Box 1, Folder 4, Document 40

Box 1, Folder 4, Document 40

NALL, MILLER, CADENHEAD & DENNIS
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

2400 NATIONAL BANK OF GEORGIA BUILDING

SAMUEL A. MILLER
A, PAUL CADENHEAD
DOUGLAS DENNIS
JAMES W. DORSEY

EDWARD S. WHITE ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
DONALD M. FAIN

THEODORE G. FRANKEL

MICHAEL D. ALEMBIK August el, 1969
ROBERT E. CORRY. UR.

GERALD A, FRIEDLANDER

DENNIS J. WEBB

THOMAS S. CARLOCK

BAXTER L. DAVIS

PRICE S. WILLIAMS, JR.

JON O, FULLERTON

COUNSEL

A.WALTON NALL
MORTYN K,. ZIETZ
HAMILTON DOUGLAS



(404) 522-2200

LOWELL 5S. FINE
RONNIE L. QUIGLEY

Mr. Dan E. Sweat, Jr.
Office of the Mayor
City Hall

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Re: Interpretation of Section 114
of Atlanta Plumbing Code

Dear Mr. Sweat:

On August 15, 1969, when I discussed with
you the problem of the interpretation of Section 114 of
the Plumbing Code, I stated that the Section was enacted
in December, 1966, on the recommendation of HUD and that
the current interpretation by the office of the Chief
Plumbing Inspector which, incidentally, began during the
administration of the former Chief Plumbing Inspector,
is attributed by Mr. Wylie Mitchell to HUD. See the
minutes of meetings of the Plumbing Advisory Board held
on March 18 and April 15, 1969, a copy of each of which
is enclosed.

Under that interpretation the use of wiped
lead stubs is required on all floors except slab on grade.
There is a serious question as to whether HUD intended or
expected that such an interpretation would be given to
Section 114. At your suggestion I have drafted and en-
close herewith a letter that you can use to ask HUD for
its position on this matter.

Your help in getting this issue cleared up

will be greatly appreciated.
hele

Sincerely yours,



Edward S. White

ESW: erm
Enclosures