3 20 57 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/71f8faec7792dc4bfd74fc3eee921db1.pdf 8bf33a097ed8bb2f7acfa7d9eea1e927 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. . ' £;,. 7 ; ;.c.,. t P Februnry 'l'O: 24 v 19G9 Mr e Ce c i l A. Al c :irn ndcn:, Chnh.--m~ n . Hous i ng Res ources Co. mittao Attn c hod ( Encl. l) is c opy o f Mcn:io f r om Er i c l.ill Assoc i n t cs to Coll ier Glnd in p eut i t l ed " f.:.;;;pm-:cJod Moans To Lowo i:• Cos t Ilousi ncs 11 • Collier bns d is c 1sned tbis briefly with Da n Sweet with v ie~ t o undort nki ng an up<latcd a 1d oxp3ndod study of the housin~ ~or t ion of t he CIP. T~is ~ouli pre~ umnbly bo ~ono by Eric llill AsGociotes . , . I / Dau fcsls p and so de I , t ha t tho iuit i ntion of nny mn j or upcl 21ting study on hous ing i n At lanta shoul d bo i ni ttatcd by th~ llousi nc Reuour ces Committee • r:ric Hill Associotos i s p0:r 1nps the best housing , pln . n i nrr c onsul t~nt :\.rm I 1 now an tho1·e l ittle c011tq • i1c<l :tn t 10 ntt ~ched proposal w t h , . ·doh I disagi:ce ., Bo mvo •, i t ,eems '-"'Or, ewilat :t u--, appr,j:n·iatc to iuit :..1te a11other c nj or stu y •;,; wu wo ':rn ve no t -Tct b oon able to l rop l<. neut the 1~c-!Ot1?.'>.Cn<fa tionu of the Pl"ovious tu-dy , al th o~c~ we a?e fully a~nre of t~o m3jor fnct o~s which o-e st ill holdin~ up mplc~ontat ion of t ho pro •ious st 1dy . Tho f ollo~i ng arc s o~e o~ tho ,, ore i opoi- t n 1t of t'1ose : '· ,b~ a. 'rho num "c.~r ono p:r.oblcro of cou1·so is gat ting site approvnls . b. Other dif.:ficulticw \,hich trn ve no t been ad oquntol , corrcc .,cd rrn.d .\Ol ' Vihich ._,pecif ·' c rec or..ir.mnt;n tions \:1Cl'C t.10 o i.orr,mlly by the Uousina Rcsou~ces Comcittoe to tho Zoning nnd Plnnnin~ ~nd Devo lopcent Comm i t t ees o:Z t h 0 Do::t:rd of Al ch::1"'mcn , Au~ust 2 e 1968 , include : 3. " Hcv:loion. o i: t ho 0:.:•d t m1nco govoruili:t non-conforming u3o o f J.nn<l to allo·, structur nl c hn~~es in i mproving dwolliilg urdt::.; to t1~et r e(!Lih·emonts of t ho Uounint: Code .. " �I I I I I i.i r o Ccc: 1 I~.. .l\lexn ~ae~: ~;,2, 11 1 969 } 'c J"U~l l 'y' Pnr;c 2 I I 'fJ~• r-"":'l-0 , ,. ,..,.,.,,_ '"°" •<.~ CA ....1 ,.,,..1 t'~• • ~1~ ._ .., .... p::1rttcula!-:-ly in t h0 l JJJH...IJfi1r::; 0 Viur:. " C""1 o ·u ,, ·_,,,.,...., -1· h 'v ..... •:0 - ' l . ' ' . J )JL.,;.i...- <.,,i, ~ 1:..'.l City ~nd 1cr:.ho1·· Os"CDf) outsi ·ie the 1 :odel Ci'i;ies m.•cn o ' i (~ hia b e i ng only· p,:a• t i a lly i mple~euted UOWo ) 6,. " A<len:; i on o f n l:ov· Ge<- c~ist.:--' ct soning cm Ji;he n w L and Use m~p,. t o map b nsed i uclud0 ::i aqu::1 te areas f or l ow=:..ncome homing." Thero nre c avoral related doc1_ents which ha·e n di rec t bearing on this matter ~ ~he more port inant o1 these aro : 111 T he ('.'econd Annual Section) uhicb Ro1m1•t (FU'I'URE DIRECTION pelled out certain r ecom~endnt 1ons :for f utui ·o c ou.1..se ox action f c1· t ho 0 hous.1_ng p rog :i.•ffm and c:illled for a i.'<nrisod statooc-ut of mis sion fro " the t1nyo1.,. 1or the Co:rn11i.ttc e . Copy o f drnft pi·oposod ( 2 - 10- 6 9 ) for revised m· saion is a~t~cled (Encle 2 ) . It c ontninad p a mon~ c thor t hinCTS p s u~aes tion t hat a j oint study of tho l ousing neAde of tiG Ci t y b a c onducted by t he Hourr · ug Author i Jcy 0 P!aun ng Departmon-'c and t he HouB. n:; Ucsou,.,ccs Comn it tae . ciuch :s;tudy m:lc~ .... t au s t tute for , 01• be a D rbed iu " t .1e pl"o o~ed study by Er · c Hill Associa t es ·2. 0 omc _suer;entions fol: o 1;_1or.o p1~octica 1 P ,pro~ch t o sol m.:, the lcw-inco1':!o hous i n:; problems Ul'O c ont ained in P.!cmo t o D:m S~ca t , Fob U:ll7 11, 1969 , copy attached (Encl c 3)o 3. Proposal for specific hous .. ug oncl ~~elato nctivitioG for t ho recently npproved Urban O~~e1•vatm:y az-o con-ca ined in IJ~mo to ii1· . Sweat , Octo ,cl' 31 0 l DG8 ,, c opy attached (Enc lo 4 ) . It i s doubtful 1 o~cvor , t hut ~11 of t he proposod activities ca n be Essumod by t ho U1·bnn Observator y» ccrtninly not initiully. 4. '£he llousing Coo1·£Jtnnto1• h¢S ropG.1tcdly pointed o ut thG nocd f m.·, and ruqucstod t ho services o:Z" a Stati.-3 ticnl Clerk to keep up-t o-data nnd period. c:m lly rcrn:ouuco tho Low-ll1cor::o Housi~1 Invcntoi'y Hoport o. Th::it i r.1901:tont 1~cp01:t csnnot be l;opt cu1·r0ut i t hrough e¾ir.;ting fncil:ltic.., o:f the Hounina nesou;;•ces Cotl:!litteo office ., Just i·eceutly, as frequently " �Ur o CccJi.l ~\ ., A {'mmcot' Fobrut1ry 24 p 1DG9 Pnbc 3 X W:i:l.:.i c ~ 1l ed " pon by .. r..;j. ,;y .,,:;,.< . , ,,.~,,._._ ""'il ,~,,... ., <·;-,· A-,,.A ....., ...:t , ...11 t , ..Ll...:. O z-':'icit>d tu ' cu:i::-:~n1.. c.v.- ,-..-··.·,1 ,~ , u-,,.,~.,r ~., ..;... e-"'· . . u l.n4\,,,'- le, cr•·nr• ·;-.,.,i ~\l.t..Vu. .... ... ~ ~,-~ v .. .... .~iv.&~. and Xn Planning in t .1~ Lo~·~ ··< nco:1e Eou.siug Px·cgrnn a Tho best I c oula 6ffcr wns to provico ~i3ur~s as o.f Novcm,er 15~ 1968 " 1 hove not been ~hlo to c on~ U. o a moi·e ·oce-n t Y-c ;02~ t ~ ~l 1thm1r,:.1 9 i ~c i s k nown th~t t bu f l f~t rc2 h!'aVO ch ... n~otl "C;ons i der~lb ly s:h:~ce the novc-,;i,br.n : 15 1·opo1:t o " 1 5. Attr.whe.cl ( Encl ., 5) ~.:e cople::i of r~cnut fie1:. os fron thir:; off ice to ,.Ji· o ~3otte1·i'ield of t he Hot sing Authc:t·ity an. e."fot't -to ob :;~in SC!:le iu E:~sscrn.t i a l c ~ t n p0:r t~ niri.G to Public n.o s :(.ng and to encournGe c oordiu~tion efforts town-d i nSU'.i:"ing relwibi l i tnt:1.on nf c z i s t . n~ subst~ud:u""d u 1it-G, .from wh ich occt,Ypan ·s t~ove i nto Publ ic Housingo In acld;tt 4 n-n , tho CIP coutnim~d a specific t · (H::0°1;-1m11dntion for establisl:n~mnt of a Housing ncsourct.s 1Jux·eiru . l;;-:t1·i1c'i; of tho p:ro.posa l i s at t ~ched {Encl o 6 )0 About 2 years aco, I provi, ed 4r. s ~oa t witb ~ b rief conc ept,. i nclur in.n· t entative propo.. od or.gnnizntiona l st."nctu "o and per s onnel c ons idore d ne cossary · to i uplcmont sue~ en ~ct1~_ty . If aetnblir-;;ho-d, tlmt or,1'n-n ization should p ro :1bly fun.ct ~o n undm.• tho guid~nco ::md no o facili t of t ho llousing Rf:',E.O\.L'c cs Co~mi t t oo s, w th a. s eci1:tc L.onslng Committee of t h ' "'oard o f P.luol'r..0:1 d o~;igirntcd t o stec1~ ond c 2 · i~y the program ' s rict ivitic throu·~h. th.-~ Bo~;rs...d of Ald ~r t~u to f ruition . no · l .iing the l ocn l t winistrnt on fs des ~c to reduco ro~.or t hat ~dJ Dopart~ents and in order t o avoid ~ppenrnuces of ompira uildin:t , I ll~1ve thus far i.-o:fra· ned -1'ro. rcc:omt~e,ntliq~ astrn.>lishrcnt of n v-ousinz nin.•::rou or ncp~1·tmcnt . Howevcrk' , Plthou~h a good ...,tri1.·t h~s b-ncn r;mdo j n ho4. sin6 , I :fo ... l t h<.:t v-;o lltoiVC bu:-\;,ly r.;;cr.Dtchr; d tho smi.·fnc,:> 0£ tho o~era l l llous:tn~ 110,~os .of tho City dn:-r~ug the nox... 20 years; rnd ~hat t ~is pro 1cm c an bast bo attnchod t~rougl ~u incronoe in P nnr.. - elovnt1on of P llousiur.; ncsou .. cea .cac:il:1. tics ~- Pe:&:lmpP tl.o ti1.1e has now co;.io wh011 wa should sc,:io•lf'; 1y consider cxnnusiou of sue ·1 facilitic·· nnd fo llow the r ucor.:w1Jn,1nt i ons o-': the CIP y oa-tn't>l shiuz 5 smull Ilov.sin,.._. Bu~c-nu or Dc partr.1ont. I n suemuu•y , tho propo.sn l of. E-ric Hi.11 Asno,ciato .... is in g;3norn.1 pr~ct:tcnl . HmHJVc·:r , I ennaot aoo any 1-,a~:-tic\ l::11" advnn.t~ge of such ~dditionnl study at thin tima, u~lc~s t here is, ar wi ll be, ample ox·gnnh.!at ion. and poli tionl structure for impJ.crnon.tntion of its :fii:,.uinf.S . 'fhis rlcos not exist now and r;hould oe n p""orcqtdsit.c to iuit.:tnt:ton of such n major now study. noco~m:,.em,ntion. ( j,f oadc) !or ouch or·,nnizntiou and po1.ttic::il st::uctu:r~ should , in rny opinion, origimlte with tho IJ.ousin~ f-oscm1·cea Con.':li ttoe" �~r o Cocil A. Al~x~ndor . Feb~unry 2~a 1 DG9 P;;1ge 4 -a'<n lcoI" Do Jones 1 Hous inff Coordina t or MDJ/ me Enc ls :1 of..:;(p andcd Means 'r'o Lower Cc-7Jt J1ou::; :.. t1g 2~Dr nf t datad Februa ry lO j 1968 3.Memo d n tod Feb~uary 11, 1gs 9 4 . McMo detod Octo Jor 31, lS GB 5o 1i!e·. os <lnted ,.; (·:b:..·um.:y l l p 1969 6. r:.::::tract f l'Ot \ CIP cc: Mr . Dau E o Sweat; Jr. . � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document Lhe Fad AP February 24, 1968 MEMORANDUM TO; Mr. Cecil A. Alewander, Chaixvnan Housing Resources Comaittee Attached (Encl. 1) is copy of Memo from Eric Hill Associates to Colliery Giadin, entitied "Expanded Moans To Loyer Cost Housing". Collier kas di seussed this pied Ly with Dan Sweat with view to under taking an updated and expanded study ef the housing portion of the Cip, This would presumanty be dono by Eric Hill Associates. Dan feels, and so do 2, that the initiation of any major up- ere study on housing in Atlanta should be initiated by the ousing Resources Committed. Livie Hill] Associates is perhaps the best housing, planning consultant fiem I know and there is little containcd in the attached proposal with which 1 disagree, However, it seems somewhat ine appropriate to initiate another major study whon we have not yot been able to implement the recomaendations of the previous study, although we aro fully aware of the major factors which are stiil holding up implementation of the px eeooe SLUG « the following are some of the more inportant of these cy? @.e The number ono problem of course is getting Bite approvals, be Other dixficulties which have net been adequatoly corrected and zor which specific reconnendations were nade formally by the Housing Resources Committee to the Zoning and “Planning ang Development Comaittees of the Board of Aldernen, August 2, 1968, includes 3. “Revision of the Ordinance governing non-conforming use of land to allow structural changes in improving dwoliting units to meet yeduiremonts of the Housing Code."  tite Cecil A. Alexander u invy 24, 1969 : 4. “Accelerate the Urban Renewal progras particularly in the NASH-BANS, Vine City and other areas outside the Ucdel Cities area." This being only partially implenented now.) 6. “Adoption of a revised district soning hap based on the new Land Use map, to include adcguate areas for low-incowe houlnes." : There are sevoral related docunents which have a direct bearing on this matter. Le Be de The more pertinent of these ares The Second Annual Roport (FUTURE DIRECTION Section) which spelicd out certain recomnend= ations for Zuture course of action for the housing progran aod called for a revised Statenent of nission from the Mayer for the Comittee. Copy of draft preposed (2-10-65) for revised mission is attached (Encl. 2). It contained, among other things, suggestion that a joint study of the housing needs of the City be conducted by the Housing Authority, Planning Department and the Housing Resources Comittee. Such study might substitute for, or be absorbed in, the proposed study by Eric Hill Asseciates. Sone suggestions fox a more practical approach to solving the Icwe-income housing problems are contained in Memo to Dan Sweat, February 11, 1969, copy attached (Encl. 3). Proposal for specific housing and related activities Zor tho recently approved Urban Observatory are contained in Memo to Mr. Sweat, October 31, 1968, copy attached (Encl. 4). It is doubtful however, that ali of the proposed activities can be assuned by the Urban Cbservatory, certainly not initially. The Housing Coordinator has repeatedly pointed cout the need for, and requested the services of, a Statistical Clerk to keep un-toedate and periodically reproduce the Low-Income Housing Inventory Report. That important report cannot be kept current, through existing facilitics of the Housing Resources Committee office. Just recently, as frequently, ir. Cecil A. Alexander February 24, 1552 ‘ Paga 3 i was calied upen by « City Official for curvent figurss on units Coupleted, Under Conctrustic: and In Planning in the Low-aineeme Nousing Pregran. The best I could offer was to provide figures as of Noveuber 15, 1955. i have not been ablo to conpile a more recent voport, slthouch, it is knovn that tho figures have chanced considerably Since the Hovenber 15 report. 5. Attached (Enci. 5) are copies of recant Henos _ fron this office to Mr, Sntterficld of the Housing Authority in an effort to ebtain sone essential data pertaining to Public Housing ang to encourage coordination efforts tosard Ansvuring rehabilitation of existing substandard uniis, from which occupants move inte Public Housinz. In addition, tho CIP contained a specific recommendation for establishnuent of a Housing Resources Burcau, Extract of the proposal is attached (Encl. 6). About 2 years azo, I provided Hr. Sweat with 2 brief concept, including tentative proposed erganizational structure and personnel considered necessary to implemont such an ectivity. If established, that organization shonld probably function under the guidance and as a facility of the Housing Resources Committee, with @ specific Housing Committee of the Board of Aldormon designated to Steer and carry the program's activities through the Board of - Aldermen to Zruition. Renlizing the lecal Administration's desire to reduce rather than add Departments and in order to avoid appearances of onpire building, I have thus far refrained from recommendins establishnent of 2 Housing Bureau or Department. However, aithough a good start has been made in housing, I feel that wo have barely scratched the uxrfaee of the overall housing needs cf the City during the next 20 years; and that this preblen can bost be attnckod through an inerease in, and elevation of, Housing Resources facilities, Perhaps the tine has now come when we should seriousiy consider expansion of such facilities and follow the recommendations of the CiP by establishing & Suall Housing Bureau or Department. In summary, the proposal of Fric Hill Associates is in general practical. However, I cannot seo ang particular advantage of such additionnl study at this time, unless there is, or will be, ample organization and political structure for implementation of its findings. This dees not exist new aud should be a prerequisite to initiation of such a major new study. Recommendation (if made} for such organization and political structure should, in my opinion, criginate with the Housing Resources Conmittee,. Mr. Cecil A. Alexander February 24, iscg9 Page 4 Sincereiy, Halcoin D. Jones Housing Coordinator UDI/mc Encis:1.Expanded Means To Lower Cost Housing 2.Drazt dated February 10, i968 3,Hemo dated February ll, 1969 4,Memo dated October 31, 1968 5 Menos dated February 11, 1968 6.Extract from CiP ccs Mr. Dan E. Sweat, dr.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 1, Document 40 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 1 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/3f18b6c239a518a0e82584c16dc23e10.pdf d326462795cea2bf5e4cf734cde65fbc Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. ,. /. ·-/ • I • C.-.1. s·,1 , ·.,, ;(-).• l l[v 11 r1 j/!1ift tl./i_ ([)J!J§ ./iJ5 Tl/J ll 'I lt; 0 0 JJJy By WARREN WEAVER JR. I\ /! ' 6 Die in Cra§h ·of RAF Plane . . ,' .:....,. / ' 1 :::;,,- ·-,,,, Tr /T o Jf7/ (lJHiiJ!J TUJ[J,Jf!: JPa<01 rm ll[t@([)! Romney, told reporters Monday tbat the key to the lleW experiWASHINGTQN - The Nixon ment would be the encourageadministration is at work on a ment of mass production tech. new housing program that will . niques in an industry where attempt to spur competition be- both the laws and th e customs . · tween giant corporations for the have tended to produce build:right l.o build hundreds of thou- i.ngs one at a time in the pas t. . sands of low-cost uni ts all over ·. the cotmtry. By pooling the separate housing needs of the major states The secretary of Housing and and cities into a single mass Urban Development, George W. market, Romney indicated the nation could make profitable use of the assembly line system, originated in his former industry, automobiles, in his former city, Detroit. Romney estimated that the FAIRFORD, England (UPI) . plan could produce from 250,000 A Royal Air Force transport to 350,000 low-cost housing units plane crashed and burned Mon- a year, but he said th at I.he first day during a training exercise, of them would probably not beand a spokesman for the Brit- come avail able for about three ish Defense Ministry said all years. six men aboard were killed. "You don't des ign an autoThe plane was a four-engine mobile in a few months, it takes · U.S.-built C130 Hercul es that had a couple of years," the form er president of American Motors been sold to the RAF. The Defense Ministry spokes- said. men said the plane crashed The housing secretary has about 200 yards short of th e run- talked in.formally with governors way at the RAF's Fairford Base. of a number of large states and (Copyrlgbt 1969 by The Nm York l'imcs) _ ' some leaders of the contruction trades muons. He said he was encouraged by their favor· able reaction. Romney said that the proposal would not involve any federal spending beyond that already planned for the mortgage interest subsidy program voted by Congress last year. Enough money should be available even if the Vietnam war continues, he added. He said his plan called first for federal authorities to take a kind of informal inventory of housing needs, in each major state and city. · "If we bring together sufficient volume of demand," Romney said, "then we can go · to the national corporations and say: 'What can you produce for this market?'" The corporations would be invited to submit cost figures competitively, as though they were bidding on an actual construction contract. State and city housing authorities could then contract with the lowest bidder for construction of their share of the national inventory. • I ' � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document Lived as MMass-bu Li By Industy ae Plan By WARREN WEAVER J R. (Copyright 1949 by The New Yor Times) WASHINGTON — The Nixon administration is at work on a new housing program that will attempt to spur competition be- ‘tween giant corporations for the right to build hundreds of thou- _ sands of low-cost units all over . the country. The secretary of Housing and Urban Development, George W. 6 Die in Crash Of RAF Plane FAIRFORD, England (UPI). A Royal Air Force transport plane crashed and burned Mon- day during a training exercise, and a spokesman for the Brit- ish Defense Ministry said all six men aboard were Killed. The plane was a four-engine U.S.-built C130 Hercules that had been sold to the RAF. The Defense Ministry spokes- men said the plane crashed about 200 yards short of the run- way at the HAF’s Fairford Base, ae Ps a Geis ? geeser ey t pete oO — OWE ~: 2 o = Romney, told reporters Monday that the key to the new experi- ment would be the encourage- ment of mass preduction tech- niques in an industry where both the laws and the customs have tended to produce build- ings one at a time in the past. By pooling the separate hous- ing needs of the major states and cities into a single mass market, Romney indicated the nation could miake profitable -|use of the assembly line sys- tem, originated in his former industry, automobiles, in his former city, Detroit. Romney estimated that the plan could produce from 250,000 to 350,000 low-cost housing units a year, but he said that the first of them would probably not be- come available for about three years. ; “You don’t design an auto- mobile in a few months, it takes a couple of years,” the former president of American Motors said. The housing secretary has talked informally with governors of a number of large states and it Houst ‘struction contract. ef Gy IL (Ube ed some leaders of the contruc- tion trades unions. He said he was encouraged by their favor- able reaction. Romney said that the proposal would not involve any federal spending beyond that already planned for the mortgage in- terest subsidy program voted by Congress last year. Enough money should be available even if the Vietnam war continues, he added. He said his plan called first for federal authorities to take a kind of informal inventory of housing needs, in each major state and city. “If we bring together suf- ficient volume of demand,” Romney said, “then we can go’ to the national corporations and say: ‘What can you produce for this market?’” The corporations would be in- vited to submit cost figures competitively, as though they were bidding on an actual con- State and city housing authorities could then contract with the lowest bidder for construction of their share of the national inventory.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 1, Document 41 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 1 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/4dff60b29776807f32e5ca81fdae6703.pdf 30ad774f10fa5fcf8da51a3d3121296a Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. ,, MINUTES SP EC IAL MEETING HOUSING RESOURCES COMMITTEE WXT:I ZONING COMMI TTEE AND PLANNING ANO DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE OF T }IE BOIi.RD OF ALDERMEN ilugust 2, 1968 The Special Meeting of the ~Jousing n.esources Committee with the Zoning Comittee and the 'Planning and Development Committee of the Board of Aldermen was held at 2: 00 Friday, in the Aldermani c Chambers, Second Floor, Ci ty Hall. p.~;, .I Agenda, invitational not i c es , mi nut es t aken by the Planning Dep~rtment, resolutions, ~nd other related documents are attached to the file copy of the minutes. j}_ttendance by Members of t he Board of .fUdermen was as fol lows: Present: l Rodney M. Cook , Chairman George Cots:::iL:is Charles Leftwich G. Everett Millic~n . .' Jack Summers Q, v. Williamson Sam Massell , Jr .~ President Absent: / John- ~ Flanigen R~chard C. Freeman E. Gregory Griggs Alderman Rod ney IA~ Cook opened the meeting by _telling the group the purpose of the meeting. He then introduced Mr~ Cecil A~ Alexander, Chairman of the Housing Resources Committee. i r ) Mr. Alexander stated that the purpose of the Housing Resources Committee was to assist by all possible means the construction of 1G~800 units of low ~nd moderate income housing. These units were to serve ~s relocation for persons to be moved by urban renewal, new roads, schools and other government action. I , t J \ Mr. Alexander urged the Zoning Committee and Planning and \ Development Committee of the Board of fldermen to support the ' :\, following (a copy rif his pres entation is ~ttached to the file copy of these minutes) ~ . t 1. Establishment of a Committee of Aldermen to be responsible for housing. 