3 20 68 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/a642db00851c9ad4245e34c7d2b6f69a.pdf 74fa9b9b27b8efd75c6e90b1a226e34c Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. March 21, 1969 Th Honorable G orge Romney Secretary of Housing and Urban Developm nt Wa hlngton, D . C . D ar Secretary Romney: The City of Atl nta is proud of its reputation a.s a le der in urb n planning. Over th y ars, the coop r tiv efforts of pw,lic agenci nd p rivate groups, working toward mutually · g r ·d-upon go ls, h v result din the dev lopment of Atl nta as the S012theast 1 pr ·emineo.t metropolis. Inde , the result h ve be n so ucces ful that we must redoubl our efforts to assur th t the dyn mic growth which li imm. di tely ahe d w ill further th ims and objectiv of our elti.z~ns. r pr p r d to do thi • Th curre'n t pl annin ctivities of th . City £ Atlant • the Stat Highway Dep rtm.ent of Georgi ., th Atl nta Ar a Tr A portatlon Study, th~ Atl nt Region Metropolit n P lan:nin Commis ion nd th M tropolitan Atlant It pid Tr n it Authority r, clo ly interrel t d. Th Atlant Are Tran portation St'1dy 1 n ring eompl · tion. In ord r to m int 1n mo nt"IJ.n'l, d to assur continuity o! our f!orts ., we no int nd to undett · compr h ntiv d tail d plan fo r C ntr l Atlan: • Th ti.min i ri ht for such atudy. Th regional pollcl nd g n ral pl s hich 71 volving from the Transportation S tqdy ill ,PJ"ovide k y input to th wntown plan. A rt of thl study. it 1 intend d that on or more m a transit W dlstrlbution y tema wW b lncNasl.o th d velopme:at. ffediv tut · nalyzed to d termln the pot, ntl tor r gional pl a. d to • rv down o ·n of t 1n rder to meet our rlgld Um . schedul • r r questing th oi ·t h Fed ra.l Gov . rnm.ent.. This lett r is b · tng dlr et d both to D rtmen.t of Tran portatlon and the D · rtme t of Houain and Urban D velopm nt. W U that ach of th e d rtm nu ls it Uy co cem d ith the kind ol. pro ram Atlanta l d · v opt I• b U v e � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document LS LE a a eae a ee, ae ee ee ee eee March 21, 1969 The Honorable George Romney Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Washington, D. C. Dear Secretary Romney: The City of Atlanta is proud of its reputation as a leader in urban planning. Over the years, the cooperative efforts of public agencies and private groups, working toward mutually agreed-upon goals, have resulted in the development of Atlanta as the Southeast's preeminent metropolis. Indeed, the results have been so successful that we must redouble our efforts to assure that the dynamic growth which lies immediately ahead will further the aims and objectives of our citizens. We are prepared to do this, The current planning activities of the City af Atlanta, the State Highway Department of Georgia, the Atlanta Area Transportation Study, the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission and the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority are closely interrelated, The Atlanta Area Transportation Study is nearing completion. In order to maintain momentum, and to assure continuity of our efforts, we now intend to undertake a comprehensive detailed plan for Central Atlanta, The timing is right for such a study. The regional policies and general plans which are evolving from the Transportation Study will provide key inputs to the dewntown plan. As part of this study, it is intended that one or more mass transit distribution systems will be analyzed to determine the potential for increasing the effectiveness of the regional plan, and to serve downtown development. In order to meet our rigid time schedule, we are requesting the assistance of the Federal Government. This letter is being directed both to the Department of Transportation and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. We believe that each of these departments is vitally concerned with the kind of program Atlanta is developing. We believe  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 4, Folder 15, Document 45 Box 4 Box 4 Folder 15 Folder topic: Central Atlanta Progress | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/d146434b8d65be4c0d927c64ad71edc0.pdf 93692811dde25b2ef145eafcae7e3f53 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. Secretairy Romney Pag Two March 21, 1969 that there is a m jor trot here for ach departin nt. We would, 0£ cours • be prepared to move ahead quickly with the assurance of the n ces ary support from either, but joint participation by both DOT and HUD would c rtainly b desirable. Th attached 11Study Design fot the Central Atlanta Planning Process" et for.th our program. A s you w ill see~ this p:rogr m calls form jor tnvolv ment of many iac: ts of th Atl anta community: the city gov rn. ment, through it De rtment of Planning; th · business commu.nity, through Centr 1 Atlanta Progress , ltlc.; and important local institution , such as c:olleg s cm th Atlanta al' a . Th c ity nd th busines m n h v pl .dg d $100, 000 in cash nd staff service to rd a total co t of $ 300, 000 lor P rt I of the study. Thi p rt, which would b compl ted int n months, would culmJ.nat in. pr Umin ry .valuation o! . lt rn tive pl o. Pa.rt 11, hich would follow imm. di tely. would 1 t lght months, r suiting in n dopted pl for Centr ·1 A tlant • Funding for P rt ll Ul bet work d oQ.t durll1g Pai-t I. Thl propo d program. will pl.lt A tl nt in an WlU ly strong po ltion to ork with the t . am of consultants in th downtown-orl t d study efiort announced March 10 by Seer tary Volp in Pittsbur • On b half of th b in e d clvie 1 d r oi Atl your a.gi-eem nt top rtkip.ate in thi unique itt.idy,. mod 1 for 1 Amei:ic: citie . lf taff dlecu C nt-ral A D nS t, W ehington Cont.er nc ion• ould be io ord nta wW b v bl to nd Collt t' Gl din, th for the N · t:lonal Lea u M rch 30 .. April Z d • 1 r sp ct!ully ,n• hlch c r._ r pr •e m t with yo~%' p opl • My City' Chlet Plann r, will be l of Cities Con · tonal ... City c n in et lth your at 11 durin this period. Sincer _ly yo'IU'•. Iv n Alle • Jr. Mayo.r- lAJl':!y rv s d nt. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document Secretary Romney Page Two March 21, 1969 that there is a major role here for each department. We would, of course, be prepared to move ahead quickly with the assurance of the necessary support from either, but joint participation by both DOT and HUD would certainly be desirable. The attached "Study Design for the Central Atlanta Planning Process" sets forth our program. As you will see, this program calis for major involvement of many facets of the Atlanta community: the city govern- ment, through its Department of Planning; the business community, through Central Atlanta Progress, Inc.; and important local institutions, such as colleges dn the Atlanta area. The city and the businessmen have pledged $100, 000 in cash and staff services toward a total cost of $300, 000 for Part I of the study. This part, which would be completed in ten months, would culminate in preliminary evaluation of alternative plans. Part , which would follow immediately, would last eight months, resulting in an adopted plan for Central Atlanta. Funding for Part I will be worked out during Part I. This proposed program will put Atlanta in an unusually strong position to work with the team of consultants in the downtown-oriented study effort announced March 10 by Secretary Volpe in Pittsburg. On behalf of the business and civic leaders of Atlanta, I respectfully urge your agreement to participate in this unique study, which can serve as a model for all American cities, If staff discussions would be in order, representatives of the City and Central Atlanta will be available to meet with your people. My assistant, Dan Sweat, and Collier Gladin, the City's Chief Planner, will be in Washington for the National League of Cities Congressional-City Conference March 30 + April 2 and can meet with your staff during this period. Sincerely yours, Ivan Allen, Jr. Mayor lAdrify - aS ee Se SL ee ee ee ee ee ee =  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 4, Folder 15, Document 46 Box 4 Box 4 Folder 15 Folder topic: Central Atlanta Progress | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/426024e72fd4c85a0ad342a999a87f14.pdf 09ee9f2f2b70a5a4db39bd6936508564 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. Secretary Volpe Pag Two M r c h 21,- 196 9 that ther is a major role h re for each depa.rbnent. We would , of course , be pr pared to move ahead quickly with the assurance of th n cessa.ry support from ith r , but joint particip tL.:m by both DOT and HUD would c rtainly b de rable . Th attached S tudy Design for th C ntr l Ail - t _ Pl mun Proc sa" ts ·f orth oar program.. As you will ee, th.is pt'Qgt"am calls for majo:cinvolv rn nt of many facets of the Atlant community: the city gov -;rn .. m nt, through it Department of Pl nning; the business community, tlu:ough Central At! :ta Progre s, Inc. ; and im.port nt local institutione,, uch a coll g a in the Atlanta rea. . The city and th buslnessme have pl dged $100. 000 in cash and st ff s rvices toward total cost of $300.t 000 !or Part 1 0£ the s tudy. This part, which would be compl ted int n mouths , would culmi te n preliminary evaluation of alt rnative p s. P rt n, which would !ollow immedi t ly, would l st eight months,. re ulting in n doptod pl n for Centr - l Atl nt • Funding for P J't 1l will b worked out during P rt I . Thi• propoa d progr m. Ul put Atlanta in an unusually trong poaitlon ultants in th downtown-orient d study M!ort annowieed by you March 10 in Pittsbur- . to woJ'k with the te m. of co On behalf of th busln ea and clvlc l ad r 0£ Atl t • l re pectfully u go your r m nt to particip te in thl uniq1.1 study., which c n model for all Am de ·tj.tl s. ould b ln ord . ~. r pr • n tiv a 0£ th City d Ct,ntr Atlant wW b vaU bl to me t with your p opl • My aalet Du S eat. and C olU r Gl din, th City' Chi f Plann r •. wUl b in Wa ington tor- the Nation Le ue of Cltle Congr io· · -City Conlerenc M rch 30 • April 2 nd c rn t ·th youa- t U duri g le dod .. Sine ,:; ly yo\lra. Allen. Jr. Mayo lAJa-:fy t, � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document ee eS Nee ee Te ee ee. aay Secretary Volpe Page Two March 21, 1969 that there is a major role here for each department, We would, of course, be prepared to move ahead quickly with the assurance of the necessary support from either, but joint participation by both DOT and HUD would certainly be desirable. The attached ''Study Design for the Central Atlanta Planning Process" sets forth our program, As you will see, this program calls for major involvement of many facets of the Atlanta community: the city govern- ment, through its Department of Planning; the business community, through Central Atlanta Progress, Ine.; and important local institutions, such as colleges in the Atlanta area. The city and the businessmen have pledged $100, 000 in cash and staff services toward a total cost of $300, 000 for Part I of the study. This part, which would be completed in ten months, would culminate in preliminary evaluation of alternative plans, Part I, which would follow immediately, would last eight months, resulting in an adopted plan for Central Atlanta. Funding for Part will be worked out during Part I. This proposed program will put Atlanta in an unusually strong position to work with the team of consultants in the downtown-oriented study effort announced hy you March 10 in Pittsburg. On behalf of the business and civic leaders of Atlanta, I respectfully urge your agreement to participate in this unique study, which can serve as a model for all American cities. If staff discussions would be in order, representatives of the City and Central Atlanta will be available to meet with your people. My assistant, Dan Sweat, and Collier Gladin, the City's Chief Planner, will bein Washington for the National League of Cities Cong¥essional-City Conference March 30 + April 2 and can meet with your staff during this period, Sincerely yours, Igan Allen, Jr. Mayor 1AIrify  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 4, Folder 15, Document 47 Box 4 Box 4 Folder 15 Folder topic: Central Atlanta Progress | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/05e431b078b0fb18f9eae53b891e6696.pdf 6fdca634e0ad0fd932b08077e50283fc Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. CITY OF ATLANTA DEPARTME NT OF LAW 2614 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING ATLANTA , GEORGIA 30303 J r . Col· r y , 19 i Pl n~i g o·r cto D r ~nt of P n ng 1 ·! all nt ·, De org·· Colli r: • tis of th ibl ' C\;. �r . Col l ier B. Gla Pa g 2 July n , 1969 f the contrac t h s not to eque t yo to c ot t he pr pos d cont r ct n f i fo · lon " the tlanta s v rsl gov r I think it ould b pr ematur~ f or o b~t reque t t a ou p l ase app o c h th get ny p cific v rba e, r. t r . ubjact with Should ,_ n ~d an y f uture communi c t i on prior to this undertakin , lease e el fr e to contact m . i t h my kindest rega r ds , I am , V ry t r u ly yours , Thom s F. Choyc C:e cc Mr .. Mr . Mr . L . D vi rry ...-,-, rd � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document CITY OF ATLANTA S a f DEPARTMENT OF LAW . 2614 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 : July 9, 1969 Mr. Collier B. Gladin Planning Director Department of Planning City Hall Atlanta, Georgia Dear Collier; I have in hand a aegies A assed to Mr. Henry L. Bowden, dated July 1, 1969, cofige in existence and whick /m future, be entered int Associates and the Cib daibiy; from time to time, in the bakween Alan M. Voorhees and or one of its related agencies. Subsequent t6/th | « Bowden asked me to handle this matter, I ¢ ¢ the telephone and you apprised me of the fact eet forth ato '} }that the City of Atlanta would possibly use Voorhees anX ig at some point in the future. Now, directly stag my comments to Mr. H. L. Stuart's letter to you of June 17, 1969, I am somewhat at a loss at this time to dater~ mine whether or not any present affirmative action is necessary in response to that letter. By this I mean I do not know whether or not the provision in contract with MARTA and Voorhees has aiready been executed or not. Assuming that it has been executed, I see of no way, under the verbage of that paragraph, whereby the City of atlanta can benefit on the basis of a future contractual relation with Voorhees; he ees Mr. Collier B. Gladin Page 2 July 9, 1969 however, if the contract has not been executed, my though would be to request you to contact Mr. Stuart with an eye toward having the proposed contract contain additional language which would create a benefit for us along the lines of the benefits now being realized by MARTA, the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission, and perhaps several governmental bodies and/or agencies. I think it would be premature for me to suggest any specific verbage, but request that you please approach this subject with Mr. Stuart. Should we need any future communication prior to this undertaking, please feel free to contact me. With my kindest regards, I am, Very truly yours, 7FU Thomas F, Choyce TFC; cwh ce Mr. Charles L. Davis Mr. George Berry — Mr. Horace T, Ward  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 4, Folder 15, Document 48 Box 4 Box 4 Folder 15 Folder topic: Central Atlanta Progress | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/f51d2257a65bcf418ad5a17272d13e47.pdf e59a22493facc8391537422c7f7e849a Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. July I, 1969 \ \., Mr. Henry Bowden City Attomey 2610 First National Bonk &.tiding Atlanta, Georgl a Dear Mr. Bowden: I am enclosing copy of Mr. H. L. Stuart's letter of June 17, 1969, concerning multlplo contracts with Alan M. Voorhees and Assodohts for your information. I will be happy to discuss thf s letter and the proposed Central Atlanta Study with you at anytime. 