Dublin Core
Title
Box 7, Folder 12, Document 20
Text Item Type Metadata
Text
FOUNDATION TAX ISSUES
Report of Action by House Ways and Means Committee
as of Wednesday, August 6, 1969
The House Ways and Means tax reform bill, which will be debated
on the House floor this week, contains several important provisions
relating to foundations and their grantees. At its last meeting,
the Action Council went on record.in opposition to many of -the
Committee's earlier proposals.
This is a report on the final action of the Ways and Manne Committee
1. Definition of Private Foundations. Private foundations have
been newly defined to include groups such as the Urban Coalition
and the Brookings Institution, in addition to seauee such as the
Ford and Carnegie foundations. _As such they are now subject to
an income tax and new limitations on their activities.
2. An annual tax of 7 1/2 per cent was imposed on net invest-
ment income. ' |
Explanation: The original tentative proposals had recommended
a tax of 5 per cent. It is estimated that revenue increases at
71/72 per cent will produce $65 million in the first year.
This is, in fact, a tax on beneficiaries of foundations rather
than on foundations. The Coalition may now have to pay a tax
on its next investment income.
3. Restrictions on Activities. The newly defined foundations
(including the Coalition) would be prohibited from:
a) Carrying on propaganda or otherwise attempting to
influence Lagiatation;
b) Attempting to influence legislation through attempting
to affect public opinion, and chrowal private com~
munication with a member or employee of a legislative
body, or with any other person who may participate
in the formulation of legislation (Except through
‘making available the results of nonpartisan analysis
or research).
Explanation: This is 3 modification of the original tentative
proposals which prohibited foundations from engaging in any
activities intended to influence the decision of any governmental
body. It is intended to tighten up the rules against lobbying.
Under present law, a foundation may influence legislation if
this is not a substantial part of its activity. The new legislation
‘would remove this test and allow no influencing of legislation.
The Committee Report explains»that these provisions are designed
to prohibit grassroots campaigns for the purpose of influencing
legislation. Further, foundations may discuss broad policy
-
oat = ocho = :
questions with congressmen and government agencies; they are
precluded from “direct attempts to persuade congressmen and
government officials to take positions on specific legislative
issues."
Voter Registration. Foundations would be prohibited from,
engaging in voter registration drives unless grants aie made .to
a 501i (e) (3) group thats
.a) operates in five or more states
b) receives support from five or more organizations, none
of which provides more than 25 per.cent of. its support.:
Explanation: The tentative proposals would have prohibited
_ foundations from engaging in any voter registration activity or
‘paying for any such activity. The bill moves away from that
strict view. The League of Women Voters Education Fund and the
Southern Regional Council are specifically mentioned in the
. Committee Report as examples of organizations which would be
hibited from receiving foundation support.
®
permitted to engage in voter registration.
But other registration and education programs-~-now conducted by
numerous smaller groups in less than five states--will be pro=
e
zk ke & Ok
The House bill will, in all probability, be passed by the full
- House this week under a "closed" rule. Floor amendments to tax
ae
“ee
- bills generally are not permitted, and passage of the tax reform
‘bill seems assured.
The Action Council and many of its cooperating groups have worked
to modify the tentative proposals of the Ways and Means Committee
so that the vital activity of foundations and foundation-related
organizations can go forward.
Our attention now turns to the Senate and the Finance Committee
in particular which will begin considering tax reform proposals
after the August Congressional Recess.
Report of Action by House Ways and Means Committee
as of Wednesday, August 6, 1969
The House Ways and Means tax reform bill, which will be debated
on the House floor this week, contains several important provisions
relating to foundations and their grantees. At its last meeting,
the Action Council went on record.in opposition to many of -the
Committee's earlier proposals.
This is a report on the final action of the Ways and Manne Committee
1. Definition of Private Foundations. Private foundations have
been newly defined to include groups such as the Urban Coalition
and the Brookings Institution, in addition to seauee such as the
Ford and Carnegie foundations. _As such they are now subject to
an income tax and new limitations on their activities.
2. An annual tax of 7 1/2 per cent was imposed on net invest-
ment income. ' |
Explanation: The original tentative proposals had recommended
a tax of 5 per cent. It is estimated that revenue increases at
71/72 per cent will produce $65 million in the first year.
This is, in fact, a tax on beneficiaries of foundations rather
than on foundations. The Coalition may now have to pay a tax
on its next investment income.
3. Restrictions on Activities. The newly defined foundations
(including the Coalition) would be prohibited from:
a) Carrying on propaganda or otherwise attempting to
influence Lagiatation;
b) Attempting to influence legislation through attempting
to affect public opinion, and chrowal private com~
munication with a member or employee of a legislative
body, or with any other person who may participate
in the formulation of legislation (Except through
‘making available the results of nonpartisan analysis
or research).
Explanation: This is 3 modification of the original tentative
proposals which prohibited foundations from engaging in any
activities intended to influence the decision of any governmental
body. It is intended to tighten up the rules against lobbying.
Under present law, a foundation may influence legislation if
this is not a substantial part of its activity. The new legislation
‘would remove this test and allow no influencing of legislation.
The Committee Report explains»that these provisions are designed
to prohibit grassroots campaigns for the purpose of influencing
legislation. Further, foundations may discuss broad policy
-
oat = ocho = :
questions with congressmen and government agencies; they are
precluded from “direct attempts to persuade congressmen and
government officials to take positions on specific legislative
issues."
Voter Registration. Foundations would be prohibited from,
engaging in voter registration drives unless grants aie made .to
a 501i (e) (3) group thats
.a) operates in five or more states
b) receives support from five or more organizations, none
of which provides more than 25 per.cent of. its support.:
Explanation: The tentative proposals would have prohibited
_ foundations from engaging in any voter registration activity or
‘paying for any such activity. The bill moves away from that
strict view. The League of Women Voters Education Fund and the
Southern Regional Council are specifically mentioned in the
. Committee Report as examples of organizations which would be
hibited from receiving foundation support.
®
permitted to engage in voter registration.
But other registration and education programs-~-now conducted by
numerous smaller groups in less than five states--will be pro=
e
zk ke & Ok
The House bill will, in all probability, be passed by the full
- House this week under a "closed" rule. Floor amendments to tax
ae
“ee
- bills generally are not permitted, and passage of the tax reform
‘bill seems assured.
The Action Council and many of its cooperating groups have worked
to modify the tentative proposals of the Ways and Means Committee
so that the vital activity of foundations and foundation-related
organizations can go forward.
Our attention now turns to the Senate and the Finance Committee
in particular which will begin considering tax reform proposals
after the August Congressional Recess.
Comments