2. Revise the Building CodESto permit innovations in new techniques and materials , particularly in Experimental Housing in the Model Cities area. �:?age 2 3. Revise the Non-Conforming Use Ordinance to permit structural changes in residential units, to meet requirements of the Housing Code. 4. 5. 6. Stepped-up Urban Renewal program in existing slum areas. 2,000 more Public Housing units. ,; : . (' Jcp-1 ~( , 80-cvd a{ A/,Jww-.,,gwi "',..dh,,,,n\.c:4 1 ) 1 ,-,, ~~1 rA ~"4-S. i Upd ate d District Zonine Map , including adequate areas for low~income housing. Draft Res ol utions for presentation to the Board of 4ldermen to implement the above were presented to the Chairmen of both 4ldermanic Committees (and have since been pr ovided each member of the Board of ~ldermen). Resol u tions and Letters of 29 p r om inen t Civic, Relieious and Educ~ t:iona l o:rganiz a t j_o~s , s u pport i ng t he I-Ious ing l~esou::rces Co mmittee proposal , were pr esented and hav e bee n provid ed eac h Dl dermen . (L i st of o r ganizatio ns ~nd d o cument s 2itt 2 c h e d to fil e c o py of these Minutes) . Mr . Alexand e r th en call e d u po n the attending members o f support ing organiz ations to stand to be r e cogni zed. Ab o ut 150 people r es p onde d . Mr . f lexander then intr o duced Mr . Denver Gr a y, Vice -Chairman o f t he ~~;[ ousine and Redev elopment Com-r.iittee of the l' tl ant3 Chambe r o f Comoerce. Mr . Gray ~ t2ted t hat the Ho u s ing ~ nd Redevelopme nt Committee is t he Chamber task f or ce f or dealinE with all mat ters pe rtaining to housin8 in o ur c omrnuni ty . r;his includes a number o f ar e a s: The Urban Ile nevi ~ l P:r oe;ram, Pub lic xlous ing , Code Enforceme nt, and the many othe r government pr o grams related to h o using; t hat t he Comrai ttee's ultimate goal , cond e nsed to a single p hra se, is to help make availabl e dec e n t h o u si ng for all o ur pe o ple . He stated that the Chamber 's position is tha t immediate ste ps s hould be taken to ad opt an updat e d Land Use Plan for the City of ftlanta , from which a n ew Zoning Ordinance could be evolved . Such a zonine plan , SEid the Chamber , should provide for adequat e land for multi-faraily housing and o pen u p land f o r increased densi t y o f housing in all quadrants of the Sity . Mr. ~l exander then introduced Dr . Benjamin E . Mays , Co-Chairman of the Housing Resource s Committee. Dr. Mays stated th~t the Aldermen should update the District Zonine Map of the City and provide ad eq u ate lo-cations for low-income hou sing requirements . He also stated that the people should be put in different sections of the City only where it is economically pos sible. Mr. I' lexa nd e :r then introduced M:".'G. fl Glenn :Parham, .Jr. President �' of the League of Women Voters. Ghe sta ted that it would seem mandatory to zone areas ~n all quadrants o f the City for different types of hou sing - low - rent , multi-family , etc . Without this dispersa l , the burden b ecomes too grea t on certain areas - as regards schools, recreational facilities , s h opping complexes , etc . TNi th dispe:rs 2l some K'esidents wou ld be b etter able to s .ec ur e transportation to reach j ob s in o u tlying a r e as . Sound planning and judiciou s zon ine rev i s i ons are necess a ~ J f or orde rly growth . Delay in acting up on a new zoning plan wi ll compound the problems . She urged that carefu l attent i on to b e givmto design (bea u ty and living q ua lity) - ope n sp 2ces and pa:d;: land - supportive community services to reduc e dange r of i sola ti on a nd i n sec urine cooperation o f b o t h new and o ld res idents . Mr . fl exander t h en a s ked f o r comments fr om the diffe rent o rganizations o n the HRC pr o p os al . M~ . Ot i s Thorpe, P~eside n t of the Erapire Real Estate Board sa id ·t ha t the Er.1p ire _rte a l Ee ta t e _,o a :i'.'d s u pports well pl anned and proper z oning to meet tis h o u sing needs o f ~tlanta . We fir mly b elieve that better housing generate s more. jot s , c cono6ic gr owth, r es ul ti ng in cit i ze n p2rticipati on in raising the sta nda rd of l iv ing o f all At l anta ns . We respectfu _ ly req u est y o ur s u ppor t o n t his proposal . Mr . Bob Flanigen , Exec u tive ~ecretary , ntlan t a Branch o f t h e rfotio n ail /:ssoc iatio n for ;:.dvancement of Co l o red Peop le ( N.l}.ll.CP ) stated tha t t he NPflCP feels tha t t he West o f l t la nt a already has too many l ow-income h o u s ing un its . He said tha t t he NlfCP does not wan t acy raore housinz uni t s in t he West area , but perhaps in other sectors of the City , and want s assurance t hat ad diti o nal devel o p me n ts will not be appr o ved in t he western part of the Ci ty unt il other secto~s eet their e q uitable share . mr . John 8teinichen , III , Cha:rmen f Interfaith , i nc ., stated that immediate steps should be ta ~en by the Ci ty of ftlanta , throu Eh its Pla n ning De partment and the Bo ard of Alde r men , to adopt an up0ated La nd Use Plan , and that a new Zoning Ordinanc e, based on the Land Use Plan , should be prepare d for s ubm issi on t o the Board of f'ldermen at t he e ar liest possible time . He al so s t 3 ted that equal recomr.iendation should be given to the Zoning Text , because o f the fuod plain and other considerations . ~ I Wr . Milton C . Poster , Pr es ident , Home Builders hssociati on of Metropolitan Atlanta , Inc . stated that t he Home Bu ilders nssociation calls upon the Board o f 1\ ldermen to move immediately toward study implementation and devel opment of a modern ordinance of land use ' controls , giv ing due regard a nd priority to the necessity for increased and flexible d e nsity in all residential categories whic h wil l e nc o urage the production of architectural types ' known as multi-family buildings , town hou ses, row houses, and condominium home ownership o f any or all of such properties. 1 �P age 4 r:Ir . D:12me Be ck , Ex ec i t ive Di rec to r o f the Community Co uncil o f t he ftlan t a frea , Inc . s t ated t hat the City o f ~tlanta s h o uld a dop t immediately an upd at e d Land Use Plan a nd a n e w Zon i n g Ordinance , permi tt i n g the dev e l o pmen t o f l o w- income h ous ing o n s everal si t es in all quadr a nt s o f t he Cit y o f htlan t a . hlr . Geore0 Rice , a privat e citiz e n, talke d ab o ut the Railr o ad ~v enue s it e. d e s aid that he was :n fa vo r of d ev e l o ping t his area , but that the area was mo re s uitable t o s ing le- fa mi l y h o u s ing o r garden t ype apartments rat~e r than high -rise f o r the elde r ly . Mr . C . D . Lc Be y fr c m the ftlanta Real Es ta t e Bo ard s tated that the Atlanta Real Es tate o oard sup p o rts a new Zo ni ng Ordinance f o r the City , wh i c h ~ o u l d u pdate and ac ~n o wledge the tr emend o u s changes that have occured since 195{ , a nd w~ich wo Lld s tabiliz e land u ses for the futu-e; that it i o not o n ly essenti~l but l ong ove rdue ; that immedi£ite steps chould b e ta k en by the Ci t y o f ltlanta , thr o ugh its : lannine Depart ment and Bo a r d o f tld e rm0n , t o ad o pt an updated Land Us e Plan . ~l d erman ~ od n ey M. Co o k then intr oduced Mr . Co llier Gladin , Planning Director . ~e s tat ed that 10 , 800 uni ts re c co dcd for rel o cation ; that the first year ' s hou sing ne e ds have been me t , but all t h e pr ob lems have n ot b een so lv0d . He als o stated that Public :'.lo u sing reso1.11·ces n eeded to b e i ncrea s ed . The pr o posed plan s u ggests ideas of continuing e ff ots f o r dispersal f o r the City and re~ion around the City . 8e said that the Federal surpl u s land should be u sed for rel o cation of f amil ies ; that timing of buildin~ of new housing unit s should c oincide with the displacement o ~ pe o p le becaus e of Urban Renewal , roads , etc . ; that the Planning Dcpartnent is ready to a o s:st and s upp ort the 3 o u sing Resou rcGs Commit tee j_n its effort . .-1e state d t hat t h e Lc ind Us G Plan s h o uld be set up with an adequate araount of land that will meet t he dens ity o f pe ple in the n e xt 15 years; that changing of the Zo ning District Map is a good sound planning principle . Mr . Llexander rec o gni zed t he presence of both Co-chairmen of the :-Iousing Resources Commi ttee , D1· . ;Janford 5 . f:.. twood, Pr es ident of Emory University a nd Dr . Be njamin E . Nays, Pr es ident Emeritus of More~ o usc College (w ho had already s p o k en) . flderman G . Everett Millican q uestioned Mr. Alexander on sev0ral points of t he proposel and st ated that enough h o u sing units s hould be built to t a~e care of displac ement and gave his views on several 2spccts of the program . Mr . f.lexander stated that betwoen ~cvember l , 1967 and June 30 , 196D, 2 , 903 people 2pplicd for Public :;::rousine; in f. tlanta and 141 o ut siders were t1rne d down b eca use of the residential requirement put on Public }lo u sing. �• Page 5 Alderman Rodney M. Cook stated that time is of the e s sence . It is tiCTe to do somet hi rg about this p:roblem now . Meeting wa s adj ourne d at 4 : 00 p . m. Respect fully sub mitt ed , rJri.-<i{lc.,,eJ:j"vVi.di:2:r \j,, l - " ~ L~8 lco l m D . Jq.ryas Eou s ing- Coor(H.n8 tor me Encls : As Listed ( with fil e c o py on l y) � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document esate - i 5 4 4 \ MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING HOUSING RESOURCES COMMITTEE WIT ZONING COMMITTEE AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE OF TEE BOARD OF ALDERMEN August 42, 1968 The Special Meeting of the Housing Resources Committee with the Zoning Comittee and the Planning and Development Committee of the Board of Aldermen was held at 2:90 p.m., Friday, in the Aldermanic Chambers, Second Floor, City Hall. Mgenda, invitational notices, minutes taken by the Planning Department, resolutions, and other related documents are attached to the file copy of the minutes, Attendance by Members of the Board of Aldermen was as follows: Present: Rodney M. Cook, Chairman George Cotsakis Charles Leftwich G. Everett Millican Jack Summers 2, VW. Williamson Sam Massell, Jr., President Absent: John WM. Flanigen Richard C, Freeman E, Gregory Griggs Alderman Rodney Ml, Cook opened the meeting by telling the group the purpose of the meeting, He then introduced Mr, Cecil A. Alexander, Chairman of the Housing Resources Committee. Mr, Alexander stated that the purpose of the Housing Resources Committee was to assist by all possible means the Gonstruction of 16,690 units of low and moderate income housing. These units were to serve as relocation for persons to be moved by urban renewal, new roads, schools and other government action. Mr, Alexander urged the Zoning Committee and Planning and Development Committee of the Board of Aldermen to support the , fOllowing (2 copy of his presentation is attached to the file copy of these minutes) + % 1. Establishment of a Committee of Aldermen to be responsible for housing, 2. Revise the Building Code# to permit innovations in new techniques and materials, particularly in Experimental Housing in the Model Cities area, Page 2 3. Revise the Non-Conforming Use Ordinance to permit structural changes in residential units, to meet requirements of the Housing Ccde, 4, Stepped-up Urban Renewal program in existing slum areas. 5. _2,000 more Public Housing units...» ' y ( ceyed 46, Bowdal Aldemean aulhevered reguesd le mode) 6. Updated District Zoning Map, including adequate areas for low-income housing. Draft Resolutions for presentation tp the Board of fidermen to implement the above were presented to the Chairmen of both Aldermanic Committees (and have since been provided each member of the Board of Aldermen). Resolkutions and Letters of 429 prominent Civic, Religious and Bducational organizaticas, supporting the Housing Lesources Committee proposal, were presented and have been provided each fidermen. (List of orgéenizations and documents attached to file copy of these Minutes). Mr. Alexander then called upon the attending members of Supporting organizations to stand to be recognized. SAbout 159 people responded, Mr. iexander then introduced Mr, Denver Gray, Vice-@hairman of the Housing and jledevelopment Committee of the ftlanta Chamber of commerce, Mr. Gray steted that the Housing and Redevelopment Committee is the Chamber task force for dealing with all matters pertaining to housing in our community. This includes a number of areas: The Urban Renewal Program, Public Housing, Code Enforcement, and the many other government programs related tc housing; that the Committee's ultimate goal, condensed to a single phrase, is to help make available decent housing for all our people, He stated that the Chamber's position is that immediate steps Shovid be taken to adopt an updated Land Use Plan for the City of ftlanta, from which 2 new Zoning Ordinance could be evolved. Such a zoning plan, said the Chember, Should previde for adequate land for multi-family housing and open up land for increased density of housing in 211 quadrants of the City. Mv. flexander thea introduced Dr. Benjamin E. Mays, Co-Chairman of the Housing Kesources Committee, Dr. Mays stated that the Jidgermen should update the District Zoning Map of the City and provide adequate locations for low-income housing requirements. He also stated that the peopie should be put in different sections of the City only where it is economically possible. Mr. Siexander then introduced Mes. 1 Glenn Parham, Jr. President Page 3 of the League of Women Voters, She stated that it would seen mandatory to zone areas in all quadrants of the City for different types of housing - low-rent, multi-family, etc. Without this dispersal, the burden becomes too great on certain areas - 25 regards schools, recreational facilities, shopping complexes, etc. With dispersal some residents would be better able to secure transportation to reach jobs in outlying areas. Sound planning and judicious zoning revisions are necessary for orderly growth, Delay in acting upon a new zoning pian will compound the problems. She urged that careful attention to be giva to design (beauty and living quality) - open Spaces and park land - supportive community services to reduce danger of isolation and in securing cooperation of both new and old residents. Mx. flexander then esiked for comments from the gifferenat organizations on the SRC proposal. lic, Otis Thorpe, ¥Fresident of the Empire Keal Estate Board said that the Empire Meal Estate Doard supports well planned and proper zoning to meet the housing needs of i.tlanta. We firmly believe that better housing generates more, jobs, cconomic growth, resulting in citizen participation in raising the standard of living of all Atiantans. We respectfully request your support cn this proposal, ir. sob FlLanigen, txecutive secretary, Atlanta Branch of the National /ssociation for isdvancement of Colored People (NAACP) stated that the ifACP feels that the West of ftlanta already has too many low-income housing units. He said that the NALCP dees not want ary more houSing units in the West erea, but perhaps in other sectors of the City, and wants assurance that additional develop- ments will not be approved ia the western part of the City until other sectors get their equitable share. liv. John Gteinichen, Jil, Chairman of Interfaith, Inc., stated that immediate steps should be talen by the City of ftlanta, through its Planning Department and the Board of Aidermen, to adopt an Updated Land Use Plan, and that a new Zoning Ordinance, based on the Land Use Plan, should be prepared for submission to the Board of fidermen at the earliest possible time. He also stated that equal recommendation should be given to the Zoning Text, because of the food plain and other considerations. liz. Milton C, Foster, President, Home Builders fssociation of Metropolitan /tlanta, Inc. stated that the Home Builders Association calls upon the Board of /idermen to move immediately toward Study, implementation and development of 2 modern ordinance of land use controls, giving due regard and priority to the necessity for increased and flexible density in all residential catagories, which will encourage the production of architectural types known aS multi-family buildings, town houses, row houses, and condominium home ownership of any or all of such properties, Page 4 Mr. Duane Beck, Executive Director of the Community Council of the Atlanta frea, inc. stated that the City of Atlanta should adopt immedietely an updated Land Use Plan and a new Zoning Ordinance, permitting the development of low-income housing on several sites in all quadrants of the City of Atlanta. Mr. George Rice, a private citizen, talked about the Railroad fvenue site. He said that he was in favor of developing this area, but that the area was more suitable to Single-family housing or garden type apartments rather than high-rise for the elderly. Mv. C. B. LeBev frem the Atlanta Real Estate Board stated that the ftlants Real Estate Board supports a new Zoning Ordinance for the City, which would update and acknowledge the tremendous changes that have occured since i9ff4, and which would stabilize land uses for the future; that it is not only essential but long overdue; that immediate steps should be taken by the City of ftlanta, through its Planning Department and Board of /idermen, to aGgopt an updated Land Use Plan, filderman }|.odney M. Cook then introduced Mr. Collier Gladin, Planning Director. He stated that 16,300 units re nmoeded for relocation; that the first year's housing needs have been met, but all the problems have not been soived. He also stated that Public Nousing resources needed to be increased. The proposed plan suggests ideas of continuing effots for dispersal fer the City and region around the City. He said that the i'ederal surplus land should be used for relocation of families; that timing of building of new housing units should coincide with the displace- ment of people because of Urban Renewal, roads, etc.; that the Planning Department is ready to assist and support the Housing Resources Committee in its effort. He stated that the Land Use Plan should be set up with an adequate amount of land that will meet the density of people in the next 15 years; that changing cf the Zoning District Map is a good sound planning principle, Go Mx, flexander recognized the presence cof both Co-chairmen ox the Housing Resources Committee, Dr. Ganford S. ftwood, President of Emory University and Dr, Benjamin E. Mays, President Emeritus of Morehouse College (who had already spoken). hidgerman G. Everett Millican questioned Mr. Alexander on Several points of the proposal and stated that enough housing units should be built to take care of displacement and gave his viewS on Several aspects of the program. Mr. flexander stated that between Ncvember 1, 1967 and June 30, 1960,2,803 people applied for Public Housing in Atlanta and i41 outsiders were turned down because of the residential requirement put on Public Housing. Page 5 fiderman Rodney if, Cook stated that time is of the essence. it is time to do something about this problem now. Meeting was adjourned at 4:00 p.m. Respectiully submitted, VYrcadur \\eea i:alcolm D. Jowtyes ‘ Housing Coordinator Bncls: As Listed (with file copy only)  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 1, Document 42 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 1 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/cab8525ed220d0588f2655df51611511.pdf 83fba06a312de682a69881f1653d807d Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. Apr il 1 , 1969 r . B Tb rt . ranklin , Ex cutiv Assoc i t Urb n Co 11t1on 1819 H tr t , N. W. bing on , D. c . 20006 r . Fran lin : Der your l tt r of arch 18 to r . Cell A. lg nd r , b ti at for your April 3 to p1ovide you 1th Atl nt " Ei not1ti d you b o nno't bich l infor d Mr . lex nder co y b r C , 000 3,0 0 To l ot r bicb mi ht follo ..• lug lly , al r , 500 u uni.ts to b 11 of t a C tt r d Bou 1 bly pro 1 Cr lY t lcol ou i .... • .c 1. txndr / Mr. Dan E. Seat , J r . ~ Mr. George Aldridge k d ting , t d. D. Jo C or 1 tor ) 1t cl r � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document April 1, 1969 Mx. Herbert M. Franklin, Executive Associate Urban Coalition 1819 H Street, N.¥. Washington, D. C. 20006 Dear Mr. Franklin: Re your letter of March 18 to Mr. Cecil A. Alexander, he asked me to provide you with Atlanta’s estimate for your April 3 meeting, which I am informed Mr. Alexander has notified you he cannot attend, Estimate of anticipated subsidized housing units to be constructed in Atlanta over the next three (3) years which might be committed to a market assembly program is as follows: 2,000 units of Public Housing (on small scattered sites) 3,000 units of Home~Ownership Housing (Townhouses or Single-Family, Sales Housing under FHA 221 d{2) or 235) 1,500 units of Rental Apartments {under FHA 221 d(3) or 236) Total 6,500 under the market assembly program Sincerely, Malcolm D. Jones Housing Coordinator MDJ/me ec: Mr. Cecil A. age alg Mr. Dan E. Sweat, Jr.i Mr. George Aldridge  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 1, Document 43 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 1 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/a8b0c869b26bdbe2448d9c790500f622.pdf 69771f8f27919f2bfe19585433413e58 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. 1 ·· . 1 ~ I I '. , • ", ~ I • • J l .• : 161 9 H S tre e t, N .VJ. ' ·-" ' Wa sh i ng ton . D . C. 2000G T el ep h o ne : (202) 223-9500 CH A I RM/>.N : John W. Gardn er CO-CHA I F ~/,EN : Andrew H8isi-.:eli i A . Ph1 ii p RJnclo!ph ' 'I .. ,I!. . I 1· March 18, 1969 I, MAR 21 1969 ROTH SCHl LD 3: PASCh.\L ATLANE, f: !::J: '. S:;\ Cecil A. Alexander, F.A,I.A. Finch, Alexander, Barnes,. Rothschild & Paschal 44 Broad Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Cecil: In my letter to you of March 4, I mentioned that we would be making plans to follow up on the February 26 mee~ing with those representatives of cities and states who expressed an interest in the market assembly program. 1 ·A 1 J \ ff -~ , . ';; / · .;' 1 ~1· / \ ! \'· l -~· ,., ,1.: \J .