1 Ci ••. Yours truly; Collier 8. G ladln Plamtng Director cc: Mr. Charles Davis / Mr. G orge Berryv CBG:pw Enclosu,. � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document oa is ® July |, 1969 U Mr. Henry Bowden City Attorney 2610 First National Bank Building Atlanta, Georgia Decor Mr. Bowden: 1 am enclosing o copy of Mr. H. L. Stuart's letter of June 17, 1969, concerning multiple contracts with Alan M. Voorhees and Associates for your information. 1! will be happy to discuss this letter and the proposed Central Atlanta Study with you at anytime. Yours truly, Collier B. Gladin Planning Director ce: Mr. Charles Davis bi Mr. George Berry CBG:pw Enclosure  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 4, Folder 15, Document 49 Box 4 Box 4 Folder 15 Folder topic: Central Atlanta Progress | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/4f83fc254f96202b4ba30cfe2613ba63.pdf 2fbf0604e7d36d15ac402a89572986aa Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. I URBAN MASS TRANSPO TATm ADM!~!SHrnTIO Information 13-34573 (963-4573) 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Organ/ Routing Symtrol UOA-1 UOA-1 UOA-1 Ext. Code OFFI CE OF HIE AlJMINISTP.liTOR Administrator Carlos C Vil larreal rm 700W .. . ................. ..... ..... ... . ....... .. .. Secretary Beatrice R Kaplan rrn 700W .. . .............. .. .. ...... . ..... . . .. Secretary Jeanne W Smith rm 700W .. . . . . ..... .. . .... .. . .. .. .... ... .. .. . . 13 · 28822 28822 13 13 27144 OFFICEOFADMINISTRATION 13 13 13 13 13 13 28361 13 13 13 13 34385 34385 34385 34385 13 13 13 -2023·1:20231 27144 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 20821 20821 20821 20821 UP0-11 UP0-11 UP0-1 1 UP0-11 UP0-12 UP0-20 UP0-30 UP0-31 Assistant Administrator W B Hurd (Acting) rm 702 ....... . ... ... .. .... . . . .. ... .... .. . . Secretary Bernadine Siegel rm 702 . . ........... .... ....... .. .. .... .. .. .. Control Offi cer Robert Abrams rm 702 .......... .. .... . .. . ........ .. .. .. . .. .. . .. .. Division of Project Development . ... . . . . .. . . . .. . ...... .. . . . ..• . .. .• ••••• .• . •• . . . • Transportation Representative Ronald L Luczak . .. .. . . . . . .. .. . .. ..••• . . . . .. .. •. Transportation Representative William O Adams rm 702 .. . . . . .. .•••..••• • • . • •• ••. Transportati on Representative Harvey Berlin rm 702 . . . . ... . . . ... • .• •. . . • ••.. • • • Transportation Repre sentative Franz Gimmler rm 702 . . . . • .......••. ...• ••• •.• • • . Transportation Representative Peter Stowell rm 702 ... . .. . ... ..• . . • • •. .. ••• • . •• Civil Engineer Eugene Jackson Jr rm 702 .. . .. ..... . .... ... .. . .... . ... .. ....... . Division of Project Management Wilbur Hare rm 702 . ... .. ......... .. .... .. .. ... .. . Division of Technical Studies Jerome C Premo rm 702 . ... .. . . . .. . .... . . ... . ....... . Transporiation Representative Deborah Warren rm 702 . . . .. ·...••••• ... ••• .•. ••• • • UPP-1 UPP-1 UPP-10 UPP-11 UPP-20 UPP-30 UPP-31 OFFICE OF PROGRAM PLANNING Assistant Administrator Gordon M Murray rm 701 .... . . . .. .. . . .... . . .. . . ...... .... .... . Secretary Vera M Pegues rm 701 .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . ........ . . . . ....... .. . .. . Division of Policy Development Milton L Brooks rm 701 . . .. .... ... . ••..••• ... •.•. .. Research Assistant Joanna Paxson rm 701 . .. .... . . . .... ... . ..... .. .... . ....... . Division of Program Evaluation rm 701 ... ..... .. .. .. ... ... .. . . ......... .. ...... . .. Division of Planning Coordination Robert H McManus Director rm 701 •••••••••••• • ••.•• Architect-Planner John Rannells rm 701 .. .. ..... . ................ .... .. . ...... . 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 26294 26294 35214 35214 35214 35214 35214 13 13 13 13 34206 34206 34206 34718 13 13 13 13 13 13 34206 34718 24315 24315 24315 -24~15- 2. (;>80) UAD-1 UAD-1 UAD-10 UAD-11 UAD-20 Assistant Administrator William Boswe0 II rm 704 ... . .. .. . . . . ..... ... . ... .. .... ..... .. .. . Secretary Deana J Brewster rm 704 . . ... ..• •• .• • . • . . . .. •• ....• ••• ...•• • • Special Assistant Alexander Abraham rm 704 ........ .. . . ... .. . ... . .. ... .. . . ... . .. . Division of Administrative Services Harriet Hawkins Director rm 704 •. • . . . ...... . ..•••• Program Assistant Mary Lou Gormous rm 704 . . .... . . . .• .. . . . . .•. •. . .•..•. ••• •• Division o~ Budge.t a~d Fiscal Operati ons Thomas E Hoadley . .. . . . ..• • •• •• •• • , ..... . . . 34573 34573 34573 34573 37603 OFFICEOF THE CHIEF .COUNSEL UCC-1 UCC·l UCC-10 UCC-10 Chief Counsel David J Speck (Acting) rm 815C .... ........ ............. . .. ....... .... . Secretary Mary Murphy rm 815C . . ..... .. .. . . . . .. ... ...... ... ....... .. . . Attorney Joseph A Blundon rm 814A ........ . .... .... .. .. .. .. .. .... ... .. .. ... .. . . Attorney Theodore Munter rm 8148 ........ .... .. . . .. ... ... .. ... . .. . . ..... .. ..... . OFFICEOF PUBLIC Ar-FAIRS UPA-1 UPA-1 UPA-10 Assistant ·Administrator !V2canil rm 700W . .. ~~-'.<:~<?.l.,:-.. c;.:~~1:~:1?':'"... .... ... .. .... ... . Secretary Joyce East ... . . . . .. ... . . . . •••.... .. . .. . . •. ...•• . .. ... . .....•. . Governmental Relations Ann W Smith Director rm 700W .... .. ... ..... ....... .. .. . .. .. ,. -z., ,11- OFFICEOF PROGRAM OPERATIONS UP0-1 UP0-1 UP0-1 UP0-10 28361 28944 28361 ~28944- 2 <,, E,f) 2. 28944 20821 28361 20821 28361 OFFICEOF RESEARCH URD-1 URD-1 URD-2 URD-10 URD-20 URD-30 URD-31 URD-32 URD-32 URD-32 URD-33 Assistant Administrator Harold W -Merritt (Acting) rm 705 .. • . • .. . . . .. . . • •..•• • •.•. • •••. Secretary Mary E Beachley rm 705 .... . .... . . ..... . ................. .. .. Program Assistant David M Glancy rm 705 . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . .. . .. . .. . . .. ... . . . . . .. • Division of Environmental Research Edmond L Kanwit Director (Acting) rm 705 .. . • . . . • • Division of Technology Division of Research Project Management Thomas H Floyd Director rm 705 . ... , . • . . .. . •• -Transportation Research Advisor Charles Stearns rm 705 . . . .. . .... .• . . . . . •. .. ..• Transportation Representative Richard J Andryshak rm 705A . . .. .. . .. .... .• • ..•.. Transportation Representative John Dupree rm 705A . . . . . . ... • . . . . .. . . . • ••. . . . •. Transportation Representative Maynard G Gleason rm 705A . . . ... . . . .. . . . ...• . . .. . Special Projects Dick G Lam rm 705 . . . . .... . . . .. ... .. . . .. .. . . .. ... . .. . . • . •• .. . 133 .. - -:-·~-. - � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document URBAN MASS TRANSPGRTATION ADMINISTRATION Information 13-34573 (§53-4573) 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Organ/ Routing Symbol OFFICE OF THE ADHINISTRATOR UOA-1 Administrator Carlos C Villarreal rit 7JOOW 2.32: .cccccsccvcsccvceccesesscasescesesnssves UOA-1 sectetary Beatrice, Kaplan Mm Z00W: pats cece scp earsalesas se elideatagea ane UOA-1 Secretary Jeanne: Wi Saalthi tim LOOW: « osse4 0 rete eagine'ele'es celpeiae'e Sede alsiseie ee OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION s UAD-1 Assistant Administrator William Boswell rm 704 ..........ccceceeececeeceeecnceeeeneunes Secretary Deana. Wl Brewster mid. ..cas de eagasseadesses ciseracesisanwett UAD-1 Special Assistant Alexander Abraham rm 704 ........0.00-.cecseceeennccneenecnetes UAD-10 Division of Administrative Services Harriet Hawkins Director rm 704 .............-00008 UAD-11 Program Assistant Mary Lou Gormous rm 704 ............02 eee eeeeeeseeecnnanes UAD-20 . Division of Budget and Fiscal Operations Thomas E Hoadley ............0..06 oe aaneieats OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COUNSEL UCC-1 Chief Counsel David J Speck (Acting) rm BISC 1.2.0... eee eee ence renee nesses cescaeess UCC-1 Secretary Mary Murphy stm 81509 < site sasstpeveaseccsustaddaendsaeonoaslens UCC-10 Attamey Joseph AnBlundon: ;MeSlAn: 465) cteuentess Utvicwa eves bac cawer on iea wouleeale ey UCC-10 Attorney. Theodore:Minter (mi B14B.c.33cecesiveesciadasiteveber ees slechaavasbee4s OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS i UPA-1 Assistant Administrator (Vacant) rm 7TOOW ...EA2R0LE CASTER eee eee UPA-1 Sacretary Joyce bast cue sivecsadcees aoae Gees be vad bes Gah SRNRa SEES chek bebe UPA-10 - Governmental Relations Ann W Smith Director rm 70O0W .........0..seeeeew eee eeeeener OFFICE OF PROGRAM OPERATIONS UPO-1 Assistant Administrator W B Hurd (Acting) rm 702 .........ccceceececeencenecncecenees ~ UPO-1 SecrelAV Bermadine: SeEeIITN: (02 <i tsVaseiesc cea cAGestesedsee eaeneaeneea UPO-1 Control Oticer- Robs ADAMS TMsf2 2 vee nce ae Se58 boi 5670344 ee RlebePRC Eee soo UPO-10 Divisionsot /Profact: Development: Gicavy vaca eained ed wale staples cele eeac se ewes Transportation Representative Ronald L Luczak .......2.cceeeececceeececeeeeees UPO-11 Transportation Representative William Q Adams rm 702 ...........eeeseeeeceenees UPO-11 Transportation Representative Harvey Berlin rm 702 ...........-.cceeceeeeeenees UPO-11 Transportation Representative Franz Gimmler rm 702 ............ceeeeeeeeeeenues UPO-11 Transportation Representative Peter Stowell rm 702 .........ceseceecceeeeceeees UPO-12 CiviliEngineer Eugene Jackson Ii tin P02. 44 iss sla ele Ste ascais sk sac dpa te seater UPO-20 Division of Project Management Wilbur Hare rm 702 .......ccccececuccececeeeucaees UPO-30 Division of Technical Studies Jerome C Premo rm 702 ...........cceecencerceceenees UPO-31 Transportation Representative Deborah Warren rm 702 .........cceeccescecccenecs OFFICE OF PROGRAM PLANNING UPP-1 Assistant Administrator Gordon M Murray rm 701 .......2.0ccccececucecccececcucecvcecs UPP-1 Secretary Vera: Mi Pegues tin 701. ova itecds cess cuevehsevaaseeuve seated UPP-10 Division of Policy Development Milton L Brooks rm 701 ...........ceceeeceseeecuecs UPP-11 Research Assistant Joanna Paxson rm 701 ..........scecesccecerceceeecrcetececs UPP-20 Division: ofp rogram -kvaluiationnime7 01. s2. 6 ce aktodcseneon eee eiies evece sakaekenaaea y UPP-30 Division of Planning Coordination Robert H McManus Director rm 701 ..........seeeeees UPP-31 Architect-Planner John Rannells rm 701 ........ceceecececececetceeesecncesecuce OFFICE OF RESEARCH URD-1 Assistant Administrator Harold W ‘Merritt (Acting) rm 705 ...........ccceececsecceseeens URD-1 Secretary Mary E€ Beachley sr, 70S: scctacs cease case ieateadaeetandteand URD-2 Program) Assistant: Davidi'M Glancy: Wit) 70S: «cana sceresasarcsic cciwauyeeemevenc ges seid URD-10 Division of Environmental Research Edmond L Kanwit Director (Acting) rm 705 ......... URD-20 Division of Technology URD-30 Division of Research Project Management Thomas H Floyd Director rm 705 ....,.......4. URD-31 Transportation Research Advisor Charles Stearns rm 705 .........:cccceeeeceeees URD-32 Transportation Representative Richard J Andryshak rm 705A ..........s0eeeeeeeee URD-32 Transportation Representative John Dupree rm 705A .......c00cecceceeeeeeeuceee URD-32 Transportation Representative Maynard G Gleason rm 705A ...........c00cecuaeees URD-33 Special Projects ‘Dick (G Lamiirmn POS: ci. scccic scene ees sh baaesebaaamssaeeenctees Ext. 28822 28822 27144 34573 34573 34573 34573 ~ 37603 . 28361 34385 34385 34385 34385 -2029t BGG 20231 27144 20821 20821 20821 20821 28361 28944 28361 28044. 26887 28944 20821 28361 20821 28361 26294 26294 35214 35214 - 35214 35214 35214 34206 34206 34206 34718 34206 34718 24315 24315 24315 24315- ZeSB! 133  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 4, Folder 15, Document 5 Box 4 Box 4 Folder 15 Folder topic: Central Atlanta Progress | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/fec38545a874fb6faf9c6879fe97108e.pdf 1d801040ffebc044ead18d89da246447 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. I J July 8 , 1969 MEMORANDUM To; Collier Gladin From: Ge orge B c i-ry Subject: CAP -- City of Atlanta Central Business District Plan I hav a c opy of your letter to Mr . Bowden, dated July l, 1969, concerning the fact lh t the City and other ag ncies have various contracts with the Al n M . Voorhees Company. Is it anticipated that the Voorhees Company will be engaged to do t h ' xpanded tudy that will b made possible as a re ult of the Federal Cira.nt exp cted from the Department of Transportation? GB:je � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document July 8, 1969 MEMORANDUM To: Collier Gladin From: George Berry Subject; CAP -- City of Atlanta Central Business District Plan I have a copy of your letter to Mr. Bowden, dated July 1, 1969, concerning the fact that the City and other agencies have various contracts with the Alan M, Voorhees Company. Is it anticipated that the Voorhees Company will be engaged to do the expanded study that will be made possible as a result of the Federal Grant expected from the Department of Transportation? GB:je  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 4, Folder 15, Document 50 Box 4 Box 4 Folder 15 Folder topic: Central Atlanta Progress | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/93ded7feaf119ef05f6d298c99e02b69.pdf 438d24b895df4e851402f10797fcf6dc Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAlPID TRANSIT AUTHOR IT Y GLENN BUILDING / ATLANTA, GEORG IA 30303 / AREA CODE 4 04 524-5711 OFFICERS: June 17, 1969 Richard H. Rich, Chairman Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman Edmund W. Hughes, Secretary Henry L. Stuart, General Manager ~ -- Mr. Collier Gladin Planning Director City of_ Atlanta Atlanta, Ga . · 30303 Mr. Robe rt W. Bive n s Exe cut i v e Di r e c tor Central Atlanta Progress 2740 First Nat 1 l Bank Bldg. Atlanta, Ga . 