Dublin Core
Title
Box 3, Folder 4, Document 44
Text Item Type Metadata
Text
2794 Chaucer Drive, &.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30311
duly 5, 1969
Me. Lester &. Parseils
Executive Director
Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta
824 Burt Building
Atianta, Geotgia 30303
Re: Parcels 3, 9, 11, 12, 19 and 40
West End Urban Renewal Area
Project GA-R-90
Dear Mr, Perselis:
Thank you for your letter of July 1, in response to the appeal letter of Arkelison,
Iacorporated. Oo Ss Seer See re te ek en ee eee ee
yourself to all the matters raised therein. The ones to which you did address
yourself were given mere surface treatment, resulting in a communication which was
generally vague end aubiguous.
In paragraph three of your letter you mention “all possible alternatives” being
considered. We submit that wisdom might dictate considering reasonably appropriate
proposals but not “ali possible alternatives” if we are to assume that there is
truly a desire to see the project developed under a fair bidding procedure and
that time is of some eveence. We note also that you referred te other alternatives
being revealed but you made no direct or specific references.
Im the next to last paragraph of your letter you sey, “we will expect to discuss
the situation further with representatives of Arkelleson” when the study is completed.
Your language is of such that you not only do not invite suggestions, you certainly
make no coumitment to discuss the results of your study with Arkellson's
tives before further action is taken.
Your attention is further called to nuwbered paragraphe one through five of our
June 25th letter to Mr. Edwin L. Sterne. A careful study thereof will give eredence
to our apprehensions. Indeed, it should, in our opinion, cause you toe not only
study Parcel 20, but to carefully study the awards procedures.
Atlanta, Georgia 30311
duly 5, 1969
Me. Lester &. Parseils
Executive Director
Housing Authority of the City of Atlanta
824 Burt Building
Atianta, Geotgia 30303
Re: Parcels 3, 9, 11, 12, 19 and 40
West End Urban Renewal Area
Project GA-R-90
Dear Mr, Perselis:
Thank you for your letter of July 1, in response to the appeal letter of Arkelison,
Iacorporated. Oo Ss Seer See re te ek en ee eee ee
yourself to all the matters raised therein. The ones to which you did address
yourself were given mere surface treatment, resulting in a communication which was
generally vague end aubiguous.
In paragraph three of your letter you mention “all possible alternatives” being
considered. We submit that wisdom might dictate considering reasonably appropriate
proposals but not “ali possible alternatives” if we are to assume that there is
truly a desire to see the project developed under a fair bidding procedure and
that time is of some eveence. We note also that you referred te other alternatives
being revealed but you made no direct or specific references.
Im the next to last paragraph of your letter you sey, “we will expect to discuss
the situation further with representatives of Arkelleson” when the study is completed.
Your language is of such that you not only do not invite suggestions, you certainly
make no coumitment to discuss the results of your study with Arkellson's
tives before further action is taken.
Your attention is further called to nuwbered paragraphe one through five of our
June 25th letter to Mr. Edwin L. Sterne. A careful study thereof will give eredence
to our apprehensions. Indeed, it should, in our opinion, cause you toe not only
study Parcel 20, but to carefully study the awards procedures.
Comments