{: Accordingly, we are presently at work refining our proposal for your revi e w and comment. We hope to send this proposal to you shortly and to meet again to discuss it in detail. A tentative date of April 3 has b e en / chosen for th~ meeting, whi~h will be held from 10: 00 a.m. / I to 3:30 p.m. in the Lawyers Club, at 1815 H Street, N.W., 1 ! Washington. I hope that you can clear your calendar to 1, atte nd. It would be helpful if in the meantime you could make some estima t e of that portion of anticipate d subsidi z ed housing units to be constructed in your city over the ne x t thre e years which might be committe d to a market assembly program. This estimate will enable us to conduct a realistic discussion on the 3rd , I would appreciate your letting me know at your ea r lie s t conve nienc e whether y ou can attend the me eting . Co r d~ially, / 1 t/ ; \.-, ../" I(.; ~ Herbert M. Frank li n Exbcutive Assoc iate HMF : sc i � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document trees ee nc al rel Sal CHAIRMAN: John W. Gardner CO-CHAIRMEN: Andrew Heiskeli / A. Philip Randolph March 18, 1969 Cecil A. Alexander, F.A,I.A, Finch, Alexander, Barnes, Rothschild & Paschal 44 Broad Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Cecil: 1619 H Street, NAW. Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 223-9500 OE oem eee 1 8, ? e : & vot Poy ee ein. eet ‘Ee k Y bas * oe MAR 21 1863 HICH, ALEXAHDER, BARICSS, ROTHSCHILD & PASCHAL ATLANTA, GEGNSIA In my letter to you of March 4, I mentioned that we would be making plans to follow up on the February 26 meeting with those representatives of cities and states who expressed an interest in the market assembly program. Accordingly, we are presently at work refining our attend. proposal for your review and comment, U3) this proposal to you shortly and to meet again to dis- [nf Noss [| cuss it in detail, A tentative date of April 3 has been | J and chosen for the meeting, which will be held from 10:00 a.m. | \. «cre | to 3:30 p.m. in the Lawyers' Club, at 1815 H Street, N.W., ees ae Washington. I hope that you can clear your calendar to i We hope to send i | ’ It would be helpful if in the meantime you could make some A) estimate of that portion of anticipated subsidized housing (LA units to be constructed in your city over the next three vr cussion on the 3rd, i ‘ DS) Cordially, fs i, / ; f p a fs ¢ V ~JA / oe Herbert M. Franklin Executive Associate HMF:sc oH i” 4 years which might be committed to a market assembly program. Cue PA This estimate will enable us to conduct a realistic dis- = I would appreciate your letting me know at your earliest a hit »| convenience whether you can attend the meeting,  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 1, Document 44 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 1 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/5b78b765e7713dfc94705e4ec807afa1.pdf b1c49aae1d076384298aae1742e5bb62 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. . March 27, 1969 MEMORANDUM TO : r . Cecil A. Alexander , Chairman Housing Resources Committee · At the arch 25 meeting of the ayor with Department Heads and Agencies re.s ponsible for carrying out Atl nta ' s Su er Program in the six core areas . I presented the HRC plan d~ted 3-20- 69 , copy of which has been furnished you . Item 11 , Promotion of Emergency Housing, struck a very responsive chord ith Ann os s , who has suggested I discuss the matter further with Al Bos . It has occurred to me th t perhaps it might be ell for you to appoint an Ad Boe Committe of about 3 emb rs of the HRC to look into this propos 1 and to come up 1th a report of findings nd 1·eoomm ndations ou th matter, t our M y eeting . I sugg st th t the r port include uch items as: a. b. c. d for such housing. Extent - numb r nd bedroo co position of untts. Whether ne or xisting structures should be c n ider d · (I 1 vor u ing exi tin Perhap VA Ho plt 1 48 structures 1th ould b pr ctical.) ini um iteration. d. Maxi um period of occup ncy by any on rh p 3 ontb) f. ould ad inist r? (U yb th lv tion Ary could do it.) T nt tiv r nt l to b ch rged and m thod of p nt, to. ln tb1 connect1on igbt or t 1 t no and bett r ~ ult tro our ould ssign v rious proj ct of our u r 11 Ad oc Co itt to wo~k on, r port f t b ily r to �r. Cecil A. Alexnder March 27, 1969 Page 2 Examples from our Summer ~ogram items might include: 3. i. 6. 8. 9. 10. 11. ork fo~ rezoning for Browntown Road Turnkey Project. Encourage bom ownership. Encourages aller developments of mix d type Publio Housing. Strive for tangible evidence of physic 1 improve ents. in Vine City during 1969. ork with Model Cities staff in expediting physic 1 evidence of experimental housing this ye r. Push e r ·l y rezoning of entire C.i ty. Work for elimination of slum pockets through NDP or by Prlv ~e Enterprise. From time to time other proj cts such as study of future housing ue ds; profit ' ble utilization of the Orb n Obs l'V tory to bests rv n eds of the HRC nd utiliz tion of City own~d Pl"Operty for PUblic Housing (Such res _s undeveloped portions of La ewond rk, th City Prison arm, etc.).would be appropri t for p-pointment of mall Ad Hoc Co itte s to work on. l believ th t such ssign nts would dev lop g»od re ults, b welco d by our C itte e bers · nd · ould iv th m feeling of orth hil p rtloip tion o.d •oco plisb ent. Siner lyr al.col I>. Jone · Housing Coo~diD tor J/ C . � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document /M4er. oye ind. March 27, 1969 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Cecil A. Alexander, Chairman Housing Resources Committee- At the March 25 weeting of the Mayor with Department Heads and Agencies responsible for carrying out Atlanta's Summer Program in the six core areas. I presented the HRC plan dated 3-20-69, copy of which has been furnished you. Item 11, Promotion of Emergency Housing, struck a very responsive chord with Ann Moses, who has suggested I discuss the matter further with Al Bows, It has occurred to me that perhaps it might be well for you to appoint an Ad Hoc Committee of about 3 members of the HRC to look into this proposal and to come up with a report of findings and recommendations on the matter, at our May meeting. I suggest that the report include such items as; a. Need for such housing. b. Extent - number and bedroom composition of units. c, Whether new or existing structures should be cans idered (I favor using existing structures with minimum alterations. Perhaps VA Hospital 48 would be practical.) qd. Maximum period of occupancy by any one family (Perhaps 3 months) e. Who would administer? (Maybe the Salvation Army could do it.) f. Tentative rentals to be charged and method of payment, etc. In this connection we might create more interest and get more assistance and better results from our Committee members if we would assign various projects of our summer and other programs to small Ad Hoc Committees to work on, report and follow through. Mr. Cecil A. Alexander March 27, 1969 Page 2 Examples from our Summer Program items might include: 3. Work for rezoning for Browntown Road Turnkey Project. 7. Encourage home ownership. 6. Encourage smaller developments of mixed type Public Housing. 8. Strive for tangible evidence of physical improvements in Vine City during 1969. 9. Work with Model Cities staff in expediting physical evidence of experimental housing this year. 10. Push early rezoning of entire City. 11. Work for elimination of slum pockets through NDP or by Private Enterprise. From time to time other projects such as study of future housing needs; profitable utilization of the Urban Observatory to best serve needs of the HRC and utilization of City owned property for Public Housing (Such areas as undeveloped portions of Lakewood Park, the City Prison Farm, etc.).would be appropriate for appointment of small Ad Hoc Committees to work on, I believe that such assignments would develop gpod results, be welcomed by our Committee members and would give them a feeling of worthwhile participation and eccomplishment. Sincerely, Malcolm D. Jones Housing Coordinator MDJ/mec  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 1, Document 45 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 1 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/226bad36804eb2b3846d925dea48eaba.pdf 9b6ca9d9587cb6eda7e31aae5478e030 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. -~ / / l 1 ae y ) blic Administration 1225 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 Phone: (202) 659-916 5 \ March 2 7 , 1969 M~ . Morel and Smi th Southern Reg iona l Counc i l, I nc. 5 F o r s y t h S t r ee t , ·N .W . At lanta , Ge org ia 30303 De a r Mr . Smith : Th is letter is to ap poin t you to the At lanta pane l f ormed by the Ac ademy to f unct i on wi th res pect to our r e search contr a c t with the U.S. De par t ment of Housing and Urb an Develo pment . Enclosure 11 All_ i s a copy of the HUD announc ement re garding this project. Th e c ontra c t c a lls for us to s tudy the criti c al decisi onal and aqm ini s tra tive asp e cts , prima rily f rom t he lo c al point of view, of .fo ur HUD .iss"Istecfur'ban program s : q turnkey h ousing,2 inner - city open s pace, Sba si c sewer and wa ter fa cil i ti e s gr ants, and .,Jnon - p r of it s ponsored new housing under Se c tion 22l ( d) (3 ) -- a r ep lac ement f or s tudy of 22l (h ) . These pro grams will be ana l ysed from point of ori g in to poiµ t of impac t i n six (o r s ev en ) ci ties, with At lan t a s i rvi ng a s t he pilot study. · The pro je ct wi l l ti e i n with r e l a ted HUD contracts awarded to t h e Na ti onal League of Citi e s to evolve a s ystem of urban ob servatories ( in a ddition to Atlanta , f our othe r de signa t e d ob s e rvatory c itie s are among t ho s e ci ti e s which we have recormnend e d to HUD f or inclusion in our stu dy )' , and to Rutge rs Univer s ity t o study ways of a chieving a more effe c tive stati r o l e in urban progran1s. Dr . Mo r ris W. Co l l ins, Jr., Dir_e ctor of the . Institute of Government, Univ er si ty of Ge org i a , is c onv eno r of t he Atlanta panel. Other pane lists are l i ste d on Enc l osure 11 B11 • One or t wo additional members may be appointed. As knowl e dgeab l e At l ant ans, t he pane l will be a s ked t o o r ient, i nf orm , advise, and help di rect t he t hree-man t eam wh ich will be in Atlanta fr om Ma rch 3 1st t hr ough April 11th . I n ad d i tion to myself, this team is compo se d of Mes srs. Elias B. Si l v erman and Char le s R. Warren. There wi l l be two pane l me e t ings, t o e ach of which this l e t ter of a pp o-intmen t is i s an i nv i t ation . These meet i ng s wi ll be he l d at Georgia Sta t e Co lleg e on: ,.....---.... Wednesday , q>..gr il 2nd\ from ( luncheon i n 't.1\e- "As"semb l y Activitie s Bu il ding, wi th the Fa cul t y Lounge of the Building); and , , Noon until about 3: 00 P.M. Room, 2nd F l oor of S tudent the me e t i ng continuing in Bu sine s s Administration �l_ Mr . More land Sm ith r-~arch 27 · 1969 2 . Thur s d 2. y, lp . ril lO _t=l).. from 9 :0 0 A.M. until middle or l~te 2.fternoon ln the President 1 s Conf erenc e Room, with luncheon. in t he Assemb ly Room. At the Ap ril 2nd mee ting , t he panel wi ll be asked to revi ew and c o:-:-.r.,e;-:t upon our Pilot Research Design (Enclosure uc 11 ) and Tentative Int e rview Sc:-iedule (Enclosure uD 11 ), to su;;ge.st ways in which we might most · produ ctively pro ceed , and in general to gui de our efforts in Atlanta. We have also developed a Progr~~ Sw-nmarization aµd Status Report on the selected pro gra.'il.s (Enclosure 11£11 ). The Apr il 10 th meeting will be devoted to an analysis and interpre. t ati on of our data and to t he f ormulation of findings and conclusions. An honorari um of $25 per meeting attended will . be provided to you 1 as a member of the Atlanta panel. A.national pane l h as been app ointed to further guide and evaluate our eff orts in all selected study citie s. This panel is composed of: Hr . William G. Colman, Execut:i.ve Director, Advisory Corranission on Intergovernmental Relations Mr . Porter W. Homer, County Manager, Dade County, Florida The Honorable Arthur Nafta lin, Mayo~ of Minneapolis Professor Ernest C. Reock, Jr., Di re ctor, Bureau of Government Resear ch, Rutger s University Pr ofessor Wallace S. Sayre, Eaton Profes sor of Public Administration, Department of Political Science, Columbia .University Profess o r Carleton F. Sharpe, Visiting Research Professor and Consultant, University of Hartf6rd Dr. Gilber t Y. Steiner, Director of Governmental 'Studies, The Brookings Institution On behalf of the Ac ademy and the national panel, I wish to express our appreciation for your willingness to participate in this important .project. lft/A/ )<.• )/1/ /J,_,, ' SincereI I Dominic DelGuidice Project Director Encl osures (4) \ � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document Natianell tances PD ks sae ae National Academy of Public Administration 1225 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 _ Phone: (202) 659-9165 March 27, 1969 Mr. Moreland Smith Southern Regional Council, Inc. 5 Forsyth Street, N.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Mr. Smith: This letter is to appoint you to the Atlanta panel formed by the Academy to function with respect to our research contract with the U.S. De- partment of Housing and Urban Development. Enclosure "A" is a copy of the HUD announcement regarding this project. : The contract calls for us to study the critical decisional and administrative aspects, primarily from the local point of view, of four HUD- assisced urban programs: y turnkey housing,2inner-city open space,2basic sewer and water facilities grants, andjnon-profit sponsored new housing under Sec- tion 221(d)(3)--a replacement for study of 221(h). These programs wiil be analysed from point of origin to point of impact in six (or seven) cities, with Atlanta serving as the pilot study. The project will tie in with related HUD contracts awarded to the National League of Cities to evolve a system of urban observatories (in addi- tion to Atlanta, four other designated observatory cities are among those cities which we have recommended to HUD for inclusion in our study)’, and to Rutgers University to study ways of achieving a more effective state role in urban programs. Dr. Morris W. Collins, Jr., Director of the-Institute of Government, University of Georgia, is convenor of the Atlanta panel. Other panelists are listed on Enclosure "B'. One or two additional members may be appointed. As knowledgeable Atlantans, the panel will be asked to orient, inform, advise, and hélp direct the three-man team which will be in Atlanta from March 3lst through April llth. In addition to myself, this team is composed of Messrs. Elias B. Silverman and Charles R. Warren. There will be two panel meetings, to each of which this letter of appointment is is an invitation. These meetings will be held at Georgia State College on: Wednesday, Moril ndy Eom Noon until about 3:00 P.M. (luncheon in thé “Assembly Room, 2nd Floor of Student Activities Building, with the meeting continuing in the Faculty Lounge of the Business Administration Building); and Mr. Moreland Smith March 27; 1969 : 9 pT ae : ; Avril 10th) from 9:00 A.M. until middle or ate af cernoon “in the President's Conference Room, with luncheon in the Assembly Room. w OQ. hcg rn fa 6 At the April 2nd meeting, the panel will be asked to review and comment upon our Pilot Research Design (E n (Enclosure "C") and Tentative Inter- view Schedule (Enclosure "D"), to suggest ways in which we might most pro- ductively proceed, and in general to guide our efforts in Atlanta. We have also developed a Program Summarization and Status Report on the selected programs (Enclosure nen), The April 10th meeting will be devoted to an analysis and interpre- tation of our data and to the formulation of findings and conclusions. An honorarium of $25 per meeting attended will be provided to eu as a member of the Atlanta panel. A national panel has been appointed to further pane and evaluate our efforts in all selected study cities. This panel is composed of: Mr. William G. Colman, Executive Director, Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations Mr. Porter W. Homer, County Manager, Dade County, Florida The Honorable Arthur Naftalin, Mayor of Minneapolis Professor Ernest C. Reock, Jr., Director, Bureau of Government Research, Rutgers University Professor Wallace S. Sayre, Eaton Professor of Public Administra- tion, Department of Political Science, Columbia University Professor Carleton F. Sharpe, Visiting Research Professor and Consultant, University of Hartford Dr. Gilbert Y. Steiner, Director of Governmental Studies, The Brookings Institution On behalf of the Academy and the national panel, I wish to express our appreciation for your willingness to participate in this important project. ‘Dominic DelGuidice roject Director Enclosures (4)  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 1, Document 46 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 1 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/e6d52e4614ffdb4948359b9bc88b537f.pdf ea8c9f96d11dc8ee804654d0a564c63a Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. r-1 n ! : ~ I .__ _ i 1 ! ' , I L .-l L-1 I I Qj o I ,.,. '-.-., e,.I ' 1 l l I \___ ',_; __,) ! i o l i ---, . . ' DJ Ii ' -~r·J ,., ,,. I" ....., U I. '· Enclosure ---- ~ I \ ·-, \ \ I !._./ / I ~- ___ ,.., . . / / r~ ·.--. , , I• .r-,.,. u'--. ..: r 11 r--'\ n :-~ \-\ I \; t '- -·-· i 1 r \ ·. , ! :·\_ · ' j i: ·: \ i_..,.I ~ _ ·--, _...., \ ~ t ' A11 '; 'I I ,\ J / r ~ I" n ~~ ,, .;~ ;,. . , . \ ; ' ' I . I, iJ V - I I i VJ A S H Br-J C - 0 N D • C • 2 0 c!, ·~ 0 II I I 1 t ' HUD-No. 69-0008 Phone (202) 755-6990 FOR RELEASE: Thursday, January 2, 19 69 IMPACT OF HUD PROGRAMS TO BE STUDIED Improving the effectiveness of major Federal programs is the aim of a research contract announced today by the U. S. Depart:ment of Housing and Urban Development. 1 T. F. Rogers, Director of HUD' s Office of Urban Technology and Research, .announced the award of a $100,000 contract to the American Society for Public Administration. The project will study · severa l of HUD' s programs in terms of their operation in a number of se lected cities. . I l Mr. Rogers noted that "it is on~ of HUD' s prime responsibilities to insure that states, cities and localities use its assistance programs to maximu m advantage. The conclusions of this study are expected to aid both HUD and the cities in improving the results of such Federal programs as public housing, urban renewal., water and sewer facilitie s, and open space. 11 The National Academy o f Public Administration, working with its parent organization, the America n Society for Public Administration, will establish a national panel and individual city panels to conduct the study. These panels will develop a pattern describing the activities related to the admini stration o f each program surveyed in a city, and analyze the principal local c ritica l decisions and actions. The · panel members will include member s of the Academy a nd residents of each city to be surveyed who are knowledgeable in public administration matters. - more- • I !I I �• -2- . HUD- No. 69-0008 . Among the questions t o be studied will be the local reaction to the initiation o f a pro gram ; the nature of Federal, State and lo cal initiative ; how t he problem t o be solved wa s perceived by various groups within the community ; whether s killed personnel were available to carry out t he program, and what the performance rate and effectivene ss has been in the light o f local circumstances. When the individual city studies are completed, the results will be assessed on a national scale and general conclusions drawn. Further information can be obtained from George Graham, Director, National Academy of Public A_d ministration, 1225 Connecticut. · Ave., N. W., Washington, D. C. 20036 • .il. 1T .u. if - I· V � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document haste ee a hat cesta lial nal ate = Enclosure "A" ght ee igo’ eetely, pees toe Soe alg te ‘ I [ —_ 1 1 , 4 < ——s = = —., ’ ' i | ! . ‘ a | rj . Pip ie df fr 7 Ph at ele, ies } § by a (. i tis 4 \ = ee Sy Ps bee ay re i ied ted ae Rear <p, Bp Lay 2 =" Ff oe bs J U Ce nh te fo AY PS RACE ee nT . Nac! ego Be ai aiauk Eaves | AR APM AR Mm Mm A | ry m™ Be OE AWN Dp UROEAN MOEVEL SO WASHINGTON D.C. 20410 4 HUD-No. 69-0008 : 7 "BOR RELEASE: Phone (202) 755-6990 . qniescaye |=. : January 2, 1969 IMPACT OF HUD PROGRAMS TO BE STUDIED Improving the effectiveness of major Federal programs is the aim of a research contract announced today by the ees Depart- _ ment of Housing and Urban Development. T. F. Rogers, Director of HUD's Office of Urban Technology and Research, announced the award of a $100,000 contract to the American Society for Public Administration. The project will study several of HUD's programs in terms of their operation in a number of selected cities, Mr. Rogers noted that "it is one of HUD's prime responsibilities to insure that states, cities and localities use its assistance programs to maximum advantage. The conclusions of this study are expected to aid both HUD and the cities in improving the results of such Federal programs as public housing, urban renewal, water and sewer facilities, and open space," The National Academy of Public Administration, working with its parent organization, the American Society for Public Administration, will establish a national panel and individual city panels to conduct the study. These panels will develop a pattern describing the activ- ities related to the administration of each program surveyed ina city, and analyze the principal local critical decisions and actions. The. panel members will include members of the Academy and residents of each city to be surveyed who are knowledgeable in public administration matters. -more= tee HUD-No. 69-0008 =-2=-° Among the questions to be studied will be the local reaction to the initiation of a program; the nature of Federal, State and local initiative; how the problem to be solved was perceived by various groups within the community; whether skilled personnel were available to carry out the program, and whai the performance rate and effective- ness has been in the light of local circumstances. When the individual city studies are completed, the results will be assessed on a national scale and general conclusions drawn. Further information can be obtained from George Graham, Director, National Academy of Public Administration, 1225 Connecticut. Ave., N. W., Washington, D. C. 20036. ff Hf: _ te  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 1, Document 47 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 1 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/41b0cb6dc651ba7b63f8895529f49d3a.pdf 1a4470c1e5d2fac2ecd3cf62a76667c0 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. Enclosure 11 B11 .ATLANTA PANEU~ Convenor Dr. }: or:::-is W.H. Collins, Jr. ~irector, Institute of Government Univers ity of Georgia Terre ll Hall Athens, Georgia 30601 · 1·::!'