30303 Mr . Lela n d Vea l Pla nni n g En g ineer St a te Highway Departme nt of Ge org i a, Inc. No. 2 Capitol Sq uare, S. W. Atlanta, Ga. 303 34 Mr. William w. Allison Deputy Administrator Economic Oppo r t unity Atlanta, Inc. 101 .Ma rietta St r e et Building Atlanta, Ga. 30303 Mr. J. D. Wingfi e ld, Jr. Planning Director Atlanta Re gion Metropolitan Planning Co'.Timi s sion 900 Gle nn Bu i l d ing Atlanta , Ga. 3030 3 Ge ntle me n: Alan M. Voorhees and Associ a t e s, now under contract to the State Highway Departme nt, a nd i n d i re ctly u nde r contra ct to MARTA, and p r oposed as a consultant t o the Ce ntr al Atlanta Study and to Economic Oppo rt unity At l ant a , is going to b e in a po s iti on of working o n transportation problems in At lanta u nder several different c o n tracts for sev eral different agencies . We should be very caref ul that we are n ot pay ing mo re money for any parti c ul a r j ob u nder the several contracts than we would h ave paid had there bee n but one contra ct . MARTA h as h a d PBTB under mult ipl e-contracts simu ltaneously with the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission, and our Counsel arranged the following ·wording to cover the situation me ntioned a bove in c o nne ction wi t h Vo orhees: "It is recogn ized that a separate contract concerning engineering for this same project exists between the Authority and the Engineer (therein designated 11 Contractor·11 ) and that, in addition, a contract e x ists between the Atlanta Re gion Me tropolita n Planning Commission and the ·· Engineer (therein designated "Contractor") for updating a previous planning study concerning �. . ..., . - 2 - the same project. Because of the inter-relationship of the tl.ree contracts, the Engineer agrees it shall report to the Authority its costs on each of thes8 contracts, computed on the reimbursement bases of the terms of this Agreement, and Engineer further agrees that the total compensation to the Engineer under the three contracts shall be no more than that which would obtain had the work all been performed under the terms of this Agreement. 11 I refer this to you for review by your Legal Counsel. Sincerely yours, H. L. Stuart, General Manager. HLS:JJ cc: Mr. Thoma s B. Dee n Alan M. Voorhees & As s ociates , Inc. Mr. w. Stell Huie Huie and Harland Mr. J. A. Coil Pars ons Br i ncke rhoff-Tudor- Be chtel � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY GLENN BUILDING / ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 / AREA CODE 404 524-5711 June 17, 1969 Mr. Collier Gladin Planning Director City of Atlanta Atlanta, Ga. 30303 . Mr. Robert W. Bivens Executive Director Central Atlanta Progress 2740 First Nat'l Bank Bldg. Atlanta, Ga. 30303 Mr. Leland Veal Planning Engineer State Highway Department of Georgia, Inc. No. 2 Capitol Square, S. W. Atlanta, Ga. 30334 Gentlemen: OFFICERS: Richard H. Rich, Chairman Roy A. Blount, Vice Chairman Edmund W. Hughes, Secretary Henry L. Stuart, General Manager Mr. William W. Allison Deputy Administrator Economic Opportunity Atlanta, Inc. 101 Marietta Street Building Atlanta, Ga. 30303 Mr. J. D. Wingfield, Jr. Planning Director Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission 900 Glenn Building Atlanta, Ga. 30303 Alan M. Voorhees and Associates, now under contract to the State Highway Department, and indirectly under contract to MARTA, and proposed as a consultant to the Central Atlanta Study and to Economic Opportunity Atlanta, is going to be in a position of work- ing on transportation problems in Atlanta under several different contracts for several different agencies. We should be very care- ful that we are not paying more money for any particular job under the several contracts than we would have paid had there been but one contract. MARTA has had PBTB under multiple-contracts simultaneously with the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission, and our Counsel arranged the following wording to cover the situation men- tioned above in connection with Voorhees: "It is recognized that a separate contract concerning engineering for this same project exists between the Authority and the Engineer (therein designated "Con- tractor") and that, in addition, a contract exists between the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Com- mission and the’Engineer (therein designated "Contrac-— tor") for updating a previous planning study concerning  oo Free the same project. Because of the inter-relationship of the three contracts, the Engineer agrees it shall report to the Authority its costs on each of these contracts, computed on the reimbursement bases of the terms of this Agreement, and Engineer further agrees that the total compensation to the Engineer under the three contracts shall be no more than that which would obtain had the work all been performed under the terms of this Agreement." I refer this to you for review by your Legal Counsel. Sincerely yours, A L Aéiauk- H. L. Stuart, General Manager. HLS :JJ cc: Mr. Thomas B. Deen : Alan M. Voorhees & Associates, Inc. Mr. W. Stell Huie Huie and Harland Mr. J. A. Coil , Parsons Brinckerhoff-Tudor-Bechtel  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 4, Folder 15, Document 51 Box 4 Box 4 Folder 15 Folder topic: Central Atlanta Progress | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/83777c86ca49062cfbb1a87b1fb7cdc9.pdf da93d2ffa18b9dcdc23ca764a6a06853 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. DRAFT 6/10/69 DGI . MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT ) {This draft of a "memorandum of understanding" is a document intended to serve as a basis for coordination of efforts and cost-sharing between Central Atlanta Progress, Inc., and the City of Atlanta. It is intended to make available the resources of C.A.P., facilities and staff, in such way as to serve as local matching funds for Federal grants, should this become desirable in the program.) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • This agreement, made and entered into this • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • e • • • • day of ______, 1969, by and between the City of Atlanta, Georgia (hereinafter called the City) and Central Atlanta Prqgress, _Inc. (hereinafter called c.A.P.). WITNESS ETH: WHEREAS, detailed Central Atlanta planning is needed on a continuing basis as called for in the City of Atlanta's Approved Land Use Plan~ such need concurred i.n by the State Highway Department, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Coomission, Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Tra~e).t . Authority,..,. . ~ ~,14,~ild /..._ .. • '~ M Fulton Co~~tY,~tlanta Area Transportation Stud~; and ~-~ '. WHEREAS, 4-J-th Central Atlanta with one of the greatest growth rates in the world, is the hub of the Metropolitan Area, and regional capital o f the Southeast, and r apidly emerging na tional and international c ent er of commerce ; and WHEREAS, Central Atlanta Progress, Inc., has pledged substantial financial r and personal support to a cooperative Central Sub-area Transportation Planning Program with the City of Atlanta; and �Page 2 WHEREAS, the Central Area Planning Policy Connnittee was established to g u i d e ~ the plan, said connnittee consisting of: ~ the . Mayor of Atlanta, Chairman of thenFinance Committee - B~AS 1 ct. ~ .;,)1 1 rl . an, Chairman of the,_Planning and Development Commit'tee - Beel!' ll e£ f 1s1o;("fll8n, Chairman of c.A.P., Inc., Executive Conmittee,~ ~ President of C.A.P., Inc.; and ~ . WHEREAS, · such a Sub-area Transportation Study is a pre-requisite to~maximum Stat• end Fed• r• l • ••iatence ; and WHEREAS, u. s. Department of Transportation and U. s. Department of Housing and Urbaq Development and local agency matching funds or services are availftble to finance Central Area studies and projects. 11.,"/t,.. 143.215.248.55(fl~./¥ 4. t lkt,,,~/r(AQ>,~c. ltavc~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1143.215.248.55· ~ ~ ~~, uwt~ ti/f>f~ , ~ 143.215.248.55 ~~ : . --- - . �Page - J NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: ·.:~ . That the orgLlnizational and worl<fnr; arraneements outlined in the . ·o~JJ~ study design prepared bY. the CITYfand C.A.P., Inc., be used as a guide for carryi-p.g out~entr1;1 ~ II. ming Progr:im. Tha~ ~he work program outlined in the study design prepared by the f}~Ufl· CITY and C.A.P., Inc.• , subject to adjustme~eemed desirable by the parties involved, be used to carry out the Central~Planning Program. III. That the financing of the Program be in accord with the study design ~M- prepared by the CJTY and C.A.P., Inc., subject to adjust~ents deemed desirable by the parties involved. IV. That the study design and its amendments, if any, will be approved by the Executive Connnittee of C.A.P., Inc., and the Planning and Development Committee of the Bo_a rd of Aldermen; however, where financial considerations are involved in ~aiq study design, the Finance Committee of the Board of Aldermen must also ffpprovee ' !~ . iJ._ , That the )[ ' · , Lplan and program of action for the Central Area resulting from thj:~'.' study will be submitted to the Board of Aldermen for review and adopti~n·· V. WITNESSES: CITY OF ATIANTA BY : MAYOR CENTRAL ATIANTA PROGRESS, INC. BY: PRESIDENT � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document DRAFT 6/10/69 DGI MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (This draft of a "memorandum of understanding" is a document intended to serve as a basis for coordination of efforts and cost-sharing between Central Atlanta Progress, Inc., and the City of Atlanta. It is intended to make available the resources of C.A.P., facilities and staff, in such way as to serve as local matching funds for Federal grants, should this become desirable in the program.) eseseeeeeeoeceeeocoeteeee eee esee ose eoeeeeeseeeseeeseeeseeeeeseeeeeeeeeeesee eee ee ee cee ee This agreement, made and entered into this day of Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. (hereinafter called C.A.P.). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, detailed Central Atlanta planning is needed on a continuing basi » 1969, by and between the City of Atlanta, Georgia (hereinafter called the City) and 58 as called for in the City of Atlanta's Approved Land Use Plan} such need concurred in by the State Highway Department, Atlanta Region Metropolitan Planning Commission, Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Trans t Authority , med Benesd Fulton County, tlanta Area Transportation Study; and lout W) ath 4 WHEREAS, Central Atlanta with one of the greatest growth rates in the world, is the hub of the Metropolitan Area, and regional capital of the Southeast, and rapidly emerging national and international center of commerce; and WHEREAS, Central Atlanta Progress, Ince, has pledged substantial financial r and personal support to a cooperative Central Sub-area Transportation Planning Program with the City of Atlanta; and Page 2 WHEREAS, the Central Area Planning Policy Committee was established to guide of the plan, said committee consisting of: the Mayor of Atlanta, Chairman of ee finance Committee - Beard=ef ftttermen, Chairman of the,Planning: and Development Committee - Beoerd—ef—A1dermen, Chairman of C.A.P., Inc., Executive uniting oars President of C.A.P., Inc.; and ; rae WHEREAS, such a Sub-area Transportation Study is a pre-requisite to,maximum State and Fedaral asaiatonce; and WHEREAS, U. S. Department of Transportation and U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and local agency matching funds or services are hs, aca to finance Central Area studies and projects. tah thd 4c Onde AP vac . have ee inal meta sete Page 3 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: ‘. That the organizational and working arrangements outlined in the avon waped study design prepared by the onl C.A.P., Inc., be used as a guide for carrying outMentral! a? Lanning Program. II. Thaf the work program outlined in the study design prepared by the ares C.A.P., Inc., subject to ey eis desirable by the parties involved, be used to carry out the Central ,Planning Program. III. That the financing of the Program be in accord with the study design an prepared by the CITY’and C.A.P., Inc., subject to adjustments deemed desirable by the parties involved. IV. That the study design and its amendments, if any, will be approved by the Exccutive Committee of C.A.P., Inc., and the Planning and Development Committee of the Board of Aldermen; however, where financial considerations are involved in said study design, the Finance Committee of the Board of Aldermen must also PProve. V. That the piiei~p lan and program of action for the Central Area resulting from this.’ study will be submitted to the Board of Aldermen for review and edoptigg. WITNESSES: CITY OF ATLANTA BY: MAYOR CENTRAL ATLANTA PROGRESS, INC. BY: - PRESIDENT  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 4, Folder 15, Document 52 Box 4 Box 4 Folder 15 Folder topic: Central Atlanta Progress | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/b182105d8ac32ecb2b51422d2010547f.pdf d532e36ee38a433ca1a8763ff69862f8 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. { •, ATLANTA, GEORCJIA ROUTE SLIP FROM: Dan E . Sweat, Jr. c / 4r your information D Please refer to the attached correspondence and make the necessary repl y. 0 Advise me the s ta tus of the attached. FOR M 25 - 4 -S � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document . Gffice of the Mayor ATLANTA,GEORGIA ROUTE SLIP TO: Coreg Renna FROM: Dan E. Sweat, Jr. For your information [_] Please refer to the attached correspondence and make the necessary reply. [_] Advise me the status of the attached. FORM 25-4-5  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 4, Folder 15, Document 53 Box 4 Box 4 Folder 15 Folder topic: Central Atlanta Progress | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/be644ebfbaca363271e46e9ab691a3f3.pdf 13e8f43d41c6254b6e4ebacff38b2358 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. r MINUTES GR AN T REVIEW B OARD JUNE 9, 1969 Memb e rs of the Gr ant Review Board m e t on M onday, J une 9, 1969, in City H a ll with the following p e rsons pr e sent: Mr. Tom Bello, A d ministrative Intern Mr. George Berry, A dministrative Coordinator Mr. Jay Fountain, D ep uty Director of Financ e Mr. C ollie r Gladin , Planning Director Mr. D on Ing ram, Associate Di r ector , C entral Atlanta Progress, In c . (CAP, Inc.) Mr. Woody Underw ood , Principal Budget Analys t Mr, Glad in re viewed the status of the joint ventur e of the C ity and CAP , Inc . t o develop a plan for the ce ntr a l city. H e pointed out tl?