Dublin Core
Title
Box 1, Folder 3, Document 17
Text Item Type Metadata
Text
oot
a
9y/
vy} CITY OF ATLANTA
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
800 CITY HALL
TEL. JA. 2-4463 EXT. 321
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
March 17, 1969
MEMORANDUM TO : Karl A. Bevins
Jack C. Delius
Ray A. Nixon
Paul Weir
FROM: W. R. Wofford ge lee’
In July, 1966, in accordance with a memorandum from
Mr. Landers we established a policy of holding plans in
the Building Department for a three~day period so that they
could be reviewed by a representative of your department who
would come to the Building Department each morning for that
purpose.
Gentlemen:
Moat of you are sending a representative to the department
as previously arranged. However, the three day waiting period
frequently seems to pass without a representative from some
departments reviewing plans on file. When this happens, we are
requiring the contractor to contact your office and secure
approval from you. Some of the contractors have objected to
being sent to various other City departments, particularly those
located in the City Halil Annex, since they claim this is an
inconvenience to them,
if you are not now sending a representative te the Building
Department each morning to check plane on file, I wish you
would do so; otherwise, I shall be compelied to issue a building
permit where the plang have remained on file for a period of more
than three days and the contractor requests approval.
ec..Mr. R. Earl Landers
a
9y/
vy} CITY OF ATLANTA
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
800 CITY HALL
TEL. JA. 2-4463 EXT. 321
ATLANTA, GEORGIA
March 17, 1969
MEMORANDUM TO : Karl A. Bevins
Jack C. Delius
Ray A. Nixon
Paul Weir
FROM: W. R. Wofford ge lee’
In July, 1966, in accordance with a memorandum from
Mr. Landers we established a policy of holding plans in
the Building Department for a three~day period so that they
could be reviewed by a representative of your department who
would come to the Building Department each morning for that
purpose.
Gentlemen:
Moat of you are sending a representative to the department
as previously arranged. However, the three day waiting period
frequently seems to pass without a representative from some
departments reviewing plans on file. When this happens, we are
requiring the contractor to contact your office and secure
approval from you. Some of the contractors have objected to
being sent to various other City departments, particularly those
located in the City Halil Annex, since they claim this is an
inconvenience to them,
if you are not now sending a representative te the Building
Department each morning to check plane on file, I wish you
would do so; otherwise, I shall be compelied to issue a building
permit where the plang have remained on file for a period of more
than three days and the contractor requests approval.
ec..Mr. R. Earl Landers
Comments