.' . Cecil A. Alexander 4l Broad St ., N.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Hr . Glenn E. Bennett c;:<ecutive Director Atlanta Region Metropolitan ?12.nning Comrnission 900 Glenn 5uilding Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Ers . Henri etta Gantry ·757 Lynvalley Road, S.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30311 Prof . Tobe Johnson 3405 Lynfield Drive, S.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30311 Dean Alex Lacey urban Life Center Georgia · State College· ·· Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Hrs. Alexander McPhedran 1365 Clifton Road, N.E. ·Atlanta, Georgia 30307 l'lr. Howard K. Menh inick Director of Planning and Development Ke ck ~ Wood, Inc. 3722 Pleasantdale Road Atlanta, Georgia 30040 · ½r . Jame s Robinson Urban East Housing Consultants 900 Peachtree St. , N.:S. Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Hr·. Moreland Smith Southern Regional Counail, Inc. 5 Forsyth St., N.W. Atlanta, Geo·rgia 30303 Dean Robert E. Steimke Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia 30332 Mr. Herbert L. Wiltsee D.i rector, Southern Office Council of State Governments 830 Peachtree St., N.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30308 -;~ One or two additional members may be· appointed. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document BALANTS Convenor TOU Dr. Morris W.H. Collins, Jr. Director, Institute of Goverrment University of Georgia Terrell Hall Atnens, Georgia 30601 Mamnar HBemMOIeTS Mr. Cecil A. Alexander li Broad St., NW. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 . nn E. Bennett ive Director anta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission 900 Glenn Building Avlanta, Georgia "30303 rH qQ Ee @ Mrs. Henrietta Cantry 787 Lynvalley Road, S.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30311 Prof. Tobe Johnson - 3405 Lynfield Drive, S.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30311 Dean Alex Lacey Urban Life Center Georgia’ State College’ Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Enclosure "Bt" Mrs. Alexander McPhedran 1365 Clifton Road, N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30307 Mr. Howard K, Menhinick Director of Planning and Development Keck & Wood, Inc. 3722 Pleasantdale Road Atlanta, Georgia 300)0° Mr. James Robinson : Uroan East Housing Consultants 900 Peachtree St., N.5. Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Mr. Moreland Snith Southern Regional Council, Inc. 5 Forsyth St., N.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dean Robert E. Steimke Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia 30332 Mr. Herbert L. Wiltsee Director, Southern Office Council of State Governments 830 Peachtree St., N.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30308 * One or two additional members may be appointed.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 1, Document 48 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 1 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/f974808eeaaca46c56dd0062952b3aaa.pdf 940df5f2a6019d878f1b7d68901657e8 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. Enclo sure 11 C11 . PILOT RESEARCH DESIGN FOR HUD PROJECT I ntr odu ction Th e Na tiona l Academy of Public Administration is undertaking, for the Dep artmen t of Housing a nd Urb an Development, a study intended to uncover' <:,~~E:te -~~·~!~~ s uy ban pro gram performanc e . ..:.·----- and relationships which fa5 il ~ e or h2:n2._er Th e ob j ec t ive is to identify the critical .,...______ el ements i n de cision making and action systems by which HUD programs for lo cal government s ·are put into e f f ect, and to suggest ways of maximizing t he fa vor a ble and minimizin g the unfavorable elements. This study is a r efle ction of t he conc er n of HUD and othe rs with the difficulties of i~p l ement i ng na tional pr ogr ams which hav e the ir impact at the local level. Th e link s be twe en ·program ori gin a nd program performance ·have appeared . long and tortuous. . . Th is study de si gn r epresents o~e approach for the anaiysis of program perf orman c e fr om the persp e ctive of t h e local level. will study f our HUD pro grams - The Aca demy non -p r of i t sponsored new housin g und er 22l ( d ) (3 ) , turnk ey housing , ba s ic wat er arid sewer· facilities grants , and inner- city open spac e - in six or s ev e~ cities. Th e Approach Although substa ntiv e que s tions and inf ormati on will vary from c ity t o city, ther e are certain conceptual items wh i ch must be cons i der ed · in ana l yzing t he pr ograms i n e ach of t he cities studied. The ass ump t ion �1 - 2 - .. is chat there are multiple forces and factors which impinge on critica l decision -making in regard to par ticul ar programs in particular cities. What we are viewing is the allocation and mob ilization of city and other resources which a re directed toward definite urban programs. The reason why resour ces are more succes s ful ly mobilized in one city as opposed to another, or in one program as oppose·d to another, leads us to investi gate these factors. In brief, t he first assumpti on is that the basic item to be vi ewed is program performance , and the second assumption is that in analyzing pr·ogram performance, one must look at the relationships o.f c ertain fa ctors to program performance. The multiple fa ctors whi ch impinge on the mobilization of r e sources f or pro gr am performance may be best viewed by means of an action (or inaction) sys t em for each program for each c ity . The action syst em c an be v iew2d as a process which responds to and , in turn, influences other factors. The Ac tion System In brief, the action pr ocess includes several ' critical points; ( 1) the definition of the issue; ( 2 ) the identific ation and gathering of resources and the involvement o f the community; (3) development of a plan of a ction and program administration; ( 4) assignment of management and operation of programs; ( 5) coordination with other level s of government; and (6) evaluation of the program and feedback. �- 3 - . This brief statement of the action system can gain added meaning by now asking questions which relate to each step in the a ction system . These questions will reflect t.wo types of phenomena. The first type concerns facto~s whi ch are reflective of the intergovernmental nature of these HUD grant -in - a id programs. · The second type of questions which are incorporated concern characteristics of the city which may impinge on the action system for · urban program performance. These questions concern the following types of c ity ch ara cteristics: (1) jurisdictional adequacy; (2) legal authority; (3) finan c ial resources; (4) trained manpower ; (5) public concern; (6) leadership; (7) bureaucratic rivalries; (8) governmental form (including plural ism and fragmentation); (9) concurrent problems and programs; (10) demographic chara ct eri stics; and (11) indices of problem areas. Questions Concerning th e Steps in the Action System 1~ (a) (b) ( c) (d) (e) I de nti f yin g and defining the issue and problem: \.Jhat cr itical events led to recognition of the problem? \.Jho pa rticipated? How much participation in this step was there on the local/ state/federal level? What was the nature of the federal, state, and/or l~cal initiati~e ? \.Jhat wa s the nature of the official interest in and support for the pro gram in the embryonic pha s e? ( f ) How mu ch involvement was t h ere from the private sector? (g) · Wha t bearin g did the favorable, apathetic, or unfavorable attitudes of identifiable segments of the public have upon initiating action? (h) Did t h e prese nce or absence of personal leadership affect the in itiat ion of act{on? (i) Wh a t type of technical information and general infonnation wa s ava ilabl e abou t the problem and programs? \ �- 4 j ' I ' ( j) ( l,) (1 ) From whom wa s it j vailable? ow avail able? 1fas it clear o:::- obscure? ( ;~1) ( :1) r:0'\-1 w.::s the problem ;;nd t he pr ogram perceived by the various parties? Wz.s there any diver gen ce here? Dici these per c ep t ions cho.n:se during the various stages of the programs? . \ Was there any divergence? ( o) (p) 2. (a) (b) ( c) (d) ( e) (f) ( g) T~e Iden t ifi ca tion and Gathering of Resour ces and the Involvement of the Con:munity : We re interested and qual ifi~d personn~l ·available to initiate, plan, ,, . a nd c a ~~y on the a cti on? Politi c a l or professional a nd technical personnel were they avaiiable1 In r efe r ence to certain p ro grams, were civic, industrial and commercial groups available? A~d othe r pa rts of the community? How were participants persu a ded as to the rightness of the goals of particular pr ograms ? Were other segments of the co!Thuunity opposed to the program ? How did this affect the mobilization of resoDrces and the eventual pr ogram ·performance? (h) P.ow was a de terminat ion made in re ga rd to the technical requirement s · for prepar ing proposals? (i) How were attention and interest built up to make the probl~m an a ction issue? Who made t h is an issue - private citizens, interested or ganizati ons, politi ca l parties, publi c officials, local/state/federal of fi cials? At wha t st age, and how, did the Mayor and other executives and council become involved? (j) (k) 3. (a) Developrr.ent of a Plan of Acti on and Program Administrati on: (c) How mu ch federal (including regional admini stration of HUD ), state, or local contribut ion was there in the development of ideas concerning a pl an of a ction? Who contributed how much to the decision? Was i t a single individu a l or a small group within the community? (d) How much general public discussion and participation was there? (e) How much were interest groups, private sectors , and political parties resoonsible for the de. cision? . (o) �1 - (f) (;) ( 1) (i) (j) (.() ( 1) (m) (n) (o) (p) (q) ( ~) (s) 5 - 1t :1:1 t al tcrn:J.tivc s were c onsidered? How wJs the choice among alternative poli ci es made? ~as t her e, in fa c t , any real al t ernatives given characteristics of t he cfry a nd oth er factors? Wa s the decision viewed the same by all parties to th~ deci si on, or was it viewed as t he s ame program with different goals and allocating vari ous rates of benefits to d if ferent groups? How cl ear was the decision made n ot only within 'the city b~t to other levels of government? How diff icult was it to ga cl1cr da t a concerning the program? 1-Jhc1:e ewes th is data c ome from? How much did the. data inf luence the development of the program a~d the pro gram administrat ion ? How wa s it handled ? Wna t were t he fa ctors i n deciding the significant elements of discret ion such as ch oice of s i-t e , timing, schedule, and magnitude_ of t he program? How were these decisions made and over what type of time span were they made? Did the c ity government have the techni cal ly qua lified personnel to proceed? Was this a limiting factor? If so, how was it over come, or-was it? Did the c ity government have the financial resources to support t he prog:;:am ? (u) . Did t he c ity have the jurisdictiona l adequacy and the legal authority to perform t h e program? (t) (v) 4. ( a) (b) How l ong did it take to formul ate the pr ogram? AssiQnment of Management and Op eration of Program : Wha t fa ctors were respon s ible for the decision as to where to place responsibility for administrat ion and operation of the program? How was this decis ion made? (c) Did the city government hav e the t e chnically qualified p ersonnel to proc eed? ( d) How long did it take from program approv al t o first action in project construction? P.ow long did it take to full sca le effor t? What a ccounts for length of time such a s fast or s low start? ( e) ( f) ( g) . Were t h ere especially difficult organiza tional or technical problems? I �I - 6 - .. (h) (i) Did the p rogram kec~ on schedule? l~a t a cc ounts for dev iation? (j) W s t h e effort la r ge or small as rela t ed t o t he size a nd s e r i ou sness or t he prob l em? (k) ( l) Was there continuing offi c ial and public intere s t in .t h~ p r~gram? Was the c hange o f personne l and elec ted o ff icial s r el e v ant to the. program? . How available were qua l ified pers onne l t h ioughout the program ? (m) 5. (a) (b) ( ,;) ( d) (c) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (1) (m) ( n) (o) Coordina tion With Other Levels of Governme n t :· lfuat were identifiable difficulties i n secur i ng s t a t e a nd/or fe d e r a l appr oval (in the regional o ffice or a t headqu arter s) ? l&at type of act i on was ini t iated t o s e c ure appr ova l? Ha s it c hiefly :throu gh admi nistretiv e c hanne ls or was it a t profe ssional levels or politi c al exec utiv e l e v el s? . Did party offi c ial s get invo l v ed , such as members o f the Sen ate or House? How long did it t ake to secure approv a l? hfha t consideration was given to other r ela t e d programs i n t he pr oce ss of pro~rarn bu ild ing and approval? Was revision of the program required b y s t a te or fe d eral off ic ial s? Was t he need for c oordina t ion perceiv ed? By whom? What steps to coordinate wer e taken? Were the stipulated procedures clear , s i mp l e , dir e ct and f unc tional , or were they neutral or dysfunctional? Did t he procedures change during the life of the pro gram? What was the nature and effect of the change? Were dire.ct personal interdep artmenta l and intergovernmental lines of communication open? Were they used and how effe c tively? (p) When decisions or clearances consume d much time, to what extent was the time cost .at tributabl e to high volume of paperwork, short~ge, of qualified personnel, interna l opposition, and/or outside ~ressures, indecisiveness or unknown c a us es? ( q) When programs were formulated and appr oved, was there delay in funding? llliat were the limiting factor s in funding? What sources were considered? ·cr) (s) 6. Evaluating the Program and Feedback: �,-- 7 - ( 3. ) (b ) (c) (d) Wa s t h ere adequa te fe edba ck f rom opera ting experience to program r ev iew and r ev·ision? (e ) i;na t h a d been the a chiev ements of the program measured by the basic pr o::,l em a s n ow perceived? Have the re b e en any bene f icial or detrimental byproducts of the program? (f ) (g ) (h) (i) (j) ·------ h'cJ.: e 2.ctiv ic ies r outin i ze d ? We~e pe r f orman c e st an dards devised by wh ich the level of routine a c tivitie s cou l d be mea s ured? Ha s a fo r ma l r ep or tin g pr oc ed ure developed? i~,a t are t he pr i ncipa l jud gments a bout the program by local officials, st a te offi cia ls, f eder al off icials, and others? What is t h e priva t e j udgme nt ? Has opp osition to the pro gram continued, increased, or decreased? Lookin g ba ck on . the eff ort, would city ' officials undertake it again in t he s ame way or differently? � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document Enclosure "0" f PILOT RESEARCH DESIGN FOR HUD PROJECT Introduction The National Academy of Public Administration is undertaking, for the Department of Housing and Urban Development, a study intended to uncover concrete factors and relationships which facilitate or hinder = a ee a ee urban program performance. The objective is to identify the critical 7 2 metas aeensnneene —_—_ elements in decision making and action systems by which HUD programs for ame local governments are put into effect, and to suggest ways of maximizing the favorable and minimizing the unfavorable elements. This study is a reflection of the concern of HUD and others with the difficulties of implementing national programs which have their impact at the local level. The links between program origin and program performance have appashéa done and tortuous. : | This study design represents one approach for the analysis of _ program performance from the perspective of the local level. The Academy will study four HUD programs — non-profit sponsored new housing under 221(d)(3), turnkey housing, basic water and sewer: facilities grants, and inner-city open space — in six or seven cities. The Approach Although substantive questions and information will vary from city to city, there are certain conceptual items which must be considered in analyzing the programs in each of the cities studied. The assumption is that there are multiple forces and factors which impinge on critical - decision-making in regard to particular programs in particular cities. What we are viewing is the allocation and mobilization of city and other resources which are directed toward definite urban programs. The reason why resources are more successfully mobilized in one city as opposed to another, or in one program as opposed to another, leads us to investigate these factors. In brief, the first assumption is that the basic item to be viewed is program performance, and the second assumption is that in analyzing program performance, one must look at the relationships of certain factors to program performance. The multiple factors which impinge on the mobilization of resources for program performance may be best viewed by means of an action (or inaction) system for each program for each city. The action system can be viewed as a process which responds to and, in turn, influences other factors. The Action System In brief, the action process includes several critical points: (1) tne definition of the issue; (2) the identification and gathering of resources and the involvement of the community; (3) development of a plan of action and program administration; (4) assignment of management and operation of programs; (5) coordination with other levels of government; and (6) evaluation of the program and feedback. ee ct oO rh rr i @ This brief statemen ‘action system can gain added meaning by now asking questions which relate to each step in the action system. These questions will reflect two types of phenomena. The first ie) type concerns factors which are reflective of the intergovernmental nature ° of these HUD grant-in-aid programs. The second type of questions which are incorporated concern characteristics of the city which may impinge on the action system for urban program performance. These questions concern the following types of city characteristics: (1) jurisdictional adequacy; (2) legal authority; (3) financial resources; (4) trained manpower; (5) public concern; (6) leadership; (7) bureaucratic rivalries; (8) governmental form (including pluralism and fragmentation); (9) concurrent problems and programs; (10) demographic characteristics; and (11) indices of problem areas. Questions Concerning the Steps in the Action System 1. Identifying and defining the issue and problem: (a) What critical events led to recognition of the problem? (b) Who participated? (c) How much participation in this step was there on the local/ state/federal level? (d) What was the nature of the federal, state, and/or local initiative? © (e) What was the nature of the official interest in and support for the program in the embryonic phase? (£) How much involvement was there from the private sector? (g) What bearing did the favorable, apathetic, or unfavorable attitudes of identifiable segments of the public have upon initiating action? Ch) Did ti he presence or absence of personal leadership affect the tion of action? . (i) What type of technical information and general information was available about the problem and programs? \ wee Le LY ANN Z hm Lo oN NN ed "a © (i) (3) (kk) From whom was it available? How available? Was it clear or obscure? How was the problem and the program, perceived by the various parties? Was there a divergence here? - id these perceptions change during the various stages of the programs? Was there an y divergence? \ : ation and Gathering of Resources and the Involvement < the Community: re interested and qualified personnel available to initiate, plan, nd carry on the action? litical: or professional and technical personnel — were they available? In reference to certain programs, were civic, industrial and commercial groups available? And other parts of the community? of particular programs? Were other segments of the community opposed to the program? How did this affect the mobilization of resources and the eventual program performance? ; How were participants persuaded as to the rightness of the goals How was a determination made in regard to the technical requirements for preparing proposals? How were attention and interest built up to make the problem an action issue? Who made this an issue — private citizens, interested organizations, political parties, public officials, local/state/federal officials? At what stage, and how, did the Mayor and other executives and council become involved? Development of a Plan of Action and Program Administration: How much federal (including regional administration of HUD), state, ox local contribution was there in the development of ideas concerning a plan of action? Who contributed how much to the decision? Was it a single individual or a small group within the community? How much general public discussion and participation was there? How much were interest groups, private sectors, and political parties responsible for the decision? hh or NS of 07 Sw NY te — - (4) (5) Ox) (1) (m) - (n) Co) Cu) (v) cernatives were considered? the choice among alternative policies made? , in fact, any real alternatives given characteristics of y and other factors? Was the decision: viewed the same by all parties to the decision, or was it viewed as the same program with different goals and allocating various rates of benefits to different groups? How clear was the decision made not only within: the city but to other ls of government? How difficult was it to gather data concerning the program? Where does this data come from? How much did the data influence the development of the program and the program administration? iow was it handled? What were the factors in deciding the significant elements of on discretion such as choice of site, timing, schedule, and magnitude of the program? How were these decisions made and over what type of time span were they made? : Did the city government have the technically