-~t f)rovisions had been rn.ade in th e 1969 G ene ral Fund Budget of the Planning Department for the progra1n in that $15,000 had been approp r iate d for consultant services and that certain staff assignme nts had b ee n made for the b e n e fit of the proj e ct. Mr . I ng ram state d that in addition to E:...x:.isting s taff m e 1nbe rs of CAP, Inc. assi g ned to the proj e ct , at least $25 ,000 wa s avail a bl e for consultant se r v ic es to support the proj ect . • Mr. Gl adin then r eviewed the proposal to utilize this accurn.ulat ed "local contri bution" to s upport a g r a nt applica tion to th e D e pa rtm e nt of Trans porta tion for grant funds s o that the s t udy could be e nlar ge d and its sc ope bro a d e n ed . H e sta t e d that a con s ortium of cons ulting firm s now r e t a ine d by th e D e p a rtment of Tran sportation had e x presse d interest in the project and it was fe lt that, to obtain approval, it would onl y b e n e cessary to e 1nphasi z e the transportatio n aspects of the pro g ram to a g r eat e r de g r ee than previously anticipa t e d . H e stated that the a ccumul a t e d loc a l c ontribution w ould 1nake possible a g rant of ab o ut $ 2 00, 000 w ith w hich to und e rtak e the pro g r a m. The grant proj e ct would b e for a tenn of 18 1nonths. Ans w e rin g questions by both Mr. Underwood and Mr. F o unta in, both Mr. Gladin a nd Mr . Ing r a m s t a t e d that it w ould not b e n e c e ssary to c r e ate any n ew p os iti o n s for the study p e riod. The y sta t e d th a t the exi s tin g s t aff w ould b e s uffi c i e nt to a dmini s t e r the s tud y a nd th a t the g r ant fun ds w o u l d be u se d for con s ult a nt se r vices . Mr. Be rry state d tha t, if the funds ar e to b e admini s t e r e d by the C it y , all normal c ity requir e m e nts as to pr oce dur e an d exp e nditur e of funds w ould have to be ob se r ve d. The G rant Revi ew Boa rd s upporte d and a pprove d th e id ea of u s ing ·th e a lr eady a ppr o pri a t ed l ocal commitm e n t t o generat e Fede r a l f unds to br oad e n a n d enl arge the Cent ral A t lan t a P l ann ing Program. It was fe lt th a t t raf fic and t ran s port a ti on �Pag e Two was perhaps the most critical problem facing the central city and that the enlarged study, with e mphasis on transportation, would be most appropriate. Approval was given, ther efore , for th e filin g of the applic ation for such funds. Mr. Gladin, however, was directed not t o include authorization for the Mayor to execute a g rant agreeme nt until an ag r eement could be executed b e twe e n CAP, I nc . and the City of Atlanta w hich would c omm.it CAP , Inc. to the City for their shar e of th e lo cal contribution n e c e ssary to support the g rant appli cation . The gr_a nt agr eem e nt its e lf and the a g re e m ent b e t ween CAP, Inc. and the City of Atlanta w ill be subject to further r evi ew by the Gr ant Rev i ew Board and the appropriat e Aldermanic C o mmittee at the time the grant funds are approved . Respectfully, __ ~1~,"~~ o/ ~ l,\_NJ\ . · Geo rge j .\ Berry ~, \ Acting in the Absence of the Chairman GJB:fy � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document MINUTES GRANT REVIEW BOARD JUNE 9, 1969 Members of the Grant Review Board met on Monday, June 9, 1969, in City Hall with the following persons present: Mr. Tom Bello, Administrative Intern Mr. George Berry, Administrative Coordinator Mr. Jay Fountain, Deputy Director of Finance Mr. Collier Gladin, Planning Director Mr. Don Ingram, Associate Director, Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. (CAP, Inc.) Mr. Woody Underwood, Principal Budget Analyst Mr. Gladin reviewed the status of the joint venture of the City and CAP, Inc. to develop a plan for the central city, He pointed out that provisions had been made in the 1969 General Fund Budget of the Planning Department for the program in that $15,000 had been appropriated for consultant services and that certain staff assignments had been made for the benefit of the project. Mr. Ingram stated that in addition to cxisting staff members of CAP, Inc. assigned to the project, at least $25,000 was available for consultant services to support the project. Mr. Gladin then reviewed the proposal to utilize this accumulated "local contri- bution'' to support a grant application to the Départment of Transportation for grant funds so that the study could be enlarged and its scope broadened. He stated that a consortium of consulting firms now retained by the Department of Transportation had expressed interest in the project and it was felt that, to obtain approval, it would only be necessary to emphasize the transportation aspects of the program to a greater degree than previously anticipated. He stated that the accumulated local contribution would make possible a grant of about $200, 000 with which to undertake the program, The grant project would be for a term of 18 months. Answering questions by both Mr, Underwood and Mr, Fountain, both Mr. Gladin and Mr. Ingram stated that it would not be necessary to create any new positions for the study period. They stated that the existing staff would be sufficient to administer the study and that the grant funds would be used for consultant services. Mr. Berry stated that, if the funds are to be administered by the City, all normal city requirements as to procedure and expenditure of funds would have to be observed. The Grant Review Board supported and approved the idea of using the already appropriated local commitment to generate Federal funds to broaden and enlarge the Central Atlanta Planning Program, It was felt that traffic and transportation Page Two was perhaps the most critical problem facing the central city and that the enlarged study, with emphasis on transportation, would be most appropriate. Approval was given, therefore, for the filing of the application for such funds. Mr. Gladin, however, was directed not to include authorization for the Mayor to execute a grant agreement until an agreement could be executed between CAP, Inc. and the City of Atlanta which would commit CAP, Inc. to the City for their share of the local contribution necessary to support the grant application. The grant agreement itself and the agreement between CAP, Inc. and the City of Atlanta will be subject to further review by the Grant Review Board and the appropriate Aldermanic Committee at the time the grant funds are approved. Respectfully, | We IA Ge ‘ye [yew ‘George J.} Berry Acting in the Absence of the Chairman GJB:fy  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 4, Folder 15, Document 54 Box 4 Box 4 Folder 15 Folder topic: Central Atlanta Progress | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/824cbad79baaf0a4466d3ce029df9a8a.pdf f62f3c58e4ba9c78ed2e0ede43fb4f4f Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. ® ~tthur lll.Jlittle,llnc-. ACORN PARK CAMBRIDGE , MASSACHUSETTS 02 140 6 17 864-5770 RESEARCH · ENGI NEER ING · MANAGEMENT CO NSULTING May JO, 1969 Mr. William Maynard. Chairman Policy Co ittt?e Atlanta Area Tran portation Study Atlanta Transi System 125 Pin Str ct, N. E. Atlanta& Georgia 30308 Dear Mr . ynurd; I a.~ taking the lib rty of sending yo and the others li ted bolo a draf of our reco endations for Pha,e II, These basic lly cov r the point e di cus ed on my visit to you, office on th w ek of t y 19. I would ap recite y co enc you h vc on tbcs reco We arc wr pping up our r port !thin th next we k. Our te lookin c rtainly njoy d worki15 in Atl nta, and e end tions. r 11 rly- forw rd to Phase II. Thanks for your h lp. Sine rely, All n IC. Sloan AKS/ina cc: Mr . Robert Biv 11a Mt". Colli r Gl dd n Mr. Don In$1,r Mr. l!arl Land rs Mr. Richard Rich r. Henry Stuart r. Dani 1 w at Mr. Lelaud V l CAM B R I DG E. MASSACHUSETTS C HI CAGO SAN FRANC I SCO NEW YORK WASHINGTON SANTA M ONICA ATHENS BRUSSE L S EDINBURGH L ONDON MEXICO C I TY TORONTO ZUR I CH � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document May 30, 1969 Ar th Ur QD) A it tl g, I rt C, cibjaciiae uae aacaveuns O2140 RESEARCH: ENGINEERING: MANAGEMENT CONSULTING 6|I7 864-5770 Mr. William Maynard, Chairman Policy Committee Atlanta Area Traneportation Study Atianta Transit Systen 125 Pine Street, N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30308 Dear Mr. Maynard: I am taking the liberty of sending you and the others listed below a draft of our recommendations for Phase II. These basically cover the pointe we discussed on my visit to your office on the week of May 19. I would appreciate any comments you have on these recommendations. We are wrapping up our report within the next week. Our team certainly enjoyed working in Atlanta, and we are all eagerly looking forward to Phase II. Thanks for your help. AKS /mag ce: Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Robert Bivens Collier Gladden Don Ingram Earl Landers Richard Rich Henry Stuart Daniel Sweat Leland Veal Sincerely, Allan K. Sloan CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS CHICAGO SAN FRANCISCO NEW YORK WASHINGTON SANTA MONICA ATHENS BRUSSELS EDINBURGH LONDON MEXICO CITY TORONTO ZURICH  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 4, Folder 15, Document 55 Box 4 Box 4 Folder 15 Folder topic: Central Atlanta Progress | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/5a8124733d4263676c879780c06ebd35.pdf 2dbcd716fc2bb638b870edc28e3cb593 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. - ---- --- --i I ROUGH DRAFT By .... ... :A.J:.l .~11.. .~.'.. Sloan Date ......Ma.Y. ..:?.~..\ 1969 Page ...... l ............. . ATLANTA -- RECOM:MEN DAT I ONS FOR PHASE II We have three basic recommenda tions to ma ke for Phase II of the CCT program. These proposals have been di scu s sed with various officials and leader.s in Atlanta and have r e c e ived po s itive response. - & that the CCT consortium team should operate under the aegis of th e Policy Committee of the Atlanta Area Transportation Study during Pha se II; e that CCT should assist MARTA in planning an ex periment a l busway connecting one of Atlanta's neighborho ods with do wn town; that CCT should a lso assi s t the joint City Planning Commission - Centra l Atlanta Pro gres s study in dev e loping a detail e d plan for downtown ci r culation. The foll owing is the rational e be hind ea ch of th e s e b a sic recommenda tions: 1. Orga ni zational Stru ctu r e -- since the AAT S Policy Committ ee is emerg i ng a s the pr ime policy making body in tra n sp or t at ion, we r ecommend that CCT's Phas e II work b e done unde r the aeg is of this committ e e . This should i n sure that the CCT pr oject will op e rate within the mainst re am of trans po rt a tion policy making in Atlant a . The AATS Policy Committ ee repr e - sents t he kind of transport a tion policy making body t hat the f ede r al gover nment has bee n wanting to c r eate i n me tropolit an are as fo r t ranspo r t a t io n plann i n g pu rpo ses. The Te chnical Adviso r y Comm ittee of AATS rep resen t s the te chn ic i ans of · the various par t i c ipa ting a genc i es and is generally the group tha t i n it iates prop osal s to be t aken t o t he Policy Commit t ee, The Cit i z en ' s Adv i sory Commi ttee is now being es t ablishe d t o review the Voo rh e es pla n and is expect e d t o be the main link to the community in ga i ning unde rstanding and s u pport fo r tra nspo r tat ion improvemen ts. AOL 116- 269 �ROUGH DRAFf By .. ... ...... ............... . Date ...................... . Page ...... 2.•............. The CCT's Phase II work should be guided a n d reviewed periodically by the appropriat e corrnnittee s of the AATS. At thi s time some sort of subcommitt e e structure is being planned for AATS and it s advisory committees. It may be that there will be appropriate subcommitt e es to which the CCT should relate more directly at some future date. To impleme nt this r ecomme ndat i on, some e xcha n g e of l e tters betwee n the Urban Mass Transportation Administrator and Hr. William Maynard, Chairman of the AATS Policy Committee, would be in order. This should happen on the initiative of UMTA once Phase II policy is set. 2. Nature of Pha se II Work -- in Phase II, CCT should act a s a sup- plement to, not a substitute for, the planning work of the specific agencies respon s ible f or tra nspo rt a tion or dev e lopmental plan ning. CCT should not be the sol e planning a g ent for a p a rt i cular proj ec t or prog r am , fo r this is p roperly the r espons ibility o f the loca l pla nni n g a nd ope rat ing agencies. Our specif ic work in Phase II should b e d esign e d to s upple me nt the t echnica l wo rk of AATS a nd MARTA i n r e f i :. i n g a n d d e t a ili n g t h e b asi c tra nsportation pl a n now und e r consid era tion a nd t aking s t e p s to implement i t and CAP- CPC as part of its planning of downt own circula tion improvements. With i n the work p r o g rams of these agencies, we r e comme nd that CCT concen t rate on those a spe ct s o f the pla nn i n g that a r e : a. oriented toward action programs that have a short t erm (3- 5 yea r) time frame fo r impl e mentation; b. o rient e d toward s pro g rams wh i ch UMTA c a n u se as a b as i s f o r d eve l o ping its nat i onal programs . The two p r oj e cts we recommend f o r d etail ed work in Phase II meet both of t h ese cri t eria. .2l.rthm D.11.ittlr.il nr. AOL 116-269 �ROUGH DRAFT By ........................... Date ... .................. .. Page ........ .3 ........... . , 3. The Busways Experiment without doubt, the planning and developing of a part of the busway system on an exp e rimental basis will be the most important tr ansportation development affecting downtown Atlanta in the nex t few years. It will also be the most important new pro- gram for which federal aid will be required. While AATS and MARTA will have prime responsibility for the furth e r planning work on busways both in th e short and long run, the CCT project could h e lp considerably in this work. By so doing, UMTA could have the direct benefit of some on-the- ground planning experience with a system concept which may have wider application n a tionally. The following are the specific kinds of work that CCT could help perform as a part of the process of setting up the spec ific experime nt a l program for busways tha t Atlanta wants to develop: a. Provide some of t h e t echnical analysis requir ed for the AATS and MARTA to sel ect a suitable segment of the overall busway plan for first s t age expe rimen t ation. This is a critical deci sion . It will involve a caref ul balancing of engineerin g, op erating, and marketing factors with the political rea lities of ?resent d ay Atlant a . This work will involve an analysis of the current charac teristics of the people living within patronag e di s tanc e of the v arious busway routes, an assessment of the marke t within the se areas for n ew bu sway s erv i ce (coverage, frequency, etc .) , an assessment of the fea sibility fr om an operating po int o f view of providing busway service on the p articular rout es, and a n analysis of the overall costs and b e n efits of selecting o ne of the rou t es for first stag e experimentation. This wou ld be a major par t of CCT' s work in Phase II, in which it would be taking program g uidance and dir ection from MARTA and working closely with their consultants . 