Box 6, Folder 10, Document 38

Box 6, Folder 10, Document 38

Lege

oe ainda ES © etna i li Bra

ee ee

DOT - CENTER CITY TRANSPORTATION PROJECT--ATLANTA-—-PHASE IT





















i { | {
aap = | TROUN
CANDIDATE eee | UMTA OUTPUT OF MAJOR FEATURES TECHNICAL WORK | okt SREREEE Pen ae
PROJECTS aes INTEREST PHASE LIL 6/70 OF PROJECT REQULRED oF
ATLANTA | | TEAM
i — | | ~ |
SCTION Quick Initiate new ser- lst phase - all day | prepare demonstration ccr ATL. |
ea Res Action Project vice in Dec.'69 iod shuttle bus ' project application |
ee j : with demo. funds service from Sta- monitor and evaluate |) WSA |
ee ATS | test new service _,, : dium-Civic Center- , performance of service, ADL
Peripheral : : : CCT monitor re- ang : | Z |
See ‘ with implica- parking to down- | once operating-study new | SOM
Parking to ae sults and propose i
; tions for new i town market and technology
Center City rt ‘7 expanded demo's 5 | 7 i
ee : rf | “people mover 2nd phase-possible | applications
People Mover by 6/70 i |
, hardware | ,new hardware sys- |
‘tem if conditions |
‘justify
Test suitabil- application for 1st phase - select survey areas and mar- ADL
ity as basic demonstration /project from AATS _ kets check on political RERC
Bushays | MARTA transit system project funds Lplab POuUbee Y toe nee acceptability and tech-
Ease 2 in medium size ' nical feasibility 1 WSA
Experiment or b aaa Tamaad [end phase = "CEsb, 9 [rts eeeseasoenese ee S ee SoM
City EOA | Ce e feasibility and test impacts on neigh-
examine new : i
develop program for borhoods-design pro- |
technology : io x i
implementation jects and set up imple- |
' mentation
Center City ATS quick action specific im- methods for im- study existing bus
Bus CAS projects = provements iden- proving bus rout- routing and operating
ze ; i : ees : ‘ . ! WSA
circulation with strategy for tified - , ing and circula- problems —- test alter- | —~ j
Inprovements TOPICS interim serv- applications for tion in center native improvements |
group ice improve- federal funds city -channelization-turni-
ments | nary movements-stations- |
etc.
|
better under- report on cen- _ information system’, check on esisting data- |
standing of ter city plus basic data and _ design and set up sys- | ADL- |
Development CAS center city work program de- analysis tem including surveys, | RERC | |
of Data Base dynamics and sign for setting | collection and proces-— |
needs up system-—tech- sing methods--analysis | |
nd nical study appl. and conclusions Pi
dev. of future alternative plans , study of total sys-| first round sketch
Circulation projects to fit with new projects , tem alternatives _. plans covering land de- SOM |
System and CAS into program-- ready to £LE into: | for center city-= velopment and circula- RERC | |
Development define UMIA in- funding program suppl. facilities tion alternatives—- WSA |
Planning terest central subway dev. impact studies--urban ADL | |
design & traffic lg

analysis




GENERAL

Transit Policy . AATS
and Program MARTA
Development l

guidance for

UMTA funding

of Euture

projects in
Atlanta

3 to 5 year mass
transit program
including UMTPA
funding

help put AATS plan
into programmatic
_term--priorities
and scheduling

depends on policy and

program of AATS and
its constituents

ADL
" WSA