qualified personnel to proceed? ; Was this a limiting factor? If so, how was it overcome, or-:was it? Did the city government have the financial resources to support the program? Did the city have the jurisdictional adequacy and the legal authority to perform the program? How long did it take to formulate the program? Assignment of Management and Operation of Program: What factors were responsible for the decision as to where to place responsibility for administration and operation of the program? How was this decision made? Did the city government have the technically qualified personnel to proceed? How long did it take from program approval to first action in project construction? How Long did it take to full scale effort? What accounts for length of time such as fast or slow start? Were there especially difficult organizational or technical problems? NE ~ os Boog Kh © Nee NL ee Loa. on > ~~ C1) (m) (n) (0) (p) Did the program keep on schedule What accounts Zo or deviation? Was the effort large or small as related to the size and seriousness of the problem? Was there continuing official and public interest in the program? Was the change of personnel and elected officials relevant to the, program? How available were qualified personnel throughout the program? Coordination With Other Levels of Government: What were identifiable difficulties in securing state and/or federal approval (in the regional office or at headquarters)? What type of action was initiated to secure approval? Was it chiefly through administrative channels or was it at pro- fessional ievels or political executive levels? Did party officials get involved, such as members of the Senate or House? How long did it take to secure approval? What consideration was given to other related programs in the process of program building and approval? Was revision of the program required by state or federal officials? Was the need for coordination perceived? By whom? What steps to coordinate were taken? Were the stipulated procedures clear, simple, direct and functional, or were they neutral or dysfunctional? Did the procedures change during the life of the program? What was the nature and effect of the change? Were direct personal interdepartmental and inter governmental lines of communication open? i Were they used and how effectively? When decisions or clearances consumed much time, to what extent was the time cost attributable to high volume of paperwork, shortage, of qualified personnel, internal opposition, and/or outside pressures, indecisiveness or unknown causes? meee programs were formulated and approved, was there delay in funding? What were the limiting factors in funding? What sources were considered? Evaluating the Program and Feedback: 7 7 . + (3) itinized? c andards devised by which the level of routine ies could be measured? ormal reporting procedure developed? as t dequate feedback from operating experience to program review and revision? ra @ 4 e fo What had been’the achievements of the program measured by the basic problem as now perceived? . Have there been any beneficial or detrimental byproducts of the pr ogram? What are the principal judgments about the program by local officials, state officials, federal officials, and others? What is the private judgement? Has opposition to the program continued, increased, or decreased? Looking back on.the effort, would city officials undertake it again in the same way or differently?  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 1, Document 49 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 1 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/880aeb1ec6b96ac76cf2e83450b3a2e7.pdf 147e99364fa37e004e97df6f23136568 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. I En closure 11 k) 1_1 Xarc:-. 24, 1069 TE~TATIVE I~TERVIEW SCHEDULE Atlanta, Georgia A• . Federal - HUD Re gion'a l Of f ice Peachtree - Seventh Building 1. Regional Adrainistrator. 2. Assistant Regional Administrators for: a. Federal Housing Admini s tr a tion (2210;L3))) b. Housing Assistance (Turnkey); c. Xetropolitan Deve l opment (Open Space and Water & Sewer). 3 • . Other k ey sta ff a t Regiona l Headquarters. 4 •. FHA Insuring Off ice, 230 Pea chtree Street, Atlanta. a. Dire ctor b. Key staff B •. Sta t e C. 1. Off ice of the Governor 2. Sta t e Planning Agency 3. State Department of Health (Water & Sewer ) 4. Department of Na tural Res our ce s Bureau of Outdoor Recrea tion (Open Spa ce ) Local - City of Atl anta l. Off i ce of the Mayor a. Mayor b. Assistant to the Mayor c. Director of Governmental Liaison -; �Tentative Inccrvicw Schedu le Atlanta, G~o~ 6 ia . D. 2. Member s of City Council 3. Depar t ment of Public Works (W3ter Director 4. Depar t ment of Parks and Re cr ea tion (Open Space) Director 5. Redeve lopment or Renewal Agency Director 6. City Planning Agency Director 7. Citizen 1 s Advisory Committee for Urban Renewal (221(~)(3))' 8. Atlanta HousingAuthority (Turnkey) Director 9. Atlanta Housing Development Corporati~n Local - &. Sewer) Fu l .ton County , Regional 1. County Officia ls 2. ~etropolitan Atlanta Coun cil . of Local Governments 900 Gl enn Bui lding, Atlanta 3. Atlanta Region Metrop olitan Planning Commission , 900 Gl enn Building, Atlanta I E • . Loca.l - .' i ' Citizens Groups / Asso ciations 1. Georgia Municipa l League, 506 Fult on Federal Building, Atlanta 2. Association. of County Commissioners of Georgia, 205 Forsythe Buildi~g 3. Model Neighborhood,Inc. 4. I nter f aith~ Inc. 5. Wr:eat Street Baptist 6. Atlant a Chamber of Commer c e, 1301 Commerce Building, Atlanta 7. Other Busines s/Industrial Gr oups 8. Housing Tenant Gr oup s 9. C?mmun i ty Ac.tion Gr oup s ) ) ) ) ) \ ( 3,4,5 are possible Housing Sponsors) � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document Enclosure "Q!! TENTATIVE INTERVIEW SCHEDULE Atlanta, Georgia . Federal — HUD Regional Office Peachtree — Seventh Building Regional Administrator. Assistant Regional Administrators for: Be eederst Housing Administration (221@) (3))') b. Housing Assistance (Turnkey); ‘ c. Metropolitan Development (Open Space and Water & Sewer). 3.. Other key staff at Regional Headquarters. 4.. FHA Insuring Office, 230 Peachtree bhcee, Atlanta. ae Director be. Key staff State 1. Office of the Governor 2. State Planning Agency 3. tate Department of Health (Water & Sewer) 4. Heparement of Natural Resources Bureau of Outdoor Recreation (Open Space) y Local - City of Atlanta 1. Office of the Mayor ae Mayor be. Assistant to the Mayor ce Director of Governmental Liaison a at) ao wo te Tentative Interview Schedul Atlanta, Georgia @ 2. Members of City Council tment of Public Works (Water & Sewer) 4. Department of Parks and Recreation (Open Space) Director ”“ 5. Redevelopment or Renewal Agency Director 6. City Planning Agency ' » Director 7. Citizen's Advisory Committee for Urban Renewal (221 (a) (3)) ‘ 8. Atlanta Housing Authority (Turnkey) Director 9. Atlanta Housing Development Corporation Local — Fulton County, Regional 1. County Officials 2. Metropolitan Atlanta Council of Local Governments 900 Glenn Building, Atlanta 3. Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission. 900 Glenn Building, Atlanta Local — Citizens Groups/Associations 1. Georgia Municipal League, 506 Fulton Federal Building, Atlanta 2- Association of County Obunilest ohare of Georgia, 205 Forsythe Building 3. Model Neighborhood,Inc. ? 4. Interfaith, Inc. : (632455 are possible Housing Sponsors) 5. Wheat Street Baptist ) | 6. Atlanta Chamber of Commerce, 1301 Commerce Building, tlanta 7. Other Business/Industrial Groups 8. Housing Tenant Groups 9. Community Action Groups  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 1, Document 50 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 1 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/07fc3d85c9b228a9d26ea4a88e52a9bf.pdf 85e1fa0b344e684d6b5974baf6abc78e Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. I 1> -- March 27, 1969 PROGRAM SUMMARIES AND STATUS This is designed to s erve as a working document for the study of HUD programs . Atta ched are five appendi ces: Appendix A - Turnkey Hou sing - Program Steps and ~roc essing Procedur~s Appendix B - Basic Wa ter and Sewer Grants Program Steps and Processing Procedures Appendix C - Open Space - Extracts from HUD Procedure Handbook App end ix D. - Non- Profit Sponsored New Housing under 22l(d) ( 3 ) Appendix E - Status of Selected HUD Programs The first four appendices provide a brief explanation of the programs and a breakdown of the pr ocessing steps and procedures under each pr ogram. Appendix E giv es an indication of the nature and ·Status of those programs currently u~derway in the city(ies). .. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document * aa a meclosul 2 (= March 27, 1969 PROGRAM SUMMARIES AND STATUS This is designed to serve as a working document for the study of HUD programs. Attached are five . Appendix A Appendix B - Appendix C - Appendix D - Appendix E - appendices: Turnkey Housing — Program eens and Processing ‘Procedures Basic Water and Sewer Grants — Program Steps and Processing Procedures Open Space - Extracts from HUD Procedure Handbook Non-Profit Sponsored New oie ne under (221(4)(3) Status of Selected HUD Programs The first four appendices provide a brief explanation of the programs and a breakdown of the processing steps and procedures under each program. Appendix E gives an indication of the nature and status of those programs currently underway in the city(ies).  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 1, Document 51 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 1 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/78381c6b9a915b43bdc16891c1fd04dd.pdf 9799b6906d17547230164e97019d0226 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. I Ma rch 18, · 1969 The Turnkey program was started by HUD on a n experimental -b ·a sis in January of· 1966 . Its basic purpose is co permit better utilizat i on of the means and knowledge of priva t e enterprise in producing public hous~ng . Under the Turnkey method, a dC!ve loper or builder who ovms a site or an option , or can obt ain one, may submit, in r e sponse ta an invit ation from a Local Hou sing Authority (LHA ), a propo s a l to buil d hous ing . . • for low income f amilies. If the developer's proposal is a ccep table to the LHA and HUD, the LHA ·will enter into a Contract of c he LHA agrees to purchase the comple t ed development. This contra ct wi:l Sale und er which be ba~ked up by the financial a ssist an ce corru~itmcnt of t he United States of Americ a , a ct ing through HUD? · to the LHA, and it will enable the dev.::.loper -c o secur e · cormner cial construc tion financing in hi s usual way . At the National lev el, responsibility for this progr am is und e r t:he Assistant Se cr etary f or Renewal and Housing Ass is tance of HUD.· Program res p ons i bility is further delegated to the Deputy As sistan t Secret~ry for Housing Assistanc e , the Head of the Hou~ing Assistance Administrati on. ~~e Turnkey Program is administered by the Direc tor of t he Production Div isio~ . . . There are three program managers ~ ithin this Div i sion who serve as liaison of fi cers between the HUD Re gions a nd Headquarters f or this and other public housing programs administered by HUD. At t he Local level, ther e are general ly only two participants: The Local Housing Authority and the privat != dev el op er . T:-.e LHA 1 s vary in powers and structure as they are establ istc~ ~~d e ~ the authority of s~ a ~2 encblin3 legislation. �2 The Tur,1key n echod en c omp asse s only the construct ion phc::se 0f . a low ren t housing project . It h a s no dire ct bearing on the initial appli c a tion mace by a community f a:::- low rer.t housing or -the management and ope ration of a l ow ren t hou s i ng proje ct. Th e pro c essing steps outl ined below for a .turnk ey p:.coject follow t he approval by HUD of ·a LHA 1 s app~i cation for a low rent hou~ing pro gram: 1 . The LHA makes the initial decision to construct proposed low rent housing by the Turnkey method . 2 . If not alre a dy versed in t he &ppli cation of the Turnkey method , the LHA consults with region a l officials, obtains sufficient inform~ti on on requirements and procedures, a nd decides to proceed by that method . 3. The LHA ma y request a pre liminary lo a n f rom HUD to cover turnkey expens e s; if appr oved by HUD , a loan con tract is negotiated bet~een HUD and t he LHA . 4. Th e LHA i nvites pr op osals from private developers fo r par ticipation in a Turnk ey p r o ject. Th is mu 3 t be don e by public adver tisemen t st a ti~g cype of proje ct desired, number o f u nits, and othe r deta ils o f ·t h e p:::-op osed project . The noti c e als o mus t specify the federal r equirements that must be complied with . 5. ~h e private developer(s) sub~its 3 cop ies of a proposal in response co t he LHA 1 s solicitation. 6 . The LHA send s tw o co pies of all the proposa ls received to th e Re g i ona l Hou sing Assistan ce Office (HAO) . 7. Th e LHA and HAO eval u a t e t h e prop o sa ls and c ome to a mutual a gre ement of the developer to be chosen. This involve s , among other things, sice evaluations made by th e HAO Realty Officer. 8. The LHA notifies the developer of his tentative selection by letter. 9. The LHA contra cts f or tw o independent appraisals of the site. 10. A Fe a si6ility Conference is held in the HAO with the following partici pan ts : t h e LHA r ep res e n ta tive s , the deve1op er, his architect and otte r as soci a t e s, and HAO st af f. · Thi s conference has three p ri~ary ? Urp o ses: ( 1) to ne gotiate the pu rc h ase price o: the land; . �- 3 - (2) to discuss proje ct des i gri and HUD requirements; (3) to s e t d~tcs for : (.:1) submission and review in the 1-IAO of the preliminary d ~wings and ot her d~tes required for the Letter of Intent ; (b) a :-1egot i a ti cn Conference; . (c) exe cu tion of the Letter of Intent ; (d ) ;.;ubmission and review by LE.A and HAO of working drawings and specifications; and te) e xe cut ion of Con t ract of Sale. 11 . Af ter the Fe~sibility Conference has been held and an understanding reached, the developer proc eeds with the preparation of t h e matirial required for the Negoti~ti on Conferenc e . 12 . The devel oper sub~its his preliminary plans which are reviewed by the LHA and HAO. The p l ans are dis cussed with the developer and. his ar chite ct and any n e cessary change s are made • . 13. The prel i minary plans are sub~i tted to two -individual cost estimators err.p loyed f or this purpose by the· LHA. 14 . The appr oved cos t estima tes are evaluated and considered by t he LHA and t he HAO.' 15 . The ~egoti a tion Conference i s held in the HAO with t he developer and his asso c iates , and LHA and HAO staff s part icip a tin g . The p~rp ose of the confir ence is to ne s otiate a price f or the improvements (the price of the land is already set tl ed , step 10). 16 . Fol l owing agreement at che Ne gotiat ion Conference, t he 'LHA prepares a Development Pro gram on Form HUD-5080 and submits an original and fou r copies to the HAO. The Dev e lopment Program is a statement of the developer ' s pr oposal and pri c e as agreed upon and approved at t he Negotiation Confe~ence . 17 . The RAO approves the LHA Development Program and sends an annua l Contribution Cont ract List to the C~ntral Offi ce for .its appr o~a1; . 18 . The Ce ntral Office a~proves the HAO subrnis~ion authorizing RUD e;~e cut ion of an Annual Contributions Contract viith the LHA and approval of :.h e Let t er of Intent between the LHA and the Developer . · 19. Following the 1-L-\O approva l and LHA is suanc e of the Letter of l nt2nt, the dev el oper prepares and submits working drawings a~d specifications to t he LHA. 20. The LHA rev iews and approves the .wo:::-king drawings and subr..its them to t.::e HAO. �- 4 ,·. 21 . The HAO reviews the working d= awing~ , ·discusses them with Lh em , t h e LHA , and developer, a~d , i f n e ce ssary, schedules a meeting a t w~ i ch the LHA, the develo~er and hi s associates will be present. .. 22 . Af ter a pprov2l of t he wo= k ing d=awings and specifications, the LHA s h.:, ll obtaintwo upd2ted cost esr:irnates , review and evalua te t h em in the same manner as the first e~timates , and submit two copies with the results of its eva luation to the HAO for review and approval. 23 . On the basis of · t h ei:..: review and evaluation of the approved, upda ted cost estinates, the L}li\. and EAO agree on a price to be of f ered to the developer for inclu s ion in the Contract of Sale, and negotiate that price with the develop er. 24. Upon agreement as to the price to be included in the Contract of Sale, the LHA and HAO shall confer and prepare the Contract ·of Sale, wh ich is theru executed by the developer, the LHA, and HUD . 25. The LHA selects an architect who ' is to perform inspection ser~ices for the LHA in connection with-the project and executes a contract with him . 26. The LHA notif i e s t he general pub l ic by newsp a per advertisement of the award of the Con tra ct of Sale to . the named developer , including the price he is to receive and a description of the project . The Construction of the Turnkey project begins with sale to the LHA upon completion. - 27. I f required, plans for the relocation ofAoccupying the site are prepared, and relocation assistance payments are made. During construction of the project, the HAO observes and reviews t he a ctivit i e s of the LHA and its archite ct to ensure compliance in administration and in inspection under the pertinent contracts. The HAO also reviews cons truction opera tions and visits the site periodically to insure c9mpliant p e.:- f; ormance. LHA 1 s are encouraged by HUD to use Urban Renewal project land _for a Turnkey s i te. In this case, the Local Public Agency may sell such l and t o a pr -i va t e dev e loper . �,-- - I .. ...., - 5 - lfuere it is economically feasible, the projects should be . so design ed that individua l units or groups of units could be sold to i~dividuals, or to groups under some form of condominium or cooperative ownership . I ~= � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document i TAR A OIT ATA ro VROCASSING PROCEDURES The Turnkey program was started by KUD on an experimental basis in January of 1966. Its basic purpose is to permit better utilization of the means and knowledge of private enterprise in er oductik public housing. Under the Turnkey method, a developer or builder who owns a site or an option, or can obtain one, may submit, in response to an invitation from a Local Housing Authority (LHA), a proposal to build housing ... for low income families. If the developer's proposal is acceptable to the LHA and HUD, the LHA will enter into a Contract of Sale under which the LHA agrees to purchase the completed development. “This contract will be backed up by the financial assistance commitment of the United States oz America, acting through HUD, to the LHA, and it will enable the developer to secure commercial construction financing in his usual way. At the National level, responsibility for this program is under the Assistant Secretary for Renewal and Housing Assistance of HUD. Program responsibility is further delegated to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Housing Assistance, the Head of the Housing Assistance Administration. The urnkey Program is administered by the Director of the Production Division. ‘There are three program managers within this Division. who serve as liaison officers between the HUD Regions and Headquarters for this and other public housing programs adunistered by HUD. At the Local level, there are generally only two participants: The Local Housing koeneeity and the private developer. The LHA's vary in powers and structure:as they are established under the authority of Stace egislation. \ The Tucnkey method encompasses only. the construction phase of a low rent housing project. It has no direct bearing on the initial application mace by.a community for low rent housing or -the management and operation of a low rent housing project. rey The processing steps outlined below for a.turnkey project follow the approval by HUD of a LHA's application for a low rent housing program: a1 decision to construct proposed low rent - If not already versed in the application of the Turnkey method, the LHA consults with regional officiais, obtains sufficient information equirements and procedures, and decides to pEecers by that method. 3. The LHA may request a preliminary loan from HUD to cover turnkey exp 3; if approved by HUD, a loan contract is negotiated between HUD and the LHA. 4. The LHA invites proposals from private developers for participation in a ‘Turnkey project. This must be done by public advertisement stating type of project desired, number of units, and other details of the proposed project. The notice also must specify the federal requirements that must be complied with. "od 5. ‘The private developer(s) submits 3 copies of a proposal in response to the. LHA's solicitation. ‘ ; i 6. The LHA sends two copies of all the proposals received to the Regional Housing Assistance Office (HAO). 7. The LHA and HAO evaluate the proposals and come to a mutual agreement of the developer to be chosen. This involves, among other things, site evaluations made by the HAO Realty Officer. 8. The LHA notifies the developer of his tentative selection by letter. 9. The LHA contracts for two independent appeaisets of the site. 10. A Feasibility Conference is held in the HAO with the following participants: the LHA representatives, the developer, his architect and other associates, and HAO stafiz. This conference has three primary purposes: ony ( ) to negotiate the purchase price of the land; (2) to discuss project design and HUD requirements; (3) to set dates for: (a) submission and review in the HAO of the drawings and other dates reguired f of Intent; (b) a Negotiation Conference; (ce) execution of the Letter of Intent; (d) submission and review by LEA and HAO of working drawings and specifications; and te) execution of Contract of Sale. ii. After the Feasibility Conference has been held and an understanding reached, the developer proceeds with the preparation of the material required for the Negotiation Conference. 