2trthur D.1!.ittkJJnc AOL 116-269 �ROUGH DRAFT By ..................... .. ... . Date ... ....... ........... .. Page .........4 .... .. ... .. . b. Provide specific studies needed to implement a selected busway project. Once a route is selected for experimentation, there are a number of other work projects in which CCT might be able to assist subsequently, including: o specific studies of the market for and the characteristics of the busway services to be provided on theselected route; • studies of the impact of the busway on the neighborhoods and land areas directly adjacent to the proposed route; studies of costs, funding requirements, and sources of funds for an ex perimental project; • studies to determine the best way to monitor the performance of the busway service, once operating, from a patronage and financial point of view. 4. Downtown Circulation -- the :uture of internal circulation in do~mtown Atlanta will depend almost entirely on the nature of the ove rall · plan the MTS and the participating agencies finally adopt. There are a number of work projects in which CCT could participate in order to h e lp the responsible agencies reach these important decisions. Most of these are included in the study program that the City Planning Commission Central Atlanta Progress joint t e am is now developing. The revised appli- cation of CAP to UMTA to fund this program reflects these projects. Our recommendation is that CCT participate in thi s planning program in a way that would provide additional assistance to the work tha t is alrea dy planned. The CCT team has been meeting with CAP to det e rmine what kind of pa r ticipation this should be . The following work proj ect s a r e po te n tial c andidates : 2rthur D.1littlr.11nc. AO L 116-269 �ROUGH DRAIT By ... .. ... .. ... .. .... .. .... .. Date ............ ....... .... Page .........?..•.......... . a. Assist a nce in desi g ning a syst em to monitor trends and changes in do,-mtown development. The futur e of downtown Atlanta is key to all plans for future mass transit to, from, and within the central area. This planning will require more knowledge about what is actually happening in the downtown area in terms of changes in employment (who is now working in downtown Atlanta by skill and location of residence, how this has been changing in the short run, what mode of travel is used to get to work), changes in investment in new and existing space of various kinds (what functions are requiring new space downtown, what costs, what volume of workers per floor area, what kind of investments are being made in new and rehabilitated space), chang e s in traffic g eneration and parking in various sections of dovmtown, and others. Currently all planning starts from the assumption that employment in downtown Atlanta will double by 1983, an estimate that was mad e by the Atlant a Region Hetropolitan Planning Commission in 1963 before many of the current growth trends were statistically evident. Since downtown growth is the reason for mass transit, both Atlanta and UMTA have an import ant stake in finding out more .about the dynamics of this downtown situa tion. This work would ini- tially involve setting up some continuing system to pull together at least annually existing d a ta on a wh~le series of these chang e fact ors. This knowl e dge is r e quired before CAP and th e other agencies will hav e a good basis to proceed with specific planning of downtown improvemen ts. b. Assistance in planning immediate transport a tion improv ements in central Atlanta. The CCT project could a ssist CAP and various respon- sible city departments in planning immediate improveme nts for downtown circulation p end ing decisions on the basic long range plan. These might in~ elude: 1) helping the City Traffic Engineer ing and Planning Departme nts und ertake a systema tic study and eva l uation o f e x isting arteria l and collect or street pattern s within the center city. Study should result in a plan for s moother flow through: 2rthm D.11.it tldlnr. AOL 116-269 �ROUGH DRAFT By .......................... . Date ....................... Page ...... .6.,............ . reduction of abrupt and acute corners use of unifi e d one-way street system use of reversibl·e lanes selective street closing s more coordinated inter section controls 2) studies of the u se of exis ting s treets for higher intensity bus usage throug h exclusive or reversible bus lanes, exclusive bus streets, signalling to favor buses, as pa rt of the planning for a busways experimental proj e ct. 3) analysis of curr e nt goods movement problems in downt own Atlanta . c. Assist a nc e i n longer r a n ge planning for down town circula tion. CCT could help in planning the basic dm,mtown circulation system n eeded to go along with the Voorhees plan or any alternativ e s to it. It could p ro- vide some o f the urban de s i g n, traffic eng ineerin g , economic, market, and co s t analysis inputs to suppl ement t ~e work tha t the CAP-CPC j oint t eam and its consultant will be doing. 1) It could include: helping plan circulation facilities to suppl ement the central subway in downtown, if the d e cision is made to g o ahead with it. The se might i nclud e: study of p e de s t r ian accesses, concours es , malls, and building connectors in connection wit h desig n o f the subwa y stations study of methods of connecting p er ipheral parking areas with s ubway stations and faci litat i ng crosstown distribution. 2rtl1m D.1!.ittk.1Jnc. AOL 116-269 �ROUGH DRAFT By .......................... . Date ............... .... ... . . .·.. ·., .:- Page ...... 7.•............. study of the 4esign and operation of the transportation center if built as ~art of a basic subway-busway plan. / · , ,, • 2) studies of alternatives to a central subway in downt own Atlanta , if the decision is made not to build a central subway as part of the . basic plan , including: studies of parking and bus circulation systems in connection with new expressways 3) studies·. of new internal circula tion systems to conne ct major traf fi~ generators in the downtown area (spe cia l vehicles, people moving system, etc.) as suggested by CAP. connections be tween Cousins air rights, Rich's, Government Center, Stadium, and parking lots. conne ctions b etween Peachtree Center, Civic Ce nte r, and- Cousins air rights. others To implement the se r e commendat ions, the following st e ps should be take n: • The recommenda tions should be r eviewed and accepted by UMTA after being transmitted by the cons ortium t eam of CCT. • A decision should be ma de on how much of an effort there will b e ip. Atlanta on Phase II in terms of money, man-hours , work emph~sis so that prioritie s can be selected from the proj ect s listed above. ~rthur D.1'.ittld(nr. AOL 116-269 �ROUGH DRAFT By...... ..................... Date .. ... .. ....... .. ... ... . Page.......... .8., ....... . After these de cisions are made and the scope of Phase II determined, follow-up meet ings should be set up with the AATS Policy Commi ttee throu gh its Chairman to review Phase II prog ram and op e rating procedures. MARTA through its Executive Director to discuss the busways project. the CAP-CPC project through its Executive Director and staff to discuss down town planning assis t a nce. The technical a nd operating details of Phase II would be worked out at th ese mee tings . .2lrtl1m D.11.ittldlnr. AOL 116-269 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document ROUGH DRAFT By Allan K. Sloan ATLANTA -- RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PHASE IT We have three basic recommendations to make for Phase II of the CCT program. These proposals have been discussed with various officials and leaders in Atlanta and have received positive response. @ that the CCT consortium team should operate under the aegis of the Policy Committee of the Atlanta Area Transportation Study during Phase IT; e that CCT should assist MARTA in planning an experimental bus- way connecting one of Atlanta's neighborhoods with downtown; @ that CCT should also assist the joint City Planning Commis- sion — Central Atlanta Progress study in developing a de- tailed plan for downtown circulation. The following is the rationale behind each of these basic recommendations: 1. Organizational Structure -- since the AATS Policy Committee is emerging as the prime policy making body in transportation, we recommend that CCT's Phase II work be done under the aegis of this committee. This should insure that the CCT project will operate within the mainstream of transportation policy making in Atlanta. The AATS Policy Committee repre- sents the kind of transportation policy making body that the federal go- vernment has been wanting to create in metropolitan areas for transporta- tion planning purposes. The Technical Advisory Committee of AATS represents the technicians of the various participating agencies and is generally the group that initiates proposals to be taken to the Policy Committee. The Citizen's Advisory Committee is now being established to review the Voorhees plan and is expected to be the main link to the com- munity in gaining understanding and support for transportation improvements. Arthur DAittle. Inc. ADL 116-269 ROUGH DRAFT The CCT's Phase II work should be guided and reviewed periodically by the appropriate committees of the AATS. At this time some sort of subcommittee structure is being planned for AATS and its advisory committees. It may be that there will be appropriate subcommittees to which the CCT should relate more directly at some future date. To implement this recommendation, some exchange of letters between the Urban Mass Transportation Administrator and Mr. William Maynard, Chairman of the AATS Policy Committee, would be in order. This should happen on the initiative of UMTA once Phase II policy is set. 2. Nature of Phase II Work -- in Phase II, CCT should act as a sup- plement to, not a substitute for, the planning work of the specific agen- cies responsible for transportation or developmental planning. CCT should not be the sole planning agent for a particular project or program, for this is properly the responsibility of the local planning and operating agencies. Our specific work in Phase II should be designed to supplement the tech- nical work of AATS and MARTA in refining and detailing the basic trans- portation plan now under consideration and taking steps to implement it and CAP-CPC as part of its planning of downtown circulation improvements. Within the work programs of these agencies, we recommend that CCT concen- trate on those aspects of the planning that are: a. oriented toward action programs that have a short term (3-5 year) time frame for implementation; b. oriented towards programs which UMTA can use as a basis for developing its national programs. The two projects we recommend for detailed work in Phase II meet both of these criteria. Arthur Zh. tittle, Inc. ADL 116-269 ROUGH DRAFT 3. The Busways Experiment -- without doubt, the planning and developing of a part of the busway system on an experimental basis will be the most important transportation development affecting downtown At- lanta in the next few years. It will also be the most important new pro- gram for which federal aid will be required. While AATS and MARTA will have prime responsibility for the further planning work on busways both in the short and long run, the CCT project could help considerably in this work. By so doing, UMTA could have the direct benefit of some on-the- ground planning experience with a system concept which may have wider application nationally. The following are the specific kinds of work’ that CCT could help perform as a part of the process of setting up the specific experimental program for busways that Atlanta wants to develop: a. Provide some of the technical analysis required for the AATS and MARTA to select a suitable segment of the overall busway plan for first stage experimentation. This is a critical decision. It will involve a careful balancing of engineering, operating, and market ing fac- tors with the political realities of »resent day Atlanta. This work will involve an analysis of the current characteristics of the people living within patronage distance of the various busway routes, an assessment of the market within these areas for new busway service (coverage, frequency, etc.), an assessment of the feasibility from an operating point of view of providing busway service on the particular routes, and an analysis of the overall costs and benefits of selecting one of the routes for first stage experimentation. This would be a major part of CCT's work in Phase II, in which it would be taking program guidance and direction from MARTA and working closely with their consultants. Arthur D Hite Inc. ADL 116-269 ROUGH DRAFT b. Provide specific studies needed to implement a selected busway project. Once a route is selected for experimentation, there are a number of other work projects in which CCT might be able to assist sub- sequently, including: @ specific studies of the market for and the character- istics of the busway services to be provided on the se- lected route; @ studies of the impact of the busway on the neighborhoods and land areas directly adjacent to the proposed route; e studies of costs, funding requirements, and sources of funds for an experimental project; e studies to determine the best way to monitor the perfor- mance of the busway service, once operating, from a pa- tronage and financial point of view. 4. Downtown Circulation -- the future of internal circulation in downtown Atlanta will depend almost entirely on the nature of the overall plan the AATS and the participating agencies finally adopt. There are a number of work projects in which CCT could participate in order to help the responsible agencies reach these important decisions. Most of these are included in the study program that the City Planning Commission - Central Atlanta Progress joint team is now developing. The revised appli- cation of CAP to UMTA to fund this program reflects these projects. Our recommendation is that CCT participate in this planning program in a way that would provide additional assistance to the work that is already planned. The CCT team has been meeting with CAP to determine what kind of participation this