Dublin Core
Title
Box 7, Folder 15, Document 14
Text Item Type Metadata
Text
REPORT ON LOCAL COALITIONS
Indicated below are the cities from which The Urban Coalition has received
either from the mayor or other community leadership expressions of interest in
forming local counterpart coalitions,
We are now in the process of exploring
the reality of that interest in these cities and the possibility of Coalition
assistance in response to requests for organizing and programming help.
Phoenix, Arizona
“Little Rock, Arkansas
Compton, California
Oakland, California
Pasadena, California
Richmond, California
Riverside, California
San Bernadino, California
San Diego, California
San Francisco, California
Denver, Colorado
Hartford, Connecticut
New Haven, Connecticut
Wilmington, Delaware
Savannah, Georgia
Honolulu, Hawaii
Chicago, Illinois
Des Moines, Iowa
Kansas City, Kansas
Topeka, Kansas
Lexington, Kentucky
Louisville, Kentucky
Baltimore, Maryland
Boston, Massachusetts
Jackson, Michigan
Saginaw, Michigan
St. Paul, Minnesota
Kansas City, Missouri
St. Louis, Missouri
University City, Missouri
Omaha, Nebraska
Las Vegas, Nevada
Atlantic City, New Jersey
Paterson, New Jersey
Buffalo, New York
Syracuse, New York
« Charlotte, North Carolina
Fargo, North Dakota . 2].
Akron, Ohio
Cincinnati, Ohio
Columbus, Ohio
Portland, Oregon
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Providence, Rhode Island
» Chattanooga, Tenn.
-Nashville, Tenn.
Seattle, Washsngton
Tacoma, Washington
Beloit, Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin
This list does not include cities where we are informed local counterpart organiza~
tions are either already formed or nearing formation. Those cities are as follows:
“Atlanta, Georgia Minneapolis, Minnesota
Detroit, Michigan New York, New York
A full report on these efforts will be made at the Steering Committee meeting
on October 9th.
Indicated below are the cities from which The Urban Coalition has received
either from the mayor or other community leadership expressions of interest in
forming local counterpart coalitions,
We are now in the process of exploring
the reality of that interest in these cities and the possibility of Coalition
assistance in response to requests for organizing and programming help.
Phoenix, Arizona
“Little Rock, Arkansas
Compton, California
Oakland, California
Pasadena, California
Richmond, California
Riverside, California
San Bernadino, California
San Diego, California
San Francisco, California
Denver, Colorado
Hartford, Connecticut
New Haven, Connecticut
Wilmington, Delaware
Savannah, Georgia
Honolulu, Hawaii
Chicago, Illinois
Des Moines, Iowa
Kansas City, Kansas
Topeka, Kansas
Lexington, Kentucky
Louisville, Kentucky
Baltimore, Maryland
Boston, Massachusetts
Jackson, Michigan
Saginaw, Michigan
St. Paul, Minnesota
Kansas City, Missouri
St. Louis, Missouri
University City, Missouri
Omaha, Nebraska
Las Vegas, Nevada
Atlantic City, New Jersey
Paterson, New Jersey
Buffalo, New York
Syracuse, New York
« Charlotte, North Carolina
Fargo, North Dakota . 2].
Akron, Ohio
Cincinnati, Ohio
Columbus, Ohio
Portland, Oregon
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Providence, Rhode Island
» Chattanooga, Tenn.
-Nashville, Tenn.
Seattle, Washsngton
Tacoma, Washington
Beloit, Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin
This list does not include cities where we are informed local counterpart organiza~
tions are either already formed or nearing formation. Those cities are as follows:
“Atlanta, Georgia Minneapolis, Minnesota
Detroit, Michigan New York, New York
A full report on these efforts will be made at the Steering Committee meeting
on October 9th.
Comments