12. The developer submits his preliminary plans which are reviewed by the LHA and HAO. The plans are discussed with the developer and. his architect and any necessary changes are made.. 13. The preliminary plans are submitted to two -individual cost estimators employed for this purpose by the LHA. ro > . r} 5 [ci] fo * " Hi 2 6 a oO °o Hn rt o o rt ty i rt @ uw e re evaluated and considered by the otiation Conference is held in the HAO with the developer ciates, and LHA and HAO staffs participating. The purpose rence is to negotiate a price for the improvements (the land is already settled, step 10). uw fo w Fh Ww @ @. o i H 0 © © rho ct rr © 16. Following agreement at the Negotiation Conference, the LHA prepares a Development Program on Form HUD-5080 and submits an original and four copies to the HAO.’ The Development Program is a statement of the developer's proposal and price as agreed upon and approved at the Negotiation Conference. 17. The HAO approves the LHA Development Program and sends an annual Contribution Contract List to the Céntral Office for its approval..- The Central Offi ce approves the HAO submission authorizing HUD n Annual Contributions Contract with the LHA and approval of che Letter of Intent between the LHA and the Developer. 19. Following the HAO approval and LHA issuance of the Letter of Intent, the developer prepares and submits working drawings and specifications to the LHA. 20. The LHA reviews and approves the working drawings and submits them co . ey a i ares HAO = HAO reviews and develop e LHA, aa ly a5 ual wo ich of th 47 sda ha After epee LHA shall obtain: two them in the same manner with the results of backs 23 \ Base oe, lat sas 2 -@2 rx ed nego Upon agreement as to ale, the LHA and HAO s which is then: execu 25. 1 aia the workin and, the developer the LHA oe inclusion in the Contract of Sale, ted by the developer, the LHA, I> ‘discusses them schedules a ciates will be g dvawin me if and ng drawings and specifications, the ce review and eva ee and submit two copies HAO for review and approval. aLuate eview and evaluation of d HAO agree on the approved, price to be x a an the developer. the price to be included in the Contract hall confer and prepare the Contract ‘of and HUD. LHA selects an architect who is to perform inspection services for the LHA in connection with-the project and executes a contract with him. The LHA award of price he otifies the he Contr n th at Cc acc upon completion. is to receive and general public by newspaper advertisement of of Sale to the named déveloper, including description of the project. The Construction of the Turnkey project begins with sale to the . *\oiwe hook residents If required, plans for the relocation of \occupy ing the site are repared, and relocation assistance payments are made. P P During construction of the project, the HAO observes and reviews the activities of the LHA and its architect to ensure compliance in administration and in inspection under the pertinent contracts. The HAO also reviews construction operations and visits the site periodically to insure compliant performance. LHA's are encouraged a Turnkey site. In this case, to a private developer. by HUD to use Urban Renewal project land for the Local Public Agency may sell such land Where it is economically feasible, the projects should be so designed that individual units or individuals, or to groups under some ownership. groups of units could be sold to form of condominium or cooperative  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 1, Document 52 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 1 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/26bbc0d9ece80683d316ea7fe89c83fa.pdf b3d67104ba1daf4fcde77ef961e513a6 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. I ..; Mar ch 18, 1969 BASIC Hi\TER .AND SEWER GRANTS P?.DGR.(:.,~ S'i'~PS Ai'-;D P~OCiSSING PROCSi)U?.ES 11 The purpose of t he Water and Sewer Facilities Grant pr ogram is to ass ist local public bodies and agencies in constructing adequa te ' b a sic water and sew2r fa cil ities needed .to promote the efficient and orderly growth and development of our communities. 11 11 To be eligible f or gra:it assistance under this program, the appi icant must be a local public body or agency est~blished by the action of one or more States or entities thereof, with legal authority to p l an, f inance, construct, mai-ntain and operate the proposed project. 11 11 Grant assistance is available to help finance spec ific projects for basic water and sewer fa cilities. Water facilitie~ include works to store, supply, trea t, purify, or distribute water of sufficient quality and quantity for domesti c, c ommercial md industrial use. Sewer faci lit ies i nclude sanitary sewer -s yster.is for the collection, transmission, and discharge of liquid wastes; and storm sewer systems for the ·collection, transmission, and discharge of storm water caus ed by ra infa ll or ground water runoff. 11 11 The amount of the grant-in-aid may not exceed 50 percent of the cost of ·constructing the basic parts of the water or sewer facility pr oJect and of acquiring the l and on which it is located , including site improvements necessary to make the land usable as a site for the project. 11 11 No grant may be made to assist in constructing a sewer project unless the Secretary of Health, Edu~ation, and Welfare certifies thijt the waste carried by the facilJty . is adequatelj treated before being discharged �- 2 - .' into any public wa terway. The request for certif ication, t6gith er with ,. releva n t project data , shall be . sent to the DHEW Regiona l office by the Regional Director upon receipt of an application for assistance in constructing a sewer project. 11 Program Steps: 1. A Loca l Public Agency (LPAY makes initial inquiry to HUD Rigion~l .o ff ice. HUD. office mails LPA printed ma terial and four copies of SF-101~ Pr e liminary Inqu iry Conc erning Federal Assistance for Water Proje cts, Sewer Pr oj ects and Waste Treatment Plants. 2. LPA completes and submits SF-101 to HUD Regional Office. 3. HUD acknowledges receipt of SF-101 by letter to LPA. 4. HUD reviews SF-101 for completen_ess , requests further information if ne c e ssary, and determines if project is applicable to the HUD grant program . (This may involve referring SF-101 to EDA, FHA, · or DHEW for commen t and considerati on. HUD also receives SF-101 forms from t hese other agencies for action.) 5. After referral and determina tion, HUD notifies LPA of decision ·to process the inquiry under the HUD program . 6. Following a det ermination by the Reg ional Director and his staff t ha t the pr e liminary inquiry will lead to an acce ptable application, t he Regional Director invites the prospe ctive applicant to attend a pre -applicati on conf erenc.e. The conference discussion concluded with an understanding as to whether an application may be submitted for consid erati on. In favorable cases, the applicant is furnished with the applic ation forms and asked to sub~it. 7. Followin g the meetin g, a lett er to the applicant is s ent by t he Regi onal Director confirming the understandings reached during the c onference, with particular reference to any actions agreed upon. 8. The LPA submits a fo r mal application for a Basic Water and Sewer Grant. Af t er receipt of th e appli c a tion, the HUD Regi onal Office send s the app lic ant a letter acknowledging the application. 9. HUD begins. its review of the applicat ion and sends a request for certification to the HEW Regi onal Office. This reque s t is accom:;:ianied by certain mater ia ls, including copies of lette r s of · comment, clearance or approval fr om local, state, and inter- state agencies having authority over design and construction of the project. At this same time, HUD may send notices of the application to other Federal Agencies as appropriate . �I_ .. - 3 - 10 . Preliminary review of the application is made by the s t a:"f of t he Re giona l Offi c e, usua lly in the fo llowing order - Planning Requirements, Engineering , Financ e , Legal and Program Officer. .. 11 . Up on satisfactory c omple t ion of the preliminary r eview , a project summary is prepared f or signatur e by the Regional Administrator and sent to the Community Facilities Divis ion , HUD , Washington, D. C., to request a fund reservation fo r the pr ojecit. 12. After a fund reservation is made , the Corranunity Facilities Divis i on arranies for a press release and release date, notification of interested members of Congress, and notifies the regional of_f ice of the reservation by teletype. · 13. Following receipt of the teletype advising of the fund res ervation and a t the relea se time specified, t he iegional _Director advises the applicant of such r es ervation of funds. 14. Upon approval of the project and grant, 'the project file is forwarded to the Lega l Division of the Regional Office for preparati6n of the Grant Agreement. . .. o=-'l)~e. ~...- '::,,~~ . 15. The Grant Agreement is forwarded to the applicantAand return to the Reg ional Office. Following the execution of the Grant Agreement, the LPA lets the c ontra ct f or t he project through competitive bidding . The LPA must mee t c erta in other requirement s including submission of material to the HUD Regional Offi c e during the pre-construction and construction phas~s of the project. ( Procedures during these phases are contained in section 20-1-1 of the Handbook s taff. ) this section has n ot . been furnished to the Academy � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document os -U ao é d. t - x U- s March 16, 1969 yD SAP POE TTA DORA ES TIOe PROCESSING PROCEDURES "The purpose of the Water and Sewer Facilities Grant program is to assist local public bodies and agencies in constructing adequate \ ; basic water and sewer facilities needed to promote the efficient and orderly growth and development of our communities." "To be eitetiie for grant assistance under this program, the applicant must be a local public body or agency established by the action | of one or more States or entities thereof, with legal authority to plan, finance, construct, maintain and operate the proposed project." "Grant assistance is available to help finance specific projects for basic water and sewer facilities. Water facilities include works to store, supply, treat, purify, or distribute water of sufficient quality and quantity for donantle: commercial md industrial use. Sewer facilities include sanitary sewer systems for the collection, transmission, and discharge of liquid waetar: and storm sewer systems for the ‘collection, transmission, and discharge of storm water caused by rainfall or ground water runoff." The. dmount of the grant-in-aid may not exceed 50 percent of the cost of ‘constructing the basic parts of the water or sewer facility project and of acquiring the land on which it is located, including site improvements necessary to make the land usable as a site for the project." "No grant may be made to assist in éénsteuctinx a sewer project unless the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare certifies that the waste carried by the facility is adequately treated before being discharged  into any public waterway. The request for certification, together with * vant @ “ Gl "J roject data, shall be sent to the DHEW Regional office by the Regional Director upon receipt of an application for assistance in constructing a sewer project.!! Program Steps: -1. A Local Public Agency (LPAY makes initial inquiry to HUD Regional ° Office. HUD office mails LPA printed material and “four copies of SF-101, Preliminary Inquiry Concerning Federal Assistance for Water Projects, Sewer Projects and Waste Treatment Plants. ; 2. LPA completes and submits SF-i01 to HUD Regional Office. 3. HUD acknowledges receipt of SF-101 by letter to LPA. 4. HUD reviews SF-101 for completeness, requests further information if necessary, and determines if project is applicable to the HUD grant program. (This may involve referring SF-101 to EDA, FHA, or DHEW for comment and consideration. HUD also receives SF-101 forms from these other agencies for action.) 5. After referral and determination, HUD notifies LPA of decision to process the inquiry under the HUD program. ~~: 6. Following a determination by the Regional Director and his staff that the preliminary inquiry will -lead to an acceptable application, the Regional Director invites the prospective applicant to attend a pre-application conference. The conference discussion concluded with an understanding as to whether an application may be submitted for consideration. In favorable cases, the applicant is furnished with the application forms and asked to submit. 7. Following the meeting, a letter to the applicant is sent by the Regional Director confirming the understandings reached during the conference, with particular reference to any actions agreed upon. 8. The LPA submits a formal application for a Basic Water and Sewer Grant. After receipt of the application, the HUD Regional Office sends the applicant a letter acknowledging the application. 9. HUD begins. its review of the application and sends a request for certification to the HEW Regional Office. This request is accompanied by certain materials, including copies of letters of comment, clearance or approval from local, state, and inter-state agencies having authority over design and construction of the project. At this same time, HUD may send notices of the application to other Federal Agencies as appropriate.  10. reliminary review of the application is made by the the Regional Office, usually in the following order — Pla Requirements, Engineering, Finance, Legal and Program Of 1i. Upon satisfactory completion of the preliminary review, a project summary is prepared for signature by the Regional Administrator and sent to the Community Facilities Division, HUD, Washington, D. C., to request a fund reservation for the project. 12. After a fund reservation is made, the Community Facilities - Division arranges for a press release and release date, notification of interested members of Congress, and notifies the regional office of the reservation by teletype. 13. Following receipt of the teletype advising of the fund reservation and at the release time specified, the Regional Director advises the applicant of such reservation of funds. 14. Upon approval of the project and grant, the project file is forwarded to the Legal Division of the Regional Office for preparation of the Grant Agreement. eee | for SP iS. The Grant Agreement is forwarded to the applicanty and return to the Regional Office. : Following the execution of the Grant Agreement , the LPA lets the contract for the project through competitive bidding. The LPA must meet certain other requirements including submission of material to the HUD Regional Office during the pre-construction and construction phases of the project. (Procedures during these phases are contained in section 20-1-1 of the Handbook — this section has not been furnished to the Academy staff.)  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 1, Document 53 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 1 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/6662b102eeeacb7944bdc430650ba3c6.pdf 17f016d13796dfa8f523a8d6887fe8d3 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. r. 0 I I ! .. .il 'l'he Open Spa ce LD...1d Pr0c~1·2.r:·l assis~.::s local r;ove1·r...:-::c:-,ts ~nC:. Stc:.-'ce:s in purchacinG nnd clevclopine l and in u:c'oan c.re;:;.::; for :p;:;.:c~ , recy22..-~::.0:.--a, scenic, historic, and co.:1.se::-vo.t ion pu1·posc s. T:'1e o':)jective::~ ot ·c:-.e progr2..n r..re to prcvcn,c the spread of- ur02.n bliGht, deterio:i:atio:1, a::c! · sprawl; to encoui-.,:.gc n:ore econo:nic a:-.ci desirable ui':n.n develop:r.e:r.t; c..nd to meet the open sp3.ce needs of people in the city. J .; ' . \ .. ..: Open Space e;rn.nt.s c2.n cover up to 50 :percent of the cost of r.cqui:tin.r; lc.r.d. Gr2.nts r,~a.y be r.,ad.e only to public bodies; :pri vat.::: ·or.:~c.nizn:~ions are not elieible. 'l'hc r.12.tchinG f\mds furnished by tile loco.J. ;;ovcr~7,cnt m8.y co:..e f1·om any non-Federal couree, inclt:.ci.:i.r.3 l)ri vatc :philanthror,y . EO\·Tever, donations of land co.nnot co"C.Y,t to·.-;a:';l ·c:-,e locc.l she.re. A p:coj ect must ·oe based on an open space i;ila.'1 for t:'1.:: CO;";l!;m.,ity und must . be in confo::r,:ance with s.re2.wic.e co::-,pr2:"2n:::ivc: ilo.nnin. ; :~or the entire mctro1)olitnn urea. The lD.nd rou:;t be locate:c. in an urbo.n area. However, there is no :minirr,",.1.m :population li;-;;ita~ic::.. • J l 'i'he Dc:pe.rvnent :plr..ces high :priority on lar.d ~cquisition ,:ne:-. :.;; i::wolves U.'1.devclo:p(!d 18.nd, but li;;-iitecl gra:yc-in-o.id assistc.r.ce t0~,2.~ the d.::vcio:pment of pa:/ks and other open space areas is also available. ~n gcner~l, all develop~ent activities i~ ·central cities anu lori_income neighborhoods can be assisted with a i'ull 50 percent gra::it. ' . '] 'l j ( 0 1 The Dcparc~ent places hiGh priori"Cy on the develop~ent of land for open s pace use when it involves clcvelopecl land, and there is no red~ction on the 50 perc~nt grant level of assistance for such l)urposcs. Land for o:pen· sp2.ce mc:.y be ei tncr vacant e.nd. \.mdevclo:p8d or, whc:."c no vacant land i s available, assistance may be obtained. :~or pm-chating already developed land, for de~olishing t~e existing st:ructures on it, and for developing it· for park or recrec:.tio~al uses. Demolition expenses are an eligible project cost when develo:p~d land is a cquired. In order f or a coi':U'ilunity to obt ain an Open S:pac2 grant, it wust file e.n · appli cation wit h hl.JD . The n:pplica,don. should be b as e d 0:1 loc~l o,cn sp~ce pluns and priorities and official ncti on by the r2s;ion::.ible loc2.l govermcent body to authorize t he :r:irojcct. Al):pli c c).tions cannot retroactively cover land already a cqu{rcd. Applicatio~s m.2.y include a m.~--nb~t_.Q""'_g;_i~e..§_~praj_~.c.ts. ?he Dc:p""rt~ent e:::couraGeS co:rJ:r.unit:res··to- include the acquisition and developr:i.cnt prog:-~:::i :for ~ whole year in a single application. Such action reduces ever-ybocy's paperwork. 0 i 1-lUD-Wa:;~ . , D. C, . ( I j . ,.s $ . , ,,... i.• '-' · . • · .,'. -!.,<,.>,1i. •.• ,? _l'! .' ~- . ' ·" '.; ·' '-~··" ... ·' .,. ..: i: '· �As soon a s a n applic a tion i s fil ed , trw. D2pc:.r t~e :i.t will o.c~'..:.o'.-:lcdg.:: it a nd i s st:e a "let te r of co:1:::; c nt " u r.d.:::r wh ich :i:~ is :;,0:::;si".:>le ~or a co::;;;;uni ty to g o a hc3.d and acc;:c.i r e the open s:!_)O.cc lar.d a t its own risl~ 1 eve n without a:r.,})rovo.l o:r a c;rant 2..:r;:plication. ~'1C "l.:::".:.tc:r • ' • l y a:pprova 1 1 •ou t· r:-~ re 1 y proviccs •l . , T ""t • -:, o:~ co:1sc n..,.,_ II cocs no~• 1:r.-1p. -;:,:;av ~vl.l r.n y :::eir,iburse the a pplicant for e::...-:r.,0ns e s i ncurrC!d after the l c tte::r c:.~ co::.s c:1t is ,a uthorized, if t h e project is approved. A:pplicants w:-,o find it necessary or desirable to eo ahead on their own, do so er..tircly at their own risk. ..<. •. J .- , ...~ ! .·i . . ~ .. ,, -~ . . ::: ·:_.:__ ::·/ ~ .··i .: ~ 'J j-~ 'I .\.fter an a1)plicatio11 }-las bee n f'ile d with o~e of t1 e D2~"'~::.2~.-:. 1 s _ Rc.-:;io:1al Offices, HUD will review the application ar..d ::-:akc a c.ecisio~ 0:1 wne ther it can be fur.ded 1 in te:r.:r.s of :priorities a,,d cor:.,cting applications. A funding ar..alysis process is used to eval~ate syste:natically all applications received. Projects a?proved for fundinr; then undergo detailed . reviews fo-.: .c o:-.1pliance with all technical pr.o gram req_uire;:;ients. I:f a p:::-ojec.t cannot be approved_ for funding, HUD will notify the corr.munity as soon as possible. ·1 I .·,4 ·j·, 0 ·iI .I ·.i •I When a e;rant is approved, t·:--ie D.2:part::nent I s Regioc1al Office pro:.,::_">tly advises tne co;:-. nunity, after wnic:"i a for:.,2.l ?ederal co,.'tract is issued. Tne contract s pells out the req_uire::-;,ents with w:1icr1 t:°'e g rant e e must comply in order subs e q_ue ntly to receive the authorized . .:;rant. Us ually the grantee :;:iust spend tne ~oney wi t:iin 12 .:-.onths; except'ions are made for cases i n vol vine; cota"t actions. Z'1 e Fede ral grant will b e :paid a s a r e irJburser:~mt after t :- ~ l and is actua lly purcha sed or the J?roposed de velop;-r;ent completed. 7nerefore , applica ;its must b e pre:pare d to fi nance acquisition or c. e velo?me;:it entirely on their own prior to re c e ivin~ reir.iburser::ent for tne Fe dera l share. T..-ie amount of tne O:p0 n Space grant will be basec. on two p r ofe ss ional l a nd ap}_)r .:.is a ls. T'ne cost of appraisals will be eligible i terns in grant cor11putation . . Land acquisition and deve lopment must meet Federal stanc~rds cove ri ng wage rat e s, non-discrimi nation, :price negotiatior.s, a~d so f orth . Mo s t of these r equireme nts a r e simlar to those. of otner Fede r ally assiste d programs. HUD h a s speciai r eloc a tion r eg_uir e ~e nts to assure tha t a nyone di s placed by a n Or,.3n Spac e pr oject ha s available g ood alternative ~ousins . Certain r e loc at ion grant pay;ncnts are mace to the displ acces. Tne se payments are e ligible for 100 :pe rce nt r e imb urs e ~ent by t he Fed era l Gove r nment in a dd iti o:1 to the a pp r oved grant. Local c or..rnunit ie s rr.ay b uy t he enti re t i t l e _to land (fee si~? le ) o~ t hey r:.ay a.cq_uire s o:-::e l iriui t e d intc r e s:, i n an oi:,~n. 2.1)3.Ce p:'oject site . Easements and life · es t ates ~ e eli r; i o l e. T.-:e D~;.:tl:".t::::::r:t e :ic oura.~es rr,ulti-ole l a nd uses, i ncludi:vr school-0ark co!:'. 0lcxcs . ii ~· �I I nir- ~·icn.;s developi;;ents > po.r1cs .:..n flood plain pro'!:.cctio;:i zo:'les , ?n.r:cs :i.n hiGh r.oisc areas near 2.ir:ports J and so forth. I i Ass i stance is not available for t:ic purchase of alrc:ac1y c1evclope:d · o::;>en space areas J such as g·olf courses . ., •j 1 fuvelop.:-.ent provided for in 3.n o:pc:n space project no:rrzlly is li;;,i tc.:1 to ~inor construction; l2..nd s c a:.9in~J riluyc;rou~d eq_ui?::-,e:::-.t, utilities , erad inGJ and si~ilar activities. Major buildinss , s,ri,7.;..i ng pools, Golf c ou:tsc s, a--:11)hi thcD. ters and other "r;:aj or c o:-:s tr·..:ction" are not eligible. Dc::velo::;i:::-,ent assistance is available o::D.y for lo.nos acquired under the :pro 0 ram. Other assistanc e is available for lands already in J,Uolic ownership through the HUD lirban 3-za·,.r~i:.icatio;:i and L~prove~ent Procram . ij .j i • i j ,! .l .:I' i ·1 I ·· i .