should be. The following work projects are potential candidates: Arthur A Little, Inc. ADL 116-269 ROUGH DRAFT a. Assistance in designing a system to monitor trends and changes in downtown development. The future of downtown Atlanta is key to all plans for future mass transit to, from, and within the central area. This planning will require more knowledge about what is actually happening in the downtown area in terms of changes in employment (who is now working in downtown Atlanta by skill and location of residence, how this has been changing in the short run, what mode of travel is used to get to work), changes in investment in new and existing space of various kinds (what functions are requiring new space downtown, what costs, what volume of workers per floor area, what kind of investments are being made in new and rehabilitated space), changes in traffic generation and parking in various sections of downtown, and others. Currently all planning starts from the assumption that employment in downtown Atlanta will double by 1983, an estimate that was made by the Atlanta Region Metropolitan Plan- ning Commission in 1963 before many of the current growth trends were ' statistically evident. Since downtown growth is the reason for mass transit, both Atlanta and UMTA have an important stake in finding out more about the dynamics of this downtown situation. This work would ini- tially involve setting up some continuing. system to pull together at least annually existing data on a whole series of these change factors. This knowledge is required before CAP and the other agencies will have a good basis to proceed with specific planning of downtown improvements. b. Assistance in planning immediate transportation improvements in central Atlanta. The CCT project could assist CAP and various respon- sible city departments in planning immediate improvements for downtown cir- culation pending decisions on the basic long range plan. These might in~ clude: 1) helping the City Traffic Engineering and Planning De- partments undertake a systematic study and evaluation of existing arterial and collector street patterns with- in the center city. Study should result in a plan for smoother flow through: Arthur D Little Inc. ADL 116-269 ROUGH DRAFT 3) - reduction of abrupt and acute corners - use of unified one-way street system - use of reversible lanes - selective street closings - more coordinated intersection controls studies of the use of existing streets for higher intensity bus usage through exclusive or reversible bus lanes, exclusive bus streets, signalling to fa- vor buses, as part of the planning for a busways experimental project. analysis of current goods movement problems in downtown Atlanta. c. Assistance in longer range planning for downtown circulation. CCT could help in planning the basic downtown circulation system. needed to go along with the Voorhees plan or any alternatives to it. It could pro- vide some of the urban design, traffic engineering, economic, market, and cost analysis inputs to supplement the work that the CAP-CPC joint team and its consultant will be doing. It could include: 13 ADL 116-259 helping plan circulation facilities to supplement the central subway in downtown, if the decision is made to go ahead with it. These might include: - study of pedestrian accesses, concourses, malls, and building connectors in connection with design of the subway stations - study of methods of connecting peripheral parking areas with subway stations and facilitating cross- town distribution. Arthur A Little Inc. ROUGH DRAFT - study of the design and operation of the transportation center if built as part of a basic subway-busway plan. Nales 2) studies of alternatives to a central subway in downtown Atlanta, if the decision is made not to build a central subway as part of the basic plan, including: studies of parking and bus circulation systems in connection with new expressways 3) studies.of new internal circulation systems to connect f major traffic generators in the downtown area (special vehicles, people moving system, etc.) as suggested by CAP. - connections between Cousins air rights, Rich's, Government Center, Stadium, and parking lots. - connections between Peachtree Center, Civic Center, and Cousins air rights. - others To implement these recommendations, the following steps should be taken: e The recommendations should be reviewed and accepted by UMTA after being transmitted by the consortium team of CCT. e A decision should be made on how much of an effort there will be in Atlanta on Phase II in terms of money, man-hours, work emphasis so that priorities can be selected from the projects listed above. : Arthur A Hittle Inc. ADL 116-269 ROUGH DRAFT ea After these decisions are made and the scope of Phase II determined, follow-up meetings should be set up with - the AATS Policy Committee through its Chairman to re- view Phase II program and operating procedures. —- MARTA through its Executive Director to discuss the bus=— ways project. - the CAP-CPC project through its Executive Director and staff to discuss downtown planning assistance. The technical and operating details of Phase II would be worked out at these meetings. Arthur DAittle Ine. ADL 116-269  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 4, Folder 15, Document 56 Box 4 Box 4 Folder 15 Folder topic: Central Atlanta Progress | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/4ecaed60f9b8e2d911d3ef82bb3b228e.pdf 5747484a0fa6254f5f464756bbd6fb9a Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. GEORGIA • • • • • • FULTON COUNTY THIS AGREEMENT, made and enter d into this day of , 1969, by and between the City of Atl anta, Georgia (hereinafter called the City) and Central Atlanta Progress , Inc. (hereinafter c alled the C . A . P . ). V'NITNESSE TH: WHEREAS , etailed Central Atl anta planning as called for in th City's Approved Land U s e Plan, is needed on a continuing bas i s ; and WHEREAS , the Central Area Pl nning Policy Committee was est blished to guide developm nt o! this continuing planning process , s id committe consisting of: the Mayor of Atlant , Ch irm n of the Ald rmanic Finance Committee , Chairman of th Aldermanic Pl oiling and Develop:m nt Com.mlttee, Ch irm n of C. A. P. Executive Committee, and the President of C.A. P.: and WHEREAS , th Planning for C . Pl City Planning D p rtment . P . h ve d velop d a study d sign, ing Pro ram" , which outline ntltl d "Centr 1 Ar organiz tion, working program and financing for th, planning proc and d th Dir ctor of rrang nt, woi-k �2. WHEREAS, the U~ S. Department of Transportation and the U . S . Department of Housing and Urban Development have matchi ng funds and/or serv i ces a v ailabl e to finance Central Area studi s ; and WHEREAS, a Sub-Area Transportation Study, f or which C . A . P . has pled~ed substantia l financial and pers onal support, is a pre - requisite for r eceiving the maximum amount of such funds ; NOW. THEREFORE, for val uable c onsiderati on, it i m.utually ag-reed as follows : Section 1 Th City nd the C. A . P . agree to joinUy undertake a Central Atl · nta Planning Progr m ouUined in the Study Design for the Central Atl nta Planning Process which is included as Exhibit "A" . S ctlon 2 Th City and the C. A. P. will impl ment this suba - ntially following the under tood th t ork program. included ny change m y b greemellt of both p rti s .. m d tudy d sign by Exhibit ' B 11 , and it l ln th work pJ"ogr m upon the mutu �3. Section 3 The City gr ed to exercise all possible diligent efforts to obtain any and any finan cial assistance that might be availabl e from the Federal Govermnent for the purpose of financing the Central Atlanta Planning Program. Section 4 In the event Federal financia l assistance i s made avail abl e , C . A. P. d oes hereby agre to pool its financial resource availabl e for the Central Atlanta Planning Program with the resources of the City for the financing of the program. Specifically, C . A . P. agre s . in the event Fed l."al assi tance i a•ailabl , to p y over to the City $25,000 ln cash and further to provide staff d other support oi the program, th full cost of which shall not be l cost s than $43,000. C. A . P . g:reee to document said staff and support in th manner ccepta.ble to th granting ag ncy and to provide the City th full docwne nt tion of ueh co te when The City gr WitA ••e : s to assu the full fin ? quest d to do so by the City. elal admini tr tion of the grant project. City o! Atl By: t M yor Central Atl - · l Progr a • ID.c. By:--------------PFeeident � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document GEORGIA ...... FULTON COUNTY THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of » 1969, by and between the City of Atlanta, Georgia (hereinafter called the City) and Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. (hereinafter called the C.A.P.). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, cetailed Central Atlanta planning as called for in the City's Approved Land Use Plan, is needed on a continuing basis; and WHEREAS, the Central Area Planning Policy Committee was established to guide development of this continuing planning process, said committee consisting of: the Mayor of Atlanta, Chairman of the Aldermanic Finance Committee, Chairman of the Aldermanic Planning and Development Committee, Chairman of C.A.P. Puscutive Committee, and the President of C.A.P.; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Department and the Director of Planning for C.A.P. have developed a study design, entitled ''Central Area Planning Program’, which outlines organization, working arrangement, work program and financing for the planning process; and 7. a ee SO ee eee ey es ee ee WR Oe eee ee a ee WHEREAS, the U. S. Department of Transportation and the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development have matching funds and/or services available to finance Central Area studies; and WHEREAS, a Sub-Area Transportation Study, for which C.A.P. has pledged substantial financial and personal support, is a pre-requisite for receiving the maximum amount of such funds; NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, it is mutually agreed as follows: Section 1 The City and the C.A.P. agree to jointly undertake a Central Atlanta Planning Program as outlined in the Study Design for the Central Atlanta Planning Process which is included as Exhibit "A". Section 2 The City and the C.A.P. will implement this study design by substantially following the work program, included as Exhibit ''B", and it is understood that any changes may be made in the work program upon the mutual agreement of both parties.  Section 3 The City agreed to exercise all possible diligent efforts to obtain any and any financial assistance that might be available from the Federal Government for the purpose of financing the Central Atlanta Planning Program, Section 4 In the event Federal financial assistance is made available, C.A.P. does hereby agree to pool its financial resources available for the Central Atlanta Planning Program with the resources of the City for the financing of the program. Specifically, C.A.P. agrees, in the event Federal assistance is azailable, to pay over to the City $25,000 in cash and further to provide staff and other support of the program, the full cost of which shall not be less than $43,000. C.A.P. agrees to document said staff and support costs in the manner acceptable to the granting agency and to provide the City the full documentation of such costs when requested to do so by the City. The City agrees to assume the full financial administration of the grant project. Witnesses: City of Atlanta By: Mayor Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. By: / ' President  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 4, Folder 15, Document 57 Box 4 Box 4 Folder 15 Folder topic: Central Atlanta Progress | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/13ec363f46177f9d5f017009dd17814e.pdf 8152bab42d2d3e67b1e73b0b438fca22 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. - -- ,.-- -- ~----'- - --- - - - - ~ ----- - - - -- ---- -- - - - ~- - - --- -- - - -- -- - -- - -- - -·----- - - --- - - --- - - - ___,.. --- -- .......... 1----:-- - ·- - - - - - - .. - - - -- - - - ·· - -- - - - - . - - - -- -- -- � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document tO CAR ie tee CA. bagreens def aw \ a tut ht A Te ail r ee  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 4, Folder 15, Document 58 Box 4 Box 4 Folder 15 Folder topic: Central Atlanta Progress | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/675efb0ecf70c076627d2c9400488211.pdf fb5c7893ceefa875f60db69c41f97a2d Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. ATLANTA,GEOAQIA FROM: Dan E. Sweat, Jr. Please refer to the attached correspondence and make the necessary reply. 0 Advise me the status of the attached. FORM 25-4-5 � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document i | fea the Mayor ATLANTA, GEORGIA f ROUTE SLIP | Jj a) eo a TO: hie tf J fa” -] i], FROM: Dan E. Sweat, Jr. (3) or your information Please refer to the attached correspondence and make the necessary reply. {_] Advise me the status of the attached. FORM 25-4-S  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 4, Folder 15, Document 59 Box 4 Box 4 Folder 15 Folder topic: Central Atlanta Progress | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/13e5acbe00b718a2db371f903597f5f8.pdf 222a89e9b4105b07859a623310a37509 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. 11/5/69 PRELIMINARY IDEAS FOR A "TRANSPORTATION DAY - ATLANTA". January 23 1 1970 Sponsorship: Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. Preliminary: An advance series of news r e leases and other appropriate public relations efforts to build interest and inform .the public of transportation-related activities in the Atlanta Area. Mayor of Atlanta and Governor of Georgia to issue joint proclamation declaring January 23rd as "Transportation Day." A Possible Itinerary: 7:30 AM Helicopter Tour of Atlanta - Mayor, Secretary Volpe, Newsmen 8:30 AM Breakfast for Transportation Agencies - Secretary Volpe to meet with local agency representatives involved in various elements of transportation activity at regional, State, and local leve~ (Local D.O.T. Regional representatives --- FHA, FAA, etc., State Highway Department, Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, Atlanta Airport representatives, etc.) 9:30 AM Transportation Workshops - Hold a series of workshops on various transportation elements -- - Airport Planning, Federal Highway Administration Programs, Urban Mass Transit, Highway Safety, Center City ~onsortium, Transportation Innovations to serve the Disadvantage~ , etc. These workshops would bring together representatives of various local a gencies concerned with the above elements, in concer t with visiting Department of Transportation repres entatives to discuss trans porta tion pr oblems of . mutual concern. (Secretary Volpe might make an appearance at the breakfast to say a few words and have the opportunity to meet some of the D. O.T . repres enta t i ves in the Atla nta Area . ) 9:30 AM Fl ight in Wor ld' s Larges t Airp l a ne (The C-SA Ga l axy) Newsmen and Staff r epr esentatives would accompany t he Secre tary on a specia l flight aboa r d the Lockhe ed C- SA Galaxy, t he world's larges t airplane . Th i s huge airc raft represents a major breakthrough in t he air freig ht industry , which wili call for new National policy considerations. 