.54 $142,198.00 $ 23,761.85 $ 20,000.00 $ 3,092.74 $ 31,250.00 $ 29,939.00 32,667.00 0 16,333.00 0 3,333.00 0 1,667.00 0 95,000, 00 0 240,000.00 0 120,000, 00 92,333.00 60,000.00 13,985.97 2,000.00 597.58 $602,250.00 $136,855.55 $764,448.00 $163,710.14 $40,353.64 $111,092.40 METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ATLANTA, GEORGIA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION MARCH 31, 1967 ASSETS Cash in Banks: C & S National Bank First National Bank - Payroll Trust Company of Georgia Fulton National Bank - Section 9 Investments: U. S. Treasury Bills U. S. Treasury Bills - Section 9 Petty Cash Accounts Receivable: Clayton County DeKalb County Gwinnett County - 1967 Gwinnett County - 1966 TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES Accounts Payable Payroll Taxes Withheld and Accrued Reserves: Parsons, Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel: Section 9 Matching Retained Agreement: Transportation Study Public Information Right-of-Way Procedure Study Surveying TOTAL LIABILITIES SURPLUS $30,354.81 6,543.55 1,000.00 5,313.88 70,261.29 34,686.12 25.00 $ 5,797.50 20,692.50 4,552.50 4,552.50 — 35,595.00 $ 124.18 2,046.01 62,333.00 $ 301.07 1,193.63 0 6,689. 36 8,184.06 $183,779.65 72,687.25 $111,092.40  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 21, Folder 6, Document 39 Box 21 Box 21 Folder 6 Folder topic: Rapid Transit | 1966-1967