} i --~ ' ·-1 1 .i G ~ -i D~partmental funding :priorities stress " putting o:pen s~ce -,o 10y wne re the ) >20:ple are. 11 . , It aJ.so stresses meeting ur3:e:1t needs, espe cially those of low-income neighborh oods and cor.i..1unit ies. Tne De:partment aiso encourages proj e cts that will have a de:.7.onstrable ir.-,pact on new urban 13rowth. L~se scale l)rojects far from U:C(?G.n centers have, in general , little likelihood of being funded . ·l., ., ..., . l ·i Tne O;,en Sp ace Land P-rograo has alrea0y helped hundreds of . co;:u";luni ties work toward r.:eeting J>3.rk, recre2..tion and · c onserva.Jci o::1 ne ~ds. The progr am can have sriecial· value in helping cities ~ect the needs of :people in inner city and low-inco;,1e neighborhoods, often related to s?ecia l su,.-m:er p rogra:ns to ease tensions. 1-~any co;r.;-~unit ies have used open spsce dcvelop~ent activities as a source of local e~ploy;nent and training for neighborhood youth and the hard-core unemployed. Tne Departruent encourages such progra~£. •l --1 1 I 'I J ·j -1 'l i ·1 J ~ Tne Dzpa.rtment also encourages conur,unities to invlove loc~l n~i zhborhood residents in all phase s of the pla nninz process -locatinz the site, designing the facilities; constructio::1, operation a::1d maintenance . Citizen :particiJ?3.tion can as.s ure that p r ojects will r.,ee t neighborhood nee ds and b e a source of pr ide 't o the com...unity. -j .'1 . i 1 i! o. 1 l 1 ·; Land acquired with }iUD assis"cance ::mst re;;;ain as op--:;:-i. s:.;iace :..: pc:c:,e"cui ty. StronG :protections are given by the law on o:pen s:.i2.co2: .?:·ojcc'cs to discourage intrusions by incorr,}?2-tiblc larid uses .. 1·:.::C?:n it is in the })Ublic interest to convcr"c · al_l or :part of an o:p,-:m s:pace project to another use, approval by the Secretary of }fu1) ~ust be obtained, and the con1uuni ty ffiUs t su~stitute land of e~ual val~e a..~t quality serving generally the sar.:e :people. 0-utrignt full fee acq_uisition of ol)en space land :i.s r.ot al\-:2.ys feasiole, ;ior is i-;;. always necessa::-y r~o-;: t he P-uolic ::3ody to o·;:,tai:-1 Oi·::-te:rshj_n of land to rr,3.int2..iri it s o-::-,2 n s-:x'lce cha:r2.cte:r. In iii ·1 t' Hli'D•Wo.sh . , D. C. • ,. , , ,k 'If �.,, ,/ .,, .., · ·I---..---------~ . . __) '/ . I i .. ! ·I dcvclo?ir.G urban o..reo.s > cor:;r.iunitics c cm c arry out the or,cr. s1x1ce: clc:::81:t of tr.c co:npr.:::hcnsi vc plo.n oy yr2se;:,vin~ opc:-i. sp::i.cc > whc.:re: n e eded> ".:.hrouc;h ti1e use of nu,11ero\.:s ad:::iinistrati vc ar,d lC:.! 0 8.l tool s. Good zoni:1g practices> subdi visio:1 rc gul atioas that er:courace cl1.:.steri n;3> and re(_luire b ui lders ·of new nci,:},"borhoods to dedicate land fo::p3.rk c,:1d rccrea,tion purposes. .. a11 · can -do much to · assure the ava il6.bilit ~ of open space. . . l I ·j I .,) ( 1 1 l '• .I I: . !i i; I i! ~ j Tne D~p.:1rt~ent gives Sf,8cia l attention to proj ects designed to neet er.-,ere;ency · needs and to ser.ve coordinated programs 'lor i:-cprovi r.3 tne urban envirorur:.ent and thereby the lives of :people . An e;;r.a;;,:ple would be s:--...a.11 :park development s in 1fodel Cities or other small parks in built.:·up ·c·ity neiGhbor:noo2fs-:- ·· ··- -· -- . ·1 1 i ~ j i°nner ·<,l .' !: ;. ,. i':. ji f; ,!!: !! Con:.11ur,ities should ma},e \lSe of open s}?ac e standards > ei th e:::- by ad opting sui:rnested national s ta::-ida:-ds or by develo}?ing tneir own . T.ne standards should help define priorities and set goals to assure an equality of diverse or-,an space opport unity for all citizens. .·1J ~ p [i !; ! • ..H ., j; l ·1 .: l .J ·°j Q JI O}X:!n Space planning a nd prograr.~ shouid provice for sites > faci l ities and a ctivities :from the block a:id neighborh ood s cale ) to city-·.-ride areas > ar,d to regional facilities serving several cour."~ies or the entire raetropolitan ·area. .i •J Effective open space proGra~s a l so r e~uire intergovcr~J~eital -coo:-dinatio:-i. between 1)2.rk and recr2ation a.::;enci.e s > s c hool syste:::;:s) ' public util ity co::1.ilissions ) cultural a gencies , water companies) a::id other public age ncies that own or rr.anage land and facili-tie:s :iaving o~n s pac e and recreational values . ,' 'j .l j '.j 1 .. ,: ~tailed program req_uirer.:~nts a:::-e explained ·in the followi:::g . pages. Special cases or situations not covered in this guide should . be brought to the attention of the appropriate Regional Office . .~ ~ l' -j -l ] .. . .. .', ·.l ., . -··1 l ·j ······ j . -.'· , . ... . ··, •···· l ,' l .j .] .l., . 1 . ·.~' •' , .. f } ,,; .,: I I· . .:1 . 1 i I i ... _:l l - I' ,. 0 .. , l '-. !I .J r ., ·.::j I iv ·.:1 • I 't _i .- -143.215.248.55Y~·;··.-~,~ '. . -~7 :.':.: ,/::·.~;_,;j'_)'.·;_. ..:·:·.~:·.:':~ "! HUD-\1'c.,,.h ., D, C, ,·.'":\:7'~~3~:v:~i:,..,:_i-.,. . •_..:~:>.:-•7'.~":-:·..re-'":.'"'"":'c-""".'.,'r-r;""'·~:,"".·:':"".:--~.....,.....-;"":'"--.-......""'.'"'-..,.,._ _ _, . ; . . . ~ - - - - - , - . -f ,:· · .. .. �• -r I ·j I l 1 I ·i ! ·j ,· . 0 I r CEEClCLIS::' FOR APPLIC ATI01'T FOR GRP.X-:r 'I'O ACQDIRE L ALl) FO:R O?EII- S? ACE ?:.r.:2csz3 ' J i Code ::o. r I J i I I I i I I OS 101 l-'6:-~ :S:- 6600, !:Pplicc.tion f or C·r2.nt To Acquire ()-;:ic~- S~ace L~d . Incl ude 3 copies of ?oril R-6600 u Binder Ho.land l copy each in Binde::rs No. 2 and 3. - l,:odi f y :Block F, Conputation of Grant Araount , shown in Attachment B. 11 OS 102. 11 as 1-:ap of urban area s hoving locat:'..op. of l and t o be a cquire d or , i f -pr oposed a cqui sition r el ate s only to land of local significance , rr..ap of l~ality sho~'"i::l.g sit es t o be a cquire d. A standard city or c ounty street or r oad ~ap ~ay be u sed . Include 3 copies of t he map in Binder No.l and l copy each i.n Binder s No. 2 and 3. 0 OS 103 OS 1 04 State~ent de scribing s~ecific open- space u ses _proposed f or the l e.nd c overed r.,y ·che a:9pl i c 2.ti6n . (A phrase such as 11 park and recreationa.1 11 ·is not a cceptable. ) Show proposed use for each i ndivi dual site in t:0.e application, indicating whether i t i s a local or regional use. .Ir any existing struct ure will be retained on l and a cquired , describe use to be made of the structure. Stater::..ent e;...' })laining na"cure , s ou_rce , and a:::ount of non-Federal :funds available for the a c quis i tion of land for open - space use , including the date . that such f\ m.ds will be avail abl e. Expl ain e:ny spe cial types of ~ortgag~ inst3.l.l.:rr.ent-payme4t purchase, or other financie.l a.:::-rangeEe~t involving land incl~ded in the program. If State assistance will be obtained, indicate the date application f or State as s istance -was submitted the present status of the application. If funds w-i-ll be derived f:-.. om bonds, indicate the length of t:ilne required to redeem the bonds. Ii' private or foundation funds are involved, indicate the soUl"ce, amount, and date f'unds wil.l be available. and 4 OSI.:? Gu:.c.e E:r..hibit A j:.· i "O Atta.cm.1e:,:rt ., i. I OSI.? Guicie C=..a-oter. 3 ~ i· r · l OSI.? C--:J.id.c c::..a:.pter l I . ! ' I t r: I I t.· i t. ~ ~ . OSI.? G-.iic..e Chapter l Lette:r Ko. OS-5 Page 9 ~· l t. ' ,.; '• ,. .!. l i f. . !: i_ ,. i I . �- ---.- -- - 1 'l i ·J 'l - J.2 - I i ·1 ·i I • I II Coc.e l{o. Item To Be S'J.b::itted · I I Refer ~o ! I I j .. i ·i Ple.nnins D2.ta . -j l OS lll St2.te~ent indicating that . corr.prehen:;;ive plc.nning for ~:::oan e.::-ea is 1,;..;1derw-;;.y, describinz scope of pianning, ! identifyir1g agency or inst~e::11:~ali-'cy carrying I,"'.:.he planning, and. indicatinz nature and e)-.-tent J l J loc::u participation and represen-'cation in the plunning . i ,, 1 ·l OS 112 i ·i·1 l Le-tte::r- ~Io . OS-5 Pages on 4, 5 of iI .II I I I . I I State~en-'c des cribin3 open- space acquisition o.nd Lette::- fio. develop~ent procram for urba..~ area, includinG (a) Pages 5, stand.n.rds and criteria, ( b) listing of :9ropose<i activities for next 5 to 10 years, (c) cost estimate , p:::iority schedule, and fi.1:ar. ci~s proposals , (d) coo:::dination procedures, e..::id (e) identification of ugeLcy or agencies· responsible for preparing pro.gr~~ • . A copy of tne open- space acqui sition Md developwent progran should be submitted_ as an exhibit . OS-5 /' 0 I ,; I If an intergovernnental agree~e~t is being or will be used. as the coordinating we c:J.a.:iism fo:::- the open- space acquisition and develo?~ent progra!:1, include a copy of the executed or proposed ayeement. If e.n agree~ent previously submi~ted to ~-'k'A is still j cu::-rent, reference r:1ay be maci.e to ti:le previous subnission whi ch includes the agreement. 1 j l ..J J j 1 ··1 , OS ·i OS ll4 1 113· 1 ,i . State::::1ent indicating whe::i applicatio:::i was ·revi_ewed by other agencies , identifying the age::icies, and s1.:r2arizing their coT.w..1ents • ! 1· I I Letter N.o . OS-5 Page 7 'j . j '.j .1 ·-1 Statement describing present and proposed activities . Lette::::- Iro. OS-5 . of local governing bodies to preserve open-space Page 6 le.nd in urban area and citing appropriate portions OSLP Guid.e of a:n:y to.x provisions or zoning, subdivision, s.nd Chapter l other regulations. 1 'l Le.nd ic ouisitirn.1 Date. ii i OS 121 1 .l .I .i .j 'i I i . , Plat of each site to be acquired or detailed map of i e a ch taking area covered by t he application. Plat II ~~oU::.d clearly identify all structures and i.:::.prov'en.lents. on the l ru:d being acc;._uired, and indicate a::i..y to be r etained in a.ccor~~ce-with proposed site I .i I 0 plau. j 1 1 i l _ _ _ _ __,,._..,....,-----i143.215.248.55 13:13, 29 December 2017 (EST)77"7143.215.248.55:'""\"",.:....,,.....-~ ... , ~-·" /·:r, •,, ,, , .-• . "-·Pi I W ll., •, ,• ·"· .,-- , ' " '• 1r • ' • • \ 7. 1 ' " -· ~ - ' ,.,.,......, , _,....,~- ,.,._.......,.._,_ _ _ _ _ __ �I I ! .! ! ! _, A3 - i 1 I l l i . i u . / ~ I 1 I Code Ko . I ., ,j I tem To Be Sc::o::::i:..t tcd F~c:fer To I ' II I I I I J -1 . l I I i ,.,,. pc.~ ial t a~inss ar.::: involv<::d. ) cho•,r vhich areas t otal }?D.::"Cc:l -w-ill rems.in iu fo::::...cr o,r.1er I s ( co:.i .) Il)Os s e s s ion . I :t' t akir.;3 nrc c..s :::.re .i nvol V8d and 1 1'.:t:al ' c.e scr i :ptions e.re l e..-::~ · ":.:.,) ces cribe taki ng a rea i n tens of nuturnl physicc.l pouncaries sue~ a s roads, r i vers, or similar f e atu:ces. OS 122. .I ~ ·l J ;;. I II -..l ~. I I . ·1 i I f developed laud is t o be acquired, ( a ) detailed -. plat or photo2r~ph of cac~ s ite to be a cquired, in sufficient detail to provide a bas is for det erni n in3 tl:at t he land is 11 dcv elo}_)e d 11 (i.e., ~ore t han 10 p ercent of t he area includes bu i ldings or ot h er stn:cture s) and t hat i "c i s located in a buil t-up po:::-tio~ of the urbw1 are~; and (b) if any st c.ndar d s tructure will b e ac~uired a.~d de~olishe d, s t at ement justif yinE i t s a cquis iti on and demoli~ion. ? Letter No~ OS-5 Pages 3; 15 -i ! I . I ~ i . I ·\ l los 122 l state~ent indi cating the sr.ount , basis , and source jof cost of real estat e services. Lette r Ne. CS- 5 · 1 Pages 8, 12 ,.r I f t. OS 1 23 OS 124 i OS 125 J l . j Statement indicating the w.1ount , basis , a.~ d source of estinat e of a cquisition cost of each parc el or group of parc el s covered by the application. Letter lfo . OS -5 Page 12 Land Acquis i t ion Policy State~ent Letter i:fo . OS - 5 Page s 13- 15 OS 126. .l .i-! - 1 If developed l and is to be a cquired, state~ent indicating e.::n.ount, basis, and source of estimated cost of demolit ion and re:noval of s"Gructures on t he la.~d. If applicable 7 include (a) description of p~oposals for relocating structur0soff sit~ and costs i.~volved; and (b) copies of bids request ed or estimates received fro~ demolition contractors. I I Letter No . OS-5 Pase 16 I . .1' -:: ·.a · ·1 I I ·1 ·-: I ",l OS i27 l \ i Copies of any optio1c.s or proposed purchz.s e a grea.Zlts. with respect t o land proposed to be acquired . i j I I Letter Ko. OS-5 If historic s i te will be acQuired, statement Paze 13 describin~ basis for deter..iining that s i te is . of historical significance and proposals for preserving site. t ,.i . I - r~-:..., r ·!  . . ,· . I r· .. ,. ';.'· r ,_. I j �- A4 .:. i .0 ' Item To Ee Submitt2d ! Cod.e:Xo. / ?.e::'er To I Reloc2.tio1;. Data . ·j < -i I (Submit if applic2.tion covers 'l a cquisition of prop,ff:!:,y f :co:r, 1,hich 1 .j site occupants will be dis-placed) ) ,I OS 131 1 , , 2sti;;l~te of nu:-:ber of individuals , f~ilies , and jous~ness c~nc~rns to oe displaced fro~ p roperty ~o oe , acq_uireu. For individuals and far.:ilies, incluue breakdown by race. Lett e:.~ lfo . 0S - 5 Page 10 . s·t.ate:nent indicating t hs.t adeq_uat e relocation housing is or will be available, includine basis for deter.nining adequacy of relocation housing. Letter Ho. CS - 5 !:l "r l ·os 132 J ,_j i l'· I i Page 10 .- ' -i i· .1 ·1 OS ·133 -~ ·] J I ·! I .,I . i ' ·i I ~ Statement outlining .relocation services to be Letter No . OS-5 provided, identif ying the asency or orsanization Pag~ll., 12 to be re sponsible, o.nd describins the q_ualification~ ·of the perso:mel and/or agency to perfo::-:n the 1 serviceG. Ii' applicable, incluc e cop i e s of con"uracts or oi:.ner agreements with local renewal agency, city relocation staff, or other agency. 'l l OS I 134· ·l Est i.::ate of total -ar.J.ount of relocation payn:ents 'to ce made , in tabular f orm as sho.m in OS 135 1 ·l 'l ·i·, l -1 ·1 I I I II 1 i ·,· 1 'I ' 'lI ! .·.,, .. •,·>' : ~-~·· ;:.-·-' •,:,: · '..!--:--,.". ::, : ....., ,·.;-_ _ ·._: ~-:~~-~~--~-_;:)~_:_/t,:_?=". ~-- :_·.. 'I I Letter No. OS-5 t he B!I!ou.r:.t , basis , and· source relocation services , excluding PageS ll, 12 I r elocatioi:. :payr;ient s, which will be i n cluded in I computing t he amount of the grant. Ir ·a per capita figu~e is used, indicate h ow per capita estimate va.s derived. bdicating ! Statement of es~iLated cost of i . I I j ·.:· . ·. 'O ,J I Letter No . OS-5 Pages 10, 11 Att achment B. i.j Attac~en"'i:. ,. !. I l I I I l 0 l 'i !- f-r ,r.. �I .! i l l. ·I I O· - A5 - .. _I tem •ro Ee Sub;:iitted Cod.e Ko. I i, ~efe:r ;:ro .II I • I I Development D~t a (Sub~it if a??l i cat i on covers development of l and) OS 141, e-. seq_. [Se~ Letter No . OS-6] . . . ' : .,, ~ Let"ce:: ~fo . OS -5 Po.ge 17 . I Le gtl De.t u OS 151 Re solution of applicant authoriz i ng filing of applic ation. At tach:r.~:::i.t C os ·152 Opin~on of couns el a.~d cutheJ t ic ated copies of all l aws and chart ers r e f e~red t o in the op in i on not avail able i n printed cowpilation. Attachment D OS 153 I f develope d l c.nd i s to be a c~uired and the applicant is n ot the gov~r~i ng body of t he l ocality, r es olut ion of l ocal govern inG body that u;:ideveloped or pr edo~ine.r.tly undeveloped l cr.d i s not avail able i.~ the locality for the open - spa ce u se s proposed f or the land t o be a cquired. Attacm:.ent C l '\ ll 0 .\ 1 ··1 l ·j -1 ,l . ..:tI "J ·I .,' ·i I .·! ·,j 1 ! . ·1 i J lI .\ l .. , .j ( '; ' l• i! 0 I I ! I .\ � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document art te eth ieee as cael cimil irietlho O : BXORACTS FROM HUD PROCEDURE HANDBOOK | é » 62:0 | SUMMARY The Open Space Land Program assists local governments and States in purchasing and developing land in urban areas for park, recreation, scenic, historic, and conservation purposes. The odjectives of the program are to prevent the spread of-urvan blight, deterioration, and ‘ Sprawl; to encourage more economic and desirable urban development; . and to meet the open space needs of people in the city. ' Open Space grants cen cover up to 50 percent of the cost oF acquiring land. Grants may be made only to public bodies; private ‘ ‘organizations are not eligible. The matching funds furnished by the local government mey come From any non-Federal source, including private philanthropy. However, donations of land cannot count toward me local share. A project must be based on an open space plan for. : ne community and must. be in conformance with areawide compren rensive Siannihe Tor the entire metropolitan area. The land must de iccatec : in an urban arta. However, there is no mininun population limitation. = The Department places high vriority on land ecquisition when iv & involves undeveloped iand, but limited grant-in-aid assistance toward che development of parks and other open space areas is also evailabie. i un general, all development activities in central cities and low- i incowe neighborhoods can be assisted with a full 50 percent grant. * artment places high priority on the development of land Tor open space use wnen it involves ceveloped land, and there is no ré the 50 percent grant level of assistance for such purposes. Land for open space may be either vacant end undeveloped or, where no vacant land is available, assistance may be obtained for purchasing already developed land, for demolishing the existing i structures on it, and for developing it. for park or recreational uses. Demolition expenses are an eligible project cost when developed land is acquired. In order for a community to optain an Open Space grant, it must Tile an application with Hu The application, should be based on local open space plans and priorities and official action by the responsible local government oe to authorize the project. Avplica- i tions cannot retroactively cover land already acquired. Applications ; may include a number of sites or projects. The Department encourages commuli{ties t6 include the acquisition and development program for a f wnole year in a single application. Such action reduces everybody's i paperwork. 2 MAS : i . ' HUD-Wash., B.S. eee er erry Aa Sar A ab are Bo ea eT ee ee re ei ae  n application is filed, the. Department will acknow- @. e a "letter of consent" under which it is p ae) v and iss oSSiDLE Or a& community to go ahcad and acquire the open space land at its own risk, even without approval of a grant application. Tne "“Letiver oF consent" docs not imply approval, but merely provides that UD i nay reinourse the applicant for exvenses incurred after the Letter of consent is authorized, if the project is approved. Applicants wno Ft be a Ou p et ss QO oO Oo 0 un ry te o ry Ou oO Ler pe KH oo o’ kK oO ct o Cs oO ®, rm @ po Ou o og ct a o b. ba oO x oo ~ ou fe) n oO ; a rs ck ate ry 0 hH S After an application nas been Tiled with one of the Department's Regional Offices, HUD will review the application and make a decision on wnether it can be funded, in terms of priorities and competing ‘ applications. A Yunding analysis process is used to evaluate systematically all applications received. Projects approved ror funding then undergo detailed reviews for compliance with all sechnical program requirements. If a project cannot be approved for funding, HUD will notify the community as soon as possible. am fd ; When @ grant is approved, the Department's Regional Office promptly advises the community, after which a formal Federal contract is issued. The contract spells out the requirements with which the grantee must comply in order subsequently to receive the authorized . grant. Usually the grantee must spend the money within 12 months; exceptions are made for cases involving court actions. © hse a Tne Federal grant will be paid as a reinboursement after the land ; is actually purchased or the proposed development completed. ‘There- : . Tore, applicants must be prepared to finance acquisition or dévelop= ment entirely on their own prior to receiving reimbursement Tor the Federal share. The amount of the Open Space grant will be based on two proressional land appraisals. The cost of appraisals will be : eligible items in grant computation. tad a ada a a BS a et Land acquisition and development must meet Federal standards covering wage rates, non-discrimination, price negotiations, and so forth. Most of these requirements are similar to those, of other — Federally assisted programs. HUD has special relocation requirements to assure that anyon isplaced by an Open Space project has aveilable good alternative ousins. Certain relocation grant payments are mace to the isplacees. Tnese payments are eligible for 100 percent reimourse- ent by the Federal Government in addition to the approved grant. yY . & (0 or they may acquire some limited inte site. Easements and life estates are el encovrazes multivle land uses, i Ging a a A Sc a ton AK arin Bde tw Edi iicin Tie H oO HUD-Wash., D.C. Sl cet a a de ee herp detente Pas upetaterttntgdtn of a oat wane A dines B4 ore Lc ed leak ah nen i Pa pre mea ab here Bs ass a ak ea dd el aaa at O On ho o - = *% a ae - air-rights Cevelopments, parks xr *~ parks in high noise areas nea ce is not available for the purchase of already developed * open space areas, such as gol courses. ch ae] 7 Development provided for in an open space project normally is limited to minor construction, landscaping, playground equivment, utilities, grading, and similar activities. Major buildings, ween Nene i e sWinming pools, golf courses, amphitheaters and other "major consvruce re not eligible. Devel looment assistance is available onl; tion" 4 % for lands acquired under the vrogram. Other assistance is available for lands already in puolic ownership through the HUD Urban seautiri- cation and Improvement Program. ; . ' Land acquired with HUD assistance must remain as open space in perpetuity. trong protections are given by the law on open space projects to discourage intrusions by incompatible land uses. When f : it is in the pudlic interest to convert’ all or part of an open space - ; project to another use, approval by the Secretary of HUD must be obtained, and the community must substitute land of equal value anc ‘quality serving generally the same people. Devartmental pea priorities stress "pucting open space money where the people are.". It also stresses meeting urgent necds, especially those of low-income neighborhoods and communities. ‘Tne 5 Department also encourages projects that will have a demonstrable impact on new urban growth. Lerge scale projects far from uxsoan centers have, in general, little likelihood of being funded. eady helped hundreds of Tie Oren Space Land Program has alreac communities work toward meeting park, recreation and: conservavion necds. The program can have special: value in helping cities mecv the needs of people in inner city sc low-income neighborhoods, orten related to special sunmer programs to ease tensions. Many comounities have used open space development activities as a source al! e or local employment and training for neighborhood youth and the nard-core unemployed. The Department encourages such programs. The Department also encourages communities to invlove Loc al nborhood residents in all phases of the planning process -- ing the site, designing the facilities, construction, operation: maintenance. Citizen participation can assure that projects will meet neighborhood needs and be a source of pride to the community. ae Cutright full fee acquisition of open space land is not always - feasivle, nor is it always necessary for the Public Body to obtain - owmershiv of land to maintain its omen svace charac = bite HUD-Wash., D. C. ce : ’ a a ee 4 — a le et eet Te bs Son wes eee et ine vl te art ae Ee le a aaa hl ee ST ee eae FEL ey a We ee Se ek ee PY Rca toatl 0 ' ci | fie 7h © it developing urban areas, communities can carry out the open space clement of the comprehensive plan by preserving open space, where needed, through the use of numerous administrative and Legal tools. Good zoning practices, subdivision regulacions tire encourage cluster. ing, and require builders of new neishborhooés to dedicate land for park and recreation purposes. -=. all’can do much to assure the avail- ability of open space... ; The Department gives special attention to projects ‘designed vO meet emergency needs and to serve coordinated programs Yor improving ene urban environment and thereby the lives oF people. An example would be small park developments in Model Cities or other small parks in ‘built-up inner city neighborhoods. a Communities should make use of open space standards, either by , adopting suggested national standards or py developing their own. The standards should help define priorities and set goals to assure an equality of diverse open space opportunity Tor all citizens. Open Space planning and programs snould vrovide for sites : = 2 = ? - facilities and activities from the block and neighborhood scale, to city-wide areas, and to regional facilities serving several counties ‘or the entire metropolitan area. Effective open space programs also reawire intergovernmental -coordination between park and recreation agencies, school systems, ay ypudlic aotlty commissions, cultural agencies, water companies, and other public agencies that own or manage land and facilities nan ing open space and recreational values. Detailed program Bequivanente are explained in the f . pages. Special cases or situations not covered in this guide s be Drought to the attention of the appropriate Regional ofr : J ; iv HUD-Wash., D.C. Ce be ee eee nears hb t i + . 