10:45 AM L Press Conference -- �Page 2 · PRELIMINARY IDEAS FOR A "TRANSPORTATION DAY - ATLANTA" (continued) 11:30 AM Directors' Reception - a reception honoring Secretary Volpe, and including the Directors of Central Atlanta Progress, Inc., the Mayor, the Governor, and other top Atlanta leaders not otherwise included. 12:30 PM ANNUAL MEETING OF CENTRAL ATLANTA PROGRESS, INC. Will be held in the main Ballroom of Atlanta's fabulous Regency Hotel, with some 600-800 of Atlanta's top business, civic, and political leaders attending. Head table to include 50 top corporation presidents and governmental leaders. Business matters will be limited to 5 minutes. Secretary Volpe to be the guest speaker, possibly for a hard-hitting, fast-moving speech intended (1) to inspire Atlantans to get going on such critical transportation matters as Rapid Transit, Airport facilities, operational traffic improvements, and the necessary interim steps to serve unprecedented growth activity in the Area, and (2) to create interest in, and support for, vital transportation legislation, from a base of broad understanding of the critical issues involved. Final plans will be developed in coordination with Mr. Volpe's Staff. .-- ______,,,. -- � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document 11/5/69 PRELIMINARY IDEAS FOR A "TRANSPORTATION DAY - ATLANTA", January 23, 1970 Sponsorship: Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. Preliminary: An advance series of news releases and other appropriate public relations efforts to build interest and inform the public of transportation-related activities in the Atlanta Area. . Mayor of Atlanta and Governor of Georgia to issue joint proclamation declaring January 23rd as "Transportation Day." A Possible Itinerary: 7:30 AM Helicopter Tour of Atlanta - Mayor, Secretary Volpe, Newsmen 8:30 AM Breakfast for Transportation Agencies - Secretary Volpe to meet with local agency representatives involved in various elements of transportation activity at regional, State, and local level. (Local D.O.T. Regional representatives --- FHA, FAA, etc., State Highway Department, Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, Atlanta Airport representatives, etc.) 9:30 AM Transportation Workshops - Hold a series of workshops on various transportation elements --- Airport Planning, Federal Highway Administration Programs, Urban Mass Transit, Highway Safety, Center City Consortium, Transportation Innovations to serve the Disadvantaged, etc. These workshops would bring together representatives of various local agencies concerned with the above elements, in concert with visiting Department of Transportation representatives to discuss transportation problems of mutual concern. (Secretary Volpe might make an appearance at the breakfast to say | a few words and have the opportunity to meet some of the D.O.T. representatives in the Atlanta Area.) 9:30 AM Flight in World's Largest Airplane (The C-5A Galaxy) Newsmen and Staff representatives would accompany the Secretary on a special flight aboard the Lockheed C-5A Galaxy, the world's largest airplane. This huge aircraft represents a major breakthrough in the air freight industry, which will call for new National policy considerations. 10:45 AM Press Conference Page 2 PRELIMINARY IDEAS FOR A "TRANSPORTATION DAY - ATLANTA" (continued) 11:30 AM Directors' Reception - a reception honoring Secretary Volpe, and including the Directors of Central Atlanta Progress, Inc., the Mayor, the Governor, and other top Atlanta leaders not otherwise included. 12:30 PM ANNUAL MEETING OF CENTRAL ATLANTA PROGRESS, INC. Will be held in the main Ballroom of Atlanta's fabulous Regency Hotel, with some 600-800 of Atlanta's top business, civic, and political leaders attending. Head table to include 50 top corporation presidents and governmental leaders. Business matters will be limited to 5 minutes. Secretary Volpe to be the guest speaker, possibly for a hard-hitting, fast-moving speech intended (1) to inspire Atlantans to get going on such critical transportation matters as Rapid Transit, Airport facilities, operational traffic improvements, and the necessary interim steps to serve unprecedented growth activity in the Area, and (2) to create interest in, and support for, vital transportation legislation, from a base of broad under- standing of the critical issues involved. Final plans will be developed in coordination with Mr. Volpe's Staff. _  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 4, Folder 15, Document 6 Box 4 Box 4 Folder 15 Folder topic: Central Atlanta Progress | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/8344ad5eb6d344daf2b7fa2cff50129b.pdf 660c1759ffd70c5e1dc0ce5d5758c9b8 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. GEORGIA • • • • • FULTON COUNTY THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 1969, by and between the City of Atlanta, Georgia (hereinafter called the City) and Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. (hereinafter called the C. A. P. ) . WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, detailed Central Atlanta planning as called for in the City's Approved Land Use Plan, is needed on a continuing basis; and WHEREAS, the Central Area Planning Policy Committee w as establishe d to guid e development of this continuing planning process, said committee consisting of: the Mayor of Atlanta , Chairman of the Al d ermanic Financ e Committee, Chairman of the Aldermanic Planning and Development Committee, Chairman of C. A. P. E x ecutive C o mmittee, and the Pr e sident of C. A. P . ; and WHEREAS, the City Plannin g D e partme nt and the Director of Plannin g fo r C . A. P. hav e deve lop e d a stud y de sign , e ntitle d "Central Ar e 2. Planning Pro g ram" , w h i ch outlines organization , w orkin g arrang eme nt , w o rk p rogr a m a nd fin an cing f or the planning pro cess; an d WHEREAS, t h e U . S. D e pa rtm ent o f T r ansp orta tion, U . S. D e partment of Hou sing a nd Urban D eve lopmen t, a:;pd v:;ir i 9ttB local ageHei0e h a ve m a tching �2. funds and/or services available to finance Central Area studie s; and WHEREAS, a Sub-Area Transportation Study, for w hich C.A. P. has pledged substantial financial and p e rsonal support, is a pre-requisite for r e ceiving the max imum amount of such funds; NOW, THEREFORE, ~ ii!S: :~:< Section 1 ~4, The City and the C. A. P. a g r ee to ...undertake a C e ntral Atlanta Planning Pro g r a m as outlined in the Study Design for the C e ntr a l Atlanta Plannin g EJ"1.~.-+"'A._ Proc e ss w hich i s includ e d a s iil:=P e f o r eR~e . S ect ion 2 a n d t he C . A. P. m a y m ak e a ny chan A t l anta P l a nning P rogram . • A . P . agrees to commit $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 c a s h e City 1 s share of $15 , 0 0 0 c a sh an d $ 2 9 , 0 0 0 in - kind financ e t h e Planning P rogram. 9 �Section 3 The City Agrees to exercise all possible dili~ent efforts to obtain any and all financial assistance that rni~ht be 8Vailatle from the Federal Government for the purpose of financing the Central Atlan t a Planning Program. Section 4 In the event federal financial assistance is made available) CAP.L ..... does hereby agree to pool its financial resources available for the Central Atlanta Planning Pro~ram with the resources of the City for the financing~ of the program. Specifically, CA.P,.sitz agrEJes, in the event federal assistance is ava ilafule, to pay over to the city $25,000 in c a sh and further to provide staff and other support of the pro~ram, the full cost of which shall not be . less than $~3,000. CAP,, agrees to document said sta.ff and support costs in the manner acceptable to the grantin g agency a nd to provide the City the full documentation of such costs when requested to do so by the City. V~maxkm• The City agrees bo assume the f ull financial administration of the g rant project. Jw,., �3. Section 4 --- immediate :y:-i B.-applying to the U. S. 0 Department ~ Developm :.a-t , and various local agencies for any available matching funds. Witnesses: City of Atlanta By: Mayor Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. B y: Presid ent � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document GEORGIA..... FULTON COUNTY THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 1969, by and between the City of Atlanta, Georgia (hereinafter called the City) and Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. (hereinafter called the C,A,P,). WITNESSE TH: WHEREAS, detailed Central Atlanta planning as called for in the City's Approved Land Use Plan, is needed on a continuing basis; and WHEREAS, the Central Area Planning Policy Committee was established to guide development of this continuing planning process, said committee consisting of: the Mayor of Atlanta, Chairman of the Aldermanic Finance Committee, Chairman of the Aldermanic Planning and Development Committee, Chairman of C,A,P. Executive Committee, and the President of C.A.P.; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Department and the Director of Planning for C,A,P, have developed a study design, entitled ''Central Area Planning Program", which outlines organization, working arrangement, work program and financing for the planning process; and WHEREAS, the U. S. Department of Transportation, U. S. Depart- ment of Housing and Urban Development, andxwarieus-tocel-eseneies have matching at funds and/or services available to finance Central Area studies; and WHEREAS, a Sub-Area Transportation Study, for which C,A.P. has pledged substantial financial and personal support, is a pre-requisite for receiving the maximum amount of such funds; NOW, THEREFORE, oe - pal - Section 1 | ees The City and the C,.A.P. agree to jundertake a Central Atlanta Planning Program as outlined in the Study Design for the Central Atlanta Planning Ehb. bt “A * Process which is included as a+eferercee. Section 2 and the C,A,P, may make any chan deemed desirable ed to carry out the Central in the study design's work program, which will be Atlanta Planning Program, Section 3 The CcA, P, agrees to commit $25,000 cash*and $43, 000 in-kind funds with the City's share of $15,000 cash and $29, 000 in-kind ds to help finance the Planning Program, Section 3 The City Agrees to exercise all possible diligent efforts to obtain any and all financial assistance that might be available from the Federal Government for the purpose of financing the Central Atlanta Planning Program. Section In the event federal financial assistance is made available, CAP, 4m. does hereby agree to pool its financial resources available for the Central Atlanta Planning Program with the resources of the City for the financings of the program. Specifically, CAPS. agrees, in the event federal assistance is available, to pay over to the city $25,000 in cash and further to provide staff and other support of the program, the full cost of which shall not be less than $H3,000. CGAP, Be, agrees to document said staff and support costs in the manner acceptable to the granting agency and to vrovide the City the full documentation of such costs when requested to do so by the City. Upsnxkka The City agrees to assume the full financial administration of the erant project. Section 4 oO _ The City-agr to proceed immediately in-applying to the U. S. —_—_— Department of Transportation;-the U. S. Departmen —_— ——— Development; and various local agencies for any available matching funds, ra sing and Urban Witnesses: City of Atlanta By: Mayor Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. By: President  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 4, Folder 15, Document 60 Box 4 Box 4 Folder 15 Folder topic: Central Atlanta Progress | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/5b6becf6541bd66e137e4002932c8943.pdf e7f36d11b6f4db91b3f6f504b145b3e7 Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. MINUTES GRANT REVIEW BOARD _MARCH 14, 1969 The City of Atlanta Grant Review Board met Friday, March 14, 1969, at 10:30 a. m. with the following in attendance: Dan Sweat, Chairman Jay Fountain, Member Collier Gladin, Member E. H. Underwood, Member Don Ingram, Central Atlanta Progress I The Grant Review Board has reviewed the proposal entitled "Study Design for the Central Atlanta Planning Process." We find that to conduct this proposed study is in the best economic and physical development interests of the City. At the present time we can find no conflict with other studies and activities, nor do we find any duplication of effort. We believe that all the coordination necessary at this time has been achieved. Further, indications are that an adequate amount of coordination will be maintained by the agencies invol.ved during the course of the study. We have examined the City's portions of the proposed funding for the study and find everything to be in order. The City's cash share amounts agree with the amounts listed in the Planning Department's 1969 budget for these purposes. Further, the Planning Department is prepared to make the necessary sta_ff commitments to generate the required non-cash credits. The recommendation of the Grant Review Board is that the Mayor forward the above mentioned proposal, along with a suitable letter to the Secretaries of the Department of Transportation and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The Mayor's transmittal letter should request their review, approval and determination of the most appropriate federal funding program to be used in financing this study. Upon their reply, the City should submit a formal application tci the appropriate department under the program specified . A copy of the Central Atlanta Action Program Outline is attached . Chair man DS :f y '• ' ·i •, . .. ... .. . l � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document MINUTES GRANT REVIEW BOARD MARCH 14, 1969 The City of Atlanta Grant Review Board met Friday, March 14, 1969, at (10:30 a.m. with the following in attendance: Dan Sweat, Chairman Jay Fountain, Member Collier Gladin, Member E. H. Underwood, Member Don Ingram, Central Atlanta Progress , The Grant Review Board has reviewed the proposal entitled "Study Design for the Central Atlanta Planning Process.'' We find that to conduct this proposed study is in the best economic and physical development interests of the City. At the present time we can find no conflict with other studies and activities, nor do we find any duplication of effort. We believe that all the coordination necessary at this time has been achieved. Further, indications are that an adequate amount of coordination will be maintained by the agencies involved during the course of the study. We have examined the City's portions of the proposed funding for the study and find everything to be in order. The City's cash share amounts agree with the amounts listed in the Planning Department's 1969 budget for these purposes. Further, the Planning Department is prepared to make the necessary staff commit- ments to generate the required non-cash credits. The recommendation of the Grant Review Board is that the Mayor forward the above mentioned proposal, along with a suitable letter to the Secretaries of the Department of Transportation and the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment, The Mayor's transmittal letter should request their review, approval and determination of the most appropriate federal funding program to be used in financing this study. Upontheir reply, the City should submit a formal application to the appropriate department under the program specified. A copy of the Central Atlanta Action Program Outline is attached. R ,) ae an Ww 2 Chairman DS :fy  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 4, Folder 15, Document 61 Box 4 Box 4 Folder 15 Folder topic: Central Atlanta Progress | 1969 https://ivanallen.iac.gatech.edu/mayoral-records/traditional/files/original/71cb82f7acc29f8658229d9de8fed6e4.pdf c0a78b8d090dc1977bc9c45c0a0b321b Scripto Transcription A written representation of a document. • ,. _ - , . -...,... ,,.· ...... - ~ -.a".. ·ei·.;;"<'te~~-., -·;. ~-- ----------------~--:·- -------'-'--'-.. .....,-' . :.... w.-~~ ~ Secretary Romney -" ·:..:~-~--· i cc: I Secretary Volpe . - ------- -· -··------- - '" -----·- ·-- - ---------··- ------ --- - --· ···-- .. . __..._. ..... _ . . , w - ~...... - · --- - . :- - ._ ~~ - ~ -- -- - - •.:.........t_. - ~ -- . .... -· - - . ' . -- ~ _ _ __ _, ___ ._ _,_. __ _..:. _ ·-.~ -- ·---'--'----"' . ... -·- __ _ .. _ _. __ _-::=:_..:.. __ __ ..,_ . . . l ... ; INTRODUCTION "'-1: -: :. :" . • ~ ·: :- ,_~.: ·;. - '_J C.. ! .., · --: , ...... . I~ - - • . - 1 ,·. - ,I • -·• , · · \. ... ·- · · .. . .;.. . . __... .._~; ·_. . ~ ~ ..:. ~ . -. :·") ·· . ·,.. I \ · This study design describes a process for d~veloping an action program. The overall study covers a total of_18 months. Part I of _this process, covering the first ten months, will provide a review of major imminent projects as well as produce a preliminary plan. Dµ~ing Part II, the . last eight moriths of the study, a comprehensive planning program will . be developed for adoption along with a method for continuous planning •. and programming for the future. l I -. : .. __ .\ ~- _-; . . \ . - ·· .. .,.__. . : - ._ -. .. :_:_ ~ ... .. The study design emphasizes planning and programming in accordance I wi_th specific goals and objectives. Provision is made for frequent re- I view of the goals and objectives and proposed programs by public officials, ,.-_ - the businessmen and citizens concerned with the central area. ,. . .. pose ~f this continuing policy review is two-fold. The pur-· - . First, the plan and - < ' · the program resulting from the proc~ss will reflect the desires and '· aspirations of the people who will_ live, work and do busines_s in the area. Second, it will generate support for the program. - .... - . - ... · ;; -- y-, . . . - .. ~ --· . - . .. . .. ._. _. •. :. . · 1 . . . .- - -. .s.. The program will be carried out by a special team to be created and staffed by local government and ·business through the City of Atlanta and - Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. (CAP), with staff assistance from tech. nical consultants. The community will be involved in special aspects J' • - • •.- ' of the study program. In particular, it is intended that private industry and/ or local colleges be involved in special studies of urban problems as they at:fect the Central Atlanta Area. The involvement of the business community is considered essential. CAP will be responsible for con- . tinuing liaison, reporting and solicitation of suggestions frorl?- the businessmen who w~ll be most affected by downtown plans. - ., . - . ..,· .. :.• ., _, . :.: \.=. . .·- . . I"- ·.J I ..-.· . • .- . ...:~-. . -~ , _.. ..... --..._. • w-4 • •, -lt- • .- - · - · , ,c• ._.. ,., • ' •... _ r �> ~_l I i =:t ~,P -···- 1 i.., - __., _ ---- ----- -· -.. ·- ·-··- --···-- .--·--·- -·· -- -- -·--- -----·-- ·--··· - ·-· ···· ··-: · ··-.---- --- --- --- ------ · - -- -· __ .,._______ . . . ·- ·,-" ·- ......- - ,. .....,....~·- · - - ······ - --- ! --~~·__~~ / w S e cretary Volpe · ···- - - · ---·· ~ -- - ~ -- - - -· - - -· - ~ · · - · · - ·- - ··· - - ~ - - - · · · ,_ ....,._ · -. · . ~ . ~ - · ~ · . .......... - · ·- ·· - .. . - - - · · · - · - - -· - · - . l .-2,. The work program places primary emphasis on t~e ;:i.nalysis and inter. pretation rather than the collection ?f data. . Most of the information wh~~h will be neede~ is already available from studies (co...:cnpleted or in ,/ ·-, . .:. .:i progress) by the City of Atlanta, the State Highway . Department of Georgia, . . . the Atlanta Area Transportation Study, the Atlanta Regional Metropolitan Planning Commission, and the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transi't Authority. This coordination is essential for the successful implementation of both studies. The timing is designed to exploit the general findings of the cur- rent area transportation study. The Central Atlanta Study and the area transportation study are mutually complementary. ! ' •: Figure 1 indicates the work program by tasks and time sequences. It is intended that this model be used as a guide for man8:gementJor the study program. I ··' ..-· .·. · i, i' . It is recognized that all studies are subject to modifica- . tion and adaptation to the exigencies of unforeseen circumstances. How- ever a it i8"believed that the schedule as indicated in Figure 1 is reasonable and can be accomplished with satisfactory results in the time periods indi- cated. Inherent in this study design is a flexibility which will permit the constant evaluation of proposed projects that are relevant to the Central Area while the study is in progress, to give views on the impact of these projects on the interim plans and objectives for Central Atlanta. T' . ,, STUDY AREA ~ ·t ... .; . • I •. I ~ ·~ The proposed study area is shown in Figure 2. The boundary which is f.· ·l defined by the circumferential railroad lines will permit analy~is of various projects on the downtown core. The core area itself w'ill be th~ subject of .. the most intensive analysis wherein data collection, analysis and fore custs ' ,. : J .1 . will be related to"· small zones, usually blo.c ks. . .: \. . •. . ·.·:.:. "·i .:,-:. ~ ~- ~ -. . . ! lj i i I . i =-1 transportation alternatives and reflect the impa ct of major r e dev elopment -- I . l ·. ,, ~ i �~- ..-~ ....- ---·- · -· -~ -· - · . ~·- ,;---~,: :, )\low;# cc: . ··----,-- - - - - -----'------...:.-.-.....-"-'--""".,._,""--=...a.;.,...~.;....,.,~·.·•:.. ··"'c.._·..,.~ ...:..-....,..-'.'-"- -..::.-·~---~ · ---·~·"'··- SecreU1ry Romney Secretary Volpe -~ ---~....._ __ 'I, / .. -· --- ........... - ---·· . . - ~.,,_ .. - - - . - - ~ - . ' --- ·· ~ ----·- -------------- - ·----- - - -·· . ---- . . . .. i...-... ' . •• -· - - - ' -- ~ -~- - · ·· - · - - - - - ~ . - - ·- - - · ·· • • - - - - -- - · -- - -- · . , _, • ___ ,.,_ . ___ _ _ ..._ . , _ _ _ _ _ ,. .., ..·-. .• . __ .: Figure 2. �~:-::.:--.::~~=::-"""'=-:S.:·:::...--::~.:: ~-.·,:~. ~. .2;.:::-2.._J.~:.:__~,_-_,.__. -~ . . _-;;;_:.:.,.·2:=.f-;S~:t--~.:-~ --~~:;., ·r.:=- Z ·· ~ .... -··· c ... . Sc cn:br y Ho mn c y S e c r etary Volp e ·:1•i ·. i __... --- --·------·-- ---- .. :f a --:.~--•.-:- · ~- ~ - -----· -- -~- -- --- . - -..... - .. -·---:--.--13:12, 29 December 2017 (EST)__,_%:-:~-.: .. · \ · ·· · ·11 ·· ________..,_ -- - \ . ·---:-~-- -.- --- ----~-·-·--· ---·----~ -· --1 J. ____ __.-~-_: -~-·-----~~---- -~----:-----~·----~-- ·:: 1 . - --·- ------ -- ·-·. _··.... --- ~ , ! ~- J, - - • - - • ,....,~.--, ·- - ·- , ___,__ ..:, ~-~---·-·-- --- - - ··- -~ ·~ --~-.,...--~---- · -·. -· . -. .. ~ .. . .' •· 1 .. -_ • ... · , ; ,·-·- ' - . , " .. "": t ·,; .. _.. i:. ....:. .· ·.. t. .- , ·· :::- · .- ·-~-·- . -. ·. ~ . J I I.. ·I I . ·1 ._- _.. . ·. ··::.< ·... ; ", ·: POLICY REVIEW PROCESS .- . , .-., : · .:.:,I :: :.· . T •PUBLIC RELATIONS r I lI •j -~ .. ..... ·-· STUDY DIRECTOR~' LEAD CONSUL TANT TECHNICAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE I l ' .I '· l .t !,. l . Figure 3. .' , .•· ., I , .· .· f' . t .,.. . 1 ,,_ I r !"1, • • S- • , .. . ' • . . .. . ,-:-~~ \~-143.215.248.55?~~:~;-143.215.248.55:;!?:~:,~,J,; ~:::·? :,-,·143.215.248.55/ ~~ .,_';'.";';~?::-~ ):. ~_:-=_::?::~~:t;,'.t'-~--~:~~t:-·~-143.215.248.55?:'.':\-·~?~f.-:-'·-~· :·:.~~-7tJ'.~'-;-'.J.·~'.\ -,~.'7:.143.215.248.55U:.1:~_~.>r_.:t :Y:.'~>~~/,:1·/~. .. .: . .. - ... ' ~ ,, . ..,.. • ' • . •• , ·-;, - ,._. • • • ~ • I • ' • ,,' .:.'. • - ~ '• > •., ,• • • • '• 'I � Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Text Any textual data included in the document Faritn eS ‘eon Secretary Romney ° Secrctary Volpe ; : \ ee el a ae me Te ms a Eee le ieee ee ete ae abe” Seat en me eal wo lan a el “Rae INTRODUCTION | : = a one sis F te * 7 ats i ey . *% f ai f This study design describes a process for developing an action program. The overall study covers a total of 18 months. Part I of this process, covering the first ten months, will provide a review of major imminent projects as well as produce a preliminary plan. During Part II, the | last eight months of the study, a comprehensive planning program will be developed for adoption along with a method for continuous planning and programming for the future. ieee The study design emphasizes planning and programming in accordance with specific goals and objectives. Provision is made for frequent re- view of the goals and objectives and proposed programs by public officials, . the businessmen and citizens concerned with the central area. The pur- 4 | pose of this continuing policy review is two-fold, First, the plan and ‘ the program resulting from the process will reflect the desires and aspirations of the people who will live, work and do business in the area. Second, it will generate support for the program. if aeagig we The program will be carried out by a special team to be created and staffed by local government and business through the City of Atlanta and Central Atlanta Progress, Inc. (CAP), with staff assistance from tech- nical consultants. The community will be involved in special aspects of the study program. In particular, it is intended that private industry , and/or local colleges be involved in special studies of urban problems — as they affect the Central Atlanta Area. The involvement of the business communityis considered essential. CAP will be responsible for con-. tinuing liaison, reporting and solicitation of suggestions from the businessmen who will be most affected by downtown plans. "Si valet hes pid nthe oneal i Secretary Volpe f 5 * o ee | ee rt ee a te tt Ee ee te eed ae te a ew, a : ‘ : : -* ‘ F “ The work program places primary emphasis on the analysis and inter- ' pretation rather than the collection of data. Most of the information which will be needed is already available from studies ccoipleted or in: io progress) by the City of Atlanta, the State Highway Department of Georgia, - the Atlanta Area Transportation Study, the Atlanta Regional Metropolitan Planning Commission, and the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority. This coordination is essential for the successful implementation of both studies. The timing is designed to exploit the general findings of the cur- rent area transportation study. The Central Atlanta Study and the area transportation study are mutually complementary. Figure 1 indicates the work program by tasks and time sequences. It is intended that this model be used as a guide for management for the study program. Itis recognized that all studies are subject to modifica- tion and adaptation to the exigencies of unforeseen circumstances. How- "ever, it isebelieved that the schedule as indicated in Figure 1 is reasonable and can be accomplished with satisfactory results in the time periods indi- cated. Inherent in this study design is a flexibility which ‘will permit the constant evaluation of proposed projects that are relevant to the Central Area while the study is in progress, to give views on the impact of these projects on the interim plans and objectives for Central Atlanta. STUDY AREA | Ghee Bue te ee: ose The proposed study area is shown in Figure 2. The poundasy which is defined by the circumferential railroad lines will permit analysis of various transportation.alternatives and reflect the impact of major redevelopment projects on the downtown core. The core area itself will be the subject of © the most intensive analysis wherein data collection, analysis and forecusts will be related to’ small zones, usually blocks. Le eek RE a ip eee endo cei mage ap Meee eer SEE Ce TREES Tee =H Sa ee  Figure 2. afeawra "ce: Secretary Romney | } Secretary, Volpe : : i Paes il al ake eect pa ii al lr clad I ahs SrA Pa aloe thee on A A pee ee a ge gd eek mer gag ee : "i 4 ‘ r ‘ oo L eo = A aid wad pA i Te — een ot eet ms et Sei sac dee RN al Li wie cat a a te i : , i a te ee Ee een de coe ce at ds Pisa oo? ECONOMICS, FINANCE & PROGRAMMING STAFF & CONSULTANT, TRANSPORTATION & PARKING STAFF & CONSULTANT, , = : yi MAYOR & BOARD CENTRAL AREA C.A.P. : OF ALDERMAN POLICY COMM: T 1 EE -\ BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY . REVIEW * PROCESS > . v Me STUDY "PUBLIC DIRECTOR 2 SecanE LS A LEAD CONSULTANT _ COMMITTEE —_— LAND USE & URBAN DESIGN STAFF & CONSULTANT Sep aS a Bi eS eee Seana ew. «= Seerciary Romney | ¥ » Secretary Volpe , 4 wi / Boe iter eS eterisesee Sara aS noes ~ eae | OS Re) pn ere emeee are ee teecre oy . i * i Figure 3. j » -* ; ; : t 5 t : = r ic i . ” 5 = ae e sean a ler . - } —— ° 2 = ee =. oe rv Se eee ee LS ee SS ee eet ee ey et ets wae : * ; “. Suet otha aw Meee age “ ered fe as a mY  Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Box 4, Folder 15, Document 62 Box 4 Box 4 Folder 15 Folder topic: Central Atlanta Progress | 1969