1 © re = ee = a ke ete sinned oe ea ee cate anna to « . * . foe A a eet teint es nel = - ee ae ee aes we Bg ln tae eds a he ated tent alice Aa Sat anne tv and nen whine dla la daha eee Sia a nei tag tg BS O A At oe acrnnon w ak %o Letter > — nae oo NO. USTD CEECKLIS? POR APPLICATION FOR GRANT TO ACQUIRE LARD FOR OPEU-SPACE PURPOSES Code No. BoP Fp ner ez +o OS 1OL OS 102 OS 103 104 in Binder No. 1 and 1 copy each in Binders ¥orm H-6600, Application for Grant To Acquire Cpen-Svace Land. Include 3 copies of Form H-6600 No. 2 and 3.. Modify Block F, "Computation of Grent Amount," as shown in Attachment 3. Mep of urban area showing location of land to be acquired or, if-proposed acquisition relates only to lend of locel significance, map or locality showing sites to be acquired. A standard city or county street or road map may be used. Include 3 copies of the mep in Binder No. 1 and 1 copy each in Binders No. 2 and 3. Statement describing specivic open-space uses proposed ae the lend covered by the application. {A phrase such as "park end recreational" is not e ble s Show proposed use for each individual ‘the application, indicating whether iv is a local or regional use. If any existing structure will be retained on lend acquired, describe use to be made of the structure. tatement explaining nature, source, and emount of non-Federal funds aves lable. for the acquisition of land for open-space use, oe the date.that such funds will be available. xplain any special types of mortgage, inst aA ieee ment purchase, or other financial arrangement involving land included in the progrem. If State assistance will be obtained, indicate the date application for State assistance was submitted and the present status of the application. Iffunds will be derived from bonds, indicate the length of time required to redeem the bonds. If private or foundation funds are involved, indicate the source, amomt, and dave | funds will be available. OSLY Guide : Cnapver 3 OSL? Guide Csapter 1 OSLP Guice Chapter i Letter No. 05-5 Page 9 a Samp pre anne, epee ge npr a ie ya ag ee ay ey pe Tastee ote cptneterem pees | Heeatias:| | | lth ee, tela 6 2 tet ee at BE a de SS eat pecdctovec cl dha welt Lak ice nae ee td tm eS Rerer 7 pe wn ae an Se a el te Pt a eT el a ml Se oS 111 OS 112 OS 113: OS 214 OS 121 Plenning Dat Statement indicating that. compre give plenning for pan area is underway, describi nes of planning, entifying agency or instrumente ay rrying on whe planning, and indicating nature ane é extent of Local participation end representation in the planning. Stevement describing open-space acquisition and development program for urben area, including (e) standards and criteria, (b) listing of proposed activities for next 5 to 10 years, ( priority schedule, and financin coordination procedures, and (e z agency or agencies ee: ering progren. A copy of the open-svace acquisition and development program should be pubmittea as. an exhnibii If an intergovernnentsal agreement is being or will be used as the coordinating mechanism for the open-space SH end development program, include a copy oF the executed or proposed agreement. If an agreement previously submitted to EEFA is still =. | See urven nv, reference may be made to the previous submission which includes ‘che agreement. Statement indicating when application was reviewed by other agencies, identifying the agencies, and summarizing their comment Se tavement describing present and proposed activities | Lo cal governing bodies to preserve open-space lend in urban area and citing appropriete portions oF any tax provisions or zoning, subdivision; snd other regulations. ! * a * Lend Acouisition Deve, x a of each site to be acquired or detailed map of ac h taking area Coxe red by Che application. Plat ould clearly identify all structures and improvements. on vn “Land being acquired, and indicate any to be retained in accordance. with proposed site | plan. Letter No. 08-5 Letter No. 05-5 Pages 5, 6 Letter No. 05-5 Letter 2 i » 05-5. Page 6 OSLP Guide Chepter 1 a ) O © asad cline tas wh Tn ee ttn ee ete A tt lt bee Ao heb hihi wt ea dite ' et ed ad d= De wah. aie ) € xr Code No. | | | 0S 121 |i? pertiel takings are involved, show which areas (con.) lo? totel parcel we aes in Orne owner's OS OS 0 122 123 Ley involved and legal possessi i? 1g cescriptions ere lacking, ceser ise taking area in terms of natural physiccl boundaries such as roads, ox similar features. to be acquired, (a) detailed each site to be acquired, in & basis for S "developed" (i.e., neludes buildings located in a 5 and (bd) if any ead end demolished, tion and demolition. developed land is or photosreph or sek detail to + ing that the ore 7 a 10 percent of or other struc cures) built-up portion of the ur standard structure will toes ae ac tatement justifying its acquisi my iStatement indicating the emount, basis, and source or cost of real estave services. Statement indicating the amcunt, basis, and source of estimate of acquisition cost of each parcel or Group of parcels covered by the application. Land Acquisition Policy Statement | Copies of any options or proposed purchase agrearaits vith respect to land proposed to be acquired. = Wok ak iz develope eS land is to be acquired, statenent indicating paar basis, and source of ae cost of demolition and removal of structures on the len If anid oabie include (2) denaniptinn of proposals for relocating structures orf site, and costs involved; and (b) copies of bids requested or estimates received from demolition contractors. if historic site will be acquired, statement describing basis for determining that site is.of historical significance and proposals for preserving site. Letter No. 05-5 Pages 3, 15 Let ter Neo. os-5 Pages G, ie Letter No. 05-5 Page 12 Letter No. 08-5 Pages 13-15 Letter No. 0S-5 Page 16 03-5 a 7 ster No. Page 13 Sp ne em en ee oe a mee eee pene oo ee ete tate fm p RENE eee ea ee ne meen mage Oat owe eapeeeee eae e etek eres ee “peste te ak ek wll hed ee cheat ee teh acest at it dee ed lee ie ee delete ete oe wate sie oS ot Pes en in ale Sas atic Lager a's a ae ee ee eS tke ‘ F i | 0S 131 OS 133 OS 135 = io - mn 2 ee | Code NO«) Item To Be Submitted {Submit if eppliceation covers acquisition of property from which site occupants will be displaced) jhousing is or will be available, including basis timate of number of individuals, families, and business concerns to be displaced from property wo be acquired. For individuals and families, include breakdown by race. Stavencat indicating thet adequate relocation Zor determining adequacy of relocetion housing. Stavement outlining relocation services to be provided to be re of the personnel and/or agency to perform the services. If applicable, include cooites of contracts or otner agreements with local renewal agency, city relocation stati, or other agency. Estimate of total:smount of relocation payments to be made, in tabular form as shown in Attachment Be Stetement indicating the amount, basis, and’ source of estimated cost of relocation services, excluding relocation payments, which will be included in 40 omputing the amount of the grant. If a per capita figure is used, indicate how per capita estimate was derived. . : ' Letter No. oS~5 Page 10. Letter No. 05-5 Page 10 tter No. 08-5 Pagesll, 12 Attachment B W) Letter No. 0 Pages10, 1 “3 fe ster No. OS-5 Pages l1, 12 O ee a qeeeetyen es ope tte ae anye a ar cl a an Se a cram cps Sua hid dl chaning uP TAb eh eaelp a oe i Sater bE ned Ane BAe Etna ete Se Te atta ctet ee al bom antes a ne he eerste he weeny Tiel o Be Submitted Satay aCLCY Lo os OS 151 OS 152 .If developed lend i Development Data ee ee oy _ (Submit if application covers » development of land) mi [See Letter No. 08-6] Legel Dete esolution of applicant authorizing filing of pps ication. ® os = Opinion of counsel ant éuthen all laws and charters referr rred to in the opinion nov svedlable in prin % a % ved compilation.: é to be acquired and the ur applicant is not the governing body of the locality, resolution oF local governing body e that undeveloped or predominantly undeveloped lend is not available in the locality Tor the open-space uses prose for the land to be acquired. : icated copies of Le tver No. OS-5 Page 17 tvachzent C . ~wtachment D oF s B caneny C  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 1, Document 54 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 1 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/d3f37852e5d402572037f37ac857ff4b.pdf bd87aa354d202e1c3872bfcc93b042d0 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. Appendi x 11 D11 I f NON - PROFI T SPOjSORED NEW HOUSING UNDER 221( d )(3) Thi s pr ogram was auth or i zed by s e ction· 221(d)(3) of the Housing Act of 1961 . I t ·was i ntended t o produc e hou s i ng f or those who are too poor t o ren t or buy s t andard h ou s ing but n ot p oor enough to be admitted to publi c h ou s i ng . The n on - pr ofi t sponsor of a 22 l(d)(3) proj e ct obtains FHA app r ov al of the pr oj e c t, inc lud i ng a l and a pprais a l and approval of the build i ng plans . The FHA agree s to i nsure the construction advance at 100 perc ent of value for n on ~profit asso c ia t i on s . The sp onsor ob t ain s a commitment fr om t h e Government a l National Mortgage Asso c ia tion (GNMA ) to pr ovide permanent mort ga ge financing for the cowpleted pr o ject. The sponsor pays a one percent fe e to GNMA f or t h is c ommitment . The sponsor borrows money from -a pr iva t e financial institution t o pay f or the constru cti on of the pr oject. Th e construction loa n is short- t erm and bears interest at the market rate. When constr u ction is completed, GNMA pays off t he cons truct ion loan of t he private lender and issues a mortgage t o the sponsor wi th a term up to forty years and an interest rate of 3 per c ent. The s ponsor makes mortgage paymen ts directly to GNMA . 11 This interest subsidy cuts the costs of mortgage debt service by appr ox imately 40 percent, and permits rent reduction of about 25 per.cent. 11 �I - 2 - . Pt ogr am Requirements : Upp er inc ome l i mi t s f or elig i bi l ity are s e t by HUD a n d ~ e pe nd upon fami l y size and geographi c area . Us ua lly t he upper limit is set at t h -2 med i an in c ome leve l of fami l ie s i n t he a r ea . 221 ( d )( 3 ) projects must be l oca t e d in communities which h ave worka b l e progr ams . Resu l t s : "By July, 196 7, FHA ha d given commitments to proceed with a t ot 1 of 73 , 000 u i t i n 569 pr oj e ts . 11 33 , 300 or 46 per cent of t he units were und er the spons orship of limited-dividend cor porat i ons. Pr oblems : A. La ck of t e chni ca l experien c e and kn ow- h ow on p art of non - pr ofit spons ors . B. Comp lexiti e s and bottl ene ck s in proce ss i ng ap plica tion s by FHA . Pro c e s s ing time to start of construction· e stimated a t 376 working da ys. C. Upper inc ome e li g ibility limit s cl a ime d to be too r estric tiv e . Adm i nistra t i on : Most of the progr am administra ti on i s h and l e d by t h e l ocal FHA Insu r i ng Offi ce. t h i s pr ogram . The Re g ion al Off i ces of HUD p l ay a minima l r ole in At the HUD Na t i onal l e vel, pr ogram res p onsib ility is with t he As sis tant Se cr etary f or Mor t ga ge Credit, Federa l Hou sing Commissioner. Re sp on s ibil i ty is fu r t h er de le gated to t h e Assis t ant Commissioner of ~u lti=amily Hou sing of FHA . �- 3 - The 221 ( d ) ( 3 ) pr~gram i s curren ::ly b e in g phased o.u t and brou ght . under sect ion 236 of t he : ous i ng and Ur ban Dev e lopment Act of 1968. The . program r ema in s basi ca ll y the same with th e prima ry ~ ifference bein g that t he permanen t mor t gage is held by t h e pr iva t ~ lender and mort gage subsidy p~y..1cn t s arc mad e t o t he fi nanci a l i n stitution by the Federal government. Unde r 221(d)(3), the mortgage is held by GNMA and mortgage payments are ma de dir e ctly to Gl\1MA . ·' . � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document Appendix "D" NON-PROFIT SPONSORED NEW HOUSING UNDER 221(d)(3) This program was authorized by section’ 22i(d)(3) of the Housing Act of 1961. It was intended to produce housing for those who are too poor to rent or buy standard housing but not poor enough to be admitted to public housing. The non-profit sponsor of a 221(d)(3) project obtains FHA approval of the project, including a land appraisal and approval of the uilding plans. The FHA oC agrees to insure the construction advance at 100 percent of value for non-profit associations. The sponsor obtains a commitment from the Governmental National Mortgag e Association (GNMA) to provide permanent mortgage financing for 12 com pleted project. The sponsor pays a one percent fee to GNMA for this commitment. The sponsor borrows money. from-a private financial institution to pay for the construction of the project. The construction loan is short-term and bears interest at the market rate. When construction is completed, GNMA pays off the construction loan of the private lender and issues a mortgage to the sponsor with a term up to forty years and an interest rate of 3 percent. The sponsor makes mortgage payments directly to GNMA. "This interest subsidy cuts the costs of mortgage debt service by approximately 40 percent, and permits rent reduction of about 25 percent." Program Requirements: Upper income limits for cligibility are set by HUD and depend upon family size and geographic area. Usually the upper limit is set at the median income level of families in the area. 221¢d)(3) projects must be located in communities which tive workable programs. Results: "By July, 1967, FHA had given commitments to proceed with a total of 73,000 units in 569 projects." 33,300 or 46 percent of the units were under the sponsorship of Limited-dividend corporations. A. Lack of technical experience and know-how on part of non-profit sponsors. B. Complexities and bottlenecks in processing applications by FHA. Processing time to start of construction’ estimated at 376 working days. C. Upper income eligibility limits claimed to be too restrictive. Administration: Most of the program administration is handled by the local FHA Insuring Office. The Regional Offices of HUD play a minimal role in this program. At.the HUD National level, program responsibility is with the Assistant Secretary for Mortgage Credit, Federal Housing Commissioner. Responsibility is further delegated to the Assistant Commissioner of Multifamily Housing of FHA. The 221(4)(3) program is currently being phased out’ and brought under section 236 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968. The program remains basically the same with the primary difference being that the Bpttets atid mortgage is held by the private lender and mortgage subsidy payments are wade to the financial institution by the Federal government. Under 221(d)(3), the mortgage is held by GNMA and mortgage payments are made directly to GNMA.  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 1, Document 55 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 1 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/df3704576b6bacd392ce6b681c83c599.pdf 85bcdb02d97510d4a0079c7b25179e96 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. --·-· -· Appendix E . STATUS OF SELECTED HUD PROGRAi~ S Atlanta, Geor gia . 1. Open Space (702): 13 Projects . Projects range in size from 8 acres to 159 acres. 5 proj e cts are comp leted. Open Space (705): 2 Projects Federal Grants Disburs ements Aeer ovals Approval date 2. 3. OSA - 23 2/67 $784,544 OSA 3/68 167,966 24 Ba sic Wa ter and Sewer Grants: $729,481 . 2 Pro j e cts ws 0014 Tot al Cos t= $2,689,0 00 Construction Started ws 0025 Total Cost= $3,407,600 Construction Complete- 09/20/68 Turnkey Housing: GA - 6 - 19 8 Projects 584 units ·2nd approval delay due to rezoning GA - 6 - 20 202 units under construction Hollywood Road site GA - 6 - 21 22 0 units under construction Gilbert Road 08/27/68 �r - 2 - ,. ... GA - 6 - 23 324 un its letter of i n t ent Wallswood Apartment site. GA - 6 - 28 500 units completion da te e st. on 4/30 /70 4 stages - one 90 percent complete . GA - 6 - 29 17 5 units under construction Prison Creek - Leslie Lane GA - 6 - 30 800 units construction document approval stage East Lake Golf Cour se GA - 6 - 31 160 un i ts .development program approved Annual Contribution Contract Jone sboro Road and Adk inson Road 4. Non - Pr of it Sponsored New Hou sing Under 221(d)(3): P:::-o jec t No. Name and Spons or 10 Proj ects Mort gage Unit:s Stage of Construction* 0 61-55001 Wheat Street Gardens Wheat St . Bapt i s t Chur ch $2,975,000 280 4 061-5 5007 Al len Temp l e Dev. Inc ., Allen Temp l e AME Church $1,419~650 151 4 061 -550 16 Al l en Temple Dev. I nc., Sec. 2 . , Allen Temp l e AME Chur ch · $2,372,000 222 4 061-55024 Al l en Temple Dev. Inc., Sec. 3 . , Allen Temp l e AJ.\ffi Church $2,405,700 208 1 061-55023 Wheat Street Gardens 2, Wheat St. Bap tist Ch. 916,600 8 4. 1 �- 3 ~ t, Proicct No . Name and Sponso.r Hortgage Units Stage of Constru ction* 061-55037 Friendship ' Center Friendship Bapt ist Church $2, 535,000 208 1 061-55052 Flipper Temple Homes Flipper Temple Al'1E Church '$ 1,712,000 156 0 061-55056 Martin Luther King Village Ebenezer Baptist Church $2,975,000 · 193 o· 06 1-55053 Central Me thodist Home s Central Me thodist Church $1,3 70,000 120 0 --J 061-55057 Butler Street YMCA Apts. Butler Street \.'MCA Key of· Construction Status of Pr oj e ct 0 not started 1 - started 2 first units r eady 3 all units ready 4 - final endorsement $2,484,ooo 216 0 .. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document STATUS OF SELECTED HUD PROGRAMS Atlanta, Georgia. 1. Open Space (702): 13 Projects Appendix E Projects range in size from 8 acres to 159 acres. 5 projects are completed. Open Space (705): 2 Projects Approval Federal Grants - date . Approvals Disbursements OSA - 23 2/67 $784,544 $729,481 OSA = 24 3/68 167,966 2. Basic Water and Sewer Grants: 2 Projects WS - 0014 Total Cost = $2,689,000 WS - 0025 Total Cost = $3,407,600 3. Turnkey Housing: 8 Projects GA - 6 - 19 584 units ‘2nd approval delay due to rezoning GA - 6 = 20 202 units under construction Hollywood Road site GA = 6 = 21 220 units under construction Gilbert Road Construction Started - 08/27/68 Construction Complete- 09/20/68 GA - GA - “GA = GA - GA - 4. Non-Profit Project No. 061-55001 061-55007 061-55016 061-55024 061-55023 6 - 23 324 units letter of intent Wallswood Apartment site - han kek. 6 - 28 500 units completion date est. on 4/30/70 4 stages — one 90 percent complete Go =..29 175 units under construction Prison Creek - Leslie Lane 6 - 30 800 units construction document approval stage East Lake Golf Course 6 - 31 160 units development program approved Annual Contribution Contract Jonesboro Road and Adkinson Road Sponsored New Housing Under 221(d)(3): 10 Projects tage of - Name and Sponsor Mortgage Units Construction* Wheat Street Gardens $2,975,000 280 4 Wheat St. Baptist Church Allen Temple Dev. Inc., $1,419,650 151 d, Allen Temple AME Church Allen Temple Dev. Inc., ' $2,372,000 age 4 Sec. 2., Allen Temple AME Church’ Allen Temple Dev. Inc., *° $2,405,700 —-.208 1 Sec. 3., Allen Temple AME Church Wheat Street Gardens 916,600 84 . t #2, Wheat St. Baptist Ch. Project’ No. 061-55037 061-55052 061-55056 061-55053 061-55057 Name and Sponsor iendship’ Center iendship Baptist Church Pr z EF = & == i Flipper Temple Homes Flipper Temple AME Church Martin Luther King Village Ebenezer Baptist Church Central Methodist Homes Central Methodist Church Butler Street YMCA Apts. Butler Street YMCA Key of Construction. Status of Project f-wWhYPrP Oo 1 = not started - started first units ready - all units ready - final endorsement Stage of Mortgage Units Construction* $2,535,000 208 1 $1,712,000 156 G $2,975,000 - 193 0. $1,370,000 125 0 $2,484,000 216 0  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 5, Folder 1, Document 56 Box 5 Box 5 Folder 1 Folder topic: Housing Resources Committee | 1969